Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757 Series Airplanes, 68764-68766 [E7-23639]
Download as PDF
68764
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
and expertise. Membership on the
steering committee will be limited to
facilitate discussions. Priority will be
given to those applicants representing
an identified part of the aviation
community who are empowered to
speak for those interests.
Additional participation is provided
through the specialized work groups. At
this time, the FAA is considering the
establishment of work groups comprised
of subject matter experts in the
following subject areas:
—14 CFR Part 25; Airplane Certification
Takeoff and Landing Performance
—14 CFR Part 23; Airplane Certification
Takeoff and Landing Performance
—14 CFR Part 121; Operations and
training associated with takeoff and
landing performance
—14 CFR Parts 135, 125, and 91 Subpart
K; Operations and training associated
with takeoff and landing performance
—14 CFR 139; Airport Certification and
Operations
—Current and new technologies for
reporting and disseminating aircraft
stopping capabilities on contaminated
runways
—Other work groups may be established
if required.
All non-government representatives
serve without government
compensation and bear all costs related
to their participation on the steering
committee or work groups. Members
and participants should be available to
attend all scheduled committee or work
group meetings for the duration of the
review. Make your request to participate
on the steering committee or specialized
work groups in writing on or before
January 7, 2008. If wishing to participate
on the Takeoff/Landing Performance
Assessment Aviation Rulemaking
Committee or its workgroups, please
provide the following information
(preferably by e-mail):
Name:
Title:
Segment(s) of the industry or
organization /association you represent:
Organization Representing:
Address:
E-mail address:
Telephone contact information:
Specific area(s) of the committee in which
you are interested in participating:
Description of your education, technical
background, and/or work experience in the
area of the committee in which you would
like to participate:
Number of hours you will be available to
participate in committee work per month in
the first 90 days of the committee; in the first
year; and beyond the first year, if necessary;
and
Number of days per month that you are
available and have the financial capability to
travel for committee activities.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 05, 2007
Jkt 214001
The FAA will notify all selected
members and participants in writing in
advance of the first meeting.
Comments. As noted above, persons
wishing to comment on this subject may
do so until February 4, 2008. In order
to provide information to the
committee, the FAA requests that
commenters be timely in their
comments.
Commenters should be as specific as
possible and provide as much detail in
comments as necessary to facilitate
regulatory decision making. Comments
should address the specific section of
the regulation at issue, a detailed
explanation of what needs to be
changed and why, and the proposed
regulatory change. Information on costs
and benefits of the proposed change are
particularly helpful.
Comments provided in response to
this notice will assist the FAA and
committee in their review and
deliberation.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E7–23740 Filed 12–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
proposing this AD to prevent
improperly sealed fasteners in the main
and center fuel tanks from becoming an
ignition source, in the event of a fault
current, which could result in a fuel
tank explosion and consequent loss of
the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Examining the AD Docket
Federal Aviation Administration
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy
Coyle, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion
Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6497;
fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0289; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–208–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 757 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 757 series
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require sealing the fasteners on the front
and rear spars inside the left and right
main fuel tanks and on the lower panel
of the center fuel tank. This proposed
AD would also require inspections of
the wire bundle support installations to
verify if certain clamps are installed and
if Teflon sleeving covers the wire
bundles inside the left and right
equipment cooling system bays, on the
left and right rear spars, and on the left
and right front spars; and corrective
actions if necessary. This proposed AD
results from a fuel system review
conducted by the manufacturer. We are
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2007–0289; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–208–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM
06DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The FAA has examined the
underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large
transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the
service history of airplanes subject to
those regulations, and existing
maintenance practices for fuel tank
systems. As a result of those findings,
we issued a regulation titled ‘‘Transport
Airplane Fuel Tank System Design
Review, Flammability Reduction and
Maintenance and Inspection
Requirements’’ (66 FR 23086, May 7,
2001). In addition to new airworthiness
standards for transport airplanes and
new maintenance requirements, this
rule included Special Federal Aviation
Regulation No. 88 (‘‘SFAR 88,’’
Amendment 21–78, and subsequent
Amendments 21–82 and 21–83).
Among other actions, SFAR 88
requires certain type design (i.e., type
certificate (TC) and supplemental type
certificate (STC)) holders to substantiate
that their fuel tank systems can prevent
ignition sources in the fuel tanks. This
requirement applies to type design
holders for large turbine-powered
transport airplanes and for subsequent
modifications to those airplanes. It
requires them to perform design reviews
and to develop design changes and
maintenance procedures if their designs
do not meet the new fuel tank safety
standards. As explained in the preamble
to the rule, we intended to adopt
airworthiness directives to mandate any
changes found necessary to address
unsafe conditions identified as a result
of these reviews.
