TRICARE Program; Overpayments Recovery, 72307-72316 [E7-24707]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
PART 75—MANDATORY SAFETY
STANDARDS—UNDERGROUND COAL
MINES
32 CFR Part 199
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 811.
2. Amend § 75.1100–2 by revising
paragraph (a)(2), adding paragraph
(a)(3), and revising paragraph (e) to read
as follows:
§ 75.1100–2 Quantity and location of
firefighting equipment.
(a) * * *
*
*
*
*
(2) Each working section of coal
mines producing less than 300 tons of
coal per shift shall be provided with the
following:
(i) Two portable fire extinguishers;
and
(ii) 240 pounds of rock dust in bags
or other suitable containers; and
(iii) At least 500 gallons of water and
at least three pails of 10-quart capacity;
OR a waterline with sufficient hose to
reach the working places; OR a portable
water car of at least 500-gallon capacity;
OR a portable, all-purpose, dry-powder
chemical car of at least 125-pound
capacity.
(3) As an alternative to paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, each working
section with no electrical equipment at
the face of an anthracite coal mine
producing less than 300 tons of coal per
shift shall be provided with the
following:
(i) Portable fire extinguishers
containing a total capacity of at least 30
pounds of dry chemical or 15 gallons of
foam and located at the entrance to the
gangway at the bottom of the slope; and
(ii) Portable fire extinguishers
containing a total capacity of at least 20
pounds of dry chemical or 10 gallons of
foam and located within 500 feet from
the working face.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Electrical installations. At each
electrical installation, the operator shall
provide two portable fire extinguishers
or one having at least 10 pounds of dry
chemical or 5 gallons of foam.
*
*
*
*
*
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
*
[FR Doc. E7–24747 Filed 12–19–07; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Dec 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
Office of the Secretary
[DOD–2007–HA–0010, RIN 0720–AB09]
1. The authority citation for part 75
continues to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
TRICARE Program; Overpayments
Recovery
Office of the Secretary, DoD.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This rule proposes
amendments to the CHAMPUS and
TRICARE program regulation that
governs the recoupment of erroneous
payments. The proposed rule
implements changes required by the
Debt Collection Improvement Act of
1996 and the revised Federal Claims
Collection Standards.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 19, 2008. Do not
submit comments directly to the point
of contact or mail your comments to any
address other that what is shown below.
Doing so will delay the posting of the
submission.
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and or RIN
number and title, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gail
L. Jones, (303) 676–3401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Purpose
On December 23, 1985, the Office of
the Secretary of Defense published a
final rule in the Federal Register (50 FR
52315), clarifying specific procedures
and criteria in the assertion, collection
or compromise of federal claims and the
suspension or termination of collection
action on such claims arising under the
operation of the Civilian Health and
Medical Program of the Uniformed
Services (CHAMPUS). Section 199.11,
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72307
‘‘Overpayments Recovery,’’ addresses
claims in favor of the United States
arising under the Federal Claims
Collection Act (recoupment claims).
This proposed rule implements
changes required by the Debt Collection
Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA) and
the revised Federal Claims Collection
Standards, which were jointly issued by
the Department of the Treasury
(Treasury), and the Department of
Justice (DOJ). The DCIA centralized the
collection of most delinquent non-tax
debt at the Department of the Treasury
Financial Management Service
(Treasury). Agencies are now required
to refer debts to Treasury for centralized
administrative offset under the Treasury
Offset Program (TOP) and to transfer
debts to Treasury for collection on the
agencies’ behalf, a process known as
cross-servicing.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Paragraph (a) of this proposed rule
provides that it applies to the TRICARE
program and the Civilian Health and
Medical Program of the Uniformed
Services (CHAMPUS).
Section (b)(1) of this proposed rule
has been updated to include the DCIA
and the revised Federal Claims
Collection Standards, 31 CFR parts 900–
904, as authority for collection, as well
as Treasury regulations, found at 31 CFR
part 285, subpart A, implementing the
DCIA and related statutes governing the
offset of Federal salaries (5 U.S.C. 5514,
5 CFR 550, subpart K), administrative
offset (31 U.S.C. 3716), administrative
offset of tax refunds (31 U.S.C. 3720A)
and regulations implementing the offset
of military pay under Title 37 U.S.C.
1007(c). The reference to waiver of
collection authorized by Section 743 of
the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 1996 has been deleted.
The legislation authorizing waiver has
expired.
Paragraph (c) of this proposed rule
has been updated to reflect that the
Director, TRICARE Management
Activity (TMA), or a designee, is
responsible for ensuring that timely
collection action is pursued. The Office
of CHAMPUS (OCHAMPUS) has been
disestablished. The functions of
OCHAMPUS are now being performed
by the TMA. The current regulation
reflects that agency authority to
compromise, suspend, or terminate
collection action was limited to claims
that did not exceed $20,000. The
proposed rule increases this amount to
$100,000 at Paragraph (g), the amount
authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3711(a)(2).
Paragraph (e) of the proposed rule is
updated to reflect that the authority to
assert, settle, compromise or to suspend
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
72308
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
or terminate collection on claims arising
under the Federal Claims Collection
Act, has been delegated to the Director,
TMA.
Paragraph (f)(1) of the proposed rule
adds a provision that recoupment
procedures may be modified or adapted
to conform to network agreements and
that the recoupment provisions of the
proposed rule apply if recoupment
under the network agreements is not
successful.
Paragraph (f)(3) of the proposed rule
clarifies a requirement that the
TRICARE contractor must first attempt
to recover an erroneous payment from
another health insurance plan through
the contractor’s coordination of benefits
procedures. If the overpayment cannot
be recovered from the other plan, or if
the other plan has made payment, the
erroneous payment will be recovered
from the party that received the
erroneous payment from TRICARE.
Paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of the proposed
rule provides that a minimum of one
demand letter is required and states that
the specific content, timing and number
of demand letters may be tailored to the
type and amount of debt and the
debtor’s response, if any. Paragraph
(6)(ii) of the current regulation states
that normally a total of three
progressively stronger written demands
for payment be made to a debtor at
approximately 30-day intervals and that
the demands for payment will be made
by CHAMPUS fiscal intermediary and
OCHAMPUS. The proposed rule
updates this language to reflect that
normally the TRICARE contractor will
initiate initial collection action to effect
recoupment.
Paragraph (f)(6)(iv) of the proposed
rule adds language providing that the
initial or subsequent demand letter(s)
may notify debtors of the mandatory
requirement to report delinquent debts
to credit reporting agencies and to refer
delinquent debts to collection agencies,
the Treasury Offset Program (TOP) for
collection by administrative offset from
Federal tax refunds and other amounts
payable by the Government, offset from
state payments as well as the
requirement that delinquent debts be
transferred to Treasury for collection. It
also provides that letters may include
TMA policies for referring delinquent
debts to the Department of Justice.
Paragraph (f)(6)(v) of the proposed
rule deletes language found at Paragraph
(f)(6)(iii) of the current regulation which
stated that offset under the provisions of
31 U.S.C. 3716 was not to be used with
respect to debts owed by any state or
local government. The collection of
debts owed by state and local
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Dec 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
governments through administrative
offset is no longer prohibited.
Paragraph (f)(6)(v)(A) of the proposed
rule is added to implement a
requirement of the DCIA that eligible
non-tax debts delinquent over 180 days
be referred to Treasury for centralized
administrative offset, unless otherwise
exempted from referral. Debts that were
formerly referred directly to the Internal
Revenue Service for Tax Refund Offset
will be referred for centralized
administrative offset. It also provides
that salary offsets under 5 U.S.C. 5514
that were formerly effected through
referral to an employee’s paying agency,
pursuant to Paragraph (f)(6)(vi) of 32
CFR § 199.11 will be effected through
referral for centralized administrative
offset.
Paragraph (f)(6)(vi) of the proposed
rule adds this section to implement a
mandatory requirement of the DCIA that
eligible non-tax debts delinquent over
180 days be transferred to Treasury or
a Treasury-Designated Collection Center
for collection through cross-servicing,
unless otherwise exempted from
referral.
Paragraph (f)(6)(ix) of the proposed
rule increases the minimum amount of
installment payment that may be
accepted to $75.00 per month unless the
debtor demonstrates financial hardship.
Paragraph (f)(6)(iv) of the current
regulation provides that the minimum
amount is $50.00.
Paragraph (f)(6)(xi) of the proposed
rule adds language that requires TMA to
use government-wide collection
contracts to obtain debt collection
services through private contractors as
provided in 31 CFR 901.5(b). The
current regulation provides for TMA to
contract for such services.
Paragraph (f)(6)(xii) of the proposed
rule adds language which provides that
Treasury will report debts transferred to
it for collection to credit reporting
agencies on behalf of TMA. Paragraph
(g)(1) of the proposed rule updates
language to authorize the Director, TMA
to compromise, suspend or terminate
collection action of debts that do not
exceed $100,000 (exclusive of interest,
penalties and administrative costs) or
less, or such other amount as the
Attorney General shall authorize, as
provided in 31 CFR 902.1(a). Paragraph
(b) of the current regulation limits this
authority to $20,000. Paragraph (g)(3) of
the current regulation has been deleted,
because the legislation authorizing the
waiver has expired.
Paragraph (h) of the proposed rule
increases the threshold for referral of
cases to the Department of Justice from
$600 to $2,500 or such other amount as
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the Attorney General shall prescribe, as
provided in 31 CFR 904.4(a).
The effect of the proposed rule would
avoid the expense of court proceedings
for both the government and the debtor,
as well as reduce administrative
handling, provide greater flexibility to
recovery efforts, and promote timely
settlements of outstanding federal
claims.
This amendment is being published
for proposed rulemaking at the same
time as it is being coordinated within
the Department of Defense, with the
Department of Health and Human
Services, and with other interested
agencies, in order that consideration of
both internal and external comments
and publication of the final rulemaking
document can be expedited.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
Executive Order 12886 requires that a
comprehensive regulatory impact
analysis be performed on any
economically significant regulatory
action, defined as one that would result
in an annual effect of $100 million or
more on the national economy or which
would have other substantial impacts.
Pub. L. 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility
Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires that each Federal Agency
prepare and make available for public
comment, a regulatory flexibility
analysis when the agency issues a
Regulation, which would have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule is
not an economically significant
regulatory action and will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities for purposes of
the RFA, thus this proposed rule is not
subject to any of these requirements.
This proposed rule, although not
economically significant under E.O.
12866, it has been designated as
significant and has been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget as
required under the provisions of E.O.
12866. The changes set forth in the
proposed rule are required by the Debt
Collection Improvement Act of 1996
(Public Law 104–134, 110 Stat.
1321,1358 (1996) (DCIA)), as
implemented by the Federal Claims
Collection Standards, joint regulations
issued by the Department of the
Treasury and the Department of Justice,
31 CFR parts 900–904.
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Pub. L. 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995’’ (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.)
It has been certified that this rule does
not impose new information collection
requirements for purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
We have examined the impact of the
proposed rule under E.O. 13132 and it
does not have policies that have
federalism implications that would have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among various levels of
government. Therefore, consultation
with State and local officials is not
required.
This is a proposed rule. Public
comments are invited.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental health, Health care,
Health insurance, Individuals with
disabilities, and Military personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 199— [AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 199
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter
55.
2. Section 199.11 is proposed to be
revised to read as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
§ 199.11
Overpayments recovery.
(a) General. Actions to recover
overpayments arise when the
government has a right to recover
money, funds or property from any
person, partnership, association,
corporation, governmental body or other
legal entity, foreign or domestic, except
another Federal agency, because of an
erroneous payment of benefits under
both CHAMPUS and the TRICARE
program under § 199.17 of this part. The
term ‘‘Civilian Health and Medical
Program of the Uniformed Services’’
(CHAMPUS) is defined in 10 U.S.C.
1072(4), and referred to under § 199.17
as the basic CHAMPUS program,
otherwise known as TRICARE Standard.
The term ‘‘TRICARE program’’ is
defined in 10 U.S.C. 1072(7) and is
referred to under § 199.17 as the tripleoption benefit of TRICARE Prime,
TRICARE Extra, and TRICARE
Standard. It is the purpose of this
section to prescribe procedures for
investigation, determination, assertion,
collection, compromise, waiver and
termination of claims in favor of the
United States for erroneous benefit
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Dec 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
payments arising out of the
administration of CHAMPUS and the
TRICARE program. For the purpose of
this section, references herein to
TRICARE beneficiaries, claims, benefits,
payments, or appeals shall include
CHAMPUS beneficiaries, claims,
benefits, payments, or appeals. A claim
against several joint debtors arising from
a single incident or transaction is
considered one claim. The Director,
TRICARE Management Activity (TMA),
or a designee, may pursue collection
against all joint debtors and is not
required to allocate the burden of
payment between debtors.
