Purchase, Sale, and Pledge of Eligible Obligations, 65441-65443 [E7-22709]
Download as PDF
65441
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 224
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 701
RIN 3133–AD37
Purchase, Sale, and Pledge of Eligible
Obligations
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NCUA is amending its rule
governing the purchase, sale, and pledge
of eligible obligations by adding a
conflict of interest provision
substantially similar to the conflict of
interest provision in NCUA’s general
lending rule. This addition will help
ensure that decisions by a federal credit
union (FCU) regarding the purchase,
sale, and pledge of eligible obligations
are made with the FCU’s best interests
in mind.
DATES: This final rule is effective
December 21, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Annette Tapia or Frank Kressman, Staff
Attorneys, Office of General Counsel, at
the above address or telephone (703)
518–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
A. Background
The NCUA continually reviews its
regulations to ‘‘update, clarify and
simplify existing regulations and
eliminate redundant and unnecessary
provisions.’’ NCUA Interpretive Rulings
and Policy Statement (IRPS) 87–2,
Developing and Reviewing Government
Regulations. Under IRPS 87–2, NCUA
conducts a rolling review of one-third of
its regulations each year, involving both
internal review and public comment.
NCUA’s 2006 review produced a
recommendation to include a conflict of
interest provision in the eligible
obligations rule similar to the one in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Nov 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
NCUA’s general lending rule. 12 CFR
701.21(c)(8), 12 CFR 701.23.
B. Discussion
Generally, the eligible obligations rule
implements the statutory provisions
limiting the purchase, sale, and
pledging of an eligible obligation, which
is defined by the NCUA Board as a loan
or group of loans. 12 U.S.C. 1757(13); 12
CFR 701.23. Subject to certain
exceptions, the rule provides that an
FCU may purchase eligible obligations,
which the regulation defines as loans
made to a member by another lender,
from any source as long as the loans are
ones the FCU is empowered to grant, up
to an amount equal to 5% of its
unimpaired capital and surplus. 12 CFR
701.23(b)(1). Exceptions in the rule
include purchasing nonmember student
and real estate secured loans for
purposes of completing a loan pool for
sale on the secondary market. In
addition, loans purchased to complete a
pool and loans purchased as part of an
indirect lending or indirect leasing
program are exempt from the 5% limit
on eligible obligations.
The Board issued a proposed rule,
with request for comments, to add a
conflict of interest provision to the
eligible obligations rule that is similar to
the conflict provision in NCUA’s
general lending regulation. 72 FR 35207
(June 27, 2007), 12 CFR 701.21(c)(8)(i).
The Board believes eligible obligation
transactions, which involve the buying
and selling of member loans, potentially
present the same kinds of conflicts of
interest as where an FCU is the original
lender to its member. The proposal
provided that an official, employee, or
their immediate family members may
not receive, directly or indirectly, any
commission, fee or other compensation
in connection with an eligible
obligations transaction. The proposal
was intended to help ensure FCUs make
decisions concerning the purchase and
sale of eligible obligations based on
appropriate business considerations
rather than any personal benefit to
insiders.
C. Summary of Comments
NCUA received only five comments:
Two from credit union trade
associations, two from state leagues, and
one from an FCU.
One of the trade associations stated it
did not support the rule because NCUA
had not supported ‘‘the need’’ for the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
rule, why it was proposed, or ‘‘what
problems it sought to address.’’ The
other trade association stated it
recognized that ‘‘self-dealing and
insider benefit should not be a
motivating factor in a credit union’s
business’’ and generally supported the
rule, emphasizing its strong support for
the exceptions in the rule that allow
various permissible payments.
One of the state leagues, while stating
it agrees with ‘‘the concept of avoiding
conflicts of interest,’’ thought it was ‘‘an
important issue’’ that credit unions
should address in an internal policy or
guidelines. This same commenter stated
it was not aware ‘‘that there are any
outstanding concerns,’’ did not see the
need for the rule and, therefore, did not
support it. The other state league that
commented stated that, although it
knew ‘‘of no immediate need for a
conflict of interest provision regarding’’
eligible obligations, it believed ‘‘the
clarity provided for in the proposed
change benefits all affected parties and
will help ensure that decisions * * *
[are for] sound business considerations
rather than any personal benefit to
insiders.’’
