Information Collection; Request for Public Comments, 68608-68609 [E7-23540]

Download as PDF 68608 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Notices North, Public File Area O–1F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, or 301–415–4737, or send an e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of August 2007. For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Richard V. Guzman, Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch I–1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES References 1. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (PA). 25 Pa. Code § 93.7 Specific water quality criteria. Accessed at http://www.pacode.com/ secure/data/025/chapter93/025_0093.pdf on March 19, 2007. (ML070780679) 2. Ecology III, Inc. (Ecology III). Environmental Studies in the Vicinity of the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, 2002— Water Quality and Fishes. Berwick, PA. (ML071040042) 3. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR). Wild Resource Conservation Program, Regal Fritillary. Accessed at: http:// www.dcnr.state.pa.us/wrcf/regal.aspx on April 12, 2007. (ML071040022) 4. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Pennyslvania’s Environment Facility Application Compliance Tracking System. Accessed at: http://www.dep.state.pa.us/ efacts/default.asp on March 20, 2007. (ML071040025) 5. Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (FBC). Endangered and Threatened Species of Pennsylvania—Bog Turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii. Accessed at: http://sites.state. pa.us/PA_Exec/Fish_Boat/etspecis.htm on April 12, 2007. (ML071040032) 6. Pennsylvania Game Commission (PGC). Endangered Species. Accessed at: http:// www.pgc.state.pa.us/pgc/cwp/view.asp?a =458&q=150321 on April 12, 2007. (ML071040030) 7. PPL Electric Utilities Corporation (PPL). Specification For Initial Clearing and Control Maintenance Of Vegetation On Or Adjacent To Electric Line Right-of-Way Through Use Of Herbicides, Mechanical, And Handclearing Techniques. Allentown, Pennsylvania. (ML071040030) 8. PPL Susquehanna, LLC (PPL). Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Proposed License Amendment Numbers 285 For Unit 1 Operating License No. NPF–14 and 253 For Unit 2 Operating License No. NPF–22 Constant Pressure Power Uprate VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:05 Dec 04, 2007 Jkt 214001 PLA–6076. Allentown, Pennsylvania. (ML062900160) 9. PPL Susquehanna, LLC (PPL). Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Proposed License Amendment Numbers 285 For Unit 1 Operating License No. NPF–14 and 253 For Unit 2 Operating License No. NPF–22 Constant Power Uprate PLA–6076, Attachment 3, Supplemental Environmental Report. Allentown, Pennsylvania. (ML062900161) 10. PPL Susquehanna, LLC (PPL). Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Units 1 and 2 License Renewal Application, Appendix E Applicant’s Environmental Report—Operating Stage. Allentown, Pennsylvania. (ML062630235) 11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Envirofacts Warehouse—Facility Registration System—Facility Detail Report. Accessed at: http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_ query_dtl.disp_program_facility?pgm_sys_id in=PAD000765883&pgm_sys_acrnm _in=RCRAINFO on March 23, 2007. (ML071040026) 12. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ‘‘Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, Docket No. 50–388, Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Unit 2, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania.’’ Federal Register, Vol. 59, No. 53, pp. 12990–12992. Washington, DC (April 28, 1994). (ML071040017) 13. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ‘‘Pennsylvania Power & Light Co., Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc., Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Unit 1; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact.’’ Federal Register, Vol. 60, No. 9, pp. 3278–3280. Washington, DC (January 13, 1995). (ML071040020) 14. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ‘‘PPL Susquehanna, LLC; Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact.’’ Federal Register, Vol. 66, No. 122, pp. 33716–33717. Washington, DC (June 25, 2001). (ML071040021) 15. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. E-mail from J. Fields, PPL Susquehanna, LLC, Allentown, Pennsylvania, to A. Mullins, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, Maryland. Subject: ‘‘Application to Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC).’’ January 8, 2007. (ML070320756) 16. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Letter from R. Bowen, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, to A. Mullins, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, Maryland. Subject: ‘‘Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory Review, PNDI Number 19031.’’ January 8, 2007. (ML070190672) [FR Doc. E7–23537 Filed 12–4–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Information Collection; Request for Public Comments Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) invites the general public and Federal agencies to comment on a renewal of an information collection with revisions that would affect two types of entities: (1) The reports of auditors to auditees concerning audit results, audit findings, and questioned costs, and (2) reports from auditees to the Federal Government providing information about the auditees, the awards they administer, and the audit results. These collection efforts are required by the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (31 U.S.C. 7501, et seq.) and OMB Circular A–133, ‘‘Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.’’ Included as part of this information collection is the Data Collection Form (SF–SAC). The changes being proposed are to modify the data elements collected on the SF–SAC to update the internal control terminology and related definitions used in OMB Circular A– 133, ‘‘Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations,’’ the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Government Accountability Office. The current Form SF–SAC is being used for audit periods ending in 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007. A revised Form SF–SAC will be used for audit periods ending in 2008, 2009, and 2010. Additionally, OMB is interested in receiving comments on the requirement to submit the Data Collection Form (SF– SAC) and the single audit reporting packages electronically. Currently, more than 87% of the SF–SAC are filed electronically. Electronic submission would streamline the submission process, reduce the administrative burden and satisfy the Bureau of Census to fully comply with the Government Paperwork Elimination Act (Pub. L. 105–277). DATES: Submit comments on or before February 4, 2008. Late comments will be considered to the extent practicable. ADDRESSES: Due to potential delays in OMB’s receipt and processing of mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, we E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM 05DEN1 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Notices encourage respondents to submit comments electronically to ensure timely receipt. We cannot guarantee that comments mailed will be received before the comment closing date. Electronic mail comments may be submitted to: Gilbert Tran at hailm.ltran@omb.eop.gov. Please include ‘‘Form SF–SAC Comments’’ in the subject line and the full body of your comments in the text of the electronic message and not as an attachment. Please include your name, title, organization, postal address, telephone number, and e-mail address in the text of the message. Comments may also be submitted via facsimile to 202–395–3952. Comments may be mailed to Gilbert Tran, Office of Federal Financial Management, Office of Management and Budget, Room 6025, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. Comments: All responses will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will also be a matter of public record. