Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 68902-68904 [E7-23607]
Download as PDF
68902
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2007 / Notices
Dated: Monday, December 4, 2007.
Steven W. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07–5976 Filed 12–4–07; 2:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–M
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
NAR Exemptive Request; OMB Control No.
3235–XXXX; SEC File No. 270–573.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for pre-approval of
an exemptive request by the National
Association of Realtors (‘‘NAR’’)
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.)
(‘‘Exchange Act’’).
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Background
NAR has requested an exemption
pursuant to Sections 15(a)(2) and 36(a)
of the Exchange Act from the brokerdealer registration requirements of
Section 15(a)(1) and the reporting and
other requirements of the Exchange Act
(other than Sections 15(b)(4) and
15(b)(6)), and the rules and regulations
thereunder, that apply to a broker or
dealer that is not registered with the
Commission. Subject to the conditions
specified in NAR’s application
(‘‘Application’’), the requested
exemption would allow any licensed
real estate agent or broker who is
predominantly engaged in and has
substantial experience in the sale of
commercial real estate (‘‘Commercial
Real Estate Professional’’) and the real
estate brokerage firm with which he or
she is licensed (‘‘Real Estate Firm’’)
(collectively, a ‘‘RE Participant’’) to
receive a real estate advisory fee (‘‘Real
Estate Advisory Fee’’) from a purchaser
of an undivided tenant-in-common
interest in real property (‘‘TIC Interest’’)
that is offered and sold together with
other arrangements that cause it to be
deemed to be a security under the
federal securities laws (‘‘TIC Security’’).
Under NAR’s exemptive request, a
Real Estate Advisory Fee could be paid
by the purchaser directly or on behalf of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:57 Dec 05, 2007
Jkt 214001
the purchaser by the sponsor or issuer
of the TIC Security, which could,
thereby, reduce the commission or other
compensation received by a registered
broker-dealer involved in the TIC
Security transaction. The Real Estate
Advisory Fee generally would be paid to
the Real Estate Firm with which the
Commercial Real Estate Professional is
licensed. The Firm would distribute all
or a previously agreed upon percentage
of the Real Estate Advisory Fee to the
Commercial Real Estate Professional
that signed a buyer’s agent agreement
with the client and to any other
Commercial Real Estate Professional or
Real Estate Firm that was added to the
agreement with the consent of the
client.
Proposed Collections of Information
The requested exemption would
contain five collections of information.
First, the requested exemption would
require a RE Participant to deliver a
copy of the executed buyer’s agent
agreement to the registered brokerdealer acting as a placement agent
(‘‘Lead Placement Agent’’). The purpose
of the first collection is to assist in
implementing the requested exemption
and monitoring for compliance with the
exemption’s conditions. The proposed
delivery requirement is designed to
ensure that the Lead Placement Agent
has a copy of the buyer’s agent
agreement in order to comply with its
recordkeeping obligations discussed
below, which would facilitate
monitoring for compliance. Without this
collection of information, the
Commission and applicable selfregulatory organization (‘‘SRO’’) would
be unable to monitor the Lead
Placement Agent’s compliance.
Second, the requested exemption
would require any Commercial Real
Estate Professional that is to receive,
directly or indirectly, a portion of a Real
Estate Advisory Fee to not be subject to
any ‘‘statutory disqualification,’’ as
defined in Section 3(a)(39) of the
Exchange Act (other than subparagraph
(E) of that section), and to deliver a
representation in writing to that effect to
the Lead Placement Agent at closing.
The purpose of the second collection is
to ensure that the Lead Placement Agent
has a copy of the statutory
disqualification representation in order
to comply with its recordkeeping
obligations, which would facilitate
monitoring for compliance with the
conditions of the requested exemption.
Without this collection of information,
the Commission and applicable SRO
would be unable to monitor the Lead
Placement Agent’s compliance.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Third, the requested exemption
would require broker-dealers that sell
the TIC Securities as participating
brokers (‘‘Selling Broker-Dealers’’) to
deliver a representation in writing that
the Selling Broker-Dealer performed a
suitability analysis to the Lead
Placement Agent at closing, or, if the
Selling Broker-Dealer is the Lead
Placement Agent, to make such a
representation in writing at closing. The
purpose of the third collection is to
ensure that the Lead Placement Agent
has a copy of the suitability analysis in
order to comply with its recordkeeping
obligations, which would facilitate
monitoring compliance with the
conditions of the requested exemption.
