Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Information Request for National Emission Standards for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters; EPA ICR No. 2286.01, 69213-69215 [E7-23845]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2007 / Notices
service, persons with Internet access
who will eFile a document and/or be
listed as a contact for an intervenor
must create and validate an
eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling
link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the intervention or protest to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First St., NE., Washington, DC
20426.
The filings in the above proceedings
are accessible in the Commission’s
eLibrary system by clicking on the
appropriate link in the above list. They
are also available for review in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room in
Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that
enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added
to a subscribed dockets(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online
service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Acting Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–23752 Filed 12–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Notice of Membership of Performance
Review Board for Senior Executives
(PRB)
November 29, 2007.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
The Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission hereby provides notice of
the membership of its Performance
Review Board (PRB) for the
Commission’s Senior Executive Service
(SES) members. The function of this
board is to make recommendations
relating to the performance of senior
executives in the Commission. This
action is undertaken in accordance with
Title 5, U.S.C., Section 4314(c)(4). The
Commission’s PRB will add the
following member:
Cynthia A. Marlette.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–23776 Filed 12–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Dec 06, 2007
Jkt 214001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2002–0058; FRL–8503–4]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Information
Request for National Emission
Standards for Industrial, Commercial,
and Institutional Boilers and Process
Heaters; EPA ICR No. 2286.01
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this action
announces that EPA is planning to
submit a request for a new Information
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). Before
submitting the ICR to OMB for review
and approval, EPA is soliciting
comments on specific aspects of the
proposed information collection as
described below.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before February 5, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2002–0058, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
• Fax: (202) 566–1741.
• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery: Air and Radiation
Docket and Information Center, U.S.
EPA, Room 3334, EPA West Building,
1301 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2002–
0058. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69213
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your
e-mail address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Jim
Eddinger, Energy Strategies Group,
Sector Policies and Program Division,
(D243–01), Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711; telephone number:
(919) 541–5426; fax number: (919) 541–
5450; e-mail address:
eddinger.jim@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
How Can I Access the Docket and/or
Submit Comments?
EPA has established a public docket
for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2002–0058, which is
available for online viewing at
www.regulations.gov, or in person
viewing at the Air and Radiation Docket
in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room
is open from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Reading Room is 202–566–1744, and the
telephone number for the Air and
Radiation Docket is 202–566–1742.
Use www.regulations.gov to obtain a
copy of the draft collection of
information, submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of
the contents of the docket, and to access
those documents in the public docket
that are available electronically. Once in
the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in
the docket ID number identified in this
document.
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
69214
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2007 / Notices
What Information Is EPA Particularly
Interested In?
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA, EPA specifically solicits
comments and information to enable it
to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(iv) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses. In
particular, EPA is requesting comments
from very small businesses (those that
employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA
could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses
affected by this collection.
What Should I Consider When I
Prepare My Comments for EPA?
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
You may find the following
suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments.
1. Explain your views as clearly as
possible and provide specific examples.
2. Describe any assumptions that you
used.
3. Provide copies of any technical
information and/or data you used that
support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or
costs, explain how you arrived at the
estimate that you provide.
5. Offer alternative ways to improve
the collection activity.
6. Make sure to submit your
comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
be sure to identify the docket ID number
assigned to this action in the subject
line on the first page of your response.
You may also provide the name, date,
and Federal Register citation.
What Information Collection Activity or
ICR Does This Apply To?
Affected entities: Entities potentially
affected by this action are major sources
of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Dec 06, 2007
Jkt 214001
industrial, commercial, and institutional
boilers and process heaters source
categories. A major source is one that
has the potential to emit more than 10
tons per year (tpy) of any HAP, 25 tpy
for the total of all HAP, or amounts
exceeding any lesser quantity cutoff
established pursuant to section 112(a)(1)
of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Title: Information Collection Effort for
Facilities with Boilers and/or Process
Heaters at Major Sources of HAP
Emission.
ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 2286.01.
ICR status: This ICR is for a new
information collection activity. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information, unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB control numbers for
EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR,
after appearing in the Federal Register
when approved, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or
by other appropriate means, such as on
the related collection instrument or
form, if applicable. The display of OMB
control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR
part 9.
Abstract: The proposed ICR has two
components to the information
collection. To obtain the information
necessary to identify and categorize all
boilers and process heaters potentially
affected by the revised standard, the
first component of this ICR will solicit
information from all potentially affected
units in the format of an electronic
survey under authority of section 114 of
the CAA. The survey will be submitted
to all facilities that either submitted an
initial notification, or if initial
notification data is not available, all
facilities with Title V permits denoted
as a major source of HAP, that have a
boiler or process heater listed in their
permit.
