Revisit User Fee Program for Medicare Survey and Certification Activities, 71579-71583 [07-6093]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
71579
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE WEST VIRGINIA SIP—Continued
State
effective
date
State citation [Chapter 16–20 or 45 CSR]
Title/subject
Section 45–40–42 ....
CAIR NOX Ozone Season Allowance Allocations.
*
*
*
*
*
5/1/06
Additional explanation/citation at 40 CFR
§ 52.2565
12/18/07 [Insert
page number
where the document begins].
1. Except for subsections 42.2.d, 42.2.e,
42.3.a.2, and 42.4.b.
2. Only Phase I (2009–2014).
(e) * * *
Name of non-regulatory SIP revision
Applicable
geographic
area
State
submittal
date
*
*
Article 3, Chapter 64 of the Code of West
Virginia, 1931.
*
Statewide ...............
*
PART 97—[AMENDED]
3. The authority citation for 40 CFR
part 97 continues to read as follows:
42 CFR Part 488
4. Appendix A to Subpart EE is
amended by adding the entry for ‘‘West
Virginia’’ in alphabetical order under
paragraph 1. to read as follows:
I
Appendix A to Subpart EE of Part 97—States
With Approved State Implementation Plan
Revisions Concerning Allocations
1. * * *
West Virginia (for control periods 2009–
2014)
*
*
*
*
5. Appendix A to Subpart EEEE is
amended by adding the entry for West
Virginia in alphabetical order to read as
follows:
I
Appendix A to Subpart EEEE of Part 97—
States With Approved State Implementation
Plan Revisions Concerning Allocations
*
*
*
*
*
West Virginia (for control periods 2009–
2014)
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–24367 Filed 12–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
*
12/18/07 [Insert
page number
where the document begins].
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, 7403, 7410,
7426, 7601, and 7651, et seq.
*
5/1/06
EPA approval date
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
I
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
EPA approval date
Jkt 214001
[CMS–2278–IFC2]
RIN 0938–AP22
Revisit User Fee Program for Medicare
Survey and Certification Activities
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Interim final rule with comment
period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This interim final rule with
comment period implements the
continuation of the revisit user fee
program for Medicare Survey and
Certification activities, in accordance
with the statutory authority in the
Further Continuing Appropriations,
2008 Resolution (‘‘Continuing
Resolution’’) budget legislation passed
by the Congress and signed by the
President on November 13, 2007. On
September 19, 2007, we published a
final rule that established a system of
revisit user fees applicable to health
care facilities that have been cited for
deficiencies during initial certification,
recertification or substantiated
complaint surveys and require a revisit
to confirm that previously-identified
deficiencies have been corrected.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations
are effective December 14, 2007, and
applicable beginning November 17,
2007.
Comment date: To be assured
consideration, comments must be
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Additional explanation
*
*
Effective date of March 11, 2006.
received at one of the addresses
provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on
February 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–2278–IFC2. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (no duplicates, please):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on specific issues
in this regulation to https://
www.cms.hhs.gov/eRulemaking. Click
on the link ‘‘Submit electronic
comments on CMS regulations with an
open comment period.’’ (Attachments
should be in Microsoft Word,
WordPerfect, or Excel; however, we
prefer Microsoft Word.)
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments (one original and two
copies) to the following address ONLY:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS–2278–
IFC2, P.O. Box 8010, Baltimore, MD
21244–8016.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–2278–IFC2, Mail Stop C4–26–05,
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments (one original
and two copies) before the close of the
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
71580
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
comment period to one of the following
addresses. If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786–
7195 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Room 445–G, Hubert H. Humphrey
Building, 200 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20201; or
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
(Because access to the interior of the
HHH Building is not readily available to
persons without Federal Government
identification, commenters are
encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main
lobby of the building. A stamp-in clock
is available for persons wishing to retain
a proof of filing by stamping in and
retaining an extra copy of the comments
being filed.)
Comments mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelley Tinsley, (410) 786–6664.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Submitting Comments: As the public
was provided an opportunity to
comment on the substance of the rule
during the comment period prior to the
publication of the September 19, 2007
final rule, and as the substance of the
rule is not changed by this interim final
rule with comment period, we are
accepting comments only to the extent
that they pertain to the applicability of
the new authority for the rule. You can
assist us by referencing the file code
CMS–2278–IFC2.
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://www.cms.hhs.gov/
eRulemaking. Click on the link
‘‘Electronic Comments on CMS
Regulations’’ on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received timely will be
available for public inspection as they
are received, generally beginning
approximately three weeks after
publication of a document, at the
headquarters of the Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
Monday through Friday of each week
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the June 29, 2007 Federal Register
(72 FR 35673), we published the
proposed rule entitled, ‘‘Establishment
of Revisit User Fee Program for
Medicare Survey and Certification
Activities’ and provided for a 60-day
comment period. In the September 19,
2007 Federal Register (72 FR 53628) we
published the Revisit User Fee Program
final rule. That final rule set forth final
requirements and a final fee schedule
for providers and suppliers who require
a revisit survey as a result of
deficiencies cited during an initial
certification, recertification, or
substantiated complaint survey.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) has in place an
outcome-oriented survey process that is
designed to ensure that existing
Medicare-certified providers and
suppliers or providers and suppliers
seeking initial Medicare certification,
meet statutory and regulatory
requirements, conditions of
participation, or conditions for
coverage. These health and safety
requirements apply to the environments
of care and the delivery of services to
residents or patients served by these
facilities and agencies. The Secretary of
the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) has designated CMS to
enforce the conditions of participation/
coverage and other requirements of the
Medicare program. The revisit user fee
will be assessed for revisits conducted
in order to determine whether
deficiencies cited as a result of failing to
satisfy federal quality of care
requirements have been corrected.
