Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans; Valuation of Benefits and Assets; Expected Retirement Age, 67645-67646 [E7-23270]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 230 / Friday, November 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations terminated either in a distress termination or involuntarily by the PBGC with a valuation date falling in 2008, and is used to determine expected List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 4022 retirement ages for plan participants. Pension insurance, Pensions, This table is needed in order to compute Reporting and recordkeeping the value of early retirement benefits requirements. and, thus, the total value of benefits I In consideration of the foregoing, 29 under the plan. CFR part 4022 is amended as follows: DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: PART 4022—BENEFITS PAYABLE IN Catherine B. Klion, Manager, Regulatory TERMINATED SINGLE-EMPLOYER and Policy Division, Legislative and PLANS Regulatory Department, Pension Benefit I 1. The authority citation for part 4022 Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street, continues to read as follows: NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202–326– Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302, 1322, 1322b, 4024. (TTY/TDD users may call the 1341(c)(3)(D), and 1344. Federal relay service toll-free at 1–800– 877–8339 and ask to be connected to I 2. Appendix D to part 4022 is 202–326–4024.) amended by adding a new entry to the end of the table to read as follows. The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The introductory text is reproduced for the PBGC’s regulation on Allocation of convenience of the reader and remains Assets in Single-Employer Plans (29 unchanged. CFR part 4044) sets forth (in subpart B) the methods for valuing plan benefits of Appendix D to Part 4022—Maximum terminating single-employer plans Guaranteeable Monthly Benefit covered under Title IV of the Employee The following table lists by year the Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. maximum guaranteeable monthly benefit Under ERISA section 4041(c), payable in the form of a life annuity guaranteed benefits and benefit commencing at age 65 as described by liabilities under a plan that is § 4022.22(b) to a participant in a plan that undergoing a distress termination must terminated in that year: be valued in accordance with part 4044, Maximum subpart B. In addition, when the PBGC guaranteeable terminates an underfunded plan Year monthly involuntarily pursuant to ERISA Section benefit 4042(a), it uses the subpart B valuation rules to determine the amount of the plan’s underfunding. * * * * * 2008 ...................................... $4,312.50 Under § 4044.51(b) of the asset allocation regulation, early retirement benefits are valued based on the annuity Issued in Washington, DC, this 27th day of November, 2007. starting date, if a retirement date has been selected, or the expected Vincent K. Snowbarger, retirement age, if the annuity starting Deputy Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty date is not known on the valuation date. Corporation. Sections 4044.55 through 4044.57 set [FR Doc. E7–23267 Filed 11–29–07; 8:45 am] forth rules for determining the expected BILLING CODE 7709–01–P retirement ages for plan participants entitled to early retirement benefits. Appendix D of part 4044 contains tables PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY to be used in determining the expected CORPORATION early retirement ages. 29 CFR Part 4044 Table I in appendix D (Selection of Retirement Rate Category) is used to Allocation of Assets in Singledetermine whether a participant has a Employer Plans; Valuation of Benefits low, medium, or high probability of and Assets; Expected Retirement Age retiring early. The determination is based on the year a participant would AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty reach ‘‘unreduced retirement age’’ (i.e., Corporation. the earlier of the normal retirement age ACTION: Final rule. or the age at which an unreduced SUMMARY: This rule amends the Pension benefit is first payable) and the Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s participant’s monthly benefit at regulation on Allocation of Assets in unreduced retirement age. The table Single-Employer Plans by substituting a applies only to plans with valuation new table that applies to any plan being dates in the current year and is updated rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES regulation, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 does not apply (5 U.S.C. 601(2)). VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:09 Nov 29, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 67645 annually by the PBGC to reflect changes in the cost of living, etc. Tables II–A, II–B, and II–C (Expected Retirement Ages for Individuals in the Low, Medium, and High Categories respectively) are used to determine the expected retirement age after the probability of early retirement has been determined using Table I. These tables establish, by probability category, the expected retirement age based on both the earliest age a participant could retire under the plan and the unreduced retirement age. This expected retirement age is used to compute the value of the early retirement benefit and, thus, the total value of benefits under the plan. This document amends appendix D to replace Table I–07 with Table I–08 in order to provide an updated correlation, appropriate for calendar year 2008, between the amount of a participant’s benefit and the probability that the participant will elect early retirement. Table I–08 will be used to value benefits in plans with valuation dates during calendar year 2008. The PBGC has determined that notice of and public comment on this rule are impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Plan administrators need to be able to estimate accurately the value of plan benefits as early as possible before initiating the termination process. For that purpose, if a plan has a valuation date in 2008, the plan administrator needs the updated table being promulgated in this rule. Accordingly, the public interest is best served by issuing this table expeditiously, without an opportunity for notice and comment, to allow as much time as possible to estimate the value of plan benefits with the proper table for plans with valuation dates in early 2008. The PBGC has determined that this action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under the criteria set forth in Executive Order 12866. Because no general notice of proposed rulemaking is required for this regulation, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 does not apply (5 U.S.C. 601(2)). List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 4044 Pension insurance, Pensions. In consideration of the foregoing, 29 CFR part 4044 is amended as follows: I PART 4044—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 4044 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1301(a), 1302(b)(3), 1341, 1344, 1362. 