Avocados Grown in South Florida and Imported Avocados; Revision of the Maturity Requirements, 69624-69628 [E7-23827]
Download as PDF
69624
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 236
Monday, December 10, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 915 and 944
[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0054; FV07–915–
2 PR]
Avocados Grown in South Florida and
Imported Avocados; Revision of the
Maturity Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule would revise the
maturity requirements currently
prescribed for avocados grown in South
Florida and for avocados imported into
the United States that are shipped to the
fresh market. The Avocado
Administrative Committee (Committee)
which locally administers the marketing
order for avocados grown in South
Florida recommended the change for
Florida avocados. A corresponding
change in the import regulation would
also be required under section 8e of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937 if this rule was implemented.
This rule would require that avocados
which fail the maturity requirements
and are reworked and presented for
reinspection must meet the maturity
requirements which correspond to the
date of the original inspection. This rule
would help ensure only mature
avocados are shipped to the fresh
market.
Comments must be received by
February 8, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
should be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Dec 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of the Docket Clerk during
regular business hours, or can be viewed
at: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William G. Pimental, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen,
Regional Manager, Southeast Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (863) 324–3375, Fax: (863)
325–8793, or E-mail:
William.Pimental@usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov,
respectively.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 121 and Marketing
Order No. 915, both as amended (7 CFR
part 915), regulating the handling of
avocados grown in South Florida,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
This proposed rule is also issued
under section 8e of the Act, which
provides that whenever certain
specified commodities, including
avocados, are regulated under a Federal
marketing order, imports of these
commodities into the United States are
prohibited unless they meet the same or
comparable grade, size, quality, or
maturity requirements as those in effect
for the domestically produced
commodities.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This action is not
intended to have retroactive effect. This
proposed rule will not preempt any
State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
There are no administrative
procedures which must be exhausted
prior to any judicial challenge to the
provisions of import regulations issued
under section 8e of the Act.
This proposal invites comments on a
revision to the maturity requirements
currently prescribed under the order for
avocados grown in South Florida. This
rule would require that avocados which
fail the maturity requirements and are
reworked and presented for reinspection
must meet the maturity requirements
which correspond to the date of the
original inspection. This action,
unanimously recommended by the
Committee, would help ensure that only
mature avocados are shipped to the
fresh market.
Section 915.51 of the order provides
the authority to issue regulations
establishing specific maturity
requirements for avocados grown in
South Florida. Section 915.332 of the
order’s rules and regulations establishes
the requisite maturity requirements for
avocados. The maturity requirements
specify minimum weights, diameters,
and shipping dates for approximately 60
different varieties of avocados. These
dates and requirements are reflected in
the avocado maturity schedule as it
appears in Table I of § 915.332(a)(2).
Under the terms of the marketing
order, fresh market shipments of Florida
avocados are required to be inspected
and are subject to grade, pack,
container, and maturity requirements.
The maturity requirements are intended
to prevent the shipment of immature
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules
avocados to the fresh market. This helps
to improve buyer confidence in the
marketplace, and fosters increased
consumption.
This rule would change the way the
maturity requirements are currently
applied. Specifically, this rule would
require avocados which fail maturity
requirements and are reworked and
presented for reinspection to meet the
maturity requirements which
correspond to the date of the original
inspection.
The maturity requirements for
avocados are expressed in terms of
minimum weights and diameters in
conjunction with specific dates during
the shipping season. Each regulated
variety has its own set of dates and
requirements on the maturity schedule.
The maturity requirements for the
various varieties are different because
each variety has its own growing season
and stages when the fruit is mature and
ready to be harvested.
With avocados, the level of maturity
is determined by when the avocado is
harvested. Because the maturity process
ceases once the fruit is severed from the
tree, an avocado needs to remain on the
tree until it is mature. According to Paul
Harding, a plant physiologist for the
Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA,
the stage of maturity of the fruit when
harvested is directly related to its
palatability and is the most important
factor that influences eating quality.1
Avocados which are not mature at the
time of harvest will not ripen properly.
Avocados that do not ripen properly can
have an unpleasant taste and
consistency which negatively affects
customer satisfaction. Consequently, the
dates on the maturity schedule have
been carefully established based on
years of testing to ensure avocados
shipped using the schedule are mature
enough to complete the ripening
process.
The maturity schedule is divided into
A, B, C, and D dates which reflect the
different stages of maturity associated
with an individual variety. Larger sized
fruit within a variety matures earlier,
while smaller fruit needs to remain on
the tree longer to reach maturity.
Consequently, A dates are associated
with larger sizes and are established
early in the variety’s shipping season.
For a majority of varieties, the schedule
also includes B and C dates that fall
somewhere in between the A and D
dates for the particular variety. These
dates proceed in stages as the season
1 Harding, Paul L. ‘‘The Relation of Maturity to
Quality in Florida Avocados.’’ Proceedings of the
Florida State Horticultural Society 67 (1954):276–
280.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Dec 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
advances, allowing for the shipment of
progressively smaller sizes and weights
as a variety matures. The D date marks
the end of a variety’s marketing season
and releases all remaining sizes for
shipment to the fresh market. This
gradual shift in the maturity standards
from the beginning of the season to its
end helps ensure that all sizes remain
on the tree long enough to reach
maturity.
