Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery; Proposed 2008-2010 Fishing Quotas for Atlantic Surfclams and Ocean Quahogs, 64187-64190 [E7-22381]
Download as PDF
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 220 / Thursday, November 15, 2007 / Proposed Rules
and the draft Amendment 2 to the
Consolidated HMS FMP is reopened.
Comments must be received by 5 p.m.
on December 17, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by 0648–AU89, by any one of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov
• Email to ShkA2@noaa.gov.
• Fax: 301–713–1917, Attn: Michael
Clark
• Mail: Attn: Michael Clark, HMS
Management Division (SF1), 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910. Please mark the outside of the
envelope ‘‘Comment on Amendment 2.’’
Instructions: All comments received
are part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, PowerPoint,
or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Copies of the draft Amendment 2 to
the Consolidated HMS FMP and other
relevant documents are available on the
HMS Management Division’s website at
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms or by
contacting the HMS Management
Division at 301–713–2347.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
more information concerning the draft
Amendment 2 to the Consolidated HMS
FMP and its proposed rule, contact:
Michael Clark at 301–713–2347 or fax
301–713–1917; or Jackie Wilson at 240–
338–3936 or fax 404–806–9188.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Atlantic HMS fisheries are managed
under the dual authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) and the
Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA).
The Consolidated HMS FMP, finalized
in 2006, and amendments to that FMP
are implemented by regulations at 50
CFR part 635.
On July 27, 2007 (72 FR 41392),
NMFS published a proposed rule that
requested comments on the draft
Amendment 2 to the Consolidated HMS
FMP, and scheduled 10 public hearings
throughout August and September 2007
to receive comments from fishery
participants and other members of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:52 Nov 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
public regarding the proposed rule and
draft Amendment 2 to the Consolidated
HMS FMP. On October 3, 2007 (72 FR
56330), the comment period was
extended from October 15, 2007, to
November 2, 2007.
At the October 2007 HMS Advisory
Panel (AP) meeting, AP members asked
a number of questions regarding the
proposed measures that would require
fishermen to land sharks with all fins
naturally attached. Specifically, AP
members asked how this requirement
would relate to the Shark Finning
Prohibition Act and its implementing
regulations. In order to provide
evidence that sharks were actually
landed with their fins attached, NMFS
is considering modifying shark dealer
weigh-out slips so that dealers can
document when they receive sharks
landed with fins naturally attached.
NMFS recently released a document
that discusses this issue entitled
‘‘Clarification of the Proposed Rule
Regarding Landing Sharks with the Fins
Attached and the Shark Finning
Prohibition Act,’’ which is available on
the HMS website (see ADDRESSES) and
was distributed to the HMS listserve.
Throughout the comment period,
NMFS has received thousands of
comments on the full range of analyzed
alternatives, including the status of the
stocks, proposed quotas, proposed shark
landing requirements, and the proposed
list of allowable shark species for
recreational anglers. NMFS has also
received suggestions on modifying the
proposed measures to minimize impacts
on fishermen. Specifically, one group of
commenters, including the Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council
and the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission, suggest implementing two
regions (i.e., a Gulf of Mexico region and
an Atlantic region). In general, these
comments were made in light of the
blacktip shark status in the Gulf of
Mexico and the large overharvests in the
Gulf of Mexico during 2007. NMFS has
not fully analyzed the implications of
the two regions versus the proposed one
region or the status quo alternative of
three regions. Nonetheless, NMFS
welcomes additional comments on this
suggestion.
Finally, NMFS is clarifying that any
overharvests in 2007 or 2008 would be
accounted for in final measures
implementing Amendment 2 to the
Consolidated HMS FMP, consistent
with both the current and proposed
regulations. NMFS continues to accept
comments on any of the proposed
measures and on those measures that
comments were specifically requested,
including the proposed list of species
that recreational anglers would be
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64187
allowed to land, the amount of time
proposed to provide notice of closures,
and the 80 percent trigger for closing
commercial shark fisheries.
In order to provide additional
opportunities for public comment,
NMFS is reopening the public comment
period on the proposed rule and draft
Amendment 2 to the Consolidated HMS
FMP until 5 p.m., December 17, 2007.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.
