Conservation Innovation Grants Fiscal Year 2008 Announcement of Program Funding; Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 10.912, 71345-71354 [E7-24411]
Download as PDF
71345
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 241
Monday, December 17, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
December 11, 2007.
The Department of Agriculture has
submitted the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology should be addressed to: Desk
Officer for Agriculture, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), OIRA_Submission@
OMB.EOP.GOV or fax (202) 395–5806
and to Departmental Clearance Office,
USDA, OCIO, Mail Stop 7602,
Washington, DC 20250–7602.
Comments regarding these information
collections are best assured of having
their full effect if received within 30
days of this notification. Copies of the
submission(s) may be obtained by
calling (202) 720–8681.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Grain Inspection, Packers & Stockyards
Administration
Title: Report and Recordkeeping
Requirements.
OMB Control Number: 0580–0013.
Summary of Collection: The Grain
Inspection, Packers and Stockyards
Administration (GIPSA) is mandated to
provide, upon request, inspection,
certification, and identification services
related to assessing the class, quality,
quantity, and condition of agricultural
products shipped or received in
interstate and foreign commerce.
Applicants requesting GIPSA services
must specify the kind and level of
service desired, the identification of the
product, the location, the amount, and
other pertinent information in order that
official personnel can efficiently
respond to their needs.
Need and Use of the Information:
GIPSA employees use the information to
guide them in the performance of their
duties. Additionally, producers, elevator
operators, and/or merchandisers who
obtain official inspection, testing, and
weighing services are required to keep
records related to the grain or
commodity for three years. Personnel
who provide official inspection, testing,
and weighing services are required to
maintain records related to the lot of
grain or related commodity for a period
of five years. The information is used for
the purpose of investigating suspected
violations.
Description of Respondents: Business
or other for-profit; Federal Government;
State, Local or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 8,754.
Frequency of Responses:
Recordkeeping; Reporting: On occasion,
Weekly, Monthly, Semi-annually,
Annually.
Total Burden Hours: 164,393.
Charlene Parker,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–24356 Filed 12–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
Conservation Innovation Grants Fiscal
Year 2008 Announcement of Program
Funding; Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 10.912
Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS),
Commodity Credit Corporation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NRCS requests applications
for Conservation Innovation Grants
(CIG) to stimulate the development and
adoption of innovative conservation
approaches and technologies.
Applications are accepted from all 50
States, the Caribbean Area (Puerto Rico
and the Virgin Islands), and the Pacific
Basin Area (Guam, American Samoa,
and the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands). NRCS anticipates that
the amount available for support of this
program in FY 2008 will be
approximately $20 million. Funds will
be awarded through a nationwide
competitive grants process. There are
three CIG categories available in FY
2008: Natural Resource Concerns
Category, Technology Category, and the
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Category.
Applications are requested from eligible
government or non-government
organizations or individuals for
competitive consideration of grant
awards for projects between one and
three years in duration. This notice
identifies the objectives for CIG projects,
the eligibility criteria for projects and
associated instructions needed to apply
to CIG.
DATES: Applications must be received in
the NRCS National Headquarters by 5
p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST), on
Wednesday, February 20, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The address for handdelivered applications or applications
submitted using express mail or
overnight courier service is: USDA
Natural Resources Conservation Service;
Conservation Innovation Grants
Program; Financial Assistance Programs
Division, Room 5239-S; 1400
Independence Ave, SW.; Washington,
DC 20250. Contact phone numbers for
hand-delivered applications are (202)
720–1845, (202) 720–2335, or (202) 205–
1165.
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
71346
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Notices
Applications sent via the U.S. Postal
Service must be sent to the following
address: USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service; Conservation
Innovation Grants Program; Financial
Assistance Programs Division; Room
5239-S, Post Office Box 2890,
Washington, DC 20013–2890.
Tessa Chadwick, CIG National Program Manager, USDA NRCS, PO
Box 2890, Room 5239–S, Washington, DC 20013–2890.
Phone: (202) 720–2335 ............................................................................
Fax: (202) 720–4265 ................................................................................
e-mail: tessa.chadwick@wdc.usda.gov. ...................................................
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
PART I—Funding Opportunity Description
A. Legislative Authority
B. Overview
C. Innovative Conservation Projects or
Activities
D. CIG Categories
1. Natural Resource Concerns
2. Chesapeake Bay Watershed
3. Technology
PART II—Funding Availability
A. National Component
B. State Component
PART III—Eligibility Information
A. Matching Funds
B. Beginning and Limited Resource
Farmers and Ranchers, and Indian Tribes
C. EQIP Payment Limitation and Duplicate
Payments
D. Project Eligibility
PART IV—Application and Submission
Information
A. How To Obtain Application Materials
B. Application Content and Format
C. How To Submit a Written Application
D. How To Submit an Application
Electronically
E. Application Due Date
F. Acknowledgement of Submission
G. Funding Restrictions
H. Patents and Inventions
I. Withdrawal of Applications
PART V—Application Review
A. Application Review and Selection
Process
B. Criteria for Application Evaluation
C. Anticipated Announcement and Award
Dates
PART VI—Award Information and
Administration
A. Award Notification
B. Grant Agreement
C. Reporting Requirements
PART VII—Agency Contacts
PART VIII—Other Information
A. FY 2008 Application Checklist
B. NRCS State Conservationists
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Legislative Authority
CIG was authorized as part of the
Environmental Quality Incentives
Program (EQIP) [16 U.S.C. 3839aa-8]
under Section 1240H of the Food
Security Act of 1985, as added by
Section 2301 of the Farm Security and
Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Pub. L.
107–171). The Secretary of Agriculture
delegated the authority for the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
Shani Harmon, CIG Program Assistant, USDA NRCS, PO Box 2890,
Room 5239–S, Washington, DC 20013–2890.
Phone: (202) 205–1165.
Fax: (202) 720–4265.
e-mail: shani.harmon@wdc.usda.gov.
administration of EQIP and CIG to the
Chief of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), who is a
Vice President of the Commodity Credit
Corporation (CCC). EQIP is
administered by NRCS under the
authorities of the CCC.
B. Overview
The purpose of CIG is to stimulate the
development and adoption of
innovative conservation approaches and
technologies while leveraging the
Federal investment in environmental
enhancement and protection, in
conjunction with agricultural
production. CIG projects are expected to
lead to the transfer of conservation
technologies, management systems, and
innovative approaches (such as marketbased systems) into NRCS technical
manuals, guides, and references, or to
the private sector. CIG does not fund
research projects. Instead, it is a vehicle
to stimulate the development and
adoption of conservation approaches or
technologies that have been studied
sufficiently to indicate a likelihood of
success and to be candidates for
eventual technology transfer or
institutionalization. CIG funds projects
targeting innovative on-the-ground
conservation, including pilot projects
and field demonstrations.
NRCS will accept applications for
single or multi-year projects, not to
exceed three years, submitted to NRCS
from eligible entities, including
federally-recognized Indian Tribes, State
and local governments, and nongovernmental organizations and
individuals. Applications are accepted
from all 50 States, the Caribbean Area
(Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands),
and the Pacific Basin Area (Guam,
American Samoa, and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands).
Complete applications will be
evaluated by a technical peer review
panel and scored based on the Criteria
for Application Evaluation identified in
this document. There are eight review
groups for FY 2008 applications: Water
Quality-Livestock; Water Quality-Not
Livestock; Water Quantity; Soils;
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
To submit your application
electronically, visit www.grants.gov/
apply and follow the instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sfmt 4703
Atmospheric; Grazing Land and Forest
Health; Wildlife; and Energy.
Applicants will indicate which of these
review groups should review the
application. Scored applications will be
forwarded to a Grants Review Board.
The Grants Review Board will make
recommendations for project approval
to the Chief. Final award selections will
be made by the Chief of NRCS.
C. Innovative Conservation Projects or
Activities
For the purposes of CIG, the proposed
innovative project or activity must
encompass the development and field
testing, evaluation, and implementation
of:
• Conservation adoption incentive
systems, including market-based
systems; or,
• Promising conservation
technologies, practices, systems,
procedures, or approaches.
To be given priority consideration, the
innovative project or activity:
• Will have been studied sufficiently
to indicate a good probability for
success;
• Demonstrates, tests, evaluates, and
verifies environmental (soil, water, air,
plants, and animal) effectiveness,
utility, affordability, and usability in the
field;
• Adapts conservation technologies,
practices, systems, procedures,
approaches, and incentive systems to
improve performance, and encourage
adoption;
• Introduces conservation systems,
approaches, and procedures from
another geographic area or agricultural
sector; and
• Adapts conservation technology,
management, or incentive systems to
improve performance.
D. CIG Categories
For Fiscal Year 2008, three categories
of CIG will be offered. Applicants will
need to identify which of the 3
categories applies to their proposed
project.
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Notices
1. National Natural Resource Concerns
Category
Applications must demonstrate the
use of innovative technologies or
approaches, or both, to address a natural
resource concern or concerns. The five
natural resource concerns for possible
funding through Conservation
Innovation Grants for fiscal year 2008
are: Water Resources; Soil Resources;
Atmospheric Resources; Grazing Land
and Forest Health; and Wildlife Habitat.
This Category also includes applications
that focus on Market Based Approaches
to address any or all of these five
resource concern areas.
A. Water Resources
The objective of this natural resource
concern is to implement new
technologies and/or approaches to
maintain, restore, or enhance water
quality and/or quantity in watersheds
with predominantly agricultural land
uses while sustaining productivity.
Subtopics include:
• Nutrient, pesticide, and/or
pathogen transport to surface water and
groundwater;
• Sediment transport to surface water;
• Aquifer recharge/maintenance of
groundwater supplies;
• Increased water supplies/
availability through alternative
treatment; enhanced automation,
monitoring or scheduling; reduced
system losses; or reuse strategies; and
• Technologies scalable to small
farms to maintain, restore, or enhance
water quality and/or quantity.
B. Soil Resources
The objective of this conservation
concern is to implement new
technologies and/or approaches to
maintain, restore, or enhance soil
resources associated with agricultural
and forest land uses while sustaining
productivity. Subtopics include:
• Erosion reduction;
• Accumulation of harmful levels of
constituents in soils, including
nutrients, metals, or salts; and
• Improvement to soil quality and
productivity.
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
C. Atmospheric Resources
The objective of this conservation
concern is to implement new
technologies and/or approaches to
maintain, restore, or enhance air quality
and atmospheric resources through
agricultural and forestry practices while
sustaining productivity. Subtopics
include:
• Agricultural emissions of
particulates, odors, volatile organic
compounds, and greenhouse gases;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
• Carbon sequestration in soil and
through other mechanisms;
• Bio-based energy opportunities; and
• Identification and quantification of
management practices for air quality
and atmospheric change concerns at
animal operations.
D. Grazing Land and Forest Health
The objective of this conservation
concern is to implement new
technologies and/or approaches to
maintain, restore, or enhance grazing
land and forest health while sustaining
productivity. Subtopics include:
• Invasive species management on
grazing and forest land;
• Effects of pests, diseases, and
fragmentation on forest and grazing land
quality/health;
• Systems or practices to minimize
overgrazing and restore lands suffering
effects of overgrazing;
• Low-input approaches to increasing
forage production;
• Alternative grasses or forages for
livestock; and
• Systems or practices that integrate
trees-forage-livestock (i.e., silvopasture).
E. Wildlife Habitat
The objective of this conservation
concern is to implement new
technologies and/or approaches for
environmentally sound wildlife habitat
management while sustaining
agricultural productivity. Possible
subtopics include:
• Riparian area management and
restoration;
• Invasive species management;
• Pollinator protection
• Biodiversity; and,
• Wetland function and health.
F. Market-Based Approaches
The objective of this approach is to
develop, implement, and or evaluate
processes, technology tools,
institutional arrangements, or systems
that are ‘market-based’ in nature and
address one of the above priority
resource concerns. Possible subtopics
include:
• Development and application of
technology tools that measure
environmental services (i.e. benefits) in
order to document credits for trading;
• Greenhouse gas accounting tools
and registries;
• Water quality improvement
accounting tools;
• Nutrient trading and/or accounting
tools;
• Demonstration of ecosystem-based
services that facilitate conservation
implementation; and
• Processes and institutional
arrangements that develop, demonstrate,
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71347
evaluate, and clarify successful
approaches to market-based
conservation involving private working
lands.
2. Chesapeake Bay Watershed Category
Applications for the Chesapeake Bay
Watershed Category are being accepted
and reviewed by the National Fish and
Wildlife Foundation. Information for
submitting an application for this
category of CIG funding can be accessed
at the following link https://
www.nfwf.org.
3. National Technology Category
Applications must address one or
more of the following specific
technology needs areas identified by
NRCS:
A. Improved On-Farm Energy
Efficiency—Possible Subtopics Include
• Renewable energy sources such as
wind or solar;
• Methane recovery;
• Other innovative farm management
or production technologies;
• Automated self energy audit
technology;
• Energy audit worksheets; and
• Compilation of on-farm energy
audits and audit processes.
B. Water Management (Both Drainage
Water and Irrigation Water) Drainage
Water Management—Possible Subtopics
Include
• Implementation of drainage water
management systems in small
watersheds and application of tools to
assess multiple effects (e.g., economic,
wildlife habitat, soil quality, air quality,
wetlands and water quality) at
watershed scale;
• Achieving downstream nutrient
reduction benefits through management
of surface or sub-surface drainage
systems;
• Improving water/nutrient
accounting/budgeting;
• Improving design and management
of drainage water management systems
to improve benefits to producers and to
the environment;
• Improving the ability of buffers to
reduce nutrient loadings in tile drained
landscapes; and
• Improving wetland creation,
restoration, and enhancement to reduce
nutrient loadings.