2. Appendix D to part 4044 is amended by removing Table I–07 and I E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM 30NOR1 67646 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 230 / Friday, November 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations adding in its place Table I–08 to read as follows: Appendix D to Part 4044—Tables Used to Determine Expected Retirement Age TABLE I–08.—SELECTION OF RETIREMENT RATE CATEGORY [(For Plans with valuation dates after December 31, 2007, and before January 1, 2009)] Participant’s Retirement Rate Category is— Low 1 if monthly benefit at URA is less than— Participant reaches URA in year— 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 1 2 3 * ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. or later .................................................................................................... From 536 549 563 576 589 602 616 630 645 660 To 536 549 563 576 589 602 616 630 645 660 2,264 2,320 2,376 2,430 2,486 2,544 2,602 2,662 2,723 2,786 High 3 if monthly benefit at URA is greater than— 2,264 2,320 2,376 2,430 2,486 2,544 2,602 2,662 2,723 2,786 Table II–A. Table II–B. Table II–C. * * * * Issued in Washington, DC, this 27th day of November, 2007. Vincent K. Snowbarger, Deputy Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. [FR Doc. E7–23270 Filed 11–29–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7709–01–P LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Copyright Royalty Board 37 CFR Part 381 [Docket No. 2006–2 CRB NCBRA] Noncommercial Educational Broadcasting Statutory License Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Copyright Royalty Judges are publishing final regulations setting the royalty rates and terms under the Copyright Act for the noncommercial educational broadcasting statutory license for the license period 2008– 2012. Effective Date: January 1, 2008. Applicability Date: The regulations apply to the license period January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Strasser, Senior Attorney, or Gina Giuffreda, Attorney-Advisor, by telephone at (202) 707–7658 or e-mail at crb@loc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DATES: rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES Medium 2 if monthly benefit at URA is VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:09 Nov 29, 2007 Jkt 214001 Background Section 118 of the Copyright Act, title 17 of the United States Code, establishes a statutory license for the use of certain copyrighted works in connection with noncommercial television and radio broadcasting. The terms and rates for this statutory license have been adjusted periodically by the Librarian of Congress and appear in 37 CFR part 253. However, the Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108–419, transferred jurisdiction over these rates and terms to the Copyright Royalty Judges (‘‘Judges’’). 17 U.S.C. 801(b)(1). This is a window year for the establishment of new rates and terms for the 2008–2012 license period. On January 9, 2006, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 803(b)(1)(A)(i)(V), the Copyright Royalty Judges published a notice in the Federal Register announcing the commencement of proceedings under 17 U.S.C. 118 and requesting interested parties to submit their petitions to participate. 71 FR 1453 (January 9, 2006). Petitions to participate were received from: The American Council on Education (‘‘ACE’’); the National Music Publishers Association, Inc. (‘‘NMPA’’); the Harry Fox Agency (‘‘HFA’’); the National Religious Broadcasters Noncommercial Music License Committee (‘‘NRBNMLC’’); Royalty Logic, Inc., the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (‘‘ASCAP’’); Broadcast Music, Inc. (‘‘BMI’’); SESAC, Inc.; National Public Radio (‘‘NPR’’); the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (‘‘CPB’’); the Public Broadcasting Service (‘‘PBS’’); and the Church Music PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Publishers Association. The Judges set the timetable for the three-month negotiation period, see 17 U.S.C. 803(b)(3), and directed the participants to submit their written direct statements no later than January 20, 2007. Instead of written direct statements, the parties submitted notification of settlements and proposed rates and terms for the Judges to adopt. Section 801(b)(7)(A) allows for the adoption of rates and terms negotiated by ‘‘some or all of the participants in a proceeding at any time during the proceeding’’ provided they are submitted to the Copyright Royalty Judges for approval. This section provides that in such event: (i) The Copyright Royalty Judges shall provide to those that would be bound by the terms, rates, or other determination set by any agreement in a proceeding to determine royalty rates an opportunity to comment on the agreement and shall provide to participants in the proceeding under section 803(b)(2) that would be bound by the terms, rates, or other determination set by the agreement to comment on the agreement and object to its adoption as a basis for statutory terms and rates; and (ii) the Copyright Royalty Judges may decline to adopt the agreement as a basis for statutory terms and rates for participants that are not parties to the agreement, if any participant described in clause (i) objects to the agreement and the Copyright Royalty Judges conclude, based on the record before them if one exists, that the agreement does not provide a reasonable basis for setting statutory terms or rates. 17 U.S.C. 801(b)(7)(A). Accordingly, on April 17, 2007, the Judges published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (‘‘NPRM’’) requesting comment on the E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM 30NOR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 230 (Friday, November 30, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67645-67646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23270]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION

