Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts Travel Management Plan, Ashley National Forest; Duchesne, Daggett, and Summit Counties, UT, and Sweetwater County, WY, 63548-63551 [E7-22029]
Download as PDF
63548
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 217 / Friday, November 9, 2007 / Notices
Dated: November 1, 2007.
Michael W. Yost,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 07–5607 Filed 11–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–10–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming
Gorge Ranger Districts Travel
Management Plan, Ashley National
Forest; Duchesne, Daggett, and
Summit Counties, UT, and Sweetwater
County, WY
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to disclose the effects of
designating National Forest System
(NFS) roads and trails available for
public motorized use on the Roosevelt/
Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger
Districts within the Ashley National
Forest. The decision will be to
determine whether to include routes
that are not currently NFS roads or trails
open for public motorized use, establish
a season of use and/or type of vehicle
use for roads and trails, the prohibition
of wheeled motorized vehicle travel off
designated NFS roads and trails by the
public (except as allowed by permit or
other authorization), and change
dispersed vehicle camping designations
from allowing travel up to 300 feet off
road to 150 feet off road. A National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
decision is not required to designate
roads and trails for public motorized
uses that are currently part of the
National Forest System of roads and
trails.
Once a decision is made, a Motor
Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) will be
prepared, in compliance with the 2005
Forest Service Travel Management Rule
(36 CFR Part 212). The MVUM will
show all the routes that are designated
for public motorized use on the
Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge
Ranger Districts. The MVUM will be the
primary tool used to determine
compliance and enforcement with
motorized vehicle use designations on
the forest. Those existing routes and
other non-system routes not designated
open on the MVUM will be legally
closed to motorized travel. The
decisions on motorized travel will not
include motorized over-the-snow travel.
DATES: The comment period on the
proposed action will extend 45 days
VerDate Aug<31>2005
23:48 Nov 08, 2007
Jkt 214001
from the date the Notice of Intent is
published in the Federal Register. The
draft environmental impact statement is
expected July 2008 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected November 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Kris Rutledge, Travel Management
Team Coordinator, Ashley National
Forest 355 N Vernal Ave., Vernal, UT
84078 or call (435) 781–5196.
Electronic comments may be e-mailed
to comments-intermtn-ashley@fs.fed.us,
contain ‘‘Roosevelt/Duchesne and
Flaming Gorge Ranger District Travel
Management Plan’’ in the subject line,
and must be submitted in MS Word
(*.doc) or rich text format (*.rtf).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kris
Rutledge, Project Coordinator, at the
Ashley National Forest 355 N. Vernal
Ave., Vernal, UT., by phone (435) 781–
5196, or e-mail krutledge@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: There will
be a concurrent NOI and scoping for the
Vernal Ranger District Travel
Management Plan. The Vernal Ranger
District is also located within the
Ashley National Forest. However,
because of differences in travel
management within this District that
currently allow motorized use on
existing, non-designated routes in
certain areas, and the large number of
user-created routes on this District, it is
anticipated that the assessment for the
EIS will take longer than for the
Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge
Ranger Districts. Therefore, the analysis
will be completed separately and at a
later date. Cumulative effects will be
analyzed for both EISs.
Purpose and Need for Action
The Ashley National Forest has
determined that there is a need to
improve management and enforcement
of off-highway vehicle travel policy on
the Forest. This need includes three
fundamental management
considerations.
1. The need to better accommodate
current motorized use and to address
future growth. There has been rapid
growth in OHV use that was not
anticipated when the 1982 Ashley
National Forest Plan was written. Over
the past few decades, the availability
and capability of motorized vehicles,
particularly off-highway vehicles
(OHVs) and sport utility vehicles (SUVs)
has increased tremendously. Utah is
experiencing a high level of OHV use
(196 % increase in eight years), with an
even greater increase in use in the
Uintah Basin (360% increase in eight
years).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. The need to have a travel plans that
is simple to understand and implement,
and consistent with other Forests and
land management agencies. The model
used for the existing travel plan relies
on ‘‘open unless signed or mapped
closed’’ designations that are
complicated to interpret and, as a result,
are difficult to enforce. The lack of
simple and consistent travel policies
among other Forests and land
management agencies is confusing for
the public; inhibits cooperative law
enforcement; and has resulted in
unplanned roads and trails, erosion,
watershed and habitat degradation, and
detrimental impacts to cultural resource
sites. Compaction and erosion are the
primary effects of OHV use on soils.
Riparian areas and aquatic dependent
species are particularly vulnerable to
OHV use. The Travel Management Rule,
36 CFR Part 212, provides policy for
ending this trend of unauthorized route
proliferation and managing the Forest
transportation system in a sustainable
manner through designation of
motorized NFS roads, trails, and areas,
and the prohibition of cross-country
travel.
