Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, 70781-70804 [E7-24175]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
RIN 1024–AD55
Special Regulations; Areas of the
National Park System
National Park Service, Interior.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This rule governs winter
visitation and certain recreational use in
Yellowstone and Grand Teton National
Parks and the John D. Rockefeller, Jr.
Memorial Parkway. This final rule is
issued to implement the Record of
Decision (ROD) for the Winter Use Plans
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) approved November 20, 2007,
and will ensure that visitors have an
appropriate range of winter recreation
opportunities that are appropriate to the
national park setting, and that these
activities do not impair park resources
and values. The rule requires that most
recreational snowmobiles and
snowcoaches operating in the parks
meet certain air and sound emissions
requirements, that snowmobilers and
snowcoach riders in Yellowstone be
accompanied by a commercial guide,
and sets daily entry limits on the
numbers of snowmobiles and
snowcoaches that may enter the parks.
Traveling off designated oversnow
routes will remain prohibited. The FEIS,
ROD, and other documents pertaining to
winter use management in the parks can
be found at https://www.nps.gov/yell/
planyourvisit/winteruse.htm.
DATES: This regulation is effective on
December 19, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Sacklin, Management Assistant’s Office,
Yellowstone National Park, 307–344–
2019.
The
National Park Service (NPS) has been
managing winter use issues in
Yellowstone National Park, Grand Teton
National Park, and the John D.
Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial Parkway (the
Parks) for several decades. In 1997, the
Fund for Animals and others filed suit,
alleging non-compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), among other laws. The suit
resulted in a settlement agreement in
October 1997 which, among other
things, required the NPS to prepare a
new winter use plan for the Parks. On
October 10, 2000, a Winter Use Plans
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(2000 FEIS) was published. A Record of
Decision (2000 ROD) was signed on
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
November 22, 2000, and subsequently
distributed to interested and affected
parties. The 2000 ROD was to eliminate
both snowmobile and snowplane use
from the Parks by the winter of 2003–
2004 and provide access via an NPSmanaged, mass-transit snowcoach
system. This decision was based on a
finding that the snowmobile and
snowplane use existing at that time—
and the snowmobile use analyzed in the
2000 FEIS alternatives—impaired park
resources and values, thus violating the
statutory mandate of the NPS.
Implementing aspects of this decision
required a special regulation for each
park unit in question. Following
publication of a proposed rule and the
subsequent public comment period, a
final rule was published in the Federal
Register on January 22, 2001 (66 FR
7260). That rule became effective on
April 22, 2001.
On December 6, 2000, the Secretary of
the Interior, the Director of the National
Park Service and others were named as
defendants in a lawsuit brought by the
International Snowmobile
Manufacturers’ Association (ISMA) and
others. The States of Wyoming and
Montana subsequently intervened on
behalf of the plaintiffs. The lawsuit
asked for the decision, as reflected in
the 2000 ROD, to be set aside. The
lawsuit alleged, among other things, a
violation of NEPA. A settlement was
reached on June 29, 2001, under which
NPS agreed to prepare a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS)
incorporating ‘‘any significant new or
additional information or data
submitted with respect to a winter use
plan.’’ Additionally, the NPS provided
the opportunity for additional public
participation in furtherance of the
purposes of NEPA. A Notice of Intent to
prepare a Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement was published in the
Federal Register on July 27, 2001 (66 FR
39197).
A draft SEIS was published on March
29, 2002, and distributed to interested
and affected parties. NPS accepted
public comments on the draft for 60
days, and 357,405 pieces of
correspondence were received. The
SEIS focused its analysis only on the
issues relevant to allowing recreational
snowmobile and snowcoach use in the
parks. These impact topics included air
quality and air quality-related values,
public and employee health and safety,
natural soundscapes, socioeconomics,
wildlife (bison and elk), and visitor
experience. The SEIS did not reevaluate the decision to ban snowplane
use on Jackson Lake because this was
not at issue in the lawsuit or the
resulting settlement and because the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70781
NPS had no reason to doubt the validity
of its finding that snowplane use
impaired park resources.
On November 18, 2002, the NPS
published a final rule (67 FR 69473)
(‘‘delay rule’’) based on the 2000 FEIS,
which generally postponed
implementation of the phase-out of
snowmobiles in the Parks for one year.
This rule allowed for additional time to
plan and implement the NPS-managed
mass-transit, snowcoach-only system
outlined in the 2000 FEIS as well as
time for completion of the SEIS. The
rule delayed the implementation of the
daily entry limits on snowmobiles until
the winter of 2003–2004 and the
complete prohibition on snowmobiles
until 2004–2005. The 2001 regulation’s
transitional requirement that
snowmobile parties use an NPSpermitted guide was also delayed until
the 2003–2004 winter use season.
Other provisions under the January
2001 regulation concerning licensing
requirements, limits on hours of
operation, Yellowstone side road use,
and the ban on snowplane use remained
effective for the winter use season of
2002–2003.
The Notice of Availability for the final
SEIS was published on February 24,
2003 (68 FR 8618). The final SEIS
included a new alternative, alternative
4, which called for 950 snowmobiles in
Yellowstone and 190 in Grand Teton.
Most would be subject to air and sound
emission requirements, and 80% of the
Yellowstone snowmobiles would be
commercially guided and 20% would be
non-commercially guided. In addition,
the final SEIS included changes to the
alternatives, changes in modeling
assumptions and analysis, and
incorporated additional new
information. Effective on March 25,
2003, NPS signed a ROD for the SEIS,
which selected final SEIS alternative 4
for implementation and enumerated
additional modifications to that
alternative. The final SEIS and ROD
found that implementation of final SEIS
alternatives 1a, 1b, 3, or 4 would not be
likely to impair park resources or values
due to motorized oversnow recreation.
On December 11, 2003, the new
regulation governing winter use in the
parks was published.
On December 16, 2003, the U.S.
District Court for the District of
Columbia, ruling in Fund for Animals v.
Norton, vacated and remanded the
December 11, 2003, regulation and SEIS.
The court effectively reinstated the
January 22, 2001, regulation phasing out
recreational snowmobiling subject to the
delay rule. Specifically, up to 493
snowmobiles a day were to be allowed
into Yellowstone for the 2003–2004
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
70782
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
season, and another 50 in Grand Teton
and the Parkway combined. All
snowmobiles in Yellowstone were
required to be led by a commercial
guide. Snowmobiles were to be phased
out entirely from the parks in the 2004–
2005 season.
ISMA and the State of Wyoming
reopened their December 2000 lawsuit
against the Department of the Interior
and the NPS. On February 10, 2004, the
U.S. District Court for the District of
Wyoming issued a preliminary
injunction in ISMA v. Norton
preventing the NPS from continuing to
implement the snowmobile phase-out.
The court also directed the
superintendents of Yellowstone and
Grand Teton to issue emergency orders
that were ‘‘fair and equitable’’ to all
parties to allow visitation to continue
for the remainder of the winter season.
Based on that injunction and using the
authority of 36 CFR 1.5, the
superintendents authorized up to 780
snowmobiles a day into Yellowstone
and up to 140 into Grand Teton and the
Parkway combined. In Yellowstone, the
requirement that all snowmobilers
travel with a commercial guide
remained in effect.
On June 30, 2004, the DC court
ordered that NPS promulgate a new rule
governing the 2004–05 winter use
season at least 30 days prior to the start
of the season, and that the new rule be
consistent with the DC court’s 2003
ruling. On October 14, 2004, the
Wyoming court vacated and remanded
the 2000 FEIS, 2000 ROD, and the 2001
implementing rule, based on violations
of NEPA and the Administrative
Procedure Act.
Because of the DC court’s order, and
because there were no clear rules under
which to manage the Parks for the
winter season of 2004–2005, the NPS
prepared a Temporary Winter Use Plans
Environmental Assessment in 2004. The
temporary plan was intended to provide
a framework for managing winter use in
the Parks for a period of 3 years and was
approved in November 2004 with a
‘‘Finding of No Significant Impact’’
(FONSI). An interim rule was published
in the Federal Register implementing
the temporary plan. Its provisions
included a limit of 720 snowmobiles per
day for Yellowstone and 140
snowmobiles for Grand Teton and the
Parkway, a requirement that all
recreational snowmobiles in
Yellowstone must be accompanied by a
commercial guide, and a requirement
that all recreational snowmobiles
operating in the Parks must meet NPS
air and sound emissions requirements
for reducing noise and air pollution
(with limited exceptions at Grand Teton
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
and the Parkway). The interim rule was
effective through the winter season of
2006–2007 while the NPS was to
prepare a long-term winter use plan and
EIS for the Parks.
Several entities then filed separate
lawsuits challenging the temporary plan
in the District Court in Wyoming and
the District Court in the District of
Columbia, respectively. On three
separate occasions, Congress
subsequently included language in
appropriations legislation for the
Department of the Interior requiring that
the temporary winter use rules remain
in effect for the winter seasons of 2004–
2005, 2005–2006, and 2006–2007. In
October 2005, the Wyoming District
Court upheld the validity of the 2004
temporary winter use rule in Wyoming
Lodging and Restaurant Association v.
U.S. Department of the Interior. As a
result of these legislative actions, on
September 24, 2007, the DC District
Court dismissed as moot the pending
claims against the temporary plan.
Additionally, in June 2007 the Wyoming
District Court, in a separate lawsuit filed
by Save Our Snowplanes, upheld the
prohibition on the use of snowplanes on
Jackson Lake. An appeal of that decision
by the plaintiffs is currently pending
before the United States Court of
Appeals for the 10th Circuit.
A proposed rule was published in the
Federal Register on May 16, 2007 (72
FR 27499). This Final Rule is issued in
conjunction with the FEIS and the ROD.
Absent this rulemaking, the authority to
operate snowmobiles and snowcoaches
in the Parks would have expired after
the 2006–2007 winter season.
Rationale for the Final Rule
This rule strikes a balance between
the use of snowmobiles and
snowcoaches in the Parks and is
designed to protect against the adverse
impacts that occurred from the
historical types and numbers of
snowmobiles used. Experience over the
past several winters, during which a
temporary plan has guided winter use
management of the Parks, has shown
that the combination of strict limits on
the numbers of snowmobiles allowed to
enter the Parks, the use of snowmobiles
that meet NPS requirements for air and
sound emissions (generally referred to
in the FEIS as Best Available
Technology or BAT, but here referred to
simply as NPS requirements, to avoid
confusion with use of the term best
available technology under other
environmental laws), the requirement
that visitors touring Yellowstone on
snowmobiles be accompanied by a
commercial guide, and the availability
of snowcoaches, allows for an
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
appropriate range of visitor experiences
while ensuring that the integrity of park
resources and values is not harmed. The
NPS found that the interim regulations
that were in effect over the past three
winter seasons resulted in quieter
conditions, cleaner air, fewer wildlife
impacts, and much improved visitor
and employee safety and experiences.
This rule reduces the daily number of
snowmobiles allowed to enter the Parks
in order to better protect park
soundscapes and other resources,
includes new requirements for
snowcoach air and sound emissions,
and eliminates certain oversnow vehicle
routes. In addition to the actual
experiences of the last several winters,
the decisions underlying the Record of
Decision and this rule have also been
informed by new analysis and
information presented in the FEIS.
This rule is consistent with the 2006
NPS Management Policies. In managing
units of the National Park System, the
NPS may undertake actions that have
both beneficial and adverse impacts on
park resources and values. However, the
NPS is generally prohibited by law from
taking or authorizing any action that
would or is likely to impair park
resources and values. Impairment is
defined in the 2006 NPS Management
Policies in section 1.4.5 as an impact
that, in the professional judgment of the
responsible NPS manager, would harm
the integrity of park resources or values,
including the opportunities that
otherwise would be present for the
enjoyment of those resources and
values.
Since the impact threshold at which
impairment occurs is not always readily
apparent, the NPS applies a standard
that offers greater assurances that
impairment will not occur. The NPS
does this by avoiding impacts that it
determines to be unacceptable. These
are impacts that fall short of impairment
but are still not acceptable within a
particular park’s environment.
Unacceptable impacts are defined in the
2006 NPS Management Policies in
section 1.4.7.1., available online at
https://www.nps.gov/policy/MP2006.pdf.
The NPS received over 122,000
comments on the DEIS and about 1,500
comments on the proposed rule. In
many cases the comments received on
the proposed rule were very similar in
content to those received on the DEIS.
Numerous commentors expressed
concerns that the preferred alternative
in the DEIS, and its implementation
through rulemaking, would violate the
NPS Organic Act, would be inconsistent
with the 2006 NPS Management
Policies, and in some cases explicitly
referenced the concept of unacceptable
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
impacts. The NPS addressed these
concerns in a number of ways,
including new modeling and analysis to
more clearly show the environmental
impacts of winter use, a revision of the
preferred alternative from the DEIS to
that in the Final EIS which reduced the
number of snowmobiles allowed in
Yellowstone from 720 per day to 540
per day, which is reflected in the ROD
and Final Rule, and affirmance in both
the ROD and this rule that
implementation of the preferred
alternative will not result in impairment
of park resources and values, nor will it
result in unacceptable impacts on the
Parks. This rule implements that
decision.
This rule includes strict limits on the
number of snowmobiles allowed to
enter the Parks each day. Prior to the
implementation of a managed winter
use program with the winter of 2003–
2004, an average of 795 snowmobiles
entered Yellowstone each day, with
peak days averaging approximately
1,400. This rule allows for 540
snowmobiles per day in Yellowstone, a
reduction from the 720 snowmobiles
authorized over the previous 3 winters,
and which would have been allowed
under the proposed rule. In response to
public comment and the analysis
presented in the FEIS, which included
the results of both modeling and
monitoring over the past several
winters, the NPS determined that a limit
of 540 snowmobiles per day, along with
the availability of snowcoaches, will
best protect the integrity of park
resources and values while providing an
appropriate range of visitor experiences.
In particular, the lower number of
snowmobiles will reduce the impacts on
the natural soundscapes of the park,
which the NPS found to be somewhat
greater than expected even with the
reduced number of snowmobiles that
used the park over the last several
winters. Similarly, the number of
snowmobiles authorized in Grand Teton
and the Parkway is limited under this
rule to 65 per day, allowing access to ice
fishing opportunities on Jackson Lake
and to the recreational opportunities on
the adjacent Targhee National Forest.
The rule also allows for up to 50
snowmobiles to enter Yellowstone on
the Cave Falls Road, an approximately
one-mile segment extending into the
southwest corner of the park from the
Targhee National Forest. Use of this
route is incidental to recreational use of
the national forest lands, is far removed
from the recreational snowmobiling and
the resulting impacts that occur within
the interior of Yellowstone, and is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
therefore considered separately from the
540 snowmobile limit.
Adjustments to the daily entry limits
for snowmobiles and snowcoaches
through an adaptive management
program is one of several tools available
to park managers to ensure that the
goals and objectives of the winter use
plans are maintained. Through adaptive
management, if monitoring of use levels
of snowmobiles and snowcoaches
allowed under the Record of Decision
indicates acceptable conditions, the
NPS will increase use levels to the
extent acceptable conditions can be
maintained. Conversely, if monitoring of
use levels of snowmobiles and
snowcoaches allowed under the Record
of Decision indicates unacceptable
conditions, the NPS will reduce use
levels to an extent that acceptable
conditions can be maintained. In some
cases, additional rulemaking would be
required in order to adjust numbers.
To mitigate impacts to air quality and
the natural soundscape, the NPS is
continuing the requirement that all
recreational snowmobiles meet strict air
and sound emissions requirements to
operate in the parks, with limited
exceptions. For air emissions, all
snowmobiles must achieve a 90%
reduction in hydrocarbons and a 70%
reduction in carbon monoxide, relative
to EPA’s baseline emissions
assumptions for conventional twostroke snowmobiles. For sound
restrictions, snowmobiles must operate
at or below 73 dBA as measured at full
throttle according to Society of
Automotive Engineers (SAE) J192 test
procedures (revised 1985). The
Superintendent will maintain a list of
approved snowmobile makes, models,
and years of manufacture that meet NPS
requirements. For the winter of 2006–
2007, the NPS certified 35 different
snowmobile models (from various
manufacturers; model years 2002–2007)
as meeting the NPS requirements. With
one exception described later in this
section, the certification is good for 6
years from the date on which a model
is certified as meeting the requirements.
The NPS is continuing the
requirement that began with the 2005
model year that all snowmobiles must
be certified under 40 CFR 1051 to a
Family Emission Limit (FEL) no greater
than 15 g/kW-hr for hydrocarbons (HC)
and 120 g/kW-hr for carbon monoxide
(CO). Snowmobiles must be tested on a
five-mode engine dynamometer
consistent with the test procedures
specified by the EPA (40 CFR 1051 and
1065). Other test methods could be
approved by the NPS.
The NPS is retaining the use of the
FEL method for demonstrating
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70783
compliance with its emissions
requirements because it has several
advantages. First, use of FEL will ensure
that all individual snowmobiles
entering the parks achieve the NPS’s
emissions requirements, unless
modified or damaged (under this
regulation, snowmobiles which are
modified in such a way as to increase
air or sound emissions will not be in
compliance with NPS requirements and
therefore not permitted to enter the
parks). Use of FEL will also minimize
any administrative burden on
snowmobile manufacturers to
demonstrate compliance with NPS
requirements, because they already
provide FEL data to the EPA. Further,
the EPA has the authority to ensure that
manufacturers’ claims on their FEL
applications are valid. EPA also requires
that manufacturers conduct production
line testing (PLT) to demonstrate that
machines being manufactured actually
meet the certification levels. If PLT
indicates that emissions exceed the FEL
levels, then the manufacturer is required
to take corrective action. Through EPA’s
ability to audit manufacturers’
emissions claims, the NPS will have
sufficient assurance that emissions
information and documentation will be
reviewed and enforced by the EPA. FEL
also takes into account other factors,
such as the deterioration rate of
snowmobiles (some snowmobiles may
produce more emissions as they age),
lab-to-lab variability, test-to-test
variability, and production line
variance. In addition, under the EPA’s
regulations, all snowmobiles
manufactured must be labeled with FEL
air emissions information. This will
help to ensure that NPS emissions
requirements are consistent with these
labels. The use of FEL will avoid
potential confusion for consumers.
The air emissions requirements for
snowmobiles allowed to operate in the
Parks should not be confused with
standards adopted by the EPA in a final
rule published in the Federal Register
on November 8, 2002 (67 FR 68242).
The EPA regulations require
manufacturers to meet certain fleet
averages for HC and CO emissions. For
example, the Phase 1 standards required
all snowmobile manufacturers to meet a
fleet-wide average in 2007 of 275 g/kWhr for CO and 100 g/kW-hr for HC,
which represents a 30-percent reduction
from the baseline emission rates for
uncontrolled snowmobiles. Any
particular make/model may emit more
or less than the standard as long as the
fleet average does not exceed the
standard. Phase 2 and Phase 3 standards
will be implemented in 2010 and 2012,
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
70784
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
respectively, effectively requiring the
equivalent of a 50% reduction in both
HC and CO as compared to average
baseline levels. By comparison, NPS
requires that all snowmobiles operating
in the Parks meet a FEL of 120 g/kWhr for CO and 15 g/kW-hr for HC. This
means that snowmobiles operating in
the Parks represent the cleanest that are
commercially available.
To determine compliance with the
sound emissions requirements,
snowmobiles must be tested using SAE
J192 test procedures (revised 1985; or
potentially as further revised and
adapted for use by NPS). The NPS
recognizes that the SAE updated these
test procedures in 2003; however, the
changes between the 2003 and 1985 test
procedures could yield different
measurement results. The sound
emissions requirement was initially
established using 1985 test procedures
(in addition to information provided by
industry and modeling). To ensure
consistency in the test results, the NPS
will at this time continue to use the
1985 test. The SAE J192 (revised 1985)
test also allows for a tolerance of 2 dBA
over the sound limit to account for
variations in weather, snow conditions,
and other factors. The NPS understands
that an update to the 2003 J192
procedures may be underway, and the
NPS will continue to evaluate these test
procedures and possibly adopt them
after these regulations are implemented.
Other test methods could be approved
by NPS on a case-by-case basis.
Snowmobiles may be tested at any
barometric pressure equal to or above
23.4 inches Hg uncorrected (as
measured at or near the test site). This
exception to the SAE J192 test
procedures maintains consistency with
the testing conditions used to determine
the sound requirement. This allowance
for reduced barometric pressure is
necessary since snowmobiles were
tested at the elevation of Yellowstone
National Park, where atmospheric
pressure is lower than that under the
SAE J192’s requirements. Testing data
indicate that snowmobiles test quieter at
high elevation, and therefore some
snowmobiles may comply with the
NPS’s sound emissions requirements at
higher elevations even though they do
not when tests are conducted near sea
level.
The NPS will annually publish a list
of snowmobile makes, models, and
years of manufacture that meet its
emissions and sound requirements.
Snowmobile manufacturers may
demonstrate that snowmobiles are
compliant with the air emissions
requirements by submitting to the NPS
a copy of their applications used to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
demonstrate compliance with EPA’s
general snowmobile regulation
(indicating FEL). The NPS will accept
this application information from
manufacturers in support of
conditionally certifying a snowmobile
as meeting its air emissions
requirements, pending ultimate review
and certification by EPA at the same
emissions levels identified in the
application. Should EPA certify a
snowmobile at an emission level that
would no longer meet the NPS’s
requirements, this snowmobile would
no longer be considered by NPS to be
compliant with its requirements and
would be phased-out according to a
schedule that will be determined by the
NPS to be appropriate. For sound
emissions, snowmobile manufacturers
may submit their existing Snowmobile
Safety and Certification Committee
(SSCC) sound level certification form.
Under the SSCC machine safety
standards program, snowmobiles are
certified by an independent testing
company as complying with all SSCC
safety standards, including sound
standards. This regulation does not
require the SSCC form specifically, as
there could be other acceptable
documentation in the future. The NPS
will work cooperatively with the
snowmobile manufacturers on
appropriate documentation. The NPS
intends to continue to rely on certified
air and sound emissions data from the
private sector rather than establish its
own independent testing program.
When the NPS certifies snowmobiles as
meeting its requirements, it will
announce how long that certification
applies. Generally, each snowmobile
model will be approved for entry into
the parks for 6 winter seasons after it is
first listed. Based on NPS experience, 6
years represents the typical useful life of
a snowmobile, and thus 6 years
provides purchasers with a reasonable
length of time where operation is
allowed once a particular model is
listed as being compliant. It is also
based on EPA snowmobile emission
regulations and the deterioration factors
that are part of those regulations (EPA
requires that if a manufacturer certifies
its snowmobile will comply with EPA’s
emission regulations, the snowmobile
will meet those regulations for a period
of 5 years or 5,000 miles). The NPS
recognizes that some privately owned
snowmobiles used predominantly for
ice fishing on Jackson Lake may have
relatively low mileages even after 6
years of use, and therefore may not have
experienced the type of deterioration
that would cause them to fail NPS air
and sound emissions requirements. The
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
certification period for snowmobiles
being operated on Jackson Lake will still
be considered to be 6 years, but it may
be extended up to a total of 10 years as
long as the snowmobile’s mileage does
not exceed 6,000 miles.
Individual snowmobiles modified in
such a way as to increase sound and air
emissions of hydrocarbons (HC) and
carbon monoxide (CO) beyond the
proposed emission restrictions will be
denied entry to the parks. It is the
responsibility of end users and guides
and outfitters to ensure that their
oversnow vehicles, whether
snowmobiles or snowcoaches, comply
with all applicable restrictions. Air and
sound emission requirements for
snowcoaches are described below. The
requirement in Yellowstone that all
snowmobilers travel with commercial
guides will assist NPS in enforcing these
requirements, since businesses
providing commercial guiding services
in the parks are responsible under their
contracts with the park to ensure that
their clients use only snowmobiles that
meet the NPS’s requirements. In
addition, these businesses are required
to ensure that snowmobiles used in the
park are not modified in such a way as
to increase sound or air emissions, and
that snowmobiles are properly
maintained.
Snowmobiles being operated on the
Cave Falls Road, which extends
approximately one mile into the
Yellowstone from the adjacent national
forest, will be exempt from air and
sound emissions requirements. Since
use of the Cave Falls Road is relatively
light and incidental to recreational use
of the surrounding national forest, it is
not necessary to require these users to
comply with requirements that address
issues associated with use of the interior
portions of the park.
