Parent-to-Child Deeming From Stepparents, 72641-72645 [E7-24787]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
affected by this proposal. It would also
be contrary to our policy for one level
of safety in part 121 operations to
exclude certain operators simply
because they are small entities. Thus,
this alternative is not considered to be
acceptable.
Alternative Four
This alternative is the proposed ADS–
B rule. ADS–B does not employ
different classes of receiving equipment
or provide different information based
on its location. Therefore, controllers
will not have to account for transitions
between surveillance solutions as an
aircraft moves closer or farther away
from an airport. In order to meet future
demand for air travel without significant
delays or denial of service, ADS–B was
found to be the most cost effective
solution to maintain a viable air
transportation system. ADS–B provides
a wider range of services to aircraft
users and could enable applications
unavailable to multilateration or radar.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing any
standards or engaging in related
activities that create unnecessary
obstacles to the foreign commerce of the
United States. Legitimate domestic
objectives, such as safety, are not
considered unnecessary obstacles. The
statute also requires consideration of
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for
U.S. standards.
ICAO is developing a set of standards
that are influenced by, and similar to,
the U.S. RTCA developed standards.
Initial discussions with the
international community lead us to
conclude that U.S. aircraft operating in
foreign airspace would not have to add
any equipment or incur any costs in
addition to what they would incur to
operate in domestic airspace under this
proposed rulemaking. Foreign operators
may incur additional costs to operate in
U.S. airspace, if their national rules,
standards and, current level of equipage
are different than those required by this
proposed rule. The FAA is actively
engaged with the international
community to ensure that the
international and U.S. ADS–B standards
are as compatible as possible. For a
fuller discussion of what other countries
are planning with regards to ADS–B, see
Section VII of the preamble. By 2020
ICAO standards may change to
harmonize with this proposed rule and
foreign operators will not have to incur
additional costs.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires each Federal agency to prepare
a written statement assessing the effects
of any Federal mandate in a proposed or
final agency rule that may result in an
expenditure of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation with the
base year 1995) in any one year by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector; such
a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of
$128.1 million in lieu of $100 million.
This proposed rule is not expected to
impose significant costs on small
governmental jurisdictions such as state,
local, or tribal governments but the FAA
calls for comment on whether this
expectation is correct. However, this
proposed rule would result in an
unfunded mandate because it would
result in expenditures in excess of an
inflation-adjusted value of $128.1
million. We have considered three
alternatives to this rulemaking, which
are discussed in section 4.0 and in the
regulatory flexibility analysis in section
7.
Issued in Washington, DC on December 14,
2007.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E7–24713 Filed 12–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Part 416
[Docket No. SSA 2007–0070]
RIN 0960–AF96
Parent-to-Child Deeming From
Stepparents
AGENCY:
Social Security Administration
(SSA).
ACTION:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: We propose to change the
Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
parent-to-child deeming rules so that we
would no longer consider the income
and resources of a stepparent when an
eligible child resides in the household
with a stepparent, but that child’s
natural or adoptive parent has
permanently left the household. These
proposed rules would respond to a
decision by the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit. Social
Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 99–
1(2) currently applies the Court’s
decision to individuals who reside in
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72641
Connecticut, New York, and Vermont.
These rules propose to establish a
uniform national policy with respect to
this issue. Also, we propose to make
uniform the age at which we consider
someone to be a ‘‘child’’ in SSI program
regulations and to make other minor
clarifications to our rules.
DATES: To be sure that we consider your
comments, we must receive them by
February 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods.
Regardless of which method you
choose, to ensure that we can associate
your comments with the correct
regulation for consideration, you must
state that your comments refer to Docket
No. SSA–2007–0070:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. (This is the
preferred method for submitting your
comments.) In the Search Documents
section, select ‘‘Social Security
Administration’’ from the agency dropdown menu, then click ‘‘submit’’. In the
Docket ID Column, locate SSA–2007–
0070 and then click ‘‘Add Comments’’
in the ‘‘Comments Add/Due By’’
column.
• Telefax to (410) 966–2830.
• Letter to the Commissioner of
Social Security, P.O. Box 17703,
Baltimore, Maryland 21235–7703.
• Deliver your comments to the Office
of Regulations, Social Security
Administration, 922 Altmeyer Building,
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21235–6401, between 8 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m. on regular business days.
Comments are posted on the Federal
eRulemaking portal, or you many
inspect them on regular business days
by making arrangements with the
contact person shown in this preamble.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric
Skidmore, Office of Income Security
Programs, 252 Altmeyer Building,
Social Security Administration, 6401
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21235–6401, (410) 597–1833, or TTY
(410) 966–5609. For information on
eligibility or filing for benefits, call our
national toll-free number, 1–800–772–
1213 or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or visit
our Internet site, Social Security Online,
at https://www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Version
The electronic file of this document is
available on the date of publication in
the Federal Register at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
Background
The basic purpose of the SSI program
is to provide a minimum level of
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
72642
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
income to people aged 65 or older, or
who are blind or disabled, and who
have limited income and resources.
Section 1611 of the Social Security Act
(the Act) provides that SSI payments
can only be made to people who have
income and resources below specified
amounts.
When we determine SSI eligibility
and benefit amounts, we always
consider the individual’s own income
and resources. Through a process
known as deeming, we also consider the
income and resources of others who are
responsible for the individual’s welfare.
Deeming is based on the concept that
those with responsibility for others
provide support to them.
Section 1614(f)(2) of the Act requires
the Commissioner of Social Security
(the Commissioner) to deem the income
and resources of eligible children to
include the income and resources of a
natural or adoptive parent and the
spouse of a parent who are living in the
same household as the eligible child.
These income and resource amounts are
deemed to the eligible child whether or
not they are available to the child,
except to the extent determined by the
Commissioner to be inequitable under
the circumstances.