The FCU stated it did not feel the rule
was necessary to ensure that FCUs make
appropriate business decisions,
questioned the need for the regulation,
and contended the rule ‘‘introduced an
additional regulatory burden.’’ This
commenter asked, if the rule is
finalized, that it be narrowly interpreted
so as not to inhibit certain activities
common in the secondary market and
offered the example of credit union
attendance at conferences with
secondary market participants that
include meals. This commenter stated
the rule should be interpreted as
applicable on a ‘‘per transaction basis,’’
meaning the determination should be
whether there is prohibited
compensation tied to the purchase or
sale of a particular loan or group of
loans.
Contrary to assertions in a couple of
the comment letters, the Board believes
the proposal clearly stated the basis for
the proposed amendment: ‘‘The Board
believes eligible obligation transactions,
which involve the buying and selling of
member loans, potentially present the
same kinds of conflicts of interest as
where an FCU is the original lender to
its member. For that reason, the Board
proposes to add a conflict of interest
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
65442
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 21, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
provision * * * similar to the conflict
of interest provision in NCUA’s general
lending rule.’’ 72 FR 35207, 35208 (June
27, 2007). Some commenters appear to
equate the ‘‘need’’ for a rule with
instances or evidence of actual problems
having occurred. The Board has
recognized the potential for conflicts in
eligible obligations transactions exists,
just as in general lending, and,
therefore, believes it should not wait for
inappropriate transactions to occur to
establish a ‘‘need’’ for a conflicts
provision. The amendment is essentially
and simply a rule of conduct and does
not create any additional regulatory
burden, for example, by affecting the
current limitations on eligible obligation
purchases or requiring FCUs undertake
any additional record keeping or
disclosures. Finally, the Board
concludes having a conflict of interest
provision in the eligible obligations rule
paralleling the provision in the general
lending rule is good regulatory structure
and, as one commenter noted, adds
clarity beneficial to all parties engaging
in eligible obligation transactions with
FCUs.
The Board notes it intends the conflict
of interest provision to remove the
incentive for personal gain at the credit
union’s expense in connection with an
eligible obligations transaction. For
example, the rule does not prohibit a
credit union employee from attending a
secondary market conference for
information gathering and other
business purposes to enhance the credit
union’s ability to engage in prudent
eligible obligations transactions. Rather,
the rule will be interpreted in the
context of particular transactions and
seeks to prevent purchases of loans that
are not in the credit union’s best
interest. The rule accomplishes this by
prohibiting personal economic
incentives, such as fees or commissions,
from being part of a transaction. NCUA
reiterates that there are numerous
exceptions built into the rule that allow
employees to receive compensation for
their eligible obligations activities under
controlled circumstances.
The Board adopts the proposed
conflict of interest provision for the
eligible obligations rule without change
as a final rule.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires NCUA to prepare an analysis to
describe any significant economic
impact a rule may have on a substantial
number of small credit unions (those
under ten million dollars in assets). This
rule adds a conflict of interest provision
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Nov 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
to the eligible obligations rule. There is
minimal regulatory burden associated
with this and the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small credit
unions. Therefore, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999—Assessment
of Federal Regulations and Policies on
Families
NCUA has determined that this rule
will not affect family well-being within
the meaning of section 654 of the
Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999, Pub. L. 105–
277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub.
L. 104–121) (SBREFA) provides
generally for a congressional review of
agency rules. A reporting requirement is
triggered in instances where NCUA
issues a final rule as defined by Section
551 of the Administrative Procedure
Act. 5 U.S.C. 551. The Office of
Management and Budget has
determined this rule is not a major rule
for purposes of SBREFA. As required by
SBREFA, NCUA will file the
appropriate reports with Congress and
the General Accounting Office so this
rule may be reviewed.