The second component will consist of
requiring, if deemed necessary, again
through the issuance of a letter pursuant
to the authority of section 114 of the
CAA, the owners/operators of up to a
total of 350 boilers or process heaters
selected at random to conduct in
accordance with an EPA-approved
protocol stack testing.
The EPA estimates the cost of the
electronic survey component of the
information collection will be 95,832
hours and $7,685,102. The total annual
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
the stack testing component of the data
gathering effort is estimated to be no
more than 29,584 hours and
$11,712,769.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Industrial, commercial, and
institutional boilers and process heaters
were listed as a major source category of
HAP on July 16, 1992 (57 FR 31576).
Section 112(c)(2) of the CAA requires
that we establish National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) for control of HAP from both
existing and new major sources, based
upon the criteria set out in the CAA
section 112(d). The CAA requires the
NESHAP to reflect the maximum degree
of reduction in emissions of HAP that is
achievable, taking into consideration the
cost of achieving the emission
reduction, any non-air quality health
and environmental impacts, and energy
requirements. This level of control is
commonly referred to as the maximum
achievable control technology (MACT).
The minimum control level allowed for
NESHAP (the minimum level of
stringency for MACT) is the ‘‘MACT
floor,’’ as defined under section
112(d)(3) of the CAA. The MACT floor
for existing sources is the emission
limitation achieved by the average of the
best-performing 12 percent of existing
sources for categories and subcategories.
For new sources, the MACT floor cannot
be less stringent than the emission
control achieved in practice by the bestcontrolled similar source.
The NESHAP for boilers and process
heaters were promulgated at 40 CFR
part 63, subpart DDDDD, on September
2004 (see 69 FR 55218), and vacated by
the Courts on June 8, 2007. The vacature
requires the Agency to revise the
standards and the associated MACT
floors based on new estimates of
potentially affected units.
The previous rulemaking was based
upon data gathered for the Industrial
Combustion Coordinated Rulemaking,
complimented by additional survey data
received from non-fossil boiler and
process heaters. These data sources are
over 10 years old. When the Agency
recently compared these data to
facilities submitting initial notifications
to comply with the vacated standard, a
large disparity was identified in the
number of potentially affected units at
major sources of HAP. Since the last
boiler and process heater data gathering
effort, many sources have shut down,
others have selected to operate with a
limit on their HAP emissions in order to
avoid being subject to the Boiler and
Process Heater NESHAP, and some
units have switched out older solid fuel
units for newer equipment due to
increased insurance and maintenance
costs. Therefore, the Agency has
concluded that obtaining updated
information will be crucial to informing
its decision on the revised NESHAP for
boilers and process heaters.
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2007 / Notices
The information in both components
of this ICR will be collected under
authority of section 114 of the CAA.
Section 114(a) states, in pertinent part:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
For the purpose * * * (iii) carrying out
any provision of this Chapter * * * (1) the
Administrator may require any person who
owns or operates any emission source * * *
to– * * * (D) sample such emissions (in
accordance with such procedures or
methods, at such locations, at such intervals,
during such periods and in such manner as
the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep
records on control equipment parameters,
production variables or other indirect data
when direct monitoring of emissions is
impractical * * * (G) provide such other
information as the Administrator may
reasonably require * * *
The data collected will be used to
revise the population of potentially
affected boilers and process heaters, and
update existing emission test data and
fuel analysis information. These data
will be used by the Agency to develop
the revised NESHAP for boilers and
process heaters (and potentially
incinerators) under sections 112 and
129 of the CAA. Specifically, the data
will respond in part to the two research
needs, providing the Agency with
updated information on the number of
potentially affected units, available
emission test data and fuel analysis data
to address variability. For a subset of
units that may become subject to CAA
section 129, and thus be required to
conduct stack tests, the data will be
used to complete emission data gaps.
All data collected will be added to
existing emission test databases for
boilers, process heaters, and when
appropriate, incinerators; it will also be
used to further evaluate the HAP
emissions from these sources.
This collection of information is
mandatory under section 114 of the
CAA (42 U.S.C 7414). All information
submitted to EPA pursuant to this ICR
for which a claim of confidentiality is
made is safeguarded according to
Agency policies in 40 CFR part 2,
subpart B. An agency may not conduct
or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
OMB control numbers for EPA’s
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40
CFR part 9.
The EPA would like to solicit
comments to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Dec 06, 2007
Jkt 214001
proposed collection of information,
including the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(iv) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Burden Statement: The projected cost
and hour burden for this one-time
collection of information is $19,398,000
and 125,400 hours. This burden is based
on an estimated 3,396 likely
respondents to the electronic survey
component and an estimated 350
respondents to the stack testing
component. Burden means the total
time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate,
maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency.