Dated: November 9, 2007.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. E7–22377 Filed 11–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No.070717342–7504–01]
RIN 0648–AV42
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the
Northeastern United States; Atlantic
Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery;
Proposed 2008–2010 Fishing Quotas
for Atlantic Surfclams and Ocean
Quahogs
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes quotas for the
Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog
fisheries for 2008, 2009, and 2010.
Regulations governing these fisheries
require NMFS to publish the proposed
quota specifications for the 2008–2010
fishing years and seek public comment
on such proposed measures. The intent
of this action is to propose allowable
harvest levels of Atlantic surfclams and
ocean quahogs from the Exclusive
Economic Zone.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than 5 p.m., eastern standard time,
on December 17, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting
documents, including the Regulatory
Impact Review (RIR) and Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
are available from Daniel Furlong,
Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
64188
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 220 / Thursday, November 15, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Fishery Management Council, Room
2115, Federal Building, 300 South New
Street, Dover, DE 19904–6790. A copy of
the RIR/IRFA is accessible via the
Internet at https://www.nero.noaa.gov/
nero/regs/com.html.
You may submit comments, identified
by RIN 0648–AV42, by any one of the
following methods:
• Mail: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional
Administrator, Northeast Region,
NMFS, One Blackburn Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930–2298. Mark on
the outside of the envelope, ‘‘Comments
on SC/OQ Proposed Specifications.’’
• Fax: (978) 281–9135.
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information
(forexample, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian R. Hooker, Fishery Policy Analyst,
978–281–9220.
The
Fishery Management Plan for the
Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog
Fisheries (FMP) requires that NMFS, in
consultation with the Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council (Council),
specify quotas for surfclams and ocean
quahogs for a 3-year period, with an
annual review, from a range that
represents the optimum yield (OY) for
each fishery. It is the policy of the
Council that the levels selected allow
sustainable fishing to continue at that
level for at least 10 years for surfclams
and 30 years for ocean quahogs. In
addition to this constraint, the Council
policy also considers the economic
impacts of the quotas. Regulations
implementing Amendment 10 to the
FMP (63 FR 27481, May 19, 1998) added
Maine ocean quahogs (locally known as
mahogany quahogs) to the management
unit, and provided for a small artisanal
fishery for ocean quahogs in the waters
north of 43 50’ N. lat. with an annual
quota within a range of 17,000 to
100,000 Maine bu (5,991 to 35,240 hL).
As specified in Amendment 10, the
Maine mahogany ocean quahog quota is
allocated separately from the quota
specified for the ocean quahog fishery.
Regulations implementing Amendment
13 to the FMP (68 FR 69970, December
16, 2003) established the ability to set
multi-year quotas. An evaluation, in the
form of an annual quota
recommendation, is conducted by the
Council every year to determine if the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
multi-year quota specifications remains
appropriate. The fishing quotas must be
in compliance with overfishing
definitions for each species. In
proposing these quotas, the Council
considered the available stock
assessments, data reported by harvesters
and processors, and other relevant
information concerning exploitable
biomass and spawning biomass, fishing
mortality rates, stock recruitment,
projected fishing effort and catches, and
areas closed to fishing.
In June 2007, the Council voted to
recommend maintaining the 2007 quota
levels of 5.333 million bu (284 million
L) for the ocean quahog fishery, 3.400
million bu (181 million L) for the
Atlantic surfclam fishery, and 100,000
Maine bu (35,240 hL) for the Maine
ocean quahog fishery for 2008–2010.
The proposed quotas for the 2008–2010
Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog
fishery are shown in the table below.
The Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog
quotas are specified in standard bu of
53.24 L per bu, while the Maine ocean
quahog quota is specified in ‘‘Maine’’ bu
of 35.24 L per bu. Because Maine ocean
quahogs are the same species as ocean
quahogs, both fisheries are assessed
under the same ocean quahog
overfishing definition. When the two
quota amounts (ocean quahog and
Maine ocean quahog) are added, the
total allowable harvest is still lower
than the level that would result in
overfishing for the entire stock.