Sfmt 4700
For the reasons discussed above,
NCUA amends 12 CFR part 701 as
follows:
PART 701—ORGANIZATION AND
OPERATIONS OF FEDERAL CREDIT
UNIONS
1. The authority citation for part 701
continues to read as follows:
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on
state and local interests. In adherence to
fundamental federalism principles,
NCUA, an independent regulatory
agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5),
voluntarily complies with the executive
order. This final rule will not have a
substantial direct effect on the states, on
the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this rule does not
constitute a policy that has federalism
implications for purposes of the
executive order.
Fmt 4700
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on November 15, 2007.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
I
Executive Order 13132
Frm 00002
Conflict of interests, credit unions,
eligible obligations, loans.
I
NCUA has determined that this rule
will not increase paperwork
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 and regulations
of the Office of Management and
Budget.
PO 00000
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 701
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1755, 1756,
1757, 1759, 1761a, 1761b, 1766, 1767, 1782,
1784, 1787, and 1789. Section 701.6 is also
authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3717. Section 701.31
is also authorized by 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.,
42 U.S.C. 1861 and 42 U.S.C. 3601–3610.
Section 701.35 is also authorized by 42
U.S.C. 4311–4312.
2. Section 701.23 is amended by
adding new paragraph (g) to read as
follows:
I
§ 701.23 Purchase, sale, and pledge of
eligible obligations.
*
*
*
*
*
(g)(1) Conflicts of interest. No federal
credit union official, employee, or their
immediate family member may receive,
directly or indirectly, any compensation
in connection with that credit union’s
purchase, sale, or pledge of an eligible
obligation under the provisions of
§ 701.23.
(2) Permissible payments. This section
does not prohibit:
(i) A federal credit union’s payment of
salary to employees;
(ii) A federal credit union’s payment
of an incentive or bonus to an employee
based on the credit union’s overall
financial performance;
(iii) A federal credit union’s payment
of an incentive or bonus to an employee,
other than a senior management
employee, in connection with that
credit union’s purchase, sale or pledge
of an eligible obligation. This payment
is permissible if the board of directors
establishes a written policy and internal
controls for the incentive or bonus
program and monitors compliance with
the policy and controls at least
annually; and
(iv) Payment by a person other than
the federal credit union of
compensation to a volunteer official,
non-senior management employee, or
their immediate family member, for a
service or activity performed outside the
credit union provided that the federal
credit union, the official, employee, or
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 21, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
their immediate family member has not
made a referral.
(3) Business associates and family
members. All transactions under this
section with business associates or
family members not specifically
prohibited by paragraph (g)(1) of this
section must be conducted at arm’s
length and in the interest of the federal
credit union.
(4) Definitions. The definitions in
§ 701.21(c)(8)(ii) of this part apply to
this section.
[FR Doc. E7–22709 Filed 11–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0176; Directorate
Identifier 2007–SW–14–AD; Amendment
39–15263; AD 2007–23–17]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bell
Helicopter Textron Canada Model 206A
and 206B Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for Bell
Helicopter Textron Canada (BHTC)
Model 206A and 206B helicopters. This
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority to
identify and correct an unsafe condition
on an aviation product. The aviation
authority of Canada, with which we
have a bilateral agreement, states in the
MCAI:
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Reevaluation of the structural analysis
indicates the need for the removal from
service of bolts in this application.
The removal of certain main rotor latch
bolts is required because these bolts do
not have a mandatory retirement life.
Further evaluation has shown that these
bolts fail prematurely due to fatigue.
This fatigue failure may result in failure
of the main rotor and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter. We are issuing
this AD to require actions to correct this
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
December 6, 2007.