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Continuing Appropriations Resolution
budget bill for fiscal year (FY) 2007, the
Secretary directed CMS to implement
the revisit user fees for FY 2007 for
certain providers and suppliers for
which a revisit was required to confirm
that previously-identified failures to
meet federal quality of care
requirements had been remedied. The
fees recover the costs associated with
the Medicare Survey and Certification
program’s revisit surveys. The primary
purpose for implementing the revisit
user fees is to ensure the continuance of
CMS Survey and Certification quality
assurance functions that improve
patient care and safety. The fees became
effective upon publication September
19, 2007, when the final rule was
published.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Provisions of the Interim Final Rule
The current Continuing Resolution
Pub. L. 110–16 Division B of HR 3222
which amends Pub. L. 110–92 H. J. Res.
52 §§ 101 & 106(2007), authorizes HHS
to continue to impose revisit user fees
until December 14, 2007, as follows:
* * *
Sec. 101. Such amounts as may be
necessary, at a rate for operations as provided
in the applicable appropriations Acts for
fiscal year 2007 and under the authority and
conditions provided in such Acts, for
continuing projects or activities (including
the costs of direct loans and loan guarantees)
that are not otherwise specifically provided
for in this joint resolution, that were
conducted in fiscal year 2007, and for which
appropriations, funds, or other authority
were made available in the following
appropriations Acts:
* * *
(3) The Continuing Appropriations
Resolution, 2007 (division B of Public Law
109–289, as amended by Public Law 110–5).
(H.J.Res.20, § 101(2007)).
Sec. 106. Unless otherwise provided for in
this joint resolution or in the applicable
appropriations Act for fiscal year 2008,
appropriations and funds made available and
authority granted pursuant to this joint
resolution shall be available until whichever
of the following first occurs:
* * *
(3) December 14, 2007.
As directed by the Secretary, in the
September 19, 2007 Federal Register (72
FR 53628), we established the revisit
user fee program for revisit surveys. We
put forth in regulation the relevant
definitions, criteria for determining the
fees, the fee schedule, procedures for
the collection of fees, the
reconsideration process, enforcement
and regulatory language addressing
enrollment and billing privileges, and
provider agreements. In the September
19, 2007 final rule, cost projections were
based on FY 2006 actual data and were
expected to amount to $37.3 million for
FY 2007. These calculations were
included in section IV of the final rule
(72 FR 53642).
We stated in the final rule that, ‘‘if
authority for the revisit user fee is
continued, we will use the current fee
schedule in [the final rule] for the
assessment of such fees until such time
as a new fee schedule notice is proposed
and published in final form.’’ (72 FR
53628). The current Continuing
Resolution continues the authority of
the FY 2007 Continuing Resolution from
November 17, 2007 through December
14, 2007. Accordingly, the revisit fees
will continue to be assessed for the
entire time period authorized by the
current Continuing Resolution.
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
III. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public
comments we normally receive on
Federal Register documents, we are not
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will
respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
IV. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
and Delay in Effective Date
We ordinarily publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register and invite public comment on
the proposed rule in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA). The notice of
proposed rulemaking includes a
reference to the legal authority under
which the rule is proposed, and the
terms and substance of the proposed
rule or a description of the subjects and
issues involved. This procedure can be
waived, however, if an agency finds
good cause that a notice-and-comment
procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest and incorporates a statement of
the finding and its reasons in the rule
issued. We find that the notice-andcomment procedure is unnecessary in
this circumstance because providers and
suppliers have already been provided
notice and an opportunity to comment
on the substance of this rule. This
interim final rule with comment merely
updates the Congressional authority
under which the rule operates.
Therefore, we find good cause to
waive the notice of proposed
rulemaking and to issue this final rule
on an interim basis. We are providing a
60-day public comment period.
We ordinarily provide a 30-day delay
in the effective date of the provisions of
a rule in accordance with the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. 553(d). However, the delay in the
effective date may be waived as, in
pertinent part, ‘‘provided by the agency
for good cause found and published
with the rule.’’ 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The
Secretary finds that good cause exists to
waive the 30-day effective date delay.
The good cause exception to the 30
day effective date delay provision of
section 553(d) of the APA is read to be
broader than the good cause exception
to the notice and comment provision of
section 553(b) of the APA.
