List of Fisheries for 2008, 66048-66080 [E7-23076]
Download as PDF
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
66048
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
December 10, 2007 until 9 p.m. on
Friday, December 14, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this
document are available for inspection or
copying at the office of the Eighth Coast
Guard District, Bridge Administration
Branch, Hale Boggs Federal Building,
Room 1313, 500 Poydras Street, New
Orleans, Louisiana 70130–3310 between
7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is (504) 671–2128.
The Bridge Administration Branch
maintains the public docket for this
temporary deviation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kay
Wade, Bridge Administration Branch,
telephone (504) 671–2128.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Texas
Department of Transportation has
requested a temporary deviation in
order to repair sections of the steel truss
members of the SR 82 swing span bridge
across the Sabine Lake at Port Arthur,
Jefferson County, Texas. Repair of the
steel truss members is necessary for
continued operation of the swing span
of the bridge. This temporary deviation
will allow the bridge to remain in the
closed-to-navigation position from 5
a.m. on Monday, December 3, 2007 until
12 p.m. on Friday, December 7, 2007
and from 5 a.m. on Monday, December
10, 2007 until 9 p.m. on Friday,
December 14, 2007. During the closure
period, the draw may be able to open
during the scheduled maintenance
period if at least 2 hours’ advance notice
is given. Currently, the draw opens on
signal; except that, from 9 p.m. to 5
a.m., the draw shall open on signal, if
at least 6 hours’ notice is given to the
Maintenance Supervisor at the Port
Arthur Area Office. The draw opens on
signal at any time for an emergency
aboard a vessel.
The bridge is a swing span bridge
with an available vertical navigational
clearance of 9 feet above high water in
the closed-to-navigation position.
Navigation on the waterway consists
primarily of recreational craft, although
the bridge is occasionally transited by
small tugs with tows transporting sand,
gravel and marine shells. Due to prior
experience, as well as coordination with
waterway users, it has been determined
that this closure will not have a
significant effect on these vessels. An
alternate route is available via the
Sabine Neches Waterway, which is
comprised of the Sabine Pass Channel,
Port Arthur Channel and Sabine Neches
Canal, thence passage into the lake from
the north side.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: November 19, 2007.
David M. Frank,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–23046 Filed 11–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 229
[Docket No. 070417093–7582–02]
RIN 0648–AV54
List of Fisheries for 2008
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) is publishing
its final List of Fisheries (LOF) for 2008,
as required by the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA). The final LOF
for 2008 reflects new information on
interactions between commercial
fisheries and marine mammals. NMFS
must categorize each commercial fishery
on the LOF into one of three categories
under the MMPA based upon the level
of serious injury and mortality of marine
mammals that occurs incidental to each
fishery. The categorization of a fishery
in the LOF determines whether
participants in that fishery are subject to
certain provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take
reduction plan requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 1, 2008.
ADDRESSES: See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for a listing of all Regional
offices.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates, or any other
aspect of the collection of information
requirements contained in this final
rule, should be submitted in writing to
Chief, Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910, or to David Rostker, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), by fax
to 202–395–7285 or by email to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Andersen, Office of Protected
Resources, 301–713–2322; David
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Gouveia, Northeast Region, 978–281–
9280; Nancy Young, Southeast Region,
727–551–5607; Elizabeth Petras,
Southwest Region, 562–980–3238; Brent
Norberg, Northwest Region, 206–526–
6733; Bridget Mansfield, Alaska Region,
907–586–7642; Lisa Van Atta, Pacific
Islands Region, 808–944–2257.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the
hearing impaired may call the Federal
Information Relay Service at 1–800–
877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Eastern time, Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Published Materials
Information regarding the LOF and
the Marine Mammal Authorization
Program, including registration
procedures and forms, current and past
LOFs, observer requirements, and
marine mammal injury/mortality
reporting forms and submittal
procedures, may be obtained at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/, or
from any NMFS Regional Office at the
addresses listed below.
Regional Offices
NMFS, Northeast Region, One
Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930–2298, Attn: Marcia Hobbs;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701,
Attn: Teletha Mincey;
NMFS, Southwest Region, 501 W.
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802–4213, Attn: Lyle Enriquez;
NMFS, Northwest Region, 7600 Sand
Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115, Attn:
Permits Office;
NMFS, Alaska Region, Protected
Resources, P.O. Box 22668, 709 West
9th Street, Juneau, AK 99802; or
NMFS, Pacific Islands Region,
Protected Resources, 1601 Kapiolani
Boulevard, Suite 1100, Honolulu, HI
96814–4700.
What is the List of Fisheries?
Section 118 of the MMPA requires
NMFS to place all U.S. commercial
fisheries into one of three categories
based on the level of incidental serious
injury and mortality of marine mammals
occurring in each fishery (16 U.S.C.
1387(c)(1)). The categorization of a
fishery in the LOF determines whether
participants in that fishery may be
required to comply with certain
provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take
reduction plan requirements. NMFS
must reexamine the LOF annually,
considering new information in the
Marine Mammal Stock Assessment
Reports (SAR) and other relevant
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
sources, and publish in the Federal
Register any necessary changes to the
LOF after notice and opportunity for
public comment (16 U.S.C. 1387
(c)(1)(C)).
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
How Does NMFS Determine in which
Category a Fishery is Placed?
The definitions for the fishery
classification criteria can be found in
the implementing regulations for section
118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2). The
criteria are also summarized here.
Fishery Classification Criteria
The fishery classification criteria
consist of a two-tiered, stock-specific
approach that first addresses the total
impact of all fisheries on each marine
mammal stock, and then addresses the
impact of individual fisheries on each
stock. This approach is based on
consideration of the rate, in numbers of
animals per year, of incidental
mortalities and serious injuries of
marine mammals due to commercial
fishing operations relative to the
potential biological removal (PBR) level
for each marine mammal stock. The
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1362 (20)) defines the
PBR level as the maximum number of
animals, not including natural
mortalities, that may be removed from a
marine mammal stock while allowing
that stock to reach or maintain its
optimum sustainable population. This
definition can also be found in the
implementing regulations for section
118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2).
Tier 1: If the total annual mortality
and serious injury of a marine mammal
stock, across all fisheries, is less than or
equal to 10 percent of the PBR level of
the stock, all fisheries interacting with
the stock would be placed in Category
III (unless those fisheries interact with
other stock(s) in which total annual
mortality and serious injury is greater
than 10 percent of PBR). Otherwise,
these fisheries are subject to the next
tier (Tier 2) of analysis to determine
their classification.
Tier 2, Category I: Annual mortality
and serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is greater than or equal to 50
percent of the PBR level.
Tier 2, Category II: Annual mortality
and serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is greater than 1 percent and less
than 50 percent of the PBR level.
Tier 2, Category III: Annual mortality
and serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is less than or equal to 1 percent
of the PBR level.
While Tier 1 considers the cumulative
fishery mortality and serious injury for
a particular stock, Tier 2 considers
fishery-specific mortality and serious
injury for a particular stock. Additional
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
details regarding how the categories
were determined are provided in the
preamble to the proposed rule
implementing section 118 of the MMPA
(60 FR 45086, August 30, 1995).
Since fisheries are categorized on a
per-stock basis, a fishery may qualify as
one Category for one marine mammal
stock and another Category for a
different marine mammal stock. A
fishery is typically categorized on the
LOF at its highest level of classification
(e.g., a fishery qualifying for Category III
for one marine mammal stock and for
Category II for another marine mammal
stock will be listed under Category II).
Other Criteria That May Be Considered
In the absence of reliable information
indicating the frequency of incidental
mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals by a commercial fishery,
NMFS will determine whether the
fishery qualifies for Category II by
evaluating other factors such as fishing
techniques, gear used, methods used to
deter marine mammals, target species,
seasons and areas fished, qualitative
data from logbooks or fisher reports,
stranding data, and the species and
distribution of marine mammals in the
area, or at the discretion of the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries (50 CFR
229.2).
How Does NMFS Determine which
Species or Stocks are Included as
Incidentally Killed or Seriously Injured
in a Fishery?
The LOF includes a list of marine
mammal species or stocks incidentally
killed or seriously injured in each
commercial fishery, based on the level
of mortality or serious injury in each
fishery relative to the PBR level for each
stock. To determine which species or
stocks are included as incidentally
killed or seriously injured in a fishery,
NMFS annually reviews the information
presented in the current SARs. The
SARs are based upon the best available
scientific information and provide the
most current and inclusive information
on each stock’s PBR level and level of
mortality or serious injury incidental to
commercial fishing operations. NMFS
also reviews other sources of new
information, including observer data,
stranding data, and fisher self-reports.
In the absence of reliable information
on the level of mortality or serious
injury of a marine mammal stock, or
insufficient observer data, NMFS will
determine whether a species or stock
should be added to, or deleted from, the
list by considering other factors such as:
changes in gear used, increases or
decreases in fishing effort, increases or
decreases in the level of observer
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66049
coverage, and/or changes in fishery
management that are expected to lead to
decreases in interactions with a given
marine mammal stock (such as a Fishery
Management Plan or a Take Reduction
Plan). NMFS will provide case-specific
justification in the LOF for changes to
the list of species or stocks incidentally
killed or seriously injured.
How Does NMFS Determine the Level of
Observer Coverage in a Fishery?
Data obtained from observers and the
level of observer coverage are important
tools in estimating the level of marine
mammal mortality and serious injury in
commercial fishing operations. The best
available information on the level of
observer coverage, and the spatial and
temporal distribution of observed
marine mammal interactions, is
presented in the SARs. Starting with the
2005 SARs, each SAR includes an
appendix with detailed descriptions of
each Category I and II fishery in the
LOF. The SARs generally do not provide
detailed information on observer
coverage in Category III fisheries
because under the MMPA Category III
fisheries are not required to
accommodate observers aboard vessels
due to the remote likelihood of
mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals. Information presented in the
SARs’ appendices include: level of
observer coverage, target species, levels
of fishing effort, spatial and temporal
distribution of fishing effort, gear
characteristics, management and
regulations, and interactions with
marine mammals. Copies of the SARs
are available on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resource’s Web site at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Additional information on observer
coverage in commercial fisheries can be
found on the NMFS National Observer
Program’s website: https://
www.st.nmfs.gov/st4/nop/.
How Do I Find Out if a Specific Fishery
is in Category I, II, or III?
This final rule includes two tables
that list all U.S. commercial fisheries by
LOF Category. Table 1 lists all of the
fisheries in the Pacific Ocean (including
Alaska). Table 2 lists all of the fisheries
in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico,
and Caribbean.
Are High Seas Fisheries Included in the
LOF?
High seas fisheries in which U.S.
persons or vessels participate are not
included in the LOF. However, NMFS is
considering the inclusion of U.S.authorized high seas fisheries (fisheries
operating beyond 200 nmi of U.S.
coasts) in future LOFs. At this time,
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
66050
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
NMFS is gathering available information
on the number of vessels permitted and/
or actively fishing in U.S.-authorized
high seas fisheries, gear types used, and
marine mammal-fishery interactions
data included in documents published
under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA), National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), Endangered Species Act
(ESA), and MMPA, and from relevant
Regional Fishery Management
Organizations (RFMO) and the
International Whaling Commission
(IWC).
Am I Required to Register Under the
MMPA?
Owners of vessels or gear engaging in
a Category I or II fishery are required
under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(2)),
as described in 50 CFR 229.4, to register
with NMFS and obtain a marine
mammal authorization from NMFS in
order to lawfully incidentally take a
marine mammal in a commercial
fishery. Owners of vessels or gear
engaged in a Category III fishery are not
required to register with NMFS or
obtain a marine mammal authorization.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
How Do I Register?
Vessel or gear owners must register
with the Marine Mammal Authorization
Program (MMAP) by contacting the
relevant NMFS Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES), unless they participate in a
fishery that has an integrated
registration program (described below).
Upon receipt of a completed
registration, NMFS will issue vessel or
gear owners an authorization certificate.
The authorization certificate, or a copy,
must be on board the vessel while it is
operating in a Category I or II fishery, or
for non-vessel fisheries, in the
possession of the person in charge of the
fishing operation (50 CFR 229.4(e)).
What is the Process for Registering in
an Integrated Fishery?
For some fisheries, NMFS has
integrated the MMAP registration
process with existing state and Federal
fishery license, registration, or permit
systems. Participants in these fisheries
are automatically registered under the
MMAP and are not required to submit
registration or renewal materials or pay
the $25 registration fee. The following
section indicates which fisheries are
integrated fisheries and has a summary
of the integration process for each
Region. Although efforts are made to
limit the issuance of authorization
certificates to only those vessel or gear
owners that participate in Category I or
II fisheries, not all state and Federal
permit systems distinguish between
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
fisheries as classified by the LOF.
Therefore, some vessel or gear owners in
Category III fisheries may receive
authorization certificates even though
they are not required for Category III
fisheries. Individuals fishing in Category
I and II fisheries for which no state or
Federal permit is required must register
with NMFS by contacting their
appropriate Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES).
Which Fisheries Have Integrated
Registration Programs?
The following fisheries have
integrated registration programs under
the MMPA:
1. All Alaska Category II fisheries;
2. All Washington and Oregon
Category II fisheries;
3. Northeast Regional fisheries for
which a state or Federal permit is
required;
4. All Southeast Regional fisheries for
which a Federal permit is required, as
well as fisheries permitted by the states
of North Carolina, South Carolina,
Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi,
Louisiana, and Texas; and
5. The HI Swordfish, Tuna, Billfish,
Mahi Mahi, Wahoo, Oceanic Sharks
Longline/Set line Fishery.
How Do I Receive My Authorization
Certificate and Injury/Mortality
Reporting Forms?
All vessel or gear owners will receive
their authorization certificates and/or
injury/mortality reporting forms via U.S.
mail upon registration, except those
vessel owners participating in the
Northeast and Southeast Regional
Integrated Registration Program. Vessel
or gear owners participating in the
Northeast and Southeast Regional
Integrated Registration Program will
receive their authorization certificates as
follows:
1. Northeast Region vessel or gear
owners participating in Category I or II
fisheries for which a state or Federal
permit is required may receive their
authorization certificate and/or injury/
mortality reporting form by contacting
the Northeast Regional Office at 978–
281–9328 or by visiting the Northeast
Regional Office Web site (https://
www.nero.noaa.gov/protlres/) and
following instructions for printing the
necessary documents.
2. Southeast Region vessel or gear
owners participating in Category I or II
fisheries for which a Federal permit is
required, as well as fisheries permitted
by the states of North Carolina, South
Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama,
Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas may
receive their authorization certificate
and/or injury/mortality reporting form
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
by contacting the Southeast Regional
Office at 727–824–5312 or by visiting
the Southeast Regional Office Web site
(https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pr.htm)
and following instructions for printing
the necessary documents.
How Do I Renew My Registration
Under the MMPA?
Vessel or gear owners that participate
in Pacific Islands or Alaska regional
fisheries are automatically renewed and
should receive an authorization
certificate by January 1 of each new
year. Vessel or gear owners in
Washington and Oregon fisheries
receive authorization with each
renewed state fishing license, the timing
of which varies based on target species.
Vessel or gear owners who participate in
Pacific Islands, Alaska, Washington, or
Oregon fisheries and have not received
authorization certificates by January 1 or
with renewed fishing licenses must
contact the appropriate NMFS Regional
Office (see ADDRESSES).
Vessel or gear owners in Southeast or
Northeast regional fisheries may receive
their authorization certificates by calling
the relevant NMFS Regional Office or
visiting the relevant NMFS Regional
Office Web site (see How Do I Receive
My Authorization Certificate and Injury/
Mortality Reporting Forms).
Vessel or gear owners that participate
in Southwest regional fisheries, which
do not have an integrated registration
program, and have previously registered
in a Category I or II fishery will receive
a renewal packet from the NMFS
Southwest Regional Office at least 30
days prior to January 1 of each new
year. It is the responsibility of the vessel
or gear owner in these fisheries to
complete their renewal form and return
it to the NMFS Southwest Regional
Office at least 30 days in advance of
fishing. Individuals who have not
received a renewal packet by January 1
must request a registration form from
the NMFS Southwest Regional Office
(see ADDRESSES).
Am I Required to Submit Reports
When I Injure or Kill a Marine Mammal
During the Course of Commercial
Fishing Operations?
In accordance with the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1387(e)) and 50 CFR 229.6, any
vessel owner or operator, or gear owner
or operator (in the case of non-vessel
fisheries), participating in a Category I,
II, or III fishery must report to NMFS all
incidental injuries and mortalities of
marine mammals that occur during
commercial fishing operations. ‘‘Injury’’
is defined in 50 CFR 229.2 as a wound
or other physical harm. In addition, any
animal that ingests fishing gear or any
animal that is released with fishing gear
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
entangling, trailing, or perforating any
part of the body is considered injured,
regardless of the presence of any wound
or other evidence of injury, and must be
reported. Injury/mortality reporting
forms and instructions for submitting
forms to NMFS can be downloaded
from: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
pdfs/interactions/
mmaplreportinglform.pdf. Reporting
requirements and procedures can be
found in 50 CFR 229.6.
Am I Required to Take an Observer
Aboard My Vessel?
Fishers participating in a Category I or
II fishery are required to accommodate
an observer aboard vessel(s) upon
request. Observer requirements can be
found in 50 CFR 229.7.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Am I Required to Comply With Any
Take Reduction Plan Regulations?
Fishers participating in a Category I or
II fishery are required to comply with
any applicable take reduction plans.
Take reduction plan regulations can be
found at 50 CFR 229.30–35.
Sources of Information Reviewed for
the Final 2008 LOF
NMFS reviewed the marine mammal
incidental mortality and serious injury
information presented in the SARs for
all observed fisheries to determine
whether changes in fishery
classification were warranted. NMFS’
SARs are based on the best scientific
information available at the time of
preparation, including the level of
mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals that occurs incidental to
commercial fisheries and the PBR levels
of marine mammal stocks. The
information contained in the SARs is
reviewed by regional Scientific Review
Groups (SRGs) representing Alaska, the
Pacific (including Hawaii), and the U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean.
The SRGs were created by the MMPA to
review the science that informs the
SARs, and to advise NMFS on
population status and trends, stock
structure, uncertainties in the science,
research needs, and other issues.
NMFS also reviewed other sources of
new information, including marine
mammal stranding data, observer
program data, fisher self-reports, and
other information that may not be
included in the SARs.
The final LOF for 2008 was based,
among other things, on information
provided in the final SARs for 1996 (63
FR 60, January 2, 1998), the final SARs
for 2001 (67 FR 10671, March 8, 2002),
the final SARs for 2002 (68 FR 17920,
April 14, 2003), the final SARs for 2003
(69 FR 54262, September 8, 2004), the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
final SARs for 2004 (70 FR 35397, June
20, 2005), the final SARs for 2005 (71
FR 26340, May 4, 2006), the final SARs
for 2006 (72 FR 12774, March 19, 2007),
and the draft SARs for 2007 (72 FR
35428, June 28, 2007). All the SARs are
available at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/sars/.
Fishery Descriptions
Below, NMFS briefly describes each
Category I and II fishery in the final LOF
for 2008. While detailed information
describing each fishery in the LOF is
included in the SARs, within a Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) or Take
Reduction Plan (TRP), or by state
agencies, general descriptive
information is important to include in
the LOF for improved clarity. Fisheries
are defined based on the gear and
fishing methods, target species,
temporal and spatial distribution, and
management and regulatory schemes.
NMFS refers readers to the SARs for
more additional information on
Category I and II fisheries.
Abbreviations used in the following
descriptions include: AK (Alaska), AL
(Alabama), CA (California), DE
(Deleware), FL (Florida), GA (Georgia),
HI (Hawaii), LA (Louisiana), MA
(Massachusetts), ME (Maine), MS
(Mississippi), NC (North Carolina), NJ
(New Jersey), NY (New York), OR
(Oregon), RI (Rhode Island), SC (South
Carolina), TX (Texas), VA (Virginia),
and WA (Washington).
Category I and II Commercial Fisheries
in the Pacific Ocean
HI Swordfish, Tuna, Billfish, Mahi
Mahi, Wahoo, Oceanic Sharks Longline/
Set Line Fishery
The Category I HI longline fishery
targets swordfish, tuna, billfish, mahi
mahi, wahoo, and oceanic sharks. The
basic unit of gear is a 30–40 mi (48–64
km) long mainline made of 0.13–0.16 in
(3.2–4.0 mm) diameter monofilament
line, with 800–1,000 hooks attached to
the mainline. Deployment and retrieval
of gear must occur at night. Shallow
swordfish sets are required to use size
18/0 circle hooks with a 10–degree
offset and mackerel bait. Using squid
bait is prohibited. For deep sets, all float
lines must be at least 20 m (65.6 ft) long
with a minimum of 15 branch lines
attached to the mainline between any 2
floats, except for basket-style longline
gear that may have as few as 10 branch
lines. The use of any light emitting
device is prohibited and vessels may not
land or possess more than 10 swordfish
at any time. The fishery operates over a
huge geographic range extending northsouth from 40° N. lat. to the equator and
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66051
east-west from Kure Atoll to as far as
135° W. long. Fishing for swordfish
generally occurs north of Hawaii (as
much as 2,000 mi (3,219 km) from
Honolulu), whereas fishing for tunas
occurs primarily around the main
Hawaiian Islands and south of the
Hawaiian Islands. The fishery operates
year-round, with effort generally lower
in the third quarter of the year.
The HI longline fishery is managed in
part under the FMP for Pelagic Fisheries
of the Western Pacific Region. The
shallow-set swordfish component has
annual fleetwide limits on interactions
with leatherback and loggerhead sea
turtles, an annual fleetwide limit of
2,120 shallow sets north of the equator
per year, and a requirement for
operators to annually participate in a
protected species workshop and get a
valid protected species certification.
Also, regulations mandate 100 percent
observer coverage in the shallow-set
component of the fishery and at least 20
percent observer coverage in the deepset component.
CA/OR Thresher Shark/Swordfish Drift
Gillnet Fishery (≥14 in mesh)
The Category I CA/OR thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery primarily
targets common thresher sharks and
swordfish using a 1000–fathom (6,000
ft; 1,829 m) gillnet with stretched mesh
size from 18–22 in (46–56 cm) with a
14–in (35.6 cm) minimum. Other
species caught include: pelagic thresher,
bigeye thresher, shortfin mako, blue
shark, albacore, other tunas, and dorado.
One end of the net is typically attached
to the vessel and is set at dusk and
allowed to drift during the night,
typically for 12–14 hours. Fishing effort
extends from the U.S.-Mexico border
north to waters off of OR, with the
majority of effort occurring from
October to December. OR restricts
landings to swordfish only.
This fishery is a limited entry fishery
managed under the Pacific Highly
Migratory Species (HMS) FMP and by
regulations under the Pacific Offshore
Cetacean Take Reduction Plan
(POCTRP), including multiple areaseason closures and gear restrictions, a
requirement for pingers on drift gillnets,
a requirement that extenders (buoy
lines) be at least 36 ft (11 m) long, and
a requirement for vessel captains to
attend skipper education workshops,
when notified by NMFS.
CA Angel Shark/Halibut and Other
Species Set Gillnet Fishery (>3.5 in
mesh)
The Category I CA angel shark/halibut
and other species set gillnet fishery
targets angel shark and halibut from the
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
66052
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
U.S.-Mexico border north to Monterey
Bay using 200 fathom (1,200 ft; 366 m)
gillnet with a stretch mesh size of 8.5 in
(31.6 cm). Net soak duration is typically
8–10, 19–24, or 44–49 hours at a depth
ranging from 15–50 fathoms (90–300 ft;
27–91 m) with most sets from 15–35
fathoms (90–210 ft; 27–64 m). No more
than 1500 fathoms (9,000 ft; 2,743 m) of
gill or trammel net may be fished in
combination for CA halibut and angel
shark. Fishing occurs year-round, with
effort generally increasing during
summer months and declining during
last the 3 months of the year. The
central CA portion of the fishery from
Point Arguello to Point Reyes has been
closed since September, 2002, following
a ban on gillnets inshore of 60 fathoms
(360 ft; 110 m). Set gill nets have been
prohibited in state waters south of Point
Arguello and within 70 fathoms (420 ft;
128 m) or one mile (1.6 km), whichever
is less, around the Channel Islands since
1990. The CA Department of Fish and
Game (CDFG) manages the fishery as a
limited entry fishery with gear
restrictions and area closures.
CA Yellowtail, Barracuda, and White
Seabass Drift Gillnet (mesh size ≥3.5 in
and <14 in) Fishery
The Category II CA yellowtail,
barracuda, and white seabass drift
gillnet fishery targets primarily
yellowtail and white seabass, and
secondarily barracuda, with target
species typically determined by market
demand on a short-term basis. Drift
gillnets are up to 6,000 ft (1,829 m) long
and are set at the surface. The mesh size
depends on target species and is
typically 6.0–6.5 in (15–16.5 cm). When
targeting yellowtail and barracuda, the
mesh size must be ≥3.5 in (9 cm); when
targeting white seabass, the mesh size
must be ≥6 in (15.2 cm). From June 16
to March 14 not more than 20 percent,
by number, of a load of fish may be
white seabass with a total length of 28
in (71 cm). A maximum of ten white
seabass per load may be taken, if taken
in gillnet or trammel nets with meshes
from 3.5–6.0 in (9–15 cm) in length. The
fishery operates year-round, primarily
south of Point Conception with some
effort around San Clemente Island and
San Nicolas Island. This fishery is a
limited entry fishery with various gear
restrictions and area closures managed
by the CDFG. Targeting tuna with this
type of gear was effectively prohibited
in April, 2004, under the Pacific HMS
FMP.
CA Anchovy, Mackerel, Sardine Purse
Seine Fishery
The Category II CA anchovy,
mackerel, sardine purse seine fishery
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
targets wetfish (anchovy, mackerel, and
sardine), with the target species
primarily driven by availability and
market demand. The fishery uses purse
seines, drum seines, and lampara nets
using standard seining techniques. A
typical purse seine net is 185 fathoms
(1,110 ft; 338 m) long, 22 fathoms (132
ft; 40 m) deep, and 1,600 meshes deep
with each mesh measuring 1.25 in (3
cm). The fishery operates year-round
predominantly in southern CA
(including the Channel Islands) from
San Diego, Oceanside, Dana Point, and
San Pedro then north to San Francisco.
This fishery is a limited entry fishery,
and the mackerel and sardine fisheries
are quota fisheries. The fishery is
managed in accordance with the Coastal
Pelagic Species (CPS) FMP.
