Action Affecting Export Privileges; Cirrus Electronics, Cirrus Electronics Pte. Ltd, Cirrus Electronics Marketing (P) Ltd., Parthasarathy Sudarshan, Mythili Gopal, Akn Prasad, and Sampath Sundar; Order Renewing Temporary Denial Order, 71117-71118 [E7-24237]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2007 / Notices
awareness and personal relevancy; and
many motivators that were leveraged in
2000 still resonate. However, the social
and political landscape has shifted since
Census 2000 and the Census Bureau is
facing new challenges such as:
• Distrust in government is higher
than ever;
• Confidentiality issues heightened;
• Shifting core values (quality of life;
family values);
• Definition of community is
broadening;
• Recent debates on immigration; and
• Increased language barriers.
The purpose of the Census
Participation Survey is to inform tactical
and strategic decisions for the ICP. The
collected data will not be used to
produce official Census Bureau
estimates.
II. Method of Collection
The Census Participation Survey will
be administered to a sample of adults.
Most interviews will be selected though
random-digit-dialing and administered
via Computer Assisted Telephone
Interviewing (CATI), while a small
portion of the interviews will be
conducted in-person. Some of the CATI
interviews will be conducted on the
respondent’s cell phone. A $10 gift will
be provided to respondents as
compensation for costs (inbound
charges) incurred from the cell phone
interview. Additionally, a $10 gift will
be provided to respondents to the inperson interview to increase the
response rate. When an address is
available, respondents will be notified
of the data collection with a prenotification letter. The Census
Participation Survey will focus on the
following topic areas:
• Awareness about the census and
attitudes and perceptions about the
Census Bureau;
• Barriers and motivations for census
participation;
• Potential 2010 Census messaging
alternatives;
• Current issues and their relevancy
to census participation;
• Individual-level participation in
Census 2000 (self-reported) and
participation intent for the 2010 Census;
and
• Demographics, socioeconomics,
and psychographics.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
III. Data
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number: CPS–2008.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
4,000.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Dec 13, 2007
Jkt 214001
Estimated Time per Response: 25
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,667.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: There is
no cost to the respondents other than
their time.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C.
Section 182.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: December 6, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–24199 Filed 12–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Action Affecting Export Privileges;
Cirrus Electronics, Cirrus Electronics
Pte. Ltd, Cirrus Electronics Marketing
(P) Ltd., Parthasarathy Sudarshan,
Mythili Gopal, Akn Prasad, and
Sampath Sundar; Order Renewing
Temporary Denial Order
In the Matter of:
Cirrus Electronics LLC, Washington, DC
Department of Corrections, Correctional
Treatment Facility, 1901 E Street, SE.,
Washington, DC 20003; and 22 Redglobe
Court, Simpsonville, South Carolina;
Cirrus Electronics Pte., Ltd., Level 3 ECON
Building, No. 2 Ang Mo Kio Street 64, Ang
Mo Kio Industrial Park 3 Singapore;
Cirrus Electronics Marketing (P) Ltd., #303,
Suraj Ganga Arcade, 332/7, 15th Cross 2nd
Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore, India;
Parthasarathy Sudarshan, Washington, DC
Department of Corrections, Correctional
Treatment Facility, 1901 E Street, SE.,
Washington, DC 20003;
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71117
Mythili Gopal, 22 Redglobe Court,
Simpsonville, South Carolina;
Akn Prasad, #303, Suraj Ganga Arcade, 332/
7, 15th Cross 2nd Block, Jayanagar,
Bangalore, India;
Sampath Sundar, Level 3 ECON Building,
No. 2 Ang Mo Kio Street 64, Ang Mo Kio
Industrial Park 3 Singapore, Respondents.
