Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Assessment and Wetland Involvement for the Transformation of Facilities and Infrastructure for the Non-Nuclear Production Activities Conducted at the National Nuclear Security Administration's Kansas City Plant at Kansas City, MI, 69690-69691 [E7-23843]
Download as PDF
69690
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2007 / Notices
indicated. The application also will be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Additional information on all bank
holding companies may be obtained
from the National Information Center
website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than January 4,
2007.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
(Douglas A. Banks, Vice President) 1455
East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio
44101–2566:
1. Milton Bancorp, Inc., Wellston,
Ohio; to merge with Community First
Financial Bancorp, Inc., and thereby
acquire voting shares of The First
National Bank of New Holland, both of
New Holland, Ohio.
B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas
City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant Vice
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas
City, Missouri 64198–0001:
1. AMG National Corp.; to become a
bank holding company by retaining 100
percent of the voting shares of AMG
National Trust Bank, both of Boulder,
Colorado, upon its conversion from a
trust company to a commerical bank.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, December 5, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc.E7–23874 Filed 12–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
[PBS–N02]
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Environmental Assessment and
Wetland Involvement for the
Transformation of Facilities and
Infrastructure for the Non-Nuclear
Production Activities Conducted at the
National Nuclear Security
Administration’s Kansas City Plant at
Kansas City, MI
General Services
Administration and National Nuclear
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Dec 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
Security Administration, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability, and opportunity for public
review and comment, of a draft
environmental assessment (EA), DOE/
EA–1592, that examines the impacts of
a proposal by the General Services
Administration (GSA), as the lead
agency, and the National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA), as a
cooperating agency, to procure the
construction of a new multistructure
facility to house NNSA’s non-nuclear
component procurement and
manufacturing operations.
DATES: The review period for the Draft
EA and other NEPA documents ends
Monday, January 14th. Comments
postmarked after this date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Further information,
including an electronic copy of the draft
EA and other supporting NEPA
documents, may be found on the
following Web site, https://www.gsa.gov/
kansascityplant.
Comments, or requests for copies of
the draft EA, should be sent to Carlos
Salazar, General Services
Administration, 1500 East Bannister
Road, Room 2191 (6PTA), Kansas City,
MO 64131. Comments may also be emailed to NNSA–KC@gsa.gov.
Requests for copies of the draft EA
may also be made by calling 816–823–
2305 or via e-mail to NNSA–
KC@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed action is for GSA to procure
the construction of a new multistructure facility to house NNSA’s nonnuclear component procurement and
manufacturing operations. GSA would
issue a Solicitation for Offers to the real
estate development community. The
successful developer would purchase
the property, and would partner with
GSA and NNSA to design and construct
a campus that meets NNSA’s needs.
GSA would lease the campus on
NNSA’s behalf, and NNSA would
relocate its non-nuclear operations from
the existing KCP at the Bannister
Federal Complex in Kansas City,
Missouri to the new facility and conduct
future operations in the new facilities.
The proposed new NNSA KCP would be
a smaller production facility designed
for flexibility to enable rapid
reconfiguration to meet changing
production requirements, reducing
annual operating costs while improving
the responsiveness, facility utilization
and reliability of the supply of nonnuclear components to NNSA. In
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
addition to these business
improvements, the new facility would
enable a reduction in the environmental
footprint associated with KCP
operations including reduced air and
water emissions and waste generation.
The EA report examines and evaluates
the environmental conditions on a
portion of the Bannister Federal
Complex located on Bannister Road in
Kansas City, Missouri and for a site
currently developed for agricultural
usage on the northwest corner of Botts
Road and Highway 150 in Kansas City,
Missouri. The EA evaluates the baseline
environmental conditions,
environmental consequences, and
cumulative impacts of several
alternatives.
The relocation would involve moving
approximately two-thirds of the existing
capital and process equipment to the
new facility. The proposed facility
would cover approximately 1 to 1.55
million rentable square feet and provide
up to 2,900 surface parking spaces. The
new campus would be constructed to
pursue a Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED), version
2.2, Gold certification, as defined by the
United States Green Building Council.
In addition, the campus would meet all
executive orders on energy
conservation.
The existing KCP is collocated on the
Bannister Federal Complex with GSA
and shares both individual buildings
and utilities. At this time it is
anticipated that GSA would also
relocate to new office space and vacate
the Bannister Federal Complex on
approximately the same time schedule
as the Kansas City Plant. It is also
anticipated that disposal of the DOEowned portion of the complex would be
coordinated with the redeployment of
the GSA-owned parcels, and may be
managed as a single real property
disposition action. Therefore,
disposition and cleanup activities for
the existing NNSA facility at the KCP
are not part of the current proposed
action and would be addressed in
appropriate future environmental
analyses.
