Environmental Impact Statement for the Expanded Moynihan/Penn Station Redevelopment Project, New York, NY, 63643-63646 [E7-22069]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 217 / Friday, November 9, 2007 / Notices
Oregon 97301–4788; telephone 503–
986–2688.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that the FHWA has issued
a Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) and Record of Decision
(ROD) in connection with a proposed
highway project in the State of Oregon.
The Newberg Dundee Transportation
Improvement Project (Tier 1), Oregon
99W, proposes an approximately 11
mile long, four-lane expressway
extending from the eastern terminus,
east of Newberg in the Rex Hill area to
its western terminus where Oregon 99
W intersects with Oregon 18 (McDougal
Corner) west of Dundee near Dayton.
The proposed expressway will be
primarily on new alignment. Decisions
in the Tier 1 ROD include, but are not
limited to, the following:
1. Purpose and need for the project
(see Chapter 1 of the FEIS).
2. Reasonable alternatives that will be
carried forward for further evaluation in
the Tier 2 proceedings (see FEIS Chapter
2).
3. Selection of the highway build
alternative and highway corridor for the
project. The selected alternative is
called Modified 3J, which is a
combination of Alternative 3J and other
build alternatives.
4. Alternatives that have been
eliminated from further consideration
and study, including but not limited to,
those identified in the Tier 1 FEIS as the
‘‘no build’’ alternative, and alternatives
3C, 3D, 3G, 3H, 3I, 3J, 3K and 4C (see
FEIS Chapter 2). Detailed information
about the alternatives considered in Tier
1, and about the Federal decisions that
eliminated alternatives other than
Alternative Modified 3J, is available in
the Tier 1 ROD and Tier 1 FEIS.
Interested parties may consult the
ROD and FEIS for further information
on each of the decisions described
above.
The Tier 1 actions by the Federal
agencies, and the laws under which
such actions were taken, are described
in the Tier 1 Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS) approved on
June 2, 2005, in the FHWA Record of
Decision (ROD) issued on August 26,
2005, and in other documents in the
FHWA project records. The scope and
purpose of the Tier 1 FEIS are described
in sections Chapter 1 of the FEIS. The
FEIS, ROD, and other documents in the
FHWA project file are available by
contacting the FHWA or the Oregon
Department of Transportation at the
addresses provided above. The FHWA
FEIS and ROD can also be viewed and
downloaded from the project Web site at
https://www.newbergdundeebypass.org.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
23:48 Nov 08, 2007
Jkt 214001
This notice applies to all Federal
agency Tier 1 decisions that are final
within the meaning of 23 U.S.C.
139(l)(1) as of the issuance date of this
notice and all laws under which such
actions were taken, including but not
limited to:
1. General: National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–
4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23
U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128].
2. Land: Section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act of
1966 [49 U.S.C. 303].
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Issued on: November 5, 2007.
Michelle Eraut,
Environmental Program Manager, Salem,
Oregon.
[FR Doc. E7–22031 Filed 11–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
Notice of Fiscal Year 2008 Safety Data
Improvement Program (SaDIP) Grant
Application Instructions and Materials
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice is intended to
announce the posting of the Fiscal Year
2008 Safety Data Improvement Program
(SaDIP) Grant Opportunity to Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). A tentative
schedule for the Fiscal Year 2008 SaDIP
grant application and award process is
included with the synopsis and
application instructions. Grant awards
are contingent on passage of the FY
2008 U.S. Department of Transportation
appropriations bill, which includes
FMCSA appropriations, by Congress
and approved by the U.S. President.
DATES: November 9, 2007.
Submit comments or questions by:
November 30, 2007.
Responses will be available on
Grants.gov by: December 14, 2007
Application deadline: January 30,
2008
Grant Awards: End of 2nd Quarter /
Start of 3rd Quarter FY 2008
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Address all comments concerning This
notice to Betsy Benkowski, Department
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63643
of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
202–366–5387 (telephone),
Betsy.Benkowski@dot.gov (Internet
address).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
4128 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU)
established the SaDIP grant opportunity.
The legislation provides discretionary
funding for the States to improve the
quality of crash and inspection data for
large trucks and buses reported by the
States to FMCSA, as established in
Section 31102 of Title 49, United States
Code. Eligible awardees include a State
Agency, the District of Columbia, Puerto
Rico, Northern Mariana Islands,
American Samoa, Guan, and the U.S.
Virgin Islands. Applicants must registrar
with Grants.gov to apply for funding
(https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
get_registered.jsp). Registration with
grants.gov may take two to five days
before the system will allow access to
the grant application package.
Applications should be submitted in
accordance with the instructions
provided and must be submitted in
accordance with the instructions
provided and must be submitted
electronically to FMCSA through the
Grants.gov Web site. The Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
number for the Safety Data
Improvement Program is 20.234.
