Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: Open Competition Seeking Professional Exchange Programs in Africa, East Asia, Europe, the Near East, North Africa, South Central Asia, and the Western Hemisphere, 65379-65392 [E7-22659]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
be submitted on or before December 11,
2007.
Electronic comments:
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR-CHX–2007–25 on the
subject line.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CHX–2007–25. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the CHX. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CHX–2007–25 and should
Amendment No. 1 is November 9, 2007. For
purposes of calculating the 60-day period within
which the Commission may summarily abrogate the
proposed rule change under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of
the Act, the Commission considers the period to
commence on November 9, 2007, the date on which
CHX submitted Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C.
78s(b)(3)(C).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:50 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–22627 Filed 11–19–07; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5994]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: Open Competition Seeking
Professional Exchange Programs in
Africa, East Asia, Europe, the Near
East, North Africa, South Central Asia,
and the Western Hemisphere
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C–08–01.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: February 15,
2007.
Executive Summary: The Office of
Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs
announces an open competition for
grants that support exchanges and build
relationships between U.S. non-profit
organizations and civil society and
cultural groups in Africa, East Asia,
Europe, the Near East, North Africa,
South Central Asia and the Western
Hemisphere. Pending availability of
funds, it is anticipated that
approximately $5,000,000 or more will
be available to support this competition.
ECA/PE/C expects to fund
approximately 15–20 projects under this
competition in FY 2008. U.S. public and
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3) may submit proposals that
support the goals of The Professional
Exchange Program. Projects should
promote mutual understanding and
partnerships between key professional
and cultural groups in the United States
and counterpart groups in other
countries through multi-phased
exchanges taking place over one to two
years. Proposals should encourage
citizen engagement in current issues,
with a particular focus on youth and
those who influence them, and promote
the development of democratic societies
and institutions, with a view toward
creating a more stable world. To the
17 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65379
fullest extent possible, programs should
be two-way exchanges supporting
roughly equal numbers of participants
from the U.S. and foreign countries.
Proposed projects should transform
institutional and individual
understanding of key issues, foster
dialogue, share expertise, and develop
capacity. Through these people-topeople exchanges, the Bureau seeks to
break down stereotypes that divide
peoples, to promote good governance
and economic growth, to contribute to
conflict prevention and management,
and to build respect for cultural
expression and identity in the world.
Projects should be structured to allow
American professionals and their
international counterparts in eligible
countries to develop a common dialogue
for dealing with shared challenges and
concerns. Projects should include
current or potential leaders who will
effect positive change in their
communities. Exchange participants
may include community leaders, elected
and professional government officials,
religious leaders, educators, and
proponents of democratic ideals and
institutions, including for example, the
media and judiciary, or others who
influence the way in which different
communities approach these issues. The
Bureau is especially interested in
engaging socially and economically
diverse groups that may not have had
extensive contact with counterpart
institutions in the United States and
particularly seeks proposals that engage
educators or other groups that directly
influence youth in innovative ways.
Applicants may not submit proposals
that address more than one region or
that include countries not eligible under
a specific theme designated in the
RFGP. Proposals that do so will be
declared technically ineligible and will
receive no further consideration in the
review process. For the purposes of this
competition, eligible regions are Africa,
East Asia, Europe, the Near East, North
Africa, South Central Asia, and the
Western Hemisphere. No guarantee is
made or implied that grants will be
awarded in all themes and for all
countries listed.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
II. Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
65380
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose: The competition is based on
the premise that people-to-people
exchanges encourage and strengthen
understanding of democratic values,
nurture the social, political, cultural,
and economic development of societies
and encourage a more active citizenry.
Exchanges supported by institutional
grants from the Bureau should operate
at two levels: they should enhance
partnerships between U.S. and foreign
institutions, and they should establish a
common language to develop practical
solutions for shared problems and
concerns. The Bureau is particularly
interested in projects that will create
mutually beneficial and self-sustaining
linkages between professional
communities in the U.S. and their
counterpart communities in other
countries. Applicants must identify the
U.S. and foreign organizations and
individuals with whom they are
proposing to collaborate and describe
previous cooperative activities, if any.
Information about the mission,
activities, and accomplishments of
partner organizations should be
included in the submission. Proposals
should contain letters of commitment or
support from partner organizations for
the proposed project. Applicants should
clearly outline and describe the role and
responsibilities of all partner
organizations in terms of project
logistics, management and oversight.
Competitive proposals will include
the following:
• A brief description of the issue to be
addressed and how it relates to the
target country or region. (Proposals that
request resources for an initial needs
assessment will be deemed less
competitive under the review criterion
Program Planning and Ability to
Achieve Objectives, per item V.1
below.);
• A clear, succinct statement of
program objectives and expected
outcomes that responds to Bureau goals
for each theme in this competition.
Desired outcomes should be described
in qualitative and quantitative terms.
(See the Program Monitoring and
Evaluation section per item V.1 below,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
for more information on project
objectives and outcomes.);
• A proposed timeline, listing the
optimal schedule for each program
activity;
• A description of participant
recruitment and selection processes;
• Letters of support from foreign and
U.S. partners. (Letters from prospective
partner institutions should demonstrate
a capacity to arrange and conduct U.S.
and overseas activities.);
• An outline of the applicant
organization’s relevant expertise in the
project theme and country(ies);
• An outline of relevant experience
managing previous exchange programs;
• Resumes of experienced staff who
have demonstrated a commitment to
implement and monitor projects and
ensure outcomes;
• A comprehensive plan to evaluate
whether program outcomes will achieve
the specific objectives described in the
narrative. (See the Program Monitoring
and Evaluation section [IV.3d.d below]
for further guidance on evaluation.);
• A post-grant plan that demonstrates
how the grantee plans to maintain
contacts initiated through the program.
Applicants should discuss ways that
U.S. and foreign participants or host
institutions will collaborate and
communicate after the ECA-funded
grant has concluded. (See Review
Criterion #5, per item V.1 below for
more information on post-grant
activities.)
• Successful projects will
demonstrate the importance Americans
place on community service as an
element of active citizenship and may
include ideas and projects to strengthen
civil society through community service
either during participants’ stay in the
U.S. or upon their return to their
countries.
• In addition to addressing the
specific themes described below,
proposals should develop partner
organizations’ capacity in such areas as
strategic planning, performance
management, fund raising, financial
management, human resources
management, and decision-making.
U.S. Embassy Involvement: Before
submitting a proposal, all applicants are
strongly encouraged to consult with the
Washington, DC-based State Department
contact for the themes/regions listed in
this solicitation. Applicants are also
strongly encouraged to consult with
Public Affairs Officers at U.S. Embassies
in relevant countries as they develop
proposals responding to this RFGP.
Also, it is important that the proposal
narrative clearly state the applicant’s
commitment to consult closely with the
Public Affairs Section of the U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Embassy in the relevant country(ies) to
develop plans for project
implementation and to select project
participants. Proposals should also
acknowledge U.S. Embassy involvement
in the final selection of all participants.
Applicants should state their
willingness to invite representatives of
the Embassy(ies) and/or consulate(s) to
participate in program sessions or site
visits.
ECA/DOS Acknowledgement:
Narratives should state that all material
developed for the project will
prominently acknowledge Department
of State ECA Bureau funding for the
program.
Outreach: Applicants who receive
assistance awards are encouraged to
engage in outreach activities that will
promote the goals of the project and
increase the visibility of the project
activities, including public events and
appropriate media appearances.
FY 2008 Thematic Topics by Region
REGION: Africa (AF):
AF: Economic Growth to Fight
Poverty and Strengthen Democracy.
Program Contact: Curtis Huff, tel:
(202) 453–8159, e-mail:
HuffCE@State.gov.
Project Goals: ECA seeks proposals
that promote entrepreneurial thinking,
job creation, business planning, and
management skills that will assist young
African adults in launching business
careers. Programs should increase
understanding of the links between
entrepreneurial activity and free
markets as well as the importance of
transparency and accountability in
business and government. Proposals
should also increase understanding
among African and American
participants of the influence of culture
on business.
Audience: Young adults, 25–32,
especially women.
Eligible Countries: Ghana, Kenya,
Liberia, Mali, Nigeria, Senegal, South
Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia.
Successful programs will achieve the
following:
• Educate young men and women in
entrepreneurial thinking, business
management skills, and attracting
investment, with also the ability to
design training and to lead others in
building these skills.
• Enhance appreciation for American
business practices and the role of the
individual in creating growth through
grassroots-focused entrepreneurial
efforts.
• Develop enduring professional ties
between U.S. and partner organizations
and expand leadership skills.
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
• Enable participants to initiate and
support development and community
service activities in their home
countries.
Successful applicants must
demonstrate a capacity to conduct the
following activities:
(1) Work jointly with an African
partner organization to develop a useful
business skills program for young adult
Africans that includes activities in both
the U.S. and Africa.
(2) U.S. experts travel to Africa for incountry consultations and preliminary
trainings. Working with the African
partner, U.S. experts recruit and select
African participants for a U.S.-based
fellowship program.
(3) Provide a six- to ten-week U.S.based fellows program for 10 to 15
Africans on business development that
features both individualized and group
learning and practice activities which
develop technical and leadership skills
plus cultural sensitivity.
(4) As a counterpart to the fellows
program in the U.S., provide a multiweek program in Africa for 10–15
Americans to learn about business
challenges and opportunities there and
to assist in conducting workshops for a
wider audience of Africans.
(5) Develop enhancement activities
and leadership development
opportunities to reinforce program goals
after all participants’ return to their
home country. An essential follow-on
component will be a longitudinal
assessment of the achievements of the
program.
Possible Program Model:
1. Grantee sends Americans to work
alongside African partners for two
weeks or more to examine the needs of
young adults in starting businesses in
the region, and any in-country efforts
that are already underway or planned to
address those needs. These activities
should include development of a
working relationship among the
Americans, their African project
partners, and any African government
offices that have responsibility for
business development.
2. Grantee works with African partner
organization to recruit a pool of 50 or
more Young Professionals who are
interested in starting businesses and
will commit to a multi-staged
development program.
3. Grantee and partner conduct a
business skills program in Africa for the
50+ recruits, including instruction on
how to write a business plan.
Participants are invited to submit
business plans to program organizers.
4. Competition is held where those
who develop the best plans will be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
offered a U.S.-based fellowship
program.
5. African participants come to the
U.S. for fellowship program of six to ten
weeks that features both individualized
and group learning and practice
activities which develop technical and
leadership skills plus cultural
sensitivity. (A shorter-term study tour
for Africans will be considered
inadequate.)
6. Grantee and African partner
commit to a plan for additional business
skills development activities in Africa
after the grant is finished. These plans
might include additional basic business
training or mentoring of new businesses
by American specialists and
maintenance of a Web site for this
purpose.
7. Grantee and African partner keep
each other informed of developments in
business education through email,
telephone, video conferences, travel,
etc, in order to maintain an informed
momentum in their partnership.
AF: Local Governance.
Program Contact: Curtis Huff, tel:
(202) 453–8159, e-mail:
HuffCE@State.gov.
Project Goals: ECA is seeking
proposals that promote democratic
institutions that are effective,
responsive, transparent, and
accountable to the people. Programs
should increase skills and commitment
to professional standards in municipal
planning, policy analysis, bill drafting,
budgeting, constituent relations, project
implementation, and administration of
services. Programs should promote the
establishment of responsible watchdog
organizations and develop a
constructive working relationship with
local government officials.
Audience: Mayors, city councilors,
public administrators, executives,
municipal planners, and community
watchdog leaders (especially women).
Eligible Countries: Democratic
Republic of Congo, Ghana, Kenya,
Liberia, Mali, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal,
South Africa, and Tanzania.
Successful programs will achieve the
following:
• Educate local officials in a
professional approach to public
administration and empower them to
conduct it with integrity and
effectiveness while also designing
training and building the ability to lead
others in this field.
• Enhance appreciation for American
local governmental practices and the
role of the watchdog groups.
• Establish structured interaction
among American and African
participants designed to develop
enduring professional ties.
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65381
• Present plans to enable participants
to initiate and support activities in their
home countries that focus on local
development and community service.
Successful applicants must
demonstrate a capacity to conduct the
following activities:
(1) Work jointly with an African
partner organization to develop an
effective governance skills program for
young adult Africans that includes
activities in both the U.S. and Africa.
(2) Provide a six- to ten-week U.S.based fellows program for 10 to 15
Africans on local government.
(3) As a counterpart to the fellows
program in the U.S., provide a multiweek program in Africa for 10–15
Americans to learn about local
governance challenges and
opportunities there and to assist in
conducting workshops for a wider
audience of Africans.
(4) Grantee and African partner
commit to a plan for additional local
governance skills development activities
in Africa after the grant is finished.
