Recruitment, Relocation, and Retention Incentives, 67831-67841 [E7-23411]
Download as PDF
67831
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 231
Monday, December 3, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Parts 530 and 575
RIN: 3206–AK81
Recruitment, Relocation, and
Retention Incentives
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel
Management is issuing final regulations
on recruitment, relocation, and
retention incentives. The final
regulations revise the interim
regulations by making a number of
technical modifications, corrections,
and clarifications. The final regulations
continue to provide agencies with
additional flexibility to help recruit and
retain Federal employees and better
meet agency strategic human capital
needs.
DATES:
Effective Date: January 2, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeanne Jacobson by telephone at (202)
606–2858; by fax at (202) 606–0824; or
by e-mail at pay-performancepolicy@opm.gov.
On May
13, 2005, the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) published interim
regulations (70 FR 25732) to implement
section 101 of the Federal Workforce
Flexibility Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108–411,
October 30, 2004). Section 101 amended
5 U.S.C. 5753 and 5754 by providing a
new authority to make recruitment,
relocation, and retention payments. The
amended law replaced the former
recruitment and relocation bonus and
retention allowance authority provided
by 5 U.S.C. 5753 and 5754. The 60-day
comment period for the interim
regulations ended July 12, 2005.
During the comment period, we
received comments from eight agencies,
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
one employee organization, and eight
individuals. A number of the
commenters stated they are pleased
with the flexibilities provided by the
interim regulations. They believe the
enhanced recruitment, relocation, and
retention incentive (3Rs) authorities will
allow agencies to be more competitive
with the private sector and assist in
recruiting and retaining highly qualified
employees and candidates. The
commenters support the approach taken
by OPM to provide agencies with
maximum flexibility and discretion to
craft plans for administering the
incentives to best meet their needs.
The Supplementary Information for
the interim regulations posed a number
of questions about whether the 3Rs
regulations should provide agencies
with the authority to pay recruitment
incentives to help recruit current
employees (as authorized by 5 U.S.C.
5753(b) under conditions that would be
described in OPM regulations) and to
pay retention incentives to help retain
employees likely to leave for a different
Federal position (as authorized by 5
U.S.C. 5754(b) under conditions that
would be described in OPM regulations)
and, if so, under what circumstances.
The comments we received in
response to these questions are not
addressed in these final regulations, but
will be addressed in a future Federal
Register notice. This Federal Register
notice addresses the remaining
comments and makes a number of
technical revisions and clarifications in
the 3Rs regulations, which are
summarized below.
Comments Applicable to Recruitment,
Relocation, and Retention Incentives
Definition of Basic Pay (§§ 530.202,
575.102, 575.202, and 575.302)
An individual expressed confusion
about the definition of basic pay in the
aggregate limitation on pay regulations
at § 530.202 and the definition of rate of
basic pay in the recruitment, relocation,
and retention incentive regulations at
§§ 575.102, 575.202, and 575.302,
respectively. The commenter questioned
why the terms themselves are different
and why they are defined differently.
Similar terms may be used and
defined in different ways in title 5, Code
of Federal Regulations, depending on
the purpose of the term and statutory
requirements. Differences in the term
basic pay for the purpose of the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
aggregate limitation on pay and the term
rate of basic pay for the purpose of the
3Rs are necessary based on how each
term is used in its respective subpart of
the regulations. Each term must be read
only within the context of the subpart
of the regulation in which it is defined.
In the aggregate limitation on pay
regulations, an employee’s basic pay is
added to certain other payments
authorized under title 5, United States
Code, to determine whether the
employee’s total pay has reached the
aggregate limitation on pay in the
calendar year. In the 3Rs regulations, an
employee’s rate of basic pay is used to
compute recruitment and relocation
incentive payment limits and retention
incentive payments.
Eligible Categories of Employees
(§§ 575.103, 575.203, and 575.303)
An agency questioned whether
employees under administratively
determined (AD) pay systems are
covered by the 3Rs authorities. The
agency wanted to ensure that AD
employees are covered.
OPM has not regulated that all AD
positions are eligible for recruitment,
relocation, and retention incentives.
Under 5 U.S.C. 5753(a)(1)(B) and
5754(a)(1)(B), OPM may approve
coverage of a category of non-General
Schedule (non-GS) employees under the
3Rs authorities at the request of the
head of an Executive agency. When we
issued the interim regulations
implementing the new authorities, OPM
approved those categories of non-GS
employees that were previously covered
under the former recruitment and
relocation bonus and retention
allowance authorities for coverage
under the new authorities, except when
such categories are excluded by law (5
U.S.C. 5753(a)(2) and 5754(a)(2)) or
regulation (§§ 575.104, 575.204, and
575.304). (See CPM 2005–08 on OPM’s
Web site at https://www.opm.gov/oca for
additional information and a list of
approved single-agency categories of
employees.) If a category of AD
employees (or other employee category)
is not already approved for coverage, the
head of an Executive agency may
request OPM approval for coverage of
such employees. The coverage of each
category of AD positions requires
separate OPM approval.
The same agency noted the
regulations at §§ 575.103, 575.203, and
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
67832
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
575.303 cover employees in a position
under the Executive Schedule paid
under 5 U.S.C. 5311–5317. The agency
stated Executive Schedule positions are
filled using presidential appointments
and such appointments are excluded
from coverage under §§ 575.104,
575.204, and 575.304. The agency
commented that the regulations appear
to be contradictory and suggested the
coverage of Executive Schedule
positions be restated or clarified.
We agree most Executive Schedule
positions are filled using presidential
appointments and, thus, employees
appointed to such positions would not
be eligible for 3Rs payments under
§§ 575.104, 575.204, and 575.304.
However, we are retaining the provision
in §§ 575.103, 575.203, and 575.303
stating employees appointed to or in
Executive Schedule positions are
eligible for 3Rs payments to ensure that
an employee in an Executive Schedule
position that is not otherwise excluded
by § 575.104, 575.204, and 575.304 (e.g.,
not a presidential appointee) remains
eligible for such payments.
Another agency asked for clarification
on whether employees of
nonappropriated fund instrumentalities
(NAFI) are eligible for recruitment,
relocation, and retention incentives. We
have not made a change to the
regulations in response to this comment.
An employee in a NAFI position
meeting the definition of a prevailing
rate position in 5 U.S.C. 5342(a)(3) is
eligible for recruitment, relocation, and
retention incentives, as long as the
position is not otherwise excluded by
§§ 575.104, 575.204, and 575.304. (See
§§ 575.103(f), 575.203(f), and
575.303(f).) As of the date of publication
of these final regulations in the Federal
Register, all other categories of NAFI
positions (e.g., ‘‘white collar’’ NAFI
positions) are ineligible for 3Rs
payments. However, because a NAFI
employee is covered by the definition of
employee in 5 U.S.C. 5753(a)(3) and
5754(a)(3) and §§ 575.102, 575.202, and
575.302 of the regulations, OPM may
extend coverage of the 3Rs authorities to
currently excluded categories of NAFI
employees upon request of the head of
an Executive agency.
Finally, we are revising the
introductory text in §§ 575.103, 575.203,
and 575.303 to clarify that only an
Executive agency (as defined in
§§ 575.102, 575.202, and 575.302) may
pay recruitment, relocation, and
retention incentives to the categories of
non-GS employees listed in those
sections. (See 5 U.S.C. 5753(a)(1)(B) and
5754(a)(1)(B).) These sections continue
to provide that an agency in the
executive branch or legislative branch
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
may pay recruitment, relocation, and
retention incentives to GS employees.
(See the definition of agency in
§§ 575.102, 575.202, and 575.302.)
Payment Approval Levels (§§ 575.107,
575.207, and 575.307)
An individual questioned whether the
authority to approve 3Rs requests could
be delegated to the immediate
supervisor of the employee receiving the
3Rs incentive provided the supervisor is
the head of a departmental element who
reports to the head of an agency and the
employee receiving the incentive is not
a member of the Senior Executive
Service. The commenter noted the
second-level supervisory or managerial
approval requirement seems contrary to
OPM’s intent to expeditiously hire and
retain the best and brightest and stated
‘‘this new requirement will actually
slow the process and hamper efforts to
review and approve 3R incentives in a
timely manner.’’
We understand the need for
streamlined and efficient agency
approvals of 3Rs incentives. However,
this need must be balanced with an
appropriate and judicious use of the
authorities. We note that the secondlevel supervisory or management
approval of 3Rs incentives is not a new
requirement-i.e., it was required by the
regulations for the former recruitment
and relocation bonus and retention
allowance authorities and was carried
over into the new regulations. Since no
additional approval levels have been
added, we foresee no slowing of the
approval process because of the new
regulations.
We note that several provisions in the
regulations make it possible to approve
incentives without a second-level
supervisory or managerial review. For
example, the regulations at
§ 575.107(b)(2) allow an agency to
establish criteria in advance so an
employment candidate’s supervisor or
equivalent-level official may offer a
recruitment incentive within a preestablished range without further review
or approval. Also, the relocation
incentive regulations at § 575.207(b)(2)
do not require higher-level approval
when approving coverage of individual
employees under a previously approved
group relocation incentive authorization
under § 575.208(b). Finally, under
§ 575.307(b)(2), second-level
supervisory or managerial approval is
not required when approving coverage
of individual employees under a
previously approved group retention
incentive authorization.
In addition, agencies have
considerable discretion when they craft
their 3Rs plans to decide which officials
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
will have approval authority for these
incentives. (See §§ 575.107(a)(1),
575.207(a)(1), and 575.307(a)(1).) If
agencies require very high-level reviews
for these incentives, the approval
process may become slow and
unwieldy. However, this is a matter that
must be decided at the agency level.
Paying Recruitment, Relocation, and
Retention Incentives Concurrently
(§§ 575.109, 575.209, and 575.309)
Two agencies requested the
regulations specify whether the service
agreement periods for more than one
type of incentive should be served
concurrently or sequentially. Another
agency pointed out the regulations do
not address the ability to offer a
recruitment incentive followed by a
relocation incentive and suggested the
explanation of the order of and the basis
for offering multiple incentives be
described more thoroughly in each
respective section under §§ 575.109,
575.209, and 575.309.
We agree that the regulations should
clarify these issues. The interim
retention incentive regulations at
§ 575.309(g) provided an agency may
not commence a retention incentive
service agreement (or begin paying a
retention incentive without a service
agreement) during a period of
employment established under a service
agreement required for the payment of
a recruitment incentive or a relocation
incentive. After a retention incentive
service agreement has commenced (or
retention incentive payments without a
service agreement have commenced),
the retention incentive regulations
allowed an agency to pay a relocation
incentive without affecting the payment
of an existing retention incentive.
However, the interim recruitment and
relocation incentive regulations were
silent on paying recruitment, relocation,
and retention incentives concurrently
and whether employees should serve
multiple 3Rs service agreements
concurrently or sequentially.
These final regulations provide the
following rules regarding concurrent
recruitment, relocation, and retention
incentive payments:
• New § 575.105(c) provides that an
agency may not commence a
recruitment incentive service agreement
during (1) a period of employment
established under a service agreement
required for a relocation incentive, or (2)
during a period of employment
established under a service agreement
for a previously authorized retention
incentive or for which an employee is
receiving a previously authorized
retention incentive without a service
agreement.
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
• New § 575.205(d) provides that an
agency may not commence a relocation
incentive service agreement during (1) a
period of employment established under
any service agreement required for a
recruitment incentive, or (2) a period of
employment established under any
service agreement required for a
previously authorized relocation
incentive.
• New § 575.205(e) provides that an
agency may commence a relocation
incentive service agreement during a
period of employment established under
a service agreement for a previously
authorized retention incentive or for
which an employee is receiving
previously authorized retention
incentive payments without a service
agreement. (This provision was formerly
in § 575.309(g).) This new paragraph
also clarifies that the service period
under two such service agreements must
run concurrently.
• Revised § 575.309(g) provides that
an agency may not commence a
retention incentive service agreement
(or begin paying a retention incentive
without a service agreement) during (1)
a period of employment established
under any service agreement required
for payment of a recruitment incentive
or a relocation incentive or (2) a period
of employment established under a
service agreement for a previously
authorized retention incentive or for
which an employee is receiving a
previously authorized retention
incentive without a service agreement.
Except as provided in § 575.205(e),
these regulatory changes prohibit the
simultaneous payment of multiple
incentives and prohibit concurrent 3Rs
service agreements. However, the
recruitment, relocation, and retention
incentive authorities provide substantial
flexibility to make sizable incentive
payments in situations in which offering
multiple incentives may otherwise be
attractive. For example, if an employee
fulfilling a recruitment incentive service
agreement is relocated to a different
geographic area in a difficult to fill
position, the regulations provide the
agency the flexibility to terminate the
recruitment incentive service agreement
under § 575.111(a) and authorize a
relocation incentive under 5 CFR part
575, subpart B, in its place. In this case,
the employee would not be
disadvantaged because under
§ 575.111(e), the employee would be
entitled to all recruitment incentive
payments attributable to completed
service and to retain any portion of a
recruitment incentive payment already
received that is attributable to
uncompleted service. The agency could
consider any remaining recruitment
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
incentive payments and time remaining
under the recruitment incentive service
agreement in determining the amount of
the relocation incentive and length of
the relocation incentive service
agreement.
Similarly, if an employee receiving a
group retention incentive under
§ 575.305(b) is still likely to leave
Federal service and has unusually high
or unique qualifications that are not
adequately covered by the group
retention incentive authorization, the
agency could terminate the group
retention incentive under § 575.311(a)
for the individual employee and
authorize an individual retention
incentive under § 575.305(a) for the
employee. The agency could consider
the amount of the group retention
incentive and time remaining under the
group retention incentive service
agreement, if any, in determining the
amount of the new retention incentive
and length of any new retention
incentive service agreement.