Existing regulations in 20 CFR part
416, subparts K, L and R, apply to
parents and stepparents equally for
purposes of deeming income and
resources to an eligible child who lives
in the same household as the parent or
stepparent. However, a 1998 decision by
the United States Court of Appeals for
the Second Circuit held that our
regulations require that a stepparent live
in the same household as the natural or
adoptive parent, in addition to living
with the child, in order for the
stepparent’s income to be deemed to the
child. (Florez on behalf of Wallace v.
Callahan, 156 F. 3d 438 (2d Cir. 1998.)).
In the case of a natural parent who
abandoned the family home leaving her
spouse, as stepparent, with sole
physical custody of the eligible child,
the Court found that deeming of a
stepparent’s income to the child was not
supported by the regulations.
The Court disagreed with us that the
controlling regulation in such a case
was § 416.1806, which addresses who is
a spouse for SSI purposes and, by
extension, who is a spouse for purposes
of deeming. Under this regulation, we
deem the income and resources of a
stepparent living in the same household
as the eligible child when the stepparent
is legally married under State law to
that child’s natural or adoptive parent,
even if the natural or adoptive parent is
not living in the household.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
Instead, the Court held that
§ 416.1101, which defines a spouse as
someone who lives with another person
as that person’s husband or wife, was
the controlling regulation. The Court
found that §§ 416.1101 and 416.1806
created a two-part test for determining
whether a spouse of a natural parent,
who lives with the eligible child, is an
ineligible parent for deeming purposes
under § 416.1160. Under this test, (1)
the spouse must live with the child’s
natural or adoptive parent pursuant to
§ 416.1101; and (2) the relationship
must be as husband or wife, as further
defined at § 416.1806.
The Court concluded that the plain
language of these regulations, supported
by the legislative history of the Act,
required us to exclude a stepparent’s
income from deeming when the eligible
child’s natural parent no longer resided
in the family home. As a result of this
decision, we issued AR 99–1(2) on
February 1, 1999 to apply the Court’s
decision within the States in the Second
Circuit. We apply the AR if an SSI
beneficiary is an eligible child who
resides in Connecticut, New York, and
Vermont at the time of the
determination (including all posteligibility determinations) or decision at
any level of the administrative review
process. We continue to use § 416.1806
as the controlling regulation in similar
cases for the rest of the nation.
These rules propose to change our
regulations so that we will now deem a
child’s income and resources to include
the income and resources of the
stepparent only if the stepparent lives in
the same household as the child and the
natural or adoptive parent. If we adopt
these proposed rules as final rules, we
anticipate that we would rescind AR
99–1(2), consistent with our regulations
at 20 CFR 416.1485(e)(4).
The regulatory changes we propose
would amend existing regulations so
that we would exclude, as part of an
eligible child’s income and resources,
the income and resources of a
stepparent if the natural or adoptive
parent is permanently absent from the
household. If adopted as final rules, the
proposed rules would restore national
uniformity by extending the policy set
out in AR 99–1(2) to the rest of the
nation. We believe the policy in these
proposed rules will encourage
stepparents to voluntarily accept
responsibility for SSI eligible children
who have been abandoned by their
natural or adoptive parents.
Generally, we believe this regulatory
change will prove beneficial to SSI
children who are subject to the
conditions described above because we
will not deem income or resources from
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
stepparents who assume sole
responsibility for their well-being. There
may be a small number of children who
are affected by the proposed changes in
the following manner. Under this
proposed rule, the stepparent would no
longer be considered a parent for
deeming purposes and the child would
be considered living in another person’s
household and, therefore, possibly in
receipt of income in the form of in-kind
support and maintenance (ISM). ISM is
treated as income and represents the
value of food and/or shelter that an
individual receives while in the
household of a person who is not the
individual’s spouse or parent. Although
we would no longer deem the
stepparent’s income and resources when
the natural or adoptive parent has left
the home, under the SSI living
arrangement rules, we are required to
consider the ISM value the child may
receive. While the individual is in the
household of another, the value of ISM
is determined by dividing the food and
household expenses by the number of
people in the household and then
subtracting the individual’s
contribution, if any, toward those
expenses. If the individual’s
contribution is less than the computed
pro rata share of the expenses, the
difference between the contribution and
the pro rata share is then counted as
income to the individual. The amount of
income charged to an eligible individual
in such a situation is capped at onethird of the Federal Benefit Rate (FBR)
for an individual. So, if the difference
between the individual’s contribution
and the individual’s pro rata share is
greater than one-third of the individual
FBR, we only count one-third of the
FBR as income to the individual. The
amount of ISM we would charge to the
child would be reduced if the child
contributed a portion of his or her
income (such as the child’s SSI check)
toward the household expenses, and in
no case can ISM alone cause a child to
be ineligible for SSI benefits.
We tracked cases in the States in the
Second Circuit for a 1-year period
following issuance of the AR and found
no other cases where the stepparent was
the only person who remained in the
household with the eligible child after
the natural or adoptive parent left. Since
we found that there are generally other
people in the household, we believe it
is more likely that the child would be
able to pay his or her share of the
household expenses and, therefore, we
expect that the child would be charged
with little or no ISM. In addition, if the
computation results in countable ISM, it
may be less than the amount of deemed
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
income we would have counted under
our current rules in such a
circumstance. As compared to our
current rules where we deem a
stepparent’s income, if these proposed
rules are adopted as final rules, we
believe there would likely be no adverse
impact on the child. We also considered
the possibility of revising our
regulations pertaining to ISM to not
count ISM in the case of a stepparent
and child living together when the
natural or adoptive parent has departed
the household. We determined that this
option was undesirable because of the
inequities it would create under the
established ISM framework for other
beneficiaries living in a non-deemor’s
household. That is, we could not justify
not counting ISM in one situation (an
eligible child living with a non-deemor
stepparent), but continuing to count
ISM in other similar situations (an
eligible child living with a non-deemor
such as a friend or other relative).
