Rhode Island: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions, 70229-70234 [E7-23946]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
human health or environmental effects
of their programs, policies, and
activities on minority and low-income
populations. Today’s action involves
determinations based on air quality
considerations. It will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
effects on any communities in the area,
including minority and low-income
communities. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant. The requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This
rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by February 11,
2008. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 30, 2007.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E7–23943 Filed 12–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
[EPA–R01–RCRA–2007–0999; FRL–8504–4]
Rhode Island: Final Authorization of
State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:17 Dec 10, 2007
Jkt 214001
SUMMARY: The State of Rhode Island has
applied to EPA for final authorization of
certain changes to its hazardous waste
program under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
EPA has determined that these changes
satisfy all requirements needed to
qualify for final authorization, and is
authorizing the State’s changes through
this immediate final action.
DATES: This final authorization will
become effective on February 11, 2008
unless EPA receives adverse written
comment by January 10, 2008. If EPA
receives such comment, it will publish
a timely withdrawal of this immediate
final rule in the Federal Register and
inform the public that this authorization
will not take immediate effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01–
RCRA–2007–0999, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: biscaia.robin@epa.gov.
• Fax: (617) 918–0642, to the
attention of Robin Biscaia.
• Mail: Robin Biscaia, Hazardous
Waste Unit, EPA New England—Region
1, One Congress Street, Suite 1100
(CHW), Boston, MA 02114–2023.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to Robin Biscaia,
Hazardous Waste Unit, Office of
Ecosystem Protection, EPA New
England—Region 1, One Congress
Street, 11th Floor, (CHW), Boston, MA
02114–2023. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Office’s normal
hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Identify your comments
as relating to Docket ID No. EPA–R01–
RCRA–2007–0999. EPA’s policy is that
all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or claimed
to be other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do
not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70229
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: EPA has established a docket
for this action under Docket ID No.
EPA–R01–RCRA–2007–0999. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although it may be listed in the
index, some information might not be
publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the following two locations: (i) EPA
Region 1 Library, One Congress Street—
11th Floor, Boston, MA 02114–2023; by
appointment only; tel: (617) 918–1990;
and (ii) Rhode Island Department of
Environmental Management, 235
Promenade St., Providence, RI 02908–
5767, by appointment only through the
Office of Technical and Customer
Assistance, tel: (401) 222–6822.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robin Biscaia, Hazardous Waste Unit,
EPA New England—Region 1, One
Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CHW),
Boston, MA 02114–2023; telephone
number: (617) 918–1642; fax number:
(617) 918–0642, e-mail address:
biscaia.robin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why Are Revisions to State
Programs Necessary?
States which have received final
authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
program. As the Federal program
changes, States must change their
E:\FR\FM\11DER1.SGM
11DER1
70230
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
programs and ask EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to State programs may
be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, States must
change their programs because of
changes to EPA’s regulations in 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 266, 268, 270, 273 and 279.
B. What Decisions Have We Made in
This Rule?
We have concluded that Rhode
Island’s application to revise its
authorized program meets all of the
statutory and regulatory requirements
established by RCRA. Therefore, we
grant Rhode Island final authorization to
operate its hazardous waste program
with the changes described in the
authorization application. Rhode
Island’s Department of Environmental
Management (RIDEM) has responsibility
for permitting Treatment, Storage, and
Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) within its
borders and for carrying out the aspects
of the RCRA program covered by its
revised program application, subject to
the limitations of the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
(HSWA). New Federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that EPA promulgates under
the authority of HSWA take effect in
authorized States before they are
authorized for the requirements. Thus,
EPA will implement any such
requirements and prohibitions in Rhode
Island, including issuing permits, until
the State is granted authorization to do
so.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
C. What Is the Effect of This
Authorization Decision?
The effect of this decision is that a
facility in Rhode Island subject to RCRA
will now have to comply with the
authorized State requirements instead of
the equivalent Federal requirements in
order to comply with RCRA. Rhode
Island has enforcement responsibilities
under its State hazardous waste program
for violations of such program, but EPA
also retains its full authority under
RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and
7003, which includes, among others,
authority to:
• Perform inspections, and require
monitoring, tests, analyses or reports.
• Enforce RCRA requirements and
suspend or revoke permits.
• Take enforcement actions.
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the
regulations for which Rhode Island is
being authorized by today’s action are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:17 Dec 10, 2007
Jkt 214001
already effective under State law, and
are not changed by today’s action.
D. Why Wasn’t There a Proposed Rule
Before This Rule?
EPA did not publish a proposal before
today’s rule because we view this as a
routine program change and do not
expect adverse comments that oppose
this approval. We are providing an
opportunity for public comment now. In
addition to this rule, in the proposed
rules section of today’s Federal Register
we are publishing a separate document
that proposes to authorize the State
program changes.
E. What Happens if EPA Receives
Comments That Oppose This Action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose
this authorization, we will withdraw
this rule by publishing a document in
the Federal Register before the rule
becomes effective. EPA will base any
further decision on the authorization of
the State program changes on the
proposal mentioned in the previous
paragraph. We will then address all
public comments in a later final rule
based upon this proposed rule that also
appears in today’s Federal Register. You
may not have another opportunity to
comment. If you want to comment on
this authorization, you should do so at
this time.
If we receive adverse comments that
oppose only the authorization of a
particular change to the State hazardous
waste program, we will withdraw that
part of this rule but the authorization of
the program changes that the comments
do not oppose will become effective on
the date specified above. The Federal
Register withdrawal document will
specify which part of the authorization
will become effective, and which part is
being withdrawn.
F. What Has Rhode Island Previously
Been Authorized for?
Rhode Island initially received final
Authorization on January 30, 1986,
effective January 31, 1986 (51 FR 3780)
to implement its base hazardous waste
management program. We granted
authorization for changes to their
program on March 12, 1990, effective
March 26, 1990 (55 FR 9128), March 6,
1992, effective May 5, 1992 (57 FR
8089), October 2, 1992, effective
December 1, 1992 (57 FR 45574) and
August 9, 2002, effective October 8,
2002 (67 FR 51765).
G. What Changes Are We Authorizing
With This Action?
On April 25, 2007 EPA received
Rhode Island’s complete program
revision application seeking
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
authorization for their changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. The
RCRA program revisions for which
Rhode Island is seeking authorization
address Corrective Action, Used Oil and
Mixed Waste requirements. The State is
also seeking authorization for various
changes it recently has made to its base
program requirements. The State’s
authorization application includes such
documents as a Corrective Action
Program Description, a Corrective
Action Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) between EPA and the RIDEM, a
Radioactive Mixed Waste Program
Description which also includes a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
between Rhode Island Department of
Health and RIDEM concerning Mixed
Waste, a copy of RIDEM’s Rules and
Regulations for Hazardous Waste
Management dated February 14, 2007
and a Supplement to the Attorney
General’s Statement.
We are now making an immediate
final decision, subject to reconsideration
only if we receive written comments
that oppose this action, that Rhode
Island’s hazardous waste program
revisions satisfy all of the requirements
necessary to qualify for final
authorization. Therefore, we grant
Rhode Island final authorization for the
program changes identified below. Note,
the Federal requirements are identified
by their checklist (CL) number and/or
letter and rule descriptions followed by
the corresponding state regulatory
analog (‘‘Rule’’) from Rhode Island’s
Rules and Regulations for Hazardous
Waste Management as in effect on
March 4, 2007 or state statutory analog
(‘‘R.I.G.L.’’) from the Rhode Island
General Laws (2001 Reenactment).
