Mortgagee Review Board; Administrative Actions, 70883-70885 [E7-24113]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Notices
70883
APPENDIX A.—EMERGENCY CAPITAL REPAIR GRANT AWARDEES FY 2007—Continued
Name of owner/sponsor
Name of development
City
State
Number of
units
Dollar amount
awarded
Presbyterian Home at Plainfield,
Inc.
Barbara L. Andrews Memorial
Housing Association.
Overlook Senior Citizens Housing
of Loudon Co., Inc.
Plainfield Tower
West.
Andrews Way ........
Plainfield ..........
NJ ........
154
64,587
Raytown ...........
MO ......
10
6,000
Dogwood Terrace
III.
Lenoir City ........
TN .......
20
83,461
Mercy Douglas Human Services
Residence Corp.
Mercy Douglas
Residences.
Philadelphia .....
PA .......
61
489,752
Century Homes for Elderly, Inc ...
Springbrook Apartments.
Vonore .............
TN .......
24
21,037
Beaches Elderly Housing Corporation.
Schnurman House, Inc ................
Pablo Hamlet .........
Jacksonville
Beach.
Mayfield
Heights.
Gulfport ............
FL ........
104
74,226
OH .......
198
290,000
MS .......
101
498,777
Saraland Manor Inc .....................
Schnurman House
Apartments.
Saraland Manor .....
Omni-Governor, Inc .....................
The Governor
Apartments.
Providence .......
RI ........
57
425,327
Jewish Federation Housing, Inc ..
Federation Towers
Miami Beach ....
FL ........
114
402,900
Labelle Towers ............................
Labelle Towers ......
Highland Park ..
MI ........
214
338,657
Villa Del Sol Senior Housing, Inc
Villa Del Sol Senior
Housing.
Sunland Park ...
NM ......
30
55,838
Chaparral Senior Housing, Inc ....
Chaparral Senior
Housing.
Las Cruces .......
NM ......
40
98,543
Elm Manor Homes, Inc ................
Elm Manor Homes
Roanoke ...........
VA .......
23
284,854
Redeemer Lutheran Housing, Inc
Luther Acres ..........
Vineland ...........
NJ ........
100
421,646
[FR Doc. E7–24130 Filed 12–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5157–N–03]
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Mortgagee Review Board;
Administrative Actions
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with Section
202(c) of the National Housing Act, this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Repairs funded
Replaced the existing two
elevators.
Replaced failing plumbing
system.
Repaired a water line,
repaved the driveway,
and replaced the air
conditioning/heating
systems.
Replaced the deteriorating
concrete slab and remediated soil conditions
beneath the building.
Replaced deteriorating
and leaking roof system.
Replaced deteriorating
and leaking windows.
Replaced the roofs.
Replaced a fire alarm and
emergency call system,
replaced the roof condenser units and repaired the elevator
doors.
Refurbished the existing
chimney, replaced roof
tiles, and repointed the
exterior wall surface.
Replaced two malfunctioning elevator cars.
Replaced a 35-year-old
chiller.
Repaved buckling pavement, repaired heaving
sidewalks, and repaired
failing storm drainage
systems.
Replaced faulty-inoperable windows, corrected
flooding problems and
repaired guttering systems on the roof.
Replaced parts of an unreliable elevator, windows, the parapet cap,
damaged vinyl siding,
and failed retaining
wall.
Replaced an inoperable
corridor ventilation system.
notice advises of the cause and
description of administrative actions
taken by HUD’s Mortgagee Review
Board against HUD-approved
mortgagees.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David E. Hintz, Secretary to the
Mortgagee Review Board, 451 Seventh
Street, Room B–133 Portals 200, SW.,
Washington, DC 20410–8000, telephone:
(202) 708–3856, extension 3594. A
Telecommunications Device for
Hearing- and Speech-Impaired
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
70884
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Notices
Individuals (TTY) is available at (800)
877–8339 (Federal Information Relay
Service).