As an example, consider the Simmons
variety. The A date for the Simmons is
the Monday nearest June 20, and
requires a minimum weight of 16
ounces or a minimum diameter of 39⁄16
inches for fruit shipped to the fresh
market. The corresponding B date is the
Monday nearest July 4, and reduces the
minimum weight to 14 ounces or a
minimum diameter of 37⁄16 inches. The
C date is the Monday nearest to July 18,
and further reduces the minimum
weight and size requirements to 12
ounces or 31⁄16 inches, and the
requirements end with a scheduled D
date of the Monday nearest to August 1
when all remaining fruit of this variety
can be shipped.
Over the years, the maturity schedule
has been determined to be the best
indicator of maturity for the different
varieties of avocados grown in Florida,
and growers and handlers rely on the
schedule in making harvesting, packing,
and shipping decisions. The maturity
schedule facilitates the shipment of the
different varieties of avocados as they
mature, and helps ensure that only
mature fruit is shipped to the fresh
market. This in turn helps promote
consumer satisfaction which is essential
for the successful marketing of the crop.
Florida avocados are inspected for
compliance with the rules and
regulations established under the order,
including the maturity requirements, by
the Federal or Federal State Inspection
Service. When a lot of avocados fails
inspection, the handler has the
opportunity to rework the lot to remove
the fruit that caused the lot to fail. This
usually entails removing any damaged
or undersized fruit from the lot. Once
the lot has been reworked, the lot is
presented for reinspection.
However, the Committee has
discovered that in some cases where lots
fail for maturity, handlers are only
holding the avocados until the next date
under the maturity schedule and then
presenting them for reinspection to
benefit from the reduced size and
weight requirements rather than
reworking the lots to remove undersized
fruit. The Committee agreed this
practice undermines the purpose of the
maturity requirements and results in
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69625
immature fruit being shipped to the
fresh market.
Committee members stated the
maturity requirements were established
to ensure that only mature avocados
reach the fresh market. By allowing a
handler to just hold the fruit until the
next date on the maturity schedule, the
overall maturity of the lot is not
improved. Because the maturity process
ends once the fruit is picked, fruit that
fails to meet the maturity standards at
the time of inspection will not develop
in maturity while being held in the box.
The only way to increase the overall
maturity of the lot is to remove the fruit
which caused the lot to fail at the time
of inspection.
The Committee believes allowing fruit
that failed maturity requirements to be
held until the next date on the maturity
schedule without being reworked to
remove undersized fruit permits
immature fruit to be shipped to the fresh
market. A lot that fails inspection for
maturity can contain a significant
amount of avocados which are
undersized or underweight. Based on
the schedule, this fruit was picked too
soon, and most likely did not spend
enough time on the tree to reach the
proper level of maturity. Because this
fruit is immature, it will frequently not
ripen properly, and it would have a
negative impact on the market and
would likely result in the loss of future
avocado sales.
The requirements associated with the
initial inspection correlate more closely
with the time of picking and as such
remain the best measure of the maturity
of the lot. Consequently, the Committee
agreed the maturity requirements
specified on the schedule at the time of
the original inspection should be the
requirements applied when the
avocados are presented for reinspection.
With this change, when avocados fail
inspection for maturity, the handler
would continue to be allowed to
immediately rework the lot to remove
undersized and/or underweight fruit
and present the lot for reinspection or
hold the lot to rework it later. However,
the reinspection would be conducted
using the maturity requirements for the
date the lot was originally presented for
inspection regardless of when it is
presented for reinspection. Even if a lot
is held until the next date on the
schedule, the requirements specified for
the original inspection would still
apply, and the avocados that caused the
lot to fail would have to be removed
before the lot would pass under a
reinspection. This change would make
sure undersized and underweight fruit
would have to be removed before a lot
could meet the necessary requirements
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
69626
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules
which in turn should help further
ensure that only mature fruit is being
shipped to the fresh market.
This change would also make the
reinspection procedures for maturity
requirements more consistent with
those applied for grade requirements.
The current grade requirement for
avocados is a U.S. No. 2 and is constant
throughout the year. The only way for
a lot that fails for grade to meet the
grade requirement is to have the fruit
which caused the lot to fail removed.
The Committee believes the process for
handling avocados which fail the
maturity requirements should be the
same. Because the maturity level does
not improve by just holding the
avocados, the maturity requirements
applied to that lot should remain
constant as it does with grade. This
change would ensure that undersized
and underweight fruit are removed prior
to reinspection, maintaining the benefits
of the maturity schedule.
Currently, when a lot of avocados fails
inspection, the handler has the option to
rework the lot, hold the fruit to be
reworked at a later date, dump or
destroy the fruit, send the fruit for
processing, or donate it to charity. With
this change, the handler would have the
same options. However, fruit to be
reworked for maturity would be
segregated and placed under the
supervision of the Federal or FederalState Inspection Service using their
Positive Lot Identification (PLI) program
to ensure the lot is reworked to meet the
minimum maturity requirements
specified at the time of the initial
inspection. Once the lot, or any portion
thereof, is reworked, the Federal or
Federal-State Inspection Service would
reinspect the avocados applying the
maturity requirements for the date of the
original inspection. Also, all fruit in the
lot would need to be accounted for
under this process. Therefore, only fruit
meeting the initial maturity
requirements would be allowed to be
shipped to the fresh market.