First, we are authorizing revised state
rules that are analogous to the following
Federal rules which relate to EPA’s
Corrective Action program. CL 17L—
HSWA Codification Rule, Corrective
Action, 50 FR 28702–28755, July 15,
1985: Rule 2.02(B), 7.01(F), 7.01(G),
8.04(G), 9.03, 16.01(A), 16.01(B); CL 17
O—HSWA Codification Rule, Omnibus
Provision, 50 FR 28702–28755, July 15,
1985: Rule 2.02(B), 2.03; CL 44A—
HSWA Codification Rule 2, Permit
Application Requirements Regarding
Corrective Action, 52 FR 45788–45799,
December 1, 1987: Rule 2.02(B), 8.01(G),
8.01(K); CL 44B—HSWA Codification
Rule 2, Corrective Action Beyond the
Facility Boundary, 52 FR 45788–45799,
December 1, 1987: Rule 2.02(B),
16.01(A), 16.01(B); CL 44C—HSWA
Codification Rule 2, Corrective Action
for Injection Wells, 52 FR 45788–45799,
December 1, 1987: Rule 7.01(F); CL
121—Corrective Action Management
Units and Temporary Units; Corrective
E:\FR\FM\11DER1.SGM
11DER1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Action Provisions Under Subtitle C, 58
FR 8658–8685, February 16, 1993: Rule
2.02(B), 3.00 Definitions, ‘‘Disposal,’’
‘‘Hazardous waste disposal facility,’’
‘‘Facility,’’ ‘‘Landfill,’’ ‘‘remediation
waste’’ incorporated by reference in
introductory paragraph; 7.06(B), 12.00,
16.01(A), 16.03(B); CL 175—Hazardous
Remediation Waste Management
Requirements (HWIR Media), 63 FR
65874–65947, November 30, 1998: Rule
2.02(B), 3.00 Definitions, ‘‘Facility,’’
‘‘remediation waste’’ incorporated by
reference in introductory paragraph,
‘‘Remediation waste management site,’’
‘‘staging pile’’ incorporated by reference
in introductory paragraph; 8.01(C), 9.12,
12.00, 16.01(A), 16.02, 16.03(B); CL
196—Amendments to the Corrective
Action Management Unit (CAMU) Rule,
67 FR 2962–3029, January 22, 2002:
Rule 2.02(B), 3.00 Definitions,
‘‘remediation waste’’ incorporated by
reference in introductory paragraph,
16.03(B), 16.03(C).
Second, we are authorizing revised
state rules that are analogous to the
following Federal rules which relate to
EPA’s Mixed Waste program. MW—
Radioactive Mixed Waste, 51 FR 24504,
July 3, 1986: Rule 1.01, 1.02, 3.00
Definitions, ‘‘hazardous waste,’’ ‘‘mixed
waste;’’ CL 191—Storage, Treatment,
Transportation, and Disposal of Mixed
Waste, 66 FR 27218–27266, May 16,
2001: Rule 3.00 Definitions, ‘‘hazardous
waste,’’ ‘‘Low-Level Mixed Waste,’’
Low-Level Radioactive Waste,’’ ‘‘Mixed
Waste,’’ ‘‘Naturally Occurring and/or
Accelerator-produced Radioactive
Material (NARM),’’ 14.00 introductory
paragraph, 14.02;
Third, we are authorizing revised
state rules that are analogous to Federal
rules which relate to EPA’s Recycled
Used Oil program. This includes CL
203—Recycled Used Oil Standards;
Clarification, 68 FR 44659–44665, July
30, 2003 and EPA’s Special
Consolidated Checklist for Recycled
Used Oil as of June 30, 2001 which
addresses requirements in the following
rule checklists: CP—Hazardous and
Used Oil Fuel Criminal Penalties,
HSWA §§ 3006(h), 3008(d), and 3014,
November 8, 1984; CL 112—Recycled
Used Oil Management Standards, 57 FR
41566–41626, September 10, 1992; CL
122—Recycled Used Oil Management
Standards; Technical Amendments and
Corrections, 58 FR 26420–26426, May 3,
1993 as amended on June 17, 1993 at 58
FR 33341–33342; CL 130—Recycled
Used Oil Management Standards;
Technical Amendments and Corrections
II, 59 FR 10550–10560, March 4, 1994;
CL 166—Recycled Used Oil
Management Standards; Technical
Correction and Clarification, 63 FR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:17 Dec 10, 2007
Jkt 214001
24963–24969, May 6, 1998, as amended
July 14, 1998, at 63 FR 37780–37782.
Note, the corresponding state regulatory
or statutory analogs (‘‘Rule’’ or
‘‘R.I.G.L.’’) are as follows: R.I.G.L. 23–
19.1–18(a) and (h); Rule 2.02(A) and (B),
3.00 Definitions, ‘‘Above-ground tank,’’
‘‘Container,’’ ‘‘Used Oil Collection
Center,’’ ‘‘Tank,’’ ‘‘Household used oil,’’
‘‘Household used oil generator,’’
‘‘Processing Used Oil,’’ ‘‘Re-Refining
Distillation Bottoms,’’ ‘‘Specification
Used Oil,’’ ‘‘Tolling Agreement,’’ ‘‘Used
Oil,’’ ‘‘Used Oil Aggregation Point,’’
‘‘Used Oil Burner,’’ ‘‘Used Oil Burning
Equipment,’’ ‘‘Used Oil Collection
Center,’’ ‘‘Used Oil Fuel,’’ ‘‘Used Oil
Generator,’’ ‘‘Used Oil Marketer,’’ ‘‘Used
oil generator,’’ ‘‘Used oil Processor or
Re-refiner,’’ ‘‘Used Oil Temporary
Storage Facility,’’ ‘‘Used Oil
Transporter;’’ 5.00; 15.01(A),
15.01(B)(1)–(3), 15.01(C)–(H), 15.01(I)
[partially broader in scope], 15.01(J)–(L);
15.02, 15.02(A)–(H); 15.03, 15.03(A)(1)–
(2), 15.03(B)(1)–(3), 15.03(C)(1)–(4),
15.03(D)(1)–(4), 15.03(E), 15.03(F)
[partially broader in scope relating to
on-spec oil], 15.03(F)(1)–(8) [(F)(5) is
partially broader in scope], 15.03(G)
[partially broader in scope relating to
on-spec oil], 15.04, 15.04(A)–(I);
15.05(A)–(C); 15.06(A)–(D); 15.07(A)–
(C), 15.07(D)(1), 15.07(F)–(G),
15.07(H)(1), 15.07(H)(12)–(19) [(H)(16) is
partially broader in scope], 15.07(I);
15.08(A), 15.08(K)–(U) [(T)(4) is
partially broader in scope], 15.08(W)–
(Z); 15.09(A)–(G).
In addition to the regulations listed
above, EPA is also authorizing the State
for miscellaneous changes it has made
to its previously authorized base
program rules as follows (note, the
analogous state provisions follow the
general area of 40 CFR to which the
changes relate): 40 CFR 260.10
definitions and related cross references
in 40 CFR parts 260 through 273—State
has revised and removed numbering of
terms in section 3.00 Definitions and
has revised related cross references
accordingly in Rules 1.00 through 17.00;
40 CFR 262.34 Accumulation time—
State has revised provisions at Rule
5.02(A) to require documentation of
inspections; No direct Federal analog—
State has revised the edition references
for 49 CFR and 40 CFR in section 3.00
Definitions; 40 CFR 263.10(b), Scope of
Standards Applicable to Transporters of
Hazardous Waste—State has added and
clarified exemption at Rule 6.00(A)
[partially broader in scope]; 40 CFR
263.12, transporter transfer facility
requirements and used oil storage at
transfer facilities at 40 CFR 279.45—
State has revised, added and clarified
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70231
provisions at Rule 6.14; 6.14(A), (B)(1)–
(2), and 6.14(E) [partially broader in
scope]; 40 CFR 270.10(b), general RCRA
permit requirements—State has revised
and clarified Rule 7.01(A); 40 CFR part
270, Standards for Universal Waste
Management related to lamps—State has
revised and clarified its incorporation
by reference in the introductory
paragraph of Rule 13.6 and has also
revised and clarified Rule 13.04,
13.06(A)(3), 13.06(C)(1)–(2), 13.06(C)(3)
removal of ‘‘lamps,’’ 13.06(C)(5) and
13.06(J)(2) changes related to lamps; 40
CFR 273.8 Applicability, household and
CESQG waste—State has revised and
clarified provisions at Rule
13.06(B)(1)(a)–(c) and (B)(2); 40 CFR
273.9 Definitions—State has revised and
clarified provisions at Rule 13.06(C)(1)–
(5); 40 CFR 273.32, Notification—State
has revised and clarified provisions of
Rule 13.06(J)(1)–(3).