The legislative history of the APA
indicates that the purpose for deferring
the effectiveness of a rule under section
553(d) was to ‘‘afford persons affected a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
reasonable time to prepare for the
effective date of a rule or rules or to take
other action which the issuance may
prompt.’’ S. Rep. No. 752, 79th Cong.,
1st Sess. 15 (1946); H.R. Rep. No. 1980,
79th Cong. 2d Sess. 25 (1946). In this
case, affected parties do not need time
to adjust their behavior before this rule
takes effect. This rule merely updates
the authority under which the revisit fee
is assessed and does not provide any
additional requirements for the affected
parties. Moreover, with or without a
revisit fee, a provider or supplier must
be found to have corrected significant
deficiencies in order to avoid
termination. Additionally, the
application of a fee for the revisit does
not place appreciable administrative
burdens on the affected providers or
suppliers. We do not expect appreciable
cost to State survey agencies because we
are undertaking the billing and
collection of the revisit user fee.
We identified in the September 19,
2007 final rule the immediacy of this
revisit user fee program and the specific
statutory requirement contained limited
in the Continuing Resolution that
required us to implement the revisit
user fee program in FY 2007.
Accordingly, providers and suppliers
have been on notice for some time that
these fees will be imposed, and do not
need additional time to be prepared to
comply with the requirements of this
regulation. We believe that given the
short timeframe that we have to collect
fees before the statutory authority of the
current Continuing Resolution expires,
there is good cause to waive the 30-day
effective date.
V. Collection of Information
Requirements
This document does not impose
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
Consequently, it need not be reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
VI. Regulatory Impact Analysis
A. Overall Impact
We have examined the impacts of this
rule as required by Executive Order
12866 (September 1993, Regulatory
Planning and Review), the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19,
1980, Pub. L. 96–354), section 1102(b) of
the Social Security Act, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4), and Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 12866 (as amended
by Executive Order 13258, which
merely reassigns responsibility of
duties) directs agencies to assess all
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71581
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). A regulatory impact analysis
(RIA) must be prepared for major rules
with economically significant effects
($100 million or more in any one year).
This rule is not a major rule. The
aggregate costs will total approximately
$37.3 million in any one year.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze
options for regulatory relief of small
businesses. For purposes of the RFA,
small entities include small businesses,
nonprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. Individuals
and States are not included in the
definition of a small entity. Small
businesses are small entities, either by
nonprofit status or by having revenues
of $6.5 million to $31.9 million or less
in any one year for purposes of the RFA.
The September 19, 2007 final rule
provided an analysis on the impact of
small entities (72 FR 53642–3). The
analysis published in the final rule
remains valid. Since this interim final
rule with comment merely updates the
Congressional authority under which
the rule operates, we have determined
that this rule will not have a significant
impact on small entities based on the
overall effect on revenues.
Section 1102(b) of the Act requires us
to prepare a regulatory impact analysis
if a rule may have a significant impact
on the operations of a substantial
number of small rural hospitals. This
analysis must conform to the provisions
of section 604 of the RFA. For purposes
of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define
a small rural hospital as a hospital that
is located outside of a Metropolitan
statistical Area (superseded by Core
Based Statistical Areas) and has fewer
than 100 beds. This rule affects those
small rural hospitals that have been
cited for a deficiency based on
noncompliance with required
conditions of participation and for
which a revisit is needed to ensure that
the deficiency has been corrected. We
identified in the September 19, 2007
final rule that for the effective period of
that rule that less than 3 percent of all
hospitals may be assessed a revisit user
fee and that less than 1 percent of those
hospitals would be rural hospitals (72
FR 53643). The analysis published in
the final rule remains valid. Since this
interim final rule with comment merely
updates the Congressional authority
under which the rule operates, we
maintain that this rule will not have a
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
71582
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
significant impact on small rural
hospitals.
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also
requires that agencies assess anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule whose mandates require spending
in any one year of $100 million in 1995
dollars, updated annually for inflation.
That threshold level is currently
approximately $120 million. This
interim final rule with comment will
have no mandated effect on State, local,
or tribal governments and the impact on
the private sector is estimated to be less
than $120 million and will only effect
those Medicare providers or suppliers
for which a revisit user fee is assessed
based on the need to conduct a revisit
survey to ensure deficient practices that
were cited have been corrected.
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
This interim final rule with comment
will not substantially affect State or
local governments. This rule establishes
user fees for providers and suppliers for
which CMS has identified deficient
practices and requires a revisit to assure
that corrections have been made.
Therefore, we have determined that this
interim final rule with comment will
not have a significant affect on the
rights, roles, and responsibilities of
State or local governments.
B. Impact on Providers/Suppliers
There is no change on the impact on
providers and suppliers with the
publication of this interim final rule
with comment. The impact remains as
discussed in the final rule (72 FR
53643).
Final Fee Schedule for Onsite and
Offsite Revisit Surveys
The FY 2007 fee schedule published
on September 19, 2007 (72 FR 53647) in
the final rule will be retained. As noted
in the final rule, the published fee
schedule will be utilized by CMS for the
assessment of such fees until such time
as a new fee schedule notice is proposed
and published in final form. The
calculations utilized to determine the
fee as identified in the final rule will be
the same (72 FR 53645–6). We will
continue to assess a flat fee based on
provider or supplier type and type of
revisit survey conducted. Table A below
identifies the final fee schedule.