Section 8e of the Act provides that
when certain domestically produced
commodities, including avocados, are
regulated under a Federal marketing
order, imports of that commodity must
meet the same or comparable grade,
size, quality, and maturity requirements.
Since this rule would modify maturity
requirements under the domestic
handling regulations, a corresponding
change to the avocado import maturity
regulations must also be considered.
Minimum grade, quality, and maturity
requirements for avocados imported
into the United States are currently in
effect under § 944.31 (7 CFR 944.31).
The maturity requirements are specified
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Dec 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
in § 944.31(a)(2). The Hass, Fuerte,
Zutano, and Edranol varieties of
avocados are exempt from the maturity
schedule, and would continue to be
exempt under this rule. However, these
varieties must meet the minimum grade
requirement of a U.S. No. 2 for imported
avocados, which would not be changed
by this action.
This proposal would require that
imported avocados which fail the
maturity requirements and are reworked
and presented for reinspection must
meet the maturity requirements which
correspond to the date of the original
inspection. With this change, fruit to be
reworked for maturity would be
segregated and placed under the
supervision of the Federal or FederalState Inspection Service using their PLI
program to ensure the lot is reworked to
meet the minimum maturity
requirements specified at the time of the
initial inspection.
Once the lot of avocados, or any
portion thereof, is reworked, the Federal
or Federal-State Inspection Service
would reinspect the lot applying the
maturity requirements for the date of the
original inspection. In addition, all fruit
in the lot would need to be accounted
for under this process. This would help
ensure only mature fruit that will ripen
properly is shipped to the fresh market.
Consumers prefer fruit that ripens
properly. Thus, importers would also
benefit from this change in maturity
requirements.
Import data for calendar years 2002
through 2006 reveals the major
exporters of green-skin avocados to the
United States are Mexico, Chile, and the
Dominican Republic. Imports of greenskin avocados totaled approximately
10,163 metric tons in 2002, 13,770
metric tons in 2003, 8,729 metric tons
in 2004, 12,411 metric tons in 2005, and
10,389 metric tons in 2006. The
Dominican Republic is the largest
supplier of green-skin avocados,
accounting for approximately 98 percent
of imports.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Import regulations issued under
the Act are based on those established
under Federal marketing orders.
There are approximately 300
producers of avocados in the production
area and approximately 35 handlers
subject to regulation under the order.
There are approximately 65 importers of
the type of avocados that are regulated
under the order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) as those
having annual receipts of less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service
firms, which include avocado handlers
and importers, are defined as those
whose annual receipts are less than
$6,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to the National
Agricultural Statistics Service and
Committee data, the average price for
Florida avocados during the 2005–06
season was around $46.75 per 55-pound
bushel container, and total shipments
were near 470,000 55-pound bushel
equivalents. Using the average price and
shipment information provided by the
Committee, the majority of avocado
handlers have annual receipts of less
than $6,500,000. In addition, based on
avocado production, grower prices, and
the total number of Florida avocado
growers, the average annual grower
revenue is less than $750,000. Based on
information from the Foreign
Agricultural Service, USDA, the dollar
value of imported avocados ranged from
around $156.7 million in 2003 to $337.5
million in 2005. Using these numbers,
the majority of avocado importers have
annual receipts of less than $6,500,000.
Consequently, the majority of avocado
producers, handlers, and importers may
be classified as small entities.
This proposed rule, recommended by
the Committee, would revise the
maturity requirements currently
prescribed for avocados grown in South
Florida and for avocados imported into
the United States that are shipped to the
fresh market. This proposal would
require that avocados which fail the
maturity requirements and are reworked
and presented for reinspection must
meet the maturity requirements which
correspond to the date of the original
inspection. This rule would help ensure
that only mature avocados are shipped
to the fresh market. This rule would
revise § 915.332, which specifies the
requisite maturity requirements.
Authority for this action is provided in
§ 915.51 of the order. This rule would
also revise § 944.31, which specifies the
maturity requirements for imported
avocados. The change in the import
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules
regulation is required under section 8e
of the Act.
This rule could result in some
additional costs for handlers and
importers. These costs would be
associated primarily with the cost to
rework the lot and the added inspection
costs associated with having Federal or
Federal-State Inspection Service
supervision of lots that fail for maturity.
However, these costs are expected to be
minimal and should apply to no more
than a few shipments each year as only
a very small percentage of lots fail for
maturity.
The vast majority of handlers and
importers are already reworking lots
that fail for maturity to remove the
undersized and underweight avocados
that caused the lot to fail. Consequently,
reworking lots which fail for maturity is
already a standard practice for most of
the industry, and as such would not
represent an additional cost for most
handlers and importers.
In addition, this rule could encourage
more careful spot picking to ensure that
the avocados are of the proper size or
weight to meet the requirements of the
maturity schedule. However, spot
picking is a standard industry practice,
so this should not result in any
additional cost.
