Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri; General Conformity, 68072-68075 [E7-23484]
Download as PDF
68072
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1721, and as
stated in specific sections.
2. Amend § 17.101 by:
a. In paragraph (g) introductory text,
removing ‘‘50 percent of the charges
otherwise’’ and adding, in its place,
‘‘100 percent of the charges’’.
I b. Revising paragraphs (a)(8), (e)(5),
(f)(4), and (f)(5)(ii).
The revisions read as follows:
I
I
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
§ 17.101 Collection or recovery by VA for
medical care or services provided or
furnished to a veteran for a nonserviceconnected disability.
(a) * * *
(8) Charges when a new DRG or CPT/
HCPCS code identifier does not have an
established charge. When VA does not
have an established charge for a new
DRG or CPT/HCPCS code to be used in
determining a billing charge under the
applicable methodology in this section,
then VA will establish an interim billing
charge or establish an interim charge to
be used for determining a billing charge
under the applicable methodology in
paragraphs (a)(8)(i) through (a)(8)(viii) of
this section.
(i) If a new DRG or CPT/HCPCS code
identifier replaces a DRG or CPT/HCPCS
code identifier, the most recently
established charge for the identifier
being replaced will continue to be used
for determining a billing charge under
paragraphs (b), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (k), or
(l) of this section until such time as VA
establishes a charge for the new
identifier.
(ii) If medical care or service is
provided or furnished at VA expense by
a non-VA provider and a charge cannot
be established under paragraph (a)(8)(i)
of this section, then VA’s billing charge
for such care or service will be the
amount VA paid to the non-VA provider
without additional calculations under
this section.
(iii) If a new CPT/HCPCS code has
been established for a prosthetic device
or durable medical equipment subject to
paragraph (l) of this section and a charge
cannot be established under paragraphs
(a)(8)(i) or (ii) of this section, VA’s
billing charge for such prosthetic device
or durable medical equipment will be 1
and 1⁄2 times VA’s average actual cost
without additional calculations under
this section.
(iv) If a new medical identifier DRG
code has been assigned to a particular
type of medical care or service and a
charge cannot be established under
paragraphs (a)(8)(i) through (iii) of this
section, then until such time as VA
establishes a charge for the new medical
identifier DRG code, the interim charge
for use in paragraph (b) of this section
will be the average charge of all medical
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
DRG codes that are within plus or
minus 10 of the numerical relative
weight assigned to the new medical
identifier DRG code.
(v) If a new surgical identifier DRG
code has been assigned to a particular
type of medical care or service and a
charge cannot be established under
paragraphs (a)(8)(i) through (iv) of this
section, then until such time as VA
establishes a charge for the new surgical
identifier DRG code, the interim charge
for use in paragraph (b) of this section
will be the average charge of all surgical
DRG codes that are within plus or
minus 10 of the numerical relative
weight assigned to the new surgical
identifier DRG code.
(vi) If a new identifier CPT/HCPCS
code is assigned to a particular type or
item of medical care or service and a
charge cannot be established under
paragraphs (a)(8)(i) through (v) of this
section, then until such time as VA
establishes a charge for the new
identifier for use in paragraphs (e), (f),
(g), (h), (i), (k), or (l) of this section, VA’s
billing charge will be the Medicare
allowable charge multiplied by 1 and 1⁄2,
without additional calculations under
this section.
(vii) If a new identifier CPT/HCPCS
code is assigned to a particular type or
item of medical care or service and a
charge cannot be established under
paragraphs (a)(8)(i) through (vi) of this
section, then until such time as VA
establishes a charge for the new
identifier, the interim charge for use in
paragraphs (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (k), or (l)
of this section will be the charge for the
CPT/HCPCS code that is closest in
characteristics to the new CPT/HCPCS
code.
(viii) If a charge cannot be established
under paragraphs (a)(8)(i) through
(a)(8)(vii) of this section, then VA will
not charge under this section for the
care or service.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(5) Multiple surgical procedures.
When multiple surgical procedures are
performed during the same outpatient
encounter by a provider or provider
team as indicated by multiple surgical
CPT/HCPCS procedure codes, then each
CPT/HCPCS procedure code will be
billed at 100 percent of the charges
established under this section.