GSA and NNSA are also providing
notice of wetland involvement for the
proposed action. Based upon a
preliminary jurisdictional waters
determination, less than 1.5 acres of
non-jurisdictional wetlands and
potential jurisdictional tributaries and
wetlands exist onsite. Mitigation of
impacts to non-jurisdictional wetlands
would take place in accordance with
Executive Order 11990, and to
jurisdictional waters in accordance with
Section 404 Permitting, which requires
avoidance of wetlands impacts,
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
69691
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2007 / Notices
minimization of potential impacts on
wetlands, and compensation for any
remaining unavoidable impacts. A
wetland assessment will be completed
in accordance with the requirements of
10 CFR Part 1022 once the proposed site
layout is known.
This EA is being prepared pursuant to
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA), and regulations
implementing NEPA issued by the
Council on Environmental Quality (40
CFR Parts 1500–1508), GSA (ADM
1095.1F), and to the extent not
inconsistent with ADM 1095.1F, DOE
(10 CFR Part 1021). GSA and NNSA will
consider comments received (see DATES
and ADDRESSES, above) in finalizing the
EA. Based on the final EA, GSA and
NNSA will determine whether to
prepare an environmental impact
statement or issue a finding of no
significant impact if appropriate for the
proposed action.
Carlos Salazar,
Regional NEPA Coordinator, GSA Public
Buildings Service, Heartland Region.
[FR Doc. E7–23843 Filed 12–7–07; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6820–CG–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day-08–07AJ]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance
Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC or by fax to (202) 395–6974. Written
comments should be received within 30
days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Racial and Ethnic Approaches to
Community Health Across the U.S.
(REACH U.S.) Management Information
System—New—National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
Racial and Ethnic Approaches to
Community Health Across the U.S.
(REACH U.S.) is a national, multi-level
program that serves as the cornerstone
of CDC’s efforts to eliminate racial and
ethnic disparities in health. Through
REACH U.S., CDC currently supports
forty local coalitions to establish
community-based programs and
culturally-appropriate interventions to
eliminate racial and ethnic health
disparities. REACH U.S. serves
communities with African American,
American Indian, Hispanic American,
Asian American, and Pacific Islander
citizens.
The communities served by REACH
U.S. are assessing the prevalence of selfreported risk behaviors in the following
key health priority areas: Cardiovascular
disease; diabetes mellitus; breast and
cervical cancer; adult/older adult
immunizations, hepatitis B, and/or
tuberculosis; asthma; and infant
mortality. Guided by logic models, each
community is required to articulate
goals, objectives, and related activities;
track whether goals and objectives are
met, ongoing, or revised; and evaluate
all program activities.
CDC requests OMB clearance for a
new, customized, Internet-based
management information system, the
REACH U.S. MIS, designed to replace
the current REACH Information
Network (REACH IN, OMB #0920–
0603). The new REACH U.S. MIS will
allow REACH grantees to perform
remote data entry and retrieval of data,
create on-demand graphs and reports of
grantees’ activities and
accomplishments, monitor progress
toward the achievement of goals and
objectives, and share and synthesize
information across grantees’ activities.
Both quantitative and qualitative
analyses can be performed. The REACH
U.S. MIS will collect new data elements
needed to measure progress toward, or
achievement of, newly developed
performance indicators, and will allow
CDC to monitor, and report on, grantee
activities more efficiently. In addition,
data reported to CDC through the
REACH U.S. MIS will be used by CDC
to identify training and technical
assistance needs and to obtain
information needed to respond to
Congressional and other inquiries
regarding program activities and
effectiveness. Information will be
reported to CDC on a semi-annual
schedule.
There are no costs to respondents
except their time. The total estimated
annualized burden hours are 120.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
REACH U.S. Grantees ................................................................................................................
40
Number of
responses per
respondent
2
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
90/60
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
ACTION:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Dated: December 3, 2007.
Maryam I. Daneshvar,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7–23855 Filed 12–7–07; 8:45 am]
Privacy Act of 1974; Report of a
Modified or Altered System
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974,
we are proposing to modify or alter an
existing SOR, ‘‘Intern and Resident
Information System (IRIS), System No.
09–70–0524, last published at 67
Federal Register 48189 (July 23, 2002).
We propose to modify existing routine
use number 1 that permits disclosure to
agency contractors and consultants to
include disclosure to CMS grantees who
Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS), Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Dec 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of a Modified or Altered
System of Records (SOR).