In evaluating these design reviews, we
have established four criteria intended
to define the unsafe conditions
associated with fuel tank systems that
require corrective actions. The
percentage of operating time during
which fuel tanks are exposed to
flammable conditions is one of these
criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation:
Single failures, single failures in
combination with a latent condition(s),
and in-service failure experience. For all
four criteria, the evaluations included
consideration of previous actions taken
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 05, 2007
Jkt 214001
that may mitigate the need for further
action.
We have determined that the actions
identified in this proposed AD are
necessary to reduce the potential of
ignition sources inside fuel tanks,
which, in combination with flammable
fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank
explosions and consequent loss of the
airplane.
Boeing has found that it is possible for
some fuel tank fasteners, in the event of
a fault current, to become an ignition
source on Boeing Model 757 series
airplanes. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the
airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 757–57A0064, dated
July 16, 2007. The service bulletin
describes procedures for sealing the
fasteners on the front and rear spars
inside the left and right main fuel tanks
and sealing the fasteners on the lower
panel of the center fuel tank. The
service bulletin also describes
procedures for doing general visual
inspections of the wire bundle support
installations to verify if certain full
cushion clamps are installed and to
confirm if the wire bundles are covered
in Teflon sleeving at the following
locations: Inside the left and right
equipment cooling system bays, on the
left and right rear spars, and on the left
and right front spars. The service
bulletin also describes procedures for
doing corrective actions if necessary,
which include replacing any incorrect
clamps with certain full cushion clamps
and installing any missing Teflon
sleeving. Accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information is
intended to adequately address the
unsafe condition.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of this same
type design. For this reason, we are
proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously, except as discussed under
‘‘Difference between the Proposed AD
and Service Bulletin.’’
Difference Between the Proposed AD
and Service Bulletin
The compliance table in paragraph
1.E. of the service bulletin recommends
accomplishing the corrective actions
(clamp replacement and installation of
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68765
Teflon sleeving) within 5 years of the
date on the service bulletin. This AD,
however, would require accomplishing
the corrective actions, if necessary,
before further flight after accomplishing
the inspections. We have coordinated
this difference with Boeing.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 1,049 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
This proposed AD would affect about
539 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
proposed actions would take up to 545
work hours per airplane depending on
the airplane configuration, at an average
labor rate of $80 per work hour.
Required parts would cost about $325
per airplane. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the proposed AD for
U.S. operators is up to $23,675,575, or
up to $43,925 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM
06DEP1
68766
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 23, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–23639 Filed 12–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
[Amended]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Federal Aviation Administration
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2007–0289;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–208–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by January 22, 2008.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a fuel system
review conducted by the manufacturer. We
are issuing this AD to prevent improperly
sealed fasteners in the main and center fuel
tanks from becoming an ignition source, in
the event of a fault current, which could
result in a fuel tank explosion and
consequent loss of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Fastener Sealing and Inspections
(f) Within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD, seal the applicable fasteners
and do the general visual inspections of the
wire bundle support installations, and do all
the applicable corrective actions before
further flight, by accomplishing all of the
applicable actions specified in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
18:18 Dec 05, 2007
Jkt 214001
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0284; Directorate
Identifier 2004–SW–06–AD]
Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky
Aircraft Corporation Model S–61A, S–
61D, S–61E, and S–61V Helicopters
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 757–
200, –200CB, –200PF, and –300 series
airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757–57A0064, dated July 16, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14 CFR Part 39
RIN 2120–AA64
Affected ADs
(b) None.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Service Bulletin 757–57A0064, dated July 16,
2007.
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document proposes
adopting a new airworthiness directive
(AD) for the specified Sikorsky Aircraft
Corporation (Sikorsky) model
helicopters. The AD would require
installing an electric chip detector on
each engine and an on-board chip
detector annunciation system. The AD
would also require revising the
Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) to add
procedures for crew response to the
illumination of an on-board chip
detector warning light. This AD would
also require testing the engine chip
detector system at specified intervals.
This proposal is prompted by reports of
Number 5 engine bearing failures.
Failure of the bearing resulted in erratic
movement of the high-speed, engine-totransmission shaft (shaft), an oil leak, an
in-flight fire, and an emergency landing.
The actions specified by the proposed
AD are intended to detect an impending
bearing failure, which if undetected and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
not addressed by appropriate crew
action may result in an oil leak, a
severed shaft housing, an uncontained
in-flight fire, and a subsequent
emergency landing.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 4, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this proposed AD from
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Attn:
Manager, Commercial Technical
Support, mailstop s581a, 6900 Main
Street, Stratford, Connecticut, phone
(203) 383–4866, e-mail address
tsslibrary@sikorsky.com.