Pursuant to Section 766.24 of the
Export Administration Regulations
(‘‘EAR’’),1 the Bureau of Industry and
Security (‘‘BIS’’), U.S. Department of
Commerce, through its Office of Export
Enforcement (‘‘OEE’’), has requested
that I renew for 180 days an Order
temporarily denying export privileges
under the EAR (‘‘TDO’’) of:
(1) Cirrus Electronics, doing business
as Cirrus Electronics LLC,
Washington, DC Department of
Corrections Correctional Treatment
Facility, 1901 E Street, SE.,
Washington, DC 20003 and 22
Redglobe Court, Simpsonsville,
South Carolina (‘‘Cirrus U.S.A.’’)
(2) Cirrus Electronics Pte Ltd., Level
3, ECON Building, No. 2, Ang Mo
Kio Street 64, Ang Mo Kio
Industrial Park 3, Singapore
(‘‘Cirrus Singapore’’)
(3) Cirrus Electronics Marketing (P)
Ltd., #303 Suraj Ganga Arcade, 332/
7, 15th Cross 2nd Block, Jayanagar,
Bangalore, India (‘‘Cirrus India’’)
(4) Parthasarathy Sudarshan,
Managing Director, CEO, President,
and Group Head of Cirrus
Washington, DC Department of
Corrections Correctional Treatment
Facility, 1901 E Street, SE.,
Washington, DC 20003 and 22
Redglobe Court, Simpsonsville,
South Carolina
(5) Mythili Gopal, International
Manager of Cirrus, 22 Redglobe
Court, Simpsonsville, South
Carolina
(6) Akn Prasad, CEO of India
Operations of Cirrus, #303 Suraj
Ganga Arcade, 332/7, 15th Cross
2nd Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore,
India
(7) Sampath Sundar, Director of
Operations of Cirrus, Cirrus
Electronics Pte Ltd., Level 3, ECON
Building, No. 2, Ang Mo Kio Street
64, Ang Mo Kio Industrial Park 3,
Singapore
1 The EAR are currently codified at 15 CFR parts
730–774 (2007). The EAR are issued under the
Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50
U.S.C. app. 2401–2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since
August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the
President, through Executive Order 13222 of August
17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which
has been extended by successive presidential
notices, the most recent being that of August 15,
2007 (72 FR 46137 (August 16, 2007)), has
continued the Regulations in effect under the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50
U.S.C. § § 1701—1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’).
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
71118
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2007 / Notices
(collectively referred to as the
‘‘Respondents’’)
On June 1, 2007, I found that evidence
presented by BIS demonstrated that the
Respondents knowingly violated the
EAR on at least five occasions between
on or about September 30, 2005 and on
or about April 17, 2006 by exporting
items subject to the EAR from the
United States to the Vikram Sarabhai
Space Centre (‘‘VSSC’’) and Bharat
Dynamics Ltd. (‘‘BDL’’) in India without
the licenses required by Section 744.1 of
the EAR. VSSC and BDL are
organizations set forth on the Entity List
set forth in Supplement No. 4 to Part
744 of the EAR. In each instance, the
items were shipped from the United
States to Singapore for subsequent
shipment to VSSC and BDL. The
Respondents were aware of the Entity
List licensing requirements and on at
least one occasion provided an end-user
statement to a U.S. vendor that falsely
represented the end-user in order to
conceal the intended actual end user,
VSSC, of the vendor’s items. I further
found that such violations had been
significant, deliberate and covert, and
were likely to occur again, especially
given the nature of the transactions. As
such, a TDO was needed to give notice
to persons and companies in the United
States and abroad that they should cease
dealing with the Respondents in export
transactions involving items subject to
the EAR. Issuance of the TDO, rendered
effective as of June 12, 2007, the date of
publication in the Federal Register, was
consistent with the public interest to
preclude future violations of the EAR.
OEE has presented additional
evidence indicating that Cirrus
Singapore remains in business despite
issuance of the TDO. I now find, based
on the continued circumstances that led
to the initial issuance of the TDO on
June 1, 2007 and the additional
evidence supplied by OEE, that the
renewal of this TDO for a period of 180
days is necessary and in the public
interest, to prevent an imminent
violation of the EAR. All parties to this
TDO have been given notice of the
request for renewal.
