Homeliving Programs, 68491-68502 [E7-23330]
Download as PDF
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
activities. Payment for the services of
uniformed law enforcement in work
zones may be included in the
construction contract, or be provided by
direct reimbursement from the highway
agency to the law enforcement agency.
When payment is included through the
construction contract, the contractor
will be responsible for reimbursing the
law enforcement agency, and in turn
will recover those costs through contract
pay items. Direct interagency
reimbursement may be made on a
project-specific basis, or on a programwide basis that considers the overall
level of services to be provided by the
law enforcement agency. Contract pay
items for law enforcement service may
be either unit price or lump sum items.
Unit price items should be utilized
when the highway agency can estimate
and control the quantity of law
enforcement services required on the
project. The use of lump sum payment
should be limited to situations where
the quantity of services is directly
affected by the contractor’s choice of
project scheduling and chosen manner
of staging and performing the work.
Innovative payment items may also be
considered when they offer an
advantage to both the highway agency
and the contractor. When
reimbursement to the law enforcement
agency is made by interagency transfer
of funds, the highway agency should
establish a program-level or projectlevel budget that is adequate to meet
anticipated program or project needs,
and include provisions to address
unplanned needs and other
contingencies.
(e) Work Vehicles and Equipment. In
addition to addressing risks to workers
and road users from motorized traffic,
the agency processes, procedures, and/
or guidance established in accordance
with 23 CFR 630.1006 should also
address safe means for work vehicles
and equipment to enter and exit traffic
lanes and for delivery of construction
materials to the work space, based on
individual project characteristics and
factors.
(f) Payment for Traffic Control.
Consistent with the requirements of 23
CFR 630.1012, Project-level Procedures,
project plans, specifications and
estimates (PS&Es) shall include
appropriate pay item provisions for
implementing the project
Transportation Management Plan
(TMP), which includes a Temporary
Traffic Control (TTC) plan, either
through method or performance based
specifications. Pay item provisions
include, but are not limited to, the
following:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
(1) Payment for work zone traffic
control features and operations shall not
be incidental to the contract, or
included in payment for other items of
work not related to traffic control and
safety;
(2) As a minimum, separate pay items
shall be provided for major categories of
traffic control devices, safety features,
and work zone safety activities,
including but not limited to positive
protection devices, and uniformed law
enforcement activities when funded
through the project;
(3) For method based specifications,
the specifications and other PS&E
documents should provide sufficient
details such that the quantity and types
of devices and the overall effort required
to implement and maintain the TMP can
be determined;
(4) For method-based specifications,
unit price pay items, lump sum pay
items, or a combination thereof may be
used;
(5) Lump sum payment should be
limited to items for which an estimate
of the actual quantity required is
provided in the PS&E or for items where
the actual quantity required is
dependent upon the contractor’s choice
of work scheduling and methodology;
(6) For Lump Sum items, a
contingency provision should be
included such that additional payment
is provided if the quantity or nature of
the required work changes, either an
increase or decrease, due to
circumstances beyond the control of the
contractor;
(7) Unit price payment should be
provided for those items over which the
contractor has little or no control over
the quantity, and no firm estimate of
quantities is provided in the PS&Es, but
over which the highway agency has
control of the actual quantity to be
required during the project;
(8) Specifications should clearly
indicate how placement, movement/
relocation, and maintenance of traffic
control devices and safety features will
be compensated; and
(9) The specifications should include
provisions to require and enforce
contractor compliance with the contract
provisions relative to implementation
and maintenance of the project TMP
and related traffic control items.
Enforcement provisions may include
remedies such as liquidated damages,
work suspensions, or withholding
payment for noncompliance.
§ 630.1110 Maintenance of Temporary
Traffic Control Devices.
To provide for the continued
effectiveness of temporary traffic control
devices, each agency shall develop and
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68491
implement quality guidelines to help
maintain the quality and adequacy of
the temporary traffic control devices for
the duration of the project. Agencies
may choose to adopt existing quality
guidelines such as those developed by
the American Traffic Safety Services
Association (ATSSA) or other state
highway agencies.1 A level of inspection
necessary to provide ongoing
compliance with the quality guidelines
shall be provided.
[FR Doc. E7–23581 Filed 12–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 36
RIN 1076–AE51
Homeliving Programs
Bureau of Indian Education,
BIA, Interior.
ACTION: Final Rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Under the No Child Left
Behind Act of 2001, the Secretary of the
Interior is publishing final regulations
addressing homeliving programs
administered under the Bureau of
Indian Education-funded school system.
DATES: Effective Date: January 4, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Skenandore, Director, Bureau of
Indian Education, 1849 C Street NW.,
MS–3609, Washington, DC 20240,
phone (202) 208–6123.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. What Information Does This Section
Address?
This section addresses:
—Requirements of the No Child Left
Behind Act of 2001 (Pub. L. 107–110;
enacted January 8, 2002; ‘‘NCLBA’’ or
‘‘the Act’’), section 1122.
1 The American Traffic Safety Services
Association’s (ATSSA) Quality Guidelines for Work
Zone Traffic Control Devices uses photos and
written descriptions to help judge when a traffic
control device has outlived its usefulness. These
guidelines are available for purchase from ATSSA
through the following URL: https://www.atssa.com/
store/bc_item_detail.jsp?productId=1. Similar
guidelines are available from various State highway
agencies. The Illinois Department of Transportation
‘‘Quality Standards for Work Zone Traffic Control
Devices’’ is available online at https://dot.state.il.us/
workzone/wztcd2004r.pdf. The Minnesota
Department of Transportation ‘‘Quality Standards—
Methods to determine whether the various traffic
control devices are Acceptable, Marginal, or
Unacceptable’’ is available online at https://
www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/otepubl/
fieldmanual2007/FM–2007–QualityStandards.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
68492
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
—Overview of the negotiated
rulemaking process.
—How public comments were handled.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
B. What Are the Negotiated Rulemaking
Requirements of the Act?
The Secretary of the Interior
(‘‘Secretary’’) established a negotiated
rulemaking committee (Committee) to
develop proposed regulations to
implement several sections of the Act
related to the Bureau of Indian
Education (Bureau)-funded school
system. The Act required that the
committee be comprised only of
representatives of the Federal
Government and representatives of
tribes served by Bureau-funded schools.
The Act also required that, to the
maximum extent possible, the tribal
representative membership reflect the
proportionate share of students from
tribes served by the Bureau-funded
school system. The Secretary chartered
the committee under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C.
Appendix (FACA)) on May 1, 2003. The
committee was comprised of Federal
representatives and representatives of
tribes served by Bureau-funded schools
who met in February 2006 to negotiate
recommendations for proposed
regulations under Section 1122 of the
Act, 25 CFR part 36, Minimum
Academic Standards for the Basic
Education of Indian Children and
National Criteria for Dormitory
Situations. As a basis for negotiations
and for consensus, the committee used
draft regulations proposed by the
Bureau school and residential
administrators.
C. What Was the Negotiated Rulemaking
Process?
As required by the No Child Left
Behind Act of 2001 (Pub. L. 107–110;
enacted January 8, 2002, referred to in
this preamble as ‘‘NCLB’’ or ‘‘the Act’’),
the Department of the Interior
established a Negotiated Rulemaking
Committee to develop proposed rules to
implement several sections of the Act
relating to the Bureau of Indian
Education-funded school system.
Negotiated Rulemaking is a process
sanctioned by Subchapter III, or Chapter
5, Title 5, United States Code and the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5
U.S.C. Appendix (FACA), that employs
Federal representatives and members of
the public who will be affected by rules
to jointly develop proposed rules.
In this case, the Act required the
Secretary of the Interior to select
representatives of Indian tribes and
Bureau-funded schools as well as
Federal Government representatives to
serve on the Committee. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
Committee’s task was to draft proposed
rules to recommend to the Secretary.
Upon the Secretary’s approval, draft
rules are published in the Federal
Register for written public comments
within a 120-day public comment
period. After the close of the public
comment period, the Committee will
reconvene to review these comments
and to recommend promulgation of final
rules to the Secretary.
The Secretary chartered the
Committee under the FACA on May 1,
2003. It is comprised of 19 members
nominated by Indian tribes and tribally
operated schools. The law required that,
to the maximum extent possible, the
tribal representative membership should
reflect the proportionate share of
students from tribes served by the
Bureau-funded school system. The
Secretary also appointed to the
Committee six members from within the
Department of the Interior. The
Committee selected three tribal
representatives and two Federal
representatives as co-chairs. Six
individuals were hired to facilitate all
Committee meetings.
The Committee initially met in the
months of June through October 2003 to
develop regulations in six areas.
Subsequently, the Department
reconvened the Committee in February
2004 to develop regulations in the areas
of closure and consolidation of schools
and criteria for homeliving situations.
The Committee met on several
occasions and developed the proposed
rules that were published on July 12,
2004 (69 FR 41770).
D. How Were Public Comments
Handled?
The Secretary published proposed
regulations on July 12, 2004, for public
comment. The public comment period
ended on November 9, 2004. We
received comments on this proposed
rule from nine commenters, including
tribal leaders, educators, and
administrators. We reviewed all
comments. Summaries of individual
public comments and our responses are
noted below. The final regulations are
organized, as were the proposed
regulations, under three broad
categories: homeliving staffing;
homeliving programs; and homeliving
privacy. The final regulations,
published as 25 CFR part 36—
Homeliving Situations, reflect the
public comments that were accepted.
The Department still has under
consideration the regulations for school
closure and consolidation. At this time,
the Department has made no final
decision on issuing these rules.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Public Comments
In this section we discuss the main
public comments received. General
comments are discussed first, followed
by comments on specific sections of the
rule. Our responses follow each
comment.
Section 36.70
to Know?
What Terms do I Need
Comment: Several commenters
suggested that we clarify or define the
term ‘‘supplemental services’’ in § 36.70
and several others suggested that we
clarify what ‘‘actually receiving
supplemental services’’ means in
§ 36.70(2)(ii).
Response: We considered these
comments and removed the obsolete
reference to ‘‘supplemental services.’’
Comment: Several commenters
suggested we add definitions for the
following terms: ‘‘behavioral health
programs,’’ ‘‘behavioral health
services,’’ and ‘‘behavioral health staff.’’
Response: We accepted the comments
and have added definitions for the
terms.
Comment: A commenter
recommended clarifying the definitions
of ‘‘homeliving manager’’ and
‘‘homeliving supervisor’’ by switching
the definitions to more accurately reflect
what each position is responsible for. In
the alternative, if the manager is to be
responsible for physically supervising
students, the commenter recommended
changing the name of the ‘‘homeliving
supervisor’’ to ‘‘homeliving
administrator.’’
Response: We considered this
comment and made no change.
Section 36.71
This Part?
What Is the Purpose of
Comment: A commenter
recommended changing the definition
for ‘‘homeliving situation’’ to: ‘‘Any
program where education instruction
and residential services are provided for
students enrolled in Bureau-funded
schools, who are housed at a Bureaufunded school facility, and who receive
care, before and after school hours, in a
manner in which they do not have to
depend on family or guardianship.’’
Response: We considered this
comment, but, determined no change
was necessary.
Comment: A commenter suggested
replacing the term ‘‘homeliving
situations’’ with ‘‘homeliving
programs.’’
Response: We considered the
comment and revised § 36.71.
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Section 36.75 What Qualifications
Must Homeliving Staff Possess?
Comment: A commenter suggested
that the competency or professional
standards of homeliving personnel
should not be compromised in § 36.75.
The commenter stated that agreements
to operate a quality program with
quality staff is between BIE and the
tribal governing body and should not be
discretionary at the school staff level.
The commenter stated that it may be
appropriate to waive such qualifications
only where the employee is a trainee
under the supervision of a fully
qualified supervisor, and it is a tribal
decision, not a Federal one.
Response: We considered the
comment, but determined that no
change was necessary because a tribe
can instruct the school supervisor if the
school is a tribally operated school.
Comment: A commenter stated that
requirements for improved criteria for
homeliving staff in § 36.75 should not
be unfunded mandates. The commenter
supports a complete overhaul of the
current funding formula in order to
create a universal therapeutic model in
all BIE-funded schools.
Response: While the Committee was
aware of the funding needs for Indian
education, the scope of the Committee
was to draft regulations to implement
the statute. Therefore, while the
Committee notes the commenter’s
general comments about the need for
additional funding and different
funding priorities, these comments are
outside of the scope of the rulemaking.
Therefore, we made no change to the
regulations.
Comment: A commenter suggested
that substance abuse education and
prevention training should be added to
required training in § 36.75.
Response: This is already required in
§ 36.86(c)(2).
Comment: A commenter suggested:
(1) that a determination of good cause in
§ 36.75(b)(2) should be made at the
Education Line Officer level, (2) that
guidelines or standards be provided for
determining what good cause means,
and (3) that a timeframe for waivers be
added.
Response: We considered the
comment and accepted it in part and
rejected it in part. We rejected the part
of the comment that raised issues the
Committee considered in its
deliberations. We accepted the part of
the comment on adding a timeframe for
waivers and revised § 36.75(b)(2).
Comment: A commenter
recommended that in § 36.75 the delay
of the effective date for higher standards
for homeliving staff apply to current
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
staff as a well as to new hires, and that
the effective date depend on the
Department’s securing additional
funding.
Response: The Committee considered
the effective date of the higher standards
for homeliving staff. The comment does
not raise new issues that the Committee
did not consider. Therefore, we
considered the comment, but we made
no change to the regulations.
Comment: A commenter suggested
changing § 36.75 to allow the
homeliving supervisor rather than the
‘‘school supervisor’’ to grant a waiver
for a showing of good cause.
Response: We considered the
comment, but we believed the proposed
language provides for the entity with
decision-making authority to decide
whether to grant the waiver. Therefore,
we made no change to the regulations.
Comment: Several commenters
suggested that some homeliving
program staff may not need the same
level of educational standards as others
because they work at night when
students are sleeping and recommended
changing the required standards in
§ 36.75(a).