Definition of ‘‘Fully Successful’’
(§§ 575.110(d), 575.111(b), 575.205(c),
575.210(d), 575.211(b), 575.305(d),
575.306(c)(2), 575.310(d), 575.311(b),
and 575.311(f)(5)(ii))
An agency requested clarification of
the definition of ‘‘fully succeed’’ [sic]
due to variances in Federal performance
ratings. The agency questioned whether
the intent is to limit the payment of
recruitment incentives to only those
employees whose rating of record is at
the highest level under the applicable
performance appraisal system and
recommended that employees at least
one level below the highest level be
eligible, so as to accommodate the
ratings of new hires.
Because recruitment incentives may
be paid only to newly-appointed
Federal employees (or former employees
with a 90-day break in service), the
regulations do not require an employee
to have a ‘‘Fully Successful’’ or higher
rating of record to receive a recruitment
incentive. However, the regulations at
§§ 575.205(c) and 575.305(d) provide
that a relocation and retention incentive
may be paid to an employee only when
the employee’s rating of record (or
official performance appraisal or
evaluation under a system not covered
by 5 U.S.C. chapter 43 or 5 CFR part
430) is at least ‘‘Fully Successful’’ or
equivalent. In addition, the regulations
at §§ 575.110(d), 575.111(b), 575.210(d),
575.211(d), 575.310(d), 575.311(b), and
575.311(f)(5)(ii) require agencies to
terminate 3Rs service agreements and
retention incentive payments when no
service agreement is required if the
employee receives a rating of record of
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67833
less than ‘‘Fully Successful’’ or
equivalent. We note ‘‘Fully Successful’’
is not intended to refer to a rating of
record that is the highest level under an
applicable performance appraisal
system, unless the performance
appraisal system is a pass-fail system.
Repayment Waivers (§§ 575.111(g) and
575.211(g))
Sections 575.111(g) and 575.211(g) of
the interim regulations provided that
the head of an agency may use the
authority in 5 U.S.C. 5584 to waive a
debt resulting from an employee’s
failure to reimburse the agency for the
full amount of a recruitment or
relocation incentive repayment
requirement when the employee fails to
fulfill a required service period. An
individual commented that OPM
appears to have the authority to permit
agencies to waive repayment of
recruitment and relocation incentives
without reliance on 5 U.S.C. 5584
because 5 U.S.C. 5753(g) permits OPM
to promulgate ‘‘regulations relating to
repayment of a bonus under this section
under appropriate circumstances when
the agreed upon service period has not
been completed.’’ The commenter also
noted such waivers should not be
routine, but circumstances are likely to
arise under which repayment of
unliquidated amounts would constitute
an undue hardship, such as for
unforeseen and compelling personal
reasons.
We agree that it is appropriate for
OPM to use its regulatory authority at 5
U.S.C. 5753(g) to provide agencies with
the authority to waive the requirement
to repay recruitment or relocation
incentive payments attributable to
uncompleted service when a service
agreement is terminated under
§§ 575.111(b) and 575.211(b), rather
than relying on the agency’s authority to
waive recovery of an erroneous payment
under 5 U.S.C. 5584. We are revising the
regulations at §§ 575.111(g) and
575.211(g) to remove the reference to an
agency’s authority to waive a debt under
5 U.S.C. 5584. We also are adding new
paragraphs §§ 575.111(h) and 575.211(h)
to provide an authorized agency official
with the authority to waive the
requirement for an employee to repay
recruitment or relocation incentive
payments attributable to uncompleted
service under §§ 575.111(f) and
575.211(f) when collection of the excess
payments from the employee would be
against equity and good conscience and
not in the best interests of the United
States. Agencies should ensure such
waiver authority is used judiciously.
(See also the conforming changes in
§§ 575.107(a)(1) and 575.207(a)(1).)
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
67834
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Definition of ‘‘Newly Appointed’’
(§ 575.102)
appointed and eligible to receive a
recruitment incentive under the
conditions prescribed in 5 CFR part 575,
subpart A, when moving to a position
listed in § 575.103 (i.e., NAFI employees
who moved to a position in the same
agency after more than a 3-day break in
service and NAFI employees who
moved to a position in a different
agency with or without a break in
service). Such NAFI employees did not
need the 90-day break in service
required by paragraph (2) of the
definition of newly appointed to receive
a recruitment incentive. (See the
exemptions in paragraphs (3)(iv) and (v)
of that definition in the interim
regulations.)
Based on the definition of employee
in § 575.102 and the definition of
employee in 5 U.S.C. 5753(a)(3), both of
which specifically include a DOD and
USCG NAFI employee, as described in
5 U.S.C. 2105(c), we believe it would be
more consistent to revise the definition
of newly appointed in these final
regulations to remove the special
exemptions from the 90-day break-inservice requirement in paragraphs
(3)(iv) and (v) of the definition of newly
appointed for DOD and USCG NAFI
employees. In other words, all DOD and
USCG NAFI service will be considered
Federal service in applying the 90-day
break-in-service rule. DOD and USCG
NAFI employees must have a 90-day
break-in-service to be eligible for a
recruitment incentive upon movement
to a position listed in § 575.103 (unless
one of the remaining exclusions in the
definition of newly appointed applies).
An agency asked for clarification on
whether the regulations permit the
payment of recruitment incentives to
employees moving from either
prevailing rate or white-collar NAFI
positions to positions covered by the
recruitment incentive regulations (e.g.,
GS). Under 5 U.S.C. 5753(b)(2)(A), a
recruitment incentive may be paid to an
employee ‘‘newly appointed as an
employee of the Federal Government.’’
Newly appointed is defined in § 575.102
as referring to (1) the first appointment
as an employee of the Federal
Government, (2) an appointment of a
former employee of the Federal
Government following a 90-day breakin-service, or (3) an appointment as an
employee of the Federal Government
when the employee’s Federal service
during the 90-day period immediately
preceding the appointment was limited
to certain types of employment (e.g., a
time-limited appointment).
Under the interim regulations, certain
categories of NAFI employees in DOD
and USCG were considered newly
Payment and Repayment Requirements
(§ 575.111)
An agency recommended amending
§ 575.111(b) and (f) to state employees
must repay recruitment incentive
payments for any part of the service
period in which they did not meet all
of the terms of the service agreement;
e.g., for periods of unsatisfactory
performance. The same agency
recommended the regulations require
full repayment of a recruitment
incentive if employment is terminated
due to falsified employment documents
or pre-employment conditions.
The regulations at § 575.111(b) require
an agency to terminate a recruitment
incentive service agreement when an
employee receives a rating of record of
less than ‘‘Fully Successful’’ or
equivalent or when an employee
otherwise fails to fulfill the terms of the
service agreement. If an agency
terminates a service agreement for such
reasons, § 575.111(f) provides that the
employee is entitled to keep any portion
of recruitment incentive payments
Agencies continue to have the authority
under 5 U.S.C. 5584 to waive recovery
of recruitment or relocation incentives
or other pay or allowances that are paid
erroneously.
Reporting Requirements (§§ 575.113,
575.213, and 575.313)
An agency requested the
or final
regulations clarify that the Department
of Defense (DOD) and United States
Coast Guard (USCG) are not expected to
report incentives paid to prevailing rate
employees from non-appropriated funds
in its submission for OPM’s report to
Congress. The agency stated, although
NAFI prevailing NAFI rate employees
are included in the definition of
employee and in the eligible categories
of employees for each type of incentive,
a 3Rs payment paid to those employees
is paid out of funds not appropriated by
Congress.
We do not agree. Incentives paid from
non-appropriated funds should be
included in the annual report to OPM
required by §§ 575.113(b), 575.213(b)
and 575.313(b). The congressional
reporting requirement in section 101(c)
of the Federal Workforce Flexibility Act
of 2004 does not make a distinction
between appropriated and nonappropriated fund positions. Agencies
should report required 3Rs data and
information for both types of employees.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Comments Applicable to Recruitment
Incentives
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
already received that are attributable to
completed service; however, the
employee is obligated to repay any
recruitment incentive payments
received attributable to uncompleted
service. Under this section, if an
employee has received recruitment
incentive payments less than the
amount attributable to completed
service when the service agreement is
terminated, the agency is not obligated
to pay the employee the amount
attributable to completed service, unless
the agency agreed to such payment in
the employee’s service agreement.
Agencies may want to consider not
paying all of a recruitment incentive as
an up-front, lump-sum payment in
advance of the employee fulfilling a
service period and, instead, paying all
or part of a recruitment incentive after
an employee successfully completes all
or part of the service period.
We agree the regulations should
require full repayment of a recruitment
incentive if employment is terminated
due to falsified employment documents
or pre-employment conditions. We are
adding a new paragraph (j) to § 575.111
to require an employee to repay all
recruitment incentive payments if an
agency terminates a service agreement
when an employee is separated as a
result of material false or inaccurate
statements or deception or fraud in
examination or appointment, or as a
result of failing to meet employment
qualifications.
An individual commented, if an
applicant accepts an offer of
employment along with a recruitment
incentive, an agency should not be able
to cancel the agreement (unless for poor
performance) without paying out the
full amount of the incentive (regardless
of the installment plan). The individual
stated if an applicant accepts a
recruitment incentive offer in good
faith, allowing the agency to terminate
the service agreement without paying
the full incentive seemed unfair.
We disagree. The regulations provide
appropriate protections for an employee
if the agency terminates a service
agreement when the employee is not at
fault. Section 575.111(e) provides that
such an employee is entitled to receive
recruitment incentive payments
attributable to completed service and to
keep any recruitment incentive
payments already received for
completed and uncompleted service. An
agency should not be obligated to pay
additional recruitment incentive
payments for service that is not
completed under a terminated service
agreement.
An agency commented the
recruitment incentive repayment
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
requirements are not consistent with the
student loan repayment regulations
which require full repayment if a
service agreement is not completed. The
student loan repayment program is
based on a different statutory authority
with different repayment requirements
if the service agreement is not fulfilled.
Under 5 U.S.C. 5379, an employee is
obligated to reimburse the paying
agency for the full amount of the
student loan repayment benefits
provided when the employee
voluntarily separates from Federal
service, or is separated involuntarily
due to misconduct or poor performance,
and does not complete the terms of the
student loan repayment service
agreement. There is no similar statutory
requirement for recruitment incentives
in 5 U.S.C. 5753. Under 5 U.S.C.
5753(c)(2), OPM has the authority to
regulate the terms and conditions under
which recruitment incentives are
payable, including the conditions under
which a service agreement may be
terminated and the effect of the
termination. Consistent with the former
recruitment bonus authority, the
recruitment incentive regulations at
§ 575.111 generally require a pro-rated
repayment of incentive payments
received that are attributable to
uncompleted service if a service
agreement is not fulfilled.
The same agency commented that
§ 575.111(f) is vague and stated
clarification is needed on whether
agencies have the discretion to define
completed service as the duration of the
service agreement. The agency
questioned whether it may require full
repayment if the employee fails to
complete a service period or must the
repayment amount be prorated based on
the portion of the agreement served.
Under § 575.110(a), a service period is
the period of employment that an
employee agrees to fulfill in exchange
for a recruitment incentive, as
documented in the employee’s service
agreement. ‘‘Completed service,’’ as
used in § 575.111, is the amount of time
the employee has fulfilled under the
service agreement, and ‘‘uncompleted
service’’ is the amount of time the
employee has not fulfilled under the
service agreement. We are clarifying the
recruitment and relocation incentive
regulations by adding a new paragraph
(i) to §§ 575.111 and 575.211 to provide
that in determining the amount of
recruitment and relocation incentive
payments attributable to completed and
uncompleted service, agencies must
prorate the full amount of the
authorized incentive payments across
the length of the service period. (See the
fact sheet at https://www.opm.gov/oca/
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
67835
PAY/HTML/rectermcalc.asp for
additional information.)
incentive determination before paying
the incentive to the employee.
Additional Changes
We are making the following
additional changes to the recruitment
incentive regulations to correct
technical errors and make minor
clarifications:
• Revising the definition of employee
and replacing the definition of employee
of the Federal Government with Federal
Government in § 575.102 to eliminate
redundancy and circular language
regarding NAFI employees. These final
regulations also revise paragraphs (2)
and (3) in the definition of newly
appointed in § 575.102 consistent with
these new definitions.
• Revising paragraph (3)(i) of the
definition of newly appointed in
§ 575.102 to clarify a ‘‘nonpermanent
appointment’’ excludes a Schedule C
appointment under 5 CFR part 213. An
agency may not pay a recruitment
incentive to an employee moving from
a Schedule C appointment to a nonSchedule C appointment, unless the
employee has a 90-day break in service.
• Adding employment under the
Student Career Experience Program
under 5 CFR 213.3202(b) as a new
paragraph (3)(vi) in the definition of
newly appointed in § 575.102. A similar
provision was included in the former
recruitment bonus regulations, but it
was inadvertently left out of the interim
recruitment incentive regulations.
• Adding an appointment as an
expert or consultant under 5 U.S.C.
3109 and 5 CFR part 304 as a new
paragraph (3)(iv) in the definition of
newly appointed in § 575.102. Service
under a temporary expert and
consultant appointment is already not
counted as Federal service in applying
the 90-day break-in-service requirement
in the existing definition of newly
appointed. This addition will ensure
that service under an intermittent
‘‘expert and consultant’’ appointment
that is not a temporary appointment also
is disregarded in applying the 90-day
break-in-service requirement.
• Revising § 575.106(b)(1) to clarify a
factor for determining when a position
is likely to be difficult to fill is the
availability and quality of candidates
possessing the competencies required
for the position, including the success of
recent efforts to recruit candidates for
‘‘the position or similar positions.’’ The
language in the interim regulations
stated only the success of recent efforts
to recruit candidates for ‘‘similar
positions.’’
• Clarifying § 575.107(b)(1) to provide
an authorized agency official must
review and approve the recruitment
Comments Applicable to Relocation
Incentives
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Definition of Temporary Relocation
(§ 575.205(a)(2))
An agency commented that the
Supplementary Information of the
interim regulations stated that a
relocation incentive may be paid for a
temporary relocation. The agency
suggested ‘‘temporary relocation’’
should be defined.