CA Tuna Purse Seine Fishery
The Category II CA tuna purse seine
fishery targets yellowfin, skipjack, and
bluefin tuna using purse seine nets
similar to those used to target Coastal
Pelagic Species (see the description
under ‘‘CA anchovy, mackerel, sardine
purse seine fishery’’). The fishery
operates from May to October south of
Point Conception to the U.S.-Mexico
border and in the Southern California
Bight. The fishery is managed under the
Pacific HMS FMP. This fishery is
considered an opportunistic fishery,
meaning that fishers only target tuna
when certain oceanographic and market
conditions exist to make the fishery
viable. Effort in the fishery is highly
variable, ranging from zero to ten
participants annually over the past
several years.
CA Squid Purse Seine Fishery
The Category II CA squid purse seine
fishery targets market squid using
several gear types. From 1997–2001, 98
percent of fishermen used purse (77
percent) or drum (21 percent) seine nets.
Other types used were lampara, dip, and
brail nets. The fishery uses lights
(shielded and oriented downward, with
a maximum of 30,000 watts) to aggregate
spawning squid. The fishery operates
year-round with the effort focusing
north of Point Conception from April to
September and south of Point
Conception from October to March. El
Nino events cause northern landings to
increase, while La Nina events cause
southern landings to increase.
The fishery is managed by the CDFG
and is monitored under the CPS FMP
and the Market Squid FMP. Commercial
squid purse seine fishing is prohibited
year-round from noon on Friday until
noon on Sunday to allow a 2–day
consecutive uninterrupted period of
spawning. All vessels must be permitted
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and comply with a mandatory logbook
program for fishing and lighting. Since
2001, a seasonal harvest guideline is set
to limit further expansion of the fishery.
CA Pelagic Longline Fishery
The Category II CA pelagic longline
fishery includes both shallow-set and
deep-set gear targeting swordfish and
bigeye, albacore, and yellowfin tuna.
The fishery operates in waters outside of
the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)
because the Pacific HMS FMP prohibits
targeting swordfish with longlines
within 200 nmi of shore. In 2004, the
CA-based shallow-set longline fishery
was closed due to anticipated levels of
sea turtle interactions. The following is
a general description of the shallow-set
fishery as it operated prior to 2004 and
the current deep-set longline fishery.
Prior to 2004, shallow-set longlines
operated year-round primarily targeting
swordfish with 15–45 mi (24–72 km) of
mainline rigged with 72–ft (22–m)
gangions at approximately 197 ft (60 m)
intervals. A shallow-set typically has
800–1,300 hooks with large squid or
mackerel for bait. Most shallow-set
fishing takes place at night when
swordfish are at the surface, using
various colored lightsticks. A shallowset mainline is deployed for 4–7 hours
and left to drift unattached for 7–10
hours. At this time there is no CA-based
shallow-set longline fishing due to
anticipated levels of sea turtle
interactions.
Deep-set longlines operate year-round
primarily targeting tuna with 4–46.6 mi
(7–75 km) mainline rigged with 25.6–36
ft (7.8–10.9 m) gangions with 15–16
branchlines set between floats. Deep-set
longlines are set at dawn with an
average 12 hour soak time. The deep-set
sag of the mainline is between 328–
1,050 ft (100–320 m) below the water’s
surface. A deep-set typically contains
270–1,900 hooks with double weighted
leaders and sardine for bait. Deep-sets
use a variety of hooks including size 38
tuna hooks, size 9 J-hooks, and size 16/
0 circle hooks. A small scale deep-set
longline fishery began in January 2005
and continues currently. One hundred
percent observer coverage is required in
the deep-set longline fishery.
WA Puget Sound Regional Salmon Drift
Gillnet
The Category II WA Puget Sound
regional salmon drift gillnet fishery
targets coho, pink, sockeye, chinook,
and chum salmon in inland marine
waters (state waters) south of the U.S.Canada border and east of the BonillaTatoosh line at the entrance to the Strait
of Juan de Fuca. Drift gillnet gear
consists of single web construction, not
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
exceeding 300 fathoms (1,800; 549 m) in
length, attached at one end of the vessel.
The minimum mesh size varies from 5–
7 in (13–18 cm) depending on the target
species. While the depths fished vary,
fishermen strive to keep the net off of
the bottom. The drift times vary
depending on the fishing area, tidal
condition, and catch. This fishery is a
limited entry fishery with seasonal
openings, area closures, and gear
restrictions. Regulations governing
incidental take of marine mammals do
not apply to tribal members exercising
fishing treaty rights within this fishery
.
AK Prince William Sound Salmon Drift
Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Prince William
Sound salmon drift gillnet fishery
targets salmon using drift gillnet gear
with soak times of 15 minutes to 3
hours. The gear is set both during the
day and night, with 10–14 sets per day.
The fishery operates from mid-May to
the end of September in the Prince
William Sound Fisheries Management
Area, the Copper River, and the Bering
Sea. The Prince William Sound
Fisheries Management Area consists of
11 districts with six hatcheries
contributing to the salmon fisheries.
This drift gillnet fishery is managed by
the AK Department of Fish and Game
(ADFG) as a limited entry fishery with
gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and
area closures.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands Salmon
Drift Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Peninsula/
Aleutian Islands salmon drift gillnet
fishery targets salmon using drift gillnet
gear with soak times of 2–5 hours. The
gear is set during the day and night,
with 3–8 sets per day. The fishery
operates from mid-June to midSeptember in two districts north of the
AK Peninsula (Northern and
Northwestern), and four districts south
of the AK Peninsula (Unimake,
Southwestern, Southcentral, and
Southeastern). This drift gillnet fishery
is managed by ADFG as a limited entry
fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and
net size) and area closures.
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands Salmon
Set Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Peninsula/
Aleutian Islands salmon set gillnet
fishery targets salmon using set gillnet
with the gear set every 2 hours during
the day and night. The gear is set with
continuous soak times during the
opener. Salmon may only be fished
commercially during periods known as
openers established by ADFG in-season.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
During some periods of the season
fishing may be continuous with openers
lasting days or even many weeks at a
time. The ADFG posts weekly notices of
fishing openers and announces the
openers on regular radio channels a few
days or a few hours before each opener.
Fishing periods are often extended by
Emergency Order during the last 24
hours of the opener.
This fishery generally operates from
June 18 to mid-August in two districts
north of the AK Peninsula (Northern
and Northwestern), and four districts
south of the AK Peninsula (Unimake,
Southwestern, Southcentral, and
Southeastern). Set gillnet fishing effort
also occurs off Atka and Amelia Islands.
This set gillnet fishery is managed by
ADFG as a limited entry fishery with
gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and
area closures.
AK Southeast Salmon Drift Gillnet
Fishery
The Category II AK Southeast salmon
drift gillnet fishery targets salmon using
drift gillnet gear with soak times of 20
minutes to 3 hours. The gear is set
during the day and night, with 6–20 sets
set per day. This fishery generally
operates from June 18 to early October
in five main fishing areas off Southeast
AK, as well as at Annette Island, in
Terminal Harvest Areas (THA) adjacent
to hatchery facilities, and for hatchery
cost recovery. The majority of salmon
are caught by drift gillnets in the five
main fishing areas (81 percent in 2003)
and the THAs (13 percent in 2003), with
small contributions from Annette Island
(4 percent in 2003), and for hatchery
cost recovery (1.8 percent in 2003). This
drift gillnet fishery is managed by ADFG
as a limited entry fishery, with gear
restrictions (mesh and net size) and area
closures.
AK Cook Inlet Salmon Drift Gillnet
Fishery
The Category II AK Cook Inlet salmon
drift gillnet fishery targets salmon using
drift gillnet gear with soak times of 15
minutes to 3 hours, or continuously.
The gear is set during the day, with 6–
18 sets per day. This fishery generally
operates from June 25 to end of August
in the Central District of the Upper Cook
Inlet. Drift gillnet fishing effort for
sockeye salmon peaks in mid to late
July. Currently, drift gillnet fishing for
salmon in the Cook Inlet occurs in the
Central District area only for the two
regular 12–hour openers on Mondays
and Thursdays. This drift gillnet fishery
is managed by ADFG as a limited entry
fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and
net size) and area closures.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66053
AK Cook Inlet Salmon Set Gillnet
Fishery
The Category II AK Cook Inlet salmon
set gillnet fishery targets salmon using
set gillnet gear with continuous soak
times during the opener. Fishing effort
occurs during the day and night in the
Upper Cook Inlet; while fishing effort
occurs only during the day in the Lower
Cook Inlet, except during fishery
extensions. In the Upper Cook Inlet, the
catch is picked from the net (i.e., the net
is tended) each day during a slack tide;
while the catch is picked from the net
every 2–6 hours in the Lower Cook
Inlet. The net becomes dry with low
tide. The fishery generally operates from
June 2 to mid-September in Cook Inlet.
This set gillnet fishery is managed by
ADFG as a limited entry fishery with
gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and
area closures.
AK Yakutat Salmon Set Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Yakutat salmon
set gillnet fishery targets salmon using
set gillnet gear with continuous soak
times during the opener, during the day
and night. The catch is picked from the
net every 2–4 hours each day or
continuously during peak fishing times.
The fishery generally operates from June
4 to the end of August. The Yakutat
salmon set gillnet fishery consists of
multiple set gillnet fisheries occurring
in two fishing districts, the Yakutat
District and the Yakataga District. As
many as 25 different areas in the
Yakutat and Yakataga Districts are open
to commercial fishing each year. The
Yakutat District fisheries primarily
target sockeye and coho salmon,
although all species of salmon are
harvested. The Yakataga District
fisheries target coho salmon. With a few
exceptions, set gillnetting is confined to
the intertidal area inside the mouths of
rivers and streams, and to the ocean
waters immediately adjacent to each.
Due to the terminal nature of these
fisheries, ADFG has been able to
develop salmon escapement goals for
most of the major, and several of the
minor, fisheries. This set gillnet fishery
is managed by ADFG as a limited entry
fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and
net size) and area closures.
AK Kodiak Salmon Set Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Kodiak salmon set
gillnet fishery targets salmon using set
gillnet gear with continuous soak times
during the opener. Fishing effort occurs
during the day, with the catch picked
from the net 2 or more times each day.
The majority of set gillnets are attached
to a shore lead up to 80 fathoms (480 ft;
146 m) long in a straight line to a king
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
66054
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
buoy offshore, with numerous anchor
lines and buoys holding the net in
place. The last 25 fathoms (150 ft; 46 m)
of the gillnet is usually formed into a
fish trap, also called a hook. The fishery
generally operates from June 9 to the
end of September or early October.
Many areas are open until early October,
but most fishermen remove the nets by
early September. As the runs progress in
late July and change from sockeye to
pink salmon, the ADFG often reduces
the length of openers if escapement
goals have not been met. Fishing effort
begins to reduce in mid to late August
as salmon runs begin to decline.
This fishery consists of 2 Districts, the
Northwest District from Spruce Island to
the south side of Uyak Bay, and the
Alitak Bay District located on the
southwestern corner of Kodiak Island.
In most years, the Northwest District is
fished by approximately 100 permit
holders and constitutes approximately
70 percent of the annual fishing effort,
while the Alitak Bay District is fished by
approximately 70 permit holders and
constitutes approximately 30 percent of
the annual fishing effort. Traditionally,
the Northwest District is open for the
majority of June and July, while effort in
the Alitak Bay District typically occurs
5 to 7 days out of every 10 days during
the fishing season. This set gillnet
fishery is managed by ADFG as a
limited entry fishery with gear
restrictions (mesh and net size) and area
closures.
AK Bristol Bay Salmon Drift Gillnet
Fishery
The Category II AK Bristol Bay
salmon drift gillnet fishery targets
salmon using drift gillnet gear with
continuous soak times for part of the
net, while other parts of the net are
tended. Fishing effort occurs during the
day and night, with a continuous
number of sets per day. This fishery
generally operates from June 17 to the
end of August in Bristol Bay.
Approximately 80 percent of the salmon
catch in Bristol Bay is caught with drift
gillnets. The Bristol Bay management
area consists of five management
districts including all coastal and inland
waters from Cape Newenham to Cape
Menshikof. There are eight major river
systems in the area, and these form the
largest commercial sockeye salmon
fishery in the world. Although sockeye
salmon is the most abundant salmon
species that returns to Bristol Bay each
year, chinook, chum, coho, and pink
salmon returns are also important to the
fishery. This drift gillnet fishery is
managed by ADFG as a limited entry
fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and
net size) and area closures.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
AK Bristol Bay Salmon Set Gillnet
Fishery
The Category II AK Bristol Bay
salmon set gillnet fishery targets salmon
using set gillnet gear with continuous
soak times during the opener, but the
net is dry during low tide. Fishing effort
occurs during the day and night, with 2
or more continuous sets per day. This
fishery generally operates from June 17
to the end of August or mid-September
in the same areas in Bristol Bay as the
AK Bristol Bay salmon drift gillnet
fishery discussed above. Approximately
20 percent of the salmon catch in Bristol
Bay is caught with set gillnets. This set
gillnet fishery is managed by ADFG as
a limited entry fishery with gear
restrictions (mesh and net size) and area
closures.
AK Metlakatla/Annette Island Salmon
Drift Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Metlakatla/
Annette Island salmon drift gillnet
fishery targets salmon using drift gillnet
gear off Annette Island in Southeast AK.
This drift gillnet fishery is an
exclusively tribal fishery. The fishery is
a limited entry fishery with gear
restrictions (mesh and net size) and area
closures. This fishery, as a tribal fishery,
is separate from the AK Southeast drift
gillnet fishery only for regulation
purposes. The fisheries are considered
the same for LOF categorization
purposes.
AK Southeast Salmon Purse Seine
Fishery
The Category II AK Southeast salmon
purse seine fishery targets salmon using
purse seine gear with soak times of 20–
45 minutes. Fishing effort occurs mostly
in daylight hours, except at the peak of
the season, with 6–20 sets per day. The
fishery generally operates from the end
of June to September. In 2003, purse
seine fishing ran through November 12
in THAs. Regulations allow purse seine
fishing to occur in certain fishing
districts, and also in certain THAs,
hatchery cost recovery areas, and the
Annette Island Fishery Reserve. This
purse seine fishery accounts for
approximately 80 percent of the total
salmon harvest in Southeast AK, and
approximately 87 percent of the fish
caught are pink salmon. This purse
seine fishery is managed by ADFG as a
limited entry fishery with gear
restrictions (mesh and net size) and area
closures.
AK Cook Inlet Salmon Purse Seine
Fishery
The Category II AK Cook Inlet salmon
purse seine fishery targets salmon using
purse seine gear in Cook Inlet from June
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1 to October 31. Purse seines must be
between 90 fathoms (540 ft; 165 m) and
250 fathoms (1,500 ft; 457 m) long, and
100 meshes and 325 meshes deep.
Detachable or loose leads are not
permitted. In Cook Inlet, purse seines
may be used in the Southern District,
Kamishak Bay District, Outer District,
Eastern District, and Chinitna Bay
Subdistrict east of a line from the crane
on the south shore to the largest boulder
on the landward end of Glacier Spit.
This purse seine fishery is managed by
ADFG as a limited entry fishery with
gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and
area closures.
AK Kodiak Salmon Purse Seine Fishery
The Category II AK Kodiak salmon
purse seine fishery targets salmon using
purse seine gear from June 1 to October
31, with fishing periods open by
regulation and emergency orders. Purse
seine gear must have a mesh size of less
than 7 in (18 cm). Purse seine gear must
be between 100 fathoms (600 ft; 183 m)
and 200 fathoms (1,200 ft; 366 m) long,
and between 100 meshes and 325
meshes deep. At least 50 fathoms (300
ft; 91 m) of a purse seine must be 150
meshes in depth. One lead, no more
than 100 fathoms (600 ft; 183 m) in
length, may be used with each purse
seine. The aggregate length of a seine
and lead may not exceed 250 fathoms
(1,500 ft; 457 m). Leads must be
removed from the water within two
hours after a season or fishing period
closure. Overlapping panels of net web
may not be used in seine leads.
This fishery occurs in the Kodiak
Area, including all waters of AK south
of Cape Douglas (58° 51.10′ N. lat.), west
of 150° W. long., north of 55° 30′ N. lat.,
and north and east of the southern
entrance of Imuya Bay. This purse seine
fishery is managed by ADFG as a
limited entry fishery with gear
restrictions (mesh and net size) and area
closures.
AK Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
(BSAI) Flatfish Trawl Fishery
The Category II AK BSAI flatfish trawl
fishery targets flatfish using trawl gear
in the U.S. EEZ of the eastern Bering Sea
and the portion of the North Pacific
Ocean adjacent to the Aleutian Islands,
which is west of 170° W. long. up to the
U.S.-Russian Convention Line of 1867.
Management measures for the BSAI
groundfish fisheries constrain fishing
both temporally and spatially. This
fishery is federally managed under the
BSAI FMP. The authorized gear, fishing
season, criteria for determining fishing
seasons, and area restrictions by gear
type are defined in the regulations
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
implementing the BSAI FMP (50 CFR
part 679).
AK Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
(BSAI) Pollock Trawl Fishery
The Category II AK BSAI pollock
trawl fishery targets flatfish using trawl
gear in the same location as the AK
BSAI flatfish trawl fishery described
above. The use of non-pelagic trawl gear
in the directed fishery for pollock is
prohibited. This fishery is federally
managed under the BSAI FMP.
Management measures for the BSAI
groundfish fisheries constrain fishing
both temporally and spatially. The gear
authorized, fishing year, criteria for
determining fishing seasons, and area
restrictions by gear type are defined in
the regulations implementing the BSAI
FMP (50 CFR part 679).
AK Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
(BSAI) Pacific Cod Longline Fishery
The Category II AK BSAI Pacific cod
longline fishery targets Pacific cod using
longline gear in the same location as the
AK BSAI flatfish trawl fishery described
above. This fishery is federally managed
under the BSAI FMP. Management
measures for the BSAI groundfish
fisheries constrain fishing both
temporally and spatially. The gear
authorized, fishing year, criteria for
determining fishing seasons, and area
restrictions by gear type are defined in
the regulations implementing the BSAI
FMP (50 CFR part 679).
AK Bering Sea Sablefish Pot Fishery
The Category II AK Bering Sea
sablefish pot fishery targets sablefish
using pot gear in the same location as
the AK BSAI flatfish trawl fishery
described above. This fishery is
Federally managed under the BSAI FMP
and is operated under Individual
Fishing Quotas. Management measures
for the BSAI groundfish fisheries
constrain fishing both temporally and
spatially. The gear authorized, fishing
year, criteria for determining fishing
seasons, and area restrictions by gear
type are defined in the regulations
implementing the BSAI FMP (50 CFR
part 679).
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Category I and II Commercial Fisheries
in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico,
and Caribbean
Northeast Sink Gillnet Fishery
The Category I Northeast sink gillnet
fishery targets Atlantic cod, haddock,
pollock, yellowtail flounder, winter
flounder, witch flounder, American
plaice, windowpane flounder, spiny
dogfish, monkfish, silver hake, red hake,
white hake, ocean pout, skate spp,
mackerel, redfish, and shad. This
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
fishery uses sink gillnet gear, which is
anchored gillnet (bottom-tending net)
fished in the lower one-third of the
water column. The dominant material is
monofilament twine with stretched
mesh sizes from 6–12 in (15–30.5 cm)
and string lengths from 600–10,500 ft
(183–3,200 m), depending on the target
species. The fishery operates from the
U.S.-Canada border to Long Island, NY,
at 72° 30′ W. long. south to 36° 33.03′
N. lat. (corresponding with the VA/NC
border) and east to the eastern edge of
the EEZ, including the Gulf of Maine,
Georges Bank, and Southern New
England, and excluding Long Island
Sound or other waters where gillnet
fisheries are listed as Category III. At
this time, these Category II and II
fisheries include: the Northeast
anchored float gillnet; Northeast drift
gillnet; Long Island Sound inshore
gillnet; and RI, southern MA (to
Monomoy Island), and NY Bight
(Raritan and Lower NY Bays) inshore
gillnet. Fishing effort occurs year-round,
peaking from May to July primarily on
continental shelf regions in depths from
30–750 ft (9–228.6 m), with some nets
deeper than 800 ft (244 m).
This fishery is managed by the
Northeast Multispecies (Groundfish)
FMP and the Monkfish FMP. This
fishery is also managed by the Atlantic
Large Whale Take Reduction Plan
(ALWTRP) and the Harbor Porpoise
Take Reduction Plan (HPTRP) to reduce
the risk of entanglement of right,
humpback, and fin whales, and harbor
porpoises, respectively. The fishery is
primarily managed by Total Allowable
Catch (TAC) limits; individual trip
limits (quotas); effort caps (limited
number of days at sea per vessel); time
and area closures; and gear restrictions.
Mid-Atlantic Gillnet Fishery
The Category I Mid-Atlantic gillnet
fishery targets monkfish, spiny dogfish,
smooth dogfish, bluefish, weakfish,
menhaden, spot, croaker, striped bass,
large and small coastal sharks, Spanish
mackerel, king mackerel, American
shad, black drum, skate spp., yellow
perch, white perch, herring, scup,
kingfish, spotted seatrout, and
butterfish. The fishery uses drift and
sink gillnets, including nets set in a
sink, stab, set, strike, or drift fashion,
with some unanchored drift or sink nets
used to target specific species. The
dominant material is monofilament
twine with stretched mesh sizes from
2.5–12 in (6.4–30.5 cm), and string
lengths from 150–8,400 ft. (46–2,560 m).
This fishery operates year-round west of
a line drawn at 72° 30′ W. long. south
to 36° 33.03′ N. lat. and east to the
eastern edge of the EEZ and north of the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66055
NC/SC border, not including waters
where Category II and Category III
inshore gillnet fisheries operate in bays,
estuaries, and rivers. At this time, these
Category II and Category III fisheries
include: the Chesapeake Bay inshore
gillnet; NC inshore gillnet; DE River
inshore gillnet; Long Island Sound
inshore gillnet; and RI, southern MA (to
Monomy Island), and NY Bight (Raritan
and Lower NY Bays) inshore gillnet.
This fishery includes any residual large
pelagic driftnet effort in the midAtlantic and any shark and dogfish
gillnet effort in the mid-Atlantic zone
described. The fishing effort is
prosecuted right off the beach (6 ft [1.8
m]) or in nearshore coastal waters to
offshore waters (250 ft [76 m]).
Gear in this fishery is managed by
several Federal FMPs and Inter-State
FMPs managed by the Atlantic States
Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC),
the ALWTRP, the HPTRP, and the
Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction
Plan (BDTRP). Fisheries are primarily
managed by TACs; individual trip limits
(quotas); effort caps (limited number of
days at sea per vessel); time and area
closures; and gear restrictions and
modifications.
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico Large Pelagics Longline Fishery
The Category I Atlantic Ocean,
Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics
longline fishery targets swordfish,
yellowfin tuna, bigeye tuna, bluefin
tuna, albacore tuna, dolphin fish,
wahoo, shortfin mako shark, and a
variety of other shark species. The
fishery uses a mainline of >700 lb (317.5
kg) test monofilament typically ranging
from 10–45 mi (16–72 km) long. Bulletshaped floats are suspended at regular
intervals along the mainline and long
sections of gear are marked by radio
beacons. Long gangion lines of 200–400
lb (91–181 kg) test monofilament of
typically 100–200 ft (30.5–61 m) are
suspended from the mainline. Only
certain sized hooks and baits are
allowed based on fishing location.
Hooks are typically fished at depths
between 40–120 ft (12–36.6 m).
Longlines targeting tuna are typically set
at dawn are hauled near dusk, while
longlines targeting swordfish are
typically set at night and hauled in the
morning. Gear remains in the water
typically for 10–14 hours. Fishermen
generally modify only select sections of
longline gear to target dolphin or
wahoo, with the remaining gear
configured to target swordfish, tuna,
and/or sharks.
This fishery operates year-round and
occurs within and outside the U.S. EEZ
throughout Atlantic, Caribbean and Gulf
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
66056
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
of Mexico waters. The fishery has
historically been composed of five
relatively distinct segments with
different fishing practices and strategies,
including: Gulf of Mexico yellowfin
tuna fishery; South Atlantic-Florida east
coast to Cape Hatteras swordfish fishery;
Mid-Atlantic and New England
swordfish and bigeye tuna fishery; U.S.
distant water swordfish fishery; and
Caribbean Islands tuna and swordfish
fishery. In addition to geographical area,
these segments have historically
differed by percentage of various target
and non-target species, gear
characteristics, and deployment
techniques.
This fishery is managed under the
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP. The
dolphin and wahoo portions of the
fishery are managed under the South
Atlantic FMP for Dolphin and Wahoo.
Regulations under the MSA address the
target fish species, as well as bycatch
species protected under the ESA and/or
the MMPA. A portion of this fishery is
the subject of the Pelagic Longline Take
Reduction Team (PLTRT), convened in
2005. NMFS is currently developing
regulations to implement the Take
Reduction Plan.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
Lobster Trap/Pot Fishery
The Category I Northeast/MidAtlantic American lobster trap/pot
fishery targets American lobster
primarily with traps, while 2–3 percent
of the target species is taken by mobile
gear (trawls and dredges). The fishery
operates in inshore and offshore waters
from ME to NJ and may extend as far
south as Cape Hatteras. Approximately
80 percent of American lobster are
harvested from state waters; therefore,
the ASMFC has a primary regulatory
role. The EEZ portion of the fishery
operates under regulations from the
Federal American Lobster FMP. Both
the EEZ and state fishery are operating
under Federal regulations from the
ALWTRP.
Northeast Anchored Float Gillnet
Fishery
The Category II Northeast anchored
float gillnet fishery targets mackerel,
herring (particularly for bait), shad, and
menhaden using gillnet gear of any size
anchored and fished in the upper twothirds of the water column. The fishery
operates from the U.S.-Canada border to
Long Island, NY, at 72° 30′ W. long
south to 36° 33.03′ N. lat. and east to the
eastern edge of the EEZ, not including
Long Island Sound or other waters
where gillnet fisheries are listed as
Category III. The fishery is managed
under the Interstate FMPs for Atlantic
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
Menhaden and Shad and is subject to
ALWTRP implementing regulations. A
total closure of the American shad
ocean intercept fishery was fully
implemented in January, 2005.
