Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast (NE) Multispecies Fishery; Regulatory Amendment to Adopt Fishing Gear Standards for the NE Multispecies Regular B Day-At-Sea (DAS) Program and the Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock Special Access Program (SAP), 72965-72967 [E7-24948]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
of residential areas, schools, nursing
homes, or daycares.
2. Inhalation exposure. For the same
reasons non-occupational inhalation
exposure to AF36 is expected to be
minimal to non-existent.
V. Cumulative Effects
Another non-aflatoxin-producing
strain of Aspergillus flavus, NRRL
21882, is undergoing research trials on
corn in Texas, but not in the same areas
to be treated during this EUP for AF36.
Cumulative effects of these strains are
not expected to exceed the risk cup for
the registered Aspergillus flavus strains,
AF36 and NRRL 21882. Furthermore,
these strains are expected to decrease
the presence of aflatoxin-producing
colonies of the fungus on treated
commodities and, thus, decrease the
risks posed by the potent liver
carcinogen, aflatoxin.
VI. Determination of Safety for U.S.
Population, Infants, and Children
Based on the previously evaluated
data, it is not necessary to use a safety
factor to determine safety to children
(see Federal Register of July 14, 2003
(68 FR 41535), as cited in Unit III.).
VII. Other Considerations
A. Endocrine Disruptors
See Federal Register of July 14, 2003
(68 FR 41535), as cited in Unit III.
B. Analytical Method(s)
See Federal Register of July 14, 2003
(68 FR 41535), as cited in Unit III.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
C. Codex Maximum Residue Level
There is no Codex Maximum Residue
Level (MRL) for residues of Aspergillus
flavus AF36 on corn.
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance
under section 408(d) of FFDCA in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has
been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Dec 21, 2007
Jkt 214001
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000) do not apply
to this rule. In addition, this rule does
not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Public Law 104–4).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
IX. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
Agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72965
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 14, 2007.
Janet L. Andersen,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution
Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.1206 is amended by
adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
I
§ 180.1206 Aspergillus flavus AF36;
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Apergillus flavus AF36 is
temporarily exempt from the
requirement of a tolerance on corn when
used in accordance with the
Experimental Use Permit 71693–EUP–2.
This temporary exemption from
tolerance will expire December 31,
2011.
[FR Doc. E7–24979 Filed 12–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 070808450–7714–02]
RIN 0648–AV83
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Northeast (NE) Multispecies
Fishery; Regulatory Amendment to
Adopt Fishing Gear Standards for the
NE Multispecies Regular B Day-At-Sea
(DAS) Program and the Eastern U.S./
Canada Haddock Special Access
Program (SAP)
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
72966
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
SUMMARY: NMFS amends the regulations
governing minimum performance
standards of fishing gear proposed for
use in both the NE multispecies Regular
B DAS Program and the Eastern U.S./
Canada Haddock SAP. The New
England Fishery Management Council
(Council) may request the
Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS
(Regional Administrator) approve
additional gear types for use in these
programs if they meet the standard. The
purpose of this rule is to provide greater
flexibility to fishermen participating in
these programs.
DATES: Effective January 25, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Douglas Potts, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281–9341, FAX (978)
281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 21, 2007, the Council
approved a motion to recommend that
the Regional Administrator approve gear
performance standards for additional
gear types in the Eastern U.S./Canada
Haddock SAP, or additional trawl gear
in the Regular B DAS Program.
On October 15, 2007, NMFS
published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register (72 FR 58280) to
amend the regulations on procedures
and requirements to approve additional
gear types for use in these two
programs. Public comment was
accepted through November 14, 2007,
and two comments were received, as
summarized below. The NE
multispecies DAS effort control system
and the history of these two programs
were outlined in the proposed rule and
are not repeated here.
This final rule also corrects an
inadvertent omission by reinserting
relevant regulatory text specific to the
U.S./Canada Management Area gear
requirements that was inadvertently
removed through the final rule
implementing Framework Adjustment
42 to the Northeast Multispecies Fishery
Management Plan. Additional details
were provided in the proposed rule and
are not repeated here.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Comments and Responses
NMFS received two comments during
the comment period for the proposed
rule. These comments were submitted
by the Council and by the Cape Cod
Commercial Hook Fisherman’s
Association (CCCHFA). The specific
issues raised in these two comments are
addressed below.