(b) Authority—(1) Federal statutory
authority. The Federal Claims
Collection Act, 31 U.S.C. 3701, et seq.,
as amended by the Debt Collection Act
of 1982 and the Debt Collection
Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA),
provides the basic authority under
which claims may be asserted pursuant
to this section. The DCIA is
implemented by the Federal Claims
Collection Standards, joint regulations
issued by the Department of the
Treasury and the Department of Justice
(DOJ) (31 CFR parts 900–904), that
prescribe government-wide standards
for administrative collection, offset,
compromise, suspension, or termination
of agency collection action, disclosure
of debt information to credit reporting
agencies, referral of debts to private
collection contractors for resolution,
and referral to the Department of Justice
for litigation to collect debts owed the
Federal government. The regulations
under this part are also issued under
Treasury regulations implementing the
DCIA (31 CFR part 285) and related
statutes and regulations governing the
offset of Federal salaries (5 U.S.C. 5514;
5 CFR 550, subpart K), administrative
offset (31 U.S.C. 3716; 31 CFR subpart
A); administrative offset of tax refunds
(31 U.S.C. 3720A) and offset of military
pay (37 U.S.C. 1007(c); Volume 7A,
Chapter 50 and Volume 7B, Chapter 28
of the Department of Defense Financial
Management Regulation, DOD
7000.14–R 1 (DoDFMR))
(2) Other authority. Federal claims
may arise under authorities other than
the federal statutes, referenced above.
These include, but are not limited to:
(i) State worker’s compensation laws
(ii) State hospital lien laws
(iii) State no-fault automobile statutes
(iv) Contract rights under terms of
insurance policies
(c) Policy. The Director, TMA, or a
designee, shall aggressively collect all
debts arising out of its activities. Claims
1 Copies may be obtained at https://www.dtic.mil/
whs/directives/.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72309
arising out of any incident, which has
or probably will generate a claim in
favor of the government, will not be
compromised, except as otherwise
provided in this section, nor will any
person not authorized to take final
action on the government’s claim,
compromise or terminate collection
action. Title 28 U.S.C. 2415–2416
establishes a statute of limitation
applicable to the government where
previously neither limitations nor
latches were available as a defense.
Claims falling within the provisions of
this statute will be referred to the
Department of Justice without
attempting administrative collection
action, if such action cannot be
accomplished in sufficient time to
preclude the running of the statue of
limitations.
(d) Appealability. This section
describes the procedures to be followed
in the recovery and collection of federal
claims in favor of the United States
arising from the operation of TRICARE.
Actions taken under this section are not
initial determinations for the purpose of
the appeal procedures of § 199.10 of this
part. However, the proper exercise of
the right to appeal benefit or provider
status determinations under the
procedures set forth in § 199.10 of this
part may affect the processing of federal
claims arising under this section. Those
appeal procedures afford a TRICARE
beneficiary or participating provider an
opportunity for administrative appellate
review in cases in which benefits have
been denied and in which there is an
appealable issue. For example, a
TRICARE contractor may erroneously
make payment for services, which are
excluded as TRICARE benefits because
they are determined to be not medically
necessary. In that event, the contractor
will initiate recoupment action, and at
the same time, the contractor will offer
an administrative appeal as provided in
§ 199.10 of this part on the medical
necessity issue raised by the adverse
benefit determination. The recoupment
action and the administrative appeal are
separate actions. However, in an
appropriate case, the pendency of the
appeal may provide a basis for the
suspension of collection in the
recoupment case. If an appeal were
resolved entirely in favor of the
appealing party, it would provide a
basis for the termination of collection
action in the recoupment case.
(e) Delegation. Subject to the
limitations imposed by law or contained
in this section, the authority to assert,
settle, and compromise or to suspend or
terminate collection action arising on
claims under the Federal Claims
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
72310
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Collection Act has been delegated to the
Director, TMA, or a designee.
(f) Recoupment of erroneous
payments. (1) Erroneous payments are
expenditures of government funds,
which are not authorized by law or this
part. Examples which are sometimes
encountered in the administration of
TRICARE include mathematical errors,
payment for care provided to an
ineligible person, payment for care
which is not an authorized benefit,
payment for duplicate claims, incorrect
application of the deductible or copayment or payment for services which
were not medically necessary. Claims in
favor of the government arising, as the
result of the filing of false TRICARE
claims or other fraud, fall under the
cognizance of the Department of Justice.
Consequently, procedures in this
section apply to such claims only when
specifically authorized or directed by
the Department of Justice. (See 31 CFR
900.3.) Due to the nature of contractual
agreements between network providers
and TRICARE prime contractors,
recoupment procedures may be
modified or adapted to conform to
network agreements. The provisions of
§ 199.11 shall apply if recoupment
under the network agreements is not
successful.
(2) Scope—(i) General. Paragraph (f)
of this section and the paragraphs
following contain requirements and
procedures for the assertion, collection
or compromise of, and the suspension
or termination of collection action on
claims for erroneous payments against a
sponsor, patient, beneficiary, provider,
physician or other supplier of products
or services under TRICARE.
(ii) Debtor defined. As used herein,
‘‘debtor’’ means a sponsor, beneficiary,
provider, physician, other supplier of
services or supplies, or any other person
who for any reason has been
erroneously paid under TRICARE. It
includes an individual, partnership,
corporation, professional corporation or
association, estate, trust or any other
legal entity.
(iii) Delinquency defined. A debt is
‘‘delinquent’’ if it has not been paid by
the date specified in the initial written
demand for payment (that is, the initial
written notification) or other applicable
contractual agreement, unless other
satisfactory payment arrangements have
been made by the date specified in the
initial written demand for payment. A
debt is considered delinquent if at any
time after entering into a repayment
agreement, the debtor fails to satisfy any
obligations under that agreement.
(3) Other health insurance claims.
Claims arising from erroneous TRICARE
payments in situations where the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Dec 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
beneficiary has entitlement to an
insurance, medical service, health and
medical plan, including any plan
offered by a third party payer as defined
in 10 U.S.C. 1095(h)(1) or other
government program, except in the case
of a plan administered under Title XIX
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396, et. seq.), through employment, by
law, through membership in an
organization, or as a student, or through
the purchase of a private insurance or
health plan, shall be recouped following
the procedures in paragraph (f) of this
section. If the other plan has not made
payment to the beneficiary or provider,
the contractor shall first attempt to
recover the overpayment from the other
plan through the contractor’s
coordination of benefits procedures. If
the overpayment cannot be recovered
from the other plan, or if the other plan
has made payment, the overpayment
will be recovered from the party that
received the erroneous payment from
TRICARE.
(4) Claim denials due to clarification
or change. In those instances where
claim review results in the denial of
benefits previously provided, but now
denied due to a change, clarification or
interpretation of the public law or this
part, no recoupment action need be
taken to recover funds expended prior
to the effective date of such change,
clarification or interpretation.
(5) Good faith payment. (i) The
Department of Defense, through the
Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting
System (DEERS), is responsible for
establishing and maintaining a file
listing of persons eligible to receive
benefits under TRICARE. However, it is
the responsibility of the Uniformed
Services to provide eligible TRICARE
beneficiaries with accurate and
appropriate means of identification.
When sources of civilian medical care
exercise reasonable care and precaution
identifying persons claiming to be
eligible TRICARE beneficiaries, and
furnish otherwise covered services and
supplies to such persons in good faith,
TRICARE benefits may be paid subject
to prior approval by the Director, TMA,
or a designee, notwithstanding the fact
that the person receiving the services
and supplies is subsequently
determined to be ineligible for benefits.
Good faith payments will not be
authorized for services and supplies
provided by a civilian source of medical
care because of its own careless
identification procedures.
(ii) When it is determined that a
person was not a TRICARE beneficiary,
the TRICARE contractor and the civilian
source of medical care are expected to
make all reasonable efforts to obtain
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
payment or to recoup the amount of the
good faith payment from the person
who erroneously claimed to be the
TRICARE beneficiary. Recoupment of
good faith payments initiated by the
TRICARE contractor will be processed
pursuant to the provisions of paragraph
(f) of this section.
(6) Recoupment procedures—(i)
Initial action. When an erroneous
payment is discovered, the TRICARE
contractor normally will be required to
take the initial action to effect
recoupment. Such actions will be in
accordance with the provisions of this
part and the TRICARE contracts and
will include a demand (or demands) for
refund or an offset against any other
TRICARE payment(s) becoming due the
debtor. When the efforts of the TRICARE
contractor to effect recoupment are not
successful within a reasonable time,
recoupment cases will be referred to the
Office of General Counsel, TMA, for
further action in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph (f) of this
section. All requests to debtors for
refund or notices of intent to offset shall
be in writing.
(ii) Demand for payment. Written
demand(s) for payment shall inform the
debtor of the following:
(A) The basis for and amount of the
debt and the consequences of failing to
cooperate to resolve the debt;
(B) The right to inspect and copy
TRICARE records pertaining to the debt;
(C) The opportunity to request an
administrative review by the TRICARE
contractor; and that such a request must
be received by the TRICARE contractor
within 90 days from the date of the
initial demand letter;
(D) That payment of the debt is due
within 30 days from the date of the
initial demand notification;
(E) That interest will be assessed on
the debt at the Treasury Current Value
of Funds rate, pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
3717, and will begin to accrue on the
date of the initial demand letter; and
that interest will be waived on the debt,
or any portion thereof, which is paid
within 30 days from the date of the
initial demand notification letter;
(F) That administrative costs and
penalties will be charged pursuant to 31
CFR 901.9;
(G) That collection by offset against
current or subsequent claims or other
amounts payable from the government
may be taken;
(H) The opportunity to enter into a
written agreement to repay the debt;
(I) The name, address, and phone
number of a contact person or office that
the debtor may contact regarding the
debt.
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(iii) A minimum of one demand letter
is required. However, the specific
content, timing and number of demand
letters may be tailored to the type and
amount of the debt, and the debtor’s
response, if any. Contractors’ demand
letters must be mailed or hand-delivered
on the same date they are dated.
(iv) The initial or subsequent demand
letters may also inform the debtor of the
requirement to report delinquent debts
to credit reporting agencies and to
collection agencies, the requirement to
refer debts to the Treasury Offset
Program for offset from Federal income
tax refunds and other amounts payable
by the Government, offset from state
payments, the requirement to refer debts
to the Department of Treasury for
collection and TRICARE policies
concerning the referral of delinquent
debts to the Department of Justice for
enforced collection action. The initial or
subsequent demand letter may also
inform the debtor of TRICARE policies
concerning waiver. When necessary to
protect the Government’s interest (for
example to prevent the running of a
statute of limitations), written demand
may be preceded by other appropriate
actions under this regulation, including
referral to the Department of Justice for
litigation. There should be no undue
delay in responding to any
communication received from the
debtor. Responses to communications
from debtors should be made within 30
days of receipt whenever feasible. If
prior to the initiation of the demand
process or at any time during or after
completion of the demand process, the
Director, TMA, or a designee,
determines to pursue or is required to
pursue offset, the procedures applicable
to administrative offset, found at
paragraph (f)(6)(v) of this section must
be followed. If it appears that initial
collection efforts are not productive or
if immediate legal action on the claim
appears necessary, the claim shall be
referred promptly by the contractor to
the Office of General Counsel, TMA.
(v) Collection by administrative offset.
Collections by offset will be undertaken
administratively in every instance when
feasible. Collections may be taken by
administrative offset under 31 U.S.C.
3716, the common law or other
applicable statutory authority. No
collection by offset may be undertaken
unless the debtor has been sent a
written demand for payment, including
the procedural safeguards described in
paragraph (f)(6)(ii) of this section, unless
the failure to take the offset would
substantially prejudice the
Government’s ability to collect the debt,
and the time before payment is to be
made does not reasonably permit the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Dec 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
time for sending written notice. Such
prior offset must be promptly followed
by sending a written notice and
affording the debtor the opportunity for
a review by the TRICARE contractor.
Examples of erroneous payments
include, but are not limited to, claims
submitted by individuals ineligible for
TRICARE benefits, claims submitted for
non-covered services or supplies, claims
for which payments by another
insurance or health plan reduces
TRICARE liability and from claims
made from participating providers in
which payment was initially
erroneously made to the beneficiary.
The resolution of recoupment claims
rarely involves issues of credibility or
veracity and a review of the written
record is ordinarily an adequate means
to correct prior mistakes. For this
reason, the pre-offset oral hearing
requirements of the Federal Claims
Collection Standards, 31 CFR 901.3(e)
do not apply to the recoupment of
erroneous TRICARE payments.
However, in instances where an oral
hearing is not required, the debtor will
be afforded an administrative review if
the TRICARE contractor receives a
written request for an administrative
review within 90 days from the date of
the initial demand letter. The appeals
procedures described in § 199.10 of this
part, affords a TRICARE beneficiary or
participating provider an opportunity
for an administrative appellate review,
including under certain circumstances,
the right to an oral hearing before a
hearing officer when an appealable
issue exists. TRICARE contractors may
take administrative action to offset
erroneous payments against other
current TRICARE payments owing a
debtor. Payments on the claims of a
debtor pending at or filed subsequent to
the time collection action is initiated
should be suspended pending the
outcome of the collection action so that
these funds will be available for offset.
All or part of a debt may be offset
depending on the amount available for
offset. Any requests for offset received
from other agencies and garnishment
orders issued by courts of competent
jurisdiction will be forwarded to the
Office of General Counsel, TMA. Unless
otherwise provided by law,
administrative offset of payments under
the authority of 31 U.S.C. 3716 may not
be conducted more than 10 years after
the Government’s right to collect the
debt first accrued, unless facts material
to the Government’s right to collect the
debt were not known and could not
reasonably have been known by the
TRICARE official or officials charged
with the responsibility to discover and
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72311
collect such debts. This limitation does
not apply to debts reduced to judgment.
