Electronic Payment of Fees for Outer Continental Shelf Activities, 72648-72652 [07-6173]
Download as PDF
72648
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
§ 1.904(f)–2
losses.
Recapture of overall foreign
through (f) published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register.]
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * * (1) [The text of the proposed
amendments to § 1.904(f)–2(c)(1) is the
same as the text of § 1.904(f)–2T(c)(1)
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register.]
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
Example 4. [The text of the proposed
amendments to § 1.904(f)–2(c)(5) Example 4.
is the same as the text of § 1.904(f)–2T(c)(5)
Example 4. published elsewhere in this issue
of the Federal Register.]
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 5. Sections 1.904(f)–7 and
1.904(f)–8 are added to read as follows:
§ 1.904(f)–7 Separate limitation loss and
the separate limitation loss account.
[The text of proposed § 1.904(f)–7 is
the same as the text of § 1.904(f)–7T(a)
through (f) published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register.]
§ 1.904(f)–8 Recapture of separate
limitation loss accounts.
[The text of proposed § 1.904(f)–8 is
the same as the text of § 1.904(f)–8T(a)
through (c) published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register.]
Par. 6. Section 1.904(g)–0 is added to
read as follows:
§ 1.904(g)–0
provisions.
*
*
Recapture of overall domestic
[The text of proposed § 1.904(g)–2 is
the same text of § 1.904(g)–2T(a)
through (d) published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register.]
§ 1.904(g)–3 Ordering rules for the
allocation of net operating losses, net
capital losses, U.S. source losses, and
separate limitation losses, and for recapture
of separate limitation losses, overall foreign
losses, and overall domestic losses.
[The text of proposed § 1.904(g)–3 is
the same text of § 1.904(g)–3T(a)
through (i) published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register.]
Par. 8. Section 1.1502–9 is revised to
read as follows:
§ 1.1502–9 Consolidated overall foreign
losses and separate limitation losses.
[The text of proposed § 1.1502–9 is
the same as the text of § 1.1502–9T(a)
through (e) published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register.]
Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E7–24896 Filed 12–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
Outline of regulation
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
*
*
*
§ 1.904(g)–1 Overall domestic loss and the
overall domestic loss account.
[The text of the entries for this section is
the same as the text for § 1.904(g)–1T(a)
through (f) in § 1.904(g)–0T published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register.]
§ 1.904(g)–2 Recapture of overall domestic
losses.
[The text of the entries for this section is
the same as the text for § 1.904(g)–2T(a)
through (d) in § 1.904(g)–0T published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register.]
§ 1.904(g)–3 Ordering rules for the
allocation of net operating losses, net capital
losses, U.S. source losses, and separate
limitation losses, and for recapture of
separate limitation losses, overall foreign
losses, and overall domestic losses.
[The text of the entries for this section is
the same as the text for § 1.904(g)–3T(a)
through (i) in § 1.904(g)–0T published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register.]
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
§ 1.904(g)–2
losses.
Par. 7. Sections 1.904(g)–1, 1.904(g)–
2, and 1.904(g)–3 are added to read as
follows:
§ 1.904(g)–1 Overall domestic loss and the
overall domestic loss account.
[The text of proposed § 1.904(g)–1 is
the same text of § 1.904(g)–1T(a)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
Minerals Management Service
30 CFR Parts 203, 250, 251, 256, 280,
281, and 290
[Docket ID: MMS–2007–OMM–0065]
RIN 1010–AD43
Electronic Payment of Fees for Outer
Continental Shelf Activities
Minerals Management Service
(MMS), Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The MMS proposes that all
lessees, operators, permittees, and
rights-of-way holders pay all fees for
processing plans, applications, and
permits electronically. The MMS
believes this proposed rule would aid
industry in payment processing, and
reduce payment processing errors. This
proposed rule would improve MMS
processing efficiency and facilitate the
correction of industry payment errors.
The MMS would not accept checks,
money orders, or cashier’s checks for
payment of fees after the effective date
of the final rule.
DATES: Submit comments by February
19, 2008. The MMS may not fully
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
consider comments received after this
date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the rulemaking by any of the
following methods. Please use the
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
1010–AD43 as an identifier in your
message. See also Public Availability of
Comments under Procedural Matters.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Select ‘‘Minerals
Management Service’’ from the agency
drop-down menu, then click ‘‘submit.’’
In the Docket ID column, select MMS–
2007–OMM–0065 to submit public
comments and to view supporting and
related materials available for this
rulemaking. Information on using
Regulations.gov, including instructions
for accessing documents, submitting
comments, and viewing the docket after
the close of the comment period, is
available through the site’s ‘‘User Tips’’
link. All comments submitted will be
posted to the docket.
• Mail or hand-carry comments to the
Department of the Interior; Minerals
Management Service; Attention:
Regulations and Standards Branch
(RSB); 381 Elden Street, MS–4024,
Herndon, Virginia 20170–4817. Please
reference ‘‘Electronic Payment of Fees
for Outer Continental Shelf Activities,
1010–AD43’’ in your comments and
include your name and return address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk
Malstrom, Petroleum Engineer, Offshore
Minerals Management, Office of
Offshore Regulatory Programs at (703)
787–1751.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This proposed rule would require a
lessee, operator, pipeline right-of-way
(ROW) holder, or permittee to submit
payments for cost recovery service fees
electronically. The idea for paying
electronically is not a new concept and
industry has been informed of MMS’s
intentions to collect fees electronically
in the Notice to Lessees (NTL) No.