Irrigation Water Management—Possible
Subtopics Include
• New engineering software or
modeling systems that would automate,
demonstrate, and facilitate technically
sound conservation decisions by the
public pertaining to resource
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
71348
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Notices
assessment, conservation planning, and
conservation system installation and
evaluation;
• Irrigation management for water
conservation;
• Achieving multiple benefits (e.g.,
economic, enhanced crop production,
recreation, wildlife habitat, soil quality,
wetlands and water quality) through
area-wide or regional irrigation water
management, scheduled application,
and supply or application of new or
innovative technology; and
• Achieving nutrient or pollutant
reduction benefits in downstream
receiving waters through area-wide or
regional irrigation water management,
scheduled application, and supply or
application of new or innovative
technology.
forwarded will be notified in writing,
and provided with a contact for State
Component information. Funding
availability and application and
submission information for state
competitions will be announced
through public notices (and on State
NRCS Web sites) separately from this
national notice. State Conservationists
will determine the funding level for
state competitions, with individual
grants not to exceed $75,000.
III. Eligibility Information
CIG applicants must be a federallyrecognized Indian Tribe; State or local
unit of government; non-governmental
organization; private business; or
individual.
A. Matching Funds
Selected applicants may receive
grants of up to 50 percent of the total
A. National Component
project cost. Applicants must provide
NRCS anticipates that the amount
non-Federal funding (matching funds)
available for support of this program in
for at least 50 percent of the project cost.
FY 2008 will be approximately $20
Up to half of the applicant’s matching
million. The anticipated funding
funds (up to 25 percent of the total
breakdown for each category is:
project cost) may be from in-kind
• National Natural Resource Concerns contributions.
Category: Up to $10 million;
B. Beginning and Limited Resource
• Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Farmers and Ranchers, and Indian
Category: Up to $5 million;
Tribes
• National Technology Category: Up
to $5 million.
Information regarding the definitions
for Limited Resource or Beginning
Funds will be awarded through a
Farmers and Ranchers can be found in
nationwide competitive grants process.
the EQIP Final Rule, Federal Register,
Funds not used in one category may be
shifted to another category by the Chief. Vol. 68, No.104, Section 1466.3,
Definitions. For the FY 2008 grant
The maximum award amount for any
award process, up to 10 percent of the
project will not exceed $1 million. CIG
total funds available for CIG may be setwill fund single- and multi-year
aside for applications from Beginning
projects, not to exceed three years.
and Limited Resource Farmers and
The available funding for the three
Ranchers, Indian Tribes, or communitynational categories is anticipated to
based organizations comprised of or
fund approximately 50 to 60 awards
representing these entities. To compete
based on previous years’ experience in
administering CIG. The anticipated start for these set-aside funds, the applicant
must make a declaration in the
date for awarded projects is September
application as described in Part IV B.5.
1, 2008.
of this notice. Applications that are
B. State Component
unsuccessful in the set-aside
The intent of the State Component is
competition will be placed
to provide flexibility to NRCS State
automatically in the general application
Conservationists to target CIG funds to
pool for consideration. Funds not used
individual producers and smaller
in the set-aside pool will revert back
organizations that may possess
into the general funding pool.
In addition, an exception regarding
promising innovations, but may not
matching funds is made for projects
compete well on the larger scale of the
funded out of the set-aside. Up to three
national grants competition. For FY
fourths of the required matching funds
2008, the State Component of CIG will
for such projects (up to 37.5 percent of
be available in select states at the
the total project cost) may derive from
discretion of the State Conservationist.
Project applications that request federal in-kind contributions. This exception is
intended to help Beginning and Limited
funds of $75,000 or less and are not
multi-state in scope will be forwarded to Resource Farmers or Ranchers and
the appropriate state program manager if Indian Tribes meet the statutory
requirements for receiving a
that state is participating in the State
Conservation Innovation Grant.
Component. All applications that are
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
II. Funding Availability
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
C. EQIP Payment Limitation and
Duplicate Payments
Section 1240G of the Food Security
Act of 1985 (as amended by the Farm
Security and Rural Investment Act of
2002), 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–7, imposes a
$450,000 limitation for all cost-share or
incentive payments disbursed to
individuals or entities under an EQIP
contract between 2002 and 2008. The
limitation applies to CIG in the
following manner:
a. CIG funds are awarded through
grant agreements; these grant
agreements are not EQIP contracts.
Thus, CIG awards in and of themselves
are not limited by the payment
limitation.
b. Direct or indirect payments made to
an individual or entity using funds from
a CIG award to carry out structural,
vegetative, or management practices
count toward each individual’s or
entity’s EQIP payment limitation.
Through project progress reports, CIG
grantees are responsible for certifying
that producers involved in CIG projects
do not exceed the payment limitation.
Further, all direct and indirect
payments made to producers using CIG
funds must be reported to the NRCS CIG
program manager in the semi-annual
report. Direct or indirect payments can
not be made for a practice for which the
producer has already received funds, or
is contracted to receive funds, through
any of the USDA Programs (EQIP, AMA,
CSP, WHIP, etc.) since this would be
considered a duplicate payment.
Payment Limitation Examples
Following are two examples of how
the $450,000 EQIP payment limitation
applies to CIG projects:
a. A $500,000 CIG grant is awarded to
a State environmental agency to
demonstrate an innovative, marketbased, water quality trading program.
The money is used to finance the
development of a market infrastructure,
and none of the funds are used to
implement structural, vegetative, or
management practices. Producers in the
trading market demonstration area may
indirectly benefit from their eventual
participation in the market, but there is
no direct or indirect transfer payment of
CIG dollars. If, on the other hand, part
of the CIG award were used to make
payments to producers who implement
conservation practices on their land as
part of a trading program, those
payments would count toward each
producer’s $450,000 EQIP payment
limitation.
b. A $1,000,000 CIG grant is awarded
to a Conservation District to pilot a
community-based animal waste
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Notices
treatment technology innovation. EQIPeligible producers in the area transport
their animal waste to a central treatment
location. Because producers are not
directly or indirectly receiving CIG
funds, the payment limitation does not
apply. If, however, the producers were
paid for their waste, or for transporting
their waste to the central treatment
location using CIG funds, the payments
would be subject to each producer’s
EQIP payment limitation.
D. Project Eligibility
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
All agricultural producers receiving
direct or indirect payments through
participation in a CIG project must meet
the EQIP eligibility requirements as set
forth in 16 U.S.C. 3839aa-1. Refer to
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/
eqip/ for more information on EQIP
eligibility requirements. Participating
producers are not required to have an
EQIP contract.
A person or entity is not eligible if the
three-year average adjusted gross
income (AGI) exceeds $2.5 million with
less than 75 percent derived from
farming, ranching, or forestry-related
sources at the time of application.
A person who is determined ineligible
for USDA program benefits under the
Highly Erodible Land Compliance
(HELC) and Wetland Compliance (WC)
provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985 will not be eligible to receive
direct or indirect payments through CIG.
Technologies and approaches that are
eligible for funding in a project’s
geographic area through EQIP are
ineligible for CIG funding except where
the use of those technologies and
approaches demonstrates clear
innovation. The burden falls on the
applicant to sufficiently describe the
innovative features of the proposed
technology or approach (applicants
should reference the appropriate State’s
EQIP Eligible Practices List by
contacting the NRCS State office, or by
visiting the EQIP Web site: https://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/eqip/
EQIP_signup/2008_EQIP_Signup/
index.html.
The grantee is responsible for
providing the technical assistance
required to successfully implement and
complete the project. NRCS will
designate a Program Contact, an
Administrative Contact, and a Technical
Contact to provide oversight for each
project receiving an award.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
A. How To Obtain Application Materials
All OMB standard forms necessary for
CIG submission are posted on the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
following Web site: https://
www.grants.gov/agencies/
aapproved_standard_forms.jsp. An
application checklist is available on the
CIG Web site: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/
programs/cig.
B. Application Content and Format
Applications must contain the
information set forth below in order to
receive consideration for a grant.
Applicants should not assume prior
knowledge on the part of NRCS or
others as to the relative merits of the
project described in the application.
Submit applications in the following
format:
Applications should be typewritten or
printed on 81⁄2″ x 11″ white paper,
double spaced. The text of the
application should be in a font no
smaller than 12-point, with one-inch
margins. If submitting applications for
more than one project, submit a
separate, complete application package
for each project.
Applications must include all
required forms and narrative sections
described below. Incomplete
applications will not be considered.
1. Cover Sheet: Applicants must use
Standard Form 424 as the cover sheet
for each project application. Standard
Form 424 can be downloaded from
https://www.grants.gov/agencies/
aapproved_standard_forms.jsp or
obtained from a NRCS State Office. (A
list of NRCS State Offices is provided at
the end of this announcement.)
2. Project Summary Sheet: Applicants
must submit a Project Summary Sheet
(no more than 2 pages in length) that
includes the listed information. A
template for the Project Summary Sheet
is available on the NRCS CIG Web site:
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/cig.
a. Project Title.
b. Project Director name and contact
information (including e-mail).
c. Names and affiliations of project
collaborators.
d. Project Purpose.
e. Project Deliverables/Products.
f. Project Scope/Area.
g. Project Start and End Dates
(Projects should plan to begin no earlier
than September 1, 2008 and no later
than September 30, 2008).
h. CIG National Component Category
(Natural Resource or Technology).
i. Application Review Category (water
quality-livestock, water quality-non
livestock, water quantity, soils,
atmospheric, grazing land and forest
health, wildlife habitat, or energy).
j. Declaration of EQIP eligibility.
k. Brief summary of project.
3. Project Description: Each project
must be completely and accurately
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71349
described in no more than 10 doublespaced pages. The description must
include the following information:
a. Project background: Describe the
history of, and need for, the proposed
innovation. Provide evidence that the
proposed innovation has been studied
sufficiently to indicate a good
probability for success of the project;
b. Project objectives: Be specific,
using qualitative and quantitative
measures, if possible, to describe the
project’s purpose and goals. Describe
how, based on the description of
innovative conservation projects and
activities provided in section I.C., the
project is innovative;
c. Project methods: Describe clearly
the methodology of the project and the
tools or processes that will be used to
implement the project;
d. Location and size of project or
project area: Describe the location of the
project and the relative size and scope
(e.g., acres, farm types and
demographics, etc.) of the project area.
Provide a map, if possible;
e. Producer participation: Estimate the
number of producers involved in the
project, and describe the extent of their
involvement (all producers involved in
the project must be eligible for EQIP);
f. Project action plan and timeline:
Provide a table listing project actions,
timeframes, and associated milestones
through project completion;
g. Project management: Give a
detailed description of how the project
will be organized and managed. Include
a list of key project personnel, their
relevant education or experience, and
their anticipated contributions to the
project. Explain the level of
participation required in the project by
government and non-government
entities. Identify who will participate in
monitoring and evaluating the project;
h. Benefits or results expected and
transferability: Identify the results and
benefits to be derived from the proposed
project activities, and explain how the
results will be measured. Identify
project beneficiaries—for example,
agricultural producers by type or region
or sector; rural communities;
municipalities. Explain how these
entities will benefit. In addition,
describe how results will be
communicated to others via outreach
activities;
i. Project evaluation: Describe the
methodology or procedures to be
followed to evaluate the project,
determine technical feasibility, and
quantify the results of the project for the
final report. (Grant recipients will be
required to provide a semi-annual report
of progress, quarterly financial reports,
and a final project report to NRCS.
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
71350
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Notices
Instructions for submitting quarterly
reports will be detailed in the grant
agreement.); and
j. Environmental impacts: Describe
the anticipated environmental effects of
the proposed project. This description
will be used to determine whether an
Environmental Assessment (EA) or
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
is needed for any given project, prior to
the awarding of grant funds. The
applicant is responsible for the cost of
an EA or EIS, should one be required.
4. Budget Information: Must use
Standard Form (SF) 424 A Budget
Information Non-Construction Programs
to document budget needs. SF 424 A is
available at https://www.grants.gov/
agencies/aapproved_standard_forms.jsp
or can be obtained from a NRCS State
Office. In addition to the SF424 A, all
applicants must provide a detailed
narrative in support of the budget for
the project, broken down by each
project year. Itemize the costs necessary
for successful completion of the
proposed project. Indicate the total
amount (both cash and in-kind) of nonFederal matching support that will be
provided to the proposed project.
Identify and provide documentation of
the source(s), the amount, and the
nature (cash or in-kind) of the matching
funds. If claiming indirect costs, an
applicant must provide justification for
the rate of indirect costs being claimed.
Indirect costs can not exceed 15 percent.
In-kind costs of equipment or project
personnel cannot exceed 50 percent of
the applicant’s match (except in the case
of projects carried out by either a
Beginning or Limited Resource Farmer
or Rancher, or Indian Tribe, or a
community-based organization
comprised of or representing these
entities). The remainder of the match
must be provided in cash.
5. Declaration of Beginning Farmer or
Rancher or Limited Resource Farmer or
Rancher, or Indian Tribe: If an applicant
wishes to compete in the 10 percent setaside funding pool (see Part III B. that
describes the provision of a set-aside
pool of funding for Beginning and
Limited Resource Farmers or Ranchers,
and Indian Tribes) and avail themselves
of the in-kind contribution exception,
applicants must make a declaration in
writing of their status as a Beginning
Farmer or Rancher or Limited Resource
Farmer or Rancher, or Indian Tribe, or
a community-based organization
comprised of or representing these
entities.