PROPOSED 2008–2010 ATLANTIC SURFCLAM AND OCEAN QUAHOG1 QUOTAS
2008
bu
Surfclams 2
Ocean Quahogs 2
Maine Ocean Quahogs3
3.400
5.333
100,000
2009
hL
2010
bu
1.810
2.840
35,240
3.400
5.333
100,000
hL
1.810
2.840
35,240
bu
3.400
5.333
100,000
hL
1.810
2.840
35,240
1 Numerical
21
31
values are in millions except for Maine ocean quahogs
bu = 1.88 cubic ft. = 53.24 liters
bu = 1.2445 cubic ft. = 35.24 liters
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Surfclams
In 1999, the Council expressed its
intention to increase the surfclam quota
to OY over a period of 5 years (OY = 3.4
million bu (181 million L)). The
proposed 2008–2010 status quo
surfclam quota was developed after
reviewing the results of the 44th
Northeast Regional Stock Assessment
Workshop (SAW 44) for surfclams,
issued in January 2007. The surfclam
quota recommendation is consistent
with the SAW 44 finding that the
Atlantic surfclam stock is not
overfished, nor is overfishing occurring.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:52 Nov 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
Estimated fishable stock biomass in
2005 was above the management target,
and fishing mortality was below the
management threshold. Even though the
total stock biomass is expected to
gradually decline over the next 3 years
due to poor recruitment, the total
proposed quota of 3.4 million bu (181
million L), if fully harvested, would not
exceed the fishing mortality threshold.
Based on this information the Council is
recommending, and NMFS is proposing,
to maintain the status quo surfclam
quota of 3.4 million bu (181 million L)
for 2008–2010. This quota represents
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the maximum allowable quota under the
FMP.
Ocean Quahogs
The proposed 2008–2010 quota for
ocean quahogs also reflects the status
quo quota of 5.333 million bu (284
million L) in 2007. SAW 44 found that
the ocean quahog stock is not
overfished, nor is overfishing occurring.
Estimated fishable biomass in 2005 was
above the management target, and
estimated fishing mortality was well
below the target level. Fishing mortality
is not expected to reach the target
threshold if the proposed quota is
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 220 / Thursday, November 15, 2007 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
harvested each of the 3 years. Similar to
surfclams, the ocean quahog biomass is
expected to decline over the next 3
years. There is some evidence of
recruitment, and small ocean quahogs
found in most regions; however, growth
is so slow that initial recruitment of year
classes to the fishery is delayed for
about 20 years. Based on this
information the Council is
recommending, and NMFS is proposing,
to maintain the status quo quota of
5.333 million bu (284 million L) for
2008–2010. This quota level is above
current market demand, but allows for
growth of the market if conditions
change.
The proposed 2008–2010 quota for
Maine ocean quahogs is the status quo
level of 100,000 Maine bu (35,240 hL).
In 2006, the State of Maine completed
a stock assessment of the resource
within the Maine Mahogany Quahog
Zone. This assessment was peerreviewed as part of SAW 44. Although
landings per unit of effort have declined
since 2002, they remain relatively high
overall. The findings of the Maine
quahog survey did not change the status
of the entire ocean quahog resource. The
proposed quota represents the
maximum allowable quota under the
FMP.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) of
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent
with the FMP, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This action is authorized by 50 CFR part
648 and has been determined to be not
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 603, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) has
been prepared, which describes the
economic impacts that this proposed
rule, if adopted, would have on small
entities. A summary of the IRFA is
included in this section. The complete
IRFA and regulatory impact review is
available from the Council (see
ADDRESSES). A description of the
reasons why this action is being
considered, as well as the objectives of
and legal basis for this proposed rule is
found in the preamble of this proposed
rule. There are no Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
proposed rule.
This action proposes fishing quotas
for Atlantic surfclams and ocean
quahogs for 2008–2010. The Council
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:52 Nov 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
analyzed four quota alternatives for the
Atlantic surfclam fishery, five
alternatives for the ocean quahog
fishery, and four alternatives for the
Maine ocean quahog fishery. Each of the
alternative sets included the proposed
alternative and a ‘‘no action’’
alternative. The three proposed quotas
for 2008–2010 are 5.333 million bu (284
million L) for the ocean quahog fishery,
3.400 million bu (181 million L) for the
Atlantic surfclam fishery, and 100,000
Maine bu (35,240 hL) for the Maine
ocean quahog fishery.
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities to Which this Proposed
Rule Would Apply
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) defines a small commercial
fishing entity as a firm with gross
annual receipts not exceeding $4
million. In 2006, a total of 38 vessels
reported harvesting surfclams and/or
ocean quahogs from Federal waters
under an Individual Transferable Quota
(ITQ) system. In addition, 25 vessels
participated in the limited access Maine
ocean quahog fishery, for a total of 63
participants in the 2006 fisheries.