In Grand Teton, all recreational
snowmobiles operating on Jackson Lake
will be required to meet NPS air and
sound emissions requirements.
During the winter season of 2007–
2008, snowmobiles being operated on
the portion of the Continental Divide
Snowmobile Trail (CDST) between
Moran Junction and Flagg Ranch, within
both Grand Teton and the Parkway,
must also meet NPS air and sound
emissions requirements. Beginning with
the winter season of 2008–2009, that
portion of the CDST will no longer be
maintained or designated for oversnow
vehicle use. The segment of the CDST
between the east boundary of Grand
Teton and Moran is exempt from NPS
air and sound emissions requirements.
Because this portion of the CDST passes
in and out of the park boundary and is
generally adjacent to other public and
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
private lands where snowmobile use is
permitted, this section is being managed
similarly to other routes where the use
of snowmobiles not meeting air and
sound emissions requirements is
allowed in order to provide access to
adjacent public and private lands. In
light of the small amount of such use
that typically occurs along this segment,
as well as the context in which that use
occurs (i.e., immediately alongside a
heavily used highway), the NPS has
determined that the impacts of this use
of snowmobiles that do not meet NPS
air and sound emissions requirements
are acceptable.
For the winter of 2007–2008,
snowmobiles being operated on the
Grassy Lake Road within the Parkway
are required to meet NPS air and sound
emissions requirements, except that
snowmobiles originating in the Targhee
National Forest will be allowed to travel
eastbound to Flagg Ranch and return
westbound without meeting the NPS
requirements; however, these
snowmobiles may not travel further into
the Parkway than Flagg Ranch. The NPS
is allowing this exception in order to
ensure that visitors to the remote Grassy
Lake area of the Targhee National Forest
are able to access food, fuel, emergency
services, and other amenities available
at Flagg Ranch. Beginning with the
2008–2009 winter season, snowmobiles
being operated on the Grassy Lake Road
will not be required to meet air and
sound emissions requirements
regardless of whether they originate
travel at Flagg Ranch or in the national
forest. In light of the relatively short
length of this segment and the very
limited amount of snowmobile use, the
NPS has determined that the impacts of
this use of snowmobiles that does not
meet NPS air and sound emissions
requirements are acceptable.
Under concession contracts issued in
2003, 78 snowcoaches are currently
authorized to operate in Yellowstone
(and in the parkway between Flagg
Ranch and Yellowstone’s South
Entrance). Approximately 29 of these
snowcoaches were manufactured by
Bombardier and were designed
specifically for oversnow travel. Those
29 snowcoaches were manufactured
before 1983 and are referred to as
‘‘historic snowcoaches’’ for the purpose
of this rulemaking. All other
snowcoaches are passenger vans or light
buses that have been converted for
oversnow travel using tracks and/or
skis. During the winter of 2005–2006, an
average of 29 snowcoaches entered
Yellowstone each day.
As of the winter of 2008–2009, all
snowcoaches must be commercially
guided. These trained, knowledgeable
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
operators help ensure that air and sound
emission requirements are met, wildlife
impacts are minimized, and visitor and
employee safety is assured.
In comparison with four-stroke
snowmobiles, snowcoaches operating
within EPA’s Tier I standards can be
substantially cleaner, especially given
that snowcoaches currently carry an
average of 7 times more passengers than
snowmobiles. In 2004, EPA began
phasing in Tier II emissions standards
for multi-passenger vans which will be
fully phased in by 2009. Tier II
standards will require that vehicles be
even cleaner than under Tier I. Tier II
standards would also significantly
reduce the open loop mode of operation,
which is the most polluting mode of
engine operation.
Beginning in the 2011–2012 season,
all snowcoaches in the Parks must meet
air emission requirements, which will
be the functional equivalent of having
EPA Tier I emissions control equipment
incorporated into the engine and drive
train for the vehicle’s class (size and
weight) as a wheeled vehicle. The NPS
will encourage, through contract and
permit, that snowcoaches have EPA Tier
II emissions control equipment for the
vehicle class. In addition, all critical
emission and sound-related exhaust
components that were originally
installed by the manufacturer must be in
place and functioning properly. Such
components may only be replaced with
original equipment manufacturer (OEM)
components where possible. If OEM
parts are not available, aftermarket parts
may be used if they do not worsen
emission and sound characteristics from
OEM levels. In general, catalysts that
have exceeded their typical useful life
as stated by the manufacturer must be
replaced unless the operator can
demonstrate the catalyst is functioning
properly.
Beginning in the 2011–2012 season,
snowcoaches must meet a sound
emissions requirement of no greater
than 73 dBA; test procedures will be
determined by the NPS.
The restrictions on air and sound
emissions proposed in this rule are not
a restriction on what manufacturers may
produce but an end-use restriction on
which commercially produced
snowmobiles and snowcoaches may be
used in the parks. The NPS Organic Act
(16 U.S.C. 1) authorizes the Secretary of
the Interior to ‘‘promote and regulate’’
the use of national parks ‘‘by such
means and measures as conform to the
fundamental purpose of said parks
* * * which purpose is to conserve the
scenery and the natural and historic
objects and the wild life therein and to
provide for the enjoyment of the same
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70785
in such manner and by such means as
will leave them unimpaired for the
enjoyment of future generations.’’
Further, the Secretary is expressly
authorized by 16 U.S.C. 3 to ‘‘make and
publish such rules and regulations as he
may deem necessary or proper for the
use and management of the parks
* * *’’ This exercise of the NPS
Organic Act authority is not an effort by
NPS to regulate manufacturers and is
consistent with Section 310 of the Clean
Air Act.
Since 2001, the Parks have been
converting their own administrative
fleet of snowmobiles to four-stroke
machines. These machines have proven
successful in fulfilling most of the
Service’s administrative needs
throughout the Parks. However, the NPS
recognizes that some administrative
applications, such as off-trail boundary
patrols in deep powder, towing heavy
equipment or disabled sleds, search and
rescue, or law enforcement uses may
require additional power beyond that
supplied by currently available
snowmobiles that meet the NPS’s air
and sound emissions requirements. In
such limited cases, the NPS will
sometimes need to use snowmobiles
that do not meet the requirements this
rule imposes upon recreational
snowmobiles (which do not have these
special needs because they travel only
upon groomed roads).
In order to mitigate impacts to natural
soundscapes and wildlife, and for
visitor and employee safety, all
recreational snowmobiles operated in
Yellowstone must be accompanied by a
commercial guide, except for those
being operated on the one-mile segment
of the Cave Falls Road that extends into
the park from the adjacent national
forest. This guiding requirement will
reduce conflicts with wildlife along
roadways because guides are trained to
lead visitors safely around the park with
minimal disturbance to wildlife.
Commercially guided parties also tend
to be larger in size, which reduces the
overall number of encounters with
wildlife and reduces the amount of time
that oversnow vehicles are audible.
Commercial guides are educated in
safety, knowledgeable about park rules,
and are required to exercise reasonable
control over their clientele, which has
reduced unsafe and illegal snowmobile
use. Commercial guides with
contractual obligations to the NPS also
allow for more effective enforcement of
park rules by the NPS. These guides
receive rigorous multi-day training and
perform guiding duties as employees of
a business. They also are experts at
interpreting the resources of the parks to
their clients. Commercial guides are
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
70786
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
employed by local businesses; those
jobs are not performed by NPS
employees.
Commercial guides use a ‘‘follow-theleader’’ approach, stopping often to talk
with the group. They lead snowmobiles
single-file through the park, using hand
signals to pass information down the
line from one snowmobile to the next,
a system which has proven to be
effective. Signals are used to warn group
members about wildlife and other road
hazards, indicate turns, and when to
turn on or off the snowmobile. Further,
all commercial guides are trained in
basic first aid and CPR. In addition to
first aid kits, they often carry satellite or
cellular telephones, radios, and other
equipment for emergency use. Guides
are thus well-equipped to ensure that
park regulations are enforced and to
provide a safer overall experience for
visitors.
Since the winter of 2003–2004, all
snowmobilers in Yellowstone have been
led by commercial guides, resulting in
significant positive effects on visitor
health and safety. Guides have been
proven to be very effective at enforcing
proper touring behavior, such as
adherence to speed limits, staying on
the groomed road surfaces, and other
snowmobiling behaviors that are
appropriate to safely and responsibly
visiting the park. Since implementation
of the guiding program there have been
pronounced reductions in the number of
law enforcement incidents and
accidents associated with the use of
snowmobiles, even when accounting for
the reduced number of snowmobilers
relative to historic use levels. The use of
guides is also beneficial to wildlife,
since guides are trained to respond
appropriately when encountering
wildlife.
No more than eleven snowmobiles
will be permitted in a group, including
that of the guide. Except in emergency
situations, guided parties must travel
together and remain within a maximum
distance of one-third mile of the first
snowmobile in the group. These size
and distance limits will ensure that
guided parties do not become separated,
will allow for sufficient and safe spacing
between individual snowmobiles within
the guided party, allow the guide(s) to
maintain control over the group and
minimize the impacts on wildlife and
natural soundscapes. NPS thus expects
that the continuation of the guiding
requirement will help ensure
compliance with park regulations and
protect park resources.
Scientific studies and monitoring of
winter visitor use and park resources
(including air quality, natural
soundscapes, wildlife, employee health
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
and safety, water quality, and visitor
experience) will continue. As part of its
adaptive management of winter use
activities, NPS will close selected areas
of the Parks to visitor use, including
sections of roads, if these studies
indicate that human presence or
activities have a substantial adverse
effect on wildlife or other park resources
that cannot otherwise be mitigated. A
one-year notice will ordinarily be
provided before any such closure is
implemented unless immediate closure
is deemed necessary to avoid
impairment of park resources. Most
non-emergency changes in park
management implemented under the
adaptive management framework will
be implemented only after at least one
or 2 years of monitoring, followed by a
6-to 12-month implementation period.
The Superintendent will continue to
have the authority under 36 CFR 1.5 to
take emergency actions to protect park
resources or values.
The adaptive management program
described in the ROD provides park
managers with a wide variety of tools to
ensure that the goals and objectives of
the winter use plans are being achieved.
Some of the techniques available
include adjustments in snowmobile or
snowcoach use levels (up or down),
adjustments in air and sound emissions
requirements, visitor and guide
education, timing of entries, and group
sizes. Also, the future improvements in
snowcoach air and sound emissions will
assist park managers in meeting goals
and objectives. Through adaptive
management, if monitoring of use levels
of snowmobiles and snowcoaches
allowed under the Record of Decision
indicates acceptable conditions, the
NPS will increase use levels to an extent
acceptable conditions can be
maintained. Conversely, if monitoring of
use levels of snowmobiles and
snowcoaches allowed under the Record
of Decision indicates unacceptable
conditions, the NPS will reduce use
levels to an extent acceptable conditions
can be maintained. In some cases,
additional rulemaking would be
required in order to implement certain
changes.
The NPS is implementing a multi-year
research proposal intended to
specifically address the question of
whether grooming of the Madison to
Norris road segment in Yellowstone has
led to alterations of bison movements
and distribution. The question was
identified in a report by Dr. Cormack
Gates et al., entitled ‘‘The Ecology of
Bison Movements and Distribution in
and Beyond Yellowstone National Park’’
(2005). The research program will
involve a linked series of experiments
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that will enable researchers to gain
insight into how road grooming and
other factors currently affect bison
travel. Initially, the research program
will include the analysis of existing data
on GPS-collared bison, the tracking of
additional GPS-collared bison, and the
deployment of cameras along travel
routes to gain information on the
relationship between road grooming and
bison travel, without necessitating the
closure of the Gibbon Canyon road
segment to public oversnow vehicle
travel. During the 5 year period, other
roads or routes may be investigated to
help understand the relationship
between snow depth, grooming, and
bison movement. For example, the
Firehole Canyon Drive may be closed to
oversnow travel and the Grand Loop
Road gated in that area to allow
snowmobile and snowcoach travel, but
not bison movement on the main road.
Bison would then be forced to travel
cross country or along the ungroomed
Firehole Canyon Road. Similarly, the
Madison to Norris Road may be fenced
or gated in the vicinity of the new
bridge over the Gibbon River to restrict
bison movement on the Madison to
Norris Road and force bison to travel
cross country. Thus bison movement
and snow depth and roads may be
tested without closing a main road.
However, following the 5 years of data
gathering and analysis, the NPS, in
consultation with the researchers, will
consider closing the main Madison to
Norris route to observe bison response.
That decision will rely on the results of
the data gathering and analysis and
whether such a closure would be likely
to yield informative data or conclusions.
If implemented, such a closure would
likely last several seasons.
Snowmobiles and snowcoaches will
continue to be restricted to designated
routes, which are a subset of the same
roads that are traveled by motor vehicles
during the remainder of the year, or in
the case of Jackson Lake, by motorboats
during the summer. In Yellowstone, in
addition to most of the Grand Loop
Road, certain side roads will be open for
snowmobile use after noon, based on
the successful experience of the NPS
with temporal zoning on Firehole
Canyon Drive. Virginia Cascades will be
accessible only via ski and snowshoe.
This rule addresses Sylvan Pass in
Yellowstone. For the winter season of
2007–2008 the pass will be managed
continuing the combined program
outlined in the 2004 Temporary Plan.
After the winter of 2007–2008, in order
to maximize risk reduction, the pass
would be open and managed using full
avalanche forecasting (as defined in the
Sylvan Pass Operational Risk
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Management Assessment and may be
viewed at: https://www.nps.gov/yell/
parkmgmt/
winterusetechnicaldocuments.htm).
When full forecasting indicates the pass
is safe, the pass would be open to
oversnow travel (both motorized and
non-motorized access).
The National Park Service will, in
good faith, work cooperatively with the
State of Wyoming, Park County,
Wyoming and the town of Cody to
determine how to provide continued
snowmobile and snowcoach motorized
oversnow access to Yellowstone
National Park through the East Gate via
Sylvan Pass in the winter use seasons
beyond 2007–2008.
The National Park Service will meet
with representatives of the State of
Wyoming, Park County, Wyoming and
the town of Cody to further explore
reasonable avalanche and access
mitigation safety measures and costs. In
order to provide adequate time to
implement actions that reflect a
potential consensus of the parties, and
to promulgate a new regulation, if
necessary, that reflects an amended
decision for the 2008–2009 winter use
season and beyond, consensus should
be reached by June 1, 2008.
If the pass is closed at times to
oversnow vehicle travel, the segment of
road from the East Entrance to a point
about four miles west, short of the
Sylvan Pass avalanche zone, will be
groomed and/or tracked for crosscountry skiing. The commercial
snowmobiles or snowcoaches
authorized to operate from East
Entrance may be allowed on that
segment in order to provide skier dropoffs or shuttles. In addition, when the
pass is not open due to safety, the road
segment between Fishing Bridge and
Lake Butte Overlook will be maintained
for oversnow vehicle travel.
Beginning with the winter season of
2008–2009, the NPS will discontinue
maintaining the Continental Divide
Snowmobile Trail (CDST) as an
oversnow vehicle route through most of
Grand Teton and the Parkway, in
essence converting this portion of the
CDST into a trailered segment.
Experience over the past several winters
strongly suggests that the minimal
amount of use on this route would not
substantially increase since much of the
previous use of the CDST was
associated with visitors traveling
through Yellowstone. The NPS
recognizes that the guiding and air and
sound emissions requirements for
Yellowstone have contributed to a
substantial reduction in the use of the
CDST, since visitors have not been able
to continue into Yellowstone without a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
guide and a snowmobile that meets the
emissions requirements, as well as being
subject to the daily entrance caps.
The NPS also recognizes, however,
that snowmobile access to and from the
Targhee National Forest is important to
some visitors. While the CDST will no
longer be maintained or designated for
snowmobile use, the air and sound
emissions requirements for the Grassy
Lake Road will be removed beginning
with the 2008–2009 winter season.
Snowmobilers will be able to transport
their machines by trailer between Moran
and Flagg Ranch using plowed roads, in
order to connect to the Grassy Lake
Road and the national forest lands to the
west of the Parkway. The daily entry
limit of 25 is similar to the level of use
that occurred in the past.
Summary of and Responses to Public
Comments
The NPS published a proposed rule
on May 16, 2007 (72 FR 27499) and
accepted public comments through July
16, 2007. Comments were accepted
through the mail, hand delivery, and
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. A total of
1,450 people commented on the
proposed rule, and 1,481 comment
documents were received (some
commentors submitted multiple letters).
Thirty-seven letters were submitted
electronically, and the remainder were
submitted in paper form. Approximately
42% of commentors submitted form
letters while the remaining 58% were
unique letters.
Snowmobiles and Snowcoaches
1. Comment: The NPS should revise
the proposed rule to prohibit the use of
snowmobiles and require that all
oversnow access to the parks be via
snowcoaches.
Response: Snowcoaches and
snowmobiles provide two very different
types of experiences for park visitors
seeking to enjoy Yellowstone during the
winter. The use of both types of travel
is well-established in the Parks,
extending back more than 4 decades. In
seeking to provide a range of
opportunities and means to enjoy the
Parks, the NPS believes that the
managed use of both types of oversnow
travel best meets that purpose and, as
described in the FEIS and ROD, can be
accomplished without harming the
integrity of park resources or values. In
addition, both types of access facilitate
a wide range of non-motorized activities
within the park by providing access to
interior destinations such as Old
Faithful and other areas that would
otherwise be unreachable by the vast
majority of visitors.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70787
2. Comment: The use of snowmobiles
results in a waste of resources and
contributes to climate change.
Response: As disclosed in the FEIS,
snowmobiles that currently meet the
NPS’s air and sound emissions
requirements are more fuel-efficient
than conventional snowmobiles and
therefore contribute less to climate
change. On a per capita basis,
snowmobiles meeting NPS air and
sound emissions requirements are
slightly more fuel-efficient than
snowcoaches, based on NPS analysis of
current ridership and gas mileage
within Yellowstone.
3. Comment: The proposed rule
would continue to allow the use of
snowcoaches, which would result in
adverse impacts on air quality and the
natural soundscape of Yellowstone.
Response: The NPS fully evaluated
the impacts of snowcoaches on the air
quality and natural soundscapes of
Yellowstone, as described in the FEIS.
The NPS recognizes that certain types of
snowcoaches, predominantly the
historic Bombardier models with
upright exhaust stacks, operate with
relatively high levels of noise and have
been responsible for a large percentage
of the instances in which sound levels
exceeded adaptive management
thresholds established by the NPS.
Beginning with the 2011–2012 winter
season, the NPS will require that all
snowcoaches meet a noise emissions
requirement of no greater than 73 dBA
and an air emissions requirement that is
the functional equivalent of having EPA
Tier I emissions control equipment into
the engine and drive train for the
vehicle class (size and weight) as a
wheeled vehicle. The NPS, through
contracts and permits, will encourage
snowcoaches to have EPA Tier II
emissions control equipment for the
vehicle class.
4. Comment: The NPS should require
all snowcoaches to meet air and sound
emissions requirements sooner than the
2011–2012 winter season.
Response: The NPS believes that the
4-year period allowed for the phase-in
of air and sound emissions requirements
is reasonable given the expense of
upgrading snowcoaches to meet these
requirements, and is necessary in order
to avoid a disruption of visitor services.
Park Resource Issues
5. Comment: The use of snowmobiles
under the proposed rule will continue
to result in adverse impacts on air and
water quality, natural soundscapes,
vegetation, wildlife, visitor experience,
and public health and safety.
Response: The NPS fully evaluated
the environmental impacts of
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
70788
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
snowmobile use in the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).
The combination of daily entry limits,
strict air and sound emissions
requirements for snowmobiles, and the
requirement that all snowmobilers
travel with a commercial guide while
visiting Yellowstone significantly
mitigates the impacts of snowmobile use
in the Parks. In order to further mitigate
these impacts, the NPS has reduced the
daily entry limits on snowmobiles to
540 per day in Yellowstone and 65 per
day in Grand Teton and the Parkway. As
stated in the FEIS and the ROD, the
impacts resulting from the use of
snowmobiles in the Parks will not harm
the integrity of park resources and
values.
6. Comment: Road grooming has
unnaturally altered bison ecology.
Response: The NPS fully evaluated
the impacts of snowmobile and
snowcoach use on bison in the FEIS and
responded to comments on this issue.
As discussed above, the NPS is also
implementing a research program to
further study aspects of this issue.
7. Comment: The improvements in air
quality as well as other improvements
in environmental conditions in
Yellowstone over the last several
winters are attributable more to the
lower numbers of snowmobiles that
have been present rather than to the air
and sound emissions requirements,
guiding requirements, and daily entry
limits (which allowed for more use than
actually occurred).
Response: The NPS recognizes that
the level of snowmobile use that
occurred over the last three winters
contributed to improvements in air
quality and other environmental
conditions. As described in the FEIS,
however, these improvements are also
attributable to the air and sound
emissions requirements, guiding, and
other elements of the temporary plan
that has been in effect for the past
several winters.
8. Comment: The NPS should not be
attempting to manage for an
unreasonable expectation that visitors
may expect to enjoy natural quiet along
with motorized travel within the Parks.
Response: Natural soundscapes are an
important element of the Parks’
resources and of visitors’ enjoyment of
the Parks. The NPS believes that it is
obligated to protect that resource and
allow for its enjoyment to the greatest
extent possible, recognizing that in
certain areas human-caused sounds will
be evident much of the time. The sound
emissions and guiding requirements,
group sizes, daily entry limits, and other
elements of the Winter Use Plan all
contribute to reasonable opportunities
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
for visitors to experience the natural
soundscapes of the Parks, even along
travel corridors.
9. Comment: Snowmobiles that meet
the air and sound emissions
requirements of the proposed rule do
not produce intrusive sounds and have
no adverse impacts on the Parks’ natural
soundscapes.
Response: As disclosed in the FEIS,
snowmobiles meeting the NPS air and
sound emissions requirements do
produce noise, although at a reduced
level from conventional two-stroke
snowmobiles. In addition, the tonal
qualities of these snowmobiles are
different from conventional
snowmobiles and may be perceived as
less intrusive, and at the limits of
audibility the low pitched sounds may
not be distinguishable from natural
sounds such as the wind. The
requirement that most snowmobiles
operating in the Parks meet NPS air and
sound emissions requirements
mitigates, but does not eliminate,
impacts on the natural soundscapes.
10. Comment: The use of
snowmobiles does not result in any
environmental impacts on the parks.
Response: The environmental impacts
of snowmobiles and snowcoaches were
identified in the FEIS.
11. Comment: The analysis
supporting the proposed rule did not
properly consider recent studies, in
particular the Bishop studies from 2006
and 2007, showing that snowcoaches
and snowmobiles can have the same
extremes in emissions—both high and
low—and the proposed rule relies on
studies not cited in the DEIS (C.C. Lela
and J.J. White/Southwest Research
Institute, ‘‘Laboratory Testing of
Snowmobile Emissions, Final Report,’’
2002).
Response: The proposed rule did use
the Bishop studies and the FEIS in its
analysis (Gary A. Bishop, Daniel A.
Burgard, Thomas R. Dalton, Donald H.
Stedman, and John D. Ray, 2006 ‘‘In-use
Emission Measurements of
Snowmobiles and Snowcoaches in
Yellowstone National Park,’’ and Gary
A. Bishop, Ryan Stadtmuller, and
Donald H. Stedman, 2007 ‘‘Portable
Emission Measurements of
Snowcoaches and Snowmobiles in
Yellowstone National Park’’). The 2006
study has been published (Winter
Motor-Vehicle Emissions in
Yellowstone National Park,
Environmental Science & Technology
(April 15, 2006): 2505–2510), and the
2007 study has been submitted for peer
review. Both of these studies support
the conclusion that although
snowcoaches as a class can have both
high and low emissions, the cleanest of
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the snowcoaches would produce
emissions well below that of four-stroke
snowmobiles, on a per capita basis. The
NPS, in requiring Tier I emissions
controls for snowcoaches with this rule
(and encouraging the stricter Tier II
emissions controls through contracts, as
indicated in the FEIS), will be
implementing snowcoach emissions
requirements intended to be equal to or
better than the emissions Bishop found
in the cleanest group of snowmobiles, as
detailed in the FEIS.
