In the Matter of Keith Davis; Confirmatory Order (Effective Immediately), 68200-68202 [E7-23478]
Download as PDF
68200
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
II. Current Actions
The purpose of the study is to
undertake original research and analysis
to identify measurable indicators of the
social, economic, personal, and
professional value of free access to
computers, the Internet, and related
services at public libraries, and of
negative impact where service is weak
or absent, and to provide new, reliable
data on the benefits to individuals,
families, and communities of these
services and resources at public
libraries. The study will be framed by
these questions:
(1) What are the demographics of
people who use computers, the Internet,
and related services in public libraries?
(2) What information and resources
provided by free access to computers,
the Internet, and related services in
public libraries are people using, across
the spectrum of on-site and off-site use?
(3) How do individuals, families, and
communities benefit (with a focus on
social, economic, personal, and
professional well-being) from free access
to computers, the Internet, and related
services at public libraries?
(4) What reliable indicators can
measure the social, economic, personal,
and/or professional well-being of
individuals, families, and communities
that result from access to computers, the
Internet, and related services at public
libraries?
(5) What correlations can be made
between the benefits obtained through
access to computers and the Internet
and a range of demographic variables?
What correlations can be made to type,
level, or volume of related services?
(6) What computer and Internet
services and resources are lacking at
public libraries that, if provided, could
bring about greater benefit?
(7) What indicators of negative impact
can be identified where free access to
computers and the Internet is weak or
absent?
Once completed, the results of the
study will be issued as a report that will
be made widely available to inform and
benefit libraries, the library research
field, and the public at large.
Agency: Institute of Museum and
Library Services.
Title: Assessing the Impact of Access
to Computers and the Internet and to
Related Services at Public Libraries on
Individuals, Families, and
Communities.
OMB Number: To be determined.
Agency Number: 3137.
Frequency: One time.
Affected Public: General public,
libraries, State Library Administrative
agencies, State and local governments.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
Number of Respondents: To be
determined.
Estimated Time per Respondent: To
be determined.
Total Annualized Capital/Startup
Costs: To be determined.
Total Costs: To be determined.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Downs, Ph.D., Research Officer,
Office of Policy, Planning, Research,
and Communications, Institute of
Museum and Library Services, 1800 M
Street, NW., 9th Floor, Washington, DC,
by telephone: 202–653–4630; fax: 202–
653–4600; or e-mail: mdowns@imls.gov.
Dated: November 26, 2007.
Barbara G. Smith,
E-Projects Officer, Institute of Museum &
Library Services.
[FR Doc. E7–23424 Filed 12–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7036–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 55–61336; License No. SOP–
11801; IA–07–14]
In the Matter of Keith Davis;
Confirmatory Order (Effective
Immediately)
I
Keith Davis (Mr. Davis) was
previously employed as a licensed
Senior Reactor Operator at the
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station
(SSES). Mr. Davis was the holder of
Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) License
Number SOP–11801 issued by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
pursuant to 10 CFR part 55. The license
authorized Mr. Davis to direct the
licensed activities of licensed operators
at, and to manipulate all controls of, the
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station,
(facility license numbers NPF–14 and
NPF–15). The facility is located on a
PPL-Susquehanna, LLC site in Berwick,
PA.
II
An investigation was initiated by the
NRC Office of Investigations (OI) on
August 4, 2006, at the Susquehanna
Steam Electric Station. This
investigation was initiated, in part, to
determine if Mr. Davis deliberately
failed to report an arrest as required by
station procedures on June 27, 2006, on
his first day back to work after the arrest
for driving under the influence (DUI) of
alcohol on June 19, 2006. As noted in
an NRC letter to Mr. Davis on July 2,
2007, OI substantiated, based on the
evidence developed during its
investigation, that Mr. Davis
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
deliberately failed to report the arrest as
required by station procedure. The letter
offered Mr. Davis the opportunity to
either attend a Predecisional
Enforcement Conference or to request
use of Alternate Dispute Resolution
(ADR), to resolve this matter.