6. Declaration of EQIP Eligibility:
Applicants must make a declaration in
writing that they, or parties involved in
the project, are eligible for EQIP.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
7. State Conservationist Letter of
Review: Applicants must send a copy of
cover letter showing that the application
was sent to the appropriate State
Conservationist(s) for review. If a project
is multi-state in scope, all states in the
project area must be sent the application
for review. The State Conservationist(s)
will review the application for potential
duplication of efforts, ethics concerns,
consistency with overall EQIP
objectives, and the expected benefits to
EQIP implementation in their state(s).
Applicants must send their application
(at least the Project Description (Item 3)
and the Budget Information (Item 4)) to
the appropriate State Conservationist(s)
postmarked, or dated if electronic, no
later than February 15, 2008. State
Conservationist(s) must submit letters to
NRCS National Headquarters by March
7, 2008. A list of NRCS State Office
addresses and phone numbers is
included at the end of this notice.
Applicants are encouraged to consult
with the appropriate State
Conservationist(s) during application
development to discuss the letter of
review.
8. Certifications: All applications
must include a signed Standard Form
(SF) 424 B—Assurances, Nonconstruction Programs. SF 424 B may be
found at: www.grants.gov/agencies/
aapproved_standard_forms.jsp or
contact a NRCS State Office. Applicants,
by signing and submitting an
application, assure and certify that they
are in compliance with the following
from 7 Code of Federal Register (CFR):
a. Part 3017, Government wide
Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) https://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/
waisidx_04/7cfr3o17_04.html
b. Part 3018, New Restrictions on
Lobbying https://www.access.gpo.gov/
nara/cfr/waisidx_04/7cfr3018_04.html;
and
c. Part 3021, Government wide
Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace
(Financial Assistance) https://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/
waisidx_04/7cfr3021_04.html.
9. DUNS Number: A Dun and
Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number is a
unique nine-digit sequence recognized
as the universal standard for identifying
and keeping track of over 70 million
businesses worldwide. A Federal
Register notice of final policy issuance
(68 FR 38402) requires a DUNS number
in every application (i.e., hard copy and
electronic) for a grant or cooperative
agreement (except applications from
individuals) submitted on or after
October 1, 2003. For information about
how to obtain a DUNS number go to
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
https://www.grants.gov/RequestaDUNS
or call 1–866–705–5711. Please note
that the registration may take up to 14
business days to complete.
10. Required CCR Registration: The
Central Contractor Registry (CCR) is a
database that serves as the primary
Government repository for contractor
information required for the conduct of
business with the Government. This
database will also be used as a central
location for maintaining organizational
information for organizations seeking
and receiving grants from the
Government. CIG applicants must
register with the CCR. To register, visit
https://www.ccr.gov. Allow a minimum
of 5 days to complete the CCR
registration.
C. How To Submit a Written
Application
Applicants must submit one signed
original copy of each project
application. Hard copies must be
accompanied by an electronic copy on
a 31⁄2-inch diskette or compact disc
(CD). Electronic files must be either
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat (pdf)
files.
Applications submitted via facsimile
or e-mail will not be accepted.
The address for hand-delivered
applications or applications submitted
using express mail or overnight courier
service is: USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Conservation
Innovation Grants Program, Financial
Assistance Programs Division, Room
5239–S, 1400 Independence Ave, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250.
Contact phone numbers for handdelivered applications (needed to enter
the USDA South Building) are (202)
720–1845, (202) 720–2335, or (202) 205–
1165.
The address for applications sent
regular mail is: USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Conservation
Innovation Grants Program, Financial
Assistance Programs Division, Room
5239–S, Post Office Box 2890,
Washington, DC 20013–2890.
D. How To Submit an Application
Electronically
Applicants may submit applications
electronically through Grants.gov, the
Federal government’s e-grants portal.
Applications submitted through
Grants.gov must contain all of the
elements of a complete application
outlined above. Instructions for
electronically submitting the required
standard forms, abstract, narrative, and
declarations are posted on Grants.gov.
The cover letter requesting the State
Conservationist letter of review may be
scanned as an attachment to the
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Notices
application. Instructions for adding
attachments are available on Grants.gov.
Applications submitted electronically
are date and time stamped by Grants.gov
and must be received by the identified
closing date. Note that NRCS is not
responsible for any technical
malfunctions or Web site problems
related to Grants.gov submissions.
Applicants should begin the Grants.gov
process well before the submission
deadline to avoid problems.
E. Application Due Date
Complete applications must be
received in Room 5239–S at NRCS
National Headquarters by 5 p.m. EST on
February 20, 2008. A postmark date is
NOT a factor in whether an application
is received on time. The applicant
assumes the risk of any delays in
application delivery. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to submit
completed applications via overnight
mail or delivery service to insure timely
receipt by NRCS.
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
F. Acknowledgement of Submission
Applications received by the due date
will be acknowledged with an official
letter. If an applicant has not received
an acknowledgement within 30 days of
the submission, they must contact the
NRCS programmatic contact (See Part
VII). Failure to do so may result in the
application not being considered for
funding by the peer review panel.
G. Funding Restrictions
Awardees may not use un-recovered
indirect costs as part of their matching
funds.
CIG funds may not be used to pay any
of the following costs unless otherwise
permitted by law, or approved in
writing by the Authorized Departmental
Officer in advance of incurring such
costs:
a. Costs above the amount of funds
authorized for the project;
b. Costs incurred prior to the effective
date of the grant;
c. Costs which lie outside the scope
of the approved project and any
amendments thereto;
d. Entertainment costs, regardless of
their apparent relationship to project
objectives;
e. Compensation for injuries to
persons, or damage to property arising
out of project activities;
f. Consulting services performed by a
Federal employee during official duty
hours when such consulting services
result in the payment of additional
compensation to the employee; and,
g. Renovation or refurbishment of
research or related spaces; the purchase
or installation of fixed equipment in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
such spaces; and the planning, repair,
rehabilitation, acquisition, or
construction of buildings or facilities.
This list is not exhaustive. Questions
regarding the allowances of particular
items of cost should be directed to the
administrative contact person listed
below.
H. Patents and Inventions
Allocation of rights to patents and
inventions shall be in accordance with
USDA regulation 7 CFR 3019.36. This
regulation provides that small
businesses normally may retain the
principal worldwide patent rights to any
invention developed with USDA
support. In accordance with 7 CFR
3019.2, this provision will also apply to
commercial organizations for the
purposes of CIG. USDA receives a
royalty-free license for Federal
Government use, reserves the right to
require the patentee to license others in
certain circumstances, and requires that
anyone exclusively licensed to sell the
invention in the United States must
normally manufacture it domestically.
I. Withdrawal of Applications
Applications may be withdrawn by
written notice at any time before an
award is made. Applications may be
withdrawn in person by the applicant,
or by an authorized representative
thereof, if the representative’s identity is
made known and the representative
signs a receipt for the application.
V. Application Review
A. Application Review and Selection
Process
Prior to technical review, each
application will be screened for
completeness and compliance with the
provisions of this notice. Incomplete
applications and those that do not meet
the provisions of this notice will be
eliminated from competition, and
notification of elimination will be
mailed to the applicant.
Applications meeting the provisions
of this notice will be scored by a Peer
Review Panel. The applications will be
divided among the peer review groups,
based on the area selected by the
applicant. The eight review areas for FY
2008 applications are: Water QualityLivestock; Water Quality-Not Livestock;
Water Quantity; Soils; Atmospheric;
Grazing Land and Forest Health;
Wildlife Habitat; and Energy.
Applications will be scored based on
the Criteria for Application Evaluation
below. Scored applications will be
forwarded to a Grants Review Board,
which will certify the rankings from the
peer review panels, and ensure that the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71351
application evaluations are consistent
with program objectives. The CIG Grants
Review Board consists of five members
of NRCS leadership, specifically the
Deputy Chief for Soil Survey and
Resource Assessment, the Deputy Chief
for Science and Technology, the Deputy
Chief for Programs, one Regional
Assistant Chief, and one State
Conservationist. The Grants Review
Board will make recommendations to
the Chief for final selection and funding
decisions.
B. Criteria for Application Evaluation
Peer review panels will use the
following criteria to evaluate project
applications. Each of the four criterions
carries an equal weight of 25 percent.
1. Purpose and goals:
a. The purpose and goals of the
project are clearly stated;
b. The project adheres to the natural
resource conservation concerns for FY
2008 stated in this notice; and,
c. There is clear and significant
potential for a positive and measurable
outcome.
2. Soundness of approach or design:
a. The project adheres to the
description of innovative projects or
activities found in Part IC. of this notice;
b. Technical design and
implementation strategy is based on
sound science;
c. There is a good likelihood of project
success;
d. The project substantively involves
EQIP eligible producers; and,
e. The project promotes
environmental enhancement and
protection in conjunction with
agricultural production.
3. Project management:
a. The application has clear
milestones and timelines, designated
staff, and demonstrates collaboration;
b. The project staff has the technical
expertise needed to do the work; and
c. The budget is reasonable and
adequately justified.
4. Transferability:
a. There is great potential to transfer
the approach or technology to others
and/or to other geographical areas; and,
b. The project will result in the
development of technical or related
materials (e.g., technical standards,
technical notes, manuals, handbooks,
software) that will help foster adoption
of the innovative technology or
approach by other producers, and in
other geographic areas.
C. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
CIG Awards are anticipated to be
announced by June 1, 2008. Funds are
not awarded, and work may not start,
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
71352
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Notices
until an agreement is signed by both
NRCS and the grantee. All agreements
are expected to be awarded by August
15, 2008.
VI. Award Information and
Administration
A. Award Notification
Applicants who have been selected
will receive a letter of official
notification from NRCS National
Headquarters. This notice will indicate
the need to work with the
administrative contact to develop an
agreement prior to starting work on the
project. Applicants who are not selected
will be notified by official letter.
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
B. Grant Agreement
The CCC, through NRCS, will use a
grant agreement with selected
applicants to document participation in
the CIG component of EQIP. The grant
agreement will include:
• Project purpose;
• Project objectives and deliverables;
• The final project plan listing
cooperators in the project, and
identifying the grant applicant and the
project manager;
• The project timelines and expected
project completion date;
• The project progress and budget
reporting requirements;
• Award amount and budget
information;
• Information regarding requests for
advance of funds or reimbursement;
• The role of NRCS technical
oversight in the project;
• Reporting requirements including
attendance at CIG grantee biannual
meeting;
• Changes in project plans; and
• Other requirements and terms
deemed necessary by the CCC to protect
the interests of the United States.
C. Reporting Requirements
Grantees receiving an advance of
Federal funds of more than $25,000 are
required to submit a SF–272 (Report of
Federal Cash Transactions), and when
necessary, the continuation sheet, SF–
272-A, no later than 15 days following
the end of each quarter or 90 days after
project completion. These reports are
used to monitor cash advanced to
recipients and to obtain disbursement
and outlay information for each award.
Grantees must submit a Financial
Status Report (SF–269) no later than 30
days after the end of each quarter and
90 days after completion of project. The
SF–272 and SF–269 are available at:
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/cig/
InfoForGrantees.html.
In addition, every six months the
grantee must submit a written
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
performance progress report to the
NRCS program contact and the NRCS
technical contact. This report is distinct
from the quarterly financial report
described above. Each progress report
shall cover work performed during the
previous 6-month period, including any
funded or unfunded time extensions, a
comparison of actual accomplishments
to project goals, and a statement of work
projected to be completed in the next 6month period.
The grantee is responsible for
providing the technical assistance
required to successfully implement and
complete the project. NRCS will
designate a Program Contact, an
Administrative Contact, and a Technical
Contact to provide oversight for each
project receiving an award.
To satisfy the requirements of EQIP (7
CFR part 1466) compliance measures,
the grantee is required to submit as a
component of the semi-annual progress
report:
1. A list of producers, identified by
name and social security number, of all
EQIP-eligible producers or entities
involved in the project.
2. The dollar amount of direct and
indirect payment made to each
individual producer or entity for any
structural, vegetative, or management
practices. Both quarterly and
cumulative payment amounts must be
submitted.
3. A self-certification indicating that
each individual or entity receiving a
direct or indirect payment through this
grant is in compliance with the EQIP
Payment Limitation, AGI, HEL, and
Wetlands Conservation Compliance
Farm Bill provisions.
A progress report template will be
provided to grantees by the NRCS
program contact. This template is also
available on the NRCS CIG Web site at:
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/cig/
InfoForGrantees.html.
NRCS will designate a Program
Contact and a Technical Contact for the
project. These individuals will have
technical oversight responsibility for the
project. The grantee must send copies of
each semi-annual progress report to
these NRCS contacts, and comply with
any requests for information from these
individuals. NRCS recommends that the
grantee work closely with these subject
matter experts throughout the course of
the project.
Upon passage of the completion date
of the project, a final report must be
submitted within 90 days detailing
project activities, funding received,
funding expended, results, and potential
for transferability of results. The final
report should address completion of the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
project deliverables listed in the grant
agreement.
NRCS will host an annual meeting for
CIG grantees and NRCS technical
contacts. Grantees will be required to
attend at least one of these sessions at
their own expense.
VII. Agency Contacts
CIG Program Contact: Tessa
Chadwick, CIG National Program
Manager, 1400 Independence Ave, SW.,
Room 5237–S, Washington, DC 20250.
Phone: (202) 720–2335, Fax: (202) 720–
4265, e-mail:
tessa.chadwick@wdc.usda.gov.
CIG Administrative Contact: Karen
Minor, Grants and Agreements Team
Leader, 1400 Independence Ave, SW.,
Room 5222–S, Washington, DC 20250.