Section
202(c)(5) of the National Housing Act
(added by Section 142 of the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development Reform Act of 1989,
Pub.L. 101–235, approved December 15,
1989), requires that HUD ‘‘publish a
description of and the cause for
administrative action against a HUDapproved mortgagee’’ by the
Department’s Mortgagee Review Board
(Board). In compliance with the
requirements of Section 202(c)(5), this
notice advises of administrative actions
that have been taken by the Board from
April 27, 2007 to August 31, 2007.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. America’s Mortgage Resource,
Metairie, LA [Docket No. 06–6031–MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed
August 24, 2007. Without admitting
liability or fault, America’s Mortgage
Resource agreed to pay HUD $64,000.
America’s Mortgage Resource also
agreed that it will not approve any
HUD/FHA-insured mortgages in which
the borrower is receiving a gift from a
downpayment assistance provider
unless that provider meets HUD’s
existing requirements for gift donors,
including obtaining 501(c)(3) status
from the Internal Revenue Service.
Cause: The Board took this action
based on the following violations of
HUD/FHA requirements in the
origination of HUD/FHA-insured loans
where America’s Mortgage Resource:
Failed to ensure that borrowers received
gift funds from acceptable sources; and
failed to adopt a Quality Control Plan in
accordance with HUD/FHA
requirements.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
2. Aspen Home Loans, LC, American
Fork, UT [Docket No. 06–6028–MR]
Action: On August 16, 2007, the
Board issued a letter to Aspen Home
Loans, LC (Aspen) immediately
withdrawing its HUD/FHA approval for
five years.
Cause: The Board took this action
based on the following violations of
HUD/FHA requirements where Aspen
failed to comply with the Board’s
directive. In a letter dated May 14, 2007,
the Board put Aspen on a one year
probation and imposed a $6,500 civil
money penalty and, directed Aspen to:
Provide the Board with Aspen’s Senior
Management Quality Control reports
performed for the preceding six months
within thirty days of Aspen’s receipt of
the Board’s Notice letter; a copy of
Aspen’s current acceptable Quality
Control Plan within fifteen days of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
Aspen’s receipt of the Board’s Notice
letter; and, copies of Aspen’s Senior
Management Quality Control reports for
the following calendar year, completed
quarterly, within thirty days of the end
of each quarter.
3. Capital Mortgage Associates, LLC,
North Haven, CT [Docket No. 07–7003–
MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed
August 31, 2007. Without admitting
liability or fault, Capital Mortgage
Associates, LLC (Capital) agreed to make
an administrative payment to HUD in
the amount of $22,500. Capital also
agreed to refund borrowers unallowable
fees identified in two loans.
Cause: The Board took this action
based on the following violations of
HUD/FHA requirements in the
origination of HUD/FHA-insured loans
where Capital: Allowed an unapproved
branch to originate HUD/FHA loans in
violation of HUD/FHA requirements;
failed to ensure that borrowers were not
charged unallowable fees; and failed to
adopt a Quality Control Plan in
accordance with HUD/FHA
requirements.
4. Citybank, Puyallup, WA [Docket No.
07–7013–MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed
August 14, 2007. Without admitting
liability or fault, Citybank agreed to
waive all insurance benefits or
indemnify HUD on two loans. Citybank
also agreed to pay HUD an
administrative payment in the amount
of $17,500.
Cause: The Board took this action
based on the following violations of
HUD/FHA requirements in the
origination of HUD/FHA-insured loans
where Citybank: Failed to verify the
source of funds for a gift used by the
borrower to meet his/her minimum
investment; failed to ensure that
borrowers met minimum credit
requirements; and failed to reconcile
discrepancies in appraisals and/or
accepted incomplete appraisal reports.