TABLE A.—FINAL FEE SCHEDULE
Facility
Fee assessed
per offsite revisit survey
Fee assessed
per onsite revisit survey
$168
168
168
168
168
168
168
$2,072
2,554
1,613
1,736
1,669
851
1,490
SNF & NF
Hospitals ...
HHA ..........
Hospice .....
ASC ..........
RHC ..........
ESRD ........
Costs for All Revisit User Fees Assessed
We anticipated that the combined
costs for all providers and suppliers for
all revisit surveys in FY 2007 would
total approximately $37.3 million on an
annual basis, with onsite revisit surveys
amounting to approximately $34.6
million and offsite revisit surveys
totaling approximately $2.7 million. (72
FR 53645). However, actual fees
assessed in FY 2007 were much less
than this amount, since CMS did not
charge for revisits that occurred prior to
publication of the final regulation. Since
we continue to operate under this same
estimate for FY 07, we provide below
monthly estimates of the impact for the
period of the current Continuing
Resolution in Tables B and C. For the
period of the current Continuing
Resolution, we will use the FY 2007 fee
schedule established in the final rule for
the assessment of fees until a new fee
schedule notice is proposed and
published as final.
In Table B below, we provide the
projected costs for the period of this
current Continuing Resolution based on
the fee schedule of the final rule. We
expect the combined costs for all
providers and suppliers for all onsite
revisit surveys for the period of this
current Continuing Resolution to total
approximately $2.9 million. We first
multiplied the total number of onsite
revisit surveys in one year by the
expected revisit user fees assessed per
revisits as finalized in Table A above,
estimated by provider or supplier, to
obtain the annual cost of revisit surveys.
We then divided this number by 12 to
obtain the monthly cost per provider or
supplier of onsite revisit surveys to
obtain the total costs for onsite revisit
surveys for the period of the current
Continuing Resolution (roughly 1
month). We then totaled all providers
and suppliers to achieve the total costs
for all onsite revisit surveys for the
period of this current Continuing
Resolution.
TABLE B.—ONSITE REVISIT SURVEYS—ESTIMATED MONTHLY COSTS
Monthly number
of onsite revisit
surveys
Fee assessed
per onsite revisit
surveys (hrs ×
$112)
Monthly costs for
onsite revisit
surveys *
SNF & NF ........................................................................................................................
Hospitals ..........................................................................................................................
HHA .................................................................................................................................
Hospice ............................................................................................................................
ASC ..................................................................................................................................
RHC .................................................................................................................................
ESRD ...............................................................................................................................
1,191
48
89
21
8
12
58
$2,072
2,554
1,613
1,736
1,669
851
1,490
$2,467,061
122,379
143,557
37,035
13,213
10,567
86,668
Total ..........................................................................................................................
1,427
............................
2,880,480
Facility
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
* Monthly costs may differ from the multiple of monthly revisits and fee per revisit due to rounding. The time period of this CR is roughly 1
month. Total numbers of onsite revisit surveys were rounded up based on FY 2006 actual data presented in the final rule.
We expect the combined costs for all
providers and suppliers for all offsite
revisit surveys to total $229,250 for the
period of the current Continuing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
Resolution. In Table C below, we first
estimated by provider or supplier the
number of offsite revisit surveys
expected for an entire fiscal year, and
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
multiplied this number by the expected
revisit user fee of $168 per offsite revisit
survey to obtain the annual cost of
surveys. We then divided this number
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
71583
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
by 12 to obtain the monthly cost of
offsite revisit surveys to obtain the total
costs for offsite revisit surveys for the
period of the current Continuing
Resolution (roughly 1 month).
TABLE C.—OFFSITE REVISIT SURVEYS—ESTIMATED MONTHLY COSTS
Monthly number
of offsite revisit
surveys
Fee assessed
per offsite revisit
survey
($112 × 1.5 hrs)
Monthly costs for
offsite revisit
surveys*
SNF & NF ........................................................................................................................
Hospitals ..........................................................................................................................
HHA .................................................................................................................................
Hospice ............................................................................................................................
ASC ..................................................................................................................................
RHC .................................................................................................................................
ESRD ...............................................................................................................................
1,262
23
43
4
8
6
19
$168
168
168
168
168
168
168
$211,932
3,892
7,238
714
1,302
938
3,234
Total ..........................................................................................................................
1,365
............................
229,250
Facility
* Monthly costs may differ from the multiple of monthly revisits and fee per revisit due to rounding. The time period of this CR is roughly 1
month.
As shown in Table D below, we
provide the aggregate costs expected as
projected for the entire FY 2007, as well
as the costs we would expect to offset
for the period of the current Continuing
Resolution.
TABLE D.—TOTAL COSTS COMBINED FOR ALL REVISITS SURVEYS PER FISCAL YEAR & PERIOD OF CR
FY 2007
Period of CR*
Onsite Revisit Surveys ....................................................................................................................................
Offsite Revisit Surveys ....................................................................................................................................
$34,565,760
2,751,000
$2,880,480
229,250
Total Costs All Revisits ............................................................................................................................
