Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Biennial Specifications and Management Measures; Inseason Adjustments, 71583-71600 [07-6077]
Download as PDF
71583
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
by 12 to obtain the monthly cost of
offsite revisit surveys to obtain the total
costs for offsite revisit surveys for the
period of the current Continuing
Resolution (roughly 1 month).
TABLE C.—OFFSITE REVISIT SURVEYS—ESTIMATED MONTHLY COSTS
Monthly number
of offsite revisit
surveys
Fee assessed
per offsite revisit
survey
($112 × 1.5 hrs)
Monthly costs for
offsite revisit
surveys*
SNF & NF ........................................................................................................................
Hospitals ..........................................................................................................................
HHA .................................................................................................................................
Hospice ............................................................................................................................
ASC ..................................................................................................................................
RHC .................................................................................................................................
ESRD ...............................................................................................................................
1,262
23
43
4
8
6
19
$168
168
168
168
168
168
168
$211,932
3,892
7,238
714
1,302
938
3,234
Total ..........................................................................................................................
1,365
............................
229,250
Facility
* Monthly costs may differ from the multiple of monthly revisits and fee per revisit due to rounding. The time period of this CR is roughly 1
month.
As shown in Table D below, we
provide the aggregate costs expected as
projected for the entire FY 2007, as well
as the costs we would expect to offset
for the period of the current Continuing
Resolution.
TABLE D.—TOTAL COSTS COMBINED FOR ALL REVISITS SURVEYS PER FISCAL YEAR & PERIOD OF CR
FY 2007
Period of CR*
Onsite Revisit Surveys ....................................................................................................................................
Offsite Revisit Surveys ....................................................................................................................................
$34,565,760
2,751,000
$2,880,480
229,250
Total Costs All Revisits ............................................................................................................................
37,316,760
3,109,730
* CR period’s costs are based on CR period revisit surveys rounded up to the nearest whole number as shown in Table B & C.
E. Alternatives Considered
We considered a number of
alternatives to the revisit user fee
program. Such alternatives were
discussed in the final rule published on
September 19, 2007 (72 FR 53647). We
affirm the continuing validity of that
analysis. The current Continuing
Resolution provides CMS with the
authority to continue projects or
activities as was otherwise provided for
in FY 2007, and as such CMS is
required to publish an interim final rule
with comment. This interim final rule
with comment merely updates the
Congressional authority under which
the rule operates.
In accordance with Executive Order
12866, this rule has been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 488
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Administrative practice and
procedure, Health facilities, Medicare,
Reporting and Recording requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services amends 42 CFR
chapter IV, part 488 as set forth below:
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
PART 488—SURVEY, CERTIFICATION,
AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 488
is revised to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the
Social Security Act, unless otherwise noted
(42 U.S.C. 1302 and 1395(hh)); Continuing
Resolution Pub. L. 101–16 Division B of HR
3222.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; and Program No. 93.774,
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program)
Dated: December 3, 2007.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
Approved: December 13, 2007.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07–6093 Filed 12–14–07; 12:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 060824226 6322 02]
RIN 0648–AW34
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery;
Biennial Specifications and
Management Measures; Inseason
Adjustments
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; inseason adjustments
to biennial groundfish management
measures; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule announces
inseason changes to management
measures in the commercial Pacific
Coast groundfish fishery. These actions,
which are authorized by the Pacific
Coast Groundfish Fishery Management
Plan (FMP), are intended to allow
fisheries to access more abundant
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
71584
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
groundfish stocks while protecting
overfished and depleted stocks.
DATES: Effective 0001 hours (local time)
January 1, 2008. Comments on this final
rule must be received no later than 5
p.m., local time on January 17, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 0648–AW34 by any
one of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Fax: 206–526–6736, Attn: Gretchen
Arentzen
• Mail: D. Robert Lohn,
Administrator, Northwest Region,
NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE,
Seattle, WA 98115–0070, Attn: Gretchen
Arentzen.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gretchen Arentzen (Northwest Region,
NMFS), phone: 206–526–6147, fax: 206–
526–6736 and e-mail
gretchen.arentzen@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Electronic Access
This final rule is accessible via the
Internet at the Office of the Federal
Register’s Website at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
Background information and documents
are available at the Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s website at https://
www.pcouncil.org/.
Background
The Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP
and its implementing regulations at title
50 in the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), part 660, subpart G, regulate
fishing for over 90 species of groundfish
off the coasts of Washington, Oregon,
and California. Groundfish
specifications and management
measures are developed by the Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council),
and are implemented by NMFS. A
proposed rule to implement the 2007–
2008 specifications and management
measures for the Pacific Coast
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
groundfish fishery and Amendment 16–
4 of the FMP was published on
September 29, 2006 (71 FR 57764). The
final rule to implement the 2007–2008
specifications and management
measures for the Pacific Coast
Groundfish Fishery was published on
December 29, 2006 (71 FR 78638). These
specifications and management
measures were codified in the CFR (50
CFR part 660, subpart G). The final rule
was subsequently amended on: March
20, 2007 (71 FR 13043); April 18, 2007
(72 FR 19390); July 5, 2007 (72 FR
36617); August 3, 2007 (72 FR 43193);
September 18, 2007 (72 FR 53165); and
October 4, 2007 (72 FR 56664); and
December 4, 2007 (72 FR 68097).
Changes to the biennial groundfish
management measures implemented by
this action were recommended by the
Council, in consultation with Pacific
Coast Treaty Indian Tribes and the
States of Washington, Oregon, and
California, at its November 5–9, 2007,
meeting in San Diego, California. At that
meeting, the Council recommended
adjusting the biennial groundfish
management measures for December
2007 to respond to updated fishery
information, and these measures were
published in a separate rulemaking on
December 4, 2007 (72 FR 68097). At that
same meeting, the Council
recommended adjusting the biennial
groundfish management measures for
the remainder of the biennial period to
respond to updated fishery information
and other inseason management needs.
The Council recommended the
following adjustments beginning
January 1, 2008: (1) Setting the trawl
Rockfish Conservation Area (RCA)
boundaries such that they take into
account recent scientific information on
constraining overfished species bycatch
early in the year; (2) adjusting trip limits
for sablefish, longspine thornyheads,
shortspine thornyheads, Dover sole,
petrale sole, arrowtooth flounder, Other
Flatfish, minor slope and darkblotched
rockfish, Pacific ocean perch, and
chilipepper rockfish in the limited entry
trawl fishery; (3) recombining
chilipepper rockfish into a single
limited entry fixed gear cumulative
limit for minor shelf, shortbelly and
widow rockfish, and bocaccio between
40°10.00′ N. lat. and 34°27.00′ N. lat.; (4)
increasing shortspine thornyhead limits
in the limited entry fixed gear fishery
south of 34°27.00′ N. lat.; (5) setting
differential open access sablefish daily
trip limits north of 36° N. lat. and
decreasing the daily trip limits north
and south of 36° N. lat.; (6) removing
trip limit requirements for lingcod in
the tribal fishery.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
NMFS has considered these
recommendations, and is implementing
them as described below. Pacific Coast
groundfish landings will be monitored
throughout the remainder of the
biennial period, and further adjustments
to trip limits or management measures
may be made as necessary to allow
achievement of, or to avoid exceeding,
optimum yields (OYs).
Fishery Management Measures for the
Limited Entry Non-Whiting Trawl
Fishery
At its November 2007 meeting, the
Council reviewed the 2007 limited entry
trawl fisheries by considering: 1) the
fishery management measures initially
set for 2007, 2) modifications to
management measures that were needed
inseason in 2007 as new data became
available throughout the season, and 3)
retrospective total catch pattern data
from the 2007 year-to-date. A noticeable
feature of the 2007 fishing season was
that the Council had to, on several
occasions, recommend inseason
adjustments to constrain either trip
limits or fishing areas in order to ensure
that the total catch for 2007 of
overfished species would stay within
their allowable harvest levels for their
rebuilding plans. This practice is in
keeping with the Council’s rebuilding
goals for overfished species, but is
challenging for an industry trying to
predict whether and how much fish will
be available for harvest in the next
month of the year. The Council’s goal in
scrutinizing the 2007 fishery was to
develop a set of management measures
for the remainder of the biennial period,
for implementation on January 1, 2008,
that would take into account new
knowledge gained in 2007 to better
structure the fishery so initial 2008
management measures would continue
to keep total catch of managed species
within their optimum yield levels, and
would be conservative enough to reduce
the frequency with which management
measure adjustments would be needed
inseason.
Trawl management measures for the
2007–2008 biennium were initially set
using fishery data available through the
June and September 2006 Council
meetings. In late January 2007, NMFS’s
West Coast Groundfish Observer
Program (WCGOP) released new fishery
data that showed that canary bycatch
rates for vessels using selective flatfish
bycatch gear were higher than was
shown in the data available for
development of management measures
in 2006. The Council’s first opportunity
to respond to this new WCGOP data was
at its March 2007 meeting, after the
2007 fishery had been underway for
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
over two months. In order to take into
account estimated canary rockfish
bycatch for the early part of 2007 and
to ultimately keep the 2007 and 2008
fisheries from exceeding the canary
rockfish OY, the Council recommended
a strict series of area closures and trip
limit revisions for implementation in
April 2007 (71 FR 19390, April 18,
2007).