Potential applicants will be required to
install Pure Edge Viewer in order to se
the form interface under the ‘‘Download
the Application Package’’ hyperlink.
Potential applicants are strongly
encouraged to register their e-mail
address with the system to receive
notice of modifications made to the
synopsis or application instructions.
Issued on: November 6, 2007.
Terry Shelton,
Associate Administrator for Research and
Information Technology.
[FR Doc. E7–22055 Filed 11–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–MC–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Expanded Moynihan/Penn Station
Redevelopment Project, New York, NY
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
63644
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 217 / Friday, November 9, 2007 / Notices
SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to
advise the public that it will jointly
prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) with the New York State
Urban Development Corporation d/b/a
Empire State Development Corporation
(ESDC) to assess the proposed Expanded
Moynihan/Penn Station Redevelopment
Project (the project) in New York City.
The project is a comprehensive public/
private development initiative to
adaptively reuse the historic James A.
Farley Building and the Western Annex
(collectively referred to as the Farley
Complex) as a new train station
(Moynihan West) and relocated
Madison Square Garden, to reconstruct
critical station and circulation elements
at the existing Pennsylvania Station
(Penn Station) referred to herein as
Moynihan East, and to implement
transit-oriented private development.
FRA is issuing this notice to solicit
public and agency input into the
development of the scope of the EIS and
to advise the public that outreach
activities conducted by ESDC and its
representatives will be considered in the
preparation of the EIS. The EIS will be
prepared in accordance the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the
applicable regulations implementing
NEPA as set forth in 40 CFR 1500–1508,
FRA’s Procedures for Considering
Environmental Impacts found at 64 FR
28545 (May 26, 1999), and the New
York State Environmental Quality
Review Act (SEQRA) and its
implementing regulations found at 6
New York Code of Rules and
Regulations Part 617. The EIS will also
address as necessary Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act,
Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of
Transportation Act of 1966 (49 U.S.C.
303) (DOT Act) and other applicable
federal and state laws and regulations.
The EIS will evaluate a ‘‘Preferred
Alternative,’’ a ‘‘No Action Alternative’’
and various build alternatives that
modify elements of the Preferred
Alternative. There are two options
under consideration for the Preferred
Alternative. Under either of these
options, the development of the Project
would occur at the Farley Complex
(Block 755) owned by ESDC and
bounded by Ninth Avenue to the west,
Eighth Avenue to the east, West 31st
Street to the south and West 33rd Street
to the north; the Penn Station Block
(Block 781) bounded by Eighth Avenue
to the west, Seventh Avenue to the east,
West 31st Street to the south and West
33rd Street to the north; the Railroad
Service Building (Block 780, Lot 60)
located mid-block on West 31st Street
across the street from Penn Station; the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
23:48 Nov 08, 2007
Jkt 214001
eastern and western portions of the One
Penn Plaza Block (Block 783) bounded
by Eighth and Seventh Avenues and
West 33rd to West 34th Streets; and the
United States Postal Service (USPS)
Morgan Facility and Annex located on
two full blocks (Blocks 726 and 727)
bounded by Tenth Avenue to the west,
Ninth Avenue to the east and between
West 28th and West 30th Streets ESDC
may also acquire properties on one or
more blocks immediately adjacent to the
Penn Station Block to facilitate the
construction of a loading dock and other
support facilities for Moynihan Station,
and to otherwise further the goals of the
project.
In addition, under one of the two
options being considered, the City of
New York would establish a new zoning
subdistrict (the Subdistrict Option).
This Subdistrict Option would allow
development rights from the Penn
Station Block to be transferred under
certain specified conditions to receiving
sites located within the subdistrict and
at prescribed maximum floor areas. It is
anticipated that the boundaries of the
proposed subdistrict would include
approximately 20 city blocks
surrounding the Penn Station Block,
extending as far south as West 28th
Street, as far north as West 36th Street,
as far east as within 200 feet west of
Fifth Avenue, and as far west as 200 feet
west of Ninth Avenue.
In a related zoning action to be
examined in the EIS, the City, in
connection with the Subdistrict Option
only, has proposed to change the
underlying zoning classifications for a
number of lots or blocks within the
proposed subdistrict from
manufacturing and commercial uses
(M1–5, M1–6, C6–3X, C6–4X and C6–
4M) to C6–4. This zoning change, if
adopted by the City, would allow
residential uses in certain areas where
such uses are not currently permitted by
zoning.
DATES: A public scoping meeting will be
held on December 6, 2007 in the Farley
Building, 380 West 33rd Street, Room
4500, New York, NY from 4 to 8 p.m.