This section does not apply to debts
arising under the Social Security Act,
except as provided in 42 U.S.C. 404,
payments made under the Social
Security Act, except as provided for in
31 U.S.C. 3716(c), debts arising under,
or payments made under, the Internal
Revenue Code, except for offset of tax
refunds or tariff laws of the United
States; offsets against Federal salaries to
the extent these standards are
inconsistent with regulations published
to implement such offsets under 5
U.S.C. 5514 and 31 U.S.C. 3716; offsets
under 31 U.S.C. 3728 against a judgment
obtained by a debtor against the United
States; offset or recoupment under
common law, state law, or federal
statutes specifically prohibiting offset or
recoupment of particular types of debts
or offsets in the course of judicial
proceedings, including bankruptcy.
(A) Referral for centralized
administrative offset. When costeffective, legally enforceable non-tax
debts delinquent over 180 days
delinquent that are eligible for
collection through administrative offset
shall be referred to the Department of
the Treasury for administrative offset,
unless otherwise exempted from
referral. Referrals shall include
certification that the debt is past due
and legally enforceable and that TMA
has complied with all due process
requirements of the statute-authorizing
offset. Administrative offset, including
administrative offset against tax refunds
due debtors under 26 U.S.C. 6402, in
accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3720A, shall
be effected through referral for
centralized administrative offset, after
debtors have been afforded at least sixty
(60) days notice required in paragraph
(f)(6) of this section. Salary offsets shall
be effected through referral for
centralized administrative offset, after
debtors have been afforded due process
required by 5 U.S.C. 5514, in
accordance with 31 CFR 285.7. Referrals
for salary offset shall include
certification that the debts are past due,
legally enforceable debts and that TMA
has complied with all due process
requirements under 5 U.S.C. 5514 and
applicable agency regulations. The
Treasury, Financial Management
Service (FMS) may waive the salary
offset certification requirement set forth
in 31 CFR 285.7, as a prerequisite to
submitting the debt to FMS for offset
from other payment types. If FMS
waives the certification requirement,
before an offset occurs, TMA will
provide the employee with the notice
and opportunity for a hearing as
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
72312
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
required by 5 U.S.C. 5514 and
applicable regulations, and will certify
to FMS that the requirements of 5 U.S.C.
5514 and applicable agency regulations
have been met. TMA is not required to
duplicate notice and administrative
review or salary offset hearing
opportunities before referring debts for
centralized administrative offset when
the debtor has been previously given
them.
(B) Referral for non-centralized
administrative offset. Unless otherwise
prohibited by law, when centralized
administrative offset is not available or
appropriate, past due legally enforceable
non-tax delinquent debts that are
eligible for referral may be collected
through non-centralized administrative
offset through a request directly to the
payment-authorizing agency. Referrals
shall include certification that the debts
are past due and that the agency has
complied with due process
requirements under 31 U.S.C. 3716(a) or
other applicable authority and
applicable agency regulations
concerning administrative offset.
Generally, non-centralized
administrative offsets will be made on
an ad hoc case-by-case basis, in
cooperation with the agency certifying
or authorizing payments to the debtor.
(vi) Collection by transfer of debts to
Treasury or a Treasury-designated debt
collection center for collection through
cross-servicing. (A) The Director, TMA
or a designee, is required to transfer
legally enforceable non-tax debts that
are delinquent 180 days or more to the
Department of the Treasury for
collection through cross-servicing (31
U.S.C. 3711(g); 31 CFR 285.12.) Debts
referred or transferred to Treasury or
Treasury-designated debt collection
centers shall be serviced, collected, or
compromised, or the collection action
will be suspended or terminated, in
accordance with the statutory
requirements and authorities applicable
to the collection of such debts. Agencies
operating Treasury-designated debt
collection centers are authorized to
charge a fee for services rendered
regarding referred or transferred debts.
This fee may be paid out of amounts
collected and may be added to the debt
as an administrative cost. Referrals will
include certification that the debts
transferred are valid, legally enforceable
debts, that there are no legal bars to
collection and that the agency has
complied with all prerequisites to a
particular collection action under the
applicable laws, regulations or policies,
unless the agency and Treasury agree
that Treasury will do so on behalf of the
agency.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Dec 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
(B) The requirement of paragraph (1)
of this section does not apply to any
debt that:
(1) Is in litigation or foreclosure.
(2) Will be disposed of under an
approved asset sale program.
(3) Has been referred to a private
collection contractor for a period of time
acceptable to Treasury.
(4) Will be collected under internal
offset procedures within 3 years after
the debt first became delinquent.
(5) Is exempt from this requirement
based on a determination by the
Secretary of the Treasury that
exemption for a certain class of debt is
in the best interest of the United States.
(vii) Collection by salary offset. When
a debtor is a member of the military
service or a retired member and
collection by offset against other
TRICARE payments due the debtor
cannot be accomplished, and there have
been no positive responses to a demand
for payment, the Director, TMA, or a
designee, may refer the debt for offset
from the debtor’s pay account pursuant
to 37 U.S.C. 1007(c), as implemented by
Volume 7A, Chapter 50 and Volume 7B,
Chapter 28 of the DoDFMR. Collection
from a Federal employee may be
effected through salary offset under 5
U.S.C. 5514.
(A) For collections by salary offset the
Director, TMA, or designee, will issue
written notification, as required by 5
CFR 550.1104(d) at least 30 days before
any offsets are taken. In addition, the
notification will advise the employee
that if he or she retires, resigns or his
or her employment ends before
collection of the debt is completed,
collection may be made from
subsequent payments of any nature due
from the United States (e.g., final salary
payment, lump-sum leave under 31
U.S.C. 3716 due the employee as of date
of separation.) A debtor’s involuntary
payment of all or part of a debt being
collected will not be construed as a
waiver of any rights the debtor may
have under 5 U.S.C. 5514 or any other
provision of contract or law, unless
there are statutory or contractual
provisions to the contrary or the
employee’s paying agency is directed by
an administrative or judicial order to
refund amounts deducted from his or
her current pay. No interest will be paid
on amounts waived or determined not
to be owed unless there are statutory or
contractual provisions to the contrary.
(B) Petition for hearing. The notice of
the proposed offset will advise the
debtor of his or her right to petition for
a hearing. The petition for hearing must
be signed by the debtor or his or her
representative and must state whether
he or she is contesting debt validity,
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
debt amount and/or the terms of the
proposed offset schedule. It must
explain with reasonable specificity all
the facts, evidence and witnesses, if any
(in the case of an oral hearing and a
summary of their anticipated
testimony), which the debtor believes
support his or her position, and include
any supporting documentation. If
contesting the terms of the proposed
offset schedule, the debtor must provide
financial information including a
completed Department of Justice
Financial Statement of Debtor form
(OBD–500 or other form prescribed by
DOJ), including specific details
concerning income and expenses of the
employee, his or her spouse and
dependents for 1-year period preceding
the debt notification and projected
income and expenses for the proposed
offset period and a statement of the
reason why the debtor believes the
salary offset schedule will impose
extreme financial hardship. Upon
receipt of the petition for hearing, the
Director, TMA, or a designee, will
complete reconsideration. If the
Director, TMA, or a designee determines
that the debt amount is not owed, that
a less amount is owed, or that the terms
of the employee’s proposed offset
schedule are acceptable, it will advise
the debtor and request that the
employee accept the results of the
reconsideration in lieu of a hearing. If
the employee declines to accept the
results of reconsideration in lieu of a
hearing, the debtor will be afforded a
hearing. Ordinarily, a petition for
hearing and required submissions that
are not timely filed, shall be accepted
after expiration of the deadline provided
in the notice of the proposed offset, only
when the debtor can demonstrate to the
Director, TMA, or a designee, that the
timely filing of the request was not
feasible due to extraordinary
circumstances over which the appealing
party had no practical control or
because of failure to receive notice of
the time limit (unless he or she was
otherwise aware of it). Each request for
an exception to the timely filing
requirement will be considered on its
own merits. The decision of the
Director, TMA, or a designee, on a
request for an exception to the timely
filing requirement shall be final.
(C) Extreme financial hardship. The
maximum authorized amount that may
be collected through involuntary salary
offset is the lesser of 15 percent of the
employee’s disposable pay or the full
amount of the debt. An employee who
has petitioned for a hearing may assert
that the maximum allowable rate of
involuntary offset produces extreme
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
financial hardship. An offset produces
an extreme financial hardship if the
offset prevents the employee from
meeting the costs necessarily incurred
for the essential expenses of the
employee, employee’s spouse and
dependents. These essential expenses
include costs incurred for food, housing,
necessary public utilities, clothing,
transportation and medical care. In
determining whether the offset would
prevent the employee from meeting the
essential expenses identified above, the
following shall be considered:
(1) Income from all sources of the
employee, the employee’s spouse, and
dependents;
(2) The extent to which assets of the
employee, employee’s spouse and
dependents are available to meet the
offset and essential subsistence
expenses;
(3) Whether these essential
subsistence expenses have been
minimized to the greatest extent
possible;
(4) The extent to which the employee
or the employee’s spouse can borrow
money to meet the offset and other
essential expenses; and
(5) The extent to which the employee
and the employee’s spouse and
dependents have other exceptional
expenses that should be taken into
account and whether these expenses
have been minimized.
(D) Form and content of hearings. The
resolution of recoupment claims rarely
involves issues of credibility or veracity
and a review of the written record is
ordinarily an adequate means to
determine the validity or amount of the
debt and/or the terms of a proposed
offset schedule. The Director, TMA, or
a designee, will determine whether an
oral hearing is required. A debtor who
has petitioned for a hearing, but who is
not entitled to an oral hearing will be
given an administrative hearing, based
on the written documentation submitted
by the debtor and the Director, TMA, or
a designee. If the Director, TMA, or a
designee, determines that the debtor
should be afforded the opportunity for
an oral hearing, the debtor may elect to
have a hearing based on the written
record in lieu of an oral hearing. The
Director, TMA, or a designee, will
provide the debtor (or his
representative) notification of the time,
date and location of the oral hearing to
be held if the debtor has been afforded
an oral hearing. Copies of records
documenting the debt will be provided
to the debtor or his representative (if
they have not been previously
provided), at least 3 calendar days prior
to the date of the oral hearing. At oral
hearings, the only evidence permitted,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Dec 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
except oral testimony, will be that
which was previously submitted as prehearing submissions. At oral hearings,
the debtor may not raise any issues not
previously raised with TMA. In the
absence of good cause shown, a debtor
who fails to appear at an oral hearing
will be deemed to have waived the right
to a hearing and salary offset may be
initiated.
(E) Costs for attendance at oral
hearings. Debtors and their witnesses
will bear their own costs for attendance
at oral hearings.
(F) Hearing official’s decision. The
Hearing Official’s decision will be in
writing and will identify the
documentation reviewed. It will
indicate the amount of debt that he or
she determined is valid and shall state
the amount of the offset and the
estimated duration of the offset. The
determination of a hearing official
designated under this section is
considered an official certification
regarding the existence and amount of
the debt and/or the terms of the
proposed offset schedule for the
purposes of executing salary offset
under 5 U.S.C. 5514. The Hearing
Official’s decision must be issued at the
earliest practical date, but not later than
60 days from the date the petition for
hearing is received by the Office of
General Counsel, TMA, unless the
debtor requests, and the Hearing Official
grants a delay in the proceedings. If a
hearing official determines that the debt
may not be collected by salary offset,
but the Director, TMA, or a designee,
finds the debt is still valid, the Director,
TMA or a designee, may seek collection
through other means, including but not
limited to, offset from other payments
due from the United States.
(viii) RESERVED
(ix) Collection of installments. Debts,
including interest, penalty and
administrative costs shall be collected
in one lump sum whenever possible.
However, when the debtor is financially
unable to pay the debt in one lump sum,
the TRICARE contractor or the Director,
TMA, or designee, may accept payment
in installments. Debtors claiming that
lump sum payment will create financial
hardship may be required to complete a
Department of Justice Financial
Statement of Debtor form or provide
other financial information that will
permit TMA to verify such
representations. TMA may also obtain
credit reports to assess installment
requests. Normally, debtors will make
installment payments on a monthly
basis. Installment payment shall bear a
reasonable relationship to the size of the
debt and the debtor’s ability to pay.
Except when a debtor can demonstrate
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72313
financial hardship or another reasonable
cause exists, installment payments
should be sufficient in size and
frequency to liquidate the debt in 3
years or less. (31 CFR 901.8(b)).
Normally, installment payments of $75
or less will not be accepted unless the
debtor demonstrates financial hardship.
Any installment agreement with a
debtor in which the total amount of
deferred installments will exceed $750,
should normally include an executed
promissory agreement. Copies of
installment agreements will be retained
in the contractor’s or TMA, Office of
General Counsel’s files.
(x) Interest, penalties, and
administrative costs. Title 31 U.S.C.