III
In response to the July 2, 2007 letter,
Mr. Davis requested the use of ADR to
resolve this matter with the NRC. ADR
is a process in which a neutral mediator
with no decision-making authority
assists the NRC and Mr. Davis in
reaching an agreement on resolving any
differences regarding the enforcement
action. An ADR session was held
between Mr. Davis and the NRC in King
of Prussia, Pennsylvania on September
27, 2007, and was mediated by a
professional mediator, arranged through
Cornell University’s Institute of Conflict
Management. During that ADR session,
a settlement agreement was reached.
The elements of the settlement
agreement consisted of the following:
1. The NRC and Mr. Davis agreed with
the following facts: (1) Mr. Davis, while
employed as a senior reactor operator at
the PPL-Susquehanna nuclear facility,
was arrested on June 19, 2006, for
driving under the influence of alcohol;
(2) Mr. Davis did not report the arrest to
the Pennsylvania Power Light (PPL)—
Susquehanna management on June 27,
2006, upon arrival for scheduled work,
his first opportunity after the arrest;
and, (3) at the time of the arrest, Mr.
Davis understood that he was required
to follow all station procedures under
the terms and conditions of his
individual senior reactor operator
license (SOP–11801).
2. As a result of the facts agreed to in
Item 1, the NRC and Mr. Davis agreed
that Mr. Davis violated NRC
requirements, in that on June 27, 2006,
contrary to 10 CFR 55.53, as required by
10 CFR 50.34(c) and PPL-Susquehanna
procedure, NDAP–00–2002, Rev 4,
‘‘Fitness for Duty/Behavior Observation
Program,’’ Mr. Davis willfully failed to
report to PPL-Susquehanna that he had
been arrested for driving under the
influence of alcohol on June 19, 2006.
3. Mr. Davis, subsequent to the NRC’s
identification of this violation, took
actions to assure that he learned from
the violation and provided the NRC
with assurance that it would not recur.
These actions included attending
substance abuse counseling and
entering into Accelerated Rehabilitation
Disposition Program with the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, which
included participating in education
awareness and community service.
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Notices
4. During the ADR mediation session,
Mr. Davis recognized an opportunity for
other licensed operators in the nuclear
industry to learn from his violation.
Therefore, Mr. Davis agreed to take the
following actions in the future to
sensitize other licensed operators to the
importance of remaining fit for duty,
and reporting any arrest to the facility
licensee as part of the behavior
observation program: (a) Writing an
Operating Experience report that will
address lessons learned from this
violation which will include a
discussion of meeting the intent of
procedures as part of procedure
adherence; (b) providing the written
report to the NRC for review; (c)
submitting the report to a minimum of
3 national organizations for possible
publication, including INPO, NEI, and a
third organization that Mr. Davis will
identify, and inform the NRC of such
when submitting the report for review;
(d) providing a written response to the
NRC explaining the reasons why the
NRC can have confidence in Mr. Davis
following licensee procedures and
meeting NRC regulations should he
work in the nuclear industry in the
future; and, (e) preparing a training plan
for licensed and non-licensed operator
training at PPL-Susquehanna regarding
procedure compliance as it relates to
meeting the intent of the procedure, and
the lessons-learned from the
circumstances which resulted in this
ADR. The subject training plan will be
provided to PPL for their potential use.
5. Mr. Davis will inform the NRC
before he resumes work involving NRC
licensed activities.
6. Mr. Davis agreed to complete the
additional actions described in Item 4
within three months after issuance of an
NRC Confirmatory Order confirming the
commitments agreed to herein, and will
send a letter to the NRC informing the
NRC that these actions are complete.
Mr. Davis agreed to send this letter to
the NRC within 30 days of completion
of all actions.
7. In light of the actions Mr. Davis has
taken as described in Item 3, and those
actions Mr. Davis has committed to take
as described in Items 4, 5, and 6, the
NRC agrees to issue a Severity Level III
Notice of Violation to Mr. Davis. The
NRC will issue a letter with the
aforementioned Notice of Violation and
a Confirmatory Order to Mr. Davis
confirming the commitments set forth
herein. The letter, Notice of Violation,
and the Confirmatory Order will be
publically available in ADAMS, will
appear on the NRC ‘‘Significant
Enforcement Actions—Individuals’’
Web site for a period of 1 year, and will
also be placed in Mr. Davis’ individual
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
license file (Docket No. 55–61336,
License No. SOP–11801).