These plans might include additional
basic training or mentoring and
maintenance of a web site for this
purpose.
(5) Launch a self-sustaining program
of enhancement activities and
leadership development opportunities
to reinforce program goals after all
participants’ return to their home
country. An essential follow-on
component will be a longitudinal
assessment of the achievements of the
program.
Possible Program Model:
1. Grantee sends Americans to work
alongside African partners for two
weeks or more to learn about the local
governance efforts in the region.
2. Grantee and partner conduct a local
governance education program in Africa
for local leaders. Program participants
would then be invited to submit training
plans, with the incentive that those who
produce the best plans will be invited
to the U.S. for fellowships.
3. Competition is held where those
who develop the best plans will be
offered a U.S.-based fellowship
program.
4. African participants come to the
U.S. for fellowship program of six to ten
weeks that features both individualized
and group learning and practice
activities which develop technical and
leadership skills plus cultural
sensitivity. (A shorter-term study tour
for Africans will be considered
inadequate.)
5. Grantee and African partner
commit to a plan for follow-on activities
in Africa after the grant is finished.
These plans might include additional
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
65382
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
training in public administration or
even the development of a public
administration academy.
6. The grantee and African partner
keep each other informed of
developments in public administration
education through email, telephone,
video conferences, travel, etc, in order
to maintain their partnership.
REGION: East Asia and the Pacific
(EAP):
EAP: Active and Responsible
Citizenship.
Program Contact: Clint Wright, tel:
(202) 453–8164, e-mail:
WrightHC@state.gov.
Project Goals: ECA encourages
proposals that will help educate
citizens, local officials, and leaders of
non-government organizations on their
rights and responsibilities in a
democracy. Programs should encourage
the empowerment of foreign
participants to participate in the
development of public policy, public
discussions, and debates by developing
individual skills and organizations.
Projects should engage government and
NGO leaders in dialogue on issues
impacting local communities and
engage government leaders—national
and local—on the importance of citizen
participation in governmental decisionmaking. Projects should examine
specific practices that promote an
effective, accountable, transparent and
responsive government and public
administration that is crucial to the
development of democracy.
Audience: Should include
representatives from government and
non-governmental organizations,
professional associations and
community leaders between the ages of
25 and 40 with an emphasis on equal
numbers of men and women.
Eligible Countries: Indonesia,
Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam.
(single-country projects only).
Successful programs will achieve the
following:
• Encourage an understanding of the
important elements of a civil society.
This includes concepts such as
volunteerism, grassroots activism, and
the importance of the rule of law in all
societies.
• Programs should help develop an
appreciation for American governmental
and legal structures, an understanding
of the diversity of American society, and
the necessity for increased tolerance and
respect for others with differing views
and beliefs.
Successful applicants must fully
demonstrate a capacity to achieve the
following:
(1) Recruit and select approximately
10 to 15 individuals from government,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
nongovernmental organizations, and
community leaders throughout the
target country, including private
business leaders for a six to eight week
U.S.-based fellows program. Partnering
with organizations based in the
proposed host-country is required.
(2) Coordinate and program the
fellowships.
(3) The final part of the program will
be conducting enhancement activities
and leadership development
opportunities that reinforce program
goals after the participants’ return to
their home country. An essential follow
on component will be a longitudinal
assessment of the achievements of the
program.
Possible Program Model:
1. U.S. grantee identifies U.S. citizens
to conduct in-country seminar for
citizen leaders, teachers, NGO
representatives, media, elected local
government officials, and legal
professionals to discuss transparency
and accountability. The in-country
partner (a local university or other
appropriate professional group) will cohost the event with the U.S. grantee
institution. During this phase, the
grantee will openly recruit and select
the participants to take part in the U.S.based fellows program.
2. The grantee implements the U.S.based fellowships in local elected
officials’ offices, NGO organizations,
and citizen organizations.
3. An in-country program would be
conducted by the U.S. experts who
served as fellowship hosts or seminar
leaders. The participants in U.S.
program would help design seminars
and serve as co-presenters. Organizers
broaden impact through public
outreach, including media.
4. Project may also support materials
translated into native language, small
grants for projects designed to expand
the exchange experience, and support
for the development of alumni
association.
REGION: Europe (EUR):
EUR: Legislative Education and
Practice Program (LEAP).
Program Contact: Jon Crocitto, Tel.
(202) 453–8149; e-mail:
CrocittoJA@state.gov.
Project Goals: In some European
countries, concepts such as free
democratic elections and political
parties are still not very developed and
other aspects of democracy almost seem
to be moving backward. Free and
democratic elections and civic activism
and engagement are the backbone of a
civil society. LEAP is designed to
strengthen understanding of the U.S.
legislative process and enhance
appreciation of civic society. LEAP will
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provide Young Professionals from
Europe with hands-on exposure to the
U.S. political process through six-month
internships in state legislatures, city
councils or local governments in the
U.S. U.S. participants should be
selected among staff members at the
various internship sites who will act as
primary host/mentors to the foreign
fellows during their U.S.-based program.
After the internships are completed,
these U.S. staff members will travel
overseas to the interns’ home countries.
There they will participate in joint
outreach activities, including media,
and conduct on-site consultancies and
presentations to wider audiences.
Audience: Generally, ECA prefers
program participants who have not
previously been part of U.S.-based
exchange programs as participants in
new programs. However, the LEAP
program is an exception. Because of the
unique nature of this program, foreign
participants who are alumni of longterm exchange programs (an academic
year or more) in the United States (USG
or privately sponsored) are favored as
participants in this program. These
alumni have previous experience living
and attending school in the U.S. that
will provide them with the cultural and
linguistic background necessary to
benefit fully from the program. The
foreign participants should be selected
through a merit-based, competitive
process. They should be recent
university graduates in political affairs
or other relevant fields—approximately
mid to late 20’s in age, with some
professional experience in the political
or legislative arenas. Participants should
have demonstrated leadership abilities
and a commitment to or participation in
the political process or policy-making
through involvement in civic education
activities, citizen advocacy groups,
political campaigns, political parties, or
election monitoring in their home
countries. U.S. participants will be staff
members of the state legislatures, city
councils or local governments who act
as hosts for the foreign participants
during the inbound portion of the
program.
Eligible Countries (all should be
included): Turkey, Russia, Ukraine,
Georgia.
Successful applicants must fully
demonstrate a capacity to achieve the
following:
(1) Manage (both programmatically
and logistically) the program in the
United States and overseas. Interested
organizations must have offices and staff
(or partner organizations) in all
countries involved in the program.
Close coordination with ECA and U.S.
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
Embassy Public Affairs Sections in
relevant countries will be essential.
(2) Conduct recruitment and selection
of participants through a merit-based
competitive process. A pre-departure
and an arrival orientation to ensure that
participants have realistic expectations
and have essential information on their
individual internships, host
communities, their responsibilities, and
logistics should be included. Use of host
families for foreign participants in the
U.S. is highly encouraged.
(3) Organize an intensive introduction
to the U.S. political process to take
place in whole or in part in Washington,
DC.
(4) Identify and manage
individualized internships with state
legislators, city councils or local
government that will expose
participants to citizen participation in
the political process. Internships at the
state level would be strongly preferred.
(5) Coordinate all logistics and
programming for consultancy and
training program where U.S.
participants will travel to the countries
where foreign participants are from for
two to three weeks. The U.S.
participants would conduct workshops
and trainings that cover the U.S.
legislative process and will enhance
appreciation of civic society. The
training(s)/workshop(s) should be
designed to engage a broad audience,
not just program participants. The U.S.
participants would also engage in joint
outreach efforts, including engagement
with the media.
Possible Program Model:
1. U.S. grantee and in-country partner
select about 20 foreign participants to
participate in the U.S.-based program
followed by a four to six month
internship in state legislatures, city
councils or local governments in the
U.S. for foreign participants.
2. An in-country program for 10 to 15
U.S. participants (who hosted/worked
with the foreign participants in the U.S.)
for two to three weeks. This would
include on-site consultancies and group
workshop(s) for a broad audience.
Foreign participants help design the
seminars and serve as co-presenters.
3. A series of enrichment activities
that could include support materials
translated into target language, small
grants for projects designed to expand
the exchange experience, the creation of
a web portal for ongoing virtual program
activities and communication, and other
activities.
EUR: Outreach and Integration of
Marginalized Populations in Western
Europe.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
Program Contact: Brent Beemer, tel:
(202) 453–8147, e-mail:
BeemerBT@state.gov.
Note: Interested Applicants are HIGHLY
encouraged to contact ECA before submitting
a proposal under this theme.
Project Goals: ECA seeks programs
that will engage community leaders,
educators, youth influencers,
journalists, and community-based
organizations in examination of
programs and practices to facilitate
integration and empowerment of
minority populations, particularly
youth, in Western European countries.
This program would look at issues
related to the integration of immigrant
and minority populations into a modern
democratic society. This includes
integration in the political system,
economic opportunity, freedom of
expression, access to education, and
practice of an open social/cultural life,
while maintaining ethnic identity
within a multi-ethnic society. A specific
concentration of programming on
immigrant and minority youth
populations and the special needs/
challenges they face in modern society
should be a major focus. An overall
comparison and sharing of best
practices in the U.S. and in the Western
European countries on these issues
should also be included. Programming
should include an overview of U.S. and
European government and legal
structures, an understanding of the
diversity of American and European
societies and efforts to increase
tolerance and respect for others with
differing views and beliefs. Program
content will include an overview of the
range of historical and current American
and European experiences with
integrating various immigrant and
minority citizens, examination of what
has worked well and what has not, and
analysis of the range of actors including
government, NGOs, religious
organizations, immigrant organizations,
educational institutions, and the role of
the media and public who report on
these issues.
Audience: Participants (from the U.S.
and foreign countries) in the program
should include representatives of nongovernmental organizations, community
leaders, educators, youth influencers,
religious leaders, and journalists from
minority communities. Note: European
Union, national, and regional
government officials are welcome to be
part of programming, but given funding
limitations, ECA funds may not be used
to support their travel expenses.
Eligible Countries (single-country
projects only) Denmark, United
Kingdom.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65383
Successful programs will achieve the
following:
• An understanding of issues related
to the status of immigrant and minority
populations in a modern democratic
society. This includes integration in the
political system, economic opportunity,
and freedom of expression, education,
and social/cultural life, while
maintaining ethnic identity within a
multi-ethnic society. A specific
understanding of immigrant and
minority youth populations and the
special needs/challenges they face in
modern society is envisioned.
• An appreciation for American
governmental and legal structures, and
a better understanding of the diversity
of American society and efforts over the
nation’s history to increase tolerance
and respect for others with differing
views and beliefs. Program content will
include an overview of the range of
historical and current American
experience with integrating various
immigrant and minority citizens,
examination of what has worked well
and what has not, and analysis of the
range of actors including local
government, NGOs, religious
organizations, immigrant organizations,
educational institutions, and the role of
the media.
• An enhanced leadership capacity
that will enable participants to initiate
and support activities in their home
countries that focus on the status of
minority populations.
Successful applicants must fully
demonstrate a capacity to achieve the
following:
(1) Recruit and select approximately
15 to 20 individuals throughout the
target country. Program should be
designed for two groups to travel to the
U.S. Partnering with organizations
based in target country is required. Also,
given resources available in Western
Europe, successful applicants will have
West European partners that will cover
considerable program costs within the
host country and cover all its own
administrative costs for this project.
(2) In addition to identifying incountry partner and screening,
selecting, and preparing participants
prior to departure for the United States,
the recipient of this grant will be
responsible for building and executing a
three to four week informative travel
and training program in the United
States.
(3) Conduct an in-country
workshop(s) to examine the process of
integration of marginalized populations
in Europe and developing strategies to
address these issues. The workshop(s)
should be designed to engage a broad
audience, not just program participants.
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
65384
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
(4) Develop enhancement activities
and development opportunities that
reinforce program goals after the
participants’ return to their home
country. An essential follow-on
component will be a longitudinal
assessment of the achievements of the
program.
Possible Program Model:
1. U.S. grantee and in-country partner
identify West European citizens to
participate in the U.S.-based program.
Then a three to four week U.S. program
that includes an orientation, study tour/
site visits; possible short-term
internships/work shadowing
opportunities; hands on training/
training-of-trainers; professional
development; and the development of
action plans.
2. An in-country workshop(s) for a
broad audience to examine the process
of integration of minority communities.
Program conducted by U.S. experts that
served as hosts or seminar leaders.
Participants in U.S. program design the
seminar and serve as co-presenters.
3. Enrichment activities that could
include support materials translated
into native language, small grants for
projects designed to expand and sustain
the exchange experience, and other
activities.
REGION: Near East and North Africa
(NEA):
NEA: Professional Mentoring for
Women in Science and Technology.
