Solicitation of Applications for Funding of Congestion-Reduction Demonstration Initiatives, 63951-63956 [E7-22117]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 13, 2007 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 5988] Fine Arts Committee Notice of Meeting The Fine Arts Committee of the Department of State will meet on November 16, 2007 at 11 a.m. in the Henry Clay Room of the Harry S. Truman Building, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will last until approximately 12 p.m. and is open to the public. The agenda for the committee meeting will include a summary of the work of the Fine Arts Office since its last meeting on April 20, 2007 and the announcement of gifts and loans of furnishings as well as financial contributions from January 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007. Public access to the Department of State is strictly controlled and space is limited. Members of the public wishing to take part in the meeting should telephone the Fine Arts Office at (202) 647–1990 or send an e-mail to Craighillmf@state.gov by November 12 to make arrangements to enter the building. The public may take part in the discussion as long as time permits and at the discretion of the chairman. Dated: October 22, 2007. Marcee F. Craighill, Secretary, Fine Arts Committee, Department of State. [FR Doc. E7–22143 Filed 11–9–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–35–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 5963] rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES Announcement of Meetings of the International Telecommunication Advisory Committee SUMMARY: This notice announces meetings of the International Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) to prepare advice on U.S. positions for meeting of the Advisory and Study Groups of the International Telecommunication Union—Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU–T). The ITAC will meet as the ITAC–T to prepare for the ITU–T December 2007 Advisory Group meeting on November 14 and 19, 2007, in the Washington, DC metro area. Both meetings are from 10 a.m.–1 p.m. Eastern Time. A conference bridge will be provided. Meeting details will be posted on the mailing list itact@state.gov. People desiring to participate on this list may apply to the secretariat at minardje@state.gov. The ITAC will meet as the ITAC Study Group B to prepare for the VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:30 Nov 09, 2007 Jkt 214001 January 2008 meeting of ITU–T Study Groups 11, 13, and 19 hosted by COMTECH Telecommunications Corporation in Chantilly, Virginia. The meeting will start at 10 a.m. Eastern Time on December 14, 2007. A conference bridge will be provided. Meeting details will be posted on the mailing list sgb@state.gov. People desiring to participate on this list may apply to the secretariat at minardje@state.gov. The meetings are open to the public. Dated: October 18, 2007. James G. Ennis, International Communications & Information Policy, Department of State. [FR Doc. E7–22140 Filed 11–9–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–07–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 5967] U.S. Department of State Advisory Committee on Private International Law: Public Meeting on the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Draft Legislative Guide on Secured Transactions and its Treatment of Security Rights in Intellectual Property (IP) The Department of State Advisory Committee on Private International Law (ACPIL) will hold a public meeting to discuss the treatment of IP secured financing practices in the UNCITRAL Draft Legislative Guide on Secured Transactions (Guide). At the 40th Session of the UNCITRAL (held June 25 through July 12, 2007), the Commission adopted a portion of the draft Guide, and scheduled adoption of the remaining portion for a second meeting of the Commission to take place in Vienna, Austria December 10–14, 2007. The Commission at its July 2007 session adopted recommendations dealing with the scope of the draft Guide as it relates to IP law and secured financing, as well as the inclusion in the commentary to the Guide of explanatory statements on the treatment of IP as secured financing. The Commission also tentatively approved a new work project on IP law matters as they relate to secured financing law, which would be initiated after conclusion of the Guide in its present scope. The first meeting on the new IP related project may occur in the spring of 2008. A top priority for the resumed Session is final adoption of the revised commentary and draft Guide. The ACPIL will use this public meeting to exchange thoughts on the draft Guide as it relates to IP secured financing PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 63951 matters with a view to determining what areas would need to be addressed in UNCITRAL’s second phase of work. The draft UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Secured Transactions and relevant information can be obtained at https:// www.uncitral.org/english/commission/ sessions. Time: The public meeting will take place at the Department of State, Office of Private International Law, 2430 E Street, NW., Washington, DC on Wednesday November 28, 2007 from 1 p.m. EDT to 5:30 p.m. EDT. Public Participation: Advisory Committee Study Group meetings are open to the public, subject to the capacity of the meeting room. Access to the meeting building is controlled; persons wishing to attend should contact Tricia Smeltzer or Maya Garrett of the Department of State’s Legal Adviser’s Office at SmeltzerTK@State.gov or GarrettM@State.gov and provide your name, e-mail address, mailing address, and affiliation(s) to get admission to the meeting and to get directions to the office. Additional meeting information can also be obtained from Rachel Wallace at WallaceRA@state.gov or telephone (202) 647–2324. Persons who cannot attend but who wish to comment on any of the proposals are welcome to do so by e-mail to Michael Dennis at DennisMJ@state.gov. If you are unable to attend the public meeting and you would like to participate by teleconferencing, please contact Tricia Smeltzer or Maya Garrett at 202–776– 8420 to receive the conference call-in number and the relevant information. Dated: November 6, 2007. Michael Dennis, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Office of Private International Law, Department of State. [FR Doc. E7–22139 Filed 11–9–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–08–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary of Transportation [Docket Nos. OST–2007–0004, FHWA–2007– 0004, and FTA–2007–0004] Solicitation of Applications for Funding of Congestion-Reduction Demonstration Initiatives Office of the Secretary of Transportation (‘‘OST’’); Federal Highway Administration (‘‘FHWA’’); Federal Transit Administration (‘‘FTA’’), Department of Transportation (‘‘DOT’’). AGENCIES: E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM 13NON1 63952 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 13, 2007 / Notices Notice of solicitation for applications to enter into agreements with the U.S. Department of Transportation (the ‘‘Department’’) for funding under any or all of the following programs (collectively, the ‘‘Funding Programs’’) to support qualified congestion-reduction demonstration initiatives: (i) FHWA’s Delta Region Transportation Development Program (§ 1308 of Public Law 109–59) (the ‘‘Delta Region Program’’); (ii) FHWA’s Ferry Boat Discretionary Program (23 U.S.C. 147) (the ‘‘Ferry Boat Program’’); (iii) FHWA’s Highways for Life Pilot Program (§ 1502 of Public Law 109–59) (the ‘‘HfL Program’’); (iv) FHWA’s Innovative Bridge Research and Deployment Program (23 U.S.C. 503(b)) (the ‘‘Innovative Bridge Program’’); (v) FHWA’s Interstate Maintenance Discretionary Program (23 U.S.C. 118(c)) (the ‘‘IMD Program’’); (vi) FHWA’s Public Lands Highway Discretionary Program (23 U.S.C. 202–204) (the ‘‘Public Lands Program’’); (vii) FHWA’s Transportation, Community, and System Preservation Program (§ 1117 of Public Law 109–59) (the ‘‘TCSP Program’’); (viii) FHWA’s Truck Parking Facilities Pilot Program (§ 1305 of Public Law 109–59) (the ‘‘Truck Parking Program’’); (ix) FTA’s capital program for Bus and Bus-Related Facilities (49 U.S.C. 5309) (the ‘‘Bus Program’’); (x) FTA’s capital program for New Fixed Guideway Facilities, including ‘‘Small Starts’’ projects (49 U.S.C. 5309, 49 U.S.C. 5309(e)) (the ‘‘Small Starts Program’’); (xi) FTA’s Alternatives Analysis Program (49 U.S.C. 5339); and (xii) any other discretionary program administered by the Department and designated by the Secretary as a source of funding under such agreements. rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES ACTION: SUMMARY: This Notice solicits proposals to enter into certain agreements with the U.S. Department of Transportation (the ‘‘Department’’). Through these agreements, the Department intends to support congestion pricing along with complementary transportation solutions proposed by jurisdictions designated as recipients of Federal assistance in accordance with this Notice (each, a ‘‘qualified jurisdiction’’). Funds made available by the Department to qualified jurisdictions may include such sums as may be available for obligation in the Department’s discretion during Fiscal Year 2008, including funds designated by law to support the Department’s VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:30 Nov 09, 2007 Jkt 214001 Congestion Initiative, as proposed in the President’s Fiscal Year 2008 Budget. 1 The Department reserves the right to solicit candidates for funding described herein by means other than this Notice. The Department expects to implement the procedures and criteria set forth in this Notice; however, such procedures and criteria shall not be binding on the Department. DATES: Applicants wishing to become qualified jurisdictions must submit their applications on or before December 31, 2007. Late-filed applications will be considered to the extent practical. The Department intends to announce agreements with qualified jurisdictions in Fiscal Year 2008. ADDRESSES: Applicants wishing to become qualified jurisdictions may file their applications electronically via email to Thomas M. McNamara at thomas.mcnamara@dot.gov or through ‘‘grants.gov’’ at https://www.grants.gov. (Please note that solely for purposes of this solicitation, the Department prefers, but does not require, submission of applications by means of the e-mail address above). In the event that either of the forgoing options for submission would impose a hardship on an applicant, the applicant may request an exception by email to the email address above. If an exception is granted, the applicant may send a single copy of its application by U.S. Post or express mail to: Thomas M. McNamara, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., W84–322, Washington, DC 20590. The Department shall only deem applications received via email or through grants.gov (or by U.S. Post or express mail pursuant to an exception) as provided above to be properly filed with the Department. The Department shall deem a single application filed pursuant to this Notice to be properly filed with each of the Funding Programs identified therein, and will not require separate applications to each such program, unless the Department determines otherwise in its discretion. Before using grants.gov for the first time, each organization must register and create an institutional profile at the grants.gov Web site. Applicants planning to apply electronically are encouraged to begin the process of registration on the grants.gov Web site well in advance of the submission deadline. Registration is a multi-step process, which may take several weeks 1 Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2008 (https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/ budget/fy2008/transportation.html). PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 to complete before an application can be submitted. