Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) for the Nourishment of 25,000 feet of Beach in Topsail Beach, Pender County, NC, 65948-65950 [E7-22958]
Download as PDF
65948
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 226 / Monday, November 26, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement
(DSEIS) for the Nourishment of 25,000
feet of Beach in Topsail Beach, Pender
County, NC
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE), Wilmington
District, Wilmington Regulatory Field
Office has received a request for
Department of the Army authorization,
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act, from the Town of
Topsail Beach to conduct a one-time
emergency beach fill project to protect
oceanfront development and
infrastructure until such time that a
federally authorized shore protection
project can be implemented. At this
time, the construction date for the
Federal project is uncertain. A Draft
General Reevaluation Report—
Environmental Impact Statement (GRR–
EIS) has been prepared by the USACE
and was released for public review and
comment in June 2006 (USACE, 2006).
Given the current status of the GRR–EIS
and the need for Congressional
authorization, funding, preparation of
plans and specifications, and right-ofway acquisition, the Federal project may
not be implemented until Fiscal Year
2010, or possibly later.
ADDRESSES: Copies of comments and
questions regarding scoping of the
DSEIS may be addressed to: U.S. Army
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:03 Nov 23, 2007
Jkt 214001
Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District,
Regulatory Division. ATTN: File
Number SAW–2006–40848–071, Post
Office Box 1890, Wilmington, NC
28402–1890.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the proposed action
and DSEIS can be directed to Mr. Dave
Timpy, Wilmington Regulatory Field
Office, telephone: (910) 251–4634.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Topsail Emergency Beach Nourishment
project was placed on Public Notice on
December 15, 2006 and a Notice of
Intent issued on December 15, 2006 (71
FR 75511). A Scoping Meeting was held
on January 16, 2007. Subsequently,
another borrow area has been found.
Therefore, this Notice of Intent is issued
to include another borrow area into the
project.
1. Project Description. The fill
placement area will occur between
Godwin Avenue on the south to a point
2,000 feet northeast of Topsail Beach/
Surf City town limits, a total ocean
shoreline length of approximately
25,000 feet. The fill would consist of
three sections, a 1,000-foot transition on
the south beginning at a point opposite
Godwin Avenue, a 22,000-foot main fill
section that would extend to the Topsail
Beach/Surf City town limits, and a
2,000-foot northern transition (Figure 1).
The project design will remain
consistent with the Federal design and
will involve a berm system to be
constructed to a height of 7 feet NGVD.
An optimum berm width of 50 feet is
proposed. The in-place volume of the
beach fill has not been determined but
could range between 900,000 to
1,250,000 cubic yards. Offshore sand
sources are currently being investigated
for sediment compatibility with the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
native beach material. The offshore
borrow areas under consideration
include all of the areas within the 3mile North Carolina territorial limit
previously identified by the USACE in
the GRR–EIS (Borrow Areas A and B),
areas lying outside of the USACE
identified borrow areas, and an area
designated as Borrow Area X located
closer to shore (Figure 1). The
navigation channel running through
Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet
through Topsail Creek and from Topsail
Creek parallel to the barrier island to the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (Figure
1) was considered as a potential source
for the one-time emergency beach fill
project but dismissed due to the small
volume of material that would be
available. The authorized dimensions of
the navigation channel are 80 feet wide
at 7 feet below mean low water. During
normal maintenance operations,
between 50,000 and 200,000 cubic yards
are removed and deposited on the south
end of Topsail Beach. This relatively
small volume of maintenance material
would fall well below the emergency
project requirements. Furthermore,
maintenance dredging is currently being
performed in Banks Channel with the
dredged material being placed on the
south end of Topsail Beach. The current
maintenance operation would totally
deplete the volume of material available
for beach disposal for at least the next
two years. Accordingly, the navigation
channels running behind Topsail Beach
will not be given detailed consideration
for the emergency project.
The proposed construction timeframe
for the emergency beach fill activities
will occur in late calendar year 2008 or
early calendar year 2009.
E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM
26NON1
Figure 1. Location map showing all
investigated sand sources in the vicinity
of Topsail Beach, North Carolina.
