List of Programs Eligible for Inclusion in Fiscal Year 2008 Funding Agreements To Be Negotiated With Self-Governance Tribes, 65593-65595 [E7-22733]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 21, 2007 / Notices
Nugent Farms Special Resource Study,
404–562–3124, extension 637.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of Intent to prepare a
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) on the Special Resource Study for
Castle Nugent Farms, St. Croix, U.S.
Virgin Islands.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Pursuant to section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, and National Park Service
(NPS) policy in Director’s Order 2 (Park
Planning) and Director’s Order 12
(Conservation Planning, Environmental
Impact Analysis, and Decision-making),
the NPS will prepare an EIS for the
Special Resource Study (SRS) for Castle
Nugent Farms.
The NPS will conduct local public
meetings to receive input from
interested parties on issues, concerns
and suggestions believed to be relevant
to the future of Castle Nugent Farms and
its potential inclusion as a unit of the
National Park System. Of particular
interest to the NPS are suggestions and
ideas for managing cultural and natural
resources, interpretation, and the visitor
experience at Castle Nugent Farms. The
Draft EIS will formulate and evaluate
environmental impacts associated with
various types and levels of visitor use
and resources management at the site.
DATES: The dates and times of the public
scoping meetings will be published in
local newspapers and on the internet at
https://parkplanning.nps.gov. These
dates and times may also be obtained by
contacting the NPS Southeast Regional
Office, Division of Planning and
Compliance. Scoping suggestions will
be accepted throughout the planning
process. The NPS anticipates that the
Draft EIS will be available for public
review by January 2009.
ADDRESSES: The locations of the public
scoping meetings will be published in
local newspapers and on the internet at
https://parkplanning.nps.gov.
Suggestions and ideas should be
submitted in writing to the following
address: John Barrett, Planning Team
Leader, Castle Nugent Farms Special
Resource Study, NPS Southeast
Regional Office, Division of Planning
and Compliance, 100 Alabama Street,
SW., 6th Floor, 1924 Building, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Barrett, Planning Team Leader, Castle
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:56 Nov 20, 2007
Castle
Nugent Farms consists of approximately
1,400 acres on the southeastern shore of
St. Croix. The rolling terrain consists of
a mixture of dry forest, native
vegetation, and rangeland that slopes
down from an elevation of 750 feet to
the sea. The property has a long and
diverse history of farming dating back to
the 1730s when it was first established
as a cotton and sugar plantation. In the
19th century, N’Dama cattle breeding
was brought to Castle Nugent Farms.
This breed was a prominent part of the
farm’s operations until the 1950s, when
attention shifted towards raising an
N’Dama cross breed of cattle known as
Senepol. Today, Senepol cattle are still
bred under an agreement between the
property’s owners and the University of
the Virgin Islands. Issues currently
being considered for the SRS/EIS
include a determination of Castle
Nugent Farm’s national significance and
an assessment of the site’s suitability
and feasibility as a potential addition to
the National Park System. The Draft EIS
will identify cultural and natural
resources of Castle Nugent Farms and
evaluate a range of potential
management options that might
adequately protect these resources and
provide for public use and enjoyment.
Our practice is to make comments,
including names, home addresses, home
phone numbers, and e-mail addresses of
respondents, available for public
review. Before including your address,
phone number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. We will always make
submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
on the Special Resource Study for
Castle Nugent Farms, St. Croix, U.S.
Virgin Islands
Jkt 214001
Authority: The authority for publishing
this notice is contained in 40 CFR 1506.6.
The responsible official for this EIS is
Art Frederick, Acting Regional Director,
Southeast Region, National Park
Service, 100 Alabama Street, SW., 1924
Building, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65593
Dated: September 19, 2007.
Art Frederick,
Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. E7–22723 Filed 11–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–53–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
List of Programs Eligible for Inclusion
in Fiscal Year 2008 Funding
Agreements To Be Negotiated With
Self-Governance Tribes
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice lists programs or
portions of programs that are eligible for
inclusion in Fiscal Year 2008 funding
agreements with self-governance tribes
and lists programmatic targets pursuant
to section 405(c)(4) of the Tribal SelfGovernance Act.