Program Contact: Thomas Johnston,
Tel: (202) 453–8162; e-mail:
JohnstonTJ@state.gov.
Project Goals: ECA seeks proposals
that will engage young women who
have recently embarked on professions
in fields requiring skills in mathematics,
scientific and/or technological fields.
Proposals should encourage the use of
critical thinking in the professional
sphere as well as other aspects of life.
Proposals should include plans to
provide eight- to ten-week mentorships
in American laboratories, professional
or commercial research and
development labs, or in the high tech
industries. This program will also send
American specialists in similar fields to
conduct/participate in seminars,
workshops, on-site consultancies, and
other types of activities in the home
countries of Middle East participants,
with the goal of reinforcing the
mentorship experience and creating a
wider network of women who are
established in these professions or who
aspire to do so. A principal goal of this
program is the development of
sustainable, long-term institutional and
individual linkages based on the
relationships established between U.S.
mentors and non-American fellows.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
Mentoring programs for Englishspeaking fellows would be designed as
individual affiliations with an
appropriate American professional
counterpart. Proposals should also
envision small specialized shadowing
opportunities for groups of 2–3
international participants without
strong English skills. These group
opportunities should incorporate
diverse training methodologies and
include full-time provision of an escort/
interpreter. All proposals should also
include a U.S. program component
allowing all participants to come
together, learn from each other and to
build relationships.
The Department has initiated
outreach to women in science and
technology in the Middle East through
previous contact and conferences;
organizers of previous projects may be
consulted for additional contacts and
information. Applicants for this ECA
grant are encouraged to contact the ECA
Program Officer, Thomas Johnston, for
additional information and contacts.
Audience: Middle Eastern
participants will be women (22–35 years
of age) who are newly engaged or rising
in professional careers that require
significant expertise/knowledge of
mathematics, science, technology
and/or innovative application of these
skills, and who already are, or show
promise of being, role models for others
in their countries, particularly for
women. We would consider, for
example, a lawyer, whose work requires
expert knowledge of environmental
science as well as international law to
be eligible for this program.
Eligible Countries: Algeria; Bahrain;
Egypt; Iraq; Jordan; Kuwait; Lebanon;
Morocco; Oman; Qatar; Saudi Arabia;
Syria; United Arab Emirates; West
Bank/Gaza; Yemen.
Successful applicants must
demonstrate a capacity to achieve the
following:
(1) Recruit and select approximately
15 to 20 qualified individuals from
throughout the eligible region, with
representatives from as many countries
as possible. The program should be
designed for non-American fellows to
travel to the United States for a group
orientation program, even if they will be
subsequently be engaged in
individualized programs, in order to
foster networking among the group. An
in-country or in-region partner
organization or affiliate offices overseas
is required to coordinate recruiting and
selection. Proposing organizations must
be prepared to mount a merit-based
selection process, to be described in the
proposal.
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(2) In addition to identifying its incountry (or in-region) partner and
identifying, selecting, and preparing
participants prior to departure for the
United States, the recipient of this grant
will be responsible for building and
implementing an eight- to ten-week
professional mentoring experience and
training program in the United States.
This will focus primarily upon
individualized fellowships for the
foreign participants at the R & D
facilities of U.S. businesses, nonuniversity high-tech institutes, or other
appropriate affiliation as well as a
commitment of appropriate American
professional counterpart women to
serve as mentors. The final selection of
foreign fellows should take into account
the types of placements that may be
available in the U.S. ECA seeks creative
and cost-efficient approaches to this
selection and placement program.
(3) Conducting an in-country
consultancy program and/or workshop
in each participating country, during
which the international fellow and
American mentor will offer skill
development and networking
workshops for a broader range of
program participants in that country.
(4) The development of a Web site
designed to foster ongoing
communication among the international
and American participants and to
publicize the results of this program. An
essential follow-on component will be a
longitudinal assessment of the
achievements of the program.
Possible Program Model:
1. U.S. grantee and in-country partner
institution select young non-American
women engaged in science and
technology for participation in the U.S.based mentoring/fellowship program.
2. An eight- to ten-week U.S. program
that includes an orientation followed by
individualized fellowships for English
speakers; a shorter program designed
around work shadowing opportunities
with interpretation for groups of 2–3
non-English speakers.
3. An in-country program in each
international participating country for
one or more of the American mentors
(who hosted/worked with the foreign
participants in the U.S.). The in-country
program would include on-site
consultancies, group workshops/
seminars and networking opportunities
for a broad audience. Foreign
participants would help design the
seminars and serve as co-presenters.
4. The development of a project
specific Web site, as well as enrichment
activities that could include having
support material translated into the
native language, small grants for
research-development projects designed
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
to expand the exchange experience, and
other activities.
NEA: Math, Science, and Technology
in Secondary Schools.
Program Contact: Thomas Johnston,
Tel: (202) 453–8162; e-mail:
JohnstonTJ@state.gov.
Project Goals: ECA seeks program
proposals that will help develop
institutional (and personal) linkages
between secondary school teachers and
administrators in the United States and
partners in the NEA region in the
disciplines of math, science, and
technology innovation. ECA is looking
to support creative programs that will
link secondary school teachers and
administrators from the U.S. and
overseas in programming designed to
explore approaches to engaging students
in critical thinking, particularly in the
teaching of math, science, and
innovative approaches to technology,
both in the classroom and through
focused extracurricular activities, and to
examine how professional counterparts
in participating countries engage the
successor generation.
Audience: Math, science, and
technology secondary school teachers
and administrators.
Eligible Countries: Algeria; Bahrain;
Egypt; Iraq; Jordan; Kuwait; Lebanon;
Libya; Morocco; Oman; Qatar; Saudi
Arabia; Syria; United Arab Emirates;
West Bank/Gaza; Yemen.
Successful programs will achieve the
following:
• An understanding of techniques
used in the NEA region and in the
United States to promote student
engagement in critical thinking and
discovery, particular in math, science,
and technology.
• Develop opportunities for
productive personal relationships
between groups from participating
countries that could lead to affiliations
between schools in the U.S. and schools
in the NEA region.
• Participants from each country
should come from the same schools or
set of schools (districts) so that direct
linkages on both sides are facilitated
and encouraged by the program.
• An appreciation for the ways in
which diverse populations can interact
productively in the secondary school
setting and work collaboratively to
develop innovative responses to
scientific and mathematics challenges.
U.S. program presentations should
showcase teaching math, science, and
technology at the secondary level,
special/accelerated programs and/or
schools in the math, science, and
technology disciplines, programs to
attract students to these disciplines
(especially girls), relevant after school
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
programs, student job-shadowing
programs, the roles of parents in
schools, and how secondary schools
build support and relationships with
local science/technology businesses.
• Enhanced leadership capacity
among the NEA educators that will
enable participants to initiate and
support activities in their home schools
and classrooms.
• Create the foundation for
collaborative partnerships among
classrooms, through virtual or other
exchanges.
Successful applicants must fully
demonstrate a capacity to achieve the
following:
(1) Recruit and select approximately
15 to 20 secondary school teachers and
administrators from overseas and 15 to
20 from the U.S. to take part in the
program. To recruit effectively, the
grantee organization must have affiliate
offices in one or more NEA countries.
(2) The recipient of this grant will be
responsible for building and executing a
one to two week study tour for
American educators in the NEA region
and a two to three week study tour
program in the United States for foreign
educators.
(3) Develop enhancement activities
and development opportunities that
reinforce program goals after the
participants’ return to their home
country. Grantee will be responsible for
establishing electronic communications/
on-line projects or other methods of
continuing communication and
developing collaborative projects
between participants and their
classrooms. An essential follow-on
component will be a longitudinal
assessment of the achievements of the
program.
Possible Program Model:
1. A merit-based competitive selection
of American secondary school educators
and administrators to participate in the
overseas program is done.
2. A one to two week program is
developed where the U.S. participants
travel overseas. This should be done
while schools in the host country(ies)
are in session. While overseas, the U.S.
participants will meet with and be
hosted by foreign participants (and their
schools) who have also been selected
through an open merit-based
competitive process. Programming
should include time in active
classrooms with students and
presentation opportunities for the
American participants in foreign
schools/classrooms.
3. During an interim period, educators
are in contact through active electronic
communications and web-based
programs.
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65385
4. A two to three week program is
developed where the foreign
participants travel to the U.S. This
should be done while schools in the
U.S. are in session. While in the U.S.,
the foreign participants will be hosted
by U.S. participants (and their schools)
whom they met in their program
overseas. Programming should include
time in active classrooms and at
appropriate extracurricular sites with
students and presentation opportunities
for the foreign participants in American
schools/classrooms.
5. Enrichment activities are developed
that could include support materials
translated into the native language,
small grants for collaborative projects
designed to expand and sustain the
exchange experience, continuation of
web/electronic activities, and other
activities are done.
REGION: South Central Asia (SCA):
SCA: Secondary School Linkages.
Program Contact: Brent Beemer, tel:
(202) 453–8147, e-mail:
BeemerBT@state.gov.
Project Goals: ECA seeks program
proposals that will help develop
institutional (and personal) linkages
between secondary schools in the
United States and partner institutions in
Turkmenistan or Pakistan. ECA will
support creative programs that will link
secondary school teachers and
administrators from the U.S. and
Turkmenistan or Pakistan in
programming designed to explore each
other’s systems, schools, approaches to
education, and study how their
profession is engaging the successor
generations in both countries.
Audience: Secondary school teachers
and administrators. Active parents
involved with parent/teacher
organizations.
Eligible Countries: Turkmenistan,
Pakistan (Single-Country Projects Only).
Successful programs will achieve the
following:
• An understanding of issues related
to the secondary school system in both
countries.
• Develop opportunities for personal
relationships to develop among the
participants and longer-term affiliations
between schools in the U.S. and schools
in Turkmenistan or Pakistan to take
root. Participants from both countries in
the program should come from the same
schools or set of schools (districts) so
that direct linkages on both sides are
facilitated and encouraged by the
program.
• An appreciation for American
governmental and legal structures, and
a better understanding of the diversity
of American society and how that
affects the secondary school educational
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
65386
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
system. Program content should include
presentations on the current American
experience with integrating various
immigrant citizens into the educational
system, education of students with
special needs, after school programs,
student service/volunteer programs, the
roles of parents in schools, and how
secondary schools build support among
local communities.
• An enhanced leadership capacity
among the foreign educators that will
enable participants to initiate and
support activities in their home schools
and classrooms.
Successful applicants must fully
demonstrate a capacity to achieve the
following:
(1) Recruit and select approximately
15 to 20 secondary school teachers and
administrators from Turkmenistan or
Pakistan and 15 to 20 from the U.S. to
take part in the program. Partnering
with a Turkmenistan-based or Pakistanbased organization or institution or
having affiliate offices based there is
required.
(2) The recipient of this grant will be
responsible for building and executing a
one to two week study tour for
American educators overseas and a two
to three week study tour program in the
United States for foreign educators.
(3) Develop enhancement activities
and development opportunities that
reinforce program goals after the
participants’ return to their home
country. Grantee will be responsible for
establishing electronic communications/
on-line projects or other methods of
continuing communications between
participants. An essential follow-on
component will be a longitudinal
assessment of the achievements of the
program.
Possible Program Model:
1. A merit-based competitive selection
of American secondary school educators
and administrators to participate in the
Turkmenistan-based or Pakistan-based
program is conducted.
2. A one to two week program is
developed where the U.S. participants
travel to Turkmenistan or Pakistan. This
should be done while schools in
Turkmenistan or Pakistan are in session.
While overseas, the U.S. participants
will meet with and be hosted by foreign
participants (and their schools) who
have also been selected through an open
merit-based competitive process.
Programming should include time in
active classrooms with students and
presentation opportunities for the
American participants in overseas
schools/classrooms.
3. During an interim period, educators
are in contact through active electronic
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
communications and web-based
programs.
4. A two to three week program is
developed where the foreign
participants travel to the U.S. This
should be done while schools in the
U.S. are in session. While in the U.S, the
foreign participants will be hosted by
U.S. participants (and their schools)
whom they met in their program in
Turkmenistan or Pakistan. Programming
should include time in active
classrooms with students and
presentation opportunities for the
foreign participants in American
schools/classrooms.
5. Enrichment activities are developed
that could include support materials
translated into the native language,
small grants for projects designed to
expand and sustain the exchange
experience, continuation of web/
electronic activities, and other activities.
SCA: Outreach and Integration of
Marginalized Populations in Sri Lanka.
Program Contact: Brent Beemer, tel:
(202) 453–8147, e-mail:
BeemerBT@state.gov.
Project Goals: ECA seeks programs
that will engage community leaders,
educators, youth influencers,
journalists, and community-based
organizations in examination of
programs and practices to engage
underserved or disengaged segments of
the Sri Lankan society. This would
include strengthening outreach to
youth, as well as support for minority
rights for the Sinhalese Muslim
population, especially at the local level.