The final authorization of new State
regulations and regulation changes is in
addition to the previous authorization of
State regulations, which remain part of
the authorized program.
H. Where Are the Revised State Rules
Different From the Federal Rules?
The most significant differences
between the State rules being authorized
and the Federal rules are summarized
below. It should be noted that this
summary does not describe every
difference, or every detail regarding the
differences that are described. Members
of the regulated community are advised
to read the complete regulations to
ensure that they understand all of the
requirements with which they will need
to comply.
1. More Stringent Provisions
There are aspects of the Rhode Island
program which are more stringent than
the Federal program. All of these more
stringent requirements are, or will
become, part of the Federally
enforceable RCRA program when
authorized by the EPA and must be
complied with in addition to the State
requirements which track the minimum
Federal requirements. These more
stringent requirements include the
following:
(a) Relating to requirements
concerning Corrective Action for
injection wells at 40 CFR 144.1(h), 40
CFR 144.31(g) and 40 CFR 270.60(b)(3),
Rhode Island’s hazardous waste
program is more stringent in that its
rules prohibit hazardous waste disposal
by underground injection at Rule
7.01(F);
(b) Rhode Island’s administrative
requirement relating to Remedial Action
Plans (RAPs) at Rule 16.02(I) is more
E:\FR\FM\11DER1.SGM
11DER1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
70232
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
stringent than the analogous Federal
requirement at 40 CFR 270.190(c) as it
provides a 30-day timeframe by which
an informal appeal must be submitted;
and
(c) Relating to the Recycled Used Oil
Management Standards, a number of
Rhode Island’s regulatory provisions at
Rule 15.00 are more stringent, some of
which are as follows: (1) Certain
definitions of the terms that apply to the
State’s used oil program are more
stringent than the Federal definitions
found at 40 CFR 279.1, e.g., ‘‘Used Oil
Aggregation Point’’ does not apply to
household used oil and ‘‘Used Oil
Collection Center’’ only accepts used oil
from households (not from other
generators); (2) pertaining to mixtures of
used oil and characteristic hazardous
waste at 40 CFR 279.10(b)(2), Rhode
Island’s used oil program at 15.01(C) is
more stringent than the Federal program
as it only allows mixtures of used oil
and hazardous waste that solely exhibit
the characteristic of flammability.
Mixtures of used oil and listed wastes
that were listed solely for the
characteristic of ignitability are not
allowed under the State regulations.
Also, the State criterion for flammability
captures more wastes than the Federal
characteristic of ignitability and, thus,
also excludes more waste; (3) the
Federal requirement at 40 CFR
279.10(b)(3) allows mixtures of used oil
and conditionally exempt small
quantity generator (CESQG) hazardous
wastes regulated under 40 CFR 261.5 to
be subject to regulation as used oil
under 40 CFR part 279; however, as
Rhode Island’s program does not
recognize this CESQG exemption, such
mixtures may be regulated as hazardous
waste; (4) Rule 15.00 does not provide
exemptions of applicability to
generators who mix used oil and diesel
fuel for use in the generator’s own
vehicle, as provided in the Federal
program at 40 CFR 279.20(a); (5) under
the State’s used oil program
prohibitions, Rule 15.02(C) restricts the
burning of off-spec used oil to the site
of generation. There is no such
restriction under the Federal used oil
program. Thus, this requirement is
considered more stringent in that it
prohibits the offsite shipment of off-spec
oil for the purpose of burning for energy
recovery that otherwise would be
allowed under the Federal program.
(Note, shipments of off-spec used oil
directed to processors and refiners is
allowed at Rule 15.09(B)); (6) also,
Rhode Island’s provisions are more
stringent than the Federal requirements
at 40 CFR 279.23 in that they exclude
used oil collected from households from
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:17 Dec 10, 2007
Jkt 214001
being burned by generators in space
heaters of less than 500,000 BTUs, and
subject burners of household used oil to
additional regulation under Rule
15.03(B); (7) Rule 15.08 requires
processors and re-refiners to comply
with additional requirements related to
responding to facility emergencies than
those contained in the analogous
Federal regulations at 40 CFR 279.52(a);
(8) Rule 15.02(B) does not provide the
exception to the prohibition of using
used oil as a dust suppressant which
allows State petition for such use.
2. Partially Broader in Scope Provisions
There are also aspects of the Rhode
Island program which are partially
broader in scope than the Federal
program. The portions of the State
requirements which are broader in
scope are not considered to be part of
the federally enforceable RCRA
program. However, they are fully
enforceable under State law and must be
complied with by sources in Rhode
Island. The various changes Rhode
Island has made to its used oil
regulations and previously authorized
base program regulations that are
broader-in-scope are discussed below.
(a) Rule 15.07, Used Oil Transporter
and Temporary Storage Facility
Standards includes broader-in-scope
provisions at (1) Rule 15.07(D)(2) which
requires transporters to obtain a permit
which is not required under Federal
requirements for used oil transporters
under 40 CFR part 279, subpart E; (2)
Rule 15.07(E) requires used oil
transporters to maintain liability
insurance as required by Department of
Transportation regulations at 49 CFR
387.7(d); and (3) Rule 15.07(H)(2)
requires a used oil transporter who acts
as a used oil temporary storage facility
to apply for a Letter of Authorization
from the RIDEM, a permit-like
document for which a facility must
provide details relating to the applicable
operation which also includes a fee
(15.07(H)(6)).
(b) Rule 15.08, Used oil Processor and
Re-Refiner Standards, requires used oil
processors and re-refiners to obtain a
permit from RIDEM, which is not
required under analogous Federal
requirements at 40 CFR part 279,
subpart F and, therefore, broader in
scope. Other requirements include
liability insurance, financial
requirements, and fees, all of which are
broader in scope when compared to the
applicable Federal requirements.
(c) The State includes both off-spec
and on-spec used oil in its definition of
‘‘used oil burner’’ at section 3.00
whereas the analogous Federal
definition at 40 CFR 279.1 references
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the burning of only off-spec used oil.
This difference is significant as it
subjects burners of on-spec used oil in
Rhode Island to additional requirements
as reflected in section 15.03 of the
State’s regulations, Burning Used Oil for
Energy Recovery. Under the Federal
program, on-spec used oil destined to be
burned for energy recovery is not
subject to the restrictions on burning in
40 CFR part 279, subpart G (40 CFR
279.60(c)), and once conditions for onspec used oil at 40 CFR 279.11 and 40
CFR part 279, subpart H have been met,
the on-spec used oil can be handled like
any other virgin fuel oil, as long as it has
not been contaminated with hazardous
waste. Rhode Island, however,
continues to regulate the burning and
other aspects of on-spec oil under Rule
15.03 beyond that which is subject to
regulation under the Federal program as
follows. The State regulates burners of
on-spec used oil according to category
of BTU capacity as well as by unit type,
i.e., onsite and offsite, in Rule 15.03(A)–
(D). The State’s requirements for used
oil burners are partially broader in
scope in that they set notification
requirements upon burners of on-spec
used oil in Rule 15.03(B)(4) and (C)(5)
and notification and approval
requirements under Rule 15.03(D)(5).
Various requirements, such as storage,
handling, tracking, etc., are also
imposed upon these on-spec burners at
Rule 15.03(F)–(G) which are generally
required for off-spec used oil burners
but are broader in scope when applied
to on-spec burners (see 40 CFR part 279,
subpart G). (Please note, additional
requirements which relate to the
burning of used oil are also discussed in
the following section, Equivalent but
Different Provisions.)