37,316,760
3,109,730
* CR period’s costs are based on CR period revisit surveys rounded up to the nearest whole number as shown in Table B & C.
E. Alternatives Considered
We considered a number of
alternatives to the revisit user fee
program. Such alternatives were
discussed in the final rule published on
September 19, 2007 (72 FR 53647). We
affirm the continuing validity of that
analysis. The current Continuing
Resolution provides CMS with the
authority to continue projects or
activities as was otherwise provided for
in FY 2007, and as such CMS is
required to publish an interim final rule
with comment. This interim final rule
with comment merely updates the
Congressional authority under which
the rule operates.
In accordance with Executive Order
12866, this rule has been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 488
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Administrative practice and
procedure, Health facilities, Medicare,
Reporting and Recording requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services amends 42 CFR
chapter IV, part 488 as set forth below:
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
PART 488—SURVEY, CERTIFICATION,
AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 488
is revised to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the
Social Security Act, unless otherwise noted
(42 U.S.C. 1302 and 1395(hh)); Continuing
Resolution Pub. L. 101–16 Division B of HR
3222.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; and Program No. 93.774,
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program)
Dated: December 3, 2007.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
Approved: December 13, 2007.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07–6093 Filed 12–14–07; 12:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 060824226 6322 02]
RIN 0648–AW34
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery;
Biennial Specifications and
Management Measures; Inseason
Adjustments
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; inseason adjustments
to biennial groundfish management
measures; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule announces
inseason changes to management
measures in the commercial Pacific
Coast groundfish fishery. These actions,
which are authorized by the Pacific
Coast Groundfish Fishery Management
Plan (FMP), are intended to allow
fisheries to access more abundant
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71579-71583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6093]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Part 488
[CMS-2278-IFC2]
RIN 0938-AP22
Revisit User Fee Program for Medicare Survey and Certification
Activities
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Interim final rule with comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This interim final rule with comment period implements the
continuation of the revisit user fee program for Medicare Survey and
Certification activities, in accordance with the statutory authority in
the Further Continuing Appropriations, 2008 Resolution (``Continuing
Resolution'') budget legislation passed by the Congress and signed by
the President on November 13, 2007. On September 19, 2007, we published
a final rule that established a system of revisit user fees applicable
to health care facilities that have been cited for deficiencies during
initial certification, recertification or substantiated complaint
surveys and require a revisit to confirm that previously-identified
deficiencies have been corrected.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations are effective December 14,
2007, and applicable beginning November 17, 2007.
Comment date: To be assured consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m.
on February 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-2278-IFC2.
Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (no duplicates,
please):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on specific
issues in this regulation to https://www.cms.hhs.gov/eRulemaking. Click
on the link ``Submit electronic comments on CMS regulations with an
open comment period.'' (Attachments should be in Microsoft Word,
WordPerfect, or Excel; however, we prefer Microsoft Word.)
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments (one original and
two copies) to the following address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS-2278-IFC2, P.O. Box 8010, Baltimore, MD 21244-8016.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following address ONLY: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services,
Attention: CMS-2278-IFC2, Mail Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments (one original and two copies) before the
close of the
[[Page 71580]]
comment period to one of the following addresses. If you intend to
deliver your comments to the Baltimore address, please call telephone
number (410) 786-7195 in advance to schedule your arrival with one of
our staff members.
Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201; or
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
(Because access to the interior of the HHH Building is not readily
available to persons without Federal Government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in the CMS drop slots
located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-in clock is
available for persons wishing to retain a proof of filing by stamping
in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being filed.)
Comments mailed to the addresses indicated as appropriate for hand
or courier delivery may be delayed and received after the comment
period.
For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelley Tinsley, (410) 786-6664.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Submitting Comments: As the public was provided an opportunity to
comment on the substance of the rule during the comment period prior to
the publication of the September 19, 2007 final rule, and as the
substance of the rule is not changed by this interim final rule with
comment period, we are accepting comments only to the extent that they
pertain to the applicability of the new authority for the rule. You can
assist us by referencing the file code CMS-2278-IFC2.
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have been received: https://
www.cms.hhs.gov/eRulemaking. Click on the link ``Electronic Comments on
CMS Regulations'' on that Web site to view public comments.
Comments received timely will be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning approximately three weeks after
publication of a document, at the headquarters of the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m. To schedule an appointment to view public comments, phone 1-800-
743-3951.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the June 29, 2007 Federal Register (72 FR 35673), we published
the proposed rule entitled, ``Establishment of Revisit User Fee Program
for Medicare Survey and Certification Activities' and provided for a
60-day comment period. In the September 19, 2007 Federal Register (72
FR 53628) we published the Revisit User Fee Program final rule. That
final rule set forth final requirements and a final fee schedule for
providers and suppliers who require a revisit survey as a result of
deficiencies cited during an initial certification, recertification, or
substantiated complaint survey.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has in place an
outcome-oriented survey process that is designed to ensure that
existing Medicare-certified providers and suppliers or providers and
suppliers seeking initial Medicare certification, meet statutory and
regulatory requirements, conditions of participation, or conditions for
coverage. These health and safety requirements apply to the
environments of care and the delivery of services to residents or
patients served by these facilities and agencies. The Secretary of the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has designated CMS to
enforce the conditions of participation/coverage and other requirements
of the Medicare program. The revisit user fee will be assessed for
revisits conducted in order to determine whether deficiencies cited as
a result of failing to satisfy federal quality of care requirements
have been corrected.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Continuing Appropriations
Resolution budget bill for fiscal year (FY) 2007, the Secretary
directed CMS to implement the revisit user fees for FY 2007 for certain
providers and suppliers for which a revisit was required to confirm
that previously-identified failures to meet federal quality of care
requirements had been remedied. The fees recover the costs associated
with the Medicare Survey and Certification program's revisit surveys.