(f) * * *
(4) Charge adjustment factors for
specified CPT/HCPCS code modifiers.
Surcharges are calculated in the
following manner: From the Part B
component of the Medicare Standard
Analytical File 5 percent Sample, the
ratio of weighted average billed charges
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for CPT/HCPCS codes with the specified
modifier to the weighted average billed
charge for CPT/HCPCS codes with no
charge modifier is calculated, using the
frequency of procedure codes with the
modifier as weights in both weighted
average calculations. The resulting
ratios constitute the surcharge factors
for specified charge-significant CPT/
HCPCS code modifiers.
(5) * * *
(ii) Charges for professional services.
Charges for the professional services of
the following providers will be 100
percent of the amount that would be
charged if the care had been provided
by a physician:
(A) Nurse practitioner.
(B) Clinical nurse specialist.
(C) Physician Assistant.
(D) Clinical psychologist.
(E) Clinical social worker.
(F) Dietitian.
(G) Clinical pharmacist.
(H) Marriage and family therapist.
(I) Licensed professional mental
health counselor.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–23505 Filed 12–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2007–1055; FRL–8502–2]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri; General Conformity
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve a revision to the
Missouri State Implementation Plan
(SIP) to amend the General Conformity
Rule to include de minimis emission
levels for Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5).
This update ensures consistency with
the Federal General Conformity Rule.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective February 4, 2008, without
further notice, unless EPA receives
adverse comment by January 3, 2008. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2007–1055, by one of the
following methods:
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
1. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: shepard.barbara@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Barbara Shepard,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 7, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, KS 66101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to Barbara Shepard,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 7, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, KS 66101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2007–
1055. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 7, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, KS 66101. The
Regional Office’s official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8
to 4:30 excluding Federal holidays. The
interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least 24
hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Shepard at (913) 551–7759, or
by e-mail at shepard.barbara@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section is arranged as follows:
I. General Conformity
II. Background for This Action
III. State Submittal and EPA Evaluation
IV. Public Comment and Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. General Conformity
General conformity is required under
section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act) to prevent the air quality
impacts of Federal actions from causing
or contributing to a violation of the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) or interfering with the
purpose of a SIP. Conformity currently
applies to areas that are designated
nonattainment, and to certain areas that
have been redesignated to attainment
after 1990 (maintenance areas).
The general conformity regulation is
found in 40 CFR part 93 and provisions
related to conformity SIPs are found in
40 CFR 51.390.
II. Background for This Action
In the CAA, Congress recognized that
actions taken by Federal agencies could
affect states’, tribes’, and local agencies’
abilities to attain and maintain the
NAAQS. Section 176(c) of the CAA
requires Federal agencies ensure that
their actions conform to the applicable
SIP for attaining and maintaining the
NAAQS. EPA published the General
Conformity Regulations in 1993 to cover
all Federal actions not related to
highway and mass transit funding and
approval to implement a portion of
section 176(c). The General Conformity
Regulations define NAAQS as ‘‘those
standards established pursuant to
section 109 of the Act and include
standards for carbon monoxide, lead,
nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate
matter, and sulfur dioxide.’’ Since 1993,
EPA has reviewed and revised the
NAAQS for particulate matter to include
a new PM2.5 standard (particulate matter
with an aerodynamic diameter of up to
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68073
2.5 microns). General conformity
requirements are applicable to areas
designated nonattainment for this
standard, and to certain areas
redesignated from nonattainment to
attainment (maintenance areas). In July
1997, EPA promulgated a new NAAQS
established pursuant to section 109 of
the CAA for PM2.5. On April 5, 2005, the
EPA designated areas as nonattainment
for PM2.5, and subsequently proposed
regulations to implement the new
particulate matter standard. Section
176(c)(6) states that the conformity
requirements of 176(c) do not apply to
an area newly designated nonattainment
for a new NAAQS until one year after
the designation. The EPA made PM2.5
designations on April 5, 2005; thus, the
applicable general conformity
requirements were not effective in these
areas until April 5, 2006. The proposed
rule published on April 5, 2006,
solicited comments on establishing 100
tons per year of PM2.5 direct or
precursor emissions as the de minimis
threshold for General Conformity
applicability.