DATES: This notice expires on
September 30, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Inquiries or comments
regarding this notice may be directed to
the American Indian Liaison Office,
1201 Eye Street, NW. (Org. 2560, 9th
Floor), Washington, DC 20005.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Title II of the Indian SelfDetermination Act Amendments of 1994
(Pub. L. 103–413, the ‘‘Tribal SelfGovernance Act’’ or the ‘‘Act’’)
instituted a permanent self-governance
program at the Department of the
Interior (DOI). Under the selfgovernance program certain programs,
services, functions, and activities, or
portions thereof, in DOI bureaus other
than the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)
are eligible to be planned, conducted,
consolidated, and administered by a
self-governance tribal government.
Under section 405(c) of the Act, the
Secretary of the Interior is required to
publish annually: (1) A list of non-BIA
programs, services, functions, and
activities, or portions thereof, that are
eligible for inclusion in agreements
negotiated under the self-governance
program; and (2) programmatic targets
for these bureaus.
Under the Act, two categories of nonBIA programs are eligible for selfgovernance funding agreements (AFAs):
(1) Under section 403(b)(2) of the Act,
any non-BIA program, service, function
or activity that is administered by DOI
that is ‘‘otherwise available to Indian
tribes or Indians,’’ can be administered
by a tribal government through a selfgovernance funding agreement. The
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
65594
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 21, 2007 / Notices
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Department interprets this provision to
authorize the inclusion of programs
eligible for self-determination contracts
under Title I of the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act (Pub. L. 93–638, as
amended). Section 403(b)(2) also
specifies ‘‘nothing in this subsection
may be construed to provide any tribe
with a preference with respect to the
opportunity of the tribe to administer
programs, services, functions and
activities, or portions thereof, unless
such preference is otherwise provided
by law.’’
(2) Under section 403(c) of the Act,
the Secretary may include other
programs, services, functions, and
activities or portions thereof that are of
‘‘special geographic, historical, or
cultural significance’’ to a selfgovernance tribe.
Under section 403(k) of the Act,
funding agreements cannot include
programs, services, functions, or
activities that are inherently Federal or
where the statute establishing the
existing program does not authorize the
type of participation sought by the tribe.
However, a tribe (or tribes) need not be
identified in the authorizing statutes in
order for a program or element to be
included in a self-governance funding
agreement. While general legal and
policy guidance regarding what
constitutes an inherently Federal
function exists, we will determine
whether a specific function is inherently
Federal on a case-by-case basis
considering the totality of
circumstances.
II. Eligible non-BIA Programs of the
National Park Service
Below is a listing of the types of nonBIA programs, or portions thereof, that
may be eligible for self-governance
funding agreements because they are
either ‘‘otherwise available to Indians’’
under Title I and not precluded by any
other law, or may have ‘‘special
geographic, historical, or cultural
significance’’ to a participating tribe.
The list represents the most current
information on programs potentially
available to tribes under a selfgovernance funding agreement.
The National Park Service will also
consider for inclusion in funding
agreements other programs or activities
not included below, but which, upon
request of a self-governance tribe, the
National Park Service determines to be
eligible under either sections 403(b)(2)
or 403(c) of the Act. Tribes with an
interest in such potential agreements are
encouraged to begin such discussions.
The National Park Service welcomes
comments from self-governance
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:56 Nov 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
regarding the content and format of this
list.
The National Park Service administers
the National Park System, which is
made up of national parks, monuments,
historic sites, battlefields, seashores,
lake shores, and recreation areas. The
National Park Service maintains the
park units, protects the natural and
cultural resources, and conducts a range
of visitor services such as law
enforcement, park maintenance, and
interpretation of geology, history, and
natural and cultural resources.
Some elements of the following
programs may be eligible for inclusion
in a self-governance funding agreement.