Response: In adopting these
regulations, the Committee considered
that there are different levels of
homeliving program staff. The
Committee considered and did not
adopt different standards for night-duty.
Therefore, we considered the comment,
but made no change to the regulations.
Comment: A commenter
recommended that § 36.75 include a
certificate program in lieu of the 32hour post-secondary semester hour
requirement since BIE-operated
boarding schools are unique. Another
commenter suggested that § 36.75
provide for development of a residential
certificate of training including at least
80 hours in topics such as child
development, behavior management,
working with students at risk, special
education students, social interaction
skills, etc., as an option to requiring 32/
48 hours of college credit. The
certificate would be updated every 3
years with at least 10 hours of training.
A second commenter recommended
that distance education and computer
modules be available to staff.
A third commenter recommended that
§ 36.75 provide that each facility is
responsible to set its own appropriate
training requirements to fit its specific
needs. This commenter further
suggested that requiring 32 hours of
post-secondary semester hours in a field
related to child development and at
least 1 year of relevant experience will
cause a drop in the applicant pool and
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68493
that a degree does not necessarily make
an applicant competent for a position.
Response: We considered these
comments and made no changes to the
rule.
Comment: A commenter suggested
that if the definitions for ‘‘homeliving
manager’’ and ‘‘homeliving supervisor’’
are switched, the qualifications for the
two positions should also be switched
in § 36.75.
Response: We considered this
comment and made no changes because
the definitions were not switched.
Comment: A commenter
recommended deleting § 36.75(b) ‘‘when
this part is published in final’’ because
it is unnecessary considering the 2009–
2010 timeframe and could be
interpreted to apply only to those
persons employed at the time the rule
becomes final.
Response: We accepted this comment
and changed the text to delete the
reference to the rule’s publication date.
Comment: A commenter
recommended that we clarify
§ 36.75(b)(2) by stating whether the
supervisor empowered to grant waivers
from new qualifications has procedural
guidance to follow.
Response: We considered this
comment and revised the paragraph to
clarify the process. The paragraph now
states that a person not meeting the
qualifications, ‘‘may, upon showing
good cause, petition the school
supervisor (or the homeliving
supervisor for peripheral dorms) for a
waiver from the new qualifications.’’
Comment: A commenter stated that:
(1) 32 hours of post-secondary semester
hours for basic homeliving staff would
dramatically reduce the applicant
supply pool for those positions at the
local level; (2) We should clarify
whether new hires before SY 2009–2010
must meet the new requirements; (3)
Funding should be made available for
dormitory programs, for training and
post-secondary credit hours for meeting
the recommended qualification
requirements, and for meeting the needs
of the students being served.
Response: We considered the
comment, but did not change the
section. While the training requirement
may reduce the number of applicants for
these positions, dormitory staff must
have more training because of new
needs children are exhibiting in
behavior, new diagnostic findings
affecting learning skills, and changes in
life styles affecting family concepts and
step-parenting, among other issues.
Comment: A commenter stated that if
‘‘recreation staff’’ is included in
‘‘homeliving staff’’ that fact should be
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
68494
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
stated and clarified in the definition of
‘‘homeliving staff.’’
Response: The committee considered
this in its original deliberation and no
new issues have been raised by this
comment that were not already
considered by the committee.
Section 36.76 Who Is in Charge of all
Homeliving Operations?
Comment: A commenter stated that
the purpose of § 36.76 is unclear. If the
section means there will be clear lines
of authority, the question should be
revised to read: ‘‘Must there exist clear
lines of authority?’’ and the answer
should read: ‘‘Yes, clear lines of
authority must be established through
the development of an organizational
chart approved by the local board
* * *’’ Or, if this section means to make
a point other than establishing the
requirement that an organizational chart
be developed; the section needs to be rewritten for clarity.
Response: We accepted this comment
and made corresponding changes to the
rule.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Section 36.77 What Are the
Homeliving Program Staffing
Requirements?
Comment: Several commenters
recommended that the delayed
implementation of the homeliving staffto-student ratios to school year 2009–10
in § 36.77 depend on the Department’s
securing the necessary funding to make
the new ratios affordable.
Response: We considered this
comment and revised the section title in
response.
Comment: A commenter suggested
that adult-to-child staffing ratios in
dormitories for Native American
children should be lower than 1:20–30
if other similar programs require lower
adult-to-child staffing ratios.
Response: The Committee considered
adult-to-child staffing ratios in drafting
the regulations. The Committee
discussed the pros and cons of changing
staffing ratios and chose to adopt
credentialing rather than changing
staffing ratios. The comments raise no
new issues to consider. Therefore, we
made no change to the regulations.
Comment: A commenter
recommended that § 36.77 should state
what ratios will be effective until SY
2009–2010.
Response: We considered this
comment, but made no changes to the
regulation.
Comment: A commenter suggested
that since § 36.75 requires higher quality
staff, § 36.77 should provide that this
staff be compensated appropriately, but
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
questioned how positions will be
funded if IRG is cut.
Response: The Committee in its
original deliberations considered the
impact of these requirements and
balanced them with the needs of the
students. No new issues are raised by
the commenter that were not considered
in the original deliberations. Therefore,
we made no change to the rule.
Comment: A commenter suggested
that § 36.77 state that existing staff-tostudent ratios remain in effect until the
new requirements are effective.
Response: The Committee considered
this issue at the time it negotiated the
regulations and the comment raises no
new issues. Therefore, we made no
change to the regulations.
Comment: A commenter questioned
whether it is necessary in § 36.77(b) to
have three different staff-to-student
ratios on weekends because weekend
staff is presumably supervising rather
than conducting structured programs.
Response: The Committee considered
this issue at the time it negotiated the
regulations and the comment raises no
new issues. Therefore, we made no
change to the regulations.
Comment: A commenter
recommended revising § 36.77 by
revising the question to: ‘‘What is the
minimum acceptable staffing
supervisory requirements necessary to
adequately supervise students and
provide a safe environment?’’ and
eliminating the introductory sentence.
Response: We considered this
comment and changed the section title
to read, ‘‘What are the homeliving
program staffing requirements?’’
Section 36.79 What Are the
Homeliving Behavioral Staff/Student
Ratio Requirements?
Comment: A commenter suggested
that the regulations define the term
‘‘behavioral staff.’’ Another commenter
suggested clarifying whether a
behavioral health professional is the
same as a certified counselor, either
school or MSW, in § 36.79.
Response: We accepted these
comments and defined ‘‘behavioral
staff’’ at § 36.79.
Comment: A commenter stated that
the regulations at § 36.79(b) change
‘‘should’’ to ‘‘must’’ for providing one
full-time behavioral health professional
for off-reservation boarding schools.
Response: We considered the
comment, but we did not accept it. This
issue was raised during the original
Committee deliberations. In order to
reach consensus the Committee adopted
the provision that the homeliving
program ‘‘should’’ consider providing
these services. This comment does not
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
raise any new issues that were not
considered by the committee when
originally discussing this issue.
Therefore, we made no change to the
regulations.
Comment: A commenter
recommended that § 36.79 be amended
to delete a 20-hour minimum.
Response: We accepted this comment
and added new paragraph (d) in
response.
Comment: A commenter stated that
funding increases are necessary to meet
the criteria in § 36.79 for the number of
and the educational level of behavioral
health professionals who are necessary
in homeliving programs to address
issues such as abuse, neglect, trauma,
cultural conflict, and lack of school
success.
Response: Budget-related issues are
fully addressed elsewhere in this
preamble.
Comment: A commenter
recommended revising § 36.79(b) to
state ‘‘must,’’ not ‘‘should’’ so that
behavioral health may not be made
optional and students who live offreservation are not deprived of this
requirement.
Response: This issue was raised
during the original deliberations and, to
reach consensus, the Committee
adopted the provision that the
homeliving program ‘‘should’’ consider
providing these services. This comment
does not raise any new issues that were
not considered by the Committee when
originally discussing this issue.
Therefore, the comment is not accepted.
Section 36.80 If a School Has
Separated Boys’ and Girls’ Homeliving
Programs, May the Same Behavioral
Staff Be Used for Each Program?
Comment: A commenter
recommended clarifying the term
‘‘homeliving count period’’ in § 36.80.
Response: We considered the
comment, but we are making no change
to the regulations because the
homeliving count period is defined in
the funding formula regulations at 25
CFR 39.
Section 36.81 May a Homeliving
Program Use Support Staff or Teachers
to Meet Behavioral Health Staffing
Requirements?
Comment: A commenter
recommended revising the second
sentence in § 36.81 to allow for
flexibility in how a residential facility
meets the behavioral health staffing
requirements. The sentence is
recommended to read: ‘‘The only
exception is if the individual support
staff employee or teacher has the
appropriate behavioral health license or
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
certification or other appropriate
training and supervision.’’
Response: We accepted this comment
in part and revised the second sentence
to read as follows: ‘‘The only exception
is if the individual support staff
employee or teacher has the appropriate
behavioral health license or
certification.’’
Comment: A commenter
recommended eliminating the exception
in § 36.81 or adding a requirement that
the individual’s contract provide that
the teaching and behavioral health
services are not to be provided
simultaneously.
Response: We considered this
comment in conjunction with other
comments on this issue. If teachers have
the requisite training, then they may be
able to provide the service as long as the
provisions of § 36.82 have been met.
Therefore, we made no change to the
rule.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Section 36.82 May Behavioral Health
Staff Provide Services During the
Academic School Day?
Comment: A commenter
recommended adding a provision for
maximizing time the behavioral health
staff is working with students during the
time students are in the dorms,
especially on weekends. Another
commenter stated that we should amend
§ 36.82 to require that behavioral health
staff provide services outside the
academic school day except in
emergencies and provide that schools
have the necessary staff to handle
emergency situations. The commenter
suggested that behavioral health staff
may observe students in their academic
environment.
Response: In response to these
comments, we revised § 36.82.
Section 36.83 How Many Hours Can a
Student be Taken Out of the Academic
Setting to Receive Behavioral Health
Services?
Comment: A commenter suggested
that § 36.83 be clarified so that schools
may not use behavioral health staff
outside their intended services.
Response: We considered the
comment and addressed the suggested
changes in § 32.82.
Comment: A commenter
recommended that we amend § 36.83 to
provide that students not be taken out
of the academic setting to receive
behavioral health services unless it is an
emergency and to provide that schools
have their own behavioral health
professionals. The commenter
recommended that Licensed Practicing
Counselors not have a caseload of
students. Another commenter
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
recommended revising § 36.83 to state:
‘‘should not spend more than’’ rather
than ‘‘may spend no more than’’ in
order to provide staff the needed
flexibility to appropriately address each
student’s individual needs and provide
necessary services.
Response: We considered these
comments and made changes consistent
with the other comments on this
section.
Section 36.84 Can a Program Hire or
Contract or Acquire by Other Means
Behavioral Health Professionals to Meet
Staffing Requirements?
Comment: A commenter
recommended that § 36.84 provide that
instructional time be guarded. Each
student should be able to go through an
initial screening provided by the
counselors.
Response: We considered this
comment, but no change to the rule is
necessary.
Comment: A commenter
recommended delaying implementation
of behavioral staff license requirement
until additional appropriations are
obtained and recommended revising
§ 36.84, paragraph (b) by changing
‘‘and’’ to ‘‘or.’’
Response: We accepted this comment
and changed the rule.
Comment: A commenter
recommended that more instruction be
provided so BIE-operated and grant/
contract school programs can strategize
with one another to maximize services
to students and minimize the cost of
services. In some locations distance is a
factor and highly qualified people are in
extreme demand and few agree to travel
long distances and/or agree to provide
services to a large number of identified
students. Restrictions imposed by
preferences of authority hinder meeting
the needs of students. Schools must
have strong working relationships.
Response: We revised this section to
allow tribes and schools to work
together to provide these services to
students.
Section 36.85 Is a Nurse Required To
Be Available in the Evenings?
Comment: A commenter
recommended that we amend § 36.85 to
require that nursing staff be on campus
not only during the academic hours, but
also outside of academic hours because
more accidents are going to happen
outside of academic hours. Another
commenter recommended making the
requirement in § 36.85 for having a RN
or LPN available in the evenings when
enrolment is over 300 mandatory.
Response: The committee considered
the response but rejected it.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68495
Section 36.86 Are There Staff Training
Requirements?
Comment: A commenter agreed with
the increase in educational
requirements for new staff and
homeliving managers and supervisors in
§ 36.86.
Response: We made no change to
§ 36.86 because the comment required
no change.
Comment: A commenter stated that in
§ 36.86 (a)(4) confidentiality should
follow the Family Education Right to
Privacy Act, not just the Health
Information Privacy Act.
Response: We considered the
comment and revised § 36.86(a)(4).
Comment: A commenter
recommended inserting ‘‘surrogate’’
before ‘‘parent training’’ in § 36.86(b)(4)
because staff serves as surrogate parents
in residential settings.
Response: We accepted the idea
behind the comment and changed
§ 36.86(b)(4) to read:
(4) Parenting skills/child care.
Comment: A commenter
recommended revising the question in
§ 36.86 as follows: ‘‘Are there
homeliving staff training requirements?’’
Response: We considered this
comment and revised the section text,
but not the title. To be more inclusive,
the section states that all homeliving
program staff and employees that
supervise students participating in
homeliving services and activities must
have appropriate certification or
requirements and receive annual
training in specified topics.
Comment: A commenter suggested
that the first paragraph in § 36.86, which
applies to training that is ‘‘appropriate
to the certification and licensing
requirements,’’ is erroneous since none
of the required training will result in
licensing or certification, except in First
Aid or CPR. Homeliving staff is not
required to be licensed or certified
(§ 36.75). The commenter recommended
that this section be revised to provide
flexibility so that residential programs
may determine the frequency and
timing of training as appropriate to their
situations, including providing for
refresher sessions for returning staff and
training that may be completed over a
2- or 3-year period (lessening the
financial impact) or more frequently as
new developments occur (such as new
or revised policy).