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please address questions concerning this Notice to David B. Horner, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy, U.S. Department of Transportation, at 202–689–4464 (or by e-mail at david.horner@dot.gov). Please address technical questions concerning project development to Thomas M. McNamara at 202–366–4462 (or by email at thomas.mcnamara@dot.gov). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Background Crisis of Congestion. Traffic congestion affects people in nearly every aspect of their daily lives—where they live, where they work, where they shop, and how much they pay for goods and services. According to 2005 figures, in certain metropolitan areas the average rush hour driver loses as many as 60 hours per year to travel delay—the equivalent of one and a half full work weeks, amounting annually to a ‘‘congestion tax’’ of approximately $1,200 per peak time traveler in wasted time and fuel. 2 Nationwide, congestion imposes costs on the economy of at least $78 billion per year. 3 The costs of congestion are higher, however, after taking into account the significant cost of unreliability to drivers and businesses, the environmental impacts of idle-related auto emissions, increased gasoline prices and the immobility of labor markets that result from congestion, all of which substantially affect interstate commerce. Traffic congestion also has a substantial negative impact upon the quality of life of many American families. In a 2005 survey, for example, 52% of Northern Virginia commuters reported that their travel times to work had increased in the past year,4 leading 70% of working parents to report having insufficient time to spend with their children and 63% of respondents to report having insufficient time to spend with their spouses.5 Nationally, in a 2005 survey conducted by the National League of Cities, 35% of U.S. citizens reported traffic congestion as the most deteriorated living condition in their cities over the past five years; 85% responded that traffic congestion was as bad as, or worse than, it was in the previous year.6 Similarly, in a 2001 2 Texas Transportation Institute (‘‘TTI’’), 2007 Urban Mobility Report, September 2007. 3 TTI, 2007 Urban Mobility Report. 4 Northern Virginia Transportation Alliance 2005 Survey (https://www.nvta.org/ content.asp?contentid=1174). 5 Virginia Department of Transportation. 6 National League of Cities survey of cities (2005). E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM 13NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 13, 2007 / Notices rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES survey conducted by the U.S. Conference of Mayors, 79% of Americans from ten metropolitan areas reported that congestion had worsened in the prior five years; 50% believe it has become ‘‘much worse.’’ 7 Solicitation. This Notice solicits proposals to enter into certain agreements with the U.S. Department of Transportation (the ‘‘Department’’). Through these agreements, the Department intends to support congestion pricing along with complementary transportation solutions proposed by jurisdictions designated as recipients of Federal assistance in accordance with this Notice (each, a ‘‘qualified jurisdiction’’). Funds made available by the Department to qualified jurisdictions may include such sums as may be available for obligation in the Department’s discretion during Fiscal Year 2008, including funds designated by law to support the Department’s Congestion Initiative, as proposed in the President’s Fiscal Year 2008 Budget.8 The Department expects to award funding only for those proposals that integrate innovative transit strategies, new transportation technologies and direct highway pricing during congested periods. In return for their agreement to adopt such strategies, the Department will support qualified jurisdictions with financial resources identified in this Notice, regulatory flexibility, and dedicated expertise and personnel. Because the Secretary generally allocates discretionary highway grant funds to State DOTs, applicants that are non-State DOTs applying for discretionary highway funds made available under any of the specified Funding Programs should partner with or submit an application through the State DOT for these funds. B. Funding Programs The Department proposes to support qualified jurisdictions through the following programs: (i) FHWA’s Delta Region Program. The Department may obligate all or part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the Delta Region Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under section 1308 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (or ‘‘SAFETEA–LU’’) (Pub. L. 109–59, August 10, 2005), the FHWA Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may fund projects that 7 U.S. Conference of Mayors survey on traffic congestion (2001). 8 Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2008 (https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/ budget/fy2008/transportation.html). VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:30 Nov 09, 2007 Jkt 214001 support and encourage multi-state transportation planning and corridor development, provide for transportation project development, facilitate transportation decision making, and support transportation construction in the 240 counties and parishes within the eight states comprising the Delta Regional Authority’s region (Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee). Eligible projects must either (a) traverse more than one State and carry interstate commerce or (b) have been identified by the Delta Regional Authority as highways of regional significance, (i.e., on or expected to be on the Delta Development Highway System). Applicants must address the standard requirements for an application to the Delta Region Transportation Development Program as described in last year’s request for applications, found at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ planning/s1308fy07drtdp.htm. The application procedures and deadlines provided in this Notice supersede those set forth in the forgoing hyperlink. (ii) FHWA’s Ferry Boat Program. The Department may obligate all or part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the Ferry Boat Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under section 1801 of SAFETEA–LU, the FHWA Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may fund projects that involve the construction of ferry boats and ferry terminal facilities in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 147. Ferry Boat Program Funds are available for construction/improvement to ferry boats or ferry boat terminals where, among other things: (a) It is not feasible to build a bridge, tunnel, combination thereof, or other normal highway structure in lieu of the use of such ferry; (b) the operation of the ferry shall be on a route classified as a public road within the State or Territory and which has not been designated as a route on the Interstate System; and (c) such ferry boat or ferry terminal facility shall be publicly owned or operated or majority publicly owned if the Secretary determines, with respect to a majority publicly owned ferry or ferry terminal facility, that such ferry boat or ferry terminal facility provides substantial public benefits. Eligible projects may include either ferry boats that carry both cars and passengers, or ferry boats carrying passengers only. Applicants must address the standard requirements for an application to the Ferry Boat Program found at: https:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/discretionary/ fbdinfo.cfm. The application procedures PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 63953 and deadlines provided in this Notice supersede those set forth in the forgoing hyperlink. (iii) FHWA’s HfL Program. The Department may obligate all or part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the HfL Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under section 1502 of SAFETEA–LU, the FHWA Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may fund projects otherwise eligible for assistance under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code that, among other things, (a) use innovative technologies, manufacturing processes, financing or contracting methods that improve safety, reduce congestion due to construction, and improve quality, and (b) constructs, reconstructs or rehabilitates a route or connection on an eligible Federal-aid highway. Applicants must address the standard requirements for an application to the HfL Program as described in an earlier solicitation for projects, found at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hfl/ application_memo.cfm. The application procedures and deadlines provided in this Notice supersede those set forth in the forgoing hyperlink. (iv) FHWA’s Innovative Bridge Program. The Department may obligate all or part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the Innovative Bridge Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under section 5202(b) of SAFETEA–LU, the FHWA Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may fund projects that promote, demonstrate, evaluate, and document the application of innovative designs, materials, and construction methods in the construction, repair, and rehabilitation of bridge and other highway structures, for purposes including—but not limited to—increasing safety and reducing construction time and traffic congestion. Detailed Innovative Bridge Program goals are identified in 23 U.S.C. 503(b)(2). Eligible projects may be on any public roadway, including State and locally funded projects. Funds may be used for costs of preliminary engineering, repair, rehabilitation, or construction of bridges or other highway structures, and costs of project performance evaluation and performance monitoring of the structure following construction. Applicants must address the standard requirements for an application to the Innovative Bridge Program found at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/ibrd/ 032807.cfm. The application procedures and deadlines provided in this Notice E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM 13NON1 rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES 63954 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 13, 2007 / Notices supersede those set forth in the forgoing hyperlink. (v) FHWA’s IMD Program. The Department may obligate all or part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the IMD Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under 23 U.S.C. 118(c), the FHWA Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may fund