Phone: (202) 720–2604 or (202) 720–
4102, Fax: (202) 720–2262, e-mail:
karen.minor@wdc.usda.gov.
Additional information about CIG,
including fact sheets and frequently
asked questions (FAQs), is available on
the CIG Web page: https://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/cig.
Signed in Washington, DC on December
10, 2007.
Arlen L. Lancaster,
Vice President, Commodity Credit
Corporation, Chief, Natural Resources
Conservation Service.
VIII. Other Information
APPLICATIONS MISSING ANY OF
THESE REQUIRED ITEMS WILL NOT
BE CONSIDERED
Fiscal Year 2008 Application Package
Checklist
b 1. Application Cover Sheet:
Complete Standard Form 424 (SF–424).
b 2. Project Summary Sheet: (2 page
maximum; template available))
a. Project Title;
b. Project Director name and contact
information (including e-mail);
c. Names and affiliations of project
collaborators;
d. Project Purpose;
e. Project Deliverables/Products;
f. Project Scope/Area;
g. Project Start and End Dates
(Projects should plan to begin no earlier
than September 1, 2008 and no later
than September 30, 2008);
h. CIG National Component Category
(Natural Resource or Technology);
i. Application Review Category (water
quality-livestock, water quality-non
livestock, water quantity, soils,
atmospheric, grazing land and forest
health, wildlife, or energy);
j. EQIP Eligibility Declaration;
k. Brief summary of project.
b 3. Project Description: (10 pages
maximum, double spaced, 12 point font)
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Notices
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
a. Project background;
b. Project objectives;
c. Project methods;
d. Location and size of project area
(include a map if possible);
e. Producer participation;
f. Project action plan and timeline;
g. Project management;
h. Benefits or results expected and
transferability;
i. Project evaluation; and
j. Environmental impacts.
b 4. Budget Information: Submit a
completed SF–424A, a DETAILED
budget narrative, and
DOCUMENTATION showing matching
funds available.
b 5. Declaration of Beginning Farmer
or Rancher, Limited Resource Farmer or
Rancher, or Indian Tribe (Special
Provisions): If applicable, include a
statement declaring your status as a
Beginning Farmer or Rancher, Limited
Resource Farmer or Rancher, Indian
Tribe, or Community-based
Organization representing these entities.
b 6. Declaration of EQIP Eligibility:
Include a statement indicating that all
producers receiving direct or indirect
payments will be eligible for EQIP
participation.
b 7. Documentation that application
was sent to all appropriate State
Conservationist(s) requesting a letter of
review.
b 8. Certifications: Complete
Standard Form 424b (SF–424b).
b 9. DUNS Number: For information
about how to obtain a DUNS number go
to https://www.grants.gov/
RequestaDUNS or call 1–866–705–5711.
Please note that the registration may
take up to 14 business days to complete.
b 10. Required CCR Registration:
Visit www.ccr.gov to register.
Natural Resources Conservation
Service State Conservationists and
State Offices
Alabama: Gary Kobylski, 3381 Skyway
Drive, Post Office Box 311, Auburn,
AL 36830; phone: (334) 887–4500;
fax: (334) 887–4552;
gary.kobylski@al.usda.gov
Alaska: Robert Jones, Atrium Building,
Suite 100, 800 West Evergreen,
Palmer, AK 99645–6539; phone: (907)
761–7760; fax: (907) 761–7790;
robert.jones@ak.usda.gov
Arizona: David McKay, Suite 800, 3003
North Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ
85012–2945; phone: (602) 280–8808;
fax: (602) 280–8809 or 8805;
david.mckay@az.usda.gov
Arkansas: Kalven L. Trice, Federal
Building, Room 3416, 700 West
Capitol Avenue, Little Rock, AR
72201–3228; phone: (501) 301–3100;
fax: (501) 301–3194;
kalven.trice@ar.usda.gov
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
California: Ed Burton, Suite 4164, 430 G
Street, Davis, CA 95616–4164; phone:
(530) 792–5600; fax: (530) 792–5790;
ed.burton@ca.usda.gov
Caribbean Area: Juan A. Martinez,
Director, IBM Building, Suite 604, 654
Munoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey, PR
00918–4123; phone: (787) 766–5206;
fax: (787) 766–6563;
juan.martinez@pr.usda.gov
Colorado: James Allen Green, Room
E200C, 655 Parfet Street, Lakewood,
CO 80215–5521; phone: (720) 544–
2810; fax: (720) 544–2965;
allen.green@co.usda.gov
Connecticut: Margo L. Wallace, 344
Merrow Road, Tolland, CT 06084;
phone: (860) 871–4011; fax: (860)
871–4054; margo.wallace@ct.usda.gov
Delaware: Russell Morgan, Suite 101,
1203 College Park Drive, Dover, DE
19904–8713; phone: (302) 678–4160;
fax: (302) 678–0843;
russell.morgan@de.usda.gov
Florida: T. Niles Glasgow, 2614 N.W.
43rd Street, Gainesville, FL 32606–
6611, or Post Office Box 141510,
Gainesville, FL 32614; phone: (352)
338–9500; fax: (352) 338–9574;
niles.glasgow@fl.usda.gov
Georgia: James Tillman, Federal
Building, Stop 200, 355 East Hancock
Avenue, Athens, GA 30601–2769;
phone: (706) 546–2272; fax: (706)
546–2120; james.tillman@ga.usda.gov
Hawaii: Lawrence T. Yamamoto, Room
4–118, 300 Ala Moana Boulevard,
Honolulu, HI 96850–0002; phone:
(808) 541–2600, ext. 100; fax: (808)
541–1335;
larry.yamamoto@hi.usda.gov
Idaho: Richard W. Sims, Suite C, 9173
West Barnes Drive, Boise, ID 83709;
phone: (208) 378–5700; fax: (208)
378–5735; richard.sims@id.usda.gov
Illinois: William J. Gradle, 2118 W. Park
Court, Champaign, IL 61821; phone:
(217) 353–6600; fax: (217) 353–6676;
bill.gradle@il.usda.gov
Indiana: Jane E. Hardisty, 6013 Lakeside
Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46278–
2933; phone: (317) 290–3200; fax:
(317) 290–3225;
jane.hardisty@in.usda.gov
Iowa: Richard Van Klaveren, 693
Federal Building, Suite 693, 210
Walnut Street, Des Moines, IA 50309–
2180; phone: (515) 284–6655; fax:
(515) 284–4394;
rick.vanklaveren@ia.usda.gov
Kansas: Harold Klaege, 760 South
Broadway, Salina, KS 67401–4642;
phone: (785) 823–4565; fax: (785)
823–4540; harold.klaege@ks.usda.gov
Kentucky: Michael Hubbs, Suite 110,
771 Corporate Drive, Lexington, KY
40503–5479; phone: (859) 224–7350;
fax: (859) 224–7399;
mike.hubbs@ky.usda.gov
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71353
Louisiana: Kevin Norton, 3737
Government Street, Alexandria, LA
71302; phone: (318) 473–7751; fax:
(318) 473–7626;
kevin.norton@la.usda.gov
Maine: Joyce Swartzendruber, Suite 3,
967 Illinois Avenue, Bangor, ME
04401; phone: (207) 990–9100, ext. 3;
fax: (207) 990–9599;
joyce.swartzendruber@me.usda.gov
Maryland: Jon Hall, John Hanson
Business Center, Suite 301, 339
Busch’s Frontage Road, Annapolis,
MD 21401–5534; phone: (410) 757–
0861 ext. 315; fax: (410) 757–0687;
jon.hall@md.usda.gov
Massachusetts: Christine Clarke, 451
West Street, Amherst, MA 01002–
2995; phone: (413) 253–4351; fax:
(413) 253–4375;
christine.clarke@ma.usda.gov.
Michigan: Garry Lee, Suite 250, 3001
Coolidge Road, East Lansing, MI
48823–6350; phone: (517) 324–5270;
fax: (517) 324–5171;
garry.lee@mi.usda.gov.
Minnesota: William Hunt, Suite 600,
375 Jackson Street, St. Paul, MN
55101–1854; phone: (651) 602–7900;
fax: (651) 602–7913 or 7914;
william.hunt@mn.usda.gov.
Mississippi: Homer L. Wilkes, Suite
1321, Federal Building, 100 West
Capitol Street, Jackson, MS 39269–
1399; phone: (601) 965–5205; fax:
(601) 965–4940;
homer.wilkes@ms.nrcs.usda.gov.
Missouri: Roger A. Hansen, Parkade
Center, Suite 250, 601 Business Loop
70, West Columbia, MO 65203–2546;
phone: (573) 876–0901; fax: (573)
876–0913;
roger.hansen@mo.usda.gov.
Montana: Jeff Burwell, acting, Federal
Building, Room 443, 10 East Babcock
Street, Bozeman, MT 59715–4704;
phone: (406) 587–6811; fax: (406)
587–6761, jeff.burwell@co.usda.gov.
Nebraska: Stephen K. Chick, Federal
Building, Room 152, 100 Centennial
Mall, North Lincoln, NE 68508–3866;
phone: (402) 437–5300; fax: (402)
437–5327; steve.chick@ne.usda.gov.
Nevada: Richard Vigil, 1365 Corporate
Blvd. Building F, Suite 201, 5301
Longley Lane, Reno, NV 89511–
180589502; phone: (775) 784–
5863857–8500; fax: (775) 784–
5939857–8524;
richard.vigil@nv.usda.gov.
New Hampshire: George W. Cleek,
Federal Building, 2 Madbury Road,
Durham, NH 03824–2043; phone:
(603) 868–7581, ext. 125; fax: (603)
868–5301; george.cleek@nh.usda.gov.
New Jersey: Thomas Drewes, 220
Davidson Avenue, 4th Floor,
Somerset, NJ 08873–3157; phone:
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
71354
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Notices
(732) 537–6040; fax: (732) 537–6095;
thomas.drewes@nj.usda.gov.
New Mexico: Dennis Alexander, Suite
305, 6200 Jefferson Street, NE.,
Albuquerque, NM 87109–3734;
phone: (505) 761–4400; fax: (505)
761–4481;
dennis.alexander@nm.usda.gov.
New York: Ron Alvarado, Suite 354, 441
South Salina Street, Syracuse, NY
13202–2450; phone: (315) 477–6504;
fax: (315) 477–6550;
ron.alvarado@ny.usda.gov.
North Carolina: Mary K. Combs, Suite
205, 4405 Bland Road, Raleigh, NC
27609–6293; phone: (919) 873–2102;
fax: (919) 873–2156;
mary.combs@nc.usda.gov.
North Dakota: J.R. Flores, Jr., Room 278,
220 E. Rosser Avenue, Post Office Box
1458, Bismarck, ND 58502–1458;
phone: (701) 530–2000; fax: (701)
530–2110; jr.flores@nd.usda.gov.
Ohio: Terry Cosby, Room 522, 200
North High Street, Columbus, OH
43215–2478; phone: (614) 255–2500;
fax: (614) 255–2548;
terry.cosby@oh.usda.gov.
Oklahoma: Ronald L. Hilliard, USDA
Agri-Center Building, Suite 206, 100
USDA, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074–
2655; phone: (405) 742–1204; fax:
(405) 742–1126;
ron.hilliard@ok.usda.gov.
Oregon: Robert Graham, 1201 NE Lloyd
Blvd., Suite 900, Portland, OR 97232;
phone: (503) 414–3200; fax: (503)
414–3103; bob.graham@or.usda.gov.
Pacific Basin: Larry Yamamoto,
Director, FHB Building, Suite 301,
400 Route 8, Mongmong, GU 96910;
phone: (671) 472–7490; fax: (671)
472–7288;
larry.yamamoto@pb.usda.gov.
Pennsylvania: Craig Derickson, Suite
340, 1 Credit Union Place, Harrisburg,
PA 17110–2993; phone: (717) 237–
2200; fax: (717) 237–2238;
craig.derickson@pa.usda.gov.
Rhode Island: Roylene Rides at the
Door, Suite 46, 60 Quaker Lane,
Warwick, RI 02886–0111; phone:
(401) 828–1300; fax: (401) 828–0433;
roylene.rides-at-the-door@ri.usda.gov.
South Carolina: Walter W. Douglas,
Strom Thurmond Federal Building,
Room 950, 1835 Assembly Street,
Columbia, SC 29201–2489; phone:
(803) 253–3935; fax: (803) 253–3670;
walt.douglas@sc.usda.gov.
South Dakota: Janet L. Oertly, Federal
Building, Room 203, 200 Fourth
Street, SW., Huron, SD 57350–2475;
phone: (605) 352–1200; fax: (605)
352–1288; janet.oertly@sd.usda.gov.
Tennessee: J. Kevin Brown, 675 U.S.
Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville,
TN 37203–3878; phone: (615) 277–
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
2531; fax: (615) 277–2578;
kevin.brown@tn.usda.gov.
Texas: Donald W. Gohmert, W.R. Poage
Federal Building, 101 South Main
Street, Temple, TX 76501–7602;
phone: (254) 742–9800; fax: (254)
742–9819; don.gohmert@tx.usda.gov.
Utah: Sylvia Gillen, W.F. Bennett
Federal Building, Room 4402, 125
South State Street, Salt Lake City, UT
84111 or Post Office Box 11350, Salt
Lake City, UT 84147–0350, phone:
(801) 524–4550, fax: (801) 524–4403;
sylvia.gillen@ut.usda.gov.
Vermont: Judith Doerner, Suite 105, 356
Mountain View Drive, Colchester, VT
05446; phone: (802) 951–6795; fax:
(802) 951–6327;
judy.doerner@vt.usda.gov.