5. Davis-Penn Mortgage Company,
Houston, TX [Docket No. 07–7005–MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed
May 15, 2007. Without admitting
liability or fault, Davis-Penn Mortgage
Company (Davis-Penn) agreed to pay
HUD an administrative payment in the
amount of $83,000.
Cause: The Board took this action
based on the following violations of
HUD/FHA requirements in the servicing
of HUD/FHA-insured loans where
Davis-Penn: Failed to report default on
two multifamily insured mortgage loans;
and failed to elect to assign two
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
multifamily insured mortgage loans that
were in default.
6. Mac-Clair Mortgage Corporation,
Flint, MI [Docket No. 07–7017–MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed
August 31, 2007. Without admitting
wrongdoing or fault, Mac-Clair Mortgage
Corporation (Mac-Clair) agreed to pay
HUD an administrative payment in the
amount of $10,000. Mac-Clair also
agreed to pay the entire debt owed to
HUD on five Settlement Agreements in
the amount of $915,627.
Cause: The Board took this action
because Mac-Clair failed to comply with
the terms of the five Settlement
Agreements.
7. Pennsylvania Housing Finance
Agency, Harrisburg, PA [Docket No. 06–
6022–MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed
May 29, 2007. Without admitting
liability or fault, Pennsylvania Housing
Finance Agency (PHFA) agreed to pay
HUD an administrative payment in the
amount of $23,000.
Cause: The Board took this action
based on the following violations of
HUD/FHA requirements in the servicing
of HUD/FHA-insured loans where the
PHFA: Failed to report a default in one
multifamily insured mortgage loan in
accordance with HUD/FHA
requirements; failed to timely elect
whether to assign the multifamily
insured mortgage loan that was in
default; and failed to assign the
mortgage to HUD within 30 days from
the date of the election to assign the
mortgage to HUD.
8. Synergy Mortgage Corporation,
Waco, TX [Docket No. 06–6021–MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed
August 14, 2007. Without admitting
liability or fault, Synergy Mortgage
Corporation (Synergy) agreed to pay
HUD an administrative payment in the
amount of $410,000. Synergy also
agreed that Synergy, Synergy Bank and
Premier Bancshares, Inc., and any
existing or newly created subsidiaries or
affiliates of these entities shall not seek
HUD/FHA approval as mortgagee for a
period of five years from the effective
date of the Settlement Agreement.
Cause: The Board took this action
based on the following violations of
HUD/FHA requirements in the
origination of HUD/FHA-insured loans
where Synergy: Failed to properly
document, and calculate income;
omitted and understated liabilities for
loan qualification; failed to properly
verify the source and adequacy of funds
for the borrower’s minimum required
investment; failed to ensure property
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2007 / Notices
eligibility for HUD/FHA mortgage
insurance; closed loans in excess of the
maximum allowable amount by failing
to consider inducements to purchase in
computing the mortgage amount and
failing to resolve conflicting information
regarding the sales price; and approved
a mortgage loan with an excessive debt
to income ratio without adequate
compensating factors.
9. Tranah Asset Management
Corporation, San Antonio, TX [Docket
No. 06–6030–MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed
April 27, 2007. Without admitting
liability or fault, Tranah Asset
Management Corporation (Tranah)
agreed to pay HUD an administrative
payment in the amount of $45,000.
Cause: The Board took this action
based on the following violation of
HUD/FHA requirements in the
origination of HUD/FHA-insured loans
where Tranah permitted a debarred
mortgagee to participate in the HUD/
FHA mortgage insurance program.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
10. Wall Street Financial Corporation,
Fairfield, NJ [Docket No. 04–4264–MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed
May 17, 2007. Without admitting
liability or fault, Wall Street Financial
Corporation (Wall Street) agreed to pay
HUD an administrative payment in the
amount of $19,500. Wall Street also
agreed to refund unallowable fees
identified in 50 loans to mortgagors
within 30 days of the effective date of
the Settlement Agreement.