This listing below was developed
considering the proximity of an
identified self-governance tribe to a
national park, monument, preserve, or
recreation area and the types of
programs that have components that
may be suitable for contracting through
a self-governance agreement. This
listing is not all-inclusive, but is
representative of the types of programs
which may be eligible for tribal
participation through a funding
agreement.
a. Archaeological Surveys
b. Comprehensive Management
Planning
c. Cultural Resource Management
Projects
d. Ethnographic Studies
e. Erosion Control
f. Fire Protection
g. Gathering Baseline Subsistence
Data, Alaska
h. Hazardous Fuel Reduction
i. Housing Construction and
Rehabilitation
j. Interpretation
k. Janitorial Services
l. Maintenance
m. Natural Resource Management
Projects
n. Operation of Campgrounds
o. Range Assessment, Alaska
p. Reindeer Grazing, Alaska
q. Road Repair
r. Solid Waste Collection and Disposal
s. Trail Rehabilitation
t. Watershed Restoration and
Maintenance
u. Beringia Research
v. Elwha River Restoration
Locations of National Park Service
Units With Close Proximity to SelfGovernance Tribes
1. Bering Land Bridge National Park,
Alaska.
2. Cape Krusenstern National
Monument, Alaska.
3. Gates of the Arctic National Park &
Preserve, Alaska.
4. Glacier Bay National Park and
Preserve, Alaska.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5. Katmai National Park and Preserve,
Alaska.
6. Kenai Fjords National Park, Alaska.
7. Klondike Gold Rush National
Historical Park, Alaska.
8. Kobuk Valley National Park,
Alaska.
9. Lake Clark National Park and
Preserve, Alaska.
10. Noatak National Preserve, Alaska.
11. Sitka National Historical Park,
Alaska.
12. Wrangell-St. Elias National Park
and Preserve, Alaska.
13. Yukon-Charley Rivers National
Preserve, Alaska.
14. Casa Grande Ruins National
Monument, Arizona.
15. Hohokam Pima National
Monument, Arizona.
16. Montezuma Castle National
Monument, Arizona.
17. Organ Pipe Cactus National
Monument, Arizona.
18. Saguaro National Park, Arizona.
19. onto National Monument,
Arizona.
20. Tumacacori National Historical
Park, Arizona.
21. Tuzigoot National Monument,
Arizona.
22. Arkansas Post National Memorial,
Arkansas.
23. Joshua Tree National Park,
California.
24. Lassen Volcanic National Park,
California.
25. Redwood National Park,
California.
26. Whiskeytown National Recreation
Area, California.
27. Hagerman Fossil Beds National
Monument, Idaho.
28. Effigy Mounds National
Monument, Iowa.
29. Fort Scott National Historic Site,
Kansas.
30. Tallgrass Prairie National
Preserve, Kansas.
31. Boston Harbor Islands, a National
Park Area, Massachusetts.
32. Cape Cod National Seashore,
Massachusetts.
33. New Bedford Whaling National
Historical Park, Massachusetts.
34. Sleeping Bear Dunes National
Lakeshore, Michigan.
35. Grand Portage National
Monument, Minnesota.
36. Voyageurs National Park,
Minnesota.
37. Bear Paw Battlefield, Nez Perce
National Historical Park, Montana.
38. Glacier National Park, Montana.
39. Great Basin National Park,
Nevada.
40. Aztec Ruins National Monument,
New Mexico.
41. Bandelier National Monument,
New Mexico.
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 21, 2007 / Notices
42. Carlsbad Caverns National Park,
New Mexico.
43. Chaco Culture National Historical
Park, New Mexico.
44. White Sands National Monument,
New Mexico.
45. Fort Stanwix National Monument,
New York.
46. Cuyahoga Valley National Park,
Ohio.
47. Hopewell Culture National
Historical Park, Ohio.
48. Chickasaw National Recreation
Area, Oklahoma.
49. John Day Fossil Beds National
Monument, Oregon.
50. Alibates Flint Quarries National
Monument, Texas.
51. Guadalupe Mountains National
Park, Texas.
52. Lake Meredith National
Recreation Area, Texas.
53. Ebey’s Landing National
Recreation Area, Texas.
54. Mt. Rainier National Park,
Washington.
55. Olympic National Park,
Washington.
56. San Juan Islands National
Historical Park, Washington.
57. Whitman Mission National
Historic Site, Washington.