Virginia: Jack Bricker, Culpeper
Building, Suite 209, 1606 Santa Rosa
Road, Richmond, VA 23229–5014;
phone: (804) 287–1691; fax: (804)
287–1737; jack.bricker@va.usda.gov.
Washington: Raymond L. ‘‘Gus’’
Hughbanks, Rock Pointe Tower II,
Suite 450, W. 316 Boone Avenue,
Spokane, WA 99201–2348; phone:
(509) 323–2900; fax: (509) 323–2909;
raymond.hughbanks@wa.usda.gov.
West Virginia: Kevin Wickey, Room
301, 75 High Street, Morgantown, WV
26505; phone: (304) 284–7540; fax:
(304) 284–4839;
kevin.wickey@wv.usda.gov.
Wisconsin: Patricia S. Leavenworth,
8030 Excelsior Drive, Suite 200,
Madison, WI 53717; phone: (608)
662–4422; fax: (608) 662–4430;
pat.leavenworth@wi.usda.gov.
Wyoming: Xavier Montoya, Federal
Building, Room 3124, 100 East B
Street, Casper, WY 82601–1911;
phone: (307) 261–6453; fax: (307)
261–6490;
xavier.montoya@wy.usda.gov.
[FR Doc. E7–24411 Filed 12–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–892]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 17, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marin Weaver or Blanche Ziv, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, Room 1870,
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–2336 and (202) 482–4207,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2006, the Department
of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on carbazole
violet pigment 23 from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 71 FR 69543
(December 1, 2006). On December 29,
2006, Nation Ford Chemical Company
and Sun Chemical Company
(‘‘Petitioners’’) requested that the
Department conduct an administrative
review of 13 companies, including Trust
Chem Co. Ltd. (‘‘Trust Chem’’). On
January 4, 2007, Trust Chem also
requested an administrative review of
its exports. The Department published a
notice of initiation of the antidumping
duty administrative review of carbazole
violet pigment 23 from the PRC for the
period December 1, 2005, through
November 30, 2006, covering the 13
companies. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 72 FR 5005
(February 2, 2007). On May 2 and May
3, 2007, Petitioners withdrew their
request for an administrative review of
the 12 companies for which they were
the sole requestor. On June 25, 2007, the
Department published a notice
rescinding the review on these 12
companies. See Carbazole Violet
Pigment 23 From the People’s Republic
of China: Notice of Rescission, in Part,
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 72 FR 34670 (June 25, 2007).
Therefore, Trust Chem is the sole party
who remained covered by this
administrative review.
Rescission of Review
On November 19, 2007, the
Department issued a memorandum
stating its intent to rescind the
administrative review on Trust Chem
because there are no entries on which
the Department can assess duties during
the POR. See Memorandum regarding,
‘‘Intent to Rescind Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review on Trust Chem
Company Limited for Carbazole Violet
Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic
of China’’ (November 19, 2007) (‘‘Intent
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 241 (Monday, December 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71345-71354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24411]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Conservation Innovation Grants Fiscal Year 2008 Announcement of
Program Funding; Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number:
10.912
AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Commodity Credit
Corporation.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NRCS requests applications for Conservation Innovation Grants
(CIG) to stimulate the development and adoption of innovative
conservation approaches and technologies. Applications are accepted
from all 50 States, the Caribbean Area (Puerto Rico and the Virgin
Islands), and the Pacific Basin Area (Guam, American Samoa, and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands). NRCS anticipates that
the amount available for support of this program in FY 2008 will be
approximately $20 million. Funds will be awarded through a nationwide
competitive grants process. There are three CIG categories available in
FY 2008: Natural Resource Concerns Category, Technology Category, and
the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Category. Applications are requested from
eligible government or non-government organizations or individuals for
competitive consideration of grant awards for projects between one and
three years in duration. This notice identifies the objectives for CIG
projects, the eligibility criteria for projects and associated
instructions needed to apply to CIG.
DATES: Applications must be received in the NRCS National Headquarters
by 5 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST), on Wednesday, February 20,
2008.
ADDRESSES: The address for hand-delivered applications or applications
submitted using express mail or overnight courier service is: USDA
Natural Resources Conservation Service; Conservation Innovation Grants
Program; Financial Assistance Programs Division, Room 5239-S; 1400
Independence Ave, SW.; Washington, DC 20250. Contact phone numbers for
hand-delivered applications are (202) 720-1845, (202) 720-2335, or
(202) 205-1165.
[[Page 71346]]
Applications sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be sent to the
following address: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service;
Conservation Innovation Grants Program; Financial Assistance Programs
Division; Room 5239-S, Post Office Box 2890, Washington, DC 20013-2890.
To submit your application electronically, visit www.grants.gov/
apply and follow the instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tessa Chadwick, CIG National Shani Harmon, CIG Program
Program Manager, USDA NRCS, PO Box Assistant, USDA NRCS, PO Box 2890,
2890, Room 5239-S, Washington, DC Room 5239-S, Washington, DC 20013-
20013-2890. 2890.
Phone: (202) 720-2335.............. Phone: (202) 205-1165.
Fax: (202) 720-4265................ Fax: (202) 720-4265.
e-mail: e-mail: shani.harmon@wdc.usda.gov.
tessa.chadwick@wdc.usda.gov..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
PART I--Funding Opportunity Description
A. Legislative Authority
B. Overview
C. Innovative Conservation Projects or Activities
D. CIG Categories
1. Natural Resource Concerns
2. Chesapeake Bay Watershed
3. Technology
PART II--Funding Availability
A. National Component
B. State Component
PART III--Eligibility Information
A. Matching Funds
B. Beginning and Limited Resource Farmers and Ranchers, and
Indian Tribes
C. EQIP Payment Limitation and Duplicate Payments
D. Project Eligibility
PART IV--Application and Submission Information
A. How To Obtain Application Materials
B. Application Content and Format
C. How To Submit a Written Application
D. How To Submit an Application Electronically
E. Application Due Date
F. Acknowledgement of Submission
G. Funding Restrictions
H. Patents and Inventions
I. Withdrawal of Applications
PART V--Application Review
A. Application Review and Selection Process
B. Criteria for Application Evaluation
C. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
PART VI--Award Information and Administration
A. Award Notification
B. Grant Agreement
C. Reporting Requirements
PART VII--Agency Contacts
PART VIII--Other Information
A. FY 2008 Application Checklist
B. NRCS State Conservationists
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Legislative Authority
CIG was authorized as part of the Environmental Quality Incentives
Program (EQIP) [16 U.S.C. 3839aa-8] under Section 1240H of the Food
Security Act of 1985, as added by Section 2301 of the Farm Security and
Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-171). The Secretary of
Agriculture delegated the authority for the administration of EQIP and
CIG to the Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS),
who is a Vice President of the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC). EQIP
is administered by NRCS under the authorities of the CCC.
B. Overview
The purpose of CIG is to stimulate the development and adoption of
innovative conservation approaches and technologies while leveraging
the Federal investment in environmental enhancement and protection, in
conjunction with agricultural production. CIG projects are expected to
lead to the transfer of conservation technologies, management systems,
and innovative approaches (such as market-based systems) into NRCS
technical manuals, guides, and references, or to the private sector.
CIG does not fund research projects. Instead, it is a vehicle to
stimulate the development and adoption of conservation approaches or
technologies that have been studied sufficiently to indicate a
likelihood of success and to be candidates for eventual technology
transfer or institutionalization. CIG funds projects targeting
innovative on-the-ground conservation, including pilot projects and
field demonstrations.
NRCS will accept applications for single or multi-year projects,
not to exceed three years, submitted to NRCS from eligible entities,
including federally-recognized Indian Tribes, State and local
governments, and non-governmental organizations and individuals.
Applications are accepted from all 50 States, the Caribbean Area
(Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands), and the Pacific Basin Area (Guam,
American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands).
Complete applications will be evaluated by a technical peer review
panel and scored based on the Criteria for Application Evaluation
identified in this document. There are eight review groups for FY 2008
applications: Water Quality-Livestock; Water Quality-Not Livestock;
Water Quantity; Soils; Atmospheric; Grazing Land and Forest Health;
Wildlife; and Energy. Applicants will indicate which of these review
groups should review the application. Scored applications will be
forwarded to a Grants Review Board. The Grants Review Board will make
recommendations for project approval to the Chief. Final award
selections will be made by the Chief of NRCS.
C. Innovative Conservation Projects or Activities
For the purposes of CIG, the proposed innovative project or
activity must encompass the development and field testing, evaluation,
and implementation of:
Conservation adoption incentive systems, including market-
based systems; or,
Promising conservation technologies, practices, systems,
procedures, or approaches.
To be given priority consideration, the innovative project or
activity:
Will have been studied sufficiently to indicate a good
probability for success;
Demonstrates, tests, evaluates, and verifies environmental
(soil, water, air, plants, and animal) effectiveness, utility,
affordability, and usability in the field;
Adapts conservation technologies, practices, systems,
procedures, approaches, and incentive systems to improve performance,
and encourage adoption;
Introduces conservation systems, approaches, and
procedures from another geographic area or agricultural sector; and
Adapts conservation technology, management, or incentive
systems to improve performance.
D. CIG Categories
For Fiscal Year 2008, three categories of CIG will be offered.
Applicants will need to identify which of the 3 categories applies to
their proposed project.
[[Page 71347]]
1. National Natural Resource Concerns Category
Applications must demonstrate the use of innovative technologies or
approaches, or both, to address a natural resource concern or concerns.
The five natural resource concerns for possible funding through
Conservation Innovation Grants for fiscal year 2008 are: Water
Resources; Soil Resources; Atmospheric Resources; Grazing Land and
Forest Health; and Wildlife Habitat. This Category also includes
applications that focus on Market Based Approaches to address any or
all of these five resource concern areas.
A. Water Resources
The objective of this natural resource concern is to implement new
technologies and/or approaches to maintain, restore, or enhance water
quality and/or quantity in watersheds with predominantly agricultural
land uses while sustaining productivity. Subtopics include:
Nutrient, pesticide, and/or pathogen transport to surface
water and groundwater;
Sediment transport to surface water;
Aquifer recharge/maintenance of groundwater supplies;
Increased water supplies/availability through alternative
treatment; enhanced automation, monitoring or scheduling; reduced
system losses; or reuse strategies; and
Technologies scalable to small farms to maintain, restore,
or enhance water quality and/or quantity.
B. Soil Resources
The objective of this conservation concern is to implement new
technologies and/or approaches to maintain, restore, or enhance soil
resources associated with agricultural and forest land uses while
sustaining productivity. Subtopics include:
Erosion reduction;
Accumulation of harmful levels of constituents in soils,
including nutrients, metals, or salts; and
Improvement to soil quality and productivity.
C. Atmospheric Resources
The objective of this conservation concern is to implement new
technologies and/or approaches to maintain, restore, or enhance air
quality and atmospheric resources through agricultural and forestry
practices while sustaining productivity. Subtopics include:
Agricultural emissions of particulates, odors, volatile
organic compounds, and greenhouse gases;
Carbon sequestration in soil and through other mechanisms;
Bio-based energy opportunities; and
Identification and quantification of management practices
for air quality and atmospheric change concerns at animal operations.
D. Grazing Land and Forest Health
The objective of this conservation concern is to implement new
technologies and/or approaches to maintain, restore, or enhance grazing
land and forest health while sustaining productivity. Subtopics
include:
Invasive species management on grazing and forest land;
Effects of pests, diseases, and fragmentation on forest
and grazing land quality/health;
Systems or practices to minimize overgrazing and restore
lands suffering effects of overgrazing;
Low-input approaches to increasing forage production;
Alternative grasses or forages for livestock; and
Systems or practices that integrate trees-forage-livestock
(i.e., silvopasture).
E. Wildlife Habitat
The objective of this conservation concern is to implement new
technologies and/or approaches for environmentally sound wildlife
habitat management while sustaining agricultural productivity. Possible
subtopics include:
Riparian area management and restoration;
Invasive species management;
Pollinator protection
Biodiversity; and,
Wetland function and health.
F. Market-Based Approaches
The objective of this approach is to develop, implement, and or
evaluate processes, technology tools, institutional arrangements, or
systems that are `market-based' in nature and address one of the above
priority resource concerns. Possible subtopics include:
Development and application of technology tools that
measure environmental services (i.e. benefits) in order to document
credits for trading;
Greenhouse gas accounting tools and registries;
Water quality improvement accounting tools;
Nutrient trading and/or accounting tools;
Demonstration of ecosystem-based services that facilitate
conservation implementation; and
Processes and institutional arrangements that develop,
demonstrate, evaluate, and clarify successful approaches to market-
based conservation involving private working lands.
2. Chesapeake Bay Watershed Category
Applications for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Category are being
accepted and reviewed by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.
Information for submitting an application for this category of CIG
funding can be accessed at the following link https://www.nfwf.org.
3. National Technology Category
Applications must address one or more of the following specific
technology needs areas identified by NRCS:
A. Improved On-Farm Energy Efficiency--Possible Subtopics Include
Renewable energy sources such as wind or solar;
Methane recovery;
Other innovative farm management or production
technologies;
Automated self energy audit technology;
Energy audit worksheets; and
Compilation of on-farm energy audits and audit processes.
B. Water Management (Both Drainage Water and Irrigation Water) Drainage
Water Management--Possible Subtopics Include
Implementation of drainage water management systems in
small watersheds and application of tools to assess multiple effects
(e.g., economic, wildlife habitat, soil quality, air quality, wetlands
and water quality) at watershed scale;
Achieving downstream nutrient reduction benefits through
management of surface or sub-surface drainage systems;
Improving water/nutrient accounting/budgeting;
Improving design and management of drainage water
management systems to improve benefits to producers and to the
environment;
Improving the ability of buffers to reduce nutrient
loadings in tile drained landscapes; and
Improving wetland creation, restoration, and enhancement
to reduce nutrient loadings.