It is therefore ordered:
First, that the Respondents, Cirrus
Electronics LLC, Washington, DC
Department of Corrections Correctional
Treatment Facility, 1901 E Street, SE.,
Washington, DC 20003, and 22 Redglobe
Court, Simpsonsville, South Carolina,
29681–3615, and Cirrus Electronics PTE
LTD., Level 3, ECON Building, No. 2,
Ang Mo Kio Street 64, Ang Mo Kio
Industrial Park 3, Singapore, and Cirrus
Electronics Marketing (P) LTD., #303
Suraj Ganga Arcade, 332/7, 15th Cross
2nd Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore, India,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Dec 13, 2007
Jkt 214001
and Parthasarsathy Sudarshan,
Managing Director, CEO, President, and
Group Head of Cirrus, Washington, D.C.
Department of Corrections Correctional
Treatment Facility, 1901 E Street, SE.,
Washington, DC 20003, and 22 Redglobe
Court, Simpsonsville, South Carolina,
29681–3615, and Mythili Gopal,
International Manager of Cirrus, 22
Redglobe Court, Simpsonsville, South
Carolina, 29681–3615, and Akn Prasad,
CEO of India Operations of Cirrus, #303
Suraj Ganga Arcade, 332/7, 15th Cross
2nd Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore, India,
and Sampath Sundar, Director of
Operations of Cirrus, Cirrus Electronics
Pte Ltd., Level 3, ECON Building, No. 2,
Ang Mo Kio Street 64, Ang Mo Kio
Industrial Park 3, Singapore
(collectively the ‘‘Denied Persons’’) may
not, directly or indirectly, participate in
any way in any transaction involving
any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Export Administration Regulations
(‘‘EAR’’), or in any other activity subject
to the EAR including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the EAR, or in any other
activity subject to the EAR; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the EAR, or in any
other activity subject to the EAR.
Second, that no person may, directly
or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the EAR;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the EAR that has been or will
be exported from the United States,
including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction
whereby the Denied Person acquires or
attempts to acquire such ownership,
possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the EAR that has
been exported from the United States;
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
EAR with knowledge or reason to know
that the item will be, or is intended to
be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the EAR that has
been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the EAR that has been or will
be exported from the United States. For
purposes of this paragraph, servicing
means installation, maintenance, repair,
modification or testing.
Third, that after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
section 766.23 of the EAR, any other
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to any of the
Respondents by affiliation, ownership,
control, or position of responsibility in
the conduct of trade or related services
may also be made subject to the
provisions of this Order.
Fourth, that this Order does not
prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the EAR where the
only items involved that are subject to
the EAR are the foreign-produced direct
product of U.S.-origin technology.
In accordance with the provisions of
Section 766.24(e) of the EAR, the
Respondents may, at any time, appeal
this Order by filing a full written
statement in support of the appeal with
the Office of the Administrative Law
Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing
Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202–4022.
In accordance with the provisions of
Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may
seek renewal of this Order by filing a
written request not later than 20 days
before the expiration date. The
Respondents may oppose a request to
renew this Order by filing a written
submission with the Assistant Secretary
for Export Enforcement, which must be
received not later than seven days
before the expiration date of the Order.
A copy of this Order shall be served
on the Respondents and shall be
published in the Federal Register.
This Order is effective as of the date
that it is signed and shall remain in
effect for 180 days.
Entered this 5th day of December, 2007.