Therefore, in most cases, any
additional costs resulting from this
change would be from the added
inspection costs associated with the
Federal or Federal-State Inspection
Service supervision of failing lots. Based
on information provided by the Federal
or Federal-State Inspection Service, the
added cost would be based on the time
it takes to apply the PLI program. For
most handlers and importers, this
should be accomplished in an hour or
less. Consequently, the added cost
would be based on the standard hourly
rate charged by the Federal or FederalState Inspection Service. These costs
could range from as low as $22.00 per
hour to $64.00 per hour for a lot of
avocados. In situations where a lot is
reworked immediately, the handler or
importer may not even accrue any
additional charges.
With average lot sizes ranging from
approximately 100 55-pound cartons of
avocados for a small lot to large lots
containing approximately 800 55-pound
cartons, and with avocados selling for a
season average of around $46.75 per 55pound container, the cost of inspection
would be a small percentage of the total
value of the lot. Consequently,
considering the possible added costs
associated with this change, and the
small number of lots affected, the
overall costs associated with this rule
are expected to be minimal.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Dec 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
Florida avocado producers and
handlers have found that the maturity
requirements have been beneficial in the
successful marketing of their avocado
crop. Experience has shown when
immature avocados are found in market
channels, they tend to have a price
depressing effect on the market and
negatively affect repeat purchases.
Preventing the shipment of immature
avocados improves buyer confidence in
the marketplace, and fosters increased
consumption. This change is expected
to provide added assurance that the
avocados marketed are of satisfactory
maturity and will ripen properly which
is expected to further promote customer
satisfaction.
This proposal is expected to similarly
impact importers of avocados. Nonexempt varieties of imported avocados
have met the minimum weight or
diameter maturity requirements in past
seasons, and this is expected to
continue. Thus, USDA believes this
proposed change would not limit the
quantity of imported avocados or place
an undue burden on exporters, or
importers of avocados. The marketplace
price and quality benefits expected for
Florida growers and handlers as a result
of this proposal would also benefit
exporters and importers of avocados.
As most handlers and importers are
already reworking lots which fail for
maturity to remove undersized and
underweight fruit, this change is not
expected to impact the total number of
avocado shipments. It is, however,
expected to have a positive effect in the
marketplace by helping to ensure only
mature avocados are reaching the
market which in turn should provide a
strong price base for the industry.
This proposed rule may impose some
additional costs on producers, handlers,
and importers. However, the costs are
expected to be minimal, and would be
offset by the benefits of the proposal.
This proposed action would benefit
consumers, producers, handlers, and
importers by providing consumers with
a better, more mature piece of fruit. The
costs and benefits of this rule are not
expected to be disproportionately
greater or less significant for small
entities than for large entities.
One alternative to this action
considered was to make no change.
However, the Committee believes this
was not an acceptable alternative as it
could result in immature avocados
reaching the fresh market. The
Committee agreed that allowing
immature avocados to reach the fresh
market would be detrimental to the
industry as a whole. Therefore, this
alternative was rejected.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69627
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
This rule would not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
avocado handlers or importers. As with
all Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies. In
addition, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this proposed
rule.
Further, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
avocado industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee
meetings, the meeting where this action
was recommended was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit information on the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
In accordance with section 8e of the
Act, the United States Trade
Representative has concurred with the
issuance of this proposed rule.
A 60-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. All written comments
timely received will be considered
before a final determination is made on
this matter.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 915
Avocados, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 944
Avocados, Food grades and standards,
Grapefruit, Grapes, Imports, Kiwifruit,
Limes, Olives, Oranges.
For the reasons set forth above, 7 CFR
parts 915 and 944 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
69628
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
PART 915—AVOCADOS GROWN IN
SOUTH FLORIDA
ACTION:
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
parts 915 and 944 continues to read as
follows:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. A new paragraph (a)(3) is added to
§ 915.332 to read as follows:
§ 915.332 Florida avocado maturity
regulation.
(a) * * *
(3) Avocados which fail to meet the
maturity requirements specified in this
section must be maintained under the
supervision of the Federal or FederalState Inspection Service using the
Positive Lot Identification program, and
when presented for reinspection, must
meet the maturity requirements which
correspond to the date of the original
inspection.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 944—FRUITS; IMPORT
REGULATIONS
3. A new paragraph (a)(3) is added to
§ 944.31 to read as follows:
§ 944.31 Avocado import maturity
regulation.
(a) * * *
(3) Avocados which fail to meet the
maturity requirements specified in this
section must be maintained under the
supervision of the Federal or FederalState Inspection Service using the
Positive Lot Identification program, and
when presented for reinspection, must
meet the maturity requirements which
correspond to the date of the original
inspection.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 4, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E7–23827 Filed 12–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0299; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–239–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Saab Model
SAAB 2000 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Dec 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
Subsequent to accidents involving Fuel
Tank System explosions in flight * * * and
on ground, the FAA has published Special
Federal Aviation Regulation 88 (SFAR88)
* * * [which] required * * * [conducting] a
design review against explosion risks.