We also propose to modify existing
regulations to clarify our longstanding
policy of not deeming the income and
resources of a stepparent who lives with
an eligible child to the child when the
natural or adoptive parent dies or
divorces the stepparent.
We also propose one change and one
clarification to our definition of
‘‘ineligible child.’’ First, we propose to
eliminate the age difference in existing
regulations between our definitions of
‘‘child’’ and ‘‘ineligible child.’’ For
purposes of consistency and to make
our rules more easily understood by the
public, we propose revising the
regulatory definition of ‘‘ineligible
child’’ to mirror the regulatory
definition of ‘‘child’’ with respect to the
maximum age requirement. As
proposed, the new rule would permit a
child in the household to be considered
an ineligible child for deeming purposes
until attainment of age 22, assuming all
other requirements are met.
Second, we also propose to modify
our definition of ‘‘ineligible child’’ to
clarify who is considered a ‘‘spouse’’ for
purposes of ineligible child
determinations in deeming situations.
Under current policy, in determining
the amount of income to deem from a
parent to an eligible child, we make an
allocation for other children in the
home, that is, we consider what other
ineligible children reside in the home
and deduct from the amount of income
to be deemed accordingly. In the
situation where a parent lives in a home
with his or her eligible child, and also
with the ineligible child of the parent’s
spouse, we provide an allocation for the
ineligible child of the parent’s spouse in
determining how much income to deem
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
from the parent to the eligible child. If
the parent’s spouse were to abandon the
home, leaving the ineligible child of the
parent’s spouse behind, we still provide
an allocation with respect to the
ineligible child of the parent’s spouse,
when determining how much income to
deem from the parent to the eligible
child. The proposed rule would clarify,
consistent with current policy, that
when determining who meets the
definition of ‘‘ineligible child’’ for SSI
purposes in the context of the child of
a spouse, we use the definition of
spouse at § 416.1806, which does not
necessarily require that the spouse of a
parent live with the parent to be
considered the parent’s spouse.
Finally, we propose to update the
name of a government entity in our
regulations due to the creation of the
United States Department of Homeland
Security. This change is clerical in
nature and has no substantive effect on
our policies or procedures.
Explanation of Proposed Changes
We propose to amend the regulations
in 20 CFR, part 416, subparts K, L and
R, to implement the policy changes
discussed above. In summary, we
propose to:
• Revise §§ 416.1160(a)(2) and (d),
416.1165(g)(4), 416.1202(b)(1), and
416.1851(c) to not deem income and
resources from a stepparent when an
eligible child lives with a stepparent but
not with his or her natural or adoptive
parent. This will make our national
policy uniform with respect to the
deeming of income and resources from
stepparents to eligible children when
the natural or adoptive parent has
permanently left the household, as
defined in § 416.1167.
• Update § 416.1160(d) to replace
‘‘Immigration and Naturalization
Service’’ with ‘‘U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services’’ due to a change
in the name of a government entity. This
is a result of the creation of the
Department of Homeland Security.
• Revise the definition of ineligible
child in § 416.1160(d) to remove the
under 21 age standard so that the
definition of ‘‘ineligible child’’ will
cross-reference the definition of ‘‘child’’
in § 416.1101, which uses an age limit
of 22. This change would eliminate a
layer of complexity that currently exists
in the SSI program; that is, the
distinction between an ‘‘ineligible
child’’ for deeming purposes and a
‘‘child’’ for all other purposes.
• Revise the definition of ineligible
child in § 416.1160(d) to clarify how we
decide who is a ‘‘spouse’’ when
determining who is an ‘‘ineligible
child.’’ The definition of ‘‘ineligible
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72643
child’’ would cross-reference § 416.1806
defining how we determine if an
individual is married and who is a
spouse. The proposed change would
clarify our regulations, consistent with
current policy, to continue providing an
ineligible child allocation when the
spouse of a parent leaves the household,
but the spouse’s children remain in the
household with the eligible child and
the parent of the eligible child.
• Revise § 416.1165(g)(3) to clarify
how we deem income to an eligible
child when the ineligible parent dies.
The proposed changes to
§ 416.1165(g)(3) would clarify our
longstanding policy, consistent with
§ 416.1881(b), to no longer deem the
income of the stepparent to the eligible
child when the natural or adoptive
parent dies or divorces the stepparent.
• Update § 416.1204 to replace
‘‘Immigration and Naturalization
Service’’ with ‘‘U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services’’ due to a change
in the name of a government entity. This
is a result of the creation of the
Department of Homeland Security.
Clarity of These Rules
Executive Order 12866, as amended,
requires each agency to write all rules
in plain language. In addition to your
substantive comments on these
proposed rules, we invite your
comments on how to make them easier
to understand. For example:
• Have we organized the material to
suit your needs?
• Are the requirements in the rules
clearly stated?
• Do the rules contain technical
language or jargon that is not clear?
• Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the rules easier to
understand?
• Would more (but shorter) sections
be better?
• Could we improve clarity by adding
tables, lists or diagrams?
• What else could we do to make the
rules easier to understand?
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, as Amended
We have consulted with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that these proposed rules
meet the requirements for a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, as amended. Thus, they were
reviewed by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that these proposed rules,
when published in final, would not
have a significant economic impact on
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
72644
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
a substantial number of small entities
because they affect only individuals.
Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility
analysis as provided in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, as amended, is not
required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These proposed regulations will
impose no additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements requiring
OMB clearance.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Programs No. 96.006, Supplemental Security
Income)
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 416
Administrative practice and
procedure, Aged, Blind, Disability
benefits, Public assistance programs,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Supplemental Security
Income (SSI).
