Northwest Area Water Supply Project, ND, 72756-72757 [E7-24575]
Download as PDF
72756
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Notices
the administration and development of
the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal
National Historical Park.
The members of the Commission are
as follows:
Mrs. Sheila Rabb Weidenfeld,
Chairperson
Mr. Charles J. Weir
Mr. Barry A. Passett
Mr. James G. McCleaf II
Mr. John A. Ziegler
Mrs. Mary E. Woodward
Mrs. Donna Printz
Mrs. Ferial S. Bishop
Ms. Nancy C. Long
Mrs. Jo Reynolds
Dr. James H. Gilford
Brother James Kirkpatrick
Dr. George E. Lewis, Jr.
Mr. Charles D. McElrath
Ms. Patricia Schooley
Mr. Jack Reeder
Ms. Merrily Pierce
Topics that will be presented during
the meeting include:
1. Update on park operations.
2. Update on major construction/
development projects.
3. Update on partnership projects.
The meeting will be open to the
public. Any member of the public may
file with the Commission a written
statement concerning the matters to be
discussed. Persons wishing further
information concerning this meeting, or
who wish to submit written statements,
may contact Kevin Brandt,
Superintendent, Chesapeake and Ohio
Canal National Historical Park. Minutes
of the meeting will be available for
public inspection six weeks after the
meeting at Chesapeake and Ohio Canal
National Historical Park Headquarters,
1850 Dual Highway, Suite 100,
Hagerstown, Maryland 21740.
Dated: November 1, 2007.
Kevin D. Brandt,
Superintendent, Chesapeake and Ohio Canal,
National Historical Park.
[FR Doc. E7–24834 Filed 12–20–07; 8:45 am]
Committee) will be held on Friday,
February 8, 2008, at 9:30 a.m. at the
Chase County Community Building,
Swope Park, 1715 RD 210, Cottonwood
Falls, Kansas.
The primary purpose of the meeting
will be to receive Committee input on
the Environmental Assessment, General
Management Plan Revision/Site
Development Study for New Visitor
Center, Administrative, and
Maintenance Facilities and to discuss
other current and future topics
concerning the preserve.
The meeting will be open to the
public. Any person may file with the
Committee a written statement
concerning the matters to be discussed.
Persons who wish to file a written
statement or testify at the meeting or
who want further information
concerning the meeting may contact
Superintendent Stephen T. Miller at
(620) 273–6034.
DATES: February 8, 2008, at 9:30 a.m.
ADDRESSES: Chase County Community
Building, Swope Park, 1715 RD 210,
Cottonwood Falls, Kansas.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Superintendent Stephen T. Miller, (620)
273–6034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Committee was established by Public
Law 104–333 to advise the Secretary of
the Interior and the Director of the
National Park Service concerning the
development, management, and
interpretation of the Tallgrass Prairie
National Preserve.
Stephen T. Miller,
Superintendent, Tallgrass Prairie National
Preserve.
[FR Doc. E7–24845 Filed 12–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–BE–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Northwest Area Water Supply Project,
ND
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
AGENCY:
Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve
Advisory Committee; Notice of Public
Meeting
National Park Service, Tallgrass
Prairie National Preserve Advisory
Committee, Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
meeting of the Tallgrass Prairie National
Preserve Advisory Committee (the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:37 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and Announcement of Public Hearings.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation
published a notice in the Federal
Register on March 6, 2006 (71 FR
11226) announcing the commencement
of work under the National
Environmental Policy Act on an
environmental impact statement for the
Northwest Area Water Supply Project
(NAWS Project). We are now notifying
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A 60-day public review period
begins with the publication of this
notice. Written comments on the Draft
EIS are due by February 26, 2008, and
should be submitted to Reclamation at
the address given below.
Public hearings will be held during
February 2008 in North Dakota. See the
Supplementary Information section for
dates of the public hearings.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on the Draft
EIS to: Northwest Area Water Supply
Project EIS, Bureau of Reclamation,
Dakotas Area Office, P.O. Box 1017,
Bismarck, ND 58502. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
meeting addresses.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alicia Waters, Northwest Area Water
Supply Project EIS, Bureau of
Reclamation, Dakotas Area Office, P.O.