3717 and the Federal Claims Collection
Standards, 31 CFR 901.9, require the
assessment of interest, penalty and
administrative costs on delinquent
debts. Interest shall accrue from the date
the initial debt notification is mailed to
the debtor. The rate of interest assessed
shall be the rate of the current value of
funds to the United States Treasury (the
Treasury tax and loan account rate). The
collection of interest on the debt or any
portion of the debt, which is paid
within 30 days after the date on which
interest begins to accrue, shall be
waived. The Director, TMA, or designee,
may extend this 30-day period on a
case-by-case basis, if it reasonably
determines that such action is
appropriate. The rate of interest as
initially assessed shall remain fixed for
the duration of the indebtedness; except
that where the debtor has defaulted on
a repayment agreement and seeks to
enter into a new agreement, a new
interest rate may be set which reflects
the current value of funds to the
Treasury at the time the new agreement
is executed. Interest shall not be
compounded; that is, interest shall not
be charged on interest, penalties, or
administrative costs required by this
section. However, if a debtor defaults on
a previous repayment agreement,
charges that accrued but were not
collected under the defaulted
agreement, shall be added to the
principal under the new repayment
agreement. The collection of interest,
penalties and administrative costs may
be waived in whole or in part as a part
of the compromise of a debt as provided
in paragraph (g) of this section. In
addition, the Director, TMA, or designee
may waive in whole or in part, the
collection of interest, penalties, or
administrative costs assessed herein if
he or she determines that collection
would be against equity and good
conscience and not in the best interest
of the United States. Some situations in
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
72314
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
which a waiver may be appropriate
include:
(A) Waiver of interest consistent with
31 CFR 903.2(c)(2) in connection with a
suspension of collection when a
TRICARE appeal is pending under
§ 199.10 of this part where there is a
substantial issue of fact in dispute.
(B) Waiver of interest where the
original debt arose through no fault or
lack of good faith on the part of the
debtor and the collection of interest
would impose a financial hardship or
burden on the debtor. Some examples in
which such a waiver would be
appropriate include: a debt arising when
a TRICARE beneficiary in good faith
files and is paid for a claim for medical
services or supplies, which are later
determined not to be covered benefits,
or a debt arising when a TRICARE
beneficiary is overpaid as the result of
a calculation error on the part of the
TRICARE contractor or TMA.
(C) Waiver of interest where there has
been an agreement to repay a debt in
installments, there is no indication of
fault or lack of good faith on the part of
the debtor, and the amount of interest is
so large in relation to the size of the
installments that the debtor can
reasonably afford to pay, that it is likely
the debt will never be repaid in full.
When a debt is paid in installments, the
installment payments first will be
applied to the payment of outstanding
penalty and administrative cost charges,
second, to accrued interest and then to
principal. Administrative costs incurred
as the result of a debt becoming
delinquent (as defined in paragraph
(f)(2)(iii) of this section) shall be
assessed against a debtor. These
administrative costs represent the
additional costs incurred in processing
and handling the debt because it became
delinquent. The calculation of
administrative costs should be based
upon cost analysis establishing an
average of actual additional costs
incurred in processing and handling
claims against other debtors in similar
stages of delinquency. A penalty charge,
not exceeding six percent a year, shall
be assessed on the amount due on a debt
that is delinquent for more than 90 days.
This charge, which need not be
calculated until the 91st day of
delinquency, shall accrue from the date
that the debt became delinquent.
(xi) Referral to private collection
agencies. TMA shall use governmentwide debt collection contracts to obtain
debt collection services provided by
private contractors in accordance with
31 CFR 901.5(b).
(xii) Reporting delinquent debts to
credit reporting agencies. Delinquent
consumer debts shall be reported to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Dec 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
credit reporting agencies. Delinquent
debts are debts which are not paid or for
which satisfactory payment
arrangements are not made by the due
date specified in the initial debt
notification letter, or those for which the
debtor has entered into a written
payment agreement and installment
payments are past due 30 days or
longer. Such referrals shall comply with
the Bankruptcy Code and the Privacy
Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, as amended.
The provisions of the Privacy Act do not
apply to credit bureaus (31 CFR
901.4(1)). There is no requirement to
duplicate the notice and review
opportunities before referring debts to
credit bureaus. Debtors will be advised
of the specific information to be
transmitted (i.e., name, address, and
taxpayer identification number,
information about the debt). Procedures
developed for such referrals must
ensure that an accounting of the
disclosures shall be kept which is
available to the debtor; that the credit
reporting agencies are provided with
corrections and annotations of
disagreements of the debtor; and that
reasonable efforts are made to ensure
that the information to be reported is
accurate, complete, timely and relevant.
When requested by a credit-reporting
agency, verification of the information
disclosed will be provided promptly.
Once a claim has been reviewed and
determined to be valid, a complete
explanation of the claim will be given
the debtor. When the claim is overdue,
the individual will be notified in
writing that payment is overdue; that
within not less than 60 days, disclosure
of the claim shall be made to a
consumer reporting agency unless
satisfactory payment arrangements are
made, or unless the debtor requests an
administrative review and demonstrates
some basis on which the debt is
legitimately disputed; and of the
specific information to be disclosed to
the consumer reporting agency. The
information to be disclosed to the credit
reporting agency will be limited to
information necessary to establish the
identity of the debtor, including name,
address and taxpayer identification
number; the amount, status and history
of the claim; and the agency or program
under which the claim arose.
Reasonable action will be taken to locate
an individual for whom a current
address is not available. The
requirements of this section do not
apply to commercial debts, although
commercial debts shall be reported to
commercial credit bureaus. The
Department of the Treasury will report
debts transferred to it for collection to
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
credit reporting agencies on behalf of
the Director, TMA, or a designee.
(xiii) Use and disclosure of mailing
addresses. In attempting to locate a
debtor in order to collect or compromise
a debt under this section, the Director,
TMA, or a designee, may send a written
request to the Secretary of the Treasury,
or a designee, for current address
information from records of the Internal
Revenue Service. TMA may disclose
mailing addresses obtained under this
authority to other agencies and to
collection agencies for collection
purposes.
(g) Compromise, suspension or
termination of collection actions arising
under the Federal Claims Collection
Act—(1) Basic considerations. Federal
claims against the debtor and in favor of
the United States arising out of the
administration of TRICARE may be
compromised or collection action taken
thereon may be suspended or
terminated in compliance with the
Federal Claims Collection Act, 31 U.S.C.
3711, as implemented by the Federal
Claims Collection Standards, 31 CFR
parts 900–904. The provisions
concerning compromise, suspension or
termination of collection activity
pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3711 apply to
debts, which do not exceed $100,000 or
any higher amount authorized by the
Attorney General, exclusive of interest,
penalties, and administrative costs, after
deducting the amount of partial
payments or collections, if any. If, after
deducting the amount of any partial
payments or collections, the principal
amount of a debt exceeds $100,000, or
any higher amount authorized by the
Attorney General, exclusive of interest,
penalties and administrative costs, the
authority to suspend or terminate rests
solely with the DOJ.
(2) Authority. TRICARE contractors
are not authorized to compromise or to
suspend or terminate collection action
on TRICARE claims. Only the Director,
TMA, or designee or Uniformed
Services claims officers acting under the
provisions of their own regulations are
so authorized.
(3) Basis for compromise. A
compromise should be for an amount
that bears a reasonable relation to the
amount that can be recovered by
enforced collection procedures, with
regard to the exemptions available to the
debtor and the time collection will take.
A claim may be compromised
hereunder if the government cannot
collect the full amount if:
(i) The debtor or the estate of a debtor
does not have the present or prospective
ability to pay the full amount within a
reasonable time;
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(ii) The cost of collecting the claim
does not justify enforced collection of
the full amount; or
(iii) The government is unable to
enforce collection of the full amount
within a reasonable time by enforced
collection proceedings; or
(iv) There is significant doubt
concerning the Government’s ability to
prove its case in court for the full
amount claimed; or
(v) The cost of collecting the claim
does not justify enforced collection of
the full amount.
(4) Basis for suspension. Collection
action may be suspended for the
following reasons if future collection
action may be sufficiently productive to
justify periodic review and action on the
claim, considering its size and the
amount, which may be realized thereon:
(i) The debtor cannot be located; or
(ii) The debtor’s financial condition is
expected to improve; or
(iii) The debtor is unable to make
payments on the government’s claim or
effect a compromise at the time, but the
debtor’s future prospects justify
retention of the claim for periodic
review and action and;
(A) The applicable statute of
limitations has been tolled or started
running anew; or
(B) Future collections can be effected
by administrative offset,
notwithstanding the expiration of the
applicable statute of limitations for
litigation of claims with due regard to
the 10-year limitation for administrative
offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716(e)(1); or
(C) The debtor agrees to pay interest
on the amount of the debt on which
collection action will be temporarily
suspended and such temporary
suspension is likely to enhance the
debtor’s ability fully to pay the principal
amount of the debt with interest at a
later date.
(iv) Consideration may be given by
the Director, TMA, or designee to
suspend collection action pending
action on a request for a review of the
government’s claim against the debtor or
pending an administrative review under
§ 199.10 of this part of any TRICARE
claim or claims directly involved in the
government’s claim against the debtor.
Suspension under this paragraph will be
made on a case-by-case basis as to
whether:
(A) There is a reasonable possibility
that the debt (in whole or in part) will
be found not owing from the debtor;
(B) The Government’s interest would
be protected if suspension were granted
by reasonable assurance that the debt
would be recovered if the debtor does
not prevail; and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Dec 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
(C) Collection of the debt will cause
undue hardship.
(5) Collection action may be
terminated for one or more of the
following reasons:
(i) TMA cannot collect or enforce
collection of any substantial amount
through its own efforts or the efforts of
others, including consideration of the
judicial remedies available to the
government, the debtor’s future
financial prospects, and the exemptions
available to the debtor under state and
federal law;
(ii) The debtor cannot be located, and
either;
(iii) The costs of collection are
anticipated to exceed the amount
recoverable; or
(iv) It is determined that the debt is
legally without merit or enforcement of
the debt is barred by any applicable
statute of limitations; or
(v) The debt cannot be substantiated;
or
(vi) The debt against the debtor has
been discharged in bankruptcy.
Collection activity may be continued
subject to the provisions of the
Bankruptcy Code, such as collection of
any payments provided under a plan of
reorganization or in cases when TMA
did not receive notice of the bankruptcy
proceedings.
(6) In determining whether the debt
should be compromised, suspended or
terminated, the responsible TMA
collection authority will consider the
following factors:
(i) Age and health of the debtor;
present and potential income;
inheritance prospects; the possibility
that assets have been concealed or
improperly transferred by the debtor;
and the availability of assets or income
which may be realized upon by
enforced collection proceedings;
(ii) Applicability of exemptions
available to a debtor under state or
federal law;
(iii) Uncertainty as to the price which
collateral or other property may bring at
a forced sale;
(iv) The probability of proving the
claim in court because of legal issues
involved or because of a bona fide
dispute of the facts; the probability of
full or partial recovery; the availability
of necessary evidence and related
pragmatic considerations. Debtors may
be required to provide a completed
Department of Justice Financial
Statement of Debtor form (OBD–500 or
such other form that DOJ shall
prescribe) or other financial information
that will permit TMA to verify debtors’
representations. TMA may obtain credit
reports or other financial information to
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72315
enable it independently to verify
debtors’ representations.
(7) Payment of compromised claims—
(i) Time and manner. Compromised
claims are to be paid in one lump sum
whenever possible. However, if
installment payments of a compromised
claim are necessary, a legally
enforceable compromise agreement
must be obtained. Payment of the
amount that TMA has agreed to accept
as a compromise in full settlement of a
TRICARE claim must be made within
the time and in the manner prescribed
in the compromise agreement. Any such
compromised amount is not settled
until full payment of the compromised
amount has been made within the time
and manner prescribed. Compromise
agreements must provide for the
reinstatement of the prior indebtedness,
less sums paid thereon, and acceleration
of the balance due upon default in the
payment of any installment.
(ii) Failure to pay the compromised
amount. Failure of any debtor to make
payment as provided in the compromise
agreement will have the effect of
reinstating the full amount of the
original claim, less any amounts paid
prior to default.
(iii) Effect of compromise, waiver,
suspension or termination of collection
action. Pursuant to the Internal Revenue
Code, 26 U.S.C. 6050P, compromises
and terminations of undisputed debts
totaling $600 or more for the year will
be reported to the Internal Revenue
Service in the manner prescribed.
Amounts, other than those discharged
in bankruptcy, will be included in the
debtor’s gross income for that year. Any
action taken under paragraph (g) of this
section regarding the compromise of a
federal claim, or waiver or suspension
or termination of collection action on a
federal claim is not an initial
determination for the purposes of the
appeal procedures in § 199.10.
(h) Referrals for collection—(1)
Prompt referral. Federal claims of
$2,500, exclusive of interest, penalties
and administrative costs, or such other
amount as the Attorney General shall
from time to time prescribe on which
collection action has been taken under
the provisions of this section which
cannot be collected or compromised or
on which collection action cannot be
suspended or terminated as provided
herein, will be promptly referred to the
Department of Justice for litigation in
accordance with 31 CFR part 904. Such
referrals shall be made as early as
possible consistent with aggressive
collection action made by TRICARE
contractors and TMA. Referral will be
made with sufficient time to bring
timely suit against the debtor. Referral
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
72316
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
shall be made by submission of a
completed Claims Collection Litigation
Report (CCLR), accompanied by a
signed Certificate of Indebtedness.
Claims of less than the minimum
amount shall not be referred unless
litigation to collect such smaller claims
is important to ensure compliance with
TRICARE’s policies or programs; the
claim is being referred solely for the
purpose of securing a judgment against
the debtor, which will be filed as a lien
against the debtor’s property pursuant to
28 U.S.C. 3201 and returned to the
referring office for enforcement; or the
debtor has the clear ability to pay the
claim and the Government effectively
can enforce payment, with due regard
for the exemptions available to the
debtor under state and Federal law and
judicial remedies available to the
Government.