We do not agree. Section 575.205(a)
provides an agency may pay a relocation
incentive to an employee who must
relocate to a different geographic area
‘‘permanently or temporarily.’’ Because
there is no minimum length for a
relocation incentive service agreement
as there is for recruitment incentives, it
is not necessary to define what is meant
by ‘‘temporary relocation.’’ Note that
under § 575.205(b) employees must
establish a residence in the new
geographic area before an agency may
pay a relocation incentive to an
employee, even when the employee is
relocated to a different geographic area
on a temporary basis.
Payment to Former NAFI Employees
(§ 575.205(a))
An agency requested clarification of
whether relocation incentives may be
paid to DOD or USCG NAFI employees
who move to appropriated fund
positions. An agency may pay a
relocation incentive to a white-collar or
prevailing rate NAFI employee in a DOD
or USCG NAFI position who moves
without a break in service to an
appropriated fund position that is
eligible for relocation incentives under
§ 575.203 and that is in a different
geographic area. Consistent with the
definition of employee in 5 U.S.C.
5753(a)(3), employee is defined in
§ 575.202 to mean an employee as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 2105 ‘‘except that
the term also includes an employee
described in 5 U.S.C. 2105(c) * * *.’’
Section 2105(c) of title 5, United States
Code, covers DOD and USCG NAFI
employees.
To help clarify this further, § 575.202
includes a revised definition of
employee and replaces the definition of
employee of the Federal Government
with Federal Government to eliminate
redundancy and circular language
regarding NAFI employees. Also, we are
revising § 575.205(a) to provide that an
agency may pay a relocation incentive
under the conditions in 5 CFR part 575,
subpart B, to an employee (as that term
is newly defined) who (1) relocates to a
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
67836
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
different geographic area (temporarily or
permanently) to accept a position listed
in § 575.203 in an agency that is likely
to be difficult to fill and (2) is an
employee of the Federal Government (as
those terms are newly defined)
immediately before the relocation.
Additional Changes
We are making the following
additional changes to the relocation
incentive regulations to correct
technical errors and make minor
clarifications:
• Revising § 575.206(a)(4) to replace
the term ‘‘recruitment incentive’’ with
‘‘relocation incentive.’’
• Revising § 575.206(b)(1) to clarify a
factor for determining when a position
is likely to be difficult to fill is the
availability and quality of candidates
possessing the competencies required
for the position, including the success of
recent efforts to recruit candidates for
‘‘the position or similar positions.’’ The
language in the interim regulations
stated only the success of recent efforts
to recruit candidates for ‘‘similar
positions.’’
• Revising § 575.207(b)(1) to clarify
an authorized agency official must
review and approve a relocation
incentive determination before paying
the incentive to the employee.
• Revising § 575.210(e) by removing
the words ‘‘agree to’’ in the second
sentence so that the language is parallel
to § 575.110(e) of the recruitment
incentive regulations.
Comments Applicable to Retention
Incentives
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Group Retention Incentives
(§ 575.309(a)(2))
An agency recommended that the
limit on an agency’s authority to
approve group retention incentives
under § 575.309(a)(2) be raised from 10
percent to 25 percent. The agency stated
with the increase in the maximum
retention incentive amount from 25 to
50 percent, it would be appropriate to
raise the agency authority to approve
group retention incentives from the
current 10 percent to 25 percent.
We do not agree. The 10 percent
limitation on an agency’s authority to
approve group retention incentives is
provided by statute at 5 U.S.C.
5754(e)(1)(B). The law requires OPM
approval of group retention incentives
in excess of 10 percent. (See 5 U.S.C.
5754(f).)
Computing Lump-Sum Retention
Incentives (§ 575.309(d))
An agency recommended the
regulations describe how to calculate
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
the total basic pay earned during a full
service period for the purpose of
calculating a retention incentive paid at
the end of the service period. We are
adding an example to § 575.309(d) that
shows how to compute a retention
incentive for the full period of service
under a service agreement (including
the total amount of basic pay earned
during the full period of service)
consistent with the example in
§ 575.309(c)(1).
Grandfathered Retention Allowances
(§ 575.314)
An individual requested clarification
on why an agency would not renew or
continue a retention allowance that was
originally authorized before May 2005
after the issuance of the new retention
incentive regulations. The commenter
observed that terminating retention
allowances seems counterproductive to
the purpose of the allowances which is
to recruit and retain persons with
unique skills.
Under section 101(d)(3) of Public Law
108–411 and § 575.314 of the
regulations, retention allowances
authorized before May 1, 2005, were
required to continue to be paid until the
allowance was reauthorized or
terminated, but not later than April 30,
2006. Agencies were required to pay
such grandfathered retention allowances
subject to regulations applicable to
retention allowances before May 1,
2005. Under the former retention
allowance regulations, agencies had the
flexibility to terminate retention
allowances if a retention allowance was
not needed to retain the employee,
labor-market factors made it more likely
to recruit a candidate with the
qualifications possessed by the
employee, the agency’s need for the
employee’s services was reduced to a
level that made paying an allowance
unnecessary, or budgetary
considerations made it difficult to
continue paying the allowance. When a
grandfathered retention allowance was
terminated, an agency could have
authorized a new retention incentive in
its place under the conditions described
in 5 CFR part 575, subpart C, as in effect
starting on May 13, 2005. Any decision
to terminate a grandfathered retention
allowance before April 30, 2006 (the
required termination date under the
statute), and whether to replace that
allowance with a new retention
incentive was subject to agency
discretion based on the needs of the
agency and the requirements of the
retention incentive law and regulations.
We note that, by law, all grandfathered
retention allowances should have been
terminated by April 30, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Additional Changes
We are making the following
additional changes to the retention
incentive regulations to correct
technical errors and make minor
clarifications:
• Revising § 575.307(a)(6)(iii) to
remove the requirement that agency
retention incentive plans address the
obligations of an employee if an agency
terminates a service agreement. Because
retention incentive payments are not
paid in advance of an employee
fulfilling the period of service
attributable to the payments, employees
do not have repayment obligations if a
service agreement is terminated.
• Revising § 575.307(b)(1) to clarify
an authorized agency official must
review and approve each retention
incentive before paying an incentive to
an employee.
• Revising the examples in
§ 575.309(c)(1) and (c)(2) to clarify how
the amount of pay an employee earned
during the service period is computed.
• Revising § 575.311 to clarify and
make consistent the conditions under
which agencies have the discretion and
are required to terminate a retention
incentive paid under a service
agreement and a retention incentive
paid without a service agreement. We
also are adding a new paragraph to this
section to clarify how to compute
retention incentive payments that may
be owed to an employee for completed
service if an agency terminates a
retention incentive service agreement.
Finally, a number of commenters
noted that the reference to paragraph (g)
in § 575.310(a) should be changed to
paragraph (f). This error was corrected
in the Federal Register notice published
on December 19, 2005 (70 FR 74995).
Miscellaneous Changes to Other
Regulations
Commenters noted incorrect
references to the special rate regulations
(5 CFR part 530, subpart C) in the
aggregate limitation on pay (5 CFR part
530, subpart B), supervisory differential
(5 CFR part 575, subpart D), and
extended assignment incentive (5 CFR
part 575, subpart E) regulations. A
commenter also noted an incorrect
reference to the prevailing rate night
differential authority at 5 U.S.C. 5343(f)
in the supervisory differential
regulations. These references are
corrected in these final regulations.
We are revising the definition of
discretionary payment in the aggregate
limitation on pay regulations at
§ 530.202 to remove ‘‘extended
assignment incentives’’ as an example of
a discretionary payment, consistent
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
with the removal of retention incentives
as an example of a discretionary
payment in the interim regulations. We
also are clarifying the definition to
provide payments that are authorized to
an employee under the terms of a
service agreement are not discretionary
payments.
Also, to conform with the new
§§ 575.111(h) and 575.211(h) and OPM’s
authority in 5 U.S.C. 5757(f) to prescribe
regulations on an employee’s
entitlement to retain extended
assignment incentive payments when an
agreement is canceled, these final
regulations add a new § 575.513(g) to
the extended assignment incentive
regulations to provide an authorized
agency official with the authority to
waive the requirement under
§ 575.513(b) and (c)(1) to repay excess
extended assignment incentive
payments if an extended assignment
incentive service agreement is
terminated when collection of the
excess amount would be against equity
and good conscience and not in the best
interest of the United States. We are
removing the reference to 5 U.S.C. 5584
in § 575.513(c)(1) as the authority for
waiving recovery of such excess
payments.
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Review
This rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with E.O. 12866.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR 530 and 575
Government employees, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
*
*
*
*
Basic pay means the total amount of
pay received at a rate fixed by law or
administrative action for the position
held by an employee, including any
special rate under 5 CFR part 530,
subpart C, or any locality-based
comparability payment under 5 CFR
part 531, subpart F, or other similar
payment under other legal authority,
before any deductions. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Discretionary payment means a
payment an agency has discretion to
make to an employee. Payments that are
authorized to be made to an employee
under the terms of a service agreement
or preauthorized to be made to an
employee at a regular fixed rate each
pay period are not discretionary
payments.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 575—RECRUITMENT,
RELOCATION, AND RETENTION
INCENTIVES; SUPERVISORY
DIFFERENTIALS; AND EXTENDED
ASSIGNMENT INCENTIVES
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1104(a)(2) and 5307;
subparts A and B also issued under 5 U.S.C.
5753 and sec. 101 of the Federal Workforce
Flexibility Act of 2004, Public Law 108–411,
118 Stat. 2305; subpart C also issued under
5 U.S.C. 5754 and sec. 101 of the Federal
Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004, Public
Law 108–411, 118 Stat. 2305; subpart D also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 5755; subpart E also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 5757 and sec. 207 of
Public Law 107–273, 116 Stat. 1780.
4. In § 575.102—
A. Revise the definition of employee,
B. Remove the definition of employee
of the Federal Government,
I C. Add a new definition of Federal
Government, and
I D. Revise paragraphs (2) and (3) in the
definition of newly appointed.
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
I
I
I
Accordingly, OPM amends 5 CFR
parts 530 and 575 as follows:
I
PART 530—PAY RATES AND
SYSTEMS (GENERAL)
1. The authority citation for part 530
continues to read as follows:
I
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Definitions.
*
Subpart A—Recruitment Incentives
Office of Personnel Management
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5305 and 5307; subpart
C also issued under 5 U.S.C. 5338 and sec.
4 of the Performance Management and
Recognition System Termination Act of 1993
(Pub. L. 103–89), 107 Stat. 981.
Jkt 214001
§ 530.202
3. The authority citation for part 575
continues to read as follows:
I certify that these regulations will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because they will apply only to Federal
agencies and employees.
14:39 Nov 30, 2007
2. In § 530.202, revise the first
sentence in the definition of basic pay
and the definition of discretionary
payment to read as follows:
I
I
Regulatory Flexibility Act
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Subpart B—Aggregate Limitation on
Pay
§ 575.102
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Employee has the meaning given that
term in 5 U.S.C. 2105, except that the
term also includes an employee
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67837
described in 5 U.S.C. 2105(c). For the
purpose of determining whether an
individual was an employee of the
Federal Government during the 90-day
period referred to in the definition of
newly appointed, employee also
includes an employee described in 5
U.S.C. 2105(e). For the purpose of
§ 575.109(d), an employee means an
individual not yet employed who has
received a written offer to be newly
appointed or reappointed and has
signed the written service agreement
required by § 575.110 before payment of
the recruitment incentive.
*
*
*
*
*
Federal Government means all
entities of the Government of the United
States, including the United States
Postal Service and the Postal Regulatory
Commission.
*
*
*
*
*
Newly appointed refers to—* * *
(2) An appointment of a former
employee of the Federal Government
following a break in Federal
Government service of at least 90 days;
or
(3) An appointment of an individual
in the Federal Government when his or
her service in the Federal Government
during the 90-day period immediately
preceding the appointment was limited
to one or more of the following:
(i) A time-limited appointment in the
competitive or excepted service;
(ii) A non-permanent appointment
(excluding a Schedule C appointment
under 5 CFR part 213) in the
competitive or excepted service;
(iii) Employment with the government
of the District of Columbia (DC) when
the candidate was first appointed by the
DC government on or after October 1,
1987;
(iv) An appointment as an expert or
consultant under 5 U.S.C. 3109 and 5
CFR part 304;
(v) Employment under a provisional
appointment designated under 5 CFR
316.403; or
(vi) Employment under the Student
Career Experience Program under 5 CFR
213.3202(b).
*
*
*
*
*
5. In § 575.103—
A. Redesignate paragraphs (a) through
(g) as paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(7),
respectively,
I B. Designate the introductory sentence
as paragraph (a) introductory text and
revise it, and
I C. Add a new paragraph (b).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
I
I
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
67838
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
§ 575.103 Eligible categories of
employees.
(a) Except as provided in § 575.104,
an Executive agency may pay a
recruitment incentive to an employee
appointed or placed in the following
categories of positions:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Except as provided in § 575.104, a
legislative agency may pay a
recruitment incentive to an employee
appointed or placed in a General
Schedule position paid under 5 U.S.C.
5332 or 5305 (or similar special rate
authority).
I 6. In § 575.105, add a new paragraph
(c) to read as follows:
§ 575.105
Applicability to employees.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) An agency may not commence a
recruitment incentive service agreement
during—
(1) A period of employment
established under any service agreement
required for a relocation incentive under
5 CFR part 575, subpart B, or
(2) A period of employment
established under any service agreement
required for a retention incentive or for
which an employee receives retention
incentive payments without a service
agreement under 5 CFR part 575,
subpart C.
