Proposed Revision of American Viticultural Area Regulations; Extension of Comment Period, 71290-71291 [E7-24364]
Download as PDF
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
71290
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
received in response to that first notice,
we published a second notice of
proposed rulemaking on November 20,
2007, as Notice No. 77 (72 FR 65256)
requesting comments on our proposal to
provide ‘‘grandfather’’ protection for
certain brand names used on existing
certificates of label approval, provided
those labels also carry information that
would dispel an impression that the
wine meets the requirements for using
the viticultural area name. As originally
published, comments on Notice No. 77
are due on or before December 20, 2007,
30 days after its publication.
Also on November 20, 2007, TTB
published Notice No. 78 (72 FR 65261),
a notice of proposed rulemaking
regarding our regulations on the
establishment of American viticultural
areas. The proposed amendments clarify
rules for preparing, submitting, and
processing viticultural area petitions.
The proposals contained in Notice No.
78 also include an amendment to 27
CFR 4.39(i) that would establish a
‘‘grandfather’’ provision to protect wine
labels using a viticultural area name,
provided that the label in question was
approved and in actual commercial use
for a specified period of time preceding
TTB’s receipt of a perfected petition for
establishment of the viticultural area. As
originally published, comments on
Notice No. 78 are due on or before
January 22, 2008, 60 days after its
publication.
After the publication of Notice No. 77,
TTB received two requests from wine
industry groups to extend that notice’s
comment period. Both the Napa Valley
Vintners, a trade group representing
over 300 Napa Valley (California)
vintners, and the Wine Institute, a trade
representing 1,100 California wineries
and wine-related businesses, requested
that the comment period for Notice No.
77 be extended an additional 90 days.
In support of its extension request,
Napa Valley Vintners indicates that the
proposed grandfather provision
contained in Notice No. 77 ‘‘is of great
concern to our association’’ and is
‘‘inextricably linked’’ to TTB’s more
general grandfathering proposal
contained in Notice No. 78. The
association believes that its decisions
regarding the two notices ‘‘should be
made at the same time.’’ Its requested
90-day extension, the group states, will
allow its Winegrower Appellation
Committee to consider the grandfather
provision and the specific questions
posed by TTB in Notice No. 77. The
Napa Valley Vintners’ request notes that
its appellation committee’s
recommendations must then be
presented to the group’s board of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:26 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
directors, which only meets once a
month.
The Wine Institute, in its comment
period extension request, also noted that
Notice Nos. 77 and 78 deal with similar
issues ‘‘that call for consistent rather
than staggered comment periods.’’ In
addition, the Wine Institute stated that,
with the holiday season, its membership
‘‘is engaged in one of its busiest months
of the year.’’
In response to these requests, TTB
extends the original 30-day comment
period for Notice No. 77 for an
additional 90 days, so that the comment
period will equal 120 days. Therefore,
comments on Notice No. 77 are now due
on or before March 20, 2008.
Drafting Information
Michael Hoover of the Regulations
and Rulings Division drafted this notice.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–24361 Filed 12–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Parts 4, 9, and 70
[Notice No. 80; Re: Notice No. 78]
RIN 1513–AB39
Proposed Revision of American
Viticultural Area Regulations;
Extension of Comment Period
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
extension of comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In response to industry
member requests, we are extending the
comment period for Notice No. 78,
Proposed Revision of American
Viticultural Area Regulations, a notice
of proposed rulemaking published in
the Federal Register on November 20,
2007, for an additional 60 days.
DATES: Written comments on Notice No.