This includes the time needed to review
instructions; develop, acquire, install,
and utilize technology and systems for
the purposes of collecting, validating,
and verifying information, processing
and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with
any previously applicable instructions
and requirements which have
subsequently changed; train personnel
to be able to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
The ICR provides a detailed
explanation of the Agency’s estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here.
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 3,396.
Frequency of response: One time.
Estimated total average number of
responses for each respondent: 1.1
(electronic survey component and stack
testing component combined)
Estimated total annual burden hours:
125,400.
Estimated total annual costs:
$19,398,000. This includes an estimated
burden cost of $7,685,100 for the
electronic survey component and an
estimated cost of $11,712,800 for the
stack testing component.
What is the Next Step in the Process for
This ICR?
EPA will consider the comments
received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will
then be submitted to OMB for review
and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69215
1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of the ICR to
OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB. If you
have any questions about this ICR or the
approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: November 30, 2007.
Frederick Thompson,
Acting Director, Sector Policies and Programs
Division.
[FR Doc. E7–23845 Filed 12–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6693–8]
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7167. An explanation of the
ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published
in FR dated April 6, 2007 (72 FR 17156).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20070401, ERP No. D–GSA–
D80032–DC, Department of Homeland
Security Headquarters at the St.
Elizabeths West Campus, To
Consolidate Federal Office Space on a
Secure Site, Washington, DC.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about impacts
to vegetation, historic woodlands, and
the cultural landscape, soil
contamination, and surface and
groundwater. EPA also expressed
concern about transportation and
environmental justice issues. Rating
EC2.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20070408, ERP No. F–AFS–
J61107–ND, NE McKenzie Allotment
Management Plan Revisions, Proposes
to Continue Livestock Grazing on 28
Allotments, Dakota Prairie Grasslands
Land and Resource Management Plan,
Dakota Prairie Grasslands, McKenzie
Ranger District, McKenzie County,
ND.
Summary: The final EIS addressed
EPA’s concerns about impacts to water
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 235 (Friday, December 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69213-69215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23845]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058; FRL-8503-4]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Information Request for National Emission Standards
for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process
Heaters; EPA ICR No. 2286.01
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this action announces that EPA is planning to
submit a request for a new Information Collection Request (ICR) to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Before submitting the ICR to OMB
for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific aspects
of the proposed information collection as described below.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 5, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2002-0058, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
Fax: (202) 566-1741.
Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Hand Delivery: Air and Radiation Docket and Information
Center, U.S. EPA, Room 3334, EPA West Building, 1301 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Such deliveries are only accepted during
the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2002-0058. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Eddinger, Energy Strategies Group,
Sector Policies and Program Division, (D243-01), Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711;
telephone number: (919) 541-5426; fax number: (919) 541-5450; e-mail
address: eddinger.jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
How Can I Access the Docket and/or Submit Comments?
EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058, which is available for online viewing at
www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Air and Radiation
Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room
is open from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is 202-566-
1744, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket is 202-
566-1742.
Use www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft collection of
information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing
of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the
public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified in this
document.
[[Page 69214]]
What Information Is EPA Particularly Interested In?
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically
solicits comments and information to enable it to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
(iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.
What Should I Consider When I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments.
1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.
What Information Collection Activity or ICR Does This Apply To?
Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
major sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) in the industrial,
commercial, and institutional boilers and process heaters source
categories. A major source is one that has the potential to emit more
than 10 tons per year (tpy) of any HAP, 25 tpy for the total of all
HAP, or amounts exceeding any lesser quantity cutoff established
pursuant to section 112(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Title: Information Collection Effort for Facilities with Boilers
and/or Process Heaters at Major Sources of HAP Emission.
ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 2286.01.
ICR status: This ICR is for a new information collection activity.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
Abstract: The proposed ICR has two components to the information
collection. To obtain the information necessary to identify and
categorize all boilers and process heaters potentially affected by the
revised standard, the first component of this ICR will solicit
information from all potentially affected units in the format of an
electronic survey under authority of section 114 of the CAA. The survey
will be submitted to all facilities that either submitted an initial
notification, or if initial notification data is not available, all
facilities with Title V permits denoted as a major source of HAP, that
have a boiler or process heater listed in their permit.
The second component will consist of requiring, if deemed
necessary, again through the issuance of a letter pursuant to the
authority of section 114 of the CAA, the owners/operators of up to a
total of 350 boilers or process heaters selected at random to conduct
in accordance with an EPA-approved protocol stack testing.