Without this collection of information,
the Commission and applicable SRO
would be unable to monitor the Lead
Placement Agent’s compliance and
would be unable to ensure that the
Selling Broker-Dealer had conducted an
appropriate suitability analysis.
Fourth, the requested exemption
would require a Selling Broker-Dealer
that determines that a TIC Security
transaction is not suitable to obtain a
written affirmation that the customer
wants to proceed with the TIC Security
transaction notwithstanding the Selling
Broker-Dealer’s determination. It also
would require the Selling Broker-Dealer
to deliver the written affirmation to the
Lead Placement Agent at closing or, if
the Selling Broker-Dealer is the Lead
Placement Agent, to maintain the
written affirmation consistent with the
record retention provisions of Exchange
Act Rule 17a–4. The purpose of the
fourth collection is to ensure that the
customer is informed if a Selling BrokerDealer determines a transaction is not
suitable, and, if the customer wants to
proceed with the transaction, that the
customer has made such a decision in
light of the broker-dealer’s
determination. In addition, the
proposed delivery requirement is
designed to ensure that the Lead
Placement Agent has a copy of the
customer affirmation in order to comply
with its recordkeeping obligations,
which would facilitate monitoring for
compliance with the conditions of the
requested exemption. Without this
collection of information, the
Commission and applicable SRO would
be unable to monitor the Lead
Placement Agent’s compliance and
would be unable to ensure that the
Selling Broker-Dealer had conducted a
suitability analysis and informed the
client of this determination.
Fifth, the requested exemption would
require the Lead Placement Agent to
maintain a copy of each of the
documents that is to be made and/or
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2007 / Notices
delivered at closing, as discussed above
(i.e., the buyer’s agent agreement, the
statutory disqualification
representations, the suitability
representation, and, if applicable, the
customer’s written affirmation), and the
relevant part of the real estate closing
documents that evidences the amount of
the Real Estate Advisory Fee paid to any
RE Participant involved in the TIC
Security transaction. The purpose of the
fifth collection is to facilitate monitoring
for compliance with the conditions of
the requested exemption by compelling
the Lead Placement Agent to maintain
records of all documents that are
required to be delivered at closing.
Without this collection of information,
the Commission and applicable SRO
would be unable to monitor the Lead
Placement Agent’s compliance.
Estimate of Respondent Reporting
Burden
a. Delivery of the Buyer’s Agent
Agreement to the Lead Placement Agent
The Commission estimates that
approximately 800 RE Participants
would rely on the requested exemption
and each RE Participant would on
average deliver to the Lead Placement
Agent a copy of an executed buyer’s
agent agreement 6.63 times 1 a year.
Based on these estimates, the
Commission estimates that this
requirement would result in
approximately 5,304 disclosures 2 per
year. The Commission also estimates
that a RE Participant would spend
approximately five minutes per
disclosure to the Lead Placement Agent.
Thus, the estimated total annual
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this requirement is 442 hours 3 for the
RE Participants.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
b. Delivery of Statutory Disqualification
The Commission estimates that
approximately 800 Commercial Real
Estate Professionals would rely on the
requested exemption and each
Commercial Real Estate Professional
would on average deliver the written
statutory disqualification representation
6.63 times 4 a year. Based on these
estimates, the Commission anticipates
that this requirement would result in
1 The Commission is estimating approximately
5,304 TIC Security transactions would occur under
the requested exemption. Accordingly, 5,304 TIC
Security transactions/800 RE Participants = 6.63.
For purposes of this Statement, the Commission has
rounded all of its calculations to two decimal
places.
2 6.63 × 800 = 5,304.
3 5,304 TIC Security transactions × five minutes
per transaction = 26,520/60 = 442.