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gilbert Tran, Office of Federal Financial Management, Office of Management and Budget, (202) 395–3052. The proposed revisions to the Information Collection Form, Form SF–SAC can be obtained by contacting the Office of Federal Financial Management as indicated above or by download from the OMB Grants Management home page on the Internet at http://www.whitehouse.gov/ OMB/grants/grants_docs.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control No.: 0348–0057. Title: Data Collection Form. Form No: SF–SAC. Type of Review: Reinstatement with change. Respondents: States, local governments, non-profit organizations (Non-Federal entities) and their auditors. Estimated Number of Respondents: 72,000 (36,000 from auditors and 36,000 from auditees). The respondents’ information is collected by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (maintained by the U.S. Bureau of the Census). Estimated Time per Respondent: 59 hours for each of 400 large respondents and 17 hours for each of 71,600 small respondents for estimated annual burden hours of 1,240,800. Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1. Frequency of Response: Annually. Needs and Uses: Reports from auditors to auditees and reports from auditees to the Federal government are used by non-Federal entities, passthrough entities, and Federal agencies to VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:05 Dec 04, 2007 Jkt 214001 ensure that Federal awards are expended in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) (maintained by the U.S. Bureau of the Census) uses the information on the SF–SAC to ensure proper distribution of audit reports to Federal agencies and identify nonFederal entities who have not filed the required reports. The FAC also uses the information on the SF–SAC to create a government-wide database which contains information on audit results. This database is publicly accessible on the Internet at http:// harvester.census.gov/sac/. It is used by Federal agencies, pass-through entities, non-Federal entities, auditors, the Government Accountability Office, OMB, and the general public for management of and information about Federal awards and the results of audits. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed information collection is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the estimate of the burden of the collection of the information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who respond, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Danny Werfel, Acting Controller. [FR Doc. E7–23540 Filed 12–4–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3110–01–P OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE [Docket No. WTO/DS–365; WTO/DS–357] WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings Regarding U.S. Domestic Support for Agricultural Products Office of the United States Trade Representative. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. AGENCY: The Office of the United States Trade Representative (‘‘USTR’’) is providing notice that on November 8, 2007, Brazil requested the establishment of a dispute settlement panel under the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (‘‘WTO Agreement’’) regarding U.S. domestic support measures for agricultural products. That request may be found at http://www.wto.org contained in a document designated as WT/DS365/13. USTR is also providing notice that on SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 68609 the same date, Canada made a revised request for the establishment of a dispute settlement panel under the WTO Agreement in a similar dispute. Canada’s request may be found at http://www.wto.org contained in a document designated as WT/DS357/12. USTR invites written comments from the public concerning the issues raised in these disputes. DATES: Although USTR will accept any comments received during the course of the consultations, comments should be submitted on or before February 1, 2008 to be assured of timely consideration by USTR. ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted (i) electronically, to FR0705@ustr.eop.gov, with ‘‘Agricultural Subsidies (DS357 and 365)’’ in the subject line, or (ii) by fax, to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–3640. For documents sent by fax, USTR requests that the submitter provide a confirmation copy to the electronic mail address listed above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Yocis, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC., (202) 395–6150. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 127(b) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) (19 U.S.C. 3537(b)(1)) requires that notice and opportunity for comment be provided after the United States submits or receives a request for the establishment of a WTO dispute settlement panel. Consistent with this obligation, USTR is providing notice that the establishment of a dispute settlement panel has been requested pursuant to the WTO Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (‘‘DSU’’) in each of these disputes. If such a panel is established pursuant to the DSU, such panel, which would hold its meetings in Geneva, Switzerland, would be expected to issue a report on its findings and recommendations within nine months after it is established. Major Issues Raised In the requests for the establishment of a panel, Brazil and Canada allege that the United States has provided support to domestic agricultural producers in excess of U.S. commitments with respect to the Aggregate Measurement of Support (‘‘AMS’’) as described in Article 6.2 of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture and the U.S. WTO schedule of commitments. According to Brazil and Canada, the United States has provided domestic support in excess of its AMS commitments in each of the E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM 05DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68608-68609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23540]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Information Collection; Request for Public Comments