Beach Fill Surveys & Design. Typical
cross-sections of the beach along the
Topsail Beach project area will be
surveyed. Nearshore profiles will extend
seaward to at least the ¥30-foot NAVD
depth contour. The total volume of
beach fill to be placed in front of the
existing development and infrastructure
will be based on an evaluation of
erosion of the project area from 2002
through the expected construction date
of the Federal project. Additional
offshore and inshore data for Hutaff
Island will also be obtained along the
northern 5,000 feet of the island. This
data will be used in the evaluation of
possible impacts associated with the
removal of sediment from the selected
offshore borrow area and for future
impact evaluations following project
implementation through the use of
numerical modeling.
Geotechnical Investigations. The
offshore sand search investigations have
included bathymetric surveys, sidescan
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:03 Nov 23, 2007
Jkt 214001
sonar surveys, seismic surveys, cultural
resource surveys, vibracore collection
and analysis, and ground-truth diver
surveys to verify existence or nonexistence of hard bottoms. The results of
the offshore investigations coupled with
the compatibility of the sand resource
area and native beach sand will be
assessed to define the borrow area. All
sediment compatibility assessments will
be based on State of North Carolina
sediment compatibility standards that
went into effect in February 2007.
Environmental Resource Coordination
& Permitting. The USACE prepared a
General Reevaluation Report—
Environmental Impact Statement (GRR–
EIS) for the larger Federal shore
protection project. The interim
(emergency) beach fill project will be
subject to Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act, Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act and the State Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA).
Preliminary coordination with the
USACE—Wilmington District resulted
in a determination that a Department of
the Army Application for an Individual
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65949
Permit will be needed for project
compliance with Sections 10 and 404.
Similarly, coordination with the North
Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (NCDCM) determined that
the project would require a State EIS
developed in accordance with SEPA; as
well as a Major Permit under the Coastal
Area Management Act.
2. Proposed Action. The scope of
activities for the proposed emergency
beach fill project included: (a)
Vibracores in the identified borrow area,
(b) side scan sonar surveys of the ocean
bottom, (c) in-water investigations of
potential near shore hard bottom
resources identified by the side scan
sonar survey, and (d) beach profile
surveys. Offshore investigations
included bathymetric surveys, sidescan
sonar surveys, seismic and cultural
resource surveys, as well as vibracore
collection and analysis. The results of
the offshore investigations coupled with
the compatibility of the sand resource
area and native beach sand will be
assessed to define the borrow area.
E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM
26NON1
EP26NO07.007
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 226 / Monday, November 26, 2007 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
65950
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 226 / Monday, November 26, 2007 / Notices
3. Issues. There are several potential
environmental issues that will be
addressed in the DSEIS. Additional
issues may be identified during the
scoping process. Issues initially
identified as potentially significant
include:
a. Potential impact to marine
biological resources (benthic organisms,
passageway for fish and other marine
life) and Essential Fish Habitat,
particularly Hard Bottoms.
b. Potential impact to threatened and
endangered marine mammals, birds,
fish, and plants.
c. Potential impacts to water quality.
d. Potential increase in erosion rates
to adjacent beaches.
e. Potential impacts to navigation,
commercial and recreational.
f. Potential impacts to private and
public property.
g. Potential impacts on public health
and safety.
h. Potential impacts to recreational
and commercial fishing.
i. The compatibility of the material for
nourishment.
j. Potential economic impacts.
4. Alternatives. Several alternatives
are being considered for the proposed
project. These alternatives will be
further formulated and developed
during the scoping process and an
appropriate range of alternatives,
including the No Action alternative,
will be considered in the Supplemental
Draft EIS.
5. Scoping Process. Project Delivery
Team meetings will be held to receive
comments and assess concerns
regarding the appropriate scope and
preparation of the DSEIS. Participation
in the meeting by federal, state, and
local agencies and other interested
organizations and persons is
encouraged.
The COE will also be consulting with
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under
the Endangered Species Act and the
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, and
with the National Marine Fisheries
Service under the Magnuson-Stevens
Act and Endangered Species Act.