4 5,304 TIC Security transactions/800 Commercial
Real Estate Professionals = 6.63.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:57 Dec 05, 2007
Jkt 214001
5,304 disclosures 5 per year. The
Commission estimates that
approximately 95 percent of
Commercial Real Estate Professionals
would spend approximately five
minutes for each representation to the
Lead Placement Agent. The Commission
also estimates that approximately five
percent of Commercial Real Estate
Professionals would spend
approximately 30 minutes for their first
representation to the Lead Placement
Agent, and five minutes for each of the
5.63 subsequent representations. Thus,
the estimated total annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden for these
requirements is 458.67 hours 6 for
Commercial Real Estate Professionals.
c. Suitability Determination by the
Selling Broker-Dealer
The Commission estimates that
approximately 150 Selling BrokerDealers would either deliver or make a
representation at closing and each
Selling Broker-Dealer would on average
deliver or make such a representation
33.59 times 7 a year. The Commission
also estimates that a Selling BrokerDealer would spend approximately five
minutes on each disclosure. Thus, the
estimated total annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden for this
requirement is 419.90 hours 8 for Selling
Broker-Dealers.
d. Customer Affirmation by the Selling
Broker-Dealer
The Commission estimates that there
are approximately 150 Selling BrokerDealers that are potential respondents,
those Selling Broker-Dealers would
obtain and then deliver or maintain a
written affirmation from 265.20
customers who are clients 9 of
Commercial Real Estate Participants a
year, and each Selling Broker-Dealer
would on average obtain and then
deliver or maintain such an affirmation
× 800 = 5,304.
× .95 × 6.63 × 5 = 25,194/60 = 419.90 total
burden hours for 95 percent of the Commercial Real
Estate Professionals. 800 × .05 × 1 × 30 = 1,200/60
= 20 hours for the first representation by five
percent of the Commercial Real Estate
Professionals. 800 × .05 × 5.63 × 5 = 1,126/60 =
18.77 hours for the second and third
representations by five percent of the Commercial
Real Estate Professionals. Thus total burden hours
would be 419.90 + 20 + 18.77 = 458.67.
7 The Commission estimates that there would be
approximately 5,304 TIC Security transactions a
year. Thus, a Selling Broker-Dealer would make or
deliver approximately ((5,304 × .95)/150) = 33.59
determinations.
8 (5,304 × .95) × five minutes per transaction =
25,194/60 = 419.90.
9 The Commission estimates that approximately
five percent of all proposed TIC Security
transactions would be determined to be not
suitable. 5,304 × .05 = 265.20.
5 6.63
6 800
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68903
1.77 10 times a year. The Commission
also estimates that a customer would
spend approximately 30 minutes on
each disclosure and the Selling BrokerDealer would spend approximately 35
minutes on each disclosure. Thus, the
estimated total annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden for this proposed
requirement is an aggregate of 132.60
hours for customers 11 and 154.70 hours
for the Selling Broker-Dealers.12
e. Recordkeeping by the Lead Placement
Agent
The Commission estimates that
approximately 45 Lead Placement
Agents would act pursuant to the
requested exemption. On average, a
Lead Placement Agent would maintain
copies of the relevant documents for
approximately 117.87 TIC Security
transactions 13 a year. The Commission
also estimates that a Lead Placement
Agent would spend 10 minutes per
closing to maintain a copy of these
documents. Thus, the estimated total
annual reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this requirement is 884
hours.14
f. Aggregated Burdens for Entering Data
into ROCIS.
For purposes of entering the above
collections into the OMB ROCIS system,
the burdens discussed above have been
summarized and aggregated as follows.
There are approximately 995 total
respondents.15 There are approximately
21 responses for each respondent.16
There are approximately 20,895 total
responses.17 Thus, there are
approximately .11 hours per response
10 The Commission estimates that there would be
approximately 5,304 TIC Security transactions
under the requested exemption. The Commission
estimates that Selling Broker-Dealers would obtain
and then deliver or maintain the customer
affirmation in five percent of all transactions under
the requested exemption. Thus, a Selling BrokerDealer would obtain approximately ((5,304 × .05)/
150) = 1.77 affirmations a year.
11 265.20 TIC Security transactions (5,304 × .05)
× 30 minutes per transaction = 7956/60 = 132.60.
12 265.20 TIC Security transactions (5,304 × .05)
× 35 minutes per transaction = 9282/60 = 154.70.