I 7. In § 575.106, revise paragraph (b)(1)
to read as follows:
§ 575.106 Authorizing a recruitment
incentive.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The availability and quality of
candidates possessing the competencies
required for the position, including the
success of recent efforts to recruit
candidates for the position or similar
positions using indicators such as offer
acceptance rates, proportion of positions
filled, and the length of time required to
fill similar positions;
*
*
*
*
*
I 8. In § 575.107, revise paragraphs
(a)(1) and (b)(1) to read as follows:
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
§ 575.107 Agency recruitment incentive
plan and approval levels.
(a) * * *
(1) The designation of officials with
authority to review and approve
payment of recruitment incentives
(subject to paragraph (b) of this section),
including the circumstances under
which an official has the authority to
approve payment without higher-level
approval under paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, and the designation of officials
with authority to waive the repayment
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
of a recruitment incentive under
§ 575.111(h);
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(1) Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section, an authorized
agency official who is at least one level
higher than the employee’s supervisor
must review and approve each
determination to pay a recruitment
incentive to a newly appointed
employee, unless there is no official at
a higher level in the agency. The
authorized agency official must review
and approve the recruitment incentive
determination before the agency may
pay the incentive to the employee.
*
*
*
*
*
I 9. In § 575.111—
I A. Revise the first sentence and the
last sentence in paragraph (f),
I B. Remove the last sentence in
paragraph (g), and
I C. Add new paragraphs (h), (i), and (j).
The revision and additions read as
follows:
§ 575.111 Termination of a service
agreement.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Except as provided in paragraph (j)
of this section, if an authorized agency
official terminates a service agreement
under paragraph (b) of this section, the
employee is entitled to retain
recruitment incentive payments
previously paid by the agency that are
attributable to the completed portion of
the service period. * * * If the
employee received recruitment
incentive payments in excess of the
amount that would be attributable to the
completed portion of the service period,
he or she must repay the excess amount,
except when an authorized agency
official waives the requirement to repay
the excess amount under paragraph (h)
of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) If an employee received
recruitment incentive payments in
excess of the amount that would be
attributable to the completed portion of
the service period under paragraph (f) of
this section, an authorized agency
official may waive the requirement to
repay the excess amount when, in the
judgment of the official, collection of
the excess amount would be against
equity and good conscience and not in
the best interest of the United States.
(i) The full amount of the authorized
recruitment incentive must be prorated
across the length of the service period
to determine the amount of the
recruitment incentive attributable to
completed service and uncompleted
service under this section.
(j) Notwithstanding paragraph (f) of
this section, if an agency terminates a
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
service agreement under paragraph (b)
of this section when an employee is
separated as a result of material false or
inaccurate statements or deception or
fraud in examination or appointment, or
as a result of failing to meet
employment qualifications, the
employee must repay all recruitment
incentive payments received under that
service agreement.
Subpart B—Relocation Incentives
10. In § 575.202—
A. Revise the definition of employee,
B. Remove the definition of employee
of the Federal Government, and
I C. Add a new definition of Federal
Government.
The revision and addition read as
follows:
I
I
I
§ 575.202
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Employee has the meaning given that
term in 5 U.S.C. 2105, except that the
term also includes an employee
described in 5 U.S.C. 2105(c). For the
purpose of determining whether an
individual had status as an employee of
the Federal Government immediately
prior to the relocation (i.e., in
§ 575.205(a)(2)), employee also includes
an employee described in 5 U.S.C.
2105(e).
*
*
*
*
*
Federal Government means all
entities of the Government of the United
States, including the United States
Postal Service and the Postal Regulatory
Commission.
*
*
*
*
*
I 11. In § 575.203—
I A. Redesignate paragraphs (a) through
(g) as paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(7),
respectively,
I B. Designate the introductory sentence
as paragraph (a) introductory text and
revise it, and
I C. Add a new paragraph (b).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
§ 575.203 Eligible categories of
employees.
(a) Except as provided in § 575.204,
an Executive agency may pay a
relocation incentive to an employee in
the following categories of positions:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Except as provided in § 575.204, a
legislative agency may pay a relocation
incentive to an employee in a General
Schedule position paid under 5 U.S.C.
5332 or 5305 (or similar special rate
authority).
I 12. In § 575.205, revise paragraph (a)
and add new paragraphs (d) and (e) to
read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
§ 575.205
Applicability to employees.
(a) An agency may pay a relocation
incentive under the conditions
prescribed in this subpart to an
employee who—
(1) Relocates to a different geographic
area (permanently or temporarily) to
accept a position listed in § 575.203 in
an agency when the position is likely to
be difficult to fill, as determined under
§ 575.206; and
(2) Is an employee of the Federal
Government immediately before the
relocation.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) An agency may not commence a
relocation incentive service agreement
during—
(1) A period of employment
established under any service agreement
required for a recruitment incentive
under 5 CFR part 575, subpart A, or
(2) A period of employment
established under any service agreement
required for a relocation incentive
previously authorized under this
subpart.
(e) An agency may commence a
relocation incentive service agreement
during a period of employment
established under a service agreement
for a previously authorized retention
incentive or for which an employee is
receiving previously authorized
retention incentive payments without a
service agreement under 5 CFR part 575,
subpart C. The service period under
such a relocation incentive service
agreement and the service period
required by the retention incentive
service agreement, if applicable, must be
fulfilled concurrently.
I 13. In § 575.206, revise paragraphs
(a)(4) and (b)(1) to read as follows:
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
§ 575.206 Authorizing a relocation
incentive.
(a) * * *
(4) Request a waiver from OPM of the
limitation on the maximum amount of
a relocation incentive under
§ 575.209(c); and
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The availability and quality of
candidates possessing the competencies
required for the position, including the
success of recent efforts to recruit
candidates for the position or similar
positions using indicators such as offer
acceptance rates, proportion of positions
filled, and the length of time required to
fill similar positions;
*
*
*
*
*
I 14. In § 575.207, revise paragraphs
(a)(1) and (b)(1) to read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
§ 575.207 Agency relocation incentive plan
and approval levels.
(a) * * *
(1) The designation of officials with
authority to review and approve
payment of relocation incentives
(subject to paragraph (b) of this section)
and the designation of officials with
authority to waive the repayment of a
relocation incentive under § 575.211(h);
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(1) Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section, an authorized
agency official who is at least one level
higher than the employee’s supervisor
must review and approve each
determination to pay a relocation
incentive, unless there is no official at
a higher level in the agency. The
authorized agency official must review
and approve the relocation incentive
determination before the agency pays
the incentive to the employee.
*
*
*
*
*
I 15. In § 575.210(e), revise the second
sentence to read as follows:
§ 575.210 Service agreement
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * * The service agreement must
specify the effect of the termination
under § 575.211, including the
conditions under which the agency will
pay an additional relocation incentive
payment for partially completed service
under § 575.211(e) and (f).
*
*
*
*
*
I 16. In § 575.211—
I A. Revise the last sentence in
paragraph (f),
I B. Remove the last sentence in
paragraph (g), and
I C. Add new paragraphs (h) and (i).
The revision and additions read as
follows:
§ 575.211 Termination of a service
agreement.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * * If the employee received
relocation incentive payments in excess
of the amount that would be attributable
to the completed portion of the service
period, he or she must repay the excess
amount, except when an authorized
agency official waives the requirement
to repay the excess amount under
paragraph (h) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) If an employee received relocation
incentive payments in excess of the
amount that would be attributable to the
completed portion of the service period
under paragraph (f) of this section, an
authorized agency official may waive
the requirement to repay the excess
amount when, in the judgment of the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67839
official, collection of the excess amount
would be against equity and good
conscience and not in the best interest
of the United States.
(i) The full amount of the authorized
relocation incentive must be prorated
across the length of the service period
to determine the amount of the
relocation incentive attributable to
completed service and uncompleted
service under this section.
Subpart C—Retention Incentives
17. In § 575.303—
A. Redesignate paragraphs (a) through
(g) as paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(7),
respectively,
I B. Designate the introductory sentence
as paragraph (a) introductory text and
revise it, and
I C. Add a new paragraph (b).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
I
I
§ 575.303 Eligible categories of
employees.
(a) Except as provided in § 575.304,
an Executive agency may pay a
retention incentive to a current
employee who holds—
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Except as provided in § 575.304, a
legislative agency may pay a retention
incentive to a current employee who
holds a General Schedule position paid
under 5 U.S.C. 5332 or 5305 (or similar
special rate authority).
I 18. In § 575.307, revise paragraph
(a)(6)(iii) and add a new sentence at the
end of paragraph (b)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 575.307 Agency retention incentive plan
and approval levels.
(a) * * *
(6) * * *
(iii) The obligations of the agency if
the agency terminates a service
agreement; and
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(1) * * * The authorized agency
official must review and approve the
retention incentive determination before
the agency pays the incentive to the
employee.
*
*
*
*
*
I 19. In § 575.309—
I A. Revise the fourth sentence in
paragraph (c)(1) and the fourth sentence
in paragraph (c)(2),
I B. Add four new sentences at the end
of paragraph (d), and
I C. Revise paragraph (g).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 575.309
Payment of retention incentives.
*
*
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
*
03DER1
*
*
67840
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(c)(1) * * * The employee earns
$15,000 during the 6 pay periods of
service ($2,500 biweekly rate of basic
pay × 6). * * *
(2) * * * The employee earns $15,000
during the 6 pay periods of service
($2,500 biweekly rate of basic pay × 6).
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * * For example, an agency
establishes a retention incentive
percentage rate of 10 percent for an
employee. The employee has a service
agreement that provides for a single
lump-sum retention incentive payment
after completion of the full service
period required by the service
agreement (i.e., 26 pay periods). The
employee earns $65,000 during the 26
pay periods of service ($2,500 biweekly
rate of basic pay x 26). Upon completion
of the full service period, the employee
will receive a single lump-sum retention
incentive payment of $6,500 ($65,000 ×
.10).
*
*
*
*
*
(g) An agency may not commence a
group or individual retention incentive
service agreement or provide a group or
individual retention incentive without a
service agreement under § 575.310(f) for
any biweekly pay period during—
(1) A period of employment
established under any service agreement
required for the payment of a
recruitment incentive under 5 CFR part
575, subpart A, or a relocation incentive
under 5 CFR part 575, subpart B, (see 5
CFR 575.205(e) regarding the authority
to commence a relocation incentive
service agreement during a period of
employment established under a service
agreement for a previously authorized
retention incentive or for which an
employee is receiving previously
authorized retention incentive payments
without a service agreement); or
(2) A period of employment
established under a service agreement
for a previously authorized retention
incentive or for which an employee is
receiving a previously authorized
retention incentive without a service
agreement under § 575.310(f) (including
a group retention incentive with or
without a service agreement).
*
*
*
*
*
I 20. Revise § 575.311 to read as
follows:
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
§ 575.311 Continuation, reduction, and
termination of retention incentives.
(a)(1) An authorized agency official
must terminate a retention incentive
service agreement when conditions
change such that the original
determination to pay the retention
incentive no longer applies (e.g., when
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
the agency assigns the employee to a
different position that is not within the
terms of the service agreement) or when
payment is no longer warranted after
considering factors such as—
(i) Whether a retention incentive is
needed to retain the employee (or group
of employees),
(ii) Whether labor-market factors
make it more likely (or reasonably
likely) to recruit a candidate with
competencies similar to those possessed
by the employee (or group of
employees), or
(iii) Whether the agency’s need for the
services of the employee (or group or
category of employees) has been
reduced to a level that makes it
unnecessary to continue paying a
retention incentive.
(2) An authorized agency official may
terminate unilaterally a retention
incentive service agreement based solely
on the management needs of the agency,
even if the conditions giving rise to the
original determination to pay the
incentive still exist. For example, an
agency may terminate a service
agreement when there are insufficient
funds to continue the planned retention
incentive payments.
(b) An authorized agency official must
terminate a retention incentive service
agreement when—
(1) The employee is demoted or
separated for cause (i.e., for
unacceptable performance or conduct);
(2) The employee receives a rating of
record (or an official performance
appraisal or evaluation under a system
not covered by 5 U.S.C. chapter 43 or 5
CFR part 430) of less than ‘‘Fully
Successful’’ or equivalent; or
(3) The employee otherwise fails to
fulfill the terms of the service
agreement.
(c) If an authorized agency official
terminates a service agreement under
paragraph (a) of this section, the
employee is entitled to retain any
retention incentive payments that are
attributable to completed service and to
receive any portion of a retention
incentive payment owed by the agency
for completed service.
(d) If an authorized agency official
terminates a service agreement under
paragraph (b) of this section, the
employee is entitled to retain retention
incentive payments previously paid by
the agency that are attributable to the
completed portion of the service period.
If the employee received retention
incentive payments that are less than
the amount that would be attributable to
the completed portion of the service
period, the agency is not obligated to
pay the employee the amount
attributable to completed service, unless
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the agency agreed to such payment
under the terms of the retention
incentive service agreement.
(e) To determine the amount of
retention incentive payments that may
be owed to an employee for completed
service under paragraphs (c) and (d) of
this section, multiply the total rate of
basic pay the employee earned during
the completed portion of the service
period by the retention incentive
percentage rate established for the
employee under § 575.309(a) and
subtract the amount of retention
incentive payments already paid to the
employee from this product. The
difference is the amount owed to the
employee for completed service.
(f)(1) For retention incentives that are
paid when no service agreement is
required under § 575.310(f), an agency
must review each determination to pay
the incentive at least annually to
determine whether payment is still
warranted. An authorized agency
official must certify this determination
in writing.
(2) An agency may continue paying a
retention incentive to an employee
when no service agreement is required
as long as the conditions giving rise to
the original determination to pay the
incentive still exist.