Guiding
12. Comment: The requirement over
the last several winters that all visitors
entering Yellowstone by snowmobile be
accompanied by a commercial guide has
resulted in adverse economic impacts
on gateway communities, and these
impacts will be perpetuated by the
proposed rule.
Response: These and other economic
impacts were disclosed and analyzed in
the FEIS and in the economic analysis
report that is summarized below. The
NPS acknowledges that there have been
some negative economic impacts to
gateway communities and individual
businesses located within those
communities over the past several
winters as a result of a decrease in
snowmobile visitation to the Parks.
13. Comment: The requirement in the
proposed rule that all snowmobilers be
accompanied by a commercial guide
while visiting Yellowstone largely
eliminates the ability to experience the
park on one’s own terms, independent
of a guided tour, thus diminishing the
enjoyment of visiting the park.
Response: The NPS recognizes that
the guiding requirement diminishes the
opportunity to travel freely through the
park independent of a commercially
guided trip, but believes that such a
requirement is a fundamental element of
the successful approach to mitigating
the impacts of motorized winter use.
While some individuals may be
discouraged from visiting the park
because of this requirement, the NPS
also recognizes that by traveling with a
commercial guide, visitors have the
ability to increase their understanding
and appreciation of the park through
frequent interaction with a
knowledgeable and experienced trip
leader.
14. Comment: Commercial guiding
does not mitigate the impacts to natural
soundscapes, wildlife, and safety.
Response: The effects of guiding on
these resource topics were analyzed in
the FEIS. Guiding has resulted in
substantial noise-free intervals in the
park because snowmobiles are clustered
in groups and travel in more predictable
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
patterns. Commercial guiding is
effective in minimizing human-wildlife
conflicts, and the number of law
enforcement and safety-related
incidents has substantially decreased
since the initiation of the commercial
guiding requirement.
15. Comment: Commercially guided
groups should continue to have a
maximum size of 10 snowmobilers plus
the guide on a separate snowmobile,
rather than the 8 or 17 snowmobiles
(depending on whether 1 or 2 guides are
present) described in the proposed rule.
Response: In response to public
comment and further discussions within
the NPS, this section of the proposed
rule has been revised to continue the
existing maximum group size of 10
snowmobiles plus one guide, for a total
of 11 snowmobiles.
16. Comment: The NPS should
specify a minimum group size of two
persons.
Response: The NPS does not believe
it is necessary to designate a minimum
group size since there will always be at
least one person plus a guide.
17. Comment: The analysis
supporting the proposed rule does not
support the NPS’s conclusions that the
requirement for commercial guides
results in mitigation of the impacts on
soundscapes, wildlife, and safety. The
analysis is flawed because groups
accompanied by a non-commercial
guide have not been allowed in
Yellowstone since implementation of
managed winter use in 2003, and
therefore was not analyzed.
Response: The NPS believes that
commercial guiding has been extremely
successful and helped address problems
that historically arose. A number of
actions in the range of alternatives
considered in the EIS have not occurred
in practice, such as non-commercial
guiding, road closures, improved air and
sound emissions requirements for
snowmobiles, and air and sound
requirements for snowcoaches. This
does not mean that those actions were
not analyzed. Modeling and
professional judgment were used to
analyze these actions.
Sylvan Pass
18. Comment: The reasons and
rationale presented by the NPS in the
proposed rule for the closure of Sylvan
Pass to oversnow vehicle travel are
insufficient to support such an action.
The rule should be revised to continue
the use of Sylvan Pass as an oversnow
route for snowmobiles and
snowcoaches.
Response: The NPS and others have
extensively studied the avalanche
hazards at Sylvan Pass as well as
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
potential ways of addressing those
hazards. The NPS has concluded that
there are serious risks to park
employees, contractors, and visitors,
and there may not be reasonable ways
of ensuring that visitors or
concessioners could depend on the pass
being consistently open in light of the
avalanche hazards, weather conditions,
and other factors. However, the National
Park Service will, in good faith, work
cooperatively with the State of
Wyoming, Park County, Wyoming and
the town of Cody to determine how to
provide continued snowmobile and
snowcoach motorized oversnow access
to Yellowstone National Park through
the East Gate via Sylvan Pass.
The National Park Service will meet
with representatives of the State of
Wyoming, Park County, Wyoming and
the town of Cody to further explore
reasonable avalanche and access
mitigation safety measures and costs. In
order to provide adequate time to
implement actions that reflect a
potential consensus of the parties for the
2008–2009 winter use season and
beyond, consensus should be reached
by June 1, 2008. Consistent with the
decision explained in the ROD, the NPS
has revised the final rule to reflect that
the East Entrance Road through Sylvan
Pass will continue to be designated as
an oversnow vehicle route beyond the
2007–2008 winter season. The NPS will
cease active avalanche control activities
beginning with the 2008–2009 season,
and the pass would be open to
motorized and non-motorized travel
when avalanche forecasting indicates
that travel through the pass is safe.
19. Comment: The NPS has used the
low number of visitors using the East
Entrance during the winter as a reason
for proposing to close Sylvan Pass to
oversnow vehicle use.
Response: Although the number of
visitors using the East Entrance has been
fairly low recently and historically, the
basis for the proposal to close Sylvan
Pass to oversnow vehicle use was that
avalanche hazards to employees and
visitors exist. As described above and in
the ROD, the National Park Service will,
in good faith, work cooperatively with
the State of Wyoming, Park County,
Wyoming and the town of Cody to
determine how to provide continued
snowmobile and snowcoach motorized
oversnow access to Yellowstone
National Park through the East Gate via
Sylvan Pass.
20. Comment: The NPS is inconsistent
in its approach to public health and
safety at Sylvan Pass because the
proposed rule prohibits the use of
oversnow vehicles through the pass due
to the danger of avalanches, while
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70789
permitting non-motorized users to ski or
snowshoe through the same area in the
absence of any avalanche control efforts.
Response: In the Final Rule,
motorized and non-motorized travel
over Sylvan Pass are treated the same.
21. Comment: Closure of the East
Entrance to Yellowstone for the winter
season would result in negative
socioeconomic impacts on communities
that depend on winter tourism.
Response: The National Park Service
has revised the final rule, and will in
good faith work cooperatively with the
State of Wyoming, Park County,
Wyoming and the town of Cody to
determine how to provide continued
snowmobile and snowcoach motorized
oversnow access to Yellowstone
National Park through the East Gate via
Sylvan Pass. The NPS recognizes that
the closure of the East Entrance during
the winter would result in some
economic impacts on Cody and Park
County, Wyoming. While some
individual businesses would likely be
adversely affected by the closure of the
East Entrance, the overall effect on the
area’s economy would have been minor
since winter tourism is only one
component of the economy (see FEIS,
pages 207–210). These and other
economic impacts were disclosed and
analyzed in the FEIS and in the
economic analysis report that is
summarized below. The full documents
are available online at https://
www.nps.gov/yell/planyourvisit/
winteruse.htm.
22. Comment: An economically
sustainable winter recreation program
for Cody and the North Fork area would
not be supportable if Sylvan Pass were
to be closed.
Response: The NPS acknowledges
that some economic impacts on Cody
and the North Fork area would result
from the closure of Sylvan Pass, and
that some individual businesses could
be particularly impacted. The NPS
believes that a variety of recreation
opportunities would continue to be
available in Cody and the North Fork
area. As described above, the National
Park Service has revised the final rule,
and will in good faith work
cooperatively with the State of
Wyoming, Park County, Wyoming and
the town of Cody to determine how to
safely provide continued snowmobile
and snowcoach motorized oversnow
access to the interior of Yellowstone
National Park through the East Gate via
Sylvan Pass.
23. Comment: Closure of Sylvan Pass
to oversnow vehicles would deprive
visitors of the opportunity to experience
and enjoy that area of the park.
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
70790
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Response: As discussed above, our
revised decision will provide such
access during periods when it is safe to
do so. During the periods when Sylvan
Pass is closed due to avalanche risk, the
first several miles of the road between
the East Entrance and Sylvan Pass will
continue to be maintained for persons
wishing to experience the area on skis
or snowshoes, with drop-offs possible
by snowcoach or snowmobile.
24. Comment: The following
statement on page 27510 of the
proposed rule is not true for
communities and businesses in Park
County, Wyoming: ‘‘The preferred
alternative also supports the
communities and businesses both near
and far from the park and will
encourage them to have an
economically sustainable winter
recreation program that relies on a
variety of modes and access to the parks
in the winter.’’
Response: The NPS has in both the
FEIS and ROD stated its support for
working with communities and
businesses in Park County in a variety
of ways to mitigate the impacts of
changes in access to the East Entrance.
As described above, the National Park
Service has revised the final rule, and
will in good faith work cooperatively
with the State of Wyoming, Park
County, Wyoming, and the town of
Cody to determine how to safely
provide continued snowmobile and
snowcoach motorized oversnow access
to Yellowstone National Park through
the East Gate via Sylvan Pass.
25. Comment: What is the rationale
for the one-year delay in implementing
the closure of Sylvan Pass and who
would benefit from that delay?
Response: The NPS believes that a
delay in transitioning to a different
method of managing risk on Sylvan Pass
is appropriate in order to give local
businesses and communities that may
be affected by the change in access time
to adjust. Also the one year delay
provides the opportunity for the
National Park Service, in good faith, to
work cooperatively with the State of
Wyoming, Park County, Wyoming and
the town of Cody to determine how to
provide continued snowmobile and
snowcoach motorized oversnow access
to Yellowstone National Park through
the East Gate via Sylvan Pass in the
winter use seasons beyond 2007–2008.
The National Park Service will meet
with representatives of the State of
Wyoming, Park County, Wyoming, and
the town of Cody to further explore
reasonable avalanche and access
mitigation safety measures and costs. In
order to provide adequate time to
implement actions that reflect a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
potential consensus of the parties,
consensus should be reached by June 1,
2008.
Socioeconomics
26. Comment: The analysis
supporting the proposed rule did not
properly consider the long-term
socioeconomic impacts on gateway
communities.
Response: The potential
socioeconomic impacts are described in
Section 4.2.2 of the FEIS.
27. Comment: The economic analysis
indicates that Alternative 2, the
‘‘snowcoach only’’ alternative, has the
second highest level of quantified net
benefits, which seems high since
combined skier and snowcoach entries
have never accounted for more than
about 20 percent of total park winter
visitation.
Response: Quantified net benefits, as
represented by consumer surplus, is
different from total number of visitors
and total spending by visitors.
Consumer surplus is the monetized
measure of the value or enjoyment of
the visit to the visitor. Under
Alternative 2, snowcoach riders placed
a very high value on visiting the park
without snowmobiles. Also, according
to actual visitation statistics presented
in the FEIS, car passengers are by far the
largest group of winter visitors in
Yellowstone, composing almost 50%.
Collectively, car riders, snowcoach
riders and skiers make up a little over
2/3 of the winter visitors. Finally, skiers
are not just people who entered the park
by ski, but people for whom skiing was
the primary activity in YNP (6% of
visitors according to the 2002–2003
survey). These people may have actually
entered the park driving a car or riding
a snowcoach or snowmobile.
28. Comment: The analysis
supporting the proposed rule is
inconsistent because it uses historical
snowmobile use levels as the baseline
for some resources but does not use that
baseline for the economic analysis.
Response: The Office of Management
and Budget requires that for rulemaking
purposes the economic analysis use as
a baseline a condition that is absent the
federal rulemaking. In this case, that
corresponds to a situation where no
oversnow vehicle use would be
authorized in the Parks. For other
impact topics, the comparison to
historical conditions was intended to
allow the reader to understand the
differences between each alternative
and conditions that previously existed,
and between the alternatives
themselves, including the no action
alternative.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29. Comment: The Parks are
important economically to the
surrounding counties, and citizens
expect reasonable access to the Parks.
Response: The NPS agrees with this
statement and recognizes the economic
significance of the Parks to the
surrounding communities, which is
described in the economic analysis in
the FEIS, and summarized in this rule.
The NPS believes that the management
of winter use that will occur under this
rule provides visitors with an
appropriate range of activities and
experiences while ensuring that the
integrity of park resources and values is
not harmed.
Designated Routes and Daily Entry
Limits
30. Comment: The NPS should restrict
the number of snowcoaches to no more
than 50 per day in order to maximize
the occupancy of each coach.
Response: We believe that the ROD
and this rule reflect an adequate balance
between snowmobile and snowcoach
access to the interior of Yellowstone in
the winter while protecting park
resources and values. The number of
snowcoaches operating in Yellowstone
over the past several winters has been
less than the 78 per day that were
authorized, although snowcoach
ridership has been on an upward trend.
While snowcoach operators strive to
maximize occupancy, the actual number
of people per coach is dependent on a
number of factors such as group sizes,
scheduling, charters, and equipment
availability. The NPS expects that as
demand for snowcoach tours increases,
the number of coaches operating in the
park will increase commensurate with
the demand, and occupancy rates may
also increase to some degree. The NPS
retains the flexibility to defer the
increase from 78 to 83 to the next
snowcoach contracts.
31. Comment: The NPS should
manage snowmobile use by regulating
the number of groups instead of
individual snowmobiles.
Response: The NPS recognizes that
managing by the number of snowmobile
groups using the parks rather than the
actual number of snowmobiles is
another possible method that could be
used to allocate daily entries. Such an
alternative was considered but
dismissed from detailed consideration
in the FEIS. The NPS believes that
allocating a set number of snowmobile
entries per entrance with an upper limit
on the number of snowmobiles per
group provides guides with the greatest
flexibility. Under a daily group limit,
some groups would not be filled to the
group size limit. Managing visitor use
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
by a daily entrance limit allows more
visitors to tour the park. Also, an
inherent part of the analysis, especially
for soundscapes, was the concept of
grouping snowmobiles. Nonetheless, the
NPS does not wish to discourage
operators from taking smaller groups or
charters since this type of individual
service is desired by some visitors.
32. Comment: The NPS should extend
the hours for access to Firehole Canyon,
North Canyon Rim Drive, and Riverside
Drive in Yellowstone to provide more
flexibility for guided tours.
Response: The NPS believes that
restricting the hours during which
snowmobiles may access these areas
allows for a separation of snowmobile
and snowcoach use which provides
opportunities for an enhanced
experience for some visitors.
33. Comment: The NPS should either
prohibit the use of snowmobiles in the
parks, or if they are allowed, the daily
entry limits should be very low.
Response: The NPS has reduced the
number of snowmobiles allowed to
enter Yellowstone each day from 720 in
the proposed rule to 540 in the final
rule. Similarly, the number of
snowmobiles allowed in Grand Teton
and the Parkway was reduced from 140
per day in the proposed rule to 65 per
day in the final rule. The numbers of
snowmobiles allowed in the parks
under this rule take into account the
analysis of public comment, feedback
from public meetings, review of the
2006 NPS Management Policies,
additional monitoring data, and
additional analysis and modeling
completed since publication of the
proposed rule and DEIS.
34. Comment: The NPS should allow
some percentage of the daily
snowmobile entries for Yellowstone to
consist of either unguided or noncommercially guided groups, perhaps in
conjunction with a certified leader
program.
Response: The NPS considered two
distinct alternatives that allowed either
20 or 25 percent of snowmobiles to
enter Yellowstone either with a noncommercial guide or unguided. Based
on the experience of the past several
winters and additional analysis
presented in the FEIS in support of this
rulemaking, the NPS concluded that the
requirement that 100% of the
snowmobile use be commercially
guided is both appropriate and
necessary to adequately mitigate the
impacts of the use on park resources
and values.
35. Comment: The use of
snowmobiles and snowcoaches should
be restricted to certain designated
routes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
Response: Consistent with the
requirements of 36 CFR 2.18(c), the use
of snowmobiles and snowcoaches under
the proposed rule was, and this final
rule continues to be, restricted to
designated routes that are the same as
roads that are used by motor vehicles
during other seasons of the year, or in
the case of Jackson Lake, by motorboats
during the summer months. Only a
portion of the Parks’ road systems is
groomed for oversnow vehicle use. The
use of snowmobiles or snowcoaches off
of designated routes is prohibited.
Grand Teton and the John D.
Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial Parkway
36. Comment: The NPS should allow
the use of ‘‘EPA Compliant’’
snowmobiles on Jackson Lake, the
Continental Divide Snowmobile Trail,
and the Grassy Lake Road. EPA
compliant would be defined as a 2007
model year or later snowmobile that
meets or exceeds the Environmental
Protection Agency’s requirements for air
emissions.
Response: The NPS considered this
concept but believes that it would not
be as effective in mitigating the noise
associated with snowmobiles as the air
and sound emissions requirements
described in the proposed rule. The EPA
regulations pertain only to air emissions
and therefore would not necessarily
result in any noticeable reduction of
noise. In addition, EPA air emission
regulations are not as strict as NPS air
requirements in this rule.
37. Comment: The NPS should
consider the CDST and Grassy Lake
Road as one segment and manage it
primarily for the use of long-distance
snowmobile tours that originate and
terminate outside of the parks in order
to facilitate travel between points in
Wyoming and destinations in Idaho and
Montana.
Response: The NPS considered but
rejected this concept because it would
have also involved the use of ‘‘EPA
Compliant’’ snowmobiles on the CDST,
which would not address noise issues as
discussed in the previous response. In
lieu of this proposal, however, the NPS
will allow two-way use of the Grassy
Lake Road without any restrictions on
the type of snowmobiles that may be
used, and allow a daily limit of 25 per
day. While snowmobiles will have to be
hauled by trailer between Moran
Junction and Flagg Ranch, this change
will improve access to the adjacent
public lands in the Targhee National
Forest and beyond.
Consistency With Laws and Policies
38. Comment: By allowing for the use
of snowmobiles in the Parks, the
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70791
proposed rule is inconsistent with the
NPS Management Policies 2006, which
require that conservation must be the
priority when there is a choice between
visitor access and use of the parks and
protection of park resources and values.
Response: Throughout the planning
process that supports this rulemaking,
the concept of providing a range of
appropriate activities and experiences
for park visitors has remained constant.
For the reasons stated in the ROD, this
concept as well as this rule are fully in
accordance with the NPS Organic Act,
the NPS Management Policies 2006,
executive orders, and other authorities
pertaining to management of the
National Park System. The NPS believes
that the carefully regulated and
monitored use of snowmobiles is part of
an appropriate range of winter activities.
Throughout the process supporting this
rulemaking, the NPS has heard from and
listened to commentors expressing a
wide variety of viewpoints on the issue,
and recognizes the difficulty in
reconciling the many differences in
opinion.
39. Comment: Implementation of the
proposed rule would result in the NPS
violating the NPS Organic Act and other
applicable mandates.
Response: The NPS determined in the
FEIS and the ROD that the actions that
are to be implemented under this rule
will not result in unacceptable impacts
or impairment and thus will not violate
the Organic Act, or any other law,
regulation or policy.
40. Comment: The Clean Air Act and
NPS Management Policies 2006 require
the National Park Service to maintain
the best possible air quality in the parks.
Response: At present, with oversnow
vehicle use levels similar to what would
likely be experienced under these rules
(including the air quality on the busiest
days, with oversnow vehicle numbers at
or near the maximum that will be
allowed under these rules), air quality
in the parks has been in full compliance
with the requirements of the Clean Air
Act and NPS Management Policies.
Under the interim plan, NPS found that
both carbon monoxide and particulate
levels were well below national
standards; carbon monoxide levels were
a tenth of the national standard and
particulate levels were less than onefourth of the standard, as documented
in the FEIS.
Miscellaneous
41. Comment: The NPS should
establish December 15 and March 15 as
fixed dates for the opening and closing
dates of the winter use season in
Yellowstone.
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
70792
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Response: Beginning with the winter
season of 2008–2009, Yellowstone’s
winter season is defined as the period
from December 15 to March 15. Actual
opening and closing dates for oversnow
travel, however, will continue to be
determined based on the presence of
adequate snowpack or snow water
equivalency as has been done for a
number of years. Additionally, an early
March closing of Yellowstone’s
Mammoth Terraces oversnow entrance
and the roads from Norris to Madison
and Norris to Canyon will continue to
occur to facilitate spring plowing.
42. Comment: The NPS should use a
lottery system for allocating entries into
Yellowstone.
Response: The NPS believes that the
existing system of allocating entries
through concessions contracts and
permits is the most appropriate method,
especially in the context of the guiding
requirement.
43. Comment: The NPS should
consider expanding opportunities for
non-motorized recreation in the parks
by grooming additional areas for cross
country skiing.
Response: This rulemaking does not
affect the ability of the NPS to consider
such actions.
44. Comment: The NPS should
continue to provide a preferential right
of renewal of long-time, small
concessioners.
Response: Concessions contracting
issues are beyond the scope of this
rulemaking and are addressed in 16
U.S.C. 5951–5966 and 36 CFR part 51.
45. Comment: The analysis
supporting the proposed rule did not
properly consider the long-term impacts
from climate change on winter activities
in the parks.
Response: The NPS addressed climate
change in Section 1.5 of the FEIS.
Climate change may affect winter
precipitation patterns and amounts in
the parks, but it would be speculative to
predict changes in snow water
equivalency or average winter
temperatures. The FEIS did analyze the
impacts of plowing Yellowstone’s lower
elevation roads, which may be a viable
adaptive management strategy in
response to changing weather patterns.
46. Comment: The analysis
supporting the proposed rule did not
adequately consider the cumulative
environmental impacts to nearby
national forest lands.
Response: The potential direct,
indirect, and cumulative effects on
lands, including national forests, within
the Greater Yellowstone Area are
discussed in Section 4.4 of the FEIS.
The U.S. Forest Service was a
cooperating agency on this FEIS in order
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
to provide technical information and
provide technical review on topics
related to their special expertise,
including cumulative impacts on
adjacent forest lands.
47. Comment: The NPS should
require snowmobilers to purchase park
entrance permits in the gateway
communities rather than at the entrance
stations in order to reduce congestion
and air pollution at the park entrances.
Response: The park entrance fee is
included in the package that visitors
purchase from the commercial tour
operators prior to entering the park,
which also typically includes the costs
of the snowmobile rental and
snowmobile suit rental, as well as the
guide fee. Guides provide a voucher to
the NPS indicating the number of
visitors, and the operator is
subsequently billed the appropriate
amount. This procedure eliminates the
need for a separate transaction at the
gate for each visitor. The requirement
that all snowmobilers be part of a
commercially guided tour facilitates this
practice.
48. Comment: Gateway communities,
concessioners, visitors, and
snowmobile-related businesses have
suffered economic impacts as a result of
restrictions on use and misinformation
regarding the extent to which the parks
were open.
Response: The NPS recognizes that
some of the decrease in winter visitation
to the parks over the past several
winters may have been the result of
potential visitors to the parks being
confused or unaware as to whether and
to what extent the parks were open. The
NPS has made every effort to ensure that
the public was aware that the parks
were open and that an appropriate range
of activities for their enjoyment was
available, and will continue to do so in
the future.
49. Comment: Revenue from
snowmobile use of the parks provides
funds that may be used by the NPS to
support operations of the park
throughout the year.
Response: The parks retain 80% of the
entrance fee revenue generated by
visitation, with the remaining funds
distributed for use elsewhere in the
National Park System. While the funds
derived from the winter season are a
relatively small component of the Parks’
budgets, those funds are important to
operation and management of the Parks,
and are used in accordance with
applicable laws, regulations, and
policies.
50. Comment: The NPS should strictly
enforce park regulations.
Response: The NPS strictly enforces
applicable federal laws and regulations
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
within the Parks. Under the temporary
plan that has been in effect the past
three winters, NPS found that there was
a significant increase in compliance
with park regulations which is
attributable to the commercial guiding
requirement.
51. Comment: The NPS should not
have initiated the rulemaking process
until after the FEIS and Record of
Decision were completed.
Response: Publication of the proposed
rule shortly after release of the DEIS
provided the public with two separate
opportunities to comment on the winter
use planning and regulation processes
prior to the NPS reaching a decision,
and did not limit the NPS in its
decision-making. In fact, as a logical
outgrowth of these comment processes,
the NPS developed and presented a new
preferred alternative in the FEIS and
released the ROD and this final rule
based on that new alternative.
52. Comment: The fees that park
visitors must pay for commercial
guiding services represent the unlawful
levy of a tax.
Response: The fees paid by visitors to
commercial guides are for services
rendered and are not a tax.