The EPA estimates the cost of the electronic survey component of
the information collection will be 95,832 hours and $7,685,102. The
total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden for the stack testing
component of the data gathering effort is estimated to be no more than
29,584 hours and $11,712,769.
Industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers and process
heaters were listed as a major source category of HAP on July 16, 1992
(57 FR 31576). Section 112(c)(2) of the CAA requires that we establish
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for
control of HAP from both existing and new major sources, based upon the
criteria set out in the CAA section 112(d). The CAA requires the NESHAP
to reflect the maximum degree of reduction in emissions of HAP that is
achievable, taking into consideration the cost of achieving the
emission reduction, any non-air quality health and environmental
impacts, and energy requirements. This level of control is commonly
referred to as the maximum achievable control technology (MACT). The
minimum control level allowed for NESHAP (the minimum level of
stringency for MACT) is the ``MACT floor,'' as defined under section
112(d)(3) of the CAA. The MACT floor for existing sources is the
emission limitation achieved by the average of the best-performing 12
percent of existing sources for categories and subcategories. For new
sources, the MACT floor cannot be less stringent than the emission
control achieved in practice by the best-controlled similar source.
The NESHAP for boilers and process heaters were promulgated at 40
CFR part 63, subpart DDDDD, on September 2004 (see 69 FR 55218), and
vacated by the Courts on June 8, 2007. The vacature requires the Agency
to revise the standards and the associated MACT floors based on new
estimates of potentially affected units.
The previous rulemaking was based upon data gathered for the
Industrial Combustion Coordinated Rulemaking, complimented by
additional survey data received from non-fossil boiler and process
heaters. These data sources are over 10 years old. When the Agency
recently compared these data to facilities submitting initial
notifications to comply with the vacated standard, a large disparity
was identified in the number of potentially affected units at major
sources of HAP. Since the last boiler and process heater data gathering
effort, many sources have shut down, others have selected to operate
with a limit on their HAP emissions in order to avoid being subject to
the Boiler and Process Heater NESHAP, and some units have switched out
older solid fuel units for newer equipment due to increased insurance
and maintenance costs. Therefore, the Agency has concluded that
obtaining updated information will be crucial to informing its decision
on the revised NESHAP for boilers and process heaters.
[[Page 69215]]
The information in both components of this ICR will be collected
under authority of section 114 of the CAA. Section 114(a) states, in
pertinent part:
For the purpose * * * (iii) carrying out any provision of this
Chapter * * * (1) the Administrator may require any person who owns
or operates any emission source * * * to- * * * (D) sample such
emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such
locations, at such intervals, during such periods and in such manner
as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control
equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data
when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical * * * (G) provide
such other information as the Administrator may reasonably require *
* *
The data collected will be used to revise the population of
potentially affected boilers and process heaters, and update existing
emission test data and fuel analysis information. These data will be
used by the Agency to develop the revised NESHAP for boilers and
process heaters (and potentially incinerators) under sections 112 and
129 of the CAA. Specifically, the data will respond in part to the two
research needs, providing the Agency with updated information on the
number of potentially affected units, available emission test data and
fuel analysis data to address variability. For a subset of units that
may become subject to CAA section 129, and thus be required to conduct
stack tests, the data will be used to complete emission data gaps. All
data collected will be added to existing emission test databases for
boilers, process heaters, and when appropriate, incinerators; it will
also be used to further evaluate the HAP emissions from these sources.
This collection of information is mandatory under section 114 of
the CAA (42 U.S.C 7414). All information submitted to EPA pursuant to
this ICR for which a claim of confidentiality is made is safeguarded
according to Agency policies in 40 CFR part 2, subpart B. An agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are
listed in 40 CFR part 9.
The EPA would like to solicit comments to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the methodology
and assumptions used;
(iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
(iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Burden Statement: The projected cost and hour burden for this one-
time collection of information is $19,398,000 and 125,400 hours. This
burden is based on an estimated 3,396 likely respondents to the
electronic survey component and an estimated 350 respondents to the
stack testing component. Burden means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here.
Estimated total number of potential respondents: 3,396.
Frequency of response: One time.
Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:
1.1 (electronic survey component and stack testing component combined)
Estimated total annual burden hours: 125,400.
Estimated total annual costs: $19,398,000. This includes an
estimated burden cost of $7,685,100 for the electronic survey component
and an estimated cost of $11,712,800 for the stack testing component.
What is the Next Step in the Process for This ICR?
EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will
issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any
questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: November 30, 2007.
Frederick Thompson,
Acting Director, Sector Policies and Programs Division.
[FR Doc. E7-23845 Filed 12-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P