3. The need for changes to the existing
transportation system. This will help
provide wheeled, motorized access to
dispersed recreation opportunities
(camping, hunting, fishing, hiking,
horseback riding, etc.); provide a
diversity of wheeled motorized
recreation opportunities (4X4 vehicles,
motorcycles, ATVs, passenger vehicles,
etc.); and reduce the potential for OHV
conflicts and impacts to other resource
uses and values.
It is Forest Service policy to provide
a diversity of road and trail
opportunities for experiencing a variety
of environments and modes of travel
consistent with the National Forest
recreation role and land capability (FSM
2353.03(2)). In meeting these needs, the
proposed action must also achieve the
following purposes:
A. Avoid impacts to cultural
resources.
B. Provide for public safety.
C. Provide for a diversity of
recreational opportunities.
D. Assure adequate access to public
and private lands.
E. Provide for adequate maintenance
and administration of designations
based on availability of resources and
funding to do so.
F. Minimize damage to soil,
vegetation and other forest resources.
G. Avoid harassment of wildlife and
significant disruption of wildlife
habitat.
H. Minimize conflicts between
wheeled motor vehicles and existing or
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 217 / Friday, November 9, 2007 / Notices
proposed recreational uses of NFS
lands.
I. Minimize conflicts among different
classes of wheeled motor vehicle uses of
NFS lands or neighboring federal lands.
J. Assure compatibility of wheeled
motor vehicle use with existing
conditions in populated areas, taking
into account sound, emissions, etc.
K. Assure compatibility of motorized
vehicle use within Inventoried Roadless
Areas according to 3CFR294.12a.
L. Have valid existing rights of use
and access (rights-of-way).
M. Provide consistency of use on
roads that cross jurisdictional
boundaries.
N. Include consideration for
compatibility with existing Potential for
Wilderness Evaluation studies.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Proposed Action
The proposed action has been
developed by tentatively designating a
motorized travel plan that moves
towards desired conditions identified in
the pre-project assessment. The
proposed travel plan was compared to
the existing travel plan to identify
changes from current conditions. The
proposed action includes addition of
non-system routes, closure of system
routes, and identification of current
system routes where a change in use or
route classification is needed to create
the desired travel plan.
The designations will set specific
seasons of use, where appropriate, and
specify the type of use (e.g., street legal
vehicle, OHVs, 4-wheel drive) for roads
and trails. The Forest Service will
produce a Motor Vehicle Use Map
(MVUM) depicting those routes that are
open to the general public for wheeled
motorized use. The final
implementation of the MVUM will
include consideration of any conflicts
with special use permits, easements, or
rights of use that may have been
unknown or not identified at the time of
the proposed action.
A consequence of designating routes
open for public motorized travel is that
existing routes not designated as open
would not be available for public
motorized travel.
1. Changes in Mileage to the National
Forest Transportation System
The Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger
District currently manages and
maintains approximately 539 miles of
NFS roads and 41 miles of NFS
motorized trails. Based on the stated
purpose and need for action, the
Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District
proposes to add approximately 5.80
miles of existing unauthorized routes to
its NFS roads; add 12.39 miles to its
VerDate Aug<31>2005
23:48 Nov 08, 2007
Jkt 214001
motorized trail system; restrict
motorized travel on 4.48 miles of NFS
roads, including the seasonal closure of
1.22 miles of NFS road; and to restrict
through seasonal closure 0.67 miles of
motorized trails. These changes would
bring the total NFS roads on the
Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District to
approximately 540.32 miles and the
miles of the motorized trails to 52.72.
The Flaming Gorge Ranger District
currently manages and maintains
approximately 434 miles of NFS roads
and 21 miles of motorized trail system.
Based on the stated purpose and need
for action, the Flaming Gorge Ranger
District proposes to add approximately
63.84 miles of existing unauthorized
routes to its NFS roads; add 8.82 miles
to its motorized trail system; and to
restrict motorized travel on 0.29 miles of
NFS roads and 3.68 miles of NFS
motorized trails. These changes would
bring the total NFS roads on the
Flaming Gorge Ranger District to
approximately 497.55 miles and the
NFS motorized trails to 26.14 miles.
2. Allowing Non-Street Legal Vehicles
(OHVS) Access to NFS Roads Currently
Open to Street Legal Vehicles Only
The Ashley National Forest
maintenance level 3, 4, and 5 roads are
subject to State traffic laws (36 CFR
212.5 (a)(1). Level 5 roads are open to
highway legal vehicles only and are
shown on the current travel maps as
Highway and Improved Paved Roads.
