Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings, 72632-72636 [E7-24846]
Download as PDF
72632
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 245
Friday, December 21, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS
AUTHORITY
5 CFR Part 2423
Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings
Office of the General Counsel,
Federal Labor Relations Authority.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The General Counsel of the
Federal Labor Relations Authority
(FLRA) proposes to revise portions of its
regulations regarding unfair labor
practice (ULP) proceedings (Part 2423,
subpart A). The purpose of the proposed
revisions is to clarify the Office of the
General Counsel’s (OGC) role during the
investigatory stage of processing unfair
labor practice charges consistent with
the policies of the General Counsel, and
to clarify certain administrative matters
relating to the filing and investigation of
ULP charges. Implementation of the
proposed changes confirms and
enhances the neutrality of the OGC
before a ULP merit determination is
made.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver written
comments to the Office of the Executive
Director, Federal Labor Relations
Authority, 1400 K Street, NW., Fourth
Floor, Washington, DC 20424.
Comments may also be e-mailed to
FLRAexecutivedirector@flra.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill
Crumpacker, Executive Director, at
jcrumpacker@flra.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OGC
of the FLRA proposes modifications to
the existing rules and regulations in
subpart A of title 5 of the Code of
Federal Regulations regarding the
processing and investigation of ULP
charges.
Subpart A of the regulations has not
been reexamined in its entirety since
1998, and before that since its
enactment in 1980. The OGC has
modified its policies, revising or
rescinding many of the internal policies
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
that were established prior to 1998 and
which resulted in the 1998 regulatory
changes. Accordingly, the General
Counsel has proposed revisions to the
regulations addressing the investigation
and processing of ULP charges.
The proposed revisions clarify the
neutral fact-finding role of the OGC in
the investigation of ULP charges. The
proposed revisions continue to
encourage parties involved in a ULP
dispute to work collaboratively to
resolve the dispute; however, consistent
with the General Counsel’s Settlement
policy, the proposed revisions clarify
that the OGC will not be involved in any
way in resolving parties’ disputes until
after a determination has been made
that a charge is meritorious. At that
time, the OGC will aggressively use
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
processes to resolve parties’ ULP
disputes and to avoid protracted
litigation of ULP complaints.
Sectional Analyses
Sectional analyses of the revisions to
Part 2423—Unfair Labor Practice
Proceedings are as follows:
Part 2423—Unfair Labor Practice
Proceedings
Section 2423.0
This part is applicable to any charge
of an alleged ULP pending or filed with
the Authority on or after February 1,
2008.
Subpart A—Filing, Investigating,
Resolving, and Acting on Charges
Section 2423.1
The current section encourages
parties to meet and resolve ULP
disputes prior to filing ULP charges. The
proposed revision continues to
encourage parties to settle their ULP
disputes, and clarifies that the OGC will
assist the parties in resolving their
dispute only once a decision has been
made that the issuance of a ULP
complaint is warranted. The proposed
revision promotes an understanding that
the parties to a ULP dispute are
responsible for their relationship and
the resolution of their disputes. The
proposed revision is intended to
preserve the neutrality of the OGC in the
investigation and processing of ULP
charges, and incorporates the General
Counsel’s Settlement Policy, which is
set forth in its entirety on the FLRA’s
Web site at www.FLRA.gov. Where the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
parties are unable to resolve their
dispute on their own and where a
determination is made that the Federal
Service Labor-Management Relations
Statute (Statute) has been violated, the
OGC—as set forth in other sections of
the proposed revised regulations—will
actively work with the parties using
ADR processes to reach a satisfactory
resolution that is consistent with the
Statute and resolves the parties’ ULP
dispute.
Section 2423.2
The current section sets forth the
specific ADR services that the OGC may
provide. The parties are redirected to
§ 2423.12, which sets forth the ADR
services that the OGC may now provide
consistent with the General Counsel’s
Settlement Policy.
Section 2423.3
This section, which identifies who
may file a ULP charge, is unchanged.
Section 2423.4
This section, describing the content of
a ULP charge, is substantially
unchanged. The proposed revisions
provide for the inclusion of e-mail
addresses for all of the parties.
The proposed revision also includes a
subsection addressing when a ULP
charge must be filed and reiterates the
statutory time limits for the filing of a
ULP charge set forth in 5 U.S.C.
7118(a)(4).
Section 2423.5
This section, which is reserved, is
unchanged.
Section 2423.6
The current section remains
substantially unchanged. The proposed
revisions address an issue previously
not addressed in the regulations, and
clarify that a charge received after the
close of business will be deemed
received and docketed the next business
day.
The current section limited to two
pages the number of pages that a party
could fax to an OGC Regional Office
when filing a charge. The proposed
revision eliminates that limitation and
returns it to the current limitation of 10
pages, consistent with 5 CFR § 2429.24.
Section 2423.7
The current section, which provides
for alternative case processing,
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
incorporates the internal OGC policies
and procedures established under the
1998 revisions. Consistent with current
internal OGC policies and procedures,
this section is being eliminated. Under
the proposed revisions the parties to a
ULP dispute are always encouraged to
work collaboratively to resolve their
own dispute, taking a problem-solving
approach, rather than filing a ULP
charge. Once a ULP charge is filed,
parties are also encouraged on their own
to attempt to resolve their dispute while
the OGC conducts its investigation of
the facts and determines the merits of
the charge.
Section 2423.8
This section, which provides for the
investigation of charges, is substantially
unchanged. The proposed revisions
clarify and confirm that all
investigations conducted by the OGC
are neutral and unbiased.
The revisions further clarify that the
failure of a party to cooperate during an
investigation may result in a ULP charge
being dismissed by the Regional
Director.
Section 2423.9
This section is unchanged.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Section 2423.10
This section, which provides for the
action by the Regional Director, remains
substantially unchanged. The proposed
revisions modify this section to be
consistent with the other sections under
this part that the Regional Director takes
its action on behalf of the General
Counsel. The proposed revision also
modifies the wording to reflect action
currently taken on a charge that is
determined to be without merit, i.e., that
the charge is dismissed.