You may examine the comments to
this proposed AD in the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk
Gustafson, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Boston Aircraft Certification Office,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803, telephone (781)
238–7190, fax (781) 238–7170.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any written
data, views, or arguments regarding this
proposed AD. Send your comments to
the address listed under the caption
ADDRESSES. Include the docket number
‘‘FAA–2007–0284, Directorate Identifier
2004–SW–06–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM
06DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 234 (Thursday, December 6, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68764-68766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23639]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-0289; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-208-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Boeing Model 757 series airplanes. This proposed AD would
require sealing the fasteners on the front and rear spars inside the
left and right main fuel tanks and on the lower panel of the center
fuel tank. This proposed AD would also require inspections of the wire
bundle support installations to verify if certain clamps are installed
and if Teflon sleeving covers the wire bundles inside the left and
right equipment cooling system bays, on the left and right rear spars,
and on the left and right front spars; and corrective actions if
necessary. This proposed AD results from a fuel system review conducted
by the manufacturer. We are proposing this AD to prevent improperly
sealed fasteners in the main and center fuel tanks from becoming an
ignition source, in the event of a fault current, which could result in
a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 22,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy Coyle, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 917-6497; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-0289;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-208-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will
[[Page 68765]]
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes
subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for
fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a
regulation titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review,
Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements''
(66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards
for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule
included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (``SFAR 88,''
Amendment 21-78, and subsequent Amendments 21-82 and 21-83).
Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e.,
type certificate (TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders
to substantiate that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition
sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design
holders for large turbine-powered transport airplanes and for
subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to
perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance
procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety
standards. As explained in the preamble to the rule, we intended to
adopt airworthiness directives to mandate any changes found necessary
to address unsafe conditions identified as a result of these reviews.
In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four
criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel
tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of
operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable
conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation: Single failures, single failures in
combination with a latent condition(s), and in-service failure
experience. For all four criteria, the evaluations included
consideration of previous actions taken that may mitigate the need for
further action.
We have determined that the actions identified in this proposed AD
are necessary to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside fuel
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result
in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.
Boeing has found that it is possible for some fuel tank fasteners,
in the event of a fault current, to become an ignition source on Boeing
Model 757 series airplanes. This condition, if not corrected, could
result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-57A0064, dated
July 16, 2007. The service bulletin describes procedures for sealing
the fasteners on the front and rear spars inside the left and right
main fuel tanks and sealing the fasteners on the lower panel of the
center fuel tank. The service bulletin also describes procedures for
doing general visual inspections of the wire bundle support
installations to verify if certain full cushion clamps are installed
and to confirm if the wire bundles are covered in Teflon sleeving at
the following locations: Inside the left and right equipment cooling
system bays, on the left and right rear spars, and on the left and
right front spars. The service bulletin also describes procedures for
doing corrective actions if necessary, which include replacing any
incorrect clamps with certain full cushion clamps and installing any
missing Teflon sleeving. Accomplishing the actions specified in the
service information is intended to adequately address the unsafe
condition.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously, except as discussed under
``Difference between the Proposed AD and Service Bulletin.''
Difference Between the Proposed AD and Service Bulletin
The compliance table in paragraph 1.E. of the service bulletin
recommends accomplishing the corrective actions (clamp replacement and
installation of Teflon sleeving) within 5 years of the date on the
service bulletin. This AD, however, would require accomplishing the
corrective actions, if necessary, before further flight after
accomplishing the inspections. We have coordinated this difference with
Boeing.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 1,049 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 539 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The proposed actions would take up to 545 work hours per
airplane depending on the airplane configuration, at an average labor
rate of $80 per work hour. Required parts would cost about $325 per
airplane. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the proposed AD
for U.S. operators is up to $23,675,575, or up to $43,925 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities
[[Page 68766]]
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2007-0289; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
208-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by January
22, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 757-200, -200CB, -200PF, and
-300 series airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-57A0064, dated July 16, 2007.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a fuel system review conducted by the
manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to prevent improperly sealed
fasteners in the main and center fuel tanks from becoming an
ignition source, in the event of a fault current, which could result
in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Fastener Sealing and Inspections
(f) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, seal
the applicable fasteners and do the general visual inspections of
the wire bundle support installations, and do all the applicable
corrective actions before further flight, by accomplishing all of
the applicable actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-57A0064, dated July 16, 2007.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 23, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-23639 Filed 12-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P