projects that involve resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation and reconstruction (‘‘4R’’) work, including added lanes to increase capacity, on most existing Interstate System routes. Ineligible projects include those that are located on (a) any highway designated as a part of the Interstate System under 23 U.S.C. 139, as in effect before the enactment of TEA–21, (b) any toll road on the Interstate System not subject to an agreement under 23 U.S.C. 119(e), as in effect on December 17, 1991, or (c) any highway added to the Interstate System under 23 U.S.C. 103(c)(4) and section 1105(e)(5)(A) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Any proposed or future Interstate route is also not eligible for IMD funds. A full listing of the statutory criteria for eligibility of IMD projects is provided in 23 U.S.C. 118(c). Applicants must address the standard requirements for an application to the Interstate Maintenance Program found at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ discretionary/imdinfo.cfm. The application procedures and deadlines provided in this Notice supersede those set forth in the forgoing hyperlink. (vi) FHWA’s Public Lands Program. The Department may obligate all or part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the Public Lands Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under 23 U.S.C. 204(b)(5), the FHWA Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may fund ‘‘any kind of transportation project eligible for assistance under title 23, United States Code, that is within, adjacent to, or provides access to’’ Federal lands or facilities. Under the provisions of 23 U.S.C. 204(b)(1)(A), Public Lands Program funds are available for transportation planning, research, engineering, and construction of the highways, roads, and parkways, and of transit facilities within the Federal public lands. Under the provisions of 23 U.S.C. 204(b)(1)(B), Public Lands Program funds are also available for operation and maintenance of transit facilities located on Federal public lands. Applicants must address the standard requirements for an application to the VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:30 Nov 09, 2007 Jkt 214001 Public Lands Program found at https:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/discretionary/ plhcurrsola3.cfm. The application procedures and deadlines provided in this Notice supersede those set forth in the forgoing hyperlink. (vii) FHWA’s TCSP Program. The Department may obligate all or part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the TCSP Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under section 1117 of SAFETEA–LU, the FHWA Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may fund planning grants, implementation grants, and research to investigate and address the relationships between transportation, community, and system preservation and to identify private sector-based initiatives to improve such relationships. States, metropolitan planning organizations (‘‘MPOs’’), local governments (including, but not limited to, towns, cities, public transit agencies) and tribal governments are eligible for TCSP Program discretionary grants. Non-governmental organizations that have projects they wish to see funded under this program are encouraged to partner with an eligible recipient as the project sponsor. Activities eligible for TCSP Program funding include activities that are eligible for Federal highway and transit funding (title 23, U.S.C., or Chapter 53 of title 49, U.S.C.) or other activities determined by the Secretary to be appropriate. Grants may be used to plan and implement strategies which improve the efficiency of the transportation system, reduce environmental impacts of transportation, reduce the need for costly future public infrastructure investments, ensure efficient access to jobs, services and centers of trade, and examine development patterns and identify strategies to encourage private sector development patterns which achieve these goals. Applicants must address the standard requirements for an application to the TCSP Program found at https:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/tcsp/pi_tcsp.htm. The application procedures and deadlines provided in this Notice supersede those set forth in the forgoing hyperlink. (viii) FHWA’s Truck Parking Program. The Department may obligate all or part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the Truck Parking Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. As directed by section 1305 of SAFETEA–LU, the Secretary established a pilot program to address PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the shortage of long-term parking for commercial motor vehicles on the National Highway System. States, MPOs and local governments are eligible to receive discretionary grants available under this pilot program. Section 1305 allows for a wide range of eligible projects, ranging from construction of spaces and other capital improvements to using intelligent transportation systems (ITS) technology to increase information on the availability of both public and private commercial vehicle parking spaces. Please note that applications to the Truck Parking Program with respect to ‘‘Corridors of the Future’’ may receive priority in consideration and funding under the program. (ix) FTA’s Bus Program. The Department may obligate all or part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the Bus Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under 49 U.S.C. 5309, the Administrator of FTA, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may provide capital assistance for the acquisition of buses and bus-related equipment or facilities. Only capital projects that are eligible under the Bus Program and that improve existing transit service or provide new transit service in a corridor or area that is part of a congestion reduction demonstration shall be eligible for funding pursuant to this Notice. Costs of a project eligible for funding under the Bus Program include the acquisition of buses for fleet and service expansion, bus maintenance and administrative facilities, transfer facilities, bus malls, transportation centers, inter-modal terminals, parkand-ride stations, acquisition of replacement vehicles, bus rebuilds, passenger amenities such as passenger shelters and bus stop signs, accessory and miscellaneous equipment such as mobile radio units, supervisory vehicles, fare boxes, computers and shop and garage equipment. Applicants must address FTA’s standard requirements for an application for Section 5309 capital program assistance found in FTA’s Circular C 9300.1A ‘‘Capital Program: Grant Application Instructions’’ 9 and FTA’s Circular C 5010.1C ‘‘Grant Management Guidelines.’’ 10 (x) FTA’s Small Starts Program. The Department may obligate all or part of such sums available for obligation in its 9 See https://www.fta.dot.gov/funding/grants/ grants_financing_3557.html. 10 See https://www.fta.dot.gov/laws/circulars/ leg_reg_4114.html. E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM 13NON1 rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 13, 2007 / Notices discretion under the Small Starts Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under 49 U.S.C. 5309, the Administrator of FTA, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may provide up to $75 million per project for qualifying fixed guideway capital projects, including certain bus rapid transit projects. Pursuant to its guidance on the Small Starts Program,11 FTA will facilitate worthy projects that are part of comprehensive congestion-reduction strategies, including strategies that incorporate congestion pricing. In its evaluation of projects proposed for funding under Small Starts pursuant to this Notice, an applicant’s designation as a qualified jurisdiction will be an ‘‘other factor’’ taken into account by the FTA pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5309(e)(4)(E). (xi) FTA’s Alternatives Analysis Program. The Department may obligate all or part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the Alternatives Analysis Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under 49 U.S.C. 5339, the FTA Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may fund projects that support technical work conducted within an alternatives analysis, in which one of the alternatives is a major transit capital investment. FTA will give priority to proposals to develop and apply methods to estimate the time savings experienced by highway users that result from transit investments. Applicants must address the standard requirements for an application to the Alternatives Analysis Program found in notice describing the Alternatives Analysis Program at https:// a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/ 01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo. gov/ 2007/pdf/E7–4830.pdf. The application procedures and deadlines provided in this Notice supersede those set forth in the forgoing hyperlink. (xii) Other Assistance. Under the Department’s Private Activity Bond Program, the Department may allocate to qualified jurisdictions authority to issue private activity bonds for qualified projects in order to lower their cost of capital. As of the date of this Notice, the Department may allocate up to $9.5 billion in private activity bond authority not already allocated or applied for. Under the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (‘‘TIFIA’’), the Department may provide qualified jurisdictions direct 11 Please see the terms of the Small Starts program set forth in the Guidance on Small Starts at https://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/ 01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/ 07–2774.pdf. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:30 Nov 09, 2007 Jkt 214001 loans, loan guarantees, and standby lines of credit for qualified projects. TIFIA allows for the support of approximately $10 billion in credit assistance. The Department may provide qualified jurisdictions the authority to institute tolls on portions of their Interstate systems12 and expedite project delivery by waiving certain FHWA regulations (in accordance with FHWA’s Special Experimental Project (or ‘‘SEP–15’’) program or as otherwise permitted by law), and placing key projects on the Environmental Stewardship Executive Order,13 allowing for the streamlining of some aspects of the environmental review process. Finally, the Department may offer extensive technical expertise and advice from world class engineers and economists. C. Application Process Applications to become qualified jurisdictions must be submitted on or before December 31, 2007 (with latefiled applications being considered to the extent practical). The Department expects to sign agreements with qualified jurisdictions, once designated, as soon as possible thereafter. The Department expects implementation or pre-implementation efforts for the proposed congestion reduction activities to commence shortly after an agreement (or series of agreements) with the qualified jurisdiction is signed. 