Average 2006 gross income from
surfclam ITQ trips was $1,182,713 per
vessel, and from ocean quahog ITQ trips
was $1,020,409 per vessel. The Maine
ocean quahog fishery reported an
average value of $160,698 per boat. Each
vessel in this analysis is treated as a
single entity for purposes of size
determination and impact assessment.
All 63 commercial fishing entities fall
under the SBA size standard for small
commercial fishing entities.
In addition to the actual vessels that
participate in the fishery there are 55
ocean quahog quota allocation owners,
67 surfclam allocation owners, and 51
Federal limited access Maine mahogany
quahog permit holders. An allocation
owner may choose to fish or lease his
or her quota allocation.
Economic Impacts of this Proposed
Action
The proposed quotas for 2008–2010
reflect the same quota level set for
2005–2007. Therefore, it is not expected
that there will be any different
economic impacts beyond status quo
resulting from the proposed quota level.
Leaving the ocean quahog quota at the
harvest level of 5.333 million bu (284
million L) is not expected to constrain
the fishery. In fact, actual ocean quahog
landings for 2005 and 2006 did not
exceed 60 percent of the available quota.
The total 2007 harvest is expected to be
similar to recent years (as of September
15, 2007, only 45.4 percent of the quota
had been harvested). In comparison, 41
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64189
percent of the quota had been harvested
as of September 15, 2006.
The surfclam quota is proposed to be
set to the maximum allowed under the
FMP. In contrast to the ocean quahog
harvest, the surfclam fishery has
harvested over 80 percent of the
available quota each year since 2005.
The Maine ocean quahog quota is
proposed to be also set at the maximum
allowed under the FMP. The Maine
ocean quahog quota is often fully
harvested on an annual basis. It is
anticipated that by maintaining the
status quo quota level for the next 3
years the fishing industry will benefit
from the stability of product demand
from the seafood processors and being
able to predict future fishery
performance based on past performance
from the last 3 years.
Economic Impacts of Alternatives to the
Proposed Action
The Council analyzed four
alternatives for the Atlantic surfclam
fishery, five alternatives for the ocean
quahog fishery, and four alternatives for
the Maine ocean quahog fishery. Each of
the alternative sets included the
proposed alternative and a ‘‘no action’’
alternative. The selection of ‘‘no action’’
alternative would result in no quotas
being established, a closure of the
fishery, and is contrary to the FMP.
Based on 2006 ex-vessel prices, the
result of no Federal surfclam or ocean
quahog harvests in 2008 would be a loss
of $34.3 million to the Federal surfclam
fishery, $18.4 million to the ocean
quahog fishery, and $4 million to the
Maine ocean quahog fishery, for a total
loss of $56.7 million. The viable
alternatives to the proposed quotas for
ocean quahog include a 20–percent
decrease from the status quo, a 6.2–
percent decrease form the status quo,
and a 20–percent increase from the
status quo. The ocean quahog quota
alternatives that were chosen for
analysis represent options within the 4
- 6 million bu (213 - 319.4 million L)
range that is specified in the FMP. Since
the alternative quota levels would not
likely constrain the harvest level, the
primary economic impact would come
from the change in the lease and sale
value of surplus quota shares. It is
estimated that the status quo lease price
per bushel of ocean quahogs is $0.53. A
20–percent decrease in quota would
likely increase the lease value to $1.00
per bu. In 2006 there were over 748,000
cage tags traded (each cage tag equals 32
bu or 1,704 liters). Most tags are traded
more than one time. Since NMFS does
not keep records on the transaction
costs, the actual value of these
transactions can not be accurately
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
64190
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 220 / Thursday, November 15, 2007 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
determined. However, it is clear that
allocation owners who depend
primarily on the lease market would
benefit from a decrease in quota at the
expense of harvesters. The other two
alternatives each would increase the
quota above status quo. Thus, each
would likely have the effect of
devaluing the lease price of a quota
share, perhaps encouraging some
allocation owners to sell their quota
shares. These sales could cause further
consolidation of quota shares in the
ocean quahog fishery.
The alternatives to the proposed
surfclam quotas include a 45.6–percent
decrease from the status quo and a 4.4–
percent decrease from the status quo.
