Notice of Availability of Eastern San Diego County Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement, California, 69226-69227 [E7-23771]
Download as PDF
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
69226
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2007 / Notices
adopts as operational requirements for
permitted activities. The ROPs were
developed to ensure that Alaska
Statewide Land Health Standards are
met.
As required by 43 CFR 1610.7–2,
areas with potential for designation as
ACECs were considered during the Bay
planning process. The preferred
alternative recommends the designation
of one ACEC, known as the Carter Spit
ACEC. Final acreage for the proposed
36,220-acre Carter Spit ACEC will
depend on the result of land conveyance
to the State of Alaska and Native
corporations. This ACEC is proposed to
provide additional protections for
Steller’s eiders (Polysticta stelleri), a
federally-listed migratory bird species,
and coastal salt-marsh habitat in the
Goodnews Bay area. Use limitations
within the boundary of the ACEC
include:
• Limited OHV (off-highway vehicle)
designation.
• Avoidance Area for rights-of-ways.
• Open to fluid mineral leasing
subject to special stipulations.
• Open to locatable mineral entry
subject to required operating
procedures.
• Closed to salable mineral activities.
All comments received on the plan
were analyzed and evaluated.
Substantive comments and the BLM’s
responses to those comments can be
found in the appendices of the Proposed
RMP/Final EIS. Comments on the Draft
RMP/EIS received from the public and
BLM review comments were
incorporated into the Proposed RMP/
Final EIS. Public comments resulted in
changes to the preferred alternative
through the addition of clarifying text
and additional analysis of impacts, and
contributed to the adjustment of the
boundary of the proposed Carter Spit
ACEC. A summary of these changes
follows the Executive Summary of the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS.
Copies of the Bay Proposed RMP/
Final EIS have been sent to affected
federal, state, and local government
agencies and to interested parties. The
document is available for public
inspection at the BLM Anchorage Field
Office, 6881 Abbott Loop Road,
Anchorage, AK, during normal business
hours from 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays.
Interested persons may also view the
document on the Internet at https://
www.blm.gov/ak, or at one of the
following locations in Alaska: BLM
Alaska State Office (Anchorage), Alaska
Resources Library and Information
Services (University of Alaska
Anchorage), Z.J. Loussac Library
(Anchorage), Dillingham Public Library,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Dec 06, 2007
Jkt 214001
Naknek Public Library, Homer Public
Library, City of Goodnews Bay, City of
New Stuyahok, City of Quinhagak, and
Lake and Peninsula Borough Planning
Department (King Salmon).
Additional Protest Information: Emailed and faxed protests will not be
accepted as valid protests unless the
protesting party also provides a copy of
the original letter postmarked by the
close of the protest period. Under these
conditions, the BLM will consider the emailed or faxed protest as an advance
copy and it will receive full
consideration. Please direct faxed
protests to the attention of the BLM
protest coordinator at (202) 452–5112,
and e-mails to Brenda_HudgensWilliams@blm.gov. All protests,
including the follow up letter (if faxing
or e-mailing), must be in writing and
mailed to one of the following
addresses:
Regular Mail: Director (210), Attn:
Brenda Williams, P.O. Box 66538,
Washington, DC 20035.
Overnight Mail: Director (210), Attn:
Brenda Williams, 1620 L Street NW.,
Suite 1075, Washington, DC 20036.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
protest, you should be aware that your
entire protest—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us to withhold your
personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that
we will be able to do so.
Dated: June 7, 2007.
Gust C. Panos,
Associate State Director.
Editorial Note: This document was
received at the Office of the Federal Register
on Monday, December 3, 2007.
[FR Doc. E7–23719 Filed 12–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JA–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[CA–670–07–1610–DQ]
Notice of Availability of Eastern San
Diego County Proposed Resource
Management Plan and Final
Environmental Impact Statement,
California
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA, 43
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has prepared a
Proposed Resource Management Plan
(RMP) and Final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the Eastern San
Diego County planning area managed by
the El Centro Field Office.
DATES: BLM Planning Regulations set
forth the provisions applicable to
protests (43 CFR 1610.5–2). A person
who meets the conditions as described
in the regulations cited above, and who
wishes to file a protest, must file said
protest within 30 days of the date this
notice is published in the Federal
Register. Additional information on
protests is set forth in the Dear Reader
letter of the Eastern San Diego County
Proposed RMP and Final EIS and in the
Supplementary Information section of
this notice. To ensure compliance with
the protest regulations, please consult
BLM’s Planning Regulations at 43 CFR
1610.5–2.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Proposed
RMP/Final EIS has been sent to affected
Federal, State and local government
agencies and interested parties. The
document will be available
electronically at the following Eastern
San Diego County RMP Web site:
https://www.ca.blm.gov/elcentro. Copies
of the PRMP/FEIS will be available for
public inspection at the following
locations:
• Bureau of Land Management,
California State Office, 2800 Cottage
Way, Suite W–1834, Sacramento, CA
95825.