A presentation will be made at 4:30 p.m.
followed by the opportunity for the
public to comment on the scope of the
EIS. Those wishing to speak are
required to register at the meeting
location. At the meeting, comments may
also be submitted in written form.
Persons interested in providing
written comments on the scope of the
EIS should do so by December 17, 2007.
Comments should be sent to Rebecca
Pellegrini, Moynihan Station
Development Corporation, 633 Third
Avenue, 36th Floor, New York, NY 1017
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or Mr. John Winkle, FRA at the address
identified below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information regarding the
environmental review, please contact:
Arnold J. Carter, Sr. Vice President,
Communications, Empire State
Development Corporation, 633 Third
Avenue, New York, NY 10017, (212)
803–3740, or Mr. John Winkle,
Transportation Industry Analyst,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1120
Vermont Avenue, NW., Mail Stop 20,
Washington DC 20590, telephone (202)
493–6067.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
I. Description of Project. The proposed
Expanded Moynihan Project/Penn
Station Redevelopment Project is a
comprehensive initiative, conceived to
address and fulfill the following specific
needs and purposes: to create a modern,
iconic, and efficient major
transportation hub that improves
circulation and passenger and
pedestrian capacity of the Penn Station
complex and expands railroad capacity
and throughput; to create a financially
viable and dynamic mixed-use rail- and
transit-oriented development; to restore
and preserve an important historic
resource; and to provide a unique
opportunity to build a modern and
efficient Madison Square Garden arena
at a major transit hub.
The development program at full
build-out would include:
redevelopment of the Farley Complex
with a new Moynihan West train station
and a new, relocated Madison Square
Garden arena; the construction of a
rebuilt rail station (the Moynihan East
train station) with improved circulation
and train halls to replace the existing
the Penn Station; the construction of up
to 5.4 million square feet in mixed-use
development allowed by the zoning of
the Penn Station Block (accommodated
through on-site development at the
Penn Station block or, alternatively, in
the subdistrict option, through a
combination of 1.1 million square feet at
the Penn Station Block and 4.3 million
square feet of development in the
proposed subdistrict); the construction
of an up to approximately 2 million
square foot commercial building on the
eastern portion of the One Penn Plaza
Block at the Penn East site; the
construction of a 125,000 square foot
retail building on the western portion of
the One Penn Plaza Block at the Penn
West Site (and under the Subdistrict
Option, a larger commercial and retail
building at the Penn West Site using
875,000 square feet of development
rights from the Penn Station Block);
renovation of the Railroad Service
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 217 / Friday, November 9, 2007 / Notices
building for railroad service,
administration or other uses; possible
expansion of the Morgan Annex to
accommodate the transfer of USPS
operations from the Farley Complex (it
is assumed that USPS retail services,
however, would be located elsewhere in
the project area if they do not remain in
the Farley Complex); in one potential
configuration, the construction of a
loading dock and other station-related
support facilities on one or more blocks
immediately adjacent to the Penn
Station Block; and other new
commercial and residential
development within the proposed
subdistrict as a result of a related zoning
action by the City of New York and the
transfer of development rights from the
Farley Complex.
II. Previous Environmental Reviews.
The development of plans for improved
New York City passenger facilities has
been underway since as early as 1991
when the National Railroad Passenger
Corporation (Amtrak) began planning
for a new intermodal transportation
facility. The potential availability of the
Farley Complex led to additional efforts
to devise plans that incorporated
passenger rail facilities in the Farley
Complex. A series of environmental
reviews have accompanied the various
proposals for improvements to the Penn
Station facilities and site, including
most recently draft and final
environmental impact statements that
were issued by ESDC under SEQRA in
January 31, 2005 and April 27, 2006
respectively. While FRA and the USPS
participated with ESDC in the
preparation of these SEQRA documents,
they were not NEPA documents and did
not attempt to specifically satisfy NEPA
requirements. The EIS that is the subject
of this notice of intent will completely
evaluate all of the environmental
impacts of the currently proposed
actions under NEPA and SEQRA and
serve as an original EIS for the FRA but
as a supplemental EIS for ESDC given
its prior efforts under the 2005/2006
state SEQRA EIS process.
III. Problem Identification/Purpose
and Need. The principal public purpose
of the project is the improvement of
transportation facilities above the
existing Penn Station tracks and
platforms. The Penn Station complex is
America’s busiest passenger
transportation facility, handling over
550,000 people daily, which is more
than Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark
Liberty airports combined. Yet the
present station—a three-level, largely
subterranean complex designed to
handle 200,000 passengers per day—is
inadequate to meet the needs of today’s
passengers. The station is already
VerDate Aug<31>2005
23:48 Nov 08, 2007
Jkt 214001
operating above its design capacity and
is expected to experience a rapidly
growing passenger load due to, among
other factors, the growth of the Midtown
business district and the development
expected as a result of the Hudson
Yards Rezoning.