Cause: The Board took this action
based on the following violations of
HUD/FHA requirements in the
origination of HUD/FHA-insured loans
where Wall Street: Approved mortgages
with debt-to-income ratios that
exceeded HUD/FHA standards without
adequate compensating factors in nine
mortgages; failed to adequately
document the source of funds used for
the downpayment or closing costs in
one mortgage; failed to ensure that
borrowers whom Wall Street charged a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Dec 12, 2007
Jkt 214001
commitment fee, executed a
Commitment Agreement guaranteeing
discount points and/or interest rates at
least fifteen days prior to closing; and
charged unallowable fees for title review
by an attorney, and/or overcharged for
obtaining credit reports.
Dated: December 6, 2007.
Brian D. Montgomery,
Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal,
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E7–24113 Filed 12–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Permits
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Issuance of
Enhancement of Survival and Incidental
Take Permits.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Between June 1, 2005, and
September 30, 2007, the Pacific Region
of the Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service) issued 18 permits for
enhancement of survival or incidental
take of threatened and endangered
species. These permits were issued
pursuant to sections 10(a)(1)(A) and
10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (Act). Copies
of the permits and associated decision
documents are available upon request.
ADDRESSES: Documents are available
from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
911 NE., 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon
97232; facsimile (503) 231–6243.
Charges for copying, shipping and
handling may apply.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please contact Shelly Sizemore,
Administrative Assistant, at the above
address and facsimile number or by
telephone at (503) 231–2194.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 9
of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70885
its implementing regulations prohibit
the take of wildlife species listed as
endangered or threatened. The term
‘‘take’’ means to harass, harm, pursue,
hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture,
or collect listed wildlife, or to attempt
to engage in any such conduct. We may,
under limited circumstances, issue
permits to authorize take that is
incidental to, and not the purpose of,
carrying out an otherwise lawful
activity. Regulations governing permits
for threatened and endangered species
are found at 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22.
Although not required by law or
regulation, it is our regional policy to
notify the public of permits issued for
enhancement of survival or incidental
take under Habitat Conservation Plans,
Safe Harbor Agreements, or Candidate
Conservation Agreements with
Assurances. Within the Pacific Region
of the Service, between June 1, 2005,
and September 30, 2007, we issued 15
permits for enhancement of survival and
3 permits for incidental take of
threatened and endangered species
subject to certain conditions set forth
therein, pursuant to sections 10(a)(1)(A)
and 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. The
enhancement of survival permits are
associated with Safe Harbor Agreements
or Candidate Conservation Agreements
with Assurances. The incidental take
permits are associated with Habitat
Conservation Plans. We issued each
permit after determining that: (1) The
permit application was submitted in
good faith; (2) all permit issuance
criteria were met, including the
requirement that granting the permit
will not jeopardize the continued
existence of listed species; and (3) the
permit was consistent with the purposes
and policy set forth in the Act and
applicable regulations, including a
thorough review of the environmental
effects of the action and alternatives
pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.).
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 239 (Thursday, December 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70883-70885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24113]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-5157-N-03]
Mortgagee Review Board; Administrative Actions
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with Section 202(c) of the National Housing Act,
this notice advises of the cause and description of administrative
actions taken by HUD's Mortgagee Review Board against HUD-approved
mortgagees.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David E. Hintz, Secretary to the
Mortgagee Review Board, 451 Seventh Street, Room B-133 Portals 200,
SW., Washington, DC 20410-8000, telephone: (202) 708-3856, extension
3594. A Telecommunications Device for Hearing- and Speech-Impaired
[[Page 70884]]
Individuals (TTY) is available at (800) 877-8339 (Federal Information
Relay Service).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 202(c)(5) of the National Housing
Act (added by Section 142 of the Department of Housing and Urban
Development Reform Act of 1989, Pub.L. 101-235, approved December 15,
1989), requires that HUD ``publish a description of and the cause for
administrative action against a HUD-approved mortgagee'' by the
Department's Mortgagee Review Board (Board). In compliance with the
requirements of Section 202(c)(5), this notice advises of
administrative actions that have been taken by the Board from April 27,
2007 to August 31, 2007.