Additionally, the Supplemental Draft
EIS will assess the potential water
quality impacts pursuant to Section 401
of the Clean Water Act, and will be
coordinated with NCDCM to determine
the projects consistency with the
Coastal Zone Management Act. The
USACE will closely work with NCDCM
through the SDEIS to ensure the process
complies with all State Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) requirements. It is the
USACE and NCDCM’s intentions to
consolidate both NEPA and SEPA
processes to eliminate duplications.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:03 Nov 23, 2007
Jkt 214001
6. Availability of the Draft
Supplemental EIS. The DSEIS is
expected to be published and circulated
in early 2008, and a public hearing will
be held after the publication of the
DSEIS.
Dated: November 13, 2007.
John E. Pulliam, Jr.,
Colonel, U.S. Army, District Commander.
[FR Doc. E7–22958 Filed 11–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–GN–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
Proposed Dam Powerhouse
Rehabilitations and Possible
Operational Changes at the Wolf
Creek, Center Hill, and Dale Hollow
Dams, Kentucky and Tennessee
AGENCY:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DOD.
ACTION:
Notice of intent.
SUMMARY: The Corps of Engineers
(Corps), Nashville District, will prepare
a Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) relating to proposed dam
powerhouse rehabilitations and possible
operational changes at the Wolf Creek,
Center Hill, and Dale Hollow Dams in
Kentucky and Tennessee. The Corps is
studying the possible impacts of
modifying existing equipment. Due to
improvements in technology,
rehabilitating the equipment could
make it possible to produce more power
from the same amount of water
discharged. Changes in equipment and
operational procedures could also cause
higher tailwater heights and velocities,
but as there is a limited amount of water
they could be for shorter duration. In
addition, alterations to flow regimes are
being considered to provide minimum
flows when hydropower releases are
shut off. If improvements are successful,
other dams may eventually be
considered for similar changes. This
study was begun in 2003 and a Notice
of Intent was published in the Federal
Register on September 25, 2003;
however, due to funding constraints
work ceased before a Draft EIS could be
completed. The proposed rehabilitation
of the powerhouse and generating units
is not related to the dam seepage repairs
that are ongoing at Center Hill and Wolf
Creek Dams.
DATES: Written scoping comments on
issues to be considered in the DEIS will
be accepted by the Corps of Engineers
until December 26, 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Scoping comments should
be mailed to: Mr. Chip Hall, Project
Planning Branch, Nashville District
Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 1070 (PM–
P), Nashville, TN 37202–1070, or may
be e-mailed to
hydropower.rehab@Lrn02.
usace.army.miL.
ADDRESSES:
For
additional information concerning the
proposed action and DEIS, please
contact Chip Hall, Project Planning
Branch, (615) 736–7666.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
1. The
intent of the DEIS is to provide NEPA
compliance for changes in design
features and operating procedures of the
Wolf Creek, Center Hill, and Dale
Hollow Dams in the Cumberland River
system. All three dams are of a similar
age, have similar turbines and related
equipment, and have similar proposed
rehabilitation and operational changes.
Operating and equipment changes that
will be studied could potentially affect
more than a combined total 60 miles of
tailwaters. This would primarily be a
result of efforts to raise dissolved
oxygen levels to meet the minimum
state water quality standards, although
flows and elevations could also be
altered for a significant distance. The
Cumberland River includes ten dams
and reservoirs. The 10 projects are
managed as one system with the goal of
managing the flow of water through the
entire Cumberland River basin. If the
proposed changes prove desirable, they
could set a precedent for future
rehabilitations at other hydropower
facilities. The Corps, therefore, proposes
to evaluate these dams
programmatically.
2. The three dams considered under
this Environmental Impact Statement,
Wolf Creek Dam, Center Hill Dam, and
Dale Hollow Dam, were authorized in
the 1930s and constructed in the 1940s
before there was a significant concern
for environmental protection. They all
predate the NEPA, the Clean Water Act,
the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act,
and many other related environmental
laws and regulations. Together these
three Corps projects affect the
temperatures, flows, and dissolved
oxygen (DO) levels of up to 250 miles
of the Cumberland River and its
tributaries. The Corps is studying the
possible impacts of modifying existing
structures or operating procedures to
improve DO in the tailwaters.