Northeast Drift Gillnet Fishery
The Category II Northeast drift gillnet
fishery targets species other than large
pelagics, including shad, herring,
mackerel, and menhaden. This fishery
uses drift gillnet gear, which is gillnet
gear not anchored to the bottom and is
free-floating on both ends or freeflowing at one end and attached to the
vessel at the other end. Mesh sizes are
likely less than those used to target large
pelagics. The fishery includes any
residual large pelagic driftnet effort in
New England and occurs at any depth
in the water column from the U.S.Canada border to Long Island, NY, at
72° 30′ W. long. south to 36° 33.03′ N.
lat. and east to the eastern edge of the
EEZ. The fishery is managed under the
Interstate FMPs for Atlantic Menhaden
and Shad and is subject to ALWTRP
implementing regulations. A total
closure of the American shad ocean
intercept fishery was fully implemented
in January, 2005.
Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Category II Chesapeake Bay
inshore gillnet fishery targets menhaden
and croaker using gillnet gear with mesh
sizes ranging from 2.75–5 in (7–12.7
cm), depending on the target species.
The fishery operates between the
Chesapeake Bay/Bridge Tunnel and the
mainland. The fishery is managed under
the Interstate FMPs for Atlantic
Menhaden and Atlantic Croaker.
Northeast Mid-Water Trawl (Including
Pair Trawl) Fishery
The Category II Northeast mid-water
trawl fishery targets Atlantic herring
with bycatch of several finfish species,
predominantly mackerel, spiny dogfish,
and silver hake. This fishery uses
primarily mid-water (pelagic) trawls
(single and paired), which is trawl gear
designed, capable, or used to fish for
pelagic species with no portion
designed to be operated in contact with
the bottom. The fishery occurs primarily
in ME State waters, Jeffrey’s Ledge,
southern New England, and Georges
Bank during the winter months when
the target species continues its southerly
migration from the Gulf of Maine/
Georges Bank, into mid-Atlantic waters.
The fishery is managed jointly by the
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
Council and the ASMFC as a migratory
stock complex.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Mid-Atlantic Flynet Fishery
The Category II Mid-Atlantic flynet
fishery is a multispecies fishery
composed of nearshore and offshore
components that operate along the
eastern coast of the Mid-Atlantic United
States. Flynets are high profile trawls
similar to bottom otter trawls. These
nets typically range from 80–120 ft (24–
36.6 m) in headrope length, with wing
mesh sizes of 16–64 in (41–163 cm),
following a slow 3:1 taper to smaller
mesh sizes in the body, extension, and
codend sections of the net. The
nearshore fishery operates from October
to April inside of 30 fathoms (180 ft; 55
m) from NC to NJ. This nearshore
fishery targets Atlantic croaker,
weakfish, butterfish, harvestfish,
bluefish, menhaden, striped bass,
kingfishes, and other finfish species.
Flynet fishing is no longer permitted
south of Cape Hatteras in order to
protect weakfish stocks. The offshore
component operates from November to
April outside of 30 fathoms (180 ft; 55
m) from the Hudson Canyon off NY,
south to Hatteras Canyon off NC. These
deeper water fisheries target bluefish,
Atlantic mackerel, Loligo squid, black
sea bass, and scup (72 FR 7382,
February 15, 2007). Illex Squid are also
targeted offshore (70–200 fathoms [420–
1,200 ft; 128–366 m]) during summer
months from May to September.
Northeast Bottom Trawl Fishery
The Category II Northeast bottom
trawl fishery uses bottom trawl gear to
target species included in the NE
Multispecies FMP, Summer Flounder
FMP, and Scup and Seabass FMP,
including, but not limited to: Atlantic
cod, haddock, pollock, yellowtail
flounder, winter flounder, witch
flounder, American plaice, Atlantic
halibut, redfish, windowpane flounder,
summer flounder, spiny dogfish,
monkfish, silver hake, red hake, white
hake, ocean pout, and skate spp. The
fishery operates year-round, with a peak
from May to July, from the U.S.-Canada
border through waters east of 72° 30′ W.
long., primarily on the continental shelf
and throughout the Gulf of Maine,
Georges Bank, and Southern New
England. The fishery is primarily
managed by TACs, individual trip limits
(quotas), effort caps (limited number of
days at sea per vessel), time and area
closures, and gear restrictions.
VA Pound Net Fishery
The Category II VA pound net fishery
targets weakfish, spot, and croaker using
stationary gear in nearshore coastal and
estuarine waters off VA. Pound net gear
includes a large mesh lead posted
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
perpendicular to the shoreline and
extending outward to the corral, or
‘‘heart,’’ where the catch accumulates.
This fishery includes all pound net
effort in VA State waters, including
waters inside the Chesapeake Bay. The
fishery is managed under Interstate
FMPs for Atlantic Croaker and Spot, and
is an affected fishery under the BDTRP.
Atlantic Mixed Species Trap/Pot
Fishery
The Category II Atlantic mixed
species trap/pot fishery’s target species
include, but are not limited to, hagfish,
shrimp, conch/whelk, red crab, Jonah
crab, rock crab, black sea bass, scup,
tautog, cod, haddock, Pollock, redfish
(ocean perch) white hake, spot, skate,
catfish, stone crab, American eel, and
cunner. The fishery includes all trap/pot
operations from the U.S.-Canada border
south through the waters east of the
fishery management demarcation line
between the Atlantic Ocean and the
Gulf of Mexico (50 CFR 600.105), but
does not include the following Category
I, II, and III trap/pot fisheries: Northeast/
Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot;
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot; Florida
spiny lobster trap/ pot; Southeastern
U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab
trap/pot; U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/pot
fisheries; and the Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico golden crab
fishery (68 FR 1421, January 10, 2003).
The fishery is managed under various
Interstate FMPs and is subject to
ALWTRP implementing regulations.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Atlantic Blue Crab Trap/Pot Fishery
The Category II Atlantic blue crab
trap/pot fishery targets blue crab using
pots baited with fish or poultry typically
set in rows in shallow water. The pot
position is marked by either a floating
or sinking buoy line attached to a
surface buoy. The fishery occurs yearround from the south shore of Long
Island at 72° 30’ W. long. in the Atlantic
and east of the fishery management
demarcation line between the Atlantic
Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico (50 CFR
600.105), including state waters. The
fishery is managed under state FMPs,
and is subject to ALWTRP
implementing regulations. It is also an
affected fishery under the BDTRP.
Mid-Atlantic Bottom Trawl Fishery
The Category II Mid-Atlantic bottom
trawl fishery uses bottom trawl gear to
target species including, but not limited
to, bluefish, croaker, monkfish, summer
flounder (fluke), winter flounder, silver
hake (whiting), spiny dogfish, smooth
dogfish, scup, and black sea bass. The
fishery occurs year-round from Cape
Cod, MA, to Cape Hatteras, NC, in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
waters west of 72° 30′ W. long. and
north of a line extending due east from
the NC/SC border. The gear is managed
by several state and Federal FMPs that
range from MA to NC.
Mid-Atlantic Mid-Water Trawl
(Including Pair Trawl) Fishery
The Category II Mid-Atlantic midwater trawl fishery targets Atlantic
mackerel, Loligo squid, Illex squid, and
Atlantic butterfish using mainly midtrawl gear, with some bottom trawls.
The fishery is dominated by small-mesh
otter trawls, but Loligo squid are also
taken by inshore pound nets and fish
traps in spring and summer. The fishery
for Illex occurs offshore, mainly in
continental shelf and slope waters
during summer months (June to
September), from southern New
England to Cape Hatteras, NC. The
fishery for Loligo occurs mostly offshore
near the edge of the continental shelf
during fall and winter months (October
to March), and inshore during spring
and summer (April to September) in
southern New England and mid-Atlantic
waters. The fishery for Atlantic
mackerel occurs primarily in southern
New England and the mid-Atlantic from
January to March, and in the Gulf of
Maine during summer and fall (May to
December). Atlantic butterfish are
mainly caught as bycatch in the directed
squid and mackerel fisheries due to
their northerly inshore migration in
summer months and southerly offshore
migration in winter months. The fishery
is managed by the Federal Squid,
Mackerel, Butterfish FMP. The Illex and
Loligo fisheries are managed by
moratorium permits, gear and area
restrictions, quotas, and trip limits. The
Atlantic mackerel and Atlantic
butterfish fisheries are managed by an
annual quota system.
Mid-Atlantic Haul/Beach Seine Fishery
Due to pending rulemakings by the
NC Division of Marine Fisheries
(NCDMF), particularly pertaining to NC
beach gear, NMFS is basing its
description of the Category II MidAtlantic haul/beach seine fishery on the
proposed 2001 LOF (66 FR 6545,
January 22, 2001) and components of
the proposed 2008 LOF (72 FR 35393,
June 28, 2007). NMFS is including
components of both definitions that
more accurately reflect the current
fishery. This includes the following
description: The Category II MidAtlantic haul/beach seine fishery targets
striped bass, mullet, spot, weakfish, sea
trout, bluefish, kingfish, and harvestfish
using seines with one end secured (e.g.,
swipe nets and long seines) and seines
secured at both ends or those anchored
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66057
to the beach and hauled up on the
beach. The beach seine system also uses
a bunt and a wash net that are attached
to the beach and extend into the surf.
The fishery occurs in waters west of 72°
30′ W. long. and north of a line
extending due east from the NC/SC
border. The fishery is managed under
several state and Interstate FMPs and is
an affected fishery under the BDTRP.
Further revision to the description of
this fishery will appear in a future LOF
pending the NCDMF rulemakings.
Mid-Atlantic Menhaden Purse Seine
Fishery
The Category II Mid-Atlantic
menhaden purse seine fishery targets
menhaden and thread herring using
purse seine gear. Most sets occur within
3 mi (4.8 km) of shore with the majority
of the effort occurring off NC from
November to January, and moving
northward during warmer months to
southern New England. The fishery is
managed under the Interstate FMP for
Atlantic Menhaden.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic Shark Gillnet
Fishery
The Category II Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic shark gillnet fishery targets
large and small coastal sharks (blacktip,
blacknose, finetooth, bonnethead, and
sharpnose) using gillnets set in a sink,
stab, set, strike, or drift fashion. Mesh
size is typically greater than 5 in (13
cm), but may be as small as 2.87 in (7.3
cm) when targeting small coastal sharks.
Drift gillnets most commonly use a
mesh size of 5 in (13 cm) and average
10.2 hours from setting the gear through
completion of haulback; sink gillnets
most frequently use a mesh size of 7 in
(18 cm) soaking for approximately 2.7
hours; and strike gillnets use the largest
mesh size of 9 in (23 cm) soaking for
approximately 0.8 hours. This fishery
has traditionally operated in coastal
waters off FL and GA.
This fishery is managed under the
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP, the
ALWTRP, and the BDTRP, and is
subject to ESA biological opinion
requirements. Regulations implemented
under the MSA address managed target
species, as well as bycatch species,
including some protected under the
ESA and MMPA (e.g., sea turtles,
smalltooth sawfish, and right whales).
Southeast Atlantic Gillnet Fishery
The Category II Southeast Atlantic
gillnet fishery targets finfish including,
but not limited to, king mackerel,
Spanish mackerel, whiting, bluefish,
pompano, spot, croaker, little tunny,
bonita, jack crevalle, cobia, and striped
mullet. This fishery does not include
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
66058
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
gillnet effort targeting sharks as part of
the ‘‘Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark
gillnet’’ fishery. This fishery uses
gillnets set in sink, stab, set, or strike
fashion. The fishery operates in waters
south of a line extending due east from
the NC/SC border and south and east of
the fishery management council
demarcation line between the Atlantic
Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico. The
majority of fishing effort occurs in
Federal waters since SC, GA, and FL
prohibit the use of gillnets, with limited
exceptions, in state waters.
Fishing for king mackerel, Spanish
mackerel, cobia, cero, and little tunny in
Federal waters is managed under the
Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources
(CMPR) FMP. None of the other target
species are Federally managed under
the MSA. In state waters, state and
ASMFC Interstate FMPs apply. The
fishery is also subject to BDTRP and
ALWTRP implementing regulations.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
NC Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Category II NC inshore gillnet
fishery targets species including, but not
limited to, southern flounder, weakfish,
bluefish, Atlantic croaker, striped
mullet, spotted seatrout, Spanish
mackerel, striped bass, spot, red drum,
black drum, and shad. This fishery
includes any fishing effort using any
type of gillnet gear, including set (float
and sink), drift, and runaround gillnet
for any target species inshore of the
COLREGS lines in NC. This fishery is
managed under state and ASMFC
interstate FMPs, applying net and mesh
size regulations, and seasonal area
closures in the Pamlico Sound Gillnet
Restricted Area (PSGNRA). It is also an
affected fishery under the BDTRP.
Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery
The Category II Gulf of Mexico gillnet
fishery targets a wide variety of target
species, including, but not limited to:
black drum, sheepshead, weakfish,
mullet, spot, croaker, king mackerel,
Spanish mackerel, Florida pompano,
flounder shark, menhaden, bluefish,
blue runner, ladyfish, spotted seatrout,
croaker, kingfish, and red drum. This
fishery operates year-round using any
type of gillnet, including strike and
straight gillnets, in waters north of the
U.S.-Mexico border and west of the
fishery management council
demarcation line between the Atlantic
Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico. Gillnet
gear is prohibited in TX and FL State
waters, but fixed and runaround gillnets
are currently used in LA, MS, and AL
with highly variable fishing effort.
Fishing for king mackerel, Spanish
mackerel, cobia, cero, little tunny,
dolphin, and bluefish are managed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
under the CMPR FMP. In the Gulf of
Mexico, CMPR FMP species are the only
Federally managed species for which
gillnet gear is authorized, and only runaround gillnetting for these species is
allowed. In state waters, state and Gulf
States Marine Fisheries Commission
(GSMFC) Interstate FMPs apply.
NC Long Haul Seine Fishery
The Category II NC long haul seine
fishery targets species including, but not
limited to, weakfish, spot, croaker,
menhaden, bluefish, spotted seatrout,
and hogfish using multi-filament seines
consisting of a 3,000–6,000 ft (914–
1,829 m) net pulled by two boats for 1–
2 nmi (2–4 km). Fish are encircled and
concentrated by pulling the net around
a fixed stake. The fishery includes
fishing with long haul seine gear to
target any species in waters off NC,
including estuarine waters in Pamlico
and Core Sounds and their tributaries.
The fishery occurs from February to
November, with peak effort occurring
from June to October. The fishery is
managed under ASMFC interstate
FMPs, and is an affected fishery under
the BDTRP.
NC Roe Mullet Stop Net Fishery
The Category II NC roe mullet stop net
fishery targets striped mullet from
October to November using a stationary,
multi-filament anchored net extended
perpendicular to the beach. Once the
catch accumulates near the end of the
stop net, a beach haul seine is used to
capture fish and bring them ashore. The
stop net is traditionally left in the water
for 1–5 days, but can be left as long as
15 days. This fishery is unique to Bogue
Banks, NC. This fishery is managed
under the NC Striped Mullet FMP, and
is an affected fishery under the BDTRP.
Gulf of Mexico Menhaden Purse Seine
Fishery
The Category II Gulf of Mexico
menhaden purse seine fishery targets
menhaden and thread herring using
purse seine gear in bays, sounds, and
nearshore coastal waters along the Gulf
of Mexico coast. The majority of the
fishing effort is concentrated off LS and
MS, with lesser effort in AL and TX
State waters. FL prohibits the use of
purse seines in state waters. The fishery
is managed under the GSMFC Interstate
Gulf Menhaden FMP.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received 10 comment letters
and 1 comment via phone on the
proposed 2008 LOF (72 FR 35393, June
28, 2007) from the Marine Mammal
Commission, Hawaii Longline
Association, Western Pacific Regional
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Fishery Management Council, MidAtlantic Fishery Management Council,
Pacific Fishery Management Council’s
Groundfish Management Team, Gulf
States Marine Fisheries Commission,
Center for Biological Diversity, 2
representatives of the commercial
fishing industry, and 2 representatives
of Federal agencies. Comments on
issues outside the scope of the LOF
were noted, but are not responded to in
this final rule.
General Comments
Comment 1: Two commenters
commended NMFS for describing all
Category I and II fisheries within the
proposed 2008 LOF. While additional
description materials are available
elsewhere, one commenter believes
these descriptions provide important
context for readers attempting to
evaluate the LOF. One commenter
recommended NMFS describe all
Category III fisheries in future LOFs.
Response: NMFS will consider
describing Category III fisheries in
future LOFs.
Comment 2: Two commenters
commended NMFS for publishing the
proposed 2008 LOF early enough to
allow for ample time to review and
comment on the rule, as well as to
publish a final 2008 LOF before the
beginning of the 2008 calendar year.
Response: NMFS will make every
effort to publish future proposed LOFs
by July of each year, to allow sufficient
time for review and comment by
organizations and individuals. This will
also allow NMFS to publish the final
LOF in time for the rule to become
effective by January 1 of the respective
calendar year.
Comment 3: One commenter
commended NMFS for its support of
depredation studies, as outlined in
response to comments in the final 2007
LOF (72 FR 14466, March 28, 2007). The
commenter encourages NMFS to
continue and enhance its efforts to
evaluate and address this developing
issue.
Response: NMFS will continue to
develop, conduct, and support research
efforts on depredation-related
interactions between marine mammals
and fisheries as funding is available. See
the response to Comment 1 in the final
2007 LOF (72 FR 14466, March 28,
2007) for details on research conducted
in the past and research currently being
conducted.
Comment 4: One commenter
reiterated previous letters on the 2005,
2006, and 2007 LOFs calling for the
inclusion of observer coverage on the
LOF. The Service indicated in its
response to comments on the final 2007
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
LOF that it would ‘‘present information
associated with the level of observer
coverage or lack of observer coverage, if
available, as part of the justification for
proposing changes in future [lists].’’
However, information on observer
coverage is not provided in the
justification for reclassifying the ‘‘CA
yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass
drift gillnet’’ fishery in the proposed
2008 LOF. Further, the commenter also
believes observer information is
important for justifying the status quo.
Without such information, it is not
possible to determine whether a given
fishery was adequately observed and no
marine mammals were taken or the
fishery was not adequately observed and
mortality and serious injury may have
occurred, but were not documented.
Response: Please see responses to
Comment 6 in the final 2005 LOF (71 FR
250, January 4, 2006), Comment 4 in the
final 2006 LOF (71 FR 48802, August
22, 2006), and Comment 8 in the final
2007 LOF (72 FR 14466, March 28,
2007). NMFS still feels that it will be of
limited use to include observer coverage
data or percentages in the LOF without
also including the confidence associated
with mortality/serious injury estimates
generated from observer data. Presenting
the level of observer coverage in the
LOF without the associated confidence
information will likely lead to
misinterpretation of the information
provided. Information including details
of the interaction data and the
Coefficient of Variance (CV) for stockspecific information is reported in the
SARs. NMFS continues to refer readers
to the SARs for the most current, peerreviewed information on observer
coverage. The SARs can be accessed
through the NMFS Office of Protected
Resource’s web site at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr.sars/.
Additional information can also be
found on the National Observer Program
web site at: https://www.st.nmfs.gov/st4/
nop/.
NMFS acknowledges the lack of
inclusion of observer information in the
explanation for the proposed elevation
of the ‘‘CA yellowtail, barracuda, and
white seabass drift gillnet’’ fishery in
the proposed 2008 LOF. This was an
unintentional oversight. NMFS will
ensure that information on observer
coverage, if available, is included as part
of the justification for proposing
classification changes in future LOFs.
NMFS has corrected this oversight here:
In the draft 2007 Pacific Marine
Mammal Stock Assessments, the level of
observer coverage in the CA small mesh
drift gillnet fishery for white seabass,
yellowtail, and barracuda observer
coverage was listed as 11 percent in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
2002 and 2003. During the public
comment of the draft 2007 SARs, errors
were found in the listed levels of
observer coverage in the CA small mesh
drift gillnet for white seabass,
yellowtail, and barracuda. The correct
levels of observer coverage for 2002,
2003, and 2004, are 11.5 percent, 10.4
percent and 17.6 percent, respectively.
There has been no observer coverage in
this fishery since 2004. NMFS is seeking
funding to observe this fishery in 2008.
Comment 5: One commenter
reiterated previous comments made on
the 2004 and 2007 LOFs for inclusion of
high seas fisheries on the LOF. Multiple
high sea fisheries, in which U.S.-flagged
vessels operate, are known to interact or
are likely to interact with marine
mammals. Section 118 of the MMPA
applies to ’’commercial fishing
operations by persons using vessels of
the United States.’’ Therefore, NMFS
failure to include these high seas
fisheries is unlawful. The commenter
notes that NMFS responded in 2004
stating, ‘‘NMFS will consider this
comment and whether the LOF applies
to high seas fisheries during the
development of future proposed LOFs
(69 FR 48407, August 10, 2004). The
commenter recognized that the
proposed 2008 LOF provides a longer
explanation of the issue of high seas
fisheries, but NMFS has continued to
fail to analyze these fisheries and
include them on the LOF. Specific
fisheries suggested as additions to the
LOF are the Cobb Seamount fishery,
Pacific pelagic squid jig fishery, South
Pacific tuna purse seine fishery, and
fisheries in the area of the Convention
on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine
Living Resources (CCAMLR) including
the Patagonian toothfish longline fishery
and a trawl fishery for krill.
Response: NMFS is continuing to
consider the inclusion of U.S.authorized high seas fisheries in future
LOFs. Also, NMFS is gathering available
information on the fishing effort, gear
used, and marine mammal interaction
levels specific to U.S. vessels operating
in high seas fisheries. NMFS faces
significant challenges in accurately
categorizing high seas fisheries in the
LOF. As discussed under in the
preamble of this rule, fisheries are
categorized in the LOF based on the
level of mortality and serious injury of
marine mammal stocks relevant to the
stock’s PBR level. PBR levels are
calculated based on the stock’s
abundance using data presented in the
SARs, required under section 117 of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1386). Section 117
requires NMFS to prepare SARs for
marine mammal stocks occurring ‘‘in
waters under the jurisdiction of the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66059
United States.’’ NMFS does not develop
SARs, or therefore calculate PBR levels,
for marine mammal stocks on the high
seas. NMFS will continue to explore
options for categorizing high seas
fisheries in a future LOF in the absence
of marine mammal stock abundance and
PBR level information. Please see
response to Comment 9 in the final 2007
LOF (72 FR 14466, March 28, 2007) and
the preamble of this rule for information
on NMFS current efforts.
NMFS provides high seas fishing
permits under the High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act (HSFCA). NMFS issues
permits only for high seas fisheries
analyzed in accordance with the NEPA
and the ESA. There are currently 7 U.S.authorized high seas fisheries: Atlantic
Highly Migratory Species Fisheries (50
CFR 635), Pacific Highly Migratory
Species Fisheries (50 CFR 660, subpart
K), Western Pacific Pelagic Fisheries (50
CFR 665, subpart C), South Pacific
Albacore Troll Fishing, Pacific Tuna
Fisheries (50 CFR 300, subpart C), South
Pacific Tuna Fisheries (50 CFR 300,
subpart D), and the Antarctic Marine
Living Resources (50 CFR 300, subpart
G). For more information please see the
NMFS Office of International Affairs
HSPCA information website: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ia/services/
highseas.htm.
The commenter suggested the
addition of several specific high sea
fisheries to the LOF, including the Cobb
Seamount fishery, Pacific pelagic squid
jig fishery, South Pacific tuna purse
seine fishery, and fisheries in the
CCAMLR area including the Patagonian
toothfish longline fishery and a trawl
fishery for krill. Currently, NMFS does
not authorize U.S. vessels to participate
in the Cobb Seamount fishery or the
Pacific pelagic squid jig fishery.
Therefore, these fisheries would not be
considered for addition to the LOF.
Also, the South Pacific tuna purse seine
fishery is managed separately under
section 301 of the MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1411); therefore, it would not be added
to the LOF required under section 118
of the MMPA. Regarding the CCAMLR
fisheries, in the past there has been a
single U.S. vessel participating in the
trawl fishery for krill. However, this
vessel has not fished in the last 2 years.
Also, in the past there have been 2 U.S.
vessels (under 1 owner) participating in
the Patagonian toothfish longline
fishery. NMFS has not received any
permit applications for U.S. vessels to
participate in either of the CCAMLR
fisheries in the coming year.
Comment 6: One commenter stated
that all Category I and II fisheries not
already subject to take reduction teams
should promptly have such teams
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
66060
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
convened for them. The Category I HI
longline fishery should be the highest
priority as takes continue to exceed PBR
for false killer whales.
Response: At this time, NMFS’
resources for TRTs are fully utilized and
new TRTs will be initiated when
additional resources become available.
When additional TRTs are convened,
they will follow priorities set out in
section 118(f)(3) of the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1387). When there is insufficient
funding available to develop and
implement a TRT for all stocks that
interact with Category I and II fisheries,
the highest priority for developing and
implementing new TRTs will be given
to species or stocks whose level of
incidental mortality and serious injury
exceeds PBR, those with a small
population size, and those which are
declining most rapidly.
Comments on Fishery Classification
Methodology
Comment 7: One commenter
reiterated previous recommendations
that NMFS revise the dividing PBR
thresholds for Category I and II fisheries.
The current range for a Category II
fishery is an interaction rate between 1
percent and 50 percent of a stock’s PBR,
which is too broad and unnecessarily
lumps fisheries with rare interactions
alongside fisheries with numerous
interactions. NMFS uses catch as a
proxy for fishing effort, unreasonably
large expansion factors, and double
counting of interactions, resulting in
one rare event in a fishery being
expanded into an unrealistic
overestimation of takes. Given the
precautionary methodology in the PBR
formula, the minimum threshold for
Category II should be increased from 1
percent to 10 percent of PBR.
Interactions under 10 percent of PBR
should be a Category III. In doing so,
rare events (i.e., 1 take in 5 years) would
result in a Category III instead of a
Category II classification.
Response: NMFS implemented the
classification criteria in the final
regulations to implement the 1994
amendments to the MMPA (60 FR
45086, August 30, 1995) after ample
consideration of comments and
suggestions from the public. NMFS
refers the reader to the response to
comments 5 through 9 in that rule for
a detailed explanation of the reasoning
for setting the dividing thresholds
between Category II and III as 1 percent
of PBR. NMFS also finalized an
Environmental Assessment (EA) in
August, 1995, to analyze the impacts of
the regulations implementing the 1994
amendments on the environment and
the public. NMFS also finalized a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
revised EA in December 2005 on the
process of classifying U.S. commercial
fisheries. A full copy of the updated
2005 EA can be found at https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/
interactions/loflea.pdf.
