Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800 and -900 Series Airplanes, 64143-64145 [E7-22000]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 220 / Thursday, November 15, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
the joints of the trailing edge flap at support
numbers 3 and 6 with new, improved
components by doing all the applicable
actions, including all applicable corrective
actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777–27A0071, Revision 1,
dated October 16, 2006. Before further flight
after doing the actions, do a detailed
inspection of the components that interface
with the flap support pins for discrepancies
(corrosion, damage, or excessive wear), and
a general visual inspection for any blocked
lubrication paths; and do all applicable
corrective actions. Repeat the freeplay
measurements for the associated trailing edge
flap support at intervals not to exceed 16,000
flight cycles in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777–27A0071, Revision 1,
dated October 16, 2006. Accomplishing the
actions in this paragraph constitutes
terminating action for the actions specified in
paragraphs (f), (g), (h), and (i) of this AD, for
the associated trailing edge flap support only.
Optional Modification for Flap Support
Numbers 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8
(k) Accomplishing the actions specified in
paragraph (j) of this AD at support numbers
1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8, extends the repetitive
intervals for the freeplay measurements
required by paragraph (g) of this AD to an
interval not to exceed 16,000 flight cycles for
the associated trailing edge flap support.
Accomplishing the actions in this paragraph
constitutes terminating action for the actions
specified in paragraphs (f), (g), (h), and (i) of
this AD, for the associated trailing edge flap
support only.
Revise Maintenance Planning Data (MPD)
Document
(l) Within 12 months after the effective
date of this AD: Revise the maintenance
practices for performing periodic inspections
and maintenance of the support joints of the
trailing edge flap for the maintenance
inspection program of the Boeing 777 MPD
Document by doing the actions specified in
paragraphs 1 and 3 only of Part 7 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777–27A0071, Revision 1,
dated October 16, 2006.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Actions Accomplished Previously
(m) Actions done before the effective date
of this AD in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777–27A0066, dated July 28,
2005, are acceptable for compliance with the
actions specified in paragraphs (f), (g), (h),
and (i) of this AD, as applicable. Actions
done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777–27A0071, dated March 30,
2006, are acceptable for compliance with the
actions specified in paragraphs (j), (k), and (l)
of this AD, as applicable.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(n)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Nov 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(o) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin
777–27A0066, Revision 1, dated May 18,
2006; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–
27A0071, Revision 1, dated October 16, 2006;
as applicable, to perform the actions that are
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise. The Director of the Federal
Register approved the incorporation by
reference of these documents in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O.
Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124–2207,
for a copy of this service information. You
may review copies at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington; or at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federalregister/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 2, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–21999 Filed 11–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–27740; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–290–AD; Amendment
39–15256; AD 2007–23–10]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800 and
–900 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Boeing Model 737–600, –700, –700C,
–800 and –900 series airplanes. This AD
requires an inspection of the fillet
sealant at the inboard and outboard
sides of the receptacles in the wheel
wells of the main landing gear, and
related investigative/corrective actions
if necessary. This AD results from
reports of in-production airplanes with
missing or insufficient fillet sealant
around the receptacles at the disconnect
bracket. We are issuing this AD to
prevent corrosion damage due to
missing or insufficient fillet sealant.
Such corrosion could result in
insufficient electrical bonding between
the connectors and the disconnect
bracket, and consequent loss of the
shielding that protects the wire bundles
from lightning, electromagnetic
interference (EMI), and high intensity
radiated field (HIRF). Loss of lightning,
EMI, and HIRF protection at those
receptacles could cause failure of
multiple electrical systems and
subsequent loss of several critical
control systems that are necessary for
safe flight. In addition, a lightning strike
could cause arcing in the fuel tank; this
potential ignition source, in
combination with flammable fuel
vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the
airplane.
This AD becomes effective
December 20, 2007.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of December 20, 2007.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207.
DATES:
Examining the AD Docket
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PO 00000
64143
Sfmt 4700
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527)
is the Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Binh Tran, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S,
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM
15NOR1
64144
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 220 / Thursday, November 15, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
development of this AD. We have
considered the comments received.
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6485; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov or in
person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is located on the
ground floor of the West Building at the
DOT street address stated in the
ADDRESSES section.
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to certain Boeing Model 737–600,
–700, –700C, –800 and –900 series
airplanes. That NPRM was published in
the Federal Register on March 30, 2007
(72 FR 15073). That NPRM proposed to
require an inspection of the fillet sealant
at the inboard and outboard sides of the
receptacles in the wheel wells of the
main landing gear, and related
investigative/corrective actions if
necessary.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
Support for NPRM
Boeing and AirTran Airways support
the NPRM’s proposed actions.