53. Comment: The NPS should not
rely on, nor make reference to the 2000
FEIS and related Record of Decision in
this rulemaking since both of these
documents were invalidated by the
Wyoming District Court, and the
conclusion within them that
snowmobile use impaired park
resources was legally and factually
wrong.
Response: The references to the 2000
FEIS and Record of Decision are
necessary to properly explain the
history and context of the winter use
issue and this rulemaking. The NPS
does not dispute that both of these
documents were vacated by the
Wyoming District Court and remanded
to the agency on procedural grounds.
The Wyoming District Court did not
find the conclusions regarding
impairment to be incorrect, and found
that the Record of Decision was within
the discretion of the NPS under the
Organic Act. This rulemaking does not
rely on either document.
54. Comment: The Wyoming
Department of Game and Fish should be
allowed to access Jackson Lake for
purposes associated with management
of the fishery.
Response: Except where noted, the
rule applies to the use of recreational
snowmobiles in the Parks. The NPS has
previously indicated to the Wyoming
Department of Game and Fish that the
use of 2-stroke snowmobiles for
administrative purposes will be allowed
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
on Jackson Lake, but strongly
encourages the use of snowmobiles
meeting NPS air and sound emissions
requirements unless necessary under
the circumstances.
Changes to the Final Rule
After taking the public comments into
consideration and after additional
internal review, several changes were
made to the final rule, in addition to
non-substitutive editorial changes made
to improve clarity of the rule. These
changes are as follows:
First, paragraphs 7.13(l)(6)(ii),
7.21(a)(6)(ii), and 7.22(g)(6)(ii) for
Yellowstone, the Parkway, and Grand
Teton, respectively, have been revised
to indicate that the NPS may in the
future utilize an updated SAE J192
procedure in order to certify which
makes and models of snowmobiles meet
NPS sound emissions requirements.
Second, paragraph (7) in § 7.13(l) has
been revised to reflect the decision that
the East Entrance Road through Sylvan
Pass will continue to be designated for
oversnow vehicle use beyond the 2007–
2008 winter season.
Third, paragraph (9) of both § 7.13(l)
and § 7.21(a) has been revised to require
that group sizes may not exceed eleven
snowmobiles, including that of the
guide. This change was based in large
part on public comment that indicated
that groups of this size worked well and
that the proposed change was not
necessary.
Fourth, the tables in § 7.13(l),
§ 7.21(a), and § 7.22(g) have been
revised to reflect the reduction in the
number of snowmobiles permitted each
day in each of the 3 park units, as well
as the slight increase in the number of
snowcoaches allowed in Yellowstone.
As described earlier, these changes were
made primarily in order to provide
greater protection of the Parks’ air
quality and natural soundscapes while
ensuring that visitors are afforded an
appropriate range of experiences. The
tables have also been revised to reflect
an allocation of 30 snowmobiles and
two snowcoaches per day to the East
Entrance, thereby slightly reducing the
allocations at the North and South
Entrances. Footnotes to Table 1 in
§ 7.13(l) have also been revised to
indicate that the specific allocations for
each entrance of Yellowstone may be
adjusted based on concession contract
requirements, not to exceed 540
snowmobiles and 83 snowcoaches per
day. Fifth, paragraph (6) of § 7.21(a) has
been revised to indicate that beginning
with the winter season of 2008–2009, air
and sound emissions requirements will
not apply to snowmobiles being
operated on the Grassy Lake Road,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
regardless of whether travel originates at
Flagg Ranch or in the Targhee National
Forest. The purpose of this change is to
improve access to the recreational
opportunities in the adjacent national
forest lands.
Sixth, paragraph (7) of § 7.21(a) has
been revised to indicate that the
Continental Divide Snowmobile Trail
and the route between the Snake River
Bridge and Flagg Ranch is designated
for oversnow vehicle use only through
the winter season of 2007–2008.
Seventh, paragraph (7) of § 7.22(g) has
been revised to reflect that the segment
of the Continental Divide Snowmobile
Trail between the Moran Entrance
Station and the north boundary of
Grand Teton is designated for
snowmobile use only through the winter
season of 2007–2008.
Summary of Economic Analysis
Introduction
This section summarizes an analysis
conducted by the National Park Service
of the costs and benefits, and impacts on
small entities associated with this rule.
The analysis is contained in the report
titled ‘‘Economic Analysis of Winter
Use Regulations in the Greater
Yellowstone Area’’ (RTI International,
September 2007), which is available at
https://www.nps.gov/yell/planyourvisit/
winteruse.htm. It should be noted that
the report was based upon the preferred
alternative in the FEIS, which was
Alternative 7. Under this alternative,
Sylvan Pass would have been closed to
oversnow vehicle use beginning with
the winter season of 2008–2009. The
Record of Decision, however, allows for
Sylvan Pass to remain open, and
therefore presents a slightly different
scenario than contained in the economic
analysis. The costs and benefits
presented in the economic analysis are
therefore likely to be slightly different
than if the report was based on the pass
being kept open, but not significantly
enough to require a new economic
analysis.
The analysis examines seven action
alternatives for winter use plans in the
Greater Yellowstone Area (Yellowstone
National Park, Grand Teton National
Park, and John D. Rockefeller, Jr.
Memorial Parkway). In Yellowstone
National Park, Alternative 1 represents
conditions under the temporary winter
use rule with some exceptions,
including closing the East Entrance.
Alternative 2 prohibits snowmobile
access but allows for snowcoaches,
while leaving the East Entrance closed.
Alternative 3a allows guided
snowmobile and snowcoach use, but
only through the South Entrance. The
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70793
other four action alternatives allow
snowmobile and snowcoach use subject
to daily entrance limits and with some
guided tour requirements. Alternatives 4
and 5 allow for 25% and 20% unguided
or non-commercially guided use,
respectively, along with snowcoach use.
Alternative 6 allows for another winter
use of Yellowstone National Park—
commercially guided wheeled vehicle
use through the West Entrance, which
would be plowed from Mammoth to the
West Entrance to Old Faithful. Guided
snowmobile and snowcoach use would
be allowed out of the South Entrance
and from Old Faithful and Norris.
Alternative 7 allows for 540
snowmobiles and 83 snowcoaches per
day in Yellowstone and closes the East
Entrance to oversnow vehicle use
beginning with the 2008–2009 winter
season. Alternative 7 also allows 65
snowmobiles per day for Grand Teton
and the Parkway.
In Grand Teton National Park,
Alternatives 1, 3, 5, and 6 allow for all
snowmobiles to ride unguided up to
varying daily caps. Alternative 4 allows
a mixture of guided and unguided
snowmobiles, while Alternative 2 bans
snowmobiles. Under Alternatives 1, 4,
and 5, the Grassy Lake Road, the
Continental Divide Snowmobile Trail
(CDST), and Jackson Lake remain open
for snowmobiles. Only the Grassy Lake
Road is open under Alternative 3a,
while Alternative 6 allows snowmobiles
on the Grassy Lake Road and Jackson
Lake.
The National Park Service identified
Alternative 7 as the preferred alternative
in the FEIS, and adopted that
alternative, with some modifications, in
the ROD. Alternative 7 combines
aspects of several of the other
alternatives, especially Alternatives 1
and 5. In Yellowstone National Park,
snowmobiles must be on guided tours,
as in Alternative 1. The total daily limit
for snowmobiles is the same as
Alternative 5, although the limit is
distributed differently across the
entrances and the East Entrance is
closed to snowmobiles. In Grand Teton
National Park, the CDST will no longer
be maintained, and snowmobiles
traveling the trail must be hauled by
trailer across it. With the closing of the
CDST in Grand Teton National Park, the
daily limit on snowmobiles is lower
than the other alternatives.
The analysis estimates the benefits
and costs associated with these seven
action alternatives relative to the
baseline, which is Alternative 3b.
Baseline describes the conditions that
would occur if the proposed regulations
that are currently under consideration
were not implemented. Under those
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
70794
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
baseline conditions, recreational
oversnow vehicle access would cease in
all three parks. The estimated benefits
and costs summarized here are
incremental to the baseline. That is,
these estimates are calculated as the
additional benefits and costs the public
would experience under each of the
action alternatives as compared to the
baseline conditions described by
Alternative 3b.
The purpose for estimating these
benefits and costs is to examine the
extent to which each action alternative
addresses the need for the proposed
regulations. These regulations are
needed to correct certain ‘‘market
failures’’ associated with winter use in
the parks. A market failure occurs when
park resources and uses are not
allocated in an economically efficient
manner. For winter use in the parks,
market failures occur as a result of
‘‘externalities.’’ An externality exists
when the actions of some individuals
impose uncompensated impacts on
others. For example, snowmobile and
snowcoach users impose costs on other
park visitors in the form of noise, air
pollution, congestion, and health and
safety risks. Because these costs are not
compensated, snowmobile and
snowcoach users have little or no
incentive to adjust their behavior
accordingly. The proposed regulations
are needed to correct this situation.
The quantitative results of the
analysis are summarized below. It is
important to note that the analysis could
not account for all benefits or costs due
to limitations in available data. For
example, the costs associated with
adverse impacts to park resources such
as wildlife, and with law enforcement
incidents, are not reflected in the
quantified net benefits presented in this
summary. It is also important to note
that the analysis addresses the economic
efficiency implications of the different
action alternatives and not their
distributive equity (i.e., it does not
identify the sectors or groups on which
the majority of impacts fall). Therefore,
additional explanation is required when
interpreting the quantitative results of
the analysis. An explanation of the
selection of the preferred alternative is
presented following the summary of
quantified benefits and costs.
Quantified Benefits and Costs
The analysis of benefits and costs
critically depends on estimates of
visitation for the different user groups.
While significant information is
available from past visitation records
and visitor surveys, a degree of
uncertainty exists about how these
visitation levels might change in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
future under the seven action
alternatives. In previous rulemakings
involving winter use plans in the
Greater Yellowstone Area, this
uncertainty was addressed by making
bounding assumptions to place upper
and lower limits on a reasonable range
of visitation. For this rulemaking, a
more sophisticated approach was used
to better characterize uncertainty and to
estimate expected levels of visitation.
That approach involves specifying
probability distributions of key
visitation parameters, and then
sampling from those distributions in
order to estimate visitation levels. By
taking multiple samples, measures of
central tendency for visitation can be
calculated that reflect the uncertainty in
the available data. This analysis used
1,000 samples, which were adequate to
calculate expected levels of visitation.
Those expected visitation levels were
then used to estimate the benefits and
costs described below for the seven
action alternatives.
The primary beneficiaries of
Alternatives 1, 2, 3a, 4, 5, 6, and 7
relative to the Alternative 3b baseline
are the park visitors who ride
snowmobiles or snowcoaches in the
park and passengers on the proposed
commercial bus tours and the
businesses that serve them. Benefits and
losses accruing to individual visitors are
called consumer surplus changes and
those accruing to businesses are called
producer surplus changes. Consumer
surplus measures the net economic
benefit obtained by individuals from
participating in their chosen activities,
while producer surplus measures the
net economic benefit obtained by
businesses from providing services to
individuals.
Overall, Alternative 6 is estimated to
provide the greatest consumer surplus
benefits due to the commercial bus
access. The daily caps on snowmobile
use vary across the seven alternatives,
with Alternative 4 allowing the most
snowmobiles per day into the parks.
Alternatives 1, 3a, 6, and 7 require
snowmobilers to be part of a guided tour
in Yellowstone National Park, a
requirement that is expected to reduce
the consumer surplus gains to
snowmobilers who prefer unguided
tours or who face additional expenses
from taking a guided tour. Alternatives
4 and 5 allow for at least 20 percent of
the tours to be unguided or led by noncommercial guides, which may
somewhat mitigate the potential loss in
consumer surplus associated with the
guided tour requirement.
The primary consumer group that
would incur costs under Alternatives 1,
2, 3a, 4, 5, 6, and 7 would be the park
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
visitors who do not ride oversnow
vehicles. Alternative 2 results in the
smallest losses for these visitors. Out of
the set of alternatives that allow for
continued snowmobile access to the
parks, Alternative 6 is expected to
impose the lowest costs on nonsnowmobile users because of the lower
daily limits, guided tour requirements,
and restriction of oversnow vehicles to
the South Entrance.
For businesses, the producer surplus
gains relative to the Alternative 3b
baseline are expected to be ordered
similar to the way consumer surplus
gains are for snowmobilers and
snowcoach riders because they are
driven largely by the number of visitors.
Alternative 6 is expected to have the
greatest positive impact on local
businesses because the bus access is
expected to result in the largest increase
in visitation. Alternative 4, which
allows the most snowmobiles and the
most unguided snowmobiles, offers the
second highest benefit to producers.
The average net benefit levels
quantified in the analysis are presented
in Tables 1 and 2 below. Table 1
presents the total present value of
quantified net benefits over the ten-year
analysis period for winter seasons 2007–
2008 through 2016–2017. Table 2
presents quantified net benefits per year
for the same analysis period. These
average net benefit levels are entirely
positive for all seven action alternatives,
relative to the Alternative 3b baseline.
TABLE 1.—TOTAL PRESENT VALUE OF
QUANTIFIED NET BENEFITS RELATIVE TO THE ALTERNATIVE 3B
BASELINE, GREATER YELLOWSTONE
AREA, 2007–2008 THROUGH 2016–
2017
Total present
value of quantified
net benefits
Alternative 1:
Discounted at
Discounted at
Alternative 2:
Discounted at
Discounted at
Alternative 3a:
Discounted at
Discounted at
Alternative 4:
Discounted at
Discounted at
Alternative 5:
Discounted at
Discounted at
Alternative 6:
Discounted at
Discounted at
Alternative 7:
Discounted at
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
3% a .....
7% a .....
$63,396,000
51,836,000
3% a .....
7% a .....
142,994,000
117,328,000
3% a .....
7% a .....
52,101,000
42,704,000
3% a .....
7% a .....
36,656,000
30,016,000
3% a .....
7% a .....
39,344,000
32,329,000
3% a .....
7% a .....
248,834,000
204,405,000
3% a .....
63,387,000
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
could not be quantified, Alternative 6
involves road plowing operations and
possibly moderate, adverse visibility
impacts due to road sanding operations,
neither of which were quantified in
terms of monetized costs. Monetizing
these costs would reduce the quantified
net benefits of Alternative 6 relative to
Total present
value of quantified those of Alternative 7.
With respect to distributive equity
net benefits
concerns, Alternative 7 better balances
Discounted at 7% a .....
51,823,000 the visitor experiences of all visitor
Note: All values are in 2003 dollars, and groups compared to all other action
alternatives. The costs and benefits
have been rounded to the nearest $1,000.
a Office of Management and Budget Circular
accruing to the different visitor groups
A–4 recommends a 7% discount rate in gen- are more evenly distributed in
eral, and a 3% discount rate when analyzing
Alternative 7 than in Alternative 2 or
impacts to private consumption.
Alternative 6. The benefits of
TABLE 2.—QUANTIFIED NET BENEFITS Alternative 2 are disproportionately
PER YEAR RELATIVE TO THE ALTER- associated with snowcoach riders. The
benefits to snowmobile riders in
NATIVE 3B BASELINE, GREATER YELAlternative 6 will be concentrated on
LOWSTONE
AREA,
2007–2008 riders who have access to the South
THROUGH 2016–2017
Entrance. Finally, the lack of any
historical precedent for plowing roads
Quantified net
benefits per year b and allowing commercial bus tours
during the winter leads to large
uncertainties as to the magnitude of the
Alternative 1:
Amortized at 3% a .......
$7,432,000 benefits associated with Alternative 6.
Amortized at 7% a .......
7,380,000 For these reasons, the National Park
Alternative 2:
Service selected Alternative 7 as the
Amortized at 3% a .......
16,763,000
preferred alternative.
a .......
Amortized at 7%
16,705,000
TABLE 1.—TOTAL PRESENT VALUE OF
QUANTIFIED NET BENEFITS RELATIVE TO THE ALTERNATIVE 3B
BASELINE, GREATER YELLOWSTONE
AREA, 2007–2008 THROUGH 2016–
2017—Continued
Alternative 3a:
Amortized at
Amortized at
Alternative 4:
Amortized at
Amortized at
Alternative 5:
Amortized at
Amortized at
Alternative 6:
Amortized at
Amortized at
Alternative 7:
Amortized at
Amortized at
3% a .......
7% a .......
6,108,000
6,080,000
3% a .......
7% a .......
4,297,000
4,274,000
3% a .......
7% a .......
4,612,000
4,603,000
3% a .......
7% a .......
29,171,000
29,103,000
3% a .......
7% a .......
7,431,000
7,378,000
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Note: All values are in 2003 dollars, and
have been rounded to the nearest $1,000.
a Office of Management and Budget Circular
A–4 recommends a 7% discount rate in general, and a 3% discount rate when analyzing
impacts to private consumption.
b This is the total present value of quantified
net benefits reported in Table 1 amortized
over the ten-year analysis timeframe at the indicated discount rate.
Interpretation of Quantified Benefits
and Costs
The National Park Service selected
Alternative 7 as the preferred
alternative; however, Alternatives 2 and
6 each have higher levels of quantified
net benefits. Alternative 1 generates
essentially the same level of quantified
net benefits. Additional factors that are
relevant in the selection of the preferred
alternative include costs that could not
be quantified and distributive equity
concerns. With respect to costs that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
Compliance With Other Laws
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
This document is a significant rule
and has been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866.
(a) This rule will not have an annual
economic effect of $100 million or
adversely affect an economic sector,
productivity, jobs, the environment, or
other units of government. A costbenefit and economic analysis has been
completed and is available upon
request. These conclusions are based on
the report ‘‘Economic Analysis of
Winter Use Regulations in the Greater
Yellowstone Area’’ (RTI International,
September 2007).
(b) This rule will not create
inconsistencies with other agencies’
actions. The National Park Service is
unaware of any other Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
(c) This rule will not materially affect
entitlements, grants, user fees, loan
programs, or the rights and obligations
of their recipients.
(d) This rule may raise novel legal or
policy issues. The issue has generated
local as well as national interest on the
subject in the Greater Yellowstone Area.
The National Park Service has been the
subject of numerous lawsuits regarding
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70795
its management of winter use in the
Parks.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The National Park Service has
determined that this rule will have a
significant positive economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities as
defined under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), in comparison
to conditions that would exist absent
this rule. Therefore, a Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis has been conducted
and is available upon request. This
analysis is contained in the report
‘‘Economic Analysis of Winter Use
Regulations in the Greater Yellowstone
Area’’ (RTI International, September
2007).
Alternative 4 has the highest daily
snowmobile limits and allows for 25%
of snowmobilers to be on noncommercially guided or unguided tours;
it would most likely result in the largest
number of snowmobilers visiting the
park. Thus, Alternative 4 would likely
be the most beneficial to small
businesses overall. However,
Alternative 6, which allows guided
commercial wheeled access to parts of
the park through the North and West
Entrances, is forecast to have the highest
visitation. Visitation under Alternative 6
is the most uncertain because of the
commercial wheeled access provision.
Small businesses near the East
Entrance and the town of Cody,
Wyoming, would benefit more from
Alternatives 4 and 5, which allow
snowmobile traffic through the East
Entrance. The East Entrance would be
closed to snowmobile traffic under both
the no-action alternative and Alternative
7.
Nevertheless, a modified version of
Alternative 7 was selected as the
preferred alternative in part because it
balances the visitor experiences of all
modes of access compared to all other
action alternatives. NPS believes that
balance will benefit small businesses
associated with all modes of access.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
This conclusion is based on the report
‘‘Economic Analysis of Winter Use
Regulations in the Greater Yellowstone
Area’’ (RTI International, September
2007).
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, state, or
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
70796
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This rulemaking has no effect on
methods of manufacturing or
production and specifically affects the
Greater Yellowstone Area, not national
or U.S.-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on state, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. It
addresses public use of national park
lands, and imposes no requirements on
other agencies or governments.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, the rule does not have significant
takings implications. Access to private
property located within or adjacent to
the parks will still be afforded the same
access during winter as before this rule.
No other property is affected.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, the rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
It addresses public use of national park
lands, and imposes no requirements on
other agencies or governments.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in Sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 on
Civil Justice Reform.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulation does not require an
information collection from 10 or more
parties and a submission under the
Paperwork Reduction Act is not
required. An OMB form 83–I is not
required.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
National Environmental Policy Act
An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD)
have been completed. The EIS and ROD
are available for review by contacting
Yellowstone or Grand Teton
superintendent offices or can be found
at: www.nps.gov/yell/parkmgmt/
winterusetechnicaldocuments.htm.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government to Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments’’ (59 FR 22951) and 512
DM 2:
The NPS has evaluated potential
effects on federally recognized Indian
tribes and have determined that there
are no potential effects. Numerous tribes
in the area were consulted in the
development of the previous NEPA
processes. Their major concern was to
reduce the adverse effects on wildlife by
snowmobiles. This rule does that
through implementation of the guiding
requirements and limits on snowmobile
numbers.
Administrative Procedure Act
This rule is effective on December 19,
2007. The National Park Service
recognizes that new rules ordinarily go
into effect thirty days after publication
in the Federal Register. For this
regulation, however, we have
determined under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) and
318 DM 6.25 that this rule should be
effective on December 19, 2007. This
rule implements the winter use plans
for the Parks and relieves the
restrictions on the use of snowmobiles
and snowcoaches that would exist in its
absence. In addition, good cause exists
for the effective date of December 19,
2007, for the following reasons:
(1) The NPS has in good faith since at
least March 2006 publicly stated that
the 2007–2008 winter season for the
Parks would commence on December
19, 2007, and the public and businesses
have made decisions based on the
widespread public knowledge of this
opening date.
(2) Since March 2006, the NPS has
consistently and repeatedly stated that
the 2007–2008 winter season would be
a transition winter. As an action
common to all alternatives in the Draft
and Final EIS, the NPS stated the Parks
would be open during the 2007–2008
winter season and operate under rules
substantially the same as those that have
been in effect last three winters under
the temporary plan. Through this rule,
the NPS intends to fulfill that
commitment.
(3) Many persons planning to visit the
Parks have already made travel plans in
anticipation of the Parks being open for
snowmobile and snowcoach use, such
as reserving time off from work, booking
airfares and hotel accommodations,
making reservations for snowmobile or
snowcoach tours, and the like. For
example, in late August, Xanterra Parks
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and Resorts (which operates lodging and
other services in Yellowstone) reported
that 2007–2008 winter bookings were
up 18% over last year. The ChristmasNew Year period is the most heavily
visited time of the 82-day winter season.
If the Parks do not open as scheduled
on December 19, it would create
unnecessary hardship for visitors who
have already planned trips, and would
likely result in economic losses for some
visitors if reservations had to be
cancelled. Significant revenue loss for
businesses in and around the Parks
would also occur. Many businesses in
the gateway communities surrounding
the Parks, and the people who rely upon
them for their livelihoods, are highly
dependent upon the Parks being open
for the entire duration of the 82-day
season.
(4) Snowmobile and snowcoach
operators have made business decisions
and investments for the winter season
premised on an opening date of
December 19, 2007. Such actions
include purchasing new snowmobiles
and snowcoaches for their fleets,
making offers of employment, preparing
advertising and other materials, and
purchasing snowmobile accessories
such as suits, helmets, boots, mittens,
etc. A delay in the effective date of this
regulation would shorten an already
brief winter season, thereby depriving
these businesses and others that depend
on the winter season (such as hotels,
restaurants, service stations, and other
hospitality-oriented businesses) of
revenue that is important to their
livelihoods. As recently as November 2,
NPS met with snowcoach and
snowmobile guides and outfitters to
plan for the 2007–2008 winter season
based on an opening date of December
19, 2007.
(5) There would be no benefit to the
public in delaying the effective date of
this rule, given that there has already
been substantial notice of the opening
date and that the Parks will be open
under conditions substantially similar
to those in effect for the past three years.
The above-described harms to the
public resulting from a procedural delay
of this rule should therefore be avoided,
and an effective date of December 19,
2007, is warranted.
Drafting Information: The primary
authors of this regulation are Gary
Pollock, Management Assistant, Grand
Teton National Park; John Sacklin,
Management Assistant, Mike Yochim,
Outdoor Recreation Planner, Denice
Swanke, Outdoor Recreation Planner,
Yellowstone National Park; Jason
Waanders, Office of the Solicitor, and
Jerry Case, Regulations Program
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Manager, National Park Service,
Washington, DC.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
District of Columbia, National Parks,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons given in the preamble,
36 CFR part 7 is amended as set forth
below:
I
PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS,
AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK
SYSTEM
1. The authority for part 7 continues
to read as follows:
I
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 460(q),
462(k); Sec. 7.96 also issued under D.C. Code
8–137(1981) and D.C. Code 40–721 (1981).