8. Mr. Davis agreed to issuance of the
letter, Notice of Violation, and
Confirmatory Order confirming this
agreement, and also agrees to waive any
request for a hearing regarding this
Confirmatory Order.
IV
Since Mr. Davis has agreed to take
additional actions to address NRC
concerns, as set forth in Section III, the
NRC has concluded that its concerns
can be resolved through the NRC’s
confirmation of the commitments as
outlined in this Confirmatory Order. I
find that Mr. Davis’ commitments as set
forth in Section III above are acceptable.
In view of the foregoing, I have
determined that these commitments be
confirmed by this Confirmatory Order.
Based on the above and Mr. Davis’
consent, this Confirmatory Order is
immediately effective upon issuance.
V
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections
103, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182, and 186 of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, and the Commission’s
regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR
Part 55, it is hereby ordered, effective
immediately that:
1. Within three months of the date of
this Order, Mr. Davis will take the
following actions to sensitize other
licensed operators to the importance of
remaining fit for duty, and reporting any
arrest to the facility licensee as part of
the behavior observation program: (a)
Writing an Operating Experience report
that will address lessons learned from
this violation which will include a
discussion of meeting the intent of
procedures as part of procedure
adherence; (b) providing the written
report to the NRC for review; (c)
submitting the report to a minimum of
3 national organizations for possible
publication, including INPO, NEI, and a
third organization that Mr. Davis will
identify and inform the NRC of such
when submitting the report for review;
(d) providing a written response to the
NRC explaining the reasons why the
NRC can have confidence in Mr. Davis
following licensee procedures and
meeting NRC regulations should he
work in the nuclear industry in the
future; and, (e) preparing a training plan
for licensed and non-licensed operator
training at PPL-Susquehanna regarding
procedure compliance as it relates to
meeting the intent of the procedure, and
the lessons-learned from the
circumstances which resulted in this
ADR. The subject training plan will be
provided to PPL for their potential use.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68201
2. Mr. Davis will inform the NRC
before he resumes work involving NRC
licensed activities.
3. Mr. Davis will provide the NRC
with a letter detailing his completion of
all actions specified in Item 1 above
within 30 days of completion of all
actions.
The NRC Region I Regional
Administrator may relax or rescind, in
writing, any of the above conditions
upon a showing by Mr. Davis of good
cause.
VI
Any person adversely affected by this
Confirmatory Order, other than Mr.
Davis, may request a hearing within 20
days of its issuance. Where good cause
is shown, consideration will be given to
extending the time to answer or request
a hearing. A request for extension of
time must be directed to the Director,
Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, and include a
statement of good cause for the
extension.
A request for a hearing must be filed
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing
rule, which the NRC promulgated in
August, 2007, 72 FR 49,139 (Aug. 28,
2007). The E-Filing process requires
participants to submit and serve
documents over the internet or, in some
cases, to mail copies on electronic
optical storage media. Participants may
not submit paper copies of their filings
unless they seek a waiver in accordance
with the procedures described below.
To comply with the procedural
requirements associated with E-Filing,
at least five (5) days prior to the filing
deadline the requestor must contact the
Office of the Secretary by e-mail at
HEARINGDOCKET@NRC.GOV, or by
calling (301) 415–1677, to request (1) a
digital ID certificate, which allows the
participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign
documents and access the E-Submittal
server for any NRC proceeding in which
it is participating; and/or (2) creation of
an electronic docket for the proceeding
(even in instances when the requestor
(or its counsel or representative) already
holds an NRC-issued digital ID
certificate). Each requestor will need to
download the Workplace Forms
ViewerTM to access the Electronic
Information Exchange (EIE), a
component of the E-Filing system. The
Workplace Forms ViewerTM is free and
is available at https://www.nrc.gov/sitehelp/e-submittals/install-viewer.html.
Information about applying for a digital
ID certificate also is available on NRC’s
public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/
site-help/e-submittals/applycertificates.html.