Section 2423.11
The proposed revisions provide that
all parties to a dispute will be advised
of an OGC decision to dismiss a ULP
charge upon completion of the
investigation. This ensures that both
parties to the dispute are apprised of the
result of the investigation at the same
time and maintains the neutrality of the
OGC. The proposed revisions also
incorporate the opportunity for a
Charging Party to withdraw the charge
prior to the issuance of the dismissal
letter.
This section also rewords the grounds
for appeal to include when a Regional
Director’s decision is based on an
incorrect statement or application of the
applicable rule of law, rather than only
when a Regional Director’s decision is
based on an incorrect statement of the
applicable rule of law.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
Section 2423.12
This section, which provides for the
settlement of ULP charges after a
Regional Director’s determination to
issue a complaint, sets forth that the
OGC will utilize ADR processes to assist
the parties in resolving the ULP dispute
and to avoid the cost of protracted
litigation.
72633
PART 2423—UNFAIR LABOR
PRACTICE PROCEEDINGS
1. The authority citation for part 2423
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7134.
2. Section 2423.0 and subpart A of
part 2423 are revised to read as follows:
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Sec. 2423.0
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the General Counsel of the FLRA
has determined that this regulation, as
amended, will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, because this rule applies to
Federal employees, Federal agencies,
and labor organizations representing
Federal employees.
Subpart A—Filing, Investigating,
Resolving, and Acting on Charges
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule change will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This action is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This rule will not
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The amended regulations contain no
additional information collection or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 2423
Administrative practice and
procedure, Government employees,
Labor management relations.
For these reasons, the General
Counsel of the Federal Labor Relations
Authority, proposes to amend 5 CFR
part 2423 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Applicability of this part.
Sec.
2423.1 Resolution of unfair labor practice
disputes prior to a Regional Director
determination whether to issue a
complaint.
2423.2 Alternative Dispute Resolution
(ADR) services.
2423.3 Who may file charges.
2423.4 Contents of the charge; supporting
evidence and documents.
2423.5 [Reserved]
2423.6 Filing and service of copies.
2423.7 [Reserved]
2423.8 Investigation of charges.
2423.9 Amendment of charges.
2423.10 Action by the Regional Director.
2423.11 Determination not to issue
complaint; review of action by the
Regional Director.
2423.12 Settlement of unfair labor practice
charges after a Regional Director
determination to issue a complaint but
prior to issuance of a complaint.
2423.13–2423.19 [Reserved]
§ 2423.0
Applicability of this part.
This part is applicable to any charge
of alleged unfair labor practices pending
or filed with the Authority on or after
February 1, 2008, and any complaint
filed on or after October 1, 1997.
Subpart A—Filing, Investigating,
Resolving, and Acting on Charges
§ 2423.1 Resolution of unfair labor
practice disputes prior to a Regional
Director determination whether to issue a
complaint.
The purposes and policies of the
Federal Service Labor-Management
Relations Statute can best be achieved
by the collaborative efforts of all persons
covered by that law. The General
Counsel encourages all persons on their
own to meet, and in good faith, attempt
to settle unfair labor practice disputes.
To maintain complete neutrality, the
General Counsel may not be involved
with such settlement discussions with
the parties prior to a Regional Director
determination on the merits. Attempts
by the parties to resolve unfair labor
practice disputes prior to filing an
unfair labor practice charge do not toll
the time limitations for filing a charge
set forth at 5 U.S.C. 7118(a)(4).
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
72634
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
§ 2423.2 Alternative Dispute Resolution
(ADR) services.
The General Counsel provides ADR
services under § 2423.12(a) after a
Regional Director has determined to
issue a complaint.
§ 2423.3
Who may file charges.
(a) Filing charges. Any person may
charge an activity, agency or labor
organization with having engaged in, or
engaging in, any unfair labor practice
prohibited under 5 U.S.C. 7116.
(b) Charging Party. Charging Party
means the individual, labor
organization, activity or agency filing an
unfair labor practice charge with a
Regional Director.
(c) Charged Party. Charged Party
means the activity, agency or labor
organization charged with allegedly
having engaged in, or engaging in, an
unfair labor practice.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
§ 2423.4 Contents of the charge;
supporting evidence and documents.
(a) What to file. The Charging Party
may file a charge alleging a violation of
5 U.S.C. 7116 by completing a form
prescribed by the General Counsel, or
on a substantially similar form, that
contains the following information:
(1) The name, address, telephone
number, facsimile number (where
facsimile equipment is available), and
e-mail address of the Charging Party;
(2) The name, address, telephone
number, facsimile number (where
facsimile equipment is available), and
e-mail address of the Charged Party;
(3) The name, address, telephone
number, facsimile number (where
facsimile equipment is available), and
e-mail address of the Charging Party’s
point of contact;
(4) The name, address, telephone
number, facsimile number (where
facsimile equipment is available), and
e-mail address of the Charged Party’s
point of contact;
(5) A clear and concise statement of
the facts alleged to constitute an unfair
labor practice, a statement of how those
facts allegedly violate specific section(s)
and paragraph(s) of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute
and the date and place of occurrence of
the particular acts; and
(6) A statement whether the subject
matter raised in the charge:
(i) Has been raised previously in a
grievance procedure;
(ii) Has been referred to the Federal
Service Impasses Panel, the Federal
Mediation and Conciliation Service, the
Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission, the Merit Systems
Protection Board, or the Office of the
Special Counsel for consideration or
action;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
(iii) Involves a negotiability issue
raised by the Charging Party in a
petition pending before the Authority
pursuant to part 2424 of this subchapter;
or
(iv) Has been the subject of any other
administrative or judicial proceeding.
(7) A statement describing the result
or status of any proceeding identified in
paragraph (a)(6) of this section.
(b) When to file. Under 5 U.S.C. 7118
(a)(4), a charge alleging an unfair labor
practice must normally be filed within
six (6) months of its occurrence.
(c) Declarations of truth and
statement of service. A charge shall be
in writing and signed, and shall contain
a declaration by the individual signing
the charge, under the penalties of the
Criminal Code (18 U.S.C. 1001), that its
contents are true and correct to the best
of that individual’s knowledge and
belief.
(d) Statement of service. A charge
shall also contain a statement that the
Charging Party served the charge on the
Charged Party, and shall list the name,
title and location of the individual
served, and the method of service.
(e) Self-contained document. A charge
shall be a self-contained document
describing the alleged unfair labor
practice without a need to refer to
supporting evidence and documents
submitted under paragraph (f) of this
section.