We must receive comments on this
AD by January 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Nov 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the economic
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon Miles, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations
and Guidance Group, Fort Worth, Texas
76193–0111, telephone (817) 222–5122,
fax (817) 222–5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new
process for streamlining the issuance of
ADs related to MCAI. This streamlined
process will allow us to adopt MCAI
safety requirements in a more efficient
manner and will reduce safety risks to
the public. This process continues to
follow all FAA AD issuance processes to
meet legal, economic, Administrative
Procedure Act, and Federal Register
requirements. We also continue to meet
our technical decision-making
responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated
products.
This AD references the MCAI and
related service information that we
considered in forming the engineering
basis to correct the unsafe condition.
The AD may contain text copied from
the MCAI and for this reason might not
follow our plain language principles.
Discussion
Transport Canada, which is the
aviation authority for Canada, has
issued Airworthiness Directive No. CF–
2006–23R1, dated March 12, 2007
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65443
(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to
correct an unsafe condition for these
Canadian-certificated products.
The MCAI states:
Reevaluation of the structural analysis
indicates the need for the removal from
service of bolts in this application.
The removal of certain main rotor latch
bolts is required because these bolts do
not have a mandatory retirement life.
Further evaluation has shown that these
bolts fail prematurely due to fatigue.
This fatigue failure may result in failure
of the main rotor and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter. We are issuing
this AD to require actions to correct this
unsafe condition on these products.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Bell Helicopter Textron has issued
Alert Service Bulletin No. 206–06–109,
dated July 25, 2006. The actions
described in this MCAI are intended to
correct the same unsafe condition
identified in the service information.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of Canada, and is
approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with this State of Design
Authority, we have been notified of the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI
and the referenced service information.
We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and
determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design. The
removal of certain bolts is required
within 30 days because these bolts do
not have a mandatory retirement life.
Further evaluation has shown that these
bolts fail prematurely due to fatigue.
This fatigue failure may result in failure
of the main rotor and subsequent loss of
the helicopter. We are issuing this AD
to require actions to correct this unsafe
condition on these products.
Differences Between the AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 21, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65441-65443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22709]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 21, 2007 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 65441]]
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 701
RIN 3133-AD37
Purchase, Sale, and Pledge of Eligible Obligations
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NCUA is amending its rule governing the purchase, sale, and
pledge of eligible obligations by adding a conflict of interest
provision substantially similar to the conflict of interest provision
in NCUA's general lending rule. This addition will help ensure that
decisions by a federal credit union (FCU) regarding the purchase, sale,
and pledge of eligible obligations are made with the FCU's best
interests in mind.
DATES: This final rule is effective December 21, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Annette Tapia or Frank Kressman, Staff
Attorneys, Office of General Counsel, at the above address or telephone
(703) 518-6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The NCUA continually reviews its regulations to ``update, clarify
and simplify existing regulations and eliminate redundant and
unnecessary provisions.'' NCUA Interpretive Rulings and Policy
Statement (IRPS) 87-2, Developing and Reviewing Government Regulations.
Under IRPS 87-2, NCUA conducts a rolling review of one-third of its
regulations each year, involving both internal review and public
comment. NCUA's 2006 review produced a recommendation to include a
conflict of interest provision in the eligible obligations rule similar
to the one in NCUA's general lending rule. 12 CFR 701.21(c)(8), 12 CFR
701.23.
B. Discussion
Generally, the eligible obligations rule implements the statutory
provisions limiting the purchase, sale, and pledging of an eligible
obligation, which is defined by the NCUA Board as a loan or group of
loans. 12 U.S.C. 1757(13); 12 CFR 701.23. Subject to certain
exceptions, the rule provides that an FCU may purchase eligible
obligations, which the regulation defines as loans made to a member by
another lender, from any source as long as the loans are ones the FCU
is empowered to grant, up to an amount equal to 5% of its unimpaired
capital and surplus. 12 CFR 701.23(b)(1). Exceptions in the rule
include purchasing nonmember student and real estate secured loans for
purposes of completing a loan pool for sale on the secondary market. In
addition, loans purchased to complete a pool and loans purchased as
part of an indirect lending or indirect leasing program are exempt from
the 5% limit on eligible obligations.