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
68202
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Notices
Once a requestor has obtained a
digital ID certificate, had a docket
created, and downloaded the EIE
viewer, it can then submit a request for
a hearing through EIE. Submissions
should be in Portable Document Format
(PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance
available on the NRC public Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered
complete at the time the filer submits its
document through EIE. To be timely,
electronic filings must be submitted to
the EIE system no later than 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on the due date. Upon
receipt of a transmission, the E-Filing
system time-stamps the document and
sends the submitter an e-mail notice
confirming receipt of the document. The
EIE system also distributes an e-mail
notice that provides access to the
document to the NRC Office of the
General Counsel and any others who
have advised the Office of the Secretary
that they wish to participate in the
proceeding, so that the filer need not
serve the document on those
participants separately. Therefore, any
others who wish to participate in the
proceeding (or their counsel or
representative) must apply for and
receive a digital ID certificate before a
hearing request is filed so that they may
obtain access to the document via the EFiling system.
A person filing electronically may
seek assistance through the ‘‘Contact
Us’’ link located on the NRC Web site
at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html or by calling the NRC
technical help line, which is available
between 8:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m.,
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
The help line number is (800) 397–4209
or locally, (301) 415–4737.
Participants who believe that they
have good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file a
motion, in accordance with 10 CFR
2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
requesting authorization to continue to
submit documents in paper format.
Such filings must be submitted by (1)
first class mail addressed to the Office
of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or
(2) courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service to the Office of the
Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One White
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing a document in this
manner are responsible for serving the
document on all other participants.
Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
the mail, or by courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service upon
depositing the document with the
provider of the service.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in NRC’s
electronic hearing docket which is
available to the public at https://
ehd.nrc.gov/EHD_Proceeding/home.asp,
unless excluded pursuant to an order of
the Commission, an Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board, or a Presiding Officer.
Participants are requested not to include
personal privacy information, such as
social security numbers, home
addresses, or home phone numbers in
their filings. With respect to copyrighted
works, except for limited excerpts that
serve the purpose of the adjudicatory
filings and would constitute a Fair Use
application, participants are requested
not to include copyrighted materials in
their works.
If a person requests a hearing, that
person shall set forth with particularity
the manner in which his interest is
adversely affected by this Order and
shall address the criteria set forth in 10
CFR 2.309(d).
If a hearing is requested by a person
whose interest is adversely affected, the
Commission will issue an Order
designating the time and place of any
hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to
be considered at such hearing shall be
whether this Confirmatory Order shall
be sustained. An answer or a request for
a hearing shall not stay the effectiveness
date of this order.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Dated this 26th day of November 2007.
Marc L. Dapas,
Deputy Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–23478 Filed 12–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 052–00008]
Notice of Issuance of Early Site Permit
for Dominion Nuclear North Anna, LLC
Located 40 Miles North-Northwest of
the City of Richmond, VA
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Issuance of Early Site
Permit.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Kevern, Senior Project
Manager, ESBWR/ABWR Projects
Branch 1, Division of New Reactor
Licensing, Office of New Reactors, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Telephone: (301) 415–0224; fax: (301)
415–5199; e-mail: tak@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
Pursuant to Title 10, Section 2.106,
‘‘Notice of Issuance,’’ of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR 2.106), the
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) is providing notice of the
issuance of early site permit (ESP) ESP–
003 to Dominion Nuclear North Anna,
LLC (Dominion or the permit holder),
for approval of a site located near Lake
Anna in Louisa County, Virginia (VA),
approximately 40 miles north-northwest
of Richmond, VA, for one or more
nuclear power reactors; this action is
separate from the filing of an
application for a construction permit or
combined license for such a facility. The
NRC has found that the application for
an ESP filed by Dominion complies
with the applicable requirements of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
and the applicable rules and regulations
of the Commission, and all required
notifications to other agencies or bodies
have been duly made. Taking into
consideration the site criteria contained
in 10 CFR Part 100, ‘‘Reactor Site
Criteria,’’ a reactor, or reactors, having
design characteristics that fall within
the site characteristics and controlling
parameters of the permit holder’s ESP
site can be constructed and operated
without undue risk to the health and
safety of the public.