13 5,304 TIC Security transactions/45 Lead
Placement Agents = 117.87.
14 5,304 TIC Security transactions × 10 minutes =
53,040/60 = 884.
15 800 + 150 + 45 = 995.
16 20,895 (total responses)/995 (total respondents)
= 21. Although total responses should be 21,216
((800 × 6.63) + (800 × 6.63) + (150 × 33.59) + (150
× 1.77) + (45 × 117.87)), the number has been
reduced to 20,895 to ensure consistency with the
other data, specifically the 21 responses per
respondent and .11 hours per respondent, being
entered into ROCIS.
17 995 (total respondents) × 21 (responses per
respondent) = 20,895.
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
68904
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2007 / Notices
Dated: November 29, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–23607 Filed 12–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon written request, copies available
from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Extension:
Rule 425; OMB Control No. 3235–0521;
SEC File No. 270–462.
Notice is hereby given, that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for approval.
Rule 425 (17 CFR 230.425) under the
Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et
seq.) requires the filing of certain
prospectuses and communications
under Rule 135 (17 CFR 230.135) and
Rule 165 (17 CFR 230.165) in
18 2,359 (total burden hours)/20,895 (total
respondents) = 0.11.
19 20,895 (total responses) × .11 (hours per
respondent) = 2,298.45. For purposes of entering
this number into ROCIS, it has been rounded to
2,298.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:57 Dec 05, 2007
Jkt 214001
connection with business combination
transactions. The purpose of the rule is
to permit more oral and written
communications with shareholders
about tender offers, mergers and other
business combination transactions on a
more timely basis, so long as the written
communications are filed on the date of
first use. Approximately 3,700 issuers
file communications under Rule 425 at
an estimated .25 hours per response for
a total of 925 annual burden hours.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden imposed
by the collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way,
Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Regulation C (17 CFR 230.400 through
230.498) provides standard instructions
to guide persons when filing registration
statements under the Securities Act of
1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.). The
information collected is intended to
ensure the adequacy of information
available to investors in the registration
of securities. The information provided
is mandatory. Regulation C is assigned
one burden hour for administrative
convenience because it does not directly
impose information collection
requirements.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
Written comments regarding the
above information should be directed to
the following persons: (i) Desk Officer
for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102,
New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503; or send an email to
Alexander_T._Hunt@omb.eop.gov; and
(ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Office, Securities and
Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way,
Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Comments must be submitted to OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
Dated: November 29, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–23609 Filed 12–5–07; 8:45 am]
Dated: November 30, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–23641 Filed 12–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
for each respondent.18 There are
approximately 2,298 total burden hours
for all respondents.19
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
Comments should be directed to (i)
Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget,
Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or by
sending an e-mail to:
Alexander_T._Hunt@omb.eop.gov; and
(ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way,
Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-mail
to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments
must be submitted within 30 days of
this notice.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
[Release No. IC–28069]
Upon written request, copies available
from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Regulation C; OMB Control No. 3235–0074;
SEC File No. 270–68.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget the request for
extension of the previously approved
collection of information discussed
below.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of Applications for
Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940
November 30, 2007.
The following is a notice of
applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 for the month of November,
2007. A copy of each application may be
obtained for a fee at the SEC’s Public
Reference Branch (tel. 202–551–5850).
An order granting each application will
be issued unless the SEC orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing on any application by writing
to the SEC’s Secretary at the address
below and serving the relevant
applicant with a copy of the request,
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 234 (Thursday, December 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68902-68904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23607]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549-0213.
Extension:
NAR Exemptive Request; OMB Control No. 3235-XXXX; SEC File No.
270-573.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for pre-approval of an exemptive request
by the National Association of Realtors[reg] (``NAR'') pursuant to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (``Exchange
Act'').