This program would examine issues
related to the integration of
marginalized populations into a modern
democratic society, including
integration in the political system,
economic opportunity, freedom of
expression, access to education, and
practice of an open social/cultural life.
A specific concentration of
programming on minority youth
populations and the special needs/
challenges they face in modern society
is encouraged. Programming should
include a study of U.S. government and
legal structures, an understanding of the
diversity of American society and efforts
over the nation’s history to increase
tolerance and respect for others with
differing views and beliefs. Program
content will include an overview of the
range of historical and current American
experience with integrating various
immigrant and minority citizens,
examination of what has worked well
and what has not, and analysis of the
range of actors including government,
NGOs, religious organizations,
immigrant organizations, educational
institutions, and the role of the media
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and public who are involved in this
these issues.
Audience: Participants in the program
should include representatives of nongovernmental organizations, community
leaders, educators, youth influencers,
religious leaders, and journalists from
minority communities.
Eligible Country: Sri Lanka.
Successful applicants must fully
demonstrate a capacity to achieve the
following:
(1) Recruit and select approximately
15 to 20 individuals throughout the
target country. Program should be
designed for two groups to travel to the
U.S. An in-country partnering
organization (based in Sri Lanka) is
required.
(2) In addition to identifying incountry partner and screening,
selecting, and preparing participants
prior to departure for the United States,
the recipient of this grant will be
responsible for building and executing a
three to four week study tour and
training program in the United States.
(3) Conducting an in-country
workshop(s) to examine the process of
integration of marginalized populations
in different societies and developing
strategies to address these issues. The
workshop(s) should be designed to
engage a broad audience, not just
program participants.
(4) The development of enhancement
activities and development
opportunities that reinforce program
goals after the participants’ return to
their home country. An essential followon component will be a longitudinal
assessment of the achievements of the
program.
Possible Program Model:
1. The U.S. grantee and in-country
partner identify Sinhalese citizens to
participate in the U.S.-based program.
Then a three to four week U.S. program
would occur that includes an
orientation, study tour/site visits;
possible short-term internships/work
shadowing opportunities; hands on
training/training-of-trainers;
professional development; and the
development of action plans.
2. A Sri Lanka-based workshop(s) for
a broad audience to examine the status
of minority communities. Participants
in U.S. program help design the seminar
and serve as co-presenters.
3. Enrichment activities would be
developed that could include having
support materials translated into the
local language, small grants for projects
designed to expand the exchange
experience, and other activities.
REGION: Western Hemisphere (WHA):
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
WHA: Creating Economic Growth to
Fight Poverty and Strengthen
Democracy.
Program Contact: Laverne Johnson,
tel: (202) 453–8160, e-mail:
JohnsonLV@state.gov.
Project Goals: ECA seeks proposals
designed to promote local grassroots
economic growth and prosperity among
emerging youth leaders from the
indigenous and Afro-Latino
communities by sharing practical
methods to achieve this goal and to
develop community leadership skills as
a means to strengthen democracy. To
increase understanding within the
community of the linkage between
entrepreneurial activity and free
markets as well as the importance of
transparency and accountability in
business and government.
Audience: Young entrepreneurs,
media representatives, community
leaders, and officials from governmental
and non-governmental organizations
that either service or come from the
indigenous and Afro-Latino
communities of the Hemisphere with a
special emphasis on women.
Eligible Countries: (Single-country
and multiple-country projects accepted)
Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador,
Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, and
Venezuela.
Successful programs will achieve the
following:
• Educate young men and women in
entrepreneurial thinking and business
leadership skills to empower them to
engage in business creation.
• Improve among participants an
understanding of the role
communication plays in creating the
conditions necessary for a free market
economy.
• A better understanding of the roles
of the private sector, and to a lesser
extent, public sector who shape the
local business environment.
• An appreciation of the role of the
individual entrepreneur in creating
economic growth.
• Enhance appreciation for American
business practices and the role of the
individual in creating growth through
grassroots-focused entrepreneurial
efforts.
• Establish a structured interaction
among American and Hemisphere
participants designed to develop
enduring professional ties.
• Expand leadership capacity
enabling participants to initiate and
support activities in their home
countries that focus on development
and community service.
Successful applicants must fully
demonstrate a capacity to achieve the
following:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
(1) Recruit and select approximately
30 individuals from the business
associations, banking and regulatory
agencies and print media. The
delegation should include individual
business owners and individuals who
report on business from diverse regions
of the participating country. Program
should be designed for two groups of 15
to travel to the U.S. for not less than ten
days. For this phase of the program,
partnering with organizations based in
the proposed host-country is required.
(2) In addition to identifying incountry partner and screening,
selecting, and preparing participants
prior to departure for the United States,
the grantee will be responsible for
building and executing a four to six
week residency program in the United
States for approximately twelve
additional Hemisphere participants.
(3) The final part of the program will
be conducting enhancement activities
and leadership development
opportunities that reinforce program
goals after all participants’ return to
their home country. An essential follow
on component will be a longitudinal
assessment of the achievements of the
program.
Possible Program Model:
1. Selected participants invited to
attend in-country workshops (presented
by the U.S. grantee and in-country
partner) that focus on effective, practical
methods of stimulating entrepreneurial
skills and support free market structures
in the countries listed in this
announcement.
2. Key members of the in-country
workshops invited to U.S. for business
facilitation or mentoring to promote
innovation and networking skills.
Develop action plans to promote
entrepreneurial skills and free markets
upon return home.
3. Upon return, participants
implement business action plans with
guidance from U.S. mentors utilizing
email and other direct communication.
4. U.S. mentors travel to country to
evaluate implementation of action plan
and offer assistance.
III. Award Information
Type of Award: Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2008, pending
availability.
Approximate Total Funding:
$5,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 20.
Approximate Average Award:
$250,000 (Please Note: For the
Legislative Education and Practice
(LEAP) program outlined under the
European Section of this document, the
Office anticipates awarding one grant
for approximately $400,000. It is
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65387
anticipated that all other awards made
under this competition will average
approximately $300,000.)
Ceiling of Award Range: $350,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, September 1, 2008.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
September 30, 2010.
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal Government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a.) Grants awarded to eligible
organizations with less than four years
of experience in conducting
international exchange programs will be
limited to $60,000.
(b.) Any one organization is limited to
submitting no more than four proposals
in this entire competition. If any one
organization submits more than four,
then all submitted proposals will be
deemed ineligible in this competition.
IV. Application and Submission
Information:
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
65388
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an
Application Package
Please contact the Office of Citizen
Exchanges, ECA/PE/C, Room 220, U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
(202) 453–8174, GustafsonDP@State.gov
to request a Solicitation Package. Please
refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/PE/C–08–01 located at the
top of this announcement when making
your request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
Please specify Program Specialist
David Gustafson and refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/
C–08–01 located at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries
and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/
education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from the
Grants.gov website at https://
www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:50 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of
ECA will be responsible for issuing DS–
2019 forms to participants in this
program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD–SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone:
(202) 203–5029, FAX: (202) 453–8640.
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is the official program sponsor of
the exchange program covered by this
RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau
will be the ‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the
program under the terms of 22 CFR part
62, which covers the administration of
the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR
part 62, organizations receiving grants
under this RFGP will be third parties
‘‘cooperating with or assisting the
sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s
program.’’ The actions of grantee
program organizations shall be
‘‘imputed to the sponsor in evaluating
the sponsor’s compliance with’’ 22 CFR
part 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects
that any organization receiving a grant
under this competition will render all
assistance necessary to enable the
Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR
part 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphasis on the secure and
proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by grantee program organizations and
program participants to all regulations
governing the J visa program status.
Therefore, proposals should explicitly
state in writing that the applicant is
prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting
all requirements governing the
administration of Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62.
If your organization has experience as a
designated Exchange Visitor Program
Sponsor, the applicant should discuss
their record of compliance with 22 CFR
part 62 et seq., including the oversight
of their Responsible Officers and
Alternate Responsible Officers,
screening and selection of program
participants, provision of pre-arrival
information and orientation to
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau’s authorizing
legislation, programs must maintain a
non-political character and should be
balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social,
and cultural life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be
interpreted in the broadest sense and
encompass differences including, but
not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socioeconomic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ‘‘Support for Diversity’’ section for
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to
monitor and evaluate the project’s
success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of the program. The
Bureau recommends that your proposal
include a draft survey questionnaire or
other technique plus a description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives. The Bureau
expects that the grantee will track
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
participants or partners and be able to
respond to key evaluation questions,
including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program,
changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on
institutions (institutions in which
participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable time frame), the easier
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:50 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected,
including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. Budget requests may not
exceed $350,000. There must be a
summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and
program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each
program component, phase, location, or
activity to provide clarification. The
Bureau reserves the right to increase or
decrease awards to meet the overall
needs of the program.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
1. Travel. International and domestic
airfare; visas; transit costs; ground
transportation costs. Please note that all
air travel must be in compliance with
the Fly America Act. There is no charge
for J–1 visas for participants in Bureau
sponsored programs.
2. Per Diem. For U.S.-based
programming, organizations should use
the published Federal per diem rates for
individual U.S. cities. Domestic per
diem rates may be accessed at: https://
www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/
contentView.
do?programId=9704&channelId=15943&ooid=16365&contentId=17943
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65389
&pageTypeId=8203&contentType=GSA_
BASIC&programPage=
%2Fep%2Fprogram%2FgsaBasic.
jsp&P=MTT.
ECA requests applicants to budget
realistic costs that reflect the local
economy and do not exceed Federal per
diem rates. Foreign per diem rates can
be accessed at: https://aoprals.state.gov/
content.asp?content
_id=184&menu_id=78.
3. Interpreters. For U.S.-based
activities, ECA strongly encourages
applicants to hire their own locally
based interpreters. However, applicants
may ask ECA to assign State Department
interpreters. One interpreter is typically
needed for every four participants who
require interpretation. When an
applicant proposes to use State
Department interpreters, the following
expenses should be included in the
budget: Published Federal per diem
rates (both ‘‘lodging’’ and ‘‘M&IE’’) and
‘‘home-program-home’’ transportation
in the amount of $400 per interpreter.
Salary expenses for State Department
interpreters will be covered by the
Bureau and should not be part of an
applicant’s proposed budget. Bureau
funds cannot support interpreters who
accompany delegations from their home
country or travel internationally.
4. Book and Cultural Allowances.
Foreign participants are entitled to a
one-time cultural allowance of $150 per
person, plus a book allowance of $50.
Interpreters should be reimbursed up to
$150 for expenses when they escort
participants to cultural events. U.S.
program staff, trainers or participants
are not eligible to receive these benefits.
5. Consultants. Consultants may be
used to provide specialized expertise or
to make presentations. Honoraria rates
should not exceed $250 per day.
Organizations are encouraged to costshare rates that would exceed that
figure. Subcontracting organizations
may also be employed, in which case
the written agreement between the
prospective grantee and sub-grantee
should be included in the proposal.
Such sub-grants should detail the
division of responsibilities and
proposed costs, and subcontracts should
be itemized in the budget.
6. Room rental. The rental of meeting
space should not exceed $250 per day.
Any rates that exceed this amount
should be cost shared.
7. Materials. Proposals may contain
costs to purchase, develop and translate
materials for participants. Costs for high
quality translation of materials should
be anticipated and included in the
budget. Grantee organizations should
expect to submit a copy of all program
materials to ECA, and ECA support
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
65390
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
should be acknowledged on all
materials developed with its funding.
8. Equipment. Applicants may
propose to use grant funds to purchase
equipment, such as computers and
printers; these costs should be justified
in the budget narrative. Costs for
furniture are not allowed.
9. Working meal. Normally, no more
than one working meal may be provided
during the program. Per capita costs
may not exceed $15–$25 for lunch and
$20–$35 for dinner, excluding room
rental. The number of invited guests
may not exceed participants by more
than a factor of two-to-one. When
setting up a budget, interpreters should
be considered ‘‘participants.’’
10. Return travel allowance. A return
travel allowance of $70 for each foreign
participant may be included in the
budget. This allowance would cover
incidental expenses incurred during
international travel.
11. Health Insurance. Foreign
participants will be covered during their
participation in the program by the
ECA-sponsored Accident and Sickness
Program for Exchanges (ASPE), for
which the grantee must enroll them.
Details of that policy can be provided by
the contact officers identified in this
solicitation. The premium is paid by
ECA and should not be included in the
grant proposal budget. However,
applicants are permitted to include
costs for travel insurance for U.S.
participants in the budget.
12. Wire transfer fees. When
necessary, applicants may include costs
to transfer funds to partner
organizations overseas. Grantees are
urged to research applicable taxes that
may be imposed on these transfers by
host governments.