For questions regarding selfgovernance contact Dr. Patricia Parker,
Chief, American Indian Liaison Office,
National Park Service, 1201 Eye Street,
NW., (Org. 2560, 9th Floor),
Washington, DC 20005, telephone 202–
354–6965, fax 202–371–6609.
III. Programmatic Targets
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
During Fiscal Year 2008, upon request
of a self-governance tribe, the National
Park Service will negotiate funding
agreements for its eligible programs
beyond those already negotiated.
The National Park Service currently
has self-governance annual funding
agreements with the Yurok Tribe and
Redwood National Park, the Grand
Portage Band of Chippewa Indians and
Grand Portage National Monument, and
the Lower Elwha Tribal Community and
Olympic National Park.
Dated: October 31, 2007.
David Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7–22733 Filed 11–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:56 Nov 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 332–491]
China: Government Policies Affecting
U.S. Trade in Selected Sectors
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of addition of case
studies on the semi-fabricated copper
and brass products sector and paper
sector in China; request for information
and views from interested parties.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In its notice announcing
institution of this investigation, the
Commission indicated that its report
would include case studies on industry
sectors in China in which government
policies and interventions are prevalent,
and the notice identified seven industry
sectors that would be the subject of such
case studies. After receiving and
considering public comment and input
from other government agencies
regarding possible additional case
studies, the Commission has decided to
include case studies on two additional
industry sectors in China, the semifabricated copper and brass products
sector, and the paper sector.
DATES: February 1, 2008: Deadline for
filing written submissions. July 29,
2008: Transmittal of Commission report
to the Committee on Ways and Means.
ADDRESSES: All Commission offices,
including the Commission’s hearing
rooms, are located in the United States
International Trade Commission
Building, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC. All written
submissions should be addressed to the
Secretary, United States International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/edis.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Project leaders Joanne Guth (202–205–
3264 or joanne.guth@usitc.gov) or
Deborah McNay (202–205–3425 or
deborah.mcnay@usitc.gov) for
information on the investigation. For
information on the legal aspects of the
investigation, contact William Gearhart
of the Commission’s Office of the
General Counsel (202–205–3091 or
william.gearhart@usitc.gov). The media
should contact Margaret O’Laughlin,
Office of External Relations (202–205–
1819 or margaret.olaughlin@usitc.gov).
Hearing-impaired individuals may
obtain information on this matter by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal at 202–205–1810. General
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65595
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
Persons with mobility impairments who
will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should
contact the Office of the Secretary at
202–205–2000.
Background
The investigation is being conducted
at the request of the Committee on Ways
and Means of the U.S. House of
Representatives. In its letter of May 23,
2007, the Committee requested that the
Commission’s report include, among
other things, case studies on sectors in
China where government policies and
interventions are prevalent, and
identified seven such sectors: The
semiconductor, telecom, banking,
textiles and apparel, steel, automotive
parts, and aircraft sectors. The
Committee also directed that the
Commission seek public comment and
input from other government agencies
on other sectors that should be included
as case studies. Notice of institution and
the scheduling of a public hearing
(which was held on October 30, 2007)
was published in the Federal Register of
July 31, 2007 (72 FR 41773).
Written Submissions
All written submissions should be
addressed to the Secretary, and should
be received not later than 5:15 p.m.,
February 1, 2008. All written
submissions must conform with the
provisions of section 201.8 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.8). Section 201.8
requires that a signed original (or a copy
so designated) and fourteen (14) copies
of each document be filed. In the event
that confidential treatment of a
document is requested, at least four (4)
additional copies must be filed, in
which the confidential information
must be deleted (see the following
paragraph for further information
regarding confidential business
information). The Commission’s rules
authorize filing submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means only to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the rules (see Handbook
for Electronic Filing Procedures, https://
www.usitc.gov/secretary/
fed_reg_notices/rules/documents/
handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf).
Persons with questions regarding
electronic filing should contact the
Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any submissions that contain
confidential business information must
also conform with the requirements of
section 201.6 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65593-65595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22733]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
List of Programs Eligible for Inclusion in Fiscal Year 2008
Funding Agreements To Be Negotiated With Self-Governance Tribes
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice lists programs or portions of programs that are
eligible for inclusion in Fiscal Year 2008 funding agreements with
self-governance tribes and lists programmatic targets pursuant to
section 405(c)(4) of the Tribal Self-Governance Act.