Another commenter suggested
correcting the cite to ‘‘Health
Information Patient Privacy Act’’ to
‘‘Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996’’ in
§ 36.86(a)(4).
A commenter suggested changing the
title in § 36.86(a)(7) to ‘‘Child Abuse
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
68496
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Reporting Requirements and Protection
Procedures.’’
Another commenter recommended
that in § 36.86(b)(7) we clarify the term
‘‘child development’’ or make the terms
applicable only to those residential
programs with younger children in
residence since some residential
programs serve only high school age
students. If paragraph (7) remains in this
section, the commenter recommended
adding ‘‘if appropriate to the student
ages served.’’
Response: We considered these
comments and made some changes
based upon them. We did not change
the section title because changes that we
made in response to other comments
made this unnecessary. Similarly, other
changes we made regarding licensure
eliminated the need to consider that
suggestion. On the issue of training
being only a refresher for returning staff,
the committee considered this issue in
its original deliberations and this
comment raised no new issues.
Comment: A commenter suggested
that § 36.86 include a recommendation
that courses be provided on dealing
with the tween, pre-teen, and teenage
adolescent years.
Response: We considered this
comment, but these various
developmental stages are covered under
the broader title of child development.
We revised this section to clarify this.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Section 36.90 What Recreation,
Academic Tutoring, Student Safety and
Health Care Services Must Homeliving
Programs Provide?
Comment: A commenter suggested
clarifying in § 36.90 what a ‘‘homeliving
program board’’ is and whether it
applies to schools with peripheral
dorms.
Response: We accepted the comment
and changed § 36.90 to read: ‘‘ * * * as
deemed necessary by the local school
board or homeliving program board.’’
Comment: A commenter suggested
that if staff are required to provide these
services in § 36.90, it should be required
that students be assigned to participate
in the service schedule.
Response: We considered this
comment, but it is not something that
should be addressed in regulations.
Comment: A commenter
recommended that in § 36.90 we require
that library and computer program
requirements must be met in the
dormitory facility because of the staff-tostudent ratio, individual student needs,
and academic needs in all subject areas
and age/grade levels.
Response: These issues are addressed
in § 36.102.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
Section 36.91 What Are the Program
Requirements for Behavioral Health
Services?
Comment: A commenter suggested
that requirements that a reiteration of
the Intensive Residential Guidance
program elements in § 36.91 is
unnecessary because the IRG program
was eliminated. Also, costs associated
with some of the required services are
prohibitive and not all students will
require each of the enumerated services.
The commenter recommended that this
section be revised as follows: ‘‘ * * *
behavioral health program must include
the following services as needed:’’
Response: We considered this
comment and clarified the rule to
provide that the homeliving program
should have the capacity to provide
these services.
Section 36.92 Are There Any Activities
That Must be Offered by a Homeliving
Program?
Comment: A commenter
recommended that we clarify § 36.92(a)
by providing a requirement for one hour
of scheduled, structured physical
activity Monday through Thursday
instead of through Friday since many
residential programs dismiss students
on Friday through Sunday. The
commenter recommended requiring two
hours total of physical or recreational
activities for those present in the dorm
on the weekend. Another commenter
suggested revising § 36.92(b) to allow
each tribe/school to decide whether to
offer and to decide the content of any of
these topics to ensure consistency with
local community values.
Response: We accepted the comment
regarding Monday through Thursday
physical activity and changed the rule
to reflect this. We partially accepted the
suggestion regarding personal wellness,
excluding the idea of consistency with
tribal mores, since it is implicit in the
ability to design a wellness program and
some schools, such as off-reservation
boarding schools, may not have local
tribal mores.
Comment: A commenter
recommended changing § 36.92(e) to
refer to activities as ‘‘personal
wellness,’’ since mandating ‘‘character’’
and ‘‘sex education’’ may not be
congruent with the local values or belief
systems of the community.
Response: We accepted the comment
and modified § 36.92(e).
Comment: A commenter
recommended deleting the term
‘‘structures’’ in § 36.92 since it is not
clear whether a lesson plan is required
or students may pick from a choice of
activities.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Response: We considered this
comment, but did not modify the rule.
The goal of the committee was to have
a structured organized physical activity
without a program goal or plan. We
believe that the term ‘‘structure’’
adequately connotes this.
Section 36.93 Is a Homeliving
Handbook Required?
Comment: A commenter suggested
that in § 36.93 we add the terms ‘‘school
board approval.’’
Response: We considered the
comment and found the comment
unpersuasive. Therefore, we made no
change to the regulations.
Comment: A commenter
recommended revising § 36.93 by
requiring that the home living handbook
be provided rather than referring to
student rights and responsibilities and
requiring that the handbook be provided
during the first week the students are in
residence rather than before the first day
of school.
Response: We accepted this comment
and revised the section accordingly.
Comment: A commenter
recommended changing ‘‘school staff’’
to ‘‘homeliving staff’’ or ‘‘residential
staff’’ in § 36.93(d).
Response: We considered limiting
circulation of the handbook only to
homeliving staff. However, we believe
that all staff should receive a copy of the
handbook.
Section 36.94 What Must a Homeliving
Handbook Contain?
Comment: Commenters recommended
the following changes to § 36.94: revise
(i) to read ‘‘Personnel and position
listing or a copy of the residential staff
organizational chart’’; revise
(l) to ‘‘Transportation Policy and
Procedures’’; revise (o) to read ‘‘Drug,
Alcohol and Tobacco Products Policy’’
and revise (q) to read: ‘‘Medication
Administration Policy.’’
Response: We made several of the
suggested changes, but did not require
an organizational chart or transportation
procedures. We do not see the need for
requiring an organizational chart. The
rule requires transportation policies, not
procedures.
Comment: A commenter suggested
that we add drug/alcohol policy and
consequences and move up its priority
in § 36.94.
Response: We accepted part of the
comment and revised § 36.94(o) to read
‘‘drug/alcohol policy.’’ We rejected the
rest of the comment because the list is
a list of all items that must be included
in the handbook and is not a priority
list. Therefore, we did not make the
change to the regulations.
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Section 36.95 What Sanitary
Standards Must Homeliving Programs
Meet?
Comment: A commenter
recommended changing the term
‘‘rooms’’ to ‘‘dorm rooms’’ for
clarification in § 36.95, and adding
‘‘unless need arises sooner’’ at the end
of paragraph (c). A commenter
recommended that § 36.95(d) and (e) be
revised to read that linens and toiletries
‘‘may be provided as needed.’’
Response: We considered this change,
but did not revise the rule because the
existing is adequate.
Comment: A commenter
recommended that § 36.95 require that
dorms pass inspection by some entity,
and that each site be visited at least
once in five years to verify that health,
safety and standards are met.
Response: We considered this
comment and made no change because
health and safety inspection
requirements vary by locality.
Section 36.96 May Students Be
Required to Assist With Daily or Weekly
Cleaning?
Comment: A commenter noted that in
§ 36.96 students should be required to
assist in cleaning the dorm.
Response: We considered the
comment, but made no change because
that rule already provides for students
to assist with cleaning.
Comment: A commenter suggested we
add a provision to § 36.96 for cleaning
and maintaining a healthy environment
by dorm staff as role models for
students.
Response: We considered the
comment and rejected it including any
additional provisions on cleaning in
§ 36.96.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Section 36.97 What Basic
Requirements Must a Program’s Health
Services Meet?
Comment: A commenter
recommended revising § 36.97(a) to also
allow for agreements between a tribe or
tribal school board and IHS.
Response: We accepted this comment
and changed the rule accordingly.
Section 36.98 Must the Homeliving
Program Have an Isolation Room for Ill
Children?
Comment: A commenter
recommended modifying § 36.98 to
require that a sickroom be available, but
space does not have to be dedicated to
this use only. Another commenter
recommended rewriting the question in
§ 36.98 to read: ‘‘Must the homeliving
program provide special
accommodations for ill children?’’
Using the singular reference to ‘‘an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
isolation room,’’ coupled with the first
sentence and the second sentence could
cause confusion as to whether one or
two rooms are required.
Response: We considered these
comments and made appropriate
changes to the rule.
Section 36.100 Are There Minimum
Requirements for Student Attendance
Checks?
Comment: A commenter
recommended revising § 36.100(d) to
state that night time physical checks
will be made once every hour, except
high school student rooms which will
be checked every two hours.
Response: We considered the
comment, but did not change the rule.
High school students are just as likely,
or even more likely, to be out of their
rooms at night.
Comment: A commenter
recommended revising § 36.100(f) to
make it applicable only when
residential staff knows that a student
will be absent from school.
Response: We accepted this comment
and changed the rule accordingly.
Comment: A commenter suggested
that § 36.100 provide that each child
accepted into the dorm should agree to
undergo drug and alcohol screening if
needed.
Response: We considered the
comment and made no change to the
rule. Schools should develop their own
drug and alcohol policies.
Section 36.102 What Student
Resources Must be Provided by A
Homeliving Program?
Comment: A commenter
recommended that we clarify the terms
‘‘library resources’’ and ‘‘reasonable
access’’ in § 36.102.
Response: We considered the
comment, but found no change to the
rule necessary.
Comment: A commenter
recommended adding at the beginning
of § 36.102(b): ‘‘To the extent the
student does have their own * * *’’
Response: We considered the
comment, but made no change, as the
committee believes it is in the best
interest of students to have textbooks
available after hours.
Section 36.110 Must Programs Provide
Space for Storing Personal Effects?
Comment: A commenter
recommended adding the following
after the first sentence in § 36.110: ‘‘This
requirement is met if a residential room
door can be locked’’ because some
residential facilities will have difficulty
meeting the lockable storage space
requirement due to space limitations
and/or age of the facility.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68497
Response: We considered this
comment, but made no change. The
committee wanted the students to have
one lockable space, such as a drawer,
closet, or storage bin.
Section 36.111 Can a Tribe, Tribal
Governing Body, or Local School Board
Waive the Homeliving Standards?
Comment: A commenter suggested
that in § 36.111 we clarify how 60 days
are calculated and recommended that a
school board or tribal body submit a
proposed waiver by January 1 of the
year preceding implementation in order
to provide time for revisions and for
starting the year with alternative
standards in place.
Response: We considered the
comment and rejected it in part because
the regulatory section is based on
statutory language. We accepted some of
the comment and made the following
changes:
A tribal governing body or local
school board may waive some or all of
the standards established in this part by
adopting a written resolution that
determines that the standards are
inappropriate for the needs of the tribe’s
students. The approved alternative
standards are effective on the first day
of the following school year.
Section 36.112 What Are the
Consequences for Failing to Meet the
Requirements of This Part?
Comment: A commenter suggested
adding a new question after § 36.112:
‘‘What happens to a school that does not
meet these standards?’’
Response: We considered the
comment, but made no changes because
this question is limited to whether the
school can be closed or consolidated for
failing to meet these standards and not
for other reasons that are addressed in
other regulations.
Section 36.120 What Type of
Reporting Is Required to Ensure
Accountability?
Comment: A commenter
recommended that we identify a
specific time for reporting enrolment
figures in § 36.120.
Response: We accepted the comment
and revised § 36.120(c) and (d).
Comment: A commenter
recommended adding a requirement in
§ 36.120 that the report be filed 45 days
after the end of the school year and a
statement that the accountability report
is the only report a residential program
is required to file.
Response: We accepted the
suggestions to add a 45-day filing
period.
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
68498
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Comment: A commenter
recommended adding a provision in
§ 36.120 to require that the report also
be submitted to the Division of
Residential Life in BIE.
Response: We did not accept this
comment. The BIE already receives the
report, and there is no reason to require
in the rule that the report go to a
particular division within the office.
III. Procedural Matters
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
(E.O. 12866)
This document is a significant rule
and the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has reviewed the rule
under Executive Order 12866.
(1) This rule will not have an effect of
$100 million or more on the economy.
It will not adversely affect in a material
way the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities.
The rule deals exclusively with
homeliving programs and is not
expected to have a significant effect on
budgets.
(2) This rule will not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency. This rule has been
prepared in consultation with the U.S.
Department of Education.
(3) This rule does not alter the
budgetary effects of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights
or obligations of their recipients. This
rule spells out student rights, the
procedures for their dissemination, and
the procedures for implementing them.
The rule is not expected to have a
significant effect on budgets.
(4) Office of Management and Budget
has determined that this rule raises
novel legal or policy issues. For this
reason review is required under E.O.
12866.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this document will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, the rule does not have significant
takings implications. Nothing in the rule
proposes rules of private property
rights, constitutional or otherwise, or
invokes the Federal condemnation
power or alters any use of Federal land
held in trust. The focus of this rule is
homeliving programs. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
D. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, the rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Nothing in this rule has substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This rule does not
implicate State government. A
Federalism Assessment is not required.
E. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175)
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have identified potential
effects on federally recognized Indian
tribes that will result from this rule.
Accordingly: (1) We have consulted
with the affected tribe(s) on a
government-to-government basis. The
consultations have been open and
candid to allow the affected tribe(s) to
fully evaluate the potential effect of the
rule on trust resources. (2) We have
fully considered tribal views in drafting
this final rule. (3) We have consulted
with the appropriate bureaus and offices
of the Department about the political
effects of this rule on Indian tribes. The
BIE and the Office of the Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs have been
consulted.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking requires information
collection from 10 or more parties and
a submission under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) is required. Accordingly, the
Department prepared submissions on
these collections for review and
approval by OMB. Having reviewed the
Department’s submissions, along with
any comments that were submitted by
the reviewing public, OMB has
approved the information collection
requirements in this rulemaking and has
assigned the OMB control number
1076–0164. In addition to this number,
the information collections in part 39
are also covered by OMB control
numbers 1076–0134 and 1076–0122.