Darryl W. Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E7–24237 Filed 12–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71117-71118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24237]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Action Affecting Export Privileges; Cirrus Electronics, Cirrus
Electronics Pte. Ltd, Cirrus Electronics Marketing (P) Ltd.,
Parthasarathy Sudarshan, Mythili Gopal, Akn Prasad, and Sampath Sundar;
Order Renewing Temporary Denial Order
In the Matter of:
Cirrus Electronics LLC, Washington, DC Department of Corrections,
Correctional Treatment Facility, 1901 E Street, SE., Washington, DC
20003; and 22 Redglobe Court, Simpsonville, South Carolina;
Cirrus Electronics Pte., Ltd., Level 3 ECON Building, No. 2 Ang Mo
Kio Street 64, Ang Mo Kio Industrial Park 3 Singapore;
Cirrus Electronics Marketing (P) Ltd., 303, Suraj Ganga
Arcade, 332/7, 15th Cross 2nd Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore, India;
Parthasarathy Sudarshan, Washington, DC Department of Corrections,
Correctional Treatment Facility, 1901 E Street, SE., Washington, DC
20003;
Mythili Gopal, 22 Redglobe Court, Simpsonville, South Carolina;
Akn Prasad, 303, Suraj Ganga Arcade, 332/7, 15th Cross 2nd
Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore, India;
Sampath Sundar, Level 3 ECON Building, No. 2 Ang Mo Kio Street 64,
Ang Mo Kio Industrial Park 3 Singapore, Respondents.
Pursuant to Section 766.24 of the Export Administration Regulations
(``EAR''),\1\ the Bureau of Industry and Security (``BIS''), U.S.
Department of Commerce, through its Office of Export Enforcement
(``OEE''), has requested that I renew for 180 days an Order temporarily
denying export privileges under the EAR (``TDO'') of:
\1\ The EAR are currently codified at 15 CFR parts 730-774
(2007). The EAR are issued under the Export Administration Act of
1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401-2420 (2000)) (``EAA''). Since
August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the President,
through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp.
783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive presidential
notices, the most recent being that of August 15, 2007 (72 FR 46137
(August 16, 2007)), has continued the Regulations in effect under
the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. Sec.
Sec. 1701--1706 (2000)) (``IEEPA'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Cirrus Electronics, doing business as Cirrus Electronics LLC,
Washington, DC Department of Corrections Correctional Treatment
Facility, 1901 E Street, SE., Washington, DC 20003 and 22 Redglobe
Court, Simpsonsville, South Carolina (``Cirrus U.S.A.'')
(2) Cirrus Electronics Pte Ltd., Level 3, ECON Building, No. 2, Ang
Mo Kio Street 64, Ang Mo Kio Industrial Park 3, Singapore (``Cirrus
Singapore'')
(3) Cirrus Electronics Marketing (P) Ltd., 303 Suraj Ganga
Arcade, 332/7, 15th Cross 2nd Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore, India
(``Cirrus India'')
(4) Parthasarathy Sudarshan, Managing Director, CEO, President, and
Group Head of Cirrus Washington, DC Department of Corrections
Correctional Treatment Facility, 1901 E Street, SE., Washington, DC
20003 and 22 Redglobe Court, Simpsonsville, South Carolina
(5) Mythili Gopal, International Manager of Cirrus, 22 Redglobe
Court, Simpsonsville, South Carolina
(6) Akn Prasad, CEO of India Operations of Cirrus, 303
Suraj Ganga Arcade, 332/7, 15th Cross 2nd Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore,
India
(7) Sampath Sundar, Director of Operations of Cirrus, Cirrus
Electronics Pte Ltd., Level 3, ECON Building, No. 2, Ang Mo Kio Street
64, Ang Mo Kio Industrial Park 3, Singapore
[[Page 71118]]
(collectively referred to as the ``Respondents'')
On June 1, 2007, I found that evidence presented by BIS
demonstrated that the Respondents knowingly violated the EAR on at
least five occasions between on or about September 30, 2005 and on or
about April 17, 2006 by exporting items subject to the EAR from the
United States to the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (``VSSC'') and Bharat
Dynamics Ltd. (``BDL'') in India without the licenses required by
Section 744.1 of the EAR. VSSC and BDL are organizations set forth on
the Entity List set forth in Supplement No. 4 to Part 744 of the EAR.