(f) Submitting supporting evidence
and documents and identifying
potential witnesses. When filing a
charge, the Charging Party shall submit
to the Regional Director, any supporting
evidence and documents, including, but
not limited to, correspondence and
memoranda, records, reports, applicable
collective bargaining agreement clauses,
memoranda of understanding, minutes
of meetings, applicable regulations,
statements of position and other
documentary evidence. The Charging
Party also shall identify potential
witnesses with contact information
(telephone number, e-mail address, and
facsimile number) and shall provide a
brief synopsis of their expected
testimony.
§ 2423.5
[Reserved]
§ 2423.6
Filing and service of copies.
(a) Where to file. A Charging Party
shall file the charge with the Regional
Director for the region in which the
alleged unfair labor practice has
occurred or is occurring. A charge
alleging that an unfair labor practice has
occurred or is occurring in two or more
regions may be filed with the Regional
Director in any of those regions.
(b) Filing date. A charge is deemed
filed when it is received by a Regional
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Director. A charge received in a Region
after the close of the business day will
be deemed received and docketed on
the next business day. The business
hours for each of the Regional Offices
are set forth at www.FLRA.gov.
(c) Method of filing. A Charging Party
may file a charge with the Regional
Director in person or by commercial
delivery, first class mail, facsimile or
certified mail. If filing by facsimile
transmission, the Charging Party is not
required to file an original copy of the
charge with the Region. A Charging
Party assumes responsibility for receipt
of a charge. Supporting evidence and
documents must be submitted to the
Regional Director in person, by
commercial delivery, first class mail,
certified mail, or by facsimile
transmission. Charges shall not be filed
by electronic mail.
(d) Service of the charge. The
Charging Party shall serve a copy of the
charge (without supporting evidence
and documents) on the Charged Party.
Where facsimile equipment is available,
the charge may be served by facsimile
transmission in accordance with
paragraph (c) of this section.
§ 2423.7
[Reserved]
§ 2423.8
Investigation of charges.
(a) Investigation. The Regional
Director, on behalf of the General
Counsel, conducts an unbiased, neutral
investigation of the charge as the
Regional Director deems necessary.
During the course of the investigation,
all parties involved are afforded an
opportunity to present their evidence
and views to the Regional Director.
(b) Cooperation. The purposes and
policies of the Federal Service LaborManagement Relations Statute can best
be achieved by the full cooperation of
all parties involved and the timely
submission of all potentially relevant
information from all potential sources
during the course of the investigation.
All persons shall cooperate fully with
the Regional Director in the
investigation of charges. The failure of
a Charging Party to cooperate during an
investigation may provide grounds for a
Regional Director to dismiss the charge
for failure to produce evidence
supporting the charge.
Cooperation includes any of the
following actions, when deemed
appropriate by the Regional Director:
(1) Making union officials, employees,
and agency supervisors and managers
available to give sworn/affirmed
testimony regarding matters under
investigation;
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(2) Producing documentary evidence
pertinent to the matters under
investigation; and
(3) Providing statements of position
on the matters under investigation.
(c) Investigatory subpoenas. If a
person fails to cooperate with the
Regional Director in the investigation of
a charge, the General Counsel, upon
recommendation of a Regional Director,
may decide in appropriate
circumstances to issue a subpoena
under 5 U.S.C. 7132 for the attendance
and testimony of witnesses and the
production of documentary or other
evidence. However, no subpoena shall
be issued under this section which
requires the disclosure of
intramanagement guidance, advice,
counsel or training within an agency or
between an agency and the Office of
Personnel Management.
(1) A subpoena shall be served by any
individual who is at least 18 years old
and who is not a party to the
proceeding. The individual who served
the subpoena must certify that he or she
did so:
(i) By delivering it to the witness in
person;
(ii) By registered or certified mail; or
(iii) By delivering the subpoena to a
responsible individual (named in the
document certifying the delivery) at the
residence or place of business (as
appropriate) of the person for whom the
subpoena was intended. The subpoena
shall show on its face the name and
address of the Regional Director and the
General Counsel.
(2) Any person served with a
subpoena who does not intend to
comply shall, within 5 days after the
date of service of the subpoena upon
such person, petition in writing to
revoke the subpoena. A copy of any
petition to revoke shall be served on the
General Counsel.
(3) The General Counsel shall revoke
the subpoena if the witness or evidence,
the production of which is required, is
not material and relevant to the matters
under investigation or in question in the
proceedings, or the subpoena does not
describe with sufficient particularity the
evidence the production of which is
required, or if for any other reason
sufficient in law the subpoena is
invalid. The General Counsel shall state
the procedural or other grounds for the
ruling on the petition to revoke. The
petition to revoke, shall become part of
the official record if there is a hearing
under subpart C of this part.
(4) Upon the failure of any person to
comply with a subpoena issued by the
General Counsel, the General Counsel
shall determine whether to institute
proceedings in the appropriate district
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
court for the enforcement of the
subpoena. Enforcement shall not be
sought if to do so would be inconsistent
with law, including the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute.
(d) Confidentiality. It is the General
Counsel’s policy to protect the identity
of individuals who submit statements
and information during the
investigation, and to protect against the
disclosure of documents obtained
during the investigation, as a means of
ensuring the General Counsel’s
continuing ability to obtain all relevant
information. After issuance of a
complaint and in preparation for a
hearing, however, identification of
witnesses, a synopsis of their expected
testimony and documents proposed to
be offered into evidence at the hearing
may be disclosed as required by the
prehearing disclosure requirements in
§ 2423.23.
§ 2423.9
Amendment of charges.
Prior to the issuance of a complaint,
the Charging Party may amend the
charge in accordance with the
requirements set forth in § 2423.6.
§ 2423.10
Action by the Regional Director.
(a) Regional Director action. The
Regional Director, on behalf of the
General Counsel, may take any of the
following actions, as appropriate:
(1) Approve a request to withdraw a
charge;
(2) Dismiss a charge;
(3) Approve a written settlement
agreement in accordance with the
provisions of § 2423.12;
(4) Issue a complaint; or
(5) Withdraw a complaint.