12 As enacted by SAFETEA–LU, the High Occupancy Vehicle (‘‘HOV’’) Facilities Program (23 U.S.C. 166) allows States and localities to convert HOV lanes to high Occupancy toll (‘‘HOT’’) lanes which allow low-occupant vehicle users to pay for the chance to travel on underutilized HOV lanes, shifting traffic from congested regular lanes to HOV lanes, while maintaining free-flowing travel speeds and vehicle throughput performance for all vehicles in the HOV lanes. When operated in parallel with general purpose lanes, HOT lanes offer drivers an option to pay for congestion-free predictable trips when they need it the most, while improving the performance of general purpose lanes. Consistent with 23 U.S.C. 166, FTA has recently published proposed guidance that, once adopted as final, would eliminate certain existing disincentives to jurisdictions to convert their HOV lanes to HOT lanes. In particular the proposed guidance describes the terms and conditions on which FTA would classify HOV lanes that are converted to HOT lanes as ‘‘fixed guideway miles’’ for purposes of the transit funding formulas administered by FTA. See ‘‘Policy Statement on When High-Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Converted to High-Occupancy/Toll Lanes Shall Be Classified as Fixed Guideway Miles for FTA’s Funding Formulas and When HOT Lanes Shall Not Be Classified as Fixed Guideway Miles for FTA’s Funding Formulas’’ (https:// a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/ edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6–14796.pdf). 13 See Executive Order 13274: Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews (September 18, 2002) at https:// environment.fhwa.dot.gov/strmlng/eo091802.asp. PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 63955 While the applicant for consideration as a qualified jurisdiction must be a public body, signatories to an agreement concerning congestion-reducing projects may include city and county governments, metropolitan planning organizations, State transportation departments, chambers of commerce, academic institutions, citizen advisory groups, or other responsible organizations that seek to resolve major congestion problems (any of whom may apply to become a qualified jurisdiction). The Department shall deem a single application filed pursuant to this Notice to be an application properly filed with each of the Funding Programs. Separate applications to specific Funding Programs shall not be required. D. Contents of Application An application to become a qualified jurisdiction should briefly describe, with respect to the metropolitan area proposed, (i) why its traffic congestion is severe, (ii) the local public’s acknowledgement of the problem, (iii) the readiness of the metropolitan area’s political leadership to solve the problem and (iv) a solution to congestion that integrates innovative transit strategies, new transportation technologies and direct highway pricing during congested periods. In addition, an application should be responsive to the specifications and criteria set forth below. The Department recognizes that information provided in an application to become a qualified jurisdiction may be preliminary and incomplete. The Department, in its discretion, may ask certain applicants to supplement the data in their applications to the extent practical. (i) Length of Applications: An application should not exceed 40 pages in length, including both the proposal details and appendix materials. Appendix materials may include maps of roadways and other affected facilities (such as bridges and parallel routes) and maps of BRT routes and other transit services or facilities that are directly involved. (ii) Participating Parties: An application should provide a preliminary, non-binding list of the parties likely to participate in the agreement between a qualified jurisdiction and the Department. (iii) Comprehensive Congestion Reduction Strategy: An application should generally describe the metropolitan area’s proposed comprehensive congestion reduction strategy, and explain how different parts of that strategy, if any, would interact to reduce congestion. E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM 13NON1 rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES 63956 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 13, 2007 / Notices (iv) Congestion Pricing Measures and Affected Areas: An application should describe the role pricing would play in the congestion reduction strategy. To the extent practical, an application should indicate, in specific terms, how traffic would be affected, what areas or routes would be priced, how congestion prices would be determined, and which vehicle categories would be affected (e.g., single occupant vehicles or all vehicles). (v) Transit Services: An application should describe transit services, including BRT and other commuter transit services that are to be provided or supplemented, and the expected impacts of the expanded transit services on congestion. The application should also describe transit fare pricing policies to be adopted with the objective of increasing traveler throughput during peak traffic periods, while avoiding excessive congestion in the transit system. (vi) Use of Technology: An application should clearly indicate the extent to which a locality plans to operationally test innovative technology in achieving its congestion reduction targets. (vii) Expedited Project Completion: An application should indicate any major transportation projects or project components that are sought to be expedited through an agreement with the Department. The application should also indicate the expected effects on congestion from early completion of these projects. (viii) Travelers Affected Daily: An application should indicate the estimated number of daily travelers that will be directly affected by priced facilities and by other measures expected to be adopted by the qualified jurisdiction. This should include the estimated number of persons (vehicles) that will pay congestion charges, as well as the likely number diverted to other travel times, routes, or other transportation services, such as transit. (ix) Research, Planning, and Experience To Date: An application should indicate the prior work that participating parties (e.g., the candidate city or other jurisdictions) have already done to reduce congestion, including research, planning, and actual implementation of congestion related activities in the metropolitan area. (x) Other Time-Frame Considerations: An application should indicate the dates during which applicants expect to conduct congestion reduction activities (e.g., a six-month trial from June 30, 2008 until December 31, 2008). If the applicant expects the activities to continue indefinitely, the application VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:30 Nov 09, 2007 Jkt 214001 should indicate this fact. Similarly, if the pricing activity is adopted on a temporary, experimental basis and the applicant expects it to be voted on by citizens of the jurisdictions participating in an agreement with the Department or otherwise considered for continuation, the application should provide this information. (xi) Funding Support: An application should indicate the estimated cost to implement the overall congestion reduction strategy. An application should also indicate the anticipated sources of those funds, including the amount requested to be covered by Federal sources. (xii) Contact Information: An application should clearly indicate contact information, including name, organization, address, phone number, and e-mail address. The Department will use this information to inform parties of the Department’s decision regarding selection of interested parties, as well as to contact parties in the event that the Department needs additional information about an application. E. Evaluation Criteria The Department will review and consider applications upon receipt, and will consider a variety of factors in reviewing applications seeking funding, including: (i) The extent to which the congestion reduction plan is reasonably projected to reduce congestion from current levels on major highways and arterial facilities within the demonstration area, as measured by projected travel speeds, ‘‘levels of service’’ or other objective measures of performance during the hours when the congestion reduction demonstration is in effect; (ii) The extent to which the congestion reduction plan is reasonably projected to enable improvements in transit service on major highways and arterial facilities within the demonstration area, as measured by projected reductions from current levels in scheduled running times or intervals between departures or other objective measures of performance during the hours when the congestion reduction plan is in effect; (iii) The extent to which the congestion reduction plan demonstrates innovative and potentially far-reaching technology applications; (iv) The project’s national demonstration value; and (v) The technical feasibility and political probability of the project being implemented in the near term. The Department reserves the right to solicit candidates for agreements described herein by means other than PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 this Notice. The Department expects to implement the procedures and criteria set forth in this Notice; however, such procedures and criteria shall not be binding on the Department. Issued in Washington, DC on November 5, 2007. D.J. Gribbin, General Counsel, U.S. Department of Transportation. [FR Doc. E7–22117 Filed 11–9–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ITS Joint Program Office; Intelligent Transportation Systems Program Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: This notice announces, pursuant to section 10(A)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 72–363; 5 U.S.C. app. 2), a meeting of the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program Advisory Committee (ITSPAC). The meeting will be held November 26, 2007, 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. and November 27, 2007, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. The meeting will take place at the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington DC, in Conference Room #6 on the lobby level of the West Building. The ITSPAC, established under section 5305 of Public Law 109–59, Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, August 10, 2005, and chartered on February 24, 2006, was created to advise the Secretary of Transportation on all matters relating to the study, development and implementation of intelligent transportation systems. Through its sponsor, the ITS Joint Program Office, the ITSPAC will make recommendations to the Secretary regarding the ITS program needs, objectives, plans, approaches, contents, and progress. The following is a summary of the meeting’s tentative agenda. Day 1: (1) Welcome and Introductions; (2) ITS Program Overview; (3) Identifying Trends in ITS (Panel Session); and (4) A & A and Wrap-up. Day 2: (1) Reports on Results of ITSPAC Member Interviews; (2) Future Vision for ITS Program (Gaps and Opportunities, What Does Success Look Like?, Implications for the Future ITS Program); (3) Summary of Outcomes (Prioritizing Trends/Programs in Terms of JPO Role E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM 13NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63951-63956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22117]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary of Transportation