The unsafe condition is the potential of
ignition sources inside fuel tanks,
which, in combination with flammable
fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank
explosions and consequent loss of the
airplane. The proposed AD would
require actions that are intended to
address the unsafe condition described
in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 9, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1112; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2007–0299; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–239–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2007–0167,
dated June 15, 2007 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
Subsequent to accidents involving Fuel
Tank System explosions in flight * * * and
on ground, the FAA has published Special
Federal Aviation Regulation 88 (SFAR88) in
June 2001.
In their Letters referenced 04/00/02/07/01–
L296 dated March 4th, 2002 and 04/00/02/
07/03–L024, dated February 3rd, 2003, the
JAA (Joint Aviation Authorities)
recommended the application of a similar
regulation to the National Aviation
Authorities (NAA).
Under this regulation, all holders of type
certificates for passenger transport aircraft
with either a passenger capacity of 30 or
more, or a payload capacity of 7,500 pounds
(3402 kg) or more, which have received their
certification since January 1st, 1958, are
required to conduct a design review against
explosion risks.
This Airworthiness Directive (AD), which
renders mandatory the modification [6089] of
improving the sealing of Fuel Access Doors,
is a consequence of the design review.
The unsafe condition is the potential
of ignition sources inside fuel tanks,
which, in combination with flammable
fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank
explosions and consequent loss of the
airplane. Saab Modification 6089
includes removing the fuel tank access
doors and the old type of clamp rings
and gaskets; installing new, improved
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 236 (Monday, December 10, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69624-69628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23827]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2007 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 69624]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 915 and 944
[Docket No. AMS-FV-07-0054; FV07-915-2 PR]
Avocados Grown in South Florida and Imported Avocados; Revision
of the Maturity Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule would revise the maturity requirements currently
prescribed for avocados grown in South Florida and for avocados
imported into the United States that are shipped to the fresh market.
The Avocado Administrative Committee (Committee) which locally
administers the marketing order for avocados grown in South Florida
recommended the change for Florida avocados. A corresponding change in
the import regulation would also be required under section 8e of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 if this rule was
implemented. This rule would require that avocados which fail the
maturity requirements and are reworked and presented for reinspection
must meet the maturity requirements which correspond to the date of the
original inspection. This rule would help ensure only mature avocados
are shipped to the fresh market.
DATES: Comments must be received by February 8, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments should be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the docket number
and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William G. Pimental, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen, Regional Manager, Southeast
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324-3375, Fax:
(863) 325-8793, or E-mail: William.Pimental@usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov, respectively.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 121 and Marketing Order No. 915, both as amended (7 CFR
part 915), regulating the handling of avocados grown in South Florida,
hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C.
601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
This proposed rule is also issued under section 8e of the Act,
which provides that whenever certain specified commodities, including
avocados, are regulated under a Federal marketing order, imports of
these commodities into the United States are prohibited unless they
meet the same or comparable grade, size, quality, or maturity
requirements as those in effect for the domestically produced
commodities.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This action is not intended to have retroactive
effect. This proposed rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
There are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted
prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of import regulations
issued under section 8e of the Act.
This proposal invites comments on a revision to the maturity
requirements currently prescribed under the order for avocados grown in
South Florida. This rule would require that avocados which fail the
maturity requirements and are reworked and presented for reinspection
must meet the maturity requirements which correspond to the date of the
original inspection. This action, unanimously recommended by the
Committee, would help ensure that only mature avocados are shipped to
the fresh market.
Section 915.51 of the order provides the authority to issue
regulations establishing specific maturity requirements for avocados
grown in South Florida. Section 915.332 of the order's rules and
regulations establishes the requisite maturity requirements for
avocados. The maturity requirements specify minimum weights, diameters,
and shipping dates for approximately 60 different varieties of
avocados. These dates and requirements are reflected in the avocado
maturity schedule as it appears in Table I of Sec. 915.332(a)(2).
Under the terms of the marketing order, fresh market shipments of
Florida avocados are required to be inspected and are subject to grade,
pack, container, and maturity requirements. The maturity requirements
are intended to prevent the shipment of immature
[[Page 69625]]
avocados to the fresh market. This helps to improve buyer confidence in
the marketplace, and fosters increased consumption.
This rule would change the way the maturity requirements are
currently applied. Specifically, this rule would require avocados which
fail maturity requirements and are reworked and presented for
reinspection to meet the maturity requirements which correspond to the
date of the original inspection.
The maturity requirements for avocados are expressed in terms of
minimum weights and diameters in conjunction with specific dates during
the shipping season. Each regulated variety has its own set of dates
and requirements on the maturity schedule. The maturity requirements
for the various varieties are different because each variety has its
own growing season and stages when the fruit is mature and ready to be
harvested.