Dated: September 25, 2007.
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security.
§ 416.1165 How we deem income to you
from your ineligible parent(s).
*
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, we propose to amend
subparts K, L and R of part 416 of
chapter III of title 20 Code of Federal
Regulations as set forth below:
PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL
SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED,
BLIND, AND DISABLED
Subpart K—[Amended]
1. The authority citation for subpart K
of part 416 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1602, 1611,
1612, 1613, 1614(f), 1621, 1631, and 1633 of
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5),
1381a, 1382, 1382a, 1382b, 1382c(f), 1382j,
1383, and 1383b); sec. 211, Pub. L. 93–66, 87
Stat. 154 (42 U.S.C. 1382 note).
2. Amend § 416.1160 by revising the
section heading, paragraph (a)(2) and
the definitions of ‘‘Date of admission to
or date of entry into the United States’’
and ‘‘Ineligible child’’ in paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
§ 416.1160
What is deeming of income?
(a) * * *
(2) Ineligible parent. If you are a child
to whom deeming rules apply (see
§ 416.1165), we look at your ineligible
parent’s income to decide whether we
must deem some of it to be yours. If you
live with both your parent and your
parent’s spouse (i.e., your stepparent),
we also look at your stepparent’s
income to decide whether we must
deem some of it to be yours. We do this
because we expect your parent (and
your stepparent, if living with you and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
your parent) to use some of his or her
income to take care of your needs.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
Date of admission to or date of entry
into the United States means the date
established by the U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services as the date the
alien is admitted for permanent
residence.
*
*
*
*
*
Ineligible child means your natural
child or adopted child, or the natural or
adopted child of your spouse, or the
natural or adopted child of your parent
or of your parent’s spouse (as the term
child is defined in § 416.1101 and the
term spouse is defined in § 416.1806),
who lives in the same household with
you, and is not eligible for SSI benefits.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 416.1165 by revising
paragraphs (g)(3) and (g)(4) to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(3) Ineligible parent dies. If your
ineligible parent dies, we do not deem
that parent’s income to you to determine
your eligibility for SSI benefits
beginning with the month following the
month of death. In determining your
benefit amount beginning with the
month following the month of death, we
use only your own countable income in
a prior month, excluding any income
deemed to you in that month from your
deceased ineligible parent (see
§ 416.1160(b)(2)(iii)). If you live with
two ineligible parents and one dies, we
continue to deem income from the
surviving ineligible parent who is also
your natural or adoptive parent. If you
live with a stepparent following the
death of your natural or adoptive parent,
we do not deem income from the
stepparent.
(4) Ineligible parent and you no longer
live in the same household. If your
ineligible parent and you no longer live
in the same household, we do not deem
that parent’s income to you to determine
your eligibility for SSI benefits
beginning with the first month
following the month in which one of
you leaves the household. We also will
not deem income to you from your
parent’s spouse (i.e., your stepparent)
who remains in the household with you
if your natural or adoptive parent has
permanently left the household. To
determine your benefit amount if you
continue to be eligible, we follow the
rule in § 416.420 of counting your
income including deemed income from
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
your parent and your parent’s spouse
(i.e., your stepparent) (if the stepparent
and parent lived in the household with
you) in the second month prior to the
current month.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart L—[Amended]
4. The authority citation for subpart L
of part 416 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1602, 1611,
1612, 1613, 1614(f), 1621, 1631, and 1633 of
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5),
1381a, 1382, 1382a, 1382b, 1382c(f), 1382j,
1383, and 1383b); sec. 211, Pub. L. 93–66, 87
Stat. 154 (42 U.S.C. 1382 note).
5. Amend § 416.1202 by revising
paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
§ 416.1202
Deeming of resources.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Child—(1) General. In the case of
a child (as defined in § 416.1856) who
is under age 18, such child’s resources
shall be deemed to include any
resources, not otherwise excluded under
this subpart, of an ineligible parent of
such child who is living in the same
household with such child (as described
in § 416.1851). Such child’s resources
also shall be deemed to include the
resources of an ineligible spouse of a
parent (stepparent), provided the
stepparent lives in the same household
as the child and the parent. The child’s
resources shall be deemed to include
the resources of the parent and
stepparent whether or not the resources
of the parent and stepparent are
available to the child, to the extent that
the resources of such parent (or parent
and stepparent), exceed the resource
limits described in § 416.1205 except as
provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section. (If the child is living with only
one parent, the resource limit for an
individual applies. If the child is living
with both parents, or the child is living
with one parent and the stepparent, the
resource limit for an individual and
spouse applies.) In addition to the
exclusions listed in § 416.1210, pension
funds which the parent or spouse of a
parent may have are also excluded. The
term ‘‘pension funds’’ is defined in
paragraph (a) of this section. As used in
this section, the term ‘‘parent’’ means
the natural or adoptive parent of a child
and the terms ‘‘spouse of a parent’’ and
‘‘stepparent’’ means the spouse (as
defined in § 416.1806) of such natural or
adoptive parent who is living in the
same household with the child and
parent.
*
*
*
*
*
6. Amend § 416.1204 by revising the
first two sentences of the introductory
text to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
§ 416.1204 Deeming of resources of the
sponsor of an alien.
The resources of an alien who first
applies for SSI benefits after September
30, 1980, are deemed to include the
resources of the alien’s sponsor for 3
years after the alien’s date of admission
into the United States. The date of
admission is the date established by the
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services as the date the alien is
admitted for permanent residence.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart R—[Amended]
7. The authority citation for subpart R
of part 416 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1612(b),
1614(b), (c), and (d), and 1631(d)(1) and (e)
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
902(a)(5), 1382a(b), 1382c(b), (c), and (d), and
1383(d)(1) and (e)).
8. Amend § 416.1851 by revising the
first sentence of paragraph (c) and
adding a new second sentence to read
as follows:
§ 416.1851
child.
