Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 Series Airplanes, 67864-67866 [E7-23335]
Download as PDF
67864
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 231
Monday, December 3, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0263; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–207–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, and
–900 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 737–600, –700, –700C,
–800, and –900 series airplanes. This
proposed AD would require repetitive
inspections for any cracking of or
damage to the left side and right side
flight deck No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5
windows, as necessary, and corrective
actions if necessary. This proposed AD
results from reports of in-flight
departure and separation of the flight
deck windows. We are proposing this
AD to detect and correct cracking in the
vinyl interlayer or damage to the
structural inner glass panes of the flight
deck No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5 windows,
which could result in loss of a window
and rapid loss of cabin pressure. Loss of
cabin pressure could cause crew
communication difficulties or crew
incapacitation.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 17, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6447; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2007–0263; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–207–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received one report of inflight departure of the flight deck No. 3
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
window, on a Boeing Model 747 series
airplane, which resulted in rapid loss of
cabin pressure and an emergency
landing. That airplane had accumulated
36,131 total flight hours and 5,607 total
flight cycles. We have also received two
reports of in-flight separation of the left
side flight deck No. 5 window, on two
Boeing Model 737 series airplanes. One
of the Model 737 series airplanes
experienced cabin pressure loss at
12,500 feet due to separation of the
forward, aft, and upper edges of the left
side flight deck No. 5 window. That
airplane had accumulated 25,673 total
flight hours and 15,669 total flight
cycles. The other Model 737 series
airplane experienced a pressure leak at
29,000 feet due to partial separation of
the upper aft corner of the left side flight
deck No. 5 window. That airplane had
accumulated 28,139 total flight hours
and 16,566 total flight cycles. Vinyl
interlayer cracking of the flight deck No.
2, No. 4, and No. 5 windows could
decrease the load carrying capability of
the affected windows during cabin
pressurization if the structural glass
pane of the window becomes broken.
Vinyl interlayer cracking could also
decrease the bird impact resistance
capability of the flight deck No. 2 and
No. 4 windows. Cracking in the vinyl
interlayer or damage to the structural
inner glass panes of the flight deck No.
2, No. 4, and No. 5 windows, if not
corrected, could result in loss of a
window and rapid loss of cabin
pressure. Loss of cabin pressure could
cause crew communication difficulties
or crew incapacitation.
Other Related Rulemaking
On July 18, 2007, we issued AD 2007–
15–10, amendment 39–15139 (72 FR
41438, July 30, 2007), to address the
unsafe condition on all Model 747
airplanes. A correction was issued on
September 10, 2007 (72 FR 53923,
September 21, 2007), to fix a
typographical error in AD 2007–15–10.
That AD requires an inspection of the
No. 2 and No. 3 windows on the left and
right sides of the airplane to determine
their part numbers, and related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. On October 5, 2007, we
issued a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to
include an airworthiness directive (AD)
that would apply to all Boeing Model
737–100, –200, –200C, –300, –400, and
E:\FR\FM\03DEP1.SGM
03DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 / Proposed Rules
–500 series airplanes. That NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on
October 17, 2007 (72 FR 58766). That
NPRM proposed to require repetitive
inspections for any cracking of or
damage to the left side and right side
flight deck No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5
windows and corrective actions if
necessary.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737–56A1022, dated
July 18, 2007. The service bulletin
describes procedures for doing
repetitive internal and external detailed
inspections for any cracking of or
damage to the left side and right side
flight deck No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5
windows, as applicable, that exceeds
the limits given in the Accomplishment
Instructions of the service bulletin. The
service bulletin specifies an initial
compliance time ranging between 6
months and 24 months, depending on
the window location and number of
window flight hours. If a replacement
window is not new or has an unknown
number of flight hours, the service
bulletin specifies accomplishing the
initial inspections before installation. If
a replacement window is new or has
zero flight hours, the service bulletin
specifies accomplishing the initial
inspections at the following times: (1)
7,500 window flight hours or 36
months, whichever occurs first, for
flight deck No. 2 windows, and (2) 6,000
window flight hours or 24 months,
whichever occurs first, for flight deck
No. 4 and No. 5 windows. The service
bulletin also specifies a repetitive
interval of (1) 7,500 window flight hours
or 36 months, whichever occurs first, for
flight deck No. 2 windows, and (2) 6,000
window flight hours or 24 months,
whichever occurs first, for flight deck
No. 4 and No. 5 windows.
The service bulletin also describes
procedures for accomplishing corrective
actions if necessary. The corrective
actions include replacing any cracked or
damaged window with a new or
serviceable window. The service
bulletin specifies accomplishing the
corrective actions before further flight.
Accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information is intended to
adequately address the unsafe
condition.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of this same
type design. For this reason, we are
proposing this AD, which would require
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
67865
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously.