(b) Request for appropriate temporary
relief. Parties may request the General
Counsel to seek appropriate temporary
relief (including a restraining order)
under 5 U.S.C. 7123(d). The General
Counsel may initiate and prosecute
injunctive proceedings under 5 U.S.C.
7123(d) only upon approval of the
Authority. A determination by the
General Counsel not to seek approval of
the Authority to seek such appropriate
temporary relief is final and shall not be
appealed to the Authority.
(c) General Counsel requests to the
Authority. When a complaint issues and
the Authority approves the General
Counsel’s request to seek appropriate
temporary relief (including a restraining
order) under 5 U.S.C. 7123(d), the
General Counsel may make application
for appropriate temporary relief
(including a restraining order) in the
district court of the United States within
which the unfair labor practice is
alleged to have occurred or in which the
party sought to be enjoined resides or
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72635
transacts business. Temporary relief
may be sought if it is just and proper
and the record establishes probable
cause that an unfair labor practice is
being committed. Temporary relief shall
not be sought if it would interfere with
the ability of the agency to carry out its
essential functions.
(d) Actions subsequent to obtaining
appropriate temporary relief. The
General Counsel shall inform the
district court which granted temporary
relief pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7123(d)
whenever an Administrative Law Judge
recommends dismissal of the complaint,
in whole or in part.
§ 2423.11 Determination not to issue
complaint; review of action by the Regional
Director.
(a) Opportunity to withdraw a charge.
If, upon the completion of an
investigation under § 2423.8, a decision
has been made to dismiss the charge,
the Regional Director will notify the
parties of the decision and the Charging
Party will be advised of an opportunity
to withdraw the charge(s).
(b) Dismissal letter. If the Charging
Party does not withdraw the charge
within a reasonable period of time, the
Regional Director will, on behalf of the
General Counsel, dismiss the charge and
provide the parties with a written
statement of the reasons for not issuing
a complaint.
(c) Appeal of a dismissal letter. The
Charging Party may obtain review of the
Regional Director’s decision not to issue
a complaint by filing an appeal with the
General Counsel within 25 days after
service of the Regional Director’s
decision. A Charging Party shall serve a
copy of the appeal on the Regional
Director. The General Counsel shall
serve notice on the Charged Party that
an appeal has been filed.
(d) Extension of time. The Charging
Party may file a request, in writing, for
an extension of time to file an appeal,
which shall be received by the General
Counsel not later than 5 days before the
date the appeal is due. A Charging Party
shall serve a copy of the request for an
extension of time on the Regional
Director.
(e) Grounds for granting an appeal.
The General Counsel may grant an
appeal when the appeal establishes at
least one of the following grounds:
(1) The Regional Director’s decision
did not consider material facts that
would have resulted in issuance of a
complaint;
(2) The Regional Director’s decision is
based on a finding of a material fact that
is clearly erroneous;
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
72636
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(3) The Regional Director’s decision is
based on an incorrect statement or
application of the applicable rule of law;
(4) There is no Authority precedent
on the legal issue in the case; or
(5) The manner in which the Region
conducted the investigation has resulted
in prejudicial error.
(f) General Counsel action. The
General Counsel may deny the appeal of
the Regional Director’s dismissal of the
charge, or may grant the appeal and
remand the case to the Regional Director
to take further action. The General
Counsel’s decision on the appeal states
the grounds listed in paragraph (e) of
this section for denying or granting the
appeal, and is served on all the parties.
Absent a timely motion for
reconsideration, the decision of the
General Counsel is final.
(g) Reconsideration. After the General
Counsel issues a final decision, the
Charging Party may move for
reconsideration of the final decision if it
can establish extraordinary
circumstances in its moving papers. The
motion shall be filed within 10 days
after the date on which the General
Counsel’s final decision is postmarked.
A motion for reconsideration shall state
with particularity the extraordinary
circumstances claimed and shall be
supported by appropriate citations. The
decision of the General Counsel on a
motion for reconsideration is final.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
§ 2423.12 Settlement of unfair labor
practice charges after a Regional Director
determination to issue a complaint but prior
to issuance of a complaint.
(a) Alternative Dispute Resolution
(ADR). After a merit determination to
issue a complaint, the Regional Director
will work with the parties to settle the
dispute using ADR, to avoid costly and
protracted litigation.
(b) Bilateral informal settlement
agreement. Prior to issuing a complaint
but after a merit determination by the
Regional Director, the Regional Director
may afford the Charging Party and the
Charged Party a reasonable period of
time to enter into an informal settlement
agreement to be approved by the
Regional Director. When a Charged
Party complies with the terms of an
informal settlement agreement approved
by the Regional Director, no further
action is taken in the case. If the
Charged Party fails to perform its
obligations under the approved informal
settlement agreement, the Regional
Director may institute further
proceedings.
(c) Unilateral informal settlement
agreement. If the Charging Party elects
not to become a party to a bilateral
settlement agreement which the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
Regional Director concludes effectuates
the policies of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute,
the Regional Director may choose to
approve a unilateral settlement between
the General Counsel and the Charged
Party. The Regional Director, on behalf
of the General Counsel, shall issue a
letter stating the grounds for approving
the settlement agreement and declining
to issue a complaint. The Charging Party
may obtain review of the Regional
Director’s action by filing an appeal
with the General Counsel in accordance
with § 2423.11(c) and (d). The General
Counsel shall take action on the appeal
as set forth in § 2423.11(e)–(g).
§§ 2423.13–2423.19
[Reserved]
Dated: December 18, 2007.
Colleen Duffy Kiko,
General Counsel, Federal Labor Relations
Authority.