Request for Parts Availability
Accounting
AirTran Airways requests that the
expected parts usage and parts
availability be reviewed and addressed
for feasibility prior to the release of the
final rule to ensure that parts shortages
will not necessitate requests for
unnecessary alternative means of
compliance or adjustments of the
compliance time. The commenter adds
that there are 36 part numbers that
could possibly need replacement if
there is corrosion beyond the acceptable
limits in the service bulletin. Of these
36 connectors, 9 part numbers are not
available; of those, 5 do not appear to
be in the production pipeline. Quite a
few part numbers show less than a
dozen available.
We agree with the request and have
coordinated with Boeing regarding
AirTran’s concern. The NPRM cited
Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737–24–1169, dated December
15, 2006. Since we issued the NPRM,
Boeing has revised the service bulletin.
Revision 1, dated August 6, 2007,
provides optional connector part
numbers, which will ensure adequate
replacement parts for the specified
corrective actions. The remaining
information in Revision 1 is essentially
unchanged. We have revised paragraphs
(c) and (f) of this final rule to refer to
Revision 1 of the service bulletin as the
appropriate source of service
information for the applicability and the
required actions. We have included
credit for actions previously performed
in accordance with the original service
bulletin.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data, including the comments
received, and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described
previously. We have determined that
these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor
increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 333 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
The following table provides the
estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this AD.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Average
labor rate
per hour
Work hours
1 .......................................................................................................................................
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:45 Nov 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$80
Cost per
airplane
$80
Number of
U.S.registered
airplanes
Fleet cost
118
$9,440
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM
15NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 220 / Thursday, November 15, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
I
2007–23–10 Boeing: Amendment 39–15256.
Docket No. FAA–2007–27740;
Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–290–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective December
20, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737–
600, –700, –700C, –800 and –900 series
airplanes; certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–24–1169, Revision 1,
dated August 6, 2007.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of inproduction airplanes with missing or
insufficient fillet sealant around the
receptacles installed in the wheel wells of the
main landing gear (MLG). We are issuing this
AD to prevent corrosion damage due to
missing or insufficient fillet sealant. Such
corrosion could result in insufficient
electrical bonding between the connectors
and the disconnect bracket, and consequent
loss of the shielding that protects the wire
bundles from lightning, electromagnetic
interference (EMI), and high intensity
radiated field (HIRF). Loss of lightning, EMI,
and HIRF protection at those receptacles
could cause failure of multiple electrical
systems and subsequent loss of several
critical control systems that are necessary for
safe flight. In addition, a lightning strike
could cause arcing in the fuel tank; this
potential ignition source, in combination
with flammable fuel vapors, could result in
a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of
the airplane.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection
(f) Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, perform a detailed inspection
to determine if there is sufficient fillet sealant
at the inboard and outboard sides of the
receptacles in the MLG wheel wells, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–24–1169, Revision 1,
dated August 6, 2007. Do all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions
before further flight in accordance with the
service bulletin.
(g) Accomplishment of an inspection and
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions done before the effective
date of this AD in accordance with Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–24–
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Nov 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
1169, dated December 15, 2006, is considered
acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding requirements of paragraph (f)
of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–24–1169, Revision 1,
dated August 6, 2007, to perform the actions
that are required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation
by reference of this document in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O.
Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124–2207,
for a copy of this service information. You
may review copies at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington; or at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to https://www.archives.gov/federalregister/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 2, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–22000 Filed 11–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
64145
Mooresville Heliport, Mooresville, NC,
additional controlled airspace extending
upward from 700 feet Above Ground
Level (AGL) is needed to accommodate
the SIAPs and for Instrument Flight
Rules (IFR) operations at Lowe’s
Mooresville Heliport.
DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC,
February 14, 2008. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part
51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melinda Giddens, System Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, P.O. Box
20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320;
telephone (404) 305–5610.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On June 27, 2007, the FAA proposed
to amend Title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR part 71) by
amending Class E5 airspace at
Mooresville, NC, (72 FR 35209). This
action provides adequate Class E5
airspace for IFR operations at Lowe’s
Mooresville Heliport, Mooresville, NC.
Designations for Class E are published
in FAA Order 7400.9R, dated August 15,
2007, and effective September 15, 2007,
which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1. The Class E designations
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA.
No comments objecting to the proposal
were received.
The Rule
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2007–28366; Airspace
Docket No. 07–ASO–11]
Amendment of Class E Airspace;
Mooresville, NC
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action amends class E5
airspace at Mooresville, NC. Due to the
establishment of two Copter Area
Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning
System (GPS) Standard Instrument
Approach Procedure (SIAP) helicopter
point in space approaches at Lowe’s
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This amendment to part 71 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR
part 71) amends the Class E5 airspace at
Mooresville, NC.