Effects of being considered a
*
*
*
*
*
(c) If you are under age 18 and live
with your parent(s) who is not eligible
for SSI benefits, we consider (deem) part
of his or her income and resources to be
your own. If you are under age 18 and
live with both your parent and your
parent’s spouse (stepparent) and neither
is eligible for SSI benefits, we consider
(deem) part of their income and
resources to be your own.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–24787 Filed 12–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–114126–07]
RIN 1545–BG54
Reduction of Foreign Tax Credit
Limitation Categories Under Section
904(d)
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
by cross-reference to temporary
regulations and notice of public hearing.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In the Rules and Regulations
section in this issue of the Federal
Register, the IRS is issuing temporary
regulations that provide guidance
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
relating to the reduction of the number
of separate foreign tax credit limitation
categories under section 904(d) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Changes to the
applicable law were made by the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
(AJCA) reducing the number of section
904(d) separate categories from eight to
two, effective for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2006. The
temporary regulations provide guidance
needed to comply with these changes
and affect individuals and corporations
claiming foreign tax credits. The text of
those temporary regulations published
in this issue of the Federal Register also
serves as the text of these proposed
regulations. This document also
provides a notice of public hearing on
these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
must be received by March 20, 2008.
Outlines of topics to be discussed at the
public hearing scheduled for April 22,
2008, at 10 a.m. must be received by
April 1, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–114126–07), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–114126–
07), Courier’s desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20044, or sent
electronically, via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–114126–
07). The public hearing will be held in
the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the regulations, Jeffrey L.
Parry, (202) 622–3850; concerning
submissions of comments, the hearing,
and/or to be placed on the building
access list to attend the hearing, Kelly
Banks, (202) 622–7180 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Explanation of
Provisions
Temporary regulations in the Rules
and Regulations section of this issue of
the Federal Register contain
amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR Part 1) which
provide rules relating to the reduction of
the number of separate foreign tax credit
limitation categories under section
904(d). The text of those regulations also
serves as the text of these proposed
regulations. The preamble to the
temporary regulations explains the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72645
temporary regulations and these
proposed regulations. The regulations
affect individuals and corporations
claiming foreign tax credits.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
has also been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations, and because the
regulations do not impose a collection
of information on small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f), these regulations have
been submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
electronic or written comments (a
signed original and eight (8) copies) that
are submitted timely to the IRS. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
specifically request comments on the
clarity of the proposed regulations and
how they may be made easier to
understand, as well as comments on
additional guidance that may be needed
to implement changes made by the
AJCA. All comments will be available
for public inspection and copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled
for April 26, 2008, in the auditorium,
Internal Revenue Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC. Due to building security
procedures, visitors must enter at the
Constitution Avenue entrance. In
addition, all visitors must present photo
identification to enter the building.
Because of access restrictions, visitors
will not be admitted beyond the
immediate entrance more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
must submit electronic or written
comments by March 20, 2008 and an
outline of the topics to be discussed and
the time to be devoted to each topic
(signed original and eight (8) copies) by
April 1, 2008. A period of 10 minutes
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72641-72645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24787]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Part 416
[Docket No. SSA 2007-0070]
RIN 0960-AF96
Parent-to-Child Deeming From Stepparents
AGENCY: Social Security Administration (SSA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to change the Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
parent-to-child deeming rules so that we would no longer consider the
income and resources of a stepparent when an eligible child resides in
the household with a stepparent, but that child's natural or adoptive
parent has permanently left the household. These proposed rules would
respond to a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit. Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 99-1(2)
currently applies the Court's decision to individuals who reside in
Connecticut, New York, and Vermont. These rules propose to establish a
uniform national policy with respect to this issue. Also, we propose to
make uniform the age at which we consider someone to be a ``child'' in
SSI program regulations and to make other minor clarifications to our
rules.
DATES: To be sure that we consider your comments, we must receive them
by February 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods.
Regardless of which method you choose, to ensure that we can associate
your comments with the correct regulation for consideration, you must
state that your comments refer to Docket No. SSA-2007-0070:
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
(This is the preferred method for submitting your comments.) In the
Search Documents section, select ``Social Security Administration''
from the agency drop-down menu, then click ``submit''. In the Docket ID
Column, locate SSA-2007-0070 and then click ``Add Comments'' in the
``Comments Add/Due By'' column.
Telefax to (410) 966-2830.
Letter to the Commissioner of Social Security, P.O. Box
17703, Baltimore, Maryland 21235-7703.
Deliver your comments to the Office of Regulations, Social
Security Administration, 922 Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
on regular business days.
Comments are posted on the Federal eRulemaking portal, or you many
inspect them on regular business days by making arrangements with the
contact person shown in this preamble.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Skidmore, Office of Income
Security Programs, 252 Altmeyer Building, Social Security
Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401,
(410) 597-1833, or TTY (410) 966-5609. For information on eligibility
or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number, 1-800-772-
1213 or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our Internet site, Social Security
Online, at https://www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Version
The electronic file of this document is available on the date of
publication in the Federal Register at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/
index.html.
Background
The basic purpose of the SSI program is to provide a minimum level
of
[[Page 72642]]
income to people aged 65 or older, or who are blind or disabled, and
who have limited income and resources. Section 1611 of the Social
Security Act (the Act) provides that SSI payments can only be made to
people who have income and resources below specified amounts.
When we determine SSI eligibility and benefit amounts, we always
consider the individual's own income and resources. Through a process
known as deeming, we also consider the income and resources of others
who are responsible for the individual's welfare. Deeming is based on
the concept that those with responsibility for others provide support
to them.