The fishery classification criteria
consider the rate of incidental serious
injury and mortality of marine mammals
in commercial fisheries on a stockspecific basis. Therefore, the rate of
interaction of a fishery with a marine
mammal stock with a low PBR can be
significant even if it appears to be a
minimal problem based on the size of
the fishery or frequency of the
interactions. The chosen approach
allows NMFS to focus management
actions where fishery interactions have
a significant negative effect on the
population.
In addition to the 1–percent
threshold, the definitions of Category II
and III fisheries include qualitative
criteria that allow the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries to place a
fishery into Category II or III in the
absence of reliable information. This
qualitative criteria will allow the
Assistant Administrator to take into
consideration cases where the PBR level
for a particular stock is very low and/
or where the level of incidental
interaction with commercial fisheries is
low and not likely to delay the
population’s attainment of its Optimum
Sustainable Population. See the general
description of the two-tiered scheme
and qualitative criteria that may be used
to classify a fishery in the preamble in
this rule under Fishery Classification
Criteria.
Comment 8: One commenter
questioned NMFS’ inconsistent use of
time periods in the LOF, instead of
always including interaction data from
the most recent 5–year period (e.g.
2002–2006 for the 2006 SAR). For some
fisheries, including those with high
levels of observer coverage, the time
period used to calculate annual take
rates to categorize fisheries is 2000–
2004. For other fisheries the time period
is 2001–2005. Given that the most
recent final SAR is 2006, why isn’t the
time period used to calculate annual
interaction rates and classify fisheries
for all fisheries 2002–2006? Or
consistent for those fisheries with
observer coverage every year?
Response: Fishery classifications on
the LOF are based on interaction data
published in the most recent SARs,
when available. SARs are revised on a
rotating schedule, so not all SARs will
include data from the same period of
time. Section 117 of the MMPA requires
NMFS to review SARs for strategic
stocks and for stocks for which
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
significant new information is available
at least annually, and at least once every
3 years for all other stocks, and make
changes if necessary. Therefore, while
the SARs for strategic stocks are
reviewed annually and updated if new
information is available, SARs for nonstrategic stocks may be updated only
once every 3 years.
Also, it takes approximately a full
year to develop new, final SARs. The
annual interaction rates presented in the
SARs are based on the most current
observer data available. The draft SARs
for 2006 were prepared in the fall of
2005; at which time, observer data for
2004 were the most current data
available. Observer data for 2005
became available in 2006 and were
incorporated into the draft SARs for
2007, which was published in June,
2007.
Comment 9: One commenter
questioned NMFS’ continued use of a
recovery factor of 0.1 in the PBR
formula for most whale stocks instead of
updating the recovery factor based on
new information. The commenter cited
various sections of the GAMMS
Workshop Report (Wade and Angliss,
1996) discussing recovery factors,
including text stating that recovery
factors can be adjusted to accommodate
additional information, when mortality
estimates are known to be relatively
unbiased based on high observer
coverage, and to allow for management
discretion as consistent with the goals of
the ESA and MMPA. The commenter
cites 3 examples in the report of
recovery factors for ESA listed stocks
being altered.
Response: This comment is not
specifically relevant to the LOF. While
fisheries on the LOF are categorized
based on the incidental mortality and
serious injury relevant to a marine
mammal stock’s PBR, the calculation of
PBR levels are completed and peerreviewed during the annual SARs
process. NMFS urges the commenter to
present these comments during the
public comment period for the draft
2008 SARs, as the comment period for
the draft 2007 SARs has closed.
Comment 10: One commenter stated
that a take in which the marine mammal
stock cannot be determined should not
be counted as a take for 2 separate
stocks, but should be apportioned across
the 2 stocks in question using a
weighted probability.
Response: See response to Comments
13 and 14 in the final 2005 LOF (71 FR
247, January 4, 2006) and Comment 10
in the final 2003 LOF (68 FR 41725, July
15, 2003) for detailed responses to the
same comment. Where there is
considerable uncertainty regarding to
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
which stock a serious injury or mortality
should be assigned, NMFS exercises a
conservative approach of assigning the
serious injury or mortality to both
stocks. Clearly, if information were
available regarding the location of take,
genetics of the taken animal, or other
conclusive information linking the
serious injury or mortality to a specific
stock, NMFS would use it to assign the
take to a specific stock. Also, NMFS
continues to conduct research and
review data to determine to which stock
an incidental mortality or serious injury
can be assigned. For example, in this
final rule NMFS is removing the Gulf of
Alaska, Aleutian Islands, and Bering Sea
transient stock of killer whales from the
list of species incidentally injured or
killed in two AK fisheries based on
genetic analyses of tissue samples
collected by observers over the past few
years, which revealed that the
interaction occurred with the resident
stock of killer whales (see below under
Summary of Changes to the LOF for
2008).
Comment 11: One commenter stated
that if NMFS persists in using observed
catch as a proxy of effort and expands
observed takes, then takes that occur
outside of the observed sample should
not be counted. The apparent point of
expansion is to make an estimate for the
‘‘unobserved’’ takes; therefore, counting
takes in the unobserved sample is
double counting.
Response: See response to Comments
19 and 20 in the final 2005 LOF (71 FR
247, January 4, 2006) for a very detailed
response to the same comment. Also see
response to and Comment 47 in the
Notice of Availability for the 2005 SARs
(71 FR 26430, May 4, 2006). The
analysis of bycatch is stratified into
many different strata, and estimates of
bycatch are calculated for each
individual stratum using data from
monitored hauls. If an observer reported
an injury or mortality incidental to a
non-monitored haul, and there were no
injuries or mortalities from monitored
hauls in that strata, the report in the
non-monitored haul is used as the
estimate of serious injury and mortality
for that stratum. Data from nonmonitored hauls are not extrapolated
using the ratio estimation approach but
are simply added to an extrapolation
using observer data from monitored
hauls.
Comments on Fisheries in the Pacific
Ocean
Comment 12: Two commenters
questions the SAR for false killer whales
in HI. One commenter stated that the
proposed 2008 LOF perpetuates serious
errors and uncertainties found in NMFS’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
SAR for false killer whales, errors which
persist in the draft 2007 SAR. NMFS’
SAR conflates false killer whale stocks,
underestimates false killer whale
abundance, and overestimates the
seriousness of the deep-set longline
fishery’s (within the Category I HI
longline fishery) interactions with false
killer whales.
The second commenter stated that
there is no scientifically recognized HI
stock of false killer whales that the
proposed LOF lists as incidentally
killed or injured in the Category I HI
longline fishery. There are large
uncertainties in the available science for
a ‘‘HI’’ stock, including the fact that
NMFS’ population assessment is based
on a single sighting. Available
information indicates that the HI-based
tuna longline fishery interacts with a
larger Eastern North Pacific stock of
false killer whales. This information
needs to be presented and objectively
discussed by NMFS and outside peers.
Response: This comment pertains to
the SAR for false killer whales, HI stock,
and has been recently addressed in the
response to comments 46–67 in the
Notice of Availability of the final 2006
SARs (72 FR 12774, March 19, 2007).
NMFS stands by the analysis of the false
killer whale stocks and recognizes that
it is the best information currently
available. NMFS will continue to work
to reduce any uncertainties that may be
associated with this stock assessment.
Comment 13: Two commenters
recommended that NMFS distinguish
between the shallow-set and the deepset fisheries in the Category I HI
longline fishery. The HI longline fishery
should be split into 2 fisheries based on
the fact that the shallow-set and deepset fisheries have different target
species, operating patterns, management
regimes, and interaction rates. Splitting
the HI longline fishery into two fisheries
would result in a Category I deep-set
fishery and a Category III shallow-set
fishery. The shallow-set fishery began
commercial fishing in late 2004 and is
distinct from the deep-set fishery in that
it targets swordfish while the deep-set
fishery targets tuna; uses different gear
(including the number of hooks,
gangions and float intervals); uses
different bait; and fishes in different
areas of the Pacific Ocean (generally
does not operate within the HI EEZ) at
different times of day. The shallow-set
fishery, which has 100 percent observer
coverage, has significantly different
interaction and mortality rates involving
protected species. An interaction with a
false killer whale has never been
observed in the shallow-set fishery.
Also, the shallow-set and deep-set
fisheries are managed differently by the
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66061
Western Pacific Regional Fishery
Management Council and NMFS and
have entirely different regulatory
requirements.
Response: The commenters requested
that the HI longline fisheries be split
and subsequently listed in the LOF as
two separately managed commercial
fisheries: (1) the deep-set (tuna target)
fishery; and (2) the shallow-set
(swordfish target) fishery. This is the
first request to split the fishery in this
manner that NMFS has received to date.
NMFS believes the request to split the
HI longline fishery into two fisheries
(the deep-set fishery and the shallow-set
fishery) for purposes of the LOF has
merit, and is therefore taking the
commenters’ request under
consideration. Indeed, NMFS has split
other fisheries in prior year’s LOFs
based upon factors such as different
target species, operating patterns,
regulations, marine mammal interaction
rates, etc. However, if NMFS were to
split the HI longline fishery into a deepset and shallow-set fishery in the LOF,
and then potentially re-categorize the
shallow-set fishery as a Category III
fishery, these changes would necessarily
be presented in the 2009 Proposed LOF,
and not in the 2008 Final LOF, as
making such considerable changes
between a ‘‘Proposed’’ and ‘‘Final’’ draft
of the LOF would negate the important
public comment and response period
required for agency rulemaking.
Additionally, if NMFS were to make
the changes articulated above, NMFS
would need to consider whether the
current system under which the HI
longline fishery is permitted would also
need to be changed. The HI longline
fishery is managed, in part, under the
Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for
Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific
Region (Pelagics FMP), as amended. The
Pelagics FMP and its amendments are
developed by the Western Pacific
Fishery Management Council under the
authority of the MSA, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et
seq. NMFS also promulgates regulations
under the MSA to administer
enforceable elements of the Pelagics
FMP.
Currently, participants in the HI
longline fishery are required to obtain a
single HI Longline Limited Entry Permit
whether they intend to engage in deepset longline fishing, shallow-set longline
fishing, or both. Integrated with the
single Limited Entry Permit requirement
is the MMAP Certificate. Any vessel
engaging in a Category I or II fishery
must obtain a MMAP certificate from
NMFS in order to lawfully incidentally
take a marine mammal in a commercial
fishery. Unless the current fishery
permitting system under the FMP is
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
66062
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
likewise amended, the single Limited
Entry Permit would still require a
MMAP certificate even if the longline
fishery was subsequently split into
Category I deep-set and Category III
shallow-set fisheries. NMFS will be
soliciting comments on these and other
issues in the 2009 Proposed LOF.
Comment 14: One commenter
reiterated a comment from the 2007 LOF
recommending NMFS elevate the
Category III ‘‘CA lobster, prawn, shrimp,
rock crab, fish pot’’ and the ‘‘WA/OR/
CA crab pot’’ fisheries to Category II
based on interactions with humpback
and gray whales. At least 14 large
whales were documented entangled in
this gear type from 2000–2005.
Response: As described in responses
to comment 18 in the final 2007 LOF (72
FR 38393, March 28, 2007), NMFS is
aware of interactions between
humpback and gray whales and pot and
trap gear and is taking steps to address
this issue. The NMFS Northwest
Regional Office reviewed interactions
between humpback and gray whales and
all crab trap/pot gear in the waters off
WA and OR and found that there have
been no observed takes of humpback
whales and that the level of take of gray
whale was well below 10 percent of the
stock’s PBR. Therefore, the available
information did not support elevating
the WA and OR crab fisheries to
Category I or II on the 2007 LOF. The
NMFS Southwest Regional Office
recently completed a draft
characterization of the CA pot and trap
fisheries as a first step in helping to
determine which fisheries are most
likely to be interacting with large
whales and whether recategorization of
the ‘‘CA lobster, prawn, shrimp, rock
crab, fish pot’’ fishery or the CA
component of the ‘‘WA/OR/CA crab
pot’’ fishery is appropriate. Before
NMFS can recategorize these fisheries, a
better understanding of the fisheries is
necessary, since reports of interactions
between large whales and pot and trap
gear come primarily from stranding
reports (including sighting of freeswimming whales). These reports may
not provide reliable identification of the
fishing gear types associated with an
interaction because it is difficult to
distinguish between various pot and
trap gears from surface observations of
line and floats. Currently, NMFS is
working with the State of CA to develop
the characterization of the state and
Federal fisheries that utilize these gear
types in the waters off of CA.
Furthermore, NMFS is reviewing
observed marine mammal
entanglements from stranding reports to
assess the extent of injuries (i.e.,
whether or not the injuries were serious
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
injuries) and whether specific fisheries
can be identified from the available
data.
NMFS is also considering whether to
change descriptions for the CA pot and
trap fishery in the LOF. Currently, the
CA lobster, prawn, shrimp, rock crab
and fish pot fisheries are listed as one
fishery on the LOF. NMFS is reviewing
of the CA pot and trap fisheries to
determine whether these fisheries
should be listed separately on future
LOFs to more accurately reflect spatial
and temporal differences in the various
fisheries, the regulatory authority for the
fisheries, and the likelihood of
interactions with marine mammals.
Comment 15: One commenter
commended NMFS for its support of
efforts to address concerns regarding
trap and pot fisheries, such as support
for research efforts and outreach efforts
to encourage voluntary reductions in the
amount of potentially entangling gear.
The commenter encouraged NMFS to
continue its work with Regional Fishery
Management Councils to improve
monitoring and mitigation of serious
injury and mortality.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this
comment. See the response to comment
14 above for more information related to
these fisheries.
Comment 16: One commenter noted
that the number of vessels listed in
Table 1 of the proposed 2008 LOF for
the Category III ‘‘WA/OR/CA groundfish
trawl’’ fishery is incorrect. Table 1
indicates an estimated 585 vessels
participating; however, the Pacific
Fishery Management Council’s
Groundfish Management Team
estimates that 160–180 vessels will
participate in 2007. The estimated range
is based on recent participants, which
varies depending on the choice of some
skippers to participate in trawl fisheries
on the West Coast or in AK.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this
comment and will make the suggested
change to the number of participants in
the ‘‘WA/OR/CA groundfish trawl’’
fishery to 160–180.
Comment 17: Two commenters
supported the elevation of the ‘‘CA
yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass
drift gillnet’’ fishery to Category I
because the estimated annual serious
injury and mortality of long-beaked
common dolphins incidental to the
fishery exceeds 50 percent of the stock’s
PBR. One commenter stated that a take
reduction team must now be convened
because this fishery interacts with
strategic marine mammal stocks.
Response: Since the publication of the
proposed 2008 LOF, new information
has become available on the level of
serious injury and mortality of the CA
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
stock of long-beaked common dolphin
in the ‘‘CA yellowtail, barracuda, and
white seabass drift gillnet’’ fishery
which indicates that elevating this
fishery to Category I is not appropriate
at this time. The proposed 2008 LOF
states that, based on observer
documented interactions in 2003 and
2004, reported in the draft 2007 SAR for
long-beaked common dolphin, the
estimated annual serious injury and
mortality of the CA stock of long-beaked
common dolphins in the ‘‘CA
yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass
drift gillnet’’ fishery is approximately 82
percent of the stock’s PBR. However,
during the public comment on the draft
2007 SARs, errors were found in the
reported levels of observer coverage in
this fishery. The correct levels of
observer coverage for 2002, 2003, and
2004, are 11.5 percent, 10.4 percent, and
17.6 percent, respectively. Based upon
these observer coverage levels, NMFS
recalculated the mean annual serious
injury or mortality of the CA stock of
long-beaked common dolphin. The
revised mean annual serious injury or
mortality in this fishery is 4.7 (0.98) (CV
in parenthesis), which is 43 percent of
the stock’s PBR of 11. Based upon these
revisions to the draft 2007 SAR, the ‘‘CA
yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass
drift gillnet’’ fishery will remain a
Category II fishery, and will not be
elevated to a Category I fishery as
proposed in the proposed 2008 LOF.
The strategic stock classification of the
CA stock of long-beaked common
dolphins remains supported by the
updated information in the SAR. Please
also see the response to Comment 4 in
this rule for additional information.
In April 2007, the Pacific Offshore
Cetacean Take Reduction Team
(POCTRT) considered CA State gillnet
fisheries at their team meeting,
including the ‘‘CA yellowtail,
barracuda, and white seabass drift
gillnet’’ fishery, and the possible
impacts on marine mammals. The
POCTRT made a number of
recommendations to NMFS related to
these fisheries, including expanding
observer coverage, encouraging research
and information sharing on methods to
reduce marine mammal bycatch, and
adding representatives from these
fisheries and an additional CDFG
advisor to the POCTRT to address
marine mammal bycatch in state gillnet
fisheries. NMFS and the POCTRT are
considering expanding the scope of the
POCTRT to include CA gillnet fisheries,
including the ‘‘CA yellowtail,
barracuda, and white seabass drift
gillnet’’ fishery. Please see response to
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
comment 6 in this rule for more
information on Take Reduction Teams.
Comment 18: One commenter
recommended NMFS remove shortfinned pilot whales from the list of
species incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II ‘‘CA squid purse seine’’
fishery for two reasons. First, the
information presented in the draft 2007
SAR for the CA squid purse seine
fishery does not reflect the best
available science. The SAR states that
the fishery is ‘‘not currently monitored,
and has expanded markedly since
1992.’’ However, NMFS Southwest
Region observer data from the CA
Coastal Pelagic Purse Seine Observer
Program indicates that 95 pilot whale
interaction-free trips were observed
from July 2004 to March 2007. Second,
the draft 2007 SAR assigns each of the
14 incidents of ‘‘undetermined’’
strandings of short-finned pilot whales
as ‘‘probably’’ the result of interactions
with the ‘‘CA squid purse seine’’
fishery. However, the SAR does not
provide clear evidence for this
determination. Since NMFS does not
typically assign fishery-specific
mortality from fishery interaction
stranding events in the absence of clear
evidence (for example, several East
Coast species covered under TRPs
including harbor porpoise, bottlenose
dolphins, and large whales), then it
should not be done in this case.
Response: NMFS acknowledges the
error in the draft 2007 SAR regarding
the monitoring of the ‘‘CA squid purse
seine’’ fishery and it will be corrected in
the final 2007 SAR. NMFS has reviewed
the report with records of the stranded
short-finned pilot whales from 1975
through 1990 and has concluded that
the strandings were most likely caused
by interactions with the purse seine
fishery for squid. This is based upon the
location and time of the strandings and
the operation of the squid fishery in the
same area and time and other details
from the stranding. NMFS notes that
there have been no observed takes of
short-finned pilot whales in this fishery
since the observer program began in
2004. However, observer coverage in
this fishery is quite low at less than 2
percent annually. The recommendation
to remove short-finned pilot whales
from the list of marine mammals
incidentally killed in the squid purse
seine fishery will be further reviewed by
NMFS when more observer information
becomes available. NMFS will continue
to monitor this fishery and consider the
recommendation to remove short-finned
pilot whales, CA/OR/WA stock, from
the list of species incidentally killed or
injured in the ‘‘CA squid purse seine’’
fishery for the 2009 LOF.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
Comment 19: One commenter
requested a review of the Category II
‘‘CA squid purse seine’’ fishery
interaction with a species listed as
‘‘common dolphin, unknown’’ and
removal of this species from the list of
species incidentally killed or injured in
this fishery if supported by the data.
The CA Coastal Pelagic Purse Seine
Observer Program data contains an
observed ‘‘1 dead unidentified common
dolphin’’ off Santa Barbara on January 3,
2005. The observer data also indicated
that a group of seven unidentified
common dolphins were sighted near the
vessel during this particular haul. The
commenter requests that NMFS reexamine this interaction and determine
whether the animals’ location, group
size, and time of capture might better
match the survey distribution and group
observations for short-beaked common
dolphins than for long-beaked common
dolphins. Given the recent increased
abundance reported for short-beaked
common dolphins and virtual
disappearance of long-beaked common
dolphins in CA waters, the commenter
believes the animal interaction was
likely with a short-beaked common
dolphin.
Response: There is insufficient
information available to identify the
species of common dolphin observed
taken in the ‘‘CA squid purse seine’’
fishery. Both species, long-beaked
common dolphins and short-beaked
common dolphins, utilize much of the
same habitat and overlap in areas with
this fishery. Therefore, it is possible that
either species could have been taken.
Comment 20: One commenter
recommended that the ‘‘strategic’’
designation for the long-beaked
common dolphin be viewed with
extreme caution in the 2008 LOF. The
draft 2007 SAR and proposed 2008 LOF
do not adequately reflect the stock’s
high interannual variability. Despite a
slight increase in human interactions
from 11 to 17 animals, the observed
population plummeted causing the PBR
to drop from 242 animals to 11 animals
reported in the draft 2007 SAR. Clearly
the reason for the strategic listing is not
fishery interactions but likely
environmental in nature, and the LOF
should clearly reflect this.
Response: It is the purpose of the LOF
to categorize fisheries based on their
level of mortality and serious injury of
a marine mammal stock relative to the
stock’s PBR level. It is not the purpose
or intent of the LOF to determine a
stock’s PBR or status as strategic. The
factors leading to a stock’s designation
as ‘‘strategic’’ are irrelevant for the
purposes of categorization fisheries on
the LOF. NMFS urges the commenter to
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66063
present these comments during the
public comment period for the draft
2008 SARs, as the comment period for
the 2007 SARs has closed.
One error was found in the draft 2007
SAR during public review related to
long-beaked common dolphins and
takes in the CA small mesh drift gillnet
fishery for white seabass, yellowtail,
and barracuda; the fishery was observed
at 11.5 percent, 10.4 percent and 17.6
percent respectively in 2002, 2003, and
2004, and one serious injury or
mortality was observed in 2003 and one
in 2004, with none observed in 2002.
The draft SAR does not list the 2004
observer coverage and assigned the
observed takes of long-beaked common
dolphins to the years 2002 and 2003.
This error will be corrected in the final
2007 SARs and will lower the mean
annual takes estimate for this stock to
from 17 to 12.5, but this adjustment
does not change the strategic
designation of this stock.
Comment 21: One commenter stated
that the Category II Bering Sea Aleutian
Islands (BSAI) Pacific cod longline
fishery has a high level of observer
coverage and effort is known, yet catch
is used as a proxy for estimating effort.
A proxy is not needed in cases where
observer coverage is high and effort is
known. Also, the Science and Statistical
Committee (SSC) of the North Pacific
Fishery Management Council stated in
minutes from its February 2005 meeting
that NMFS should ‘‘ explore the use of
direct measures of fishing effort (instead
of using catch as a proxy for effort) in
future analyses at least when and where
possible.’’
Response: The response to Comment
15 in the final LOF for 2005 states that
catch is the only data that can be used
to measure effort for all vessels, seasons,
and areas, to measure relative levels of
effort (71 FR 247, 4 January 2006).
NMFS took note of the recommendation
made by the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s SSC to consider
other measures of fishing effort, and
discussed this with the analyst. At this
time, catch remains the best method of
quantifying observed and total fishing
effort. Should another measure of effort
become available that can be used for all
vessels, seasons, and areas, NMFS will
consider modifying the analytical
approach.
Comment 22: One commenter noted
that, according to a study by Perez in
2004, 68 percent of longline hauls from
1998–2003 were sampled by observers.
Also, NMFS stated in 2000 (in a Pacific
cod paper) that 94 percent of the BSAI
Pacific cod longline harvest came from
observed vessels.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
66064
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Response: The response to Comment
25 in the final LOF for 2005 (71 FR 247,
4 January 2006) describes why there is
a difference between the percent of
hauls observed (or the percent of hooks
observed, or the percent of sets
observed) and the percent of boats
observed. Also, NMFS notes that the
commenter did not provide citations for
the literature referenced in the
comment.
Comment 23: One commenter asked
NMFS to explain certain observer
percentages and associated expansions
of takes in the 2006 SARs associated
with the Category II BSAI Pacific cod
longline fishery. The 2006 SAR for
ribbon seal lists one take in 2001
(although the most recent 5–year period
of 2002–2006 should make this
interaction drop out), which is
expanded to 3.0 takes with observer
coverage of 29.5 percent; for Steller sea
lion (Western stock) lists one take in
2002, expanded to 3.7 takes with
observer coverage of 29.6 percent; and
for killer whale (Eastern North Pacific
Alaska resident) lists one take in 2003,
expanded to 4.2 takes with observer
coverage of 29.9 percent. Why does one
take, at the same stated level of observer
coverage (29 percent) expand to a range
of 3 to 4.2 takes depending on the stock?
Response: To provide as precise an
estimate of marine mammal bycatch as
possible, fishery effort and observed
marine mammal serious injury/
mortality levels are stratified by fishery,
geographic area and by 2–week period.
The percent observer coverage reflected
in the SARs is an average percent
observer coverage, not the percent for
each strata. Thus, users of the SARs
cannot use the reported percent
observer coverage in the SARs to
directly calculate an estimated marine
mammal serious injury/mortality from
the observed serious injury/mortality
level.
Comment 24: One commenter
questioned why the observer coverage
in these SARs listed as 29 percent when
94 percent of the BSAI pacific cod
longline catch comes from observed
vessels (NMFS 2000 Pacific cod paper)
and 68 percent of the catch comes from
observed sets (Perez 2004)?
Response: Please see response to
comment 22. Also, NMFS notes that the
commenter did not provide citations for
the literature referenced in the
comment.
Comment 25: One commenter stated
that the formula used to estimate PBR
for the strategic Central North Pacific
stock of humpback whales uses a
population estimate from 1993, which
causes several fisheries that interact
with this stock to be classified as
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
Category II. However, all studies
indicate that this stock is steadily
increasing. A 2001 study calculates an
annual growth rate increase of 7 percent
(now used as r max) and a 2004 study
calculates an annual growth rate
increase of 10 percent. A 2002 study of
the Southeast humpback stock reports
that estimates are substantially higher
and that the abundance has increased in
recent years. The commenter cites the
GAMMS workshop report (Wade and
Angliss, 1996) which states, ‘‘ The SARs
should be revised whenever new
information becomes available on
abundance, mortality, r max, or stock
structure ‘‘ Why then is the 1993
estimate still used if growth population
has been 7 percent–10 percent
annually?
Response: This is a comment that
related to the Stock Assessment Reports,
not the proposed List of Fisheries for
2008. In short, a change in the
abundance estimate will be made when
the results of a recent basin-wide study
of North Pacific humpback whales is
available in 2009 or 2010.