2006–N05 Payment Method for New
and Existing Cost Recovery Fees. As
stated in NTL No. 2006–N05, MMS
prefers and strongly urges applicants to
pay their fees using credit card or
Automated Clearing House (ACH)
payments through the Pay.Gov Web site.
Launched in October 2000, Pay.Gov is a
secure government-wide collection
portal, developed to meet the U.S.
Treasury’s commitment to process
collections electronically using internet
technologies. Pay.Gov has been
developed to help Federal agencies meet
the directives outlined in the
Government Paperwork Elimination
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Act, primarily the reduction of paper
transactions through the utilization of
electronic processing via the Internet.
By using an electronic payment system,
MMS and industry have an efficient
method to aid in the payment process.
The MMS has made Pay.Gov available
for payment of cost recovery fees since
early 2006 and accepted electronic
Pay.Gov payments for all applications
since September 2006. To show
industry’s acceptance of electronic
payments, currently more than 94
percent of cost recovery fees are paid
electronically through Pay.Gov. This
proposed rule would require all fees to
be paid electronically. The MMS is
aware of a few companies not paying
electronically, but MMS has determined
that the costs to use Pay.Gov are
negligible compared to that of operating
on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).
Electronic payment through Pay.Gov
is more efficient and less prone to
mistakes than check payments.
Examples of check payment errors
include incorrect date, incorrect
payment amount, check sent to a
different address than application, and
closing an account shortly after the
check is sent to MMS. Check payment
errors can result in delay or lead to
denial of an application or permit due
to non-payment. To rectify a check
payment error additional time and
expense are required from industry,
MMS, or both. If payment errors are
made through Pay.Gov, the refund
process is easier due to system records
and controls. With 100% electronic
payment, the internal MMS processes to
secure, verify and deposit check
payments can be eliminated.
The MMS does not believe that this
proposed rule would place an
additional burden on industry. Industry
has been advised by NTL No. 2006-N05
and MMS staff about our future intent
to require electronic payments. Most
companies voluntarily pay
electronically and have been satisfied
with the functionality and performance
of the Pay.Gov system. For the
remaining companies that have opted
not to pay electronically, the time
between the publishing of the proposed
and final rule would provide sufficient
opportunity to implement internal
processes to pay fees by ACH or credit
card.
The MMS intends to accept only
Pay.Gov payments for cost recovery
service fees. Checks, money orders, and
cashier’s checks will no longer be
accepted after the effective date of the
final rule. If you process your
applications through eWell, you are
already directed to Pay.Gov in order to
pay application fees online.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
Since MMS has accepted payments
electronically, industry has provided
verbal feedback to MMS requesting the
availability of declining deposit
accounts. The basic proposal, as an
alternative to Pay.Gov, would permit a
company conducting business on the
OCS to deposit funds with MMS. The
MMS would then draw down those
funds as the company submits
applications requiring fees. The
company would be notified when its
balance reached a trigger level and the
company would replenish the account.
Invoices would periodically be sent to
the customer.
The MMS does not have a financial
system that can track, invoice, and
manage declining deposit accounts. The
existing bureau financial system cannot
handle deferred revenue. Since we do
not have system functionality, the
declining deposit accounts would be
tracked manually. A manual process
would increase the cost for processing
cost recovery payments, increase the
potential for errors, and result in
increased fees charged to industry.
Therefore, MMS will not consider
implementing declining deposit
accounts.
The MMS plans to adjust certain cost
recovery fees according to inflation in
the final rule. These fees have not been
updated to include inflation since the
Cost Recovery Final Rule published on
July 19, 2006 (71 FR 40904).
Procedural Matters
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order (E.O.) 12866)
This proposed rule is not a significant
rule as determined by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and is
not subject to review under E.O. 12866.
(1) This proposed rule would not have
an effect of $100 million or more on the
economy. It would not adversely affect
in a material way the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities. This proposed rule would
simply require all fees be paid
electronically through Pay.Gov.
(2) This proposed rule would not
create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency. By
requiring electronic payment through
the Pay.Gov system, MMS is supporting
the President’s Management Agenda of
expanding electronic government or ‘‘E–
Government.’’
(3) This proposed rule would not alter
the budgetary effects of entitlements,
grants, user fees or loan programs, or the
rights or obligations of their recipients.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72649
(4) This proposed rule would not raise
novel legal or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this proposed rule would
not have a significant economic effect
on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The changes proposed in the rule
would affect lessees, operators of leases,
pipeline right-of-way (ROW) holders in
the OCS, and permittees. This could
include about 130 active Federal oil and
gas lessees, 88 pipeline ROW holders,
and 10 geophysical companies. Small
lessees that operate under this rule
mostly fall under the Small Business
Administration’s (SBA) North American
Industry Classification System Codes
(NAICS) 211111, Crude Petroleum and
Natural Gas Extraction and 213111,
Drilling Oil and Gas Wells. For these
NAICS code classifications, a small
company is one with fewer than 500
employees. Based on these criteria, an
estimated 70 percent of these companies
are considered small. This rule,
therefore, affects a substantial number of
small entities.
The changes proposed in the rule
would not have a significant economic
effect on a substantial number of small
entities because Pay.Gov credit card or
ACH payments do not increase the
amount of money a company would pay
in cost recovery fees. We do not expect
any company to incur significant other
costs because no special software or
other equipment would be required to
pay through Pay.Gov or ACH. We have
no information that any company would
incur any costs associated with
accounting processes, changes in
business procedures, or other
compliance costs.