2. Amend § 7.13 to revise paragraph
(l) to read as follows:
I
§ 7.13
Yellowstone National Park.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(l)(1) What is the scope of this
regulation? The regulations contained in
paragraphs (l)(2) through (l)(17) of this
section apply to the use of snowcoaches
and recreational snowmobiles. Except
where indicated, paragraphs (l)(2)
through (l)(17) do not apply to nonadministrative over-snow vehicle use by
NPS, contractor, or concessioner
employees, or other non-recreational
users authorized by the Superintendent.
(2) What terms do I need to know?
The definitions in this paragraph (l)(2)
also apply to non-administrative oversnow vehicle use by NPS, contractor, or
concessioner employees, or other nonrecreational users authorized by the
Superintendent.
(i) Commercial guide means a guide
who operates as a snowmobile or
snowcoach guide for a fee or
compensation and is authorized to
operate in the park under a concession
contract. In this section, ‘‘guide’’ also
means ‘‘commercial guide.’’
(ii) Historic snowcoach means a
Bombardier snowcoach manufactured in
1983 or earlier. Any other snowcoach is
considered a non-historic snowcoach.
(iii) Oversnow route means that
portion of the unplowed roadway
located between the road shoulders and
designated by snow poles or other poles,
ropes, fencing, or signs erected to
regulate oversnow activity. Oversnow
routes include pullouts or parking areas
that are groomed or marked similarly to
roadways and are adjacent to designated
oversnow routes. An oversnow route
may also be distinguished by the
interior boundaries of the berm created
by the packing and grooming of the
unplowed roadway. The only motorized
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
vehicles permitted on oversnow routes
are oversnow vehicles.
(iv) Oversnow vehicle means a
snowmobile, snowcoach, or other
motorized vehicle that is intended for
travel primarily on snow and has been
authorized by the Superintendent to
operate in the park. An oversnow
vehicle that does not meet the definition
of a snowcoach must comply with all
requirements applicable to
snowmobiles.
(v) Snowcoach means a self-propelled
mass transit vehicle intended for travel
on snow, having a curb weight of over
1,000 pounds (450 kilograms), driven by
a track or tracks and steered by skis or
tracks, and having a capacity of at least
8 passengers. A snowcoach has a
maximum size of 102 inches wide, plus
tracks (not to exceed 110 inches
overall); a maximum length of 35 feet;
and a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating
(GVWR) not exceeding 25,000 pounds.
(vi) Snowmobile means a selfpropelled vehicle intended for travel on
snow, with a curb weight of not more
than 1,000 pounds (450 kg), driven by
a track or tracks in contact with the
snow, and which may be steered by a
ski or skis in contact with the snow.
(vii) Snowplane means a selfpropelled vehicle intended for
oversnow travel and driven by an airdisplacing propeller.
(3) May I operate a snowmobile in
Yellowstone National Park? You may
operate a snowmobile in Yellowstone
National Park in compliance with use
limits, guiding requirements, operating
hours and dates, equipment, and
operating conditions established under
this section. The Superintendent may
establish additional operating
conditions and must provide notice of
those conditions in accordance with
§ 1.7(a) of this chapter or in the Federal
Register.
(4) May I operate a snowcoach in
Yellowstone National Park? (i)
Beginning with the 2008–2009 winter
season snowcoaches may only be
operated in Yellowstone National Park
under a concessions contract.
Snowcoach operation is subject to the
conditions stated in the concessions
contract and all other conditions
identified in this section.
(ii) Beginning in the 2011–2012
season, all snowcoaches (historic and
non-historic) must meet NPS air
emission requirements, which
functionally means that they must have
the same EPA Tier I emissions control
equipment incorporated into the engine
and drive train as would the equivalent
class (size and weight) of wheeled
vehicle. Through the winter of 2010–
2011, all non-historic snowcoaches
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70797
must meet NPS air emissions
requirements, which are the applicable
EPA emission standards for the vehicle
at the time it was manufactured.
(iii) All critical emission-related
exhaust components (as listed in 40 CFR
86.004–25(b)(3)(iii) through (v)) must be
functioning properly. Such critical
emissions-related components may only
be replaced with the original equipment
manufacturer (OEM) component, where
possible. Where OEM parts are not
available, aftermarket parts may be used
if they do not worsen emission and
sound characteristics.
(iv) Modifying or disabling a
snowcoach’s original pollution control
equipment is prohibited except for
maintenance purposes.
(v) Beginning in the 2011–2012
season, all snowcoaches must meet a
sound emissions requirement of no
greater than 73 dBA. The
Superintendent will establish the
procedures for determining compliance.
(vi) Individual snowcoaches may be
subject to periodic inspections to
determine compliance with the
requirements of paragraphs (l)(4)(ii)
through (l)(4)(v) of this section.
(5) Must I operate a certain model of
snowmobile? Only commercially
available snowmobiles that meet NPS
air and sound emissions requirements
as set forth in this section may be
operated in the park. The
Superintendent will approve
snowmobile makes, models, and years
of manufacture that meet those
requirements. Any snowmobile model
not approved by the Superintendent
may not be operated in the park.
(6) How will the Superintendent
approve snowmobile makes, models,
and years of manufacture for use in the
park? (i) Beginning with the 2005 model
year, all snowmobiles must be certified
under 40 CFR Part 1051, to a Family
Emission Limit no greater than 15 g/kWhr for hydrocarbons and to a Family
Emission Limit no greater than 120
g/kW-hr for carbon monoxide.
(A) 2004 model year snowmobiles
may use measured emissions levels
(official emission results with no
deterioration factors applied) to comply
with the emission limits specified in
paragraph (l)(6)(i) of this section.
(B) Snowmobiles manufactured before
the 2004 model year may be operated
only if they have been shown to the
Superintendent to have emissions no
greater than the limits specified in
paragraph (l)(6)(i) of this section.
(C) The snowmobile test procedures
specified by EPA (40 CFR Parts 1051
and 1065) must be used to measure air
emissions from model year 2004 and
later snowmobiles. Equivalent
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
70798
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
procedures may be used for earlier
model years.
(ii) For sound emissions,
snowmobiles must operate at or below
73 dBA as measured at full throttle
according to Society of Automotive
Engineers J192 test procedures (revised
1985). Snowmobiles may be tested at
any barometric pressure equal to or
above 23.4 inches Hg uncorrected. The
Superintendent may revise these testing
procedures based on new information
and/or updates to the SAE J192 testing
procedures.
(iii) Snowmobiles meeting the
requirements for air and sound
emissions may be operated in the park
for a period not exceeding 6 years from
the date upon which first certified.
(iv) The Superintendent may prohibit
entry into the park of any snowmobile
that has been modified in a manner that
may adversely affect air or sound
emissions.
(v) These air and sound emissions
requirements do not apply to
snowmobiles being operated on the
Cave Falls Road in Yellowstone.
(7) Where may I operate my
snowmobile in Yellowstone National
Park? (i) You may operate your
snowmobile only upon designated
oversnow routes established within the
park in accordance with § 2.18(c) of this
chapter. The following oversnow routes
are so designated for snowmobile use:
(A) The Grand Loop Road from its
junction with Upper Terrace Drive to
Norris Junction.
(B) Norris Junction to Canyon
Junction.
(C) The Grand Loop Road from Norris
Junction to Madison Junction.
(D) The West Entrance Road from the
park boundary at West Yellowstone to
Madison Junction.
(E) The Grand Loop Road from
Madison Junction to West Thumb.
(F) The South Entrance Road from the
South Entrance to West Thumb.
(G) The Grand Loop Road from West
Thumb to its junction with the East
Entrance Road.
(H) The East Entrance Road from
Fishing Bridge Junction to the East
Entrance.
(I) The Grand Loop Road from its
junction with the East Entrance Road to
Canyon Junction.
(J) The South Canyon Rim Drive.
(K) Lake Butte Road.
(L) In the developed areas of Madison
Junction, Old Faithful, Grant Village,
West Thumb, Lake, Fishing Bridge,
Canyon, Indian Creek, and Norris.
(M) Firehole Canyon Drive, between
noon and 9 p.m. each day.
(N) North Canyon Rim Drive, between
noon and 9 p.m. each day.
(O) Riverside Drive, between noon
and 9 p.m. each day.
(P) Cave Falls Road.
(ii) The Superintendent may open or
close these routes, or portions thereof,
for snowmobile travel after taking into
consideration the location of wintering
wildlife, appropriate snow cover, public
safety, avalanche conditions, and other
factors. Notice of such opening or
closing will be provided by one or more
of the methods listed in § 1.7(a) of this
chapter.
(iii) This paragraph (l)(7) also applies
to non-administrative over-snow vehicle
use by NPS, contractor, or concessioner
employees, or other non-recreational
users authorized by the Superintendent.
(iv) Maps detailing the designated
oversnow routes will be available from
Park Headquarters.
(8) What routes are designated for
snowcoach use? (i) Authorized
snowcoaches may be operated on the
routes designated for snowmobile use in
paragraphs (l)(7)(i)(A) through
(l)(7)(i)(O) of this section. The restricted
hours of snowmobile use described in
paragraphs (1)(7)(i)(M) through
(1)(7)(i)(O) do not apply to
snowcoaches. Snowcoaches may also be
operated on the following additional
oversnow routes:
(A) Fountain Flat Road.
(B) The Grand Loop Road from
Canyon Junction to Washburn Hot
Springs overlook.
(C) For rubber-tracked snowcoaches
only, the Grand Loop Road from Upper
Terrace Drive to the junction of the
Grand Loop Road and North Entrance
Road, and within the Mammoth Hot
Springs developed area.
(ii) The Superintendent may open or
close these oversnow routes, or portions
thereof, or designate new routes for
snowcoach travel after taking into
consideration the location of wintering
wildlife, appropriate snow cover, public
safety, and other factors. Notice of such
opening or closing shall be provided by
one of more of the methods listed in
§ 1.7(a) of this chapter.
(iii) This paragraph (l)(8) also applies
to non-administrative snowcoach use by
NPS, contractor, or concessioner
employees, or other non-recreational
users authorized by the Superintendent.
(9) Must I travel with a commercial
guide while snowmobiling in
Yellowstone and what other guiding
requirements apply? (i) All recreational
snowmobile operators must be
accompanied by a commercial guide.
(ii) Snowmobile parties must travel in
a group of no more than 11
snowmobiles, including that of the
guide.
(iii) Guided parties must travel
together within a maximum of one-third
mile of the first snowmobile in the
group.
(iv) The guiding requirements
described in this paragraph (l)(9) do not
apply to snowmobiles being operated on
the Cave Falls Road.
(10) Are there limits established for
the number of snowmobiles and
snowcoaches permitted to operate in the
park each day? The number of
snowmobiles and snowcoaches allowed
to operate in the park each day is
limited to a certain number per entrance
or location. The limits are listed in the
following table:
TABLE.—DAILY SNOWMOBILE AND SNOWCOACH LIMITS*
Commercially
guided
snowmobiles
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Park entrance/location**
(i) North Entrance ............................................................................................................................................
(ii) West Entrance ............................................................................................................................................
(iii) South Entrance ..........................................................................................................................................
(iv) East Entrance ............................................................................................................................................
(v) Old Faithful .................................................................................................................................................
(vi) Cave Falls ..................................................................................................................................................
***20
300
170
30
***20
****50
Commercially
guided
snowcoaches
15
37
10
2
19
0
* The numbers of snowmobiles and snowcoaches allocated to a particular entrance may be adjusted depending on the results of analysis for
concessions contracts, not to exceed a parkwide daily total of 540 snowmobiles and 83 snowcoaches. The snowcoaches allocated to Old Faithful are parkwide.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
70799
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
** For the winter of 2007–2008 only, the following snowmobile allocations are in effect: West Entrance, 400; South Entrance, 220; East Entrance, 40; North Entrance, 30; and Old Faithful, 30. The following snowcoach allocations will apply in 2007–2008 only: West Entrance, 34;
South Entrance, 10; East Entrance, 3; North Entrance, 13; and Old Faithful, 18.
*** Commercially guided snowmobile tours originating at the North Entrance and Old Faithful are currently provided solely by Xanterra Parks
and Resorts. Because this concessionaire is the sole provider at both of these areas, this regulation allows the daily entry limits between the
North Entrance and Old Faithful to be adjusted as necessary, so long as the total number of snowmobiles between the two entrances does not
exceed 40. For example, the concessionaire could operate 20 snowmobiles at Old Faithful and 20 at the North Entrance if visitor demand warranted it. This will allow the concessionaire to respond to changing visitor demand for commercially guided snowmobile tours, thus enhancing
visitor service in Yellowstone.
**** These snowmobiles operate on an approximately 1-mile segment of road within the park where the use is incidental to other snowmobiling
activities in the Targhee National Forest. These snowmobiles do not need to be guided or meet NPS air and sound emissions requirements.
(11) When may I operate my
snowmobile or snowcoach? The
Superintendent will determine
operating hours and dates. Except for
emergency situations, any changes to
operating hours will be made on an
annual basis, and the public will be
notified of those changes through one or
more of the methods listed in § 1.7(a) of
this chapter.
(12) What other conditions apply to
the operation of oversnow vehicles? (i)
The following are prohibited:
(A) Idling an oversnow vehicle for
more than 5 minutes at any one time.
(B) Driving an oversnow vehicle while
the driver’s motor vehicle license or
privilege is suspended or revoked.
(C) Allowing or permitting an
unlicensed driver to operate an
oversnow vehicle.
(D) Driving an oversnow vehicle in
willful or wanton disregard for the
safety of persons, property, or park
resources or otherwise in a reckless
manner.
(E) Operating an oversnow vehicle
without a lighted white headlamp and
red taillight.
(F) Operating an oversnow vehicle
that does not have brakes in good
working order.
(G) The towing of persons on skis,
sleds or other sliding devices by
oversnow vehicles, except in emergency
situations.
(ii) The following are required:
(A) All oversnow vehicles that stop on
designated routes must pull over to the
far right and next to the snow berm.
Pullouts must be used where available
and accessible. Oversnow vehicles may
not be stopped in a hazardous location
or where the view might be obscured, or
operated so slowly as to interfere with
the normal flow of traffic.
(B) Oversnow vehicle drivers must
possess a valid motor vehicle driver’s
license. A learner’s permit does not
satisfy this requirement. The license
must be carried by the driver at all
times.
(C) Equipment sleds towed by a
snowmobile must be pulled behind the
snowmobile and fastened to the
snowmobile with a rigid hitching
mechanism.
(D) Snowmobiles must be properly
registered and display a valid
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
registration from a state or province in
the United States or Canada,
respectively.
(iii) The Superintendent may impose
other terms and conditions as necessary
to protect park resources, visitors, or
employees. The public will be notified
of any changes through one or more
methods listed in § 1.7(a) of this
chapter.
(iv) This paragraph (l)(12) also applies
to non-administrative over-snow vehicle
use by NPS, contractor, or concessioner
employees, or other non-recreational
users authorized by the Superintendent.
(13) What conditions apply to alcohol
use while operating an oversnow
vehicle? In addition to 36 CFR 4.23, the
following conditions apply:
(i) Operating or being in actual
physical control of an oversnow vehicle
is prohibited when the driver is under
21 years of age and the alcohol
concentration in the driver’s blood or
breath is 0.02 grams or more of alcohol
per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.02
grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters
of breath.
(ii) Operating or being in actual
physical control of an oversnow vehicle
is prohibited when the driver is a
snowmobile guide or a snowcoach
driver and the alcohol concentration in
the operator’s blood or breath is 0.04
grams or more of alcohol per 100
milliliters of blood or 0.04 grams or
more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath.
(iii) This paragraph (l)(13) also applies
to non-administrative over-snow vehicle
use by NPS, contractor, or concessioner
employees, or other non-recreational
users authorized by the Superintendent.
(14) Do other NPS regulations apply
to the use of oversnow vehicles? (i) The
use of oversnow vehicles in
Yellowstone is subject to §§ 2.18(a) and
(c), but not subject to §§ 2.18(b), (d), (e),
and 2.19(b) of this chapter.
(ii) This paragraph (l)(14) also applies
to non-administrative over-snow vehicle
use by NPS, contractor, or concessioner
employees, or other non-recreational
users authorized by the Superintendent.
(15) Are there any forms of nonmotorized oversnow transportation
allowed in the park? (i) Non-motorized
travel consisting of skiing, skating,
snowshoeing, or walking is permitted
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
unless otherwise restricted under this
section or other NPS regulations.
(ii) The Superintendent may designate
areas of the park as closed, reopen such
areas, or establish terms and conditions
for non-motorized travel within the park
in order to protect visitors, employees,
or park resources. Notice will be made
in accordance with § 1.7(a) of this
chapter.
(iii) Dog sledding and ski-joring are
prohibited. Bicycles are not allowed on
oversnow routes in Yellowstone.
(16) May I operate a snowplane in
Yellowstone National Park? The
operation of a snowplane in
Yellowstone is prohibited.
(17) Is violating any of the provisions
of this section prohibited? Violating any
of the terms, conditions or requirements
of paragraphs (l)(1) through (l)(16) of
this section is prohibited. Each such
occurrence of non-compliance with
these regulations is a separate violation.
I 3. Revise § 7.21 to read as follows:
§ 7.21 John D. Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial
Parkway.
(a)(1) What is the scope of this
section? The regulations contained in
paragraphs (a)(2) through (a)(17) of this
section apply to the use of snowcoaches
and recreational snowmobiles. Except
where indicated, paragraphs (a)(2)
through (a)(17) do not apply to nonadministrative over-snow vehicle use by
NPS, contractor, or concessioner
employees, or other non-recreational
users authorized by the Superintendent.
(2) What terms do I need to know? All
of the terms in § 7.13(l)(2) of this part
apply to this section. This paragraph
also applies to non-administrative oversnow vehicle use by NPS, contractor, or
concessioner employees, or other nonrecreational users authorized by the
Superintendent.
(3) May I operate a snowmobile in the
Parkway? You may operate a
snowmobile in the Parkway in
compliance with use limits, guiding
requirements, operating hours and
dates, equipment, and operating
conditions established under this
section. The Superintendent may
establish additional operating
conditions and will provide notice of
those conditions in accordance with
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
70800
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
§ 1.7(a) of this chapter or in the Federal
Register.
(4) May I operate a snowcoach in the
Parkway? (i) Snowcoaches may be only
operated in the Parkway under a
concessions contract. Snowcoach
operation is subject to the conditions
stated in the concessions contract and
all other conditions identified in this
section.
(ii) Beginning in the 2011–2012
season, all snowcoaches (historic and
non-historic) must meet NPS air
emission requirements, which
functionally means that they must have
the same EPA Tier I emissions control
equipment incorporated into the engine
and drive train as would the equivalent
class (size and weight) of wheeled
vehicle. Through the winter of 2010–
2011, all non-historic snowcoaches
must meet NPS air emissions
requirements, which are the applicable
EPA emission standards for the vehicle
at the time it was manufactured.
(iii) All critical emission-related
exhaust components (as defined in 40
CFR 86.004–25(b)(3)(iii) through (v))
must be functioning properly. Such
critical emission-related components
may only be replaced with the original
equipment manufacturer (OEM)
component, where possible. Where
OEM parts are not available, aftermarket parts may be used if they do not
worsen emission and sound
characteristics.
(iv) Modifying or disabling a
snowcoach’s original pollution control
equipment is prohibited except for
maintenance purposes.
(v) Beginning in the 2011–2012
season, all snowcoaches must meet a
sound emissions requirement of no
greater than 73 dBA. The
Superintendent will establish the
procedures for determining compliance.
(vi) Individual snowcoaches may be
subject to periodic inspections to
determine compliance with the
requirements of paragraphs (a)(4)(ii)
through (a)(4)(v) of this section.
(5) Must I operate a certain model of
snowmobile? Only commercially
available snowmobiles that meet NPS
air and sound emissions requirements
as set forth in this section may be
operated in the Parkway. The
Superintendent will approve
snowmobile makes, models, and years
of manufacture that meet those
requirements. Any snowmobile model
not approved by the Superintendent
may not be operated in the Parkway.
(6) How will the Superintendent
approve snowmobile makes, models,
and years of manufacture for use in the
Parkway? (i) Beginning with the 2005
model year, all snowmobiles must be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
certified under 40 CFR Part 1051, to a
Family Emission Limit no greater than
15 g/kW-hr for hydrocarbons and to a
Family Emission Limit no greater than
120 g/kW-hr for carbon monoxide.
(A) 2004 model year snowmobiles
may use measured air emissions levels
(official emission results with no
deterioration factors applied) to comply
with the air emission limits specified in
paragraph (a)(6)(i) of this section.
(B) Snowmobiles manufactured before
the 2004 model year may be operated
only if they have been shown to have air
emissions no greater than the
restrictions identified in paragraph
(a)(6)(i) of this section.
(C) The snowmobile test procedures
specified by EPA (40 CFR Parts 1051
and 1065) must be used to measure air
emissions from model year 2004 and
later snowmobiles. Equivalent
procedures may be used for earlier
model years.
(ii) For sound emissions,
snowmobiles must operate at or below
73 dBA as measured at full throttle
according to Society of Automotive
Engineers J192 test procedures (revised
1985). Snowmobiles may be tested at
any barometric pressure equal to or
above 23.4 inches Hg uncorrected. The
Superintendent may revise these testing
procedures based on new information
and/or updates to the SAE J192 testing
procedures.
(iii) Snowmobiles meeting the
requirements for air and sound
emissions may be operated in the
Parkway for a period not exceeding 6
years from the date upon which first
certified.
(iv) Beginning with the winter season
of 2008–2009, these air and sound
emissions restrictions do not apply to
snowmobiles being operated on the
Grassy Lake Road. For the winter season
of 2007–2008 only, these air and sound
emissions restrictions do not apply to
snowmobiles originating in the Targhee
National Forest and traveling on the
Grassy Lake Road to Flagg Ranch. On all
other oversnow routes within the
Parkway, snowmobiles must meet these
air and sound emissions requirements.
(v) The Superintendent may prohibit
entry into the Parkway of any
snowmobile that has been modified in
a manner that may adversely affect air
or sound emissions.
(7) Where may I operate my
snowmobile in the Parkway? (i) You
may operate your snowmobile only
upon designated oversnow routes
established within the Parkway in
accordance with § 2.18(c) of this
chapter. The following oversnow routes
are so designated for snowmobile use:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(A) The Continental Divide
Snowmobile Trail (CDST) along U.S.
Highway 89/191/287 from the southern
boundary of the Parkway north to the
Snake River Bridge through the winter
season of 2007–2008 only.
(B) Along U.S. Highway 89/191/287
from Flagg Ranch to the northern
boundary of the Parkway. Through the
winter of 2007–2008 only, this route
also includes the segment from the
Snake River Bridge to Flagg Ranch.
(C) Grassy Lake Road from Flagg
Ranch to the western boundary of the
Parkway.
(D) Flagg Ranch developed area.
(ii) The Superintendent may open or
close these routes, or portions thereof,
for snowmobile travel after taking into
consideration the location of wintering
wildlife, appropriate snow cover, public
safety, and other factors. The
Superintendent will provide notice of
such opening or closing by one or more
of the methods listed in § 1.7(a) of this
chapter.
(iii) This paragraph (a)(6) also applies
to non-administrative over-snow vehicle
use by NPS, contractor, or concessioner
employees, or other non-recreational
users authorized by the Superintendent.
(iv) Maps detailing the designated
oversnow routes will be available from
Park Headquarters.
(8) What routes are designated for
snowcoach use? (i) Authorized
snowcoaches may only be operated on
the routes designated for snowmobile
use in paragraph (a)(7)(i)(B) and (D) of
this section. No other routes are open to
snowcoach use, except as provided in
(ii).
(ii) The Superintendent may open or
close these oversnow routes, or portions
thereof, or designate new routes for
snowcoach travel after taking into
consideration the location of wintering
wildlife, appropriate snow cover, public
safety, and other factors. The
Superintendent will provide notice of
such opening or closing by one or more
of the methods listed in § 1.7(a) of this
chapter.