The information collected will be
used to enable the Bureau to better
administer Bureau-funded schools
subject to this rulemaking. In all
instances, the Department has striven to
lessen the burden on the public and ask
for only information essential to
administering the responsibility to
federally recognized tribes. The public
may make additional comments on the
accuracy of our burden estimates (which
are explained in detail in the preamble
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to the proposed rule published on
February 25, 2004, at 69 FR 8752) and
any suggestions for reducing this burden
to the OMB Interior Desk Officer, Docket
Number 1076–AE49, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, 202/
395–6566 (facsimile); email:
OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov.
G. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 is not
required.
H. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with Executive Order
12988, the Department has determined
that this rule does not unduly burden
the judicial system and meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 36
Indians—Education, Schools,
Elementary and secondary education
programs, grant programs—Indians,
Government programs—education.
Dated: October 19, 2007.
Carl J. Artman,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
For the reasons given in the preamble,
part 36 of Title 25 of the Code of Federal
Regulations is amended by revising
subpart G to read as follows:
I
PART 36—MINIMUM ACADEMIC
STANDARDS FOR THE BASIC
EDUCATION OF INDIAN CHILDREN
AND NATIONAL CRITERIA FOR
DORMITORY SITUATIONS
Subpart G—Homeliving Programs
Sec.
§ 36.70 What terms do I need to know?
§ 36.71 What is the purpose of this part?
Staffing
§ 36.75 What qualifications must
homeliving staff possess?
§ 36.76 Who is in charge of all homeliving
operations?
§ 36.77 What are the homeliving staffing
requirements?
§ 36.78 What are the staffing requirements
for homeliving programs offering less
than 5 nights service?
§ 36.79 What are the homeliving behavioral
staff/student ratio requirements?
§ 36.80 If a school has separated boys’ and
girls’ homeliving programs, may the
same behavioral staff be used for each
program?
§ 36.81 May a homeliving program use
support staff or teachers to meet
behavioral health staffing requirements?
§ 36.82 May behavioral health staff provide
services during the academic school day?
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
§ 36.83 How many hours can a student be
taken out of the academic setting to
receive behavioral health services?
§ 36.84 Can a program hire or contract or
acquire by other means behavioral health
professionals to meet staffing
requirements?
§ 36.85 Is a nurse required to be available in
the evenings?
§ 36.86 Are there staff training
requirements?
§ 36.112 Can a homeliving program be
closed, transferred, consolidated, or
substantially curtailed for failure to meet
these standards?
§ 36.120 What type of reporting is required
to ensure accountability?
Program Requirements
§ 36.90 What recreation, academic tutoring,
student safety and health care services
must homeliving programs provide?
§ 36.91 What are the program requirements
for behavioral health services?
§ 36.92 Are there any activities that must be
offered by a homeliving program?
§ 36.93 Is a homeliving handbook required?
§ 36.94 What must a homeliving handbook
contain?
§ 36.95 What sanitary standards must
homeliving programs meet?
§ 36.96 May students be required to assist
with daily or weekly cleaning?
§ 36.97 What basic requirements must a
program’s health services meet?
§ 36.98 Must the homeliving program have
an isolation room for ill children?
§ 36.99 Are immunizations required for
residential program students?
§ 36.100 Are there minimum requirements
for student attendance checks?
§ 36.101 How often must students who have
been separated for emergency health or
behavioral reasons be supervised?
§ 36.102 What student resources must be
provided by a homeliving program?
§ 36.103 Are there requirements for
multipurpose spaces in homeliving
programs?
§ 36.70
Privacy
§ 36.110 Must programs provide space for
storing personal effects?
Waivers and Accountability
§ 36.111 Can a tribe, tribal governing body
or local school board waive the
homeliving standards?
Subpart G—Homeliving Programs
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 13; 25 U.S.C. 2008;
Pub. L. 107–110 (115 Stat. 1425).
What terms do I need to know?
The following definitions apply to
this subpart:
Behavioral health professional means
a State licensed or State certified Social
Worker, School Counselor, Drug and
Alcohol Counselor, School Psychologist,
or School Psychometrist responsible for
coordinating a broad range of needs
including:
(1) Support groups;
(2) Individual counseling;
(3) Crisis intervention;
(4) Preventive activities; and
(5) Coordination of referrals and
outside services with appropriate
providers.
Behavioral Health Program means a
homeliving based service designed to
decrease barriers to learning or increase
positive, personal well-being by:
(1) Providing early intervention
services, coordinating crisis
intervention and prevention services;
(2) Promoting a positive social and
emotional environment;
(3) Reducing the incidence of
problems; and
(4) Referring students with behavioral
needs that require professional medical
care to an appropriate residential care
facility.
Behavioral health services means the
services provided by a school behavioral
health program as defined in this
section.
68499
Homeliving Manager means the
employee responsible for direct
supervision of the homeliving program
staff and students.
Homeliving Program means a program
that provides room and board in a
boarding school or dormitory to
residents who are either:
(1) Enrolled in and are current
members of a public school in the
community in which they reside; or
(2) Members of the instructional
program in the same boarding school in
which they are counted as residents
and:
(i) Are officially enrolled in the
residential program of a Bureauoperated or funded school; and
(ii) Are actually receiving a
homeliving program provided to all
students who are provided room and
board in a boarding school or dormitory.
Homeliving Program Staff means the
employee(s) responsible for direct
supervision of students in the
homeliving area.
Homeliving Supervisor means the
employee with overall administrative
responsibility for supervising students,
programs, and personnel in the
homeliving area.
§ 36.71
What is the purpose of this part?
The purpose of this part is to establish
standards for homeliving programs.
Staffing
§ 36.75 What qualifications must
homeliving staff possess?
(a) Homeliving staff must possess the
qualifications shown in the following
table:
Position
Required training
(1) Homeliving Supervisor ....
(2) Homeliving Manager .......
Must be qualified based on size and complexity of the school, but at minimum possess a bachelor’s degree.
Must be qualified based on the size and complexity of the student body but must at a minimum have an associate’s degree no later than 2008.
Must have at least 32 post-secondary semester hours (or 48 quarter hours) in an applicable academic discipline,
including fields related to working with children, such as, child development, education, behavioral sciences
and cultural studies.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
(3) Homeliving Program Staff
(b) A person employed as a
homeliving program staff:
(1) Should meet the requirements of
paragraph (a) of this section by the
2009–2010 school year; and
(2) May, upon showing good cause,
petition the school supervisor (or the
homeliving supervisor for peripheral
dorms) for a waiver from the new
qualifications.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
§ 36.76 Who is in charge of all homeliving
operations?
for operations of the homeliving
program.
One staff member who has the
authority to ensure the successful
functioning of all phases of the
homeliving program should be
designated as in charge of all
homeliving operations. All staff should
be advised of the lines of authority
through an organizational chart
approved by the local board responsible
§ 36.77 What are the homeliving staffing
requirements?
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Homeliving programs must meet the
staffing requirements of this section.
(a) Effective with the 2009–2010
school year, each homeliving program
must maintain the following student
minimum supervisory requirements on
weekdays:
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
68500
Grade level
Elementary
(Grade 1–
6).
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Time of day
Ratio
Morning ........
1:20.
During school
Grade level
As school
needs.
1:20.
Evening ........
Time of day
Ratio
Night ............
1:40.
Morning ........
As school
needs.
Evening ........
Night ............
Ratio
1:30.
1:50.
(b) The following staffing ratios apply
on weekends:
Grade level
Time of day
Elementary (Grade 1–6) .....................................
Morning/day .....................................................
Evening ............................................................
Night .................................................................
1:20.
1:20.
1:40.
High School (Gr. 7–12) ......................................
Ratio
Morning/day .....................................................
Evening ............................................................
Night .................................................................
1:40.
1:40.
1:50.
§ 36.78 What are the staffing requirements
for homeliving programs offering less than
5 nights service?
are based on the combined enrollment
during the homeliving count period.
For homeliving programs providing
less than 5 nights service, the staffing
levels from § 36.77 apply. To fill this
requirement, the program must use only
employees who work a minimum of 20
hours per week.
§ 36.81 May a homeliving program use
support staff or teachers to meet behavioral
health staffing requirements?
§ 36.79 What are the homeliving
behavioral professional staff/student ratio
requirements?
Behavioral health professional(s) is
necessary in homeliving programs to
address issues, such as abuse, neglect,
trauma, cultural conflict, and lack of
school success. Each homeliving
program must provide a minimum of
one half-time behavioral health
professional for every 50 students.
(a) The program may fill the staffing
requirements of this section by using
contract services, other agencies
(including the Indian Health Service) or
private/nonprofit volunteer service
organizations.
(b) Off-reservation homeliving
programs should consider providing one
full-time behavioral health professional
for every 50 students.
(c) For purposes of this section, a one
half-time behavioral health professional
is one that works for the homeliving
program a minimum of 20 hours per
week.
(d) For purposes of this section, in
instances where the behavioral health
services are obtained through other
programs, the behavioral health
professional must be available at the
request of the homeliving program.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Time of day
1:20.
During school
High School
(Gr. 7–12).
Grade level
§ 36.80 If a school or dormitory has
separated boys’ and girls’ homeliving
programs, may the same behavioral
professional be used for each program?
Yes, a program may use the same
behavioral professional for both boys’
and girls’ programs. However,
behavioral health staffing requirements
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
No, a homeliving program must not
use support staff or teachers to meet
behavioral health staffing requirements.
The only exception is if the individual
support staff employee or teacher has
the appropriate behavioral health
license or certification.
§ 36.82 May behavioral health
professional(s) provide services during the
academic school day?
Behavioral health professional(s) must
average at least 75 percent of their work
hours with students in their
dormitories. These work hours must
occur outside of the academic school
day, except in emergency situations as
deemed by the administrative head of
the homeliving program or designee.
The purpose of this requirement is to
maximize contact time with students in
their homeliving setting.
§ 36.83 How many hours can a student be
taken out of the academic setting to receive
behavioral health services?
A student may spend no more than 5
hours per week out of the academic
setting to receive behavioral health
services from the homeliving behavioral
health professional(s), except for
emergency situations.
§ 36.84 Can a program hire or contract or
acquire by other means behavioral health
professionals to meet staffing
requirements?
A program may hire or contract
behavioral health professionals to meet
staffing requirements or acquire such
services by other means such as through
a Memorandum of Understanding with
other programs.
(a) At least one individual must be a
licensed or certified school counselor or
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
a social worker who is licensed/certified
to practice at the location where the
services are provided.
(b) For additional staffing, other
individuals with appropriate
certifications or licenses are acceptable
to meet staffing requirements.
§ 36.85 Is a nurse required to be available
in the evenings?
No, a program is not required to make
a nurse (LPN or RN) available in the
evenings. However, this is encouraged
for homeliving programs with an
enrollment greater than 300 or for
programs that are more than 50 miles
from available services.
§ 36.86 Are there staff training
requirements?
(a) All homeliving program staff as
well as all employees that supervise
students participating in homeliving
services and activities must have the
appropriate certification or licensing
requirements up to date and on file.
Programs must provide annual and
continuous professional training and
development appropriate to the
certification and licensing requirements.
(b) All homeliving program staff as
well as all employees who supervise
students participating in homeliving
services and activities must receive
annual training in the topics set out in
this section before the first day of
student occupancy for the year.
(1) First Aid/Safety/Emergency &
Crisis Preparedness;
(2) CPR—Automated External
Defibrillator;
(3) Student Checkout Policy;
(4) Confidentiality (Health
Information Privacy Act and the Family
Education Right to Privacy Act.);
(5) Medication Administration;
(6) Student Rights;
(7) Child Abuse Reporting
Requirements and Protection
Procedures; and
(8) Suicide Prevention.
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(c) Homeliving staff as well as all
employees that supervise students
participating in homeliving services and
activities must be given the following
training annually:
(1) De-escalation/Conflict Resolution;
(2) Substance Abuse Issues;
(3) Ethics;
(4) Parenting skills/Child Care;
(5) Special Education and Working
with Students with Disabilities;
(6) Student Supervision Skills;
(7) Child Development (recognizes
various stages of development in the
student population);
(8) Basic Counseling Skills; and
(9) Continuity of Operations Plan
(COOP).
Program Requirements
§ 36.90 What recreation, academic
tutoring, student safety, and health care
services must homeliving programs
provide?
All homeliving programs must
provide for appropriate student safety,
academic tutoring, recreation, and
health care services for their students, as
deemed necessary by the local school
board or homeliving board.
§ 36.91 What are the program
requirements for behavioral health
services?
(a) The homeliving behavioral health
program must make available the
following services:
(1) Behavioral Health Screening/
Assessment;
(2) Diagnosis;
(3) Treatment Plan;
(4) Treatment and Placement;
(5) Evaluation; and
(6) Record of Services (if applicable,
in coordination with the student’s
Individual Education Plan).
(b) Each homeliving behavioral health
program must have written procedures
for dealing with emergency behavioral
health care issues.
(c) Parents or guardians may opt out
of any non-emergency behavioral health
services by submitting a written request.
(d) Parents or guardians must be
consulted before a child is prescribed
behavioral health.
(e) Medication in a non-emergency
situation.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
§ 36.92 Are there any activities that must
be offered by a homeliving program?
Yes, a homeliving program must make
available the following activities:
(a) One hour per day of scheduled,
structured physical activity Monday
through Thursday, and two hours of
scheduled physical activities on the
weekends for any students who are in
residence on the weekends;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
(b) One hour per day of scheduled,
structured study at least four days per
week for all students, and additional
study time for students who are failing
any classes;
(c) Tutoring during study time;
(d) Native language or cultural
activities; and
(e) Wellness program that may
include character, health, wellness, and
sex education.
§ 36.93 Is a homeliving handbook
required?
Yes, each program must publish a
homeliving handbook, which may be
incorporated into a general student
handbook. During the first week the
students and staff are in the dormitory,
the homeliving program must:
(a) Provide each student with a copy
of the handbook that contains all the
provisions in § 36.94;
(b) Provide all staff, students, and
parents or guardians with a current and
updated copy of student rights and
responsibilities;
(c) Conduct an orientation for all
students on the handbook and student
rights and responsibilities; and
(d) Ensure that all students, school
staff, and to the extent possible, parents
and guardians confirm in writing that
they have received a copy of and
understand the homeliving handbook.