Box 1017, Bismarck ND 58502;
Telephone: (701) 221–1206; or FAX
(701) 250–4326. You may submit e-mail
to awaters@gp.usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Public Hearing Dates:
• Monday, February 4, 2008, 7 p.m.,
Bismarck, North Dakota
• Tuesday, February 5, 2008, 7 p.m.,
Minot, North Dakota
• Thursday, February 7, 2008, 7 p.m.,
New Town, North Dakota
Public Hearing Locations:
BILLING CODE 4312–JW–P
National Park Service
the public that Reclamation has
prepared a Draft EIS which is now
available for review and comment. The
Draft EIS provides information and
analyses related to water treatment for
the NAWS Project that would further
minimize the transfer of potentially
invasive species from the Missouri River
basin into the Hudson Bay basin from
potential treatment or conveyance
failures. The Draft EIS analyzes the
potential environmental, cultural, and
socioeconomic effects of four
alternatives.
• Bismarck—Best Western Ramkota,
800 South 3rd Street, Bismarck, ND
58504
• Minot—Sleep Inn & Suites, 2400 10th
Street SW., Minot, ND 58701
• New Town—Four Bears Casino and
Lodge, 202 Frontage Rd, Newtown,
ND 58763
Public Review Locations:
Copies of the Draft EIS are available
for public review at the following
locations:
• Bismarck Public Library, 515 North
5th Street, Bismarck, ND
• Minot Public Library, 516 2nd Avenue
SW., Minot, ND
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Notices
• Dakotas Area Office, Bureau of
Reclamation, 304 East Broadway,
Bismarck, ND
• Bureau of Indian Affairs, Fort
Berthold Agency, 202 Main Street,
New Town, ND
• North Dakota State Library, 603 East
Boulevard Avenue, Bismarck, ND
• Standing Rock Administrative Service
Center, Building #1, North Standing
Rock Avenue, Fort Yates, ND
• Mohall Public Library, 112 Main
Street East, Mohall, ND
• Bottineau City Hall, 115 West 6th
Street, Bottineau, ND
• Millennium Library, 251 Donald
Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Background
The Garrison Diversion Unit’s
Municipal, Rural and Industrial Water
Supply (MR&I) program was authorized
by the U.S. Congress on May 12, 1986,
through the Garrison Diversion Unit
Reformulation Act of 1986. This act
authorized the appropriation of $200
million of Federal funds for the
planning and construction of water
supply facilities throughout North
Dakota. The NAWS project, initiated in
November 1987, is being developed as
a result of this authorization.
The NAWS project is designed as a
bulk water distribution system that will
service local communities and rural
water systems in 10 counties in
northwestern North Dakota including
the community of Minot. The NAWS
project is an interbasin transfer of water
from Lake Sakakawea, in the Missouri
River basin in North Dakota to Minot,
North Dakota, in the Hudson Bay basin.
Reclamation completed an
Environmental Assessment (EA) and
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) for the project in 2001.
Construction on the project began in
April 2002. In October 2002, the
Province of Manitoba filed a legal
challenge in U.S. District Court in
Washington, DC to compel the
Department of the Interior to complete
an EIS on the project. A Court Order
dated February 3, 2005, remanded the
case to Reclamation for completion of
additional environmental analysis.
During the pendancy of the litigation
filed by Manitoba, construction
continued on the project. Construction
of the 45 miles of raw water core
pipeline began in April 2002 and is
substantially complete. The Court has
also granted permission for the design
and construction of other project
features for the distribution system.
These project features include a high
service pump station and distribution
pipeline in Minot, North Dakota and a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:37 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
distribution pipeline to the community
of Berthold, North Dakota.
Proposed Action
Reclamation proposes to construct a
biota water treatment plant for the
NAWS project that would reduce the
risk of transferring potentially invasive
species from the Missouri River basin to
the Hudson Bay basin. As a part of this
proposed action, Reclamation would
implement construction methods and
operational measures to further
minimize the risk of invasive species
transfer that may occur as a result of a
failure in the treatment process or
conveyance pipeline.
Purpose and Need for the Federal
Action
The purpose of the proposed action is
to adequately treat water from the
Missouri River basin (Lake Sakakawea)
using methods and measures that
minimize the risk of transferring
invasive species into the Hudson Bay
basin. Previous environmental analyses
have shown that the risk of the NAWS
project transferring invasive species
between these two drainage basins is
very low. However, in response to the
legal challenge by the Province of
Manitoba, Canada, and the subsequent
order from the U.S. District Court,
Reclamation has conducted further
environmental analyses of this issue.