78 must now be received on or before
March 20, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments on
Notice No. 78 to one of the following
addresses:
• https://www.regulations.gov (Federal
e-rulemaking portal; follow the
instructions for submitting comments);
or
• Director, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, P.O. Box 14412,
Washington, DC 20044–4412.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may view copies of this notice,
Notice No. 78, and any comments we
receive about the proposals described in
Notice No. 78 under Docket No. TTB–
2007–0068 on the Regulations.gov Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov. A
link to Docket No. TTB–2007–0068 is
also available on the TTB Web site at
https://www.ttb.gov/regulations_laws/
all_rulemaking.shtml, within the entry
for Notice No. 78. In addition, you may
view copies of the same materials
described above by appointment at the
TTB Information Resource Center, 1310
G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
To make an appointment, call (202)
927–2400.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita
D. Butler, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street, NW., Suite
200–E, Washington, DC 20220;
telephone: 202–927–1608, fax: 202–
927–8525.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 20, 2007, the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register as
Notice No. 78 (72 FR 65261) requesting
comments on proposed amendments to
our regulations regarding the use of
geographic brand names found in 27
CFR part 4 and the establishment of
American viticultural areas (AVAs)
contained in 27 CFR part 9. The
proposed amendments address the
effect that the approval of an AVA may
have on established brand names and
clarify the rules for preparing,
submitting, and processing viticultural
area petitions. TTB also proposes to add
to the regulations statements regarding
the viticultural significance of
established viticultural area names, or
key portions of those names, for wine
labeling purposes. As originally
published, comments on Notice No. 78
are due on or before January 22, 2008,
60 days after its publication.
Also on November 20, 2007, TTB
published Notice No. 77 in the Federal
Register (72 FR 65256), a notice of
proposed rulemaking regarding the
establishment of the Calistoga
viticultural area in Napa County,
California. Specifically, Notice No. 77
sought comments on a proposal to
provide ‘‘grandfather’’ protection for
certain brand names used on existing
certificates of label approval. As
originally published, comments on
Notice No. 77 are due on or before
December 20, 2007, 30 days after its
publication.
After the publication of Notice No. 78,
TTB received three requests from wine
industry groups to extend that notice’s
E:\FR\FM\17DEP1.SGM
17DEP1
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
comment period. Requests for 60-day
extensions were received from the Napa
Valley Vintners, a trade group
representing over 300 Napa Valley
(California) vintners, and the Wine
Institute, a trade representing 1,100
California wineries and wine-related
businesses. The Oregon Winegrowers
Association, a trade association with
239 grape grower and winery members,
requested a 120-day extension.
In support of its extension request,
Napa Valley Vintners indicates that the
proposed amendments to the AVA
program cannot be considered by its
membership within the announced
comment period. The group states that
it only meets once a month, and
‘‘because of the complexity of the
subjects covered in the Notice, the
current holiday season and market visits
already scheduled by our winery
members during January, we will be
unable to complete our deliberations
and finalize our comments until after
our general membership meeting in
March.’’
The Wine Institute, in its comment
period extension request, stated that
Notice No. 78 ‘‘is complex and farreaching, and will affect many of our
members.’’ The Wine Institute also
noted that the comment period deadline
for Notice No. 78 runs up against the
January 27, 2008, comment deadline for
Notice No. 73, a notice of proposed
rulemaking regarding ‘‘Serving Facts’’
labeling for alcohol beverages, ‘‘which is
already demanding a large part of our
resources and membership
participation,’’ all of which is occurring
during the holiday season when its
membership ‘‘is engaged in one of its
busiest months of the year.’’ In addition,
the group adds that Notice Nos. 77 and
78 deal with similar issues ‘‘that call for
consistent rather than staggered
comment periods.’’
The Oregon Winegrowers Association,
noting the ‘‘complex and lengthy’’
proposals outlined in Notice No. 78,
states that it will require additional time
to thoroughly understand the full
impact of the proposals, acquaint its
board members with their meaning,
garner consensus within the industry,
and respond in detail to the notice’s
proposals.
In response to these requests, TTB
extends the original 60-day comment
period for Notice No. 78 for an
additional 60 days so that the comment
period will equal 120 days. Therefore,
comments on Notice No. 77 are now due
on or before March 20, 2008.
