Proposed Establishment of the Calistoga Viticultural Area; Comment Period Extension, 71289-71290 [E7-24361]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Actions accomplished before the effective
date of this AD in accordance with Avions
de Transport Regional Service Bulletin
ATR42–28–0039, Revision 03, dated
November 15, 2006, are considered
71289
acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding action specified in this AD.
TABLE 1.—SERVICE INFORMATION
Avions de Transport Regional Service Bulletin
Revision level
ATR42–28–0039 (for Model ATR42 Airplanes) ...................................................................................................
ATR72–28–1019 (for Model ATR72 Airplanes) ...................................................................................................
04
05
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: The
additional actions specified in the MCAI for
operators that have done actions in
accordance with previous issues of the
service bulletins are not complete. Therefore,
this AD only refers to ATR Service Bulletin
ATR42–28–0039, Revision 03, dated
November 15, 2006; Revision 04, dated June
12, 2007; and ATR72–28–1019, Revision 05,
dated June 12, 2007; as appropriate sources
of service information for accomplishing the
required actions. Operators that have done
actions in accordance with previous issues of
the service bulletins may request an approval
for an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) according to paragraph (g) of this
AD, provided that the AMOC provides an
acceptable level of safety.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, ANM–116,
International Branch, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
Date
June 12, 2007.
June 12, 2007.
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2007–0226, dated August 24, 2007,
and the service information listed in Table 2
of this AD, for related information.
TABLE 2.—RELATED SERVICE INFORMATION
Avions de Transport Regional Service Bulletin
Revision level
ATR42–28–0039 ...................................................................................................................................................
ATR72–28–1019 ...................................................................................................................................................
04
05
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 10, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–24382 Filed 12–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Parts 4 and 9
[Notice No. 79; Re: Notice No. 77]
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
RIN 1513–AA92
Proposed Establishment of the
Calistoga Viticultural Area; Comment
Period Extension
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
extension of comment period.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:26 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
SUMMARY: In response to industry
member requests, we are extending the
comment period for Notice No. 77,
Proposed Establishment of the Calistoga
Viticultural Area, a notice of proposed
rulemaking published in the Federal
Register on November 20, 2007, for an
additional 90 days.
DATES: Written comments on Notice No.
77 must now be received on or before
March 20, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments on
Notice No. 77 to one of the following
addresses:
• https://www.regulations.gov (Federal
e-rulemaking portal; follow the
instructions for submitting comments);
or
• Director, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, P.O. Box 14412,
Washington, DC 20044–4412.
You may view copies of this notice,
Notice No. 77, and any comments we
receive about the proposals described in
Notice No. 77 under Docket No. TTB–
2007–0067 on the Regulations.gov Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov. A
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Date
June 12, 2007.
June 12, 2007.
link to Docket No. TTB–2007–0067 is
also available on the TTB Web site at
https://www.ttb.gov/regulations_laws/
all_rulemaking.shtml, within the entry
for Notice No. 77. In addition, you may
view copies of the same materials
described above by appointment at the
TTB Information Resource Center, 1310
G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
To make an appointment, call (202)
927–2400.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy R. Greenberg, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street,
NW., Suite 200E, Washington, DC
20220; telephone 202–927–8210; or email Amy.Greenberg@ttb.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
31, 2005, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) published a
notice of proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register regarding the
establishment of the Calistoga
viticultural area (see Notice No. 36, 70
FR 16451). In light of comments
regarding the potential adverse impact
on established brand names that we
E:\FR\FM\17DEP1.SGM
17DEP1
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
71290
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
received in response to that first notice,
we published a second notice of
proposed rulemaking on November 20,
2007, as Notice No. 77 (72 FR 65256)
requesting comments on our proposal to
provide ‘‘grandfather’’ protection for
certain brand names used on existing
certificates of label approval, provided
those labels also carry information that
would dispel an impression that the
wine meets the requirements for using
the viticultural area name. As originally
published, comments on Notice No. 77
are due on or before December 20, 2007,
30 days after its publication.
Also on November 20, 2007, TTB
published Notice No. 78 (72 FR 65261),
a notice of proposed rulemaking
regarding our regulations on the
establishment of American viticultural
areas. The proposed amendments clarify
rules for preparing, submitting, and
processing viticultural area petitions.
The proposals contained in Notice No.