Your comments are important. The
Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and 10 Regional Fairness Boards were
established to receive comments from
small businesses about Federal agency
enforcement actions. The Ombudsman
will annually evaluate the enforcement
activities and rate each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on the actions of
MMS, call 1–888–734–3247. You may
comment to the Small Business
Administration without fear of
retaliation. Disciplinary action for
retaliation by an MMS employee may
include suspension or termination from
employment with the DOI.
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
72650
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
The proposed rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804(2) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act. This proposed rule:
a. Would not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
b. Would not cause a major increase
in costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Would not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13175, we
have evaluated this proposed rule and
determined that it has no substantial
direct effects on federally recognized
Indian tribes. There are no Indian or
tribal lands in the OCS.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed rule would not impose
an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
proposed rule would not have a
significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the
private sector. A statement containing
the information required by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings Implication Assessment (E.O.
12630)
Under the criteria in E.O. 12630, this
proposed rule does not have significant
takings implications. The proposed rule
is not a governmental action capable of
interference with constitutionally
protected property rights. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13132, this
proposed rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
This proposed rule would not
substantially and directly affect the
relationship between the Federal and
State governments. To the extent that
State and local governments have a role
in OCS activities, this proposed rule
would not affect that role. A Federalism
Assessment is not required.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity, be written to minimize
litigation, and promote simplification
and burden reduction; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule contains no new
reporting or recordkeeping
requirements, and an OMB submission
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) is not required. The PRA provides
that an agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. Until OMB approves a
collection of information and assigns a
control number, you are not required to
respond. The proposed regulations will
specify that all operators, lessees, and
ROW holders must now use Pay.Gov for
every fee that will be submitted to
MMS. The proposed revisions in this
rulemaking refer to, but do not change,
information collection requirements in
numerous current regulations. The OMB
approved the referenced information
collection requirements under OMB
Control Numbers 1010–0071, 1010–
0114, 1010–0151, 1010–0141, 1010–
0067, 1010–0043, 1010–0059, 1010–
0149, 1010–0050, 1010–0051, 1010–
0086, 1010–0142, 1010–0048, 1010–
0006, and 1010–0072, respectively.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. The
MMS has analyzed this rule under the
criteria of the National Environmental
Policy Act and 516 Departmental
Manual 2, Appendix 1.10. and
determined that it falls within the
categorical exclusion for ‘‘regulations
* * * that are of an administrative,
financial, legal, technical, or procedural
nature and whose environmental effects
are too broad, speculative, or conjectural
to lend themselves to meaningful
analysis.’’ The MMS completed a
Categorical Exclusion Review for this
action and concluded that the
rulemaking does not represent an
exception to the established criteria for
categorical exclusion; therefore,
preparation of an environmental
analysis or environmental impact
statement will not be required.
Data Quality Act
In developing this rule we did not
conduct or use a study, experiment, or
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
survey requiring peer review under the
Data Quality Act (Pub. L. 106–554, app.
C Section 515, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–
153–154).
Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in E.O.
13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is
not required.
Clarity of this Regulation
We are required by E.O. 12866, E.O.
12988, and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write
all rules in plain language. This means
that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that you find
unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment’including your
personal identifying information’may be
made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
List of Subjects in
30 CFR Part 203
Continental shelf, Mineral royalties,
Oil and gas exploration, Public lands—
mineral resources.
30 CFR Part 250
Administrative practice and
procedure, Continental shelf, Pipelines,
Public lands—mineral resources, Public
lands—rights-of-way, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
30 CFR Part 251
Continental shelf, Public lands—
mineral resources, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
30 CFR Part 256
Administrative practice and
procedure, Public lands—mineral
resources, Public lands—rights-of-way,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
30 CFR Part 280
Public lands—mineral resources,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 250—OIL AND GAS AND
SULPHUR OPERATIONS IN THE
OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF
30 CFR Part 281
Administrative practice and
procedure, Mineral royalties, Public
lands—mineral resources, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
3. The authority citation for part 250
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701, 43 U.S.C. 1334.
4. Section 250.126 is revised to read
as follows:
30 CFR Part 290
Administrative practice and
procedure.
§ 250.126
Dated: December 10, 2007.
C. Stephen Allred,
Assistant Secretary—Land and Minerals
Management.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Minerals Management
Service (MMS) proposes to amend 30
CFR parts 203, 250, 251, 256, 280, 281,
and 290 as follows:
PART 203—RELIEF OR REDUCTION IN
ROYALTY RATES
1. The authority citation for part 203
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 396; 25 U.S.C. 2107;
30 U.S.C. 189, 241; 30 U.S.C. 359; 30 U.S.C.
1023; 30 U.S.C. 1751; 31 U.S.C. 9701; and 43
U.S.C. 1334.
2. Section 203.3 is revised to read as
follows:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
§ 203.3 Do I have to pay a fee to request
royalty relief?
When you submit an application or
ask for a preview assessment, you must
include a fee to reimburse us for our
costs of processing your application or
assessment. Federal policy and law
require us to recover the cost of services
that confer special benefits to
identifiable non-Federal recipients. The
Independent Offices Appropriation Act
(31 U.S.C. 9701), Office of Management
and Budget Circular A’25, and the
Omnibus Appropriations Bill (Pub. L.
104’134, 110 Stat. 1321, April 26, 1996)
authorize us to collect these fees.
(a) We will specify the necessary fees
for each of the types of royalty relief
applications and possible MMS audits
in a Notice to Lessees. We will
periodically update the fees to reflect
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
changes in costs, as well as provide
other information necessary to
administer royalty relief.