§ 36.94 What must a homeliving handbook
contain?
A homeliving handbook must contain
all of the following, and may include
additional information:
(a) Mission/Vision Statement;
(b) Discipline Policy;
(c) Parent/Student Rights and
Responsibilities;
(d) Confidentiality;
(e) Sexual Harassment Policy;
(f) Violence/Bullying Policy;
(g) Homeliving Policies and
Procedures;
(h) Services Available;
(i) Personnel and Position Listing;
(j) Emergency Procedures and Contact
Numbers;
(k) Bank Procedures;
(l) Transportation Policy;
(m) Check-Out Procedures;
(n) Dress Code;
(o) Drug/Alcohol Policy;
(p) Computer Usage Policy;
(q) Medication Administration Policy
and Procedure; and
(r) Isolation/Separation Policy.
§ 36.95 What sanitary standards must
homeliving programs meet?
Each homeliving program must meet
all of the following standards:
(a) Restrooms, showers, and common
areas must be cleaned daily;
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68501
(b) Rooms must be cleaned daily;
(c) Linens must be changed and
cleaned weekly;
(d) Linens are to be provided;
(e) Basic Toiletries must be provided;
and
(f) Functional washing machines and
dryers must be provided.
§ 36.96 May students be required to assist
with daily or weekly cleaning?
Yes, students can be required to assist
with daily or weekly cleaning. However,
the ultimate responsibility of
cleanliness rests with the homeliving
supervisor and local law or rules
regarding chemical use must be
followed.
§ 36.97 What basic requirements must a
program’s health services meet?
(a) A homeliving program must make
available basic medical, dental, vision,
and other necessary health services for
all students residing in the homeliving
program, subject to agreements between
the BIE and the Indian Health Service or
between a tribally-operated homeliving
program and the Indian Health Service
or tribal health program.
(b) A homeliving program must have
written procedures for dealing with
emergency health care issues.
(c) Parents or guardians may opt out
of any non-emergency services by
submitting a written request.
(d) The homeliving supervisor or
designee must act in loco parentis when
the parent or guardian cannot be found.
§ 36.98 Must the homeliving program have
an isolation room for ill children?
Yes, the homeliving program must
have an isolation room(s) available for
ill students. The isolation room (or
rooms, if needed) must be made
available for use by students with
contagious conditions. Contagious boys
and girls should have separate rooms.
The isolation room(s) should have a
separate access to shower and restroom
facilities. Students isolated for
contagious illness must be supervised as
frequently and as closely as the
circumstances and protocols require,
but at least every 30 minutes.
§ 36.99 Are immunizations required for
residential program students?
Each student must have all
immunizations required by State, local,
or tribal governments before being
admitted to a homeliving program.
Annual flu shots are not required, but
are encouraged.
§ 36.100 Are there minimum requirements
for student attendance checks?
Yes, there are minimum requirements
for student attendance checks as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
68502
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(a) All students must be physically
accounted for four times daily;
(b) Each count must be at least two
hours apart;
(c) If students are on an off-campus
activity, physical accounts of students
must be made at least once every two
hours or at other reasonable times
depending on the activity;
(d) At night all student rooms should
be physically checked at least once
every hour;
(e) If a student is unaccounted for, the
homeliving program must follow its
established search procedures; and
(f) When homeliving staff is aware of
a student who is going to be absent from
school, the homeliving program is
required to notify the school.
§ 36.101 How often must students who
have been separated for emergency health
or behavioral reasons be supervised?
Students who have been separated for
emergency behavioral or health reasons
must be supervised as frequently and as
closely as the circumstances and
protocols require. No student will be left
unsupervised for any period until such
factors as the student’s health based on
a medical assessment, the safety of the
student, and any other applicable
guidance for dealing with behavior or
health emergencies are considered.
§ 36.102 What student resources must be
provided by a homeliving program?
The following minimum resources
must be available at all homeliving
programs:
(a) Library resources such as access to
books and resource materials, including
school libraries and public libraries
which are conveniently available;
(b) A copy of each textbook used by
the academic program or the equivalent
for peripheral dorms; and
(c) Reasonable access to a computer
with Internet access to facilitate
homework and study.
§ 36.103 What are the requirements for
multi-purpose spaces in homeliving
programs?
Homeliving programs must provide
adequate areas for sleeping, study,
recreation, and related activities.
Privacy
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
§ 36.110 Must programs provide space for
storing personal effects?
Yes, students are entitled to private
personal spaces for storing their own
personal effects, including at least one
lockable closet, dresser drawer, or
storage space. However, all drawers,
dressers, storage space, or lockable
space are the property of the homeliving
program and are subject to random
search.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
Waivers and Accountability
§ 36.111 Can a tribe, tribal governing body,
or local school board waive the homeliving
standards?
A tribal governing body or local
school board may waive some or all of
the standards established by this part if
the body or board determines that the
standards are inappropriate for the
needs of the tribe’s students.
(a) If a tribal governing body or school
board waives standards under this
section, it must, within 60 days, submit
proposed alternative standards to the
Director, BIE.
(b) Within 90 days of receiving a
waiver and proposal under paragraph
(a) of this section, the Director must
either:
(1) Approve the submission; or
(2) Deliver to the governing body or
school board a written explanation of
the good cause for rejecting the
submission.
(c) If the Director rejects a submission
under paragraph (c) of this section, the
governing body or school board may
submit another waiver and proposal for
approval. The standards in this part
remain in effect until the Director
approves alternative standards.
§ 36.112 Can a homeliving program be
closed, transferred, consolidated, or
substantially curtailed for failure to meet
these standards?
No, a homeliving program cannot be
closed, transferred to any other
authority, consolidated, or its programs
substantially curtailed for failure to
meet these standards.
§ 36.120 What type of reporting is required
to ensure accountability?
The homeliving program must
provide to the appropriate local school
board or alternative board such as a
homeliving board, the tribal governing
body, BIE, and the Secretary of the
Interior, an annual accountability report
within 45 days following the end of the
school year consisting of:
(a) Enrollment figures identified by
the homeliving count period;
(b) A brief description of programs
offered;
(c) A statement of compliance with
the requirements of this part and, if the
program is not in compliance,
recommendations for achieving
compliance; and
(d) Recommendations to improve the
homeliving program including
identification of issues and needs.
[FR Doc. E7–23330 Filed 12–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–6W–P
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
BOARD
29 CFR Part 102
Revisions of Regulations Concerning
Procedures for Filing Appeals to
Denial in Whole or Part of Initial FOIA
Requests
National Labor Relations Board
(NLRB).
ACTION: Final Rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Labor Relations
Board (NLRB) is amending regulations
concerning the procedures for filing an
appeal to adverse FOIA determinations.
The revisions require that appeals be
filed within 28 calendar days of the
service of the notification of the adverse
determination.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lester A. Heltzer, Executive Secretary,
National Labor Relations Board, Room
11600, 1099 14th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20570–0001,
Telephone (202) 273–1067, e-mail
address Lester.Heltzer@nlrb.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Current regulation
Section 102.117(c)(2)(v) provides in
part that ‘‘An appeal from an adverse
determination made pursuant to
paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section must
be filed within 20 working days of the
receipt by the person making the request
of the notification of the adverse
determination where the request is
denied in its entirety; or, in the case of
a partial denial, within 20 working days
of the receipt of any records being made
available pursuant to the request.’’
II. Proposed revision
Since the Agency does not send such
determinations on initial requests by
certified mail, it has no objective means
of determining when a requestor
receives an adverse determination.
Therefore, it is impossible to know from
which date to compute time periods
from adverse FOIA determinations.
Other agencies’ practices support
using the date of service rather than date
of receipt as the appropriate date for
computing timeliness of FOIA appeals.
Under 28 CFR Ch. 1, Sec. 16.9, appeals
from adverse Department of Justice
FOIA determinations must be filed
‘‘within 60 days of the date of the letter
denying’’ the request. See also, Center
for Biological Diversity v. Gutierrez, 451
F. Supp.2d 57 (D.D.C. 2006)(Department
of Commerce regulations provide that
appeals from adverse determinations
must be received by 5 p.m. EST on the
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 5, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68491-68502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23330]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 36
RIN 1076-AE51
Homeliving Programs
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Education, BIA, Interior.
ACTION: Final Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, the Secretary of
the Interior is publishing final regulations addressing homeliving
programs administered under the Bureau of Indian Education-funded
school system.
DATES: Effective Date: January 4, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Skenandore, Director, Bureau of
Indian Education, 1849 C Street NW., MS-3609, Washington, DC 20240,
phone (202) 208-6123.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. What Information Does This Section Address?
This section addresses:
--Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Pub. L. 107-
110; enacted January 8, 2002; ``NCLBA'' or ``the Act''), section 1122.
[[Page 68492]]
--Overview of the negotiated rulemaking process.
--How public comments were handled.
B. What Are the Negotiated Rulemaking Requirements of the Act?
The Secretary of the Interior (``Secretary'') established a
negotiated rulemaking committee (Committee) to develop proposed
regulations to implement several sections of the Act related to the
Bureau of Indian Education (Bureau)-funded school system. The Act
required that the committee be comprised only of representatives of the
Federal Government and representatives of tribes served by Bureau-
funded schools. The Act also required that, to the maximum extent
possible, the tribal representative membership reflect the
proportionate share of students from tribes served by the Bureau-funded
school system. The Secretary chartered the committee under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix (FACA)) on May 1, 2003. The
committee was comprised of Federal representatives and representatives
of tribes served by Bureau-funded schools who met in February 2006 to
negotiate recommendations for proposed regulations under Section 1122
of the Act, 25 CFR part 36, Minimum Academic Standards for the Basic
Education of Indian Children and National Criteria for Dormitory
Situations. As a basis for negotiations and for consensus, the
committee used draft regulations proposed by the Bureau school and
residential administrators.
C. What Was the Negotiated Rulemaking Process?
As required by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Pub. L. 107-
110; enacted January 8, 2002, referred to in this preamble as ``NCLB''
or ``the Act''), the Department of the Interior established a
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee to develop proposed rules to implement
several sections of the Act relating to the Bureau of Indian Education-
funded school system. Negotiated Rulemaking is a process sanctioned by
Subchapter III, or Chapter 5, Title 5, United States Code and the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix (FACA), that employs
Federal representatives and members of the public who will be affected
by rules to jointly develop proposed rules.
In this case, the Act required the Secretary of the Interior to
select representatives of Indian tribes and Bureau-funded schools as
well as Federal Government representatives to serve on the Committee.
The Committee's task was to draft proposed rules to recommend to the
Secretary. Upon the Secretary's approval, draft rules are published in
the Federal Register for written public comments within a 120-day
public comment period. After the close of the public comment period,
the Committee will reconvene to review these comments and to recommend
promulgation of final rules to the Secretary.
The Secretary chartered the Committee under the FACA on May 1,
2003. It is comprised of 19 members nominated by Indian tribes and
tribally operated schools. The law required that, to the maximum extent
possible, the tribal representative membership should reflect the
proportionate share of students from tribes served by the Bureau-funded
school system. The Secretary also appointed to the Committee six
members from within the Department of the Interior. The Committee
selected three tribal representatives and two Federal representatives
as co-chairs. Six individuals were hired to facilitate all Committee
meetings.
The Committee initially met in the months of June through October
2003 to develop regulations in six areas. Subsequently, the Department
reconvened the Committee in February 2004 to develop regulations in the
areas of closure and consolidation of schools and criteria for
homeliving situations. The Committee met on several occasions and
developed the proposed rules that were published on July 12, 2004 (69
FR 41770).
D. How Were Public Comments Handled?
The Secretary published proposed regulations on July 12, 2004, for
public comment. The public comment period ended on November 9, 2004. We
received comments on this proposed rule from nine commenters, including
tribal leaders, educators, and administrators. We reviewed all
comments. Summaries of individual public comments and our responses are
noted below. The final regulations are organized, as were the proposed
regulations, under three broad categories: homeliving staffing;
homeliving programs; and homeliving privacy. The final regulations,
published as 25 CFR part 36--Homeliving Situations, reflect the public
comments that were accepted. The Department still has under
consideration the regulations for school closure and consolidation. At
this time, the Department has made no final decision on issuing these
rules.
II. Public Comments
In this section we discuss the main public comments received.
General comments are discussed first, followed by comments on specific
sections of the rule. Our responses follow each comment.
Section 36.70 What Terms do I Need to Know?
Comment: Several commenters suggested that we clarify or define the
term ``supplemental services'' in Sec. 36.70 and several others
suggested that we clarify what ``actually receiving supplemental
services'' means in Sec. 36.70(2)(ii).
Response: We considered these comments and removed the obsolete
reference to ``supplemental services.''
Comment: Several commenters suggested we add definitions for the
following terms: ``behavioral health programs,'' ``behavioral health
services,'' and ``behavioral health staff.''
Response: We accepted the comments and have added definitions for
the terms.
Comment: A commenter recommended clarifying the definitions of
``homeliving manager'' and ``homeliving supervisor'' by switching the
definitions to more accurately reflect what each position is
responsible for. In the alternative, if the manager is to be
responsible for physically supervising students, the commenter
recommended changing the name of the ``homeliving supervisor'' to
``homeliving administrator.''
Response: We considered this comment and made no change.
Section 36.71 What Is the Purpose of This Part?
Comment: A commenter recommended changing the definition for
``homeliving situation'' to: ``Any program where education instruction
and residential services are provided for students enrolled in Bureau-
funded schools, who are housed at a Bureau-funded school facility, and
who receive care, before and after school hours, in a manner in which
they do not have to depend on family or guardianship.''
Response: We considered this comment, but, determined no change was
necessary.
Comment: A commenter suggested replacing the term ``homeliving
situations'' with ``homeliving programs.''
Response: We considered the comment and revised Sec. 36.71.