Maintenance level 3 and 4 roads are
suitable for passenger cars and are
shown on the current travel maps as
Improved Roads that are gravel or native
dirt. Maintenance level 2 roads include
4-wheel drive vehicles and are not
suitable for passenger cars. These roads
are shown on the current travel maps as
Unimproved Roads. Both improved
gravel or dirt and unimproved roads
may be managed for street legal vehicles
only, or a mix of street legal and nonstreet legal vehicles (OHVs). This is
referred to as ‘‘mixed traffic’’.
The Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger
District proposes to add mixed traffic
use to 2.87 miles of road that are
currently designated for street legal
vehicles only. The Roosevelt/Duchesne
Ranger District proposes to change .15
miles of road currently designated as
mixed traffic use to allow only street
legal vehicle use and allow mixed traffic
on 1.92 miles of motorized trail. The
Flaming Gorge Ranger District proposes
to add mixed traffic use to 17.67 miles
of road that are currently designated for
street legal vehicles only.
The change of motorized use on an
open NFS road does not require NEPA.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63549
3. Allowing Motorized Access to NFS
Roads That Are Currently Closed
The Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger
District is not proposing to open NFS
roads that are currently closed to public
motorized access. The Flaming Gorge
Ranger District is proposing to open
8.04 miles of NFS roads and .71 miles
of motorized trail that are currently
closed to public motorized access. This
includes the removal of a seasonal
closure on 5.99 miles of NFS roads.
4. Change the Allowable Distance for
Motorized Dispersed Camping Off a
Designated Road or Motorized Trail
From 300 to 150 Feet
The current travel plan allows
motorized dispersed camping up to 300
feet from a designated motorized route.
In order to establish consistency with
other National Forests in Utah, the
allowable area for motorized dispersed
camping will be reduced to 150 feet
from a designated motorized route.
The Ashley National Forest
recognizes its unique niche for
dispersed camping and plans to
continue to offer a multitude of
dispersed camping opportunities where
appropriate. With this in mind, the
Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge
Ranger Districts have closely examined
routes that provide this opportunity.
Many sites (especially on the Flaming
Gorge) access a multitude of recreational
opportunities, such as fishing or
hunting, as well as dispersed camping
and have been included in the proposals
outlined in Item 1 above.
In addition, the Roosevelt/Duchesne
Ranger District has been inventorying
existing numerous short routes that are
appropriately used for dispersed
camping, but are further than 150 feet
from a designated motorized route.
Those routes meeting an initial review
are shown as ‘‘Potential Dispersed
Camping Routes under Consideration’’
on the proposed action map. A
determination of type of vehicle class
for these routes will also be required. It
is anticipated that most routes will be
designated as mixed traffic use roads or
motorized trails greater than 50 inches.
There are 15.28 miles of Potential
Dispersed Camping Routes under
Consideration being proposed by the
Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District.
Note: Maps describing the existing
transportation system and maps and tables
describing the proposed action can found at
https://www.fs.fed.us/r4/ashley/projects/
travel_management. In addition, the maps
and tables will be available for viewing at:
Supervisor’s Office, 355 N. Vernal Ave.,
Vernal, UT 84078. Roosevelt Ranger District,
650 W. Highway 40 Roosevelt, UT 84066.
Duchesne Ranger District, 85 W. Main
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
63550
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 217 / Friday, November 9, 2007 / Notices
Duchesne, UT 84021. Flaming Gorge Ranger
District, Intersection of Highways 43 and 44,
Manila, UT 84046.
Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge
Ranger Districts Travel Management
Plan.
No Action Alternative
The No Action Alternative would be
to designate all of the motorized system
roads and trails as identified in the
existing travel management plans for
Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge
Ranger Districts, and would not address
existing routes that are identified as
unauthorized (i.e. non-system) routes by
the Forest Service. Those existing routes
not designated as open would not be
available for public motorized travel.
The opportunity to motorize disperse
camp up to 300 feet from a designated
motorized route would continue to be
available.
Scoping Process
Possible Alternatives
The Forest is expecting that the public
input will generate either thematic
concerns or route-specific issues that
may be addressed by modifying the
proposed action to create a new
alternative or alternatives.
Decommissioning or obliterating of
routes, which may involve grounddisturbing activities, would be a part of
the Proposed Action or alternatives. The
environmental consequences of having
routes closed to motorized travel will be
evaluated in this environmental
analysis. Identification of new routes
that would meet the goals and objectives
for a motorized transportation system on
NFS lands will be, as appropriate, a part
of this travel management planning.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official is Kevin
Elliott, Forest Supervisor, Ashley
National Forest, 355 N. Vernal Ave.,
Vernal, UT 84078.
Nature of Decision to be Made
Based on the purpose and need for the
proposed action, the Forest Supervisor
will evaluate the Proposed Action and
other alternatives in order to make the
following decisions for the specific
National Forest System lands:
1. Designating or eliminating
unclassified travel ways;
2. Determine the allowed season and/
or type of use for those routes open to
motorized travel; and
3. Determine if any changes in the
extent and nature of motorized
dispersed camping are warranted.