On July 17, 2006, EPA published a
final rule (71 FR 40420), PM2.5 De
Minimis Emission Levels for General
Conformity Applicability, which
amended the regulations relating to the
CAA requirement that Federal actions
conform to the appropriate state, tribal
or Federal implementation plan for
attaining clean air (‘‘general
conformity’’). This action revised the
tables in subparagraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2)
of 40 CFR 51.853 and 40 CFR 93.153 by
adding the de minimis emissions levels
for PM2.5 and established the previously
proposed 100 tons per year as the de
minimis emission level for direct PM2.5
and each of its precursors in
nonattainment and maintenance areas.
III. State Submittal and EPA Evaluation
The SIP revision submitted to EPA on
September 10, 2007, amends the state
rule, Conformity of General Federal
Actions to State Implementation Plans
(10 Code of State Regulations (CSR) 10–
6.300), to be consistent with the Federal
conformity requirements described
above. This revision added de minimis
emissions levels for PM2.5 to the state’s
rule and updated the state’s tables for de
minimis emissions levels for direct
PM2.5 and the relevant precursors in
nonattainment and maintenance areas.
This Missouri rule implements
Section 176(c) of the CAA, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q) and regulations
under 40 CFR part 51, subpart W, with
respect to conformity of general Federal
actions to the applicable
implementation plan. Missouri rule 10
CSR 10–6.300 at Subsection (2)(B)26.C,
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
68074
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
was revised to identify precursors of
PM2.5 consistent with the Federal rule.
The state rule identifies the following
precursors: Sulfur dioxide, nitrogen
oxides (unless the state and EPA have
determined they are not significant
precursors), and volatile organic
compounds and ammonia (only where
the state or EPA has determined they are
significant precursors). Rule 10 CSR 10–
6.300, Subsection (3)(B) was revised to
add a requirement that a conformity
determination must be made for each
criteria pollutant or precursor where the
total of direct and indirect emissions of
the criteria pollutant or precursor in a
nonattainment or maintenance area
caused by a Federal action would equal
or exceed any of the rates in paragraph
(3)(B)1. or 2. of the rule. Subsection
(3)(B) of 10 CSR 10–6.300 revised tables
in subparagraphs (B)1. and (B)2. by
incorporating the Federally established
100 tons per year as the de minimis
emission level for direct PM2.5, and each
of its precursors in nonattainment and
maintenance areas.
The submittal documents public
notice and hearing for this SIP revision
in compliance with CAA section 110(l)
and 40 CFR 51.102.
We have reviewed the submittal to
assure consistency with the current
CAA, and EPA regulations (40 CFR part
93 and 40 CFR 51.390) governing state
procedures for general conformity and
interagency consultation and have
concluded that the submittal is
approvable. Details of our review are set
forth in a technical support document,
which has been included in the docket
for this action.
IV. Public Comment and Final Action
Under section 110(k) of the Act, and
for the reasons set forth above, EPA is
taking action to approve the revision to
the Missouri SIP which adds de
minimis emissions levels for PM2.5 and
precursors, for general conformity
purposes.
We do not expect objection to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without
proposing it in advance. However, in
the Proposed Rules section of this
Federal Register, we are simultaneously
proposing approval of the same
submittal. If we receive adverse
comments by January 3, 2008, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public
that the direct final approval will not
take effect and we will address the
comments in a subsequent final action
based on the proposal. If we do not
receive timely adverse comments, the
direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on February 4,
2008. This will incorporate these
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
general conformity procedures into the
Federally-enforceable SIP and thereby
replace the previous version. Please
note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves state law implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
CAA. This rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it approves a
state rule implementing a Federal
standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. In this context, in the absence
of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA when it reviews a SIP submission
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the CAA. Thus, the requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by February 4, 2008. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
68075
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
10–6.300 under Chapter 6 to read as
follows:
§ 52.1320
I
Dated: November 26, 2007.
William Rice,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
*
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
Identification of Plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
2. In § 52.1320 the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
I
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri
citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of Missouri
*
*
10–6.300 ...................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
Conformity of General Federal Actions to State Implementation Plans.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–23484 Filed 12–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–R04–SFUND–2007–0719; FRL–8501–
8]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List
Environmental Protection
Agency.
Direct final notice of deletion of
the Standard Auto Bumper Site from the
National Priorities List; correction.