(b) You must file all payments
electronically through the Pay.Gov Web
site and you must include a copy of the
Pay.Gov confirmation receipt page with
your application or assessment. The
Pay.Gov Web site may be accessed
through links on the MMS Offshore Web
site at: https://www.mms.gov/offshore/
homepage or directly through Pay.Gov
at: https://www.pay.gov/paygov/.
Electronic payment instructions.
You must file all payments
electronically through Pay.Gov. This
includes, but is not limited to, all OCS
applications or filing fee payments. The
Pay.Gov Web site may be accessed
through links on the MMS Offshore Web
site at: https://www.mms.gov/offshore/
homepage or directly through Pay.Gov
at: https://www.pay.gov/paygov/.
(a) Payment of fees associated with
electronic applications. If you submitted
an application through eWell, you must
use the interactive payment feature in
that system which directs you through
Pay.Gov.
(b) Payment of fees for applications
not submitted electronically. For
applications not submitted
electronically through eWell, you must
use credit card or automated clearing
house (ACH) payments through the
Pay.Gov Web site and you must include
a copy of the Pay.Gov confirmation
receipt page with your application.
5. Section 250.160(h) is revised to
read as follows:
§ 250.160 When will MMS grant me a rightof-use and easement, and what
requirements must I meet?
*
*
*
*
*
(h) You may make the rental
payments required by paragraph (g)(1)
and (g)(2) of this section on an annual
basis, for a 5-year period, or for
multiples of 5 years. You must make the
first payment electronically through
Pay.Gov and you must include a copy
of the Pay.Gov confirmation receipt
page with your right-of-use and
easement application. You must make
all subsequent payments electronically
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72651
through Pay.Gov before the respective
time periods begin.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 251—GEOLOGICAL AND
GEOPHYSICAL (G&G) EXPLORATIONS
OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF
6. The authority citation for part 251
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701, 43 U.S.C. 1334.
7. Section 251.5(a) is revised to read
as follows:
§ 251.5 Applying for permits or filing
Notices.
(a) Permits. You must submit a signed
original and three copies of the MMS
permit application form (Form MMS—
327). The form includes names of
persons, type, location, purpose, dates
of activity, and environmental and other
information. A nonrefundable service
fee of $1,900 must be paid electronically
through Pay.Gov at: https://
www.pay.gov/paygov/, and you must
include a copy of the Pay.Gov
confirmation receipt page with your
application.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 256—LEASING OF SULPHUR OR
OIL AND GAS IN THE OUTER
CONTINENTAL SHELF
8. The authority citation for part 256
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701, 42 U.S.C. 6213,
43 U.S.C. 1334.
9. Section 256.64(a)(8) is revised to
read as follows:
§ 256.64
How to file transfers.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(8) You must pay electronically
through Pay.Gov at: https://
www.pay.gov/paygov/ the service fee
listed in § 256.63 of this subpart and
you must include a copy of the Pay.Gov
confirmation receipt page with your
application for approval of any
instrument of transfer you are required
to file (Record Title/Operating Rights
(Transfer) Fee). Where multiple
transfers of interest are included in a
single instrument, a separate fee applies
to each individual transfer of interest.
For any document you are not required
to file by these regulations but which
you submit for record purposes, you
must also pay electronically through
Pay.Gov the service fee listed in
§ 256.63 (Non-required Document Filing
Fee) per lease affected, and you must
include a copy of the Pay.Gov
confirmation receipt page with your
document. Such documents may be
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
72652
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / Proposed Rules
page with your document. Such
documents may be rejected at the
discretion of the authorized officer.
*
*
*
*
*
rejected at the discretion of the
authorized officer.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 280—PROSPECTING FOR
MINERALS OTHER THAN OIL, GAS,
AND SULPHUR ON THE OUTER
CONTINENTAL SHELF
PART 290—APPEAL PROCEDURES
10. The authority citation for part 280
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701, 43 U.S.C. 1334.
11. Section 280.12(a) is revised to
read as follows:
14. The authority citation for part 290
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 396,
2107; 30 U.S.C. 189, 359, 1023, 1701 et seq.,
1751(a); 31 U.S.C. 3716, 9701; and 43 U.S.C.
1334.
15. Section 290.4(b) is revised to read
as follows:
§ 280.12 What must I include in my
application or notification?
§ 290.4
How do I file an appeal?
(a) Permits. You must submit to the
Regional Director a signed original and
three copies of the permit application
form (Form MMS–134) at least 30 days
before the startup date for activities in
the permit area. If unusual
circumstances prevent you from
meeting this deadline, you must
immediately contact the Regional
Director to arrange an acceptable
deadline. The form includes names of
persons, type, location, purpose, and
dates of activity, as well as
environmental and other information. A
nonrefundable service fee of $1,900
must be paid electronically through
Pay.Gov at: https://www.pay.gov/
paygov/, and you must include a copy
of the Pay.Gov confirmation receipt
page with your application.
*
*
*
*
*
*
PART 281—LEASING OF MINERALS
OTHER THAN OIL, GAS, AND
SULPHUR IN THE OUTER
CONTINENTAL SHELF
RIN 1010–AD29
Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1334.
13. Section 281.41(a)(2) is revised to
read as follows:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
§ 281.41 Requirements for filing for
transfers.