The Council’s goal in reviewing 2007
fishery data in preparation for
recommending management measures
for January 1, 2008, was to ensure that
management measures in place for the
remainder of the biennial period reflect
the best available science and are
appropriately designed to constrain total
catch during the year for all species. To
that end, the Council’s Groundfish
Management Team (GMT) incorporated
additional new data from WCGOP,
released in October 2007, and the most
recently available state logbook data on
trawl fishing areas. Based on 2007
fishery landed catch information
received to date and on WCGOP data in
combination with new logbook data, the
GMT recommended that the Council
consider measures to protect canary
rockfish in 2008 that primarily focused
on adjustments to the trawl RCA
boundaries coastwide. Incidental catch
of canary rockfish is of higher concern
in the non-whiting trawl fishery
compared to incidental catch of other
overfished species because they are a
shelf species that commonly co-occur
with target species taken with trawl
gear. Canary rockfish are the most
constraining of the overfished species,
based on incidental catch projections in
the non-whiting trawl fishery. A GMT
review of the trip limits implemented
for target species in 2007 found that
arrowtooth flounder was the primary
species that needed adjustments to its
trip limits in order to gain savings of
canary rockfish bycatch in addition to
the savings that the GMT estimated
would be achieved from modifying the
trawl RCA. Upon reviewing this
analysis, the Council recommended
reducing the arrowtooth flounder trip
limits for selective flatfish gear in
northern waters, and provided an RCA
schedule for the remainder of the
biennial period as next described.
The Council also received the most
recent Pacific Fishery Information
Network’s (PacFIN) and Quota Species
Monitoring (QSM) data, which
estimated catch through the end of
October, and considered trip limit
adjustments based on the performance
of the fishery during the first 10 months
of the biennial period.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
Limited Entry Trawl Rockfish
Conservation Area
North of 40°10.00′ N. lat. The Council
determined that, in order to constrain
the incidental catch of canary rockfish
and to prevent exceeding the 2008
canary rockfish OY, the limited entry
trawl RCA north of 40°10.00′ N. lat.
should be modified, using a similar
approach to what was ultimately
implemented in April 2007 (72 FR
19390, April 18, 2007). In some areas,
the RCA would be expanded to
eliminate fishing opportunity where
trawl data shows higher canary rockfish
bycatch rates, shifting fishing effort to
depths exhibiting relatively lower
canary rockfish bycatch rates. In some
areas, the RCA would be liberalized to
allow effort shifts and targeting
opportunities in depths with relatively
lower canary bycatch rates. The Council
considered modification of the
shoreward RCA boundaries in areas
north of 40°10.00′ N. lat. that would
close or substantially restrict areas with
the highest bycatch rates, as identified
from WCGOP data. The areas of highest
canary rockfish bycatch rates included
the area shoreward of the RCA north of
Leadbetter Point (46°38.17′ N. lat.) and
the area shoreward of the RCA between
Cape Arago (43°20.83′ N. lat.) and
Humbug Mountain (42°40.50′ N. lat.).
The GMT analyzed the effect of
relatively greater restrictions in these
areas and, based on that analysis,
recommended closing the shoreward
area north of Cape Alava (48°10.00′ N.
lat.) in the winter. For the area between
Cape Alava south to Cape Arago where
canary rockfish bycatch is relatively
lower, yet where softshell Dungeness
crab can occur, the GMT recommended
a combined strategy of 75–fm (137–m)
and 60–fm (110–m) shoreward RCA
boundaries throughout the year.
Trawl fishing opportunities seaward
of the trawl RCA are primarily
constrained by measures intended to
minimize the incidental catch of
darkblotched rockfish. Data from the
NMFS trawl survey, logbook data, and
WCGOP data show that various
continental slope target species and
darkblotched rockfish are found in
shallower depths in the north and move
deeper toward the south. The GMT
analyzed the effects of shifting the
seaward boundary of the trawl RCA
shoreward to accommodate a shift in
fishing effort from nearshore to offshore
waters and recommended concentrating
most fishing effort throughout the year
offshore of a boundary line
approximating the 200–fm (366–m)
depth contour, with some seasonal
modifications to allow greater access to
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71585
petrale sole and Other Flatfish. The
Council adopted these
recommendations for the seaward
boundary of the RCA to allow increased
fishing opportunity in offshore waters
while maintaining RCA protections for
darkblotched rockfish.
Based on the information and analysis
described above, the Council
recommended and NMFS is
implementing the following changes to
the trawl RCA north of 40°10.00′ N. lat.
for the remainder of the biennial period:
for the area north of Cape Alava, an RCA
closure from the shoreline to the
boundary line approximating the 200–
fm (366–m) depth contour, with a
winter modification to accommodate
petrale sole fishing, and a summer
modification to accommodate greater
flatfish fishing; for the area between
Cape Alava and Cape Arago, an RCA
closure from a boundary line
approximating the 75–fm (137–fm)
depth contour to a boundary line
approximating the 200–fm (366–fm)
depth contour, with modifications in
the spring through fall months for the
Cape Alava to the Washington-Oregon
border (46°16.00’ N. lat.) sub-area to
protect soft-shell crab and allow access
to flatfish and slope target species where
canary bycatch is low, and with a winter
modification to accommodate petrale
sole fishing; for the area between Cape
Arago and Humbug Mountain, an RCA
closure from the shoreline to a boundary
line approximating the 200–fm (366–m)
depth contour, with a winter
modification to accommodate petrale
sole fishing; and for the area between
Humbug Mountain and 40°10.00′ N. lat.,
an RCA closure from a boundary line
approximating the 75–fm (137–fm)
depth contour to a boundary line
approximating the 200–fm (366–fm)
depth contour, with a winter
modification to accommodate petrale
sole fishing.
South of 40°10.00′ N. lat. Trawl effort
seaward of the trawl RCA is primarily
constrained by incidental catch of
darkblotched rockfish. Incidental catch
of darkblotched rockfish between
40°10.00′ N. lat. and 38° N. lat. was
lower than originally predicted at the
start of the biennial period. The Council
determined that liberalizing the seaward
boundary of the trawl RCA during
winter in this area would allow
increased targeting opportunities while
keeping darkblotched rockfish within
the 2008 OY. This would also establish
a constant seaward boundary of the
trawl RCA. Therefore, the Council
recommended and NMFS is
implementing an adjustment of the
seaward boundary of the trawl RCA
between 40°10.00′ N. lat. and 38° N. lat.
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
71586
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
to a boundary line approximating the
150–fm (274–m) depth contour during
winter.
Limited Entry Trawl Trip Limits
North of 40°10.00′ N. lat. In addition
to RCA modifications north of 40°10.00′
N. lat., the Council determined that
cumulative limits in the limited entry
trawl fishery should be modified to:
Reduce total impacts and keep canary
rockfish within the 2008 OY; provide
increased access to target species in
areas with lower canary bycatch rates;
reduce a restriction by allowing
fishermen increased opportunities to
harvest available healthy stocks; reduce
complexity of the cumulative limit
structure and provide year round fishing
opportunity; eliminate targeting of
species subject to rebuilding
requirements; reduce unnecessary
discards; and reduce overall catches to
keep stocks within their 2008 OYs.
The Council considered various
combinations of cumulative limit
adjustments paired with RCA
modifications and area closures to
reduce fishery impacts to canary
rockfish. As with the RCA boundary
revisions, the Council’s GMT analyzed
revisions to trip limits intended to shift
fishing effort away from areas where
canary rockfish are more commonly
taken as bycatch. The Council
considered and recommended a more
conservative schedule of RCA
boundaries, and, when paired with the
reductions that had been made to other
target species taken with selective
flatfish trawl gear in April 2007, there
were few additional trip limit
reductions necessary to keep the
fisheries within the 2008 canary
rockfish OY. As a result, the Council
recommended reducing arrowtooth
flounder limits taken with selective
flatfish trawl gear north of 40°10.00′ N.
lat. because arrowtooth flounder are a
target species more highly associated
with canary rockfish bycatch and
selective flatfish trawl gear is used to
target arrowtooth shoreward of the trawl
RCA, where canary rockfish bycatch
rates are highest. The Council also
recommended continuing the reduction
in sablefish cumulative limits taken
with selective flatfish trawl
implemented in April 2007. Reducing
these limits is estimated to reduce
impacts on canary rockfish from status
quo management measures.
In April 2007, arrowtooth flounder
cumulative limits for all gear types were
combined into a single cumulative limit
with Other Flatfish north of 40°10.00′ N.
lat. to reduce total catch and, in turn,
reduce impacts on canary rockfish. The
most recently available catch data
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
indicate that an unintentional
consequence of this combined limit was
that arrowtooth was being discarded for
other higher-priced species in the
combined cumulative limit. Therefore,
the Council considered separating these
limits to eliminate unnecessary
discards, in conjunction with reducing
canary rockfish impacts with gearspecific reductions in trip limits.
To reduce the negative economic
impacts of decreases to arrowtooth
flounder cumulative limits taken with
selective flatfish trawl gear north of
40°10.00′ N. lat., the Council
recommended increasing Dover sole
cumulative limits taken with selective
flatfish trawl gear in that area. Dover
sole are a target species not strongly
associated with incidental catch of
canary rockfish. The Council also
recommended increasing arrowtooth
flounder cumulative limits taken
seaward of the RCA with large footrope
trawl gear north of 40°10.00′ N. lat. to
provide additional fishing opportunity
for these healthy target species in waters
where they are least likely to co-occur
with canary rockfish. In combination
with the schedule of RCAs
recommended by the Council and
described above, the GMT projected that
an increase in the Dover sole limits
using selective flatfish trawl gear could
be accommodated in the nearshore areas
that remain open without exceeding the
2008 canary rockfish OY, and an
increase in the arrowtooth flounder
cumulative limit using large and small
footrope trawl gear could be
accommodated in offshore areas without
exceeding the 2008 darkblotched
rockfish OY.
The Council also considered whether
decreases in cumulative limits for
petrale sole taken with selective flatfish
trawl gear might reduce fishery impacts
on canary rockfish. However, the
Council concluded that the schedule of
RCAs described above are adequate to
protect the canary rockfish OY while
maintaining the overall catch limits of
petrale sole for the year in the nearshore
areas that remain open.