Section 1614(f)(2) of the Act requires the Commissioner of Social
Security (the Commissioner) to deem the income and resources of
eligible children to include the income and resources of a natural or
adoptive parent and the spouse of a parent who are living in the same
household as the eligible child. These income and resource amounts are
deemed to the eligible child whether or not they are available to the
child, except to the extent determined by the Commissioner to be
inequitable under the circumstances.
Existing regulations in 20 CFR part 416, subparts K, L and R, apply
to parents and stepparents equally for purposes of deeming income and
resources to an eligible child who lives in the same household as the
parent or stepparent. However, a 1998 decision by the United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that our regulations
require that a stepparent live in the same household as the natural or
adoptive parent, in addition to living with the child, in order for the
stepparent's income to be deemed to the child. (Florez on behalf of
Wallace v. Callahan, 156 F. 3d 438 (2d Cir. 1998.)). In the case of a
natural parent who abandoned the family home leaving her spouse, as
stepparent, with sole physical custody of the eligible child, the Court
found that deeming of a stepparent's income to the child was not
supported by the regulations.
The Court disagreed with us that the controlling regulation in such
a case was Sec. 416.1806, which addresses who is a spouse for SSI
purposes and, by extension, who is a spouse for purposes of deeming.
Under this regulation, we deem the income and resources of a stepparent
living in the same household as the eligible child when the stepparent
is legally married under State law to that child's natural or adoptive
parent, even if the natural or adoptive parent is not living in the
household.
Instead, the Court held that Sec. 416.1101, which defines a spouse
as someone who lives with another person as that person's husband or
wife, was the controlling regulation. The Court found that Sec. Sec.
416.1101 and 416.1806 created a two-part test for determining whether a
spouse of a natural parent, who lives with the eligible child, is an
ineligible parent for deeming purposes under Sec. 416.1160. Under this
test, (1) the spouse must live with the child's natural or adoptive
parent pursuant to Sec. 416.1101; and (2) the relationship must be as
husband or wife, as further defined at Sec. 416.1806.
The Court concluded that the plain language of these regulations,
supported by the legislative history of the Act, required us to exclude
a stepparent's income from deeming when the eligible child's natural
parent no longer resided in the family home. As a result of this
decision, we issued AR 99-1(2) on February 1, 1999 to apply the Court's
decision within the States in the Second Circuit. We apply the AR if an
SSI beneficiary is an eligible child who resides in Connecticut, New
York, and Vermont at the time of the determination (including all post-
eligibility determinations) or decision at any level of the
administrative review process. We continue to use Sec. 416.1806 as the
controlling regulation in similar cases for the rest of the nation.
These rules propose to change our regulations so that we will now
deem a child's income and resources to include the income and resources
of the stepparent only if the stepparent lives in the same household as
the child and the natural or adoptive parent. If we adopt these
proposed rules as final rules, we anticipate that we would rescind AR
99-1(2), consistent with our regulations at 20 CFR 416.1485(e)(4).
The regulatory changes we propose would amend existing regulations
so that we would exclude, as part of an eligible child's income and
resources, the income and resources of a stepparent if the natural or
adoptive parent is permanently absent from the household. If adopted as
final rules, the proposed rules would restore national uniformity by
extending the policy set out in AR 99-1(2) to the rest of the nation.
We believe the policy in these proposed rules will encourage
stepparents to voluntarily accept responsibility for SSI eligible
children who have been abandoned by their natural or adoptive parents.
Generally, we believe this regulatory change will prove beneficial
to SSI children who are subject to the conditions described above
because we will not deem income or resources from stepparents who
assume sole responsibility for their well-being. There may be a small
number of children who are affected by the proposed changes in the
following manner. Under this proposed rule, the stepparent would no
longer be considered a parent for deeming purposes and the child would
be considered living in another person's household and, therefore,
possibly in receipt of income in the form of in-kind support and
maintenance (ISM). ISM is treated as income and represents the value of
food and/or shelter that an individual receives while in the household
of a person who is not the individual's spouse or parent. Although we
would no longer deem the stepparent's income and resources when the
natural or adoptive parent has left the home, under the SSI living
arrangement rules, we are required to consider the ISM value the child
may receive. While the individual is in the household of another, the
value of ISM is determined by dividing the food and household expenses
by the number of people in the household and then subtracting the
individual's contribution, if any, toward those expenses. If the
individual's contribution is less than the computed pro rata share of
the expenses, the difference between the contribution and the pro rata
share is then counted as income to the individual. The amount of income
charged to an eligible individual in such a situation is capped at one-
third of the Federal Benefit Rate (FBR) for an individual. So, if the
difference between the individual's contribution and the individual's
pro rata share is greater than one-third of the individual FBR, we only
count one-third of the FBR as income to the individual. The amount of
ISM we would charge to the child would be reduced if the child
contributed a portion of his or her income (such as the child's SSI
check) toward the household expenses, and in no case can ISM alone
cause a child to be ineligible for SSI benefits.
We tracked cases in the States in the Second Circuit for a 1-year
period following issuance of the AR and found no other cases where the
stepparent was the only person who remained in the household with the
eligible child after the natural or adoptive parent left. Since we
found that there are generally other people in the household, we
believe it is more likely that the child would be able to pay his or
her share of the household expenses and, therefore, we expect that the
child would be charged with little or no ISM. In addition, if the
computation results in countable ISM, it may be less than the amount of
deemed
[[Page 72643]]
income we would have counted under our current rules in such a
circumstance. As compared to our current rules where we deem a
stepparent's income, if these proposed rules are adopted as final
rules, we believe there would likely be no adverse impact on the child.
We also considered the possibility of revising our regulations
pertaining to ISM to not count ISM in the case of a stepparent and
child living together when the natural or adoptive parent has departed
the household. We determined that this option was undesirable because
of the inequities it would create under the established ISM framework
for other beneficiaries living in a non-deemor's household. That is, we
could not justify not counting ISM in one situation (an eligible child
living with a non-deemor stepparent), but continuing to count ISM in
other similar situations (an eligible child living with a non-deemor
such as a friend or other relative).