DATES: This notice expires on September 30, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Inquiries or comments regarding this notice may be directed
to the American Indian Liaison Office, 1201 Eye Street, NW. (Org. 2560,
9th Floor), Washington, DC 20005.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Title II of the Indian Self-Determination Act Amendments of 1994
(Pub. L. 103-413, the ``Tribal Self-Governance Act'' or the ``Act'')
instituted a permanent self-governance program at the Department of the
Interior (DOI). Under the self-governance program certain programs,
services, functions, and activities, or portions thereof, in DOI
bureaus other than the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) are eligible to
be planned, conducted, consolidated, and administered by a self-
governance tribal government.
Under section 405(c) of the Act, the Secretary of the Interior is
required to publish annually: (1) A list of non-BIA programs, services,
functions, and activities, or portions thereof, that are eligible for
inclusion in agreements negotiated under the self-governance program;
and (2) programmatic targets for these bureaus.
Under the Act, two categories of non-BIA programs are eligible for
self-governance funding agreements (AFAs):
(1) Under section 403(b)(2) of the Act, any non-BIA program,
service, function or activity that is administered by DOI that is
``otherwise available to Indian tribes or Indians,'' can be
administered by a tribal government through a self-governance funding
agreement. The
[[Page 65594]]
Department interprets this provision to authorize the inclusion of
programs eligible for self-determination contracts under Title I of the
Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (Pub. L. 93-638,
as amended). Section 403(b)(2) also specifies ``nothing in this
subsection may be construed to provide any tribe with a preference with
respect to the opportunity of the tribe to administer programs,
services, functions and activities, or portions thereof, unless such
preference is otherwise provided by law.''
(2) Under section 403(c) of the Act, the Secretary may include
other programs, services, functions, and activities or portions thereof
that are of ``special geographic, historical, or cultural
significance'' to a self-governance tribe.
Under section 403(k) of the Act, funding agreements cannot include
programs, services, functions, or activities that are inherently
Federal or where the statute establishing the existing program does not
authorize the type of participation sought by the tribe. However, a
tribe (or tribes) need not be identified in the authorizing statutes in
order for a program or element to be included in a self-governance
funding agreement. While general legal and policy guidance regarding
what constitutes an inherently Federal function exists, we will
determine whether a specific function is inherently Federal on a case-
by-case basis considering the totality of circumstances.
II. Eligible non-BIA Programs of the National Park Service
Below is a listing of the types of non-BIA programs, or portions
thereof, that may be eligible for self-governance funding agreements
because they are either ``otherwise available to Indians'' under Title
I and not precluded by any other law, or may have ``special geographic,
historical, or cultural significance'' to a participating tribe. The
list represents the most current information on programs potentially
available to tribes under a self-governance funding agreement.
The National Park Service will also consider for inclusion in
funding agreements other programs or activities not included below, but
which, upon request of a self-governance tribe, the National Park
Service determines to be eligible under either sections 403(b)(2) or
403(c) of the Act. Tribes with an interest in such potential agreements
are encouraged to begin such discussions.
The National Park Service welcomes comments from self-governance
regarding the content and format of this list.
The National Park Service administers the National Park System,
which is made up of national parks, monuments, historic sites,
battlefields, seashores, lake shores, and recreation areas. The
National Park Service maintains the park units, protects the natural
and cultural resources, and conducts a range of visitor services such
as law enforcement, park maintenance, and interpretation of geology,
history, and natural and cultural resources.