By rebuilding Penn Station and
expanding it within the Farley Complex,
the project aims to improve the
functionality and capacity of station
facilities, increase the reliability and
sustainability of the station, and create
an architecturally distinctive and
welcoming facility that is easily
navigable and understood both within
the facility and at street level. Further,
the project would resolve existing
deficiencies in Penn Station that
include pedestrian crowding,
insufficient passenger waiting areas,
confusing circulation, insufficient and
outmoded employee facilities, and poor
station identification and visibility
within the surrounding area. By
significantly increasing the amount of
public space in the train station, the
combination of both the east and west
station elements creates an opportunity
to establish wider concourses and
improved connections to a renovated
and expanded Penn Station, grand
entrances from Eighth Avenue, and skylit train halls.
Another primary goal of the proposed
project is the preservation of major
portions of the historic Farley Complex,
including the exterior, notably the
Eighth Avenue entrance and
monumental stairs, and certain interior
spaces, such as the USPS retail lobby
and the New York Postmaster’s office.
The adaptive reuse of the historic Farley
Complex would reflect the original
Pennsylvania Station’s role as a
transportation resource and civic
gateway, while preserving and restoring
a designated local landmark and
National Register property.
The project includes major private
sector components as well. Based on an
extensive ESDC Developer Selection
Process, ESDC conditionally designated
a joint venture of the Related Companies
and Vornado Realty Trust (the Venture)
as project developers in July 2005. The
Venture has proposed a revised
development program that includes
relocating Madison Square Garden to
the Western Annex of the Farley
Building and rail- and transit-oriented
development at Penn Station and nearby
development sites. The relocation of
Madison Square Garden to the Farley
Complex will enable Madison Square
Garden to retain its status as an
important civic facility that hosts
sporting events, political conventions,
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63645
memorial services, and related
activities.
The proposed project would include
mixed-use high-rise development
constructed above and around the new
Moynihan Station with up to 5.4 million
square feet of zoning floor area on the
Penn Station block (or, in the
Subdistrict Option, 1.1 million square
feet of new retail development at the
Penn Station block and 4.3 million
square feet of zoning floor of
development in the surrounding area)
and approximately 2.125 million square
feet on an adjacent block (the Penn East
and West development sites). This
development takes advantage of its
unique location at a large transportation
hub and is consistent with New York
State and City public policy that
promotes transit-oriented development.
Additional transit-oriented development
may result from a rezoning that has been
proposed by the City of New York in
connection with the subdistrict option
and by the utilization of unused
development rights from the Farley
Complex at other sites within the
subdistrict.
As a high-profile and large-scale
public and private development
initiative, the proposed project is
intended to be a leader in incorporating
sustainable development principles in
its design and construction. While the
planning, design, and construction
techniques are still being developed, it
is anticipated that buildings located at
the Farley Complex, at Penn East and
Penn West and on the Penn Station
Block will seek to achieve recognition
under the Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED) standards
as established by the U.S. Green
Building Council and in conformance
with city, state, and federal agency
initiatives to integrate sustainable
design standards in public development
projects.
The principal identified federal
government roles at this stage of project
development that trigger the application
of NEPA (and related environmental
and historic preservation statutes and
regulations) involve the availability of
federal funds appropriated by Congress
to the FRA and other Department of
Transportation operating
administrations for improvements to
Penn Station incorporating the James A.
Farley Building, and FRA’s statutory
oversight responsibilities with respect to
Amtrak. FRA does not have a role in the
relocation of Madison Square Garden to
the Western Annex or the development
of the mixed-use high rise components
of the project, both as proposed by the
Venture. Other federal agencies,
including but not limited to USPS, may
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
63646
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 217 / Friday, November 9, 2007 / Notices
participate, as cooperating agencies in
the environmental review to the extent
other federal actions subject to NEPA
are identified.
IV. Alternatives to be Considered. The
EIS will consider the Preferred
Alternative as established by ESDC, a
No Action Alternative and a number of
different build alternatives that would
modify elements of the Preferred
Alternative. These alternatives will
consider ways to accommodate truck
loading facilities at or near the new
station and private development, as well
as different sizes and configurations of
the proposed development.
V. Probable Effects. The FRA and
ESDC will evaluate both project-specific
and cumulative changes to the social,
economic and physical environment—
including land use and socioeconomic
conditions, community facilities and
services, open space, shadows, water
resources, historic and archaeological
resources, visual character and
aesthetics, contaminated and hazardous
materials, transportation, air quality,
noise and vibration, infrastructure,
environmental justice, and cumulative
and secondary effects. The analysis will
be undertaken consistent with NEPA,
the Council on Environmental Quality
regulations, Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act, Section 4(f) of
the DOT Act and SEQRA, along with
other applicable federal and state
regulations.