(iii) This paragraph (a)(8) also applies
to non-administrative snowcoach use by
NPS, contractor, or concessioner
employees, or other non-recreational
users authorized by the Superintendent.
(9) Must I travel with a commercial
guide while snowmobiling in the
Parkway, and what other guiding
requirements apply? (i) All recreational
snowmobile operators using the
oversnow route along U.S. Highway 89/
191/287 from Flagg Ranch to the
northern boundary of the Parkway must
be accompanied by a commercial guide.
A guide is not required in other portions
of the Parkway.
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) Guided snowmobile parties must
travel in a group of no more than 11
snowmobiles, including that of the
guide.
(iii) Guided snowmobile parties must
travel together within a maximum of
one-third mile of the first snowmobile
in the group.
(10) Are there limits established for
the numbers of snowmobiles and
snowcoaches permitted to operate in the
Parkway each day? The number of
70801
snowmobiles and snowcoaches allowed
to operate in the Parkway each day is
limited to a certain number per road
segment. The limits are listed in the
following table:
TABLE.—DAILY SNOWMOBILE AND SNOWCOACH ENTRY LIMITS
Park entrance/road segment
Snowmobiles
(i) CDST * .........................................................................................................................................................
(ii) Grassy Lake Road (Flagg-Ashton Road) ** ...............................................................................................
(iii) Flagg Ranch to Yellowstone South Entrance *** .......................................................................................
0
25
170
Commercial
snowcoaches
0
0
10
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
* The Continental Divide Snowmobile Trail lies within both Grand Teton and the Parkway. For the winter of 2007–2008 only, a daily entry limit
of 50 snowmobiles applies to total use on this route in both parks.
** For the winter season of 2007–2008 only, the daily entry limit for this route is 50 snowmobiles per day.
*** Commercially guided; during the winter of 2007–2008 only, the daily entrance limit is 220 snowmobiles and 10 snowcoaches. The numbers
of snowmobiles and snowcoaches allocated to the Flagg Ranch to Yellowstone South Entrance road segment may be adjusted depending on the
results of analysis for concessions contracts.
(11) When may I operate my
snowmobile or snowcoach? The
Superintendent will determine
operating hours and dates. Except for
emergency situations, any changes to
operating hours will be made on an
annual basis and the public will be
notified of those changes through one or
more of the methods listed in § 1.7(a) of
this chapter.
(12) What other conditions apply to
the operation of oversnow vehicles? (i)
The following are prohibited:
(A) Idling an oversnow vehicle more
than 5 minutes at any one time.
(B) Driving an oversnow vehicle while
the operator’s motor vehicle license or
privilege is suspended or revoked.
(C) Allowing or permitting an
unlicensed driver to operate an
oversnow vehicle.
(D) Driving an oversnow vehicle in
willful or wanton disregard for the
safety of persons, property, or parkway
resources or otherwise in a reckless
manner.
(E) Operating an oversnow vehicle
without a lighted white headlamp and
red taillight.
(F) Operating an oversnow vehicle
that does not have brakes in good
working order.
(G) Towing persons on skis, sleds or
other sliding devices by oversnow
vehicles, except in emergency
situations.
(ii) The following are required:
(A) All oversnow vehicles that stop on
designated routes must pull over to the
far right and next to the snow berm.
Pullouts must be used where available
and accessible. Oversnow vehicles may
not be stopped in a hazardous location
or where the view might be obscured, or
operated so slowly as to interfere with
the normal flow of traffic.
(B) Oversnow vehicle drivers must
possess a valid motor vehicle driver’s
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
license. A learner’s permit does not
satisfy this requirement. The license
must be carried by the driver at all
times.
(C) Equipment sleds towed by a
snowmobile must be pulled behind the
snowmobile and fastened to the
snowmobile with a rigid hitching
mechanism.
(D) Snowmobiles must be properly
registered and display a valid
registration from the United States or
Canada.
(iii) The Superintendent may impose
other terms and conditions as necessary
to protect park resources, visitors, or
employees. The Superintendent will
notify the public of any changes through
one or more methods listed in § 1.7(a) of
this chapter.
(iv) This paragraph (a)(12) also
applies to non-administrative over-snow
vehicle use by NPS, contractor, or
concessioner employees, or other nonrecreational users authorized by the
Superintendent.
(13) What conditions apply to alcohol
use while operating an oversnow
vehicle? In addition to 36 CFR 4.23, the
following conditions apply:
(i) Operating or being in actual
physical control of an oversnow vehicle
is prohibited when the driver is under
21 years of age and the alcohol
concentration in the driver’s blood or
breath is 0.02 grams or more of alcohol
per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.02
grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters
of breath.
(ii) Operating or being in actual
physical control of an oversnow vehicle
is prohibited when the driver is a
snowmobile guide or a snowcoach
driver and the alcohol concentration in
the operator’s blood or breath is 0.04
grams or more of alcohol per 100
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
milliliters of blood or 0.04 grams or
more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath.
(iii) This paragraph (a)(13) also
applies to non-administrative over-snow
vehicle use by NPS, contractor, or
concessioner employees, or other nonrecreational users authorized by the
Superintendent.
(14) Do other NPS regulations apply
to the use of oversnow vehicles? (i) The
use of oversnow vehicles in the Parkway
is subject to §§ 2.18(a), (b), and (c), but
not to §§ 2.18(d), (e), and 2.19(b) of this
chapter.
(ii) This paragraph (a)(14) also applies
to non-administrative over-snow vehicle
use by NPS, contractor, or concessioner
employees, or other non-recreational
users authorized by the Superintendent.
(15) Are there any forms of nonmotorized oversnow transportation
allowed in the Parkway? (i) Nonmotorized travel consisting of skiing,
skating, snowshoeing, or walking is
permitted unless otherwise restricted
under this section or other NPS
regulations.
(ii) The Superintendent may designate
areas of the Parkway as closed, reopen
such areas, or establish terms and
conditions for non-motorized travel
within the Parkway in order to protect
visitors, employees, or park resources.
Notice will be made in accordance with
§ 1.7(a) of this chapter.
(16) May I operate a snowplane in the
Parkway? The operation of a snowplane
in the Parkway is prohibited.
(17) Is violating any of the provisions
of this section prohibited? Violating any
of the terms, conditions, or
requirements of paragraphs (a)(1)
through (a)(16) of this section is
prohibited. Each occurrence of noncompliance with these regulations is a
separate violation.
(b) [Reserved]
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
70802
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
4. Amend § 7.22, to revise paragraph
(g) to read as follows:
I
§ 7.22
Grand Teton National Park.
*
*
*
*
*
(g)(1) What is the scope of this
section? The regulations contained in
paragraphs (g)(2) through (g)(20) of this
section are intended to apply to the use
of snowcoaches and recreational
snowmobiles. Except where indicated,
paragraphs (g)(2) through (g)(20) do not
apply to non-administrative over-snow
vehicle use by NPS, contractor, or
concessioner employees, or other nonrecreational users authorized by the
Superintendent.
(2) What terms do I need to know? All
the terms in § 7.13(l)(2) of this part
apply to this section. This paragraph
(g)(2) also applies to non-administrative
over-snow vehicle use by NPS,
contractor, or concessioner employees,
or other non-recreational users
authorized by the Superintendent.
(3) May I operate a snowmobile in
Grand Teton National Park? You may
operate a snowmobile in Grand Teton
National Park in compliance with use
limits, operating hours and dates,
equipment, and operating conditions
established under this section. The
Superintendent may establish
additional operating conditions and
provide notice of those conditions in
accordance with § 1.7(a) of this chapter
or in the Federal Register.
(4) May I operate a snowcoach in
Grand Teton National Park? It is
prohibited to operate a snowcoach in
Grand Teton National Park except as
authorized by the Superintendent.
(5) Must I operate a certain model of
snowmobile in the park? Only
commercially available snowmobiles
that meet NPS air and sound emissions
requirements as set forth in this section
may be operated in the park. The
Superintendent will approve
snowmobile makes, models, and years
of manufacture that meet those
requirements. Any snowmobile model
not approved by the Superintendent
may not be operated in the park.
(6) How will the Superintendent
approve snowmobile makes, models,
and years of manufacture for use in
Grand Teton National Park? (i)
Beginning with the 2005 model year, all
snowmobiles must be certified under 40
CFR Part 1051, to a Family Emission
Limit no greater than 15 g/kW-hr for
hydrocarbons and to a Family Emission
Limit no greater than 120 g/kW-hr for
carbon monoxide.
(A) 2004 model year snowmobiles
may use measured air emissions levels
(official emission results with no
deterioration factors applied) to comply
with the air emission limits specified in
paragraph (g)(6)(i) of this section.
(B) Snowmobiles manufactured before
the 2004 model year may be operated
only if they have shown to have air
emissions no greater than the
requirements identified in paragraph
(g)(6)(i) of this section.
(C) The snowmobile test procedures
specified by EPA (40 CFR Parts 1051
and 1065) must be used to measure air
emissions from model year 2004 and
later snowmobiles. Equivalent
procedures may be used for earlier
model years.
(ii) For sound emissions,
snowmobiles must operate at or below
73 dBA as measured at full throttle
according to Society of Automotive
Engineers J192 test procedures (revised
1985). Snowmobiles may be tested at
any barometric pressure equal to or
above 23.4 inches Hg uncorrected. The
Superintendent may revise these testing
procedures based on new information
and/or updates to the SAE J192 testing
procedures.
(iii) Snowmobiles meeting the
requirements for air and sound
emissions may be operated in the park
for a period not exceeding 6 years from
the date upon which first certified,
except that snowmobiles being operated
on Jackson Lake may continue to be
operated up to 10 years, provided that
these snowmobiles’ mileage does not
exceed 6,000 miles.
(iv) Snowmobiles will be exempt from
these air and sound emissions
requirements while in use to access
lands authorized by paragraphs (g)(16)
and (g)(18) of this section.
(v) The Superintendent may prohibit
entry into the park of any snowmobile
that has been modified in a manner that
may adversely affect air or sound
emissions.
(7) Where may I operate my
snowmobile in the park? (i) You may
operate your snowmobile only upon
designated oversnow routes established
within the park in accordance with
§ 2.18(c) of this chapter. The following
oversnow routes are so designated for
snowmobile use:
(A) The frozen water surface of
Jackson Lake for the purposes of ice
fishing only. Those persons accessing
Jackson Lake for ice fishing must be
licensed or otherwise permitted to fish
in Wyoming and possess the proper
fishing gear. Snowmobiles may only be
used to travel to and from fishing
locations on the lake.
(B) The Continental Divide
Snowmobile Trail (CDST) from the
Moran Entrance Station to the north
boundary of the park for the winter
season of 2007–2008 only.
(ii) The Superintendent may open or
close these routes, or portions thereof,
for snowmobile travel, and may
establish separate zones for motorized
and non-motorized uses on Jackson
Lake, after taking into consideration the
location of wintering wildlife,
appropriate snow cover, public safety
and other factors. The Superintendent
will provide notice of such opening or
closing by one or more of the methods
listed in § 1.7(a) of this chapter.
(iii) This paragraph (g)(7) also applies
to non-administrative over-snow vehicle
use by NPS, contractor, or concessioner
employees, or other non-recreational
users authorized by the Superintendent.
(iv) Maps detailing the designated
oversnow routes will be available from
Park Headquarters.
(8) Must I travel with a commercial
guide while snowmobiling in Grand
Teton National Park? You are not
required to use a guide while
snowmobiling in Grand Teton National
Park.
(9) Are there limits established for the
number of snowmobiles permitted to
operate in the park each day? The
number of snowmobiles allowed to
operate in the park each day is limited
to a certain number per road segment or
location. The snowmobile limits are
listed in the following table:
TABLE.—DAILY SNOWMOBILE LIMITS
Total number of
snowmobiles
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Road segment/location
(i) GTNP and the Parkway—Total Use on CDST * .........................................................................................................................
(ii) Jackson Lake ..............................................................................................................................................................................
0
40
* The Continental Divide Snowmobile Trail lies within both GTNP and the Parkway. For the winter season of 2007–2008 only, a daily limit of 50
snowmobiles will be in effect. The limits established here do not apply to the portion of the CDST described in paragraph (g)(16)(iii) of this
section.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(10) When may I operate my
snowmobile? The Superintendent will
determine operating hours and dates.
Except for emergency situations, any
changes to operating hours or dates will
be made on an annual basis, and the
public will be notified of those changes
through one or more of the methods
listed in § 1.7(a) of this chapter.
(11) What other conditions apply to
the operation of oversnow vehicles? (i)
The following are prohibited:
(A) Idling an oversnow vehicle more
than 5 minutes at any one time.
(B) Driving an oversnow vehicle while
the operator’s motor vehicle license or
privilege is suspended or revoked.
(C) Allowing or permitting an
unlicensed driver to operate an
oversnow vehicle.
(D) Driving an oversnow vehicle in
willful or wanton disregard for the
safety of persons, property, or park
resources or otherwise in a reckless
manner.
(E) Operating an oversnow vehicle
without a lighted white headlamp and
red taillight.
(F) Operating an oversnow vehicle
that does not have brakes in good
working order.
(G) The towing of persons on skis,
sleds or other sliding devices by
oversnow vehicles.
(ii) The following are required:
(A) All oversnow vehicles that stop on
designated routes must pull over to the
far right and next to the snow berm.
Pullouts must be used where available
and accessible. Oversnow vehicles may
not be stopped in a hazardous location
or where the view might be obscured, or
operated so slowly as to interfere with
the normal flow of traffic.
(B) Oversnow vehicle drivers must
possess a valid motor vehicle driver’s
license. A learner’s permit does not
satisfy this requirement. The license
must be carried by the driver at all
times.
(C) Equipment sleds towed by a
snowmobile must be pulled behind the
snowmobile and fastened to the
snowmobile with a rigid hitching
mechanism.
(D) Snowmobiles must be properly
registered and display a valid
registration from the United States or
Canada.
(iii) The Superintendent may impose
other terms and conditions as necessary
to protect park resources, visitors, or
employees. The Superintendent will
notify the public of any changes through
one or more methods listed in § 1.7(a) of
this chapter.
(iv) This paragraph (g)(11) also
applies to non-administrative over-snow
vehicle use by NPS, contractor, or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
concessioner employees, or other nonrecreational users authorized by the
Superintendent.
(12) What conditions apply to alcohol
use while operating an oversnow
vehicle? In addition to 36 CFR 4.23, the
following conditions apply:
(i) Operating or being in actual
physical control of an oversnow vehicle
is prohibited when the driver is under
21 years of age and the alcohol
concentration in the driver’s blood or
breath is 0.02 grams or more of alcohol
per 100 milliliters or blood or 0.02
grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters
of breath.
(ii) Operating or being in actual
physical control of an oversnow vehicle
is prohibited when the driver is a
snowmobile guide or a snowcoach
operator and the alcohol concentration
in the driver’s blood or breath is 0.04
grams or more of alcohol per 100
milliliters of blood or 0.04 grams or
more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath.
(iii) This paragraph (g)(12) also
applies to non-administrative over-snow
vehicle use by NPS, contractor, or
concessioner employees, or other nonrecreational users authorized by the
Superintendent.
(13) Do other NPS regulations apply
to the use of oversnow vehicles? The use
of oversnow vehicles in Grand Teton is
subject to §§ 2.18(a), (b), and (c), but not
subject to § 2.18(d) and (e) and § 2.19(b)
of this chapter.
(14) Are there any forms of nonmotorized oversnow transportation
allowed in the park? (i) Non-motorized
travel consisting of skiing, skating,
snowshoeing, or walking is permitted
unless otherwise restricted under this
section or other NPS regulations.
(ii) The Superintendent may designate
areas of the park as closed, reopen such
areas, or establish terms and conditions
for non-motorized travel within the park
in order to protect visitors, employees,
or park resources.
(iii) Dog sledding and ski-joring are
prohibited.
(15) May I operate a snowplane in the
park? The operation of a snowplane in
Grand Teton National Park is
prohibited.
(16) May I continue to access public
lands via snowmobile through the park?
Reasonable and direct access, via
snowmobile, to adjacent public lands
will continue to be permitted on the
designated routes through the park
identified in (i)–(iv) below.
Requirements established in this section
related to air and sound emissions, daily
entry limits, snowmobile operator age,
guiding, and licensing do not apply on
these oversnow routes. Only the
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70803
following routes are designated for
access via snowmobile to public lands:
(i) From the parking area at Shadow
Mountain directly along the unplowed
portion of the road to the east park
boundary.
(ii) Along the unplowed portion of the
Ditch Creek Road directly to the east
park boundary.
(iii) The Continental Divide
Snowmobile Trail (CDST) along U.S. 26/
287 from the east park boundary to a
point approximately 2 miles east of
Moran Junction. If necessary for the
proper administration of visitor use and
resource protection, the Superintendent
may extend this designated route to the
Moran Entrance Station.
(iv) The Superintendent may
designate additional routes if necessary
to provide access to other adjacent
public lands.
(17) For what purpose may I use the
routes designated in paragraph (g)(16)
of this section? You may only use those
routes designated in paragraph (g)(16) of
this section to gain direct access to
public lands adjacent to the park
boundary.
(18) May I continue to access private
property within or adjacent to the park
via snowmobile? The Superintendent
may establish reasonable and direct
snowmobile access routes to the
inholding or to private property
adjacent to park boundaries for which
other routes or means of access are not
reasonably available. Requirements
established in this section related to air
and sound emissions, snowmobile
operator age, licensing, and guiding do
not apply on these oversnow routes. The
following routes are designated for
access to private properties within or
adjacent to the park:
(i) The unplowed portion of Antelope
Flats Road off U.S. 26/89/191 to private
lands in the Craighead Subdivision.
(ii) The unplowed portion of the
Teton Park Road to the piece of land
commonly referred to as the ‘‘Clark
Property.’’
(iii) From the Moose-Wilson Road to
the land commonly referred to as the
‘‘Barker Property.’’
(iv) From the Moose-Wilson Road to
the property commonly referred to as
the ‘‘Halpin Property.’’
(v) From Highway 26/89/191 to those
lands commonly referred to as the
‘‘Meadows’’, the ‘‘Circle EW Ranch’’, the
‘‘Moulton Property’’, the ‘‘Levinson
Property’’ and the ‘‘West Property.’’
(vi) From Cunningham Cabin pullout
on U.S. 26/89/191 near Triangle X to the
piece of land commonly referred to as
the ‘‘Lost Creek Ranch.’’
(vii) The Superintendent may
designate additional routes if necessary
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
70804
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
to provide reasonable access to
inholdings or adjacent private property.
(viii) Maps detailing designated routes
will be available from Park
Headquarters.
(19) For what purpose may I use the
routes designated in paragraph (g)(18)
of this section? The routes designated in
paragraph (g)(18) of this section are only
to access private property within or
directly adjacent to the park boundary.
Use of these roads via snowmobile is
authorized only for the landowners and
their representatives or guests. Use of
these roads by anyone else or for any
other purpose is prohibited.
(20) Is violating any of the provisions
of this section prohibited? Violating any
of the terms, conditions or requirements
of paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(19) of
this section is prohibited. Each
occurrence of non-compliance with
these regulations is a separate violation.
Dated: December 10, 2007.
Lyle Laverty,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. E7–24175 Filed 12–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–CT–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2004–IL–0002; FRL–8503–
5]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Illinois; SourceSpecific Revision for CromwellPhoenix, Incorporated
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA is approving a
revision to the Illinois State
Implementation Plan (SIP) to
incorporate site-specific Volatile
Organic Compounds (VOC) regulations
for the Corrosion Inhibiting (CI)
packaging production facility of
Cromwell-Phoenix, Incorporated
(Cromwell-Phoenix) located in Alsip,
Illinois (Cook County). The EPA is
approving an adjusted standard from
Illinois’ paper coating regulations for
Cromwell-Phoenix’s CI packaging
production facility.
DATES: This ‘‘direct final’’ rule is
effective on February 11, 2008, unless
EPA receives adverse written comments
by January 14, 2008. If an adverse
comment is received, EPA will publish
a timely withdrawal of the rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2004–IL–0002, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 886–5824.
4. Mail: John M. Mooney, Chief,
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: John M. Mooney,
Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office’s official hours of
operation are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2004–IL–
0002. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI, or otherwise
protected, through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters and any
form of encryption, and should be free
of any defects or viruses. For additional
instructions on submitting comments,
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
go to section I of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hardcopy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hardcopy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. It is
recommended that you telephone
Edward Doty, Environmental Scientist,
at (312) 886–6057, before visiting the
Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward Doty, Environmental Scientist,
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604. Telephone: (312) 886–6057. Email address: doty.edward@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used, we mean
EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section is organized as follows:
I. General Information
Does this action apply to me?
II. Today’s Action
A. What action is EPA taking today?
B. Why is EPA taking this action?
C. What are the alternative control
requirements included in the Adjusted
Standard?
D. What information did Illinois submit in
support of this SIP revision?
E. Was a public hearing held?
F. Why is this SIP revision being
approved?
III. Final Rulemaking Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. General Information
Does this action apply to me?
This action only applies to CromwellPhoenix, Incorporated (CromwellPhoenix), and, in particular, to
Cromwell-Phoenix’s CI packaging
production facility located in Alsip,
Illinois (Cook County). If you are the
owner or operator of this source, this
action affects the air pollution control
rules that apply to your source as
contained in the Illinois SIP.
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 239 (Thursday, December 13, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70781-70804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24175]
[[Page 70781]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
RIN 1024-AD55
Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule governs winter visitation and certain recreational
use in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks and the John D.
Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial Parkway. This final rule is issued to
implement the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Winter Use Plans Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) approved November 20, 2007, and
will ensure that visitors have an appropriate range of winter
recreation opportunities that are appropriate to the national park
setting, and that these activities do not impair park resources and
values. The rule requires that most recreational snowmobiles and
snowcoaches operating in the parks meet certain air and sound emissions
requirements, that snowmobilers and snowcoach riders in Yellowstone be
accompanied by a commercial guide, and sets daily entry limits on the
numbers of snowmobiles and snowcoaches that may enter the parks.
Traveling off designated oversnow routes will remain prohibited. The
FEIS, ROD, and other documents pertaining to winter use management in
the parks can be found at https://www.nps.gov/yell/planyourvisit/
winteruse.htm.
DATES: This regulation is effective on December 19, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Sacklin, Management Assistant's
Office, Yellowstone National Park, 307-344-2019.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Park Service (NPS) has been
managing winter use issues in Yellowstone National Park, Grand Teton
National Park, and the John D. Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial Parkway (the
Parks) for several decades. In 1997, the Fund for Animals and others
filed suit, alleging non-compliance with the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), among other laws. The suit resulted in a settlement
agreement in October 1997 which, among other things, required the NPS
to prepare a new winter use plan for the Parks. On October 10, 2000, a
Winter Use Plans Final Environmental Impact Statement (2000 FEIS) was
published. A Record of Decision (2000 ROD) was signed on November 22,
2000, and subsequently distributed to interested and affected parties.
The 2000 ROD was to eliminate both snowmobile and snowplane use from
the Parks by the winter of 2003-2004 and provide access via an NPS-
managed, mass-transit snowcoach system. This decision was based on a
finding that the snowmobile and snowplane use existing at that time--
and the snowmobile use analyzed in the 2000 FEIS alternatives--impaired
park resources and values, thus violating the statutory mandate of the
NPS.
Implementing aspects of this decision required a special regulation
for each park unit in question. Following publication of a proposed
rule and the subsequent public comment period, a final rule was
published in the Federal Register on January 22, 2001 (66 FR 7260).
That rule became effective on April 22, 2001.
On December 6, 2000, the Secretary of the Interior, the Director of
the National Park Service and others were named as defendants in a
lawsuit brought by the International Snowmobile Manufacturers'
Association (ISMA) and others. The States of Wyoming and Montana
subsequently intervened on behalf of the plaintiffs. The lawsuit asked
for the decision, as reflected in the 2000 ROD, to be set aside. The
lawsuit alleged, among other things, a violation of NEPA. A settlement
was reached on June 29, 2001, under which NPS agreed to prepare a
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) incorporating ``any
significant new or additional information or data submitted with
respect to a winter use plan.'' Additionally, the NPS provided the
opportunity for additional public participation in furtherance of the
purposes of NEPA. A Notice of Intent to prepare a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement was published in the Federal Register on
July 27, 2001 (66 FR 39197).