The Board issued a proposed rule, with request for comments, to add
a conflict of interest provision to the eligible obligations rule that
is similar to the conflict provision in NCUA's general lending
regulation. 72 FR 35207 (June 27, 2007), 12 CFR 701.21(c)(8)(i). The
Board believes eligible obligation transactions, which involve the
buying and selling of member loans, potentially present the same kinds
of conflicts of interest as where an FCU is the original lender to its
member. The proposal provided that an official, employee, or their
immediate family members may not receive, directly or indirectly, any
commission, fee or other compensation in connection with an eligible
obligations transaction. The proposal was intended to help ensure FCUs
make decisions concerning the purchase and sale of eligible obligations
based on appropriate business considerations rather than any personal
benefit to insiders.
C. Summary of Comments
NCUA received only five comments: Two from credit union trade
associations, two from state leagues, and one from an FCU.
One of the trade associations stated it did not support the rule
because NCUA had not supported ``the need'' for the rule, why it was
proposed, or ``what problems it sought to address.'' The other trade
association stated it recognized that ``self-dealing and insider
benefit should not be a motivating factor in a credit union's
business'' and generally supported the rule, emphasizing its strong
support for the exceptions in the rule that allow various permissible
payments.
One of the state leagues, while stating it agrees with ``the
concept of avoiding conflicts of interest,'' thought it was ``an
important issue'' that credit unions should address in an internal
policy or guidelines. This same commenter stated it was not aware
``that there are any outstanding concerns,'' did not see the need for
the rule and, therefore, did not support it. The other state league
that commented stated that, although it knew ``of no immediate need for
a conflict of interest provision regarding'' eligible obligations, it
believed ``the clarity provided for in the proposed change benefits all
affected parties and will help ensure that decisions * * * [are for]
sound business considerations rather than any personal benefit to
insiders.''
The FCU stated it did not feel the rule was necessary to ensure
that FCUs make appropriate business decisions, questioned the need for
the regulation, and contended the rule ``introduced an additional
regulatory burden.'' This commenter asked, if the rule is finalized,
that it be narrowly interpreted so as not to inhibit certain activities
common in the secondary market and offered the example of credit union
attendance at conferences with secondary market participants that
include meals. This commenter stated the rule should be interpreted as
applicable on a ``per transaction basis,'' meaning the determination
should be whether there is prohibited compensation tied to the purchase
or sale of a particular loan or group of loans.
Contrary to assertions in a couple of the comment letters, the
Board believes the proposal clearly stated the basis for the proposed
amendment: ``The Board believes eligible obligation transactions, which
involve the buying and selling of member loans, potentially present the
same kinds of conflicts of interest as where an FCU is the original
lender to its member. For that reason, the Board proposes to add a
conflict of interest
[[Page 65442]]
provision * * * similar to the conflict of interest provision in NCUA's
general lending rule.'' 72 FR 35207, 35208 (June 27, 2007). Some
commenters appear to equate the ``need'' for a rule with instances or
evidence of actual problems having occurred. The Board has recognized
the potential for conflicts in eligible obligations transactions
exists, just as in general lending, and, therefore, believes it should
not wait for inappropriate transactions to occur to establish a
``need'' for a conflicts provision. The amendment is essentially and
simply a rule of conduct and does not create any additional regulatory
burden, for example, by affecting the current limitations on eligible
obligation purchases or requiring FCUs undertake any additional record
keeping or disclosures. Finally, the Board concludes having a conflict
of interest provision in the eligible obligations rule paralleling the
provision in the general lending rule is good regulatory structure and,
as one commenter noted, adds clarity beneficial to all parties engaging
in eligible obligation transactions with FCUs.