Comment 1: The Council noted that
the term ‘‘stock of concern’’ is only
defined in the regulations as regulated
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Dec 21, 2007
Jkt 214001
groundfish stocks that are overfished or
subject to overfishing and would not be
applicable for non-regulated groundfish
species.
Response: The proposed rule language
specific to ‘‘other stocks of concern’’
was based upon the language in the
original Council motion. To avoid any
uncertainty about the phrase ‘‘other
stocks of concern,’’ the regulatory
language has been further modified to
define such other stocks as other nongroundfish stocks that are overfished or
subject to overfishing identified by the
Council.
Comment 2: The Council commented
that the proposed rule was unclear on
whether the required reductions in
catch were for all regulated groundfish
or just stocks of concern. From Council
discussions it is clear the intent was to
limit the reductions to stocks that are
overfished or are experiencing
overfishing.
Response: The regulatory language
has been modified to clarify that
reductions are specific to stocks that are
overfished or experiencing overfishing.
Comment 3: The CCCHFA
commented that the NMFS Regional
Administrator should have greater
flexibility to add or remove gear from
these programs based on how that gear
is used in the fishery, and not solely on
its performance in a controlled research
setting.
Response: To be consistent with the
Council’s request for gear standards, and
the purpose of allowing certain types of
gear in areas where bycatch of
groundfish stocks of concern may occur,
rigorous experimental comparison is
necessary to thoroughly demonstrate
that a new proposed gear is comparable
to those currently approved. The
potential for bycatch, and the impacts of
environmental conditions, vessel size,
or crew behavior are difficult to
properly account for when monitoring
the performance of gear in the
commercial fishery. However, the
performance of gear in the fishery will
continue to be monitored and the use of
inappropriate modification or misuse of
gear to negate the required catch
reduction may result in removal of gear
from these programs.
Comment 4: The CCCHFA stated that
allowing the Council to specify which
stocks are subject to the standard and
which are not would reduce flexibility
in these programs.
Response: This provision was
included in the regulatory text
specifically to increase the flexibility for
both the Council and the NMFS
Regional Administrator. If the
regulations specified which stocks had
to show reduced catch and which could
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
sustain increased mortality, it would
require a regulatory change to modify
the regulations if rebuilt stocks, or
stocks in relatively good condition, for
example, declined in the future.
Comment 5: The CCCHFA expressed
concern that experimental results may
not translate well into gear performance
in the fishery. Gear could be misused
and either result in reduced harvest of
the intended target species, or increased
catch of bycatch species.
Response: The proper use of any
approved gear is a legitimate concern.
To the extent practical, important
aspects of approved gear will be
specified in the regulations. As noted in
the response to Comment 3, the
performance of gear in the fishery will
continue to be monitored and
possession limits, for example, could be
adjusted to encourage the proper use of
specific gear. If it becomes evident that
a gear is not working effectively in the
field, it may be removed from these
programs.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
NMFS has made changes to the
proposed rule. In § 648.85, paragraphs
(b)(6)(iv)(J)(2)(i) and (ii) have been
revised, in response to comment and in
order to be consistent with Council
intent, by specifying that required catch
reductions apply to regulated species
stocks of concern and non-groundfish
stocks that are overfished or subject to
overfishing.
Classification
The Administrator, Northeast Region,
NMFS, determined that the final rule is
necessary for the conservation and
management of the NE multispecies
fishery and that it is consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act and
other applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
The Regional Administrator has
determined that this final rule is a
minor technical addition, correction, or
change to a management plan and is
therefore categorically excluded from
the requirement to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement or
equivalent document under the National
Environmental Policy Act.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration during
the proposed rule stage that this action
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the
certification was published in the
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
proposed rule and is not repeated here.