(2) Preservation of evidence. The
Director, TMA, or a designee will take
such action as is necessary to ensure
that all files, records and exhibits on
claims referred, hereunder, are properly
preserved.
(i) Claims involving indication of
fraud, filing of false claims or
misrepresentation. Any case in which
there is an indication of fraud, the filing
of a false claim or misrepresentation on
the part of the debtor or any party
having an interest in the claim, shall be
promptly referred to the Director, TMA,
or designee. The Director, TMA, or a
designee, will investigate and evaluate
the case and either refers the case to an
appropriate investigative law
enforcement agency or return the claim
for other appropriate administrative
action, including collection action
under this section. Payment on all
TRICARE beneficiary or provider claims
in which fraud, filing false claims or
misrepresentation is suspected will be
suspended until the Director, TMA, or
designee, authorizes payment or denial
of the claims. Collection action on all
claims in which a suspicion of fraud,
misrepresentation or filing false claims
arises, will be suspended pending
referral to the appropriate law
enforcement agencies by the Director,
TMA, or a designee. Only the
Department of Justice has authority to
compromise, suspend or terminate
collection of such debts.
Dated: December 14, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E7–24707 Filed 12–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Dec 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
Establishment of Negotiated
Rulemaking Advisory Committee for
Off-Road Vehicle Management, Cape
Hatteras National Seashore
National Park Service (NPS),
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of establishment and
Notice of the first and second meetings
of the Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory
Committee for Off-Road Vehicle
Management at Cape Hatteras National
Seashore.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Negotiated Rulemaking
Advisory Committee for Off-Road
Vehicle Management at Cape Hatteras
National Seashore (Seashore) is
established under the authority of 16
U.S.C. 1a–2(c), and in accordance with
the Negotiated Rulemaking Act, 5 U.S.C.
561–570. The establishment of this
Committee is in the public interest and
supports the NPS in performing its
duties and responsibilities under the
NPS Organic Act, 16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.;
Executive Order 11644, as amended by
Executive Order 11989; 36 CFR 4.10; the
Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.; the enabling legislation for the
Seashore, 16 U.S.C. 459 et seq.; and
other legal authorities.
An unusual combination of events in
the preparation, approval, and
transmission of this notice has resulted
in the publication of this notice less
than 15 days before the date of the first
meeting and official date of
establishment. The National Park
Service has made extraordinary efforts
to provide other forms of notification to
all Committee members and to the
public.
DATES: The Committee will hold its first
meeting on January 3–4, 2008, from 8:30
a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on January 3, and from
8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on January 4. The
meetings on both days will be held at
the Avon Fire Hall, 40159 Harbor Drive,
Avon, North Carolina 27915.
The Committee will hold its second
meeting on February 26–27, 2008, from
8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on February 26,
and from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on
February 27. The meetings on both days
will be held at the Ramada Inn, 1701
South Virginia Dare Trail, Kill Devil
Hills, North Carolina 27948.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Murray, Superintendent, Outer
Banks Group, 1401 National Park Drive,
Manteo, North Carolina 27954, (252)
473–2111, ext. 148.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The
Committee’s function is to assist
directly in the development of special
regulations for management of off-road
vehicles (ORVs) at Cape Hatteras
National Seashore (Seashore). Executive
Order 11644, as amended by Executive
Order 11989, requires certain Federal
agencies to publish regulations that
provide for administrative designation
of the specific areas and trails on which
ORV use may be permitted. In response,
the NPS published a general regulation
at 36 CFR 4.10, which provides that
each park that designates routes and
areas for ORV use must do so by
promulgating a special regulation
specific to that park. It also provides
that the designation of routes and areas
shall comply with Executive Order
11644, and 36 CFR 1.5 regarding
closures. Members of the Committee
will negotiate to reach consensus on
concepts and language to be used as the
basis for a proposed special regulation,
to be published by the NPS in the
Federal Register, governing ORV use at
the Seashore. The duties of the
Committee are solely advisory.
In accordance with the Negotiated
Rulemaking Act, 5 U.S.C. 561–570, a
Notice of Intent to Establish a
Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory
Committee was published in the
Federal Register on June 28, 2007,
providing a 30-day public comment
period which concluded July 30, 2007.
The NPS received 143 comment letters
or comment entries in the NPS
Planning, Environment, and Public
Comment (PEPC) on-line system during
the comment period.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Responses to Comments Suggesting
Additions to the Committee
The NPS received comments from a
number of nonresident owners and
renters of vacation homes asking that
representatives of the Hatteras Landing
Homeowners Association, Inc., and the
Hatteras Island Homeowners Coalition
be appointed as members of the
Committee to represent their interests
(nonresident property owners/renters
and pedestrian and safety issues
respectively) and to better balance the
representation of interests on the
Committee. One commenter noted that
Hatteras Island is a premier surfing
destination on the East Coast, and asked
that NPS consider appointing a local
resident from the Eastern Surfers
Association or a representative from the
Surfrider Foundation to represent
interests of surfers.
Response
The NPS is aware that a balanced
Committee is necessary for discussions
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72307-72316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24707]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[DOD-2007-HA-0010, RIN 0720-AB09]
32 CFR Part 199
TRICARE Program; Overpayments Recovery
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule proposes amendments to the CHAMPUS and TRICARE
program regulation that governs the recoupment of erroneous payments.
The proposed rule implements changes required by the Debt Collection
Improvement Act of 1996 and the revised Federal Claims Collection
Standards.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 19, 2008. Do not
submit comments directly to the point of contact or mail your comments
to any address other that what is shown below. Doing so will delay the
posting of the submission.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and or
RIN number and title, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the Internet at https://regulations.gov
as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers
or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gail L. Jones, (303) 676-3401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Purpose
On December 23, 1985, the Office of the Secretary of Defense
published a final rule in the Federal Register (50 FR 52315),
clarifying specific procedures and criteria in the assertion,
collection or compromise of federal claims and the suspension or
termination of collection action on such claims arising under the
operation of the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed
Services (CHAMPUS). Section 199.11, ``Overpayments Recovery,''
addresses claims in favor of the United States arising under the
Federal Claims Collection Act (recoupment claims).
This proposed rule implements changes required by the Debt
Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA) and the revised Federal
Claims Collection Standards, which were jointly issued by the
Department of the Treasury (Treasury), and the Department of Justice
(DOJ). The DCIA centralized the collection of most delinquent non-tax
debt at the Department of the Treasury Financial Management Service
(Treasury). Agencies are now required to refer debts to Treasury for
centralized administrative offset under the Treasury Offset Program
(TOP) and to transfer debts to Treasury for collection on the agencies'
behalf, a process known as cross-servicing.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Paragraph (a) of this proposed rule provides that it applies to the
TRICARE program and the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the
Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS).
Section (b)(1) of this proposed rule has been updated to include
the DCIA and the revised Federal Claims Collection Standards, 31 CFR
parts 900-904, as authority for collection, as well as Treasury
regulations, found at 31 CFR part 285, subpart A, implementing the DCIA
and related statutes governing the offset of Federal salaries (5 U.S.C.
5514, 5 CFR 550, subpart K), administrative offset (31 U.S.C. 3716),
administrative offset of tax refunds (31 U.S.C. 3720A) and regulations
implementing the offset of military pay under Title 37 U.S.C. 1007(c).
The reference to waiver of collection authorized by Section 743 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 has been
deleted. The legislation authorizing waiver has expired.
Paragraph (c) of this proposed rule has been updated to reflect
that the Director, TRICARE Management Activity (TMA), or a designee, is
responsible for ensuring that timely collection action is pursued. The
Office of CHAMPUS (OCHAMPUS) has been disestablished. The functions of
OCHAMPUS are now being performed by the TMA. The current regulation
reflects that agency authority to compromise, suspend, or terminate
collection action was limited to claims that did not exceed $20,000.
The proposed rule increases this amount to $100,000 at Paragraph (g),
the amount authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3711(a)(2).
Paragraph (e) of the proposed rule is updated to reflect that the
authority to assert, settle, compromise or to suspend
[[Page 72308]]
or terminate collection on claims arising under the Federal Claims
Collection Act, has been delegated to the Director, TMA.
Paragraph (f)(1) of the proposed rule adds a provision that
recoupment procedures may be modified or adapted to conform to network
agreements and that the recoupment provisions of the proposed rule
apply if recoupment under the network agreements is not successful.
Paragraph (f)(3) of the proposed rule clarifies a requirement that
the TRICARE contractor must first attempt to recover an erroneous
payment from another health insurance plan through the contractor's
coordination of benefits procedures. If the overpayment cannot be
recovered from the other plan, or if the other plan has made payment,
the erroneous payment will be recovered from the party that received
the erroneous payment from TRICARE.
Paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of the proposed rule provides that a minimum
of one demand letter is required and states that the specific content,
timing and number of demand letters may be tailored to the type and
amount of debt and the debtor's response, if any. Paragraph (6)(ii) of
the current regulation states that normally a total of three
progressively stronger written demands for payment be made to a debtor
at approximately 30-day intervals and that the demands for payment will
be made by CHAMPUS fiscal intermediary and OCHAMPUS. The proposed rule
updates this language to reflect that normally the TRICARE contractor
will initiate initial collection action to effect recoupment.
Paragraph (f)(6)(iv) of the proposed rule adds language providing
that the initial or subsequent demand letter(s) may notify debtors of
the mandatory requirement to report delinquent debts to credit
reporting agencies and to refer delinquent debts to collection
agencies, the Treasury Offset Program (TOP) for collection by
administrative offset from Federal tax refunds and other amounts
payable by the Government, offset from state payments as well as the
requirement that delinquent debts be transferred to Treasury for
collection. It also provides that letters may include TMA policies for
referring delinquent debts to the Department of Justice.
Paragraph (f)(6)(v) of the proposed rule deletes language found at
Paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of the current regulation which stated that
offset under the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 3716 was not to be used with
respect to debts owed by any state or local government. The collection
of debts owed by state and local governments through administrative
offset is no longer prohibited.
Paragraph (f)(6)(v)(A) of the proposed rule is added to implement a
requirement of the DCIA that eligible non-tax debts delinquent over 180
days be referred to Treasury for centralized administrative offset,
unless otherwise exempted from referral. Debts that were formerly
referred directly to the Internal Revenue Service for Tax Refund Offset
will be referred for centralized administrative offset. It also
provides that salary offsets under 5 U.S.C. 5514 that were formerly
effected through referral to an employee's paying agency, pursuant to
Paragraph (f)(6)(vi) of 32 CFR Sec. 199.11 will be effected through
referral for centralized administrative offset.
Paragraph (f)(6)(vi) of the proposed rule adds this section to
implement a mandatory requirement of the DCIA that eligible non-tax
debts delinquent over 180 days be transferred to Treasury or a
Treasury-Designated Collection Center for collection through cross-
servicing, unless otherwise exempted from referral.
Paragraph (f)(6)(ix) of the proposed rule increases the minimum
amount of installment payment that may be accepted to $75.00 per month
unless the debtor demonstrates financial hardship. Paragraph (f)(6)(iv)
of the current regulation provides that the minimum amount is $50.00.
Paragraph (f)(6)(xi) of the proposed rule adds language that
requires TMA to use government-wide collection contracts to obtain debt
collection services through private contractors as provided in 31 CFR
901.5(b). The current regulation provides for TMA to contract for such
services.
Paragraph (f)(6)(xii) of the proposed rule adds language which
provides that Treasury will report debts transferred to it for
collection to credit reporting agencies on behalf of TMA. Paragraph
(g)(1) of the proposed rule updates language to authorize the Director,
TMA to compromise, suspend or terminate collection action of debts that
do not exceed $100,000 (exclusive of interest, penalties and
administrative costs) or less, or such other amount as the Attorney
General shall authorize, as provided in 31 CFR 902.1(a). Paragraph (b)
of the current regulation limits this authority to $20,000. Paragraph
(g)(3) of the current regulation has been deleted, because the
legislation authorizing the waiver has expired.
Paragraph (h) of the proposed rule increases the threshold for
referral of cases to the Department of Justice from $600 to $2,500 or
such other amount as the Attorney General shall prescribe, as provided
in 31 CFR 904.4(a).
The effect of the proposed rule would avoid the expense of court
proceedings for both the government and the debtor, as well as reduce
administrative handling, provide greater flexibility to recovery
efforts, and promote timely settlements of outstanding federal claims.
This amendment is being published for proposed rulemaking at the
same time as it is being coordinated within the Department of Defense,
with the Department of Health and Human Services, and with other
interested agencies, in order that consideration of both internal and
external comments and publication of the final rulemaking document can
be expedited.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
Executive Order 12886 requires that a comprehensive regulatory
impact analysis be performed on any economically significant regulatory
action, defined as one that would result in an annual effect of $100
million or more on the national economy or which would have other
substantial impacts.
Pub. L. 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. 601)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that each Federal
Agency prepare and make available for public comment, a regulatory
flexibility analysis when the agency issues a Regulation, which would
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule is not an economically significant regulatory action and will
not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities
for purposes of the RFA, thus this proposed rule is not subject to any
of these requirements.
This proposed rule, although not economically significant under
E.O. 12866, it has been designated as significant and has been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget as required under the provisions
of E.O. 12866. The changes set forth in the proposed rule are required
by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-134, 110
Stat. 1321,1358 (1996) (DCIA)), as implemented by the Federal Claims
Collection Standards, joint regulations issued by the Department of the
Treasury and the Department of Justice, 31 CFR parts 900-904.
