Detroit Edison Company; FERMI 2; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact, 70619-70620 [E7-24087]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 12, 2007 / Notices
Any person may observe meetings, or
portions thereof, of advisory panels that
are open to the public, and if time
allows, may be permitted to participate
in the panel’s discussions at the
discretion of the panel chairman. If you
need special accommodations due to a
disability, please contact the Office of
AccessAbility, National Endowment for
the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682–
5532, TDY-TDD 202/682–5496, at least
seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
Further information with reference to
these meetings can be obtained from Ms.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of
Guidelines & Panel Operations, National
Endowment for the Arts, Washington,
DC, 20506, or call 202/682–5691.
Dated: December 7, 2007.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations,
National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. E7–24070 Filed 12–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Project 0741]
Notice of Receipt and Availability of
Application for a Combined License
Dominion Virginia Power—North Anna
Unit 3
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Receipt of Combined
License Application.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Kevern, Senior Project
Manager, ESBWR/ABWR Projects
Branch 1, Division of New Reactor
Licensing, Office of New Reactors, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
Telephone: (301) 415–0224; fax: (301)
415–5199; e-mail: tak@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 26, 2007, Dominion Virginia
Power (Dominion, or the applicant) filed
with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, or the Commission)
pursuant to section 103 of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and 10
CFR Part 52, Subpart C, an application
for a combined license (COL) for an
economic simplified boiling water
reactor (ESBWR) to be located at the
North Anna Power Station (NAPS) site
in Louisa County, Virginia, and
designated as North Anna Unit 3. The
information submitted by the applicant
includes certain administrative
information such as financial
qualifications submitted pursuant to 10
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:54 Dec 11, 2007
Jkt 214001
CFR 50.33, and an agreement to limit
access to sensitive information
submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 50.37.
Subsequent Federal Register notices
will address the acceptability of the
tendered COL application for docketing
and provisions for participation of the
public in the COL review process.
A copy of the application is available
for public inspection at the
Commission’s Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland, and via the
Agencywide Document Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
at the NRC Web site, http://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
The accession number for the
application is ML073320913. Future
publicly available documents related to
the application will also be posted in
ADAMS. Persons who do not have
access to ADAMS, or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, should contact the
NRC Public Document Room staff by
telephone at 1–800–397–4209 or 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
The application is also available at
http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/newlicensing/col.html.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day
of December, 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Thomas A. Kevern,
Senior Project Manager, ESBWR/ABWR
Projects Branch 1, Division of New Reactor
Licensing, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. E7–24089 Filed 12–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–341]
Detroit Edison Company; FERMI 2;
Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an exemption from Title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR) Part 74, section 74.19(c), for
Facility Operating License No. NPF–43,
issued to Detroit Edison Company (the
licensee), for operation of Fermi 2,
located in Monroe County, Michigan.
Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21,
the NRC is issuing this environmental
assessment and finding of no significant
impact.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70619
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed ACTION:
The proposed action would exempt
the licensee from the requirement in 10
CFR 74.19(c) to conduct a physical
inventory of all special nuclear material
(SNM) at intervals not to exceed 12
months. Specifically, the request is for
exemption from the physical inventory
requirements for those fuel assemblies
that are stored under the Holtec
Overhead Platforms (HOPs) when the
HOPs are installed in the spent fuel
racks.
The proposed action is in accordance
with the licensee’s application dated
April 27, 2007, as supplemented by
letter dated November 9, 2007.
The Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action would allow the
licensee to not have to perform physical
inventory of fuel assemblies below the
HOPs when the HOPs are installed.
Therefore, the licensee would not have
to empty and remove the HOPs to
perform the annual SNM physical
inventory.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The NRC has completed its safety
evaluation of the proposed action and
concludes that exempting the licensee
from performing a physical inventory of
fuel assemblies under the HOPs when
the HOPs are installed is acceptable.
The details of the staff’s safety
evaluation will be provided in the
exemption that will be issued as part of
the letter to the licensee approving the
exemption to the regulation.
The proposed action will not
significantly increase the probability or
consequences of accidents. No changes
are being made in the types of effluents
that may be released off site. There is no
significant increase in the amount of
any effluent released off site. There is no
significant increase in occupational or
public radiation exposure. Therefore,
there are no significant radiological
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed action.
With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed
action does not have a potential to affect
any historic sites. It does not affect nonradiological plant effluents and has no
other environmental impact. Therefore,
there are no significant non-radiological
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed action.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that
there are no significant environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
action.
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
70620
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 12, 2007 / Notices
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed
action, the staff considered denial of the
proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’
alternative). Denial of the application
would result in no change in current
environmental impacts. The
environmental impacts of the proposed
action and the alternative action are
similar.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day
of December 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
˜
Adrian Muniz,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III–
1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E7–24087 Filed 12–11–07; 8:45 am]
Alternative Use of Resources
The action does not involve the use of
any different resources than those
previously considered in the Final
Environmental Statement for Fermi 2,
NUREG–0769, dated August 1981 and
NUREG–0769, Addendum No. 1 dated
March 1982.
OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT
CORPORATION
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy,
on December 4, 2007, the staff consulted
with the Michigan State official, Thor
Strong of the Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality, Radiological
Protection Section, regarding the
environmental impact of the proposed
action. The State official had no
comments.
Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the environmental
assessment, the NRC concludes that the
proposed action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment. Accordingly, the
NRC has determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the
proposed action.
For further details with respect to the
proposed action, see the licensee’s letter
dated April 27, 2007, as supplemented
by letter dated November 9, 2007. The
licensee requested that the enclosures to
both letters be withheld from public
disclosure because they contain
security-related sensitive information.