The Atlantic surfclam quota alternatives
that were chosen for analysis represent
options within the 1.85 - 3.4 million bu
(98.5 - 181 million L) range that is
specified in the FMP. A 45.6–percent
decrease in the Federal surfclam quota
would subtract 23,147 bu (1.2 million L)
from the current average allocation. At
an average ex-vessel value of $11.22 per
bu, the gross value of the quota decrease
would equal $259,715 per allocation.
For those entities that are simply renting
their allocation, it is assumed that the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Nov 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
current rental value for a bu of
surfclams is $4.00. The foregone value
of 23,147 bu (1.2 million L) would
equate to $92,590. A 4.4–percent
decrease in the Federal surfclam quota
would subtract 2,234 bu (118,930 L)
from the current average allocation. At
an average ex-vessel value of $11.22 per
bu, the gross value of the quota decrease
would equal $25,060 per allocation. For
those allocation owners renting their
allocation, 2,334 bu (118,930 L) at $4.00
per bushel would equate to a loss of
$8,934.
The alternatives to the proposed
Maine ocean quahog quota include a
50–percent decrease from the status quo
and a 10–percent decrease from the
status quo. Since 100,000 Maine bu
(35,240 hL) is the maximum quota
currently allowed for the Maine ocean
quahog fishery under the FMP, only
quota alternatives equal to, and less
than that amount were analyzed. In
2006, a total of 25 vessels participated
in the Maine ocean quahog fishery. If
the Maine quota were reduced by 50
percent to 50,000 Maine bu (1.8 million
L), 90 percent of the reduction would
likely be replaced by renting ocean
quahog allocation from the ITQ fishery.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
This would equal a total of 45,000 bu
(1.6 million L) rented, at an estimated
$1.00 per bushel. Divided among the 25
vessels in the fleet, the average cost per
vessel would be $1,800. A 10–percent
decrease in the Maine ocean quahog
quota would likely result in 10,000 bu
(352,400 L) being leased from the ocean
quahog ITQ fishery, resulting in a lease
cost of $400 per vessel. Under both
alternatives, those unable to lease quota
shares would just lose the amount they
would have harvested under the
100,000–bu (35,240,000–L) quota.
Reporting and Recordkeeping
Requirements
This proposed rule would not impose
any new reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements.
Therefore, the costs of compliance
would remain unchanged.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 9, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–22381 Filed 11–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 220 (Thursday, November 15, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64187-64190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22381]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No.070717342-7504-01]
RIN 0648-AV42
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic
Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery; Proposed 2008-2010 Fishing Quotas
for Atlantic Surfclams and Ocean Quahogs
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes quotas for the Atlantic surfclam and ocean
quahog fisheries for 2008, 2009, and 2010. Regulations governing these
fisheries require NMFS to publish the proposed quota specifications for
the 2008-2010 fishing years and seek public comment on such proposed
measures. The intent of this action is to propose allowable harvest
levels of Atlantic surfclams and ocean quahogs from the Exclusive
Economic Zone.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than 5 p.m., eastern standard
time, on December 17, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting documents, including the Regulatory
Impact Review (RIR) and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
are available from Daniel Furlong, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic
[[Page 64188]]
Fishery Management Council, Room 2115, Federal Building, 300 South New
Street, Dover, DE 19904-6790. A copy of the RIR/IRFA is accessible via
the Internet at https://www.nero.noaa.gov/nero/regs/com.html.
You may submit comments, identified by RIN 0648-AV42, by any one of
the following methods:
Mail: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator,
Northeast Region, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-2298.
Mark on the outside of the envelope, ``Comments on SC/OQ Proposed
Specifications.''
Fax: (978) 281-9135.