[[Page 72309]]
Pub. L. 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995'' (44 U.S.C. 3501, et
seq.)
It has been certified that this rule does not impose new
information collection requirements for purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
We have examined the impact of the proposed rule under E.O. 13132
and it does not have policies that have federalism implications that
would have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among various levels of
government. Therefore, consultation with State and local officials is
not required.
This is a proposed rule. Public comments are invited.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental health, Health care, Health insurance, Individuals
with disabilities, and Military personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 199-- [AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 199 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter 55.
2. Section 199.11 is proposed to be revised to read as follows:
Sec. 199.11 Overpayments recovery.
(a) General. Actions to recover overpayments arise when the
government has a right to recover money, funds or property from any
person, partnership, association, corporation, governmental body or
other legal entity, foreign or domestic, except another Federal agency,
because of an erroneous payment of benefits under both CHAMPUS and the
TRICARE program under Sec. 199.17 of this part. The term ``Civilian
Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services'' (CHAMPUS) is
defined in 10 U.S.C. 1072(4), and referred to under Sec. 199.17 as the
basic CHAMPUS program, otherwise known as TRICARE Standard. The term
``TRICARE program'' is defined in 10 U.S.C. 1072(7) and is referred to
under Sec. 199.17 as the triple-option benefit of TRICARE Prime,
TRICARE Extra, and TRICARE Standard. It is the purpose of this section
to prescribe procedures for investigation, determination, assertion,
collection, compromise, waiver and termination of claims in favor of
the United States for erroneous benefit payments arising out of the
administration of CHAMPUS and the TRICARE program. For the purpose of
this section, references herein to TRICARE beneficiaries, claims,
benefits, payments, or appeals shall include CHAMPUS beneficiaries,
claims, benefits, payments, or appeals. A claim against several joint
debtors arising from a single incident or transaction is considered one
claim. The Director, TRICARE Management Activity (TMA), or a designee,
may pursue collection against all joint debtors and is not required to
allocate the burden of payment between debtors.
(b) Authority--(1) Federal statutory authority. The Federal Claims
Collection Act, 31 U.S.C. 3701, et seq., as amended by the Debt
Collection Act of 1982 and the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996
(DCIA), provides the basic authority under which claims may be asserted
pursuant to this section. The DCIA is implemented by the Federal Claims
Collection Standards, joint regulations issued by the Department of the
Treasury and the Department of Justice (DOJ) (31 CFR parts 900-904),
that prescribe government-wide standards for administrative collection,
offset, compromise, suspension, or termination of agency collection
action, disclosure of debt information to credit reporting agencies,
referral of debts to private collection contractors for resolution, and
referral to the Department of Justice for litigation to collect debts
owed the Federal government. The regulations under this part are also
issued under Treasury regulations implementing the DCIA (31 CFR part
285) and related statutes and regulations governing the offset of
Federal salaries (5 U.S.C. 5514; 5 CFR 550, subpart K), administrative
offset (31 U.S.C. 3716; 31 CFR subpart A); administrative offset of tax
refunds (31 U.S.C. 3720A) and offset of military pay (37 U.S.C.
1007(c); Volume 7A, Chapter 50 and Volume 7B, Chapter 28 of the
Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, DOD 7000.14-R
\1\ (DoDFMR))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Copies may be obtained at https://www.dtic.mil/whs/
directives/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Other authority. Federal claims may arise under authorities
other than the federal statutes, referenced above. These include, but
are not limited to:
(i) State worker's compensation laws
(ii) State hospital lien laws
(iii) State no-fault automobile statutes
(iv) Contract rights under terms of insurance policies
(c) Policy. The Director, TMA, or a designee, shall aggressively
collect all debts arising out of its activities. Claims arising out of
any incident, which has or probably will generate a claim in favor of
the government, will not be compromised, except as otherwise provided
in this section, nor will any person not authorized to take final
action on the government's claim, compromise or terminate collection
action. Title 28 U.S.C. 2415-2416 establishes a statute of limitation
applicable to the government where previously neither limitations nor
latches were available as a defense. Claims falling within the
provisions of this statute will be referred to the Department of
Justice without attempting administrative collection action, if such
action cannot be accomplished in sufficient time to preclude the
running of the statue of limitations.
(d) Appealability. This section describes the procedures to be
followed in the recovery and collection of federal claims in favor of
the United States arising from the operation of TRICARE. Actions taken
under this section are not initial determinations for the purpose of
the appeal procedures of Sec. 199.10 of this part. However, the proper
exercise of the right to appeal benefit or provider status
determinations under the procedures set forth in Sec. 199.10 of this
part may affect the processing of federal claims arising under this
section. Those appeal procedures afford a TRICARE beneficiary or
participating provider an opportunity for administrative appellate
review in cases in which benefits have been denied and in which there
is an appealable issue. For example, a TRICARE contractor may
erroneously make payment for services, which are excluded as TRICARE
benefits because they are determined to be not medically necessary. In
that event, the contractor will initiate recoupment action, and at the
same time, the contractor will offer an administrative appeal as
provided in Sec. 199.10 of this part on the medical necessity issue
raised by the adverse benefit determination. The recoupment action and
the administrative appeal are separate actions. However, in an
appropriate case, the pendency of the appeal may provide a basis for
the suspension of collection in the recoupment case. If an appeal were
resolved entirely in favor of the appealing party, it would provide a
basis for the termination of collection action in the recoupment case.
(e) Delegation. Subject to the limitations imposed by law or
contained in this section, the authority to assert, settle, and
compromise or to suspend or terminate collection action arising on
claims under the Federal Claims
[[Page 72310]]
Collection Act has been delegated to the Director, TMA, or a designee.
(f) Recoupment of erroneous payments. (1) Erroneous payments are
expenditures of government funds, which are not authorized by law or
this part. Examples which are sometimes encountered in the
administration of TRICARE include mathematical errors, payment for care
provided to an ineligible person, payment for care which is not an
authorized benefit, payment for duplicate claims, incorrect application
of the deductible or co-payment or payment for services which were not
medically necessary. Claims in favor of the government arising, as the
result of the filing of false TRICARE claims or other fraud, fall under
the cognizance of the Department of Justice. Consequently, procedures
in this section apply to such claims only when specifically authorized
or directed by the Department of Justice. (See 31 CFR 900.3.) Due to
the nature of contractual agreements between network providers and
TRICARE prime contractors, recoupment procedures may be modified or
adapted to conform to network agreements. The provisions of Sec.
199.11 shall apply if recoupment under the network agreements is not
successful.
(2) Scope--(i) General. Paragraph (f) of this section and the
paragraphs following contain requirements and procedures for the
assertion, collection or compromise of, and the suspension or
termination of collection action on claims for erroneous payments
against a sponsor, patient, beneficiary, provider, physician or other
supplier of products or services under TRICARE.
(ii) Debtor defined. As used herein, ``debtor'' means a sponsor,
beneficiary, provider, physician, other supplier of services or
supplies, or any other person who for any reason has been erroneously
paid under TRICARE. It includes an individual, partnership,
corporation, professional corporation or association, estate, trust or
any other legal entity.
(iii) Delinquency defined. A debt is ``delinquent'' if it has not
been paid by the date specified in the initial written demand for
payment (that is, the initial written notification) or other applicable
contractual agreement, unless other satisfactory payment arrangements
have been made by the date specified in the initial written demand for
payment. A debt is considered delinquent if at any time after entering
into a repayment agreement, the debtor fails to satisfy any obligations
under that agreement.
(3) Other health insurance claims. Claims arising from erroneous
TRICARE payments in situations where the beneficiary has entitlement to
an insurance, medical service, health and medical plan, including any
plan offered by a third party payer as defined in 10 U.S.C. 1095(h)(1)
or other government program, except in the case of a plan administered
under Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396, et. seq.),
through employment, by law, through membership in an organization, or
as a student, or through the purchase of a private insurance or health
plan, shall be recouped following the procedures in paragraph (f) of
this section. If the other plan has not made payment to the beneficiary
or provider, the contractor shall first attempt to recover the
overpayment from the other plan through the contractor's coordination
of benefits procedures. If the overpayment cannot be recovered from the
other plan, or if the other plan has made payment, the overpayment will
be recovered from the party that received the erroneous payment from
TRICARE.
(4) Claim denials due to clarification or change. In those
instances where claim review results in the denial of benefits
previously provided, but now denied due to a change, clarification or
interpretation of the public law or this part, no recoupment action
need be taken to recover funds expended prior to the effective date of
such change, clarification or interpretation.
(5) Good faith payment. (i) The Department of Defense, through the
Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS), is responsible
for establishing and maintaining a file listing of persons eligible to
receive benefits under TRICARE. However, it is the responsibility of
the Uniformed Services to provide eligible TRICARE beneficiaries with
accurate and appropriate means of identification. When sources of
civilian medical care exercise reasonable care and precaution
identifying persons claiming to be eligible TRICARE beneficiaries, and
furnish otherwise covered services and supplies to such persons in good
faith, TRICARE benefits may be paid subject to prior approval by the
Director, TMA, or a designee, notwithstanding the fact that the person
receiving the services and supplies is subsequently determined to be
ineligible for benefits. Good faith payments will not be authorized for
services and supplies provided by a civilian source of medical care
because of its own careless identification procedures.
(ii) When it is determined that a person was not a TRICARE
beneficiary, the TRICARE contractor and the civilian source of medical
care are expected to make all reasonable efforts to obtain payment or
to recoup the amount of the good faith payment from the person who
erroneously claimed to be the TRICARE beneficiary. Recoupment of good
faith payments initiated by the TRICARE contractor will be processed
pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (f) of this section.
(6) Recoupment procedures--(i) Initial action. When an erroneous
payment is discovered, the TRICARE contractor normally will be required
to take the initial action to effect recoupment. Such actions will be
in accordance with the provisions of this part and the TRICARE
contracts and will include a demand (or demands) for refund or an
offset against any other TRICARE payment(s) becoming due the debtor.
When the efforts of the TRICARE contractor to effect recoupment are not
successful within a reasonable time, recoupment cases will be referred
to the Office of General Counsel, TMA, for further action in accordance
with the provisions of paragraph (f) of this section. All requests to
debtors for refund or notices of intent to offset shall be in writing.
(ii) Demand for payment. Written demand(s) for payment shall inform
the debtor of the following:
(A) The basis for and amount of the debt and the consequences of
failing to cooperate to resolve the debt;
(B) The right to inspect and copy TRICARE records pertaining to the
debt;
(C) The opportunity to request an administrative review by the
TRICARE contractor; and that such a request must be received by the
TRICARE contractor within 90 days from the date of the initial demand
letter;
(D) That payment of the debt is due within 30 days from the date of
the initial demand notification;
(E) That interest will be assessed on the debt at the Treasury
Current Value of Funds rate, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3717, and will begin
to accrue on the date of the initial demand letter; and that interest
will be waived on the debt, or any portion thereof, which is paid
within 30 days from the date of the initial demand notification letter;
(F) That administrative costs and penalties will be charged
pursuant to 31 CFR 901.9;
(G) That collection by offset against current or subsequent claims
or other amounts payable from the government may be taken;
(H) The opportunity to enter into a written agreement to repay the
debt;
(I) The name, address, and phone number of a contact person or
office that the debtor may contact regarding the debt.
[[Page 72311]]
(iii) A minimum of one demand letter is required. However, the
specific content, timing and number of demand letters may be tailored
to the type and amount of the debt, and the debtor's response, if any.
Contractors' demand letters must be mailed or hand-delivered on the
same date they are dated.
(iv) The initial or subsequent demand letters may also inform the
debtor of the requirement to report delinquent debts to credit
reporting agencies and to collection agencies, the requirement to refer
debts to the Treasury Offset Program for offset from Federal income tax
refunds and other amounts payable by the Government, offset from state
payments, the requirement to refer debts to the Department of Treasury
for collection and TRICARE policies concerning the referral of
delinquent debts to the Department of Justice for enforced collection
action. The initial or subsequent demand letter may also inform the
debtor of TRICARE policies concerning waiver. When necessary to protect
the Government's interest (for example to prevent the running of a
statute of limitations), written demand may be preceded by other
appropriate actions under this regulation, including referral to the
Department of Justice for litigation. There should be no undue delay in
responding to any communication received from the debtor. Responses to
communications from debtors should be made within 30 days of receipt
whenever feasible. If prior to the initiation of the demand process or
at any time during or after completion of the demand process, the
Director, TMA, or a designee, determines to pursue or is required to
pursue offset, the procedures applicable to administrative offset,
found at paragraph (f)(6)(v) of this section must be followed. If it
appears that initial collection efforts are not productive or if
immediate legal action on the claim appears necessary, the claim shall
be referred promptly by the contractor to the Office of General
Counsel, TMA.
(v) Collection by administrative offset. Collections by offset will
be undertaken administratively in every instance when feasible.