[[Page 68493]]
Section 36.75 What Qualifications Must Homeliving Staff Possess?
Comment: A commenter suggested that the competency or professional
standards of homeliving personnel should not be compromised in Sec.
36.75. The commenter stated that agreements to operate a quality
program with quality staff is between BIE and the tribal governing body
and should not be discretionary at the school staff level. The
commenter stated that it may be appropriate to waive such
qualifications only where the employee is a trainee under the
supervision of a fully qualified supervisor, and it is a tribal
decision, not a Federal one.
Response: We considered the comment, but determined that no change
was necessary because a tribe can instruct the school supervisor if the
school is a tribally operated school.
Comment: A commenter stated that requirements for improved criteria
for homeliving staff in Sec. 36.75 should not be unfunded mandates.
The commenter supports a complete overhaul of the current funding
formula in order to create a universal therapeutic model in all BIE-
funded schools.
Response: While the Committee was aware of the funding needs for
Indian education, the scope of the Committee was to draft regulations
to implement the statute. Therefore, while the Committee notes the
commenter's general comments about the need for additional funding and
different funding priorities, these comments are outside of the scope
of the rulemaking. Therefore, we made no change to the regulations.
Comment: A commenter suggested that substance abuse education and
prevention training should be added to required training in Sec.
36.75.
Response: This is already required in Sec. 36.86(c)(2).
Comment: A commenter suggested: (1) that a determination of good
cause in Sec. 36.75(b)(2) should be made at the Education Line Officer
level, (2) that guidelines or standards be provided for determining
what good cause means, and (3) that a timeframe for waivers be added.
Response: We considered the comment and accepted it in part and
rejected it in part. We rejected the part of the comment that raised
issues the Committee considered in its deliberations. We accepted the
part of the comment on adding a timeframe for waivers and revised Sec.
36.75(b)(2).
Comment: A commenter recommended that in Sec. 36.75 the delay of
the effective date for higher standards for homeliving staff apply to
current staff as a well as to new hires, and that the effective date
depend on the Department's securing additional funding.
Response: The Committee considered the effective date of the higher
standards for homeliving staff. The comment does not raise new issues
that the Committee did not consider. Therefore, we considered the
comment, but we made no change to the regulations.
Comment: A commenter suggested changing Sec. 36.75 to allow the
homeliving supervisor rather than the ``school supervisor'' to grant a
waiver for a showing of good cause.
Response: We considered the comment, but we believed the proposed
language provides for the entity with decision-making authority to
decide whether to grant the waiver. Therefore, we made no change to the
regulations.
Comment: Several commenters suggested that some homeliving program
staff may not need the same level of educational standards as others
because they work at night when students are sleeping and recommended
changing the required standards in Sec. 36.75(a).
Response: In adopting these regulations, the Committee considered
that there are different levels of homeliving program staff. The
Committee considered and did not adopt different standards for night-
duty. Therefore, we considered the comment, but made no change to the
regulations.
Comment: A commenter recommended that Sec. 36.75 include a
certificate program in lieu of the 32-hour post-secondary semester hour
requirement since BIE-operated boarding schools are unique. Another
commenter suggested that Sec. 36.75 provide for development of a
residential certificate of training including at least 80 hours in
topics such as child development, behavior management, working with
students at risk, special education students, social interaction
skills, etc., as an option to requiring 32/48 hours of college credit.
The certificate would be updated every 3 years with at least 10 hours
of training.
A second commenter recommended that distance education and computer
modules be available to staff.
A third commenter recommended that Sec. 36.75 provide that each
facility is responsible to set its own appropriate training
requirements to fit its specific needs. This commenter further
suggested that requiring 32 hours of post-secondary semester hours in a
field related to child development and at least 1 year of relevant
experience will cause a drop in the applicant pool and that a degree
does not necessarily make an applicant competent for a position.
Response: We considered these comments and made no changes to the
rule.
Comment: A commenter suggested that if the definitions for
``homeliving manager'' and ``homeliving supervisor'' are switched, the
qualifications for the two positions should also be switched in Sec.
36.75.
Response: We considered this comment and made no changes because
the definitions were not switched.
Comment: A commenter recommended deleting Sec. 36.75(b) ``when
this part is published in final'' because it is unnecessary considering
the 2009-2010 timeframe and could be interpreted to apply only to those
persons employed at the time the rule becomes final.
Response: We accepted this comment and changed the text to delete
the reference to the rule's publication date.
Comment: A commenter recommended that we clarify Sec. 36.75(b)(2)
by stating whether the supervisor empowered to grant waivers from new
qualifications has procedural guidance to follow.
Response: We considered this comment and revised the paragraph to
clarify the process. The paragraph now states that a person not meeting
the qualifications, ``may, upon showing good cause, petition the school
supervisor (or the homeliving supervisor for peripheral dorms) for a
waiver from the new qualifications.''
Comment: A commenter stated that: (1) 32 hours of post-secondary
semester hours for basic homeliving staff would dramatically reduce the
applicant supply pool for those positions at the local level; (2) We
should clarify whether new hires before SY 2009-2010 must meet the new
requirements; (3) Funding should be made available for dormitory
programs, for training and post-secondary credit hours for meeting the
recommended qualification requirements, and for meeting the needs of
the students being served.
Response: We considered the comment, but did not change the
section. While the training requirement may reduce the number of
applicants for these positions, dormitory staff must have more training
because of new needs children are exhibiting in behavior, new
diagnostic findings affecting learning skills, and changes in life
styles affecting family concepts and step-parenting, among other
issues.
Comment: A commenter stated that if ``recreation staff'' is
included in ``homeliving staff'' that fact should be
[[Page 68494]]
stated and clarified in the definition of ``homeliving staff.''
Response: The committee considered this in its original
deliberation and no new issues have been raised by this comment that
were not already considered by the committee.
Section 36.76 Who Is in Charge of all Homeliving Operations?
Comment: A commenter stated that the purpose of Sec. 36.76 is
unclear. If the section means there will be clear lines of authority,
the question should be revised to read: ``Must there exist clear lines
of authority?'' and the answer should read: ``Yes, clear lines of
authority must be established through the development of an
organizational chart approved by the local board * * *'' Or, if this
section means to make a point other than establishing the requirement
that an organizational chart be developed; the section needs to be re-
written for clarity.
Response: We accepted this comment and made corresponding changes
to the rule.
Section 36.77 What Are the Homeliving Program Staffing Requirements?
Comment: Several commenters recommended that the delayed
implementation of the homeliving staff-to-student ratios to school year
2009-10 in Sec. 36.77 depend on the Department's securing the
necessary funding to make the new ratios affordable.
Response: We considered this comment and revised the section title
in response.
Comment: A commenter suggested that adult-to-child staffing ratios
in dormitories for Native American children should be lower than 1:20-
30 if other similar programs require lower adult-to-child staffing
ratios.
Response: The Committee considered adult-to-child staffing ratios
in drafting the regulations. The Committee discussed the pros and cons
of changing staffing ratios and chose to adopt credentialing rather
than changing staffing ratios. The comments raise no new issues to
consider. Therefore, we made no change to the regulations.
Comment: A commenter recommended that Sec. 36.77 should state what
ratios will be effective until SY 2009-2010.
Response: We considered this comment, but made no changes to the
regulation.
Comment: A commenter suggested that since Sec. 36.75 requires
higher quality staff, Sec. 36.77 should provide that this staff be
compensated appropriately, but questioned how positions will be funded
if IRG is cut.
Response: The Committee in its original deliberations considered
the impact of these requirements and balanced them with the needs of
the students. No new issues are raised by the commenter that were not
considered in the original deliberations. Therefore, we made no change
to the rule.
Comment: A commenter suggested that Sec. 36.77 state that existing
staff-to-student ratios remain in effect until the new requirements are
effective.
Response: The Committee considered this issue at the time it
negotiated the regulations and the comment raises no new issues.
Therefore, we made no change to the regulations.
Comment: A commenter questioned whether it is necessary in Sec.
36.77(b) to have three different staff-to-student ratios on weekends
because weekend staff is presumably supervising rather than conducting
structured programs.
Response: The Committee considered this issue at the time it
negotiated the regulations and the comment raises no new issues.
Therefore, we made no change to the regulations.
Comment: A commenter recommended revising Sec. 36.77 by revising
the question to: ``What is the minimum acceptable staffing supervisory
requirements necessary to adequately supervise students and provide a
safe environment?'' and eliminating the introductory sentence.
Response: We considered this comment and changed the section title
to read, ``What are the homeliving program staffing requirements?''
Section 36.79 What Are the Homeliving Behavioral Staff/Student Ratio
Requirements?
Comment: A commenter suggested that the regulations define the term
``behavioral staff.'' Another commenter suggested clarifying whether a
behavioral health professional is the same as a certified counselor,
either school or MSW, in Sec. 36.79.
Response: We accepted these comments and defined ``behavioral
staff'' at Sec. 36.79.
Comment: A commenter stated that the regulations at Sec. 36.79(b)
change ``should'' to ``must'' for providing one full-time behavioral
health professional for off-reservation boarding schools.
Response: We considered the comment, but we did not accept it. This
issue was raised during the original Committee deliberations. In order
to reach consensus the Committee adopted the provision that the
homeliving program ``should'' consider providing these services. This
comment does not raise any new issues that were not considered by the
committee when originally discussing this issue. Therefore, we made no
change to the regulations.
Comment: A commenter recommended that Sec. 36.79 be amended to
delete a 20-hour minimum.
Response: We accepted this comment and added new paragraph (d) in
response.
Comment: A commenter stated that funding increases are necessary to
meet the criteria in Sec. 36.79 for the number of and the educational
level of behavioral health professionals who are necessary in
homeliving programs to address issues such as abuse, neglect, trauma,
cultural conflict, and lack of school success.
Response: Budget-related issues are fully addressed elsewhere in
this preamble.
Comment: A commenter recommended revising Sec. 36.79(b) to state
``must,'' not ``should'' so that behavioral health may not be made
optional and students who live off-reservation are not deprived of this
requirement.
Response: This issue was raised during the original deliberations
and, to reach consensus, the Committee adopted the provision that the
homeliving program ``should'' consider providing these services. This
comment does not raise any new issues that were not considered by the
Committee when originally discussing this issue. Therefore, the comment
is not accepted.
Section 36.80 If a School Has Separated Boys' and Girls' Homeliving
Programs, May the Same Behavioral Staff Be Used for Each Program?
Comment: A commenter recommended clarifying the term ``homeliving
count period'' in Sec. 36.80.
Response: We considered the comment, but we are making no change to
the regulations because the homeliving count period is defined in the
funding formula regulations at 25 CFR 39.
Section 36.81 May a Homeliving Program Use Support Staff or Teachers to
Meet Behavioral Health Staffing Requirements?
Comment: A commenter recommended revising the second sentence in
Sec. 36.81 to allow for flexibility in how a residential facility
meets the behavioral health staffing requirements. The sentence is
recommended to read: ``The only exception is if the individual support
staff employee or teacher has the appropriate behavioral health license
or
[[Page 68495]]
certification or other appropriate training and supervision.''
Response: We accepted this comment in part and revised the second
sentence to read as follows: ``The only exception is if the individual
support staff employee or teacher has the appropriate behavioral health
license or certification.''
Comment: A commenter recommended eliminating the exception in Sec.
36.81 or adding a requirement that the individual's contract provide
that the teaching and behavioral health services are not to be provided
simultaneously.
Response: We considered this comment in conjunction with other
comments on this issue. If teachers have the requisite training, then
they may be able to provide the service as long as the provisions of
Sec. 36.82 have been met. Therefore, we made no change to the rule.
Section 36.82 May Behavioral Health Staff Provide Services During the
Academic School Day?
Comment: A commenter recommended adding a provision for maximizing
time the behavioral health staff is working with students during the
time students are in the dorms, especially on weekends. Another
commenter stated that we should amend Sec. 36.82 to require that
behavioral health staff provide services outside the academic school
day except in emergencies and provide that schools have the necessary
staff to handle emergency situations. The commenter suggested that
behavioral health staff may observe students in their academic
environment.
Response: In response to these comments, we revised Sec. 36.82.
Section 36.83 How Many Hours Can a Student be Taken Out of the Academic
Setting to Receive Behavioral Health Services?
Comment: A commenter suggested that Sec. 36.83 be clarified so
that schools may not use behavioral health staff outside their intended
services.
Response: We considered the comment and addressed the suggested
changes in Sec. 32.82.
Comment: A commenter recommended that we amend Sec. 36.83 to
provide that students not be taken out of the academic setting to
receive behavioral health services unless it is an emergency and to
provide that schools have their own behavioral health professionals.
The commenter recommended that Licensed Practicing Counselors not have
a caseload of students. Another commenter recommended revising Sec.
36.83 to state: ``should not spend more than'' rather than ``may spend
no more than'' in order to provide staff the needed flexibility to
appropriately address each student's individual needs and provide
necessary services.
Response: We considered these comments and made changes consistent
with the other comments on this section.
Section 36.84 Can a Program Hire or Contract or Acquire by Other Means
Behavioral Health Professionals to Meet Staffing Requirements?
Comment: A commenter recommended that Sec. 36.84 provide that
instructional time be guarded. Each student should be able to go
through an initial screening provided by the counselors.
Response: We considered this comment, but no change to the rule is
necessary.
Comment: A commenter recommended delaying implementation of
behavioral staff license requirement until additional appropriations
are obtained and recommended revising Sec. 36.84, paragraph (b) by
changing ``and'' to ``or.''
Response: We accepted this comment and changed the rule.
Comment: A commenter recommended that more instruction be provided
so BIE-operated and grant/contract school programs can strategize with
one another to maximize services to students and minimize the cost of
services. In some locations distance is a factor and highly qualified
people are in extreme demand and few agree to travel long distances
and/or agree to provide services to a large number of identified
students. Restrictions imposed by preferences of authority hinder
meeting the needs of students. Schools must have strong working
relationships.
Response: We revised this section to allow tribes and schools to
work together to provide these services to students.