Based on these analyses, the Council
recommended and NMFS is
implementing changes in the limited
entry trawl flatfish fishery north of
40°10.00′ N. lat. for the remainder of the
biennial period that increase arrowtooth
flounder trip limits for waters offshore
of the trawl RCA, yet decrease
arrowtooth flounder trip limits in the
area shoreward of the trawl RCA and for
selective flatfish trawl gear, and that
stabilize Dover sole and Other Flatfish
cumulative limits throughout the year,
also with greater Dover sole
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
opportunities offshore than nearshore,
beginning January 1, 2008.
In 2007, landings and total mortality
estimates were lower than had been
initially estimated for continental slope
species Dover sole, longspine and
shortspine thornyheads, and sablefish
(DTS complex species) taken seaward of
the trawl RCA with large and small
footrope trawl gear north of 40°10.00′ N.
lat. and limits for these DTS species
were increased inseason in 2007. Under
status quo regulations, total catch
projections for these species are
estimated to be below the 2008 OYs.
Therefore, the Council developed a
strategy for the remainder of the
biennial period to re-distribute catch
levels for DTS species more evenly over
the entire period, reducing complexity
in the cumulative limit structure and
providing year round fishing
opportunity. As discussed above, the
Council recommended a stabilized trip
limit strategy for Dover sole, beginning
January 1, 2008. Dover sole is broadly
distributed over a wide range of depths,
and associates both with Other Flatfish
species and, in deep water with the
other species in the DTS complex.
Consistent with its 2008 strategy for
flatfish, the Council also recommended,
and NMFS is implementing, a DTS
complex strategy of stabilizing trip
limits throughout the year and
maintaining low status quo trip limits in
offshore areas where overfished species
are less likely to be taken, beginning
January 1, 2008.
In March 2007, the Council
recommended and NMFS implemented
a decrease in the minor slope and
darkblotched rockfish combined
cumulative limit north of 40°10.00′ N.
lat. to reduce the impact of greater effort
occurring in offshore areas where
darkblotched rockfish are found, and
considered how increased trawl effort
seaward of the RCA would affect the
incidental impacts to Pacific ocean
perch (POP); however, inseason
adjustments were anticipated to keep
POP total catch well within its 2007 OY
of 150 mt (72 FR 19390, April 18 2007).
At its November 2007 meeting, the
Council considered continuing the
lower minor slope and darkblotched
rockfish limits for the remainder of the
biennial period, since management
measures that shift fishing effort into
deeper waters to protect canary rockfish
can also increase bycatch of deepwater
overfished species, such as
darkblotched and POP. To prevent
vessels from targeting darkblotched
rockfish and POP, the Council
recommended and NMFS is
implementing a strategy for the
remainder of the biennial period for
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
slope rockfish species taken north of
40°10.00′ N. lat. that, beginning January
1, 2008, maintains the lower status quo
trip limits.
South of 40°10.00′ N. lat. The Council
determined that cumulative limits in the
limited entry trawl fishery south of
40°10.00′ N. lat. should be modified to:
reduce unnecessary discards; reduce a
restriction by allowing fishermen
increased opportunities to harvest
available healthy stocks; and, reduce
complexity of the cumulative limit
structure and provide year round fishing
opportunity.
In May 2007, arrowtooth flounder
cumulative limits were combined into a
single cumulative limit with Other
Flatfish south of 40°10.00′ N. lat. to
increase targeting flexibility while
reducing total catch. The most recently
available catch data indicate that an
unintentional consequence of this
combined limit was that arrowtooth was
being discarded for other higher-priced
species in the combined cumulative
limit. As in the north, the Council
recommended separating these limits to
eliminate unnecessary discards by
setting the cumulative limit for the year
as it was set prior to inseason changes
in May 2007.
In addition, the Council considered
the strategy of separate chilipepper
rockfish limits for the remainder of the
biennial period. Chilipepper rockfish
are an abundant species taken in
common with other rockfish in the
southern shelf rockfish complex. Based
on the most recently available WCGOP
data, chilipepper rockfish are being
regularly discarded under current trip
limits for small footrope trawl gear
south of 40°10.00′ N. lat. OYs for
chilipepper rockfish have not come
close to being achieved in recent years.
For example, in the 2005 limited entry
trawl and fixed gear fishery, the
chilipepper rockfish landings were 28
mt, less than 3 percent of the 1099 mt
chilipepper rockfish OY. In June 2007,
the Council recommended and NMFS
implemented an increase in chilipepper
rockfish limits to allow some of this
discard to be retained while keeping
limits low enough to prevent targeting,
and a modest increase in monthly limits
for small footrope trawl gear south of
40°10.00′ N. lat. (72 FR 36617, July 5,
2007). Catch estimates indicate that
targeting did not occur under this higher
limit, and there was little increase in the
catch of co-occurring bocaccio and
widow rockfish. At their November 5–
9 meeting, the Council considered
increasing chilipepper limits, and catch
projections estimate that less than 54
percent of the 2008 bocaccio OY and
less than 79 percent of the 2008 widow
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
rockfish OY will be obtained for either
bocaccio or widow rockfish by the end
of 2008 with these changes. This means
that, even if catch of chilipepper
rockfish were to increase in 2008, and
higher than expected bycatch of
bocaccio and widow rockfish occurs,
bocaccio and widow rockfish total catch
would still remain within their 2008
OYs.
Therefore, the Council recommended
and NMFS is implementing a fishing
strategy for the remainder of the
biennial period for both arrowtooth
flounder and chilipepper rockfish for
the limited entry trawl fishery south of
40°10.00′ N. lat. that separates
arrowtooth flounder from Other Flatfish
limits, beginning January 1, 2008 and
that increases the chilipepper rockfish
limits using small footrope trawl gear to
2,000 lb (907 kg) per two months,
beginning January 1, 2008.
In 2007, landings and total mortality
estimates were lower than had been
estimated preseason for DTS complex
species and Other Flatfish south of
40°10.00′ N. lat. and limits for these
species were increased inseason. If the
limits for DTS complex species were
maintained for early 2008, total catch
projections were estimated to be below
the 2008 OYs for these species. In
addition, status quo cumulative limits
for DTS complex species and Other
Flatfish would ramp up throughout the
year, providing less fishing opportunity
early in the year. Therefore, the Council
recommended and NMFS is
implementing a strategy for DTS
complex species and Other Flatfish
taken with trawl gear south of 40°10.00′
N. lat. to stabilize tip limit levels for
these species throughout the year, with
lower limits for sablefish in winter
months, beginning January 1, 2008.
At its March 2007 meeting, the
Council received preliminary landings
data indicating higher than expected
petrale sole catch through February and
recommended reducing summer petrale
sole trip limits coastwide to keep total
catch within the 2007 petrale sole OY.
At its November 2007 meeting, the
Council considered the most recent
fishery data and performance of the
2007 fishery and did not recommend
this strategy for the remainder of the
biennial period. Instead, the Council
recommended and NMFS is
implementing petrale sole trip limits
south of 40°10.00′ N. lat. equivalent to
the levels established at the beginning of
the biennial period and continuing the
status quo strategy of providing greater
petrale sole fishing limits in the offshore
areas in winter months, when
overfished species bycatch is lowest.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71587
Trip limits for minor slope and
darkblotched rockfish south of 38° N.
lat. were increased inseason in 2007
after the Council considered data at
their September meeting indicating that
only 16 percent (286 mt out of 1,786 mt)
of the 2007 minor slope rockfish OY
south of 38° N. lat. was expected to be
taken through the end of 2007. At their
November 2007 meeting, the Council
considered the most recent fishery data
and performance of the 2007 fishery and
recommended continuing higher trip
limits and stabilizing limits for minor
slope and darkblotched rockfish for the
remainder of the biennial period to
allow fishermen to access available
healthy stocks while keeping catch of
overfished and depleted species within
2008 OYs. Darkblotched rockfish and
POP are overfished slope species within
this complex; however, these species are
much less abundant south of 38° N. lat.
Yelloweye rockfish, impacts to which
are of concern in hook-and-line fisheries
like the California recreational fishery,
are rarely taken in trawl fisheries.
Therefore, the Council recommended
and NMFS is implementing a strategy
that stabilizes the combined cumulative
limit for minor slope and darkblotched
rockfish south of 38° N. lat. at 55,000 lb
(24,948 kg) for the remainder of the
biennial period.
Limited Entry Fixed Gear Trip Limits
South of 40°10.00′ N. Lat.
As described in the section above
(Limited Entry Trawl Trip Limits South
of 40°10.00′ N. lat.), chilipepper
rockfish are an abundant species taken
in common with other rockfish in the
southern shelf rockfish complex.
Chilipepper rockfish taken in the
limited entry fixed gear fishery south of
40°10.00′ N. lat. were removed from the
combined cumulative limit for minor
shelf rockfish, shortbelly and widow
rockfish at the beginning of the 2005
fishing season to allow increased
targeting opportunities. In June 2007,
the Council received a request to
recombine chilipepper rockfish into the
combined cumulative limit to allow
increased targeting opportunities and
reduced discards. The Council had
concerns, however, with the impacts to
overfished species that might occur
from combining chilipepper rockfish
cumulative limits into a single
cumulative limit with minor shelf
rockfish, bocaccio and widow rockfish,
since the high abundance of chilipepper
rockfish would result in a combined
limit too high to be supported by less
abundant species in the complex. At
their November 2007 meeting, the
Council discussed recombining
chilipepper rockfish into a single
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
71588
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
combined cumulative limit, but with a
sub-limit for all species other than
chilipepper rockfish, to constrain catch
of overfished species in the combined
limit but allow additional opportunity
for chilipepper rockfish. Therefore, the
Council recommended and NMFS is
implementing the following trip limit
changes for the limited entry fixed gear
fishery between 40°10.00′ N. lat. and
34°27.00’ N. lat.: modify the chilipepper
rockfish limit of 2,000 lb (907 kg) per
two months by recombining it into a
single combined cumulative limit with
minor shelf rockfish, shortbelly, widow
rockfish and bocaccio, and increase the
trip limit from 500 lb (267 kg) per two
months to ‘‘2,500 lb (1,134 kg) per two
months of which no more than 500 lb
(267 kg) per two months may be any
species other than chilipepper
rockfish,’’ beginning January 1, 2008.