There is reasonable assurance that the
permit holder will comply with the
regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, and the
health and safety of the public will not
be endangered. Issuance of an ESP to
the permit holder will not be inimical
to the common defense and security or
the health and safety of the public.
There is no significant impediment to
the development of emergency plans, as
referenced in 10 CFR 52.17(b)(1) and 10
CFR 52.18, ‘‘Standards for Review of
Applications.’’ The descriptions of
contacts and arrangements made with
Federal, State, and local governmental
agencies with emergency planning
responsibilities, as referenced in 10 CFR
52.17(b)(3), are acceptable. Major
features A, B, C, D, E, F, G, I, J, K, L,
O, and P of the emergency plan are
acceptable to the extent specified in
NUREG–1835, ‘‘Safety Evaluation
Report for an Early Site Permit (ESP) at
the North Anna ESP Site,’’ issued
September 2005 and ‘‘Safety Evaluation
Report for an Early Site Permit (ESP) at
the North Anna ESP Site, Supplement
1’’ issued November 2006. The issuance
of this ESP is in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act, as
amended, and with applicable sections
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68200-68202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23478]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 55-61336; License No. SOP-11801; IA-07-14]
In the Matter of Keith Davis; Confirmatory Order (Effective
Immediately)
I
Keith Davis (Mr. Davis) was previously employed as a licensed
Senior Reactor Operator at the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station
(SSES). Mr. Davis was the holder of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO)
License Number SOP-11801 issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) pursuant to 10 CFR part 55. The license authorized Mr. Davis to
direct the licensed activities of licensed operators at, and to
manipulate all controls of, the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station,
(facility license numbers NPF-14 and NPF-15). The facility is located
on a PPL-Susquehanna, LLC site in Berwick, PA.
II
An investigation was initiated by the NRC Office of Investigations
(OI) on August 4, 2006, at the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station. This
investigation was initiated, in part, to determine if Mr. Davis
deliberately failed to report an arrest as required by station
procedures on June 27, 2006, on his first day back to work after the
arrest for driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol on June 19,
2006. As noted in an NRC letter to Mr. Davis on July 2, 2007, OI
substantiated, based on the evidence developed during its
investigation, that Mr. Davis deliberately failed to report the arrest
as required by station procedure. The letter offered Mr. Davis the
opportunity to either attend a Predecisional Enforcement Conference or
to request use of Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), to resolve this
matter.
III
In response to the July 2, 2007 letter, Mr. Davis requested the use
of ADR to resolve this matter with the NRC. ADR is a process in which a
neutral mediator with no decision-making authority assists the NRC and
Mr. Davis in reaching an agreement on resolving any differences
regarding the enforcement action. An ADR session was held between Mr.
Davis and the NRC in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania on September 27,
2007, and was mediated by a professional mediator, arranged through
Cornell University's Institute of Conflict Management. During that ADR
session, a settlement agreement was reached. The elements of the
settlement agreement consisted of the following:
1. The NRC and Mr. Davis agreed with the following facts: (1) Mr.
Davis, while employed as a senior reactor operator at the PPL-
Susquehanna nuclear facility, was arrested on June 19, 2006, for
driving under the influence of alcohol; (2) Mr. Davis did not report
the arrest to the Pennsylvania Power Light (PPL)--Susquehanna
management on June 27, 2006, upon arrival for scheduled work, his first
opportunity after the arrest; and, (3) at the time of the arrest, Mr.
Davis understood that he was required to follow all station procedures
under the terms and conditions of his individual senior reactor
operator license (SOP-11801).
2. As a result of the facts agreed to in Item 1, the NRC and Mr.
Davis agreed that Mr. Davis violated NRC requirements, in that on June
27, 2006, contrary to 10 CFR 55.53, as required by 10 CFR 50.34(c) and
PPL-Susquehanna procedure, NDAP-00-2002, Rev 4, ``Fitness for Duty/
Behavior Observation Program,'' Mr. Davis willfully failed to report to
PPL-Susquehanna that he had been arrested for driving under the
influence of alcohol on June 19, 2006.