Irrigation Water Management--Possible Subtopics Include
New engineering software or modeling systems that would
automate, demonstrate, and facilitate technically sound conservation
decisions by the public pertaining to resource
[[Page 71348]]
assessment, conservation planning, and conservation system installation
and evaluation;
Irrigation management for water conservation;
Achieving multiple benefits (e.g., economic, enhanced crop
production, recreation, wildlife habitat, soil quality, wetlands and
water quality) through area-wide or regional irrigation water
management, scheduled application, and supply or application of new or
innovative technology; and
Achieving nutrient or pollutant reduction benefits in
downstream receiving waters through area-wide or regional irrigation
water management, scheduled application, and supply or application of
new or innovative technology.
II. Funding Availability
A. National Component
NRCS anticipates that the amount available for support of this
program in FY 2008 will be approximately $20 million. The anticipated
funding breakdown for each category is:
National Natural Resource Concerns Category: Up to $10
million;
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Category: Up to $5 million;
National Technology Category: Up to $5 million.
Funds will be awarded through a nationwide competitive grants process.
Funds not used in one category may be shifted to another category by
the Chief. The maximum award amount for any project will not exceed $1
million. CIG will fund single- and multi-year projects, not to exceed
three years.
The available funding for the three national categories is
anticipated to fund approximately 50 to 60 awards based on previous
years' experience in administering CIG. The anticipated start date for
awarded projects is September 1, 2008.
B. State Component
The intent of the State Component is to provide flexibility to NRCS
State Conservationists to target CIG funds to individual producers and
smaller organizations that may possess promising innovations, but may
not compete well on the larger scale of the national grants
competition. For FY 2008, the State Component of CIG will be available
in select states at the discretion of the State Conservationist.
Project applications that request federal funds of $75,000 or less and
are not multi-state in scope will be forwarded to the appropriate state
program manager if that state is participating in the State Component.
All applications that are forwarded will be notified in writing, and
provided with a contact for State Component information. Funding
availability and application and submission information for state
competitions will be announced through public notices (and on State
NRCS Web sites) separately from this national notice. State
Conservationists will determine the funding level for state
competitions, with individual grants not to exceed $75,000.
III. Eligibility Information
CIG applicants must be a federally-recognized Indian Tribe; State
or local unit of government; non-governmental organization; private
business; or individual.
A. Matching Funds
Selected applicants may receive grants of up to 50 percent of the
total project cost. Applicants must provide non-Federal funding
(matching funds) for at least 50 percent of the project cost. Up to
half of the applicant's matching funds (up to 25 percent of the total
project cost) may be from in-kind contributions.
B. Beginning and Limited Resource Farmers and Ranchers, and Indian
Tribes
Information regarding the definitions for Limited Resource or
Beginning Farmers and Ranchers can be found in the EQIP Final Rule,
Federal Register, Vol. 68, No.104, Section 1466.3, Definitions. For the
FY 2008 grant award process, up to 10 percent of the total funds
available for CIG may be set-aside for applications from Beginning and
Limited Resource Farmers and Ranchers, Indian Tribes, or community-
based organizations comprised of or representing these entities. To
compete for these set-aside funds, the applicant must make a
declaration in the application as described in Part IV B.5. of this
notice. Applications that are unsuccessful in the set-aside competition
will be placed automatically in the general application pool for
consideration. Funds not used in the set-aside pool will revert back
into the general funding pool.
In addition, an exception regarding matching funds is made for
projects funded out of the set-aside. Up to three fourths of the
required matching funds for such projects (up to 37.5 percent of the
total project cost) may derive from in-kind contributions. This
exception is intended to help Beginning and Limited Resource Farmers or
Ranchers and Indian Tribes meet the statutory requirements for
receiving a Conservation Innovation Grant.
C. EQIP Payment Limitation and Duplicate Payments
Section 1240G of the Food Security Act of 1985 (as amended by the
Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002), 16 U.S.C. 3839aa-7,
imposes a $450,000 limitation for all cost-share or incentive payments
disbursed to individuals or entities under an EQIP contract between
2002 and 2008. The limitation applies to CIG in the following manner:
a. CIG funds are awarded through grant agreements; these grant
agreements are not EQIP contracts. Thus, CIG awards in and of
themselves are not limited by the payment limitation.
b. Direct or indirect payments made to an individual or entity
using funds from a CIG award to carry out structural, vegetative, or
management practices count toward each individual's or entity's EQIP
payment limitation. Through project progress reports, CIG grantees are
responsible for certifying that producers involved in CIG projects do
not exceed the payment limitation. Further, all direct and indirect
payments made to producers using CIG funds must be reported to the NRCS
CIG program manager in the semi-annual report. Direct or indirect
payments can not be made for a practice for which the producer has
already received funds, or is contracted to receive funds, through any
of the USDA Programs (EQIP, AMA, CSP, WHIP, etc.) since this would be
considered a duplicate payment.
Payment Limitation Examples
Following are two examples of how the $450,000 EQIP payment
limitation applies to CIG projects:
a. A $500,000 CIG grant is awarded to a State environmental agency
to demonstrate an innovative, market-based, water quality trading
program. The money is used to finance the development of a market
infrastructure, and none of the funds are used to implement structural,
vegetative, or management practices. Producers in the trading market
demonstration area may indirectly benefit from their eventual
participation in the market, but there is no direct or indirect
transfer payment of CIG dollars. If, on the other hand, part of the CIG
award were used to make payments to producers who implement
conservation practices on their land as part of a trading program,
those payments would count toward each producer's $450,000 EQIP payment
limitation.
b. A $1,000,000 CIG grant is awarded to a Conservation District to
pilot a community-based animal waste
[[Page 71349]]
treatment technology innovation. EQIP-eligible producers in the area
transport their animal waste to a central treatment location. Because
producers are not directly or indirectly receiving CIG funds, the
payment limitation does not apply. If, however, the producers were paid
for their waste, or for transporting their waste to the central
treatment location using CIG funds, the payments would be subject to
each producer's EQIP payment limitation.
D. Project Eligibility
All agricultural producers receiving direct or indirect payments
through participation in a CIG project must meet the EQIP eligibility
requirements as set forth in 16 U.S.C. 3839aa-1. Refer to https://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/eqip/ for more information on EQIP
eligibility requirements. Participating producers are not required to
have an EQIP contract.
A person or entity is not eligible if the three-year average
adjusted gross income (AGI) exceeds $2.5 million with less than 75
percent derived from farming, ranching, or forestry-related sources at
the time of application.
A person who is determined ineligible for USDA program benefits
under the Highly Erodible Land Compliance (HELC) and Wetland Compliance
(WC) provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 will not be eligible
to receive direct or indirect payments through CIG.
Technologies and approaches that are eligible for funding in a
project's geographic area through EQIP are ineligible for CIG funding
except where the use of those technologies and approaches demonstrates
clear innovation. The burden falls on the applicant to sufficiently
describe the innovative features of the proposed technology or approach
(applicants should reference the appropriate State's EQIP Eligible
Practices List by contacting the NRCS State office, or by visiting the
EQIP Web site: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/eqip/EQIP_signup/
2008_EQIP_Signup/.
The grantee is responsible for providing the technical assistance
required to successfully implement and complete the project. NRCS will
designate a Program Contact, an Administrative Contact, and a Technical
Contact to provide oversight for each project receiving an award.
IV. Application and Submission Information
A. How To Obtain Application Materials
All OMB standard forms necessary for CIG submission are posted on
the following Web site: https://www.grants.gov/agencies/aapproved_
standard_forms.jsp. An application checklist is available on the CIG
Web site: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/cig.
B. Application Content and Format
Applications must contain the information set forth below in order
to receive consideration for a grant. Applicants should not assume
prior knowledge on the part of NRCS or others as to the relative merits
of the project described in the application. Submit applications in the
following format:
Applications should be typewritten or printed on 8\1/2\'' x 11''
white paper, double spaced. The text of the application should be in a
font no smaller than 12-point, with one-inch margins. If submitting
applications for more than one project, submit a separate, complete
application package for each project.
Applications must include all required forms and narrative sections
described below. Incomplete applications will not be considered.
1. Cover Sheet: Applicants must use Standard Form 424 as the cover
sheet for each project application. Standard Form 424 can be downloaded
from https://www.grants.gov/agencies/aapproved_standard_forms.jsp or
obtained from a NRCS State Office. (A list of NRCS State Offices is
provided at the end of this announcement.)
2. Project Summary Sheet: Applicants must submit a Project Summary
Sheet (no more than 2 pages in length) that includes the listed
information. A template for the Project Summary Sheet is available on
the NRCS CIG Web site: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/cig.
a. Project Title.
b. Project Director name and contact information (including e-
mail).
c. Names and affiliations of project collaborators.
d. Project Purpose.
e. Project Deliverables/Products.
f. Project Scope/Area.
g. Project Start and End Dates (Projects should plan to begin no
earlier than September 1, 2008 and no later than September 30, 2008).
h. CIG National Component Category (Natural Resource or
Technology).
i. Application Review Category (water quality-livestock, water
quality-non livestock, water quantity, soils, atmospheric, grazing land
and forest health, wildlife habitat, or energy).
j. Declaration of EQIP eligibility.
k. Brief summary of project.
3. Project Description: Each project must be completely and
accurately described in no more than 10 double-spaced pages. The
description must include the following information:
a. Project background: Describe the history of, and need for, the
proposed innovation. Provide evidence that the proposed innovation has
been studied sufficiently to indicate a good probability for success of
the project;
b. Project objectives: Be specific, using qualitative and
quantitative measures, if possible, to describe the project's purpose
and goals. Describe how, based on the description of innovative
conservation projects and activities provided in section I.C., the
project is innovative;
c. Project methods: Describe clearly the methodology of the project
and the tools or processes that will be used to implement the project;
d. Location and size of project or project area: Describe the
location of the project and the relative size and scope (e.g., acres,
farm types and demographics, etc.) of the project area. Provide a map,
if possible;
e. Producer participation: Estimate the number of producers
involved in the project, and describe the extent of their involvement
(all producers involved in the project must be eligible for EQIP);
f. Project action plan and timeline: Provide a table listing
project actions, timeframes, and associated milestones through project
completion;
g. Project management: Give a detailed description of how the
project will be organized and managed. Include a list of key project
personnel, their relevant education or experience, and their
anticipated contributions to the project. Explain the level of
participation required in the project by government and non-government
entities. Identify who will participate in monitoring and evaluating
the project;
h. Benefits or results expected and transferability: Identify the
results and benefits to be derived from the proposed project
activities, and explain how the results will be measured. Identify
project beneficiaries--for example, agricultural producers by type or
region or sector; rural communities; municipalities. Explain how these
entities will benefit. In addition, describe how results will be
communicated to others via outreach activities;
i. Project evaluation: Describe the methodology or procedures to be
followed to evaluate the project, determine technical feasibility, and
quantify the results of the project for the final report. (Grant
recipients will be required to provide a semi-annual report of
progress, quarterly financial reports, and a final project report to
NRCS.
[[Page 71350]]
Instructions for submitting quarterly reports will be detailed in the
grant agreement.); and
j. Environmental impacts: Describe the anticipated environmental
effects of the proposed project. This description will be used to
determine whether an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) is needed for any given project, prior to the
awarding of grant funds. The applicant is responsible for the cost of
an EA or EIS, should one be required.
4. Budget Information: Must use Standard Form (SF) 424 A Budget
Information Non-Construction Programs to document budget needs. SF 424
A is available at https://www.grants.gov/agencies/aapproved_standard_
forms.jsp or can be obtained from a NRCS State Office. In addition to
the SF424 A, all applicants must provide a detailed narrative in
support of the budget for the project, broken down by each project
year. Itemize the costs necessary for successful completion of the
proposed project. Indicate the total amount (both cash and in-kind) of
non-Federal matching support that will be provided to the proposed
project. Identify and provide documentation of the source(s), the
amount, and the nature (cash or in-kind) of the matching funds. If
claiming indirect costs, an applicant must provide justification for
the rate of indirect costs being claimed. Indirect costs can not exceed
15 percent. In-kind costs of equipment or project personnel cannot
exceed 50 percent of the applicant's match (except in the case of
projects carried out by either a Beginning or Limited Resource Farmer
or Rancher, or Indian Tribe, or a community-based organization
comprised of or representing these entities). The remainder of the
match must be provided in cash.
5. Declaration of Beginning Farmer or Rancher or Limited Resource
Farmer or Rancher, or Indian Tribe: If an applicant wishes to compete
in the 10 percent set-aside funding pool (see Part III B. that
describes the provision of a set-aside pool of funding for Beginning
and Limited Resource Farmers or Ranchers, and Indian Tribes) and avail
themselves of the in-kind contribution exception, applicants must make
a declaration in writing of their status as a Beginning Farmer or
Rancher or Limited Resource Farmer or Rancher, or Indian Tribe, or a
community-based organization comprised of or representing these
entities.
6. Declaration of EQIP Eligibility: Applicants must make a
declaration in writing that they, or parties involved in the project,
are eligible for EQIP.