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal https://www.regulations.gov.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (forexample, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian R. Hooker, Fishery Policy
Analyst, 978-281-9220.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Fishery Management Plan for the Atlantic
Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fisheries (FMP) requires that NMFS, in
consultation with the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council
(Council), specify quotas for surfclams and ocean quahogs for a 3-year
period, with an annual review, from a range that represents the optimum
yield (OY) for each fishery. It is the policy of the Council that the
levels selected allow sustainable fishing to continue at that level for
at least 10 years for surfclams and 30 years for ocean quahogs. In
addition to this constraint, the Council policy also considers the
economic impacts of the quotas. Regulations implementing Amendment 10
to the FMP (63 FR 27481, May 19, 1998) added Maine ocean quahogs
(locally known as mahogany quahogs) to the management unit, and
provided for a small artisanal fishery for ocean quahogs in the waters
north of 43 50' N. lat. with an annual quota within a range of 17,000
to 100,000 Maine bu (5,991 to 35,240 hL). As specified in Amendment 10,
the Maine mahogany ocean quahog quota is allocated separately from the
quota specified for the ocean quahog fishery. Regulations implementing
Amendment 13 to the FMP (68 FR 69970, December 16, 2003) established
the ability to set multi-year quotas. An evaluation, in the form of an
annual quota recommendation, is conducted by the Council every year to
determine if the multi-year quota specifications remains appropriate.
The fishing quotas must be in compliance with overfishing definitions
for each species. In proposing these quotas, the Council considered the
available stock assessments, data reported by harvesters and
processors, and other relevant information concerning exploitable
biomass and spawning biomass, fishing mortality rates, stock
recruitment, projected fishing effort and catches, and areas closed to
fishing.
In June 2007, the Council voted to recommend maintaining the 2007
quota levels of 5.333 million bu (284 million L) for the ocean quahog
fishery, 3.400 million bu (181 million L) for the Atlantic surfclam
fishery, and 100,000 Maine bu (35,240 hL) for the Maine ocean quahog
fishery for 2008-2010. The proposed quotas for the 2008-2010 Atlantic
surfclam and ocean quahog fishery are shown in the table below. The
Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog quotas are specified in standard bu
of 53.24 L per bu, while the Maine ocean quahog quota is specified in
``Maine'' bu of 35.24 L per bu. Because Maine ocean quahogs are the
same species as ocean quahogs, both fisheries are assessed under the
same ocean quahog overfishing definition. When the two quota amounts
(ocean quahog and Maine ocean quahog) are added, the total allowable
harvest is still lower than the level that would result in overfishing
for the entire stock.
PROPOSED 2008-2010 ATLANTIC SURFCLAM AND OCEAN QUAHOG\1\ QUOTAS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008 2009 2010
-----------------------------------------------------------
bu hL bu hL bu hL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surfclams \2\ 3.400 1.810 3.400 1.810 3.400 1.810
Ocean Quahogs \2\ 5.333 2.840 5.333 2.840 5.333 2.840
Maine Ocean Quahogs\3\ 100,000 35,240 100,000 35,240 100,000 35,240
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Numerical values are in millions except for Maine ocean quahogs
\2\ 1 bu = 1.88 cubic ft. = 53.24 liters
\3\ 1 bu = 1.2445 cubic ft. = 35.24 liters
Surfclams
In 1999, the Council expressed its intention to increase the
surfclam quota to OY over a period of 5 years (OY = 3.4 million bu (181
million L)). The proposed 2008-2010 status quo surfclam quota was
developed after reviewing the results of the 44th Northeast Regional
Stock Assessment Workshop (SAW 44) for surfclams, issued in January
2007. The surfclam quota recommendation is consistent with the SAW 44
finding that the Atlantic surfclam stock is not overfished, nor is
overfishing occurring. Estimated fishable stock biomass in 2005 was
above the management target, and fishing mortality was below the
management threshold. Even though the total stock biomass is expected
to gradually decline over the next 3 years due to poor recruitment, the
total proposed quota of 3.4 million bu (181 million L), if fully
harvested, would not exceed the fishing mortality threshold. Based on
this information the Council is recommending, and NMFS is proposing, to
maintain the status quo surfclam quota of 3.4 million bu (181 million
L) for 2008-2010. This quota represents the maximum allowable quota
under the FMP.
Ocean Quahogs
The proposed 2008-2010 quota for ocean quahogs also reflects the
status quo quota of 5.333 million bu (284 million L) in 2007. SAW 44
found that the ocean quahog stock is not overfished, nor is overfishing
occurring. Estimated fishable biomass in 2005 was above the management
target, and estimated fishing mortality was well below the target
level. Fishing mortality is not expected to reach the target threshold
if the proposed quota is
[[Page 64189]]
harvested each of the 3 years. Similar to surfclams, the ocean quahog
biomass is expected to decline over the next 3 years. There is some
evidence of recruitment, and small ocean quahogs found in most regions;
however, growth is so slow that initial recruitment of year classes to
the fishery is delayed for about 20 years. Based on this information
the Council is recommending, and NMFS is proposing, to maintain the
status quo quota of 5.333 million bu (284 million L) for 2008-2010.