Alterations to flow regimes are being
considered to provide minimum flows
below the dams when hydropower
releases are shut off.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM
26NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 226 (Monday, November 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65948-65950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22958]
[[Page 65948]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (DSEIS) for the Nourishment of 25,000 feet of Beach in
Topsail Beach, Pender County, NC
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Wilmington District,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office has received a request for
Department of the Army authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, from the
Town of Topsail Beach to conduct a one-time emergency beach fill
project to protect oceanfront development and infrastructure until such
time that a federally authorized shore protection project can be
implemented. At this time, the construction date for the Federal
project is uncertain. A Draft General Reevaluation Report--
Environmental Impact Statement (GRR-EIS) has been prepared by the USACE
and was released for public review and comment in June 2006 (USACE,
2006). Given the current status of the GRR-EIS and the need for
Congressional authorization, funding, preparation of plans and
specifications, and right-of-way acquisition, the Federal project may
not be implemented until Fiscal Year 2010, or possibly later.
ADDRESSES: Copies of comments and questions regarding scoping of the
DSEIS may be addressed to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District, Regulatory Division. ATTN: File Number SAW-2006-40848-071,
Post Office Box 1890, Wilmington, NC 28402-1890.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the proposed action
and DSEIS can be directed to Mr. Dave Timpy, Wilmington Regulatory
Field Office, telephone: (910) 251-4634.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Topsail Emergency Beach Nourishment
project was placed on Public Notice on December 15, 2006 and a Notice
of Intent issued on December 15, 2006 (71 FR 75511). A Scoping Meeting
was held on January 16, 2007. Subsequently, another borrow area has
been found. Therefore, this Notice of Intent is issued to include
another borrow area into the project.
1. Project Description. The fill placement area will occur between
Godwin Avenue on the south to a point 2,000 feet northeast of Topsail
Beach/Surf City town limits, a total ocean shoreline length of
approximately 25,000 feet. The fill would consist of three sections, a
1,000-foot transition on the south beginning at a point opposite Godwin
Avenue, a 22,000-foot main fill section that would extend to the
Topsail Beach/Surf City town limits, and a 2,000-foot northern
transition (Figure 1). The project design will remain consistent with
the Federal design and will involve a berm system to be constructed to
a height of 7 feet NGVD. An optimum berm width of 50 feet is proposed.
The in-place volume of the beach fill has not been determined but could
range between 900,000 to 1,250,000 cubic yards. Offshore sand sources
are currently being investigated for sediment compatibility with the
native beach material. The offshore borrow areas under consideration
include all of the areas within the 3-mile North Carolina territorial
limit previously identified by the USACE in the GRR-EIS (Borrow Areas A
and B), areas lying outside of the USACE identified borrow areas, and
an area designated as Borrow Area X located closer to shore (Figure 1).
The navigation channel running through Banks Channel from New Topsail
Inlet through Topsail Creek and from Topsail Creek parallel to the
barrier island to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (Figure 1) was
considered as a potential source for the one-time emergency beach fill
project but dismissed due to the small volume of material that would be
available. The authorized dimensions of the navigation channel are 80
feet wide at 7 feet below mean low water. During normal maintenance
operations, between 50,000 and 200,000 cubic yards are removed and
deposited on the south end of Topsail Beach. This relatively small
volume of maintenance material would fall well below the emergency
project requirements. Furthermore, maintenance dredging is currently
being performed in Banks Channel with the dredged material being placed
on the south end of Topsail Beach. The current maintenance operation
would totally deplete the volume of material available for beach
disposal for at least the next two years. Accordingly, the navigation
channels running behind Topsail Beach will not be given detailed
consideration for the emergency project.
The proposed construction timeframe for the emergency beach fill
activities will occur in late calendar year 2008 or early calendar year
2009.
[[Page 65949]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26NO07.007
Figure 1. Location map showing all investigated sand sources in the
vicinity of Topsail Beach, North Carolina.