The Board notes it intends the conflict of interest provision to
remove the incentive for personal gain at the credit union's expense in
connection with an eligible obligations transaction. For example, the
rule does not prohibit a credit union employee from attending a
secondary market conference for information gathering and other
business purposes to enhance the credit union's ability to engage in
prudent eligible obligations transactions. Rather, the rule will be
interpreted in the context of particular transactions and seeks to
prevent purchases of loans that are not in the credit union's best
interest. The rule accomplishes this by prohibiting personal economic
incentives, such as fees or commissions, from being part of a
transaction. NCUA reiterates that there are numerous exceptions built
into the rule that allow employees to receive compensation for their
eligible obligations activities under controlled circumstances.
The Board adopts the proposed conflict of interest provision for
the eligible obligations rule without change as a final rule.
Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires NCUA to prepare an analysis
to describe any significant economic impact a rule may have on a
substantial number of small credit unions (those under ten million
dollars in assets). This rule adds a conflict of interest provision to
the eligible obligations rule. There is minimal regulatory burden
associated with this and the rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small credit unions. Therefore, a
regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
NCUA has determined that this rule will not increase paperwork
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and regulations
of the Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on state and local interests. In
adherence to fundamental federalism principles, NCUA, an independent
regulatory agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5), voluntarily complies
with the executive order. This final rule will not have a substantial
direct effect on the states, on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this rule does not constitute a policy that has
federalism implications for purposes of the executive order.
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999--
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
NCUA has determined that this rule will not affect family well-
being within the meaning of section 654 of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999, Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681
(1998).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(Pub. L. 104-121) (SBREFA) provides generally for a congressional
review of agency rules. A reporting requirement is triggered in
instances where NCUA issues a final rule as defined by Section 551 of
the Administrative Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. 551. The Office of
Management and Budget has determined this rule is not a major rule for
purposes of SBREFA. As required by SBREFA, NCUA will file the
appropriate reports with Congress and the General Accounting Office so
this rule may be reviewed.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 701
Conflict of interests, credit unions, eligible obligations, loans.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board on November
15, 2007.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
0
For the reasons discussed above, NCUA amends 12 CFR part 701 as
follows:
PART 701--ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS OF FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 701 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1755, 1756, 1757, 1759, 1761a,
1761b, 1766, 1767, 1782, 1784, 1787, and 1789. Section 701.6 is also
authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3717. Section 701.31 is also authorized by
15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq., 42 U.S.C. 1861 and 42 U.S.C. 3601-3610.
Section 701.35 is also authorized by 42 U.S.C. 4311-4312.
0
2. Section 701.23 is amended by adding new paragraph (g) to read as
follows:
Sec. 701.23 Purchase, sale, and pledge of eligible obligations.
* * * * *
(g)(1) Conflicts of interest. No federal credit union official,
employee, or their immediate family member may receive, directly or
indirectly, any compensation in connection with that credit union's
purchase, sale, or pledge of an eligible obligation under the
provisions of Sec. 701.23.
(2) Permissible payments. This section does not prohibit:
(i) A federal credit union's payment of salary to employees;
(ii) A federal credit union's payment of an incentive or bonus to
an employee based on the credit union's overall financial performance;
(iii) A federal credit union's payment of an incentive or bonus to
an employee, other than a senior management employee, in connection
with that credit union's purchase, sale or pledge of an eligible
obligation. This payment is permissible if the board of directors
establishes a written policy and internal controls for the incentive or
bonus program and monitors compliance with the policy and controls at
least annually; and
(iv) Payment by a person other than the federal credit union of
compensation to a volunteer official, non-senior management employee,
or their immediate family member, for a service or activity performed
outside the credit union provided that the federal credit union, the
official, employee, or
[[Page 65443]]
their immediate family member has not made a referral.
(3) Business associates and family members. All transactions under
this section with business associates or family members not
specifically prohibited by paragraph (g)(1) of this section must be
conducted at arm's length and in the interest of the federal credit
union.
(4) Definitions. The definitions in Sec. 701.21(c)(8)(ii) of this
part apply to this section.
[FR Doc. E7-22709 Filed 11-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P