Comment 26: One commenter
questioned the use of 16–year old data
to categorize the Prince William Sound
salmon drift gillnet fishery as Category
II. The categorization is partly due to
estimated takes of Stellar sea lions
(Western stock) observed in 1990–1991,
when 0 and 2 takes of Stellar sea lions
were observed in 1990–1991,
respectively. With 4–5 percent observer
coverage the take expanded to 29, or
14.5 takes per year, comprising 50
percent of all fishing mortality of Stellar
sea lions (Western stock).
Response: NMFS agrees that marine
mammal interaction data used to
classify commercial fisheries should be
as current as is practicable to ensure
that the estimated levels of serious
injury and mortality reflect current
fishing practices and conditions. In
some cases, information on marine
mammal serious injury and mortality is
quite dated. Currently there are eleven
Category II state-managed fisheries in
Alaska on the LOF. Since 1990, seven
Category II fisheries have been observed.
Of those, two have been reclassified
from Category II to Category III because
the observer program documented very
low levels of marine mammal serious
injuries and mortalities that occurred
incidental to these fisheries. Six statemanaged Category II fisheries have
never been observed. With currently
available funds, only one fishery can be
observed at a time due to the high cost
of the observer programs. There have
also been interim years with no Alaska
state-managed fishery observed. Ideally,
NMFS would observe each of these
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
fisheries every five years to ensure data
quality and timeliness. However,
without the availability of newer
information, NMFS must rely on the
best available information.
Comment 27: One commenter noted
that the fishery description for the
Category II AK Metlakatla/Annette
Island salmon drift gillnet fishery is
incorrect. The proposed 2008 LOF states
that this fishery is managed by the
ADFG with a tribal portion separate
from the Category II ‘‘AK Southeast
salmon drift gillnet’’ fishery only for
regulation purposes. The commenter
states that this fishery is an exclusively
tribal fishery managed exclusively by
the tribe. There is no relation or
connection with any state fishery or
management by any other state or
Federal agency.
Response: NMFS agrees and the
change has been made to the final 2008
LOF.
Comments on Fisheries in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
Comment 28: One commenter stated
that all of the butterfish and Illex and
Loligo squid fisheries on the East coast
are bottom trawl fisheries, yet the
proposed 2008 LOF defines them as
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl fisheries.
The mackerel fishery consists primarily
of mid-water trawlers, but also includes
bottom trawls. This information can be
found in the most recent stock
assessments for each fish and squid
species at: https://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/
nefsc/publications/series/crdlist.htm. In
addition, butterfish were deemed
overfished in 2005 and there is no
longer a directed fishery. Trip limits and
a very low bycatch quota will be in
place for 2008.
Response: NMFS agrees that based on
how some trawl gear is fished in the
Illex and Loligo squid fisheries, the
current ‘‘Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl’’
designation for the Illex and Loligo
squid fisheries may not be an
appropriate description of the fishing
gear used for these specific Mid-Atlantic
fisheries. However, in the past NMFS
has also received information that
suggests that the Illex and Loligo squid
fisheries utilize their trawl gear in a
more traditional mid-water trawl fishing
operation. Therefore, NMFS believes
that it would be inappropriate to reclassify this fishery in this 2008 final
LOF. NMFS will consult with the
Atlantic Trawl Gear Take Reduction
Team and the Northeast Fisheries
Science Center to determine a more
appropriate characterization. NMFS will
then propose any necessary changes in
the 2009 proposed LOF, allowing
adequate time for public comment. The
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
inclusion of the butterfish fishery
within the ‘‘Mid-Atlantic mid-water
trawl’’ fishery will also be addressed
and examined at that time.
Comment 29: One commenter
reiterated their comment from the 2007
LOF raising concern over NMFS’ failure
to adequately classify certain Gulf of
Mexico fisheries as Category I or II
based on known or estimated mortality
and serious injury of marine mammals
in those fisheries. The commenter
specifically recommended NMFS
elevate the Gulf of Mexico blue crab
trap/pot fishery to at least a Category II
and perhaps a Category I, and the Gulf
of Mexico menhaden purse seine fishery
to a Category I, based on known or
likely impacts to bottlenose dolphin
stocks.
Response: NMFS does not believe
elevation of the ‘‘Gulf of Mexico blue
crab trap/pot’’ fishery or ‘‘Gulf of
Mexico menhaden purse seine’’ fishery
is warranted at this time. There is no
observer program for either of these
fisheries; therefore, NMFS relies on
stranding data and fishermen selfreports to document fishery interactions
with marine mammals. Available data
from both of these sources do not justify
a reclassification of either fishery at this
time. However, NMFS will continue
monitoring fishermen self-reports and
stranding data, as well as enhance
stranding response in the Gulf of
Mexico, which has been low,
particularly following Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita. Observer coverage for
both these fisheries also remains a
priority when resources become
available.
Available data indicate interactions
with marine mammals occurred in both
fisheries between 2002–2006. In the
Gulf of Mexico blue crab trap/pot
fishery, stranding data indicate there
were two confirmed bottlenose dolphin
interactions with crab pot fishing gear
between 2002–2006, one alive and one
dead. In the same period, four dead
bottlenose dolphins stranded with rope
or rope marks that may have been from
trap/pot gear, but cause of death could
not be determined. NMFS acknowledges
these numbers may underestimate the
number of interactions that are
occurring. However, interpreting the
data is difficult due to limitations of the
stranding network to accurately
document human interactions, and
insufficient information on bottlenose
dolphin abundance and stock structure
in the Gulf of Mexico to calculate PBR
or quantify the impacts of fishery
interactions on bottlenose dolphin
stocks.
The ‘‘Gulf of Mexico menhaden purse
seine’’ fishery was observed by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
researchers from Louisiana State
University in 1992, 1994, and 1995. The
observers documented nine bottlenose
dolphin captures, three of which were
mortalities. Using observed and total
fishery effort data, the number of takes
was linearly extrapolated to an estimate
of 68 animals. On the basis of this
information, the fishery was elevated
from Category III to Category II on the
1999 LOF (64 FR 9067, February 24,
1999). Since that time, there has been no
observer coverage in this fishery.
Fishermen self-reports through the
MMAP reveal five bottlenose dolphin
mortalities from 2002–2006, with two
mortalities in 2002, one in 2004, and
two in 2005. One of these animals was
believed to have been dead prior to
capture. However, information gathered
under the MMAP cannot be verified and
it is not possible to extrapolate these
numbers to obtain an estimate of total
takes in this fishery.
The current lack of information on
bottlenose dolphin abundance and stock
structure in the Gulf of Mexico
combined with a low level of stranding
response, particularly following
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, make it
difficult to assess the population-level
impacts of either of these fisheries. For
example, the percentage of stranded
animals that are necropsied is low (FL,
TX, and AL necropsied over 50 percent
of all stranded marine mammals from
2002–2006, but MS and LA had much
lower necropsy rates, 16 percent and 3
percent, respectively), making
documentation of human interactions
difficult. NMFS is focused on building
capacity in the Gulf and increasing the
level and quality of stranding response.
NMFS held workshops in LA and MS in
September 2007 to raise awareness of
marine mammal management
challenges in the Gulf of Mexico and to
enhance marine mammal stranding
response. NMFS staff met with
representatives from state fishery and
wildlife management agencies, marine
mammal stranding networks, research
institutions, universities, Sea Grant, and
other Federal agencies to identify ways
to better manage protected and
endangered marine mammals in the
Gulf of Mexico. Furthermore, NMFS
intends to provide additional training
workshops in 2008 to enhance the
stranding network’s capacity for
identifying and documenting human
interaction, and instruction on
conducting necropsies. NMFS expects
these efforts to increase the effectiveness
of the stranding networks and better
inform management decisions in the
future.
Comment 30: One commenter
reiterated concerns raised in their letters
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66065
on the 2003 through 2007 LOFs
recommending that NMFS expedite its
investigation of bottlenose dolphin
stock structure and reevaluate the
classification of Gulf of Mexico
fisheries. The commenter further
recommended that NMFS expand its
efforts to collect reliable information on
serious injury and mortality of marine
mammals incidental to Gulf of Mexico
fisheries, with priority given to
instituting an observer program for the
menhaden purse seine fishery and
expanding efforts to evaluate bottlenose
dolphin entanglement in the blue crab
trap/pot fishery. NMFS has initiated
efforts to address some of these issues
and has indicated that it intends to
reevaluate these fisheries as new
information becomes available,
particularly information regarding the
stock structure of bottlenose dolphins in
the Gulf of Mexico. Nonetheless, the
commenter remains concerned about
marine mammal interactions with Gulf
of Mexico fisheries, believes that more
active management is needed in this
region, and therefore reiterates its
previous recommendations.
Response: NMFS agrees that
collection of reliable information on
serious injury and mortality of marine
mammals in the Gulf of Mexico is
essential. NMFS is making efforts to
more actively manage marine mammals
and build capacity in this area to: (1)
address significant data gaps regarding
the distribution, abundance, stock
structure, and health of marine
mammals; (2) enhance stranding
response capabilities to better
understand threats to marine mammals
in the Gulf of Mexico ecosystem, and (3)
ensure constituents are informed
regarding NMFS efforts, threats to the
ecosystem, and mitigation strategies to
further reduce impacts to marine
mammals. See the response to Comment
29 regarding efforts to enhance
stranding network coverage and
response in the Gulf of Mexico.
Managing bottlenose dolphin stocks
in the Gulf of Mexico is especially
challenging due to lack of data,
particularly regarding abundance and
stock structure. There is currently no
PBR calculated for coastal stocks or bay,
sound, and estuarine stocks, so NMFS is
unable to assess the population-level
impacts of fishery-related serious
injuries and mortalities. To address this,
NMFS is working towards updating
estimates of bottlenose dolphin
abundance and refining our
understanding of bottlenose dolphin
stock structure in the Gulf of Mexico.
Specifically, in July and August 2007,
NMFS completed a ship-based survey of
the Gulf of Mexico continental shelf
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
66066
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
from 20 m (65.6 ft) depth to 500 m (1640
ft) depth from Cedar Key, FL, to
Brownsville, TX, which included linetransect abundance surveys and the
collection of over 200 bottlenose
dolphin biopsies for stock structure
analysis. In 2007, NMFS also completed
winter and summer aerial line-transect
abundance surveys of coastal bottlenose
dolphin stocks (shore to 20 m [65.6 ft]
depth) from Key West to the MS River
delta. NMFS has also worked on bay,
sound, and estuarine stocks, conducting
a photo-ID mark-recapture study and
biopsy sampling in Choctawhatchee
Bay, FL in July and August 2007 and
biopsy sampling in Mississippi Sound
in 2005 and 2006. Data collected during
these surveys are currently being
analyzed, and updated information on
population abundance and stock
structure should be available in the
2008 SARs. Once this information is
available and PBR is calculated for each
stock, NMFS will be better able to assess
the impacts of mortality and serious
injury of marine mammals associated
with commercial fisheries in the Gulf.
Observer coverage remains a priority for
Gulf of Mexico fisheries, when
resources become available.
Comment 31: One commenter stated
that the number of vessels listed in the
proposed 2008 LOF for the Category II
Gulf of Mexico menhaden purse seine
fishery is incorrect. Table 2 lists 50
vessels as operating in this fishery;
however, 1999 was the last year that the
number of vessels in the fishery
exceeded 50. Since 2000 there have
been between 40 and 42 vessels
annually participating in the fishery, 2
of which are typically run boats from
the fishing grounds back to the
reduction plants and do not actively
fish.
Response: NMFS thanks the
commenter for this information. The
number of vessels in the Gulf of Mexico
menhaden purse seine fishery has been
updated from 50 to 40–42.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Summary of Changes to the LOF for
2008
The following summarizes changes to
the LOF for 2008 in fishery
classification, fisheries listed in the
LOF, the number of participants in a
particular fishery, and the species and/
or stocks that are incidentally killed or
seriously injured in a particular fishery.
The classifications and definitions of
U.S. commercial fisheries for 2008 are
identical to those provided in the LOF
for 2007 with the following exceptions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific
Ocean
Fishery Classification
The ‘‘CA yellowtail, barracuda, and
white seabass drift gillnet (mesh size
≥3.5 inches and <14 inches)’’ fishery is
not elevated to a Category I fishery as
proposed in the proposed 2008 LOF.
The mean annual mortality and serious
injury for the CA stock of long-beaked
common dolphins was recalculated due
to errors in the reporting of observer
coverage for this fishery discovered
during the public comment period for
the draft 2007 SARs. Using the correct
information, the data indicate that the
annual mortality and serious injury of
this stock in this fishery is 43 percent,
not 82 percent, of the stock’s PBR as had
been reported in the proposed 2008
LOF. For this reason, the ‘‘CA
yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass
drift gillnet (mesh size ≥3.5 inches and
<14 inches)’’ fishery remains a Category
II on the final 2008 LOF.
The superscript ‘‘2’’ is removed from
Table 1 following the ‘‘CA yellowtail,
barracuda, and white seabass drift
gillnet (mesh size ≥3.5 inches and <14
inches)’’ fishery because it is no longer
classified by analogy to other gillnet
fisheries. The current data shows that
the mortality and serious injury of the
CA stock of long-beaked common
dolphin is 43 percent; therefore, it is
driving the classification of this fishery.
A superscript ‘‘1’’ is placed next to this
stock in Table 1 to indicate its role as
a driving stock.
Removal of Fisheries from the LOF
The Category II ‘‘OR blue shark
floating longline’’ fishery is removed
from the LOF.
The Category II ‘‘OR swordfish
floating longline’’ fishery is removed
from the LOF.
Fishery Name and Organizational
Changes and Clarifications
The Category II ‘‘CA yellowtail,
barracuda, and white seabass drift
gillnet (mesh size >3.5 inches and <14
inches)’’ fishery is renamed the ‘‘CA
yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass
drift gillnet (mesh size ≥3.5 inches and
<14 inches)’’ fishery.
The Category III ‘‘CA set and drift
gillnet fisheries that use a stretched
mesh size of 3.5 in or less’’ is renamed
the ‘‘CA set gillnet fishery (mesh size
<3.5 inches).’’
NMFS reviewed the various West
Coast pot and trap fisheries for
information on the takes of humpback
and gray whales in Category III trap/pot
fisheries on the Pacific Coast. NMFS
anticipates that incidental serious injury
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and mortality of gray and humpback
whales in OR and WA crab fisheries is
unlikely to increase; therefore, NMFS
did not reclassify the crab pot fisheries
at this time. NMFS will continue to
analyze information from the remaining
pot fisheries along the West Coast for
potential recategorization of certain
West Coast trap/pot fisheries in future
LOFs.
The fishery description for the
Category II ‘‘AK Metlakatla/Annette
Island salmon drift gillnet’’ fishery is
changed to reflect that the fishery is an
exclusively tribal fishery managed
exclusively by the tribe. There is no
management by any state or Federal
agency.
Number of Vessels/Persons
The estimated number of vessels or
persons in the Category II ‘‘CA anchovy,
mackerel, and sardine purse seine’’
fishery is updated to 63.
The estimated number of vessels or
persons in the Category II ‘‘CA squid
purse seine’’ fishery is updated to 71.
The estimated number of vessels or
persons in the Category III ‘‘HI inshore
gillnet’’ fishery is updated to 5.
The estimated number of vessels or
persons in the Category III ‘‘WA/OR/CA
groundfish trawl’’ fishery is updated to
160–180.
The estimated number of vessels or
persons in the Category III ‘‘CA
abalone’’ fishery is updated to zero.
The estimated number of vessels or
persons in the Category III ‘‘CA set
gillnet (mesh size <3.5 inches)’’ fishery
(renamed from the ‘‘CA set and drift
gillnet fisheries that use a stretched
mesh size of 3.5 in or less’’ fishery in
this final rule) is updated to 304.
List of Species That are Incidentally
Injured or Killed
The Hawaiian stocks of striped
dolphin and Bryde’s whale are added to
the list of marine mammal species and
stocks incidentally injured or killed in
the Category I ‘‘HI swordfish, tuna,
billfish, mahi mahi, wahoo, oceanic
sharks longline/set line’’ fishery.
The Gulf of Alaska, Aleutian Islands,
and Bering Sea transient stock of killer
whales is removed from the list of
marine mammal species and stocks
incidentally injured or killed in the
Category II ‘‘AK Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Pacific cod longline’’
fishery and the Category III ‘‘AK Bering
Sea and Aleutian Islands Greenland
turbot longline’’ fishery.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
Addition of Fisheries to the LOF
The ‘‘GA cannonball jellyfish trawl’’
fishery is added to the LOF as a
Category III fishery.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Removal of Fisheries from the LOF
The Category III ‘‘U.S. Mid-Atlantic
hand seine’’ fishery is removed from the
LOF.
Fishery Name and Organizational
Changes and Clarifications
The estimated number of vessels or
persons in the Category II ‘‘Gulf of
Mexico menhaden purse seine’’ fishery
is updated to 40–42.
The list of target fish species
associated with the Category II ‘‘Atlantic
mixed species trap/pot’’ fishery is
expanded to include cunner.
The list of target species associated
with the Category II ‘‘Southeast Atlantic
gillnet’’ fishery is updated by removing
shad.
The description of the Category II
‘‘Southeast Atlantic gillnet’’ fishery is
corrected by clarifying that the fishery is
also managed under ALWTRP
implementing regulations. Management
under the ALWTRP was inadvertently
left out of the description in the
proposed rule.
The boundaries and excluded
fisheries associated with the Category I
‘‘Mid-Atlantic gillnet’’ fishery are
updated through the addition of the
following language, ‘‘ NC/SC border, but
not including waters where gillnet
fisheries are listed as Category II and
Category III. At this time, these Category
II and Category III fisheries include: the
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet; NC
inshore gillnet; DE River inshore gillnet;
Long Island Sound inshore gillnet; and
RI, southern MA (to Monomy Island),
and NY Bight (Raritan and Lower NY
Bays) inshore gillnet.’’
The boundaries and excluded
fisheries associated with the Category II
‘‘Atlantic mixed species trap/pot’’
fishery are updated through the addition
of the following language, ‘‘The Atlantic
mixed species trap/pot fishery (Category
II) includes all trap/pot operations for
species from the U.S.-Canada border
down through the waters east of the
fishery management demarcation line
between the Atlantic Ocean and the
Gulf of Mexico (50 CFR 600.105), but
does not include the following Category
I, II, and III trap/pot fisheries: Northeast/
Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot;
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot; FL spiny
lobster trap/ pot; Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/
pot; U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/pot
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
fisheries; and the Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico golden crab
fishery (68 FR 1421, January 10, 2003).’’
The definition of the Category II
‘‘Mid-Atlantic flynet’’ fishery, provided
in the final 2007 LOF (71 FR 70345,
December 4, 2006), is replaced with the
following language: ‘‘The flynet fishery
is a multispecies fishery composed of
nearshore and offshore components that
operate along the eastern coast of the
Mid-Atlantic United States. Flynets are
high profile trawls similar to bottom
otter trawls. These nets typically range
from 80–120 ft (24–36.6 m) in headrope
length, with wing mesh sizes of 16–64
in (41–163 cm), following a slow 3:1
taper to smaller mesh sizes in the body,
extension, and codend sections of the
net. The nearshore fishery operates from
October to April inside of 30 fathoms
(180 ft–55 m) from NC to NJ. This
nearshore fishery targets Atlantic
croaker, weakfish, butterfish,
harvestfish, bluefish, menhaden ,
striped bass, kingfishes, and other
finfish species. Flynet fishing is no
longer permitted south of Cape Hatteras
in order to protect weakfish stocks. The
offshore component operates from
November to April outside of 30
fathoms (180 ft; 55 m) from the Hudson
Canyon off NY, south to Hatteras
Canyon off NC. These deeper water
fisheries target bluefish, Atlantic
mackerel, Loligo squid, black sea bass,
and scup (72 FR 7382, February 15,
2007). Illex squid are also targeted
offshore (70–200 fathoms [420–1,200 ft;
128–366 m]) during summer months
from May to September.’’ NMFS
acknowledges that concerns have been
raised over the possible colloquial
nature of this fishery and will continue
working to resolve these concerns.
The descriptions of the Category II
‘‘Northeast anchored float gillnet’’,
‘‘Northeast drift gillnet’’, ‘‘Atlantic blue
crab trap/pot, and ‘‘Atlantic mixed
species trap/pot’’ fisheries are updated
to reflect that each is now also managed
under ALWTRP implementing
regulations under a recent rulemaking
(72 FR 57104, October 5, 2007).
The description of the Category II
‘‘Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine’’ fishery
is undergoing change, particularly
pertaining to NC beach gear, due to
pending rulemakings by NCDMF. An
updated description of this fishery will
be provided in a future LOF.
List of Species That are Incidentally
Seriously Injured or Killed
The Northern Gulf of Mexico
continental shelf and Eastern Gulf of
Mexico coastal stocks of bottlenose
dolphins are added to the list of marine
mammal species and stocks incidentally
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66067
injured or killed in the Category III
‘‘Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico, shark bottom longline/hookand-line’’ fishery.
The name of the bottlenose dolphin
stocks incidentally seriously injured or
killed in the Category I ‘‘Atlantic Ocean,
Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics
longline’’ and Category III ‘‘Gulf of
Mexico butterfish trawl’’ fisheries are
changed from ‘‘Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern Gulf of Mexico outer
continental shelf’’ to ‘‘Bottlenose
dolphin, Northern Gulf of Mexico
oceanic’’, and from ‘‘Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern Gulf of Mexico continental
shelf edge and slope’’ to ‘‘Bottlenose
dolphin, Northern Gulf of Mexico
continental shelf.’’
The name the humpback whale stock
incidentally killed/injured in the
Category I ‘‘Northeast sink gillnet’’,
Category I ‘‘Northeast/Mid-Atlantic
American lobster trap/pot’’, Category II
‘‘Northeast anchored float gillnet’’, and
Category III ‘‘Gulf of Maine, U.S. MidAtlantic tuna, shark, swordfish hookand-line/harpoon’’ fisheries is changed
from ‘‘Western North Atlantic (WNA)’’
to ‘‘Gulf of Maine.’’
List of Fisheries
The following two tables list U.S.
commercial fisheries according to their
assigned categories under section 118 of
the MMPA. The estimated number of
vessels/participants is expressed in
terms of the number of active
participants in the fishery, when
possible. If this information is not
available, the estimated number of
vessels or persons licensed for a
particular fishery is provided. If no
recent information is available on the
number of participants in a fishery, the
number from the most recent LOF is
used.
The tables also list the marine
mammal species and stocks incidentally
killed or injured in each fishery based
on observer data, logbook data,
stranding reports, and fisher reports.
This list includes all species or stocks
known to experience mortality or injury
in a given fishery, but also includes
species or stocks for which there are
anecdotal records of interaction.
Additionally, species identified by
logbook entries may not be verified.
Bycatch of species or stocks identified is
not necessarily driving a fishery’s
classification in a given Category. NMFS
has designated those stocks driving a
fishery’s classification (i.e., the fishery
is classified based on serious injuries
and mortalities of a marine mammal
stock greater than 50 percent [Category
I], or greater than 1 percent and less
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
66068
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
than 50 percent [Category II], of a stock’s
PBR) by a ‘‘1’’ after the stock’s name.
There are several fisheries classified
in Category II that have no recently
documented interactions with marine
mammals, or interactions that did not
result in a serious injury or mortality.
Justification for classifying these
fisheries as a Category II is by analogy
to other gear types that are known to
cause mortality or serious injury of
marine mammals, as discussed in the
final LOF for 1996 (60 FR 67063,
December 28, 1995), and according to
factors listed in the definition of a
‘‘Category II fishery’’ in 50 CFR 229.2.
NMFS has designated those fisheries
originally listed by analogy in Tables 1
and 2 by a ‘‘2’’ after the fishery’s name.
Table 1 lists commercial fisheries in
the Pacific Ocean (including Alaska);
Table 2 lists commercial fisheries in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean.
TABLE 1 - LIST OF FISHERIES COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Fishery Description
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed/
injured
CATEGORY I
GILLNET FISHERIES:
CA angel shark/halibut and other species set gillnet
(>3.5 in. mesh)
58
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor seal, CA
Harbor porpoise, Central CA1
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding
Sea otter, CA
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA
CA/OR thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in.
mesh)
85
California sea lion, U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA
Fin whale, CA/OR/WA
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Humpback whale, Eastern North Pacific
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding
Northern right-whale dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Risso’s dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Short-finned pilot whale, CA/OR/WA1
Sperm whale, CA/OR/WA
140
Blainville’s beaked whale, HI
Bottlenose dolphin, HI
Bryde’s whale, HI
False killer whale, HI1
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific
Pantropical spotted dolphin, HI
Risso’s dolphin, HI
Short-finned pilot whale, HI
Spinner dolphin, HI
Sperm whale, HI
Striped dolphin, HI
AK Bristol Bay salmon drift gillnet2
1,903
Beluga whale, Bristol Bay
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Harbor seal, Bering Sea
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific
Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific
Spotted seal, AK
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.1
AK Bristol Bay salmon set gillnet2
1,014
Beluga whale, Bristol Bay
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Harbor seal, Bering Sea
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific
Spotted seal, AK
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
HI swordfish, tuna, billfish, mahi mahi, wahoo, oceanic sharks longline/set line
CATEGORY II
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
GILLNET FISHERIES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
66069
TABLE 1 - LIST OF FISHERIES COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Fishery Description
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed/
injured
AK Cook Inlet salmon set gillnet
745
Beluga whale, Cook Inlet
Dall’s porpoise, AK
Harbor porpoise, GOA
Harbor seal, GOA
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific1
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Cook Inlet salmon drift gillnet
576
Beluga whale, Cook Inlet
Dall’s porpoise, AK
Harbor porpoise, GOA1
Harbor seal, GOA
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Kodiak salmon set gillnet
188
Harbor porpoise, GOA1
Harbor seal, GOA
Sea otter, Southwest AK
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Metlakatla/Annette Island salmon drift gillnet2
60
None documented
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon drift gillnet2
164
Dall’s porpoise, AK
Harbor porpoise, GOA
Harbor seal, GOA
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon set gillnet2
116
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Prince William Sound salmon drift gillnet
541
Dall’s porpoise, AK
Harbor porpoise, GOA1
Harbor seal, GOA
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific
Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific
Sea Otter, South Central AK
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.1
AK Southeast salmon drift gillnet
481
Dall’s porpoise, AK
Harbor porpoise, Southeast AK
Harbor seal, Southeast AK
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific1
Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
AK Yakutat salmon set gillnet2
170
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Harbor seal, Southeast AK
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK)
CA yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass drift
gillnet fishery (mesh size ≥3.5 in and <14 in)
24
California sea lion, U.S.