Alternatives
Four water treatment alternatives are
evaluated in the Draft EIS to meet the
purpose and need for the proposed
action. Each of the alternatives includes
a combination of treatment features to
form a process that reduces the potential
risk of the NAWS project transferring
invasive species from the Missouri River
basin to the Hudson Bay basin. The
alternatives considered in the EIS are
generally listed in the order of their
relative treatment inactivation/removal
capability with the No Action
Alternative providing the lowest level of
treatment and microfiltration providing
the highest level of treatment. The
alternatives evaluated in the Draft EIS
include:
• No Action. The preferred treatment
alternative described in the Final EA
would include chemical disinfection of
raw Missouri River water prior to
transfer into the Hudson Bay basin. This
alternative includes additional
safeguards of pipeline construction and
operation to minimize the risk of
transferring invasive species as a result
of pipeline failure. Ultraviolet (UV)
disinfection is provided along with
softening and filtration at the existing
Minot water treatment plant.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72757
• Basic Treatment. This treatment
alternative would include a pretreatment (Coagulation, Flocculation,
Sedimentation) process followed by
chemical and UV disinfection prior to
the water crossing the drainage divide.
The purpose of the pre-treatment
process is to reduce raw water turbidity
which can influence the effectiveness of
the disinfection processes.
• Conventional Treatment. This
treatment process would include a pretreatment of Dissolved Air Flotation
(DAF) followed by media filtration and
disinfection using UV and chemicals
(chlorine and chloramines) within the
Missouri River basin.
• Microfiltration. This treatment
alternative would include pre-treatment
(coagulation, pin floc) followed by
membrane filtration and chemical and
UV disinfection processes prior to the
water crossing the drainage divide.
Public Disclosure Statement
Before including your name, address,
phone number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: December 10, 2007.
Michael J. Ryan,
Regional Director, Great Plains Region.
[FR Doc. E7–24575 Filed 12–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Grassland Bypass Project Extension,
Merced and Fresno Counties, CA
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement/
environmental impact report (EIS/EIR)
and notice of scoping meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation
(Reclamation) and the San Luis & DeltaMendota Water Authority (Authority)
are preparing a joint EIS/EIR, pursuant
to the National Environmental Policy
Act and the California Environmental
Quality Act, to evaluate effects of
extending the Grassland Bypass Project
(Project) until December 31, 2019. The
Project’s use of the San Luis Drain
(Drain) was only authorized until
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72756-72757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24575]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Northwest Area Water Supply Project, ND
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) and Announcement of Public Hearings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation published a notice in the Federal
Register on March 6, 2006 (71 FR 11226) announcing the commencement of
work under the National Environmental Policy Act on an environmental
impact statement for the Northwest Area Water Supply Project (NAWS
Project). We are now notifying the public that Reclamation has prepared
a Draft EIS which is now available for review and comment. The Draft
EIS provides information and analyses related to water treatment for
the NAWS Project that would further minimize the transfer of
potentially invasive species from the Missouri River basin into the
Hudson Bay basin from potential treatment or conveyance failures. The
Draft EIS analyzes the potential environmental, cultural, and
socioeconomic effects of four alternatives.
DATES: A 60-day public review period begins with the publication of
this notice. Written comments on the Draft EIS are due by February 26,
2008, and should be submitted to Reclamation at the address given
below.
Public hearings will be held during February 2008 in North Dakota.
See the Supplementary Information section for dates of the public
hearings.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on the Draft EIS to: Northwest Area Water
Supply Project EIS, Bureau of Reclamation, Dakotas Area Office, P.O.
Box 1017, Bismarck, ND 58502. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
meeting addresses.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alicia Waters, Northwest Area Water
Supply Project EIS, Bureau of Reclamation, Dakotas Area Office, P.O.
Box 1017, Bismarck ND 58502; Telephone: (701) 221-1206; or FAX (701)
250-4326. You may submit e-mail to awaters@gp.usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Hearing Dates:
Monday, February 4, 2008, 7 p.m., Bismarck, North Dakota
Tuesday, February 5, 2008, 7 p.m., Minot, North Dakota
Thursday, February 7, 2008, 7 p.m., New Town, North Dakota
Public Hearing Locations:
Bismarck--Best Western Ramkota, 800 South 3\rd\ Street,
Bismarck, ND 58504
Minot--Sleep Inn & Suites, 2400 10\th\ Street SW., Minot, ND
58701
New Town--Four Bears Casino and Lodge, 202 Frontage Rd,
Newtown, ND 58763
Public Review Locations:
Copies of the Draft EIS are available for public review at the
following locations:
Bismarck Public Library, 515 North 5\th\ Street, Bismarck, ND
Minot Public Library, 516 2\nd\ Avenue SW., Minot, ND
[[Page 72757]]
Dakotas Area Office, Bureau of Reclamation, 304 East Broadway,
Bismarck, ND
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Fort Berthold Agency, 202 Main
Street, New Town, ND
North Dakota State Library, 603 East Boulevard Avenue,
Bismarck, ND
Standing Rock Administrative Service Center, Building
1, North Standing Rock Avenue, Fort Yates, ND
Mohall Public Library, 112 Main Street East, Mohall, ND
Bottineau City Hall, 115 West 6\th\ Street, Bottineau, ND
Millennium Library, 251 Donald Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba,
Canada
Background
The Garrison Diversion Unit's Municipal, Rural and Industrial Water
Supply (MR&I) program was authorized by the U.S. Congress on May 12,
1986, through the Garrison Diversion Unit Reformulation Act of 1986.