13. In-country travel costs for visa
processing purposes. Given the
requirements associated with obtaining
J–1 visas for ECA-supported
participants, applicants should include
costs for any travel associated with visa
interviews or DS–2019 pick-up.
14. Administrative Costs. Costs
necessary for the effective
administration of the program may
include salaries for grantee organization
employees, benefits, and other direct
and indirect costs per detailed
instructions in the Application Package.
While there is no rigid ratio of
administrative to program costs,
proposals in which the administrative
costs do not exceed 25% of the total
requested ECA grant funds will be more
competitive under the cost effectiveness
and cost sharing criterion, per item V.1
below. Proposals should show strong
administrative cost sharing
contributions from the applicant, the in-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:51 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
country partner and other sources.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package
for complete budget guidelines and
formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: February
15, 2008.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C–08–01.
Methods of Submission: Applications
may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2.) electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications
Applications must be shipped no later
than the above deadline. Delivery
services used by applicants must have
in-place, centralized shipping
identification and tracking systems that
may be accessed via the Internet and
delivery people who are identifiable by
commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but
received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
further consideration under this
competition. Proposals shipped after the
established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and 8 copies of the
application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.:
ECA/PE–08–01, Program Management,
ECA/EX/PM, Room 534, 301 4th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on
a PC-formatted disk. The Bureau will
provide these files electronically to the
appropriate Public Affairs Section(s) at
the U.S. embassy(ies) for its(their)
review.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic
Applications
Applicants have the option of
submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in
the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the system. Please
follow the instructions available in the
’Get Started’ portion of the site (https://
www.grants.gov/GetStarted). Several of
the steps in the Grants.gov registration
process could take several weeks.
Therefore, applicants should check with
appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov. Once registered, the amount
of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a
variety of factors including the size of
the application and the speed of your
Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you not wait
until the application deadline to begin
the submission process through
Grants.gov.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to:
Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726.
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Applicants will receive a
confirmation e-mail from grants.gov
upon the successful submission of an
application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
IV.3f.3. Applicants may not submit
proposals that address more than one
region or that include countries not
eligible under a specific theme
designated in the RFGP. Proposals that
do so will be declared technically
ineligible and will receive no further
consideration in the review process. For
the purposes of this competition,
eligible regions are Africa, East Asia,
Europe, the Near East, North Africa,
South Central Asia, and the Western
Hemisphere.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for grants resides
with the Bureau’s Grants Officer.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning and Ability to
Achieve Objectives: Program objectives
should be stated clearly and should
reflect the applicant’s expertise in the
subject area and region. Objectives
should respond to the topics in this
announcement and should relate to the
current conditions in the target country/
countries. A detailed agenda and
relevant work plan should explain how
objectives will be achieved and should
include a timetable for completion of
major tasks. The substance of
workshops, internships, seminars and/
or consulting should be described in
detail. Sample training schedules
should be outlined. Responsibilities of
proposed in-country partners should be
clearly described. A discussion of how
the applicant intends to address
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:50 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
language issues should be included, if
needed.
2. Institutional Capacity: Proposals
should include (1) the institution’s
mission and date of establishment; (2)
detailed information about proposed incountry partner(s) and the history of the
partnership; (3) an outline of prior
awards-U.S. government and/or private
support received for the target theme/
country/region; and (4) descriptions of
experienced staff members who will
implement the program. The proposal
should reflect the institution’s expertise
in the subject area and knowledge of the
conditions in the target country/
countries. Proposals should demonstrate
an institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as
determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The
Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the
demonstrated potential of new
applicants. Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be
adequate and appropriate to achieve the
program’s goals. The Bureau strongly
encourages applicants to submit letters
of support from proposed in-country
partners.
3. Cost Effectiveness and Cost
Sharing: Overhead and administrative
costs in the proposal budget, including
salaries, honoraria and subcontracts for
services, should be kept to a minimum.
Proposals in which the administrative
costs do not exceed 25% of the total
requested ECA grant funds will be more
competitive (see IV.3e.2 #14 for
clarification on this). Applicants are
strongly encouraged to cost share a
portion of overhead and administrative
expenses. Cost-sharing, including
contributions from the applicant,
proposed in-country partner(s), and
other sources should be included in the
budget request. Proposal budgets that do
not reflect cost sharing will be deemed
not competitive in this category.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
Applicants should refer to the Bureau’s
Diversity, Freedom and Democracy
Guidelines in the Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI) and the Diversity,
Freedom and Democracy Guidelines
section, Item IV.3d.2, above for
additional guidance.
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65391
5. Post-Grant Activities: Applicants
should provide a plan to conduct
activities after the Bureau-funded
project has concluded in order to ensure
that Bureau-supported programs are not
isolated events. Funds for all post-grant
activities must be in the form of
contributions from the applicant or
sources outside of the Bureau. Costs for
these activities must not appear in the
proposal budget, but should be outlined
in the narrative.
6. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation: Proposals should include a
detailed plan to monitor and evaluate
the program. Program objectives should
target clearly defined results in
quantitative terms. Competitive
evaluation plans will describe how
applicant organizations would measure
these results, and proposals should
include draft data collection
instruments (surveys, questionnaires,
etc) in Tab E. Successful applicants
(grantee institutions) will be expected to
submit a report after each program
component concludes or on a quarterly
basis, whichever is less frequent. The
Bureau also requires that grantee
institutions submit a final narrative and
financial report no more than 90 days
after the expiration of a grant.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive an Assistance Award Document
(AAD) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The AAD and the original grant
proposal with subsequent modifications
(if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
For assistance awards involving the
Palestinian Authority: All awards made
under this competition must be
executed according to all relevant laws
and policies regarding assistance to the
Palestinian Authority, and to the West
Bank and Gaza. Recipients must consult
with the Public Affairs Section in
Jerusalem prior to submission of
proposal.
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of the Palestinian Authority
complies with requirements, please contact
Thomas Johnston, Tel. (202) 453–8162;
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
65392
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / Notices
e-mail: JohnstonTJ@state.gov for additional
information.
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and
other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus one electronic copy
of the following reports:
1. Quarterly program and financial
reports for the duration of the program.
2. A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. (Please refer to IV.
Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on
funds provided by the grant or who
benefit from the grant funding but do
not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three weeks prior to the official
opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Brent Beemer,
Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C,
Room 220, ECA/PE/C–08–01, U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
202–453–8147; BeemerBT@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/PE/C–
08–01. Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
VI.4. Optional Program Data
Requirements
Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
Dated: November 13, 2007.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. E7–22659 Filed 11–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:50 Nov 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Hearing and
Commission Meeting
Susquehanna River Basin
Commission.
AGENCY:
Notice of Public Hearing and
Commission Meeting.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Susquehanna River Basin
Commission will hold a public hearing
as part of its regular business meeting
beginning at 1:30 p.m. on December 5,
2007 in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. At the
public hearing, the Commission will
consider: (1) The approval of certain
water resources projects, (2)
enforcement actions involving three
projects, (3) consideration of a request
for an administrative hearing, (4)
extension of two emergency water
withdrawal certificates, and (5) revision
of the Commission’s current project fee
schedule. Details concerning the matters
to be addressed at the public hearing
and business meeting are contained in
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this notice.
DATES:
December 5, 2007.
Woods Conference Room,
Alumni Sports and Fitness Complex,
Franklin & Marshall College, 929
Harrisburg Pike, Lancaster, Pa. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
mailing and electronic mailing
addresses for submission of written
comments.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard A. Cairo, General Counsel,
telephone: (717) 238–0423; ext. 306; fax:
(717) 238–2436; e-mail: rcairo@srbc.net
or Deborah J. Dickey, Secretary to the
Commission, telephone: (717) 238–
0423, ext. 301; fax: (717) 238–2436;
e-mail: ddickey@srbc.net.
In
addition to the public hearing and its
related action items identified below,
the business meeting also includes the
following items on the agenda: (1)
Special recognitions for Pennsylvania
Senator Noah Wenger and New York
Alternate Commissioner Scott Foti, (2) a
report on the present hydrologic
conditions of the basin, (3) adoption of
a final rulemaking for agricultural
consumptive water use, (4) approval of
certain low flow augmentation for
agricultural consumptive use mitigation,
(5) revision of aquifer test standards, (6)
approval of the FY–07 independent
audit, and (7) various contract and grant
approvals.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65379-65392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22659]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5994]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: Open Competition Seeking Professional Exchange
Programs in Africa, East Asia, Europe, the Near East, North Africa,
South Central Asia, and the Western Hemisphere
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C-08-01.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: February 15, 2007.
Executive Summary: The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs announces an open competition for
grants that support exchanges and build relationships between U.S. non-
profit organizations and civil society and cultural groups in Africa,
East Asia, Europe, the Near East, North Africa, South Central Asia and
the Western Hemisphere. Pending availability of funds, it is
anticipated that approximately $5,000,000 or more will be available to
support this competition. ECA/PE/C expects to fund approximately 15-20
projects under this competition in FY 2008. U.S. public and non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit proposals that support the goals
of The Professional Exchange Program. Projects should promote mutual
understanding and partnerships between key professional and cultural
groups in the United States and counterpart groups in other countries
through multi-phased exchanges taking place over one to two years.
Proposals should encourage citizen engagement in current issues, with a
particular focus on youth and those who influence them, and promote the
development of democratic societies and institutions, with a view
toward creating a more stable world. To the fullest extent possible,
programs should be two-way exchanges supporting roughly equal numbers
of participants from the U.S. and foreign countries.
Proposed projects should transform institutional and individual
understanding of key issues, foster dialogue, share expertise, and
develop capacity. Through these people-to-people exchanges, the Bureau
seeks to break down stereotypes that divide peoples, to promote good
governance and economic growth, to contribute to conflict prevention
and management, and to build respect for cultural expression and
identity in the world. Projects should be structured to allow American
professionals and their international counterparts in eligible
countries to develop a common dialogue for dealing with shared
challenges and concerns. Projects should include current or potential
leaders who will effect positive change in their communities. Exchange
participants may include community leaders, elected and professional
government officials, religious leaders, educators, and proponents of
democratic ideals and institutions, including for example, the media
and judiciary, or others who influence the way in which different
communities approach these issues. The Bureau is especially interested
in engaging socially and economically diverse groups that may not have
had extensive contact with counterpart institutions in the United
States and particularly seeks proposals that engage educators or other
groups that directly influence youth in innovative ways.
Applicants may not submit proposals that address more than one
region or that include countries not eligible under a specific theme
designated in the RFGP. Proposals that do so will be declared
technically ineligible and will receive no further consideration in the
review process. For the purposes of this competition, eligible regions
are Africa, East Asia, Europe, the Near East, North Africa, South
Central Asia, and the Western Hemisphere. No guarantee is made or
implied that grants will be awarded in all themes and for all countries
listed.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
II. Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States
[[Page 65380]]
and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which
unite us with other nations by demonstrating the educational and
cultural interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the
United States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of the world.'' The funding
authority for the program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The competition is based on the premise that people-to-
people exchanges encourage and strengthen understanding of democratic
values, nurture the social, political, cultural, and economic
development of societies and encourage a more active citizenry.
Exchanges supported by institutional grants from the Bureau should
operate at two levels: they should enhance partnerships between U.S.
and foreign institutions, and they should establish a common language
to develop practical solutions for shared problems and concerns. The
Bureau is particularly interested in projects that will create mutually
beneficial and self-sustaining linkages between professional
communities in the U.S. and their counterpart communities in other
countries. Applicants must identify the U.S. and foreign organizations
and individuals with whom they are proposing to collaborate and
describe previous cooperative activities, if any. Information about the
mission, activities, and accomplishments of partner organizations
should be included in the submission. Proposals should contain letters
of commitment or support from partner organizations for the proposed
project. Applicants should clearly outline and describe the role and
responsibilities of all partner organizations in terms of project
logistics, management and oversight.
Competitive proposals will include the following:
A brief description of the issue to be addressed and how
it relates to the target country or region. (Proposals that request
resources for an initial needs assessment will be deemed less
competitive under the review criterion Program Planning and Ability to
Achieve Objectives, per item V.1 below.);
A clear, succinct statement of program objectives and
expected outcomes that responds to Bureau goals for each theme in this
competition. Desired outcomes should be described in qualitative and
quantitative terms. (See the Program Monitoring and Evaluation section
per item V.1 below, for more information on project objectives and
outcomes.);
A proposed timeline, listing the optimal schedule for each
program activity;
A description of participant recruitment and selection
processes;
Letters of support from foreign and U.S. partners.