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 236 (Monday, December 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69690-69691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23843]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
[PBS-N02]
Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Assessment and
Wetland Involvement for the Transformation of Facilities and
Infrastructure for the Non-Nuclear Production Activities Conducted at
the National Nuclear Security Administration's Kansas City Plant at
Kansas City, MI
AGENCY: General Services Administration and National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability, and opportunity for
public review and comment, of a draft environmental assessment (EA),
DOE/EA-1592, that examines the impacts of a proposal by the General
Services Administration (GSA), as the lead agency, and the National
Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), as a cooperating agency, to
procure the construction of a new multistructure facility to house
NNSA's non-nuclear component procurement and manufacturing operations.
DATES: The review period for the Draft EA and other NEPA documents ends
Monday, January 14th. Comments postmarked after this date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Further information, including an electronic copy of the
draft EA and other supporting NEPA documents, may be found on the
following Web site, https://www.gsa.gov/kansascityplant.
Comments, or requests for copies of the draft EA, should be sent to
Carlos Salazar, General Services Administration, 1500 East Bannister
Road, Room 2191 (6PTA), Kansas City, MO 64131. Comments may also be e-
mailed to NNSA-KC@gsa.gov.
Requests for copies of the draft EA may also be made by calling
816-823-2305 or via e-mail to NNSA-KC@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed action is for GSA to procure
the construction of a new multi-structure facility to house NNSA's non-
nuclear component procurement and manufacturing operations. GSA would
issue a Solicitation for Offers to the real estate development
community. The successful developer would purchase the property, and
would partner with GSA and NNSA to design and construct a campus that
meets NNSA's needs. GSA would lease the campus on NNSA's behalf, and
NNSA would relocate its non-nuclear operations from the existing KCP at
the Bannister Federal Complex in Kansas City, Missouri to the new
facility and conduct future operations in the new facilities. The
proposed new NNSA KCP would be a smaller production facility designed
for flexibility to enable rapid reconfiguration to meet changing
production requirements, reducing annual operating costs while
improving the responsiveness, facility utilization and reliability of
the supply of non-nuclear components to NNSA. In addition to these
business improvements, the new facility would enable a reduction in the
environmental footprint associated with KCP operations including
reduced air and water emissions and waste generation.
The EA report examines and evaluates the environmental conditions
on a portion of the Bannister Federal Complex located on Bannister Road
in Kansas City, Missouri and for a site currently developed for
agricultural usage on the northwest corner of Botts Road and Highway
150 in Kansas City, Missouri. The EA evaluates the baseline
environmental conditions, environmental consequences, and cumulative
impacts of several alternatives.
The relocation would involve moving approximately two-thirds of the
existing capital and process equipment to the new facility. The
proposed facility would cover approximately 1 to 1.55 million rentable
square feet and provide up to 2,900 surface parking spaces. The new
campus would be constructed to pursue a Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED), version 2.2, Gold certification, as
defined by the United States Green Building Council. In addition, the
campus would meet all executive orders on energy conservation.
The existing KCP is collocated on the Bannister Federal Complex
with GSA and shares both individual buildings and utilities. At this
time it is anticipated that GSA would also relocate to new office space
and vacate the Bannister Federal Complex on approximately the same time
schedule as the Kansas City Plant. It is also anticipated that disposal
of the DOE-owned portion of the complex would be coordinated with the
redeployment of the GSA-owned parcels, and may be managed as a single
real property disposition action. Therefore, disposition and cleanup
activities for the existing NNSA facility at the KCP are not part of
the current proposed action and would be addressed in appropriate
future environmental analyses.
GSA and NNSA are also providing notice of wetland involvement for
the proposed action. Based upon a preliminary jurisdictional waters
determination, less than 1.5 acres of non-jurisdictional wetlands and
potential jurisdictional tributaries and wetlands exist onsite.
Mitigation of impacts to non-jurisdictional wetlands would take place
in accordance with Executive Order 11990, and to jurisdictional waters
in accordance with Section 404 Permitting, which requires avoidance of
wetlands impacts,
[[Page 69691]]
minimization of potential impacts on wetlands, and compensation for any
remaining unavoidable impacts. A wetland assessment will be completed
in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 1022 once the
proposed site layout is known.
This EA is being prepared pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), and regulations implementing NEPA issued by
the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508), GSA (ADM
1095.1F), and to the extent not inconsistent with ADM 1095.1F, DOE (10
CFR Part 1021). GSA and NNSA will consider comments received (see DATES
and ADDRESSES, above) in finalizing the EA. Based on the final EA, GSA
and NNSA will determine whether to prepare an environmental impact
statement or issue a finding of no significant impact if appropriate
for the proposed action.
Carlos Salazar,
Regional NEPA Coordinator, GSA Public Buildings Service, Heartland
Region.
[FR Doc. E7-23843 Filed 12-7-07; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6820-CG-P