29 CFR Part 4044


Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans; Valuation of 
Benefits and Assets; Expected Retirement Age

AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's 
regulation on Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans by 
substituting a new table that applies to any plan being terminated 
either in a distress termination or involuntarily by the PBGC with a 
valuation date falling in 2008, and is used to determine expected 
retirement ages for plan participants. This table is needed in order to 
compute the value of early retirement benefits and, thus, the total 
value of benefits under the plan.

DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine B. Klion, Manager, 
Regulatory and Policy Division, Legislative and Regulatory Department, 
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20005, 202-326-4024. (TTY/TDD users may call the Federal relay 
service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to be connected to 202-326-
4024.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The PBGC's regulation on Allocation of 
Assets in Single-Employer Plans (29 CFR part 4044) sets forth (in 
subpart B) the methods for valuing plan benefits of terminating single-
employer plans covered under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income 
Security Act of 1974. Under ERISA section 4041(c), guaranteed benefits 
and benefit liabilities under a plan that is undergoing a distress 
termination must be valued in accordance with part 4044, subpart B. In 
addition, when the PBGC terminates an underfunded plan involuntarily 
pursuant to ERISA Section 4042(a), it uses the subpart B valuation 
rules to determine the amount of the plan's underfunding.
    Under Sec.  4044.51(b) of the asset allocation regulation, early 
retirement benefits are valued based on the annuity starting date, if a 
retirement date has been selected, or the expected retirement age, if 
the annuity starting date is not known on the valuation date. Sections 
4044.55 through 4044.57 set forth rules for determining the expected 
retirement ages for plan participants entitled to early retirement 
benefits. Appendix D of part 4044 contains tables to be used in 
determining the expected early retirement ages.
    Table I in appendix D (Selection of Retirement Rate Category) is 
used to determine whether a participant has a low, medium, or high 
probability of retiring early. The determination is based on the year a 
participant would reach ``unreduced retirement age'' (i.e., the earlier 
of the normal retirement age or the age at which an unreduced benefit 
is first payable) and the participant's monthly benefit at unreduced 
retirement age. The table applies only to plans with valuation dates in 
the current year and is updated annually by the PBGC to reflect changes 
in the cost of living, etc.
    Tables II-A, II-B, and II-C (Expected Retirement Ages for 
Individuals in the Low, Medium, and High Categories respectively) are 
used to determine the expected retirement age after the probability of 
early retirement has been determined using Table I. These tables 
establish, by probability category, the expected retirement age based 
on both the earliest age a participant could retire under the plan and 
the unreduced retirement age. This expected retirement age is used to 
compute the value of the early retirement benefit and, thus, the total 
value of benefits under the plan.
    This document amends appendix D to replace Table I-07 with Table I-
08 in order to provide an updated correlation, appropriate for calendar 
year 2008, between the amount of a participant's benefit and the 
probability that the participant will elect early retirement. Table I-
08 will be used to value benefits in plans with valuation dates during 
calendar year 2008.
    The PBGC has determined that notice of and public comment on this 
rule are impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Plan 
administrators need to be able to estimate accurately the value of plan 
benefits as early as possible before initiating the termination 
process. For that purpose, if a plan has a valuation date in 2008, the 
plan administrator needs the updated table being promulgated in this 
rule. Accordingly, the public interest is best served by issuing this 
table expeditiously, without an opportunity for notice and comment, to 
allow as much time as possible to estimate the value of plan benefits 
with the proper table for plans with valuation dates in early 2008.
    The PBGC has determined that this action is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under the criteria set forth in Executive Order 
12866.
    Because no general notice of proposed rulemaking is required for 
this regulation, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 does not apply 
(5 U.S.C. 601(2)).

List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 4044

    Pension insurance, Pensions.

0
In consideration of the foregoing, 29 CFR part 4044 is amended as 
follows:

PART 4044--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 4044 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1301(a), 1302(b)(3), 1341, 1344, 1362.


0
2. Appendix D to part 4044 is amended by removing Table I-07 and

[[Page 67646]]

adding in its place Table I-08 to read as follows:

Appendix D to Part 4044--Tables Used to Determine Expected Retirement 
Age

                               TABLE I-08.--Selection of Retirement Rate Category
             [(For Plans with valuation dates after December 31, 2007, and before January 1, 2009)]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Participant's Retirement Rate Category is--
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Low \1\ if     Medium \2\ if monthly benefit    High \3\ if
        Participant reaches URA in year--             monthly                at URA is                monthly
                                                    benefit at   --------------------------------   benefit at
                                                    URA is less                                   URA is greater
                                                      than--           From             To             than--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2009............................................             536             536           2,264           2,264
2010............................................             549             549           2,320           2,320
2011............................................             563             563           2,376           2,376
2012............................................             576             576           2,430           2,430
2013............................................             589             589           2,486           2,486
2014............................................             602             602           2,544           2,544
2015............................................             616             616           2,602           2,602
2016............................................             630             630           2,662           2,662
2017............................................             645             645           2,723           2,723
2018 or later...................................             660             660           2,786          2,786
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Table II-A.
\2\ Table II-B.
\3\ Table II-C.

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, this 27th day of November, 2007.
Vincent K. Snowbarger,
Deputy Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. E7-23270 Filed 11-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.