In June 2007, the Council
recommended a short term increase in
shortspine thornyhead cumulative
limits south of 34°27.00′ N. lat. during
Period 4 (July 1 through August 31). The
Council had considered whether
increases in effort in this area could
result in higher incidental catches of
sablefish and other species; however,
estimates at that time showed that
sablefish catches in this area were
actually lower than had been estimated
preseason for 2007. In September 2007,
the most recent catch data indicated that
the Period 4 increases in the shortspine
thornyhead cumulative limit did not
result in a large effort shift, and only
slightly increased the catch rate in this
area. Therefore, the Council
recommended continuing the Period 4
increases to the shortspine thornyhead
cumulative limit south of 34°27.00′ N.
lat. through the end of 2007. At the
November 2007 Council meeting, the
GMT recommended continuing the
higher limit for the remainder of the
biennial period because a change in
behavior relative to the 2007 fishing
season is not expected. Therefore, the
Council recommended, and NMFS is
implementing the following changes for
the limited entry fixed gear fishery
south of 34°27.00′ N. lat.: increase the
shortspine thornyhead limits from 2,000
lb (907 kg) per 2 months to 3,000 lb
(1,361 kg) per 2 months, beginning
January 1, 2008.
Open Access Fishery Management
Measures
At their June 2007 meeting, the
Council recommended and NMFS
implemented an increase in the daily
and weekly limits in the open access
sablefish daily trip limit (DTL) fishery
south of 36° N. lat. on August 1. The
most recent catch information indicates
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
that there have been increased sablefish
landings in this area in 2007. In
November 2007, the GMT compared
current trip limits with historical
catches and trip limits. An analysis of
2003 through 2006 catch information
indicates that increased effort and
increased per-vessel catch have been
responsible for the increased landings of
sablefish in this area, in particular after
the August 1, 2007, increases in daily
and weekly trip limits. If catch rates
seen during 2007 were to continue for
the remainder of the biennial period, the
2008 sablefish OY could be exceeded.
The Council considered decreasing the
weekly limits to 800 lb (363 kg) and
implementing a two month cumulative
limit of 2,400 lb (1,089 kg) per two
months to keep catch projections within
the 2008 sablefish OY; however,
industry testimony stated that
introducing a two month cumulative
limit would force many long-time
fishermen out of this fishery.
The Council also considered using
differential trip limits for open access
sablefish north and south of 36° N. lat.
to control shifts in effort that were seen
in 2007. The Council discussed keeping
weekly and daily limits equal to deter
effort shifts; however, the bimonthly
limit north of 36° N. lat. and the lack of
a bimonthly limit south of 36° N. lat.
will likely cause a shift of some effort
to the south even when daily and
weekly limits are equal. The GMT
reviewed sablefish catch projections
relative to overfished species impacts
and an increase in trip limits can be
accommodated north of 36° N. lat.,
which may reduce incentives for
fishermen to shift their effort south
where there is no bi-monthly limit for
sablefish. Therefore, the Council
recommended, and NMFS is
implementing a sablefish limit strategy
for the open access fishery that
decreases the sablefish DTL limits south
of 36° N. lat. from ‘‘350 lb (159 kg) per
day, or 1 landing per week of up to
1,050 lb (476 kg)’’ to ‘‘300 lb (136 kg)
per day, or 1 landing per week of up to
700 lb (318 kg)’’, and increases the
sablefish DTL limits north of 36° N. lat.
from ‘‘300 lb (136 kg) per day, or 1
landing per week of up to 700 lb (318
kg), not to exceed 2,100 lb (953 kg) per
two months’’ to ‘‘300 lbs (136 kg) per
day, or 1 landing per week up to 800 lbs
(363 kg), not to exceed 2,400 lbs per two
months,’’ beginning January 1, 2008.
Tribal Fishery Management Measures
At their November 2007 meeting, the
Council was informed of unnecessary
discards of lingcod in tribal fisheries as
they reached their lingcod limits in
some sectors of the fishery. Other
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
sectors reduced target opportunities on
associated species to avoid unnecessary
lingcod discards. The tribes proposed to
change lingcod management in 2008 to
avoid unnecessary discards of lingcod.
Rather than maintaining the current trip
limits of 1,000 lb (454 kg) per day and
4,000 lb (1,814 kg) per week in the troll
fishery and 600 lb (272 kg) per day and
1,800 lb (816 kg) per week for all other
sectors, the tribes will manage all tribal
fisheries to stay within an expected total
lingcod catch of 250 mt. The tribes will
continue to manage their fisheries to
stay within the current catch estimates
of canary and yelloweye rockfish
impacts, regardless of any new targeting
strategies for lingcod.
Classification
These actions are taken under the
authority of 50 CFR 660.370(c) and are
exempt from review under Executive
Order 12866.
These actions are authorized by the
Pacific Coast groundfish FMP and its
implementing regulations, and are based
on the most recent data available. The
aggregate data, upon which these
actions are based, are available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Administrator, Northwest Region,
NMFS, (see ADDRESSES) during business
hours.
For the following reasons, NMFS
finds good cause to waive prior public
notice and comment on the revisions to
biennial groundfish management
measures under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)
because notice and comment would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. Also for the same reasons,
NMFS finds good cause to waive the
30–day delay in effectiveness pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) and 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3).
The data upon which these
recommendations were based was
provided to the Council and the Council
made its recommendations at its
November 5–9, 2007, meeting in San
Diego, California. There was not
sufficient time after that meeting to draft
this notice and undergo proposed and
final rulemaking before these actions
need to be in effect. For the actions to
be implemented in this notice, affording
the time necessary for prior notice and
opportunity for public comment would
be impractical and contrary to the
public interest because it would prevent
the Agency from managing fisheries
using the best available science to
approach without exceeding the OYs for
Federally managed species. The
adjustments to management measures in
this document affect commercial and
tribal groundfish fisheries off
Washington, Oregon, and California.
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Changes to cumulative limits for the
remainder of the biennial period in the
limited entry non-whiting trawl fishery
and to the trawl RCA north of 40°10.00′
N. lat. are based on the most recently
available fishery information and must
be implemented by January 1, 2008 to
adequately constrain the projected
bycatch of canary rockfish, a groundfish
species that is currently subject to
rebuilding requirements, and to provide
increased access to fishing in areas with
lower canary rockfish bycatch rates. The
projected bycatch of canary rockfish
must be reduced in order to keep
coastwide fisheries from exceeding that
species rebuilding OY. Shoreward
boundaries of the trawl RCA and
cumulative limit adjustments for
arrowtooth flounder caught with
selective flatfish trawl gear must be
restricted to lower canary rockfish
impacts. Seaward boundaries of the
trawl RCA and cumulative limit
adjustments for the following species
must be liberalized to relieve a
restriction and allow fishing
opportunities in areas where fishing can
occur with relatively lower canary
rockfish impacts: arrowtooth flounder
using large and small footrope trawl
gear; and Dover sole using selective
flatfish trawl gear. Changes to the trawl
RCA to reduce the bycatch of canary
and darkblotched rockfish must be
implemented by January 1, 2008, so that
the total catch of canary and
darkblotched rockfish stays within their
2008 OYs, as defined in the rebuilding
plan for this species. It would be
contrary to the public interest to wait to
implement these RCA revisions until
after public notice and comment,
because making this regulatory change
as soon as possible relieves a regulatory
restriction for fisheries that are
important to coastal communities.
Liberalizing the seaward boundary of
the limited entry trawl RCA between
40°10.00′ N. lat. and 38° N. lat. and
changes to all other cumulative limits in
the non-whiting commercial fisheries
must be implemented in a timely
manner to: reduce a restriction by
allowing fishermen increased
opportunities to harvest available
healthy stocks; reduce complexity of the
cumulative limit structure and provide
year round fishing opportunity;
eliminate targeting of species subject to
rebuilding requirements; reduce
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
unnecessary discards; and reduce
overall catches to keep stocks within
their 2008 OYs. Changes to commercial
cumulative limits for the following
stocks must be implemented in a timely
manner by January 1, 2008: (1) sablefish,
longspine thornyhead, shortspine
thornyhead, Dover sole, Other Flatfish,
petrale sole, arrowtooth flounder,
Pacific ocean perch (POP), chilipepper
rockfish, and minor slope rockfish in
the limited entry trawl fishery; (2)
chilipepper and shortspine thornyheads
in the limited entry fixed gear fishery;
and (3) sablefish in the open access
daily trip limit fishery. Some of these
changes allow fishermen an opportunity
to harvest higher trip limits for stocks
with lower than expected projected
catch, and open some areas seaward of
the trawl RCA south of 40°10.00′ N. lat.
based on availability of incidentally
caught overfished species; therefore, it
would be contrary to the public interest
to fail to increase these limits and open
these areas to reduce the current
restrictions in a timely manner. Some of
these changes implement restrictions for
target species to keep 2008 projected
total mortality for these species within
their 2008 OYs. Changes in cumulative
limits for the following species do not
result in a total reduction or increase in
per-vessel catch, but re-distribute
cumulative limits to provide more stable
year round fishing opportunities: (1)
petrale sole and (2) Other Flatfish taken
with selective flatfish trawl gear in the
limited entry trawl fishery north of
40°10.00′ N. lat.; and, (3) Dover sole in
the limited entry trawl fishery south of
40°10.00′ N. lat. Changes in cumulative
limits for minor slope rockfish and POP
to eliminate targeting opportunities for
darkblotched rockfish and POP must be
implemented as close as possible to
January 1, 2008, so that the total catch
of darkblotched rockfish and POP stay
within their 2008 OYs, as defined in the
rebuilding plans for these species. All of
these cumulative limit changes keep
projected mortality for overfished
species within current estimates.