Drafting Information
Michael Hoover of the Regulations
and Rulings Division drafted this notice.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:26 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
Signed: December 11, 2007.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–24364 Filed 12–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 756
[Stats No. CR–1–FOR; Docket ID OSM–
2007–0019]
Crow Tribe Abandoned Mine Land
Reclamation Plan
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are announcing receipt of a
proposed amendment to the Crow Tribe
Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation
(AMLR) Plan (hereinafter, the Crow
Plan) under the Surface Mining Control
and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA
or the Act). The Crow Tribe has
requested concurrence from the
Secretary of the Department of the
Interior with its certification of
completion of all coal-related
reclamation objectives. If the Secretary
concurs with the certification, the Crow
Tribe intends to request AMLR funds to
pursue projects in accordance with
section 411 of SMCRA.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be received by 4:00 p.m., m.s.t.,
January 16, 2008 to ensure our
consideration. If requested, we will hold
a public hearing on the amendment on
January 11, 2008. We will accept
requests to speak until 4 p.m., m.s.t.,
January 2, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the two following methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. The notice
is listed under the agency name ‘‘Office
of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement’’ and has been assigned
Docket ID: OSM–2007–0019.
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Jeffrey
Fleischman, Director, Casper Field
Office; Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement; 150 East
‘‘B’’ Street, Room 1018, Casper,
Wyoming 82601. Please include the
Docket ID (OSM–2007–0019) with your
comments.
If you would like to submit comments
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal,
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
71291
go to www.regulations.gov and do the
following. Find the blue banner with the
words ‘‘Search Documents’’ and go to
‘‘Optional Step 2.’’ Select ‘‘Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement’’ from the agency dropdown menu, then click the ‘‘Submit’’
button at the bottom of the page. The
next screen will have the title
‘‘Document Search Results.’’ The
proposed rule is listed under the Docket
ID as OSM–2007–0019. If you click on
OSM–2007–0019, you can view and
print a copy of the amendment, the
proposed rule, add comments, and view
any comments submitted by other
persons.
We cannot ensure that comments
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES) or sent to an address
other than the two listed above will be
included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
For additional information on the
rulemaking process and the public
availability of comments, see ‘‘III. Public
Comment Procedures’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
You may receive one free copy of this
amendment by contacting OSM’s Casper
Field Office. You may access this
amendment’s docket, review copies of
the Crow Plan and this amendment, find
a listing of any scheduled public
hearings, and review all written
comments received in response to this
document during normal business
hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays, at the following
addresses:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The notice has
been assigned Docket ID: OSM–2007–
0019.
Jeffrey Fleischman, Director, Casper
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 150 East
‘‘B’’ Street, Room 1018, Casper,
Wyoming 82601, (307) 261–6550,
jfleischman@osmre.gov.
Carl Venne, Chairman, Crow Tribe
Executive Branch, Bacheeitche Avenue,
Crow Agency, Montana 59022, (406)
638–3715.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Fleischman, Casper Field Office
Director, Telephone: (307) 261–6550,
Internet address:
jfleischman@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Crow Plan
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
E:\FR\FM\17DEP1.SGM
17DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 241 (Monday, December 17, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71290-71291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24364]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Parts 4, 9, and 70
[Notice No. 80; Re: Notice No. 78]
RIN 1513-AB39
Proposed Revision of American Viticultural Area Regulations;
Extension of Comment Period
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In response to industry member requests, we are extending the
comment period for Notice No. 78, Proposed Revision of American
Viticultural Area Regulations, a notice of proposed rulemaking
published in the Federal Register on November 20, 2007, for an
additional 60 days.
DATES: Written comments on Notice No. 78 must now be received on or
before March 20, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments on Notice No. 78 to one of the
following addresses:
https://www.regulations.gov (Federal e-rulemaking portal;
follow the instructions for submitting comments); or
Director, Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, P.O. Box 14412, Washington, DC 20044-
4412.