In each instance, the items were shipped from the United States to
Singapore for subsequent shipment to VSSC and BDL. The Respondents were
aware of the Entity List licensing requirements and on at least one
occasion provided an end-user statement to a U.S. vendor that falsely
represented the end-user in order to conceal the intended actual end
user, VSSC, of the vendor's items. I further found that such violations
had been significant, deliberate and covert, and were likely to occur
again, especially given the nature of the transactions. As such, a TDO
was needed to give notice to persons and companies in the United States
and abroad that they should cease dealing with the Respondents in
export transactions involving items subject to the EAR. Issuance of the
TDO, rendered effective as of June 12, 2007, the date of publication in
the Federal Register, was consistent with the public interest to
preclude future violations of the EAR.
OEE has presented additional evidence indicating that Cirrus
Singapore remains in business despite issuance of the TDO. I now find,
based on the continued circumstances that led to the initial issuance
of the TDO on June 1, 2007 and the additional evidence supplied by OEE,
that the renewal of this TDO for a period of 180 days is necessary and
in the public interest, to prevent an imminent violation of the EAR.
All parties to this TDO have been given notice of the request for
renewal.
It is therefore ordered:
First, that the Respondents, Cirrus Electronics LLC, Washington, DC
Department of Corrections Correctional Treatment Facility, 1901 E
Street, SE., Washington, DC 20003, and 22 Redglobe Court,
Simpsonsville, South Carolina, 29681-3615, and Cirrus Electronics PTE
LTD., Level 3, ECON Building, No. 2, Ang Mo Kio Street 64, Ang Mo Kio
Industrial Park 3, Singapore, and Cirrus Electronics Marketing (P)
LTD., 303 Suraj Ganga Arcade, 332/7, 15th Cross 2nd Block,
Jayanagar, Bangalore, India, and Parthasarsathy Sudarshan, Managing
Director, CEO, President, and Group Head of Cirrus, Washington, D.C.
Department of Corrections Correctional Treatment Facility, 1901 E
Street, SE., Washington, DC 20003, and 22 Redglobe Court,
Simpsonsville, South Carolina, 29681-3615, and Mythili Gopal,
International Manager of Cirrus, 22 Redglobe Court, Simpsonsville,
South Carolina, 29681-3615, and Akn Prasad, CEO of India Operations of
Cirrus, 303 Suraj Ganga Arcade, 332/7, 15th Cross 2nd Block,
Jayanagar, Bangalore, India, and Sampath Sundar, Director of Operations
of Cirrus, Cirrus Electronics Pte Ltd., Level 3, ECON Building, No. 2,
Ang Mo Kio Street 64, Ang Mo Kio Industrial Park 3, Singapore
(collectively the ``Denied Persons'') may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as
``item'') exported or to be exported from the United States that is
subject to the Export Administration Regulations (``EAR''), or in any
other activity subject to the EAR including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the EAR, or in any other activity
subject to the EAR; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the EAR, or in any other activity subject to the EAR.
Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the EAR;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or
control of any item subject to the EAR that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the EAR that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the EAR with knowledge or reason to know that the item will
be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the EAR
that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is
owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or service any
item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the
Denied Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to
the EAR that has been or will be exported from the United States. For
purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance,
repair, modification or testing.
Third, that after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in
section 766.23 of the EAR, any other person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to any of the Respondents by affiliation,
ownership, control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of
trade or related services may also be made subject to the provisions of
this Order.
Fourth, that this Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or
other transaction subject to the EAR where the only items involved that
are subject to the EAR are the foreign-produced direct product of U.S.-
origin technology.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 766.24(e) of the EAR,
the Respondents may, at any time, appeal this Order by filing a full
written statement in support of the appeal with the Office of the
Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40
South Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4022.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 766.24(d) of the EAR,
BIS may seek renewal of this Order by filing a written request not
later than 20 days before the expiration date. The Respondents may
oppose a request to renew this Order by filing a written submission
with the Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement, which must be
received not later than seven days before the expiration date of the
Order.
A copy of this Order shall be served on the Respondents and shall
be published in the Federal Register.
This Order is effective as of the date that it is signed and shall
remain in effect for 180 days.
Entered this 5th day of December, 2007.
Darryl W. Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E7-24237 Filed 12-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P