With avocados, the level of maturity is determined by when the
avocado is harvested. Because the maturity process ceases once the
fruit is severed from the tree, an avocado needs to remain on the tree
until it is mature. According to Paul Harding, a plant physiologist for
the Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA, the stage of maturity of the
fruit when harvested is directly related to its palatability and is the
most important factor that influences eating quality.\1\ Avocados which
are not mature at the time of harvest will not ripen properly. Avocados
that do not ripen properly can have an unpleasant taste and consistency
which negatively affects customer satisfaction. Consequently, the dates
on the maturity schedule have been carefully established based on years
of testing to ensure avocados shipped using the schedule are mature
enough to complete the ripening process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Harding, Paul L. ``The Relation of Maturity to Quality in
Florida Avocados.'' Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural
Society 67 (1954):276-280.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The maturity schedule is divided into A, B, C, and D dates which
reflect the different stages of maturity associated with an individual
variety. Larger sized fruit within a variety matures earlier, while
smaller fruit needs to remain on the tree longer to reach maturity.
Consequently, A dates are associated with larger sizes and are
established early in the variety's shipping season. For a majority of
varieties, the schedule also includes B and C dates that fall somewhere
in between the A and D dates for the particular variety. These dates
proceed in stages as the season advances, allowing for the shipment of
progressively smaller sizes and weights as a variety matures. The D
date marks the end of a variety's marketing season and releases all
remaining sizes for shipment to the fresh market. This gradual shift in
the maturity standards from the beginning of the season to its end
helps ensure that all sizes remain on the tree long enough to reach
maturity.
As an example, consider the Simmons variety. The A date for the
Simmons is the Monday nearest June 20, and requires a minimum weight of
16 ounces or a minimum diameter of 3\9/16\ inches for fruit shipped to
the fresh market. The corresponding B date is the Monday nearest July
4, and reduces the minimum weight to 14 ounces or a minimum diameter of
3\7/16\ inches. The C date is the Monday nearest to July 18, and
further reduces the minimum weight and size requirements to 12 ounces
or 3\1/16\ inches, and the requirements end with a scheduled D date of
the Monday nearest to August 1 when all remaining fruit of this variety
can be shipped.
Over the years, the maturity schedule has been determined to be the
best indicator of maturity for the different varieties of avocados
grown in Florida, and growers and handlers rely on the schedule in
making harvesting, packing, and shipping decisions. The maturity
schedule facilitates the shipment of the different varieties of
avocados as they mature, and helps ensure that only mature fruit is
shipped to the fresh market. This in turn helps promote consumer
satisfaction which is essential for the successful marketing of the
crop.
Florida avocados are inspected for compliance with the rules and
regulations established under the order, including the maturity
requirements, by the Federal or Federal State Inspection Service. When
a lot of avocados fails inspection, the handler has the opportunity to
rework the lot to remove the fruit that caused the lot to fail. This
usually entails removing any damaged or undersized fruit from the lot.
Once the lot has been reworked, the lot is presented for reinspection.
However, the Committee has discovered that in some cases where lots
fail for maturity, handlers are only holding the avocados until the
next date under the maturity schedule and then presenting them for
reinspection to benefit from the reduced size and weight requirements
rather than reworking the lots to remove undersized fruit. The
Committee agreed this practice undermines the purpose of the maturity
requirements and results in immature fruit being shipped to the fresh
market.
Committee members stated the maturity requirements were established
to ensure that only mature avocados reach the fresh market. By allowing
a handler to just hold the fruit until the next date on the maturity
schedule, the overall maturity of the lot is not improved. Because the
maturity process ends once the fruit is picked, fruit that fails to
meet the maturity standards at the time of inspection will not develop
in maturity while being held in the box. The only way to increase the
overall maturity of the lot is to remove the fruit which caused the lot
to fail at the time of inspection.
The Committee believes allowing fruit that failed maturity
requirements to be held until the next date on the maturity schedule
without being reworked to remove undersized fruit permits immature
fruit to be shipped to the fresh market. A lot that fails inspection
for maturity can contain a significant amount of avocados which are
undersized or underweight. Based on the schedule, this fruit was picked
too soon, and most likely did not spend enough time on the tree to
reach the proper level of maturity. Because this fruit is immature, it
will frequently not ripen properly, and it would have a negative impact
on the market and would likely result in the loss of future avocado
sales.
The requirements associated with the initial inspection correlate
more closely with the time of picking and as such remain the best
measure of the maturity of the lot. Consequently, the Committee agreed
the maturity requirements specified on the schedule at the time of the
original inspection should be the requirements applied when the
avocados are presented for reinspection.
With this change, when avocados fail inspection for maturity, the
handler would continue to be allowed to immediately rework the lot to
remove undersized and/or underweight fruit and present the lot for
reinspection or hold the lot to rework it later. However, the
reinspection would be conducted using the maturity requirements for the
date the lot was originally presented for inspection regardless of when
it is presented for reinspection. Even if a lot is held until the next
date on the schedule, the requirements specified for the original
inspection would still apply, and the avocados that caused the lot to
fail would have to be removed before the lot would pass under a
reinspection. This change would make sure undersized and underweight
fruit would have to be removed before a lot could meet the necessary
requirements
[[Page 69626]]
which in turn should help further ensure that only mature fruit is
being shipped to the fresh market.
This change would also make the reinspection procedures for
maturity requirements more consistent with those applied for grade
requirements. The current grade requirement for avocados is a U.S. No.