(3) An authorized agency official must
reduce or terminate a retention
incentive authorization when no service
agreement is required whenever
conditions change such that the original
determination to pay the retention
incentive no longer applies (e.g., when
the agency assigns the employee to a
different position that is not within the
terms of the original determination) or
when payment is no longer warranted at
the level originally approved or at all
after considering factors such as—
(i) Whether a lesser amount (or none
at all) would be sufficient to retain the
employee (or group or category of
employees);
(ii) Whether labor-market factors
make it more likely (or reasonably
likely) to recruit a candidate with
competencies similar to those possessed
by the employee (or group or category
of employees); or
(iii) Whether the agency’s need for the
services of the employee (or group or
category of employees) has been
reduced to a level that makes it
unnecessary to continue payment at the
level originally approved (or at all).
(4) An authorized agency official may
terminate unilaterally a retention
incentive authorization when no service
agreement is required based solely on
the management needs of the agency,
even if the conditions giving rise to the
original determination to pay the
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
incentive still exist. For example, an
agency may terminate a retention
incentive when there are insufficient
funds to continue the planned retention
incentive payments.
(5) An authorized agency official must
terminate a retention incentive
authorization when no service
agreement is required when—
(i) The employee is demoted or
separated for cause (i.e., for
unacceptable performance or conduct),
or
(ii) The employee receives a rating of
record (or an official performance
appraisal or evaluation under a system
not covered by 5 U.S.C. chapter 43 or 5
CFR part 430) of less than ‘‘Fully
Successful’’ or equivalent.
(g) The termination of a retention
incentive service agreement or the
reduction or termination of a retention
incentive under this section is not
grievable or appealable.
(h) If an agency terminates a retention
incentive service agreement or reduces
or terminates a retention incentive paid
without a service agreement under this
section, the agency must notify the
employee in writing. When a retention
incentive is terminated under paragraph
(f) of this section, the employee is
entitled to receive any scheduled
incentive payments through the end of
the pay period in which the written
notice is provided or until the date of
separation, if sooner.
Subpart D—Supervisory Differentials
21. In § 575.402, revise paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
I
§ 575.402
Delegation of authority.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) A supervisory differential may not
be paid on the basis of supervising a
civilian employee whose rate of basic
pay exceeds the maximum rate of basic
pay established for grade GS–15 on the
pay schedule applicable to the GS
supervisor, including a schedule for any
applicable special rate under 5 CFR part
530, subpart C; locality-based
comparability payment under 5 CFR
part 531, subpart F; or similar payment
or supplement under other legal
authority.
*
*
*
*
*
I 22. In § 575.403, revise the definition
of rate of basic pay to read as follows:
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
§ 575.403
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Rate of basic pay means the rate of
pay fixed by law or administrative
action for the position to which the
employee is or will be appointed before
deductions and including any special
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
rate under 5 CFR part 530, subpart C;
locality-based comparability payment
under 5 CFR part 531, subpart F; or
similar payment or supplement under
other legal authority, but excluding
additional pay of any other kind. For
example, rate of basic pay excludes a
night differential under 5 U.S.C. 5343(f),
an environment differential under 5
U.S.C. 5343(c)(4), or a similar payment
under other legal authority.
*
*
*
*
*
I 23. Revise § 575.405(d)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 575.405 Calculation and payment of
supervisory differential.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Basic pay, excluding a night or
environmental differential under 5
U.S.C. 5343(f) or 5343(c)(4),
respectively, or similar payment under
other legal authority;
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart E—Extended Assignment
Incentives
24. In § 575.502, revise the first
sentence in the definition of rate of
basic pay to read as follows:
I
§ 575.502
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Rate of basic pay means the rate of
pay fixed by law or administrative
action for the position held by an
employee, including any special rate
under 5 CFR part 530, subpart C;
locality-based comparability payment
under 5 CFR part 531, subpart F; or
similar payment under other legal
authority, but before deductions and
exclusive of additional pay of any other
kind. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
I 25. In § 575.513—
I A. Revise paragraph (b) introductory
text,
I B. Revise paragraph (c)(1),
I C. Remove the last sentence in
paragraph (f), and
I D. Add a new paragraph (g).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 575.513 What are the agency’s and the
employee’s obligations when an employee
fails to fulfill the terms of a service
agreement?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Except as provided in paragraph
(g) of this section, an employee is
indebted to the Federal Government and
must repay the paying agency for an
appropriate portion of an extended
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67841
assignment incentive received by the
employee if—
*
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) If an employee does not fulfill
the terms of a service agreement under
the circumstances prescribed in
paragraph (b) of this section and has
received incentive payments whose
value as a percentage of the planned
total sum of incentive payments for the
entire service period exceeds the
percentage reflecting the portion of the
service period completed by the
employee, he or she must repay the
excess payment and any additional
repayment penalty imposed by the
agency under paragraph (e) of this
section, except when an authorized
agency official waives the requirement
to repay the excess amount under
paragraph (g) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) If an employee received extended
assignment incentive payments in
excess of the amount that would be
attributable to the completed portion of
the service period under paragraph (c)
of this section, an authorized agency
official may waive the requirement to
repay the excess amount when, in the
judgment of the official, collection of
the excess amount would be against
equity and good conscience and not in
the best interest of the United States.
[FR Doc. E7–23411 Filed 11–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–28980 Directorate
Identifier 2007–CE–071–AD; Amendment
39–15282; AD 2007–25–01]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Aircraft
Industries, a.s. (Type Certificate No.
´
G24EU Formerly Held by LETECKE
´
ZAVODY a.s. and LET Aeronautical
Works) Model L–13 Blanik Gliders
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final Rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 231 (Monday, December 3, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67831-67841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23411]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 67831]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Parts 530 and 575
RIN: 3206-AK81
Recruitment, Relocation, and Retention Incentives
AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management is issuing final
regulations on recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives. The
final regulations revise the interim regulations by making a number of
technical modifications, corrections, and clarifications. The final
regulations continue to provide agencies with additional flexibility to
help recruit and retain Federal employees and better meet agency
strategic human capital needs.
DATES: Effective Date: January 2, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanne Jacobson by telephone at (202)
606-2858; by fax at (202) 606-0824; or by e-mail at pay-performance-
policy@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 13, 2005, the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) published interim regulations (70 FR 25732) to
implement section 101 of the Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004
(Pub. L. 108-411, October 30, 2004). Section 101 amended 5 U.S.C. 5753
and 5754 by providing a new authority to make recruitment, relocation,
and retention payments. The amended law replaced the former recruitment
and relocation bonus and retention allowance authority provided by 5
U.S.C. 5753 and 5754. The 60-day comment period for the interim
regulations ended July 12, 2005.
During the comment period, we received comments from eight
agencies, one employee organization, and eight individuals. A number of
the commenters stated they are pleased with the flexibilities provided
by the interim regulations. They believe the enhanced recruitment,
relocation, and retention incentive (3Rs) authorities will allow
agencies to be more competitive with the private sector and assist in
recruiting and retaining highly qualified employees and candidates. The
commenters support the approach taken by OPM to provide agencies with
maximum flexibility and discretion to craft plans for administering the
incentives to best meet their needs.
The Supplementary Information for the interim regulations posed a
number of questions about whether the 3Rs regulations should provide
agencies with the authority to pay recruitment incentives to help
recruit current employees (as authorized by 5 U.S.C. 5753(b) under
conditions that would be described in OPM regulations) and to pay
retention incentives to help retain employees likely to leave for a
different Federal position (as authorized by 5 U.S.C. 5754(b) under
conditions that would be described in OPM regulations) and, if so,
under what circumstances.
The comments we received in response to these questions are not
addressed in these final regulations, but will be addressed in a future
Federal Register notice. This Federal Register notice addresses the
remaining comments and makes a number of technical revisions and
clarifications in the 3Rs regulations, which are summarized below.
Comments Applicable to Recruitment, Relocation, and Retention
Incentives
Definition of Basic Pay (Sec. Sec. 530.202, 575.102, 575.202, and
575.302)
An individual expressed confusion about the definition of basic pay
in the aggregate limitation on pay regulations at Sec. 530.202 and the
definition of rate of basic pay in the recruitment, relocation, and
retention incentive regulations at Sec. Sec. 575.102, 575.202, and
575.302, respectively. The commenter questioned why the terms
themselves are different and why they are defined differently.
Similar terms may be used and defined in different ways in title 5,
Code of Federal Regulations, depending on the purpose of the term and
statutory requirements. Differences in the term basic pay for the
purpose of the aggregate limitation on pay and the term rate of basic
pay for the purpose of the 3Rs are necessary based on how each term is
used in its respective subpart of the regulations. Each term must be
read only within the context of the subpart of the regulation in which
it is defined. In the aggregate limitation on pay regulations, an
employee's basic pay is added to certain other payments authorized
under title 5, United States Code, to determine whether the employee's
total pay has reached the aggregate limitation on pay in the calendar
year. In the 3Rs regulations, an employee's rate of basic pay is used
to compute recruitment and relocation incentive payment limits and
retention incentive payments.
Eligible Categories of Employees (Sec. Sec. 575.103, 575.203, and
575.303)
An agency questioned whether employees under administratively
determined (AD) pay systems are covered by the 3Rs authorities. The
agency wanted to ensure that AD employees are covered.
OPM has not regulated that all AD positions are eligible for
recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives. Under 5 U.S.C.
5753(a)(1)(B) and 5754(a)(1)(B), OPM may approve coverage of a category
of non-General Schedule (non-GS) employees under the 3Rs authorities at
the request of the head of an Executive agency. When we issued the
interim regulations implementing the new authorities, OPM approved
those categories of non-GS employees that were previously covered under
the former recruitment and relocation bonus and retention allowance
authorities for coverage under the new authorities, except when such
categories are excluded by law (5 U.S.C. 5753(a)(2) and 5754(a)(2)) or
regulation (Sec. Sec. 575.104, 575.204, and 575.304). (See CPM 2005-08
on OPM's Web site at https://www.opm.gov/oca for additional information
and a list of approved single-agency categories of employees.) If a
category of AD employees (or other employee category) is not already
approved for coverage, the head of an Executive agency may request OPM
approval for coverage of such employees. The coverage of each category
of AD positions requires separate OPM approval.
The same agency noted the regulations at Sec. Sec. 575.103,
575.203, and
[[Page 67832]]
575.303 cover employees in a position under the Executive Schedule paid
under 5 U.S.C. 5311-5317. The agency stated Executive Schedule
positions are filled using presidential appointments and such
appointments are excluded from coverage under Sec. Sec. 575.104,
575.204, and 575.304. The agency commented that the regulations appear
to be contradictory and suggested the coverage of Executive Schedule
positions be restated or clarified.
We agree most Executive Schedule positions are filled using
presidential appointments and, thus, employees appointed to such
positions would not be eligible for 3Rs payments under Sec. Sec.
575.104, 575.204, and 575.304. However, we are retaining the provision
in Sec. Sec. 575.103, 575.203, and 575.303 stating employees appointed
to or in Executive Schedule positions are eligible for 3Rs payments to
ensure that an employee in an Executive Schedule position that is not
otherwise excluded by Sec. 575.104, 575.204, and 575.304 (e.g., not a
presidential appointee) remains eligible for such payments.
Another agency asked for clarification on whether employees of
nonappropriated fund instrumentalities (NAFI) are eligible for
recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives. We have not made a
change to the regulations in response to this comment. An employee in a
NAFI position meeting the definition of a prevailing rate position in 5
U.S.C. 5342(a)(3) is eligible for recruitment, relocation, and
retention incentives, as long as the position is not otherwise excluded
by Sec. Sec. 575.104, 575.204, and 575.304. (See Sec. Sec.
575.103(f), 575.203(f), and 575.303(f).) As of the date of publication
of these final regulations in the Federal Register, all other
categories of NAFI positions (e.g., ``white collar'' NAFI positions)
are ineligible for 3Rs payments. However, because a NAFI employee is
covered by the definition of employee in 5 U.S.C. 5753(a)(3) and
5754(a)(3) and Sec. Sec. 575.102, 575.202, and 575.302 of the
regulations, OPM may extend coverage of the 3Rs authorities to
currently excluded categories of NAFI employees upon request of the
head of an Executive agency.
Finally, we are revising the introductory text in Sec. Sec.
575.103, 575.203, and 575.303 to clarify that only an Executive agency
(as defined in Sec. Sec. 575.102, 575.202, and 575.302) may pay
recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives to the categories of
non-GS employees listed in those sections. (See 5 U.S.C. 5753(a)(1)(B)
and 5754(a)(1)(B).) These sections continue to provide that an agency
in the executive branch or legislative branch may pay recruitment,
relocation, and retention incentives to GS employees. (See the
definition of agency in Sec. Sec. 575.102, 575.202, and 575.302.)
Payment Approval Levels (Sec. Sec. 575.107, 575.207, and 575.307)
An individual questioned whether the authority to approve 3Rs
requests could be delegated to the immediate supervisor of the employee
receiving the 3Rs incentive provided the supervisor is the head of a
departmental element who reports to the head of an agency and the
employee receiving the incentive is not a member of the Senior
Executive Service. The commenter noted the second-level supervisory or
managerial approval requirement seems contrary to OPM's intent to
expeditiously hire and retain the best and brightest and stated ``this
new requirement will actually slow the process and hamper efforts to
review and approve 3R incentives in a timely manner.''
We understand the need for streamlined and efficient agency
approvals of 3Rs incentives. However, this need must be balanced with
an appropriate and judicious use of the authorities. We note that the
second-level supervisory or management approval of 3Rs incentives is
not a new requirement-i.e., it was required by the regulations for the
former recruitment and relocation bonus and retention allowance
authorities and was carried over into the new regulations. Since no
additional approval levels have been added, we foresee no slowing of
the approval process because of the new regulations.
We note that several provisions in the regulations make it possible
to approve incentives without a second-level supervisory or managerial
review. For example, the regulations at Sec. 575.107(b)(2) allow an
agency to establish criteria in advance so an employment candidate's
supervisor or equivalent-level official may offer a recruitment
incentive within a pre-established range without further review or
approval. Also, the relocation incentive regulations at Sec.