[Docket Nos. OST-2007-0004, FHWA-2007-0004, and FTA-2007-0004]


Solicitation of Applications for Funding of Congestion-Reduction 
Demonstration Initiatives

AGENCIES: Office of the Secretary of Transportation (``OST''); Federal 
Highway Administration (``FHWA''); Federal Transit Administration 
(``FTA''), Department of Transportation (``DOT'').

[[Page 63952]]


ACTION: Notice of solicitation for applications to enter into 
agreements with the U.S. Department of Transportation (the 
``Department'') for funding under any or all of the following programs 
(collectively, the ``Funding Programs'') to support qualified 
congestion-reduction demonstration initiatives: (i) FHWA's Delta Region 
Transportation Development Program (Sec.  1308 of Public Law 109-59) 
(the ``Delta Region Program''); (ii) FHWA's Ferry Boat Discretionary 
Program (23 U.S.C. 147) (the ``Ferry Boat Program''); (iii) FHWA's 
Highways for Life Pilot Program (Sec.  1502 of Public Law 109-59) (the 
``HfL Program''); (iv) FHWA's Innovative Bridge Research and Deployment 
Program (23 U.S.C. 503(b)) (the ``Innovative Bridge Program''); (v) 
FHWA's Interstate Maintenance Discretionary Program (23 U.S.C. 118(c)) 
(the ``IMD Program''); (vi) FHWA's Public Lands Highway Discretionary 
Program (23 U.S.C. 202-204) (the ``Public Lands Program''); (vii) 
FHWA's Transportation, Community, and System Preservation Program 
(Sec.  1117 of Public Law 109-59) (the ``TCSP Program''); (viii) FHWA's 
Truck Parking Facilities Pilot Program (Sec.  1305 of Public Law 109-
59) (the ``Truck Parking Program''); (ix) FTA's capital program for Bus 
and Bus-Related Facilities (49 U.S.C. 5309) (the ``Bus Program''); (x) 
FTA's capital program for New Fixed Guideway Facilities, including 
``Small Starts'' projects (49 U.S.C. 5309, 49 U.S.C. 5309(e)) (the 
``Small Starts Program''); (xi) FTA's Alternatives Analysis Program (49 
U.S.C. 5339); and (xii) any other discretionary program administered by 
the Department and designated by the Secretary as a source of funding 
under such agreements.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice solicits proposals to enter into certain 
agreements with the U.S. Department of Transportation (the 
``Department''). Through these agreements, the Department intends to 
support congestion pricing along with complementary transportation 
solutions proposed by jurisdictions designated as recipients of Federal 
assistance in accordance with this Notice (each, a ``qualified 
jurisdiction''). Funds made available by the Department to qualified 
jurisdictions may include such sums as may be available for obligation 
in the Department's discretion during Fiscal Year 2008, including funds 
designated by law to support the Department's Congestion Initiative, as 
proposed in the President's Fiscal Year 2008 Budget. \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2008 
(https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2008/transportation.html).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department reserves the right to solicit candidates for funding 
described herein by means other than this Notice. The Department 
expects to implement the procedures and criteria set forth in this 
Notice; however, such procedures and criteria shall not be binding on 
the Department.

DATES: Applicants wishing to become qualified jurisdictions must submit 
their applications on or before December 31, 2007. Late-filed 
applications will be considered to the extent practical. The Department 
intends to announce agreements with qualified jurisdictions in Fiscal 
Year 2008.

ADDRESSES: Applicants wishing to become qualified jurisdictions may 
file their applications electronically via e-mail to Thomas M. McNamara 
at thomas.mcnamara@dot.gov or through ``grants.gov'' at https://
www.grants.gov. (Please note that solely for purposes of this 
solicitation, the Department prefers, but does not require, submission 
of applications by means of the e-mail address above). In the event 
that either of the forgoing options for submission would impose a 
hardship on an applicant, the applicant may request an exception by 
email to the email address above. If an exception is granted, the 
applicant may send a single copy of its application by U.S. Post or 
express mail to: Thomas M. McNamara, Office of the Assistant Secretary 
for Transportation Policy, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New 
Jersey Ave., SE., W84-322, Washington, DC 20590. The Department shall 
only deem applications received via email or through grants.gov (or by 
U.S. Post or express mail pursuant to an exception) as provided above 
to be properly filed with the Department. The Department shall deem a 
single application filed pursuant to this Notice to be properly filed 
with each of the Funding Programs identified therein, and will not 
require separate applications to each such program, unless the 
Department determines otherwise in its discretion. Before using 
grants.gov for the first time, each organization must register and 
create an institutional profile at the grants.gov Web site. Applicants 
planning to apply electronically are encouraged to begin the process of 
registration on the grants.gov Web site well in advance of the 
submission deadline. Registration is a multi-step process, which may 
take several weeks to complete before an application can be submitted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please address questions concerning 
this Notice to David B. Horner, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Transportation Policy, U.S. Department of Transportation, at 202-689-
4464 (or by e-mail at david.horner@dot.gov). Please address technical 
questions concerning project development to Thomas M. McNamara at 202-
366-4462 (or by e-mail at thomas.mcnamara@dot.gov).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Background