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 2,127 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
This proposed AD would affect about
737 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
proposed actions would take about 2
work hours per airplane, at an average
labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based
on these figures, the estimated cost of
the proposed AD for U.S. operators is
$117,920, or $160 per airplane, per
inspection cycle.
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2007–0263;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–207–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by January 17, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model
737–600, –700, –700C, –800, and –900 series
airplanes, certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of in-flight
departure and separation of the flight deck
windows. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct cracking in the vinyl interlayer or
damage to the structural inner glass panes of
the flight deck No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5
windows, which could result in loss of a
window and rapid loss of cabin pressure.
Loss of cabin pressure could cause crew
communication difficulties or crew
incapacitation.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections and Replacement
(f) At the applicable times specified in
Tables 1, 2, and 3 of paragraph 1.E. of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737–56A1022, dated
July 18, 2007, except as provided by
paragraph (g) of this AD: Do the internal and
external detailed inspections for any cracking
of or damage to the left side and right side
flight deck No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5 windows,
as applicable, and do the applicable
corrective actions before further flight, by
accomplishing all of the applicable actions
specified in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737–56A1022, dated July 18, 2007. Repeat
E:\FR\FM\03DEP1.SGM
03DEP1
67866
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 / Proposed Rules
the inspections thereafter at the applicable
interval specified in paragraph 1.E. of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737–56A1022, dated
July 18, 2007.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
Exception to Compliance Times
(g) Where Tables 1, 2, and 3 of paragraph
1.E. of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–
56A1022, dated July 18, 2007, specify
counting the compliance time from ‘‘* * * the
date on this service bulletin,’’ this AD
requires counting the compliance time from
the effective date of this AD.
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0264; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–212–AD]
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
AGENCY:
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Installation of metallic window blanks
at cockpit eyebrow windows No. 4 and No.
5 in accordance with Supplemental Type
Certificate ST01630SE is approved as a
means of compliance with the initial and
repetitive inspections for the flight deck No.
4 and No. 5 windows required by paragraph
(f) of this AD. All other applicable actions
required by paragraph (f) of this AD must be
fully complied with.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 7, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–23335 Filed 11–30–07; 8:45 am]
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 707 Airplanes and Model 720
and 720B Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 707 airplanes and Model
720 and 720B series airplanes. This
proposed AD would require repetitive
inspections for any cracking of or
damage to the left side and right side
flight deck No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5
windows, as necessary, and corrective
actions if necessary. This proposed AD
results from reports of in-flight
departure and separation of the flight
deck windows. We are proposing this
AD to detect and correct cracking in the
vinyl interlayer or damage to the
structural inner glass panes of the flight
deck No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5 windows,
which could result in loss of a window
and rapid loss of cabin pressure. Loss of
cabin pressure could cause crew
communication difficulties or crew
incapacitation.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 17, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6577; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2007–0264; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–212–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received one report of inflight departure of the flight deck No. 3
window, on a Boeing Model 747 series
airplane, which resulted in rapid loss of
cabin pressure and an emergency
landing. That airplane had accumulated
36,131 total flight hours and 5,607 total
flight cycles. We have also received two
reports of in-flight separation of the left
side flight deck No. 5 window, on two
Boeing Model 737 series airplanes. One
of the Model 737 series airplanes
experienced cabin pressure loss at
12,500 feet due to separation of the
forward, aft, and upper edges of the left
side flight deck No. 5 window. That
airplane had accumulated 25,673 total
flight hours and 15,669 total flight
cycles. The other Model 737 series
airplane experienced a pressure leak at
29,000 feet due to partial separation of
the upper aft corner of the left side flight
E:\FR\FM\03DEP1.SGM
03DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 231 (Monday, December 3, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 67864-67866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23335]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 67864]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-0263; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-207-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -
800, and -900 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 series
airplanes. This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections for
any cracking of or damage to the left side and right side flight deck
No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5 windows, as necessary, and corrective actions
if necessary. This proposed AD results from reports of in-flight
departure and separation of the flight deck windows. We are proposing
this AD to detect and correct cracking in the vinyl interlayer or
damage to the structural inner glass panes of the flight deck No. 2,
No. 4, and No. 5 windows, which could result in loss of a window and
rapid loss of cabin pressure. Loss of cabin pressure could cause crew
communication difficulties or crew incapacitation.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 17,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6447; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-0263;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-207-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received one report of in-flight departure of the flight
deck No. 3 window, on a Boeing Model 747 series airplane, which
resulted in rapid loss of cabin pressure and an emergency landing. That
airplane had accumulated 36,131 total flight hours and 5,607 total
flight cycles. We have also received two reports of in-flight
separation of the left side flight deck No. 5 window, on two Boeing
Model 737 series airplanes. One of the Model 737 series airplanes
experienced cabin pressure loss at 12,500 feet due to separation of the
forward, aft, and upper edges of the left side flight deck No. 5
window. That airplane had accumulated 25,673 total flight hours and
15,669 total flight cycles. The other Model 737 series airplane
experienced a pressure leak at 29,000 feet due to partial separation of
the upper aft corner of the left side flight deck No. 5 window. That
airplane had accumulated 28,139 total flight hours and 16,566 total
flight cycles. Vinyl interlayer cracking of the flight deck No. 2, No.