Travel management direction for
routes that will not have a change in
travel management direction will be
shown on the MVUM (pursuant to 36
CFR part 212). Routes, for which travel
management direction is being changed,
will be analyzed in the EIS for the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
23:48 Nov 08, 2007
Jkt 214001
Public participation will be especially
important at several points during the
analysis. The Forest Service will be
seeking information, comments, and
assistance from the federal, state, tribal,
local agencies, and other individuals or
organizations that may be interested in
or affected by the proposed action. A
series of public opportunities are
scheduled to explain the proposed
travel plan and route designation
process and to provide an opportunity
for public input. Dates for these scoping
meetings will be posted on the Ashley
National Forest web page at https://
www.fs.fed.us/r4/ashley/projects/
travelmanagement and in local
newspapers prior to the meetings.
The Forest Service will consider all
public scoping comments and concerns
that have been submitted, as well as
resource related input from the
interdisciplinary team and other agency
resource specialists. This input will be
used to identify issues to consider in the
environmental analysis. A
comprehensive list of issues will be
determined before the full range of
alternatives is developed and the
environmental analysis is begun.
The Notice of Intent is expected to be
published in the Federal Register. The
comment period on the proposed action
will extend 45 days from the date the
Notice of Intent is published in the
Federal Register.
The draft environmental impact
statement is expected to be filed with
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and to be available for public
review by July 2008. EPA will publish
a notice of availability of the draft EIS
in the Federal Register. The comment
period on the draft EIS will extend 45
days from the date the EPA notice
appears in the Federal Register. At that
time, copies of the draft EIS will be
distributed to interested and affected
agencies, organizations, and members of
the public for their review and
comment. It is very important that those
interested in the management of the
Ashley National Forest participate at
that time.
The final EIS is scheduled to be
completed November 2008. In the final
EIS, the Forest Service is required to
respond to comments received during
the comment period that pertain to the
environmental consequences discussed
in the draft EIS and applicable laws,
regulations, and policies considered in
making the decision.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Preliminary Issues
Important goals for the project are to
create a motorized travel plan that is
simple to understand, consistent with
other public land management agencies
in Utah, and is enforceable. Protections
for threatened and endangered animal
and plant habitats, cultural resources,
roadless considerations, and the need to
maintain motorized and non-motorized
recreational opportunities have also
directed the development and design of
the proposed action.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process that guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact
statement will be prepared for comment.
The comment period on the draft
environmental impact statement will be
45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). In
addition, environmental objections that
could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage
but that are not raised until after
completion of the final environmental
impact statement may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v.
Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980). Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the comment
period so that substantive comments
and objections are made available to the
Forest Service at a time when it can
meaningfully consider them and
respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 217 / Friday, November 9, 2007 / Notices
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal, and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: November 2, 2007.
Kevin B. Elliott,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E7–22029 Filed 11–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Vernal Ranger District Travel
Management Plan, Ashley National
Forest; Uintah, Duchesne, and Daggett
Counties, UT
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to disclose the effects of
designating National Forest System
(NFS) roads and trails available for
public motorized use on the Vernal
Ranger District within the Ashley
National Forest. The decision will be to
determine whether to include routes
that are not currently NFS roads or trails
open for public motorized use, establish
a season of use and/or type of vehicle
use for roads and trails, the prohibition
of wheeled motorized vehicle travel off
designated NFS roads and trails by the
public (except as allowed by permit or
other authorization), and change
dispersed vehicle camping designations
from allowing travel up to 300 feet off
road to 150 feet off road. A National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
decision is not required to designate
roads and trails for public motorized
uses that are currently part of the
National Forest System of roads and
trails.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
23:48 Nov 08, 2007
Jkt 214001
Once a decision is made, a Motor
Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) will be
prepared, in compliance with the 2005
Forest Service Travel Management Rule
(36 CFR part 212). The MVUM will
show all the routes that are designated
for public motorized use on the Vernal
Ranger District. The MVUM will be the
primary tool used to determine
compliance and enforcement with
motorized vehicle use designations on
the forest. Those existing routes and
other non-system routes not designated
open on the MVUM will be legally
closed to motorized travel. The
decisions on motorized travel will not
include motorized over-the-snow travel.
DATES: The comment period on the
proposed action will extend 45 days
from the date the Notice of Intent is
published in the Federal Register. The
draft environmental impact statement is
expected July 2009 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected November 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Kris Rutledge, Travel Management
Team Coordinator, Ashley National
Forest 355 N Vernal Ave., Vernal, UT
84078 or call (435) 781–5196.