No comments were received regarding
this certification or on the economic
impacts of the proposed rule. As a
result, a regulatory flexibility analysis
was not required and none was
prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 18, 2007
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For
RegulatoryPrograms, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
50 CFR part 648 is amended as follows:
I
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 648.14, paragraphs (a)(132) and
(c)(81) are revised to read as follows:
I
§ 648.14
Prohibitions.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
(a) * * *
(132) If fishing with trawl gear under
a NE multispecies DAS in the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area defined in
§ 648.85(a)(1)(ii), fail to fish with a
haddock separator trawl or a flounder
trawl net, as specified in
§ 648.85(a)(3)(iii); unless using other
gear as authorized under § 648.85 (b)(6)
or (b)(8).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(81) If fishing with trawl gear in the
Regular B DAS Program specified in
§ 648.85(b)(6), fail to use a haddock
separator trawl as described under
§ 648.85(a)(3)(iii)(A); or other gear as
authorized under § 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(J).
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. In § 648.85, paragraph (a)(3)(iii)
introductory text is added, and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Dec 21, 2007
Jkt 214001
paragraphs (b)(6)(iv)(J)(2) and
(b)(8)(v)(E)(2) are revised to read as
follows:
§ 648.85
Special management programs.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Gear requirements. NE
multispecies vessels fishing with trawl
gear in the Eastern U.S./Canada Area
defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this
section, unless otherwise provided in
paragraphs (b)(6) and (b)(8) of this
section, must fish with a haddock
separator trawl or a flounder trawl net,
as described in paragraphs (a)(3)(iii)(A)
and (B) of this section (both nets may be
onboard the fishing vessel
simultaneously). Gear other than the
haddock separator trawl or the flounder
trawl net as described in paragraph
(a)(3)(iii) of this section, or gear
authorized under paragraphs (b)(6) and
(b)(8) of this section, may be on board
the vessel during a trip to the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area, provided the gear is
stowed according to the regulations at
§ 648.23(b). The description of the
haddock separator trawl and flounder
trawl net in this paragraph (a)(3)(iii)
may be further specified by the Regional
Administrator through publication of
such specifications in the Federal
Register, consistent with the
requirements of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(6) * * *
(iv) * * *
(J) * * *
(2) Approval of additional gear. At the
request of the Council or the Council’s
Executive Committee, the Regional
Administrator may authorize additional
gear for use in the Regular B DAS
Program, through notice consistent with
the Administrative Procedure Act. The
proposed gear must satisfy standards
specified in paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J)(2)(i)
or (ii) of this section in a completed
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72967
experiment that has been reviewed
according to the standards established
by the Council’s research policy before
the gear can be considered and
approved by the Regional
Administrator. Comparisons of the
criteria specified in this paragraph
(b)(6)(iv)(J)(2) will be made to an
appropriately selected control gear.
(i) The gear must show a statistically
significant reduction in catch of at least
50 percent (by weight, on a trip-by-trip
basis) of each regulated species stock of
concern, unless otherwise allowed in
this paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J)(2)(i), or other
non-groundfish stocks that are
overfished or subject to overfishing
identified by the Council. This
requirement does not apply to regulated
species identified by the Council as not
being subject to gear performance
standards; or
(ii) The catch of each regulated
species stock of concern, unless
otherwise allowed in this paragraph
(b)(6)(iv)(J)(2)(ii), or other nongroundfish stocks that are overfished or
subject to overfishing identified by the
Council, must be less than 5 percent of
the total catch of regulated groundfish
(by weight, on a trip-by-trip basis). This
requirement does not apply to regulated
species identified by the Council as not
being subject to gear performance
standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) * * *
(v) * * *
(E) * * *
(2) Approval of additional gear. The
Regional Administrator may authorize
additional gear for use in the Eastern
U.S./Canada Haddock SAP in
accordance with the standards and
requirements specified at
§ 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(J)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–24948 Filed 12–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72965-72967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24948]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 070808450-7714-02]
RIN 0648-AV83
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast (NE)
Multispecies Fishery; Regulatory Amendment to Adopt Fishing Gear
Standards for the NE Multispecies Regular B Day-At-Sea (DAS) Program
and the Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock Special Access Program (SAP)
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 72966]]
SUMMARY: NMFS amends the regulations governing minimum performance
standards of fishing gear proposed for use in both the NE multispecies
Regular B DAS Program and the Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP. The New
England Fishery Management Council (Council) may request the
Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator) approve
additional gear types for use in these programs if they meet the
standard. The purpose of this rule is to provide greater flexibility to
fishermen participating in these programs.