[FR Doc. E7–24846 Filed 12–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6727–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2002–NM–260–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited
(Jetstream) Model 4101 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action withdraws a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
that proposed a new airworthiness
directive (AD), applicable to all BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited
(Jetstream) Model 4101 airplanes. That
action would have required revising the
airplane flight manual to advise the
flightcrew of special operating
limitations associated with a reduction
in airplane performance due to loss of
propeller efficiency. That action also
would have required installing placards
in the flight compartment and operating
the airplane per certain special
operating limitations; or performing
repetitive flight checks to verify the
adequacy of the airplane’s climb
performance, and accomplishing followon actions if necessary. Since the
issuance of the NPRM, the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) has
issued another NPRM applicable to
certain propellers, which addresses the
identified unsafe condition.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Accordingly, the proposed rule is
withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1175;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
add a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to all BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited (Jetstream) Model
4101 airplanes, was published in the
Federal Register as a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) on February 6,
2004 (69 FR 5775). The proposed rule
would have required revising the
airplane flight manual to advise the
flightcrew of special operating
limitations associated with a reduction
in airplane performance due to loss of
propeller efficiency. That action also
would have required installing placards
in the flight compartment and operating
the airplane per certain special
operating limitations; or performing
repetitive flight checks to verify the
adequacy of the airplane’s climb
performance, and accomplishing followon actions if necessary. That action was
prompted by a report indicating that a
shortfall in engine performance,
compared to the performance standards
shown in the airplane flight manual
(AFM), has been observed during climbperformance test flights. The proposed
actions were intended to ensure that the
flightcrew accounts for the potential
loss of airplane performance due to loss
of propeller efficiency, which could
result in an increased risk of collision
with terrain.
Actions that Occurred Since the NPRM
Was Issued
On October 24, 2007, we issued
NPRM, Docket No. FAA–2006–25173,
for McCauley Propeller Systems
propeller models B5JFR36C1101/
114GCA–0, C5JFR36C1102/L114GCA–0,
B5JFR36C1103/114HCA–0, and
C5JFR36C1104/L114HCA–0. These
propellers are installed on BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited (Jetstream) Model
4100 and 4101 airplanes. That NPRM
would require, for certain blades,
fluorescent penetrant inspections (FPI)
and eddy current inspections (ECI) of
propeller blades for cracks based on
hours time-in-service after the effective
date of the AD, and if any crack
indications are found, removal from
service.
Also, the NPRM would require
inspecting for blunt leading edges of the
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72632-72636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24846]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 72632]]
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
5 CFR Part 2423
Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings
AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Federal Labor Relations
Authority.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The General Counsel of the Federal Labor Relations Authority
(FLRA) proposes to revise portions of its regulations regarding unfair
labor practice (ULP) proceedings (Part 2423, subpart A). The purpose of
the proposed revisions is to clarify the Office of the General
Counsel's (OGC) role during the investigatory stage of processing
unfair labor practice charges consistent with the policies of the
General Counsel, and to clarify certain administrative matters relating
to the filing and investigation of ULP charges. Implementation of the
proposed changes confirms and enhances the neutrality of the OGC before
a ULP merit determination is made.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver written comments to the Office of the
Executive Director, Federal Labor Relations Authority, 1400 K Street,
NW., Fourth Floor, Washington, DC 20424. Comments may also be e-mailed
to FLRAexecutivedirector@flra.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill Crumpacker, Executive Director,
at jcrumpacker@flra.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OGC of the FLRA proposes modifications
to the existing rules and regulations in subpart A of title 5 of the
Code of Federal Regulations regarding the processing and investigation
of ULP charges.
Subpart A of the regulations has not been reexamined in its
entirety since 1998, and before that since its enactment in 1980. The
OGC has modified its policies, revising or rescinding many of the
internal policies that were established prior to 1998 and which
resulted in the 1998 regulatory changes. Accordingly, the General
Counsel has proposed revisions to the regulations addressing the
investigation and processing of ULP charges.
The proposed revisions clarify the neutral fact-finding role of the
OGC in the investigation of ULP charges. The proposed revisions
continue to encourage parties involved in a ULP dispute to work
collaboratively to resolve the dispute; however, consistent with the
General Counsel's Settlement policy, the proposed revisions clarify
that the OGC will not be involved in any way in resolving parties'
disputes until after a determination has been made that a charge is
meritorious. At that time, the OGC will aggressively use Alternative
Dispute Resolution (ADR) processes to resolve parties' ULP disputes and
to avoid protracted litigation of ULP complaints.
Sectional Analyses
Sectional analyses of the revisions to Part 2423--Unfair Labor
Practice Proceedings are as follows:
Part 2423--Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings
Section 2423.0
This part is applicable to any charge of an alleged ULP pending or
filed with the Authority on or after February 1, 2008.
Subpart A--Filing, Investigating, Resolving, and Acting on Charges
Section 2423.1
The current section encourages parties to meet and resolve ULP
disputes prior to filing ULP charges. The proposed revision continues
to encourage parties to settle their ULP disputes, and clarifies that
the OGC will assist the parties in resolving their dispute only once a
decision has been made that the issuance of a ULP complaint is
warranted. The proposed revision promotes an understanding that the
parties to a ULP dispute are responsible for their relationship and the
resolution of their disputes. The proposed revision is intended to
preserve the neutrality of the OGC in the investigation and processing
of ULP charges, and incorporates the General Counsel's Settlement
Policy, which is set forth in its entirety on the FLRA's Web site at
www.FLRA.gov. Where the parties are unable to resolve their dispute on
their own and where a determination is made that the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute (Statute) has been violated, the
OGC--as set forth in other sections of the proposed revised
regulations--will actively work with the parties using ADR processes to
reach a satisfactory resolution that is consistent with the Statute and
resolves the parties' ULP dispute.
Section 2423.2
The current section sets forth the specific ADR services that the
OGC may provide. The parties are redirected to Sec. 2423.12, which
sets forth the ADR services that the OGC may now provide consistent
with the General Counsel's Settlement Policy.
Section 2423.3
This section, which identifies who may file a ULP charge, is
unchanged.
Section 2423.4
This section, describing the content of a ULP charge, is
substantially unchanged. The proposed revisions provide for the
inclusion of e-mail addresses for all of the parties.
The proposed revision also includes a subsection addressing when a
ULP charge must be filed and reiterates the statutory time limits for
the filing of a ULP charge set forth in 5 U.S.C. 7118(a)(4).
Section 2423.5
This section, which is reserved, is unchanged.
Section 2423.6
The current section remains substantially unchanged. The proposed
revisions address an issue previously not addressed in the regulations,
and clarify that a charge received after the close of business will be
deemed received and docketed the next business day.
The current section limited to two pages the number of pages that a
party could fax to an OGC Regional Office when filing a charge. The
proposed revision eliminates that limitation and returns it to the
current limitation of 10 pages, consistent with 5 CFR Sec. 2429.24.