• Bureau of Land Management, El
Centro Field Office, 1661 S. 4th Street,
El Centro, CA 92243.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
Dreyfuss, Eastern San Diego County
RMP Team Leader, at (760) 337–4400,
Bureau of Land Management, 1661 S.
4th Street, El Centro, CA 92243;
caesdrmp@ca.blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
planning area for the Eastern San Diego
County RMP is the El Centro Field
Office’s area of management
responsibility. A total of approximately
103,000 acres of public lands are
administered by the BLM in the
planning area. The decisions in the RMP
will only apply to BLM-administered
lands and mineral estate in the planning
area. The Eastern San Diego County
Proposed RMP and Final EIS have been
developed through collaborative
planning and consider four alternatives.
Primary issues include: renewable
energy, sensitive natural and cultural
resources, livestock grazing, energy and
mineral development, visual resources,
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2007 / Notices
and motorized vehicle route
designations. The Proposed RMP/FEIS
includes consideration of the
designation of Areas of Critical
Environmental Concern (ACECs). The
proposed plan includes retaining all or
portions of the following existing
ACECs: In-Ko-Pah ACEC—(currently
22,186 acres); Table Mountain ACEC—
(currently 4,293 acres). In the Proposed
RMP/FEIS, the In-Ko-Pah ACEC would
be reduced in the north and east to
avoid overlap with designated
wilderness and wilderness study areas,
and expanded in the south and west to
include critical habitat for Peninsular
Bighorn Sheep. Use of public lands
within these ACECs would vary,
depending on the resources and/or
values identified but would likely
include limitations on OHV use and
livestock grazing.
Comments on the Eastern San Diego
County Draft RMP/EIS received from the
public and internal BLM review
comments were incorporated into the
Proposed RMP. Public comments
resulted in corrections, clarifying text,
and the addition of new data used in the
analysis of impacts. The Proposed
Eastern San Diego County RMP would
provide comprehensive, long-range
decisions for the use and management
of resources in the planning area
administered by the BLM and focus on
the principles of multiple use and
sustained yield.
As noted above, instructions for filing
a protest with the Director of the BLM
regarding the Proposed RMP and Final
EIS are described in 43 CFR 1610.5–2.
E-mailed and faxed protests will not be
accepted as valid protests unless the
protesting party also provides the
original letter by regular or overnight
mail postmarked by the close of the
protest period. Under these conditions,
BLM will consider the e-mailed or faxed
protest as an advance copy and it will
receive full consideration. If you wish to
provide BLM with such advance
notification, please direct faxed protests
to the attention of the BLM protest
coordinator at (202) 452–5112, and emails to Brenda_HudgensWilliams@blm.gov.
All protests, including the follow-up
letter (if e-mailing or faxing) must be in
writing and mailed to one of the
following addresses:
Regular Mail:
Director (210)
Attention: Brenda Williams
P.O. Box 66538
Washington, DC 20035
Overnight Mail:
Director (210)
Attention: Brenda Williams
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:08 Dec 06, 2007
Jkt 214001
1620 L Street, NW., Suite 1075
Washington, DC 20036
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
protest, you should be aware that your
entire protest—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your protest to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: November 19, 2007.
Vicki L. Wood,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. E7–23771 Filed 12–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–40–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–600 ]
In the Matter of Certain Rechargeable
Lithium-Ion Batteries, Components
Thereof, and Products Containing
Same; Notice of Commission Decision
Not To Review an Initial Determination
Terminating From the Investigation the
Last Remaining Respondents Hitachi
Koki USA and CDW Corp.; Termination
of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) (Order No. 19) in the abovecaptioned investigation terminating this
investigation, as to the last remaining
respondents, Hitachi Koki USA
(‘‘Hitachi’’) and CDW Corp. (‘‘CDW’’).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
M. Bartkowski, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5432. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69227
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
investigation was instituted on April 27,
2007, based on a complaint filed by 3M
Company and 3M Innovative Properties
Company of St. Paul, Minnesota
(collectively ‘‘3M’’). 72 FR 21,050 (April
27, 2006). The complaint, as amended
and supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain rechargeable
lithium-ion batteries, components
thereof, and products containing the
same by reason of infringement of one
or more of claims 1, 2, 13, and 15–19 of
U.S. Patent No. 6,964,828 (‘‘the ‘828
patent’’) and claims 10, 15, 16, and 22
of U.S. Patent No. 7,078,128 (‘‘the ‘128
patent’’). The amended complaint also
alleges that a domestic industry exists
with regard to the ‘828 and ‘128 patents
under 19 U.S.C. 1337 subsections (a)(2)
and (a)(3). The amended complaint
names Sony Corporation and Sony
Electronics, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Sony’’);
Lenovo Group Ltd. (Hong Kong) and
Lenovo Inc. (USA) (collectively,
‘‘Lenovo’’); CDW; Batteries Com, LLC
(‘‘Batteries Com’’); Hitachi; Matsushita
Industrial Electric Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Matsushita’’); Panasonic Corporation
of North America (‘‘Panasonic’’); Total
Micro Technologies Inc. (‘‘Total
Micro’’); and Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Sanyo’’) as the proposed respondents.