(Letters from prospective partner institutions should demonstrate a
capacity to arrange and conduct U.S. and overseas activities.);
An outline of the applicant organization's relevant
expertise in the project theme and country(ies);
An outline of relevant experience managing previous
exchange programs;
Resumes of experienced staff who have demonstrated a
commitment to implement and monitor projects and ensure outcomes;
A comprehensive plan to evaluate whether program outcomes
will achieve the specific objectives described in the narrative. (See
the Program Monitoring and Evaluation section [IV.3d.d below] for
further guidance on evaluation.);
A post-grant plan that demonstrates how the grantee plans
to maintain contacts initiated through the program. Applicants should
discuss ways that U.S. and foreign participants or host institutions
will collaborate and communicate after the ECA-funded grant has
concluded. (See Review Criterion 5, per item V.1 below for
more information on post-grant activities.)
Successful projects will demonstrate the importance
Americans place on community service as an element of active
citizenship and may include ideas and projects to strengthen civil
society through community service either during participants' stay in
the U.S. or upon their return to their countries.
In addition to addressing the specific themes described
below, proposals should develop partner organizations' capacity in such
areas as strategic planning, performance management, fund raising,
financial management, human resources management, and decision-making.
U.S. Embassy Involvement: Before submitting a proposal, all
applicants are strongly encouraged to consult with the Washington, DC-
based State Department contact for the themes/regions listed in this
solicitation. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with
Public Affairs Officers at U.S. Embassies in relevant countries as they
develop proposals responding to this RFGP. Also, it is important that
the proposal narrative clearly state the applicant's commitment to
consult closely with the Public Affairs Section of the U.S. Embassy in
the relevant country(ies) to develop plans for project implementation
and to select project participants. Proposals should also acknowledge
U.S. Embassy involvement in the final selection of all participants.
Applicants should state their willingness to invite representatives of
the Embassy(ies) and/or consulate(s) to participate in program sessions
or site visits.
ECA/DOS Acknowledgement: Narratives should state that all material
developed for the project will prominently acknowledge Department of
State ECA Bureau funding for the program.
Outreach: Applicants who receive assistance awards are encouraged
to engage in outreach activities that will promote the goals of the
project and increase the visibility of the project activities,
including public events and appropriate media appearances.
FY 2008 Thematic Topics by Region
REGION: Africa (AF):
AF: Economic Growth to Fight Poverty and Strengthen Democracy.
Program Contact: Curtis Huff, tel: (202) 453-8159, e-mail:
HuffCE@State.gov.
Project Goals: ECA seeks proposals that promote entrepreneurial
thinking, job creation, business planning, and management skills that
will assist young African adults in launching business careers.
Programs should increase understanding of the links between
entrepreneurial activity and free markets as well as the importance of
transparency and accountability in business and government. Proposals
should also increase understanding among African and American
participants of the influence of culture on business.
Audience: Young adults, 25-32, especially women.
Eligible Countries: Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Mali, Nigeria, Senegal,
South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia.
Successful programs will achieve the following:
Educate young men and women in entrepreneurial thinking,
business management skills, and attracting investment, with also the
ability to design training and to lead others in building these skills.
Enhance appreciation for American business practices and
the role of the individual in creating growth through grassroots-
focused entrepreneurial efforts.
Develop enduring professional ties between U.S. and
partner organizations and expand leadership skills.
[[Page 65381]]
Enable participants to initiate and support development
and community service activities in their home countries.
Successful applicants must demonstrate a capacity to conduct the
following activities:
(1) Work jointly with an African partner organization to develop a
useful business skills program for young adult Africans that includes
activities in both the U.S. and Africa.
(2) U.S. experts travel to Africa for in-country consultations and
preliminary trainings. Working with the African partner, U.S. experts
recruit and select African participants for a U.S.-based fellowship
program.
(3) Provide a six- to ten-week U.S.-based fellows program for 10 to
15 Africans on business development that features both individualized
and group learning and practice activities which develop technical and
leadership skills plus cultural sensitivity.
(4) As a counterpart to the fellows program in the U.S., provide a
multi-week program in Africa for 10-15 Americans to learn about
business challenges and opportunities there and to assist in conducting
workshops for a wider audience of Africans.
(5) Develop enhancement activities and leadership development
opportunities to reinforce program goals after all participants' return
to their home country. An essential follow-on component will be a
longitudinal assessment of the achievements of the program.
Possible Program Model:
1. Grantee sends Americans to work alongside African partners for
two weeks or more to examine the needs of young adults in starting
businesses in the region, and any in-country efforts that are already
underway or planned to address those needs. These activities should
include development of a working relationship among the Americans,
their African project partners, and any African government offices that
have responsibility for business development.
2. Grantee works with African partner organization to recruit a
pool of 50 or more Young Professionals who are interested in starting
businesses and will commit to a multi-staged development program.
3. Grantee and partner conduct a business skills program in Africa
for the 50+ recruits, including instruction on how to write a business
plan. Participants are invited to submit business plans to program
organizers.
4. Competition is held where those who develop the best plans will
be offered a U.S.-based fellowship program.
5. African participants come to the U.S. for fellowship program of
six to ten weeks that features both individualized and group learning
and practice activities which develop technical and leadership skills
plus cultural sensitivity. (A shorter-term study tour for Africans will
be considered inadequate.)
6. Grantee and African partner commit to a plan for additional
business skills development activities in Africa after the grant is
finished. These plans might include additional basic business training
or mentoring of new businesses by American specialists and maintenance
of a Web site for this purpose.
7. Grantee and African partner keep each other informed of
developments in business education through email, telephone, video
conferences, travel, etc, in order to maintain an informed momentum in
their partnership.
AF: Local Governance.
Program Contact: Curtis Huff, tel: (202) 453-8159, e-mail:
HuffCE@State.gov.
Project Goals: ECA is seeking proposals that promote democratic
institutions that are effective, responsive, transparent, and
accountable to the people. Programs should increase skills and
commitment to professional standards in municipal planning, policy
analysis, bill drafting, budgeting, constituent relations, project
implementation, and administration of services. Programs should promote
the establishment of responsible watchdog organizations and develop a
constructive working relationship with local government officials.
Audience: Mayors, city councilors, public administrators,
executives, municipal planners, and community watchdog leaders
(especially women).
Eligible Countries: Democratic Republic of Congo, Ghana, Kenya,
Liberia, Mali, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, South Africa, and Tanzania.
Successful programs will achieve the following:
Educate local officials in a professional approach to
public administration and empower them to conduct it with integrity and
effectiveness while also designing training and building the ability to
lead others in this field.
Enhance appreciation for American local governmental
practices and the role of the watchdog groups.
Establish structured interaction among American and
African participants designed to develop enduring professional ties.
Present plans to enable participants to initiate and
support activities in their home countries that focus on local
development and community service.
Successful applicants must demonstrate a capacity to conduct the
following activities:
(1) Work jointly with an African partner organization to develop an
effective governance skills program for young adult Africans that
includes activities in both the U.S. and Africa.
(2) Provide a six- to ten-week U.S.-based fellows program for 10 to
15 Africans on local government.
(3) As a counterpart to the fellows program in the U.S., provide a
multi-week program in Africa for 10-15 Americans to learn about local
governance challenges and opportunities there and to assist in
conducting workshops for a wider audience of Africans.
(4) Grantee and African partner commit to a plan for additional
local governance skills development activities in Africa after the
grant is finished. These plans might include additional basic training
or mentoring and maintenance of a web site for this purpose.
(5) Launch a self-sustaining program of enhancement activities and
leadership development opportunities to reinforce program goals after
all participants' return to their home country. An essential follow-on
component will be a longitudinal assessment of the achievements of the
program.
Possible Program Model:
1. Grantee sends Americans to work alongside African partners for
two weeks or more to learn about the local governance efforts in the
region.
2. Grantee and partner conduct a local governance education program
in Africa for local leaders. Program participants would then be invited
to submit training plans, with the incentive that those who produce the
best plans will be invited to the U.S. for fellowships.
3. Competition is held where those who develop the best plans will
be offered a U.S.-based fellowship program.
4. African participants come to the U.S. for fellowship program of
six to ten weeks that features both individualized and group learning
and practice activities which develop technical and leadership skills
plus cultural sensitivity. (A shorter-term study tour for Africans will
be considered inadequate.)
5. Grantee and African partner commit to a plan for follow-on
activities in Africa after the grant is finished. These plans might
include additional
[[Page 65382]]
training in public administration or even the development of a public
administration academy.
6. The grantee and African partner keep each other informed of
developments in public administration education through email,
telephone, video conferences, travel, etc, in order to maintain their
partnership.
REGION: East Asia and the Pacific (EAP):
EAP: Active and Responsible Citizenship.
Program Contact: Clint Wright, tel: (202) 453-8164, e-mail:
WrightHC@state.gov.
Project Goals: ECA encourages proposals that will help educate
citizens, local officials, and leaders of non-government organizations
on their rights and responsibilities in a democracy. Programs should
encourage the empowerment of foreign participants to participate in the
development of public policy, public discussions, and debates by
developing individual skills and organizations. Projects should engage
government and NGO leaders in dialogue on issues impacting local
communities and engage government leaders--national and local--on the
importance of citizen participation in governmental decision-making.
Projects should examine specific practices that promote an effective,
accountable, transparent and responsive government and public
administration that is crucial to the development of democracy.
Audience: Should include representatives from government and non-
governmental organizations, professional associations and community
leaders between the ages of 25 and 40 with an emphasis on equal numbers
of men and women.
Eligible Countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and
Vietnam. (single-country projects only).
Successful programs will achieve the following:
Encourage an understanding of the important elements of a
civil society. This includes concepts such as volunteerism, grassroots
activism, and the importance of the rule of law in all societies.
Programs should help develop an appreciation for American
governmental and legal structures, an understanding of the diversity of
American society, and the necessity for increased tolerance and respect
for others with differing views and beliefs.
Successful applicants must fully demonstrate a capacity to achieve
the following:
(1) Recruit and select approximately 10 to 15 individuals from
government, nongovernmental organizations, and community leaders
throughout the target country, including private business leaders for a
six to eight week U.S.-based fellows program. Partnering with
organizations based in the proposed host-country is required.
(2) Coordinate and program the fellowships.
(3) The final part of the program will be conducting enhancement
activities and leadership development opportunities that reinforce
program goals after the participants' return to their home country. An
essential follow on component will be a longitudinal assessment of the
achievements of the program.
Possible Program Model:
1. U.S. grantee identifies U.S. citizens to conduct in-country
seminar for citizen leaders, teachers, NGO representatives, media,
elected local government officials, and legal professionals to discuss
transparency and accountability. The in-country partner (a local
university or other appropriate professional group) will co-host the
event with the U.S. grantee institution. During this phase, the grantee
will openly recruit and select the participants to take part in the
U.S.-based fellows program.
2. The grantee implements the U.S.-based fellowships in local
elected officials' offices, NGO organizations, and citizen
organizations.
3. An in-country program would be conducted by the U.S. experts who
served as fellowship hosts or seminar leaders. The participants in U.S.
program would help design seminars and serve as co-presenters.
Organizers broaden impact through public outreach, including media.
4. Project may also support materials translated into native
language, small grants for projects designed to expand the exchange
experience, and support for the development of alumni association.
REGION: Europe (EUR):
EUR: Legislative Education and Practice Program (LEAP).
Program Contact: Jon Crocitto, Tel. (202) 453-8149; e-mail:
CrocittoJA@state.gov.
Project Goals: In some European countries, concepts such as free
democratic elections and political parties are still not very developed
and other aspects of democracy almost seem to be moving backward. Free
and democratic elections and civic activism and engagement are the
backbone of a civil society. LEAP is designed to strengthen
understanding of the U.S. legislative process and enhance appreciation
of civic society. LEAP will provide Young Professionals from Europe
with hands-on exposure to the U.S. political process through six-month
internships in state legislatures, city councils or local governments
in the U.S. U.S. participants should be selected among staff members at
the various internship sites who will act as primary host/mentors to
the foreign fellows during their U.S.-based program. After the
internships are completed, these U.S. staff members will travel
overseas to the interns' home countries. There they will participate in
joint outreach activities, including media, and conduct on-site
consultancies and presentations to wider audiences.
Audience: Generally, ECA prefers program participants who have not
previously been part of U.S.-based exchange programs as participants in
new programs. However, the LEAP program is an exception. Because of the
unique nature of this program, foreign participants who are alumni of
long-term exchange programs (an academic year or more) in the United
States (USG or privately sponsored) are favored as participants in this
program. These alumni have previous experience living and attending
school in the U.S. that will provide them with the cultural and
linguistic background necessary to benefit fully from the program. The
foreign participants should be selected through a merit-based,
competitive process. They should be recent university graduates in
political affairs or other relevant fields--approximately mid to late
20's in age, with some professional experience in the political or
legislative arenas. Participants should have demonstrated leadership
abilities and a commitment to or participation in the political process
or policy-making through involvement in civic education activities,
citizen advocacy groups, political campaigns, political parties, or
election monitoring in their home countries. U.S. participants will be
staff members of the state legislatures, city councils or local
governments who act as hosts for the foreign participants during the
inbound portion of the program.