(a) * * *
(2) An application for approval of any
instrument required to be filed shall not
be accepted unless a nonrefundable fee
of $50 is paid electronically through
Pay.Gov at: https://www.pay.gov/
paygov/ and a copy of the Pay.Gov
confirmation receipt page is included
with your application. For any
document you are not required to file by
these regulations but which you submit
for record purposes, you must also pay
electronically through Pay.Gov the
service fee listed in § 256.63 (Nonrequired Document Filing Fee) per lease
affected, and you must include a copy
of the Pay.Gov confirmation receipt
17:13 Dec 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
[FR Doc. 07–6173 Filed 12–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service
Background
30 CFR Parts 203 and 260
[Docket ID: MMS–2007–OMM–0074]
12. The authority citation for part 281
is revised to read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
*
*
(b) A nonrefundable processing fee of
$150.00 paid with the Notice of Appeal.
(1) You must pay electronically
through Pay.Gov at: https://
www.pay.gov/paygov/, and you must
include a copy of the Pay.Gov
confirmation receipt page with your
Notice of Appeal.
(2) You cannot extend the 60-day
period for payment of the processing
fee.
the following methods. Please use the
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
1010–AD29 as an identifier in your
message. See also Public Availability of
Comments under Procedural Matters.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Select ‘‘Minerals
Management Service’’ from the agency
drop-down menu, then click ‘‘submit.’’
In the Docket ID column, select MMS–
2007–OMM–0074 to submit public
comments and to view supporting and
related materials available for this
rulemaking. Information on using
Regulations.gov, including instructions
for accessing documents, submitting
comments, and viewing the docket after
the close of the comment period, is
available through the site’s ‘‘User Tips’’
link. The MMS will post all comments.
• Mail or hand-carry comments to the
Department of the Interior; Minerals
Management Service; Attention:
Regulations and Standards Branch
(RSB); 381 Elden Street, MS–4024;
Herndon, Virginia 20170–4817. Please
reference ‘‘Royalty Relief for Deepwater
OCS Oil and Gas Leases—Conforming
Regulations to Court Decision, 1010–
AD29’’ in your comments and include
your name and return address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marshall Rose, Chief, Economics
Division, at (703) 787–1536.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Royalty Relief for Deepwater Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas
Leases—Conforming Regulations to
Court Decision
Minerals Management Service
(MMS), Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
amend 30 CFR parts 260 and 203 to
conform the regulations to the decision
of the United States Court of Appeals for
the Fifth Circuit in Santa Fe Snyder
Corp., et al. v. Norton (the Decision).
That decision found that certain
provisions of the MMS regulations
interpreting section 304 of the Deep
Water Royalty Relief Act are contrary to
the requirements of the statute.
DATES: Submit comments by February
19, 2008. The MMS may not fully
consider comments received after this
date.
You may submit comments
on the proposed rulemaking by any of
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
On November 28, 1995, President
Clinton signed Public Law 104–58,
which included the Deep Water Royalty
Relief Act (Act). The Act was designed
to encourage development of new
supplies of energy. It included
incentives to promote investment in a
particularly high-cost, high-risk area,
the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico.
These deep Gulf of Mexico waters were
viewed as having potential for large oil
and gas discoveries, but technological
advances and multi-billion dollar
investments would be needed to realize
that potential. Since the enactment of
the incentive, the deep waters of the
Gulf of Mexico have become one of the
most important sources of domestic oil
and gas production.
The Secretary was required to
suspend royalties for certain volumes of
production on all leases in more than
200 meters of water in the central and
western Gulf of Mexico issued in the
first 5 years following enactment of the
Act. These royalty suspension volumes
(RSVs) (i.e., specified volumes of
royalty-free production) ranged from
17.5 million to 87.5 million barrels of
oil equivalent, depending on water
depth. The royalty suspension incentive
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72648-72652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6173]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service
30 CFR Parts 203, 250, 251, 256, 280, 281, and 290
[Docket ID: MMS-2007-OMM-0065]
RIN 1010-AD43
Electronic Payment of Fees for Outer Continental Shelf Activities
AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The MMS proposes that all lessees, operators, permittees, and
rights-of-way holders pay all fees for processing plans, applications,
and permits electronically. The MMS believes this proposed rule would
aid industry in payment processing, and reduce payment processing
errors. This proposed rule would improve MMS processing efficiency and
facilitate the correction of industry payment errors. The MMS would not
accept checks, money orders, or cashier's checks for payment of fees
after the effective date of the final rule.
DATES: Submit comments by February 19, 2008. The MMS may not fully
consider comments received after this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the rulemaking by any of the
following methods. Please use the Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
1010-AD43 as an identifier in your message. See also Public
Availability of Comments under Procedural Matters.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Select ``Minerals Management Service'' from the agency drop-down menu,
then click ``submit.'' In the Docket ID column, select MMS-2007-OMM-
0065 to submit public comments and to view supporting and related
materials available for this rulemaking. Information on using
Regulations.gov, including instructions for accessing documents,
submitting comments, and viewing the docket after the close of the
comment period, is available through the site's ``User Tips'' link. All
comments submitted will be posted to the docket.