3. Mr. Davis, subsequent to the NRC's identification of this
violation, took actions to assure that he learned from the violation
and provided the NRC with assurance that it would not recur. These
actions included attending substance abuse counseling and entering into
Accelerated Rehabilitation Disposition Program with the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, which included participating in education awareness and
community service.
[[Page 68201]]
4. During the ADR mediation session, Mr. Davis recognized an
opportunity for other licensed operators in the nuclear industry to
learn from his violation. Therefore, Mr. Davis agreed to take the
following actions in the future to sensitize other licensed operators
to the importance of remaining fit for duty, and reporting any arrest
to the facility licensee as part of the behavior observation program:
(a) Writing an Operating Experience report that will address lessons
learned from this violation which will include a discussion of meeting
the intent of procedures as part of procedure adherence; (b) providing
the written report to the NRC for review; (c) submitting the report to
a minimum of 3 national organizations for possible publication,
including INPO, NEI, and a third organization that Mr. Davis will
identify, and inform the NRC of such when submitting the report for
review; (d) providing a written response to the NRC explaining the
reasons why the NRC can have confidence in Mr. Davis following licensee
procedures and meeting NRC regulations should he work in the nuclear
industry in the future; and, (e) preparing a training plan for licensed
and non-licensed operator training at PPL-Susquehanna regarding
procedure compliance as it relates to meeting the intent of the
procedure, and the lessons-learned from the circumstances which
resulted in this ADR. The subject training plan will be provided to PPL
for their potential use.
5. Mr. Davis will inform the NRC before he resumes work involving
NRC licensed activities.
6. Mr. Davis agreed to complete the additional actions described in
Item 4 within three months after issuance of an NRC Confirmatory Order
confirming the commitments agreed to herein, and will send a letter to
the NRC informing the NRC that these actions are complete. Mr. Davis
agreed to send this letter to the NRC within 30 days of completion of
all actions.
7. In light of the actions Mr. Davis has taken as described in Item
3, and those actions Mr. Davis has committed to take as described in
Items 4, 5, and 6, the NRC agrees to issue a Severity Level III Notice
of Violation to Mr. Davis. The NRC will issue a letter with the
aforementioned Notice of Violation and a Confirmatory Order to Mr.
Davis confirming the commitments set forth herein. The letter, Notice
of Violation, and the Confirmatory Order will be publically available
in ADAMS, will appear on the NRC ``Significant Enforcement Actions--
Individuals'' Web site for a period of 1 year, and will also be placed
in Mr. Davis' individual license file (Docket No. 55-61336, License No.
SOP-11801).
8. Mr. Davis agreed to issuance of the letter, Notice of Violation,
and Confirmatory Order confirming this agreement, and also agrees to
waive any request for a hearing regarding this Confirmatory Order.
IV
Since Mr. Davis has agreed to take additional actions to address
NRC concerns, as set forth in Section III, the NRC has concluded that
its concerns can be resolved through the NRC's confirmation of the
commitments as outlined in this Confirmatory Order. I find that Mr.
Davis' commitments as set forth in Section III above are acceptable. In
view of the foregoing, I have determined that these commitments be
confirmed by this Confirmatory Order. Based on the above and Mr. Davis'
consent, this Confirmatory Order is immediately effective upon
issuance.
V
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 103, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182, and
186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's
regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR Part 55, it is hereby ordered,
effective immediately that:
1. Within three months of the date of this Order, Mr. Davis will
take the following actions to sensitize other licensed operators to the
importance of remaining fit for duty, and reporting any arrest to the
facility licensee as part of the behavior observation program: (a)
Writing an Operating Experience report that will address lessons
learned from this violation which will include a discussion of meeting
the intent of procedures as part of procedure adherence; (b) providing
the written report to the NRC for review; (c) submitting the report to
a minimum of 3 national organizations for possible publication,
including INPO, NEI, and a third organization that Mr. Davis will
identify and inform the NRC of such when submitting the report for
review; (d) providing a written response to the NRC explaining the
reasons why the NRC can have confidence in Mr. Davis following licensee
procedures and meeting NRC regulations should he work in the nuclear
industry in the future; and, (e) preparing a training plan for licensed
and non-licensed operator training at PPL-Susquehanna regarding
procedure compliance as it relates to meeting the intent of the
procedure, and the lessons-learned from the circumstances which
resulted in this ADR. The subject training plan will be provided to PPL
for their potential use.