Eligible Countries (all should be included): Turkey, Russia,
Ukraine, Georgia.
Successful applicants must fully demonstrate a capacity to achieve
the following:
(1) Manage (both programmatically and logistically) the program in
the United States and overseas. Interested organizations must have
offices and staff (or partner organizations) in all countries involved
in the program. Close coordination with ECA and U.S.
[[Page 65383]]
Embassy Public Affairs Sections in relevant countries will be
essential.
(2) Conduct recruitment and selection of participants through a
merit-based competitive process. A pre-departure and an arrival
orientation to ensure that participants have realistic expectations and
have essential information on their individual internships, host
communities, their responsibilities, and logistics should be included.
Use of host families for foreign participants in the U.S. is highly
encouraged.
(3) Organize an intensive introduction to the U.S. political
process to take place in whole or in part in Washington, DC.
(4) Identify and manage individualized internships with state
legislators, city councils or local government that will expose
participants to citizen participation in the political process.
Internships at the state level would be strongly preferred.
(5) Coordinate all logistics and programming for consultancy and
training program where U.S. participants will travel to the countries
where foreign participants are from for two to three weeks. The U.S.
participants would conduct workshops and trainings that cover the U.S.
legislative process and will enhance appreciation of civic society. The
training(s)/workshop(s) should be designed to engage a broad audience,
not just program participants. The U.S. participants would also engage
in joint outreach efforts, including engagement with the media.
Possible Program Model:
1. U.S. grantee and in-country partner select about 20 foreign
participants to participate in the U.S.-based program followed by a
four to six month internship in state legislatures, city councils or
local governments in the U.S. for foreign participants.
2. An in-country program for 10 to 15 U.S. participants (who
hosted/worked with the foreign participants in the U.S.) for two to
three weeks. This would include on-site consultancies and group
workshop(s) for a broad audience. Foreign participants help design the
seminars and serve as co-presenters.
3. A series of enrichment activities that could include support
materials translated into target language, small grants for projects
designed to expand the exchange experience, the creation of a web
portal for ongoing virtual program activities and communication, and
other activities.
EUR: Outreach and Integration of Marginalized Populations in
Western Europe.
Program Contact: Brent Beemer, tel: (202) 453-8147, e-mail:
BeemerBT@state.gov.
Note: Interested Applicants are HIGHLY encouraged to contact ECA
before submitting a proposal under this theme.
Project Goals: ECA seeks programs that will engage community
leaders, educators, youth influencers, journalists, and community-based
organizations in examination of programs and practices to facilitate
integration and empowerment of minority populations, particularly
youth, in Western European countries. This program would look at issues
related to the integration of immigrant and minority populations into a
modern democratic society. This includes integration in the political
system, economic opportunity, freedom of expression, access to
education, and practice of an open social/cultural life, while
maintaining ethnic identity within a multi-ethnic society. A specific
concentration of programming on immigrant and minority youth
populations and the special needs/challenges they face in modern
society should be a major focus. An overall comparison and sharing of
best practices in the U.S. and in the Western European countries on
these issues should also be included. Programming should include an
overview of U.S. and European government and legal structures, an
understanding of the diversity of American and European societies and
efforts to increase tolerance and respect for others with differing
views and beliefs. Program content will include an overview of the
range of historical and current American and European experiences with
integrating various immigrant and minority citizens, examination of
what has worked well and what has not, and analysis of the range of
actors including government, NGOs, religious organizations, immigrant
organizations, educational institutions, and the role of the media and
public who report on these issues.
Audience: Participants (from the U.S. and foreign countries) in the
program should include representatives of non-governmental
organizations, community leaders, educators, youth influencers,
religious leaders, and journalists from minority communities. Note:
European Union, national, and regional government officials are welcome
to be part of programming, but given funding limitations, ECA funds may
not be used to support their travel expenses.
Eligible Countries (single-country projects only) Denmark, United
Kingdom.
Successful programs will achieve the following:
An understanding of issues related to the status of
immigrant and minority populations in a modern democratic society. This
includes integration in the political system, economic opportunity, and
freedom of expression, education, and social/cultural life, while
maintaining ethnic identity within a multi-ethnic society. A specific
understanding of immigrant and minority youth populations and the
special needs/challenges they face in modern society is envisioned.
An appreciation for American governmental and legal
structures, and a better understanding of the diversity of American
society and efforts over the nation's history to increase tolerance and
respect for others with differing views and beliefs. Program content
will include an overview of the range of historical and current
American experience with integrating various immigrant and minority
citizens, examination of what has worked well and what has not, and
analysis of the range of actors including local government, NGOs,
religious organizations, immigrant organizations, educational
institutions, and the role of the media.
An enhanced leadership capacity that will enable
participants to initiate and support activities in their home countries
that focus on the status of minority populations.
Successful applicants must fully demonstrate a capacity to achieve
the following:
(1) Recruit and select approximately 15 to 20 individuals
throughout the target country. Program should be designed for two
groups to travel to the U.S. Partnering with organizations based in
target country is required. Also, given resources available in Western
Europe, successful applicants will have West European partners that
will cover considerable program costs within the host country and cover
all its own administrative costs for this project.
(2) In addition to identifying in-country partner and screening,
selecting, and preparing participants prior to departure for the United
States, the recipient of this grant will be responsible for building
and executing a three to four week informative travel and training
program in the United States.
(3) Conduct an in-country workshop(s) to examine the process of
integration of marginalized populations in Europe and developing
strategies to address these issues. The workshop(s) should be designed
to engage a broad audience, not just program participants.
[[Page 65384]]
(4) Develop enhancement activities and development opportunities
that reinforce program goals after the participants' return to their
home country. An essential follow-on component will be a longitudinal
assessment of the achievements of the program.
Possible Program Model:
1. U.S. grantee and in-country partner identify West European
citizens to participate in the U.S.-based program. Then a three to four
week U.S. program that includes an orientation, study tour/site visits;
possible short-term internships/work shadowing opportunities; hands on
training/training-of-trainers; professional development; and the
development of action plans.
2. An in-country workshop(s) for a broad audience to examine the
process of integration of minority communities. Program conducted by
U.S. experts that served as hosts or seminar leaders. Participants in
U.S. program design the seminar and serve as co-presenters.
3. Enrichment activities that could include support materials
translated into native language, small grants for projects designed to
expand and sustain the exchange experience, and other activities.
REGION: Near East and North Africa (NEA):
NEA: Professional Mentoring for Women in Science and Technology.
Program Contact: Thomas Johnston, Tel: (202) 453-8162; e-mail:
JohnstonTJ@state.gov.
Project Goals: ECA seeks proposals that will engage young women who
have recently embarked on professions in fields requiring skills in
mathematics, scientific and/or technological fields. Proposals should
encourage the use of critical thinking in the professional sphere as
well as other aspects of life. Proposals should include plans to
provide eight- to ten-week mentorships in American laboratories,
professional or commercial research and development labs, or in the
high tech industries. This program will also send American specialists
in similar fields to conduct/participate in seminars, workshops, on-
site consultancies, and other types of activities in the home countries
of Middle East participants, with the goal of reinforcing the
mentorship experience and creating a wider network of women who are
established in these professions or who aspire to do so. A principal
goal of this program is the development of sustainable, long-term
institutional and individual linkages based on the relationships
established between U.S. mentors and non-American fellows.
Mentoring programs for English-speaking fellows would be designed
as individual affiliations with an appropriate American professional
counterpart. Proposals should also envision small specialized shadowing
opportunities for groups of 2-3 international participants without
strong English skills. These group opportunities should incorporate
diverse training methodologies and include full-time provision of an
escort/interpreter. All proposals should also include a U.S. program
component allowing all participants to come together, learn from each
other and to build relationships.
The Department has initiated outreach to women in science and
technology in the Middle East through previous contact and conferences;
organizers of previous projects may be consulted for additional
contacts and information. Applicants for this ECA grant are encouraged
to contact the ECA Program Officer, Thomas Johnston, for additional
information and contacts.
Audience: Middle Eastern participants will be women (22-35 years of
age) who are newly engaged or rising in professional careers that
require significant expertise/knowledge of mathematics, science,
technology and/or innovative application of these skills, and who
already are, or show promise of being, role models for others in their
countries, particularly for women. We would consider, for example, a
lawyer, whose work requires expert knowledge of environmental science
as well as international law to be eligible for this program.
Eligible Countries: Algeria; Bahrain; Egypt; Iraq; Jordan; Kuwait;
Lebanon; Morocco; Oman; Qatar; Saudi Arabia; Syria; United Arab
Emirates; West Bank/Gaza; Yemen.
Successful applicants must demonstrate a capacity to achieve the
following:
(1) Recruit and select approximately 15 to 20 qualified individuals
from throughout the eligible region, with representatives from as many
countries as possible. The program should be designed for non-American
fellows to travel to the United States for a group orientation program,
even if they will be subsequently be engaged in individualized
programs, in order to foster networking among the group. An in-country
or in-region partner organization or affiliate offices overseas is
required to coordinate recruiting and selection. Proposing
organizations must be prepared to mount a merit-based selection
process, to be described in the proposal.
(2) In addition to identifying its in-country (or in-region)
partner and identifying, selecting, and preparing participants prior to
departure for the United States, the recipient of this grant will be
responsible for building and implementing an eight- to ten-week
professional mentoring experience and training program in the United
States. This will focus primarily upon individualized fellowships for
the foreign participants at the R & D facilities of U.S. businesses,
non-university high-tech institutes, or other appropriate affiliation
as well as a commitment of appropriate American professional
counterpart women to serve as mentors. The final selection of foreign
fellows should take into account the types of placements that may be
available in the U.S. ECA seeks creative and cost-efficient approaches
to this selection and placement program.
(3) Conducting an in-country consultancy program and/or workshop in
each participating country, during which the international fellow and
American mentor will offer skill development and networking workshops
for a broader range of program participants in that country.
(4) The development of a Web site designed to foster ongoing
communication among the international and American participants and to
publicize the results of this program. An essential follow-on component
will be a longitudinal assessment of the achievements of the program.
Possible Program Model:
1. U.S. grantee and in-country partner institution select young
non-American women engaged in science and technology for participation
in the U.S.-based mentoring/fellowship program.
2. An eight- to ten-week U.S. program that includes an orientation
followed by individualized fellowships for English speakers; a shorter
program designed around work shadowing opportunities with
interpretation for groups of 2-3 non-English speakers.
3. An in-country program in each international participating
country for one or more of the American mentors (who hosted/worked with
the foreign participants in the U.S.). The in-country program would
include on-site consultancies, group workshops/seminars and networking
opportunities for a broad audience. Foreign participants would help
design the seminars and serve as co-presenters.
4. The development of a project specific Web site, as well as
enrichment activities that could include having support material
translated into the native language, small grants for research-
development projects designed
[[Page 65385]]
to expand the exchange experience, and other activities.
NEA: Math, Science, and Technology in Secondary Schools.
Program Contact: Thomas Johnston, Tel: (202) 453-8162; e-mail:
JohnstonTJ@state.gov.
Project Goals: ECA seeks program proposals that will help develop
institutional (and personal) linkages between secondary school teachers
and administrators in the United States and partners in the NEA region
in the disciplines of math, science, and technology innovation. ECA is
looking to support creative programs that will link secondary school
teachers and administrators from the U.S. and overseas in programming
designed to explore approaches to engaging students in critical
thinking, particularly in the teaching of math, science, and innovative
approaches to technology, both in the classroom and through focused
extracurricular activities, and to examine how professional
counterparts in participating countries engage the successor
generation.
Audience: Math, science, and technology secondary school teachers
and administrators.
Eligible Countries: Algeria; Bahrain; Egypt; Iraq; Jordan; Kuwait;
Lebanon; Libya; Morocco; Oman; Qatar; Saudi Arabia; Syria; United Arab
Emirates; West Bank/Gaza; Yemen.
Successful programs will achieve the following:
An understanding of techniques used in the NEA region and
in the United States to promote student engagement in critical thinking
and discovery, particular in math, science, and technology.
Develop opportunities for productive personal
relationships between groups from participating countries that could
lead to affiliations between schools in the U.S. and schools in the NEA
region.
Participants from each country should come from the same
schools or set of schools (districts) so that direct linkages on both
sides are facilitated and encouraged by the program.