This quota level is above current market demand, but allows for growth
of the market if conditions change.
The proposed 2008-2010 quota for Maine ocean quahogs is the status
quo level of 100,000 Maine bu (35,240 hL). In 2006, the State of Maine
completed a stock assessment of the resource within the Maine Mahogany
Quahog Zone. This assessment was peer-reviewed as part of SAW 44.
Although landings per unit of effort have declined since 2002, they
remain relatively high overall. The findings of the Maine quahog survey
did not change the status of the entire ocean quahog resource. The
proposed quota represents the maximum allowable quota under the FMP.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
and other applicable law, subject to further consideration after public
comment. This action is authorized by 50 CFR part 648 and has been
determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 603, an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) has been prepared, which describes the economic impacts
that this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A
summary of the IRFA is included in this section. The complete IRFA and
regulatory impact review is available from the Council (see ADDRESSES).
A description of the reasons why this action is being considered, as
well as the objectives of and legal basis for this proposed rule is
found in the preamble of this proposed rule. There are no Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
This action proposes fishing quotas for Atlantic surfclams and
ocean quahogs for 2008-2010. The Council analyzed four quota
alternatives for the Atlantic surfclam fishery, five alternatives for
the ocean quahog fishery, and four alternatives for the Maine ocean
quahog fishery. Each of the alternative sets included the proposed
alternative and a ``no action'' alternative. The three proposed quotas
for 2008-2010 are 5.333 million bu (284 million L) for the ocean quahog
fishery, 3.400 million bu (181 million L) for the Atlantic surfclam
fishery, and 100,000 Maine bu (35,240 hL) for the Maine ocean quahog
fishery.
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which this
Proposed Rule Would Apply
The Small Business Administration (SBA) defines a small commercial
fishing entity as a firm with gross annual receipts not exceeding $4
million. In 2006, a total of 38 vessels reported harvesting surfclams
and/or ocean quahogs from Federal waters under an Individual
Transferable Quota (ITQ) system. In addition, 25 vessels participated
in the limited access Maine ocean quahog fishery, for a total of 63
participants in the 2006 fisheries. Average 2006 gross income from
surfclam ITQ trips was $1,182,713 per vessel, and from ocean quahog ITQ
trips was $1,020,409 per vessel. The Maine ocean quahog fishery
reported an average value of $160,698 per boat. Each vessel in this
analysis is treated as a single entity for purposes of size
determination and impact assessment. All 63 commercial fishing entities
fall under the SBA size standard for small commercial fishing entities.
In addition to the actual vessels that participate in the fishery
there are 55 ocean quahog quota allocation owners, 67 surfclam
allocation owners, and 51 Federal limited access Maine mahogany quahog
permit holders. An allocation owner may choose to fish or lease his or
her quota allocation.
Economic Impacts of this Proposed Action
The proposed quotas for 2008-2010 reflect the same quota level set
for 2005-2007. Therefore, it is not expected that there will be any
different economic impacts beyond status quo resulting from the
proposed quota level. Leaving the ocean quahog quota at the harvest
level of 5.333 million bu (284 million L) is not expected to constrain
the fishery. In fact, actual ocean quahog landings for 2005 and 2006
did not exceed 60 percent of the available quota. The total 2007
harvest is expected to be similar to recent years (as of September 15,
2007, only 45.4 percent of the quota had been harvested). In
comparison, 41 percent of the quota had been harvested as of September
15, 2006.
The surfclam quota is proposed to be set to the maximum allowed
under the FMP. In contrast to the ocean quahog harvest, the surfclam
fishery has harvested over 80 percent of the available quota each year
since 2005. The Maine ocean quahog quota is proposed to be also set at
the maximum allowed under the FMP. The Maine ocean quahog quota is
often fully harvested on an annual basis. It is anticipated that by
maintaining the status quo quota level for the next 3 years the fishing
industry will benefit from the stability of product demand from the
seafood processors and being able to predict future fishery performance
based on past performance from the last 3 years.