The primary purpose for implementing the revisit user fees is to ensure
the continuance of CMS Survey and Certification quality assurance
functions that improve patient care and safety. The fees became
effective upon publication September 19, 2007, when the final rule was
published.
II. Provisions of the Interim Final Rule
The current Continuing Resolution Pub. L. 110-16 Division B of HR
3222 which amends Pub. L. 110-92 H. J. Res. 52 Sec. Sec. 101 &
106(2007), authorizes HHS to continue to impose revisit user fees until
December 14, 2007, as follows:
* * *
Sec. 101. Such amounts as may be necessary, at a rate for
operations as provided in the applicable appropriations Acts for
fiscal year 2007 and under the authority and conditions provided in
such Acts, for continuing projects or activities (including the
costs of direct loans and loan guarantees) that are not otherwise
specifically provided for in this joint resolution, that were
conducted in fiscal year 2007, and for which appropriations, funds,
or other authority were made available in the following
appropriations Acts:
* * *
(3) The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (division B
of Public Law 109-289, as amended by Public Law 110-5). (H.J.Res.20,
Sec. 101(2007)).
Sec. 106. Unless otherwise provided for in this joint resolution
or in the applicable appropriations Act for fiscal year 2008,
appropriations and funds made available and authority granted
pursuant to this joint resolution shall be available until whichever
of the following first occurs:
* * *
(3) December 14, 2007.
As directed by the Secretary, in the September 19, 2007 Federal
Register (72 FR 53628), we established the revisit user fee program for
revisit surveys. We put forth in regulation the relevant definitions,
criteria for determining the fees, the fee schedule, procedures for the
collection of fees, the reconsideration process, enforcement and
regulatory language addressing enrollment and billing privileges, and
provider agreements. In the September 19, 2007 final rule, cost
projections were based on FY 2006 actual data and were expected to
amount to $37.3 million for FY 2007. These calculations were included
in section IV of the final rule (72 FR 53642).
We stated in the final rule that, ``if authority for the revisit
user fee is continued, we will use the current fee schedule in [the
final rule] for the assessment of such fees until such time as a new
fee schedule notice is proposed and published in final form.'' (72 FR
53628). The current Continuing Resolution continues the authority of
the FY 2007 Continuing Resolution from November 17, 2007 through
December 14, 2007. Accordingly, the revisit fees will continue to be
assessed for the entire time period authorized by the current
Continuing Resolution.
[[Page 71581]]
III. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public comments we normally receive
on Federal Register documents, we are not able to acknowledge or
respond to them individually. We will consider all comments we receive
by the date and time specified in the DATES section of this preamble,
and, when we proceed with a subsequent document, we will respond to the
comments in the preamble to that document.
IV. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and Delay in Effective Date
We ordinarily publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register and invite public comment on the proposed rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA). The notice of proposed rulemaking includes a reference to the
legal authority under which the rule is proposed, and the terms and
substance of the proposed rule or a description of the subjects and
issues involved. This procedure can be waived, however, if an agency
finds good cause that a notice-and-comment procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest and incorporates a
statement of the finding and its reasons in the rule issued. We find
that the notice-and-comment procedure is unnecessary in this
circumstance because providers and suppliers have already been provided
notice and an opportunity to comment on the substance of this rule.
This interim final rule with comment merely updates the Congressional
authority under which the rule operates.
Therefore, we find good cause to waive the notice of proposed
rulemaking and to issue this final rule on an interim basis. We are
providing a 60-day public comment period.
We ordinarily provide a 30-day delay in the effective date of the
provisions of a rule in accordance with the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553(d). However, the delay in the effective date
may be waived as, in pertinent part, ``provided by the agency for good
cause found and published with the rule.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The
Secretary finds that good cause exists to waive the 30-day effective
date delay.
The good cause exception to the 30 day effective date delay
provision of section 553(d) of the APA is read to be broader than the
good cause exception to the notice and comment provision of section
553(b) of the APA.
The legislative history of the APA indicates that the purpose for
deferring the effectiveness of a rule under section 553(d) was to
``afford persons affected a reasonable time to prepare for the
effective date of a rule or rules or to take other action which the
issuance may prompt.'' S. Rep. No. 752, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. 15
(1946); H.R. Rep. No. 1980, 79th Cong. 2d Sess. 25 (1946). In this
case, affected parties do not need time to adjust their behavior before
this rule takes effect. This rule merely updates the authority under
which the revisit fee is assessed and does not provide any additional
requirements for the affected parties. Moreover, with or without a
revisit fee, a provider or supplier must be found to have corrected
significant deficiencies in order to avoid termination. Additionally,
the application of a fee for the revisit does not place appreciable
administrative burdens on the affected providers or suppliers. We do
not expect appreciable cost to State survey agencies because we are
undertaking the billing and collection of the revisit user fee.