575.207(b)(2) do not require higher-level approval when approving
coverage of individual employees under a previously approved group
relocation incentive authorization under Sec. 575.208(b). Finally,
under Sec. 575.307(b)(2), second-level supervisory or managerial
approval is not required when approving coverage of individual
employees under a previously approved group retention incentive
authorization.
In addition, agencies have considerable discretion when they craft
their 3Rs plans to decide which officials will have approval authority
for these incentives. (See Sec. Sec. 575.107(a)(1), 575.207(a)(1), and
575.307(a)(1).) If agencies require very high-level reviews for these
incentives, the approval process may become slow and unwieldy. However,
this is a matter that must be decided at the agency level.
Paying Recruitment, Relocation, and Retention Incentives Concurrently
(Sec. Sec. 575.109, 575.209, and 575.309)
Two agencies requested the regulations specify whether the service
agreement periods for more than one type of incentive should be served
concurrently or sequentially. Another agency pointed out the
regulations do not address the ability to offer a recruitment incentive
followed by a relocation incentive and suggested the explanation of the
order of and the basis for offering multiple incentives be described
more thoroughly in each respective section under Sec. Sec. 575.109,
575.209, and 575.309.
We agree that the regulations should clarify these issues. The
interim retention incentive regulations at Sec. 575.309(g) provided an
agency may not commence a retention incentive service agreement (or
begin paying a retention incentive without a service agreement) during
a period of employment established under a service agreement required
for the payment of a recruitment incentive or a relocation incentive.
After a retention incentive service agreement has commenced (or
retention incentive payments without a service agreement have
commenced), the retention incentive regulations allowed an agency to
pay a relocation incentive without affecting the payment of an existing
retention incentive. However, the interim recruitment and relocation
incentive regulations were silent on paying recruitment, relocation,
and retention incentives concurrently and whether employees should
serve multiple 3Rs service agreements concurrently or sequentially.
These final regulations provide the following rules regarding
concurrent recruitment, relocation, and retention incentive payments:
New Sec. 575.105(c) provides that an agency may not
commence a recruitment incentive service agreement during (1) a period
of employment established under a service agreement required for a
relocation incentive, or (2) during a period of employment established
under a service agreement for a previously authorized retention
incentive or for which an employee is receiving a previously authorized
retention incentive without a service agreement.
[[Page 67833]]
New Sec. 575.205(d) provides that an agency may not
commence a relocation incentive service agreement during (1) a period
of employment established under any service agreement required for a
recruitment incentive, or (2) a period of employment established under
any service agreement required for a previously authorized relocation
incentive.
New Sec. 575.205(e) provides that an agency may commence
a relocation incentive service agreement during a period of employment
established under a service agreement for a previously authorized
retention incentive or for which an employee is receiving previously
authorized retention incentive payments without a service agreement.
(This provision was formerly in Sec. 575.309(g).) This new paragraph
also clarifies that the service period under two such service
agreements must run concurrently.
Revised Sec. 575.309(g) provides that an agency may not
commence a retention incentive service agreement (or begin paying a
retention incentive without a service agreement) during (1) a period of
employment established under any service agreement required for payment
of a recruitment incentive or a relocation incentive or (2) a period of
employment established under a service agreement for a previously
authorized retention incentive or for which an employee is receiving a
previously authorized retention incentive without a service agreement.
Except as provided in Sec. 575.205(e), these regulatory changes
prohibit the simultaneous payment of multiple incentives and prohibit
concurrent 3Rs service agreements. However, the recruitment,
relocation, and retention incentive authorities provide substantial
flexibility to make sizable incentive payments in situations in which
offering multiple incentives may otherwise be attractive. For example,
if an employee fulfilling a recruitment incentive service agreement is
relocated to a different geographic area in a difficult to fill
position, the regulations provide the agency the flexibility to
terminate the recruitment incentive service agreement under Sec.
575.111(a) and authorize a relocation incentive under 5 CFR part 575,
subpart B, in its place. In this case, the employee would not be
disadvantaged because under Sec. 575.111(e), the employee would be
entitled to all recruitment incentive payments attributable to
completed service and to retain any portion of a recruitment incentive
payment already received that is attributable to uncompleted service.
The agency could consider any remaining recruitment incentive payments
and time remaining under the recruitment incentive service agreement in
determining the amount of the relocation incentive and length of the
relocation incentive service agreement.
Similarly, if an employee receiving a group retention incentive
under Sec. 575.305(b) is still likely to leave Federal service and has
unusually high or unique qualifications that are not adequately covered
by the group retention incentive authorization, the agency could
terminate the group retention incentive under Sec. 575.311(a) for the
individual employee and authorize an individual retention incentive
under Sec. 575.305(a) for the employee. The agency could consider the
amount of the group retention incentive and time remaining under the
group retention incentive service agreement, if any, in determining the
amount of the new retention incentive and length of any new retention
incentive service agreement.
Definition of ``Fully Successful'' (Sec. Sec. 575.110(d), 575.111(b),
575.205(c), 575.210(d), 575.211(b), 575.305(d), 575.306(c)(2),
575.310(d), 575.311(b), and 575.311(f)(5)(ii))
An agency requested clarification of the definition of ``fully
succeed'' [sic] due to variances in Federal performance ratings. The
agency questioned whether the intent is to limit the payment of
recruitment incentives to only those employees whose rating of record
is at the highest level under the applicable performance appraisal
system and recommended that employees at least one level below the
highest level be eligible, so as to accommodate the ratings of new
hires.
Because recruitment incentives may be paid only to newly-appointed
Federal employees (or former employees with a 90-day break in service),
the regulations do not require an employee to have a ``Fully
Successful'' or higher rating of record to receive a recruitment
incentive. However, the regulations at Sec. Sec. 575.205(c) and
575.305(d) provide that a relocation and retention incentive may be
paid to an employee only when the employee's rating of record (or
official performance appraisal or evaluation under a system not covered
by 5 U.S.C. chapter 43 or 5 CFR part 430) is at least ``Fully
Successful'' or equivalent. In addition, the regulations at Sec. Sec.
575.110(d), 575.111(b), 575.210(d), 575.211(d), 575.310(d), 575.311(b),
and 575.311(f)(5)(ii) require agencies to terminate 3Rs service
agreements and retention incentive payments when no service agreement
is required if the employee receives a rating of record of less than
``Fully Successful'' or equivalent. We note ``Fully Successful'' is not
intended to refer to a rating of record that is the highest level under
an applicable performance appraisal system, unless the performance
appraisal system is a pass-fail system.
Repayment Waivers (Sec. Sec. 575.111(g) and 575.211(g))
Sections 575.111(g) and 575.211(g) of the interim regulations
provided that the head of an agency may use the authority in 5 U.S.C.
5584 to waive a debt resulting from an employee's failure to reimburse
the agency for the full amount of a recruitment or relocation incentive
repayment requirement when the employee fails to fulfill a required
service period. An individual commented that OPM appears to have the
authority to permit agencies to waive repayment of recruitment and
relocation incentives without reliance on 5 U.S.C. 5584 because 5
U.S.C. 5753(g) permits OPM to promulgate ``regulations relating to
repayment of a bonus under this section under appropriate circumstances
when the agreed upon service period has not been completed.'' The
commenter also noted such waivers should not be routine, but
circumstances are likely to arise under which repayment of unliquidated
amounts would constitute an undue hardship, such as for unforeseen and
compelling personal reasons.
We agree that it is appropriate for OPM to use its regulatory
authority at 5 U.S.C. 5753(g) to provide agencies with the authority to
waive the requirement to repay recruitment or relocation incentive
payments attributable to uncompleted service when a service agreement
is terminated under Sec. Sec. 575.111(b) and 575.211(b), rather than
relying on the agency's authority to waive recovery of an erroneous
payment under 5 U.S.C. 5584. We are revising the regulations at
Sec. Sec. 575.111(g) and 575.211(g) to remove the reference to an
agency's authority to waive a debt under 5 U.S.C. 5584. We also are
adding new paragraphs Sec. Sec. 575.111(h) and 575.211(h) to provide
an authorized agency official with the authority to waive the
requirement for an employee to repay recruitment or relocation
incentive payments attributable to uncompleted service under Sec. Sec.
575.111(f) and 575.211(f) when collection of the excess payments from
the employee would be against equity and good conscience and not in the
best interests of the United States. Agencies should ensure such waiver
authority is used judiciously. (See also the conforming changes in
Sec. Sec. 575.107(a)(1) and 575.207(a)(1).)
[[Page 67834]]
Agencies continue to have the authority under 5 U.S.C. 5584 to waive
recovery of recruitment or relocation incentives or other pay or
allowances that are paid erroneously.
Reporting Requirements (Sec. Sec. 575.113, 575.213, and 575.313)
An agency requested the supplementary information or final
regulations clarify that the Department of Defense (DOD) and United
States Coast Guard (USCG) are not expected to report incentives paid to
prevailing rate employees from non-appropriated funds in its submission
for OPM's report to Congress. The agency stated, although NAFI
prevailing NAFI rate employees are included in the definition of
employee and in the eligible categories of employees for each type of
incentive, a 3Rs payment paid to those employees is paid out of funds
not appropriated by Congress.
We do not agree. Incentives paid from non-appropriated funds should
be included in the annual report to OPM required by Sec. Sec.
575.113(b), 575.213(b) and 575.313(b). The congressional reporting
requirement in section 101(c) of the Federal Workforce Flexibility Act
of 2004 does not make a distinction between appropriated and non-
appropriated fund positions. Agencies should report required 3Rs data
and information for both types of employees.
Comments Applicable to Recruitment Incentives
Definition of ``Newly Appointed'' (Sec. 575.102)
An agency asked for clarification on whether the regulations permit
the payment of recruitment incentives to employees moving from either
prevailing rate or white-collar NAFI positions to positions covered by
the recruitment incentive regulations (e.g., GS). Under 5 U.S.C.
5753(b)(2)(A), a recruitment incentive may be paid to an employee
``newly appointed as an employee of the Federal Government.'' Newly
appointed is defined in Sec. 575.102 as referring to (1) the first
appointment as an employee of the Federal Government, (2) an
appointment of a former employee of the Federal Government following a
90-day break-in-service, or (3) an appointment as an employee of the
Federal Government when the employee's Federal service during the 90-
day period immediately preceding the appointment was limited to certain
types of employment (e.g., a time-limited appointment).
Under the interim regulations, certain categories of NAFI employees
in DOD and USCG were considered newly appointed and eligible to receive
a recruitment incentive under the conditions prescribed in 5 CFR part
575, subpart A, when moving to a position listed in Sec. 575.103
(i.e., NAFI employees who moved to a position in the same agency after
more than a 3-day break in service and NAFI employees who moved to a
position in a different agency with or without a break in service).
Such NAFI employees did not need the 90-day break in service required
by paragraph (2) of the definition of newly appointed to receive a
recruitment incentive. (See the exemptions in paragraphs (3)(iv) and
(v) of that definition in the interim regulations.)
Based on the definition of employee in Sec. 575.102 and the
definition of employee in 5 U.S.C. 5753(a)(3), both of which
specifically include a DOD and USCG NAFI employee, as described in 5
U.S.C. 2105(c), we believe it would be more consistent to revise the
definition of newly appointed in these final regulations to remove the
special exemptions from the 90-day break-in-service requirement in
paragraphs (3)(iv) and (v) of the definition of newly appointed for DOD
and USCG NAFI employees. In other words, all DOD and USCG NAFI service
will be considered Federal service in applying the 90-day break-in-
service rule. DOD and USCG NAFI employees must have a 90-day break-in-
service to be eligible for a recruitment incentive upon movement to a
position listed in Sec. 575.103 (unless one of the remaining
exclusions in the definition of newly appointed applies).
Payment and Repayment Requirements (Sec. 575.111)
An agency recommended amending Sec. 575.111(b) and (f) to state
employees must repay recruitment incentive payments for any part of the
service period in which they did not meet all of the terms of the
service agreement; e.g., for periods of unsatisfactory performance. The
same agency recommended the regulations require full repayment of a
recruitment incentive if employment is terminated due to falsified
employment documents or pre-employment conditions.
The regulations at Sec. 575.111(b) require an agency to terminate
a recruitment incentive service agreement when an employee receives a
rating of record of less than ``Fully Successful'' or equivalent or
when an employee otherwise fails to fulfill the terms of the service
agreement. If an agency terminates a service agreement for such
reasons, Sec. 575.111(f) provides that the employee is entitled to
keep any portion of recruitment incentive payments already received
that are attributable to completed service; however, the employee is
obligated to repay any recruitment incentive payments received
attributable to uncompleted service. Under this section, if an employee
has received recruitment incentive payments less than the amount
attributable to completed service when the service agreement is
terminated, the agency is not obligated to pay the employee the amount
attributable to completed service, unless the agency agreed to such
payment in the employee's service agreement. Agencies may want to
consider not paying all of a recruitment incentive as an up-front,
lump-sum payment in advance of the employee fulfilling a service period
and, instead, paying all or part of a recruitment incentive after an
employee successfully completes all or part of the service period.
We agree the regulations should require full repayment of a
recruitment incentive if employment is terminated due to falsified
employment documents or pre-employment conditions. We are adding a new
paragraph (j) to Sec. 575.111 to require an employee to repay all
recruitment incentive payments if an agency terminates a service
agreement when an employee is separated as a result of material false
or inaccurate statements or deception or fraud in examination or
appointment, or as a result of failing to meet employment
qualifications.
An individual commented, if an applicant accepts an offer of
employment along with a recruitment incentive, an agency should not be
able to cancel the agreement (unless for poor performance) without
paying out the full amount of the incentive (regardless of the
installment plan). The individual stated if an applicant accepts a
recruitment incentive offer in good faith, allowing the agency to
terminate the service agreement without paying the full incentive
seemed unfair.
We disagree. The regulations provide appropriate protections for an
employee if the agency terminates a service agreement when the employee
is not at fault. Section 575.111(e) provides that such an employee is
entitled to receive recruitment incentive payments attributable to
completed service and to keep any recruitment incentive payments
already received for completed and uncompleted service. An agency
should not be obligated to pay additional recruitment incentive
payments for service that is not completed under a terminated service
agreement.