78 also include an amendment to 27
CFR 4.39(i) that would establish a
‘‘grandfather’’ provision to protect wine
labels using a viticultural area name,
provided that the label in question was
approved and in actual commercial use
for a specified period of time preceding
TTB’s receipt of a perfected petition for
establishment of the viticultural area. As
originally published, comments on
Notice No. 78 are due on or before
January 22, 2008, 60 days after its
publication.
After the publication of Notice No. 77,
TTB received two requests from wine
industry groups to extend that notice’s
comment period. Both the Napa Valley
Vintners, a trade group representing
over 300 Napa Valley (California)
vintners, and the Wine Institute, a trade
representing 1,100 California wineries
and wine-related businesses, requested
that the comment period for Notice No.
77 be extended an additional 90 days.
In support of its extension request,
Napa Valley Vintners indicates that the
proposed grandfather provision
contained in Notice No. 77 ‘‘is of great
concern to our association’’ and is
‘‘inextricably linked’’ to TTB’s more
general grandfathering proposal
contained in Notice No. 78. The
association believes that its decisions
regarding the two notices ‘‘should be
made at the same time.’’ Its requested
90-day extension, the group states, will
allow its Winegrower Appellation
Committee to consider the grandfather
provision and the specific questions
posed by TTB in Notice No. 77. The
Napa Valley Vintners’ request notes that
its appellation committee’s
recommendations must then be
presented to the group’s board of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:26 Dec 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
directors, which only meets once a
month.
The Wine Institute, in its comment
period extension request, also noted that
Notice Nos. 77 and 78 deal with similar
issues ‘‘that call for consistent rather
than staggered comment periods.’’ In
addition, the Wine Institute stated that,
with the holiday season, its membership
‘‘is engaged in one of its busiest months
of the year.’’
In response to these requests, TTB
extends the original 30-day comment
period for Notice No. 77 for an
additional 90 days, so that the comment
period will equal 120 days. Therefore,
comments on Notice No. 77 are now due
on or before March 20, 2008.
Drafting Information
Michael Hoover of the Regulations
and Rulings Division drafted this notice.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–24361 Filed 12–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Parts 4, 9, and 70
[Notice No. 80; Re: Notice No. 78]
RIN 1513–AB39
Proposed Revision of American
Viticultural Area Regulations;
Extension of Comment Period
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
extension of comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In response to industry
member requests, we are extending the
comment period for Notice No. 78,
Proposed Revision of American
Viticultural Area Regulations, a notice
of proposed rulemaking published in
the Federal Register on November 20,
2007, for an additional 60 days.
DATES: Written comments on Notice No.
78 must now be received on or before
March 20, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments on
Notice No. 78 to one of the following
addresses:
• https://www.regulations.gov (Federal
e-rulemaking portal; follow the
instructions for submitting comments);
or
• Director, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, P.O. Box 14412,
Washington, DC 20044–4412.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may view copies of this notice,
Notice No. 78, and any comments we
receive about the proposals described in
Notice No. 78 under Docket No. TTB–
2007–0068 on the Regulations.gov Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov. A
link to Docket No. TTB–2007–0068 is
also available on the TTB Web site at
https://www.ttb.gov/regulations_laws/
all_rulemaking.shtml, within the entry
for Notice No. 78. In addition, you may
view copies of the same materials
described above by appointment at the
TTB Information Resource Center, 1310
G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
To make an appointment, call (202)
927–2400.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita
D. Butler, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street, NW., Suite
200–E, Washington, DC 20220;
telephone: 202–927–1608, fax: 202–
927–8525.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 20, 2007, the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register as
Notice No. 78 (72 FR 65261) requesting
comments on proposed amendments to
our regulations regarding the use of
geographic brand names found in 27
CFR part 4 and the establishment of
American viticultural areas (AVAs)
contained in 27 CFR part 9. The
proposed amendments address the
effect that the approval of an AVA may
have on established brand names and
clarify the rules for preparing,
submitting, and processing viticultural
area petitions. TTB also proposes to add
to the regulations statements regarding
the viticultural significance of
established viticultural area names, or
key portions of those names, for wine
labeling purposes. As originally
published, comments on Notice No. 78
are due on or before January 22, 2008,
60 days after its publication.
Also on November 20, 2007, TTB
published Notice No. 77 in the Federal
Register (72 FR 65256), a notice of
proposed rulemaking regarding the
establishment of the Calistoga
viticultural area in Napa County,
California. Specifically, Notice No. 77
sought comments on a proposal to
provide ‘‘grandfather’’ protection for
certain brand names used on existing
certificates of label approval. As
originally published, comments on
Notice No. 77 are due on or before
December 20, 2007, 30 days after its
publication.