ACTION:
This document corrects the
direct final notice of deletion of the
Standard Auto Bumper Site from the
National Priorities List, published in the
Federal Register of August 27, 2007.
This correction clarifies that all
Institutional Controls (ICs) are in place
and recorded at the site.
DATES: Effective December 4, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Taylor, Remedial Project
Manager, Superfund Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
*
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960, Phone:
(404) 562–8762, Electronic Mail:
taylor.michael@epa.gov
Correction
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
AGENCY:
*
In the direct final notice of deletion
FRL–8458–7, beginning on page 48942
in the issue of August 27, 2007, make
the following correction in the Basis for
Site Deletion section, under Response
Actions. On page 48945 in the second
column, the first paragraph is corrected
to read as follows:
All institutional controls (ICs) are in place
and recorded at the site. All appropriate
Fund-financed response under CERCLA has
been implemented. No further response
action is necessary.
Dated: November 13, 2007.
J.I. Palmer, Jr.,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. E7–23499 Filed 12–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
*
9/30/07
*
12/04/07
[insert FR
page number where
the document begins].
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Parts 411 and 424
[CMS–1810–CN2]
RIN 0938–AK67
Medicare Program, Physicians’
Referrals to Health Care Entities With
Which They Have Financial
Relationships (Phase III), Correction
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Correction of final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document corrects
technical and typographical errors that
appeared in the final rule published in
the Federal Register on September 5,
2007 entitled ‘‘Medicare Program,
Physicians’’ Referrals to Health Care
Entities With Which They Have
Financial Relationships (Phase III).’’
DATES: Effective Date: December 4, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
Ohrin, (410) 786–4565.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In FR Doc. 07–4252 of September 5,
2007 (72 FR 51012), there were a
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 4, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68072-68075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23484]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2007-1055; FRL-8502-2]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri; General Conformity
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the
Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP) to amend the General
Conformity Rule to include de minimis emission levels for Particulate
Matter 2.5 (PM2.5). This update ensures consistency with the
Federal General Conformity Rule.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective February 4, 2008,
without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by January
3, 2008. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2007-1055, by one of the following methods:
[[Page 68073]]
1. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: shepard.barbara@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Barbara Shepard, Environmental Protection Agency, Region
7, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas
City, KS 66101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to Barbara
Shepard, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, KS 66101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2007-1055. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, KS 66101. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:30 excluding Federal
holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours in
advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Shepard at (913) 551-7759, or
by e-mail at shepard.barbara@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section is arranged as follows:
I. General Conformity
II. Background for This Action
III. State Submittal and EPA Evaluation
IV. Public Comment and Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. General Conformity
General conformity is required under section 176(c) of the Clean
Air Act (CAA or Act) to prevent the air quality impacts of Federal
actions from causing or contributing to a violation of the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) or interfering with the purpose
of a SIP. Conformity currently applies to areas that are designated
nonattainment, and to certain areas that have been redesignated to
attainment after 1990 (maintenance areas).
The general conformity regulation is found in 40 CFR part 93 and
provisions related to conformity SIPs are found in 40 CFR 51.390.
II. Background for This Action
In the CAA, Congress recognized that actions taken by Federal
agencies could affect states', tribes', and local agencies' abilities
to attain and maintain the NAAQS. Section 176(c) of the CAA requires
Federal agencies ensure that their actions conform to the applicable
SIP for attaining and maintaining the NAAQS. EPA published the General
Conformity Regulations in 1993 to cover all Federal actions not related
to highway and mass transit funding and approval to implement a portion
of section 176(c). The General Conformity Regulations define NAAQS as
``those standards established pursuant to section 109 of the Act and
include standards for carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone,
particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.'' Since 1993, EPA has reviewed
and revised the NAAQS for particulate matter to include a new
PM2.5 standard (particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter of up to 2.5 microns). General conformity requirements are
applicable to areas designated nonattainment for this standard, and to
certain areas redesignated from nonattainment to attainment
(maintenance areas). In July 1997, EPA promulgated a new NAAQS
established pursuant to section 109 of the CAA for PM2.5. On
April 5, 2005, the EPA designated areas as nonattainment for
PM2.5, and subsequently proposed regulations to implement
the new particulate matter standard. Section 176(c)(6) states that the
conformity requirements of 176(c) do not apply to an area newly
designated nonattainment for a new NAAQS until one year after the
designation. The EPA made PM2.5 designations on April 5,
2005; thus, the applicable general conformity requirements were not
effective in these areas until April 5, 2006. The proposed rule
published on April 5, 2006, solicited comments on establishing 100 tons
per year of PM2.5 direct or precursor emissions as the de
minimis threshold for General Conformity applicability.