An agency commented the recruitment incentive repayment
[[Page 67835]]
requirements are not consistent with the student loan repayment
regulations which require full repayment if a service agreement is not
completed. The student loan repayment program is based on a different
statutory authority with different repayment requirements if the
service agreement is not fulfilled. Under 5 U.S.C. 5379, an employee is
obligated to reimburse the paying agency for the full amount of the
student loan repayment benefits provided when the employee voluntarily
separates from Federal service, or is separated involuntarily due to
misconduct or poor performance, and does not complete the terms of the
student loan repayment service agreement. There is no similar statutory
requirement for recruitment incentives in 5 U.S.C. 5753. Under 5 U.S.C.
5753(c)(2), OPM has the authority to regulate the terms and conditions
under which recruitment incentives are payable, including the
conditions under which a service agreement may be terminated and the
effect of the termination. Consistent with the former recruitment bonus
authority, the recruitment incentive regulations at Sec. 575.111
generally require a pro-rated repayment of incentive payments received
that are attributable to uncompleted service if a service agreement is
not fulfilled.
The same agency commented that Sec. 575.111(f) is vague and stated
clarification is needed on whether agencies have the discretion to
define completed service as the duration of the service agreement. The
agency questioned whether it may require full repayment if the employee
fails to complete a service period or must the repayment amount be
prorated based on the portion of the agreement served.
Under Sec. 575.110(a), a service period is the period of
employment that an employee agrees to fulfill in exchange for a
recruitment incentive, as documented in the employee's service
agreement. ``Completed service,'' as used in Sec. 575.111, is the
amount of time the employee has fulfilled under the service agreement,
and ``uncompleted service'' is the amount of time the employee has not
fulfilled under the service agreement. We are clarifying the
recruitment and relocation incentive regulations by adding a new
paragraph (i) to Sec. Sec. 575.111 and 575.211 to provide that in
determining the amount of recruitment and relocation incentive payments
attributable to completed and uncompleted service, agencies must
prorate the full amount of the authorized incentive payments across the
length of the service period. (See the fact sheet at https://
www.opm.gov/oca/PAY/HTML/rectermcalc.asp for additional information.)
Additional Changes
We are making the following additional changes to the recruitment
incentive regulations to correct technical errors and make minor
clarifications:
Revising the definition of employee and replacing the
definition of employee of the Federal Government with Federal
Government in Sec. 575.102 to eliminate redundancy and circular
language regarding NAFI employees. These final regulations also revise
paragraphs (2) and (3) in the definition of newly appointed in Sec.
575.102 consistent with these new definitions.
Revising paragraph (3)(i) of the definition of newly
appointed in Sec. 575.102 to clarify a ``nonpermanent appointment''
excludes a Schedule C appointment under 5 CFR part 213. An agency may
not pay a recruitment incentive to an employee moving from a Schedule C
appointment to a non-Schedule C appointment, unless the employee has a
90-day break in service.
Adding employment under the Student Career Experience
Program under 5 CFR 213.3202(b) as a new paragraph (3)(vi) in the
definition of newly appointed in Sec. 575.102. A similar provision was
included in the former recruitment bonus regulations, but it was
inadvertently left out of the interim recruitment incentive
regulations.
Adding an appointment as an expert or consultant under 5
U.S.C. 3109 and 5 CFR part 304 as a new paragraph (3)(iv) in the
definition of newly appointed in Sec. 575.102. Service under a
temporary expert and consultant appointment is already not counted as
Federal service in applying the 90-day break-in-service requirement in
the existing definition of newly appointed. This addition will ensure
that service under an intermittent ``expert and consultant''
appointment that is not a temporary appointment also is disregarded in
applying the 90-day break-in-service requirement.
Revising Sec. 575.106(b)(1) to clarify a factor for
determining when a position is likely to be difficult to fill is the
availability and quality of candidates possessing the competencies
required for the position, including the success of recent efforts to
recruit candidates for ``the position or similar positions.'' The
language in the interim regulations stated only the success of recent
efforts to recruit candidates for ``similar positions.''
Clarifying Sec. 575.107(b)(1) to provide an authorized
agency official must review and approve the recruitment incentive
determination before paying the incentive to the employee.
Comments Applicable to Relocation Incentives
Definition of Temporary Relocation (Sec. 575.205(a)(2))
An agency commented that the Supplementary Information of the
interim regulations stated that a relocation incentive may be paid for
a temporary relocation. The agency suggested ``temporary relocation''
should be defined.
We do not agree. Section 575.205(a) provides an agency may pay a
relocation incentive to an employee who must relocate to a different
geographic area ``permanently or temporarily.'' Because there is no
minimum length for a relocation incentive service agreement as there is
for recruitment incentives, it is not necessary to define what is meant
by ``temporary relocation.'' Note that under Sec. 575.205(b) employees
must establish a residence in the new geographic area before an agency
may pay a relocation incentive to an employee, even when the employee
is relocated to a different geographic area on a temporary basis.
Payment to Former NAFI Employees (Sec. 575.205(a))
An agency requested clarification of whether relocation incentives
may be paid to DOD or USCG NAFI employees who move to appropriated fund
positions. An agency may pay a relocation incentive to a white-collar
or prevailing rate NAFI employee in a DOD or USCG NAFI position who
moves without a break in service to an appropriated fund position that
is eligible for relocation incentives under Sec. 575.203 and that is
in a different geographic area. Consistent with the definition of
employee in 5 U.S.C. 5753(a)(3), employee is defined in Sec. 575.202
to mean an employee as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2105 ``except that the term
also includes an employee described in 5 U.S.C. 2105(c) * * *.''
Section 2105(c) of title 5, United States Code, covers DOD and USCG
NAFI employees.
To help clarify this further, Sec. 575.202 includes a revised
definition of employee and replaces the definition of employee of the
Federal Government with Federal Government to eliminate redundancy and
circular language regarding NAFI employees. Also, we are revising Sec.
575.205(a) to provide that an agency may pay a relocation incentive
under the conditions in 5 CFR part 575, subpart B, to an employee (as
that term is newly defined) who (1) relocates to a
[[Page 67836]]
different geographic area (temporarily or permanently) to accept a
position listed in Sec. 575.203 in an agency that is likely to be
difficult to fill and (2) is an employee of the Federal Government (as
those terms are newly defined) immediately before the relocation.
Additional Changes
We are making the following additional changes to the relocation
incentive regulations to correct technical errors and make minor
clarifications:
Revising Sec. 575.206(a)(4) to replace the term
``recruitment incentive'' with ``relocation incentive.''
Revising Sec. 575.206(b)(1) to clarify a factor for
determining when a position is likely to be difficult to fill is the
availability and quality of candidates possessing the competencies
required for the position, including the success of recent efforts to
recruit candidates for ``the position or similar positions.'' The
language in the interim regulations stated only the success of recent
efforts to recruit candidates for ``similar positions.''
Revising Sec. 575.207(b)(1) to clarify an authorized
agency official must review and approve a relocation incentive
determination before paying the incentive to the employee.
Revising Sec. 575.210(e) by removing the words ``agree
to'' in the second sentence so that the language is parallel to Sec.
575.110(e) of the recruitment incentive regulations.
Comments Applicable to Retention Incentives
Group Retention Incentives (Sec. 575.309(a)(2))
An agency recommended that the limit on an agency's authority to
approve group retention incentives under Sec. 575.309(a)(2) be raised
from 10 percent to 25 percent. The agency stated with the increase in
the maximum retention incentive amount from 25 to 50 percent, it would
be appropriate to raise the agency authority to approve group retention
incentives from the current 10 percent to 25 percent.
We do not agree. The 10 percent limitation on an agency's authority
to approve group retention incentives is provided by statute at 5
U.S.C. 5754(e)(1)(B). The law requires OPM approval of group retention
incentives in excess of 10 percent. (See 5 U.S.C. 5754(f).)
Computing Lump-Sum Retention Incentives (Sec. 575.309(d))
An agency recommended the regulations describe how to calculate the
total basic pay earned during a full service period for the purpose of
calculating a retention incentive paid at the end of the service
period. We are adding an example to Sec. 575.309(d) that shows how to
compute a retention incentive for the full period of service under a
service agreement (including the total amount of basic pay earned
during the full period of service) consistent with the example in Sec.
575.309(c)(1).
Grandfathered Retention Allowances (Sec. 575.314)
An individual requested clarification on why an agency would not
renew or continue a retention allowance that was originally authorized
before May 2005 after the issuance of the new retention incentive
regulations. The commenter observed that terminating retention
allowances seems counterproductive to the purpose of the allowances
which is to recruit and retain persons with unique skills.
Under section 101(d)(3) of Public Law 108-411 and Sec. 575.314 of
the regulations, retention allowances authorized before May 1, 2005,
were required to continue to be paid until the allowance was
reauthorized or terminated, but not later than April 30, 2006. Agencies
were required to pay such grandfathered retention allowances subject to
regulations applicable to retention allowances before May 1, 2005.
Under the former retention allowance regulations, agencies had the
flexibility to terminate retention allowances if a retention allowance
was not needed to retain the employee, labor-market factors made it
more likely to recruit a candidate with the qualifications possessed by
the employee, the agency's need for the employee's services was reduced
to a level that made paying an allowance unnecessary, or budgetary
considerations made it difficult to continue paying the allowance. When
a grandfathered retention allowance was terminated, an agency could
have authorized a new retention incentive in its place under the
conditions described in 5 CFR part 575, subpart C, as in effect
starting on May 13, 2005. Any decision to terminate a grandfathered
retention allowance before April 30, 2006 (the required termination
date under the statute), and whether to replace that allowance with a
new retention incentive was subject to agency discretion based on the
needs of the agency and the requirements of the retention incentive law
and regulations. We note that, by law, all grandfathered retention
allowances should have been terminated by April 30, 2006.
Additional Changes
We are making the following additional changes to the retention
incentive regulations to correct technical errors and make minor
clarifications:
Revising Sec. 575.307(a)(6)(iii) to remove the
requirement that agency retention incentive plans address the
obligations of an employee if an agency terminates a service agreement.
Because retention incentive payments are not paid in advance of an
employee fulfilling the period of service attributable to the payments,
employees do not have repayment obligations if a service agreement is
terminated.
Revising Sec. 575.307(b)(1) to clarify an authorized
agency official must review and approve each retention incentive before
paying an incentive to an employee.
Revising the examples in Sec. 575.309(c)(1) and (c)(2) to
clarify how the amount of pay an employee earned during the service
period is computed.
Revising Sec. 575.311 to clarify and make consistent the
conditions under which agencies have the discretion and are required to
terminate a retention incentive paid under a service agreement and a
retention incentive paid without a service agreement. We also are
adding a new paragraph to this section to clarify how to compute
retention incentive payments that may be owed to an employee for
completed service if an agency terminates a retention incentive service
agreement.
Finally, a number of commenters noted that the reference to
paragraph (g) in Sec. 575.310(a) should be changed to paragraph (f).
This error was corrected in the Federal Register notice published on
December 19, 2005 (70 FR 74995).
Miscellaneous Changes to Other Regulations
Commenters noted incorrect references to the special rate
regulations (5 CFR part 530, subpart C) in the aggregate limitation on
pay (5 CFR part 530, subpart B), supervisory differential (5 CFR part
575, subpart D), and extended assignment incentive (5 CFR part 575,
subpart E) regulations. A commenter also noted an incorrect reference
to the prevailing rate night differential authority at 5 U.S.C. 5343(f)
in the supervisory differential regulations. These references are
corrected in these final regulations.
We are revising the definition of discretionary payment in the
aggregate limitation on pay regulations at Sec. 530.202 to remove
``extended assignment incentives'' as an example of a discretionary
payment, consistent
[[Page 67837]]
with the removal of retention incentives as an example of a
discretionary payment in the interim regulations. We also are
clarifying the definition to provide payments that are authorized to an
employee under the terms of a service agreement are not discretionary
payments.
Also, to conform with the new Sec. Sec. 575.111(h) and 575.211(h)
and OPM's authority in 5 U.S.C. 5757(f) to prescribe regulations on an
employee's entitlement to retain extended assignment incentive payments
when an agreement is canceled, these final regulations add a new Sec.
575.513(g) to the extended assignment incentive regulations to provide
an authorized agency official with the authority to waive the
requirement under Sec. 575.513(b) and (c)(1) to repay excess extended
assignment incentive payments if an extended assignment incentive
service agreement is terminated when collection of the excess amount
would be against equity and good conscience and not in the best
interest of the United States. We are removing the reference to 5
U.S.C. 5584 in Sec. 575.513(c)(1) as the authority for waiving
recovery of such excess payments.
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Review
This rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
in accordance with E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they
will apply only to Federal agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR 530 and 575
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wages.
Office of Personnel Management
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
0
Accordingly, OPM amends 5 CFR parts 530 and 575 as follows:
PART 530--PAY RATES AND SYSTEMS (GENERAL)
0
1. The authority citation for part 530 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5305 and 5307; subpart C also issued under 5
U.S.C. 5338 and sec. 4 of the Performance Management and Recognition
System Termination Act of 1993 (Pub. L. 103-89), 107 Stat. 981.
Subpart B--Aggregate Limitation on Pay
0
2. In Sec. 530.202, revise the first sentence in the definition of
basic pay and the definition of discretionary payment to read as
follows:
Sec. 530.202 Definitions.
* * * * *
Basic pay means the total amount of pay received at a rate fixed by
law or administrative action for the position held by an employee,
including any special rate under 5 CFR part 530, subpart C, or any
locality-based comparability payment under 5 CFR part 531, subpart F,
or other similar payment under other legal authority, before any
deductions. * * *
* * * * *
Discretionary payment means a payment an agency has discretion to
make to an employee. Payments that are authorized to be made to an
employee under the terms of a service agreement or preauthorized to be
made to an employee at a regular fixed rate each pay period are not
discretionary payments.