Changes to lingcod trip limits in the
tribal fishery must be implemented in a
timely manner to: reduce unnecessary
discards; and reduce a restriction by
allowing fishermen in the tribal fishery
increased flexibility in lingcod targeting
opportunities. Changes to tribal lingcod
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71589
cumulative limits are within projected
mortality for overfished species.
It would be contrary to the public
interest to wait to implement these trip
limit changes until after public notice
and comment, because making these
regulatory changes as soon as possible
reduces regulatory restriction for
fisheries that are important to coastal
communities and fishery participants.
For the same reasons, allowing a 30–day
delay in effectiveness would be contrary
to the public interest.
Delaying these changes would keep
management measures in place that are
not based on the best available data,
which could risk fisheries exceeding
OYs, or deny fishermen access to
available harvest. Such delay would
impair achievement of one of the Pacific
Coast Groundfish FMP objectives of
providing for year-round harvest
opportunities or extending fishing
opportunities as long as practicable
during the fishing year.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and
procedure, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 11, 2007.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is amended
as follows:
I
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES
1. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 660.385 paragraph (c) is revised
to read as follows:
I
§ 660.385 Washington coastal tribal
fisheries management measures.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Lingcod. Lingcod taken in the
treaty fisheries are subject to an overall
expected total lingcod catch of 250 mt.
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. Tables 3 (North), 3 (South), 4
(South), 5 (North), and 5 (South) to part
660 subpart G are revised to read as
follows.
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
ER18DE07.015
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
71590
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
71591
ER18DE07.016
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
ER18DE07.017
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
71592
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
71593
ER18DE07.018
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
ER18DE07.019
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
71594
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
71595
ER18DE07.020
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
ER18DE07.021
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
71596
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
71597
ER18DE07.022
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
ER18DE07.023
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
71598
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
71599
ER18DE07.024
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
71600
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
[FR Doc. 07–6077 Filed 12–17–07; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 Dec 17, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
ER18DE07.025
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
BILLING CODE 3510–22–C
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71583-71600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6077]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 060824226 6322 02]
RIN 0648-AW34
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Biennial Specifications and
Management Measures; Inseason Adjustments
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; inseason adjustments to biennial groundfish
management measures; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule announces inseason changes to management
measures in the commercial Pacific Coast groundfish fishery. These
actions, which are authorized by the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
Management Plan (FMP), are intended to allow fisheries to access more
abundant
[[Page 71584]]
groundfish stocks while protecting overfished and depleted stocks.
DATES: Effective 0001 hours (local time) January 1, 2008. Comments on
this final rule must be received no later than 5 p.m., local time on
January 17, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN 0648-AW34 by any
one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal https://www.regulations.gov.
Fax: 206-526-6736, Attn: Gretchen Arentzen
Mail: D. Robert Lohn, Administrator, Northwest Region,
NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115-0070, Attn: Gretchen
Arentzen.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gretchen Arentzen (Northwest Region,
NMFS), phone: 206-526-6147, fax: 206-526-6736 and e-mail
gretchen.arentzen@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
This final rule is accessible via the Internet at the Office of the
Federal Register's Website at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
Background information and documents are available at the Pacific
Fishery Management Council's website at https://www.pcouncil.org/.
Background
The Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP and its implementing regulations
at title 50 in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), part 660, subpart
G, regulate fishing for over 90 species of groundfish off the coasts of
Washington, Oregon, and California. Groundfish specifications and
management measures are developed by the Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council), and are implemented by NMFS. A proposed rule to
implement the 2007-2008 specifications and management measures for the
Pacific Coast groundfish fishery and Amendment 16-4 of the FMP was
published on September 29, 2006 (71 FR 57764). The final rule to
implement the 2007-2008 specifications and management measures for the
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery was published on December 29, 2006 (71
FR 78638). These specifications and management measures were codified
in the CFR (50 CFR part 660, subpart G). The final rule was
subsequently amended on: March 20, 2007 (71 FR 13043); April 18, 2007
(72 FR 19390); July 5, 2007 (72 FR 36617); August 3, 2007 (72 FR
43193); September 18, 2007 (72 FR 53165); and October 4, 2007 (72 FR
56664); and December 4, 2007 (72 FR 68097).
Changes to the biennial groundfish management measures implemented
by this action were recommended by the Council, in consultation with
Pacific Coast Treaty Indian Tribes and the States of Washington,
Oregon, and California, at its November 5-9, 2007, meeting in San
Diego, California. At that meeting, the Council recommended adjusting
the biennial groundfish management measures for December 2007 to
respond to updated fishery information, and these measures were
published in a separate rulemaking on December 4, 2007 (72 FR 68097).
At that same meeting, the Council recommended adjusting the biennial
groundfish management measures for the remainder of the biennial period
to respond to updated fishery information and other inseason management
needs.
The Council recommended the following adjustments beginning January
1, 2008: (1) Setting the trawl Rockfish Conservation Area (RCA)
boundaries such that they take into account recent scientific
information on constraining overfished species bycatch early in the
year; (2) adjusting trip limits for sablefish, longspine thornyheads,
shortspine thornyheads, Dover sole, petrale sole, arrowtooth flounder,
Other Flatfish, minor slope and darkblotched rockfish, Pacific ocean
perch, and chilipepper rockfish in the limited entry trawl fishery; (3)
recombining chilipepper rockfish into a single limited entry fixed gear
cumulative limit for minor shelf, shortbelly and widow rockfish, and
bocaccio between 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. and 34[deg]27.00' N. lat.; (4)
increasing shortspine thornyhead limits in the limited entry fixed gear
fishery south of 34[deg]27.00' N. lat.; (5) setting differential open
access sablefish daily trip limits north of 36[deg] N. lat. and
decreasing the daily trip limits north and south of 36[deg] N. lat.;
(6) removing trip limit requirements for lingcod in the tribal fishery.
NMFS has considered these recommendations, and is implementing them
as described below. Pacific Coast groundfish landings will be monitored
throughout the remainder of the biennial period, and further
adjustments to trip limits or management measures may be made as
necessary to allow achievement of, or to avoid exceeding, optimum
yields (OYs).
Fishery Management Measures for the Limited Entry Non-Whiting Trawl
Fishery
At its November 2007 meeting, the Council reviewed the 2007 limited
entry trawl fisheries by considering: 1) the fishery management
measures initially set for 2007, 2) modifications to management
measures that were needed inseason in 2007 as new data became available
throughout the season, and 3) retrospective total catch pattern data
from the 2007 year-to-date. A noticeable feature of the 2007 fishing
season was that the Council had to, on several occasions, recommend
inseason adjustments to constrain either trip limits or fishing areas
in order to ensure that the total catch for 2007 of overfished species
would stay within their allowable harvest levels for their rebuilding
plans. This practice is in keeping with the Council's rebuilding goals
for overfished species, but is challenging for an industry trying to
predict whether and how much fish will be available for harvest in the
next month of the year. The Council's goal in scrutinizing the 2007
fishery was to develop a set of management measures for the remainder
of the biennial period, for implementation on January 1, 2008, that
would take into account new knowledge gained in 2007 to better
structure the fishery so initial 2008 management measures would
continue to keep total catch of managed species within their optimum
yield levels, and would be conservative enough to reduce the frequency
with which management measure adjustments would be needed inseason.
Trawl management measures for the 2007-2008 biennium were initially
set using fishery data available through the June and September 2006
Council meetings. In late January 2007, NMFS's West Coast Groundfish
Observer Program (WCGOP) released new fishery data that showed that
canary bycatch rates for vessels using selective flatfish bycatch gear
were higher than was shown in the data available for development of
management measures in 2006. The Council's first opportunity to respond
to this new WCGOP data was at its March 2007 meeting, after the 2007
fishery had been underway for
[[Page 71585]]
over two months. In order to take into account estimated canary
rockfish bycatch for the early part of 2007 and to ultimately keep the
2007 and 2008 fisheries from exceeding the canary rockfish OY, the
Council recommended a strict series of area closures and trip limit
revisions for implementation in April 2007 (71 FR 19390, April 18,
2007).
The Council's goal in reviewing 2007 fishery data in preparation
for recommending management measures for January 1, 2008, was to ensure
that management measures in place for the remainder of the biennial
period reflect the best available science and are appropriately
designed to constrain total catch during the year for all species. To
that end, the Council's Groundfish Management Team (GMT) incorporated
additional new data from WCGOP, released in October 2007, and the most
recently available state logbook data on trawl fishing areas. Based on
2007 fishery landed catch information received to date and on WCGOP
data in combination with new logbook data, the GMT recommended that the
Council consider measures to protect canary rockfish in 2008 that
primarily focused on adjustments to the trawl RCA boundaries coastwide.
Incidental catch of canary rockfish is of higher concern in the non-
whiting trawl fishery compared to incidental catch of other overfished
species because they are a shelf species that commonly co-occur with
target species taken with trawl gear. Canary rockfish are the most
constraining of the overfished species, based on incidental catch
projections in the non-whiting trawl fishery. A GMT review of the trip
limits implemented for target species in 2007 found that arrowtooth
flounder was the primary species that needed adjustments to its trip
limits in order to gain savings of canary rockfish bycatch in addition
to the savings that the GMT estimated would be achieved from modifying
the trawl RCA. Upon reviewing this analysis, the Council recommended
reducing the arrowtooth flounder trip limits for selective flatfish
gear in northern waters, and provided an RCA schedule for the remainder
of the biennial period as next described.