Electronic comments may be e-mailed
to comments-intermtn-ashley@fs.fed.us,
contain ‘‘Vernal Ranger District Travel
Management Plan’’ in the subject line,
and must be submitted in MS Word
(*.doc) or rich text format (*.rtf).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kris
Rutledge, Project Coordinator, at the
Ashley National Forest 355 N. Vernal
Ave., Vernal, UT, by phone (435) 781–
5196, or e-mail krutledge@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: There will
be a concurrent NOI and scoping for the
Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge
Ranger Districts Travel Management
Plan. The Roosevelt/Duchesne and
Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts are also
located within the Ashley National
Forest. However, because of differences
in travel management within the Vernal
Ranger District that currently allow
motorized use on existing, nondesignated routes in certain areas, and
the large number of user-created routes
on the District, it is anticipated that the
assessment for the EIS will take longer
than for the Roosevelt/Duchesne and
Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts.
Therefore, the analysis will be
completed seperately and at a later date.
Cummulative effects will be analyzed
for both EISs.
Purpose and Need for Action
The Ashley National Forest has
determined that there is a need to
improve management and enforcement
of off-highway vehicle travel policy on
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63551
the Forest. This need includes three
fundamental management
considerations.
1. The need to better accommodate
current motorized use and to address
future growth. There has been rapid
growth in OHV use that was not
anticipated when the 1982 Ashley
National Forest Plan was written. Over
the past few decades, the availability
and capability of motorized vehicles,
particularly off-highway vehicles
(OHVs) and sport utility vehicles (SUVs)
has increased tremendously. Utah is
experiencing a high level of OHV use
(196 % increase in eight years), with an
even greater increase in use in the
Uintah Basin (360% increase in eight
years).
2. The need to have a travel plans that
is simple to understand and implement,
and consistent with other Forests and
land management agencies. The model
used for the existing travel plan relies
on ‘‘open unless signed or mapped
closed’’ designations that are
complicated to interpret and, as a result,
are difficult to enforce. The lack of
simple and consistent travel policies
among other Forests and land
management agencies is confusing for
the public; inhibits cooperative law
enforcement; and has resulted in
unplanned roads and trails, erosion,
watershed and habitat degradation, and
detrimental impacts to cultural resource
sites. Compaction and erosion are the
primary effects of OHV use on soils.
Riparian areas and aquatic dependent
species are particularly vulnerable to
OHV use. The Travel Management Rule,
36 CFR part 212, provides policy for
ending this trend of unauthorized route
proliferation and managing the Forest
transportation system in a sustainable
manner through designation of
motorized NFS roads, trails, and areas,
and the prohibition of cross-country
travel.
3. The need for changes to the existing
transportation system. This will help
provide wheeled, motorized access to
dispersed recreation opportunities
(camping, hunting, fishing, hiking,
horseback riding, etc.); provide a
diversity of wheeled motorized
recreation opportunities (4X4 vehicles,
motorcycles, ATVs, passenger vehicles,
etc.); and reduce the potential for OHV
conflicts and impacts to other resource
uses and values.
It is Forest Service policy to provide
a diversity of road and trail
opportunities for experiencing a variety
of environments and modes of travel
consistent with the National Forest
recreation role and land capability (FSM
2353.03(2)). In meeting these needs, the
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 217 (Friday, November 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63548-63551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22029]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts Travel
Management Plan, Ashley National Forest; Duchesne, Daggett, and Summit
Counties, UT, and Sweetwater County, WY
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to disclose the effects of designating National Forest
System (NFS) roads and trails available for public motorized use on the
Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts within the Ashley
National Forest. The decision will be to determine whether to include
routes that are not currently NFS roads or trails open for public
motorized use, establish a season of use and/or type of vehicle use for
roads and trails, the prohibition of wheeled motorized vehicle travel
off designated NFS roads and trails by the public (except as allowed by
permit or other authorization), and change dispersed vehicle camping
designations from allowing travel up to 300 feet off road to 150 feet
off road. A National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) decision is not
required to designate roads and trails for public motorized uses that
are currently part of the National Forest System of roads and trails.
Once a decision is made, a Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) will be
prepared, in compliance with the 2005 Forest Service Travel Management
Rule (36 CFR Part 212). The MVUM will show all the routes that are
designated for public motorized use on the Roosevelt/Duchesne and
Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts. The MVUM will be the primary tool used
to determine compliance and enforcement with motorized vehicle use
designations on the forest. Those existing routes and other non-system
routes not designated open on the MVUM will be legally closed to
motorized travel. The decisions on motorized travel will not include
motorized over-the-snow travel.
DATES: The comment period on the proposed action will extend 45 days
from the date the Notice of Intent is published in the Federal
Register. The draft environmental impact statement is expected July
2008 and the final environmental impact statement is expected November
2008.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Kris Rutledge, Travel Management
Team Coordinator, Ashley National Forest 355 N Vernal Ave., Vernal, UT
84078 or call (435) 781-5196.