Some elements of the following programs may be eligible for
inclusion in a self-governance funding agreement. This listing below
was developed considering the proximity of an identified self-
governance tribe to a national park, monument, preserve, or recreation
area and the types of programs that have components that may be
suitable for contracting through a self-governance agreement. This
listing is not all-inclusive, but is representative of the types of
programs which may be eligible for tribal participation through a
funding agreement.
a. Archaeological Surveys
b. Comprehensive Management Planning
c. Cultural Resource Management Projects
d. Ethnographic Studies
e. Erosion Control
f. Fire Protection
g. Gathering Baseline Subsistence Data, Alaska
h. Hazardous Fuel Reduction
i. Housing Construction and Rehabilitation
j. Interpretation
k. Janitorial Services
l. Maintenance
m. Natural Resource Management Projects
n. Operation of Campgrounds
o. Range Assessment, Alaska
p. Reindeer Grazing, Alaska
q. Road Repair
r. Solid Waste Collection and Disposal
s. Trail Rehabilitation
t. Watershed Restoration and Maintenance
u. Beringia Research
v. Elwha River Restoration
Locations of National Park Service Units With Close Proximity to
Self-Governance Tribes
1. Bering Land Bridge National Park, Alaska.
2. Cape Krusenstern National Monument, Alaska.
3. Gates of the Arctic National Park & Preserve, Alaska.
4. Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, Alaska.
5. Katmai National Park and Preserve, Alaska.
6. Kenai Fjords National Park, Alaska.
7. Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park, Alaska.
8. Kobuk Valley National Park, Alaska.
9. Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, Alaska.
10. Noatak National Preserve, Alaska.
11. Sitka National Historical Park, Alaska.
12. Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve, Alaska.
13. Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve, Alaska.
14. Casa Grande Ruins National Monument, Arizona.
15. Hohokam Pima National Monument, Arizona.
16. Montezuma Castle National Monument, Arizona.
17. Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Arizona.
18. Saguaro National Park, Arizona.
19. onto National Monument, Arizona.
20. Tumacacori National Historical Park, Arizona.
21. Tuzigoot National Monument, Arizona.
22. Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas.
23. Joshua Tree National Park, California.
24. Lassen Volcanic National Park, California.
25. Redwood National Park, California.
26. Whiskeytown National Recreation Area, California.
27. Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument, Idaho.
28. Effigy Mounds National Monument, Iowa.
29. Fort Scott National Historic Site, Kansas.
30. Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve, Kansas.
31. Boston Harbor Islands, a National Park Area, Massachusetts.
32. Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts.
33. New Bedford Whaling National Historical Park, Massachusetts.
34. Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, Michigan.
35. Grand Portage National Monument, Minnesota.
36. Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota.
37. Bear Paw Battlefield, Nez Perce National Historical Park,
Montana.
38. Glacier National Park, Montana.
39. Great Basin National Park, Nevada.
40. Aztec Ruins National Monument, New Mexico.
41. Bandelier National Monument, New Mexico.
[[Page 65595]]
42. Carlsbad Caverns National Park, New Mexico.
43. Chaco Culture National Historical Park, New Mexico.
44. White Sands National Monument, New Mexico.
45. Fort Stanwix National Monument, New York.
46. Cuyahoga Valley National Park, Ohio.
47. Hopewell Culture National Historical Park, Ohio.
48. Chickasaw National Recreation Area, Oklahoma.
49. John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon.
50. Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument, Texas.
51. Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Texas.
52. Lake Meredith National Recreation Area, Texas.
53. Ebey's Landing National Recreation Area, Texas.
54. Mt. Rainier National Park, Washington.
55. Olympic National Park, Washington.
56. San Juan Islands National Historical Park, Washington.
57. Whitman Mission National Historic Site, Washington.
For questions regarding self-governance contact Dr. Patricia
Parker, Chief, American Indian Liaison Office, National Park Service,
1201 Eye Street, NW., (Org. 2560, 9th Floor), Washington, DC 20005,
telephone 202-354-6965, fax 202-371-6609.
III. Programmatic Targets
During Fiscal Year 2008, upon request of a self-governance tribe,
the National Park Service will negotiate funding agreements for its
eligible programs beyond those already negotiated.
The National Park Service currently has self-governance annual
funding agreements with the Yurok Tribe and Redwood National Park, the
Grand Portage Band of Chippewa Indians and Grand Portage National
Monument, and the Lower Elwha Tribal Community and Olympic National
Park.
Dated: October 31, 2007.
David Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7-22733 Filed 11-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