3. Equivalent But Different Provisions
While many State regulations track
Federal requirements identically, some
differ from the Federal regulation in
particular details but have been
determined by the EPA to be equivalent
to the Federal regulations in providing
the same (or greater) overall level of
environmental protection with respect
to each Federal requirement. There are
various Rhode Island regulations which
differ from but have been determined to
be equivalent to the Federal regulations.
These regulations are part of the
Federally enforceable RCRA program.
These different but equivalent
requirements include the following:
(a) Rhode Island’s used oil definition
is broader than the Federal definition in
that it includes used oils which have
become unsuitable for their original
purpose other than through use (e.g., the
State includes used oils that have
E:\FR\FM\11DER1.SGM
11DER1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
become contaminated during storage).
This generally results in more stringent
regulation of oils that mostly would be
considered only non-hazardous solid
wastes in the Federal program. In a few
cases the State regulations might allow
such used oils which are characteristic
to be handled in the used program
rather than as fully regulated hazardous
wastes (as they technically would be in
the Federal program). The used oils
would not be different in composition
from those regulated under the Federal
used oil program. The State’s approach
makes environmental sense and is part
of a regulation which is overall at least
as stringent as the corresponding
Federal requirement.
(b) As stated previously, Rhode
Island’s requirements for burning used
oil at Rule 15.03 are broader in scope as
they regulate burners of on-spec oil in
Rule 15.03(A)–(D), and Rhode Island’s
provisions are also more stringent in
that they only allow on-spec oil to be
shipped off-site to be burned for energy
recovery. However, the State’s used oil
requirements are also equivalent but
different in transferring the analytical
and recordkeeping requirements
imposed on used oil marketers of onspec oil in 40 CFR 279.72 onto on-spec
used oil burners at 15.03(B)(1) and (2),
(C)(2) and (3) and (D)(2) and (3). Rhode
Island regulations are also different but
equivalent in allowing on-spec burners
to aggregate off-spec used oil with virgin
oil or on-spec used oil for burning
blended mixtures at Rule 15.03(B)(3),
(C)(4) and (D)(4) provided analysis
shows it meets specification
requirements (aggregation by off-spec
used oil burners is allowed at 40 CFR
279.61(b)(2)).
(c) Rhode Island’s program is also
different in that it has adopted a
regulatory approach to address small
amounts of used oil that are generated
by companies that service oil-fired
furnaces that heat buildings. While
there is no direct counterpart in the
Federal used oil program for this
specific scenario, the State’s provisions
closely track the agency’s requirements
for off-site shipments of used oil to
aggregation points owned by the
generator at 40 CFR 279.24(b), a
provision for which Rhode Island is also
being authorized. Under the Federal
provision, EPA allows generators to selftransport up to 55 gallons at a time of
used oil (without an EPA I.D. Number)
to aggregation points owned by the
generator. Rhode Island’s used oil
program at Rule 15.04(H) allows service
companies, upon generation of used oil
during service of oil-fired furnaces used
to heat buildings, to assume the role of
generator and to self-transport up to 5
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:17 Dec 10, 2007
Jkt 214001
gallons of used oil to the company’s
place of business, as long as basic
requirements, such as handling, labeling
and spill control measures are met.
Upon arrival, the used oil must be
transferred to appropriate storage
containers or tanks on the premises of
the service company who is considered
the generator of the used oil and subject
to all applicable requirements of section
15.00 of Rhode Island’s Used Oil
Management Standards. Rhode Island
has adopted state requirements which
tailor a Federal requirement to address
a specific activity in which small
amounts of used oil are generated at
many sites, including households,
which can immediately be removed
from the site of generation and
consolidated at the generator’s site of
business. By applying this provision in
this way, it is likely to be more
protective of human health and the
environment in assuring small
quantities of used oil are managed
properly. Thus, we believe the State
regulation is legally consistent and
equivalent to and perhaps even more
stringent than the Federal used oil
program.
(d) Rhode Island has adopted a
conditional exemption for oil filters in
its Rule 15.01(E) which differs from the
Federal exemption of 40 CFR
261.4(b)(13) by allowing cold draining
and crushing of the filters whereas the
Federal regulation allows only hot
draining. The State regulation specifies
that any cold draining must include
crushing using a mechanical, pneumatic
or hydraulic device designed for the
purpose of crushing oil filters and
effectively removing the oil. This State
provision will encourage recycling of
used oil by enabling filters from junked
vehicles to be managed in accordance
with the exemption. Junked vehicles
often cannot be started and
consequently filters removed from those
vehicles cannot meet the hot draining
criteria of the Federal regulation. This
approach of combining cold draining
and crushing used oil filters was
adopted by the State of Vermont and
authorized by EPA [70 FR 36350, June
23, 2005]. Vermont provided
documentation showing that as much or
more used oil is removed from used oil
filters through cold draining plus
crushing than is removed by some of the
hot draining methods allowed in the
Federal regulation. Thus, while the
Rhode Island exemption, like the
Vermont exemption, differs from the
Federal exemption, the State regulation
is at least as stringent as the Federal
regulation in requiring the removal of
the oil. Note, copies of Vermont’s
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70233
documentation relative to the cold
crushing/draining of oil filters has been
included in the Administrative Docket
to this notice.
Relative to terne-plated filters, the
State has also combined the Federal
scrap metal exemption at 40 CFR
261.6(a)(3)(ii) as referenced in its
definition of hazardous waste at 3.00,
with its oil filter exemption at 15.01(E).
Rhode Island allows terne-plated filters
to be exempt from hazardous waste
requirements once they have both been
processed to remove excess oil and
when the metals are sent offsite for
reclamation which is documented. This
is equivalent to the combination of the
two Federal exemptions.
I. How Does This Action Affect Indian
Country (18 U.S.C. 115) in Rhode
Island?
Rhode Island is not authorized to
carryout its hazardous waste program in
Indian country within the State which
includes the land of the Narragansett
Indian Tribe. Therefore, this action has
no effect on Indian country. EPA will
continue to implement and administer
the RCRA program in these lands.
J. Who Handles Permits After the
Authorization Takes Effect?
Rhode Island will issue permits for all
the provisions for which it is authorized
and will administer the permits it
issues. EPA will continue to administer
and enforce any RCRA and HSWA
(Hazardous and Solid Waste Act)
permits or portions of permits which it
has issued in Rhode Island prior to the
effective date of this authorization until
the State incorporates the terms and
conditions of the Federal permits into
the State RCRA permits. EPA will not
issue any more new permits, or new
portions of permits, for the provisions
listed in this notice above after the
effective date of this authorization. EPA
will continue to implement and issue
permits for any HSWA requirements for
which Rhode Island is not yet
authorized.
K. What Is Codification and Is EPA
Codifying Rhode Island’s Hazardous
Waste Program as Authorized in This
Rule?
Codification is the process of placing
the State’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s authorized
hazardous waste program into the Code
of Federal Regulations. We do this by
referencing the authorized State rules in
40 CFR part 272. We reserve the
amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart
UU for this authorization of Rhode
Island’s program until a later date.
E:\FR\FM\11DER1.SGM
11DER1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
70234
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
L. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget
has exempted this action (RCRA State
Authorization) from the requirements of
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993); therefore, this action
is not subject to review by OMB. This
action authorizes State requirements for
the purpose of RCRA 3006 and imposes
no additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law.