Section 36.85 Is a Nurse Required To Be Available in the Evenings?
Comment: A commenter recommended that we amend Sec. 36.85 to
require that nursing staff be on campus not only during the academic
hours, but also outside of academic hours because more accidents are
going to happen outside of academic hours. Another commenter
recommended making the requirement in Sec. 36.85 for having a RN or
LPN available in the evenings when enrolment is over 300 mandatory.
Response: The committee considered the response but rejected it.
Section 36.86 Are There Staff Training Requirements?
Comment: A commenter agreed with the increase in educational
requirements for new staff and homeliving managers and supervisors in
Sec. 36.86.
Response: We made no change to Sec. 36.86 because the comment
required no change.
Comment: A commenter stated that in Sec. 36.86 (a)(4)
confidentiality should follow the Family Education Right to Privacy
Act, not just the Health Information Privacy Act.
Response: We considered the comment and revised Sec. 36.86(a)(4).
Comment: A commenter recommended inserting ``surrogate'' before
``parent training'' in Sec. 36.86(b)(4) because staff serves as
surrogate parents in residential settings.
Response: We accepted the idea behind the comment and changed Sec.
36.86(b)(4) to read:
(4) Parenting skills/child care.
Comment: A commenter recommended revising the question in Sec.
36.86 as follows: ``Are there homeliving staff training requirements?''
Response: We considered this comment and revised the section text,
but not the title. To be more inclusive, the section states that all
homeliving program staff and employees that supervise students
participating in homeliving services and activities must have
appropriate certification or requirements and receive annual training
in specified topics.
Comment: A commenter suggested that the first paragraph in Sec.
36.86, which applies to training that is ``appropriate to the
certification and licensing requirements,'' is erroneous since none of
the required training will result in licensing or certification, except
in First Aid or CPR. Homeliving staff is not required to be licensed or
certified (Sec. 36.75). The commenter recommended that this section be
revised to provide flexibility so that residential programs may
determine the frequency and timing of training as appropriate to their
situations, including providing for refresher sessions for returning
staff and training that may be completed over a 2- or 3-year period
(lessening the financial impact) or more frequently as new developments
occur (such as new or revised policy).
Another commenter suggested correcting the cite to ``Health
Information Patient Privacy Act'' to ``Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996'' in Sec. 36.86(a)(4).
A commenter suggested changing the title in Sec. 36.86(a)(7) to
``Child Abuse
[[Page 68496]]
Reporting Requirements and Protection Procedures.''
Another commenter recommended that in Sec. 36.86(b)(7) we clarify
the term ``child development'' or make the terms applicable only to
those residential programs with younger children in residence since
some residential programs serve only high school age students. If
paragraph (7) remains in this section, the commenter recommended adding
``if appropriate to the student ages served.''
Response: We considered these comments and made some changes based
upon them. We did not change the section title because changes that we
made in response to other comments made this unnecessary. Similarly,
other changes we made regarding licensure eliminated the need to
consider that suggestion. On the issue of training being only a
refresher for returning staff, the committee considered this issue in
its original deliberations and this comment raised no new issues.
Comment: A commenter suggested that Sec. 36.86 include a
recommendation that courses be provided on dealing with the tween, pre-
teen, and teenage adolescent years.
Response: We considered this comment, but these various
developmental stages are covered under the broader title of child
development. We revised this section to clarify this.
Section 36.90 What Recreation, Academic Tutoring, Student Safety and
Health Care Services Must Homeliving Programs Provide?
Comment: A commenter suggested clarifying in Sec. 36.90 what a
``homeliving program board'' is and whether it applies to schools with
peripheral dorms.
Response: We accepted the comment and changed Sec. 36.90 to read:
`` * * * as deemed necessary by the local school board or homeliving
program board.''
Comment: A commenter suggested that if staff are required to
provide these services in Sec. 36.90, it should be required that
students be assigned to participate in the service schedule.
Response: We considered this comment, but it is not something that
should be addressed in regulations.
Comment: A commenter recommended that in Sec. 36.90 we require
that library and computer program requirements must be met in the
dormitory facility because of the staff-to-student ratio, individual
student needs, and academic needs in all subject areas and age/grade
levels.
Response: These issues are addressed in Sec. 36.102.
Section 36.91 What Are the Program Requirements for Behavioral Health
Services?
Comment: A commenter suggested that requirements that a reiteration
of the Intensive Residential Guidance program elements in Sec. 36.91
is unnecessary because the IRG program was eliminated. Also, costs
associated with some of the required services are prohibitive and not
all students will require each of the enumerated services. The
commenter recommended that this section be revised as follows: `` * * *
behavioral health program must include the following services as
needed:''
Response: We considered this comment and clarified the rule to
provide that the homeliving program should have the capacity to provide
these services.
Section 36.92 Are There Any Activities That Must be Offered by a
Homeliving Program?
Comment: A commenter recommended that we clarify Sec. 36.92(a) by
providing a requirement for one hour of scheduled, structured physical
activity Monday through Thursday instead of through Friday since many
residential programs dismiss students on Friday through Sunday. The
commenter recommended requiring two hours total of physical or
recreational activities for those present in the dorm on the weekend.
Another commenter suggested revising Sec. 36.92(b) to allow each
tribe/school to decide whether to offer and to decide the content of
any of these topics to ensure consistency with local community values.
Response: We accepted the comment regarding Monday through Thursday
physical activity and changed the rule to reflect this. We partially
accepted the suggestion regarding personal wellness, excluding the idea
of consistency with tribal mores, since it is implicit in the ability
to design a wellness program and some schools, such as off-reservation
boarding schools, may not have local tribal mores.
Comment: A commenter recommended changing Sec. 36.92(e) to refer
to activities as ``personal wellness,'' since mandating ``character''
and ``sex education'' may not be congruent with the local values or
belief systems of the community.
Response: We accepted the comment and modified Sec. 36.92(e).
Comment: A commenter recommended deleting the term ``structures''
in Sec. 36.92 since it is not clear whether a lesson plan is required
or students may pick from a choice of activities.
Response: We considered this comment, but did not modify the rule.
The goal of the committee was to have a structured organized physical
activity without a program goal or plan. We believe that the term
``structure'' adequately connotes this.
Section 36.93 Is a Homeliving Handbook Required?
Comment: A commenter suggested that in Sec. 36.93 we add the terms
``school board approval.''
Response: We considered the comment and found the comment
unpersuasive. Therefore, we made no change to the regulations.
Comment: A commenter recommended revising Sec. 36.93 by requiring
that the home living handbook be provided rather than referring to
student rights and responsibilities and requiring that the handbook be
provided during the first week the students are in residence rather
than before the first day of school.
Response: We accepted this comment and revised the section
accordingly.
Comment: A commenter recommended changing ``school staff'' to
``homeliving staff'' or ``residential staff'' in Sec. 36.93(d).
Response: We considered limiting circulation of the handbook only
to homeliving staff. However, we believe that all staff should receive
a copy of the handbook.
Section 36.94 What Must a Homeliving Handbook Contain?
Comment: Commenters recommended the following changes to Sec.
36.94: revise (i) to read ``Personnel and position listing or a copy of
the residential staff organizational chart''; revise
(l) to ``Transportation Policy and Procedures''; revise (o) to read
``Drug, Alcohol and Tobacco Products Policy'' and revise (q) to read:
``Medication Administration Policy.''
Response: We made several of the suggested changes, but did not
require an organizational chart or transportation procedures. We do not
see the need for requiring an organizational chart. The rule requires
transportation policies, not procedures.
Comment: A commenter suggested that we add drug/alcohol policy and
consequences and move up its priority in Sec. 36.94.
Response: We accepted part of the comment and revised Sec.
36.94(o) to read ``drug/alcohol policy.'' We rejected the rest of the
comment because the list is a list of all items that must be included
in the handbook and is not a priority list. Therefore, we did not make
the change to the regulations.
[[Page 68497]]
Section 36.95 What Sanitary Standards Must Homeliving Programs Meet?
Comment: A commenter recommended changing the term ``rooms'' to
``dorm rooms'' for clarification in Sec. 36.95, and adding ``unless
need arises sooner'' at the end of paragraph (c). A commenter
recommended that Sec. 36.95(d) and (e) be revised to read that linens
and toiletries ``may be provided as needed.''
Response: We considered this change, but did not revise the rule
because the existing is adequate.
Comment: A commenter recommended that Sec. 36.95 require that
dorms pass inspection by some entity, and that each site be visited at
least once in five years to verify that health, safety and standards
are met.
Response: We considered this comment and made no change because
health and safety inspection requirements vary by locality.
Section 36.96 May Students Be Required to Assist With Daily or Weekly
Cleaning?
Comment: A commenter noted that in Sec. 36.96 students should be
required to assist in cleaning the dorm.
Response: We considered the comment, but made no change because
that rule already provides for students to assist with cleaning.
Comment: A commenter suggested we add a provision to Sec. 36.96
for cleaning and maintaining a healthy environment by dorm staff as
role models for students.
Response: We considered the comment and rejected it including any
additional provisions on cleaning in Sec. 36.96.
Section 36.97 What Basic Requirements Must a Program's Health Services
Meet?
Comment: A commenter recommended revising Sec. 36.97(a) to also
allow for agreements between a tribe or tribal school board and IHS.
Response: We accepted this comment and changed the rule
accordingly.
Section 36.98 Must the Homeliving Program Have an Isolation Room for
Ill Children?
Comment: A commenter recommended modifying Sec. 36.98 to require
that a sickroom be available, but space does not have to be dedicated
to this use only. Another commenter recommended rewriting the question
in Sec. 36.98 to read: ``Must the homeliving program provide special
accommodations for ill children?'' Using the singular reference to ``an
isolation room,'' coupled with the first sentence and the second
sentence could cause confusion as to whether one or two rooms are
required.
Response: We considered these comments and made appropriate changes
to the rule.
Section 36.100 Are There Minimum Requirements for Student Attendance
Checks?
Comment: A commenter recommended revising Sec. 36.100(d) to state
that night time physical checks will be made once every hour, except
high school student rooms which will be checked every two hours.
Response: We considered the comment, but did not change the rule.
High school students are just as likely, or even more likely, to be out
of their rooms at night.
Comment: A commenter recommended revising Sec. 36.100(f) to make
it applicable only when residential staff knows that a student will be
absent from school.
Response: We accepted this comment and changed the rule
accordingly.
Comment: A commenter suggested that Sec. 36.100 provide that each
child accepted into the dorm should agree to undergo drug and alcohol
screening if needed.
Response: We considered the comment and made no change to the rule.
Schools should develop their own drug and alcohol policies.
Section 36.102 What Student Resources Must be Provided by A Homeliving
Program?
Comment: A commenter recommended that we clarify the terms
``library resources'' and ``reasonable access'' in Sec. 36.102.
Response: We considered the comment, but found no change to the
rule necessary.
Comment: A commenter recommended adding at the beginning of Sec.
36.102(b): ``To the extent the student does have their own * * *''
Response: We considered the comment, but made no change, as the
committee believes it is in the best interest of students to have
textbooks available after hours.
Section 36.110 Must Programs Provide Space for Storing Personal
Effects?
Comment: A commenter recommended adding the following after the
first sentence in Sec. 36.110: ``This requirement is met if a
residential room door can be locked'' because some residential
facilities will have difficulty meeting the lockable storage space
requirement due to space limitations and/or age of the facility.
Response: We considered this comment, but made no change. The
committee wanted the students to have one lockable space, such as a
drawer, closet, or storage bin.
Section 36.111 Can a Tribe, Tribal Governing Body, or Local School
Board Waive the Homeliving Standards?
Comment: A commenter suggested that in Sec. 36.111 we clarify how
60 days are calculated and recommended that a school board or tribal
body submit a proposed waiver by January 1 of the year preceding
implementation in order to provide time for revisions and for starting
the year with alternative standards in place.
Response: We considered the comment and rejected it in part because
the regulatory section is based on statutory language. We accepted some
of the comment and made the following changes:
A tribal governing body or local school board may waive some or all
of the standards established in this part by adopting a written
resolution that determines that the standards are inappropriate for the
needs of the tribe's students. The approved alternative standards are
effective on the first day of the following school year.
Section 36.112 What Are the Consequences for Failing to Meet the
Requirements of This Part?
Comment: A commenter suggested adding a new question after Sec.
36.112: ``What happens to a school that does not meet these
standards?''
Response: We considered the comment, but made no changes because
this question is limited to whether the school can be closed or
consolidated for failing to meet these standards and not for other
reasons that are addressed in other regulations.
Section 36.120 What Type of Reporting Is Required to Ensure
Accountability?
Comment: A commenter recommended that we identify a specific time
for reporting enrolment figures in Sec. 36.120.
Response: We accepted the comment and revised Sec. 36.120(c) and
(d).
Comment: A commenter recommended adding a requirement in Sec.
36.120 that the report be filed 45 days after the end of the school
year and a statement that the accountability report is the only report
a residential program is required to file.
Response: We accepted the suggestions to add a 45-day filing
period.
[[Page 68498]]
Comment: A commenter recommended adding a provision in Sec. 36.120
to require that the report also be submitted to the Division of
Residential Life in BIE.
Response: We did not accept this comment. The BIE already receives
the report, and there is no reason to require in the rule that the
report go to a particular division within the office.
III. Procedural Matters
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866)
This document is a significant rule and the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has reviewed the rule under Executive Order 12866.
(1) This rule will not have an effect of $100 million or more on
the economy. It will not adversely affect in a material way the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities. The rule deals exclusively with homeliving programs and is
not expected to have a significant effect on budgets.
(2) This rule will not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency. This rule
has been prepared in consultation with the U.S. Department of
Education.
(3) This rule does not alter the budgetary effects of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or obligations of
their recipients. This rule spells out student rights, the procedures
for their dissemination, and the procedures for implementing them. The
rule is not expected to have a significant effect on budgets.
