Request for Public Comments and Office of Management and Budget Approval of an Existing Information Collection Requirement (2137-0618), 65643-65644 [E7-22691]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 21, 2007 / Notices
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
of HMEP planning grant funds devoted
to this effort?
d. Did the grantee conduct exercises
to support its emergency plan? How
many exercises were conducted? Did
any of these exercises include shipper
or carrier participation? What was the
total amount of HMEP planning grant
funds devoted to emergency response
drills or exercises of all types?
e. What was the total amount of
HMEP planning grant funds devoted to
other authorized planning activities by
the grantee (e.g., providing technical
staff in support of emergency response
planning efforts)?
3. Based on the activities outlined
above, how well has the HMEP grants
program met emergency response
planning needs within your
jurisdiction? Does your current ability to
provide planning enable you to meet the
needs you have identified? Do you have
any recommendations for additional
activities or programs that could further
enhance your emergency response
planning capabilities?
Training Grants
1. What was the total amount of
HMEP training grant funds utilized to
assess training needs and provide
training for emergency response
personnel in your jurisdiction?
a. Did you complete or update an
assessment of the training needs of the
emergency response personnel in your
jurisdiction? What was the total amount
of HMEP training grant funds devoted to
this effort?
b. How many individuals were
trained in whole or in part using HMEP
training grant funds? You should
include separate totals for numbers of
fire, police, emergency medical services
(EMS) or other personnel who were
trained and the type of training
provided. (Note that ‘‘other’’ personnel
include public works employees,
accident clean-up crews, and liaison
and support officers. Note also that if
HMEP training grant funds were used in
any way to support the training, such as
for books or equipment, you should
show that the training was partially
funded by HMEP training grant funds.)
What was the total amount of HMEP
training grant funds devoted to this
effort?
c. Did you provide incident command
systems training? If so, provide separate
indications for the numbers of fire,
policy, EMS, or other personnel who
were trained. What was the total amount
of HMEP training grant funds devoted to
this effort?
d. Did you develop new training using
HMEP training grant funds in whole or
in part, such as training in handling
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:56 Nov 20, 2007
Jkt 214001
specific types of incidents of specific
types of materials? If so, briefly describe
the new programs. Did a commodity
flow assessment influence the
development of new training programs?
Was the program qualified using the
HMEP Curriculum Guidelines process?
What was the total amount of HMEP
training grant funds devoted to this
effort?
e. What was the total amount of
HMEP planning grant funds devoted to
other authorized training activities (e.g.,
activities necessary to monitor training,
including examinations, critiques, and
instructor evaluations; management
activities to increase the benefits,
proficiency, and rapid deployment of
emergency responders)?
2. Do you have a system in place for
measuring the effectiveness of
emergency response to hazardous
materials incidents in your jurisdiction?
Describe the criteria you use (total
response time, total time at an accident
scene, communication among different
agencies or jurisdictions, or other
criteria). How many state and local
response teams are located in your
jurisdiction? What is the estimated
coverage of these teams (e.g., the percent
of state jurisdictions covered)?
3. Based on the activities outlined
above, how well has the HMEP grants
program met emergency response
training needs within your jurisdiction?
Does your current ability to provide
training enable you to meet the needs
you have identified? Do you have any
recommendations for additional
activities or programs that could further
enhance the effectiveness of emergency
response to hazardous materials
incidents in your jurisdiction?
The total revised information
collection budget for the HMEP grants
program follows:
Title: Hazardous Materials Public
Sector Training and Planning Grants.
OMB Control Number: 2137–0586.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved information
collection.
Abstract: Part 110 of 49 CFR sets forth
the procedures for reimbursable grants
for public sector planning and training
in support of the emergency planning
and training efforts of states, Indian
tribes and local communities to manage
hazardous materials emergencies,
particularly those involving
transportation. Sections in this part
address information collection and
recordkeeping with regard to applying
for grants, monitoring expenditures, and
reporting and requesting modifications.
Affected Public: State and local
governments, Indian tribes.
Recordkeeping:
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65643
Number of Respondents: 68.
Total Number of Responses: 68.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 5,428.
Frequency of collection: On occasion.
Issued in Washington, DC on November 15,
2007.
Edward T. Mazzullo,
Director, Office of Hazardous Materials
Standards.
[FR Doc. E7–22689 Filed 11–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket: PHMSA–1998–4957]
Request for Public Comments and
Office of Management and Budget
Approval of an Existing Information
Collection Requirement (2137–0618)
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), this notice announces that
PHMSA forwarded an Information
Collection Request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for an
extension of the currently approved
information collection: ‘‘Pipeline Safety:
Periodic Underwater Inspections’’
(2137–0618). The purpose of this notice
is to invite the public to submit
comments on the request.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
December 21, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send comments directly to
the Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: Desk Officer for the
Department of Transportation, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roger Little at (202) 366–4569, or by email at roger.little@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal pipeline safety regulations (49
CFR Parts 190–199) require operators to
conduct appropriate underwater
inspections in the Gulf of Mexico. If the
operator finds pipeline exposed on the
seabed floor or a hazard to navigation,
the operator must contact the National
Response Center by telephone within 24
hours of discovery and report the
location of the exposed pipeline (49
CFR 192.612 and 195.413). PHMSA is
now requesting that OMB grant a three-
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
65644
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 21, 2007 / Notices
year term of approval for renewal of this
information collection requirement.
Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA, PHMSA invites comments on
whether the information collection is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of DOT. As used in this
notice, the term ‘‘information
collection’’ includes all work related to
preparing and disseminating
information related to this information
collection requirement including
completing paperwork, gathering
information, and conducting telephone
calls. Comments may include (1)
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
DOT’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collection; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of the
information collection on respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Type of Information Collection
Request: Renewal of Existing Collection.