Accordingly, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
action authorizes pre-existing
requirements under State law and does
not impose any additional enforceable
duty beyond that required by State law,
it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). For the same
reason, this action also does not
significantly or uniquely affect Tribal
governments, as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This action will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
authorizes State requirements as part of
the State RCRA hazardous waste
program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
RCRA. This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001) ) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), EPA grants a
State’s application for authorization as
long as the State meets the criteria
required by RCRA. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a State
authorization application, to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:17 Dec 10, 2007
Jkt 214001
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, EPA has taken the necessary
steps to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR
8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the
takings implications of the rule in
accordance with the ‘‘Attorney
General’s Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under
the executive order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action nevertheless will be effective
February 11, 2008, because it is an
immediate final rule.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006 and
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: November 2, 2007.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. E7–23946 Filed 12–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
41 CFR Part 302–4
[FTR Amendment 2007–06; FTR Case 2007–
306; Docket 2007–0002, Sequence 5]
RIN 3090–AI40
Federal Travel Regulation; Relocation
Allowances; OCONUS Travel
Office of Governmentwide
Policy, General Services Administration
(GSA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Federal Travel Regulation
(FTR) Amendment 2007–03, FTR Case
2007–301 was published in the Federal
Register on June 27, 2007 (72 FR 35187).
That final rule changed the mileage
reimbursement rate for using a
personally owned vehicle (POV) for
relocation to equal the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) Standard Mileage Rate for
moving purposes in the continental
United States (CONUS). Subsequent
information revealed that in changing to
this rate, GSA inadvertently removed
any ability to apply this rate to both
foreign and non-foreign overseas
(OCONUS) relocations. This final rule
will allow for the new mileage
reimbursement rate to be applied
worldwide. It will also allow for the use
of actual expense for OCONUS
relocations if the agency chooses to do
so. The FTR and any corresponding
documents may be accessed at GSA’s
website at https://www.gsa.gov/ftr.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective December 11, 2007.
Applicability Date: This final rule is
applicable to September 25, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Regulatory Secretariat (VIR), Room
4035, GS Building, Washington, DC,
20405, (202) 501–4755, for information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules. For clarification of content,
contact Mr. Ed Davis, Office of
Governmentwide Policy (M), Office of
Travel, Transportation and Asset
Management (MT), General Services
Administration at (202) 208–7638 or email at ed.davis@gsa.gov. Please cite
FTR Amendment 2007–06; FTR case
2007–306.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
On June 27, 2007, GSA published a
final rule specifying that the IRS
Standard Mileage Rate for moving
purposes would be the rate at which
agencies will reimburse an employee for
using a POV for CONUS relocation.
E:\FR\FM\11DER1.SGM
11DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 11, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70229-70234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23946]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA-R01-RCRA-2007-0999; FRL-8504-4]
Rhode Island: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste
Management Program Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The State of Rhode Island has applied to EPA for final
authorization of certain changes to its hazardous waste program under
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA has determined
that these changes satisfy all requirements needed to qualify for final
authorization, and is authorizing the State's changes through this
immediate final action.
DATES: This final authorization will become effective on February 11,
2008 unless EPA receives adverse written comment by January 10, 2008.
If EPA receives such comment, it will publish a timely withdrawal of
this immediate final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that this authorization will not take immediate effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01-
RCRA-2007-0999, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: biscaia.robin@epa.gov.
Fax: (617) 918-0642, to the attention of Robin Biscaia.
Mail: Robin Biscaia, Hazardous Waste Unit, EPA New
England--Region 1, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CHW), Boston, MA
02114-2023.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to Robin
Biscaia, Hazardous Waste Unit, Office of Ecosystem Protection, EPA New
England--Region 1, One Congress Street, 11th Floor, (CHW), Boston, MA
02114-2023. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Office's
normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Identify your comments as relating to Docket ID No.
EPA-R01-RCRA-2007-0999. EPA's policy is that all comments received will
be included in the public docket without change and may be made
available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or claimed to be other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through
https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov
Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA
without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that
is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If
you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with
any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
ID No. EPA-R01-RCRA-2007-0999. All documents in the docket are listed
on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although it may be listed
in the index, some information might not be publicly available, e.g.,
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the following two
locations: (i) EPA Region 1 Library, One Congress Street--11th Floor,
Boston, MA 02114-2023; by appointment only; tel: (617) 918-1990; and
(ii) Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, 235 Promenade
St., Providence, RI 02908-5767, by appointment only through the Office
of Technical and Customer Assistance, tel: (401) 222-6822.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin Biscaia, Hazardous Waste Unit,
EPA New England--Region 1, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CHW),
Boston, MA 02114-2023; telephone number: (617) 918-1642; fax number:
(617) 918-0642, e-mail address: biscaia.robin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why Are Revisions to State Programs Necessary?
States which have received final authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste
program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than the Federal program. As the Federal program changes, States must
change their
[[Page 70230]]
programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes. Changes to State
programs may be necessary when Federal or State statutory or regulatory
authority is modified or when certain other changes occur. Most
commonly, States must change their programs because of changes to EPA's
regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260
through 266, 268, 270, 273 and 279.
B. What Decisions Have We Made in This Rule?
We have concluded that Rhode Island's application to revise its
authorized program meets all of the statutory and regulatory
requirements established by RCRA. Therefore, we grant Rhode Island
final authorization to operate its hazardous waste program with the
changes described in the authorization application. Rhode Island's
Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) has responsibility for
permitting Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) within
its borders and for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA program
covered by its revised program application, subject to the limitations
of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). New Federal
requirements and prohibitions imposed by Federal regulations that EPA
promulgates under the authority of HSWA take effect in authorized
States before they are authorized for the requirements. Thus, EPA will
implement any such requirements and prohibitions in Rhode Island,
including issuing permits, until the State is granted authorization to
do so.
C. What Is the Effect of This Authorization Decision?
The effect of this decision is that a facility in Rhode Island
subject to RCRA will now have to comply with the authorized State
requirements instead of the equivalent Federal requirements in order to
comply with RCRA. Rhode Island has enforcement responsibilities under
its State hazardous waste program for violations of such program, but
EPA also retains its full authority under RCRA sections 3007, 3008,
3013, and 7003, which includes, among others, authority to:
Perform inspections, and require monitoring, tests,
analyses or reports.
Enforce RCRA requirements and suspend or revoke permits.
Take enforcement actions.
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations for which Rhode Island is
being authorized by today's action are already effective under State
law, and are not changed by today's action.
D. Why Wasn't There a Proposed Rule Before This Rule?
EPA did not publish a proposal before today's rule because we view
this as a routine program change and do not expect adverse comments
that oppose this approval. We are providing an opportunity for public
comment now. In addition to this rule, in the proposed rules section of
today's Federal Register we are publishing a separate document that
proposes to authorize the State program changes.
E. What Happens if EPA Receives Comments That Oppose This Action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose this authorization, we will
withdraw this rule by publishing a document in the Federal Register
before the rule becomes effective. EPA will base any further decision
on the authorization of the State program changes on the proposal
mentioned in the previous paragraph. We will then address all public
comments in a later final rule based upon this proposed rule that also
appears in today's Federal Register. You may not have another
opportunity to comment. If you want to comment on this authorization,
you should do so at this time.
If we receive adverse comments that oppose only the authorization
of a particular change to the State hazardous waste program, we will
withdraw that part of this rule but the authorization of the program
changes that the comments do not oppose will become effective on the
date specified above. The Federal Register withdrawal document will
specify which part of the authorization will become effective, and
which part is being withdrawn.
F. What Has Rhode Island Previously Been Authorized for?
Rhode Island initially received final Authorization on January 30,
1986, effective January 31, 1986 (51 FR 3780) to implement its base
hazardous waste management program. We granted authorization for
changes to their program on March 12, 1990, effective March 26, 1990
(55 FR 9128), March 6, 1992, effective May 5, 1992 (57 FR 8089),
October 2, 1992, effective December 1, 1992 (57 FR 45574) and August 9,
2002, effective October 8, 2002 (67 FR 51765).
G. What Changes Are We Authorizing With This Action?
On April 25, 2007 EPA received Rhode Island's complete program
revision application seeking authorization for their changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. The RCRA program revisions for which
Rhode Island is seeking authorization address Corrective Action, Used
Oil and Mixed Waste requirements. The State is also seeking
authorization for various changes it recently has made to its base
program requirements. The State's authorization application includes
such documents as a Corrective Action Program Description, a Corrective
Action Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between EPA and the RIDEM, a
Radioactive Mixed Waste Program Description which also includes a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Rhode Island Department of
Health and RIDEM concerning Mixed Waste, a copy of RIDEM's Rules and
Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management dated February 14, 2007 and
a Supplement to the Attorney General's Statement.