Background
NAR has requested an exemption pursuant to Sections 15(a)(2) and
36(a) of the Exchange Act from the broker-dealer registration
requirements of Section 15(a)(1) and the reporting and other
requirements of the Exchange Act (other than Sections 15(b)(4) and
15(b)(6)), and the rules and regulations thereunder, that apply to a
broker or dealer that is not registered with the Commission. Subject to
the conditions specified in NAR's application (``Application''), the
requested exemption would allow any licensed real estate agent or
broker who is predominantly engaged in and has substantial experience
in the sale of commercial real estate (``Commercial Real Estate
Professional'') and the real estate brokerage firm with which he or she
is licensed (``Real Estate Firm'') (collectively, a ``RE Participant'')
to receive a real estate advisory fee (``Real Estate Advisory Fee'')
from a purchaser of an undivided tenant-in-common interest in real
property (``TIC Interest'') that is offered and sold together with
other arrangements that cause it to be deemed to be a security under
the federal securities laws (``TIC Security'').
Under NAR's exemptive request, a Real Estate Advisory Fee could be
paid by the purchaser directly or on behalf of the purchaser by the
sponsor or issuer of the TIC Security, which could, thereby, reduce the
commission or other compensation received by a registered broker-dealer
involved in the TIC Security transaction. The Real Estate Advisory Fee
generally would be paid to the Real Estate Firm with which the
Commercial Real Estate Professional is licensed. The Firm would
distribute all or a previously agreed upon percentage of the Real
Estate Advisory Fee to the Commercial Real Estate Professional that
signed a buyer's agent agreement with the client and to any other
Commercial Real Estate Professional or Real Estate Firm that was added
to the agreement with the consent of the client.
Proposed Collections of Information
The requested exemption would contain five collections of
information. First, the requested exemption would require a RE
Participant to deliver a copy of the executed buyer's agent agreement
to the registered broker-dealer acting as a placement agent (``Lead
Placement Agent''). The purpose of the first collection is to assist in
implementing the requested exemption and monitoring for compliance with
the exemption's conditions. The proposed delivery requirement is
designed to ensure that the Lead Placement Agent has a copy of the
buyer's agent agreement in order to comply with its recordkeeping
obligations discussed below, which would facilitate monitoring for
compliance. Without this collection of information, the Commission and
applicable self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') would be unable to
monitor the Lead Placement Agent's compliance.
Second, the requested exemption would require any Commercial Real
Estate Professional that is to receive, directly or indirectly, a
portion of a Real Estate Advisory Fee to not be subject to any
``statutory disqualification,'' as defined in Section 3(a)(39) of the
Exchange Act (other than subparagraph (E) of that section), and to
deliver a representation in writing to that effect to the Lead
Placement Agent at closing. The purpose of the second collection is to
ensure that the Lead Placement Agent has a copy of the statutory
disqualification representation in order to comply with its
recordkeeping obligations, which would facilitate monitoring for
compliance with the conditions of the requested exemption. Without this
collection of information, the Commission and applicable SRO would be
unable to monitor the Lead Placement Agent's compliance.
Third, the requested exemption would require broker-dealers that
sell the TIC Securities as participating brokers (``Selling Broker-
Dealers'') to deliver a representation in writing that the Selling
Broker-Dealer performed a suitability analysis to the Lead Placement
Agent at closing, or, if the Selling Broker-Dealer is the Lead
Placement Agent, to make such a representation in writing at closing.
The purpose of the third collection is to ensure that the Lead
Placement Agent has a copy of the suitability analysis in order to
comply with its recordkeeping obligations, which would facilitate
monitoring compliance with the conditions of the requested exemption.
Without this collection of information, the Commission and applicable
SRO would be unable to monitor the Lead Placement Agent's compliance
and would be unable to ensure that the Selling Broker-Dealer had
conducted an appropriate suitability analysis.
Fourth, the requested exemption would require a Selling Broker-
Dealer that determines that a TIC Security transaction is not suitable
to obtain a written affirmation that the customer wants to proceed with
the TIC Security transaction notwithstanding the Selling Broker-
Dealer's determination. It also would require the Selling Broker-Dealer
to deliver the written affirmation to the Lead Placement Agent at
closing or, if the Selling Broker-Dealer is the Lead Placement Agent,
to maintain the written affirmation consistent with the record
retention provisions of Exchange Act Rule 17a-4. The purpose of the
fourth collection is to ensure that the customer is informed if a
Selling Broker-Dealer determines a transaction is not suitable, and, if
the customer wants to proceed with the transaction, that the customer
has made such a decision in light of the broker-dealer's determination.