VI. Scoping Process. FRA invites all
interested individuals, organizations,
and federal, state, and local agencies to
comment on the scope of the EIS.
Comments are encouraged on specific
social, economic, or environmental
issues to be evaluated, on the purpose
and need for the project, and on
reasonable alternatives that may be less
costly, more cost effective or have fewer
environmental impacts while achieving
similar transportation and other
objectives. ESDC has also prepared a
detailed draft scope of analysis as
required under SEQRA and the draft
scope may be obtained from ESDC’s
Web site: https://
www.empire.state.ny.us/default.asp or
from the contacts identified above.
ESDC will be leading the outreach
activities during the public scoping
process, beginning with the scoping
meeting identified under DATES above.
Additional opportunities for public
participation will be announced through
mailings, notices, advertisements and
press releases.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
23:48 Nov 08, 2007
Jkt 214001
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 31,
2007.
Mark Yachmetz,
Associate Administration for Railroad
Development.
[FR Doc. E7–22069 Filed 11–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
[Docket No: FTA–2007–28960]
National Transit Database:
Amendments to Urbanized Area
Annual Reporting Manual
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Final Amendments to
the 2007 National Transit Database
Urbanized Area Annual Reporting
Manual.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice provides final
notice of changes to the Federal Transit
Administration’s (FTA) 2007 National
Transit Database (NTD) Urbanized Area
Annual Reporting Manual (Annual
Manual). Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5335,
FTA requires recipients of FTA
Urbanized Area Formula Grants to
provide an annual report to the
Secretary of Transportation via the NTD
reporting system according to a uniform
system of accounts (USOA). In an
ongoing effort to improve the NTD
reporting system and be responsive to
the needs of NTD data users and of the
transit agencies reporting to the NTD,
FTA annually refines and clarifies the
reporting requirements through
revisions to the Annual Manual. On
September 5, 2007, FTA published a
notice in the Federal Register (72 FR
17564) inviting comments on proposed
amendments to the 2007 Annual
Manual. This notice provides responses
to those comments and announces the
availability of the final 2007 Annual
Manual.
DATES:
Effective Date: November 9,
2007.
For
program issues, John D. Giorgis, Office
of Budget and Policy, (202) 366–5430
(telephone); (202) 366–7989 (fax); or
john.giorgis@dot.gov (e-mail). For legal
issues, Richard Wong, Office of the
Chief Counsel, (202) 366–0675
(telephone); (202) 366–3809 (fax); or
richard.wong@dot.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
The National Transit Database (NTD)
is the Federal Transit Administration’s
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(FTA’s) primary database for statistics
on the transit industry. Recipients of
FTA’s Urbanized Area Formula Program
(Section 5307) and Other Than
Urbanized Area Formula Program
(Section 5311) are required by statute to
submit data to the NTD. These data are
used to ‘‘help meet the needs of * * *
the public for information on which to
base public transportation service
planning * * *’’ (49 U.S.C 5335).
Currently, over 650 transit agencies in
urbanized areas report to the NTD
through an Internet-based reporting
system. Each year, performance data
from these submissions are used to
apportion over $4 billion of FTA funds
under the Urbanized Area Formula
Grants Program. These data are also
used in the annual National Transit
Summaries and Trends report, the
biennial Conditions and Performance
Report to Congress, and in meeting
FTA’s obligations under the
Government Performance Results Act of
1993.
In an ongoing effort to improve the
NTD Internet reporting system and to be
responsive to both the needs of NTD
data users and the needs of transit
agencies reporting to the NTD, FTA
annually refines and clarifies reporting
requirements to the NTD, as contained
in the Annual NTD Module Reporting
Manual. This notice announces the
availability of the final 2007 Annual
Manual.