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA1
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA
WA Puget Sound Region salmon drift gillnet (includes all inland waters south of US-Canada border and eastward of the Bonilla-Tatoosh line-Treaty
Indian fishing is excluded)
210
Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA
Harbor porpoise, inland WA1
Harbor seal, WA inland
AK Southeast salmon purse seine
416
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific1
AK Cook Inlet salmon purse seine
82
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific1
AK Kodiak salmon purse seine
370
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific1
CA anchovy, mackerel, sardine purse seine
63
Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA offshore1
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor seal, CA
CA squid purse seine
71
Common dolphin, unknown
Short-finned pilot whale, CA/OR/WA1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
66070
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 - LIST OF FISHERIES COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Fishery Description
CA tuna purse seine2
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed/
injured
10
None documented
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands flatfish trawl
26
Bearded seal, AK
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea
Harbor seal, Bering Sea
Killer whale, AK resident1
Northern fur seal, Eastern North Pacific
Spotted seal, AK
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.1
Walrus, AK
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands pollock trawl
120
Dall’s porpoise, AK
Harbor seal, AK
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific1
Humpback whale, Western North Pacific1
Killer whale, Eastern North Pacific, GOA, Aleutian Islands, and Bering Sea transient1
Minke whale, AK
Ribbon seal, AK
Spotted seal, AK
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.1
114
Killer whale, AK resident1
Ribbon seal, AK
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
TRAWL FISHERIES:
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod
longline
CA pelagic longline2
6
California sea lion, U.S.
Risso’s dolphin, CA/OR/WA
6
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific1
Humpback whale, Western North Pacific1
POT, RING NET, AND TRAP FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea sablefish pot
CATEGORY III
GILLNET FISHERIES:
AK Kuskokwim, Yukon, Norton Sound, Kotzebue
salmon gillnet
1,922
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea
AK miscellaneous finfish set gillnet
3
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Prince William Sound salmon set gillnet
30
Harbor seal, GOA
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK roe herring and food/bait herring gillnet
2,034
None documented
304
None documented
CA set gillnet (mesh size <3.5 inches)
5
Bottlenose dolphin, HI
Spinner dolphin, HI
WA Grays Harbor salmon drift gillnet (excluding
treaty Tribal fishing)
24
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast
WA/OR herring, smelt, shad, sturgeon, bottom fish,
mullet, perch, rockfish gillnet
913
None documented
WA/OR lower Columbia River (includes tributaries)
drift gillnet
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
HI inshore gillnet
110
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast
WA Willapa Bay drift gillnet
82
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding
PURSE SEINE, BEACH SEINE, ROUND HAUL
AND THROW NET FISHERIES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
66071
TABLE 1 - LIST OF FISHERIES COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Fishery Description
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed/
injured
AK Metlakatla salmon purse seine
10
None documented
AK miscellaneous finfish beach seine
1
None documented
AK miscellaneous finfish purse seine
3
None documented
AK octopus/squid purse seine
2
None documented
AK roe herring and food/bait herring beach seine
8
None documented
AK roe herring and food/bait herring purse seine
624
None documented
AK salmon beach seine
34
None documented
AK salmon purse seine (except Southeast Alaska,
which is in Category II)
953
Harbor seal, GOA
WA/OR sardine purse seine
42
None documented
HI Kona crab loop net
42
None documented
HI opelu/akule net
12
None documented
HI inshore purse seine
23
None documented
HI throw net, cast net
14
None documented
WA (all species) beach seine or drag seine
235
None documented
WA/OR herring, smelt, squid purse seine or
lampara
130
None documented
WA salmon purse seine
440
None documented
WA salmon reef net
53
None documented
CA squid dip net
115
None documented
WA/OR smelt, herring dip net
119
None documented
unknown
None documented
CA salmon enhancement rearing pen
>1
None documented
CA white seabass enhancement net pens
13
California sea lion, U.S.
HI offshore pen culture
2
None documented
OR salmon ranch
1
None documented
WA/OR salmon net pens
14
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor seal, WA inland waters
DIP NET FISHERIES:
MARINE AQUACULTURE FISHERIES:
CA marine shellfish aquaculture
TROLL FISHERIES:
AK North Pacific halibut, AK bottom fish, WA/OR/
CA albacore, groundfish, bottom fish, CA halibut
non-salmonid troll fisheries
1,530 (330 AK)
None documented
2,335
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
American Samoa tuna troll
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
AK salmon troll
< 50
None documented
CA/OR/WA salmon troll
4,300
None documented
88
None documented
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
tuna troll
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
66072
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 - LIST OF FISHERIES COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Fishery Description
Guam tuna troll
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed/
injured
401
1,321
HI trolling, rod and reel
None documented
None documented
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Greenland turbot
longline
12
Killer whale, AK resident
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands rockfish longline
17
None documented
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands sablefish longline
63
None documented
1,302
None documented
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod longline
440
None documented
AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish longline
421
None documented
AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish longline
412
Sperm whale, North Pacific
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
3,079
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska halibut longline
AK halibut longline/set line (State and Federal waters)
AK octopus/squid longline
7
None documented
AK state-managed waters groundfish longline/
setline (including sablefish, rockfish, and miscellaneous finfish)
731
None documented
American Samoa longline
60
None documented
WA/OR/CA groundfish, bottomfish longline/set line
367
None documented
WA/OR North Pacific halibut longline/set line
350
None documented
TRAWL FISHERIES:
8
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod trawl
87
Harbor seal, Bering Sea
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands rockfish trawl
9
None documented
AK Gulf of Alaska flatfish trawl
52
None documented
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod trawl
101
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska pollock trawl
83
Fin whale, Northeast Pacific
Northern elephant seal, North Pacific
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish trawl
45
None documented
AK food/bait herring trawl
3
None documented
AK miscellaneous finfish otter or beam trawl
6
None documented
AK shrimp otter trawl and beam trawl (statewide
and Cook Inlet)
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Atka mackerel
trawl
58
None documented
AK state-managed waters of Cook Inlet, Kachemak
Bay, Prince William Sound, Southeast AK groundfish trawl
2
None documented
CA halibut bottom trawl
53
None documented
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
66073
TABLE 1 - LIST OF FISHERIES COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Fishery Description
WA/OR/CA groundfish trawl
160-180
WA/OR/CA shrimp trawl
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed/
injured
California sea lion, U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
300
None documented
AK Aleutian Islands sablefish pot
8
None documented
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod pot
76
None documented
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands crab pot
329
None documented
unknown
None documented
154
Harbor seal, GOA
POT, RING NET, AND TRAP FISHERIES:
AK Gulf of Alaska crab pot
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod pot
AK Southeast Alaska crab pot
unknown
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK)
AK Southeast Alaska shrimp pot
unknown
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK)
AK octopus/squid pot
72
None documented
AK snail pot
2
None documented
CA lobster, prawn, shrimp, rock crab, fish pot
608
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Harbor seal, CA
Humpback whale, Eastern North Pacific
Sea otter, CA
OR/CA hagfish pot or trap
25
None documented
WA/OR/CA crab pot
1,478
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific
Humpback whale, Eastern North Pacific
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot
176
None documented
WA/OR shrimp pot/trap
254
None documented
HI crab trap
22
None documented
HI fish trap
19
None documented
HI lobster trap
0
Hawaiian monk seal
HI shrimp trap
5
None documented
AK miscellaneous finfish handline and mechanical
jig
100
None documented
AK North Pacific halibut handline and mechanical
jig
93
None documented
AK octopus/squid handline
2
None documented
American Samoa bottomfish
<50
None documented
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
bottomfish
<50
None documented
Guam bottomfish
200
None documented
4
None documented
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
HANDLINE AND JIG FISHERIES:
HI aku boat, pole and line
HI Main Hawaiian Islands, Northwest Hawaiian Islands deep sea bottomfish
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
300
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Hawaiian monk seal
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
66074
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 - LIST OF FISHERIES COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Fishery Description
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed/
injured
HI inshore handline
307
None documented
HI tuna handline
298
Hawaiian monk seal
WA groundfish, bottomfish jig
679
None documented
6
None documented
30
None documented
452
None documented
AK Southeast herring roe/food/bait pound net
3
None documented
WA herring brush weir
1
None documented
13
California sea lion, U.S.
Western Pacific squid jig
HARPOON FISHERIES:
CA swordfish harpoon
POUND NET/WEIR FISHERIES:
AK herring spawn on kelp pound net
BAIT PENS:
WA/OR/CA bait pens
DREDGE FISHERIES:
Coastwide scallop dredge
108 (12 AK)
None documented
0
None documented
156
None documented
WA herring spawn on kelp
4
None documented
AK dungeness crab
3
None documented
AK herring spawn on kelp
363
None documented
AK urchin and other fish/shellfish
471
None documented
0
None documented
583
None documented
1
None documented
HI fish pond
N/A
None documented
HI handpick
37
None documented
HI lobster diving
19
None documented
HI squiding, spear
91
None documented
WA/CA kelp
4
None documented
WA/OR sea urchin, other clam, octopus, oyster,
sea cucumber, scallop, ghost shrimp hand, dive, or
mechanical collection
637
None documented
WA shellfish aquaculture
684
None documented
DIVE, HAND/MECHANICAL COLLECTION FISHERIES:
AK abalone
AK clam
CA abalone
CA sea urchin
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
HI black coral diving
COMMERCIAL PASSENGER FISHING VESSEL
(CHARTER BOAT) FISHERIES:
AK/WA/OR/CA commercial passenger fishing vessel
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
>7,000 (1,107 AK)
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Killer whale, stock unknown
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
66075
TABLE 1 - LIST OF FISHERIES COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated # of vessels/persons
Fishery Description
HI charter vessel
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed/
injured
114
None documented
93
None documented
LIVE FINFISH/SHELLFISH FISHERIES:
CA finfish and shellfish live trap/hook-and-line
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 1: AK - Alaska; CA - California; GOA - Gulf of Alaska; HI - Hawaii; OR - Oregon; WA - Washington
1 Fishery classified based on serious injuries and mortalities of this stock, which are greater than 1 percent of the stock’s PBR
2 Fishery classified by analogy.
TABLE 2 - LIST OF FISHERIES COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN
Estimated # of
vessels/persons
Fishery Description
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed/injured
CATEGORY I
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic gillnet
>670
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA coastal1
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
Gray seal, WNA
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF1
Harbor seal, WNA
Harp seal, WNA
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine1
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA
Minke whale, Canadian east coast
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA
White-sided dolphin, WNA
Northeast sink gillnet
341
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
Fin whale, WNA
Gray seal, WNA
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF1
Harbor seal, WNA
Harp seal, WNA
Hooded seal, WNA
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine1
Minke whale, Canadian east coast1
North Atlantic right whale, WNA1
Risso’s dolphin, WNA
White-sided dolphin, WNA
94
Atlantic spotted dolphin, Northern GMX
Atlantic spotted dolphin, WNA
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX oceanic
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX continental shelf
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
Cuvier’s beaked whale, WNA
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA1
Mesoplodon beaked whale, WNA
Northern bottlenose whale, WNA
Pantropical spotted dolphin, Northern GMX
Pantropical spotted dolphin, WNA
Pygmy sperm whale, WNA1
Risso’s dolphin, Northern GMX
Risso’s dolphin, WNA
Short-finned pilot whale, Northern GMX
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA1
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics
longline
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
66076
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2 - LIST OF FISHERIES COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Estimated # of
vessels/persons
Fishery Description
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot
13,000
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed/injured
Fin whale, WNA
Harbor seal, WNA
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine1
Minke whale, Canadian east coast1
North Atlantic right whale, WNA1
CATEGORY II
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet2
45
None documented
Gulf of Mexico gillnet2
724
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
NC inshore gillnet
94
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA coastal1
Northeast anchored float gillnet2
133
Harbor seal, WNA
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine
White-sided dolphin, WNA
Northeast drift gillnet2
unknown
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
Eastern GMX coastal
GMX bay, sound, and estuarine
Northern GMX coastal
Western GMX coastal
None documented
Southeast Atlantic gillnet2
779
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA coastal
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet
30
Atlantic spotted dolphin, WNA
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA coastal1
North Atlantic right whale, WNA
620
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore
Common dolphin, WNA
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA
Risso’s dolphin, WNA
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA
White-sided dolphin, WNA1
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl (including pair trawl)
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl
>1,000
Common dolphin, WNA1
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA1
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA1
Mid-Atlantic flynet2
21
None documented
Northeast mid-water trawl (including pair trawl)
17
Harbor seal, WNA
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA1
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA1
White-sided dolphin, WNA
1,052
Common dolphin, WNA
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF
Harp seal, WNA
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA
White-sided dolphin, WNA1
Northeast bottom trawl
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot
>16,000
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA coastal1
West Indian manatee, FL1
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot2
unknown
Fin whale, WNA
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
66077
TABLE 2 - LIST OF FISHERIES COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Estimated # of
vessels/persons
Fishery Description
Gulf of Mexico menhaden purse seine
40-42
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine2
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed/injured
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
Eastern GMX coastal
GMX bay, sound, estuarine
Northern GMX coastal1
Western GMX coastal
22
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA coastal
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine
25
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA coastal1
NC long haul seine
33
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA coastal1
13
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA coastal1
187
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA coastal1
>991
Dwarf sperm whale, WNA
West Indian manatee, Antillean
HAUL/BEACH SEINE FISHERIES:
STOP NET FISHERIES:
NC roe mullet stop net
POUND NET FISHERIES:
VA pound net
CATEGORY III
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Caribbean gillnet
DE River inshore gillnet
60
None documented
Long Island Sound inshore gillnet
20
None documented
RI, southern MA (to Monomoy Island), and NY Bight
(Raritan and Lower NY Bays) inshore gillnet
32
None documented
unknown
None documented
Atlantic shellfish bottom trawl
972
None documented
Gulf of Mexico butterfish trawl
2
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX oceanic
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX continental shelf
Gulf of Mexico mixed species trawl
20
None documented
GA cannonball jellyfish trawl
1
None documented
Southeast Atlantic inshore gillnet
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl
>18,000
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine
West Indian Manatee, FL
MARINE AQUACULTURE FISHERIES:
Finfish aquaculture
48
Harbor seal, WNA
unknown
None documented
Gulf of Maine Atlantic herring purse seine
30
Harbor seal, WNA
Gray seal, WNA
Gulf of Maine menhaden purse seine
50
None documented
FL west coast sardine purse seine
10
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal
Shellfish aquaculture
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
66078
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2 - LIST OF FISHERIES COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Estimated # of
vessels/persons
Fishery Description
U.S. Atlantic tuna purse seine
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed/injured
5
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA
46
None documented
LONGLINE/HOOK-AND-LINE FISHERIES:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic bottom longline/hook-and-line
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic tuna, shark swordfish
hook-and-line/harpoon
26,223
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean snapper-grouper and other reef fish bottom
longline/hook-and-line
>5,000
None documented
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shark bottom
longline/hook-and-line
<125
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX continental shelf
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean pelagic hook-and-line/harpoon
1,446
None documented
Caribbean mixed species trap/pot
>501
None documented
Caribbean spiny lobster trap/pot
>197
None documented
FL spiny lobster trap/pot
2,145
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal
Gulf of Mexico blue crab trap/pot
4,113
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX Bay, Sound, & Estuarine
West Indian manatee, FL
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
Gulf of Mexico mixed species trap/pot
unknown
None documented
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico golden crab
trap/pot
10
None documented
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab
trap/pot
4,453
None documented
U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/pot
>700
None documented
STOP SEINE/WEIR/POUND NET FISHERIES:
Gulf of Maine herring and Atlantic mackerel stop seine/
weir
U.S. Mid-Atlantic crab stop seine/weir
50
Gray seal, Northwest North Atlantic
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF
Harbor seal, WNA
Minke whale, Canadian east coast
White-sided dolphin, WNA
2,600
None documented
751
None documented
Gulf of Maine mussel
>50
None documented
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic sea scallop dredge
233
None documented
7,000
None documented
100
None documented
U.S. Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop seine/weir/pound
net (except the North Carolina roe mullet stop net)
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
DREDGE FISHERIES:
U.S. Mid-Atlantic/Gulf of Mexico oyster
U.S. Mid-Atlantic offshore surf clam and quahog dredge
HAUL/BEACH SEINE FISHERIES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
66079
TABLE 2 - LIST OF FISHERIES COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Estimated # of
vessels/persons
Fishery Description
Caribbean haul/beach seine
15
Gulf of Mexico haul/beach seine
West Indian manatee, Antillean
unknown
COLLECTION
None documented
20,000
None documented
>50
None documented
unknown
None documented
FISH-
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean shellfish dive,
hand/mechanical collection
Gulf of Maine urchin dive, hand/mechanical collection
Gulf of Mexico, Southeast Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, and
Caribbean cast net
COMMERCIAL PASSENGER FISHING
(CHARTER BOAT) FISHERIES:
None documented
25
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, haul/beach seine
DIVE, HAND/MECHANICAL
ERIES:
Marine mammal species and stocks incidentally killed/injured
VESSEL
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean commercial
passenger fishing vessel
4,000
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
Eastern GMX coastal
Northern GMX coastal
Western GMX coastal
WNA coastal
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 2: DE - Delaware; FL - Florida; GA - Georgia; GME/BF - Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy; GMX Gulf of Mexico; MA - Massachusetts; NC - North Carolina; VA - Virginia; WNA - Western North Atlantic
1 - Fishery classified based on serious injuries and mortalities of this stock, which are greater than 1 percent of the stock’s PBR
2 - Fishery classified by analogy.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Classification
During the proposed rulemaking stage
for this rule, the Chief Counsel for
Regulation of the Department of
Commerce certified to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis leading to the
certification is repeated below.
Under existing regulations, all fishers
participating in Category I or II fisheries
must register under the MMPA, obtain
an Authorization Certificate, and pay a
fee of $25 (with the exception of those
in regions with a registration process
integrated with existing state and
Federal permitting processes).
Additionally, fishers may be subject to
a Take Reduction Plan (TRP) and
requested to carry an observer. The
Authorization Certificate authorizes the
taking of marine mammals incidental to
commercial fishing operations. NMFS
has estimated that approximately 42,000
fishing vessels, most of which are small
entities, operate in Category I or II
fisheries, and therefore, are required to
register. However, registration has been
integrated with existing state or Federal
registration programs for the majority of
these fisheries so these fishers do not
need to register separately under the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
MMPA. Currently, approximately 350
fishers register directly with NMFS
under the MMPA authorization
program.
Though this final rule will affect
approximately 350 small entities, the
$25 registration fee, with respect to
anticipated revenues, is not considered
a significant economic impact. If a
vessel is requested to carry an observer,
fishers will not incur any direct
economic costs associated with carrying
that observer. Potential indirect costs to
individual fishers required to take
observers may include: lost space on
deck for catch, lost bunk space, and lost
fishing time due to time needed to
process bycatch data. However, effective
monitoring will rotate observers among
a limited number of vessels in a fishery
at any given time and each vessel within
an observed fishery has an equal
probability of being requested to
accommodate an observer. Therefore,
the potential indirect costs to individual
fishers are expected to be minimal since
observer coverage would only be
required for a small percentage of an
individual’s total annual fishing time. In
addition, section 118 of the MMPA
states that an observer will not be
placed on a vessel if the facilities for
quartering an observer or performing
observer functions are inadequate or
unsafe, thereby exempting vessels too
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
small to accommodate an observer from
this requirement. As a result of this
certification, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
was not prepared. In the event that
reclassification of a fishery to Category
I or II results in a TRP, economic
analyses of the effects of that plan will
be summarized in subsequent
rulemaking actions.
This final rule contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act. The
collection of information for the
registration of fishers under the MMPA
has been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
OMB control number 0648–0293 (0.15
hours per report for new registrants and
0.09 hours per report for renewals). The
requirement for reporting marine
mammal injuries or mortalities has been
approved by OMB under OMB control
number 0648–0292 (0.15 hours per
report). These estimates include the
time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information. Send
comments regarding these reporting
burden estimates or any other aspect of
the collections of information, including
suggestions for reducing burden, to
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
66080
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
NMFS and OMB (see ADDRESSES and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
An environmental assessment (EA)
was prepared under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for
regulations to implement section 118 of
the MMPA in June 1995. NMFS revised
that EA relative to classifying U.S.
commercial fisheries on the LOF in
December 2005. Both the 1995 EA and
the 2005 EA concluded that
implementation of MMPA section 118
regulations would not have a significant
impact on the human environment. This
final rule does not make any significant
change in the management of
reclassified fisheries, and therefore, this
final rule is not expected to change the
analysis or conclusion of the 2005 EA.
If NMFS takes a management action, for
example, through the development of a
TRP, NMFS will first prepare an
environmental document, as required
under NEPA, specific to that action.
This final rule will not affect species
listed as threatened or endangered
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) or their associated critical habitat.
The impacts of numerous fisheries have
been analyzed in various biological
opinions, and this final rule will not
affect the conclusions of those opinions.
The classification of fisheries on the
LOF is not considered to be a
management action that would
adversely affect threatened or
endangered species. If NMFS takes a
management action, for example,
through the development of a TRP,
NMFS would conduct consultation
under ESA section 7 for that action.
This final rule will have no adverse
impacts on marine mammals and may
have a positive impact on marine
mammals by improving knowledge of
marine mammals and the fisheries
interacting with marine mammals
through information collected from
observer programs, stranding and
sighting data, or take reduction teams.
This final rule will not affect the land
or water uses or natural resources of the
coastal zone, as specified under section
307 of the Coastal Zone Management
Act.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:41 Nov 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
Dated: November 19, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–23076 Filed 11–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 061121304–7053–02; I.D.
112006B]
RIN 0648–AT87
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico;
Republication of Gulf Red Snapper
Interim Management Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; republication
of interim measures.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This temporary rule
republishes interim measures to reduce
overfishing of Gulf red snapper that
were previously implemented via a
temporary rule published by NMFS on
April 2, 2007, and extended through
March 28, 2008, by a temporary rule
published by NMFS on September 24,
2007. The interim measures reduce the
commercial and recreational quotas for
red snapper, reduce the commercial
minimum size limit for red snapper,
reduce the recreational bag limit for
Gulf red snapper, prohibit the retention
of red snapper under the bag limit for
captain and crew of a vessel operating
as a charter vessel or headboat, and
establish a target level of reduction of
shrimp trawl bycatch mortality of red
snapper. The intended effect of this
temporary rule is to reinstate the text of
the interim measures in the Code of
Federal Regulations that was
inadvertently removed.
DATES: This rule is effective November
27, 2007 through March 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS)
and Record of Decision (ROD) prepared
for the April 2, 2007, temporary final
rule (72 FR 15617) are available from
Peter Hood, Southeast Regional Office,
NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The red
snapper fishery of the Gulf of Mexico is
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
managed under the Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) for the Reef
Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, and
the shrimp fishery is managed under the
FMP for the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf
of Mexico. The FMPs were prepared by
the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council (Council) and are implemented
under the authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens
Act) by regulations at 50 CFR part 622.
NMFS issued a temporary rule (72 FR
15617, April 2, 2007) under section
305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, to
implement interim measures to reduce
fishing mortality on red snapper by
reducing harvest and bycatch levels.
Specifically, that rule: (1) reduced red
snapper total allowable catch (TAC)
from 9.12 million lb (4.14 million kg) to
6.5 million lb (2.9 million kg), whole
weight, resulting in a commercial quota
of 3.315 million lb (1.504 million kg)
and a recreational quota of 3.185 million
lb (1.445 million kg); (2) reduced the
commercial minimum size limit for red
snapper from 15 inches (38 cm) to 13
inches (33 cm) total length (TL); (3)
reduced the daily recreational bag limit
from four fish to two fish per person and
prohibits the captain and crew of forhire vessels (charter vessels and
headboats) from retaining the
recreational bag limit; and (4)
established a goal to reduce red snapper
bycatch mortality in the shrimp fishery
to 50 percent of the bycatch mortality
that occurred during 2001–2003. These
measures remain necessary to address
overfishing of the red snapper resource.
Under section 305(c)(3)(B) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS may
extend the effectiveness of interim
measures for one additional period of
not more than 186 days, provided the
public has had an opportunity to
comment on the interim measures and
the Council is actively preparing
proposed regulations to address the
overfishing on a permanent basis. NMFS
solicited public comments on the
interim measures in a temporary
proposed rule (71 FR 75220, December
14, 2006) and received numerous
comments. These comments were
summarized and NMFS’s responses
were provided in the temporary final
rule (72 FR 15617, April 2, 2007). The
Council prepared joint Amendment 27/
14 to the Reef Fish and Shrimp FMPs in
the Gulf of Mexico (Amendment 27/14)
to address overfishing of red snapper.
NMFS partially approved Amendment
27/14 on October 19, 2007. The
approved portions of the amendment
include additional measures to end
overfishing and to rebuild the red
snapper stock.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 27, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66048-66080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23076]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 229
[Docket No. 070417093-7582-02]
RIN 0648-AV54
List of Fisheries for 2008
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is publishing its
final List of Fisheries (LOF) for 2008, as required by the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). The final LOF for 2008 reflects new
information on interactions between commercial fisheries and marine
mammals. NMFS must categorize each commercial fishery on the LOF into
one of three categories under the MMPA based upon the level of serious
injury and mortality of marine mammals that occurs incidental to each
fishery. The categorization of a fishery in the LOF determines whether
participants in that fishery are subject to certain provisions of the
MMPA, such as registration, observer coverage, and take reduction plan
requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 1, 2008.