DATES: Effective January 25, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Potts, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281-9341, FAX (978) 281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 21, 2007, the Council approved a motion to recommend that
the Regional Administrator approve gear performance standards for
additional gear types in the Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP, or
additional trawl gear in the Regular B DAS Program.
On October 15, 2007, NMFS published a proposed rule in the Federal
Register (72 FR 58280) to amend the regulations on procedures and
requirements to approve additional gear types for use in these two
programs. Public comment was accepted through November 14, 2007, and
two comments were received, as summarized below. The NE multispecies
DAS effort control system and the history of these two programs were
outlined in the proposed rule and are not repeated here.
This final rule also corrects an inadvertent omission by
reinserting relevant regulatory text specific to the U.S./Canada
Management Area gear requirements that was inadvertently removed
through the final rule implementing Framework Adjustment 42 to the
Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan. Additional details were
provided in the proposed rule and are not repeated here.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received two comments during the comment period for the
proposed rule. These comments were submitted by the Council and by the
Cape Cod Commercial Hook Fisherman's Association (CCCHFA). The specific
issues raised in these two comments are addressed below.
Comment 1: The Council noted that the term ``stock of concern'' is
only defined in the regulations as regulated groundfish stocks that are
overfished or subject to overfishing and would not be applicable for
non-regulated groundfish species.
Response: The proposed rule language specific to ``other stocks of
concern'' was based upon the language in the original Council motion.
To avoid any uncertainty about the phrase ``other stocks of concern,''
the regulatory language has been further modified to define such other
stocks as other non-groundfish stocks that are overfished or subject to
overfishing identified by the Council.
Comment 2: The Council commented that the proposed rule was unclear
on whether the required reductions in catch were for all regulated
groundfish or just stocks of concern. From Council discussions it is
clear the intent was to limit the reductions to stocks that are
overfished or are experiencing overfishing.
Response: The regulatory language has been modified to clarify that
reductions are specific to stocks that are overfished or experiencing
overfishing.
Comment 3: The CCCHFA commented that the NMFS Regional
Administrator should have greater flexibility to add or remove gear
from these programs based on how that gear is used in the fishery, and
not solely on its performance in a controlled research setting.
Response: To be consistent with the Council's request for gear
standards, and the purpose of allowing certain types of gear in areas
where bycatch of groundfish stocks of concern may occur, rigorous
experimental comparison is necessary to thoroughly demonstrate that a
new proposed gear is comparable to those currently approved. The
potential for bycatch, and the impacts of environmental conditions,
vessel size, or crew behavior are difficult to properly account for
when monitoring the performance of gear in the commercial fishery.
However, the performance of gear in the fishery will continue to be
monitored and the use of inappropriate modification or misuse of gear
to negate the required catch reduction may result in removal of gear
from these programs.
Comment 4: The CCCHFA stated that allowing the Council to specify
which stocks are subject to the standard and which are not would reduce
flexibility in these programs.
Response: This provision was included in the regulatory text
specifically to increase the flexibility for both the Council and the
NMFS Regional Administrator. If the regulations specified which stocks
had to show reduced catch and which could sustain increased mortality,
it would require a regulatory change to modify the regulations if
rebuilt stocks, or stocks in relatively good condition, for example,
declined in the future.
Comment 5: The CCCHFA expressed concern that experimental results
may not translate well into gear performance in the fishery. Gear could
be misused and either result in reduced harvest of the intended target
species, or increased catch of bycatch species.
Response: The proper use of any approved gear is a legitimate
concern. To the extent practical, important aspects of approved gear
will be specified in the regulations. As noted in the response to
Comment 3, the performance of gear in the fishery will continue to be
monitored and possession limits, for example, could be adjusted to
encourage the proper use of specific gear. If it becomes evident that a
gear is not working effectively in the field, it may be removed from
these programs.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
NMFS has made changes to the proposed rule. In Sec. 648.85,
paragraphs (b)(6)(iv)(J)(2)(i) and (ii) have been revised, in response
to comment and in order to be consistent with Council intent, by
specifying that required catch reductions apply to regulated species
stocks of concern and non-groundfish stocks that are overfished or
subject to overfishing.