II. Comments and FTA Response to
Comments
On September 5, 2007, FTA published
a notice in the Federal Register (72 FR
17564) inviting comments on proposed
amendments to the 2007 Annual
Manual. In this announcement, FTA
proposed seven changes:
(1) To require buyers of purchased
transportation service from private
providers to include the service in their
own NTD report, and to no longer
permit private providers of purchased
transportation service to report
separately to the NTD on behalf of the
public provider of transit services;
(2) To require that when one public
transit provider purchases
transportation services from another
public transit agency, that either the
buyer or the seller may report the
service, but that the service must be
reported as being ‘‘directly operated;’’
(3) To require rail transit agencies to
report Average Weekday Unlinked
Passenger Trips and Actual Passenger
Car Revenue Miles by four time
categories: Weekday AM Peak, Weekday
Midday, Weekday PM Peak and
Weekday Other;
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 217 (Friday, November 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63643-63646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22069]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for the Expanded Moynihan/Penn
Station Redevelopment Project, New York, NY
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 63644]]
SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to advise the public that it will
jointly prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) with the New
York State Urban Development Corporation d/b/a Empire State Development
Corporation (ESDC) to assess the proposed Expanded Moynihan/Penn
Station Redevelopment Project (the project) in New York City. The
project is a comprehensive public/private development initiative to
adaptively reuse the historic James A. Farley Building and the Western
Annex (collectively referred to as the Farley Complex) as a new train
station (Moynihan West) and relocated Madison Square Garden, to
reconstruct critical station and circulation elements at the existing
Pennsylvania Station (Penn Station) referred to herein as Moynihan
East, and to implement transit-oriented private development.
FRA is issuing this notice to solicit public and agency input into
the development of the scope of the EIS and to advise the public that
outreach activities conducted by ESDC and its representatives will be
considered in the preparation of the EIS. The EIS will be prepared in
accordance the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA, 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the applicable regulations implementing NEPA
as set forth in 40 CFR 1500-1508, FRA's Procedures for Considering
Environmental Impacts found at 64 FR 28545 (May 26, 1999), and the New
York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and its
implementing regulations found at 6 New York Code of Rules and
Regulations Part 617. The EIS will also address as necessary Section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Section 4(f) of the U.S.
Department of Transportation Act of 1966 (49 U.S.C. 303) (DOT Act) and
other applicable federal and state laws and regulations.
The EIS will evaluate a ``Preferred Alternative,'' a ``No Action
Alternative'' and various build alternatives that modify elements of
the Preferred Alternative. There are two options under consideration
for the Preferred Alternative. Under either of these options, the
development of the Project would occur at the Farley Complex (Block
755) owned by ESDC and bounded by Ninth Avenue to the west, Eighth
Avenue to the east, West 31st Street to the south and West 33rd Street
to the north; the Penn Station Block (Block 781) bounded by Eighth
Avenue to the west, Seventh Avenue to the east, West 31st Street to the
south and West 33rd Street to the north; the Railroad Service Building
(Block 780, Lot 60) located mid-block on West 31st Street across the
street from Penn Station; the eastern and western portions of the One
Penn Plaza Block (Block 783) bounded by Eighth and Seventh Avenues and
West 33rd to West 34th Streets; and the United States Postal Service
(USPS) Morgan Facility and Annex located on two full blocks (Blocks 726
and 727) bounded by Tenth Avenue to the west, Ninth Avenue to the east
and between West 28th and West 30th Streets ESDC may also acquire
properties on one or more blocks immediately adjacent to the Penn
Station Block to facilitate the construction of a loading dock and
other support facilities for Moynihan Station, and to otherwise further
the goals of the project.
In addition, under one of the two options being considered, the
City of New York would establish a new zoning subdistrict (the
Subdistrict Option). This Subdistrict Option would allow development
rights from the Penn Station Block to be transferred under certain
specified conditions to receiving sites located within the subdistrict
and at prescribed maximum floor areas. It is anticipated that the
boundaries of the proposed subdistrict would include approximately 20
city blocks surrounding the Penn Station Block, extending as far south
as West 28th Street, as far north as West 36th Street, as far east as
within 200 feet west of Fifth Avenue, and as far west as 200 feet west
of Ninth Avenue.
In a related zoning action to be examined in the EIS, the City, in
connection with the Subdistrict Option only, has proposed to change the
underlying zoning classifications for a number of lots or blocks within
the proposed subdistrict from manufacturing and commercial uses (M1-5,
M1-6, C6-3X, C6-4X and C6-4M) to C6-4. This zoning change, if adopted
by the City, would allow residential uses in certain areas where such
uses are not currently permitted by zoning.
DATES: A public scoping meeting will be held on December 6, 2007 in the
Farley Building, 380 West 33rd Street, Room 4500, New York, NY from 4
to 8 p.m. A presentation will be made at 4:30 p.m. followed by the
opportunity for the public to comment on the scope of the EIS. Those
wishing to speak are required to register at the meeting location. At
the meeting, comments may also be submitted in written form.