This act authorized the appropriation of $200 million of Federal funds
for the planning and construction of water supply facilities throughout
North Dakota. The NAWS project, initiated in November 1987, is being
developed as a result of this authorization.
The NAWS project is designed as a bulk water distribution system
that will service local communities and rural water systems in 10
counties in northwestern North Dakota including the community of Minot.
The NAWS project is an interbasin transfer of water from Lake
Sakakawea, in the Missouri River basin in North Dakota to Minot, North
Dakota, in the Hudson Bay basin. Reclamation completed an Environmental
Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the
project in 2001. Construction on the project began in April 2002. In
October 2002, the Province of Manitoba filed a legal challenge in U.S.
District Court in Washington, DC to compel the Department of the
Interior to complete an EIS on the project. A Court Order dated
February 3, 2005, remanded the case to Reclamation for completion of
additional environmental analysis.
During the pendancy of the litigation filed by Manitoba,
construction continued on the project. Construction of the 45 miles of
raw water core pipeline began in April 2002 and is substantially
complete. The Court has also granted permission for the design and
construction of other project features for the distribution system.
These project features include a high service pump station and
distribution pipeline in Minot, North Dakota and a distribution
pipeline to the community of Berthold, North Dakota.
Proposed Action
Reclamation proposes to construct a biota water treatment plant for
the NAWS project that would reduce the risk of transferring potentially
invasive species from the Missouri River basin to the Hudson Bay basin.
As a part of this proposed action, Reclamation would implement
construction methods and operational measures to further minimize the
risk of invasive species transfer that may occur as a result of a
failure in the treatment process or conveyance pipeline.
Purpose and Need for the Federal Action
The purpose of the proposed action is to adequately treat water
from the Missouri River basin (Lake Sakakawea) using methods and
measures that minimize the risk of transferring invasive species into
the Hudson Bay basin. Previous environmental analyses have shown that
the risk of the NAWS project transferring invasive species between
these two drainage basins is very low. However, in response to the
legal challenge by the Province of Manitoba, Canada, and the subsequent
order from the U.S. District Court, Reclamation has conducted further
environmental analyses of this issue.
Alternatives
Four water treatment alternatives are evaluated in the Draft EIS to
meet the purpose and need for the proposed action. Each of the
alternatives includes a combination of treatment features to form a
process that reduces the potential risk of the NAWS project
transferring invasive species from the Missouri River basin to the
Hudson Bay basin. The alternatives considered in the EIS are generally
listed in the order of their relative treatment inactivation/removal
capability with the No Action Alternative providing the lowest level of
treatment and microfiltration providing the highest level of treatment.
The alternatives evaluated in the Draft EIS include:
No Action. The preferred treatment alternative described
in the Final EA would include chemical disinfection of raw Missouri
River water prior to transfer into the Hudson Bay basin. This
alternative includes additional safeguards of pipeline construction and
operation to minimize the risk of transferring invasive species as a
result of pipeline failure. Ultraviolet (UV) disinfection is provided
along with softening and filtration at the existing Minot water
treatment plant.
Basic Treatment. This treatment alternative would include
a pre-treatment (Coagulation, Flocculation, Sedimentation) process
followed by chemical and UV disinfection prior to the water crossing
the drainage divide. The purpose of the pre-treatment process is to
reduce raw water turbidity which can influence the effectiveness of the
disinfection processes.
Conventional Treatment. This treatment process would
include a pre-treatment of Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) followed by
media filtration and disinfection using UV and chemicals (chlorine and
chloramines) within the Missouri River basin.
Microfiltration. This treatment alternative would include
pre-treatment (coagulation, pin floc) followed by membrane filtration
and chemical and UV disinfection processes prior to the water crossing
the drainage divide.
Public Disclosure Statement
Before including your name, address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should
be aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: December 10, 2007.
Michael J. Ryan,
Regional Director, Great Plains Region.
[FR Doc. E7-24575 Filed 12-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P