Electronic comments may be e-mailed to comments-intermtn-
ashley@fs.fed.us, contain ``Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger
District Travel Management Plan'' in the subject line, and must be
submitted in MS Word (*.doc) or rich text format (*.rtf).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kris Rutledge, Project Coordinator, at
the Ashley National Forest 355 N. Vernal Ave., Vernal, UT., by phone
(435) 781-5196, or e-mail krutledge@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: There will be a concurrent NOI and scoping
for the Vernal Ranger District Travel Management Plan. The Vernal
Ranger District is also located within the Ashley National Forest.
However, because of differences in travel management within this
District that currently allow motorized use on existing, non-designated
routes in certain areas, and the large number of user-created routes on
this District, it is anticipated that the assessment for the EIS will
take longer than for the Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger
Districts. Therefore, the analysis will be completed separately and at
a later date. Cumulative effects will be analyzed for both EISs.
Purpose and Need for Action
The Ashley National Forest has determined that there is a need to
improve management and enforcement of off-highway vehicle travel policy
on the Forest. This need includes three fundamental management
considerations.
1. The need to better accommodate current motorized use and to
address future growth. There has been rapid growth in OHV use that was
not anticipated when the 1982 Ashley National Forest Plan was written.
Over the past few decades, the availability and capability of motorized
vehicles, particularly off-highway vehicles (OHVs) and sport utility
vehicles (SUVs) has increased tremendously. Utah is experiencing a high
level of OHV use (196 % increase in eight years), with an even greater
increase in use in the Uintah Basin (360% increase in eight years).
2. The need to have a travel plans that is simple to understand and
implement, and consistent with other Forests and land management
agencies. The model used for the existing travel plan relies on ``open
unless signed or mapped closed'' designations that are complicated to
interpret and, as a result, are difficult to enforce. The lack of
simple and consistent travel policies among other Forests and land
management agencies is confusing for the public; inhibits cooperative
law enforcement; and has resulted in unplanned roads and trails,
erosion, watershed and habitat degradation, and detrimental impacts to
cultural resource sites. Compaction and erosion are the primary effects
of OHV use on soils. Riparian areas and aquatic dependent species are
particularly vulnerable to OHV use. The Travel Management Rule, 36 CFR
Part 212, provides policy for ending this trend of unauthorized route
proliferation and managing the Forest transportation system in a
sustainable manner through designation of motorized NFS roads, trails,
and areas, and the prohibition of cross-country travel.
3. The need for changes to the existing transportation system. This
will help provide wheeled, motorized access to dispersed recreation
opportunities (camping, hunting, fishing, hiking, horseback riding,
etc.); provide a diversity of wheeled motorized recreation
opportunities (4X4 vehicles, motorcycles, ATVs, passenger vehicles,
etc.); and reduce the potential for OHV conflicts and impacts to other
resource uses and values.
It is Forest Service policy to provide a diversity of road and
trail opportunities for experiencing a variety of environments and
modes of travel consistent with the National Forest recreation role and
land capability (FSM 2353.03(2)). In meeting these needs, the proposed
action must also achieve the following purposes:
A. Avoid impacts to cultural resources.
B. Provide for public safety.
C. Provide for a diversity of recreational opportunities.
D. Assure adequate access to public and private lands.
E. Provide for adequate maintenance and administration of
designations based on availability of resources and funding to do so.
F. Minimize damage to soil, vegetation and other forest resources.
G. Avoid harassment of wildlife and significant disruption of
wildlife habitat.
H. Minimize conflicts between wheeled motor vehicles and existing
or
[[Page 63549]]
proposed recreational uses of NFS lands.
I. Minimize conflicts among different classes of wheeled motor
vehicle uses of NFS lands or neighboring federal lands.
J. Assure compatibility of wheeled motor vehicle use with existing
conditions in populated areas, taking into account sound, emissions,
etc.
K. Assure compatibility of motorized vehicle use within Inventoried
Roadless Areas according to 3CFR294.12a.
L. Have valid existing rights of use and access (rights-of-way).
M. Provide consistency of use on roads that cross jurisdictional
boundaries.
N. Include consideration for compatibility with existing Potential
for Wilderness Evaluation studies.
Proposed Action
The proposed action has been developed by tentatively designating a
motorized travel plan that moves towards desired conditions identified
in the pre-project assessment. The proposed travel plan was compared to
the existing travel plan to identify changes from current conditions.
The proposed action includes addition of non-system routes, closure of
system routes, and identification of current system routes where a
change in use or route classification is needed to create the desired
travel plan.