Beach Fill Surveys & Design. Typical cross-sections of the beach
along the Topsail Beach project area will be surveyed. Nearshore
profiles will extend seaward to at least the -30-foot NAVD depth
contour. The total volume of beach fill to be placed in front of the
existing development and infrastructure will be based on an evaluation
of erosion of the project area from 2002 through the expected
construction date of the Federal project. Additional offshore and
inshore data for Hutaff Island will also be obtained along the northern
5,000 feet of the island. This data will be used in the evaluation of
possible impacts associated with the removal of sediment from the
selected offshore borrow area and for future impact evaluations
following project implementation through the use of numerical modeling.
Geotechnical Investigations. The offshore sand search
investigations have included bathymetric surveys, sidescan sonar
surveys, seismic surveys, cultural resource surveys, vibracore
collection and analysis, and ground-truth diver surveys to verify
existence or non-existence of hard bottoms. The results of the offshore
investigations coupled with the compatibility of the sand resource area
and native beach sand will be assessed to define the borrow area. All
sediment compatibility assessments will be based on State of North
Carolina sediment compatibility standards that went into effect in
February 2007.
Environmental Resource Coordination & Permitting. The USACE
prepared a General Reevaluation Report--Environmental Impact Statement
(GRR-EIS) for the larger Federal shore protection project. The interim
(emergency) beach fill project will be subject to Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).
Preliminary coordination with the USACE--Wilmington District
resulted in a determination that a Department of the Army Application
for an Individual Permit will be needed for project compliance with
Sections 10 and 404. Similarly, coordination with the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM) determined that the project
would require a State EIS developed in accordance with SEPA; as well as
a Major Permit under the Coastal Area Management Act.
2. Proposed Action. The scope of activities for the proposed
emergency beach fill project included: (a) Vibracores in the identified
borrow area, (b) side scan sonar surveys of the ocean bottom, (c) in-
water investigations of potential near shore hard bottom resources
identified by the side scan sonar survey, and (d) beach profile
surveys. Offshore investigations included bathymetric surveys, sidescan
sonar surveys, seismic and cultural resource surveys, as well as
vibracore collection and analysis. The results of the offshore
investigations coupled with the compatibility of the sand resource area
and native beach sand will be assessed to define the borrow area.
[[Page 65950]]
3. Issues. There are several potential environmental issues that
will be addressed in the DSEIS. Additional issues may be identified
during the scoping process. Issues initially identified as potentially
significant include:
a. Potential impact to marine biological resources (benthic
organisms, passageway for fish and other marine life) and Essential
Fish Habitat, particularly Hard Bottoms.
b. Potential impact to threatened and endangered marine mammals,
birds, fish, and plants.
c. Potential impacts to water quality.
d. Potential increase in erosion rates to adjacent beaches.
e. Potential impacts to navigation, commercial and recreational.
f. Potential impacts to private and public property.
g. Potential impacts on public health and safety.
h. Potential impacts to recreational and commercial fishing.
i. The compatibility of the material for nourishment.
j. Potential economic impacts.
4. Alternatives. Several alternatives are being considered for the
proposed project. These alternatives will be further formulated and
developed during the scoping process and an appropriate range of
alternatives, including the No Action alternative, will be considered
in the Supplemental Draft EIS.
5. Scoping Process. Project Delivery Team meetings will be held to
receive comments and assess concerns regarding the appropriate scope
and preparation of the DSEIS. Participation in the meeting by federal,
state, and local agencies and other interested organizations and
persons is encouraged.
The COE will also be consulting with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service under the Endangered Species Act and the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act, and with the National Marine Fisheries Service under
the Magnuson-Stevens Act and Endangered Species Act. Additionally, the
Supplemental Draft EIS will assess the potential water quality impacts
pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, and will be coordinated
with NCDCM to determine the projects consistency with the Coastal Zone
Management Act. The USACE will closely work with NCDCM through the
SDEIS to ensure the process complies with all State Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) requirements. It is the USACE and NCDCM's intentions
to consolidate both NEPA and SEPA processes to eliminate duplications.
6. Availability of the Draft Supplemental EIS. The DSEIS is
expected to be published and circulated in early 2008, and a public
hearing will be held after the publication of the DSEIS.
Dated: November 13, 2007.
John E. Pulliam, Jr.,
Colonel, U.S. Army, District Commander.
[FR Doc. E7-22958 Filed 11-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-GN-P