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the 
President.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501, et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
invites the general public and Federal agencies to comment on a renewal 
of an information collection with revisions that would affect two types 
of entities: (1) The reports of auditors to auditees concerning audit 
results, audit findings, and questioned costs, and (2) reports from 
auditees to the Federal Government providing information about the 
auditees, the awards they administer, and the audit results. These 
collection efforts are required by the Single Audit Act Amendments of 
1996 (31 U.S.C. 7501, et seq.) and OMB Circular A-133, ``Audits of 
States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.''
    Included as part of this information collection is the Data 
Collection Form (SF-SAC). The changes being proposed are to modify the 
data elements collected on the SF-SAC to update the internal control 
terminology and related definitions used in OMB Circular A-133, 
``Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations,'' 
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the 
Government Accountability Office. The current Form SF-SAC is being used 
for audit periods ending in 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007. A revised Form 
SF-SAC will be used for audit periods ending in 2008, 2009, and 2010.
    Additionally, OMB is interested in receiving comments on the 
requirement to submit the Data Collection Form (SF-SAC) and the single 
audit reporting packages electronically. Currently, more than 87% of 
the SF-SAC are filed electronically. Electronic submission would 
streamline the submission process, reduce the administrative burden and 
satisfy the Bureau of Census to fully comply with the Government 
Paperwork Elimination Act (Pub. L. 105-277).

DATES: Submit comments on or before February 4, 2008. Late comments 
will be considered to the extent practicable.

ADDRESSES: Due to potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of 
mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, we

[[Page 68609]]

encourage respondents to submit comments electronically to ensure 
timely receipt. We cannot guarantee that comments mailed will be 
received before the comment closing date.
    Electronic mail comments may be submitted to: Gilbert Tran at hai_
m._tran@omb.eop.gov. Please include ``Form SF-SAC Comments'' in the 
subject line and the full body of your comments in the text of the 
electronic message and not as an attachment. Please include your name, 
title, organization, postal address, telephone number, and e-mail 
address in the text of the message. Comments may also be submitted via 
facsimile to 202-395-3952.
    Comments may be mailed to Gilbert Tran, Office of Federal Financial 
Management, Office of Management and Budget, Room 6025, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    Comments: All responses will be summarized and included in the 
request for OMB approval. All comments will also be a matter of public 
record.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gilbert Tran, Office of Federal 
Financial Management, Office of Management and Budget, (202) 395-3052. 
The proposed revisions to the Information Collection Form, Form SF-SAC 
can be obtained by contacting the Office of Federal Financial 
Management as indicated above or by download from the OMB Grants 
Management home page on the Internet at http://www.whitehouse.gov/OMB/
grants/grants_docs.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Control No.: 0348-0057.
    Title: Data Collection Form.
    Form No: SF-SAC.
    Type of Review: Reinstatement with change.
    Respondents: States, local governments, non-profit organizations 
(Non-Federal entities) and their auditors.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 72,000 (36,000 from auditors and 
36,000 from auditees). The respondents' information is collected by the 
Federal Audit Clearinghouse (maintained by the U.S. Bureau of the 
Census).
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 59 hours for each of 400 large 
respondents and 17 hours for each of 71,600 small respondents for 
estimated annual burden hours of 1,240,800.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Needs and Uses: Reports from auditors to auditees and reports from 
auditees to the Federal government are used by non-Federal entities, 
pass-through entities, and Federal agencies to ensure that Federal 
awards are expended in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. 
The Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) (maintained by the U.S. Bureau of 
the Census) uses the information on the SF-SAC to ensure proper 
distribution of audit reports to Federal agencies and identify non-
Federal entities who have not filed the required reports. The FAC also 
uses the information on the SF-SAC to create a government-wide database 
which contains information on audit results. This database is publicly 
accessible on the Internet at http://harvester.census.gov/sac/. It is 
used by Federal agencies, pass-through entities, non-Federal entities, 
auditors, the Government Accountability Office, OMB, and the general 
public for management of and information about Federal awards and the 
results of audits. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
information collection is necessary for the proper performance of the 
functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have 
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the estimate of the burden of 
the collection of the information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who 
respond, including through the use of automated collection techniques 
or other forms of information technology.

Danny Werfel,
Acting Controller.
 [FR Doc. E7-23540 Filed 12-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P