Collections may be taken by administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716,
the common law or other applicable statutory authority. No collection
by offset may be undertaken unless the debtor has been sent a written
demand for payment, including the procedural safeguards described in
paragraph (f)(6)(ii) of this section, unless the failure to take the
offset would substantially prejudice the Government's ability to
collect the debt, and the time before payment is to be made does not
reasonably permit the time for sending written notice. Such prior
offset must be promptly followed by sending a written notice and
affording the debtor the opportunity for a review by the TRICARE
contractor. Examples of erroneous payments include, but are not limited
to, claims submitted by individuals ineligible for TRICARE benefits,
claims submitted for non-covered services or supplies, claims for which
payments by another insurance or health plan reduces TRICARE liability
and from claims made from participating providers in which payment was
initially erroneously made to the beneficiary. The resolution of
recoupment claims rarely involves issues of credibility or veracity and
a review of the written record is ordinarily an adequate means to
correct prior mistakes. For this reason, the pre-offset oral hearing
requirements of the Federal Claims Collection Standards, 31 CFR
901.3(e) do not apply to the recoupment of erroneous TRICARE payments.
However, in instances where an oral hearing is not required, the debtor
will be afforded an administrative review if the TRICARE contractor
receives a written request for an administrative review within 90 days
from the date of the initial demand letter. The appeals procedures
described in Sec. 199.10 of this part, affords a TRICARE beneficiary
or participating provider an opportunity for an administrative
appellate review, including under certain circumstances, the right to
an oral hearing before a hearing officer when an appealable issue
exists. TRICARE contractors may take administrative action to offset
erroneous payments against other current TRICARE payments owing a
debtor. Payments on the claims of a debtor pending at or filed
subsequent to the time collection action is initiated should be
suspended pending the outcome of the collection action so that these
funds will be available for offset. All or part of a debt may be offset
depending on the amount available for offset. Any requests for offset
received from other agencies and garnishment orders issued by courts of
competent jurisdiction will be forwarded to the Office of General
Counsel, TMA. Unless otherwise provided by law, administrative offset
of payments under the authority of 31 U.S.C. 3716 may not be conducted
more than 10 years after the Government's right to collect the debt
first accrued, unless facts material to the Government's right to
collect the debt were not known and could not reasonably have been
known by the TRICARE official or officials charged with the
responsibility to discover and collect such debts. This limitation does
not apply to debts reduced to judgment. This section does not apply to
debts arising under the Social Security Act, except as provided in 42
U.S.C. 404, payments made under the Social Security Act, except as
provided for in 31 U.S.C. 3716(c), debts arising under, or payments
made under, the Internal Revenue Code, except for offset of tax refunds
or tariff laws of the United States; offsets against Federal salaries
to the extent these standards are inconsistent with regulations
published to implement such offsets under 5 U.S.C. 5514 and 31 U.S.C.
3716; offsets under 31 U.S.C. 3728 against a judgment obtained by a
debtor against the United States; offset or recoupment under common
law, state law, or federal statutes specifically prohibiting offset or
recoupment of particular types of debts or offsets in the course of
judicial proceedings, including bankruptcy.
(A) Referral for centralized administrative offset. When cost-
effective, legally enforceable non-tax debts delinquent over 180 days
delinquent that are eligible for collection through administrative
offset shall be referred to the Department of the Treasury for
administrative offset, unless otherwise exempted from referral.
Referrals shall include certification that the debt is past due and
legally enforceable and that TMA has complied with all due process
requirements of the statute-authorizing offset. Administrative offset,
including administrative offset against tax refunds due debtors under
26 U.S.C. 6402, in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3720A, shall be effected
through referral for centralized administrative offset, after debtors
have been afforded at least sixty (60) days notice required in
paragraph (f)(6) of this section. Salary offsets shall be effected
through referral for centralized administrative offset, after debtors
have been afforded due process required by 5 U.S.C. 5514, in accordance
with 31 CFR 285.7. Referrals for salary offset shall include
certification that the debts are past due, legally enforceable debts
and that TMA has complied with all due process requirements under 5
U.S.C. 5514 and applicable agency regulations. The Treasury, Financial
Management Service (FMS) may waive the salary offset certification
requirement set forth in 31 CFR 285.7, as a prerequisite to submitting
the debt to FMS for offset from other payment types. If FMS waives the
certification requirement, before an offset occurs, TMA will provide
the employee with the notice and opportunity for a hearing as
[[Page 72312]]
required by 5 U.S.C. 5514 and applicable regulations, and will certify
to FMS that the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 5514 and applicable agency
regulations have been met. TMA is not required to duplicate notice and
administrative review or salary offset hearing opportunities before
referring debts for centralized administrative offset when the debtor
has been previously given them.
(B) Referral for non-centralized administrative offset. Unless
otherwise prohibited by law, when centralized administrative offset is
not available or appropriate, past due legally enforceable non-tax
delinquent debts that are eligible for referral may be collected
through non-centralized administrative offset through a request
directly to the payment-authorizing agency. Referrals shall include
certification that the debts are past due and that the agency has
complied with due process requirements under 31 U.S.C. 3716(a) or other
applicable authority and applicable agency regulations concerning
administrative offset. Generally, non-centralized administrative
offsets will be made on an ad hoc case-by-case basis, in cooperation
with the agency certifying or authorizing payments to the debtor.
(vi) Collection by transfer of debts to Treasury or a Treasury-
designated debt collection center for collection through cross-
servicing. (A) The Director, TMA or a designee, is required to transfer
legally enforceable non-tax debts that are delinquent 180 days or more
to the Department of the Treasury for collection through cross-
servicing (31 U.S.C. 3711(g); 31 CFR 285.12.) Debts referred or
transferred to Treasury or Treasury-designated debt collection centers
shall be serviced, collected, or compromised, or the collection action
will be suspended or terminated, in accordance with the statutory
requirements and authorities applicable to the collection of such
debts. Agencies operating Treasury-designated debt collection centers
are authorized to charge a fee for services rendered regarding referred
or transferred debts. This fee may be paid out of amounts collected and
may be added to the debt as an administrative cost. Referrals will
include certification that the debts transferred are valid, legally
enforceable debts, that there are no legal bars to collection and that
the agency has complied with all prerequisites to a particular
collection action under the applicable laws, regulations or policies,
unless the agency and Treasury agree that Treasury will do so on behalf
of the agency.
(B) The requirement of paragraph (1) of this section does not apply
to any debt that:
(1) Is in litigation or foreclosure.
(2) Will be disposed of under an approved asset sale program.
(3) Has been referred to a private collection contractor for a
period of time acceptable to Treasury.
(4) Will be collected under internal offset procedures within 3
years after the debt first became delinquent.
(5) Is exempt from this requirement based on a determination by the
Secretary of the Treasury that exemption for a certain class of debt is
in the best interest of the United States.
(vii) Collection by salary offset. When a debtor is a member of the
military service or a retired member and collection by offset against
other TRICARE payments due the debtor cannot be accomplished, and there
have been no positive responses to a demand for payment, the Director,
TMA, or a designee, may refer the debt for offset from the debtor's pay
account pursuant to 37 U.S.C. 1007(c), as implemented by Volume 7A,
Chapter 50 and Volume 7B, Chapter 28 of the DoDFMR. Collection from a
Federal employee may be effected through salary offset under 5 U.S.C.
5514.
(A) For collections by salary offset the Director, TMA, or
designee, will issue written notification, as required by 5 CFR
550.1104(d) at least 30 days before any offsets are taken. In addition,
the notification will advise the employee that if he or she retires,
resigns or his or her employment ends before collection of the debt is
completed, collection may be made from subsequent payments of any
nature due from the United States (e.g., final salary payment, lump-sum
leave under 31 U.S.C. 3716 due the employee as of date of separation.)
A debtor's involuntary payment of all or part of a debt being collected
will not be construed as a waiver of any rights the debtor may have
under 5 U.S.C. 5514 or any other provision of contract or law, unless
there are statutory or contractual provisions to the contrary or the
employee's paying agency is directed by an administrative or judicial
order to refund amounts deducted from his or her current pay. No
interest will be paid on amounts waived or determined not to be owed
unless there are statutory or contractual provisions to the contrary.
(B) Petition for hearing. The notice of the proposed offset will
advise the debtor of his or her right to petition for a hearing. The
petition for hearing must be signed by the debtor or his or her
representative and must state whether he or she is contesting debt
validity, debt amount and/or the terms of the proposed offset schedule.
It must explain with reasonable specificity all the facts, evidence and
witnesses, if any (in the case of an oral hearing and a summary of
their anticipated testimony), which the debtor believes support his or
her position, and include any supporting documentation. If contesting
the terms of the proposed offset schedule, the debtor must provide
financial information including a completed Department of Justice
Financial Statement of Debtor form (OBD-500 or other form prescribed by
DOJ), including specific details concerning income and expenses of the
employee, his or her spouse and dependents for 1-year period preceding
the debt notification and projected income and expenses for the
proposed offset period and a statement of the reason why the debtor
believes the salary offset schedule will impose extreme financial
hardship. Upon receipt of the petition for hearing, the Director, TMA,
or a designee, will complete reconsideration. If the Director, TMA, or
a designee determines that the debt amount is not owed, that a less
amount is owed, or that the terms of the employee's proposed offset
schedule are acceptable, it will advise the debtor and request that the
employee accept the results of the reconsideration in lieu of a
hearing. If the employee declines to accept the results of
reconsideration in lieu of a hearing, the debtor will be afforded a
hearing. Ordinarily, a petition for hearing and required submissions
that are not timely filed, shall be accepted after expiration of the
deadline provided in the notice of the proposed offset, only when the
debtor can demonstrate to the Director, TMA, or a designee, that the
timely filing of the request was not feasible due to extraordinary
circumstances over which the appealing party had no practical control
or because of failure to receive notice of the time limit (unless he or
she was otherwise aware of it). Each request for an exception to the
timely filing requirement will be considered on its own merits. The
decision of the Director, TMA, or a designee, on a request for an
exception to the timely filing requirement shall be final.
(C) Extreme financial hardship. The maximum authorized amount that
may be collected through involuntary salary offset is the lesser of 15
percent of the employee's disposable pay or the full amount of the
debt. An employee who has petitioned for a hearing may assert that the
maximum allowable rate of involuntary offset produces extreme
[[Page 72313]]
financial hardship. An offset produces an extreme financial hardship if
the offset prevents the employee from meeting the costs necessarily
incurred for the essential expenses of the employee, employee's spouse
and dependents. These essential expenses include costs incurred for
food, housing, necessary public utilities, clothing, transportation and
medical care. In determining whether the offset would prevent the
employee from meeting the essential expenses identified above, the
following shall be considered:
(1) Income from all sources of the employee, the employee's spouse,
and dependents;
(2) The extent to which assets of the employee, employee's spouse
and dependents are available to meet the offset and essential
subsistence expenses;
(3) Whether these essential subsistence expenses have been
minimized to the greatest extent possible;
(4) The extent to which the employee or the employee's spouse can
borrow money to meet the offset and other essential expenses; and
(5) The extent to which the employee and the employee's spouse and
dependents have other exceptional expenses that should be taken into
account and whether these expenses have been minimized.
(D) Form and content of hearings. The resolution of recoupment
claims rarely involves issues of credibility or veracity and a review
of the written record is ordinarily an adequate means to determine the
validity or amount of the debt and/or the terms of a proposed offset
schedule. The Director, TMA, or a designee, will determine whether an
oral hearing is required. A debtor who has petitioned for a hearing,
but who is not entitled to an oral hearing will be given an
administrative hearing, based on the written documentation submitted by
the debtor and the Director, TMA, or a designee. If the Director, TMA,
or a designee, determines that the debtor should be afforded the
opportunity for an oral hearing, the debtor may elect to have a hearing
based on the written record in lieu of an oral hearing. The Director,
TMA, or a designee, will provide the debtor (or his representative)
notification of the time, date and location of the oral hearing to be
held if the debtor has been afforded an oral hearing. Copies of records
documenting the debt will be provided to the debtor or his
representative (if they have not been previously provided), at least 3
calendar days prior to the date of the oral hearing. At oral hearings,
the only evidence permitted, except oral testimony, will be that which
was previously submitted as pre-hearing submissions. At oral hearings,
the debtor may not raise any issues not previously raised with TMA. In
the absence of good cause shown, a debtor who fails to appear at an
oral hearing will be deemed to have waived the right to a hearing and
salary offset may be initiated.
(E) Costs for attendance at oral hearings. Debtors and their
witnesses will bear their own costs for attendance at oral hearings.
(F) Hearing official's decision. The Hearing Official's decision
will be in writing and will identify the documentation reviewed. It
will indicate the amount of debt that he or she determined is valid and
shall state the amount of the offset and the estimated duration of the
offset. The determination of a hearing official designated under this
section is considered an official certification regarding the existence
and amount of the debt and/or the terms of the proposed offset schedule
for the purposes of executing salary offset under 5 U.S.C. 5514. The
Hearing Official's decision must be issued at the earliest practical
date, but not later than 60 days from the date the petition for hearing
is received by the Office of General Counsel, TMA, unless the debtor
requests, and the Hearing Official grants a delay in the proceedings.
If a hearing official determines that the debt may not be collected by
salary offset, but the Director, TMA, or a designee, finds the debt is
still valid, the Director, TMA or a designee, may seek collection
through other means, including but not limited to, offset from other
payments due from the United States.
(viii) RESERVED
(ix) Collection of installments. Debts, including interest, penalty
and administrative costs shall be collected in one lump sum whenever
possible. However, when the debtor is financially unable to pay the
debt in one lump sum, the TRICARE contractor or the Director, TMA, or
designee, may accept payment in installments. Debtors claiming that
lump sum payment will create financial hardship may be required to
complete a Department of Justice Financial Statement of Debtor form or
provide other financial information that will permit TMA to verify such
representations. TMA may also obtain credit reports to assess
installment requests. Normally, debtors will make installment payments
on a monthly basis. Installment payment shall bear a reasonable
relationship to the size of the debt and the debtor's ability to pay.