Persons interested in providing written comments on the scope of
the EIS should do so by December 17, 2007. Comments should be sent to
Rebecca Pellegrini, Moynihan Station Development Corporation, 633 Third
Avenue, 36th Floor, New York, NY 1017 or Mr. John Winkle, FRA at the
address identified below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding the
environmental review, please contact: Arnold J. Carter, Sr. Vice
President, Communications, Empire State Development Corporation, 633
Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, (212) 803-3740, or Mr. John Winkle,
Transportation Industry Analyst, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120
Vermont Avenue, NW., Mail Stop 20, Washington DC 20590, telephone (202)
493-6067.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
I. Description of Project. The proposed Expanded Moynihan Project/
Penn Station Redevelopment Project is a comprehensive initiative,
conceived to address and fulfill the following specific needs and
purposes: to create a modern, iconic, and efficient major
transportation hub that improves circulation and passenger and
pedestrian capacity of the Penn Station complex and expands railroad
capacity and throughput; to create a financially viable and dynamic
mixed-use rail- and transit-oriented development; to restore and
preserve an important historic resource; and to provide a unique
opportunity to build a modern and efficient Madison Square Garden arena
at a major transit hub.
The development program at full build-out would include:
redevelopment of the Farley Complex with a new Moynihan West train
station and a new, relocated Madison Square Garden arena; the
construction of a rebuilt rail station (the Moynihan East train
station) with improved circulation and train halls to replace the
existing the Penn Station; the construction of up to 5.4 million square
feet in mixed-use development allowed by the zoning of the Penn Station
Block (accommodated through on-site development at the Penn Station
block or, alternatively, in the subdistrict option, through a
combination of 1.1 million square feet at the Penn Station Block and
4.3 million square feet of development in the proposed subdistrict);
the construction of an up to approximately 2 million square foot
commercial building on the eastern portion of the One Penn Plaza Block
at the Penn East site; the construction of a 125,000 square foot retail
building on the western portion of the One Penn Plaza Block at the Penn
West Site (and under the Subdistrict Option, a larger commercial and
retail building at the Penn West Site using 875,000 square feet of
development rights from the Penn Station Block); renovation of the
Railroad Service
[[Page 63645]]
building for railroad service, administration or other uses; possible
expansion of the Morgan Annex to accommodate the transfer of USPS
operations from the Farley Complex (it is assumed that USPS retail
services, however, would be located elsewhere in the project area if
they do not remain in the Farley Complex); in one potential
configuration, the construction of a loading dock and other station-
related support facilities on one or more blocks immediately adjacent
to the Penn Station Block; and other new commercial and residential
development within the proposed subdistrict as a result of a related
zoning action by the City of New York and the transfer of development
rights from the Farley Complex.
II. Previous Environmental Reviews. The development of plans for
improved New York City passenger facilities has been underway since as
early as 1991 when the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
began planning for a new intermodal transportation facility. The
potential availability of the Farley Complex led to additional efforts
to devise plans that incorporated passenger rail facilities in the
Farley Complex. A series of environmental reviews have accompanied the
various proposals for improvements to the Penn Station facilities and
site, including most recently draft and final environmental impact
statements that were issued by ESDC under SEQRA in January 31, 2005 and
April 27, 2006 respectively. While FRA and the USPS participated with
ESDC in the preparation of these SEQRA documents, they were not NEPA
documents and did not attempt to specifically satisfy NEPA
requirements. The EIS that is the subject of this notice of intent will
completely evaluate all of the environmental impacts of the currently
proposed actions under NEPA and SEQRA and serve as an original EIS for
the FRA but as a supplemental EIS for ESDC given its prior efforts
under the 2005/2006 state SEQRA EIS process.
III. Problem Identification/Purpose and Need. The principal public
purpose of the project is the improvement of transportation facilities
above the existing Penn Station tracks and platforms. The Penn Station
complex is America's busiest passenger transportation facility,
handling over 550,000 people daily, which is more than Kennedy,
LaGuardia and Newark Liberty airports combined. Yet the present
station--a three-level, largely subterranean complex designed to handle
200,000 passengers per day--is inadequate to meet the needs of today's
passengers. The station is already operating above its design capacity
and is expected to experience a rapidly growing passenger load due to,
among other factors, the growth of the Midtown business district and
the development expected as a result of the Hudson Yards Rezoning.
By rebuilding Penn Station and expanding it within the Farley
Complex, the project aims to improve the functionality and capacity of
station facilities, increase the reliability and sustainability of the
station, and create an architecturally distinctive and welcoming
facility that is easily navigable and understood both within the
facility and at street level. Further, the project would resolve
existing deficiencies in Penn Station that include pedestrian crowding,
insufficient passenger waiting areas, confusing circulation,
insufficient and outmoded employee facilities, and poor station
identification and visibility within the surrounding area. By
significantly increasing the amount of public space in the train
station, the combination of both the east and west station elements
creates an opportunity to establish wider concourses and improved
connections to a renovated and expanded Penn Station, grand entrances
from Eighth Avenue, and sky-lit train halls.