We identified in the September 19, 2007 final rule the immediacy of
this revisit user fee program and the specific statutory requirement
contained limited in the Continuing Resolution that required us to
implement the revisit user fee program in FY 2007. Accordingly,
providers and suppliers have been on notice for some time that these
fees will be imposed, and do not need additional time to be prepared to
comply with the requirements of this regulation. We believe that given
the short timeframe that we have to collect fees before the statutory
authority of the current Continuing Resolution expires, there is good
cause to waive the 30-day effective date.
V. Collection of Information Requirements
This document does not impose information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. Consequently, it need not be reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
VI. Regulatory Impact Analysis
A. Overall Impact
We have examined the impacts of this rule as required by Executive
Order 12866 (September 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review), the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96-354),
section 1102(b) of the Social Security Act, the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), and Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 12866 (as amended by Executive Order 13258, which
merely reassigns responsibility of duties) directs agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A
regulatory impact analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules with
economically significant effects ($100 million or more in any one
year). This rule is not a major rule. The aggregate costs will total
approximately $37.3 million in any one year.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief
of small businesses. For purposes of the RFA, small entities include
small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions. Individuals and States are not included in the
definition of a small entity. Small businesses are small entities,
either by nonprofit status or by having revenues of $6.5 million to
$31.9 million or less in any one year for purposes of the RFA. The
September 19, 2007 final rule provided an analysis on the impact of
small entities (72 FR 53642-3). The analysis published in the final
rule remains valid. Since this interim final rule with comment merely
updates the Congressional authority under which the rule operates, we
have determined that this rule will not have a significant impact on
small entities based on the overall effect on revenues.
Section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a regulatory
impact analysis if a rule may have a significant impact on the
operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This
analysis must conform to the provisions of section 604 of the RFA. For
purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small rural
hospital as a hospital that is located outside of a Metropolitan
statistical Area (superseded by Core Based Statistical Areas) and has
fewer than 100 beds. This rule affects those small rural hospitals that
have been cited for a deficiency based on noncompliance with required
conditions of participation and for which a revisit is needed to ensure
that the deficiency has been corrected. We identified in the September
19, 2007 final rule that for the effective period of that rule that
less than 3 percent of all hospitals may be assessed a revisit user fee
and that less than 1 percent of those hospitals would be rural
hospitals (72 FR 53643). The analysis published in the final rule
remains valid. Since this interim final rule with comment merely
updates the Congressional authority under which the rule operates, we
maintain that this rule will not have a
[[Page 71582]]
significant impact on small rural hospitals.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any one year of
$100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. That
threshold level is currently approximately $120 million. This interim
final rule with comment will have no mandated effect on State, local,
or tribal governments and the impact on the private sector is estimated
to be less than $120 million and will only effect those Medicare
providers or suppliers for which a revisit user fee is assessed based
on the need to conduct a revisit survey to ensure deficient practices
that were cited have been corrected.
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent
final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State
and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism
implications. This interim final rule with comment will not
substantially affect State or local governments. This rule establishes
user fees for providers and suppliers for which CMS has identified
deficient practices and requires a revisit to assure that corrections
have been made. Therefore, we have determined that this interim final
rule with comment will not have a significant affect on the rights,
roles, and responsibilities of State or local governments.
B. Impact on Providers/Suppliers
There is no change on the impact on providers and suppliers with
the publication of this interim final rule with comment. The impact
remains as discussed in the final rule (72 FR 53643).
Final Fee Schedule for Onsite and Offsite Revisit Surveys
The FY 2007 fee schedule published on September 19, 2007 (72 FR
53647) in the final rule will be retained. As noted in the final rule,
the published fee schedule will be utilized by CMS for the assessment
of such fees until such time as a new fee schedule notice is proposed
and published in final form. The calculations utilized to determine the
fee as identified in the final rule will be the same (72 FR 53645-6).
We will continue to assess a flat fee based on provider or supplier
type and type of revisit survey conducted. Table A below identifies the
final fee schedule.
Table A.--Final Fee Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee assessed Fee assessed
Facility per offsite per onsite
revisit survey revisit survey
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SNF & NF................................ $168 $2,072
Hospitals............................... 168 2,554
HHA..................................... 168 1,613
Hospice................................. 168 1,736
ASC..................................... 168 1,669
RHC..................................... 168 851
ESRD.................................... 168 1,490
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs for All Revisit User Fees Assessed
We anticipated that the combined costs for all providers and
suppliers for all revisit surveys in FY 2007 would total approximately
$37.3 million on an annual basis, with onsite revisit surveys amounting
to approximately $34.6 million and offsite revisit surveys totaling
approximately $2.7 million. (72 FR 53645). However, actual fees
assessed in FY 2007 were much less than this amount, since CMS did not
charge for revisits that occurred prior to publication of the final
regulation. Since we continue to operate under this same estimate for
FY 07, we provide below monthly estimates of the impact for the period
of the current Continuing Resolution in Tables B and C. For the period
of the current Continuing Resolution, we will use the FY 2007 fee
schedule established in the final rule for the assessment of fees until
a new fee schedule notice is proposed and published as final.