We are now making an immediate final decision, subject to
reconsideration only if we receive written comments that oppose this
action, that Rhode Island's hazardous waste program revisions satisfy
all of the requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization.
Therefore, we grant Rhode Island final authorization for the program
changes identified below. Note, the Federal requirements are identified
by their checklist (CL) number and/or letter and rule descriptions
followed by the corresponding state regulatory analog (``Rule'') from
Rhode Island's Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as
in effect on March 4, 2007 or state statutory analog (``R.I.G.L.'')
from the Rhode Island General Laws (2001 Reenactment).
First, we are authorizing revised state rules that are analogous to
the following Federal rules which relate to EPA's Corrective Action
program. CL 17L--HSWA Codification Rule, Corrective Action, 50 FR
28702-28755, July 15, 1985: Rule 2.02(B), 7.01(F), 7.01(G), 8.04(G),
9.03, 16.01(A), 16.01(B); CL 17 O--HSWA Codification Rule, Omnibus
Provision, 50 FR 28702-28755, July 15, 1985: Rule 2.02(B), 2.03; CL
44A--HSWA Codification Rule 2, Permit Application Requirements
Regarding Corrective Action, 52 FR 45788-45799, December 1, 1987: Rule
2.02(B), 8.01(G), 8.01(K); CL 44B--HSWA Codification Rule 2, Corrective
Action Beyond the Facility Boundary, 52 FR 45788-45799, December 1,
1987: Rule 2.02(B), 16.01(A), 16.01(B); CL 44C--HSWA Codification Rule
2, Corrective Action for Injection Wells, 52 FR 45788-45799, December
1, 1987: Rule 7.01(F); CL 121--Corrective Action Management Units and
Temporary Units; Corrective
[[Page 70231]]
Action Provisions Under Subtitle C, 58 FR 8658-8685, February 16, 1993:
Rule 2.02(B), 3.00 Definitions, ``Disposal,'' ``Hazardous waste
disposal facility,'' ``Facility,'' ``Landfill,'' ``remediation waste''
incorporated by reference in introductory paragraph; 7.06(B), 12.00,
16.01(A), 16.03(B); CL 175--Hazardous Remediation Waste Management
Requirements (HWIR Media), 63 FR 65874-65947, November 30, 1998: Rule
2.02(B), 3.00 Definitions, ``Facility,'' ``remediation waste''
incorporated by reference in introductory paragraph, ``Remediation
waste management site,'' ``staging pile'' incorporated by reference in
introductory paragraph; 8.01(C), 9.12, 12.00, 16.01(A), 16.02,
16.03(B); CL 196--Amendments to the Corrective Action Management Unit
(CAMU) Rule, 67 FR 2962-3029, January 22, 2002: Rule 2.02(B), 3.00
Definitions, ``remediation waste'' incorporated by reference in
introductory paragraph, 16.03(B), 16.03(C).
Second, we are authorizing revised state rules that are analogous
to the following Federal rules which relate to EPA's Mixed Waste
program. MW--Radioactive Mixed Waste, 51 FR 24504, July 3, 1986: Rule
1.01, 1.02, 3.00 Definitions, ``hazardous waste,'' ``mixed waste;'' CL
191--Storage, Treatment, Transportation, and Disposal of Mixed Waste,
66 FR 27218-27266, May 16, 2001: Rule 3.00 Definitions, ``hazardous
waste,'' ``Low-Level Mixed Waste,'' Low-Level Radioactive Waste,''
``Mixed Waste,'' ``Naturally Occurring and/or Accelerator-produced
Radioactive Material (NARM),'' 14.00 introductory paragraph, 14.02;
Third, we are authorizing revised state rules that are analogous to
Federal rules which relate to EPA's Recycled Used Oil program. This
includes CL 203--Recycled Used Oil Standards; Clarification, 68 FR
44659-44665, July 30, 2003 and EPA's Special Consolidated Checklist for
Recycled Used Oil as of June 30, 2001 which addresses requirements in
the following rule checklists: CP--Hazardous and Used Oil Fuel Criminal
Penalties, HSWA Sec. Sec. 3006(h), 3008(d), and 3014, November 8,
1984; CL 112--Recycled Used Oil Management Standards, 57 FR 41566-
41626, September 10, 1992; CL 122--Recycled Used Oil Management
Standards; Technical Amendments and Corrections, 58 FR 26420-26426, May
3, 1993 as amended on June 17, 1993 at 58 FR 33341-33342; CL 130--
Recycled Used Oil Management Standards; Technical Amendments and
Corrections II, 59 FR 10550-10560, March 4, 1994; CL 166--Recycled Used
Oil Management Standards; Technical Correction and Clarification, 63 FR
24963-24969, May 6, 1998, as amended July 14, 1998, at 63 FR 37780-
37782. Note, the corresponding state regulatory or statutory analogs
(``Rule'' or ``R.I.G.L.'') are as follows: R.I.G.L. 23-19.1-18(a) and
(h); Rule 2.02(A) and (B), 3.00 Definitions, ``Above-ground tank,''
``Container,'' ``Used Oil Collection Center,'' ``Tank,'' ``Household
used oil,'' ``Household used oil generator,'' ``Processing Used Oil,''
``Re-Refining Distillation Bottoms,'' ``Specification Used Oil,''
``Tolling Agreement,'' ``Used Oil,'' ``Used Oil Aggregation Point,''
``Used Oil Burner,'' ``Used Oil Burning Equipment,'' ``Used Oil
Collection Center,'' ``Used Oil Fuel,'' ``Used Oil Generator,'' ``Used
Oil Marketer,'' ``Used oil generator,'' ``Used oil Processor or Re-
refiner,'' ``Used Oil Temporary Storage Facility,'' ``Used Oil
Transporter;'' 5.00; 15.01(A), 15.01(B)(1)-(3), 15.01(C)-(H), 15.01(I)
[partially broader in scope], 15.01(J)-(L); 15.02, 15.02(A)-(H); 15.03,
15.03(A)(1)-(2), 15.03(B)(1)-(3), 15.03(C)(1)-(4), 15.03(D)(1)-(4),
15.03(E), 15.03(F) [partially broader in scope relating to on-spec
oil], 15.03(F)(1)-(8) [(F)(5) is partially broader in scope], 15.03(G)
[partially broader in scope relating to on-spec oil], 15.04, 15.04(A)-
(I); 15.05(A)-(C); 15.06(A)-(D); 15.07(A)-(C), 15.07(D)(1), 15.07(F)-
(G), 15.07(H)(1), 15.07(H)(12)-(19) [(H)(16) is partially broader in
scope], 15.07(I); 15.08(A), 15.08(K)-(U) [(T)(4) is partially broader
in scope], 15.08(W)-(Z); 15.09(A)-(G).