    Crisis of Congestion. Traffic congestion affects people in nearly 
every aspect of their daily lives--where they live, where they work, 
where they shop, and how much they pay for goods and services. 
According to 2005 figures, in certain metropolitan areas the average 
rush hour driver loses as many as 60 hours per year to travel delay--
the equivalent of one and a half full work weeks, amounting annually to 
a ``congestion tax'' of approximately $1,200 per peak time traveler in 
wasted time and fuel. \2\ Nationwide, congestion imposes costs on the 
economy of at least $78 billion per year. \3\ The costs of congestion 
are higher, however, after taking into account the significant cost of 
unreliability to drivers and businesses, the environmental impacts of 
idle-related auto emissions, increased gasoline prices and the 
immobility of labor markets that result from congestion, all of which 
substantially affect interstate commerce.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Texas Transportation Institute (``TTI''), 2007 Urban 
Mobility Report, September 2007.
    \3\ TTI, 2007 Urban Mobility Report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Traffic congestion also has a substantial negative impact upon the 
quality of life of many American families. In a 2005 survey, for 
example, 52% of Northern Virginia commuters reported that their travel 
times to work had increased in the past year,\4\ leading 70% of working 
parents to report having insufficient time to spend with their children 
and 63% of respondents to report having insufficient time to spend with 
their spouses.\5\ Nationally, in a 2005 survey conducted by the 
National League of Cities, 35% of U.S. citizens reported traffic 
congestion as the most deteriorated living condition in their cities 
over the past five years; 85% responded that traffic congestion was as 
bad as, or worse than, it was in the previous year.\6\ Similarly, in a 
2001

[[Page 63953]]

survey conducted by the U.S. Conference of Mayors, 79% of Americans 
from ten metropolitan areas reported that congestion had worsened in 
the prior five years; 50% believe it has become ``much worse.'' \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Northern Virginia Transportation Alliance 2005 Survey 
(https://www.nvta.org/content.asp?contentid=1174).
    \5\ Virginia Department of Transportation.
    \6\ National League of Cities survey of cities (2005).
    \7\ U.S. Conference of Mayors survey on traffic congestion 
(2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Solicitation. This Notice solicits proposals to enter into certain 
agreements with the U.S. Department of Transportation (the 
``Department''). Through these agreements, the Department intends to 
support congestion pricing along with complementary transportation 
solutions proposed by jurisdictions designated as recipients of Federal 
assistance in accordance with this Notice (each, a ``qualified 
jurisdiction''). Funds made available by the Department to qualified 
jurisdictions may include such sums as may be available for obligation 
in the Department's discretion during Fiscal Year 2008, including funds 
designated by law to support the Department's Congestion Initiative, as 
proposed in the President's Fiscal Year 2008 Budget.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2008 
(https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2008/transportation.html).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department expects to award funding only for those proposals 
that integrate innovative transit strategies, new transportation 
technologies and direct highway pricing during congested periods. In 
return for their agreement to adopt such strategies, the Department 
will support qualified jurisdictions with financial resources 
identified in this Notice, regulatory flexibility, and dedicated 
expertise and personnel. Because the Secretary generally allocates 
discretionary highway grant funds to State DOTs, applicants that are 
non-State DOTs applying for discretionary highway funds made available 
under any of the specified Funding Programs should partner with or 
submit an application through the State DOT for these funds.

B. Funding Programs

    The Department proposes to support qualified jurisdictions through 
the following programs:
    (i) FHWA's Delta Region Program. The Department may obligate all or 
part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the 
Delta Region Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects 
sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under section 1308 of the Safe, 
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy 
for Users (or ``SAFETEA-LU'') (Pub. L. 109-59, August 10, 2005), the 
FHWA Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may fund 
projects that support and encourage multi-state transportation planning 
and corridor development, provide for transportation project 
development, facilitate transportation decision making, and support 
transportation construction in the 240 counties and parishes within the 
eight states comprising the Delta Regional Authority's region (Alabama, 
Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and 
Tennessee). Eligible projects must either (a) traverse more than one 
State and carry interstate commerce or (b) have been identified by the 
Delta Regional Authority as highways of regional significance, (i.e., 
on or expected to be on the Delta Development Highway System).
    Applicants must address the standard requirements for an 
application to the Delta Region Transportation Development Program as 
described in last year's request for applications, found at https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/s1308fy07drtdp.htm. The application 
procedures and deadlines provided in this Notice supersede those set 
forth in the forgoing hyperlink.
    (ii) FHWA's Ferry Boat Program. The Department may obligate all or 
part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the 
Ferry Boat Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects 
sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under section 1801 of SAFETEA-LU, 
the FHWA Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may fund 
projects that involve the construction of ferry boats and ferry 
terminal facilities in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 147.
    Ferry Boat Program Funds are available for construction/improvement 
to ferry boats or ferry boat terminals where, among other things: (a) 
It is not feasible to build a bridge, tunnel, combination thereof, or 
other normal highway structure in lieu of the use of such ferry; (b) 
the operation of the ferry shall be on a route classified as a public 
road within the State or Territory and which has not been designated as 
a route on the Interstate System; and (c) such ferry boat or ferry 
terminal facility shall be publicly owned or operated or majority 
publicly owned if the Secretary determines, with respect to a majority 
publicly owned ferry or ferry terminal facility, that such ferry boat 
or ferry terminal facility provides substantial public benefits. 
Eligible projects may include either ferry boats that carry both cars 
and passengers, or ferry boats carrying passengers only.
    Applicants must address the standard requirements for an 
application to the Ferry Boat Program found at: https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/discretionary/fbdinfo.cfm. The application procedures 
and deadlines provided in this Notice supersede those set forth in the 
forgoing hyperlink.
    (iii) FHWA's HfL Program. The Department may obligate all or part 
of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the HfL 
Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by 
qualified jurisdictions. Under section 1502 of SAFETEA-LU, the FHWA 
Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may fund projects 
otherwise eligible for assistance under chapter 1 of title 23, United 
States Code that, among other things, (a) use innovative technologies, 
manufacturing processes, financing or contracting methods that improve 
safety, reduce congestion due to construction, and improve quality, and 
(b) constructs, reconstructs or rehabilitates a route or connection on 
an eligible Federal-aid highway.
    Applicants must address the standard requirements for an 
application to the HfL Program as described in an earlier solicitation 
for projects, found at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hfl/application_
memo.cfm. The application procedures and deadlines provided in this 
Notice supersede those set forth in the forgoing hyperlink.
    (iv) FHWA's Innovative Bridge Program. The Department may obligate 
all or part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion 
under the Innovative Bridge Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support 
eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under section 
5202(b) of SAFETEA-LU, the FHWA Administrator, acting on behalf of the 
Secretary, may fund projects that promote, demonstrate, evaluate, and 
document the application of innovative designs, materials, and 
construction methods in the construction, repair, and rehabilitation of 
bridge and other highway structures, for purposes including--but not 
limited to--increasing safety and reducing construction time and 
traffic congestion. Detailed Innovative Bridge Program goals are 
identified in 23 U.S.C. 503(b)(2). Eligible projects may be on any 
public roadway, including State and locally funded projects. Funds may 
be used for costs of preliminary engineering, repair, rehabilitation, 
or construction of bridges or other highway structures, and costs of 
project performance evaluation and performance monitoring of the 
structure following construction.
    Applicants must address the standard requirements for an 
application to the Innovative Bridge Program found at https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/ibrd/032807.cfm. The application procedures and 
deadlines provided in this Notice