4, and No. 5 windows could decrease the load carrying capability of the
affected windows during cabin pressurization if the structural glass
pane of the window becomes broken. Vinyl interlayer cracking could also
decrease the bird impact resistance capability of the flight deck No. 2
and No. 4 windows. Cracking in the vinyl interlayer or damage to the
structural inner glass panes of the flight deck No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5
windows, if not corrected, could result in loss of a window and rapid
loss of cabin pressure. Loss of cabin pressure could cause crew
communication difficulties or crew incapacitation.
Other Related Rulemaking
On July 18, 2007, we issued AD 2007-15-10, amendment 39-15139 (72
FR 41438, July 30, 2007), to address the unsafe condition on all Model
747 airplanes. A correction was issued on September 10, 2007 (72 FR
53923, September 21, 2007), to fix a typographical error in AD 2007-15-
10. That AD requires an inspection of the No. 2 and No. 3 windows on
the left and right sides of the airplane to determine their part
numbers, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary.
On October 5, 2007, we issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to
amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that
would apply to all Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and
[[Page 67865]]
-500 series airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register
on October 17, 2007 (72 FR 58766). That NPRM proposed to require
repetitive inspections for any cracking of or damage to the left side
and right side flight deck No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5 windows and
corrective actions if necessary.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-56A1022, dated
July 18, 2007. The service bulletin describes procedures for doing
repetitive internal and external detailed inspections for any cracking
of or damage to the left side and right side flight deck No. 2, No. 4,
and No. 5 windows, as applicable, that exceeds the limits given in the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. The service
bulletin specifies an initial compliance time ranging between 6 months
and 24 months, depending on the window location and number of window
flight hours. If a replacement window is not new or has an unknown
number of flight hours, the service bulletin specifies accomplishing
the initial inspections before installation. If a replacement window is
new or has zero flight hours, the service bulletin specifies
accomplishing the initial inspections at the following times: (1) 7,500
window flight hours or 36 months, whichever occurs first, for flight
deck No. 2 windows, and (2) 6,000 window flight hours or 24 months,
whichever occurs first, for flight deck No. 4 and No. 5 windows. The
service bulletin also specifies a repetitive interval of (1) 7,500
window flight hours or 36 months, whichever occurs first, for flight
deck No. 2 windows, and (2) 6,000 window flight hours or 24 months,
whichever occurs first, for flight deck No. 4 and No. 5 windows.
The service bulletin also describes procedures for accomplishing
corrective actions if necessary. The corrective actions include
replacing any cracked or damaged window with a new or serviceable
window. The service bulletin specifies accomplishing the corrective
actions before further flight.
Accomplishing the actions specified in the service information is
intended to adequately address the unsafe condition.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 2,127 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 737 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The proposed actions would take about 2 work hours per
airplane, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the proposed AD for U.S. operators is
$117,920, or $160 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2007-0263; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
207-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by January
17, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -
800, and -900 series airplanes, certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of in-flight departure and
separation of the flight deck windows. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct cracking in the vinyl interlayer or damage to the
structural inner glass panes of the flight deck No. 2, No. 4, and
No. 5 windows, which could result in loss of a window and rapid loss
of cabin pressure. Loss of cabin pressure could cause crew
communication difficulties or crew incapacitation.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections and Replacement
(f) At the applicable times specified in Tables 1, 2, and 3 of
paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-56A1022, dated
July 18, 2007, except as provided by paragraph (g) of this AD: Do
the internal and external detailed inspections for any cracking of
or damage to the left side and right side flight deck No. 2, No. 4,
and No. 5 windows, as applicable, and do the applicable corrective
actions before further flight, by accomplishing all of the
applicable actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-56A1022, dated July 18, 2007.
Repeat
[[Page 67866]]
the inspections thereafter at the applicable interval specified in
paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-56A1022, dated
July 18, 2007.
Exception to Compliance Times
(g) Where Tables 1, 2, and 3 of paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-56A1022, dated July 18, 2007, specify counting
the compliance time from ``* * * the date on this service
bulletin,'' this AD requires counting the compliance time from the
effective date of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this
AD.
(4) Installation of metallic window blanks at cockpit eyebrow
windows No. 4 and No. 5 in accordance with Supplemental Type
Certificate ST01630SE is approved as a means of compliance with the
initial and repetitive inspections for the flight deck No. 4 and No.
5 windows required by paragraph (f) of this AD. All other applicable
actions required by paragraph (f) of this AD must be fully complied
with.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 7, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-23335 Filed 11-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P