ADDRESSES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for a listing of all Regional
offices.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates, or any other
aspect of the collection of information requirements contained in this
final rule, should be submitted in writing to Chief, Marine Mammal and
Sea Turtle Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, or to David Rostker,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), by fax to 202-395-7285 or by
email to David--Rostker@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Andersen, Office of Protected
Resources, 301-713-2322; David Gouveia, Northeast Region, 978-281-9280;
Nancy Young, Southeast Region, 727-551-5607; Elizabeth Petras,
Southwest Region, 562-980-3238; Brent Norberg, Northwest Region, 206-
526-6733; Bridget Mansfield, Alaska Region, 907-586-7642; Lisa Van
Atta, Pacific Islands Region, 808-944-2257. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the hearing impaired may call the Federal
Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Eastern time, Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Published Materials
Information regarding the LOF and the Marine Mammal Authorization
Program, including registration procedures and forms, current and past
LOFs, observer requirements, and marine mammal injury/mortality
reporting forms and submittal procedures, may be obtained at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/, or from any NMFS Regional Office at
the addresses listed below.
Regional Offices
NMFS, Northeast Region, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-
2298, Attn: Marcia Hobbs;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL
33701, Attn: Teletha Mincey;
NMFS, Southwest Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802-4213, Attn: Lyle Enriquez;
NMFS, Northwest Region, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115,
Attn: Permits Office;
NMFS, Alaska Region, Protected Resources, P.O. Box 22668, 709 West
9th Street, Juneau, AK 99802; or
NMFS, Pacific Islands Region, Protected Resources, 1601 Kapiolani
Boulevard, Suite 1100, Honolulu, HI 96814-4700.
What is the List of Fisheries?
Section 118 of the MMPA requires NMFS to place all U.S. commercial
fisheries into one of three categories based on the level of incidental
serious injury and mortality of marine mammals occurring in each
fishery (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(1)). The categorization of a fishery in the
LOF determines whether participants in that fishery may be required to
comply with certain provisions of the MMPA, such as registration,
observer coverage, and take reduction plan requirements. NMFS must
reexamine the LOF annually, considering new information in the Marine
Mammal Stock Assessment Reports (SAR) and other relevant
[[Page 66049]]
sources, and publish in the Federal Register any necessary changes to
the LOF after notice and opportunity for public comment (16 U.S.C. 1387
(c)(1)(C)).
How Does NMFS Determine in which Category a Fishery is Placed?
The definitions for the fishery classification criteria can be
found in the implementing regulations for section 118 of the MMPA (50
CFR 229.2). The criteria are also summarized here.
Fishery Classification Criteria
The fishery classification criteria consist of a two-tiered, stock-
specific approach that first addresses the total impact of all
fisheries on each marine mammal stock, and then addresses the impact of
individual fisheries on each stock. This approach is based on
consideration of the rate, in numbers of animals per year, of
incidental mortalities and serious injuries of marine mammals due to
commercial fishing operations relative to the potential biological
removal (PBR) level for each marine mammal stock. The MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1362 (20)) defines the PBR level as the maximum number of animals, not
including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal
stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its optimum
sustainable population. This definition can also be found in the
implementing regulations for section 118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2).
Tier 1: If the total annual mortality and serious injury of a
marine mammal stock, across all fisheries, is less than or equal to 10
percent of the PBR level of the stock, all fisheries interacting with
the stock would be placed in Category III (unless those fisheries
interact with other stock(s) in which total annual mortality and
serious injury is greater than 10 percent of PBR). Otherwise, these
fisheries are subject to the next tier (Tier 2) of analysis to
determine their classification.
Tier 2, Category I: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock
in a given fishery is greater than or equal to 50 percent of the PBR
level.
Tier 2, Category II: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock
in a given fishery is greater than 1 percent and less than 50 percent
of the PBR level.
Tier 2, Category III: Annual mortality and serious injury of a
stock in a given fishery is less than or equal to 1 percent of the PBR
level.
While Tier 1 considers the cumulative fishery mortality and serious
injury for a particular stock, Tier 2 considers fishery-specific
mortality and serious injury for a particular stock. Additional details
regarding how the categories were determined are provided in the
preamble to the proposed rule implementing section 118 of the MMPA (60
FR 45086, August 30, 1995).
Since fisheries are categorized on a per-stock basis, a fishery may
qualify as one Category for one marine mammal stock and another
Category for a different marine mammal stock. A fishery is typically
categorized on the LOF at its highest level of classification (e.g., a
fishery qualifying for Category III for one marine mammal stock and for
Category II for another marine mammal stock will be listed under
Category II).
Other Criteria That May Be Considered
In the absence of reliable information indicating the frequency of
incidental mortality and serious injury of marine mammals by a
commercial fishery, NMFS will determine whether the fishery qualifies
for Category II by evaluating other factors such as fishing techniques,
gear used, methods used to deter marine mammals, target species,
seasons and areas fished, qualitative data from logbooks or fisher
reports, stranding data, and the species and distribution of marine
mammals in the area, or at the discretion of the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries (50 CFR 229.2).
How Does NMFS Determine which Species or Stocks are Included as
Incidentally Killed or Seriously Injured in a Fishery?
The LOF includes a list of marine mammal species or stocks
incidentally killed or seriously injured in each commercial fishery,
based on the level of mortality or serious injury in each fishery
relative to the PBR level for each stock. To determine which species or
stocks are included as incidentally killed or seriously injured in a
fishery, NMFS annually reviews the information presented in the current
SARs. The SARs are based upon the best available scientific information
and provide the most current and inclusive information on each stock's
PBR level and level of mortality or serious injury incidental to
commercial fishing operations. NMFS also reviews other sources of new
information, including observer data, stranding data, and fisher self-
reports.
In the absence of reliable information on the level of mortality or
serious injury of a marine mammal stock, or insufficient observer data,
NMFS will determine whether a species or stock should be added to, or
deleted from, the list by considering other factors such as: changes in
gear used, increases or decreases in fishing effort, increases or
decreases in the level of observer coverage, and/or changes in fishery
management that are expected to lead to decreases in interactions with
a given marine mammal stock (such as a Fishery Management Plan or a
Take Reduction Plan). NMFS will provide case-specific justification in
the LOF for changes to the list of species or stocks incidentally
killed or seriously injured.
How Does NMFS Determine the Level of Observer Coverage in a Fishery?
Data obtained from observers and the level of observer coverage are
important tools in estimating the level of marine mammal mortality and
serious injury in commercial fishing operations. The best available
information on the level of observer coverage, and the spatial and
temporal distribution of observed marine mammal interactions, is
presented in the SARs. Starting with the 2005 SARs, each SAR includes
an appendix with detailed descriptions of each Category I and II
fishery in the LOF. The SARs generally do not provide detailed
information on observer coverage in Category III fisheries because
under the MMPA Category III fisheries are not required to accommodate
observers aboard vessels due to the remote likelihood of mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals. Information presented in the SARs'
appendices include: level of observer coverage, target species, levels
of fishing effort, spatial and temporal distribution of fishing effort,
gear characteristics, management and regulations, and interactions with
marine mammals. Copies of the SARs are available on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resource's Web site at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Additional information on observer coverage in commercial fisheries can
be found on the NMFS National Observer Program's website: https://
www.st.nmfs.gov/st4/nop/.
How Do I Find Out if a Specific Fishery is in Category I, II, or III?
This final rule includes two tables that list all U.S. commercial
fisheries by LOF Category. Table 1 lists all of the fisheries in the
Pacific Ocean (including Alaska). Table 2 lists all of the fisheries in
the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean.
Are High Seas Fisheries Included in the LOF?
High seas fisheries in which U.S. persons or vessels participate
are not included in the LOF. However, NMFS is considering the inclusion
of U.S.-authorized high seas fisheries (fisheries operating beyond 200
nmi of U.S. coasts) in future LOFs. At this time,
[[Page 66050]]
NMFS is gathering available information on the number of vessels
permitted and/or actively fishing in U.S.-authorized high seas
fisheries, gear types used, and marine mammal-fishery interactions data
included in documents published under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (MSA), National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), Endangered Species Act (ESA), and MMPA, and from relevant
Regional Fishery Management Organizations (RFMO) and the International
Whaling Commission (IWC).
Am I Required to Register Under the MMPA?
Owners of vessels or gear engaging in a Category I or II fishery
are required under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(2)), as described in 50
CFR 229.4, to register with NMFS and obtain a marine mammal
authorization from NMFS in order to lawfully incidentally take a marine
mammal in a commercial fishery. Owners of vessels or gear engaged in a
Category III fishery are not required to register with NMFS or obtain a
marine mammal authorization.
How Do I Register?
Vessel or gear owners must register with the Marine Mammal
Authorization Program (MMAP) by contacting the relevant NMFS Regional
Office (see ADDRESSES), unless they participate in a fishery that has
an integrated registration program (described below). Upon receipt of a
completed registration, NMFS will issue vessel or gear owners an
authorization certificate. The authorization certificate, or a copy,
must be on board the vessel while it is operating in a Category I or II
fishery, or for non-vessel fisheries, in the possession of the person
in charge of the fishing operation (50 CFR 229.4(e)).
What is the Process for Registering in an Integrated Fishery?
For some fisheries, NMFS has integrated the MMAP registration
process with existing state and Federal fishery license, registration,
or permit systems. Participants in these fisheries are automatically
registered under the MMAP and are not required to submit registration
or renewal materials or pay the $25 registration fee. The following
section indicates which fisheries are integrated fisheries and has a
summary of the integration process for each Region. Although efforts
are made to limit the issuance of authorization certificates to only
those vessel or gear owners that participate in Category I or II
fisheries, not all state and Federal permit systems distinguish between
fisheries as classified by the LOF. Therefore, some vessel or gear
owners in Category III fisheries may receive authorization certificates
even though they are not required for Category III fisheries.
Individuals fishing in Category I and II fisheries for which no state
or Federal permit is required must register with NMFS by contacting
their appropriate Regional Office (see ADDRESSES).
Which Fisheries Have Integrated Registration Programs?
The following fisheries have integrated registration programs under
the MMPA:
1. All Alaska Category II fisheries;
2. All Washington and Oregon Category II fisheries;
3. Northeast Regional fisheries for which a state or Federal permit
is required;
4. All Southeast Regional fisheries for which a Federal permit is
required, as well as fisheries permitted by the states of North
Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi,
Louisiana, and Texas; and
5. The HI Swordfish, Tuna, Billfish, Mahi Mahi, Wahoo, Oceanic
Sharks Longline/Set line Fishery.
How Do I Receive My Authorization Certificate and Injury/Mortality
Reporting Forms?
All vessel or gear owners will receive their authorization
certificates and/or injury/mortality reporting forms via U.S. mail upon
registration, except those vessel owners participating in the Northeast
and Southeast Regional Integrated Registration Program. Vessel or gear
owners participating in the Northeast and Southeast Regional Integrated
Registration Program will receive their authorization certificates as
follows:
1. Northeast Region vessel or gear owners participating in Category
I or II fisheries for which a state or Federal permit is required may
receive their authorization certificate and/or injury/mortality
reporting form by contacting the Northeast Regional Office at 978-281-
9328 or by visiting the Northeast Regional Office Web site (https://
www.nero.noaa.gov/prot_res/) and following instructions for printing
the necessary documents.
2. Southeast Region vessel or gear owners participating in Category
I or II fisheries for which a Federal permit is required, as well as
fisheries permitted by the states of North Carolina, South Carolina,
Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas may
receive their authorization certificate and/or injury/mortality
reporting form by contacting the Southeast Regional Office at 727-824-
5312 or by visiting the Southeast Regional Office Web site (https://
sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pr.htm) and following instructions for printing
the necessary documents.
How Do I Renew My Registration Under the MMPA?
Vessel or gear owners that participate in Pacific Islands or
Alaska regional fisheries are automatically renewed and should receive
an authorization certificate by January 1 of each new year. Vessel or
gear owners in Washington and Oregon fisheries receive authorization
with each renewed state fishing license, the timing of which varies
based on target species. Vessel or gear owners who participate in
Pacific Islands, Alaska, Washington, or Oregon fisheries and have not
received authorization certificates by January 1 or with renewed
fishing licenses must contact the appropriate NMFS Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES).
Vessel or gear owners in Southeast or Northeast regional fisheries
may receive their authorization certificates by calling the relevant
NMFS Regional Office or visiting the relevant NMFS Regional Office Web
site (see How Do I Receive My Authorization Certificate and Injury/
Mortality Reporting Forms).
Vessel or gear owners that participate in Southwest regional
fisheries, which do not have an integrated registration program, and
have previously registered in a Category I or II fishery will receive a
renewal packet from the NMFS Southwest Regional Office at least 30 days
prior to January 1 of each new year. It is the responsibility of the
vessel or gear owner in these fisheries to complete their renewal form
and return it to the NMFS Southwest Regional Office at least 30 days in
advance of fishing. Individuals who have not received a renewal packet
by January 1 must request a registration form from the NMFS Southwest
Regional Office (see ADDRESSES).
Am I Required to Submit Reports When I Injure or Kill a Marine
Mammal During the Course of Commercial Fishing Operations?
In accordance with the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(e)) and 50 CFR 229.6,
any vessel owner or operator, or gear owner or operator (in the case of
non-vessel fisheries), participating in a Category I, II, or III
fishery must report to NMFS all incidental injuries and mortalities of
marine mammals that occur during commercial fishing operations.
``Injury'' is defined in 50 CFR 229.2 as a wound or other physical
harm. In addition, any animal that ingests fishing gear or any animal
that is released with fishing gear
[[Page 66051]]
entangling, trailing, or perforating any part of the body is considered
injured, regardless of the presence of any wound or other evidence of
injury, and must be reported. Injury/mortality reporting forms and
instructions for submitting forms to NMFS can be downloaded from:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/interactions/mmap_reporting_
form.pdf. Reporting requirements and procedures can be found in 50 CFR
229.6.
Am I Required to Take an Observer Aboard My Vessel?
Fishers participating in a Category I or II fishery are required to
accommodate an observer aboard vessel(s) upon request. Observer
requirements can be found in 50 CFR 229.7.
Am I Required to Comply With Any Take Reduction Plan Regulations?
Fishers participating in a Category I or II fishery are required to
comply with any applicable take reduction plans. Take reduction plan
regulations can be found at 50 CFR 229.30-35.
Sources of Information Reviewed for the Final 2008 LOF
NMFS reviewed the marine mammal incidental mortality and serious
injury information presented in the SARs for all observed fisheries to
determine whether changes in fishery classification were warranted.
NMFS' SARs are based on the best scientific information available at
the time of preparation, including the level of mortality and serious
injury of marine mammals that occurs incidental to commercial fisheries
and the PBR levels of marine mammal stocks. The information contained
in the SARs is reviewed by regional Scientific Review Groups (SRGs)
representing Alaska, the Pacific (including Hawaii), and the U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean. The SRGs were created by the
MMPA to review the science that informs the SARs, and to advise NMFS on
population status and trends, stock structure, uncertainties in the
science, research needs, and other issues.
NMFS also reviewed other sources of new information, including
marine mammal stranding data, observer program data, fisher self-
reports, and other information that may not be included in the SARs.
The final LOF for 2008 was based, among other things, on
information provided in the final SARs for 1996 (63 FR 60, January 2,
1998), the final SARs for 2001 (67 FR 10671, March 8, 2002), the final
SARs for 2002 (68 FR 17920, April 14, 2003), the final SARs for 2003
(69 FR 54262, September 8, 2004), the final SARs for 2004 (70 FR 35397,
June 20, 2005), the final SARs for 2005 (71 FR 26340, May 4, 2006), the
final SARs for 2006 (72 FR 12774, March 19, 2007), and the draft SARs
for 2007 (72 FR 35428, June 28, 2007). All the SARs are available at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Fishery Descriptions
Below, NMFS briefly describes each Category I and II fishery in the
final LOF for 2008. While detailed information describing each fishery
in the LOF is included in the SARs, within a Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) or Take Reduction Plan (TRP), or by state agencies, general
descriptive information is important to include in the LOF for improved
clarity. Fisheries are defined based on the gear and fishing methods,
target species, temporal and spatial distribution, and management and
regulatory schemes. NMFS refers readers to the SARs for more additional
information on Category I and II fisheries. Abbreviations used in the
following descriptions include: AK (Alaska), AL (Alabama), CA
(California), DE (Deleware), FL (Florida), GA (Georgia), HI (Hawaii),
LA (Louisiana), MA (Massachusetts), ME (Maine), MS (Mississippi), NC
(North Carolina), NJ (New Jersey), NY (New York), OR (Oregon), RI
(Rhode Island), SC (South Carolina), TX (Texas), VA (Virginia), and WA
(Washington).
Category I and II Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
HI Swordfish, Tuna, Billfish, Mahi Mahi, Wahoo, Oceanic Sharks
Longline/Set Line Fishery
The Category I HI longline fishery targets swordfish, tuna,
billfish, mahi mahi, wahoo, and oceanic sharks. The basic unit of gear
is a 30-40 mi (48-64 km) long mainline made of 0.13-0.16 in (3.2-4.0
mm) diameter monofilament line, with 800-1,000 hooks attached to the
mainline. Deployment and retrieval of gear must occur at night. Shallow
swordfish sets are required to use size 18/0 circle hooks with a 10-
degree offset and mackerel bait. Using squid bait is prohibited. For
deep sets, all float lines must be at least 20 m (65.6 ft) long with a
minimum of 15 branch lines attached to the mainline between any 2
floats, except for basket-style longline gear that may have as few as
10 branch lines. The use of any light emitting device is prohibited and
vessels may not land or possess more than 10 swordfish at any time. The
fishery operates over a huge geographic range extending north-south
from 40[deg] N. lat. to the equator and east-west from Kure Atoll to as
far as 135[deg] W. long. Fishing for swordfish generally occurs north
of Hawaii (as much as 2,000 mi (3,219 km) from Honolulu), whereas
fishing for tunas occurs primarily around the main Hawaiian Islands and
south of the Hawaiian Islands. The fishery operates year-round, with
effort generally lower in the third quarter of the year.
The HI longline fishery is managed in part under the FMP for
Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region. The shallow-set
swordfish component has annual fleetwide limits on interactions with
leatherback and loggerhead sea turtles, an annual fleetwide limit of
2,120 shallow sets north of the equator per year, and a requirement for
operators to annually participate in a protected species workshop and
get a valid protected species certification. Also, regulations mandate
100 percent observer coverage in the shallow-set component of the
fishery and at least 20 percent observer coverage in the deep-set
component.
CA/OR Thresher Shark/Swordfish Drift Gillnet Fishery ([gteqt]14 in
mesh)
The Category I CA/OR thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery
primarily targets common thresher sharks and swordfish using a 1000-
fathom (6,000 ft; 1,829 m) gillnet with stretched mesh size from 18-22
in (46-56 cm) with a 14-in (35.6 cm) minimum. Other species caught
include: pelagic thresher, bigeye thresher, shortfin mako, blue shark,
albacore, other tunas, and dorado. One end of the net is typically
attached to the vessel and is set at dusk and allowed to drift during
the night, typically for 12-14 hours. Fishing effort extends from the
U.S.-Mexico border north to waters off of OR, with the majority of
effort occurring from October to December. OR restricts landings to
swordfish only.
This fishery is a limited entry fishery managed under the Pacific
Highly Migratory Species (HMS) FMP and by regulations under the Pacific
Offshore Cetacean Take Reduction Plan (POCTRP), including multiple
area-season closures and gear restrictions, a requirement for pingers
on drift gillnets, a requirement that extenders (buoy lines) be at
least 36 ft (11 m) long, and a requirement for vessel captains to
attend skipper education workshops, when notified by NMFS.
CA Angel Shark/Halibut and Other Species Set Gillnet Fishery (>3.5 in
mesh)
The Category I CA angel shark/halibut and other species set gillnet
fishery targets angel shark and halibut from the
[[Page 66052]]
U.S.-Mexico border north to Monterey Bay using 200 fathom (1,200 ft;
366 m) gillnet with a stretch mesh size of 8.5 in (31.6 cm). Net soak
duration is typically 8-10, 19-24, or 44-49 hours at a depth ranging
from 15-50 fathoms (90-300 ft; 27-91 m) with most sets from 15-35
fathoms (90-210 ft; 27-64 m). No more than 1500 fathoms (9,000 ft;
2,743 m) of gill or trammel net may be fished in combination for CA
halibut and angel shark. Fishing occurs year-round, with effort
generally increasing during summer months and declining during last the
3 months of the year. The central CA portion of the fishery from Point
Arguello to Point Reyes has been closed since September, 2002,
following a ban on gillnets inshore of 60 fathoms (360 ft; 110 m). Set
gill nets have been prohibited in state waters south of Point Arguello
and within 70 fathoms (420 ft; 128 m) or one mile (1.6 km), whichever
is less, around the Channel Islands since 1990. The CA Department of
Fish and Game (CDFG) manages the fishery as a limited entry fishery
with gear restrictions and area closures.
CA Yellowtail, Barracuda, and White Seabass Drift Gillnet (mesh size
[gteqt]3.5 in and <14 in) Fishery
The Category II CA yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass drift
gillnet fishery targets primarily yellowtail and white seabass, and
secondarily barracuda, with target species typically determined by
market demand on a short-term basis. Drift gillnets are up to 6,000 ft
(1,829 m) long and are set at the surface. The mesh size depends on
target species and is typically 6.0-6.5 in (15-16.5 cm). When targeting
yellowtail and barracuda, the mesh size must be [gteqt]3.5 in (9 cm);
when targeting white seabass, the mesh size must be [gteqt]6 in (15.2
cm). From June 16 to March 14 not more than 20 percent, by number, of a
load of fish may be white seabass with a total length of 28 in (71 cm).
A maximum of ten white seabass per load may be taken, if taken in
gillnet or trammel nets with meshes from 3.5-6.0 in (9-15 cm) in
length. The fishery operates year-round, primarily south of Point
Conception with some effort around San Clemente Island and San Nicolas
Island. This fishery is a limited entry fishery with various gear
restrictions and area closures managed by the CDFG. Targeting tuna with
this type of gear was effectively prohibited in April, 2004, under the
Pacific HMS FMP.
CA Anchovy, Mackerel, Sardine Purse Seine Fishery
The Category II CA anchovy, mackerel, sardine purse seine fishery
targets wetfish (anchovy, mackerel, and sardine), with the target
species primarily driven by availability and market demand. The fishery
uses purse seines, drum seines, and lampara nets using standard seining
techniques. A typical purse seine net is 185 fathoms (1,110 ft; 338 m)
long, 22 fathoms (132 ft; 40 m) deep, and 1,600 meshes deep with each
mesh measuring 1.25 in (3 cm). The fishery operates year-round
predominantly in southern CA (including the Channel Islands) from San
Diego, Oceanside, Dana Point, and San Pedro then north to San
Francisco. This fishery is a limited entry fishery, and the mackerel
and sardine fisheries are quota fisheries. The fishery is managed in
accordance with the Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) FMP.
CA Tuna Purse Seine Fishery
The Category II CA tuna purse seine fishery targets yellowfin,
skipjack, and bluefin tuna using purse seine nets similar to those used
to target Coastal Pelagic Species (see the description under ``CA
anchovy, mackerel, sardine purse seine fishery''). The fishery operates
from May to October south of Point Conception to the U.S.-Mexico border
and in the Southern California Bight. The fishery is managed under the
Pacific HMS FMP. This fishery is considered an opportunistic fishery,
meaning that fishers only target tuna when certain oceanographic and
market conditions exist to make the fishery viable. Effort in the
fishery is highly variable, ranging from zero to ten participants
annually over the past several years.
CA Squid Purse Seine Fishery
The Category II CA squid purse seine fishery targets market squid
using several gear types. From 1997-2001, 98 percent of fishermen used
purse (77 percent) or drum (21 percent) seine nets. Other types used
were lampara, dip, and brail nets. The fishery uses lights (shielded
and oriented downward, with a maximum of 30,000 watts) to aggregate
spawning squid. The fishery operates year-round with the effort
focusing north of Point Conception from April to September and south of
Point Conception from October to March. El Nino events cause northern
landings to increase, while La Nina events cause southern landings to
increase.
The fishery is managed by the CDFG and is monitored under the CPS
FMP and the Market Squid FMP. Commercial squid purse seine fishing is
prohibited year-round from noon on Friday until noon on Sunday to allow
a 2-day consecutive uninterrupted period of spawning. All vessels must
be permitted and comply with a mandatory logbook program for fishing
and lighting. Since 2001, a seasonal harvest guideline is set to limit
further expansion of the fishery.
CA Pelagic Longline Fishery
The Category II CA pelagic longline fishery includes both shallow-
set and deep-set gear targeting swordfish and bigeye, albacore, and
yellowfin tuna. The fishery operates in waters outside of the U.S.
Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) because the Pacific HMS FMP prohibits
targeting swordfish with longlines within 200 nmi of shore. In 2004,
the CA-based shallow-set longline fishery was closed due to anticipated
levels of sea turtle interactions. The following is a general
description of the shallow-set fishery as it operated prior to 2004 and
the current deep-set longline fishery.
Prior to 2004, shallow-set longlines operated year-round primarily
targeting swordfish with 15-45 mi (24-72 km) of mainline rigged with
72-ft (22-m) gangions at approximately 197 ft (60 m) intervals. A
shallow-set typically has 800-1,300 hooks with large squid or mackerel
for bait. Most shallow-set fishing takes place at night when swordfish
are at the surface, using various colored lightsticks. A shallow-set
mainline is deployed for 4-7 hours and left to drift unattached for 7-
10 hours. At this time there is no CA-based shallow-set longline
fishing due to anticipated levels of sea turtle interactions.
Deep-set longlines operate year-round primarily targeting tuna with
4-46.6 mi (7-75 km) mainline rigged with 25.6-36 ft (7.8-10.9 m)
gangions with 15-16 branchlines set between floats. Deep-set longlines
are set at dawn with an average 12 hour soak time. The deep-set sag of
the mainline is between 328-1,050 ft (100-320 m) below the water's
surface. A deep-set typically contains 270-1,900 hooks with double
weighted leaders and sardine for bait. Deep-sets use a variety of hooks
including size 38 tuna hooks, size 9 J-hooks, and size 16/0 circle
hooks. A small scale deep-set longline fishery began in January 2005
and continues currently. One hundred percent observer coverage is
required in the deep-set longline fishery.
WA Puget Sound Regional Salmon Drift Gillnet
The Category II WA Puget Sound regional salmon drift gillnet
fishery targets coho, pink, sockeye, chinook, and chum salmon in inland
marine waters (state waters) south of the U.S.-Canada border and east
of the Bonilla-Tatoosh line at the entrance to the Strait of Juan de
Fuca. Drift gillnet gear consists of single web construction, not
[[Page 66053]]
exceeding 300 fathoms (1,800; 549 m) in length, attached at one end of
the vessel. The minimum mesh size varies from 5-7 in (13-18 cm)
depending on the target species. While the depths fished vary,
fishermen strive to keep the net off of the bottom. The drift times
vary depending on the fishing area, tidal condition, and catch. This
fishery is a limited entry fishery with seasonal openings, area
closures, and gear restrictions. Regulations governing incidental take
of marine mammals do not apply to tribal members exercising fishing
treaty rights within this fishery .