[[Page 63954]]

supersede those set forth in the forgoing hyperlink.
    (v) FHWA's IMD Program. The Department may obligate all or part of 
such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the IMD 
Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by 
qualified jurisdictions. Under 23 U.S.C. 118(c), the FHWA 
Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may fund projects 
that involve resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation and 
reconstruction (``4R'') work, including added lanes to increase 
capacity, on most existing Interstate System routes. Ineligible 
projects include those that are located on (a) any highway designated 
as a part of the Interstate System under 23 U.S.C. 139, as in effect 
before the enactment of TEA-21, (b) any toll road on the Interstate 
System not subject to an agreement under 23 U.S.C. 119(e), as in effect 
on December 17, 1991, or (c) any highway added to the Interstate System 
under 23 U.S.C. 103(c)(4) and section 1105(e)(5)(A) of the Intermodal 
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Any proposed or future 
Interstate route is also not eligible for IMD funds. A full listing of 
the statutory criteria for eligibility of IMD projects is provided in 
23 U.S.C. 118(c).
    Applicants must address the standard requirements for an 
application to the Interstate Maintenance Program found at https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/discretionary/imdinfo.cfm. The application procedures 
and deadlines provided in this Notice supersede those set forth in the 
forgoing hyperlink.
    (vi) FHWA's Public Lands Program. The Department may obligate all 
or part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under 
the Public Lands Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible 
projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under 23 U.S.C. 
204(b)(5), the FHWA Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, 
may fund ``any kind of transportation project eligible for assistance 
under title 23, United States Code, that is within, adjacent to, or 
provides access to'' Federal lands or facilities. Under the provisions 
of 23 U.S.C. 204(b)(1)(A), Public Lands Program funds are available for 
transportation planning, research, engineering, and construction of the 
highways, roads, and parkways, and of transit facilities within the 
Federal public lands. Under the provisions of 23 U.S.C. 204(b)(1)(B), 
Public Lands Program funds are also available for operation and 
maintenance of transit facilities located on Federal public lands.
    Applicants must address the standard requirements for an 
application to the Public Lands Program found at https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/discretionary/plhcurrsola3.cfm. The application 
procedures and deadlines provided in this Notice supersede those set 
forth in the forgoing hyperlink.
    (vii) FHWA's TCSP Program. The Department may obligate all or part 
of such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the TCSP 
Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by 
qualified jurisdictions. Under section 1117 of SAFETEA-LU, the FHWA 
Administrator, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may fund planning 
grants, implementation grants, and research to investigate and address 
the relationships between transportation, community, and system 
preservation and to identify private sector-based initiatives to 
improve such relationships.
    States, metropolitan planning organizations (``MPOs''), local 
governments (including, but not limited to, towns, cities, public 
transit agencies) and tribal governments are eligible for TCSP Program 
discretionary grants. Non-governmental organizations that have projects 
they wish to see funded under this program are encouraged to partner 
with an eligible recipient as the project sponsor. Activities eligible 
for TCSP Program funding include activities that are eligible for 
Federal highway and transit funding (title 23, U.S.C., or Chapter 53 of 
title 49, U.S.C.) or other activities determined by the Secretary to be 
appropriate. Grants may be used to plan and implement strategies which 
improve the efficiency of the transportation system, reduce 
environmental impacts of transportation, reduce the need for costly 
future public infrastructure investments, ensure efficient access to 
jobs, services and centers of trade, and examine development patterns 
and identify strategies to encourage private sector development 
patterns which achieve these goals.
    Applicants must address the standard requirements for an 
application to the TCSP Program found at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tcsp/
pi_tcsp.htm. The application procedures and deadlines provided in this 
Notice supersede those set forth in the forgoing hyperlink.
    (viii) FHWA's Truck Parking Program. The Department may obligate 
all or part of such sums available for obligation in its discretion 
under the Truck Parking Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible 
projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. As directed by section 
1305 of SAFETEA-LU, the Secretary established a pilot program to 
address the shortage of long-term parking for commercial motor vehicles 
on the National Highway System. States, MPOs and local governments are 
eligible to receive discretionary grants available under this pilot 
program. Section 1305 allows for a wide range of eligible projects, 
ranging from construction of spaces and other capital improvements to 
using intelligent transportation systems (ITS) technology to increase 
information on the availability of both public and private commercial 
vehicle parking spaces. Please note that applications to the Truck 
Parking Program with respect to ``Corridors of the Future'' may receive 
priority in consideration and funding under the program.
    (ix) FTA's Bus Program. The Department may obligate all or part of 
such sums available for obligation in its discretion under the Bus 
Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to support eligible projects sponsored by 
qualified jurisdictions. Under 49 U.S.C. 5309, the Administrator of 
FTA, acting on behalf of the Secretary, may provide capital assistance 
for the acquisition of buses and bus-related equipment or facilities. 
Only capital projects that are eligible under the Bus Program and that 
improve existing transit service or provide new transit service in a 
corridor or area that is part of a congestion reduction demonstration 
shall be eligible for funding pursuant to this Notice.
    Costs of a project eligible for funding under the Bus Program 
include the acquisition of buses for fleet and service expansion, bus 
maintenance and administrative facilities, transfer facilities, bus 
malls, transportation centers, inter-modal terminals, park-and-ride 
stations, acquisition of replacement vehicles, bus rebuilds, passenger 
amenities such as passenger shelters and bus stop signs, accessory and 
miscellaneous equipment such as mobile radio units, supervisory 
vehicles, fare boxes, computers and shop and garage equipment. 
Applicants must address FTA's standard requirements for an application 
for Section 5309 capital program assistance found in FTA's Circular C 
9300.1A ``Capital Program: Grant Application Instructions'' \9\ and 
FTA's Circular C 5010.1C ``Grant Management Guidelines.'' \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See https://www.fta.dot.gov/funding/grants/grants_
financing_3557.html.
    \10\ See https://www.fta.dot.gov/laws/circulars/leg_reg_
4114.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (x) FTA's Small Starts Program. The Department may obligate all or 
part of such sums available for obligation in its

[[Page 63955]]

discretion under the Small Starts Program in Fiscal Year 2008 to 
support eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. Under 
49 U.S.C. 5309, the Administrator of FTA, acting on behalf of the 
Secretary, may provide up to $75 million per project for qualifying 
fixed guideway capital projects, including certain bus rapid transit 
projects. Pursuant to its guidance on the Small Starts Program,\11\ FTA 
will facilitate worthy projects that are part of comprehensive 
congestion-reduction strategies, including strategies that incorporate 
congestion pricing. In its evaluation of projects proposed for funding 
under Small Starts pursuant to this Notice, an applicant's designation 
as a qualified jurisdiction will be an ``other factor'' taken into 
account by the FTA pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5309(e)(4)(E).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Please see the terms of the Small Starts program set forth 
in the Guidance on Small Starts at https://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/
257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/07-2774.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (xi) FTA's Alternatives Analysis Program. The Department may 
obligate all or part of such sums available for obligation in its 
discretion under the Alternatives Analysis Program in Fiscal Year 2008 
to support eligible projects sponsored by qualified jurisdictions. 
Under 49 U.S.C. 5339, the FTA Administrator, acting on behalf of the 
Secretary, may fund projects that support technical work conducted 
within an alternatives analysis, in which one of the alternatives is a 
major transit capital investment. FTA will give priority to proposals 
to develop and apply methods to estimate the time savings experienced 
by highway users that result from transit investments.
    Applicants must address the standard requirements for an 
application to the Alternatives Analysis Program found in notice 
describing the Alternatives Analysis Program at https://
a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo. gov/
2007/pdf/E7-4830.pdf. The application procedures and deadlines provided 
in this Notice supersede those set forth in the forgoing hyperlink.
    (xii) Other Assistance. Under the Department's Private Activity 
Bond Program, the Department may allocate to qualified jurisdictions 
authority to issue private activity bonds for qualified projects in 
order to lower their cost of capital. As of the date of this Notice, 
the Department may allocate up to $9.5 billion in private activity bond 
authority not already allocated or applied for.
    Under the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act 
(``TIFIA''), the Department may provide qualified jurisdictions direct 
loans, loan guarantees, and standby lines of credit for qualified 
projects. TIFIA allows for the support of approximately $10 billion in 
credit assistance.
    The Department may provide qualified jurisdictions the authority to 
institute tolls on portions of their Interstate systems\12\ and 
expedite project delivery by waiving certain FHWA regulations (in 
accordance with FHWA's Special Experimental Project (or ``SEP-15'') 
program or as otherwise permitted by law), and placing key projects on 
the Environmental Stewardship Executive Order,\13\ allowing for the 
streamlining of some aspects of the environmental review process. 
Finally, the Department may offer extensive technical expertise and 
advice from world class engineers and economists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ As enacted by SAFETEA-LU, the High Occupancy Vehicle 
(``HOV'') Facilities Program (23 U.S.C. 166) allows States and 
localities to convert HOV lanes to high Occupancy toll (``HOT'') 
lanes which allow low-occupant vehicle users to pay for the chance 
to travel on underutilized HOV lanes, shifting traffic from 
congested regular lanes to HOV lanes, while maintaining free-flowing 
travel speeds and vehicle throughput performance for all vehicles in 
the HOV lanes. When operated in parallel with general purpose lanes, 
HOT lanes offer drivers an option to pay for congestion-free 
predictable trips when they need it the most, while improving the 
performance of general purpose lanes. Consistent with 23 U.S.C. 166, 
FTA has recently published proposed guidance that, once adopted as 
final, would eliminate certain existing disincentives to 
jurisdictions to convert their HOV lanes to HOT lanes. In particular 
the proposed guidance describes the terms and conditions on which 
FTA would classify HOV lanes that are converted to HOT lanes as 
``fixed guideway miles'' for purposes of the transit funding 
formulas administered by FTA. See ``Policy Statement on When High-
Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Converted to High-Occupancy/Toll Lanes Shall 
Be Classified as Fixed Guideway Miles for FTA's Funding Formulas and 
When HOT Lanes Shall Not Be Classified as Fixed Guideway Miles for 
FTA's Funding Formulas'' (https://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/
01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-14796.pdf).
    \13\ See Executive Order 13274: Environmental Stewardship and 
Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews (September 18, 2002) 
at https://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/strmlng/eo091802.asp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Application Process