Section 2423.7
The current section, which provides for alternative case
processing,
[[Page 72633]]
incorporates the internal OGC policies and procedures established under
the 1998 revisions. Consistent with current internal OGC policies and
procedures, this section is being eliminated. Under the proposed
revisions the parties to a ULP dispute are always encouraged to work
collaboratively to resolve their own dispute, taking a problem-solving
approach, rather than filing a ULP charge. Once a ULP charge is filed,
parties are also encouraged on their own to attempt to resolve their
dispute while the OGC conducts its investigation of the facts and
determines the merits of the charge.
Section 2423.8
This section, which provides for the investigation of charges, is
substantially unchanged. The proposed revisions clarify and confirm
that all investigations conducted by the OGC are neutral and unbiased.
The revisions further clarify that the failure of a party to
cooperate during an investigation may result in a ULP charge being
dismissed by the Regional Director.
Section 2423.9
This section is unchanged.
Section 2423.10
This section, which provides for the action by the Regional
Director, remains substantially unchanged. The proposed revisions
modify this section to be consistent with the other sections under this
part that the Regional Director takes its action on behalf of the
General Counsel. The proposed revision also modifies the wording to
reflect action currently taken on a charge that is determined to be
without merit, i.e., that the charge is dismissed.
Section 2423.11
The proposed revisions provide that all parties to a dispute will
be advised of an OGC decision to dismiss a ULP charge upon completion
of the investigation. This ensures that both parties to the dispute are
apprised of the result of the investigation at the same time and
maintains the neutrality of the OGC. The proposed revisions also
incorporate the opportunity for a Charging Party to withdraw the charge
prior to the issuance of the dismissal letter.
This section also rewords the grounds for appeal to include when a
Regional Director's decision is based on an incorrect statement or
application of the applicable rule of law, rather than only when a
Regional Director's decision is based on an incorrect statement of the
applicable rule of law.
Section 2423.12
This section, which provides for the settlement of ULP charges
after a Regional Director's determination to issue a complaint, sets
forth that the OGC will utilize ADR processes to assist the parties in
resolving the ULP dispute and to avoid the cost of protracted
litigation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 605(b), the General Counsel of the FLRA has determined that this
regulation, as amended, will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities, because this rule applies to
Federal employees, Federal agencies, and labor organizations
representing Federal employees.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule change will not result in the expenditure by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This action is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The amended regulations contain no additional information
collection or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 2423
Administrative practice and procedure, Government employees, Labor
management relations.
For these reasons, the General Counsel of the Federal Labor
Relations Authority, proposes to amend 5 CFR part 2423 as follows:
PART 2423--UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE PROCEEDINGS
1. The authority citation for part 2423 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7134.
2. Section 2423.0 and subpart A of part 2423 are revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 2423.0 Applicability of this part.
Subpart A--Filing, Investigating, Resolving, and Acting on Charges
Sec.
2423.1 Resolution of unfair labor practice disputes prior to a
Regional Director determination whether to issue a complaint.
2423.2 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) services.
2423.3 Who may file charges.
2423.4 Contents of the charge; supporting evidence and documents.
2423.5 [Reserved]
2423.6 Filing and service of copies.
2423.7 [Reserved]
2423.8 Investigation of charges.
2423.9 Amendment of charges.
2423.10 Action by the Regional Director.
2423.11 Determination not to issue complaint; review of action by
the Regional Director.
2423.12 Settlement of unfair labor practice charges after a Regional
Director determination to issue a complaint but prior to issuance of
a complaint.
2423.13-2423.19 [Reserved]
Sec. 2423.0 Applicability of this part.
This part is applicable to any charge of alleged unfair labor
practices pending or filed with the Authority on or after February 1,
2008, and any complaint filed on or after October 1, 1997.
Subpart A--Filing, Investigating, Resolving, and Acting on Charges
Sec. 2423.1 Resolution of unfair labor practice disputes prior to a
Regional Director determination whether to issue a complaint.
The purposes and policies of the Federal Service Labor-Management
Relations Statute can best be achieved by the collaborative efforts of
all persons covered by that law. The General Counsel encourages all
persons on their own to meet, and in good faith, attempt to settle
unfair labor practice disputes. To maintain complete neutrality, the
General Counsel may not be involved with such settlement discussions
with the parties prior to a Regional Director determination on the
merits. Attempts by the parties to resolve unfair labor practice
disputes prior to filing an unfair labor practice charge do not toll
the time limitations for filing a charge set forth at 5 U.S.C.
7118(a)(4).
[[Page 72634]]
Sec. 2423.2 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) services.
The General Counsel provides ADR services under Sec. 2423.12(a)
after a Regional Director has determined to issue a complaint.
Sec. 2423.3 Who may file charges.
(a) Filing charges. Any person may charge an activity, agency or
labor organization with having engaged in, or engaging in, any unfair
labor practice prohibited under 5 U.S.C. 7116.
(b) Charging Party. Charging Party means the individual, labor
organization, activity or agency filing an unfair labor practice charge
with a Regional Director.
(c) Charged Party. Charged Party means the activity, agency or
labor organization charged with allegedly having engaged in, or
engaging in, an unfair labor practice.
Sec. 2423.4 Contents of the charge; supporting evidence and
documents.
(a) What to file. The Charging Party may file a charge alleging a
violation of 5 U.S.C. 7116 by completing a form prescribed by the
General Counsel, or on a substantially similar form, that contains the
following information:
(1) The name, address, telephone number, facsimile number (where
facsimile equipment is available), and e-mail address of the Charging
Party;
(2) The name, address, telephone number, facsimile number (where
facsimile equipment is available), and e-mail address of the Charged
Party;
(3) The name, address, telephone number, facsimile number (where
facsimile equipment is available), and e-mail address of the Charging
Party's point of contact;
(4) The name, address, telephone number, facsimile number (where
facsimile equipment is available), and e-mail address of the Charged
Party's point of contact;
(5) A clear and concise statement of the facts alleged to
constitute an unfair labor practice, a statement of how those facts
allegedly violate specific section(s) and paragraph(s) of the Federal
Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and the date and place of
occurrence of the particular acts; and
(6) A statement whether the subject matter raised in the charge:
(i) Has been raised previously in a grievance procedure;
(ii) Has been referred to the Federal Service Impasses Panel, the
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, the Merit Systems Protection Board, or the
Office of the Special Counsel for consideration or action;
(iii) Involves a negotiability issue raised by the Charging Party
in a petition pending before the Authority pursuant to part 2424 of
this subchapter; or
(iv) Has been the subject of any other administrative or judicial
proceeding.