7. State Conservationist Letter of Review: Applicants must send a
copy of cover letter showing that the application was sent to the
appropriate State Conservationist(s) for review. If a project is multi-
state in scope, all states in the project area must be sent the
application for review. The State Conservationist(s) will review the
application for potential duplication of efforts, ethics concerns,
consistency with overall EQIP objectives, and the expected benefits to
EQIP implementation in their state(s). Applicants must send their
application (at least the Project Description (Item 3) and the Budget
Information (Item 4)) to the appropriate State Conservationist(s)
postmarked, or dated if electronic, no later than February 15, 2008.
State Conservationist(s) must submit letters to NRCS National
Headquarters by March 7, 2008. A list of NRCS State Office addresses
and phone numbers is included at the end of this notice. Applicants are
encouraged to consult with the appropriate State Conservationist(s)
during application development to discuss the letter of review.
8. Certifications: All applications must include a signed Standard
Form (SF) 424 B--Assurances, Non-construction Programs. SF 424 B may be
found at: www.grants.gov/agencies/aapproved_standard_forms.jsp or
contact a NRCS State Office. Applicants, by signing and submitting an
application, assure and certify that they are in compliance with the
following from 7 Code of Federal Register (CFR):
a. Part 3017, Government wide Debarment and Suspension (Non-
procurement) https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_04/7cfr3o17_
04.html
b. Part 3018, New Restrictions on Lobbying https://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_04/7cfr3018_04.html; and
c. Part 3021, Government wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace
(Financial Assistance) https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_04/
7cfr3021_04.html.
9. DUNS Number: A Dun and Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number is a unique nine-digit sequence recognized as the
universal standard for identifying and keeping track of over 70 million
businesses worldwide. A Federal Register notice of final policy
issuance (68 FR 38402) requires a DUNS number in every application
(i.e., hard copy and electronic) for a grant or cooperative agreement
(except applications from individuals) submitted on or after October 1,
2003. For information about how to obtain a DUNS number go to https://
www.grants.gov/RequestaDUNS or call 1-866-705-5711. Please note that
the registration may take up to 14 business days to complete.
10. Required CCR Registration: The Central Contractor Registry
(CCR) is a database that serves as the primary Government repository
for contractor information required for the conduct of business with
the Government. This database will also be used as a central location
for maintaining organizational information for organizations seeking
and receiving grants from the Government. CIG applicants must register
with the CCR. To register, visit https://www.ccr.gov. Allow a minimum of
5 days to complete the CCR registration.
C. How To Submit a Written Application
Applicants must submit one signed original copy of each project
application. Hard copies must be accompanied by an electronic copy on a
3\1/2\-inch diskette or compact disc (CD). Electronic files must be
either Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat (pdf) files.
Applications submitted via facsimile or e-mail will not be
accepted.
The address for hand-delivered applications or applications
submitted using express mail or overnight courier service is: USDA
Natural Resources Conservation Service, Conservation Innovation Grants
Program, Financial Assistance Programs Division, Room 5239-S, 1400
Independence Ave, SW., Washington, DC 20250.
Contact phone numbers for hand-delivered applications (needed to
enter the USDA South Building) are (202) 720-1845, (202) 720-2335, or
(202) 205-1165.
The address for applications sent regular mail is: USDA Natural
Resources Conservation Service, Conservation Innovation Grants Program,
Financial Assistance Programs Division, Room 5239-S, Post Office Box
2890, Washington, DC 20013-2890.
D. How To Submit an Application Electronically
Applicants may submit applications electronically through
Grants.gov, the Federal government's e-grants portal. Applications
submitted through Grants.gov must contain all of the elements of a
complete application outlined above. Instructions for electronically
submitting the required standard forms, abstract, narrative, and
declarations are posted on Grants.gov. The cover letter requesting the
State Conservationist letter of review may be scanned as an attachment
to the
[[Page 71351]]
application. Instructions for adding attachments are available on
Grants.gov. Applications submitted electronically are date and time
stamped by Grants.gov and must be received by the identified closing
date. Note that NRCS is not responsible for any technical malfunctions
or Web site problems related to Grants.gov submissions. Applicants
should begin the Grants.gov process well before the submission deadline
to avoid problems.
E. Application Due Date
Complete applications must be received in Room 5239-S at NRCS
National Headquarters by 5 p.m. EST on February 20, 2008. A postmark
date is NOT a factor in whether an application is received on time. The
applicant assumes the risk of any delays in application delivery.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to submit completed applications via
overnight mail or delivery service to insure timely receipt by NRCS.
F. Acknowledgement of Submission
Applications received by the due date will be acknowledged with an
official letter. If an applicant has not received an acknowledgement
within 30 days of the submission, they must contact the NRCS
programmatic contact (See Part VII). Failure to do so may result in the
application not being considered for funding by the peer review panel.
G. Funding Restrictions
Awardees may not use un-recovered indirect costs as part of their
matching funds.
CIG funds may not be used to pay any of the following costs unless
otherwise permitted by law, or approved in writing by the Authorized
Departmental Officer in advance of incurring such costs:
a. Costs above the amount of funds authorized for the project;
b. Costs incurred prior to the effective date of the grant;
c. Costs which lie outside the scope of the approved project and
any amendments thereto;
d. Entertainment costs, regardless of their apparent relationship
to project objectives;
e. Compensation for injuries to persons, or damage to property
arising out of project activities;
f. Consulting services performed by a Federal employee during
official duty hours when such consulting services result in the payment
of additional compensation to the employee; and,
g. Renovation or refurbishment of research or related spaces; the
purchase or installation of fixed equipment in such spaces; and the
planning, repair, rehabilitation, acquisition, or construction of
buildings or facilities.
This list is not exhaustive. Questions regarding the allowances of
particular items of cost should be directed to the administrative
contact person listed below.
H. Patents and Inventions
Allocation of rights to patents and inventions shall be in
accordance with USDA regulation 7 CFR 3019.36. This regulation provides
that small businesses normally may retain the principal worldwide
patent rights to any invention developed with USDA support. In
accordance with 7 CFR 3019.2, this provision will also apply to
commercial organizations for the purposes of CIG. USDA receives a
royalty-free license for Federal Government use, reserves the right to
require the patentee to license others in certain circumstances, and
requires that anyone exclusively licensed to sell the invention in the
United States must normally manufacture it domestically.
I. Withdrawal of Applications
Applications may be withdrawn by written notice at any time before
an award is made. Applications may be withdrawn in person by the
applicant, or by an authorized representative thereof, if the
representative's identity is made known and the representative signs a
receipt for the application.
V. Application Review
A. Application Review and Selection Process
Prior to technical review, each application will be screened for
completeness and compliance with the provisions of this notice.
Incomplete applications and those that do not meet the provisions of
this notice will be eliminated from competition, and notification of
elimination will be mailed to the applicant.
Applications meeting the provisions of this notice will be scored
by a Peer Review Panel. The applications will be divided among the peer
review groups, based on the area selected by the applicant. The eight
review areas for FY 2008 applications are: Water Quality-Livestock;
Water Quality-Not Livestock; Water Quantity; Soils; Atmospheric;
Grazing Land and Forest Health; Wildlife Habitat; and Energy.
Applications will be scored based on the Criteria for Application
Evaluation below. Scored applications will be forwarded to a Grants
Review Board, which will certify the rankings from the peer review
panels, and ensure that the application evaluations are consistent with
program objectives. The CIG Grants Review Board consists of five
members of NRCS leadership, specifically the Deputy Chief for Soil
Survey and Resource Assessment, the Deputy Chief for Science and
Technology, the Deputy Chief for Programs, one Regional Assistant
Chief, and one State Conservationist. The Grants Review Board will make
recommendations to the Chief for final selection and funding decisions.
B. Criteria for Application Evaluation
Peer review panels will use the following criteria to evaluate
project applications. Each of the four criterions carries an equal
weight of 25 percent.
1. Purpose and goals:
a. The purpose and goals of the project are clearly stated;
b. The project adheres to the natural resource conservation
concerns for FY 2008 stated in this notice; and,
c. There is clear and significant potential for a positive and
measurable outcome.
2. Soundness of approach or design:
a. The project adheres to the description of innovative projects or
activities found in Part IC. of this notice;
b. Technical design and implementation strategy is based on sound
science;
c. There is a good likelihood of project success;
d. The project substantively involves EQIP eligible producers; and,
e. The project promotes environmental enhancement and protection in
conjunction with agricultural production.
3. Project management:
a. The application has clear milestones and timelines, designated
staff, and demonstrates collaboration;
b. The project staff has the technical expertise needed to do the
work; and
c. The budget is reasonable and adequately justified.
4. Transferability:
a. There is great potential to transfer the approach or technology
to others and/or to other geographical areas; and,
b. The project will result in the development of technical or
related materials (e.g., technical standards, technical notes, manuals,
handbooks, software) that will help foster adoption of the innovative
technology or approach by other producers, and in other geographic
areas.
C. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
CIG Awards are anticipated to be announced by June 1, 2008. Funds
are not awarded, and work may not start,
[[Page 71352]]
until an agreement is signed by both NRCS and the grantee. All
agreements are expected to be awarded by August 15, 2008.
VI. Award Information and Administration
A. Award Notification
Applicants who have been selected will receive a letter of official
notification from NRCS National Headquarters. This notice will indicate
the need to work with the administrative contact to develop an
agreement prior to starting work on the project. Applicants who are not
selected will be notified by official letter.
B. Grant Agreement
The CCC, through NRCS, will use a grant agreement with selected
applicants to document participation in the CIG component of EQIP. The
grant agreement will include:
Project purpose;
Project objectives and deliverables;
The final project plan listing cooperators in the project,
and identifying the grant applicant and the project manager;
The project timelines and expected project completion
date;
The project progress and budget reporting requirements;
Award amount and budget information;
Information regarding requests for advance of funds or
reimbursement;
The role of NRCS technical oversight in the project;
Reporting requirements including attendance at CIG grantee
biannual meeting;
Changes in project plans; and
Other requirements and terms deemed necessary by the CCC
to protect the interests of the United States.
C. Reporting Requirements
Grantees receiving an advance of Federal funds of more than $25,000
are required to submit a SF-272 (Report of Federal Cash Transactions),
and when necessary, the continuation sheet, SF-272-A, no later than 15
days following the end of each quarter or 90 days after project
completion. These reports are used to monitor cash advanced to
recipients and to obtain disbursement and outlay information for each
award.
Grantees must submit a Financial Status Report (SF-269) no later
than 30 days after the end of each quarter and 90 days after completion
of project. The SF-272 and SF-269 are available at: https://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/cig/InfoForGrantees.html.
In addition, every six months the grantee must submit a written
performance progress report to the NRCS program contact and the NRCS
technical contact. This report is distinct from the quarterly financial
report described above. Each progress report shall cover work performed
during the previous 6-month period, including any funded or unfunded
time extensions, a comparison of actual accomplishments to project
goals, and a statement of work projected to be completed in the next 6-
month period.
The grantee is responsible for providing the technical assistance
required to successfully implement and complete the project. NRCS will
designate a Program Contact, an Administrative Contact, and a Technical
Contact to provide oversight for each project receiving an award.
To satisfy the requirements of EQIP (7 CFR part 1466) compliance
measures, the grantee is required to submit as a component of the semi-
annual progress report:
1. A list of producers, identified by name and social security
number, of all EQIP-eligible producers or entities involved in the
project.
2. The dollar amount of direct and indirect payment made to each
individual producer or entity for any structural, vegetative, or
management practices. Both quarterly and cumulative payment amounts
must be submitted.
3. A self-certification indicating that each individual or entity
receiving a direct or indirect payment through this grant is in
compliance with the EQIP Payment Limitation, AGI, HEL, and Wetlands
Conservation Compliance Farm Bill provisions.
A progress report template will be provided to grantees by the NRCS
program contact. This template is also available on the NRCS CIG Web
site at: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/cig/InfoForGrantees.html.
NRCS will designate a Program Contact and a Technical Contact for
the project. These individuals will have technical oversight
responsibility for the project. The grantee must send copies of each
semi-annual progress report to these NRCS contacts, and comply with any
requests for information from these individuals. NRCS recommends that
the grantee work closely with these subject matter experts throughout
the course of the project.
Upon passage of the completion date of the project, a final report
must be submitted within 90 days detailing project activities, funding
received, funding expended, results, and potential for transferability
of results. The final report should address completion of the project
deliverables listed in the grant agreement.
NRCS will host an annual meeting for CIG grantees and NRCS
technical contacts. Grantees will be required to attend at least one of
these sessions at their own expense.
VII. Agency Contacts
CIG Program Contact: Tessa Chadwick, CIG National Program Manager,
1400 Independence Ave, SW., Room 5237-S, Washington, DC 20250. Phone:
(202) 720-2335, Fax: (202) 720-4265, e-mail:
tessa.chadwick@wdc.usda.gov.
CIG Administrative Contact: Karen Minor, Grants and Agreements Team
Leader, 1400 Independence Ave, SW., Room 5222-S, Washington, DC 20250.
Phone: (202) 720-2604 or (202) 720-4102, Fax: (202) 720-2262, e-mail:
karen.minor@wdc.usda.gov.
Additional information about CIG, including fact sheets and
frequently asked questions (FAQs), is available on the CIG Web page:
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/cig.
Signed in Washington, DC on December 10, 2007.
Arlen L. Lancaster,
Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation, Chief, Natural Resources
Conservation Service.
VIII. Other Information
APPLICATIONS MISSING ANY OF THESE REQUIRED ITEMS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED
Fiscal Year 2008 Application Package Checklist
[ballot] 1. Application Cover Sheet: Complete Standard Form 424
(SF-424).