1. America's Mortgage Resource, Metairie, LA [Docket No. 06-6031-MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed August 24, 2007. Without
admitting liability or fault, America's Mortgage Resource agreed to pay
HUD $64,000. America's Mortgage Resource also agreed that it will not
approve any HUD/FHA-insured mortgages in which the borrower is
receiving a gift from a downpayment assistance provider unless that
provider meets HUD's existing requirements for gift donors, including
obtaining 501(c)(3) status from the Internal Revenue Service.
Cause: The Board took this action based on the following violations
of HUD/FHA requirements in the origination of HUD/FHA-insured loans
where America's Mortgage Resource: Failed to ensure that borrowers
received gift funds from acceptable sources; and failed to adopt a
Quality Control Plan in accordance with HUD/FHA requirements.
2. Aspen Home Loans, LC, American Fork, UT [Docket No. 06-6028-MR]
Action: On August 16, 2007, the Board issued a letter to Aspen Home
Loans, LC (Aspen) immediately withdrawing its HUD/FHA approval for five
years.
Cause: The Board took this action based on the following violations
of HUD/FHA requirements where Aspen failed to comply with the Board's
directive. In a letter dated May 14, 2007, the Board put Aspen on a one
year probation and imposed a $6,500 civil money penalty and, directed
Aspen to: Provide the Board with Aspen's Senior Management Quality
Control reports performed for the preceding six months within thirty
days of Aspen's receipt of the Board's Notice letter; a copy of Aspen's
current acceptable Quality Control Plan within fifteen days of the
Aspen's receipt of the Board's Notice letter; and, copies of Aspen's
Senior Management Quality Control reports for the following calendar
year, completed quarterly, within thirty days of the end of each
quarter.
3. Capital Mortgage Associates, LLC, North Haven, CT [Docket No. 07-
7003-MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed August 31, 2007. Without
admitting liability or fault, Capital Mortgage Associates, LLC
(Capital) agreed to make an administrative payment to HUD in the amount
of $22,500. Capital also agreed to refund borrowers unallowable fees
identified in two loans.
Cause: The Board took this action based on the following violations
of HUD/FHA requirements in the origination of HUD/FHA-insured loans
where Capital: Allowed an unapproved branch to originate HUD/FHA loans
in violation of HUD/FHA requirements; failed to ensure that borrowers
were not charged unallowable fees; and failed to adopt a Quality
Control Plan in accordance with HUD/FHA requirements.
4. Citybank, Puyallup, WA [Docket No. 07-7013-MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed August 14, 2007. Without
admitting liability or fault, Citybank agreed to waive all insurance
benefits or indemnify HUD on two loans. Citybank also agreed to pay HUD
an administrative payment in the amount of $17,500.
Cause: The Board took this action based on the following violations
of HUD/FHA requirements in the origination of HUD/FHA-insured loans
where Citybank: Failed to verify the source of funds for a gift used by
the borrower to meet his/her minimum investment; failed to ensure that
borrowers met minimum credit requirements; and failed to reconcile
discrepancies in appraisals and/or accepted incomplete appraisal
reports.
5. Davis-Penn Mortgage Company, Houston, TX [Docket No. 07-7005-MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed May 15, 2007. Without admitting
liability or fault, Davis-Penn Mortgage Company (Davis-Penn) agreed to
pay HUD an administrative payment in the amount of $83,000.
Cause: The Board took this action based on the following violations
of HUD/FHA requirements in the servicing of HUD/FHA-insured loans where
Davis-Penn: Failed to report default on two multifamily insured
mortgage loans; and failed to elect to assign two multifamily insured
mortgage loans that were in default.