The FAA has determined that this
rule only involves an established body
of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. It, therefore, (1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM
15NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 220 (Thursday, November 15, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64143-64145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-220]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-27740; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-290-AD;
Amendment 39-15256; AD 2007-23-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800
and -900 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800 and -900 series
airplanes. This AD requires an inspection of the fillet sealant at the
inboard and outboard sides of the receptacles in the wheel wells of the
main landing gear, and related investigative/corrective actions if
necessary. This AD results from reports of in-production airplanes with
missing or insufficient fillet sealant around the receptacles at the
disconnect bracket. We are issuing this AD to prevent corrosion damage
due to missing or insufficient fillet sealant. Such corrosion could
result in insufficient electrical bonding between the connectors and
the disconnect bracket, and consequent loss of the shielding that
protects the wire bundles from lightning, electromagnetic interference
(EMI), and high intensity radiated field (HIRF). Loss of lightning,
EMI, and HIRF protection at those receptacles could cause failure of
multiple electrical systems and subsequent loss of several critical
control systems that are necessary for safe flight. In addition, a
lightning strike could cause arcing in the fuel tank; this potential
ignition source, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could
result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective December 20, 2007.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of December 20,
2007.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Binh Tran, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
[[Page 64144]]
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6485; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov
or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is located on the ground floor of the
West Building at the DOT street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section.
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to certain Boeing Model
737-600, -700, -700C, -800 and -900 series airplanes. That NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on March 30, 2007 (72 FR 15073). That
NPRM proposed to require an inspection of the fillet sealant at the
inboard and outboard sides of the receptacles in the wheel wells of the
main landing gear, and related investigative/corrective actions if
necessary.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments received.
Support for NPRM
Boeing and AirTran Airways support the NPRM's proposed actions.
Request for Parts Availability Accounting
AirTran Airways requests that the expected parts usage and parts
availability be reviewed and addressed for feasibility prior to the
release of the final rule to ensure that parts shortages will not
necessitate requests for unnecessary alternative means of compliance or
adjustments of the compliance time. The commenter adds that there are
36 part numbers that could possibly need replacement if there is
corrosion beyond the acceptable limits in the service bulletin. Of
these 36 connectors, 9 part numbers are not available; of those, 5 do
not appear to be in the production pipeline. Quite a few part numbers
show less than a dozen available.
We agree with the request and have coordinated with Boeing
regarding AirTran's concern. The NPRM cited Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-24-1169, dated December 15, 2006. Since we issued
the NPRM, Boeing has revised the service bulletin. Revision 1, dated
August 6, 2007, provides optional connector part numbers, which will
ensure adequate replacement parts for the specified corrective actions.
The remaining information in Revision 1 is essentially unchanged. We
have revised paragraphs (c) and (f) of this final rule to refer to
Revision 1 of the service bulletin as the appropriate source of service
information for the applicability and the required actions. We have
included credit for actions previously performed in accordance with the
original service bulletin.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously.
We have determined that these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 333 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this AD.
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Average Cost per U.S.-
Work hours labor rate airplane registered Fleet cost
per hour airplanes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1........................................................... $80 $80 118 $9,440
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 64145]]
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2007-23-10 Boeing: Amendment 39-15256. Docket No. FAA-2007-27740;
Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-290-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective December 20, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800
and -900 series airplanes; certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-24-1169,
Revision 1, dated August 6, 2007.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of in-production airplanes with
missing or insufficient fillet sealant around the receptacles
installed in the wheel wells of the main landing gear (MLG). We are
issuing this AD to prevent corrosion damage due to missing or
insufficient fillet sealant. Such corrosion could result in
insufficient electrical bonding between the connectors and the
disconnect bracket, and consequent loss of the shielding that
protects the wire bundles from lightning, electromagnetic
interference (EMI), and high intensity radiated field (HIRF). Loss
of lightning, EMI, and HIRF protection at those receptacles could
cause failure of multiple electrical systems and subsequent loss of
several critical control systems that are necessary for safe flight.
In addition, a lightning strike could cause arcing in the fuel tank;
this potential ignition source, in combination with flammable fuel
vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of
the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection
(f) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD,
perform a detailed inspection to determine if there is sufficient
fillet sealant at the inboard and outboard sides of the receptacles
in the MLG wheel wells, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-24-
1169, Revision 1, dated August 6, 2007. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before further flight in
accordance with the service bulletin.
(g) Accomplishment of an inspection and applicable related
investigative and corrective actions done before the effective date
of this AD in accordance with Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-24-1169, dated December 15, 2006, is considered
acceptable for compliance with the corresponding requirements of
paragraph (f) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-
24-1169, Revision 1, dated August 6, 2007, to perform the actions
that are required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of this document in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
Seattle, Washington 98124-2207, for a copy of this service
information. You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or
go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 2, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-22000 Filed 11-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P