In Table B below, we provide the projected costs for the period of
this current Continuing Resolution based on the fee schedule of the
final rule. We expect the combined costs for all providers and
suppliers for all onsite revisit surveys for the period of this current
Continuing Resolution to total approximately $2.9 million. We first
multiplied the total number of onsite revisit surveys in one year by
the expected revisit user fees assessed per revisits as finalized in
Table A above, estimated by provider or supplier, to obtain the annual
cost of revisit surveys. We then divided this number by 12 to obtain
the monthly cost per provider or supplier of onsite revisit surveys to
obtain the total costs for onsite revisit surveys for the period of the
current Continuing Resolution (roughly 1 month). We then totaled all
providers and suppliers to achieve the total costs for all onsite
revisit surveys for the period of this current Continuing Resolution.
Table B.--Onsite Revisit Surveys--Estimated Monthly Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee assessed per Monthly costs
Monthly number onsite revisit for onsite
Facility of onsite surveys (hrs x revisit surveys
revisit surveys $112) *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SNF & NF.................................................. 1,191 $2,072 $2,467,061
Hospitals................................................. 48 2,554 122,379
HHA....................................................... 89 1,613 143,557
Hospice................................................... 21 1,736 37,035
ASC....................................................... 8 1,669 13,213
RHC....................................................... 12 851 10,567
ESRD...................................................... 58 1,490 86,668
-----------------------------------------------------
Total................................................. 1,427 ................ 2,880,480
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Monthly costs may differ from the multiple of monthly revisits and fee per revisit due to rounding. The time
period of this CR is roughly 1 month. Total numbers of onsite revisit surveys were rounded up based on FY 2006
actual data presented in the final rule.
We expect the combined costs for all providers and suppliers for
all offsite revisit surveys to total $229,250 for the period of the
current Continuing Resolution. In Table C below, we first estimated by
provider or supplier the number of offsite revisit surveys expected for
an entire fiscal year, and multiplied this number by the expected
revisit user fee of $168 per offsite revisit survey to obtain the
annual cost of surveys. We then divided this number
[[Page 71583]]
by 12 to obtain the monthly cost of offsite revisit surveys to obtain
the total costs for offsite revisit surveys for the period of the
current Continuing Resolution (roughly 1 month).
Table C.--Offsite Revisit Surveys--Estimated Monthly Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee assessed per
Monthly number offsite revisit Monthly costs
Facility of offsite survey ($112 x for offsite
revisit surveys 1.5 hrs) revisit surveys*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SNF & NF.................................................. 1,262 $168 $211,932
Hospitals................................................. 23 168 3,892
HHA....................................................... 43 168 7,238
Hospice................................................... 4 168 714
ASC....................................................... 8 168 1,302
RHC....................................................... 6 168 938
ESRD...................................................... 19 168 3,234
-----------------------------------------------------
Total................................................. 1,365 ................ 229,250
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Monthly costs may differ from the multiple of monthly revisits and fee per revisit due to rounding. The time
period of this CR is roughly 1 month.
As shown in Table D below, we provide the aggregate costs expected
as projected for the entire FY 2007, as well as the costs we would
expect to offset for the period of the current Continuing Resolution.
Table D.--Total Costs Combined for All Revisits Surveys per Fiscal Year
& Period of CR
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2007 Period of CR*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Onsite Revisit Surveys.............. $34,565,760 $2,880,480
Offsite Revisit Surveys............. 2,751,000 229,250
-----------------------------------
Total Costs All Revisits........ 37,316,760 3,109,730
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* CR period's costs are based on CR period revisit surveys rounded up to
the nearest whole number as shown in Table B & C.
E. Alternatives Considered
We considered a number of alternatives to the revisit user fee
program. Such alternatives were discussed in the final rule published
on September 19, 2007 (72 FR 53647). We affirm the continuing validity
of that analysis. The current Continuing Resolution provides CMS with
the authority to continue projects or activities as was otherwise
provided for in FY 2007, and as such CMS is required to publish an
interim final rule with comment. This interim final rule with comment
merely updates the Congressional authority under which the rule
operates.
In accordance with Executive Order 12866, this rule has been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 488
Administrative practice and procedure, Health facilities, Medicare,
Reporting and Recording requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services amends 42 CFR chapter IV, part 488 as set forth
below:
PART 488--SURVEY, CERTIFICATION, AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for part 488 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the Social Security Act,
unless otherwise noted (42 U.S.C. 1302 and 1395(hh)); Continuing
Resolution Pub. L. 101-16 Division B of HR 3222.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical
Assistance Program)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773,
Medicare--Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare--
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: December 3, 2007.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Approved: December 13, 2007.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-6093 Filed 12-14-07; 12:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P