(7) A statement describing the result or status of any proceeding
identified in paragraph (a)(6) of this section.
(b) When to file. Under 5 U.S.C. 7118 (a)(4), a charge alleging an
unfair labor practice must normally be filed within six (6) months of
its occurrence.
(c) Declarations of truth and statement of service. A charge shall
be in writing and signed, and shall contain a declaration by the
individual signing the charge, under the penalties of the Criminal Code
(18 U.S.C. 1001), that its contents are true and correct to the best of
that individual's knowledge and belief.
(d) Statement of service. A charge shall also contain a statement
that the Charging Party served the charge on the Charged Party, and
shall list the name, title and location of the individual served, and
the method of service.
(e) Self-contained document. A charge shall be a self-contained
document describing the alleged unfair labor practice without a need to
refer to supporting evidence and documents submitted under paragraph
(f) of this section.
(f) Submitting supporting evidence and documents and identifying
potential witnesses. When filing a charge, the Charging Party shall
submit to the Regional Director, any supporting evidence and documents,
including, but not limited to, correspondence and memoranda, records,
reports, applicable collective bargaining agreement clauses, memoranda
of understanding, minutes of meetings, applicable regulations,
statements of position and other documentary evidence. The Charging
Party also shall identify potential witnesses with contact information
(telephone number, e-mail address, and facsimile number) and shall
provide a brief synopsis of their expected testimony.
Sec. 2423.5 [Reserved]
Sec. 2423.6 Filing and service of copies.
(a) Where to file. A Charging Party shall file the charge with the
Regional Director for the region in which the alleged unfair labor
practice has occurred or is occurring. A charge alleging that an unfair
labor practice has occurred or is occurring in two or more regions may
be filed with the Regional Director in any of those regions.
(b) Filing date. A charge is deemed filed when it is received by a
Regional Director. A charge received in a Region after the close of the
business day will be deemed received and docketed on the next business
day. The business hours for each of the Regional Offices are set forth
at www.FLRA.gov.
(c) Method of filing. A Charging Party may file a charge with the
Regional Director in person or by commercial delivery, first class
mail, facsimile or certified mail. If filing by facsimile transmission,
the Charging Party is not required to file an original copy of the
charge with the Region. A Charging Party assumes responsibility for
receipt of a charge. Supporting evidence and documents must be
submitted to the Regional Director in person, by commercial delivery,
first class mail, certified mail, or by facsimile transmission. Charges
shall not be filed by electronic mail.
(d) Service of the charge. The Charging Party shall serve a copy of
the charge (without supporting evidence and documents) on the Charged
Party. Where facsimile equipment is available, the charge may be served
by facsimile transmission in accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section.
Sec. 2423.7 [Reserved]
Sec. 2423.8 Investigation of charges.
(a) Investigation. The Regional Director, on behalf of the General
Counsel, conducts an unbiased, neutral investigation of the charge as
the Regional Director deems necessary. During the course of the
investigation, all parties involved are afforded an opportunity to
present their evidence and views to the Regional Director.
(b) Cooperation. The purposes and policies of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute can best be achieved by the full
cooperation of all parties involved and the timely submission of all
potentially relevant information from all potential sources during the
course of the investigation. All persons shall cooperate fully with the
Regional Director in the investigation of charges. The failure of a
Charging Party to cooperate during an investigation may provide grounds
for a Regional Director to dismiss the charge for failure to produce
evidence supporting the charge.
Cooperation includes any of the following actions, when deemed
appropriate by the Regional Director:
(1) Making union officials, employees, and agency supervisors and
managers available to give sworn/affirmed testimony regarding matters
under investigation;
[[Page 72635]]
(2) Producing documentary evidence pertinent to the matters under
investigation; and
(3) Providing statements of position on the matters under
investigation.
(c) Investigatory subpoenas. If a person fails to cooperate with
the Regional Director in the investigation of a charge, the General
Counsel, upon recommendation of a Regional Director, may decide in
appropriate circumstances to issue a subpoena under 5 U.S.C. 7132 for
the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of
documentary or other evidence. However, no subpoena shall be issued
under this section which requires the disclosure of intramanagement
guidance, advice, counsel or training within an agency or between an
agency and the Office of Personnel Management.
(1) A subpoena shall be served by any individual who is at least 18
years old and who is not a party to the proceeding. The individual who
served the subpoena must certify that he or she did so:
(i) By delivering it to the witness in person;
(ii) By registered or certified mail; or
(iii) By delivering the subpoena to a responsible individual (named
in the document certifying the delivery) at the residence or place of
business (as appropriate) of the person for whom the subpoena was
intended. The subpoena shall show on its face the name and address of
the Regional Director and the General Counsel.
(2) Any person served with a subpoena who does not intend to comply
shall, within 5 days after the date of service of the subpoena upon
such person, petition in writing to revoke the subpoena. A copy of any
petition to revoke shall be served on the General Counsel.
(3) The General Counsel shall revoke the subpoena if the witness or
evidence, the production of which is required, is not material and
relevant to the matters under investigation or in question in the
proceedings, or the subpoena does not describe with sufficient
particularity the evidence the production of which is required, or if
for any other reason sufficient in law the subpoena is invalid. The
General Counsel shall state the procedural or other grounds for the
ruling on the petition to revoke. The petition to revoke, shall become
part of the official record if there is a hearing under subpart C of
this part.
(4) Upon the failure of any person to comply with a subpoena issued
by the General Counsel, the General Counsel shall determine whether to
institute proceedings in the appropriate district court for the
enforcement of the subpoena. Enforcement shall not be sought if to do
so would be inconsistent with law, including the Federal Service Labor-
Management Relations Statute.
(d) Confidentiality. It is the General Counsel's policy to protect
the identity of individuals who submit statements and information
during the investigation, and to protect against the disclosure of
documents obtained during the investigation, as a means of ensuring the
General Counsel's continuing ability to obtain all relevant
information. After issuance of a complaint and in preparation for a
hearing, however, identification of witnesses, a synopsis of their
expected testimony and documents proposed to be offered into evidence
at the hearing may be disclosed as required by the prehearing
disclosure requirements in Sec. 2423.23.