In addition to the regulations listed above, EPA is also
authorizing the State for miscellaneous changes it has made to its
previously authorized base program rules as follows (note, the
analogous state provisions follow the general area of 40 CFR to which
the changes relate): 40 CFR 260.10 definitions and related cross
references in 40 CFR parts 260 through 273--State has revised and
removed numbering of terms in section 3.00 Definitions and has revised
related cross references accordingly in Rules 1.00 through 17.00; 40
CFR 262.34 Accumulation time--State has revised provisions at Rule
5.02(A) to require documentation of inspections; No direct Federal
analog--State has revised the edition references for 49 CFR and 40 CFR
in section 3.00 Definitions; 40 CFR 263.10(b), Scope of Standards
Applicable to Transporters of Hazardous Waste--State has added and
clarified exemption at Rule 6.00(A) [partially broader in scope]; 40
CFR 263.12, transporter transfer facility requirements and used oil
storage at transfer facilities at 40 CFR 279.45--State has revised,
added and clarified provisions at Rule 6.14; 6.14(A), (B)(1)-(2), and
6.14(E) [partially broader in scope]; 40 CFR 270.10(b), general RCRA
permit requirements--State has revised and clarified Rule 7.01(A); 40
CFR part 270, Standards for Universal Waste Management related to
lamps--State has revised and clarified its incorporation by reference
in the introductory paragraph of Rule 13.6 and has also revised and
clarified Rule 13.04, 13.06(A)(3), 13.06(C)(1)-(2), 13.06(C)(3) removal
of ``lamps,'' 13.06(C)(5) and 13.06(J)(2) changes related to lamps; 40
CFR 273.8 Applicability, household and CESQG waste--State has revised
and clarified provisions at Rule 13.06(B)(1)(a)-(c) and (B)(2); 40 CFR
273.9 Definitions--State has revised and clarified provisions at Rule
13.06(C)(1)-(5); 40 CFR 273.32, Notification--State has revised and
clarified provisions of Rule 13.06(J)(1)-(3).
The final authorization of new State regulations and regulation
changes is in addition to the previous authorization of State
regulations, which remain part of the authorized program.
H. Where Are the Revised State Rules Different From the Federal Rules?
The most significant differences between the State rules being
authorized and the Federal rules are summarized below. It should be
noted that this summary does not describe every difference, or every
detail regarding the differences that are described. Members of the
regulated community are advised to read the complete regulations to
ensure that they understand all of the requirements with which they
will need to comply.
1. More Stringent Provisions
There are aspects of the Rhode Island program which are more
stringent than the Federal program. All of these more stringent
requirements are, or will become, part of the Federally enforceable
RCRA program when authorized by the EPA and must be complied with in
addition to the State requirements which track the minimum Federal
requirements. These more stringent requirements include the following:
(a) Relating to requirements concerning Corrective Action for
injection wells at 40 CFR 144.1(h), 40 CFR 144.31(g) and 40 CFR
270.60(b)(3), Rhode Island's hazardous waste program is more stringent
in that its rules prohibit hazardous waste disposal by underground
injection at Rule 7.01(F);
(b) Rhode Island's administrative requirement relating to Remedial
Action Plans (RAPs) at Rule 16.02(I) is more
[[Page 70232]]
stringent than the analogous Federal requirement at 40 CFR 270.190(c)
as it provides a 30-day timeframe by which an informal appeal must be
submitted; and
(c) Relating to the Recycled Used Oil Management Standards, a
number of Rhode Island's regulatory provisions at Rule 15.00 are more
stringent, some of which are as follows: (1) Certain definitions of the
terms that apply to the State's used oil program are more stringent
than the Federal definitions found at 40 CFR 279.1, e.g., ``Used Oil
Aggregation Point'' does not apply to household used oil and ``Used Oil
Collection Center'' only accepts used oil from households (not from
other generators); (2) pertaining to mixtures of used oil and
characteristic hazardous waste at 40 CFR 279.10(b)(2), Rhode Island's
used oil program at 15.01(C) is more stringent than the Federal program
as it only allows mixtures of used oil and hazardous waste that solely
exhibit the characteristic of flammability. Mixtures of used oil and
listed wastes that were listed solely for the characteristic of
ignitability are not allowed under the State regulations. Also, the
State criterion for flammability captures more wastes than the Federal
characteristic of ignitability and, thus, also excludes more waste; (3)
the Federal requirement at 40 CFR 279.10(b)(3) allows mixtures of used
oil and conditionally exempt small quantity generator (CESQG) hazardous
wastes regulated under 40 CFR 261.5 to be subject to regulation as used
oil under 40 CFR part 279; however, as Rhode Island's program does not
recognize this CESQG exemption, such mixtures may be regulated as
hazardous waste; (4) Rule 15.00 does not provide exemptions of
applicability to generators who mix used oil and diesel fuel for use in
the generator's own vehicle, as provided in the Federal program at 40
CFR 279.20(a); (5) under the State's used oil program prohibitions,
Rule 15.02(C) restricts the burning of off-spec used oil to the site of
generation. There is no such restriction under the Federal used oil
program. Thus, this requirement is considered more stringent in that it
prohibits the offsite shipment of off-spec oil for the purpose of
burning for energy recovery that otherwise would be allowed under the
Federal program. (Note, shipments of off-spec used oil directed to
processors and refiners is allowed at Rule 15.09(B)); (6) also, Rhode
Island's provisions are more stringent than the Federal requirements at
40 CFR 279.23 in that they exclude used oil collected from households
from being burned by generators in space heaters of less than 500,000
BTUs, and subject burners of household used oil to additional
regulation under Rule 15.03(B); (7) Rule 15.08 requires processors and
re-refiners to comply with additional requirements related to
responding to facility emergencies than those contained in the
analogous Federal regulations at 40 CFR 279.52(a); (8) Rule 15.02(B)
does not provide the exception to the prohibition of using used oil as
a dust suppressant which allows State petition for such use.
2. Partially Broader in Scope Provisions
There are also aspects of the Rhode Island program which are
partially broader in scope than the Federal program. The portions of
the State requirements which are broader in scope are not considered to
be part of the federally enforceable RCRA program. However, they are
fully enforceable under State law and must be complied with by sources
in Rhode Island. The various changes Rhode Island has made to its used
oil regulations and previously authorized base program regulations that
are broader-in-scope are discussed below.
(a) Rule 15.07, Used Oil Transporter and Temporary Storage Facility
Standards includes broader-in-scope provisions at (1) Rule 15.07(D)(2)
which requires transporters to obtain a permit which is not required
under Federal requirements for used oil transporters under 40 CFR part
279, subpart E; (2) Rule 15.07(E) requires used oil transporters to
maintain liability insurance as required by Department of
Transportation regulations at 49 CFR 387.7(d); and (3) Rule 15.07(H)(2)
requires a used oil transporter who acts as a used oil temporary
storage facility to apply for a Letter of Authorization from the RIDEM,
a permit-like document for which a facility must provide details
relating to the applicable operation which also includes a fee
(15.07(H)(6)).
(b) Rule 15.08, Used oil Processor and Re-Refiner Standards,
requires used oil processors and re-refiners to obtain a permit from
RIDEM, which is not required under analogous Federal requirements at 40
CFR part 279, subpart F and, therefore, broader in scope. Other
requirements include liability insurance, financial requirements, and
fees, all of which are broader in scope when compared to the applicable
Federal requirements.
(c) The State includes both off-spec and on-spec used oil in its
definition of ``used oil burner'' at section 3.00 whereas the analogous
Federal definition at 40 CFR 279.1 references the burning of only off-
spec used oil. This difference is significant as it subjects burners of
on-spec used oil in Rhode Island to additional requirements as
reflected in section 15.03 of the State's regulations, Burning Used Oil
for Energy Recovery. Under the Federal program, on-spec used oil
destined to be burned for energy recovery is not subject to the
restrictions on burning in 40 CFR part 279, subpart G (40 CFR
279.60(c)), and once conditions for on-spec used oil at 40 CFR 279.11
and 40 CFR part 279, subpart H have been met, the on-spec used oil can
be handled like any other virgin fuel oil, as long as it has not been
contaminated with hazardous waste. Rhode Island, however, continues to
regulate the burning and other aspects of on-spec oil under Rule 15.03
beyond that which is subject to regulation under the Federal program as
follows. The State regulates burners of on-spec used oil according to
category of BTU capacity as well as by unit type, i.e., onsite and
offsite, in Rule 15.03(A)-(D). The State's requirements for used oil
burners are partially broader in scope in that they set notification
requirements upon burners of on-spec used oil in Rule 15.03(B)(4) and
(C)(5) and notification and approval requirements under Rule
15.03(D)(5). Various requirements, such as storage, handling, tracking,
etc., are also imposed upon these on-spec burners at Rule 15.03(F)-(G)
which are generally required for off-spec used oil burners but are
broader in scope when applied to on-spec burners (see 40 CFR part 279,
subpart G). (Please note, additional requirements which relate to the
burning of used oil are also discussed in the following section,
Equivalent but Different Provisions.)