You may view copies of this notice, Notice No. 78, and any comments
we receive about the proposals described in Notice No. 78 under Docket
No. TTB-2007-0068 on the Regulations.gov Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov. A link to Docket No. TTB-2007-0068 is also
available on the TTB Web site at https://www.ttb.gov/regulations_laws/
all_rulemaking.shtml, within the entry for Notice No. 78. In addition,
you may view copies of the same materials described above by
appointment at the TTB Information Resource Center, 1310 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20220. To make an appointment, call (202) 927-2400.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita D. Butler, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street, NW., Suite 200-E, Washington, DC 20220; telephone: 202-927-
1608, fax: 202-927-8525.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 20, 2007, the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register as Notice No. 78 (72 FR 65261)
requesting comments on proposed amendments to our regulations regarding
the use of geographic brand names found in 27 CFR part 4 and the
establishment of American viticultural areas (AVAs) contained in 27 CFR
part 9. The proposed amendments address the effect that the approval of
an AVA may have on established brand names and clarify the rules for
preparing, submitting, and processing viticultural area petitions. TTB
also proposes to add to the regulations statements regarding the
viticultural significance of established viticultural area names, or
key portions of those names, for wine labeling purposes. As originally
published, comments on Notice No. 78 are due on or before January 22,
2008, 60 days after its publication.
Also on November 20, 2007, TTB published Notice No. 77 in the
Federal Register (72 FR 65256), a notice of proposed rulemaking
regarding the establishment of the Calistoga viticultural area in Napa
County, California. Specifically, Notice No. 77 sought comments on a
proposal to provide ``grandfather'' protection for certain brand names
used on existing certificates of label approval. As originally
published, comments on Notice No. 77 are due on or before December 20,
2007, 30 days after its publication.
After the publication of Notice No. 78, TTB received three requests
from wine industry groups to extend that notice's
[[Page 71291]]
comment period. Requests for 60-day extensions were received from the
Napa Valley Vintners, a trade group representing over 300 Napa Valley
(California) vintners, and the Wine Institute, a trade representing
1,100 California wineries and wine-related businesses. The Oregon
Winegrowers Association, a trade association with 239 grape grower and
winery members, requested a 120-day extension.
In support of its extension request, Napa Valley Vintners indicates
that the proposed amendments to the AVA program cannot be considered by
its membership within the announced comment period. The group states
that it only meets once a month, and ``because of the complexity of the
subjects covered in the Notice, the current holiday season and market
visits already scheduled by our winery members during January, we will
be unable to complete our deliberations and finalize our comments until
after our general membership meeting in March.''
The Wine Institute, in its comment period extension request, stated
that Notice No. 78 ``is complex and far-reaching, and will affect many
of our members.'' The Wine Institute also noted that the comment period
deadline for Notice No. 78 runs up against the January 27, 2008,
comment deadline for Notice No. 73, a notice of proposed rulemaking
regarding ``Serving Facts'' labeling for alcohol beverages, ``which is
already demanding a large part of our resources and membership
participation,'' all of which is occurring during the holiday season
when its membership ``is engaged in one of its busiest months of the
year.'' In addition, the group adds that Notice Nos. 77 and 78 deal
with similar issues ``that call for consistent rather than staggered
comment periods.''
The Oregon Winegrowers Association, noting the ``complex and
lengthy'' proposals outlined in Notice No. 78, states that it will
require additional time to thoroughly understand the full impact of the
proposals, acquaint its board members with their meaning, garner
consensus within the industry, and respond in detail to the notice's
proposals.
In response to these requests, TTB extends the original 60-day
comment period for Notice No. 78 for an additional 60 days so that the
comment period will equal 120 days. Therefore, comments on Notice No.
77 are now due on or before March 20, 2008.
Drafting Information
Michael Hoover of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted this
notice.
Signed: December 11, 2007.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-24364 Filed 12-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P