The Council also received the most recent Pacific Fishery
Information Network's (PacFIN) and Quota Species Monitoring (QSM) data,
which estimated catch through the end of October, and considered trip
limit adjustments based on the performance of the fishery during the
first 10 months of the biennial period.
Limited Entry Trawl Rockfish Conservation Area
North of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. The Council determined that, in
order to constrain the incidental catch of canary rockfish and to
prevent exceeding the 2008 canary rockfish OY, the limited entry trawl
RCA north of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. should be modified, using a similar
approach to what was ultimately implemented in April 2007 (72 FR 19390,
April 18, 2007). In some areas, the RCA would be expanded to eliminate
fishing opportunity where trawl data shows higher canary rockfish
bycatch rates, shifting fishing effort to depths exhibiting relatively
lower canary rockfish bycatch rates. In some areas, the RCA would be
liberalized to allow effort shifts and targeting opportunities in
depths with relatively lower canary bycatch rates. The Council
considered modification of the shoreward RCA boundaries in areas north
of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. that would close or substantially restrict
areas with the highest bycatch rates, as identified from WCGOP data.
The areas of highest canary rockfish bycatch rates included the area
shoreward of the RCA north of Leadbetter Point (46[deg]38.17' N. lat.)
and the area shoreward of the RCA between Cape Arago (43[deg]20.83' N.
lat.) and Humbug Mountain (42[deg]40.50' N. lat.). The GMT analyzed the
effect of relatively greater restrictions in these areas and, based on
that analysis, recommended closing the shoreward area north of Cape
Alava (48[deg]10.00' N. lat.) in the winter. For the area between Cape
Alava south to Cape Arago where canary rockfish bycatch is relatively
lower, yet where softshell Dungeness crab can occur, the GMT
recommended a combined strategy of 75-fm (137-m) and 60-fm (110-m)
shoreward RCA boundaries throughout the year.
Trawl fishing opportunities seaward of the trawl RCA are primarily
constrained by measures intended to minimize the incidental catch of
darkblotched rockfish. Data from the NMFS trawl survey, logbook data,
and WCGOP data show that various continental slope target species and
darkblotched rockfish are found in shallower depths in the north and
move deeper toward the south. The GMT analyzed the effects of shifting
the seaward boundary of the trawl RCA shoreward to accommodate a shift
in fishing effort from nearshore to offshore waters and recommended
concentrating most fishing effort throughout the year offshore of a
boundary line approximating the 200-fm (366-m) depth contour, with some
seasonal modifications to allow greater access to petrale sole and
Other Flatfish. The Council adopted these recommendations for the
seaward boundary of the RCA to allow increased fishing opportunity in
offshore waters while maintaining RCA protections for darkblotched
rockfish.
Based on the information and analysis described above, the Council
recommended and NMFS is implementing the following changes to the trawl
RCA north of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. for the remainder of the biennial
period: for the area north of Cape Alava, an RCA closure from the
shoreline to the boundary line approximating the 200-fm (366-m) depth
contour, with a winter modification to accommodate petrale sole
fishing, and a summer modification to accommodate greater flatfish
fishing; for the area between Cape Alava and Cape Arago, an RCA closure
from a boundary line approximating the 75-fm (137-fm) depth contour to
a boundary line approximating the 200-fm (366-fm) depth contour, with
modifications in the spring through fall months for the Cape Alava to
the Washington-Oregon border (46[deg]16.00' N. lat.) sub-area to
protect soft-shell crab and allow access to flatfish and slope target
species where canary bycatch is low, and with a winter modification to
accommodate petrale sole fishing; for the area between Cape Arago and
Humbug Mountain, an RCA closure from the shoreline to a boundary line
approximating the 200-fm (366-m) depth contour, with a winter
modification to accommodate petrale sole fishing; and for the area
between Humbug Mountain and 40[deg]10.00' N. lat., an RCA closure from
a boundary line approximating the 75-fm (137-fm) depth contour to a
boundary line approximating the 200-fm (366-fm) depth contour, with a
winter modification to accommodate petrale sole fishing.
South of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. Trawl effort seaward of the trawl
RCA is primarily constrained by incidental catch of darkblotched
rockfish. Incidental catch of darkblotched rockfish between
40[deg]10.00' N. lat. and 38[deg] N. lat. was lower than originally
predicted at the start of the biennial period. The Council determined
that liberalizing the seaward boundary of the trawl RCA during winter
in this area would allow increased targeting opportunities while
keeping darkblotched rockfish within the 2008 OY. This would also
establish a constant seaward boundary of the trawl RCA. Therefore, the
Council recommended and NMFS is implementing an adjustment of the
seaward boundary of the trawl RCA between 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. and
38[deg] N. lat.
[[Page 71586]]
to a boundary line approximating the 150-fm (274-m) depth contour
during winter.
Limited Entry Trawl Trip Limits
North of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. In addition to RCA modifications
north of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat., the Council determined that cumulative
limits in the limited entry trawl fishery should be modified to: Reduce
total impacts and keep canary rockfish within the 2008 OY; provide
increased access to target species in areas with lower canary bycatch
rates; reduce a restriction by allowing fishermen increased
opportunities to harvest available healthy stocks; reduce complexity of
the cumulative limit structure and provide year round fishing
opportunity; eliminate targeting of species subject to rebuilding
requirements; reduce unnecessary discards; and reduce overall catches
to keep stocks within their 2008 OYs.
The Council considered various combinations of cumulative limit
adjustments paired with RCA modifications and area closures to reduce
fishery impacts to canary rockfish. As with the RCA boundary revisions,
the Council's GMT analyzed revisions to trip limits intended to shift
fishing effort away from areas where canary rockfish are more commonly
taken as bycatch. The Council considered and recommended a more
conservative schedule of RCA boundaries, and, when paired with the
reductions that had been made to other target species taken with
selective flatfish trawl gear in April 2007, there were few additional
trip limit reductions necessary to keep the fisheries within the 2008
canary rockfish OY. As a result, the Council recommended reducing
arrowtooth flounder limits taken with selective flatfish trawl gear
north of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. because arrowtooth flounder are a target
species more highly associated with canary rockfish bycatch and
selective flatfish trawl gear is used to target arrowtooth shoreward of
the trawl RCA, where canary rockfish bycatch rates are highest. The
Council also recommended continuing the reduction in sablefish
cumulative limits taken with selective flatfish trawl implemented in
April 2007. Reducing these limits is estimated to reduce impacts on
canary rockfish from status quo management measures.
In April 2007, arrowtooth flounder cumulative limits for all gear
types were combined into a single cumulative limit with Other Flatfish
north of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. to reduce total catch and, in turn,
reduce impacts on canary rockfish. The most recently available catch
data indicate that an unintentional consequence of this combined limit
was that arrowtooth was being discarded for other higher-priced species
in the combined cumulative limit. Therefore, the Council considered
separating these limits to eliminate unnecessary discards, in
conjunction with reducing canary rockfish impacts with gear-specific
reductions in trip limits.
To reduce the negative economic impacts of decreases to arrowtooth
flounder cumulative limits taken with selective flatfish trawl gear
north of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat., the Council recommended increasing
Dover sole cumulative limits taken with selective flatfish trawl gear
in that area. Dover sole are a target species not strongly associated
with incidental catch of canary rockfish. The Council also recommended
increasing arrowtooth flounder cumulative limits taken seaward of the
RCA with large footrope trawl gear north of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. to
provide additional fishing opportunity for these healthy target species
in waters where they are least likely to co-occur with canary rockfish.
In combination with the schedule of RCAs recommended by the Council and
described above, the GMT projected that an increase in the Dover sole
limits using selective flatfish trawl gear could be accommodated in the
nearshore areas that remain open without exceeding the 2008 canary
rockfish OY, and an increase in the arrowtooth flounder cumulative
limit using large and small footrope trawl gear could be accommodated
in offshore areas without exceeding the 2008 darkblotched rockfish OY.
The Council also considered whether decreases in cumulative limits
for petrale sole taken with selective flatfish trawl gear might reduce
fishery impacts on canary rockfish. However, the Council concluded that
the schedule of RCAs described above are adequate to protect the canary
rockfish OY while maintaining the overall catch limits of petrale sole
for the year in the nearshore areas that remain open.
Based on these analyses, the Council recommended and NMFS is
implementing changes in the limited entry trawl flatfish fishery north
of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. for the remainder of the biennial period that
increase arrowtooth flounder trip limits for waters offshore of the
trawl RCA, yet decrease arrowtooth flounder trip limits in the area
shoreward of the trawl RCA and for selective flatfish trawl gear, and
that stabilize Dover sole and Other Flatfish cumulative limits
throughout the year, also with greater Dover sole opportunities
offshore than nearshore, beginning January 1, 2008.
In 2007, landings and total mortality estimates were lower than had
been initially estimated for continental slope species Dover sole,
longspine and shortspine thornyheads, and sablefish (DTS complex
species) taken seaward of the trawl RCA with large and small footrope
trawl gear north of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. and limits for these DTS
species were increased inseason in 2007. Under status quo regulations,
total catch projections for these species are estimated to be below the
2008 OYs. Therefore, the Council developed a strategy for the remainder
of the biennial period to re-distribute catch levels for DTS species
more evenly over the entire period, reducing complexity in the
cumulative limit structure and providing year round fishing
opportunity. As discussed above, the Council recommended a stabilized
trip limit strategy for Dover sole, beginning January 1, 2008. Dover
sole is broadly distributed over a wide range of depths, and associates
both with Other Flatfish species and, in deep water with the other
species in the DTS complex. Consistent with its 2008 strategy for
flatfish, the Council also recommended, and NMFS is implementing, a DTS
complex strategy of stabilizing trip limits throughout the year and
maintaining low status quo trip limits in offshore areas where
overfished species are less likely to be taken, beginning January 1,
2008.