Except when a debtor can demonstrate financial hardship or another
reasonable cause exists, installment payments should be sufficient in
size and frequency to liquidate the debt in 3 years or less. (31 CFR
901.8(b)). Normally, installment payments of $75 or less will not be
accepted unless the debtor demonstrates financial hardship. Any
installment agreement with a debtor in which the total amount of
deferred installments will exceed $750, should normally include an
executed promissory agreement. Copies of installment agreements will be
retained in the contractor's or TMA, Office of General Counsel's files.
(x) Interest, penalties, and administrative costs. Title 31 U.S.C.
3717 and the Federal Claims Collection Standards, 31 CFR 901.9, require
the assessment of interest, penalty and administrative costs on
delinquent debts. Interest shall accrue from the date the initial debt
notification is mailed to the debtor. The rate of interest assessed
shall be the rate of the current value of funds to the United States
Treasury (the Treasury tax and loan account rate). The collection of
interest on the debt or any portion of the debt, which is paid within
30 days after the date on which interest begins to accrue, shall be
waived. The Director, TMA, or designee, may extend this 30-day period
on a case-by-case basis, if it reasonably determines that such action
is appropriate. The rate of interest as initially assessed shall remain
fixed for the duration of the indebtedness; except that where the
debtor has defaulted on a repayment agreement and seeks to enter into a
new agreement, a new interest rate may be set which reflects the
current value of funds to the Treasury at the time the new agreement is
executed. Interest shall not be compounded; that is, interest shall not
be charged on interest, penalties, or administrative costs required by
this section. However, if a debtor defaults on a previous repayment
agreement, charges that accrued but were not collected under the
defaulted agreement, shall be added to the principal under the new
repayment agreement. The collection of interest, penalties and
administrative costs may be waived in whole or in part as a part of the
compromise of a debt as provided in paragraph (g) of this section. In
addition, the Director, TMA, or designee may waive in whole or in part,
the collection of interest, penalties, or administrative costs assessed
herein if he or she determines that collection would be against equity
and good conscience and not in the best interest of the United States.
Some situations in
[[Page 72314]]
which a waiver may be appropriate include:
(A) Waiver of interest consistent with 31 CFR 903.2(c)(2) in
connection with a suspension of collection when a TRICARE appeal is
pending under Sec. 199.10 of this part where there is a substantial
issue of fact in dispute.
(B) Waiver of interest where the original debt arose through no
fault or lack of good faith on the part of the debtor and the
collection of interest would impose a financial hardship or burden on
the debtor. Some examples in which such a waiver would be appropriate
include: a debt arising when a TRICARE beneficiary in good faith files
and is paid for a claim for medical services or supplies, which are
later determined not to be covered benefits, or a debt arising when a
TRICARE beneficiary is overpaid as the result of a calculation error on
the part of the TRICARE contractor or TMA.
(C) Waiver of interest where there has been an agreement to repay a
debt in installments, there is no indication of fault or lack of good
faith on the part of the debtor, and the amount of interest is so large
in relation to the size of the installments that the debtor can
reasonably afford to pay, that it is likely the debt will never be
repaid in full. When a debt is paid in installments, the installment
payments first will be applied to the payment of outstanding penalty
and administrative cost charges, second, to accrued interest and then
to principal. Administrative costs incurred as the result of a debt
becoming delinquent (as defined in paragraph (f)(2)(iii) of this
section) shall be assessed against a debtor. These administrative costs
represent the additional costs incurred in processing and handling the
debt because it became delinquent. The calculation of administrative
costs should be based upon cost analysis establishing an average of
actual additional costs incurred in processing and handling claims
against other debtors in similar stages of delinquency. A penalty
charge, not exceeding six percent a year, shall be assessed on the
amount due on a debt that is delinquent for more than 90 days. This
charge, which need not be calculated until the 91st day of delinquency,
shall accrue from the date that the debt became delinquent.
(xi) Referral to private collection agencies. TMA shall use
government-wide debt collection contracts to obtain debt collection
services provided by private contractors in accordance with 31 CFR
901.5(b).
(xii) Reporting delinquent debts to credit reporting agencies.
Delinquent consumer debts shall be reported to credit reporting
agencies. Delinquent debts are debts which are not paid or for which
satisfactory payment arrangements are not made by the due date
specified in the initial debt notification letter, or those for which
the debtor has entered into a written payment agreement and installment
payments are past due 30 days or longer. Such referrals shall comply
with the Bankruptcy Code and the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, as
amended. The provisions of the Privacy Act do not apply to credit
bureaus (31 CFR 901.4(1)). There is no requirement to duplicate the
notice and review opportunities before referring debts to credit
bureaus. Debtors will be advised of the specific information to be
transmitted (i.e., name, address, and taxpayer identification number,
information about the debt). Procedures developed for such referrals
must ensure that an accounting of the disclosures shall be kept which
is available to the debtor; that the credit reporting agencies are
provided with corrections and annotations of disagreements of the
debtor; and that reasonable efforts are made to ensure that the
information to be reported is accurate, complete, timely and relevant.
When requested by a credit-reporting agency, verification of the
information disclosed will be provided promptly. Once a claim has been
reviewed and determined to be valid, a complete explanation of the
claim will be given the debtor. When the claim is overdue, the
individual will be notified in writing that payment is overdue; that
within not less than 60 days, disclosure of the claim shall be made to
a consumer reporting agency unless satisfactory payment arrangements
are made, or unless the debtor requests an administrative review and
demonstrates some basis on which the debt is legitimately disputed; and
of the specific information to be disclosed to the consumer reporting
agency. The information to be disclosed to the credit reporting agency
will be limited to information necessary to establish the identity of
the debtor, including name, address and taxpayer identification number;
the amount, status and history of the claim; and the agency or program
under which the claim arose. Reasonable action will be taken to locate
an individual for whom a current address is not available. The
requirements of this section do not apply to commercial debts, although
commercial debts shall be reported to commercial credit bureaus. The
Department of the Treasury will report debts transferred to it for
collection to credit reporting agencies on behalf of the Director, TMA,
or a designee.
(xiii) Use and disclosure of mailing addresses. In attempting to
locate a debtor in order to collect or compromise a debt under this
section, the Director, TMA, or a designee, may send a written request
to the Secretary of the Treasury, or a designee, for current address
information from records of the Internal Revenue Service. TMA may
disclose mailing addresses obtained under this authority to other
agencies and to collection agencies for collection purposes.
(g) Compromise, suspension or termination of collection actions
arising under the Federal Claims Collection Act--(1) Basic
considerations. Federal claims against the debtor and in favor of the
United States arising out of the administration of TRICARE may be
compromised or collection action taken thereon may be suspended or
terminated in compliance with the Federal Claims Collection Act, 31
U.S.C. 3711, as implemented by the Federal Claims Collection Standards,
31 CFR parts 900-904. The provisions concerning compromise, suspension
or termination of collection activity pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3711 apply
to debts, which do not exceed $100,000 or any higher amount authorized
by the Attorney General, exclusive of interest, penalties, and
administrative costs, after deducting the amount of partial payments or
collections, if any. If, after deducting the amount of any partial
payments or collections, the principal amount of a debt exceeds
$100,000, or any higher amount authorized by the Attorney General,
exclusive of interest, penalties and administrative costs, the
authority to suspend or terminate rests solely with the DOJ.
(2) Authority. TRICARE contractors are not authorized to compromise
or to suspend or terminate collection action on TRICARE claims. Only
the Director, TMA, or designee or Uniformed Services claims officers
acting under the provisions of their own regulations are so authorized.
(3) Basis for compromise. A compromise should be for an amount that
bears a reasonable relation to the amount that can be recovered by
enforced collection procedures, with regard to the exemptions available
to the debtor and the time collection will take. A claim may be
compromised hereunder if the government cannot collect the full amount
if:
(i) The debtor or the estate of a debtor does not have the present
or prospective ability to pay the full amount within a reasonable time;
[[Page 72315]]
(ii) The cost of collecting the claim does not justify enforced
collection of the full amount; or
(iii) The government is unable to enforce collection of the full
amount within a reasonable time by enforced collection proceedings; or
(iv) There is significant doubt concerning the Government's ability
to prove its case in court for the full amount claimed; or
(v) The cost of collecting the claim does not justify enforced
collection of the full amount.
(4) Basis for suspension. Collection action may be suspended for
the following reasons if future collection action may be sufficiently
productive to justify periodic review and action on the claim,
considering its size and the amount, which may be realized thereon:
(i) The debtor cannot be located; or
(ii) The debtor's financial condition is expected to improve; or
(iii) The debtor is unable to make payments on the government's
claim or effect a compromise at the time, but the debtor's future
prospects justify retention of the claim for periodic review and action
and;
(A) The applicable statute of limitations has been tolled or
started running anew; or
(B) Future collections can be effected by administrative offset,
notwithstanding the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations
for litigation of claims with due regard to the 10-year limitation for
administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716(e)(1); or
(C) The debtor agrees to pay interest on the amount of the debt on
which collection action will be temporarily suspended and such
temporary suspension is likely to enhance the debtor's ability fully to
pay the principal amount of the debt with interest at a later date.
(iv) Consideration may be given by the Director, TMA, or designee
to suspend collection action pending action on a request for a review
of the government's claim against the debtor or pending an
administrative review under Sec. 199.10 of this part of any TRICARE
claim or claims directly involved in the government's claim against the
debtor. Suspension under this paragraph will be made on a case-by-case
basis as to whether:
(A) There is a reasonable possibility that the debt (in whole or in
part) will be found not owing from the debtor;
(B) The Government's interest would be protected if suspension were
granted by reasonable assurance that the debt would be recovered if the
debtor does not prevail; and
(C) Collection of the debt will cause undue hardship.
(5) Collection action may be terminated for one or more of the
following reasons:
(i) TMA cannot collect or enforce collection of any substantial
amount through its own efforts or the efforts of others, including
consideration of the judicial remedies available to the government, the
debtor's future financial prospects, and the exemptions available to
the debtor under state and federal law;
(ii) The debtor cannot be located, and either;
(iii) The costs of collection are anticipated to exceed the amount
recoverable; or
(iv) It is determined that the debt is legally without merit or
enforcement of the debt is barred by any applicable statute of
limitations; or
(v) The debt cannot be substantiated; or
(vi) The debt against the debtor has been discharged in bankruptcy.
Collection activity may be continued subject to the provisions of the
Bankruptcy Code, such as collection of any payments provided under a
plan of reorganization or in cases when TMA did not receive notice of
the bankruptcy proceedings.
(6) In determining whether the debt should be compromised,
suspended or terminated, the responsible TMA collection authority will
consider the following factors:
(i) Age and health of the debtor; present and potential income;
inheritance prospects; the possibility that assets have been concealed
or improperly transferred by the debtor; and the availability of assets
or income which may be realized upon by enforced collection
proceedings;
(ii) Applicability of exemptions available to a debtor under state
or federal law;
(iii) Uncertainty as to the price which collateral or other
property may bring at a forced sale;
(iv) The probability of proving the claim in court because of legal
issues involved or because of a bona fide dispute of the facts; the
probability of full or partial recovery; the availability of necessary
evidence and related pragmatic considerations. Debtors may be required
to provide a completed Department of Justice Financial Statement of
Debtor form (OBD-500 or such other form that DOJ shall prescribe) or
other financial information that will permit TMA to verify debtors'
representations. TMA may obtain credit reports or other financial
information to enable it independently to verify debtors'
representations.
(7) Payment of compromised claims--(i) Time and manner. Compromised
claims are to be paid in one lump sum whenever possible. However, if
installment payments of a compromised claim are necessary, a legally
enforceable compromise agreement must be obtained. Payment of the
amount that TMA has agreed to accept as a compromise in full settlement
of a TRICARE claim must be made within the time and in the manner
prescribed in the compromise agreement. Any such compromised amount is
not settled until full payment of the compromised amount has been made
within the time and manner prescribed. Compromise agreements must
provide for the reinstatement of the prior indebtedness, less sums paid
thereon, and acceleration of the balance due upon default in the
payment of any installment.
(ii) Failure to pay the compromised amount. Failure of any debtor
to make payment as provided in the compromise agreement will have the
effect of reinstating the full amount of the original claim, less any
amounts paid prior to default.
(iii) Effect of compromise, waiver, suspension or termination of
collection action. Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.
6050P, compromises and terminations of undisputed debts totaling $600
or more for the year will be reported to the Internal Revenue Service
in the manner prescribed. Amounts, other than those discharged in
bankruptcy, will be included in the debtor's gross income for that
year. Any action taken under paragraph (g) of this section regarding
the compromise of a federal claim, or waiver or suspension or
termination of collection action on a federal claim is not an initial
determination for the purposes of the appeal procedures in Sec.
199.10.
(h) Referrals for collection--(1) Prompt referral. Federal claims
of $2,500, exclusive of interest, penalties and administrative costs,
or such other amount as the Attorney General shall from time to time
prescribe on which collection action has been taken under the
provisions of this section which cannot be collected or compromised or
on which collection action cannot be suspended or terminated as
pr