We also propose to modify existing regulations to clarify our
longstanding policy of not deeming the income and resources of a
stepparent who lives with an eligible child to the child when the
natural or adoptive parent dies or divorces the stepparent.
We also propose one change and one clarification to our definition
of ``ineligible child.'' First, we propose to eliminate the age
difference in existing regulations between our definitions of ``child''
and ``ineligible child.'' For purposes of consistency and to make our
rules more easily understood by the public, we propose revising the
regulatory definition of ``ineligible child'' to mirror the regulatory
definition of ``child'' with respect to the maximum age requirement. As
proposed, the new rule would permit a child in the household to be
considered an ineligible child for deeming purposes until attainment of
age 22, assuming all other requirements are met.
Second, we also propose to modify our definition of ``ineligible
child'' to clarify who is considered a ``spouse'' for purposes of
ineligible child determinations in deeming situations. Under current
policy, in determining the amount of income to deem from a parent to an
eligible child, we make an allocation for other children in the home,
that is, we consider what other ineligible children reside in the home
and deduct from the amount of income to be deemed accordingly. In the
situation where a parent lives in a home with his or her eligible
child, and also with the ineligible child of the parent's spouse, we
provide an allocation for the ineligible child of the parent's spouse
in determining how much income to deem from the parent to the eligible
child. If the parent's spouse were to abandon the home, leaving the
ineligible child of the parent's spouse behind, we still provide an
allocation with respect to the ineligible child of the parent's spouse,
when determining how much income to deem from the parent to the
eligible child. The proposed rule would clarify, consistent with
current policy, that when determining who meets the definition of
``ineligible child'' for SSI purposes in the context of the child of a
spouse, we use the definition of spouse at Sec. 416.1806, which does
not necessarily require that the spouse of a parent live with the
parent to be considered the parent's spouse.
Finally, we propose to update the name of a government entity in
our regulations due to the creation of the United States Department of
Homeland Security. This change is clerical in nature and has no
substantive effect on our policies or procedures.
Explanation of Proposed Changes
We propose to amend the regulations in 20 CFR, part 416, subparts
K, L and R, to implement the policy changes discussed above. In
summary, we propose to:
Revise Sec. Sec. 416.1160(a)(2) and (d), 416.1165(g)(4),
416.1202(b)(1), and 416.1851(c) to not deem income and resources from a
stepparent when an eligible child lives with a stepparent but not with
his or her natural or adoptive parent. This will make our national
policy uniform with respect to the deeming of income and resources from
stepparents to eligible children when the natural or adoptive parent
has permanently left the household, as defined in Sec. 416.1167.
Update Sec. 416.1160(d) to replace ``Immigration and
Naturalization Service'' with ``U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services'' due to a change in the name of a government entity. This is
a result of the creation of the Department of Homeland Security.
Revise the definition of ineligible child in Sec.
416.1160(d) to remove the under 21 age standard so that the definition
of ``ineligible child'' will cross-reference the definition of
``child'' in Sec. 416.1101, which uses an age limit of 22. This change
would eliminate a layer of complexity that currently exists in the SSI
program; that is, the distinction between an ``ineligible child'' for
deeming purposes and a ``child'' for all other purposes.
Revise the definition of ineligible child in Sec.
416.1160(d) to clarify how we decide who is a ``spouse'' when
determining who is an ``ineligible child.'' The definition of
``ineligible child'' would cross-reference Sec. 416.1806 defining how
we determine if an individual is married and who is a spouse. The
proposed change would clarify our regulations, consistent with current
policy, to continue providing an ineligible child allocation when the
spouse of a parent leaves the household, but the spouse's children
remain in the household with the eligible child and the parent of the
eligible child.
Revise Sec. 416.1165(g)(3) to clarify how we deem income
to an eligible child when the ineligible parent dies. The proposed
changes to Sec. 416.1165(g)(3) would clarify our longstanding policy,
consistent with Sec. 416.1881(b), to no longer deem the income of the
stepparent to the eligible child when the natural or adoptive parent
dies or divorces the stepparent.
Update Sec. 416.1204 to replace ``Immigration and
Naturalization Service'' with ``U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services'' due to a change in the name of a government entity. This is
a result of the creation of the Department of Homeland Security.
Clarity of These Rules
Executive Order 12866, as amended, requires each agency to write
all rules in plain language. In addition to your substantive comments
on these proposed rules, we invite your comments on how to make them
easier to understand. For example:
Have we organized the material to suit your needs?
Are the requirements in the rules clearly stated?
Do the rules contain technical language or jargon that is
not clear?
Would a different format (grouping and order of sections,
use of headings, paragraphing) make the rules easier to understand?
Would more (but shorter) sections be better?
Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists or
diagrams?
What else could we do to make the rules easier to
understand?
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, as Amended
We have consulted with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
and determined that these proposed rules meet the requirements for a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, as amended.
Thus, they were reviewed by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that these proposed rules, when published in final,
would not have a significant economic impact on
[[Page 72644]]
a substantial number of small entities because they affect only
individuals. Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility analysis as provided
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These proposed regulations will impose no additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements requiring OMB clearance.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs No. 96.006,
Supplemental Security Income)
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 416
Administrative practice and procedure, Aged, Blind, Disability
benefits, Public assistance programs, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
Dated: September 25, 2007.
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, we propose to amend
subparts K, L and R of part 416 of chapter III of title 20 Code of
Federal Regulations as set forth below:
PART 416--SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND
DISABLED
Subpart K--[Amended]
1. The authority citation for subpart K of part 416 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1602, 1611, 1612, 1613, 1614(f),
1621, 1631, and 1633 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
902(a)(5), 1381a, 1382, 1382a, 1382b, 1382c(f), 1382j, 1383, and
1383b); sec. 211, Pub. L. 93-66, 87 Stat. 154 (42 U.S.C. 1382 note).