[ballot] 2. Project Summary Sheet: (2 page maximum; template
available))
a. Project Title;
b. Project Director name and contact information (including e-
mail);
c. Names and affiliations of project collaborators;
d. Project Purpose;
e. Project Deliverables/Products;
f. Project Scope/Area;
g. Project Start and End Dates (Projects should plan to begin no
earlier than September 1, 2008 and no later than September 30, 2008);
h. CIG National Component Category (Natural Resource or
Technology);
i. Application Review Category (water quality-livestock, water
quality-non livestock, water quantity, soils, atmospheric, grazing land
and forest health, wildlife, or energy);
j. EQIP Eligibility Declaration;
k. Brief summary of project.
[ballot] 3. Project Description: (10 pages maximum, double spaced,
12 point font)
[[Page 71353]]
a. Project background;
b. Project objectives;
c. Project methods;
d. Location and size of project area (include a map if possible);
e. Producer participation;
f. Project action plan and timeline;
g. Project management;
h. Benefits or results expected and transferability;
i. Project evaluation; and
j. Environmental impacts.
[ballot] 4. Budget Information: Submit a completed SF-424A, a
DETAILED budget narrative, and DOCUMENTATION showing matching funds
available.
[ballot] 5. Declaration of Beginning Farmer or Rancher, Limited
Resource Farmer or Rancher, or Indian Tribe (Special Provisions): If
applicable, include a statement declaring your status as a Beginning
Farmer or Rancher, Limited Resource Farmer or Rancher, Indian Tribe, or
Community-based Organization representing these entities.
[ballot] 6. Declaration of EQIP Eligibility: Include a statement
indicating that all producers receiving direct or indirect payments
will be eligible for EQIP participation.
[ballot] 7. Documentation that application was sent to all
appropriate State Conservationist(s) requesting a letter of review.
[ballot] 8. Certifications: Complete Standard Form 424b (SF-424b).
[ballot] 9. DUNS Number: For information about how to obtain a DUNS
number go to https://www.grants.gov/RequestaDUNS or call 1-866-705-5711.
Please note that the registration may take up to 14 business days to
complete.
[ballot] 10. Required CCR Registration: Visit www.ccr.gov to
register.
Natural Resources Conservation Service State Conservationists and State
Offices
Alabama: Gary Kobylski, 3381 Skyway Drive, Post Office Box 311, Auburn,
AL 36830; phone: (334) 887-4500; fax: (334) 887-4552;
gary.kobylski@al.usda.gov
Alaska: Robert Jones, Atrium Building, Suite 100, 800 West Evergreen,
Palmer, AK 99645-6539; phone: (907) 761-7760; fax: (907) 761-7790;
robert.jones@ak.usda.gov
Arizona: David McKay, Suite 800, 3003 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ
85012-2945; phone: (602) 280-8808; fax: (602) 280-8809 or 8805;
david.mckay@az.usda.gov
Arkansas: Kalven L. Trice, Federal Building, Room 3416, 700 West
Capitol Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72201-3228; phone: (501) 301-3100; fax:
(501) 301-3194; kalven.trice@ar.usda.gov
California: Ed Burton, Suite 4164, 430 G Street, Davis, CA 95616-4164;
phone: (530) 792-5600; fax: (530) 792-5790; ed.burton@ca.usda.gov
Caribbean Area: Juan A. Martinez, Director, IBM Building, Suite 604,
654 Munoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey, PR 00918-4123; phone: (787) 766-
5206; fax: (787) 766-6563; juan.martinez@pr.usda.gov
Colorado: James Allen Green, Room E200C, 655 Parfet Street, Lakewood,
CO 80215-5521; phone: (720) 544-2810; fax: (720) 544-2965;
allen.green@co.usda.gov
Connecticut: Margo L. Wallace, 344 Merrow Road, Tolland, CT 06084;
phone: (860) 871-4011; fax: (860) 871-4054; margo.wallace@ct.usda.gov
Delaware: Russell Morgan, Suite 101, 1203 College Park Drive, Dover, DE
19904-8713; phone: (302) 678-4160; fax: (302) 678-0843;
russell.morgan@de.usda.gov
Florida: T. Niles Glasgow, 2614 N.W. 43rd Street, Gainesville, FL
32606-6611, or Post Office Box 141510, Gainesville, FL 32614; phone:
(352) 338-9500; fax: (352) 338-9574; niles.glasgow@fl.usda.gov
Georgia: James Tillman, Federal Building, Stop 200, 355 East Hancock
Avenue, Athens, GA 30601-2769; phone: (706) 546-2272; fax: (706) 546-
2120; james.tillman@ga.usda.gov
Hawaii: Lawrence T. Yamamoto, Room 4-118, 300 Ala Moana Boulevard,
Honolulu, HI 96850-0002; phone: (808) 541-2600, ext. 100; fax: (808)
541-1335; larry.yamamoto@hi.usda.gov
Idaho: Richard W. Sims, Suite C, 9173 West Barnes Drive, Boise, ID
83709; phone: (208) 378-5700; fax: (208) 378-5735;
richard.sims@id.usda.gov
Illinois: William J. Gradle, 2118 W. Park Court, Champaign, IL 61821;
phone: (217) 353-6600; fax: (217) 353-6676; bill.gradle@il.usda.gov
Indiana: Jane E. Hardisty, 6013 Lakeside Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN
46278-2933; phone: (317) 290-3200; fax: (317) 290-3225;
jane.hardisty@in.usda.gov
Iowa: Richard Van Klaveren, 693 Federal Building, Suite 693, 210 Walnut
Street, Des Moines, IA 50309-2180; phone: (515) 284-6655; fax: (515)
284-4394; rick.vanklaveren@ia.usda.gov
Kansas: Harold Klaege, 760 South Broadway, Salina, KS 67401-4642;
phone: (785) 823-4565; fax: (785) 823-4540; harold.klaege@ks.usda.gov
Kentucky: Michael Hubbs, Suite 110, 771 Corporate Drive, Lexington, KY
40503-5479; phone: (859) 224-7350; fax: (859) 224-7399;
mike.hubbs@ky.usda.gov
Louisiana: Kevin Norton, 3737 Government Street, Alexandria, LA 71302;
phone: (318) 473-7751; fax: (318) 473-7626; kevin.norton@la.usda.gov
Maine: Joyce Swartzendruber, Suite 3, 967 Illinois Avenue, Bangor, ME
04401; phone: (207) 990-9100, ext. 3; fax: (207) 990-9599;
joyce.swartzendruber@me.usda.gov
Maryland: Jon Hall, John Hanson Business Center, Suite 301, 339 Busch's
Frontage Road, Annapolis, MD 21401-5534; phone: (410) 757-0861 ext.
315; fax: (410) 757-0687; jon.hall@md.usda.gov
Massachusetts: Christine Clarke, 451 West Street, Amherst, MA 01002-
2995; phone: (413) 253-4351; fax: (413) 253-4375;
christine.clarke@ma.usda.gov.
Michigan: Garry Lee, Suite 250, 3001 Coolidge Road, East Lansing, MI
48823-6350; phone: (517) 324-5270; fax: (517) 324-5171;
garry.lee@mi.usda.gov.
Minnesota: William Hunt, Suite 600, 375 Jackson Street, St. Paul, MN
55101-1854; phone: (651) 602-7900; fax: (651) 602-7913 or 7914;
william.hunt@mn.usda.gov.
Mississippi: Homer L. Wilkes, Suite 1321, Federal Building, 100 West
Capitol Street, Jackson, MS 39269-1399; phone: (601) 965-5205; fax:
(601) 965-4940; homer.wilkes@ms.nrcs.usda.gov.
Missouri: Roger A. Hansen, Parkade Center, Suite 250, 601 Business Loop
70, West Columbia, MO 65203-2546; phone: (573) 876-0901; fax: (573)
876-0913; roger.hansen@mo.usda.gov.
Montana: Jeff Burwell, acting, Federal Building, Room 443, 10 East
Babcock Street, Bozeman, MT 59715-4704; phone: (406) 587-6811; fax:
(406) 587-6761, jeff.burwell@co.usda.gov.
Nebraska: Stephen K. Chick, Federal Building, Room 152, 100 Centennial
Mall, North Lincoln, NE 68508-3866; phone: (402) 437-5300; fax: (402)
437-5327; steve.chick@ne.usda.gov.
Nevada: Richard Vigil, 1365 Corporate Blvd. Building F, Suite 201, 5301
Longley Lane, Reno, NV 89511-180589502; phone: (775) 784-5863857-8500;
fax: (775) 784-5939857-8524; richard.vigil@nv.usda.gov.
New Hampshire: George W. Cleek, Federal Building, 2 Madbury Road,
Durham, NH 03824-2043; phone: (603) 868-7581, ext. 125; fax: (603) 868-
5301; george.cleek@nh.usda.gov.
New Jersey: Thomas Drewes, 220 Davidson Avenue, 4th Floor, Somerset, NJ
08873-3157; phone:
[[Page 71354]]
(732) 537-6040; fax: (732) 537-6095; thomas.drewes@nj.usda.gov.
New Mexico: Dennis Alexander, Suite 305, 6200 Jefferson Street, NE.,
Albuquerque, NM 87109-3734; phone: (505) 761-4400; fax: (505) 761-4481;
dennis.alexander@nm.usda.gov.
New York: Ron Alvarado, Suite 354, 441 South Salina Street, Syracuse,
NY 13202-2450; phone: (315) 477-6504; fax: (315) 477-6550;
ron.alvarado@ny.usda.gov.
North Carolina: Mary K. Combs, Suite 205, 4405 Bland Road, Raleigh, NC
27609-6293; phone: (919) 873-2102; fax: (919) 873-2156;
mary.combs@nc.usda.gov.
North Dakota: J.R. Flores, Jr., Room 278, 220 E. Rosser Avenue, Post
Office Box 1458, Bismarck, ND 58502-1458; phone: (701) 530-2000; fax:
(701) 530-2110; jr.flores@nd.usda.gov.
Ohio: Terry Cosby, Room 522, 200 North High Street, Columbus, OH 43215-
2478; phone: (614) 255-2500; fax: (614) 255-2548;
terry.cosby@oh.usda.gov.
Oklahoma: Ronald L. Hilliard, USDA Agri-Center Building, Suite 206, 100
USDA, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074-2655; phone: (405) 742-1204; fax:
(405) 742-1126; ron.hilliard@ok.usda.gov.
Oregon: Robert Graham, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 900, Portland, OR
97232; phone: (503) 414-3200; fax: (503) 414-3103;
bob.graham@or.usda.gov.
Pacific Basin: Larry Yamamoto, Director, FHB Building, Suite 301, 400
Route 8, Mongmong, GU 96910; phone: (671) 472-7490; fax: (671) 472-
7288; larry.yamamoto@pb.usda.gov.
Pennsylvania: Craig Derickson, Suite 340, 1 Credit Union Place,
Harrisburg, PA 17110-2993; phone: (717) 237-2200; fax: (717) 237-2238;
craig.derickson@pa.usda.gov.
Rhode Island: Roylene Rides at the Door, Suite 46, 60 Quaker Lane,
Warwick, RI 02886-0111; phone: (401) 828-1300; fax: (401) 828-0433;
roylene.rides-at-the-door@ri.usda.gov.
South Carolina: Walter W. Douglas, Strom Thurmond Federal Building,
Room 950, 1835 Assembly Street, Columbia, SC 29201-2489; phone: (803)
253-3935; fax: (803) 253-3670; walt.douglas@sc.usda.gov.
South Dakota: Janet L. Oertly, Federal Building, Room 203, 200 Fourth
Street, SW., Huron, SD 57350-2475; phone: (605) 352-1200; fax: (605)
352-1288; janet.oertly@sd.usda.gov.
Tennessee: J. Kevin Brown, 675 U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway,
Nashville, TN 37203-3878; phone: (615) 277-2531; fax: (615) 277-2578;
kevin.brown@tn.usda.gov.
Texas: Donald W. Gohmert, W.R. Poage Federal Building, 101 South Main
Street, Temple, TX 76501-7602; phone: (254) 742-9800; fax: (254) 742-
9819; don.gohmert@tx.usda.gov.
Utah: Sylvia Gillen, W.F. Bennett Federal Building, Room 4402, 125
South State Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 or Post Office Box 11350,
Salt Lake City, UT 84147-0350, phone: (801) 524-4550, fax: (801) 524-
4403; sylvia.gillen@ut.usda.gov.
Vermont: Judith Doerner, Suite 105, 356 Mountain View Drive,
Colchester, VT 05446; phone: (802) 951-6795; fax: (802) 951-6327;
judy.doerner@vt.usda.gov.
Virginia: Jack Bricker, Culpeper Building, Suite 209, 1606 Santa Rosa
Road, Richmond, VA 23229-5014; phone: (804) 287-1691; fax: (804) 287-
1737; jack.bricker@va.usda.gov.
Washington: Raymond L. ``Gus'' Hughbanks, Rock Pointe Tower II, Suite
450, W. 316 Boone Avenue, Spokane, WA 99201-2348; phone: (509) 323-
2900; fax: (509) 323-2909; raymond.hughbanks@wa.usda.gov.
West Virginia: Kevin Wickey, Room 301, 75 High Street, Morgantown, WV
26505; phone: (304) 284-7540; fax: (304) 284-4839;
kevin.wickey@wv.usda.gov.
Wisconsin: Patricia S. Leavenworth, 8030 Excelsior Drive, Suite 200,
Madison, WI 53717; phone: (608) 662-4422; fax: (608) 662-4430;
pat.leavenworth@wi.usda.gov.
Wyoming: Xavier Montoya, Federal Building, Room 3124, 100 East B
Street, Casper, WY 82601-1911; phone: (307) 261-6453; fax: (307) 261-
6490; xavier.montoya@wy.usda.gov<