Publicly available records will be
accessible electronically from the
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
at the NRC Web site, http://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR
Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–
397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or send an
e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. Documents may
be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at
the NRC’s Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North,
Public File Area O1 F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:54 Dec 11, 2007
Jkt 214001
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
political risk insurance, assess the
environmental impact and
developmental effects of the project,
measure the economic effects for the
U.S. and the host country economy, and
collect information for insurance
underwriting analysis.
Dated: December 7, 2007.
John Crowley III,
Senior Counsel, Administrative Affairs,
Department of Legal Affairs.
[FR Doc. 07–6030 Filed 12–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3210–01–M
Submission for OMB Review
Overseas Private Investment
Corporation (OPIC).
ACTION: Request for approval.
AGENCY:
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), agencies are required to
publish a Notice in the Federal Register
notifying the public that the agency has
prepared an information collection for
OMB review and approval. Comments
were solicited in the 60-day notice,
posted on October 2, 2007, and no
comments were received.
DATES: This 30-day notice is to inform
the public, that this collection is being
submitted to OMB for approval.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the subject form
may be obtained from the Agency
submitting officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OPIC Agency Submitting Officer: Essie
Bryant, Record Manager, Overseas
Private Investment Corporation, 1100
New York Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20527; (202) 336–8563.
SUMMARY:
Summary Form Under Review
Type of Request: Revised form.
Title: Application for Political Risk
Insurance.
Form Number: OPIC–52.
Frequency of Use: Once per investor
per project.
Type of Respondents: Business or
other institution (except farms);
individuals.
Standard Industrial Classification
Codes: All.
Description of Affected Public: U.S.
companies or citizens investing
overseas.
Reporting Hours: 9 hours per project.
Number of Responses: 100 per year.
Federal Cost: $24,300.00.
Authority for Information Collection:
Sections 231, 234(a), 239(d), and 240A
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961,
as amended.
Abstract (Needs and Uses): The
application is the principal document
used by OPIC to determine the
investor’s and the project’s eligibility for
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Rule 17a–4; OMB Control No. 3235–0279;
SEC File No. 270–198.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
• Rule 17a–4 (17 CFR 240.17–4)—
Records to be preserved by certain
exchange members, brokers and dealers.
Rule 17a–4 requires exchange
members, brokers and dealers to
preserve for prescribed periods of time
certain records required to be made by
Rule 17a–3 (17 CFR 240.17a–3). In
addition, Rule 17a–4 requires the
preservation of records required to be
made by other Commission rules and
other kinds of records which firms make
or receive in the ordinary course of
business. These include, but are not
limited to, bank statements, cancelled
checks, bills receivable and payable,
originals of communications, and
descriptions of various transactions.
Rule 17a–4 also permits broker-dealers
to employ, under certain conditions,
electronic storage media to maintain
records required to be maintained under
Rules 17a–3 and 17a–4.
There are approximately 5,791 active,
registered broker-dealers. The staff
estimates that the average amount of
time necessary to preserve the books
and records as required by Rule 17a–4
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70619-70620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24087]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-341]
Detroit Edison Company; FERMI 2; Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an exemption from Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Part 74, section 74.19(c), for Facility Operating
License No. NPF-43, issued to Detroit Edison Company (the licensee),
for operation of Fermi 2, located in Monroe County, Michigan.
Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC is issuing this
environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact.
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed ACTION:
The proposed action would exempt the licensee from the requirement
in 10 CFR 74.19(c) to conduct a physical inventory of all special
nuclear material (SNM) at intervals not to exceed 12 months.
Specifically, the request is for exemption from the physical inventory
requirements for those fuel assemblies that are stored under the Holtec
Overhead Platforms (HOPs) when the HOPs are installed in the spent fuel
racks.
The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's
application dated April 27, 2007, as supplemented by letter dated
November 9, 2007.
The Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action would allow the licensee to not have to perform
physical inventory of fuel assemblies below the HOPs when the HOPs are
installed. Therefore, the licensee would not have to empty and remove
the HOPs to perform the annual SNM physical inventory.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC has completed its safety evaluation of the proposed action
and concludes that exempting the licensee from performing a physical
inventory of fuel assemblies under the HOPs when the HOPs are installed
is acceptable.
The details of the staff's safety evaluation will be provided in
the exemption that will be issued as part of the letter to the licensee
approving the exemption to the regulation.
The proposed action will not significantly increase the probability
or consequences of accidents. No changes are being made in the types of
effluents that may be released off site. There is no significant
increase in the amount of any effluent released off site. There is no
significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure.
Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts
associated with the proposed action.
With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed
action does not have a potential to affect any historic sites. It does
not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no other
environmental impact. Therefore, there are no significant non-
radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant
environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
[[Page 70620]]
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative).
Denial of the application would result in no change in current
environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action
and the alternative action are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
The action does not involve the use of any different resources than
those previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for
Fermi 2, NUREG-0769, dated August 1981 and NUREG-0769, Addendum No. 1
dated March 1982.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy, on December 4, 2007, the
staff consulted with the Michigan State official, Thor Strong of the
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Radiological Protection
Section, regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. The
State official had no comments.
Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes
that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined
not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed
action.
For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the
licensee's letter dated April 27, 2007, as supplemented by letter dated
November 9, 2007. The licensee requested that the enclosures to both
letters be withheld from public disclosure because they contain
security-related sensitive information. Publicly available records will
be accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the
Internet at the NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR
Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or send
an e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for
a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White
Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first
floor), Rockville, Maryland.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of December 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Adrian Mu[ntilde]iz,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III-1, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E7-24087 Filed 12-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P