The designations will set specific seasons of use, where
appropriate, and specify the type of use (e.g., street legal vehicle,
OHVs, 4-wheel drive) for roads and trails. The Forest Service will
produce a Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) depicting those routes that are
open to the general public for wheeled motorized use. The final
implementation of the MVUM will include consideration of any conflicts
with special use permits, easements, or rights of use that may have
been unknown or not identified at the time of the proposed action.
A consequence of designating routes open for public motorized
travel is that existing routes not designated as open would not be
available for public motorized travel.
1. Changes in Mileage to the National Forest Transportation System
The Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District currently manages and
maintains approximately 539 miles of NFS roads and 41 miles of NFS
motorized trails. Based on the stated purpose and need for action, the
Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District proposes to add approximately 5.80
miles of existing unauthorized routes to its NFS roads; add 12.39 miles
to its motorized trail system; restrict motorized travel on 4.48 miles
of NFS roads, including the seasonal closure of 1.22 miles of NFS road;
and to restrict through seasonal closure 0.67 miles of motorized
trails. These changes would bring the total NFS roads on the Roosevelt/
Duchesne Ranger District to approximately 540.32 miles and the miles of
the motorized trails to 52.72.
The Flaming Gorge Ranger District currently manages and maintains
approximately 434 miles of NFS roads and 21 miles of motorized trail
system. Based on the stated purpose and need for action, the Flaming
Gorge Ranger District proposes to add approximately 63.84 miles of
existing unauthorized routes to its NFS roads; add 8.82 miles to its
motorized trail system; and to restrict motorized travel on 0.29 miles
of NFS roads and 3.68 miles of NFS motorized trails. These changes
would bring the total NFS roads on the Flaming Gorge Ranger District to
approximately 497.55 miles and the NFS motorized trails to 26.14 miles.
2. Allowing Non-Street Legal Vehicles (OHVS) Access to NFS Roads
Currently Open to Street Legal Vehicles Only
The Ashley National Forest maintenance level 3, 4, and 5 roads are
subject to State traffic laws (36 CFR 212.5 (a)(1). Level 5 roads are
open to highway legal vehicles only and are shown on the current travel
maps as Highway and Improved Paved Roads. Maintenance level 3 and 4
roads are suitable for passenger cars and are shown on the current
travel maps as Improved Roads that are gravel or native dirt.
Maintenance level 2 roads include 4-wheel drive vehicles and are not
suitable for passenger cars. These roads are shown on the current
travel maps as Unimproved Roads. Both improved gravel or dirt and
unimproved roads may be managed for street legal vehicles only, or a
mix of street legal and non-street legal vehicles (OHVs). This is
referred to as ``mixed traffic''.
The Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District proposes to add mixed
traffic use to 2.87 miles of road that are currently designated for
street legal vehicles only. The Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District
proposes to change .15 miles of road currently designated as mixed
traffic use to allow only street legal vehicle use and allow mixed
traffic on 1.92 miles of motorized trail. The Flaming Gorge Ranger
District proposes to add mixed traffic use to 17.67 miles of road that
are currently designated for street legal vehicles only.
The change of motorized use on an open NFS road does not require
NEPA.
3. Allowing Motorized Access to NFS Roads That Are Currently Closed
The Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District is not proposing to open NFS
roads that are currently closed to public motorized access. The Flaming
Gorge Ranger District is proposing to open 8.04 miles of NFS roads and
.71 miles of motorized trail that are currently closed to public
motorized access. This includes the removal of a seasonal closure on
5.99 miles of NFS roads.
4. Change the Allowable Distance for Motorized Dispersed Camping Off a
Designated Road or Motorized Trail From 300 to 150 Feet
The current travel plan allows motorized dispersed camping up to
300 feet from a designated motorized route. In order to establish
consistency with other National Forests in Utah, the allowable area for
motorized dispersed camping will be reduced to 150 feet from a
designated motorized route.
The Ashley National Forest recognizes its unique niche for
dispersed camping and plans to continue to offer a multitude of
dispersed camping opportunities where appropriate. With this in mind,
the Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts have closely
examined routes that provide this opportunity. Many sites (especially
on the Flaming Gorge) access a multitude of recreational opportunities,
such as fishing or hunting, as well as dispersed camping and have been
included in the proposals outlined in Item 1 above.
In addition, the Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District has been
inventorying existing numerous short routes that are appropriately used
for dispersed camping, but are further than 150 feet from a designated
motorized route. Those routes meeting an initial review are shown as
``Potential Dispersed Camping Routes under Consideration'' on the
proposed action map. A determination of type of vehicle class for these
routes will also be required. It is anticipated that most routes will
be designated as mixed traffic use roads or motorized trails greater
than 50 inches.
There are 15.28 miles of Potential Dispersed Camping Routes under
Consideration being proposed by the Roosevelt/Duchesne Ranger District.