A draft SEIS was published on March 29, 2002, and distributed to
interested and affected parties. NPS accepted public comments on the
draft for 60 days, and 357,405 pieces of correspondence were received.
The SEIS focused its analysis only on the issues relevant to allowing
recreational snowmobile and snowcoach use in the parks. These impact
topics included air quality and air quality-related values, public and
employee health and safety, natural soundscapes, socioeconomics,
wildlife (bison and elk), and visitor experience. The SEIS did not re-
evaluate the decision to ban snowplane use on Jackson Lake because this
was not at issue in the lawsuit or the resulting settlement and because
the NPS had no reason to doubt the validity of its finding that
snowplane use impaired park resources.
On November 18, 2002, the NPS published a final rule (67 FR 69473)
(``delay rule'') based on the 2000 FEIS, which generally postponed
implementation of the phase-out of snowmobiles in the Parks for one
year. This rule allowed for additional time to plan and implement the
NPS-managed mass-transit, snowcoach-only system outlined in the 2000
FEIS as well as time for completion of the SEIS. The rule delayed the
implementation of the daily entry limits on snowmobiles until the
winter of 2003-2004 and the complete prohibition on snowmobiles until
2004-2005. The 2001 regulation's transitional requirement that
snowmobile parties use an NPS-permitted guide was also delayed until
the 2003-2004 winter use season.
Other provisions under the January 2001 regulation concerning
licensing requirements, limits on hours of operation, Yellowstone side
road use, and the ban on snowplane use remained effective for the
winter use season of 2002-2003.
The Notice of Availability for the final SEIS was published on
February 24, 2003 (68 FR 8618). The final SEIS included a new
alternative, alternative 4, which called for 950 snowmobiles in
Yellowstone and 190 in Grand Teton. Most would be subject to air and
sound emission requirements, and 80% of the Yellowstone snowmobiles
would be commercially guided and 20% would be non-commercially guided.
In addition, the final SEIS included changes to the alternatives,
changes in modeling assumptions and analysis, and incorporated
additional new information. Effective on March 25, 2003, NPS signed a
ROD for the SEIS, which selected final SEIS alternative 4 for
implementation and enumerated additional modifications to that
alternative. The final SEIS and ROD found that implementation of final
SEIS alternatives 1a, 1b, 3, or 4 would not be likely to impair park
resources or values due to motorized oversnow recreation. On December
11, 2003, the new regulation governing winter use in the parks was
published.
On December 16, 2003, the U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia, ruling in Fund for Animals v. Norton, vacated and remanded
the December 11, 2003, regulation and SEIS. The court effectively
reinstated the January 22, 2001, regulation phasing out recreational
snowmobiling subject to the delay rule. Specifically, up to 493
snowmobiles a day were to be allowed into Yellowstone for the 2003-2004
[[Page 70782]]
season, and another 50 in Grand Teton and the Parkway combined. All
snowmobiles in Yellowstone were required to be led by a commercial
guide. Snowmobiles were to be phased out entirely from the parks in the
2004-2005 season.
ISMA and the State of Wyoming reopened their December 2000 lawsuit
against the Department of the Interior and the NPS. On February 10,
2004, the U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming issued a
preliminary injunction in ISMA v. Norton preventing the NPS from
continuing to implement the snowmobile phase-out. The court also
directed the superintendents of Yellowstone and Grand Teton to issue
emergency orders that were ``fair and equitable'' to all parties to
allow visitation to continue for the remainder of the winter season.
Based on that injunction and using the authority of 36 CFR 1.5, the
superintendents authorized up to 780 snowmobiles a day into Yellowstone
and up to 140 into Grand Teton and the Parkway combined. In
Yellowstone, the requirement that all snowmobilers travel with a
commercial guide remained in effect.
On June 30, 2004, the DC court ordered that NPS promulgate a new
rule governing the 2004-05 winter use season at least 30 days prior to
the start of the season, and that the new rule be consistent with the
DC court's 2003 ruling. On October 14, 2004, the Wyoming court vacated
and remanded the 2000 FEIS, 2000 ROD, and the 2001 implementing rule,
based on violations of NEPA and the Administrative Procedure Act.
Because of the DC court's order, and because there were no clear
rules under which to manage the Parks for the winter season of 2004-
2005, the NPS prepared a Temporary Winter Use Plans Environmental
Assessment in 2004. The temporary plan was intended to provide a
framework for managing winter use in the Parks for a period of 3 years
and was approved in November 2004 with a ``Finding of No Significant
Impact'' (FONSI). An interim rule was published in the Federal Register
implementing the temporary plan. Its provisions included a limit of 720
snowmobiles per day for Yellowstone and 140 snowmobiles for Grand Teton
and the Parkway, a requirement that all recreational snowmobiles in
Yellowstone must be accompanied by a commercial guide, and a
requirement that all recreational snowmobiles operating in the Parks
must meet NPS air and sound emissions requirements for reducing noise
and air pollution (with limited exceptions at Grand Teton and the
Parkway). The interim rule was effective through the winter season of
2006-2007 while the NPS was to prepare a long-term winter use plan and
EIS for the Parks.
Several entities then filed separate lawsuits challenging the
temporary plan in the District Court in Wyoming and the District Court
in the District of Columbia, respectively. On three separate occasions,
Congress subsequently included language in appropriations legislation
for the Department of the Interior requiring that the temporary winter
use rules remain in effect for the winter seasons of 2004-2005, 2005-
2006, and 2006-2007. In October 2005, the Wyoming District Court upheld
the validity of the 2004 temporary winter use rule in Wyoming Lodging
and Restaurant Association v. U.S. Department of the Interior. As a
result of these legislative actions, on September 24, 2007, the DC
District Court dismissed as moot the pending claims against the
temporary plan. Additionally, in June 2007 the Wyoming District Court,
in a separate lawsuit filed by Save Our Snowplanes, upheld the
prohibition on the use of snowplanes on Jackson Lake. An appeal of that
decision by the plaintiffs is currently pending before the United
States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit.
A proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on May 16,
2007 (72 FR 27499). This Final Rule is issued in conjunction with the
FEIS and the ROD. Absent this rulemaking, the authority to operate
snowmobiles and snowcoaches in the Parks would have expired after the
2006-2007 winter season.
Rationale for the Final Rule
This rule strikes a balance between the use of snowmobiles and
snowcoaches in the Parks and is designed to protect against the adverse
impacts that occurred from the historical types and numbers of
snowmobiles used. Experience over the past several winters, during
which a temporary plan has guided winter use management of the Parks,
has shown that the combination of strict limits on the numbers of
snowmobiles allowed to enter the Parks, the use of snowmobiles that
meet NPS requirements for air and sound emissions (generally referred
to in the FEIS as Best Available Technology or BAT, but here referred
to simply as NPS requirements, to avoid confusion with use of the term
best available technology under other environmental laws), the
requirement that visitors touring Yellowstone on snowmobiles be
accompanied by a commercial guide, and the availability of snowcoaches,
allows for an appropriate range of visitor experiences while ensuring
that the integrity of park resources and values is not harmed. The NPS
found that the interim regulations that were in effect over the past
three winter seasons resulted in quieter conditions, cleaner air, fewer
wildlife impacts, and much improved visitor and employee safety and
experiences. This rule reduces the daily number of snowmobiles allowed
to enter the Parks in order to better protect park soundscapes and
other resources, includes new requirements for snowcoach air and sound
emissions, and eliminates certain oversnow vehicle routes. In addition
to the actual experiences of the last several winters, the decisions
underlying the Record of Decision and this rule have also been informed
by new analysis and information presented in the FEIS.
This rule is consistent with the 2006 NPS Management Policies. In
managing units of the National Park System, the NPS may undertake
actions that have both beneficial and adverse impacts on park resources
and values. However, the NPS is generally prohibited by law from taking
or authorizing any action that would or is likely to impair park
resources and values. Impairment is defined in the 2006 NPS Management
Policies in section 1.4.5 as an impact that, in the professional
judgment of the responsible NPS manager, would harm the integrity of
park resources or values, including the opportunities that otherwise
would be present for the enjoyment of those resources and values.
Since the impact threshold at which impairment occurs is not always
readily apparent, the NPS applies a standard that offers greater
assurances that impairment will not occur. The NPS does this by
avoiding impacts that it determines to be unacceptable. These are
impacts that fall short of impairment but are still not acceptable
within a particular park's environment. Unacceptable impacts are
defined in the 2006 NPS Management Policies in section 1.4.7.1.,
available online at https://www.nps.gov/policy/MP2006.pdf.
The NPS received over 122,000 comments on the DEIS and about 1,500
comments on the proposed rule. In many cases the comments received on
the proposed rule were very similar in content to those received on the
DEIS. Numerous commentors expressed concerns that the preferred
alternative in the DEIS, and its implementation through rulemaking,
would violate the NPS Organic Act, would be inconsistent with the 2006
NPS Management Policies, and in some cases explicitly referenced the
concept of unacceptable
[[Page 70783]]
impacts. The NPS addressed these concerns in a number of ways,
including new modeling and analysis to more clearly show the
environmental impacts of winter use, a revision of the preferred
alternative from the DEIS to that in the Final EIS which reduced the
number of snowmobiles allowed in Yellowstone from 720 per day to 540
per day, which is reflected in the ROD and Final Rule, and affirmance
in both the ROD and this rule that implementation of the preferred
alternative will not result in impairment of park resources and values,
nor will it result in unacceptable impacts on the Parks. This rule
implements that decision.
This rule includes strict limits on the number of snowmobiles
allowed to enter the Parks each day. Prior to the implementation of a
managed winter use program with the winter of 2003-2004, an average of
795 snowmobiles entered Yellowstone each day, with peak days averaging
approximately 1,400. This rule allows for 540 snowmobiles per day in
Yellowstone, a reduction from the 720 snowmobiles authorized over the
previous 3 winters, and which would have been allowed under the
proposed rule. In response to public comment and the analysis presented
in the FEIS, which included the results of both modeling and monitoring
over the past several winters, the NPS determined that a limit of 540
snowmobiles per day, along with the availability of snowcoaches, will
best protect the integrity of park resources and values while providing
an appropriate range of visitor experiences. In particular, the lower
number of snowmobiles will reduce the impacts on the natural
soundscapes of the park, which the NPS found to be somewhat greater
than expected even with the reduced number of snowmobiles that used the
park over the last several winters. Similarly, the number of
snowmobiles authorized in Grand Teton and the Parkway is limited under
this rule to 65 per day, allowing access to ice fishing opportunities
on Jackson Lake and to the recreational opportunities on the adjacent
Targhee National Forest. The rule also allows for up to 50 snowmobiles
to enter Yellowstone on the Cave Falls Road, an approximately one-mile
segment extending into the southwest corner of the park from the
Targhee National Forest. Use of this route is incidental to
recreational use of the national forest lands, is far removed from the
recreational snowmobiling and the resulting impacts that occur within
the interior of Yellowstone, and is therefore considered separately
from the 540 snowmobile limit.
Adjustments to the daily entry limits for snowmobiles and
snowcoaches through an adaptive management program is one of several
tools available to park managers to ensure that the goals and
objectives of the winter use plans are maintained. Through adaptive
management, if monitoring of use levels of snowmobiles and snowcoaches
allowed under the Record of Decision indicates acceptable conditions,
the NPS will increase use levels to the extent acceptable conditions
can be maintained. Conversely, if monitoring of use levels of
snowmobiles and snowcoaches allowed under the Record of Decision
indicates unacceptable conditions, the NPS will reduce use levels to an
extent that acceptable conditions can be maintained. In some cases,
additional rulemaking would be required in order to adjust numbers.
To mitigate impacts to air quality and the natural soundscape, the
NPS is continuing the requirement that all recreational snowmobiles
meet strict air and sound emissions requirements to operate in the
parks, with limited exceptions. For air emissions, all snowmobiles must
achieve a 90% reduction in hydrocarbons and a 70% reduction in carbon
monoxide, relative to EPA's baseline emissions assumptions for
conventional two-stroke snowmobiles. For sound restrictions,
snowmobiles must operate at or below 73 dBA as measured at full
throttle according to Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) J192 test
procedures (revised 1985). The Superintendent will maintain a list of
approved snowmobile makes, models, and years of manufacture that meet
NPS requirements. For the winter of 2006-2007, the NPS certified 35
different snowmobile models (from various manufacturers; model years
2002-2007) as meeting the NPS requirements. With one exception
described later in this section, the certification is good for 6 years
from the date on which a model is certified as meeting the
requirements.
The NPS is continuing the requirement that began with the 2005
model year that all snowmobiles must be certified under 40 CFR 1051 to
a Family Emission Limit (FEL) no greater than 15 g/kW-hr for
hydrocarbons (HC) and 120 g/kW-hr for carbon monoxide (CO). Snowmobiles
must be tested on a five-mode engine dynamometer consistent with the
test procedures specified by the EPA (40 CFR 1051 and 1065). Other test
methods could be approved by the NPS.
The NPS is retaining the use of the FEL method for demonstrating
compliance with its emissions requirements because it has several
advantages. First, use of FEL will ensure that all individual
snowmobiles entering the parks achieve the NPS's emissions
requirements, unless modified or damaged (under this regulation,
snowmobiles which are modified in such a way as to increase air or
sound emissions will not be in compliance with NPS requirements and
therefore not permitted to enter the parks). Use of FEL will also
minimize any administrative burden on snowmobile manufacturers to
demonstrate compliance with NPS requirements, because they already
provide FEL data to the EPA. Further, the EPA has the authority to
ensure that manufacturers' claims on their FEL applications are valid.
EPA also requires that manufacturers conduct production line testing
(PLT) to demonstrate that machines being manufactured actually meet the
certification levels. If PLT indicates that emissions exceed the FEL
levels, then the manufacturer is required to take corrective action.
Through EPA's ability to audit manufacturers' emissions claims, the NPS
will have sufficient assurance that emissions information and
documentation will be reviewed and enforced by the EPA. FEL also takes
into account other factors, such as the deterioration rate of
snowmobiles (some snowmobiles may produce more emissions as they age),
lab-to-lab variability, test-to-test variability, and production line
variance. In addition, under the EPA's regulations, all snowmobiles
manufactured must be labeled with FEL air emissions information. This
will help to ensure that NPS emissions requirements are consistent with
these labels. The use of FEL will avoid potential confusion for
consumers.
The air emissions requirements for snowmobiles allowed to operate
in the Parks should not be confused with standards adopted by the EPA
in a final rule published in the Federal Register on November 8, 2002
(67 FR 68242). The EPA regulations require manufacturers to meet
certain fleet averages for HC and CO emissions. For example, the Phase
1 standards required all snowmobile manufacturers to meet a fleet-wide
average in 2007 of 275 g/kW-hr for CO and 100 g/kW-hr for HC, which
represents a 30-percent reduction from the baseline emission rates for
uncontrolled snowmobiles. Any particular make/model may emit more or
less than the standard as long as the fleet average does not exceed the
standard. Phase 2 and Phase 3 standards will be implemented in 2010 and
2012,
[[Page 70784]]
respectively, effectively requiring the equivalent of a 50% reduction
in both HC and CO as compared to average baseline levels. By
comparison, NPS requires that all snowmobiles operating in the Parks
meet a FEL of 120 g/kW-hr for CO and 15 g/kW-hr for HC. This means that
snowmobiles operating in the Parks represent the cleanest that are
commercially available.
To determine compliance with the sound emissions requirements,
snowmobiles must be tested using SAE J192 test procedures (revised
1985; or potentially as further revised and adapted for use by NPS).
The NPS recognizes that the SAE updated these test procedures in 2003;
however, the changes between the 2003 and 1985 test procedures could
yield different measurement results. The sound emissions requirement
was initially established using 1985 test procedures (in addition to
information provided by industry and modeling). To ensure consistency
in the test results, the NPS will at this time continue to use the 1985
test. The SAE J192 (revised 1985) test also allows for a tolerance of 2
dBA over the sound limit to account for variations in weather, snow
conditions, and other factors. The NPS understands that an update to
the 2003 J192 procedures may be underway, and the NPS will continue to
evaluate these test procedures and possibly adopt them after these
regulations are implemented. Other test methods could be approved by
NPS on a case-by-case basis.
Snowmobiles may be tested at any barometric pressure equal to or
above 23.4 inches Hg uncorrected (as measured at or near the test
site). This exception to the SAE J192 test procedures maintains
consistency with the testing conditions used to determine the sound
requirement. This allowance for reduced barometric pressure is
necessary since snowmobiles were tested at the elevation of Yellowstone
National Park, where atmospheric pressure is lower than that under the
SAE J192's requirements. Testing data indicate that snowmobiles test
quieter at high elevation, and therefore some snowmobiles may comply
with the NPS's sound emissions requirements at higher elevations even
though they do not when tests are conducted near sea level.
The NPS will annually publish a list of snowmobile makes, models,
and years of manufacture that meet its emissions and sound
requirements. Snowmobile manufacturers may demonstrate that snowmobiles
are compliant with the air emissions requirements by submitting to the
NPS a copy of their applications used to demonstrate compliance with
EPA's general snowmobile regulation (indicating FEL). The NPS will
accept this application information from manufacturers in support of
conditionally certifying a snowmobile as meeting its air emissions
requirements, pending ultimate review and certification by EPA at the
same emissions levels identified in the application. Should EPA certify
a snowmobile at an emission level that would no longer meet the NPS's
requirements, this snowmobile would no longer be considered by NPS to
be compliant with its requirements and would be phased-out according to
a schedule that will be determined by the NPS to be appropriate. For
sound emissions, snowmobile manufacturers may submit their existing
Snowmobile Safety and Certification Committee (SSCC) sound level
certification form. Under the SSCC machine safety standards program,
snowmobiles are certified by an independent testing company as
complying with all SSCC safety standards, including sound standards.
This regulation does not require the SSCC form specifically, as there
could be other acceptable documentation in the future. The NPS will
work cooperatively with the snowmobile manufacturers on appropriate
documentation. The NPS intends to continue to rely on certified air and
sound emissions data from the private sector rather than establish its
own independent testing program. When the NPS certifies snowmobiles as
meeting its requirements, it will announce how long that certification
applies. Generally, each snowmobile model will be approved for entry
into the parks for 6 winter seasons after it is first listed. Based on
NPS experience, 6 years represents the typical useful life of a
snowmobile, and thus 6 years provides purchasers with a reasonable
length of time where operation is allowed once a particular model is
listed as being compliant. It is also based on EPA snowmobile emission
regulations and the deterioration factors that are part of those
regulations (EPA requires that if a manufacturer certifies its
snowmobile will comply with EPA's emission regulations, the snowmobile
will meet those regulations for a period of 5 years or 5,000 miles).
The NPS recognizes that some privately owned snowmobiles used
predominantly for ice fishing on Jackson Lake may have relatively low
mileages even after 6 years of use, and therefore may not have
experienced the type of deterioration that would cause them to fail NPS
air and sound emissions requirements. The certification period for
snowmobiles being operated on Jackson Lake will still be considered to
be 6 years, but it may be extended up to a total of 10 years as long as
the snowmobile's mileage does not exceed 6,000 miles.
Individual snowmobiles modified in such a way as to increase sound
and air emissions of hydrocarbons (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO) beyond
the proposed emission restrictions will be denied entry to the parks.
It is the responsibility of end users and guides and outfitters to
ensure that their oversnow vehicles, whether snowmobiles or
snowcoaches, comply with all applicable restrictions. Air and sound
emission requirements for snowcoaches are described below. The
requirement in Yellowstone that all snowmobilers travel with commercial
guides will assist NPS in enforcing these requirements, since
businesses providing commercial guiding services in the parks are
responsible under their contracts with the park to ensure that their
clients use only snowmobiles that meet the NPS's requirements. In
addition, these businesses are required to ensure that snowmobiles used
in the park are not modified in such a way as to increase sound or air
emissions, and that snowmobiles are properly maintained.
Snowmobiles being operated on the Cave Falls Road, which extends
approximately one mile into the Yellowstone from the adjacent national
forest, will be exempt from air and sound emissions requirements. Since
use of the Cave Falls Road is relatively light and incidental to
recreational use of the surrounding national forest, it is not
necessary to require these users to comply with requirements that
address issues associated with use of the interior portions of the
park.
In Grand Teton, all recreational snowmobiles operating on Jackson
Lake will be required to meet NPS air and sound emissions requirements.
During the winter season of 2007-2008, snowmobiles being operated
on the portion of the Continental Divide Snowmobile Trail (CDST)
between Moran Junction and Flagg Ranch, within both Grand Teton and the
Parkway, must also meet NPS air and sound emissions requirements.
Beginning with the winter season of 2008-2009, that portion of the CDST
will no longer be maintained or designated for oversnow vehicle use.
The segment of the CDST between the east boundary of Grand Teton and
Moran is exempt from NPS air and sound emissions requirements. Because
this portion of the CDST passes in and out of the park boundary and is
generally adjacent to other public and
[[Page 70785]]
private lands where snowmobile use is permitted, this section is being
managed similarly to other routes where the use of snowmobiles not
meeting air and sound emissions requirements is allowed in order to
provide access to adjacent public and private lands. In light of the
small amount of such use that typically occurs along this segment, as
well as the context in which that use occurs (i.e., immediately
alongside a heavily used highway), the NPS has determined that the
impacts of this use of snowmobiles that do not meet NPS air and sound
emissions requirements are acceptable.
For the winter of 2007-2008, snowmobiles being operated on the
Grassy Lake Road within the Parkway are required to meet NPS air and
sound emissions requirements, except that snowmobiles originating in
the Targhee National Forest will be allowed to travel eastbound to
Flagg Ranch and return westbound without meeting the NPS requirements;
however, these snowmobiles may not travel further into the Parkway than
Flagg Ranch. The NPS is allowing this exception in order to ensure that
visitors to the remote Grassy Lake area of the Targhee National Forest
are able to access food, fuel, emergency services, and other amenities
available at Flagg Ranch. Beginning with the 2008-2009 winter season,
snowmobiles being operated on the Grassy Lake Road will not be required
to meet air and sound emissions requirements regardless of whether they
originate travel at Flagg Ranch or in the national forest. In light of
the relatively short length of this segment and the very limited amount
of snowmobile use, the NPS has determined that the impacts of this use
of snowmobiles that does not meet NPS air and sound emissions
requirements are acceptable.
Under concession contracts issued in 2003, 78 snowcoaches are
currently authorized to operate in Yellowstone (and in the parkway
between Flagg Ranch and Yellowstone's South Entrance). Approximately 29
of these snowcoaches were manufactured by Bombardier and were designed
specifically for oversnow travel. Those 29 snowcoaches were
manufactured before 1983 and are referred to as ``historic
snowcoaches'' for the purpose of this rulemaking. All other snowcoaches
are passenger vans or light buses that have been converted for oversnow
travel using tracks and/or skis. During the winter of 2005-2006, an
average of 29 snowcoaches entered Yellowstone each day.
As of the winter of 2008-2009, all snowcoaches must be commercially
guided. These trained, knowledgeable operators help ensure that air and
sound emission requirements are met, wildlife impacts are minimized,
and visitor and employee safety is assured.
In comparison with four-stroke snowmobiles, snowcoaches operating
within EPA's Tier I standards can be substantially cleaner, especially
given that snowcoaches currently carry an average of 7 times more
passengers than snowmobiles. In 2004, EPA began phasing in Tier II
emissions standards for multi-passenger vans which will be fully phased
in by 2009. Tier II standards will require that vehicles be even
cleaner than under Tier I. Tier II standards would also significantly
reduce the open loop mode of operation, which is the most polluting
mode of engine operation.
Beginning in the 2011-2012 season, all snowcoaches in the Parks
must meet air emission requirements, which will be the functional
equivalent of having EPA Tier I emissions control equipment
incorporated into the engine and drive train for the vehicle's class
(size and weight) as a wheeled vehicle. The NPS will encourage, through
contract and permit, that snowcoaches have EPA Tier II emissions
control equipment for the vehicle class. In addition, all critical
emission and sound-related exhaust components that were originally
installed by the manufacturer must be in place and functioning
properly. Such components may only be replaced with original equipment
manufacturer (OEM) components where possible. If OEM parts are not
available, aftermarket parts may be used if they do not worsen emission
and sound characteristics from OEM levels. In general, catalysts that
have exceeded their typical useful life as stated by the manufacturer
must be replaced unless the operator can demonstrate the catalyst is
functioning properly.