Classification
The Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS, determined that the
final rule is necessary for the conservation and management of the NE
multispecies fishery and that it is consistent with the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and other applicable
laws.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Regional Administrator has determined that this final rule is a
minor technical addition, correction, or change to a management plan
and is therefore categorically excluded from the requirement to prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement or equivalent document under the
National Environmental Policy Act.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration during the proposed rule stage that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the certification was published in the
[[Page 72967]]
proposed rule and is not repeated here. No comments were received
regarding this certification or on the economic impacts of the proposed
rule. As a result, a regulatory flexibility analysis was not required
and none was prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 18, 2007
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For RegulatoryPrograms, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is amended as
follows:
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 648.14, paragraphs (a)(132) and (c)(81) are revised to read
as follows:
Sec. 648.14 Prohibitions.
(a) * * *
(132) If fishing with trawl gear under a NE multispecies DAS in the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area defined in Sec. 648.85(a)(1)(ii), fail to
fish with a haddock separator trawl or a flounder trawl net, as
specified in Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(iii); unless using other gear as
authorized under Sec. 648.85 (b)(6) or (b)(8).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(81) If fishing with trawl gear in the Regular B DAS Program
specified in Sec. 648.85(b)(6), fail to use a haddock separator trawl
as described under Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(iii)(A); or other gear as
authorized under Sec. 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(J).
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 648.85, paragraph (a)(3)(iii) introductory text is added,
and paragraphs (b)(6)(iv)(J)(2) and (b)(8)(v)(E)(2) are revised to read
as follows:
Sec. 648.85 Special management programs.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Gear requirements. NE multispecies vessels fishing with trawl
gear in the Eastern U.S./Canada Area defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of
this section, unless otherwise provided in paragraphs (b)(6) and (b)(8)
of this section, must fish with a haddock separator trawl or a flounder
trawl net, as described in paragraphs (a)(3)(iii)(A) and (B) of this
section (both nets may be onboard the fishing vessel simultaneously).
Gear other than the haddock separator trawl or the flounder trawl net
as described in paragraph (a)(3)(iii) of this section, or gear
authorized under paragraphs (b)(6) and (b)(8) of this section, may be
on board the vessel during a trip to the Eastern U.S./Canada Area,
provided the gear is stowed according to the regulations at Sec.
648.23(b). The description of the haddock separator trawl and flounder
trawl net in this paragraph (a)(3)(iii) may be further specified by the
Regional Administrator through publication of such specifications in
the Federal Register, consistent with the requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(6) * * *
(iv) * * *
(J) * * *
(2) Approval of additional gear. At the request of the Council or
the Council's Executive Committee, the Regional Administrator may
authorize additional gear for use in the Regular B DAS Program, through
notice consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act. The proposed
gear must satisfy standards specified in paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J)(2)(i)
or (ii) of this section in a completed experiment that has been
reviewed according to the standards established by the Council's
research policy before the gear can be considered and approved by the
Regional Administrator. Comparisons of the criteria specified in this
paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J)(2) will be made to an appropriately selected
control gear.
(i) The gear must show a statistically significant reduction in
catch of at least 50 percent (by weight, on a trip-by-trip basis) of
each regulated species stock of concern, unless otherwise allowed in
this paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J)(2)(i), or other non-groundfish stocks that
are overfished or subject to overfishing identified by the Council.
This requirement does not apply to regulated species identified by the
Council as not being subject to gear performance standards; or
(ii) The catch of each regulated species stock of concern, unless
otherwise allowed in this paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J)(2)(ii), or other non-
groundfish stocks that are overfished or subject to overfishing
identified by the Council, must be less than 5 percent of the total
catch of regulated groundfish (by weight, on a trip-by-trip basis).
This requirement does not apply to regulated species identified by the
Council as not being subject to gear performance standards.
* * * * *
(8) * * *
(v) * * *
(E) * * *
(2) Approval of additional gear. The Regional Administrator may
authorize additional gear for use in the Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock
SAP in accordance with the standards and requirements specified at
Sec. 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(J)(2).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-24948 Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S