After the publication of Notice No. 78,
TTB received three requests from wine
industry groups to extend that notice’s
E:\FR\FM\17DEP1.SGM
17DEP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 241 (Monday, December 17, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71289-71290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24361]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Parts 4 and 9
[Notice No. 79; Re: Notice No. 77]
RIN 1513-AA92
Proposed Establishment of the Calistoga Viticultural Area;
Comment Period Extension
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In response to industry member requests, we are extending the
comment period for Notice No. 77, Proposed Establishment of the
Calistoga Viticultural Area, a notice of proposed rulemaking published
in the Federal Register on November 20, 2007, for an additional 90
days.
DATES: Written comments on Notice No. 77 must now be received on or
before March 20, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments on Notice No. 77 to one of the
following addresses:
https://www.regulations.gov (Federal e-rulemaking portal;
follow the instructions for submitting comments); or
Director, Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, P.O. Box 14412, Washington, DC 20044-
4412.
You may view copies of this notice, Notice No. 77, and any comments
we receive about the proposals described in Notice No. 77 under Docket
No. TTB-2007-0067 on the Regulations.gov Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov. A link to Docket No. TTB-2007-0067 is also
available on the TTB Web site at https://www.ttb.gov/regulations_laws/
all_rulemaking.shtml, within the entry for Notice No. 77. In addition,
you may view copies of the same materials described above by
appointment at the TTB Information Resource Center, 1310 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20220. To make an appointment, call (202) 927-2400.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy R. Greenberg, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street, NW., Suite 200E, Washington, DC 20220; telephone 202-927-8210;
or e-mail Amy.Greenberg@ttb.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 31, 2005, the Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) published a notice of proposed rulemaking in
the Federal Register regarding the establishment of the Calistoga
viticultural area (see Notice No. 36, 70 FR 16451). In light of
comments regarding the potential adverse impact on established brand
names that we
[[Page 71290]]
received in response to that first notice, we published a second notice
of proposed rulemaking on November 20, 2007, as Notice No. 77 (72 FR
65256) requesting comments on our proposal to provide ``grandfather''
protection for certain brand names used on existing certificates of
label approval, provided those labels also carry information that would
dispel an impression that the wine meets the requirements for using the
viticultural area name. As originally published, comments on Notice No.
77 are due on or before December 20, 2007, 30 days after its
publication.
Also on November 20, 2007, TTB published Notice No. 78 (72 FR
65261), a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding our regulations on
the establishment of American viticultural areas. The proposed
amendments clarify rules for preparing, submitting, and processing
viticultural area petitions. The proposals contained in Notice No. 78
also include an amendment to 27 CFR 4.39(i) that would establish a
``grandfather'' provision to protect wine labels using a viticultural
area name, provided that the label in question was approved and in
actual commercial use for a specified period of time preceding TTB's
receipt of a perfected petition for establishment of the viticultural
area. As originally published, comments on Notice No. 78 are due on or
before January 22, 2008, 60 days after its publication.
After the publication of Notice No. 77, TTB received two requests
from wine industry groups to extend that notice's comment period. Both
the Napa Valley Vintners, a trade group representing over 300 Napa
Valley (California) vintners, and the Wine Institute, a trade
representing 1,100 California wineries and wine-related businesses,
requested that the comment period for Notice No. 77 be extended an
additional 90 days.
In support of its extension request, Napa Valley Vintners indicates
that the proposed grandfather provision contained in Notice No. 77 ``is
of great concern to our association'' and is ``inextricably linked'' to
TTB's more general grandfathering proposal contained in Notice No. 78.
The association believes that its decisions regarding the two notices
``should be made at the same time.'' Its requested 90-day extension,
the group states, will allow its Winegrower Appellation Committee to
consider the grandfather provision and the specific questions posed by
TTB in Notice No. 77. The Napa Valley Vintners' request notes that its
appellation committee's recommendations must then be presented to the
group's board of directors, which only meets once a month.
The Wine Institute, in its comment period extension request, also
noted that Notice Nos. 77 and 78 deal with similar issues ``that call
for consistent rather than staggered comment periods.'' In addition,
the Wine Institute stated that, with the holiday season, its membership
``is engaged in one of its busiest months of the year.''
In response to these requests, TTB extends the original 30-day
comment period for Notice No. 77 for an additional 90 days, so that the
comment period will equal 120 days. Therefore, comments on Notice No.
77 are now due on or before March 20, 2008.
Drafting Information
Michael Hoover of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted this
notice.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-24361 Filed 12-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