AK Prince William Sound Salmon Drift Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Prince William Sound salmon drift gillnet
fishery targets salmon using drift gillnet gear with soak times of 15
minutes to 3 hours. The gear is set both during the day and night, with
10-14 sets per day. The fishery operates from mid-May to the end of
September in the Prince William Sound Fisheries Management Area, the
Copper River, and the Bering Sea. The Prince William Sound Fisheries
Management Area consists of 11 districts with six hatcheries
contributing to the salmon fisheries. This drift gillnet fishery is
managed by the AK Department of Fish and Game (ADFG) as a limited entry
fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and area closures.
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands Salmon Drift Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon drift gillnet
fishery targets salmon using drift gillnet gear with soak times of 2-5
hours. The gear is set during the day and night, with 3-8 sets per day.
The fishery operates from mid-June to mid-September in two districts
north of the AK Peninsula (Northern and Northwestern), and four
districts south of the AK Peninsula (Unimake, Southwestern,
Southcentral, and Southeastern). This drift gillnet fishery is managed
by ADFG as a limited entry fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and net
size) and area closures.
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands Salmon Set Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon set gillnet
fishery targets salmon using set gillnet with the gear set every 2
hours during the day and night. The gear is set with continuous soak
times during the opener. Salmon may only be fished commercially during
periods known as openers established by ADFG in-season. During some
periods of the season fishing may be continuous with openers lasting
days or even many weeks at a time. The ADFG posts weekly notices of
fishing openers and announces the openers on regular radio channels a
few days or a few hours before each opener. Fishing periods are often
extended by Emergency Order during the last 24 hours of the opener.
This fishery generally operates from June 18 to mid-August in two
districts north of the AK Peninsula (Northern and Northwestern), and
four districts south of the AK Peninsula (Unimake, Southwestern,
Southcentral, and Southeastern). Set gillnet fishing effort also occurs
off Atka and Amelia Islands. This set gillnet fishery is managed by
ADFG as a limited entry fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and net
size) and area closures.
AK Southeast Salmon Drift Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Southeast salmon drift gillnet fishery targets
salmon using drift gillnet gear with soak times of 20 minutes to 3
hours. The gear is set during the day and night, with 6-20 sets set per
day. This fishery generally operates from June 18 to early October in
five main fishing areas off Southeast AK, as well as at Annette Island,
in Terminal Harvest Areas (THA) adjacent to hatchery facilities, and
for hatchery cost recovery. The majority of salmon are caught by drift
gillnets in the five main fishing areas (81 percent in 2003) and the
THAs (13 percent in 2003), with small contributions from Annette Island
(4 percent in 2003), and for hatchery cost recovery (1.8 percent in
2003). This drift gillnet fishery is managed by ADFG as a limited entry
fishery, with gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and area closures.
AK Cook Inlet Salmon Drift Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Cook Inlet salmon drift gillnet fishery targets
salmon using drift gillnet gear with soak times of 15 minutes to 3
hours, or continuously. The gear is set during the day, with 6-18 sets
per day. This fishery generally operates from June 25 to end of August
in the Central District of the Upper Cook Inlet. Drift gillnet fishing
effort for sockeye salmon peaks in mid to late July. Currently, drift
gillnet fishing for salmon in the Cook Inlet occurs in the Central
District area only for the two regular 12-hour openers on Mondays and
Thursdays. This drift gillnet fishery is managed by ADFG as a limited
entry fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and area
closures.
AK Cook Inlet Salmon Set Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Cook Inlet salmon set gillnet fishery targets
salmon using set gillnet gear with continuous soak times during the
opener. Fishing effort occurs during the day and night in the Upper
Cook Inlet; while fishing effort occurs only during the day in the
Lower Cook Inlet, except during fishery extensions. In the Upper Cook
Inlet, the catch is picked from the net (i.e., the net is tended) each
day during a slack tide; while the catch is picked from the net every
2-6 hours in the Lower Cook Inlet. The net becomes dry with low tide.
The fishery generally operates from June 2 to mid-September in Cook
Inlet. This set gillnet fishery is managed by ADFG as a limited entry
fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and area closures.
AK Yakutat Salmon Set Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Yakutat salmon set gillnet fishery targets
salmon using set gillnet gear with continuous soak times during the
opener, during the day and night. The catch is picked from the net
every 2-4 hours each day or continuously during peak fishing times. The
fishery generally operates from June 4 to the end of August. The
Yakutat salmon set gillnet fishery consists of multiple set gillnet
fisheries occurring in two fishing districts, the Yakutat District and
the Yakataga District. As many as 25 different areas in the Yakutat and
Yakataga Districts are open to commercial fishing each year. The
Yakutat District fisheries primarily target sockeye and coho salmon,
although all species of salmon are harvested. The Yakataga District
fisheries target coho salmon. With a few exceptions, set gillnetting is
confined to the intertidal area inside the mouths of rivers and
streams, and to the ocean waters immediately adjacent to each. Due to
the terminal nature of these fisheries, ADFG has been able to develop
salmon escapement goals for most of the major, and several of the
minor, fisheries. This set gillnet fishery is managed by ADFG as a
limited entry fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and
area closures.
AK Kodiak Salmon Set Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Kodiak salmon set gillnet fishery targets salmon
using set gillnet gear with continuous soak times during the opener.
Fishing effort occurs during the day, with the catch picked from the
net 2 or more times each day. The majority of set gillnets are attached
to a shore lead up to 80 fathoms (480 ft; 146 m) long in a straight
line to a king
[[Page 66054]]
buoy offshore, with numerous anchor lines and buoys holding the net in
place. The last 25 fathoms (150 ft; 46 m) of the gillnet is usually
formed into a fish trap, also called a hook. The fishery generally
operates from June 9 to the end of September or early October. Many
areas are open until early October, but most fishermen remove the nets
by early September. As the runs progress in late July and change from
sockeye to pink salmon, the ADFG often reduces the length of openers if
escapement goals have not been met. Fishing effort begins to reduce in
mid to late August as salmon runs begin to decline.
This fishery consists of 2 Districts, the Northwest District from
Spruce Island to the south side of Uyak Bay, and the Alitak Bay
District located on the southwestern corner of Kodiak Island. In most
years, the Northwest District is fished by approximately 100 permit
holders and constitutes approximately 70 percent of the annual fishing
effort, while the Alitak Bay District is fished by approximately 70
permit holders and constitutes approximately 30 percent of the annual
fishing effort. Traditionally, the Northwest District is open for the
majority of June and July, while effort in the Alitak Bay District
typically occurs 5 to 7 days out of every 10 days during the fishing
season. This set gillnet fishery is managed by ADFG as a limited entry
fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and area closures.
AK Bristol Bay Salmon Drift Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Bristol Bay salmon drift gillnet fishery targets
salmon using drift gillnet gear with continuous soak times for part of
the net, while other parts of the net are tended. Fishing effort occurs
during the day and night, with a continuous number of sets per day.
This fishery generally operates from June 17 to the end of August in
Bristol Bay. Approximately 80 percent of the salmon catch in Bristol
Bay is caught with drift gillnets. The Bristol Bay management area
consists of five management districts including all coastal and inland
waters from Cape Newenham to Cape Menshikof. There are eight major
river systems in the area, and these form the largest commercial
sockeye salmon fishery in the world. Although sockeye salmon is the
most abundant salmon species that returns to Bristol Bay each year,
chinook, chum, coho, and pink salmon returns are also important to the
fishery. This drift gillnet fishery is managed by ADFG as a limited
entry fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and area
closures.
AK Bristol Bay Salmon Set Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Bristol Bay salmon set gillnet fishery targets
salmon using set gillnet gear with continuous soak times during the
opener, but the net is dry during low tide. Fishing effort occurs
during the day and night, with 2 or more continuous sets per day. This
fishery generally operates from June 17 to the end of August or mid-
September in the same areas in Bristol Bay as the AK Bristol Bay salmon
drift gillnet fishery discussed above. Approximately 20 percent of the
salmon catch in Bristol Bay is caught with set gillnets. This set
gillnet fishery is managed by ADFG as a limited entry fishery with gear
restrictions (mesh and net size) and area closures.
AK Metlakatla/Annette Island Salmon Drift Gillnet Fishery
The Category II AK Metlakatla/Annette Island salmon drift gillnet
fishery targets salmon using drift gillnet gear off Annette Island in
Southeast AK. This drift gillnet fishery is an exclusively tribal
fishery. The fishery is a limited entry fishery with gear restrictions
(mesh and net size) and area closures. This fishery, as a tribal
fishery, is separate from the AK Southeast drift gillnet fishery only
for regulation purposes. The fisheries are considered the same for LOF
categorization purposes.
AK Southeast Salmon Purse Seine Fishery
The Category II AK Southeast salmon purse seine fishery targets
salmon using purse seine gear with soak times of 20-45 minutes. Fishing
effort occurs mostly in daylight hours, except at the peak of the
season, with 6-20 sets per day. The fishery generally operates from the
end of June to September. In 2003, purse seine fishing ran through
November 12 in THAs. Regulations allow purse seine fishing to occur in
certain fishing districts, and also in certain THAs, hatchery cost
recovery areas, and the Annette Island Fishery Reserve. This purse
seine fishery accounts for approximately 80 percent of the total salmon
harvest in Southeast AK, and approximately 87 percent of the fish
caught are pink salmon. This purse seine fishery is managed by ADFG as
a limited entry fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and
area closures.
AK Cook Inlet Salmon Purse Seine Fishery
The Category II AK Cook Inlet salmon purse seine fishery targets
salmon using purse seine gear in Cook Inlet from June 1 to October 31.
Purse seines must be between 90 fathoms (540 ft; 165 m) and 250 fathoms
(1,500 ft; 457 m) long, and 100 meshes and 325 meshes deep. Detachable
or loose leads are not permitted. In Cook Inlet, purse seines may be
used in the Southern District, Kamishak Bay District, Outer District,
Eastern District, and Chinitna Bay Subdistrict east of a line from the
crane on the south shore to the largest boulder on the landward end of
Glacier Spit. This purse seine fishery is managed by ADFG as a limited
entry fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and area
closures.
AK Kodiak Salmon Purse Seine Fishery
The Category II AK Kodiak salmon purse seine fishery targets salmon
using purse seine gear from June 1 to October 31, with fishing periods
open by regulation and emergency orders. Purse seine gear must have a
mesh size of less than 7 in (18 cm). Purse seine gear must be between
100 fathoms (600 ft; 183 m) and 200 fathoms (1,200 ft; 366 m) long, and
between 100 meshes and 325 meshes deep. At least 50 fathoms (300 ft; 91
m) of a purse seine must be 150 meshes in depth. One lead, no more than
100 fathoms (600 ft; 183 m) in length, may be used with each purse
seine. The aggregate length of a seine and lead may not exceed 250
fathoms (1,500 ft; 457 m). Leads must be removed from the water within
two hours after a season or fishing period closure. Overlapping panels
of net web may not be used in seine leads.
This fishery occurs in the Kodiak Area, including all waters of AK
south of Cape Douglas (58[deg] 51.10' N. lat.), west of 150[deg] W.
long., north of 55[deg] 30' N. lat., and north and east of the southern
entrance of Imuya Bay. This purse seine fishery is managed by ADFG as a
limited entry fishery with gear restrictions (mesh and net size) and
area closures.
AK Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) Flatfish Trawl Fishery
The Category II AK BSAI flatfish trawl fishery targets flatfish
using trawl gear in the U.S. EEZ of the eastern Bering Sea and the
portion of the North Pacific Ocean adjacent to the Aleutian Islands,
which is west of 170[deg] W. long. up to the U.S.-Russian Convention
Line of 1867. Management measures for the BSAI groundfish fisheries
constrain fishing both temporally and spatially. This fishery is
federally managed under the BSAI FMP. The authorized gear, fishing
season, criteria for determining fishing seasons, and area restrictions
by gear type are defined in the regulations
[[Page 66055]]
implementing the BSAI FMP (50 CFR part 679).
AK Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) Pollock Trawl Fishery
The Category II AK BSAI pollock trawl fishery targets flatfish
using trawl gear in the same location as the AK BSAI flatfish trawl
fishery described above. The use of non-pelagic trawl gear in the
directed fishery for pollock is prohibited. This fishery is federally
managed under the BSAI FMP. Management measures for the BSAI groundfish
fisheries constrain fishing both temporally and spatially. The gear
authorized, fishing year, criteria for determining fishing seasons, and
area restrictions by gear type are defined in the regulations
implementing the BSAI FMP (50 CFR part 679).
AK Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) Pacific Cod Longline Fishery
The Category II AK BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery targets
Pacific cod using longline gear in the same location as the AK BSAI
flatfish trawl fishery described above. This fishery is federally
managed under the BSAI FMP. Management measures for the BSAI groundfish
fisheries constrain fishing both temporally and spatially. The gear
authorized, fishing year, criteria for determining fishing seasons, and
area restrictions by gear type are defined in the regulations
implementing the BSAI FMP (50 CFR part 679).
AK Bering Sea Sablefish Pot Fishery
The Category II AK Bering Sea sablefish pot fishery targets
sablefish using pot gear in the same location as the AK BSAI flatfish
trawl fishery described above. This fishery is Federally managed under
the BSAI FMP and is operated under Individual Fishing Quotas.
Management measures for the BSAI groundfish fisheries constrain fishing
both temporally and spatially. The gear authorized, fishing year,
criteria for determining fishing seasons, and area restrictions by gear
type are defined in the regulations implementing the BSAI FMP (50 CFR
part 679).
Category I and II Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of
Mexico, and Caribbean
Northeast Sink Gillnet Fishery
The Category I Northeast sink gillnet fishery targets Atlantic cod,
haddock, pollock, yellowtail flounder, winter flounder, witch flounder,
American plaice, windowpane flounder, spiny dogfish, monkfish, silver
hake, red hake, white hake, ocean pout, skate spp, mackerel, redfish,
and shad. This fishery uses sink gillnet gear, which is anchored
gillnet (bottom-tending net) fished in the lower one-third of the water
column. The dominant material is monofilament twine with stretched mesh
sizes from 6-12 in (15-30.5 cm) and string lengths from 600-10,500 ft
(183-3,200 m), depending on the target species. The fishery operates
from the U.S.-Canada border to Long Island, NY, at 72[deg] 30' W. long.
south to 36[deg] 33.03' N. lat. (corresponding with the VA/NC border)
and east to the eastern edge of the EEZ, including the Gulf of Maine,
Georges Bank, and Southern New England, and excluding Long Island Sound
or other waters where gillnet fisheries are listed as Category III. At
this time, these Category II and II fisheries include: the Northeast
anchored float gillnet; Northeast drift gillnet; Long Island Sound
inshore gillnet; and RI, southern MA (to Monomoy Island), and NY Bight
(Raritan and Lower NY Bays) inshore gillnet. Fishing effort occurs
year-round, peaking from May to July primarily on continental shelf
regions in depths from 30-750 ft (9-228.6 m), with some nets deeper
than 800 ft (244 m).
This fishery is managed by the Northeast Multispecies (Groundfish)
FMP and the Monkfish FMP. This fishery is also managed by the Atlantic
Large Whale Take Reduction Plan (ALWTRP) and the Harbor Porpoise Take
Reduction Plan (HPTRP) to reduce the risk of entanglement of right,
humpback, and fin whales, and harbor porpoises, respectively. The
fishery is primarily managed by Total Allowable Catch (TAC) limits;
individual trip limits (quotas); effort caps (limited number of days at
sea per vessel); time and area closures; and gear restrictions.
Mid-Atlantic Gillnet Fishery
The Category I Mid-Atlantic gillnet fishery targets monkfish, spiny
dogfish, smooth dogfish, bluefish, weakfish, menhaden, spot, croaker,
striped bass, large and small coastal sharks, Spanish mackerel, king
mackerel, American shad, black drum, skate spp., yellow perch, white
perch, herring, scup, kingfish, spotted seatrout, and butterfish. The
fishery uses drift and sink gillnets, including nets set in a sink,
stab, set, strike, or drift fashion, with some unanchored drift or sink
nets used to target specific species. The dominant material is
monofilament twine with stretched mesh sizes from 2.5-12 in (6.4-30.5
cm), and string lengths from 150-8,400 ft. (46-2,560 m). This fishery
operates year-round west of a line drawn at 72[deg] 30' W. long. south
to 36[deg] 33.03' N. lat. and east to the eastern edge of the EEZ and
north of the NC/SC border, not including waters where Category II and
Category III inshore gillnet fisheries operate in bays, estuaries, and
rivers. At this time, these Category II and Category III fisheries
include: the Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet; NC inshore gillnet; DE
River inshore gillnet; Long Island Sound inshore gillnet; and RI,
southern MA (to Monomy Island), and NY Bight (Raritan and Lower NY
Bays) inshore gillnet. This fishery includes any residual large pelagic
driftnet effort in the mid-Atlantic and any shark and dogfish gillnet
effort in the mid-Atlantic zone described. The fishing effort is
prosecuted right off the beach (6 ft [1.8 m]) or in nearshore coastal
waters to offshore waters (250 ft [76 m]).
Gear in this fishery is managed by several Federal FMPs and Inter-
State FMPs managed by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission
(ASMFC), the ALWTRP, the HPTRP, and the Bottlenose Dolphin Take
Reduction Plan (BDTRP). Fisheries are primarily managed by TACs;
individual trip limits (quotas); effort caps (limited number of days at
sea per vessel); time and area closures; and gear restrictions and
modifications.
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico Large Pelagics Longline
Fishery
The Category I Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large
pelagics longline fishery targets swordfish, yellowfin tuna, bigeye
tuna, bluefin tuna, albacore tuna, dolphin fish, wahoo, shortfin mako
shark, and a variety of other shark species. The fishery uses a
mainline of >700 lb (317.5 kg) test monofilament typically ranging from
10-45 mi (16-72 km) long. Bullet-shaped floats are suspended at regular
intervals along the mainline and long sections of gear are marked by
radio beacons. Long gangion lines of 200-400 lb (91-181 kg) test
monofilament of typically 100-200 ft (30.5-61 m) are suspended from the
mainline. Only certain sized hooks and baits are allowed based on
fishing location. Hooks are typically fished at depths between 40-120
ft (12-36.6 m). Longlines targeting tuna are typically set at dawn are
hauled near dusk, while longlines targeting swordfish are typically set
at night and hauled in the morning. Gear remains in the water typically
for 10-14 hours. Fishermen generally modify only select sections of
longline gear to target dolphin or wahoo, with the remaining gear
configured to target swordfish, tuna, and/or sharks.
This fishery operates year-round and occurs within and outside the
U.S. EEZ throughout Atlantic, Caribbean and Gulf
[[Page 66056]]
of Mexico waters. The fishery has historically been composed of five
relatively distinct segments with different fishing practices and
strategies, including: Gulf of Mexico yellowfin tuna fishery; South
Atlantic-Florida east coast to Cape Hatteras swordfish fishery; Mid-
Atlantic and New England swordfish and bigeye tuna fishery; U.S.
distant water swordfish fishery; and Caribbean Islands tuna and
swordfish fishery. In addition to geographical area, these segments
have historically differed by percentage of various target and non-
target species, gear characteristics, and deployment techniques.
This fishery is managed under the Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP.
The dolphin and wahoo portions of the fishery are managed under the
South Atlantic FMP for Dolphin and Wahoo. Regulations under the MSA
address the target fish species, as well as bycatch species protected
under the ESA and/or the MMPA. A portion of this fishery is the subject
of the Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Team (PLTRT), convened in 2005.
NMFS is currently developing regulations to implement the Take
Reduction Plan.
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American Lobster Trap/Pot Fishery
The Category I Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot
fishery targets American lobster primarily with traps, while 2-3
percent of the target species is taken by mobile gear (trawls and
dredges). The fishery operates in inshore and offshore waters from ME
to NJ and may extend as far south as Cape Hatteras. Approximately 80
percent of American lobster are harvested from state waters; therefore,
the ASMFC has a primary regulatory role. The EEZ portion of the fishery
operates under regulations from the Federal American Lobster FMP. Both
the EEZ and state fishery are operating under Federal regulations from
the ALWTRP.
Northeast Anchored Float Gillnet Fishery
The Category II Northeast anchored float gillnet fishery targets
mackerel, herring (particularly for bait), shad, and menhaden using
gillnet gear of any size anchored and fished in the upper two-thirds of
the water column. The fishery operates from the U.S.-Canada border to
Long Island, NY, at 72[deg] 30' W. long south to 36[deg] 33.03' N. lat.
and east to the eastern edge of the EEZ, not including Long Island
Sound or other waters where gillnet fisheries are listed as Category
III. The fishery is managed under the Interstate FMPs for Atlantic
Menhaden and Shad and is subject to ALWTRP implementing regulations. A
total closure of the American shad ocean intercept fishery was fully
implemented in January, 2005.
Northeast Drift Gillnet Fishery
The Category II Northeast drift gillnet fishery targets species
other than large pelagics, including shad, herring, mackerel, and
menhaden. This fishery uses drift gillnet gear, which is gillnet gear
not anchored to the bottom and is free-floating on both ends or free-
flowing at one end and attached to the vessel at the other end. Mesh
sizes are likely less than those used to target large pelagics. The
fishery includes any residual large pelagic driftnet effort in New
England and occurs at any depth in the water column from the U.S.-
Canada border to Long Island, NY, at 72[deg] 30' W. long. south to
36[deg] 33.03' N. lat. and east to the eastern edge of the EEZ. The
fishery is managed under the Interstate FMPs for Atlantic Menhaden and
Shad and is subject to ALWTRP implementing regulations. A total closure
of the American shad ocean intercept fishery was fully implemented in
January, 2005.
Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Category II Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet fishery targets
menhaden and croaker using gillnet gear with mesh sizes ranging from
2.75-5 in (7-12.7 cm), depending on the target species. The fishery
operates between the Chesapeake Bay/Bridge Tunnel and the mainland. The
fishery is managed under the Interstate FMPs for Atlantic Menhaden and
Atlantic Croaker.
Northeast Mid-Water Trawl (Including Pair Trawl) Fishery
The Category II Northeast mid-water trawl fishery targets Atlantic
herring with bycatch of several finfish species, predominantly
mackerel, spiny dogfish, and silver hake. This fishery uses primarily
mid-water (pelagic) trawls (single and paired), which is trawl gear
designed, capable, or used to fish for pelagic species with no portion
designed to be operated in contact with the bottom. The fishery occurs
primarily in ME State waters, Jeffrey's Ledge, southern New England,
and Georges Bank during the winter months when the target species
continues its southerly migration from the Gulf of Maine/Georges Bank,
into mid-Atlantic waters. The fishery is managed jointly by the Mid-
Atlantic Fishery Management Council and the ASMFC as a migratory stock
complex.
Mid-Atlantic Flynet Fishery
The Category II Mid-Atlantic flynet fishery is a multispecies
fishery composed of nearshore and offshore components that operate
along the eastern coast of the Mid-Atlantic United States. Flynets are
high profile trawls similar to bottom otter trawls. These nets
typically range from 80-120 ft (24-36.6 m) in headrope length, with
wing mesh sizes of 16-64 in (41-163 cm), following a slow 3:1 taper to
smaller mesh sizes in the body, extension, and codend sections of the
net. The nearshore fishery operates from October to April inside of 30
fathoms (180 ft; 55 m) from NC to NJ. This nearshore fishery targets
Atlantic croaker, weakfish, butterfish, harvestfish, bluefish,
menhaden, striped bass, kingfishes, and other finfish species. Flynet
fishing is no longer permitted south of Cape Hatteras in order to
protect weakfish stocks. The offshore component operates from November
to April outside of 30 fathoms (180 ft; 55 m) from the Hudson Canyon
off NY, south to Hatteras Canyon off NC. These deeper water fisheries
target bluefish, Atlantic mackerel, Loligo squid, black sea bass, and
scup (72 FR 7382, February 15, 2007). Illex Squid are also targeted
offshore (70-200 fathoms [420-1,200 ft; 128-366 m]) during summer
months from May to September.
Northeast Bottom Trawl Fishery
The Category II Northeast bottom trawl fishery uses bottom trawl
gear to target species included in the NE Multispecies FMP, Summer
Flounder FMP, and Scup and Seabass FMP, including, but not limited to:
Atlantic cod, haddock, pollock, yellowtail flounder, winter flounder,
witch flounder, American plaice, Atlantic halibut, redfish, windowpane
flounder, summer flounder, spiny dogfish, monkfish, silver hake, red
hake, white hake, ocean pout, and skate spp. The fishery operates year-
round, with a peak from May to July, from the U.S.-Canada border
through waters east of 72[deg] 30' W. long., primarily on the
continental shelf and throughout the Gulf of Maine, Georges Bank, and
Southern New England. The fishery is primarily managed by TACs,
individual trip limits (quotas), effort caps (limited number of days at
sea per vessel), time and area closures, and gear restrictions.
VA Pound Net Fishery
The Category II VA pound net fishery targets weakfish, spot, and
croaker using stationary gear in nearshore coastal and estuarine waters
off VA. Pound net gear includes a large mesh lead posted
[[Page 66057]]
perpendicular to the shoreline and extending outward to the corral, or
``heart,'' where the catch accumulates. This fishery includes all pound
net effort in VA State waters, including waters inside the Chesapeake
Bay. The fishery is managed under Interstate FMPs for Atlantic Croaker
and Spot, and is an affected fishery under the BDTRP.
Atlantic Mixed Species Trap/Pot Fishery
The Category II Atlantic mixed species trap/pot fishery's target
species include, but are not limited to, hagfish, shrimp, conch/whelk,
red crab, Jonah crab, rock crab, black sea bass, scup, tautog, cod,
haddock, Pollock, redfish (ocean perch) white hake, spot, skate,
catfish, stone crab, American eel, and cunner. The fishery includes all
trap/pot operations from the U.S.-Canada border south through the
waters east of the fishery management demarcation line between the
Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico (50 CFR 600.105), but does not
include the following Category I, II, and III trap/pot fisheries:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot; Atlantic blue crab
trap/pot; Florida spiny lobster trap/ pot; Southeastern U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/pot; U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/pot
fisheries; and the Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico golden
crab fishery (68 FR 1421, January 10, 2003). The fishery is managed
under various