The amended complaint requests that
the Commission institute an
investigation pursuant to section 337
and, after the investigation, issue a
permanent exclusion order and cease
and desist orders. Subsequently,
respondents Sony, Lenovo, Batteries
Com, Matsushita, Panasonic, Total
Micro, and Sanyo were terminated from
the investigation. None of those
determinations were reviewed by the
Commission.
On November 9, 2007, the ALJ issued
the subject ID terminating this
investigation as to Hitachi and CDW
pursuant to Commission rule 210.21 on
the basis of settlement agreements with
the suppliers of the batteries at issue. No
petitions for review of the ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not to
review the ID.
3M filed a supplement to its motion
pursuant to Commission rule 210.16
that it does not seek a general exclusion
order. 3M also filed a declaration stating
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 235 (Friday, December 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69226-69227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23771]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[CA-670-07-1610-DQ]
Notice of Availability of Eastern San Diego County Proposed
Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement,
California
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA, 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) has prepared a Proposed Resource Management Plan
(RMP) and Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Eastern
San Diego County planning area managed by the El Centro Field Office.
DATES: BLM Planning Regulations set forth the provisions applicable to
protests (43 CFR 1610.5-2). A person who meets the conditions as
described in the regulations cited above, and who wishes to file a
protest, must file said protest within 30 days of the date this notice
is published in the Federal Register. Additional information on
protests is set forth in the Dear Reader letter of the Eastern San
Diego County Proposed RMP and Final EIS and in the Supplementary
Information section of this notice. To ensure compliance with the
protest regulations, please consult BLM's Planning Regulations at 43
CFR 1610.5-2.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS has been sent to
affected Federal, State and local government agencies and interested
parties. The document will be available electronically at the following
Eastern San Diego County RMP Web site: https://www.ca.blm.gov/elcentro.
Copies of the PRMP/FEIS will be available for public inspection at the
following locations:
Bureau of Land Management, California State Office, 2800
Cottage Way, Suite W-1834, Sacramento, CA 95825.
Bureau of Land Management, El Centro Field Office, 1661 S.
4\th\ Street, El Centro, CA 92243.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Dreyfuss, Eastern San Diego
County RMP Team Leader, at (760) 337-4400, Bureau of Land Management,
1661 S. 4\th\ Street, El Centro, CA 92243; caesdrmp@ca.blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The planning area for the Eastern San Diego
County RMP is the El Centro Field Office's area of management
responsibility. A total of approximately 103,000 acres of public lands
are administered by the BLM in the planning area. The decisions in the
RMP will only apply to BLM-administered lands and mineral estate in the
planning area. The Eastern San Diego County Proposed RMP and Final EIS
have been developed through collaborative planning and consider four
alternatives. Primary issues include: renewable energy, sensitive
natural and cultural resources, livestock grazing, energy and mineral
development, visual resources,
[[Page 69227]]
and motorized vehicle route designations. The Proposed RMP/FEIS
includes consideration of the designation of Areas of Critical
Environmental Concern (ACECs). The proposed plan includes retaining all
or portions of the following existing ACECs: In-Ko-Pah ACEC--(currently
22,186 acres); Table Mountain ACEC--(currently 4,293 acres). In the
Proposed RMP/FEIS, the In-Ko-Pah ACEC would be reduced in the north and
east to avoid overlap with designated wilderness and wilderness study
areas, and expanded in the south and west to include critical habitat
for Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. Use of public lands within these ACECs
would vary, depending on the resources and/or values identified but
would likely include limitations on OHV use and livestock grazing.
Comments on the Eastern San Diego County Draft RMP/EIS received
from the public and internal BLM review comments were incorporated into
the Proposed RMP. Public comments resulted in corrections, clarifying
text, and the addition of new data used in the analysis of impacts. The
Proposed Eastern San Diego County RMP would provide comprehensive,
long-range decisions for the use and management of resources in the
planning area administered by the BLM and focus on the principles of
multiple use and sustained yield.
As noted above, instructions for filing a protest with the Director
of the BLM regarding the Proposed RMP and Final EIS are described in 43
CFR 1610.5-2. E-mailed and faxed protests will not be accepted as valid
protests unless the protesting party also provides the original letter
by regular or overnight mail postmarked by the close of the protest
period. Under these conditions, BLM will consider the e-mailed or faxed
protest as an advance copy and it will receive full consideration. If
you wish to provide BLM with such advance notification, please direct
faxed protests to the attention of the BLM protest coordinator at (202)
452-5112, and e-mails to Brenda--Hudgens-Williams@blm.gov.
All protests, including the follow-up letter (if e-mailing or
faxing) must be in writing and mailed to one of the following
addresses:
Regular Mail:
Director (210)
Attention: Brenda Williams
P.O. Box 66538
Washington, DC 20035
Overnight Mail:
Director (210)
Attention: Brenda Williams
1620 L Street, NW., Suite 1075
Washington, DC 20036
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your protest, you should be
aware that your entire protest--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your protest to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: November 19, 2007.
Vicki L. Wood,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. E7-23771 Filed 12-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P