Mail or hand-carry comments to the Department of the
Interior; Minerals Management Service; Attention: Regulations and
Standards Branch (RSB); 381 Elden Street, MS-4024, Herndon, Virginia
20170-4817. Please reference ``Electronic Payment of Fees for Outer
Continental Shelf Activities, 1010-AD43'' in your comments and include
your name and return address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk Malstrom, Petroleum Engineer,
Offshore Minerals Management, Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs at
(703) 787-1751.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This proposed rule would require a lessee, operator, pipeline
right-of-way (ROW) holder, or permittee to submit payments for cost
recovery service fees electronically. The idea for paying
electronically is not a new concept and industry has been informed of
MMS's intentions to collect fees electronically in the Notice to
Lessees (NTL) No. 2006-N05 Payment Method for New and Existing Cost
Recovery Fees. As stated in NTL No. 2006-N05, MMS prefers and strongly
urges applicants to pay their fees using credit card or Automated
Clearing House (ACH) payments through the Pay.Gov Web site. Launched in
October 2000, Pay.Gov is a secure government-wide collection portal,
developed to meet the U.S. Treasury's commitment to process collections
electronically using internet technologies. Pay.Gov has been developed
to help Federal agencies meet the directives outlined in the Government
Paperwork Elimination
[[Page 72649]]
Act, primarily the reduction of paper transactions through the
utilization of electronic processing via the Internet. By using an
electronic payment system, MMS and industry have an efficient method to
aid in the payment process.
The MMS has made Pay.Gov available for payment of cost recovery
fees since early 2006 and accepted electronic Pay.Gov payments for all
applications since September 2006. To show industry's acceptance of
electronic payments, currently more than 94 percent of cost recovery
fees are paid electronically through Pay.Gov. This proposed rule would
require all fees to be paid electronically. The MMS is aware of a few
companies not paying electronically, but MMS has determined that the
costs to use Pay.Gov are negligible compared to that of operating on
the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).
Electronic payment through Pay.Gov is more efficient and less prone
to mistakes than check payments. Examples of check payment errors
include incorrect date, incorrect payment amount, check sent to a
different address than application, and closing an account shortly
after the check is sent to MMS. Check payment errors can result in
delay or lead to denial of an application or permit due to non-payment.
To rectify a check payment error additional time and expense are
required from industry, MMS, or both. If payment errors are made
through Pay.Gov, the refund process is easier due to system records and
controls. With 100% electronic payment, the internal MMS processes to
secure, verify and deposit check payments can be eliminated.
The MMS does not believe that this proposed rule would place an
additional burden on industry. Industry has been advised by NTL No.
2006-N05 and MMS staff about our future intent to require electronic
payments. Most companies voluntarily pay electronically and have been
satisfied with the functionality and performance of the Pay.Gov system.
For the remaining companies that have opted not to pay electronically,
the time between the publishing of the proposed and final rule would
provide sufficient opportunity to implement internal processes to pay
fees by ACH or credit card.
The MMS intends to accept only Pay.Gov payments for cost recovery
service fees. Checks, money orders, and cashier's checks will no longer
be accepted after the effective date of the final rule. If you process
your applications through eWell, you are already directed to Pay.Gov in
order to pay application fees online.
Since MMS has accepted payments electronically, industry has
provided verbal feedback to MMS requesting the availability of
declining deposit accounts. The basic proposal, as an alternative to
Pay.Gov, would permit a company conducting business on the OCS to
deposit funds with MMS. The MMS would then draw down those funds as the
company submits applications requiring fees. The company would be
notified when its balance reached a trigger level and the company would
replenish the account. Invoices would periodically be sent to the
customer.
The MMS does not have a financial system that can track, invoice,
and manage declining deposit accounts. The existing bureau financial
system cannot handle deferred revenue. Since we do not have system
functionality, the declining deposit accounts would be tracked
manually. A manual process would increase the cost for processing cost
recovery payments, increase the potential for errors, and result in
increased fees charged to industry. Therefore, MMS will not consider
implementing declining deposit accounts.
The MMS plans to adjust certain cost recovery fees according to
inflation in the final rule. These fees have not been updated to
include inflation since the Cost Recovery Final Rule published on July
19, 2006 (71 FR 40904).
Procedural Matters
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order (E.O.) 12866)
This proposed rule is not a significant rule as determined by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and is not subject to review
under E.O. 12866.
(1) This proposed rule would not have an effect of $100 million or
more on the economy. It would not adversely affect in a material way
the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities. This proposed rule would simply require all fees be paid
electronically through Pay.Gov.
(2) This proposed rule would not create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency.
By requiring electronic payment through the Pay.Gov system, MMS is
supporting the President's Management Agenda of expanding electronic
government or ``E-Government.''
(3) This proposed rule would not alter the budgetary effects of
entitlements, grants, user fees or loan programs, or the rights or
obligations of their recipients.
(4) This proposed rule would not raise novel legal or policy
issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of
small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.).
The changes proposed in the rule would affect lessees, operators of
leases, pipeline right-of-way (ROW) holders in the OCS, and permittees.
This could include about 130 active Federal oil and gas lessees, 88
pipeline ROW holders, and 10 geophysical companies. Small lessees that
operate under this rule mostly fall under the Small Business
Administration's (SBA) North American Industry Classification System
Codes (NAICS) 211111, Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas Extraction and
213111, Drilling Oil and Gas Wells. For these NAICS code
classifications, a small company is one with fewer than 500 employees.
Based on these criteria, an estimated 70 percent of these companies are
considered small. This rule, therefore, affects a substantial number of
small entities.
The changes proposed in the rule would not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number of small entities because
Pay.Gov credit card or ACH payments do not increase the amount of money
a company would pay in cost recovery fees. We do not expect any company
to incur significant other costs because no special software or other
equipment would be required to pay through Pay.Gov or ACH. We have no
information that any company would incur any costs associated with
accounting processes, changes in business procedures, or other
compliance costs.