* * * * *
PART 575--RECRUITMENT, RELOCATION, AND RETENTION INCENTIVES;
SUPERVISORY DIFFERENTIALS; AND EXTENDED ASSIGNMENT INCENTIVES
0
3. The authority citation for part 575 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1104(a)(2) and 5307; subparts A and B also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 5753 and sec. 101 of the Federal Workforce
Flexibility Act of 2004, Public Law 108-411, 118 Stat. 2305; subpart
C also issued under 5 U.S.C. 5754 and sec. 101 of the Federal
Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004, Public Law 108-411, 118 Stat.
2305; subpart D also issued under 5 U.S.C. 5755; subpart E also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 5757 and sec. 207 of Public Law 107-273, 116
Stat. 1780.
Subpart A--Recruitment Incentives
0
4. In Sec. 575.102--
0
A. Revise the definition of employee,
0
B. Remove the definition of employee of the Federal Government,
0
C. Add a new definition of Federal Government, and
0
D. Revise paragraphs (2) and (3) in the definition of newly appointed.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 575.102 Definitions.
* * * * *
Employee has the meaning given that term in 5 U.S.C. 2105, except
that the term also includes an employee described in 5 U.S.C. 2105(c).
For the purpose of determining whether an individual was an employee of
the Federal Government during the 90-day period referred to in the
definition of newly appointed, employee also includes an employee
described in 5 U.S.C. 2105(e). For the purpose of Sec. 575.109(d), an
employee means an individual not yet employed who has received a
written offer to be newly appointed or reappointed and has signed the
written service agreement required by Sec. 575.110 before payment of
the recruitment incentive.
* * * * *
Federal Government means all entities of the Government of the
United States, including the United States Postal Service and the
Postal Regulatory Commission.
* * * * *
Newly appointed refers to--* * *
(2) An appointment of a former employee of the Federal Government
following a break in Federal Government service of at least 90 days; or
(3) An appointment of an individual in the Federal Government when
his or her service in the Federal Government during the 90-day period
immediately preceding the appointment was limited to one or more of the
following:
(i) A time-limited appointment in the competitive or excepted
service;
(ii) A non-permanent appointment (excluding a Schedule C
appointment under 5 CFR part 213) in the competitive or excepted
service;
(iii) Employment with the government of the District of Columbia
(DC) when the candidate was first appointed by the DC government on or
after October 1, 1987;
(iv) An appointment as an expert or consultant under 5 U.S.C. 3109
and 5 CFR part 304;
(v) Employment under a provisional appointment designated under 5
CFR 316.403; or
(vi) Employment under the Student Career Experience Program under 5
CFR 213.3202(b).
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 575.103--
0
A. Redesignate paragraphs (a) through (g) as paragraphs (a)(1) through
(a)(7), respectively,
0
B. Designate the introductory sentence as paragraph (a) introductory
text and revise it, and
0
C. Add a new paragraph (b).
The revision and addition read as follows:
[[Page 67838]]
Sec. 575.103 Eligible categories of employees.
(a) Except as provided in Sec. 575.104, an Executive agency may
pay a recruitment incentive to an employee appointed or placed in the
following categories of positions:
* * * * *
(b) Except as provided in Sec. 575.104, a legislative agency may
pay a recruitment incentive to an employee appointed or placed in a
General Schedule position paid under 5 U.S.C. 5332 or 5305 (or similar
special rate authority).
0
6. In Sec. 575.105, add a new paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.105 Applicability to employees.
* * * * *
(c) An agency may not commence a recruitment incentive service
agreement during--
(1) A period of employment established under any service agreement
required for a relocation incentive under 5 CFR part 575, subpart B, or
(2) A period of employment established under any service agreement
required for a retention incentive or for which an employee receives
retention incentive payments without a service agreement under 5 CFR
part 575, subpart C.
0
7. In Sec. 575.106, revise paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.106 Authorizing a recruitment incentive.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) The availability and quality of candidates possessing the
competencies required for the position, including the success of recent
efforts to recruit candidates for the position or similar positions
using indicators such as offer acceptance rates, proportion of
positions filled, and the length of time required to fill similar
positions;
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 575.107, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 575.107 Agency recruitment incentive plan and approval levels.
(a) * * *
(1) The designation of officials with authority to review and
approve payment of recruitment incentives (subject to paragraph (b) of
this section), including the circumstances under which an official has
the authority to approve payment without higher-level approval under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, and the designation of officials with
authority to waive the repayment of a recruitment incentive under Sec.
575.111(h);
* * * * *
(b)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, an
authorized agency official who is at least one level higher than the
employee's supervisor must review and approve each determination to pay
a recruitment incentive to a newly appointed employee, unless there is
no official at a higher level in the agency. The authorized agency
official must review and approve the recruitment incentive
determination before the agency may pay the incentive to the employee.
* * * * *
0
9. In Sec. 575.111--
0
A. Revise the first sentence and the last sentence in paragraph (f),
0
B. Remove the last sentence in paragraph (g), and
0
C. Add new paragraphs (h), (i), and (j).
The revision and additions read as follows:
Sec. 575.111 Termination of a service agreement.
* * * * *
(f) Except as provided in paragraph (j) of this section, if an
authorized agency official terminates a service agreement under
paragraph (b) of this section, the employee is entitled to retain
recruitment incentive payments previously paid by the agency that are
attributable to the completed portion of the service period. * * * If
the employee received recruitment incentive payments in excess of the
amount that would be attributable to the completed portion of the
service period, he or she must repay the excess amount, except when an
authorized agency official waives the requirement to repay the excess
amount under paragraph (h) of this section.
* * * * *
(h) If an employee received recruitment incentive payments in
excess of the amount that would be attributable to the completed
portion of the service period under paragraph (f) of this section, an
authorized agency official may waive the requirement to repay the
excess amount when, in the judgment of the official, collection of the
excess amount would be against equity and good conscience and not in
the best interest of the United States.
(i) The full amount of the authorized recruitment incentive must be
prorated across the length of the service period to determine the
amount of the recruitment incentive attributable to completed service
and uncompleted service under this section.
(j) Notwithstanding paragraph (f) of this section, if an agency
terminates a service agreement under paragraph (b) of this section when
an employee is separated as a result of material false or inaccurate
statements or deception or fraud in examination or appointment, or as a
result of failing to meet employment qualifications, the employee must
repay all recruitment incentive payments received under that service
agreement.
Subpart B--Relocation Incentives
0
10. In Sec. 575.202--
0
A. Revise the definition of employee,
0
B. Remove the definition of employee of the Federal Government, and
0
C. Add a new definition of Federal Government.
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 575.202 Definitions.
* * * * *
Employee has the meaning given that term in 5 U.S.C. 2105, except
that the term also includes an employee described in 5 U.S.C. 2105(c).
For the purpose of determining whether an individual had status as an
employee of the Federal Government immediately prior to the relocation
(i.e., in Sec. 575.205(a)(2)), employee also includes an employee
described in 5 U.S.C. 2105(e).
* * * * *
Federal Government means all entities of the Government of the
United States, including the United States Postal Service and the
Postal Regulatory Commission.
* * * * *
0
11. In Sec. 575.203--
0
A. Redesignate paragraphs (a) through (g) as paragraphs (a)(1) through
(a)(7), respectively,
0
B. Designate the introductory sentence as paragraph (a) introductory
text and revise it, and
0
C. Add a new paragraph (b).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 575.203 Eligible categories of employees.
(a) Except as provided in Sec. 575.204, an Executive agency may
pay a relocation incentive to an employee in the following categories
of positions:
* * * * *
(b) Except as provided in Sec. 575.204, a legislative agency may
pay a relocation incentive to an employee in a General Schedule
position paid under 5 U.S.C. 5332 or 5305 (or similar special rate
authority).
0
12. In Sec. 575.205, revise paragraph (a) and add new paragraphs (d)
and (e) to read as follows:
[[Page 67839]]
Sec. 575.205 Applicability to employees.
(a) An agency may pay a relocation incentive under the conditions
prescribed in this subpart to an employee who--
(1) Relocates to a different geographic area (permanently or
temporarily) to accept a position listed in Sec. 575.203 in an agency
when the position is likely to be difficult to fill, as determined
under Sec. 575.206; and
(2) Is an employee of the Federal Government immediately before the
relocation.
* * * * *
(d) An agency may not commence a relocation incentive service
agreement during--
(1) A period of employment established under any service agreement
required for a recruitment incentive under 5 CFR part 575, subpart A,
or
(2) A period of employment established under any service agreement
required for a relocation incentive previously authorized under this
subpart.
(e) An agency may commence a relocation incentive service agreement
during a period of employment established under a service agreement for
a previously authorized retention incentive or for which an employee is
receiving previously authorized retention incentive payments without a
service agreement under 5 CFR part 575, subpart C. The service period
under such a relocation incentive service agreement and the service
period required by the retention incentive service agreement, if
applicable, must be fulfilled concurrently.
0
13. In Sec. 575.206, revise paragraphs (a)(4) and (b)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 575.206 Authorizing a relocation incentive.
(a) * * *
(4) Request a waiver from OPM of the limitation on the maximum
amount of a relocation incentive under Sec. 575.209(c); and
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) The availability and quality of candidates possessing the
competencies required for the position, including the success of recent
efforts to recruit candidates for the position or similar positions
using indicators such as offer acceptance rates, proportion of
positions filled, and the length of time required to fill similar
positions;
* * * * *
0
14. In Sec. 575.207, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 575.207 Agency relocation incentive plan and approval levels.
(a) * * *
(1) The designation of officials with authority to review and
approve payment of relocation incentives (subject to paragraph (b) of
this section) and the designation of officials with authority to waive
the repayment of a relocation incentive under Sec. 575.211(h);
* * * * *
(b)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, an
authorized agency official who is at least one level higher than the
employee's supervisor must review and approve each determination to pay
a relocation incentive, unless there is no official at a higher level
in the agency. The authorized agency official must review and approve
the relocation incentive determination before the agency pays the
incentive to the employee.
* * * * *
0
15. In Sec. 575.210(e), revise the second sentence to read as follows:
Sec. 575.210 Service agreement requirements.
* * * * *
(e) * * * The service agreement must specify the effect of the
termination under Sec. 575.211, including the conditions under which
the agency will pay an additional relocation incentive payment for
partially completed service under Sec. 575.211(e) and (f).
* * * * *
0
16. In Sec. 575.211--
0
A. Revise the last sentence in paragraph (f),
0
B. Remove the last sentence in paragraph (g), and
0
C. Add new paragraphs (h) and (i).
The revision and additions read as follows:
Sec. 575.211 Termination of a service agreement.
* * * * *
(f) * * * If the employee received relocation incentive payments in
excess of the amount that would be attributable to the completed
portion of the service period, he or she must repay the excess amount,
except when an authorized agency official waives the requirement to
repay the excess amount under paragraph (h) of this section.
* * * * *
(h) If an employee received relocation incentive payments in excess
of the amount that would be attributable to the completed portion of
the service period under paragraph (f) of this section, an authorized
agency official may waive the requirement to repay the excess amount
when, in the judgment of the official, collection of the excess amount
would be against equity and good conscience and not in the best
interest of the United States.
(i) The full amount of the authorized relocation incentive must be
prorated across the length of the service period to determine the
amount of the relocation incentive attributable to completed service
and uncompleted service under this section.
Subpart C--Retention Incentives
0
17. In Sec. 575.303--
0
A. Redesignate paragraphs (a) through (g) as paragraphs (a)(1) through
(a)(7), respectively,
0
B. Designate the introductory sentence as paragraph (a) introductory
text and revise it, and
0
C. Add a new paragraph (b).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 575.303 Eligible categories of employees.
(a) Except as provided in Sec. 575.304, an Executive agency may
pay a retention incentive to a current employee who holds--
* * * * *
(b) Except as provided in Sec. 575.304, a legislative agency may
pay a retention incentive to a current employee who holds a General
Schedule position paid under 5 U.S.C. 5332 or 5305 (or similar special
rate authority).
0
18. In Sec. 575.307, revise paragraph (a)(6)(iii) and add a new
sentence at the end of paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.307 Agency retention incentive plan and approval levels.
(a) * * *
(6) * * *
(iii) The obligations of the agency if the agency terminates a
service agreement; and
* * * * *
(b)(1) * * * The authorized agency official must review and approve
the retention incentive determination before the agency pays the
incentive to the employee.
* * * * *
0
19. In Sec. 575.309--
0
A. Revise the fourth sentence in paragraph (c)(1) and the fourth
sentence in paragraph (c)(2),
0
B. Add four new sentences at the end of paragraph (d), and
0
C. Revise paragraph (g).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 575.309 Payment of retention incentives.
* * * * *
[[Page 67840]]
(c)(1) * * * The employee earns $15,000 during the 6 pay periods of
service ($2,500 biweekly rate of basic pay x 6). * * *
(2) * * * The employee earns $15,000 during the 6 pay periods of
service ($2,500 biweekly rate of basic pay x 6). * * *
* * * * *
(d) * * * For example, an agency establishes a retention incentive
percentage rate of 10 percent for an employee. The employee has a
service agreement that provides for a single lump-sum retention
incentive payment after completion of the full service period required
by the service agreement (i.e., 26 pay periods). The employee earns
$65,000 during the 26 pay periods of service ($2,500 biweekly rate of
basic pay x 26). Upon completion of the full service period, the
employee will receive a single lump-sum retention incentive payment of
$6,500 ($65,000 x .10).
* * * * *
(g) An agency may not commence a group or individual retention
incentive service agreement or provide a group or individual retention
incentive without a service agreement under Sec. 575.310(f) for any
biweekly pay period during--
(1) A period of employment established under any service agreement
required for the payment of a recruitment incentive under 5 CFR part
575, subpart A, or a relocation incentive under 5 CFR part 575, subpart