2 and is constant throughout the year. The only way for a lot that
fails for grade to meet the grade requirement is to have the fruit
which caused the lot to fail removed. The Committee believes the
process for handling avocados which fail the maturity requirements
should be the same. Because the maturity level does not improve by just
holding the avocados, the maturity requirements applied to that lot
should remain constant as it does with grade. This change would ensure
that undersized and underweight fruit are removed prior to
reinspection, maintaining the benefits of the maturity schedule.
Currently, when a lot of avocados fails inspection, the handler has
the option to rework the lot, hold the fruit to be reworked at a later
date, dump or destroy the fruit, send the fruit for processing, or
donate it to charity. With this change, the handler would have the same
options. However, fruit to be reworked for maturity would be segregated
and placed under the supervision of the Federal or Federal-State
Inspection Service using their Positive Lot Identification (PLI)
program to ensure the lot is reworked to meet the minimum maturity
requirements specified at the time of the initial inspection. Once the
lot, or any portion thereof, is reworked, the Federal or Federal-State
Inspection Service would reinspect the avocados applying the maturity
requirements for the date of the original inspection. Also, all fruit
in the lot would need to be accounted for under this process.
Therefore, only fruit meeting the initial maturity requirements would
be allowed to be shipped to the fresh market.
Section 8e of the Act provides that when certain domestically
produced commodities, including avocados, are regulated under a Federal
marketing order, imports of that commodity must meet the same or
comparable grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements. Since this
rule would modify maturity requirements under the domestic handling
regulations, a corresponding change to the avocado import maturity
regulations must also be considered.
Minimum grade, quality, and maturity requirements for avocados
imported into the United States are currently in effect under Sec.
944.31 (7 CFR 944.31). The maturity requirements are specified in Sec.
944.31(a)(2). The Hass, Fuerte, Zutano, and Edranol varieties of
avocados are exempt from the maturity schedule, and would continue to
be exempt under this rule. However, these varieties must meet the
minimum grade requirement of a U.S. No. 2 for imported avocados, which
would not be changed by this action.
This proposal would require that imported avocados which fail the
maturity requirements and are reworked and presented for reinspection
must meet the maturity requirements which correspond to the date of the
original inspection. With this change, fruit to be reworked for
maturity would be segregated and placed under the supervision of the
Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service using their PLI program to
ensure the lot is reworked to meet the minimum maturity requirements
specified at the time of the initial inspection.
Once the lot of avocados, or any portion thereof, is reworked, the
Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service would reinspect the lot
applying the maturity requirements for the date of the original
inspection. In addition, all fruit in the lot would need to be
accounted for under this process. This would help ensure only mature
fruit that will ripen properly is shipped to the fresh market.
Consumers prefer fruit that ripens properly. Thus, importers would also
benefit from this change in maturity requirements.
Import data for calendar years 2002 through 2006 reveals the major
exporters of green-skin avocados to the United States are Mexico,
Chile, and the Dominican Republic. Imports of green-skin avocados
totaled approximately 10,163 metric tons in 2002, 13,770 metric tons in
2003, 8,729 metric tons in 2004, 12,411 metric tons in 2005, and 10,389
metric tons in 2006. The Dominican Republic is the largest supplier of
green-skin avocados, accounting for approximately 98 percent of
imports.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Import regulations issued under
the Act are based on those established under Federal marketing orders.
There are approximately 300 producers of avocados in the production
area and approximately 35 handlers subject to regulation under the
order. There are approximately 65 importers of the type of avocados
that are regulated under the order. Small agricultural producers are
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service
firms, which include avocado handlers and importers, are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less than $6,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service and
Committee data, the average price for Florida avocados during the 2005-
06 season was around $46.75 per 55-pound bushel container, and total
shipments were near 470,000 55-pound bushel equivalents. Using the
average price and shipment information provided by the Committee, the
majority of avocado handlers have annual receipts of less than
$6,500,000. In addition, based on avocado production, grower prices,
and the total number of Florida avocado growers, the average annual
grower revenue is less than $750,000. Based on information from the
Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA, the dollar value of imported
avocados ranged from around $156.7 million in 2003 to $337.5 million in
2005. Using these numbers, the majority of avocado importers have
annual receipts of less than $6,500,000. Consequently, the majority of
avocado producers, handlers, and importers may be classified as small
entities.
This proposed rule, recommended by the Committee, would revise the
maturity requirements currently prescribed for avocados grown in South
Florida and for avocados imported into the United States that are
shipped to the fresh market. This proposal would require that avocados
which fail the maturity requirements and are reworked and presented for
reinspection must meet the maturity requirements which correspond to
the date of the original inspection. This rule would help ensure that
only mature avocados are shipped to the fresh market. This rule would
revise Sec. 915.332, which specifies the requisite maturity
requirements. Authority for this action is provided in Sec. 915.51 of
the order. This rule would also revise Sec. 944.31, which specifies
the maturity requirements for imported avocados. The change in the
import
[[Page 69627]]
regulation is required under section 8e of the Act.
This rule could result in some additional costs for handlers and
importers. These costs would be associated primarily with the cost to
rework the lot and the added inspection costs associated with having
Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service supervision of lots that
fail for maturity. However, these costs are expected to be minimal and
should apply to no more than a few shipments each year as only a very
small percentage of lots fail for maturity.