Your comments are important. The Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and 10 Regional Fairness Boards were
established to receive comments from small businesses about Federal
agency enforcement actions. The Ombudsman will annually evaluate the
enforcement activities and rate each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on the actions of MMS, call 1-888-734-
3247. You may comment to the Small Business Administration without fear
of retaliation. Disciplinary action for retaliation by an MMS employee
may include suspension or termination from employment with the DOI.
[[Page 72650]]
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The proposed rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2) of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This proposed rule:
a. Would not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
b. Would not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Would not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed rule would not impose an unfunded mandate on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100
million per year. The proposed rule would not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings Implication Assessment (E.O. 12630)
Under the criteria in E.O. 12630, this proposed rule does not have
significant takings implications. The proposed rule is not a
governmental action capable of interference with constitutionally
protected property rights. A takings implication assessment is not
required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13132, this proposed rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment. This proposed rule would not substantially and
directly affect the relationship between the Federal and State
governments. To the extent that State and local governments have a role
in OCS activities, this proposed rule would not affect that role. A
Federalism Assessment is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity, be written
to minimize litigation, and promote simplification and burden
reduction; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13175, we have evaluated this proposed
rule and determined that it has no substantial direct effects on
federally recognized Indian tribes. There are no Indian or tribal lands
in the OCS.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule contains no new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements, and an OMB submission under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) is not required. The PRA provides that an agency may not conduct
or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. Until OMB approves a collection of
information and assigns a control number, you are not required to
respond. The proposed regulations will specify that all operators,
lessees, and ROW holders must now use Pay.Gov for every fee that will
be submitted to MMS. The proposed revisions in this rulemaking refer
to, but do not change, information collection requirements in numerous
current regulations. The OMB approved the referenced information
collection requirements under OMB Control Numbers 1010-0071, 1010-0114,
1010-0151, 1010-0141, 1010-0067, 1010-0043, 1010-0059, 1010-0149, 1010-
0050, 1010-0051, 1010-0086, 1010-0142, 1010-0048, 1010-0006, and 1010-
0072, respectively.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. The MMS has analyzed
this rule under the criteria of the National Environmental Policy Act
and 516 Departmental Manual 2, Appendix 1.10. and determined that it
falls within the categorical exclusion for ``regulations * * * that are
of an administrative, financial, legal, technical, or procedural nature
and whose environmental effects are too broad, speculative, or
conjectural to lend themselves to meaningful analysis.'' The MMS
completed a Categorical Exclusion Review for this action and concluded
that the rulemaking does not represent an exception to the established
criteria for categorical exclusion; therefore, preparation of an
environmental analysis or environmental impact statement will not be
required.
Data Quality Act
In developing this rule we did not conduct or use a study,
experiment, or survey requiring peer review under the Data Quality Act
(Pub. L. 106-554, app. C Section 515, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A-153-154).
Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in E.O. 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
Clarity of this Regulation
We are required by E.O. 12866, E.O. 12988, and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This
means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful,
etc.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment'including your personal identifying
information'may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects in
30 CFR Part 203
Continental shelf, Mineral royalties, Oil and gas exploration,
Public lands--mineral resources.
30 CFR Part 250
Administrative practice and procedure, Continental shelf,
Pipelines, Public lands--mineral resources, Public lands--rights-of-
way, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 72651]]
30 CFR Part 251
Continental shelf, Public lands--mineral resources, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
30 CFR Part 256
Administrative practice and procedure, Public lands--mineral
resources, Public lands--rights-of-way, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
30 CFR Part 280
Public lands--mineral resources, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
30 CFR Part 281
Administrative practice and procedure, Mineral royalties, Public
lands--mineral resources, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
30 CFR Part 290
Administrative practice and procedure.
Dated: December 10, 2007.
C. Stephen Allred,
Assistant Secretary--Land and Minerals Management.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Minerals Management
Service (MMS) proposes to amend 30 CFR parts 203, 250, 251, 256, 280,
281, and 290 as follows:
PART 203--RELIEF OR REDUCTION IN ROYALTY RATES
1. The authority citation for part 203 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 396; 25 U.S.C. 2107; 30 U.S.C. 189, 241; 30
U.S.C. 359; 30 U.S.C. 1023; 30 U.S.C. 1751; 31 U.S.C. 9701; and 43
U.S.C. 1334.
2. Section 203.3 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 203.3 Do I have to pay a fee to request royalty relief?
When you submit an application or ask for a preview assessment, you
must include a fee to reimburse us for our costs of processing your
application or assessment. Federal policy and law require us to recover
the cost of services that confer special benefits to identifiable non-
Federal recipients. The Independent Offices Appropriation Act (31
U.S.C. 9701), Office of Management and Budget Circular A'25, and the
Omnibus Appropriations Bill (Pub. L. 104'134, 110 Stat. 1321, April 26,
1996) authorize us to collect these fees.
(a) We will specify the necessary fees for each of the types of
royalty relief applications and possible MMS audits in a Notice to
Lessees. We will periodically update the fees to reflect changes in
costs, as well as provide other information necessary to administer
royalty relief.
(b) You must file all payments electronically through the Pay.Gov
Web site and you must include a copy of the Pay.Gov confirmation
receipt page with your application or assessment. The Pay.Gov Web site
may be accessed through links on the MMS Offshore Web site at: https://
www.mms.gov/offshore/ homepage or directly through Pay.Gov at: https://
www.pay.gov/paygov/.