Sec. 2423.9 Amendment of charges.
Prior to the issuance of a complaint, the Charging Party may amend
the charge in accordance with the requirements set forth in Sec.
2423.6.
Sec. 2423.10 Action by the Regional Director.
(a) Regional Director action. The Regional Director, on behalf of
the General Counsel, may take any of the following actions, as
appropriate:
(1) Approve a request to withdraw a charge;
(2) Dismiss a charge;
(3) Approve a written settlement agreement in accordance with the
provisions of Sec. 2423.12;
(4) Issue a complaint; or
(5) Withdraw a complaint.
(b) Request for appropriate temporary relief. Parties may request
the General Counsel to seek appropriate temporary relief (including a
restraining order) under 5 U.S.C. 7123(d). The General Counsel may
initiate and prosecute injunctive proceedings under 5 U.S.C. 7123(d)
only upon approval of the Authority. A determination by the General
Counsel not to seek approval of the Authority to seek such appropriate
temporary relief is final and shall not be appealed to the Authority.
(c) General Counsel requests to the Authority. When a complaint
issues and the Authority approves the General Counsel's request to seek
appropriate temporary relief (including a restraining order) under 5
U.S.C. 7123(d), the General Counsel may make application for
appropriate temporary relief (including a restraining order) in the
district court of the United States within which the unfair labor
practice is alleged to have occurred or in which the party sought to be
enjoined resides or transacts business. Temporary relief may be sought
if it is just and proper and the record establishes probable cause that
an unfair labor practice is being committed. Temporary relief shall not
be sought if it would interfere with the ability of the agency to carry
out its essential functions.
(d) Actions subsequent to obtaining appropriate temporary relief.
The General Counsel shall inform the district court which granted
temporary relief pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7123(d) whenever an
Administrative Law Judge recommends dismissal of the complaint, in
whole or in part.
Sec. 2423.11 Determination not to issue complaint; review of action
by the Regional Director.
(a) Opportunity to withdraw a charge. If, upon the completion of an
investigation under Sec. 2423.8, a decision has been made to dismiss
the charge, the Regional Director will notify the parties of the
decision and the Charging Party will be advised of an opportunity to
withdraw the charge(s).
(b) Dismissal letter. If the Charging Party does not withdraw the
charge within a reasonable period of time, the Regional Director will,
on behalf of the General Counsel, dismiss the charge and provide the
parties with a written statement of the reasons for not issuing a
complaint.
(c) Appeal of a dismissal letter. The Charging Party may obtain
review of the Regional Director's decision not to issue a complaint by
filing an appeal with the General Counsel within 25 days after service
of the Regional Director's decision. A Charging Party shall serve a
copy of the appeal on the Regional Director. The General Counsel shall
serve notice on the Charged Party that an appeal has been filed.
(d) Extension of time. The Charging Party may file a request, in
writing, for an extension of time to file an appeal, which shall be
received by the General Counsel not later than 5 days before the date
the appeal is due. A Charging Party shall serve a copy of the request
for an extension of time on the Regional Director.
(e) Grounds for granting an appeal. The General Counsel may grant
an appeal when the appeal establishes at least one of the following
grounds:
(1) The Regional Director's decision did not consider material
facts that would have resulted in issuance of a complaint;
(2) The Regional Director's decision is based on a finding of a
material fact that is clearly erroneous;
[[Page 72636]]
(3) The Regional Director's decision is based on an incorrect
statement or application of the applicable rule of law;
(4) There is no Authority precedent on the legal issue in the case;
or
(5) The manner in which the Region conducted the investigation has
resulted in prejudicial error.
(f) General Counsel action. The General Counsel may deny the appeal
of the Regional Director's dismissal of the charge, or may grant the
appeal and remand the case to the Regional Director to take further
action. The General Counsel's decision on the appeal states the grounds
listed in paragraph (e) of this section for denying or granting the
appeal, and is served on all the parties. Absent a timely motion for
reconsideration, the decision of the General Counsel is final.
(g) Reconsideration. After the General Counsel issues a final
decision, the Charging Party may move for reconsideration of the final
decision if it can establish extraordinary circumstances in its moving
papers. The motion shall be filed within 10 days after the date on
which the General Counsel's final decision is postmarked. A motion for
reconsideration shall state with particularity the extraordinary
circumstances claimed and shall be supported by appropriate citations.
The decision of the General Counsel on a motion for reconsideration is
final.
Sec. 2423.12 Settlement of unfair labor practice charges after a
Regional Director determination to issue a complaint but prior to
issuance of a complaint.
(a) Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). After a merit
determination to issue a complaint, the Regional Director will work
with the parties to settle the dispute using ADR, to avoid costly and
protracted litigation.
(b) Bilateral informal settlement agreement. Prior to issuing a
complaint but after a merit determination by the Regional Director, the
Regional Director may afford the Charging Party and the Charged Party a
reasonable period of time to enter into an informal settlement
agreement to be approved by the Regional Director. When a Charged Party
complies with the terms of an informal settlement agreement approved by
the Regional Director, no further action is taken in the case. If the
Charged Party fails to perform its obligations under the approved
informal settlement agreement, the Regional Director may institute
further proceedings.
(c) Unilateral informal settlement agreement. If the Charging Party
elects not to become a party to a bilateral settlement agreement which
the Regional Director concludes effectuates the policies of the Federal
Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, the Regional Director may
choose to approve a unilateral settlement between the General Counsel
and the Charged Party. The Regional Director, on behalf of the General
Counsel, shall issue a letter stating the grounds for approving the
settlement agreement and declining to issue a complaint. The Charging
Party may obtain review of the Regional Director's action by filing an
appeal with the General Counsel in accordance with Sec. 2423.11(c) and
(d). The General Counsel shall take action on the appeal as set forth
in Sec. 2423.11(e)-(g).
Sec. Sec. 2423.13-2423.19 [Reserved]
Dated: December 18, 2007.
Colleen Duffy Kiko,
General Counsel, Federal Labor Relations Authority.
[FR Doc. E7-24846 Filed 12-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6727-01-P