2. Amend Sec. 416.1160 by revising the section heading, paragraph
(a)(2) and the definitions of ``Date of admission to or date of entry
into the United States'' and ``Ineligible child'' in paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
Sec. 416.1160 What is deeming of income?
(a) * * *
(2) Ineligible parent. If you are a child to whom deeming rules
apply (see Sec. 416.1165), we look at your ineligible parent's income
to decide whether we must deem some of it to be yours. If you live with
both your parent and your parent's spouse (i.e., your stepparent), we
also look at your stepparent's income to decide whether we must deem
some of it to be yours. We do this because we expect your parent (and
your stepparent, if living with you and your parent) to use some of his
or her income to take care of your needs.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
Date of admission to or date of entry into the United States means
the date established by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
as the date the alien is admitted for permanent residence.
* * * * *
Ineligible child means your natural child or adopted child, or the
natural or adopted child of your spouse, or the natural or adopted
child of your parent or of your parent's spouse (as the term child is
defined in Sec. 416.1101 and the term spouse is defined in Sec.
416.1806), who lives in the same household with you, and is not
eligible for SSI benefits.
* * * * *
3. Amend Sec. 416.1165 by revising paragraphs (g)(3) and (g)(4) to
read as follows:
Sec. 416.1165 How we deem income to you from your ineligible
parent(s).
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(3) Ineligible parent dies. If your ineligible parent dies, we do
not deem that parent's income to you to determine your eligibility for
SSI benefits beginning with the month following the month of death. In
determining your benefit amount beginning with the month following the
month of death, we use only your own countable income in a prior month,
excluding any income deemed to you in that month from your deceased
ineligible parent (see Sec. 416.1160(b)(2)(iii)). If you live with two
ineligible parents and one dies, we continue to deem income from the
surviving ineligible parent who is also your natural or adoptive
parent. If you live with a stepparent following the death of your
natural or adoptive parent, we do not deem income from the stepparent.
(4) Ineligible parent and you no longer live in the same household.
If your ineligible parent and you no longer live in the same household,
we do not deem that parent's income to you to determine your
eligibility for SSI benefits beginning with the first month following
the month in which one of you leaves the household. We also will not
deem income to you from your parent's spouse (i.e., your stepparent)
who remains in the household with you if your natural or adoptive
parent has permanently left the household. To determine your benefit
amount if you continue to be eligible, we follow the rule in Sec.
416.420 of counting your income including deemed income from your
parent and your parent's spouse (i.e., your stepparent) (if the
stepparent and parent lived in the household with you) in the second
month prior to the current month.
* * * * *
Subpart L--[Amended]
4. The authority citation for subpart L of part 416 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1602, 1611, 1612, 1613, 1614(f),
1621, 1631, and 1633 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
902(a)(5), 1381a, 1382, 1382a, 1382b, 1382c(f), 1382j, 1383, and
1383b); sec. 211, Pub. L. 93-66, 87 Stat. 154 (42 U.S.C. 1382 note).
5. Amend Sec. 416.1202 by revising paragraph (b)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 416.1202 Deeming of resources.
* * * * *
(b) Child--(1) General. In the case of a child (as defined in Sec.
416.1856) who is under age 18, such child's resources shall be deemed
to include any resources, not otherwise excluded under this subpart, of
an ineligible parent of such child who is living in the same household
with such child (as described in Sec. 416.1851). Such child's
resources also shall be deemed to include the resources of an
ineligible spouse of a parent (stepparent), provided the stepparent
lives in the same household as the child and the parent. The child's
resources shall be deemed to include the resources of the parent and
stepparent whether or not the resources of the parent and stepparent
are available to the child, to the extent that the resources of such
parent (or parent and stepparent), exceed the resource limits described
in Sec. 416.1205 except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section. (If the child is living with only one parent, the resource
limit for an individual applies. If the child is living with both
parents, or the child is living with one parent and the stepparent, the
resource limit for an individual and spouse applies.) In addition to
the exclusions listed in Sec. 416.1210, pension funds which the parent
or spouse of a parent may have are also excluded. The term ``pension
funds'' is defined in paragraph (a) of this section. As used in this
section, the term ``parent'' means the natural or adoptive parent of a
child and the terms ``spouse of a parent'' and ``stepparent'' means the
spouse (as defined in Sec. 416.1806) of such natural or adoptive
parent who is living in the same household with the child and parent.
* * * * *
6. Amend Sec. 416.1204 by revising the first two sentences of the
introductory text to read as follows:
[[Page 72645]]
Sec. 416.1204 Deeming of resources of the sponsor of an alien.
The resources of an alien who first applies for SSI benefits after
September 30, 1980, are deemed to include the resources of the alien's
sponsor for 3 years after the alien's date of admission into the United
States. The date of admission is the date established by the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services as the date the alien is admitted
for permanent residence.
* * * * *
Subpart R--[Amended]
7. The authority citation for subpart R of part 416 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1612(b), 1614(b), (c), and (d), and
1631(d)(1) and (e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5),
1382a(b), 1382c(b), (c), and (d), and 1383(d)(1) and (e)).
8. Amend Sec. 416.1851 by revising the first sentence of paragraph
(c) and adding a new second sentence to read as follows:
Sec. 416.1851 Effects of being considered a child.
* * * * *
(c) If you are under age 18 and live with your parent(s) who is not
eligible for SSI benefits, we consider (deem) part of his or her income
and resources to be your own. If you are under age 18 and live with
both your parent and your parent's spouse (stepparent) and neither is
eligible for SSI benefits, we consider (deem) part of their income and
resources to be your own.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-24787 Filed 12-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P