In March 2007, the Council recommended and NMFS implemented a
decrease in the minor slope and darkblotched rockfish combined
cumulative limit north of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. to reduce the impact of
greater effort occurring in offshore areas where darkblotched rockfish
are found, and considered how increased trawl effort seaward of the RCA
would affect the incidental impacts to Pacific ocean perch (POP);
however, inseason adjustments were anticipated to keep POP total catch
well within its 2007 OY of 150 mt (72 FR 19390, April 18 2007). At its
November 2007 meeting, the Council considered continuing the lower
minor slope and darkblotched rockfish limits for the remainder of the
biennial period, since management measures that shift fishing effort
into deeper waters to protect canary rockfish can also increase bycatch
of deepwater overfished species, such as darkblotched and POP. To
prevent vessels from targeting darkblotched rockfish and POP, the
Council recommended and NMFS is implementing a strategy for the
remainder of the biennial period for
[[Page 71587]]
slope rockfish species taken north of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. that,
beginning January 1, 2008, maintains the lower status quo trip limits.
South of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. The Council determined that
cumulative limits in the limited entry trawl fishery south of
40[deg]10.00' N. lat. should be modified to: reduce unnecessary
discards; reduce a restriction by allowing fishermen increased
opportunities to harvest available healthy stocks; and, reduce
complexity of the cumulative limit structure and provide year round
fishing opportunity.
In May 2007, arrowtooth flounder cumulative limits were combined
into a single cumulative limit with Other Flatfish south of
40[deg]10.00' N. lat. to increase targeting flexibility while reducing
total catch. The most recently available catch data indicate that an
unintentional consequence of this combined limit was that arrowtooth
was being discarded for other higher-priced species in the combined
cumulative limit. As in the north, the Council recommended separating
these limits to eliminate unnecessary discards by setting the
cumulative limit for the year as it was set prior to inseason changes
in May 2007.
In addition, the Council considered the strategy of separate
chilipepper rockfish limits for the remainder of the biennial period.
Chilipepper rockfish are an abundant species taken in common with other
rockfish in the southern shelf rockfish complex. Based on the most
recently available WCGOP data, chilipepper rockfish are being regularly
discarded under current trip limits for small footrope trawl gear south
of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. OYs for chilipepper rockfish have not come
close to being achieved in recent years. For example, in the 2005
limited entry trawl and fixed gear fishery, the chilipepper rockfish
landings were 28 mt, less than 3 percent of the 1099 mt chilipepper
rockfish OY. In June 2007, the Council recommended and NMFS implemented
an increase in chilipepper rockfish limits to allow some of this
discard to be retained while keeping limits low enough to prevent
targeting, and a modest increase in monthly limits for small footrope
trawl gear south of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. (72 FR 36617, July 5, 2007).
Catch estimates indicate that targeting did not occur under this higher
limit, and there was little increase in the catch of co-occurring
bocaccio and widow rockfish. At their November 5-9 meeting, the Council
considered increasing chilipepper limits, and catch projections
estimate that less than 54 percent of the 2008 bocaccio OY and less
than 79 percent of the 2008 widow rockfish OY will be obtained for
either bocaccio or widow rockfish by the end of 2008 with these
changes. This means that, even if catch of chilipepper rockfish were to
increase in 2008, and higher than expected bycatch of bocaccio and
widow rockfish occurs, bocaccio and widow rockfish total catch would
still remain within their 2008 OYs.
Therefore, the Council recommended and NMFS is implementing a
fishing strategy for the remainder of the biennial period for both
arrowtooth flounder and chilipepper rockfish for the limited entry
trawl fishery south of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. that separates arrowtooth
flounder from Other Flatfish limits, beginning January 1, 2008 and that
increases the chilipepper rockfish limits using small footrope trawl
gear to 2,000 lb (907 kg) per two months, beginning January 1, 2008.
In 2007, landings and total mortality estimates were lower than had
been estimated preseason for DTS complex species and Other Flatfish
south of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. and limits for these species were
increased inseason. If the limits for DTS complex species were
maintained for early 2008, total catch projections were estimated to be
below the 2008 OYs for these species. In addition, status quo
cumulative limits for DTS complex species and Other Flatfish would ramp
up throughout the year, providing less fishing opportunity early in the
year. Therefore, the Council recommended and NMFS is implementing a
strategy for DTS complex species and Other Flatfish taken with trawl
gear south of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. to stabilize tip limit levels for
these species throughout the year, with lower limits for sablefish in
winter months, beginning January 1, 2008.
At its March 2007 meeting, the Council received preliminary
landings data indicating higher than expected petrale sole catch
through February and recommended reducing summer petrale sole trip
limits coastwide to keep total catch within the 2007 petrale sole OY.
At its November 2007 meeting, the Council considered the most recent
fishery data and performance of the 2007 fishery and did not recommend
this strategy for the remainder of the biennial period. Instead, the
Council recommended and NMFS is implementing petrale sole trip limits
south of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. equivalent to the levels established at
the beginning of the biennial period and continuing the status quo
strategy of providing greater petrale sole fishing limits in the
offshore areas in winter months, when overfished species bycatch is
lowest.
Trip limits for minor slope and darkblotched rockfish south of
38[deg] N. lat. were increased inseason in 2007 after the Council
considered data at their September meeting indicating that only 16
percent (286 mt out of 1,786 mt) of the 2007 minor slope rockfish OY
south of 38[deg] N. lat. was expected to be taken through the end of
2007. At their November 2007 meeting, the Council considered the most
recent fishery data and performance of the 2007 fishery and recommended
continuing higher trip limits and stabilizing limits for minor slope
and darkblotched rockfish for the remainder of the biennial period to
allow fishermen to access available healthy stocks while keeping catch
of overfished and depleted species within 2008 OYs. Darkblotched
rockfish and POP are overfished slope species within this complex;
however, these species are much less abundant south of 38[deg] N. lat.
Yelloweye rockfish, impacts to which are of concern in hook-and-line
fisheries like the California recreational fishery, are rarely taken in
trawl fisheries. Therefore, the Council recommended and NMFS is
implementing a strategy that stabilizes the combined cumulative limit
for minor slope and darkblotched rockfish south of 38[deg] N. lat. at
55,000 lb (24,948 kg) for the remainder of the biennial period.
Limited Entry Fixed Gear Trip Limits South of 40[deg]10.00' N. Lat.
As described in the section above (Limited Entry Trawl Trip Limits
South of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat.), chilipepper rockfish are an abundant
species taken in common with other rockfish in the southern shelf
rockfish complex. Chilipepper rockfish taken in the limited entry fixed
gear fishery south of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. were removed from the
combined cumulative limit for minor shelf rockfish, shortbelly and
widow rockfish at the beginning of the 2005 fishing season to allow
increased targeting opportunities. In June 2007, the Council received a
request to recombine chilipepper rockfish into the combined cumulative
limit to allow increased targeting opportunities and reduced discards.
The Council had concerns, however, with the impacts to overfished
species that might occur from combining chilipepper rockfish cumulative
limits into a single cumulative limit with minor shelf rockfish,
bocaccio and widow rockfish, since the high abundance of chilipepper
rockfish would result in a combined limit too high to be supported by
less abundant species in the complex. At their November 2007 meeting,
the Council discussed recombining chilipepper rockfish into a single
[[Page 71588]]
combined cumulative limit, but with a sub-limit for all species other
than chilipepper rockfish, to constrain catch of overfished species in
the combined limit but allow additional opportunity for chilipepper
rockfish. Therefore, the Council recommended and NMFS is implementing
the following trip limit changes for the limited entry fixed gear
fishery between 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. and 34[deg]27.00' N. lat.: modify
the chilipepper rockfish limit of 2,000 lb (907 kg) per two months by
recombining it into a single combined cumulative limit with minor shelf
rockfish, shortbelly, widow rockfish and bocaccio, and increase the
trip limit from 500 lb (267 kg) per two months to ``2,500 lb (1,134 kg)
per two months of which no more than 500 lb (267 kg) per two months may
be any species other than chilipepper rockfish,'' beginning January 1,
2008.
In June 2007, the Council recommended a short term increase in
shortspine thornyhead cumulative limits south of 34[deg]27.00' N. lat.
during Period 4 (July 1 through August 31). The Council had considered
whether increases in effort in this area could result in higher
incidental catches of sablefish and other species; however, estimates
at that time showed that sablefish catches in this area were actually
lower than had been estimated preseason for 2007. In September 2007,
the most recent catch data indicated that the Period 4 increases in the
shortspine thornyhead cumulative limit did not result in a large effort
shift, and only slightly increased the catch rate in this area.
Therefore, the Council recommended continuing the Period 4 increases to
the shortspine thornyhead cumulative limit south of 34[deg]27.00' N.
lat. through the end of 2007. At the November 2007 Council meeting, the
GMT recommended continuing the higher limit for the remainder of the
biennial period because a change in behavior relative to the 2007
fishing season is not expected. Therefore, the Council recommended, and
NMFS is implementing the following changes for the limited entry fixed
gear fishery south of 34[deg]27.00' N. lat.: increase the shortspine
thornyhead limits from 2,000 lb (907 kg) per 2 months to 3,000 lb
(1,361 kg) per 2 months, beginning January 1, 2008.