2. Mr. Davis will inform the NRC before he resumes work involving
NRC licensed activities.
3. Mr. Davis will provide the NRC with a letter detailing his
completion of all actions specified in Item 1 above within 30 days of
completion of all actions.
The NRC Region I Regional Administrator may relax or rescind, in
writing, any of the above conditions upon a showing by Mr. Davis of
good cause.
VI
Any person adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order, other
than Mr. Davis, may request a hearing within 20 days of its issuance.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the
time to answer or request a hearing. A request for extension of time
must be directed to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, and include a statement of good cause for the
extension.
A request for a hearing must be filed in accordance with the NRC E-
Filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in August, 2007, 72 FR 49,139
(Aug. 28, 2007). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit
and serve documents over the internet or, in some cases, to mail copies
on electronic optical storage media. Participants may not submit paper
copies of their filings unless they seek a waiver in accordance with
the procedures described below.
To comply with the procedural requirements associated with E-
Filing, at least five (5) days prior to the filing deadline the
requestor must contact the Office of the Secretary by e-mail at
HEARINGDOCKET@NRC.GOV, or by calling (301) 415-1677, to request (1) a
digital ID certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign documents and access the E-Submittal
server for any NRC proceeding in which it is participating; and/or (2)
creation of an electronic docket for the proceeding (even in instances
when the requestor (or its counsel or representative) already holds an
NRC-issued digital ID certificate). Each requestor will need to
download the Workplace Forms Viewer\TM\ to access the Electronic
Information Exchange (EIE), a component of the E-Filing system. The
Workplace Forms Viewer\TM\ is free and is available at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/install-viewer.html. Information
about applying for a digital ID certificate also is available on NRC's
public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/apply-
certificates.html.
[[Page 68202]]
Once a requestor has obtained a digital ID certificate, had a
docket created, and downloaded the EIE viewer, it can then submit a
request for a hearing through EIE. Submissions should be in Portable
Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance available on the
NRC public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
A filing is considered complete at the time the filer submits its
document through EIE. To be timely, electronic filings must be
submitted to the EIE system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on
the due date. Upon receipt of a transmission, the E-Filing system time-
stamps the document and sends the submitter an e-mail notice confirming
receipt of the document. The EIE system also distributes an e-mail
notice that provides access to the document to the NRC Office of the
General Counsel and any others who have advised the Office of the
Secretary that they wish to participate in the proceeding, so that the
filer need not serve the document on those participants separately.
Therefore, any others who wish to participate in the proceeding (or
their counsel or representative) must apply for and receive a digital
ID certificate before a hearing request is filed so that they may
obtain access to the document via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically may seek assistance through the
``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/
site-help/e-submittals.html or by calling the NRC technical help line,
which is available between 8:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m., Eastern Time,
Monday through Friday. The help line number is (800) 397-4209 or
locally, (301) 415-4737.
Participants who believe that they have good cause for not
submitting documents electronically must file a motion, in accordance
with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing requesting
authorization to continue to submit documents in paper format. Such
filings must be submitted by (1) first class mail addressed to the
Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852,
Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants filing a
document in this manner are responsible for serving the document on all
other participants. Filing is considered complete by first-class mail
as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service upon depositing the document with the
provider of the service.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in
NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at
https://ehd.nrc.gov/EHD_Proceeding/home.asp, unless excluded pursuant
to an order of the Commission, an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, or
a Presiding Officer. Participants are requested not to include personal
privacy information, such as social security numbers, home addresses,
or home phone numbers in their filings. With respect to copyrighted
works, except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the
adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use application,
participants are requested not to include copyrighted materials in
their works.
If a person requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with
particularity the manner in which his interest is adversely affected by
this Order and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d).
If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely
affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating the time and
place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered
at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order shall be
sustained. An answer or a request for a hearing shall not stay the
effectiveness date of this order.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Dated this 26th day of November 2007.
Marc L. Dapas,
Deputy Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-23478 Filed 12-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P