On July 17, 2006, EPA published a final rule (71 FR 40420),
PM2.5 De Minimis Emission Levels for General Conformity
Applicability, which amended the regulations relating to the CAA
requirement that Federal actions conform to the appropriate state,
tribal or Federal implementation plan for attaining clean air
(``general conformity''). This action revised the tables in
subparagraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of 40 CFR 51.853 and 40 CFR 93.153 by
adding the de minimis emissions levels for PM2.5 and
established the previously proposed 100 tons per year as the de minimis
emission level for direct PM2.5 and each of its precursors
in nonattainment and maintenance areas.
III. State Submittal and EPA Evaluation
The SIP revision submitted to EPA on September 10, 2007, amends the
state rule, Conformity of General Federal Actions to State
Implementation Plans (10 Code of State Regulations (CSR) 10-6.300), to
be consistent with the Federal conformity requirements described above.
This revision added de minimis emissions levels for PM2.5 to
the state's rule and updated the state's tables for de minimis
emissions levels for direct PM2.5 and the relevant
precursors in nonattainment and maintenance areas.
This Missouri rule implements Section 176(c) of the CAA, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q) and regulations under 40 CFR part 51, subpart W,
with respect to conformity of general Federal actions to the applicable
implementation plan. Missouri rule 10 CSR 10-6.300 at Subsection
(2)(B)26.C,
[[Page 68074]]
was revised to identify precursors of PM2.5 consistent with
the Federal rule. The state rule identifies the following precursors:
Sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides (unless the state and EPA have
determined they are not significant precursors), and volatile organic
compounds and ammonia (only where the state or EPA has determined they
are significant precursors). Rule 10 CSR 10-6.300, Subsection (3)(B)
was revised to add a requirement that a conformity determination must
be made for each criteria pollutant or precursor where the total of
direct and indirect emissions of the criteria pollutant or precursor in
a nonattainment or maintenance area caused by a Federal action would
equal or exceed any of the rates in paragraph (3)(B)1. or 2. of the
rule. Subsection (3)(B) of 10 CSR 10-6.300 revised tables in
subparagraphs (B)1. and (B)2. by incorporating the Federally
established 100 tons per year as the de minimis emission level for
direct PM2.5, and each of its precursors in nonattainment
and maintenance areas.
The submittal documents public notice and hearing for this SIP
revision in compliance with CAA section 110(l) and 40 CFR 51.102.
We have reviewed the submittal to assure consistency with the
current CAA, and EPA regulations (40 CFR part 93 and 40 CFR 51.390)
governing state procedures for general conformity and interagency
consultation and have concluded that the submittal is approvable.
Details of our review are set forth in a technical support document,
which has been included in the docket for this action.
IV. Public Comment and Final Action
Under section 110(k) of the Act, and for the reasons set forth
above, EPA is taking action to approve the revision to the Missouri SIP
which adds de minimis emissions levels for PM2.5 and
precursors, for general conformity purposes.
We do not expect objection to this approval, so we are finalizing
it without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed Rules
section of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing
approval of the same submittal. If we receive adverse comments by
January 3, 2008, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register to notify the public that the direct final approval will not
take effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final
action based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse
comments, the direct final approval will be effective without further
notice on February 4, 2008. This will incorporate these general
conformity procedures into the Federally-enforceable SIP and thereby
replace the previous version. Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves state law
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA when it reviews a SIP
submission to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by February 4, 2008. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
[[Page 68075]]
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: November 26, 2007.
William Rice,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
0
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for 10-6.300 under Chapter 6 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of Plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
Regulations for the State of Missouri
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-6.300....................... Conformity of General 9/30/07 12/04/07 [insert
Federal Actions to FR page number
State Implementation where the
Plans. document begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-23484 Filed 12-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P