Title of Information Collection:
Pipeline Safety: Periodic Underwater
Inspections.
Respondents: 82.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 1,350 hours.
Estimated Cost: $87,413.
Issued in Washington, DC on November 15,
2007.
Barbara Betsock,
Deputy Director of Regulations, Office of
Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. E7–22691 Filed 11–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety;
Notice of Application for Special
Permits
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: List of applications for special
permits.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special
permits from the Department of
Transportation’s Hazardous Material
Regulations (49 CFR part 107, subpart
B), notice is hereby given that the Office
of Hazardous Materials Safety has
received the application described
herein. Each mode of transportation for
which a particular special permit is
requested is indicated by a number in
the ‘‘Nature of Application’’ portion of
the table below as follows: 1—Motor
vehicle, 2—Rail freight, 3—Cargo vessel,
4—Cargo aircraft only, 5—Passengercarrying aircraft.
Comments must be received on
or before December 21, 2007.
Address Comments to: Record Center,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Washington, DC 20590.
Comments should refer to the
application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of
comments is desired, include a selfaddressed stamped postcard showing
the special permit number.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the applications are available
for inspection in the Records Center,
East Building, PHH–30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, Southeast, Washington,
DC or at https://dms.dot.gov.
This notice of receipt of applications
for special permit is published in
accordance with part 107 of the Federal
hazardous materials transportation law
(49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
14, 2007.
Delmer F. Billings,
Director, Office of Hazardous Materials,
Special Permits and Approvals.
NEW SPECIAL PERMITS
Application
No.
Docket No.
14597–N ......
........................
14598–N ......
........................
14599–N ......
Nature of special permits thereof
The Columbiana Boiler
Co., Columbiana, OH.
49 CFR 173.314 ...............
49 CFR 178.345 ...............
........................
Tremcar USA, Inc., SaintJean-sur-Richeli eu, CN.
State of New York Department of Health, Albany,
NY.
14600–N ......
........................
McLane Company, Inc.
Temple, TX.
49 CFR 173.308 ...............
14601–N ......
........................
Precision Combustion
Technology, LLC.
49 CFR 173.302a .............
14602–N ......
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Regulation(s) affected
........................
14603–N ......
........................
Lockheed Martin Space
Systems Company,
Sunnyvale, CA.
Yi Wu Huan Qiu Can
Manufacture Yiwu City,
Zhejiang.
49 CFR 173.304a,
173.301, 172.101 Table
Column (9B).
49 CFR 173.304(d),
173.306(a) and 178.33a.
To authorize the transportation in commerce of anhydrous ammonia in a DOT 110 multi unit tank car
tank. (Modes 1, 2, 3)
To authorize the use of an alternative material in the
manufacture of cargo tank components. (Mode 1)
To authorize the transportation in commerce of packagings identified as infectious substances, Category B, which are actually non-hazardous for purposes of shipping and packaging drills conducted
through New York State to evaluate bioterrorism,
chemical terrorism and pandemic influenza preparedness. (Modes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
To authorize the transportation in commerce of up to
5,000 lighters manufactured by BIC Corporation
per motor vehicle not subject to the requirements
of subparts C through H of part 173 and part 177
in its entirety. (Mode 1)
To authorize the manufacture, marking, sale and use
of a non-DOT specification pressure vessel for the
transportation in commerce of boron trifluoride.
(Modes 1, 2, 3)
To authorize the transportation in commerce of anhydrous ammonia in non-DOT specification packaging. (Modes 1, 2, 3, 4)
To authorize the manufacture, marking, sale and use
of non-DOT specification inner nonrefillable metal
receptacles similar to DOT specification 2Q containers for certain Division 2.2 materials. (Modes 1,
2, 3, 4)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:56 Nov 20, 2007
Applicant
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
49 CFR 171.2(K) ..............
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65643-65644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22691]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
[Docket: PHMSA-1998-4957]
Request for Public Comments and Office of Management and Budget
Approval of an Existing Information Collection Requirement (2137-0618)
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA),
this notice announces that PHMSA forwarded an Information Collection
Request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for an extension
of the currently approved information collection: ``Pipeline Safety:
Periodic Underwater Inspections'' (2137-0618). The purpose of this
notice is to invite the public to submit comments on the request.
DATES: Submit comments on or before December 21, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send comments directly to the Office of Management and
Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: Desk
Officer for the Department of Transportation, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Little at (202) 366-4569, or by
e-mail at roger.little@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal pipeline safety regulations (49
CFR Parts 190-199) require operators to conduct appropriate underwater
inspections in the Gulf of Mexico. If the operator finds pipeline
exposed on the seabed floor or a hazard to navigation, the operator
must contact the National Response Center by telephone within 24 hours
of discovery and report the location of the exposed pipeline (49 CFR
192.612 and 195.413). PHMSA is now requesting that OMB grant a three-
[[Page 65644]]
year term of approval for renewal of this information collection
requirement.
Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, PHMSA invites
comments on whether the information collection is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of DOT. As used in this notice, the
term ``information collection'' includes all work related to preparing
and disseminating information related to this information collection
requirement including completing paperwork, gathering information, and
conducting telephone calls. Comments may include (1) whether the
information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of DOT's
estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; (3) ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the information
collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
Type of Information Collection Request: Renewal of Existing
Collection.
Title of Information Collection: Pipeline Safety: Periodic
Underwater Inspections.
Respondents: 82.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1,350 hours.
Estimated Cost: $87,413.
Issued in Washington, DC on November 15, 2007.
Barbara Betsock,
Deputy Director of Regulations, Office of Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. E7-22691 Filed 11-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P