The vast majority of handlers and importers are already reworking
lots that fail for maturity to remove the undersized and underweight
avocados that caused the lot to fail. Consequently, reworking lots
which fail for maturity is already a standard practice for most of the
industry, and as such would not represent an additional cost for most
handlers and importers.
In addition, this rule could encourage more careful spot picking to
ensure that the avocados are of the proper size or weight to meet the
requirements of the maturity schedule. However, spot picking is a
standard industry practice, so this should not result in any additional
cost.
Therefore, in most cases, any additional costs resulting from this
change would be from the added inspection costs associated with the
Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service supervision of failing
lots. Based on information provided by the Federal or Federal-State
Inspection Service, the added cost would be based on the time it takes
to apply the PLI program. For most handlers and importers, this should
be accomplished in an hour or less. Consequently, the added cost would
be based on the standard hourly rate charged by the Federal or Federal-
State Inspection Service. These costs could range from as low as $22.00
per hour to $64.00 per hour for a lot of avocados. In situations where
a lot is reworked immediately, the handler or importer may not even
accrue any additional charges.
With average lot sizes ranging from approximately 100 55-pound
cartons of avocados for a small lot to large lots containing
approximately 800 55-pound cartons, and with avocados selling for a
season average of around $46.75 per 55-pound container, the cost of
inspection would be a small percentage of the total value of the lot.
Consequently, considering the possible added costs associated with this
change, and the small number of lots affected, the overall costs
associated with this rule are expected to be minimal.
Florida avocado producers and handlers have found that the maturity
requirements have been beneficial in the successful marketing of their
avocado crop. Experience has shown when immature avocados are found in
market channels, they tend to have a price depressing effect on the
market and negatively affect repeat purchases. Preventing the shipment
of immature avocados improves buyer confidence in the marketplace, and
fosters increased consumption. This change is expected to provide added
assurance that the avocados marketed are of satisfactory maturity and
will ripen properly which is expected to further promote customer
satisfaction.
This proposal is expected to similarly impact importers of
avocados. Non-exempt varieties of imported avocados have met the
minimum weight or diameter maturity requirements in past seasons, and
this is expected to continue. Thus, USDA believes this proposed change
would not limit the quantity of imported avocados or place an undue
burden on exporters, or importers of avocados. The marketplace price
and quality benefits expected for Florida growers and handlers as a
result of this proposal would also benefit exporters and importers of
avocados.
As most handlers and importers are already reworking lots which
fail for maturity to remove undersized and underweight fruit, this
change is not expected to impact the total number of avocado shipments.
It is, however, expected to have a positive effect in the marketplace
by helping to ensure only mature avocados are reaching the market which
in turn should provide a strong price base for the industry.
This proposed rule may impose some additional costs on producers,
handlers, and importers. However, the costs are expected to be minimal,
and would be offset by the benefits of the proposal. This proposed
action would benefit consumers, producers, handlers, and importers by
providing consumers with a better, more mature piece of fruit. The
costs and benefits of this rule are not expected to be
disproportionately greater or less significant for small entities than
for large entities.
One alternative to this action considered was to make no change.
However, the Committee believes this was not an acceptable alternative
as it could result in immature avocados reaching the fresh market. The
Committee agreed that allowing immature avocados to reach the fresh
market would be detrimental to the industry as a whole. Therefore, this
alternative was rejected.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
This rule would not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large avocado handlers or
importers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap
or conflict with this proposed rule.
Further, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout
the avocado industry and all interested persons were invited to attend
the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the meeting where this action was recommended was a
public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to
express views on this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit information on the regulatory and informational impacts of this
action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
In accordance with section 8e of the Act, the United States Trade
Representative has concurred with the issuance of this proposed rule.
A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. All written comments timely received will be
considered before a final determination is made on this matter.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 915
Avocados, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 944
Avocados, Food grades and standards, Grapefruit, Grapes, Imports,
Kiwifruit, Limes, Olives, Oranges.
For the reasons set forth above, 7 CFR parts 915 and 944 are
proposed to be amended as follows:
[[Page 69628]]
PART 915--AVOCADOS GROWN IN SOUTH FLORIDA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR parts 915 and 944 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. A new paragraph (a)(3) is added to Sec. 915.332 to read as
follows:
Sec. 915.332 Florida avocado maturity regulation.
(a) * * *
(3) Avocados which fail to meet the maturity requirements specified
in this section must be maintained under the supervision of the Federal
or Federal-State Inspection Service using the Positive Lot
Identification program, and when presented for reinspection, must meet
the maturity requirements which correspond to the date of the original
inspection.
* * * * *
PART 944--FRUITS; IMPORT REGULATIONS
3. A new paragraph (a)(3) is added to Sec. 944.31 to read as
follows:
Sec. 944.31 Avocado import maturity regulation.
(a) * * *
(3) Avocados which fail to meet the maturity requirements specified
in this section must be maintained under the supervision of the Federal
or Federal-State Inspection Service using the Positive Lot
Identification program, and when presented for reinspection, must meet
the maturity requirements which correspond to the date of the original
inspection.
* * * * *
Dated: December 4, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E7-23827 Filed 12-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P