Beginning in the 2011-2012 season, snowcoaches must meet a sound
emissions requirement of no greater than 73 dBA; test procedures will
be determined by the NPS.
The restrictions on air and sound emissions proposed in this rule
are not a restriction on what manufacturers may produce but an end-use
restriction on which commercially produced snowmobiles and snowcoaches
may be used in the parks. The NPS Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1) authorizes
the Secretary of the Interior to ``promote and regulate'' the use of
national parks ``by such means and measures as conform to the
fundamental purpose of said parks * * * which purpose is to conserve
the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life
therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and
by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future
generations.'' Further, the Secretary is expressly authorized by 16
U.S.C. 3 to ``make and publish such rules and regulations as he may
deem necessary or proper for the use and management of the parks * *
*'' This exercise of the NPS Organic Act authority is not an effort by
NPS to regulate manufacturers and is consistent with Section 310 of the
Clean Air Act.
Since 2001, the Parks have been converting their own administrative
fleet of snowmobiles to four-stroke machines. These machines have
proven successful in fulfilling most of the Service's administrative
needs throughout the Parks. However, the NPS recognizes that some
administrative applications, such as off-trail boundary patrols in deep
powder, towing heavy equipment or disabled sleds, search and rescue, or
law enforcement uses may require additional power beyond that supplied
by currently available snowmobiles that meet the NPS's air and sound
emissions requirements. In such limited cases, the NPS will sometimes
need to use snowmobiles that do not meet the requirements this rule
imposes upon recreational snowmobiles (which do not have these special
needs because they travel only upon groomed roads).
In order to mitigate impacts to natural soundscapes and wildlife,
and for visitor and employee safety, all recreational snowmobiles
operated in Yellowstone must be accompanied by a commercial guide,
except for those being operated on the one-mile segment of the Cave
Falls Road that extends into the park from the adjacent national
forest. This guiding requirement will reduce conflicts with wildlife
along roadways because guides are trained to lead visitors safely
around the park with minimal disturbance to wildlife. Commercially
guided parties also tend to be larger in size, which reduces the
overall number of encounters with wildlife and reduces the amount of
time that oversnow vehicles are audible. Commercial guides are educated
in safety, knowledgeable about park rules, and are required to exercise
reasonable control over their clientele, which has reduced unsafe and
illegal snowmobile use. Commercial guides with contractual obligations
to the NPS also allow for more effective enforcement of park rules by
the NPS. These guides receive rigorous multi-day training and perform
guiding duties as employees of a business. They also are experts at
interpreting the resources of the parks to their clients. Commercial
guides are
[[Page 70786]]
employed by local businesses; those jobs are not performed by NPS
employees.
Commercial guides use a ``follow-the-leader'' approach, stopping
often to talk with the group. They lead snowmobiles single-file through
the park, using hand signals to pass information down the line from one
snowmobile to the next, a system which has proven to be effective.
Signals are used to warn group members about wildlife and other road
hazards, indicate turns, and when to turn on or off the snowmobile.
Further, all commercial guides are trained in basic first aid and CPR.
In addition to first aid kits, they often carry satellite or cellular
telephones, radios, and other equipment for emergency use. Guides are
thus well-equipped to ensure that park regulations are enforced and to
provide a safer overall experience for visitors.
Since the winter of 2003-2004, all snowmobilers in Yellowstone have
been led by commercial guides, resulting in significant positive
effects on visitor health and safety. Guides have been proven to be
very effective at enforcing proper touring behavior, such as adherence
to speed limits, staying on the groomed road surfaces, and other
snowmobiling behaviors that are appropriate to safely and responsibly
visiting the park. Since implementation of the guiding program there
have been pronounced reductions in the number of law enforcement
incidents and accidents associated with the use of snowmobiles, even
when accounting for the reduced number of snowmobilers relative to
historic use levels. The use of guides is also beneficial to wildlife,
since guides are trained to respond appropriately when encountering
wildlife.
No more than eleven snowmobiles will be permitted in a group,
including that of the guide. Except in emergency situations, guided
parties must travel together and remain within a maximum distance of
one-third mile of the first snowmobile in the group. These size and
distance limits will ensure that guided parties do not become
separated, will allow for sufficient and safe spacing between
individual snowmobiles within the guided party, allow the guide(s) to
maintain control over the group and minimize the impacts on wildlife
and natural soundscapes. NPS thus expects that the continuation of the
guiding requirement will help ensure compliance with park regulations
and protect park resources.
Scientific studies and monitoring of winter visitor use and park
resources (including air quality, natural soundscapes, wildlife,
employee health and safety, water quality, and visitor experience) will
continue. As part of its adaptive management of winter use activities,
NPS will close selected areas of the Parks to visitor use, including
sections of roads, if these studies indicate that human presence or
activities have a substantial adverse effect on wildlife or other park
resources that cannot otherwise be mitigated. A one-year notice will
ordinarily be provided before any such closure is implemented unless
immediate closure is deemed necessary to avoid impairment of park
resources. Most non-emergency changes in park management implemented
under the adaptive management framework will be implemented only after
at least one or 2 years of monitoring, followed by a 6-to 12-month
implementation period. The Superintendent will continue to have the
authority under 36 CFR 1.5 to take emergency actions to protect park
resources or values.
The adaptive management program described in the ROD provides park
managers with a wide variety of tools to ensure that the goals and
objectives of the winter use plans are being achieved. Some of the
techniques available include adjustments in snowmobile or snowcoach use
levels (up or down), adjustments in air and sound emissions
requirements, visitor and guide education, timing of entries, and group
sizes. Also, the future improvements in snowcoach air and sound
emissions will assist park managers in meeting goals and objectives.
Through adaptive management, if monitoring of use levels of snowmobiles
and snowcoaches allowed under the Record of Decision indicates
acceptable conditions, the NPS will increase use levels to an extent
acceptable conditions can be maintained. Conversely, if monitoring of
use levels of snowmobiles and snowcoaches allowed under the Record of
Decision indicates unacceptable conditions, the NPS will reduce use
levels to an extent acceptable conditions can be maintained. In some
cases, additional rulemaking would be required in order to implement
certain changes.
The NPS is implementing a multi-year research proposal intended to
specifically address the question of whether grooming of the Madison to
Norris road segment in Yellowstone has led to alterations of bison
movements and distribution. The question was identified in a report by
Dr. Cormack Gates et al., entitled ``The Ecology of Bison Movements and
Distribution in and Beyond Yellowstone National Park'' (2005). The
research program will involve a linked series of experiments that will
enable researchers to gain insight into how road grooming and other
factors currently affect bison travel. Initially, the research program
will include the analysis of existing data on GPS-collared bison, the
tracking of additional GPS-collared bison, and the deployment of
cameras along travel routes to gain information on the relationship
between road grooming and bison travel, without necessitating the
closure of the Gibbon Canyon road segment to public oversnow vehicle
travel. During the 5 year period, other roads or routes may be
investigated to help understand the relationship between snow depth,
grooming, and bison movement. For example, the Firehole Canyon Drive
may be closed to oversnow travel and the Grand Loop Road gated in that
area to allow snowmobile and snowcoach travel, but not bison movement
on the main road. Bison would then be forced to travel cross country or
along the ungroomed Firehole Canyon Road. Similarly, the Madison to
Norris Road may be fenced or gated in the vicinity of the new bridge
over the Gibbon River to restrict bison movement on the Madison to
Norris Road and force bison to travel cross country. Thus bison
movement and snow depth and roads may be tested without closing a main
road. However, following the 5 years of data gathering and analysis,
the NPS, in consultation with the researchers, will consider closing
the main Madison to Norris route to observe bison response. That
decision will rely on the results of the data gathering and analysis
and whether such a closure would be likely to yield informative data or
conclusions. If implemented, such a closure would likely last several
seasons.
Snowmobiles and snowcoaches will continue to be restricted to
designated routes, which are a subset of the same roads that are
traveled by motor vehicles during the remainder of the year, or in the
case of Jackson Lake, by motorboats during the summer. In Yellowstone,
in addition to most of the Grand Loop Road, certain side roads will be
open for snowmobile use after noon, based on the successful experience
of the NPS with temporal zoning on Firehole Canyon Drive. Virginia
Cascades will be accessible only via ski and snowshoe.
This rule addresses Sylvan Pass in Yellowstone. For the winter
season of 2007-2008 the pass will be managed continuing the combined
program outlined in the 2004 Temporary Plan. After the winter of 2007-
2008, in order to maximize risk reduction, the pass would be open and
managed using full avalanche forecasting (as defined in the Sylvan Pass
Operational Risk
[[Page 70787]]
Management Assessment and may be viewed at: https://www.nps.gov/yell/
parkmgmt/winterusetechnicaldocuments.htm). When full forecasting
indicates the pass is safe, the pass would be open to oversnow travel
(both motorized and non-motorized access).
The National Park Service will, in good faith, work cooperatively
with the State of Wyoming, Park County, Wyoming and the town of Cody to
determine how to provide continued snowmobile and snowcoach motorized
oversnow access to Yellowstone National Park through the East Gate via
Sylvan Pass in the winter use seasons beyond 2007-2008.
The National Park Service will meet with representatives of the
State of Wyoming, Park County, Wyoming and the town of Cody to further
explore reasonable avalanche and access mitigation safety measures and
costs. In order to provide adequate time to implement actions that
reflect a potential consensus of the parties, and to promulgate a new
regulation, if necessary, that reflects an amended decision for the
2008-2009 winter use season and beyond, consensus should be reached by
June 1, 2008.
If the pass is closed at times to oversnow vehicle travel, the
segment of road from the East Entrance to a point about four miles
west, short of the Sylvan Pass avalanche zone, will be groomed and/or
tracked for cross-country skiing. The commercial snowmobiles or
snowcoaches authorized to operate from East Entrance may be allowed on
that segment in order to provide skier drop-offs or shuttles. In
addition, when the pass is not open due to safety, the road segment
between Fishing Bridge and Lake Butte Overlook will be maintained for
oversnow vehicle travel.
Beginning with the winter season of 2008-2009, the NPS will
discontinue maintaining the Continental Divide Snowmobile Trail (CDST)
as an oversnow vehicle route through most of Grand Teton and the
Parkway, in essence converting this portion of the CDST into a
trailered segment. Experience over the past several winters strongly
suggests that the minimal amount of use on this route would not
substantially increase since much of the previous use of the CDST was
associated with visitors traveling through Yellowstone. The NPS
recognizes that the guiding and air and sound emissions requirements
for Yellowstone have contributed to a substantial reduction in the use
of the CDST, since visitors have not been able to continue into
Yellowstone without a guide and a snowmobile that meets the emissions
requirements, as well as being subject to the daily entrance caps.
The NPS also recognizes, however, that snowmobile access to and
from the Targhee National Forest is important to some visitors. While
the CDST will no longer be maintained or designated for snowmobile use,
the air and sound emissions requirements for the Grassy Lake Road will
be removed beginning with the 2008-2009 winter season. Snowmobilers
will be able to transport their machines by trailer between Moran and
Flagg Ranch using plowed roads, in order to connect to the Grassy Lake
Road and the national forest lands to the west of the Parkway. The
daily entry limit of 25 is similar to the level of use that occurred in
the past.
Summary of and Responses to Public Comments
The NPS published a proposed rule on May 16, 2007 (72 FR 27499) and
accepted public comments through July 16, 2007. Comments were accepted
through the mail, hand delivery, and through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. A total of 1,450 people commented
on the proposed rule, and 1,481 comment documents were received (some
commentors submitted multiple letters). Thirty-seven letters were
submitted electronically, and the remainder were submitted in paper
form. Approximately 42% of commentors submitted form letters while the
remaining 58% were unique letters.
Snowmobiles and Snowcoaches
1. Comment: The NPS should revise the proposed rule to prohibit the
use of snowmobiles and require that all oversnow access to the parks be
via snowcoaches.
Response: Snowcoaches and snowmobiles provide two very different
types of experiences for park visitors seeking to enjoy Yellowstone
during the winter. The use of both types of travel is well-established
in the Parks, extending back more than 4 decades. In seeking to provide
a range of opportunities and means to enjoy the Parks, the NPS believes
that the managed use of both types of oversnow travel best meets that
purpose and, as described in the FEIS and ROD, can be accomplished
without harming the integrity of park resources or values. In addition,
both types of access facilitate a wide range of non-motorized
activities within the park by providing access to interior destinations
such as Old Faithful and other areas that would otherwise be
unreachable by the vast majority of visitors.
2. Comment: The use of snowmobiles results in a waste of resources
and contributes to climate change.
Response: As disclosed in the FEIS, snowmobiles that currently meet
the NPS's air and sound emissions requirements are more fuel-efficient
than conventional snowmobiles and therefore contribute less to climate
change. On a per capita basis, snowmobiles meeting NPS air and sound
emissions requirements are slightly more fuel-efficient than
snowcoaches, based on NPS analysis of current ridership and gas mileage
within Yellowstone.
3. Comment: The proposed rule would continue to allow the use of
snowcoaches, which would result in adverse impacts on air quality and
the natural soundscape of Yellowstone.
Response: The NPS fully evaluated the impacts of snowcoaches on the
air quality and natural soundscapes of Yellowstone, as described in the
FEIS. The NPS recognizes that certain types of snowcoaches,
predominantly the historic Bombardier models with upright exhaust
stacks, operate with relatively high levels of noise and have been
responsible for a large percentage of the instances in which sound
levels exceeded adaptive management thresholds established by the NPS.
Beginning with the 2011-2012 winter season, the NPS will require that
all snowcoaches meet a noise emissions requirement of no greater than
73 dBA and an air emissions requirement that is the functional
equivalent of having EPA Tier I emissions control equipment into the
engine and drive train for the vehicle class (size and weight) as a
wheeled vehicle. The NPS, through contracts and permits, will encourage
snowcoaches to have EPA Tier II emissions control equipment for the
vehicle class.
4. Comment: The NPS should require all snowcoaches to meet air and
sound emissions requirements sooner than the 2011-2012 winter season.
Response: The NPS believes that the 4-year period allowed for the
phase-in of air and sound emissions requirements is reasonable given
the expense of upgrading snowcoaches to meet these requirements, and is
necessary in order to avoid a disruption of visitor services.
Park Resource Issues
5. Comment: The use of snowmobiles under the proposed rule will
continue to result in adverse impacts on air and water quality, natural
soundscapes, vegetation, wildlife, visitor experience, and public
health and safety.
Response: The NPS fully evaluated the environmental impacts of
[[Page 70788]]
snowmobile use in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). The
combination of daily entry limits, strict air and sound emissions
requirements for snowmobiles, and the requirement that all snowmobilers
travel with a commercial guide while visiting Yellowstone significantly
mitigates the impacts of snowmobile use in the Parks. In order to
further mitigate these impacts, the NPS has reduced the daily entry
limits on snowmobiles to 540 per day in Yellowstone and 65 per day in
Grand Teton and the Parkway. As stated in the FEIS and the ROD, the
impacts resulting from the use of snowmobiles in the Parks will not
harm the integrity of park resources and values.
6. Comment: Road grooming has unnaturally altered bison ecology.
Response: The NPS fully evaluated the impacts of snowmobile and
snowcoach use on bison in the FEIS and responded to comments on this
issue. As discussed above, the NPS is also implementing a research
program to further study aspects of this issue.
7. Comment: The improvements in air quality as well as other
improvements in environmental conditions in Yellowstone over the last
several winters are attributable more to the lower numbers of
snowmobiles that have been present rather than to the air and sound
emissions requirements, guiding requirements, and daily entry limits
(which allowed for more use than actually occurred).
Response: The NPS recognizes that the level of snowmobile use that
occurred over the last three winters contributed to improvements in air
quality and other environmental conditions. As described in the FEIS,
however, these improvements are also attributable to the air and sound
emissions requirements, guiding, and other elements of the temporary
plan that has been in effect for the past several winters.
8. Comment: The NPS should not be attempting to manage for an
unreasonable expectation that visitors may expect to enjoy natural
quiet along with motorized travel within the Parks.
Response: Natural soundscapes are an important element of the
Parks' resources and of visitors' enjoyment of the Parks. The NPS
believes that it is obligated to protect that resource and allow for
its enjoyment to the greatest extent possible, recognizing that in
certain areas human-caused sounds will be evident much of the time. The
sound emissions and guiding requirements, group sizes, daily entry
limits, and other elements of the Winter Use Plan all contribute to
reasonable opportunities for visitors to experience the natural
soundscapes of the Parks, even along travel corridors.
9. Comment: Snowmobiles that meet the air and sound emissions
requirements of the proposed rule do not produce intrusive sounds and
have no adverse impacts on the Parks' natural soundscapes.
Response: As disclosed in the FEIS, snowmobiles meeting the NPS air
and sound emissions requirements do produce noise, although at a
reduced level from conventional two-stroke snowmobiles. In addition,
the tonal qualities of these snowmobiles are different from
conventional snowmobiles and may be perceived as less intrusive, and at
the limits of audibility the low pitched sounds may not be
distinguishable from natural sounds such as the wind. The requirement
that most snowmobiles operating in the Parks meet NPS air and sound
emissions requirements mitigates, but does not eliminate, impacts on
the natural soundscapes.
10. Comment: The use of snowmobiles does not result in any
environmental impacts on the parks.
Response: The environmental impacts of snowmobiles and snowcoaches
were identified in the FEIS.
11. Comment: The analysis supporting the proposed rule did not
properly consider recent studies, in particular the Bishop studies from
2006 and 2007, showing that snowcoaches and snowmobiles can have the
same extremes in emissions--both high and low--and the proposed rule
relies on studies not cited in the DEIS (C.C. Lela and J.J. White/
Southwest Research Institute, ``Laboratory Testing of Snowmobile
Emissions, Final Report,'' 2002).
Response: The proposed rule did use the Bishop studies and the FEIS
in its analysis (Gary A. Bishop, Daniel A. Burgard, Thomas R. Dalton,
Donald H. Stedman, and John D. Ray, 2006 ``In-use Emission Measurements
of Snowmobiles and Snowcoaches in Yellowstone National Park,'' and Gary
A. Bishop, Ryan Stadtmuller, and Donald H. Stedman, 2007 ``Portable
Emission Measurements of Snowcoaches and Snowmobiles in Yellowstone
National Park''). The 2006 study has been published (Winter Motor-
Vehicle Emissions in Yellowstone National Park, Environmental Science &
Technology (April 15, 2006): 2505-2510), and the 2007 study has been
submitted for peer review. Both of these studies support the conclusion
that although snowcoaches as a class can have both high and low
emissions, the cleanest of the snowcoaches would produce emissions well
below that of four-stroke snowmobiles, on a per capita basis. The NPS,
in requiring Tier I emissions controls for snowcoaches with this rule
(and encouraging the stricter Tier II emissions controls through
contracts, as indicated in the FEIS), will be implementing snowcoach
emissions requirements intended to be equal to or better than the
emissions Bishop found in the cleanest group of snowmobiles, as
detailed in the FEIS.
Guiding
12. Comment: The requirement over the last several winters that all
visitors entering Yellowstone by snowmobile be accompanied by a
commercial guide has resulted in adverse economic impacts on gateway
communities, and these impacts will be perpetuated by the proposed
rule.
Response: These and other economic impacts were disclosed and
analyzed in the FEIS and in the economic analysis report that is
summarized below. The NPS acknowledges that there have been some
negative economic impacts to gateway communities and individual
businesses located within those communities over the past several
winters as a result of a decrease in snowmobile visitation to the
Parks.
13. Comment: The requirement in the proposed rule that all
snowmobilers be accompanied by a commercial guide while visiting
Yellowstone largely eliminates the ability to experience the park on
one's own terms, independent of a guided tour, thus diminishing the
enjoyment of visiting the park.
Response: The NPS recognizes that the guiding requirement
diminishes the opportunity to travel freely through the park
independent of a commercially guided trip, but believes that such a
requirement is a fundamental element of the successful approach to
mitigating the impacts of motorized winter use. While some individuals
may be discouraged from visiting the park because of this requirement,
the NPS also recognizes that by traveling with a commercial guide,
visitors have the ability to increase their understanding and
appreciation of the park through frequent interaction with a
knowledgeable and experienced trip leader.
14. Comment: Commercial guiding does not mitigate the impacts to
natural soundscapes, wildlife, and safety.
Response: The effects of guiding on these resource topics were
analyzed in the FEIS. Guiding has resulted in substantial noise-free
intervals in the park because snowmobiles are clustered in groups and
travel in more predictable
[[Page 70789]]
patterns. Commercial guiding is effective in minimizing human-wildlife
conflicts, and the number of law enforcement and safety-related
incidents has substantially decreased since the initiation of the
commercial guiding requirement.
15. Comment: Commercially guided groups should continue to have a
maximum size of 10 snowmobilers plus the guide on a separate
snowmobile, rather than the 8 or 17 snowmobiles (depending on whether 1
or 2 guides are present) described in the proposed rule.
Response: In response to public comment and further discussions
within the NPS, this section of the proposed rule has been revised to
continue the existing maximum group size of 10 snowmobiles plus one
guide, for a total of 11 snowmobiles.
16. Comment: The NPS should specify a minimum group size of two
persons.
Response: The NPS does not believe it is necessary to designate a
minimum group size since there will always be at least one person plus
a guide.
17. Comment: The analysis supporting the proposed rule does not
support the NPS's conclusions that the requirement for commercial
guides results in mitigation of the impacts on soundscapes, wildlife,
and safety. The analysis is flawed because groups accompanied by a non-
commercial guide have not been allowed in Yellowstone since
implementation of managed winter use in 2003, and therefore was not
analyzed.
Response: The NPS believes that commercial guiding has been
extremely successful and helped address problems that historically
arose. A number of actions in the range of alternatives considered in
the EIS have not occurred in practice, such as non-commercial guiding,
road closures, improved air and sound emissions requirements for
snowmobiles, and air and sound requirements for snowcoaches. This does
not mean that those actions were not analyzed. Modeling and
professional judgment were used to analyze these actions.
Sylvan Pass
18. Comment: The reasons and rationale presented by the NPS in the
proposed rule for the closure of Sylvan Pass to oversnow vehicle travel
are insufficient to support such an action. The rule should be revised
to continue the use of Sylvan Pass as an oversnow route for snowmobiles
and snowcoaches.
Response: The NPS and others have extensively studied the avalanche
hazards at Sylvan Pass as well as potential ways of addressing those
hazards. The NPS has concluded that there are serious risks to park
employees, contractors, and visitors, and there may not be reasonable
ways of ensuring that visitors or concessioners could depend on the
pass being consistently open in light of the avalanche hazards, weather
conditions, and other factors. However, the National Park Service will,
in good faith, work cooperatively with the State of Wyoming, Park
County, Wyoming and the town of Cody to determine how to provide
continued snowmobile and snowcoach motorized oversnow access to
Yellowstone National Park through the East Gate via Sylvan Pass.
The National Park Service will meet with representatives of the
State of Wyoming, Park County, Wyoming and the town of Cody to further
explore reasonable avalanche and access mitigation safety measures and
costs. In order to provide adequate time to implement actions that
reflect a potential consensus of the parties for the 2008-2009 winter
use season and beyond, consensus should be reached by June 1, 2008.
Consistent with the decision explained in the ROD, the NPS has revised
the final rule to reflect that the East Entrance Road through Sylvan
Pass will continue to be designated as an oversnow vehicle route beyond
the 2007-2008 winter season. The NPS will cease active avalanche
control activities beginning with the 2008-2009 season, and the pass
would be open to motorized and non-motorized travel when avalanche
forecasting indicates that travel through the pass is safe.
19. Comment: The NPS has used the low number of visitors using the
East Entrance during the winter as a reason for proposing to close
Sylvan Pass to oversnow vehicle use.
Response: Although the number of visitors using the East Entrance
has been fairly low recently and historically, the basis for the
proposal to close Sylvan Pass to oversnow vehicle use was that
avalanche hazards to employees and visitors exist. As described above
and in the ROD, the National Park Service will, in good faith, work
cooperatively with the State of Wyoming, Park County, Wyoming and the
town of Cody to determine how to provide continued snowmobile and
snowcoach motorized oversnow access to Yellowstone National Park
through the East Gate via Sylvan Pass.
20. Comment: The NPS is inconsis