Economic Impacts of Alternatives to the Proposed Action
The Council analyzed four alternatives for the Atlantic surfclam
fishery, five alternatives for the ocean quahog fishery, and four
alternatives for the Maine ocean quahog fishery. Each of the
alternative sets included the proposed alternative and a ``no action''
alternative. The selection of ``no action'' alternative would result in
no quotas being established, a closure of the fishery, and is contrary
to the FMP. Based on 2006 ex-vessel prices, the result of no Federal
surfclam or ocean quahog harvests in 2008 would be a loss of $34.3
million to the Federal surfclam fishery, $18.4 million to the ocean
quahog fishery, and $4 million to the Maine ocean quahog fishery, for a
total loss of $56.7 million. The viable alternatives to the proposed
quotas for ocean quahog include a 20-percent decrease from the status
quo, a 6.2-percent decrease form the status quo, and a 20-percent
increase from the status quo. The ocean quahog quota alternatives that
were chosen for analysis represent options within the 4 - 6 million bu
(213 - 319.4 million L) range that is specified in the FMP. Since the
alternative quota levels would not likely constrain the harvest level,
the primary economic impact would come from the change in the lease and
sale value of surplus quota shares. It is estimated that the status quo
lease price per bushel of ocean quahogs is $0.53. A 20-percent decrease
in quota would likely increase the lease value to $1.00 per bu. In 2006
there were over 748,000 cage tags traded (each cage tag equals 32 bu or
1,704 liters). Most tags are traded more than one time. Since NMFS does
not keep records on the transaction costs, the actual value of these
transactions can not be accurately
[[Page 64190]]
determined. However, it is clear that allocation owners who depend
primarily on the lease market would benefit from a decrease in quota at
the expense of harvesters. The other two alternatives each would
increase the quota above status quo. Thus, each would likely have the
effect of devaluing the lease price of a quota share, perhaps
encouraging some allocation owners to sell their quota shares. These
sales could cause further consolidation of quota shares in the ocean
quahog fishery.
The alternatives to the proposed surfclam quotas include a 45.6-
percent decrease from the status quo and a 4.4-percent decrease from
the status quo. The Atlantic surfclam quota alternatives that were
chosen for analysis represent options within the 1.85 - 3.4 million bu
(98.5 - 181 million L) range that is specified in the FMP. A 45.6-
percent decrease in the Federal surfclam quota would subtract 23,147 bu
(1.2 million L) from the current average allocation. At an average ex-
vessel value of $11.22 per bu, the gross value of the quota decrease
would equal $259,715 per allocation. For those entities that are simply
renting their allocation, it is assumed that the current rental value
for a bu of surfclams is $4.00. The foregone value of 23,147 bu (1.2
million L) would equate to $92,590. A 4.4-percent decrease in the
Federal surfclam quota would subtract 2,234 bu (118,930 L) from the
current average allocation. At an average ex-vessel value of $11.22 per
bu, the gross value of the quota decrease would equal $25,060 per
allocation. For those allocation owners renting their allocation, 2,334
bu (118,930 L) at $4.00 per bushel would equate to a loss of $8,934.
The alternatives to the proposed Maine ocean quahog quota include a
50-percent decrease from the status quo and a 10-percent decrease from
the status quo. Since 100,000 Maine bu (35,240 hL) is the maximum quota
currently allowed for the Maine ocean quahog fishery under the FMP,
only quota alternatives equal to, and less than that amount were
analyzed. In 2006, a total of 25 vessels participated in the Maine
ocean quahog fishery. If the Maine quota were reduced by 50 percent to
50,000 Maine bu (1.8 million L), 90 percent of the reduction would
likely be replaced by renting ocean quahog allocation from the ITQ
fishery. This would equal a total of 45,000 bu (1.6 million L) rented,
at an estimated $1.00 per bushel. Divided among the 25 vessels in the
fleet, the average cost per vessel would be $1,800. A 10-percent
decrease in the Maine ocean quahog quota would likely result in 10,000
bu (352,400 L) being leased from the ocean quahog ITQ fishery,
resulting in a lease cost of $400 per vessel. Under both alternatives,
those unable to lease quota shares would just lose the amount they
would have harvested under the 100,000-bu (35,240,000-L) quota.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements
This proposed rule would not impose any new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements. Therefore, the costs
of compliance would remain unchanged.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 9, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-22381 Filed 11-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S