An appreciation for the ways in which diverse populations
can interact productively in the secondary school setting and work
collaboratively to develop innovative responses to scientific and
mathematics challenges. U.S. program presentations should showcase
teaching math, science, and technology at the secondary level, special/
accelerated programs and/or schools in the math, science, and
technology disciplines, programs to attract students to these
disciplines (especially girls), relevant after school programs, student
job-shadowing programs, the roles of parents in schools, and how
secondary schools build support and relationships with local science/
technology businesses.
Enhanced leadership capacity among the NEA educators that
will enable participants to initiate and support activities in their
home schools and classrooms.
Create the foundation for collaborative partnerships among
classrooms, through virtual or other exchanges.
Successful applicants must fully demonstrate a capacity to achieve
the following:
(1) Recruit and select approximately 15 to 20 secondary school
teachers and administrators from overseas and 15 to 20 from the U.S. to
take part in the program. To recruit effectively, the grantee
organization must have affiliate offices in one or more NEA countries.
(2) The recipient of this grant will be responsible for building
and executing a one to two week study tour for American educators in
the NEA region and a two to three week study tour program in the United
States for foreign educators.
(3) Develop enhancement activities and development opportunities
that reinforce program goals after the participants' return to their
home country. Grantee will be responsible for establishing electronic
communications/on-line projects or other methods of continuing
communication and developing collaborative projects between
participants and their classrooms. An essential follow-on component
will be a longitudinal assessment of the achievements of the program.
Possible Program Model:
1. A merit-based competitive selection of American secondary school
educators and administrators to participate in the overseas program is
done.
2. A one to two week program is developed where the U.S.
participants travel overseas. This should be done while schools in the
host country(ies) are in session. While overseas, the U.S. participants
will meet with and be hosted by foreign participants (and their
schools) who have also been selected through an open merit-based
competitive process. Programming should include time in active
classrooms with students and presentation opportunities for the
American participants in foreign schools/classrooms.
3. During an interim period, educators are in contact through
active electronic communications and web-based programs.
4. A two to three week program is developed where the foreign
participants travel to the U.S. This should be done while schools in
the U.S. are in session. While in the U.S., the foreign participants
will be hosted by U.S. participants (and their schools) whom they met
in their program overseas. Programming should include time in active
classrooms and at appropriate extracurricular sites with students and
presentation opportunities for the foreign participants in American
schools/classrooms.
5. Enrichment activities are developed that could include support
materials translated into the native language, small grants for
collaborative projects designed to expand and sustain the exchange
experience, continuation of web/electronic activities, and other
activities are done.
REGION: South Central Asia (SCA):
SCA: Secondary School Linkages.
Program Contact: Brent Beemer, tel: (202) 453-8147, e-mail:
BeemerBT@state.gov.
Project Goals: ECA seeks program proposals that will help develop
institutional (and personal) linkages between secondary schools in the
United States and partner institutions in Turkmenistan or Pakistan. ECA
will support creative programs that will link secondary school teachers
and administrators from the U.S. and Turkmenistan or Pakistan in
programming designed to explore each other's systems, schools,
approaches to education, and study how their profession is engaging the
successor generations in both countries.
Audience: Secondary school teachers and administrators. Active
parents involved with parent/teacher organizations.
Eligible Countries: Turkmenistan, Pakistan (Single-Country Projects
Only).
Successful programs will achieve the following:
An understanding of issues related to the secondary school
system in both countries.
Develop opportunities for personal relationships to
develop among the participants and longer-term affiliations between
schools in the U.S. and schools in Turkmenistan or Pakistan to take
root. Participants from both countries in the program should come from
the same schools or set of schools (districts) so that direct linkages
on both sides are facilitated and encouraged by the program.
An appreciation for American governmental and legal
structures, and a better understanding of the diversity of American
society and how that affects the secondary school educational
[[Page 65386]]
system. Program content should include presentations on the current
American experience with integrating various immigrant citizens into
the educational system, education of students with special needs, after
school programs, student service/volunteer programs, the roles of
parents in schools, and how secondary schools build support among local
communities.
An enhanced leadership capacity among the foreign
educators that will enable participants to initiate and support
activities in their home schools and classrooms.
Successful applicants must fully demonstrate a capacity to achieve
the following:
(1) Recruit and select approximately 15 to 20 secondary school
teachers and administrators from Turkmenistan or Pakistan and 15 to 20
from the U.S. to take part in the program. Partnering with a
Turkmenistan-based or Pakistan-based organization or institution or
having affiliate offices based there is required.
(2) The recipient of this grant will be responsible for building
and executing a one to two week study tour for American educators
overseas and a two to three week study tour program in the United
States for foreign educators.
(3) Develop enhancement activities and development opportunities
that reinforce program goals after the participants' return to their
home country. Grantee will be responsible for establishing electronic
communications/on-line projects or other methods of continuing
communications between participants. An essential follow-on component
will be a longitudinal assessment of the achievements of the program.
Possible Program Model:
1. A merit-based competitive selection of American secondary school
educators and administrators to participate in the Turkmenistan-based
or Pakistan-based program is conducted.
2. A one to two week program is developed where the U.S.
participants travel to Turkmenistan or Pakistan. This should be done
while schools in Turkmenistan or Pakistan are in session. While
overseas, the U.S. participants will meet with and be hosted by foreign
participants (and their schools) who have also been selected through an
open merit-based competitive process. Programming should include time
in active classrooms with students and presentation opportunities for
the American participants in overseas schools/classrooms.
3. During an interim period, educators are in contact through
active electronic communications and web-based programs.
4. A two to three week program is developed where the foreign
participants travel to the U.S. This should be done while schools in
the U.S. are in session. While in the U.S, the foreign participants
will be hosted by U.S. participants (and their schools) whom they met
in their program in Turkmenistan or Pakistan. Programming should
include time in active classrooms with students and presentation
opportunities for the foreign participants in American schools/
classrooms.
5. Enrichment activities are developed that could include support
materials translated into the native language, small grants for
projects designed to expand and sustain the exchange experience,
continuation of web/electronic activities, and other activities.
SCA: Outreach and Integration of Marginalized Populations in Sri
Lanka.
Program Contact: Brent Beemer, tel: (202) 453-8147, e-mail:
BeemerBT@state.gov.
Project Goals: ECA seeks programs that will engage community
leaders, educators, youth influencers, journalists, and community-based
organizations in examination of programs and practices to engage
underserved or disengaged segments of the Sri Lankan society. This
would include strengthening outreach to youth, as well as support for
minority rights for the Sinhalese Muslim population, especially at the
local level. This program would examine issues related to the
integration of marginalized populations into a modern democratic
society, including integration in the political system, economic
opportunity, freedom of expression, access to education, and practice
of an open social/cultural life. A specific concentration of
programming on minority youth populations and the special needs/
challenges they face in modern society is encouraged. Programming
should include a study of U.S. government and legal structures, an
understanding of the diversity of American society and efforts over the
nation's history to increase tolerance and respect for others with
differing views and beliefs. Program content will include an overview
of the range of historical and current American experience with
integrating various immigrant and minority citizens, examination of
what has worked well and what has not, and analysis of the range of
actors including government, NGOs, religious organizations, immigrant
organizations, educational institutions, and the role of the media and
public who are involved in this these issues.
Audience: Participants in the program should include
representatives of non-governmental organizations, community leaders,
educators, youth influencers, religious leaders, and journalists from
minority communities.
Eligible Country: Sri Lanka.
Successful applicants must fully demonstrate a capacity to achieve
the following:
(1) Recruit and select approximately 15 to 20 individuals
throughout the target country. Program should be designed for two
groups to travel to the U.S. An in-country partnering organization
(based in Sri Lanka) is required.
(2) In addition to identifying in-country partner and screening,
selecting, and preparing participants prior to departure for the United
States, the recipient of this grant will be responsible for building
and executing a three to four week study tour and training program in
the United States.
(3) Conducting an in-country workshop(s) to examine the process of
integration of marginalized populations in different societies and
developing strategies to address these issues. The workshop(s) should
be designed to engage a broad audience, not just program participants.
(4) The development of enhancement activities and development
opportunities that reinforce program goals after the participants'
return to their home country. An essential follow-on component will be
a longitudinal assessment of the achievements of the program.
Possible Program Model:
1. The U.S. grantee and in-country partner identify Sinhalese
citizens to participate in the U.S.-based program. Then a three to four
week U.S. program would occur that includes an orientation, study tour/
site visits; possible short-term internships/work shadowing
opportunities; hands on training/training-of-trainers; professional
development; and the development of action plans.
2. A Sri Lanka-based workshop(s) for a broad audience to examine
the status of minority communities. Participants in U.S. program help
design the seminar and serve as co-presenters.
3. Enrichment activities would be developed that could include
having support materials translated into the local language, small
grants for projects designed to expand the exchange experience, and
other activities.
REGION: Western Hemisphere (WHA):
[[Page 65387]]
WHA: Creating Economic Growth to Fight Poverty and Strengthen
Democracy.
Program Contact: Laverne Johnson, tel: (202) 453-8160, e-mail:
JohnsonLV@state.gov.
Project Goals: ECA seeks proposals designed to promote local
grassroots economic growth and prosperity among emerging youth leaders
from the indigenous and Afro-Latino communities by sharing practical
methods to achieve this goal and to develop community leadership skills
as a means to strengthen democracy. To increase understanding within
the community of the linkage between entrepreneurial activity and free
markets as well as the importance of transparency and accountability in
business and government.
Audience: Young entrepreneurs, media representatives, community
leaders, and officials from governmental and non-governmental
organizations that either service or come from the indigenous and Afro-
Latino communities of the Hemisphere with a special emphasis on women.
Eligible Countries: (Single-country and multiple-country projects
accepted) Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru,
and Venezuela.
Successful programs will achieve the following:
Educate young men and women in entrepreneurial thinking
and business leadership skills to empower them to engage in business
creation.
Improve among participants an understanding of the role
communication plays in creating the conditions necessary for a free
market economy.
A better understanding of the roles of the private sector,
and to a lesser extent, public sector who shape the local business
environment.
An appreciation of the role of the individual entrepreneur
in creating economic growth.
Enhance appreciation for American business practices and
the role of the individual in creating growth through grassroots-
focused entrepreneurial efforts.
Establish a structured interaction among American and
Hemisphere participants designed to develop enduring professional ties.
Expand leadership capacity enabling participants to
initiate and support activities in their home countries that focus on
development and community service.
Successful applicants must fully demonstrate a capacity to achieve
the following:
(1) Recruit and select approximately 30 individuals from the
business associations, banking and regulatory agencies and print media.
The delegation should include individual business owners and
individuals who report on business from diverse regions of the
participating country. Program should be designed for two groups of 15
to travel to the U.S. for not less than ten days. For this phase of the
program, partnering with organizations based in the proposed host-
country is required.
(2) In addition to identifying in-country partner and screening,
selecting, and preparing participants prior to departure for the United
States, the grantee will be responsible for building and executing a
four to six week residency program in the United States for
approximately twelve additional Hemisphere participants.
(3) The final part of the program will be conducting enhancement
activities and leadership development opportunities that reinforce
program goals after all participants' return to their home country. An
essential follow on component will be a longitudinal assessment of the
achievements of the program.
Possible Program Model:
1. Selected participants invited to attend in-country workshops
(presented by the U.S. grantee and in-country partner) that focus on
effective, practical methods of stimulating entrepreneurial skills and
support free market structures in the countries listed in this
announcement.
2. Key members of the in-country workshops invited to U.S. for
business facilitation or mentoring to promote innovation and networking
skills. Develop action plans to promote entrepreneurial skills and free
markets upon return home.
3. Upon return, participants implement business action plans with
guidance from U.S. mentors utilizing email and other direct
communication.
4. U.S. mentors travel to country to evaluate implementation of
action plan and offer assistance.
III. Award Information
Type of Award: Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2008, pending availability.
Approximate Total Funding: $5,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 20.
Approximate Average Award: $250,000 (Please Note: For the
Legislative Education and Practice (LEAP) program outlined under the
European Section of this document, the Office anticipates awarding one
grant for approximately $400,000. It is anticipated that all other
awards made under this competition will average approximately
$300,000.)
Ceiling of Award Range: $350,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, September 1,
2008.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: September 30, 2010.
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal Government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a.) Grants awarded to eligible organizations with less than four
years of experience in conducting international exchange programs will
be limited to $60,000.
(b.) Any one organization is limited to submitting no more than
four proposals in this entire competition. If any one organization
submits more than four, then all submitted proposals will be deemed
ineligible in this competition.
IV. Application and Submission Information:
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
[[Page 65388]]
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an Application Package
Please contact the Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C, Room 220,
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547, (202) 453-8174, GustafsonDP@State.gov to request a Solicitation
Package. Please refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C-08-01
located at the top of this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
Please specify Program Specialist David Gustafson and refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C-08-01 located at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or
from the Grants.gov website at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under
IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and Methods of Submission'' section
below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit whic