PART 250--OIL AND GAS AND SULPHUR OPERATIONS IN THE OUTER
CONTINENTAL SHELF
3. The authority citation for part 250 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701, 43 U.S.C. 1334.
4. Section 250.126 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 250.126 Electronic payment instructions.
You must file all payments electronically through Pay.Gov. This
includes, but is not limited to, all OCS applications or filing fee
payments. The Pay.Gov Web site may be accessed through links on the MMS
Offshore Web site at: https://www.mms.gov/offshore/ homepage or directly
through Pay.Gov at: https://www.pay.gov/paygov/.
(a) Payment of fees associated with electronic applications. If you
submitted an application through eWell, you must use the interactive
payment feature in that system which directs you through Pay.Gov.
(b) Payment of fees for applications not submitted electronically.
For applications not submitted electronically through eWell, you must
use credit card or automated clearing house (ACH) payments through the
Pay.Gov Web site and you must include a copy of the Pay.Gov
confirmation receipt page with your application.
5. Section 250.160(h) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 250.160 When will MMS grant me a right-of-use and easement, and
what requirements must I meet?
* * * * *
(h) You may make the rental payments required by paragraph (g)(1)
and (g)(2) of this section on an annual basis, for a 5-year period, or
for multiples of 5 years. You must make the first payment
electronically through Pay.Gov and you must include a copy of the
Pay.Gov confirmation receipt page with your right-of-use and easement
application. You must make all subsequent payments electronically
through Pay.Gov before the respective time periods begin.
* * * * *
PART 251--GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL (G&G) EXPLORATIONS OF THE
OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF
6. The authority citation for part 251 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701, 43 U.S.C. 1334.
7. Section 251.5(a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 251.5 Applying for permits or filing Notices.
(a) Permits. You must submit a signed original and three copies of
the MMS permit application form (Form MMS--327). The form includes
names of persons, type, location, purpose, dates of activity, and
environmental and other information. A nonrefundable service fee of
$1,900 must be paid electronically through Pay.Gov at: https://
www.pay.gov/paygov/, and you must include a copy of the Pay.Gov
confirmation receipt page with your application.
* * * * *
PART 256--LEASING OF SULPHUR OR OIL AND GAS IN THE OUTER
CONTINENTAL SHELF
8. The authority citation for part 256 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701, 42 U.S.C. 6213, 43 U.S.C. 1334.
9. Section 256.64(a)(8) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 256.64 How to file transfers.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(8) You must pay electronically through Pay.Gov at: https://
www.pay.gov/paygov/ the service fee listed in Sec. 256.63 of this
subpart and you must include a copy of the Pay.Gov confirmation receipt
page with your application for approval of any instrument of transfer
you are required to file (Record Title/Operating Rights (Transfer)
Fee). Where multiple transfers of interest are included in a single
instrument, a separate fee applies to each individual transfer of
interest. For any document you are not required to file by these
regulations but which you submit for record purposes, you must also pay
electronically through Pay.Gov the service fee listed in Sec. 256.63
(Non-required Document Filing Fee) per lease affected, and you must
include a copy of the Pay.Gov confirmation receipt page with your
document. Such documents may be
[[Page 72652]]
rejected at the discretion of the authorized officer.
* * * * *
PART 280--PROSPECTING FOR MINERALS OTHER THAN OIL, GAS, AND SULPHUR
ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF
10. The authority citation for part 280 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701, 43 U.S.C. 1334.
11. Section 280.12(a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 280.12 What must I include in my application or notification?
(a) Permits. You must submit to the Regional Director a signed
original and three copies of the permit application form (Form MMS-134)
at least 30 days before the startup date for activities in the permit
area. If unusual circumstances prevent you from meeting this deadline,
you must immediately contact the Regional Director to arrange an
acceptable deadline. The form includes names of persons, type,
location, purpose, and dates of activity, as well as environmental and
other information. A nonrefundable service fee of $1,900 must be paid
electronically through Pay.Gov at: https://www.pay.gov/paygov/, and you
must include a copy of the Pay.Gov confirmation receipt page with your
application.
* * * * *
PART 281--LEASING OF MINERALS OTHER THAN OIL, GAS, AND SULPHUR IN
THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF
12. The authority citation for part 281 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1334.
13. Section 281.41(a)(2) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 281.41 Requirements for filing for transfers.
(a) * * *
(2) An application for approval of any instrument required to be
filed shall not be accepted unless a nonrefundable fee of $50 is paid
electronically through Pay.Gov at: https://www.pay.gov/paygov/ and a
copy of the Pay.Gov confirmation receipt page is included with your
application. For any document you are not required to file by these
regulations but which you submit for record purposes, you must also pay
electronically through Pay.Gov the service fee listed in Sec. 256.63
(Non-required Document Filing Fee) per lease affected, and you must
include a copy of the Pay.Gov confirmation receipt page with your
document. Such documents may be rejected at the discretion of the
authorized officer.
* * * * *
PART 290--APPEAL PROCEDURES
14. The authority citation for part 290 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 396, 2107; 30 U.S.C. 189,
359, 1023, 1701 et seq., 1751(a); 31 U.S.C. 3716, 9701; and 43
U.S.C. 1334.
15. Section 290.4(b) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 290.4 How do I file an appeal?
* * * * *
(b) A nonrefundable processing fee of $150.00 paid with the Notice
of Appeal.
(1) You must pay electronically through Pay.Gov at: https://
www.pay.gov/paygov/, and you must include a copy of the Pay.Gov
confirmation receipt page with your Notice of Appeal.
(2) You cannot extend the 60-day period for payment of the
processing fee.
[FR Doc. 07-6173 Filed 12-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P