In addition, the proposed delivery requirement is designed to ensure
that the Lead Placement Agent has a copy of the customer affirmation in
order to comply with its recordkeeping obligations, which would
facilitate monitoring for compliance with the conditions of the
requested exemption. Without this collection of information, the
Commission and applicable SRO would be unable to monitor the Lead
Placement Agent's compliance and would be unable to ensure that the
Selling Broker-Dealer had conducted a suitability analysis and informed
the client of this determination.
Fifth, the requested exemption would require the Lead Placement
Agent to maintain a copy of each of the documents that is to be made
and/or
[[Page 68903]]
delivered at closing, as discussed above (i.e., the buyer's agent
agreement, the statutory disqualification representations, the
suitability representation, and, if applicable, the customer's written
affirmation), and the relevant part of the real estate closing
documents that evidences the amount of the Real Estate Advisory Fee
paid to any RE Participant involved in the TIC Security transaction.
The purpose of the fifth collection is to facilitate monitoring for
compliance with the conditions of the requested exemption by compelling
the Lead Placement Agent to maintain records of all documents that are
required to be delivered at closing. Without this collection of
information, the Commission and applicable SRO would be unable to
monitor the Lead Placement Agent's compliance.
Estimate of Respondent Reporting Burden
a. Delivery of the Buyer's Agent Agreement to the Lead Placement Agent
The Commission estimates that approximately 800 RE Participants
would rely on the requested exemption and each RE Participant would on
average deliver to the Lead Placement Agent a copy of an executed
buyer's agent agreement 6.63 times \1\ a year. Based on these
estimates, the Commission estimates that this requirement would result
in approximately 5,304 disclosures \2\ per year. The Commission also
estimates that a RE Participant would spend approximately five minutes
per disclosure to the Lead Placement Agent. Thus, the estimated total
annual reporting and recordkeeping burden for this requirement is 442
hours \3\ for the RE Participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Commission is estimating approximately 5,304 TIC
Security transactions would occur under the requested exemption.
Accordingly, 5,304 TIC Security transactions/800 RE Participants =
6.63. For purposes of this Statement, the Commission has rounded all
of its calculations to two decimal places.
\2\ 6.63 x 800 = 5,304.
\3\ 5,304 TIC Security transactions x five minutes per
transaction = 26,520/60 = 442.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Delivery of Statutory Disqualification
The Commission estimates that approximately 800 Commercial Real
Estate Professionals would rely on the requested exemption and each
Commercial Real Estate Professional would on average deliver the
written statutory disqualification representation 6.63 times \4\ a
year. Based on these estimates, the Commission anticipates that this
requirement would result in 5,304 disclosures \5\ per year. The
Commission estimates that approximately 95 percent of Commercial Real
Estate Professionals would spend approximately five minutes for each
representation to the Lead Placement Agent. The Commission also
estimates that approximately five percent of Commercial Real Estate
Professionals would spend approximately 30 minutes for their first
representation to the Lead Placement Agent, and five minutes for each
of the 5.63 subsequent representations. Thus, the estimated total
annual reporting and recordkeeping burden for these requirements is
458.67 hours \6\ for Commercial Real Estate Professionals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 5,304 TIC Security transactions/800 Commercial Real Estate
Professionals = 6.63.
\5\ 6.63 x 800 = 5,304.
\6\ 800 x .95 x 6.63 x 5 = 25,194/60 = 419.90 total burden hours
for 95 percent of the Commercial Real Estate Professionals. 800 x
.05 x 1 x 30 = 1,200/60 = 20 hours for the first representation by
five percent of the Commercial Real Estate Professionals. 800 x .05
x 5.63 x 5 = 1,126/60 = 18.77 hours for the second and third
representations by five percent of the Commercial Real Estate
Professionals. Thus total burden hours would be 419.90 + 20 + 18.77
= 458.67.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
c. Suitability Determination by the Selling Broker-Dealer
The Commission estimates that approximately 150 Selling Broker-
Dealers would either deliver or make a representation at closing and
each Selling Broker-Dealer would on average deliver or make such a
representation 33.59 times \7\ a year. The Commission also estimates
that a Selling Broker-Dealer would spend approximately five minutes on
each disclosure. Thus, the estimated total annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden for this requirement is 419.90 hours \8\ for
Selling Broker-Dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Commission estimates that there would be approximately
5,304 TIC Security transactions a year. Thus, a Selling Broker-
Dealer would make or deliver approximately ((5,304 x .95)/150) =
33.59 determinations.