6. Mac-Clair Mortgage Corporation, Flint, MI [Docket No. 07-7017-MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed August 31, 2007. Without
admitting wrongdoing or fault, Mac-Clair Mortgage Corporation (Mac-
Clair) agreed to pay HUD an administrative payment in the amount of
$10,000. Mac-Clair also agreed to pay the entire debt owed to HUD on
five Settlement Agreements in the amount of $915,627.
Cause: The Board took this action because Mac-Clair failed to
comply with the terms of the five Settlement Agreements.
7. Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, Harrisburg, PA [Docket No. 06-
6022-MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed May 29, 2007. Without admitting
liability or fault, Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency (PHFA) agreed
to pay HUD an administrative payment in the amount of $23,000.
Cause: The Board took this action based on the following violations
of HUD/FHA requirements in the servicing of HUD/FHA-insured loans where
the PHFA: Failed to report a default in one multifamily insured
mortgage loan in accordance with HUD/FHA requirements; failed to timely
elect whether to assign the multifamily insured mortgage loan that was
in default; and failed to assign the mortgage to HUD within 30 days
from the date of the election to assign the mortgage to HUD.
8. Synergy Mortgage Corporation, Waco, TX [Docket No. 06-6021-MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed August 14, 2007. Without
admitting liability or fault, Synergy Mortgage Corporation (Synergy)
agreed to pay HUD an administrative payment in the amount of $410,000.
Synergy also agreed that Synergy, Synergy Bank and Premier Bancshares,
Inc., and any existing or newly created subsidiaries or affiliates of
these entities shall not seek HUD/FHA approval as mortgagee for a
period of five years from the effective date of the Settlement
Agreement.
Cause: The Board took this action based on the following violations
of HUD/FHA requirements in the origination of HUD/FHA-insured loans
where Synergy: Failed to properly document, and calculate income;
omitted and understated liabilities for loan qualification; failed to
properly verify the source and adequacy of funds for the borrower's
minimum required investment; failed to ensure property
[[Page 70885]]
eligibility for HUD/FHA mortgage insurance; closed loans in excess of
the maximum allowable amount by failing to consider inducements to
purchase in computing the mortgage amount and failing to resolve
conflicting information regarding the sales price; and approved a
mortgage loan with an excessive debt to income ratio without adequate
compensating factors.
9. Tranah Asset Management Corporation, San Antonio, TX [Docket No. 06-
6030-MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed April 27, 2007. Without
admitting liability or fault, Tranah Asset Management Corporation
(Tranah) agreed to pay HUD an administrative payment in the amount of
$45,000.
Cause: The Board took this action based on the following violation
of HUD/FHA requirements in the origination of HUD/FHA-insured loans
where Tranah permitted a debarred mortgagee to participate in the HUD/
FHA mortgage insurance program.
10. Wall Street Financial Corporation, Fairfield, NJ [Docket No. 04-
4264-MR]
Action: Settlement Agreement signed May 17, 2007. Without admitting
liability or fault, Wall Street Financial Corporation (Wall Street)
agreed to pay HUD an administrative payment in the amount of $19,500.
Wall Street also agreed to refund unallowable fees identified in 50
loans to mortgagors within 30 days of the effective date of the
Settlement Agreement.
Cause: The Board took this action based on the following violations
of HUD/FHA requirements in the origination of HUD/FHA-insured loans
where Wall Street: Approved mortgages with debt-to-income ratios that
exceeded HUD/FHA standards without adequate compensating factors in
nine mortgages; failed to adequately document the source of funds used
for the downpayment or closing costs in one mortgage; failed to ensure
that borrowers whom Wall Street charged a commitment fee, executed a
Commitment Agreement guaranteeing discount points and/or interest rates
at least fifteen days prior to closing; and charged unallowable fees
for title review by an attorney, and/or overcharged for obtaining
credit reports.
Dated: December 6, 2007.
Brian D. Montgomery,
Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal, Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E7-24113 Filed 12-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P