Another primary goal of the proposed project is the preservation of
major portions of the historic Farley Complex, including the exterior,
notably the Eighth Avenue entrance and monumental stairs, and certain
interior spaces, such as the USPS retail lobby and the New York
Postmaster's office. The adaptive reuse of the historic Farley Complex
would reflect the original Pennsylvania Station's role as a
transportation resource and civic gateway, while preserving and
restoring a designated local landmark and National Register property.
The project includes major private sector components as well. Based
on an extensive ESDC Developer Selection Process, ESDC conditionally
designated a joint venture of the Related Companies and Vornado Realty
Trust (the Venture) as project developers in July 2005. The Venture has
proposed a revised development program that includes relocating Madison
Square Garden to the Western Annex of the Farley Building and rail- and
transit-oriented development at Penn Station and nearby development
sites. The relocation of Madison Square Garden to the Farley Complex
will enable Madison Square Garden to retain its status as an important
civic facility that hosts sporting events, political conventions,
memorial services, and related activities.
The proposed project would include mixed-use high-rise development
constructed above and around the new Moynihan Station with up to 5.4
million square feet of zoning floor area on the Penn Station block (or,
in the Subdistrict Option, 1.1 million square feet of new retail
development at the Penn Station block and 4.3 million square feet of
zoning floor of development in the surrounding area) and approximately
2.125 million square feet on an adjacent block (the Penn East and West
development sites). This development takes advantage of its unique
location at a large transportation hub and is consistent with New York
State and City public policy that promotes transit-oriented
development. Additional transit-oriented development may result from a
rezoning that has been proposed by the City of New York in connection
with the subdistrict option and by the utilization of unused
development rights from the Farley Complex at other sites within the
subdistrict.
As a high-profile and large-scale public and private development
initiative, the proposed project is intended to be a leader in
incorporating sustainable development principles in its design and
construction. While the planning, design, and construction techniques
are still being developed, it is anticipated that buildings located at
the Farley Complex, at Penn East and Penn West and on the Penn Station
Block will seek to achieve recognition under the Leadership in Energy
and Environmental Design (LEED) standards as established by the U.S.
Green Building Council and in conformance with city, state, and federal
agency initiatives to integrate sustainable design standards in public
development projects.
The principal identified federal government roles at this stage of
project development that trigger the application of NEPA (and related
environmental and historic preservation statutes and regulations)
involve the availability of federal funds appropriated by Congress to
the FRA and other Department of Transportation operating
administrations for improvements to Penn Station incorporating the
James A. Farley Building, and FRA's statutory oversight
responsibilities with respect to Amtrak. FRA does not have a role in
the relocation of Madison Square Garden to the Western Annex or the
development of the mixed-use high rise components of the project, both
as proposed by the Venture. Other federal agencies, including but not
limited to USPS, may
[[Page 63646]]
participate, as cooperating agencies in the environmental review to the
extent other federal actions subject to NEPA are identified.
IV. Alternatives to be Considered. The EIS will consider the
Preferred Alternative as established by ESDC, a No Action Alternative
and a number of different build alternatives that would modify elements
of the Preferred Alternative. These alternatives will consider ways to
accommodate truck loading facilities at or near the new station and
private development, as well as different sizes and configurations of
the proposed development.
V. Probable Effects. The FRA and ESDC will evaluate both project-
specific and cumulative changes to the social, economic and physical
environment--including land use and socioeconomic conditions, community
facilities and services, open space, shadows, water resources, historic
and archaeological resources, visual character and aesthetics,
contaminated and hazardous materials, transportation, air quality,
noise and vibration, infrastructure, environmental justice, and
cumulative and secondary effects. The analysis will be undertaken
consistent with NEPA, the Council on Environmental Quality regulations,
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Section 4(f) of
the DOT Act and SEQRA, along with other applicable federal and state
regulations.
VI. Scoping Process. FRA invites all interested individuals,
organizations, and federal, state, and local agencies to comment on the
scope of the EIS. Comments are encouraged on specific social, economic,
or environmental issues to be evaluated, on the purpose and need for
the project, and on reasonable alternatives that may be less costly,
more cost effective or have fewer environmental impacts while achieving
similar transportation and other objectives. ESDC has also prepared a
detailed draft scope of analysis as required under SEQRA and the draft
scope may be obtained from ESDC's Web site: https://
www.empire.state.ny.us/default.asp or from the contacts identified
above.
ESDC will be leading the outreach activities during the public
scoping process, beginning with the scoping meeting identified under
DATES above. Additional opportunities for public participation will be
announced through mailings, notices, advertisements and press releases.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 31, 2007.
Mark Yachmetz,
Associate Administration for Railroad Development.
[FR Doc. E7-22069 Filed 11-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P