3. Equivalent But Different Provisions
While many State regulations track Federal requirements
identically, some differ from the Federal regulation in particular
details but have been determined by the EPA to be equivalent to the
Federal regulations in providing the same (or greater) overall level of
environmental protection with respect to each Federal requirement.
There are various Rhode Island regulations which differ from but have
been determined to be equivalent to the Federal regulations. These
regulations are part of the Federally enforceable RCRA program. These
different but equivalent requirements include the following:
(a) Rhode Island's used oil definition is broader than the Federal
definition in that it includes used oils which have become unsuitable
for their original purpose other than through use (e.g., the State
includes used oils that have
[[Page 70233]]
become contaminated during storage). This generally results in more
stringent regulation of oils that mostly would be considered only non-
hazardous solid wastes in the Federal program. In a few cases the State
regulations might allow such used oils which are characteristic to be
handled in the used program rather than as fully regulated hazardous
wastes (as they technically would be in the Federal program). The used
oils would not be different in composition from those regulated under
the Federal used oil program. The State's approach makes environmental
sense and is part of a regulation which is overall at least as
stringent as the corresponding Federal requirement.
(b) As stated previously, Rhode Island's requirements for burning
used oil at Rule 15.03 are broader in scope as they regulate burners of
on-spec oil in Rule 15.03(A)-(D), and Rhode Island's provisions are
also more stringent in that they only allow on-spec oil to be shipped
off-site to be burned for energy recovery. However, the State's used
oil requirements are also equivalent but different in transferring the
analytical and recordkeeping requirements imposed on used oil marketers
of on-spec oil in 40 CFR 279.72 onto on-spec used oil burners at
15.03(B)(1) and (2), (C)(2) and (3) and (D)(2) and (3). Rhode Island
regulations are also different but equivalent in allowing on-spec
burners to aggregate off-spec used oil with virgin oil or on-spec used
oil for burning blended mixtures at Rule 15.03(B)(3), (C)(4) and (D)(4)
provided analysis shows it meets specification requirements
(aggregation by off-spec used oil burners is allowed at 40 CFR
279.61(b)(2)).
(c) Rhode Island's program is also different in that it has adopted
a regulatory approach to address small amounts of used oil that are
generated by companies that service oil-fired furnaces that heat
buildings. While there is no direct counterpart in the Federal used oil
program for this specific scenario, the State's provisions closely
track the agency's requirements for off-site shipments of used oil to
aggregation points owned by the generator at 40 CFR 279.24(b), a
provision for which Rhode Island is also being authorized. Under the
Federal provision, EPA allows generators to self-transport up to 55
gallons at a time of used oil (without an EPA I.D. Number) to
aggregation points owned by the generator. Rhode Island's used oil
program at Rule 15.04(H) allows service companies, upon generation of
used oil during service of oil-fired furnaces used to heat buildings,
to assume the role of generator and to self-transport up to 5 gallons
of used oil to the company's place of business, as long as basic
requirements, such as handling, labeling and spill control measures are
met. Upon arrival, the used oil must be transferred to appropriate
storage containers or tanks on the premises of the service company who
is considered the generator of the used oil and subject to all
applicable requirements of section 15.00 of Rhode Island's Used Oil
Management Standards. Rhode Island has adopted state requirements which
tailor a Federal requirement to address a specific activity in which
small amounts of used oil are generated at many sites, including
households, which can immediately be removed from the site of
generation and consolidated at the generator's site of business. By
applying this provision in this way, it is likely to be more protective
of human health and the environment in assuring small quantities of
used oil are managed properly. Thus, we believe the State regulation is
legally consistent and equivalent to and perhaps even more stringent
than the Federal used oil program.
(d) Rhode Island has adopted a conditional exemption for oil
filters in its Rule 15.01(E) which differs from the Federal exemption
of 40 CFR 261.4(b)(13) by allowing cold draining and crushing of the
filters whereas the Federal regulation allows only hot draining. The
State regulation specifies that any cold draining must include crushing
using a mechanical, pneumatic or hydraulic device designed for the
purpose of crushing oil filters and effectively removing the oil. This
State provision will encourage recycling of used oil by enabling
filters from junked vehicles to be managed in accordance with the
exemption. Junked vehicles often cannot be started and consequently
filters removed from those vehicles cannot meet the hot draining
criteria of the Federal regulation. This approach of combining cold
draining and crushing used oil filters was adopted by the State of
Vermont and authorized by EPA [70 FR 36350, June 23, 2005]. Vermont
provided documentation showing that as much or more used oil is removed
from used oil filters through cold draining plus crushing than is
removed by some of the hot draining methods allowed in the Federal
regulation. Thus, while the Rhode Island exemption, like the Vermont
exemption, differs from the Federal exemption, the State regulation is
at least as stringent as the Federal regulation in requiring the
removal of the oil. Note, copies of Vermont's documentation relative to
the cold crushing/draining of oil filters has been included in the
Administrative Docket to this notice.
Relative to terne-plated filters, the State has also combined the
Federal scrap metal exemption at 40 CFR 261.6(a)(3)(ii) as referenced
in its definition of hazardous waste at 3.00, with its oil filter
exemption at 15.01(E). Rhode Island allows terne-plated filters to be
exempt from hazardous waste requirements once they have both been
processed to remove excess oil and when the metals are sent offsite for
reclamation which is documented. This is equivalent to the combination
of the two Federal exemptions.
I. How Does This Action Affect Indian Country (18 U.S.C. 115) in Rhode
Island?
Rhode Island is not authorized to carryout its hazardous waste
program in Indian country within the State which includes the land of
the Narragansett Indian Tribe. Therefore, this action has no effect on
Indian country. EPA will continue to implement and administer the RCRA
program in these lands.
J. Who Handles Permits After the Authorization Takes Effect?
Rhode Island will issue permits for all the provisions for which it
is authorized and will administer the permits it issues. EPA will
continue to administer and enforce any RCRA and HSWA (Hazardous and
Solid Waste Act) permits or portions of permits which it has issued in
Rhode Island prior to the effective date of this authorization until
the State incorporates the terms and conditions of the Federal permits
into the State RCRA permits. EPA will not issue any more new permits,
or new portions of permits, for the provisions listed in this notice
above after the effective date of this authorization. EPA will continue
to implement and issue permits for any HSWA requirements for which
Rhode Island is not yet authorized.
K. What Is Codification and Is EPA Codifying Rhode Island's Hazardous
Waste Program as Authorized in This Rule?
Codification is the process of placing the State's statutes and
regulations that comprise the State's authorized hazardous waste
program into the Code of Federal Regulations. We do this by referencing
the authorized State rules in 40 CFR part 272. We reserve the amendment
of 40 CFR part 272, subpart UU for this authorization of Rhode Island's
program until a later date.
[[Page 70234]]
L. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action (RCRA
State Authorization) from the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993); therefore, this action is not subject to
review by OMB. This action authorizes State requirements for the
purpose of RCRA 3006 and imposes no additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law. Accordingly, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.). Because this action authorizes pre-existing requirements under
State law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). For the same
reason, this action also does not significantly or uniquely affect
Tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000). This action will not have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely authorizes State
requirements as part of the State RCRA hazardous waste program without
altering the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established by RCRA. This action also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is
not economically significant and it does not make decisions based on
environmental health or safety risks. This rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001) ) because it is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), EPA grants a State's application for
authorization as long as the State meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it
reviews a State authorization application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
in issuing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining
the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive order.
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action nevertheless will be effective February 11, 2008, because it is
an immediate final rule.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections
2002(a), 3006 and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended
42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: November 2, 2007.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. E7-23946 Filed 12-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P