Note: Maps describing the existing transportation system and
maps and tables describing the proposed action can found at https://
www.fs.fed.us/r4/ashley/projects/travel_management. In addition,
the maps and tables will be available for viewing at: Supervisor's
Office, 355 N. Vernal Ave., Vernal, UT 84078. Roosevelt Ranger
District, 650 W. Highway 40 Roosevelt, UT 84066. Duchesne Ranger
District, 85 W. Main
[[Page 63550]]
Duchesne, UT 84021. Flaming Gorge Ranger District, Intersection of
Highways 43 and 44, Manila, UT 84046.
No Action Alternative
The No Action Alternative would be to designate all of the
motorized system roads and trails as identified in the existing travel
management plans for Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger
Districts, and would not address existing routes that are identified as
unauthorized (i.e. non-system) routes by the Forest Service. Those
existing routes not designated as open would not be available for
public motorized travel. The opportunity to motorize disperse camp up
to 300 feet from a designated motorized route would continue to be
available.
Possible Alternatives
The Forest is expecting that the public input will generate either
thematic concerns or route-specific issues that may be addressed by
modifying the proposed action to create a new alternative or
alternatives.
Decommissioning or obliterating of routes, which may involve
ground-disturbing activities, would be a part of the Proposed Action or
alternatives. The environmental consequences of having routes closed to
motorized travel will be evaluated in this environmental analysis.
Identification of new routes that would meet the goals and objectives
for a motorized transportation system on NFS lands will be, as
appropriate, a part of this travel management planning.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official is Kevin Elliott, Forest Supervisor,
Ashley National Forest, 355 N. Vernal Ave., Vernal, UT 84078.
Nature of Decision to be Made
Based on the purpose and need for the proposed action, the Forest
Supervisor will evaluate the Proposed Action and other alternatives in
order to make the following decisions for the specific National Forest
System lands:
1. Designating or eliminating unclassified travel ways;
2. Determine the allowed season and/or type of use for those routes
open to motorized travel; and
3. Determine if any changes in the extent and nature of motorized
dispersed camping are warranted.
Travel management direction for routes that will not have a change
in travel management direction will be shown on the MVUM (pursuant to
36 CFR part 212). Routes, for which travel management direction is
being changed, will be analyzed in the EIS for the Roosevelt/Duchesne
and Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts Travel Management Plan.
Scoping Process
Public participation will be especially important at several points
during the analysis. The Forest Service will be seeking information,
comments, and assistance from the federal, state, tribal, local
agencies, and other individuals or organizations that may be interested
in or affected by the proposed action. A series of public opportunities
are scheduled to explain the proposed travel plan and route designation
process and to provide an opportunity for public input. Dates for these
scoping meetings will be posted on the Ashley National Forest web page
at https://www.fs.fed.us/r4/ashley/projects/travelmanagement and in
local newspapers prior to the meetings.
The Forest Service will consider all public scoping comments and
concerns that have been submitted, as well as resource related input
from the interdisciplinary team and other agency resource specialists.
This input will be used to identify issues to consider in the
environmental analysis. A comprehensive list of issues will be
determined before the full range of alternatives is developed and the
environmental analysis is begun.
The Notice of Intent is expected to be published in the Federal
Register. The comment period on the proposed action will extend 45 days
from the date the Notice of Intent is published in the Federal
Register.
The draft environmental impact statement is expected to be filed
with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and to be available for
public review by July 2008. EPA will publish a notice of availability
of the draft EIS in the Federal Register. The comment period on the
draft EIS will extend 45 days from the date the EPA notice appears in
the Federal Register. At that time, copies of the draft EIS will be
distributed to interested and affected agencies, organizations, and
members of the public for their review and comment. It is very
important that those interested in the management of the Ashley
National Forest participate at that time.
The final EIS is scheduled to be completed November 2008. In the
final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to comments
received during the comment period that pertain to the environmental
consequences discussed in the draft EIS and applicable laws,
regulations, and policies considered in making the decision.
Preliminary Issues
Important goals for the project are to create a motorized travel
plan that is simple to understand, consistent with other public land
management agencies in Utah, and is enforceable. Protections for
threatened and endangered animal and plant habitats, cultural
resources, roadless considerations, and the need to maintain motorized
and non-motorized recreational opportunities have also directed the
development and design of the proposed action.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process that guides the
development of the environmental impact statement.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact statement will be prepared for
comment. The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement
will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). In addition, environmental objections that could be raised
at the draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not
raised until after completion of the final environmental impact
statement may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v.
Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages,
Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this
proposed action participate by the close of the comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental
[[Page 63551]]
impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful
if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the alternatives formulated and
discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council
on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in
addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal,
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: November 2, 2007.
Kevin B. Elliott,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E7-22029 Filed 11-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P