    Applications to become qualified jurisdictions must be submitted on 
or before December 31, 2007 (with late-filed applications being 
considered to the extent practical).
    The Department expects to sign agreements with qualified 
jurisdictions, once designated, as soon as possible thereafter. The 
Department expects implementation or pre-implementation efforts for the 
proposed congestion reduction activities to commence shortly after an 
agreement (or series of agreements) with the qualified jurisdiction is 
signed.
    While the applicant for consideration as a qualified jurisdiction 
must be a public body, signatories to an agreement concerning 
congestion-reducing projects may include city and county governments, 
metropolitan planning organizations, State transportation departments, 
chambers of commerce, academic institutions, citizen advisory groups, 
or other responsible organizations that seek to resolve major 
congestion problems (any of whom may apply to become a qualified 
jurisdiction).
    The Department shall deem a single application filed pursuant to 
this Notice to be an application properly filed with each of the 
Funding Programs. Separate applications to specific Funding Programs 
shall not be required.

D. Contents of Application

    An application to become a qualified jurisdiction should briefly 
describe, with respect to the metropolitan area proposed, (i) why its 
traffic congestion is severe, (ii) the local public's acknowledgement 
of the problem, (iii) the readiness of the metropolitan area's 
political leadership to solve the problem and (iv) a solution to 
congestion that integrates innovative transit strategies, new 
transportation technologies and direct highway pricing during congested 
periods. In addition, an application should be responsive to the 
specifications and criteria set forth below. The Department recognizes 
that information provided in an application to become a qualified 
jurisdiction may be preliminary and incomplete. The Department, in its 
discretion, may ask certain applicants to supplement the data in their 
applications to the extent practical.
    (i) Length of Applications: An application should not exceed 40 
pages in length, including both the proposal details and appendix 
materials. Appendix materials may include maps of roadways and other 
affected facilities (such as bridges and parallel routes) and maps of 
BRT routes and other transit services or facilities that are directly 
involved.
    (ii) Participating Parties: An application should provide a 
preliminary, non-binding list of the parties likely to participate in 
the agreement between a qualified jurisdiction and the Department.
    (iii) Comprehensive Congestion Reduction Strategy: An application 
should generally describe the metropolitan area's proposed 
comprehensive congestion reduction strategy, and explain how different 
parts of that strategy, if any, would interact to reduce congestion.

[[Page 63956]]

    (iv) Congestion Pricing Measures and Affected Areas: An application 
should describe the role pricing would play in the congestion reduction 
strategy. To the extent practical, an application should indicate, in 
specific terms, how traffic would be affected, what areas or routes 
would be priced, how congestion prices would be determined, and which 
vehicle categories would be affected (e.g., single occupant vehicles or 
all vehicles).
    (v) Transit Services: An application should describe transit 
services, including BRT and other commuter transit services that are to 
be provided or supplemented, and the expected impacts of the expanded 
transit services on congestion. The application should also describe 
transit fare pricing policies to be adopted with the objective of 
increasing traveler throughput during peak traffic periods, while 
avoiding excessive congestion in the transit system.
    (vi) Use of Technology: An application should clearly indicate the 
extent to which a locality plans to operationally test innovative 
technology in achieving its congestion reduction targets.
    (vii) Expedited Project Completion: An application should indicate 
any major transportation projects or project components that are sought 
to be expedited through an agreement with the Department. The 
application should also indicate the expected effects on congestion 
from early completion of these projects.
    (viii) Travelers Affected Daily: An application should indicate the 
estimated number of daily travelers that will be directly affected by 
priced facilities and by other measures expected to be adopted by the 
qualified jurisdiction. This should include the estimated number of 
persons (vehicles) that will pay congestion charges, as well as the 
likely number diverted to other travel times, routes, or other 
transportation services, such as transit.
    (ix) Research, Planning, and Experience To Date: An application 
should indicate the prior work that participating parties (e.g., the 
candidate city or other jurisdictions) have already done to reduce 
congestion, including research, planning, and actual implementation of 
congestion related activities in the metropolitan area.
    (x) Other Time-Frame Considerations: An application should indicate 
the dates during which applicants expect to conduct congestion 
reduction activities (e.g., a six-month trial from June 30, 2008 until 
December 31, 2008). If the applicant expects the activities to continue 
indefinitely, the application should indicate this fact. Similarly, if 
the pricing activity is adopted on a temporary, experimental basis and 
the applicant expects it to be voted on by citizens of the 
jurisdictions participating in an agreement with the Department or 
otherwise considered for continuation, the application should provide 
this information.
    (xi) Funding Support: An application should indicate the estimated 
cost to implement the overall congestion reduction strategy. An 
application should also indicate the anticipated sources of those 
funds, including the amount requested to be covered by Federal sources.
    (xii) Contact Information: An application should clearly indicate 
contact information, including name, organization, address, phone 
number, and e-mail address. The Department will use this information to 
inform parties of the Department's decision regarding selection of 
interested parties, as well as to contact parties in the event that the 
Department needs additional information about an application.

E. Evaluation Criteria

    The Department will review and consider applications upon receipt, 
and will consider a variety of factors in reviewing applications 
seeking funding, including:
    (i) The extent to which the congestion reduction plan is reasonably 
projected to reduce congestion from current levels on major highways 
and arterial facilities within the demonstration area, as measured by 
projected travel speeds, ``levels of service'' or other objective 
measures of performance during the hours when the congestion reduction 
demonstration is in effect;
    (ii) The extent to which the congestion reduction plan is 
reasonably projected to enable improvements in transit service on major 
highways and arterial facilities within the demonstration area, as 
measured by projected reductions from current levels in scheduled 
running times or intervals between departures or other objective 
measures of performance during the hours when the congestion reduction 
plan is in effect;
    (iii) The extent to which the congestion reduction plan 
demonstrates innovative and potentially far-reaching technology 
applications;
    (iv) The project's national demonstration value; and
    (v) The technical feasibility and political probability of the 
project being implemented in the near term.
    The Department reserves the right to solicit candidates for 
agreements described herein by means other than this Notice. The 
Department expects to implement the procedures and criteria set forth 
in this Notice; however, such procedures and criteria shall not be 
binding on the Department.

    Issued in Washington, DC on November 5, 2007.
D.J. Gribbin,
General Counsel, U.S. Department of Transportation.
 [FR Doc. E7-22117 Filed 11-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.