\8\ (5,304 x .95) x five minutes per transaction = 25,194/60 =
419.90.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
d. Customer Affirmation by the Selling Broker-Dealer
The Commission estimates that there are approximately 150 Selling
Broker-Dealers that are potential respondents, those Selling Broker-
Dealers would obtain and then deliver or maintain a written affirmation
from 265.20 customers who are clients \9\ of Commercial Real Estate
Participants a year, and each Selling Broker-Dealer would on average
obtain and then deliver or maintain such an affirmation 1.77 \10\ times
a year. The Commission also estimates that a customer would spend
approximately 30 minutes on each disclosure and the Selling Broker-
Dealer would spend approximately 35 minutes on each disclosure. Thus,
the estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden for this
proposed requirement is an aggregate of 132.60 hours for customers \11\
and 154.70 hours for the Selling Broker-Dealers.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The Commission estimates that approximately five percent of
all proposed TIC Security transactions would be determined to be not
suitable. 5,304 x .05 = 265.20.
\10\ The Commission estimates that there would be approximately
5,304 TIC Security transactions under the requested exemption. The
Commission estimates that Selling Broker-Dealers would obtain and
then deliver or maintain the customer affirmation in five percent of
all transactions under the requested exemption. Thus, a Selling
Broker-Dealer would obtain approximately ((5,304 x .05)/150) = 1.77
affirmations a year.
\11\ 265.20 TIC Security transactions (5,304 x .05) x 30 minutes
per transaction = 7956/60 = 132.60.
\12\ 265.20 TIC Security transactions (5,304 x .05) x 35 minutes
per transaction = 9282/60 = 154.70.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
e. Recordkeeping by the Lead Placement Agent
The Commission estimates that approximately 45 Lead Placement
Agents would act pursuant to the requested exemption. On average, a
Lead Placement Agent would maintain copies of the relevant documents
for approximately 117.87 TIC Security transactions \13\ a year. The
Commission also estimates that a Lead Placement Agent would spend 10
minutes per closing to maintain a copy of these documents. Thus, the
estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden for this
requirement is 884 hours.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 5,304 TIC Security transactions/45 Lead Placement Agents =
117.87.
\14\ 5,304 TIC Security transactions x 10 minutes = 53,040/60 =
884.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
f. Aggregated Burdens for Entering Data into ROCIS.
For purposes of entering the above collections into the OMB ROCIS
system, the burdens discussed above have been summarized and aggregated
as follows. There are approximately 995 total respondents.\15\ There
are approximately 21 responses for each respondent.\16\ There are
approximately 20,895 total responses.\17\ Thus, there are approximately
.11 hours per response
[[Page 68904]]
for each respondent.\18\ There are approximately 2,298 total burden
hours for all respondents.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 800 + 150 + 45 = 995.
\16\ 20,895 (total responses)/995 (total respondents) = 21.
Although total responses should be 21,216 ((800 x 6.63) + (800 x
6.63) + (150 x 33.59) + (150 x 1.77) + (45 x 117.87)), the number
has been reduced to 20,895 to ensure consistency with the other
data, specifically the 21 responses per respondent and .11 hours per
respondent, being entered into ROCIS.
\17\ 995 (total respondents) x 21 (responses per respondent) =
20,895.
\18\ 2,359 (total burden hours)/20,895 (total respondents) =
0.11.
\19\ 20,895 (total responses) x .11 (hours per respondent) =
2,298.45. For purposes of entering this number into ROCIS, it has
been rounded to 2,298.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
Comments should be directed to (i) Desk Officer for the Securities
and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an e-mail to: Alexander--
T.--Hunt@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-
mail to: PRA--Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must be submitted within 30
days of this notice.
Dated: November 29, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-23607 Filed 12-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P