Open Access Fishery Management Measures
At their June 2007 meeting, the Council recommended and NMFS
implemented an increase in the daily and weekly limits in the open
access sablefish daily trip limit (DTL) fishery south of 36[deg] N.
lat. on August 1. The most recent catch information indicates that
there have been increased sablefish landings in this area in 2007. In
November 2007, the GMT compared current trip limits with historical
catches and trip limits. An analysis of 2003 through 2006 catch
information indicates that increased effort and increased per-vessel
catch have been responsible for the increased landings of sablefish in
this area, in particular after the August 1, 2007, increases in daily
and weekly trip limits. If catch rates seen during 2007 were to
continue for the remainder of the biennial period, the 2008 sablefish
OY could be exceeded. The Council considered decreasing the weekly
limits to 800 lb (363 kg) and implementing a two month cumulative limit
of 2,400 lb (1,089 kg) per two months to keep catch projections within
the 2008 sablefish OY; however, industry testimony stated that
introducing a two month cumulative limit would force many long-time
fishermen out of this fishery.
The Council also considered using differential trip limits for open
access sablefish north and south of 36[deg] N. lat. to control shifts
in effort that were seen in 2007. The Council discussed keeping weekly
and daily limits equal to deter effort shifts; however, the bimonthly
limit north of 36[deg] N. lat. and the lack of a bimonthly limit south
of 36[deg] N. lat. will likely cause a shift of some effort to the
south even when daily and weekly limits are equal. The GMT reviewed
sablefish catch projections relative to overfished species impacts and
an increase in trip limits can be accommodated north of 36[deg] N.
lat., which may reduce incentives for fishermen to shift their effort
south where there is no bi-monthly limit for sablefish. Therefore, the
Council recommended, and NMFS is implementing a sablefish limit
strategy for the open access fishery that decreases the sablefish DTL
limits south of 36[deg] N. lat. from ``350 lb (159 kg) per day, or 1
landing per week of up to 1,050 lb (476 kg)'' to ``300 lb (136 kg) per
day, or 1 landing per week of up to 700 lb (318 kg)'', and increases
the sablefish DTL limits north of 36[deg] N. lat. from ``300 lb (136
kg) per day, or 1 landing per week of up to 700 lb (318 kg), not to
exceed 2,100 lb (953 kg) per two months'' to ``300 lbs (136 kg) per
day, or 1 landing per week up to 800 lbs (363 kg), not to exceed 2,400
lbs per two months,'' beginning January 1, 2008.
Tribal Fishery Management Measures
At their November 2007 meeting, the Council was informed of
unnecessary discards of lingcod in tribal fisheries as they reached
their lingcod limits in some sectors of the fishery. Other sectors
reduced target opportunities on associated species to avoid unnecessary
lingcod discards. The tribes proposed to change lingcod management in
2008 to avoid unnecessary discards of lingcod. Rather than maintaining
the current trip limits of 1,000 lb (454 kg) per day and 4,000 lb
(1,814 kg) per week in the troll fishery and 600 lb (272 kg) per day
and 1,800 lb (816 kg) per week for all other sectors, the tribes will
manage all tribal fisheries to stay within an expected total lingcod
catch of 250 mt. The tribes will continue to manage their fisheries to
stay within the current catch estimates of canary and yelloweye
rockfish impacts, regardless of any new targeting strategies for
lingcod.
Classification
These actions are taken under the authority of 50 CFR 660.370(c)
and are exempt from review under Executive Order 12866.
These actions are authorized by the Pacific Coast groundfish FMP
and its implementing regulations, and are based on the most recent data
available. The aggregate data, upon which these actions are based, are
available for public inspection at the Office of the Administrator,
Northwest Region, NMFS, (see ADDRESSES) during business hours.
For the following reasons, NMFS finds good cause to waive prior
public notice and comment on the revisions to biennial groundfish
management measures under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) because notice and
comment would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest.
Also for the same reasons, NMFS finds good cause to waive the 30-day
delay in effectiveness pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) and 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3).
The data upon which these recommendations were based was provided
to the Council and the Council made its recommendations at its November
5-9, 2007, meeting in San Diego, California. There was not sufficient
time after that meeting to draft this notice and undergo proposed and
final rulemaking before these actions need to be in effect. For the
actions to be implemented in this notice, affording the time necessary
for prior notice and opportunity for public comment would be
impractical and contrary to the public interest because it would
prevent the Agency from managing fisheries using the best available
science to approach without exceeding the OYs for Federally managed
species. The adjustments to management measures in this document affect
commercial and tribal groundfish fisheries off Washington, Oregon, and
California.
[[Page 71589]]
Changes to cumulative limits for the remainder of the biennial
period in the limited entry non-whiting trawl fishery and to the trawl
RCA north of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. are based on the most recently
available fishery information and must be implemented by January 1,
2008 to adequately constrain the projected bycatch of canary rockfish,
a groundfish species that is currently subject to rebuilding
requirements, and to provide increased access to fishing in areas with
lower canary rockfish bycatch rates. The projected bycatch of canary
rockfish must be reduced in order to keep coastwide fisheries from
exceeding that species rebuilding OY. Shoreward boundaries of the trawl
RCA and cumulative limit adjustments for arrowtooth flounder caught
with selective flatfish trawl gear must be restricted to lower canary
rockfish impacts. Seaward boundaries of the trawl RCA and cumulative
limit adjustments for the following species must be liberalized to
relieve a restriction and allow fishing opportunities in areas where
fishing can occur with relatively lower canary rockfish impacts:
arrowtooth flounder using large and small footrope trawl gear; and
Dover sole using selective flatfish trawl gear. Changes to the trawl
RCA to reduce the bycatch of canary and darkblotched rockfish must be
implemented by January 1, 2008, so that the total catch of canary and
darkblotched rockfish stays within their 2008 OYs, as defined in the
rebuilding plan for this species. It would be contrary to the public
interest to wait to implement these RCA revisions until after public
notice and comment, because making this regulatory change as soon as
possible relieves a regulatory restriction for fisheries that are
important to coastal communities.
Liberalizing the seaward boundary of the limited entry trawl RCA
between 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. and 38[deg] N. lat. and changes to all
other cumulative limits in the non-whiting commercial fisheries must be
implemented in a timely manner to: reduce a restriction by allowing
fishermen increased opportunities to harvest available healthy stocks;
reduce complexity of the cumulative limit structure and provide year
round fishing opportunity; eliminate targeting of species subject to
rebuilding requirements; reduce unnecessary discards; and reduce
overall catches to keep stocks within their 2008 OYs. Changes to
commercial cumulative limits for the following stocks must be
implemented in a timely manner by January 1, 2008: (1) sablefish,
longspine thornyhead, shortspine thornyhead, Dover sole, Other
Flatfish, petrale sole, arrowtooth flounder, Pacific ocean perch (POP),
chilipepper rockfish, and minor slope rockfish in the limited entry
trawl fishery; (2) chilipepper and shortspine thornyheads in the
limited entry fixed gear fishery; and (3) sablefish in the open access
daily trip limit fishery. Some of these changes allow fishermen an
opportunity to harvest higher trip limits for stocks with lower than
expected projected catch, and open some areas seaward of the trawl RCA
south of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. based on availability of incidentally
caught overfished species; therefore, it would be contrary to the
public interest to fail to increase these limits and open these areas
to reduce the current restrictions in a timely manner. Some of these
changes implement restrictions for target species to keep 2008
projected total mortality for these species within their 2008 OYs.
Changes in cumulative limits for the following species do not result in
a total reduction or increase in per-vessel catch, but re-distribute
cumulative limits to provide more stable year round fishing
opportunities: (1) petrale sole and (2) Other Flatfish taken with
selective flatfish trawl gear in the limited entry trawl fishery north
of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat.; and, (3) Dover sole in the limited entry
trawl fishery south of 40[deg]10.00' N. lat. Changes in cumulative
limits for minor slope rockfish and POP to eliminate targeting
opportunities for darkblotched rockfish and POP must be implemented as
close as possible to January 1, 2008, so that the total catch of
darkblotched rockfish and POP stay within their 2008 OYs, as defined in
the rebuilding plans for these species. All of these cumulative limit
changes keep projected mortality for overfished species within current
estimates.
Changes to lingcod trip limits in the tribal fishery must be
implemented in a timely manner to: reduce unnecessary discards; and
reduce a restriction by allowing fishermen in the tribal fishery
increased flexibility in lingcod targeting opportunities. Changes to
tribal lingcod cumulative limits are within projected mortality for
overfished species.
It would be contrary to the public interest to wait to implement
these trip limit changes until after public notice and comment, because
making these regulatory changes as soon as possible reduces regulatory
restriction for fisheries that are important to coastal communities and
fishery participants. For the same reasons, allowing a 30-day delay in
effectiveness would be contrary to the public interest.
Delaying these changes would keep management measures in place that
are not based on the best available data, which could risk fisheries
exceeding OYs, or deny fishermen access to available harvest. Such
delay would impair achievement of one of the Pacific Coast Groundfish
FMP objectives of providing for year-round harvest opportunities or
extending fishing opportunities as long as practicable during the
fishing year.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and procedure, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 11, 2007.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is amended as
follows:
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 660.385 paragraph (c) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 660.385 Washington coastal tribal fisheries management measures.
* * * * *
(c) Lingcod. Lingcod taken in the treaty fisheries are subject to
an overall expected total lingcod catch of 250 mt.
* * * * *
0
3. Tables 3 (North), 3 (South), 4 (South), 5 (North), and 5 (South) to
part 660 subpart G are revised to read as follows.
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
[[Page 71590]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18DE07.015
[[Page 71591]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18DE07.016
[[Page 71592]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18DE07.017
[[Page 71593]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18DE07.018
[[Page 71594]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18DE07.019
[[Page 71595]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18DE07.020
[[Page 71596]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18DE07.021
[[Page 71597]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18DE07.022
[[Page 71598]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18DE07.023
[[Page 71599]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18DE07.024
[[Page 71600]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18DE07.025
[FR Doc. 07-6077 Filed 12-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-C