(4) Office of Management and Budget has determined that this rule
raises novel legal or policy issues. For this reason review is required
under E.O. 12866.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this document will
not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the rule does not have
significant takings implications. Nothing in the rule proposes rules of
private property rights, constitutional or otherwise, or invokes the
Federal condemnation power or alters any use of Federal land held in
trust. The focus of this rule is homeliving programs. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
D. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment. Nothing in this rule has substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. This rule does
not implicate State government. A Federalism Assessment is not
required.
E. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have identified
potential effects on federally recognized Indian tribes that will
result from this rule. Accordingly: (1) We have consulted with the
affected tribe(s) on a government-to-government basis. The
consultations have been open and candid to allow the affected tribe(s)
to fully evaluate the potential effect of the rule on trust resources.
(2) We have fully considered tribal views in drafting this final rule.
(3) We have consulted with the appropriate bureaus and offices of the
Department about the political effects of this rule on Indian tribes.
The BIE and the Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs have
been consulted.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking requires information collection from 10 or more
parties and a submission under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) is required. Accordingly, the Department prepared
submissions on these collections for review and approval by OMB. Having
reviewed the Department's submissions, along with any comments that
were submitted by the reviewing public, OMB has approved the
information collection requirements in this rulemaking and has assigned
the OMB control number 1076-0164. In addition to this number, the
information collections in part 39 are also covered by OMB control
numbers 1076-0134 and 1076-0122.
The information collected will be used to enable the Bureau to
better administer Bureau-funded schools subject to this rulemaking. In
all instances, the Department has striven to lessen the burden on the
public and ask for only information essential to administering the
responsibility to federally recognized tribes. The public may make
additional comments on the accuracy of our burden estimates (which are
explained in detail in the preamble to the proposed rule published on
February 25, 2004, at 69 FR 8752) and any suggestions for reducing this
burden to the OMB Interior Desk Officer, Docket Number 1076-AE49,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 202/395-6566 (facsimile);
email: OIRA--DOCKET@omb.eop.gov.
G. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 is not required.
H. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Department has
determined that this rule does not unduly burden the judicial system
and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 36
Indians--Education, Schools, Elementary and secondary education
programs, grant programs--Indians, Government programs--education.
Dated: October 19, 2007.
Carl J. Artman,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
0
For the reasons given in the preamble, part 36 of Title 25 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended by revising subpart G to read as
follows:
PART 36--MINIMUM ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR THE BASIC EDUCATION OF
INDIAN CHILDREN AND NATIONAL CRITERIA FOR DORMITORY SITUATIONS
Subpart G--Homeliving Programs
Sec.
Sec. 36.70 What terms do I need to know?
Sec. 36.71 What is the purpose of this part?
Staffing
Sec. 36.75 What qualifications must homeliving staff possess?
Sec. 36.76 Who is in charge of all homeliving operations?
Sec. 36.77 What are the homeliving staffing requirements?
Sec. 36.78 What are the staffing requirements for homeliving
programs offering less than 5 nights service?
Sec. 36.79 What are the homeliving behavioral staff/student ratio
requirements?
Sec. 36.80 If a school has separated boys' and girls' homeliving
programs, may the same behavioral staff be used for each program?
Sec. 36.81 May a homeliving program use support staff or teachers
to meet behavioral health staffing requirements?
Sec. 36.82 May behavioral health staff provide services during the
academic school day?
[[Page 68499]]
Sec. 36.83 How many hours can a student be taken out of the
academic setting to receive behavioral health services?
Sec. 36.84 Can a program hire or contract or acquire by other means
behavioral health professionals to meet staffing requirements?
Sec. 36.85 Is a nurse required to be available in the evenings?
Sec. 36.86 Are there staff training requirements?
Program Requirements
Sec. 36.90 What recreation, academic tutoring, student safety and
health care services must homeliving programs provide?
Sec. 36.91 What are the program requirements for behavioral health
services?
Sec. 36.92 Are there any activities that must be offered by a
homeliving program?
Sec. 36.93 Is a homeliving handbook required?
Sec. 36.94 What must a homeliving handbook contain?
Sec. 36.95 What sanitary standards must homeliving programs meet?
Sec. 36.96 May students be required to assist with daily or weekly
cleaning?
Sec. 36.97 What basic requirements must a program's health services
meet?
Sec. 36.98 Must the homeliving program have an isolation room for
ill children?
Sec. 36.99 Are immunizations required for residential program
students?
Sec. 36.100 Are there minimum requirements for student attendance
checks?
Sec. 36.101 How often must students who have been separated for
emergency health or behavioral reasons be supervised?
Sec. 36.102 What student resources must be provided by a homeliving
program?
Sec. 36.103 Are there requirements for multipurpose spaces in
homeliving programs?
Privacy
Sec. 36.110 Must programs provide space for storing personal
effects?
Waivers and Accountability
Sec. 36.111 Can a tribe, tribal governing body or local school
board waive the homeliving standards?
Sec. 36.112 Can a homeliving program be closed, transferred,
consolidated, or substantially curtailed for failure to meet these
standards?
Sec. 36.120 What type of reporting is required to ensure
accountability?
Subpart G--Homeliving Programs
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 13; 25 U.S.C. 2008; Pub. L. 107-110 (115
Stat. 1425).
Sec. 36.70 What terms do I need to know?
The following definitions apply to this subpart:
Behavioral health professional means a State licensed or State
certified Social Worker, School Counselor, Drug and Alcohol Counselor,
School Psychologist, or School Psychometrist responsible for
coordinating a broad range of needs including:
(1) Support groups;
(2) Individual counseling;
(3) Crisis intervention;
(4) Preventive activities; and
(5) Coordination of referrals and outside services with appropriate
providers.
Behavioral Health Program means a homeliving based service designed
to decrease barriers to learning or increase positive, personal well-
being by:
(1) Providing early intervention services, coordinating crisis
intervention and prevention services;
(2) Promoting a positive social and emotional environment;
(3) Reducing the incidence of problems; and
(4) Referring students with behavioral needs that require
professional medical care to an appropriate residential care facility.
Behavioral health services means the services provided by a school
behavioral health program as defined in this section.
Homeliving Manager means the employee responsible for direct
supervision of the homeliving program staff and students.
Homeliving Program means a program that provides room and board in
a boarding school or dormitory to residents who are either:
(1) Enrolled in and are current members of a public school in the
community in which they reside; or
(2) Members of the instructional program in the same boarding
school in which they are counted as residents and:
(i) Are officially enrolled in the residential program of a Bureau-
operated or funded school; and
(ii) Are actually receiving a homeliving program provided to all
students who are provided room and board in a boarding school or
dormitory.
Homeliving Program Staff means the employee(s) responsible for
direct supervision of students in the homeliving area.
Homeliving Supervisor means the employee with overall
administrative responsibility for supervising students, programs, and
personnel in the homeliving area.
Sec. 36.71 What is the purpose of this part?
The purpose of this part is to establish standards for homeliving
programs.
Staffing
Sec. 36.75 What qualifications must homeliving staff possess?
(a) Homeliving staff must possess the qualifications shown in the
following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Position Required training
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Homeliving Supervisor.... Must be qualified based on size and
complexity of the school, but at minimum
possess a bachelor's degree.
(2) Homeliving Manager....... Must be qualified based on the size and
complexity of the student body but must
at a minimum have an associate's degree
no later than 2008.
(3) Homeliving Program Staff. Must have at least 32 post-secondary
semester hours (or 48 quarter hours) in
an applicable academic discipline,
including fields related to working with
children, such as, child development,
education, behavioral sciences and
cultural studies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) A person employed as a homeliving program staff:
(1) Should meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section
by the 2009-2010 school year; and
(2) May, upon showing good cause, petition the school supervisor
(or the homeliving supervisor for peripheral dorms) for a waiver from
the new qualifications.
Sec. 36.76 Who is in charge of all homeliving operations?
One staff member who has the authority to ensure the successful
functioning of all phases of the homeliving program should be
designated as in charge of all homeliving operations. All staff should
be advised of the lines of authority through an organizational chart
approved by the local board responsible for operations of the
homeliving program.
Sec. 36.77 What are the homeliving staffing requirements?
Homeliving programs must meet the staffing requirements of this
section.
(a) Effective with the 2009-2010 school year, each homeliving
program must maintain the following student minimum supervisory
requirements on weekdays:
[[Page 68500]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grade level Time of day Ratio
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elementary (Grade 1-6).......... Morning........... 1:20.
During school..... As school needs.
Evening........... 1:20.
Night............. 1:40.
High School (Gr. 7-12).......... Morning........... 1:20.
During school As school needs.
Evening........... 1:30.
Night............. 1:50.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) The following staffing ratios apply on weekends:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grade level Time of day Ratio
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elementary (Grade 1-6)...... Morning/day......... 1:20.
Evening............. 1:20.
Night............... 1:40.
High School (Gr. 7-12)...... Morning/day......... 1:40.
Evening............. 1:40.
Night............... 1:50.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 36.78 What are the staffing requirements for homeliving programs
offering less than 5 nights service?
For homeliving programs providing less than 5 nights service, the
staffing levels from Sec. 36.77 apply. To fill this requirement, the
program must use only employees who work a minimum of 20 hours per
week.
Sec. 36.79 What are the homeliving behavioral professional staff/
student ratio requirements?
Behavioral health professional(s) is necessary in homeliving
programs to address issues, such as abuse, neglect, trauma, cultural
conflict, and lack of school success. Each homeliving program must
provide a minimum of one half-time behavioral health professional for
every 50 students.
(a) The program may fill the staffing requirements of this section
by using contract services, other agencies (including the Indian Health
Service) or private/nonprofit volunteer service organizations.
(b) Off-reservation homeliving programs should consider providing
one full-time behavioral health professional for every 50 students.
(c) For purposes of this section, a one half-time behavioral health
professional is one that works for the homeliving program a minimum of
20 hours per week.
(d) For purposes of this section, in instances where the behavioral
health services are obtained through other programs, the behavioral
health professional must be available at the request of the homeliving
program.
Sec. 36.80 If a school or dormitory has separated boys' and girls'
homeliving programs, may the same behavioral professional be used for
each program?
Yes, a program may use the same behavioral professional for both
boys' and girls' programs. However, behavioral health staffing
requirements are based on the combined enrollment during the homeliving
count period.
Sec. 36.81 May a homeliving program use support staff or teachers to
meet behavioral health staffing requirements?
No, a homeliving program must not use support staff or teachers to
meet behavioral health staffing requirements. The only exception is if
the individual support staff employee or teacher has the appropriate
behavioral health license or certification.
Sec. 36.82 May behavioral health professional(s) provide services
during the academic school day?
Behavioral health professional(s) must average at least 75 percent
of their work hours with students in their dormitories. These work
hours must occur outside of the academic school day, except in
emergency situations as deemed by the administrative head of the
homeliving program or designee. The purpose of this requirement is to
maximize contact time with students in their homeliving setting.
Sec. 36.83 How many hours can a student be taken out of the academic
setting to receive behavioral health services?
A student may spend no more than 5 hours per week out of the
academic setting to receive behavioral health services from the
homeliving behavioral health professional(s), except for emergency
situations.
Sec. 36.84 Can a program hire or contract or acquire by other means
behavioral health professionals to meet staffing requirements?
A program may hire or contract behavioral health professionals to
meet staffing requirements or acquire such services by other means such
as through a Memorandum of Understanding with other programs.
(a) At least one individual must be a licensed or certified school
counselor or a social worker who is licensed/certified to practice at
the location where the services are provided.
(b) For additional staffing, other individuals with appropriate
certifications or licenses are acceptable to meet staffing
requirements.
Sec. 36.85 Is a nurse required to be available in the evenings?
No, a program is not required to make a nurse (LPN or RN) available
in the evenings. However, this is encouraged for homeliving programs
with an enrollment greater than 300 or for programs that are more than
50 miles from available services.
Sec. 36.86 Are there staff training requirements?
(a) All homeliving program staff as well as all employees that
supervise students participating in homeliving services and activities
must have the appropriate certification or licensing requirements up to
date and on file. Programs must provide annual and continuous
professional training and development appropriate to the certification
and licensing requirements.
(b) All homeliving program staff as well as all employees who
supervise students participating in homeliving services and activities
must receive annual training in the topics set out in this section
before the first day of student occupancy for the year.
(1) First Aid/Safety/Emergency & Crisis Preparedness;
(2) CPR--Automated External Defibrillator;
(3) Student Checkout Policy;
(4) Confidentiality (Health Information Privacy Act and the Family
Education Right to Privacy Act.);
(5) Medication Administration;
(6) Student Rights;
(7) Child Abuse Reporting Requirements and Protection Procedures;
and
(8) Suicide Prevention.
[[Page 68501]]
(c) Homeliving staff as well as all employees that supervise
students participating in homeliving services and activities must be
given the following training annually:
(1) De-escalation/Conflict Resolution;
(2) Substance Abuse Issues;
(3) Ethics;
(4) Parenting skills/Child Care;
(5) Special Education and Working with Students with Disabilities;
(6) Student Supervision Skills;
(7) Child Development (recognizes various stages of development in
the student population);
(8) Basic Counseling Skills; and
(9) Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP).
Program Requirements
Sec. 36.90 What recreation, academic tutoring, student safety, and
health care services must homeliving programs provide?
All homeliving programs must provide for appropriate student
safety, academic tutoring, recreation, and health care services for
their students, as deemed necessary by the local school board or
homeliving board.
Sec. 36.91 What are the program requirements for behavioral health
services?
(a) The homeliving behavioral health program must make available
the following services:
(1) Behavioral Health Screening/Assessment;
(2) Diagnosis;
(3) Treatment Plan;
(4) Treatment and Placement;
(5) Evaluation; and
(6) Record of Services (if applicable, in coordination with the
student's Individual Education Plan).
(b) Each homeliving behavioral health program must have written
procedures for dealing with emergency behavioral health care issues.
(c) Parents or guardians may opt out of any non-emergency
behavioral health services by submitting a written request.
(d) Parent