Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices, 63167-63168 [07-5588]
Download as PDF
63167
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 216 / Thursday, November 8, 2007 / Notices
Authority: Section 203(o)(4) of the
Dominican Republic-Central America-United
States Free Trade Agreement Implementation
Act (CAFTA-DR Act); the Statement of
Administrative Action (SAA), accompanying
the CAFTA-DR Act; Presidential
Proclamations 7987 (February 28, 2006) and
7996 (March 31, 2006).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
BACKGROUND:
The CAFTA-DR Agreement provides a
list in Annex 3.25 for fabrics, yarns, and
fibers that the Parties to the CAFTA-DR
Agreement have determined are not
available in commercial quantities in a
timely manner in the territory of any
Party. Articles that otherwise meet the
rule of origin to qualify for preferential
treatment are not disqualified because
they contain one of the products on the
Annex 3.25 list.
The CAFTA-DR Agreement provides
that the list in Annex 3.25 may be
modified pursuant to Article 3.25(4)-(5)
when the President of the United States
determines that a fabric, yarn, or fiber is
not available in commercial quantities
in a timely manner in the territory of
any Party. See also section 203(o)(4)(C)
of the CAFTA-DR Act.
The CAFTA-DR Act requires the
President to establish procedures
governing the submission of a request
and providing an opportunity for
interested entities to submit comments
and supporting evidence before a
commercial availability determination is
made. In Presidential Proclamations
7987 and 7996, the President delegated
to CITA the authority under section
203(o)(4) of CAFTA-DR Act for
modifying the Annex 3.25 list. On
March 21, 2007, CITA published final
procedures it would follow in
considering requests to modify the
Annex 3.25 list (72 FR 13256).
On September 20, 2007, the Chairman
of CITA received a request from Alston
& Bird, LLP on behalf of Perry
Manufacturing Company for certain
three-thread circular knit fleece fabrics,
of the specifications detailed below. On
September 24, 2007, CITA notified
interested parties of, and posted on its
website, the accepted request and asked
that interested entities provide, by
October 4, 2007, a response advising of
its objection to the request or its ability
to supply the subject product, and
rebuttals to responses by October 11,
2007.
On October 1, 2007, Texpasa, S.A.
(‘‘Texpasa’’) advised CITA of its
objection to the request, explaining its
ability to supply the fabrics listed in the
request. On October 3, 2007, Elasticos
Centro Americanos y Textiles
(‘‘Elcatex’’) advised CITA of its
objection to the request by submitting a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:54 Nov 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
response with an offer to supply certain
fabrics.
In its rebuttal submitted on October
10, 2007, Perry asserted that neither
Texpasa’s nor Elcatex’responses were
sufficient. In the case of Texpasa, Perry
claimed that it was concerned that
Tepasa cannot supply the required
quantity of fabric. With respect to
Elcatex, Perry stated that the fabric
Elcatex offered to supply did not meet
Perry’s specifications. As a result, Perry
asserted that Elcatex could not supply
the fabrics in question.
On October 15, 2007, in accordance
with Section 203(o)(4)(C)(iv) of the
CAFTA-DR Implementation Act and
section 8(c)(4) of CITA’s procedures,
because there was insufficient
information to make a determination
after 30 days, CITA extended the period
for making a determination by 14 U.S.
business days.
On October 23 and 24, 2007,
respectively, Texpasa and Elcatex
advised CITA that they were
withdrawing their responses to Perry’s
request.
In accordance with Section
203(o)(4)(C)(iii)(II) of the CAFTA-DR
Act, and its procedures, as the two
entities who objected to the request both
withdrew their objections, and because
no other interested entity submitted a
response advising CITA of its objection
to the request or its ability to supply the
subject product, CITA has determined to
add the specified fabrics to the list in
Annex 3.25 of the CAFTA-DR
Agreement.
The subject fabrics are added to the
list in Annex 3.25 of the CAFTA-DR
Agreement in unrestricted quantities. A
revised list has been published on-line.
Weight:
Width:
Finish:
Performance Criteria:
Fabric #2:
Fiber Content:
Gauge:
Knit Type:
Weight:
Width:
Finish:
Performance Criteria:
6001.21.0000
72 to 78 percent cotton,
22 to 28 percent polyester
Yarn:
Face Yarn - Single ply,
ring spun cotton. Metric yarn number: 41
to 48; English yarn
number: 24 to 28
Tie Yarn - Polyester
filament of 49 to
51denier
Fleece yarn - Single ply
staple of 57 to 63
percent cotton and 37
to 43 percent polyester. Metric
yarnnumber: 24 to
30; English yarn
number 14 to 18.
20 to 24
Three-thread circular
knit
Gauge:
Knit Type:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77 to 83 percent cotton,
17 to 23 percent polyester
Yarn:
Specifications:
HTS Subheading:
Fabric #1:
Fiber Content:
Metric - 285 to 300
grams per square
meter; English - 8.42
to 9.75 ounces per
square yard.
Metric - 172 to 183 centimeters; English - 68
to 72 inches.
Napped on the technical back; bleached,
yarn dyed, or piece
dyed.
Not more than 5 percent vertical and horizontal shrinkage and
not more than 4 percent vertical torque.
Face Yarn - Single ply,
ring spun cotton. Metric yarn number: 47
to 54; English yarn
number: 28 to 32
Tie Yarn - Polyester
filament of 49 to
51denier
Fleece yarn - Single ply
staple of 67 to 73
percent cotton and 27
to 33 percent polyester. Metric yarn
number: 24 to 30;
English yarn number
14 to 18.
20 to 24
Three-thread circular
knit
Metric - 266 to 308
grams per square
meter; English - 7.85
to 9.08 ounces per
square yard.
Metric - 146 to 183 centimeters; English - 58
to 72 inches.
Napped on the technical back; bleached,
yarn dyed, or piece
dyed.
Not more than 5 percent vertical and horizontal shrinkage and
not more than 4 percent vertical torque.
R. Matthew Priest,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation
of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. E7–21950 Filed 11–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary of Defense
Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on
Electron Devices
Department of Defense,
Advisory Group on Electron Devices.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
63168
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 216 / Thursday, November 8, 2007 / Notices
Notice.
SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on
Electron Devices (AGED) announces a
closed session meeting.
DATES: The meeting will be held at
0900, Tuesday November 13, 2007.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the IT Services Group-QNA, 4100 N.
Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA
22203.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Aimee Steussy, IT Services Group-QNA,
4100 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800,
Arlington, VA 22203, 703–284–8357.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
mission of the Advisory Group is to
provide advice to the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition, Technology
and Logistics, to the Director of Defense
Research and Engineering (DDR&E), and
through the DDR&E to the Director,
Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency and the Military Departments in
planning and managing an effective and
economical research and development
program in the area of electron devices.
The AGED meeting will be limited to
review of research and development
efforts in electronics and photonics with
a focus on benefits to national defense.
The reviews may form the basis for
research and development programs
initiated by the Military Departments
and Defense Agencies to be conducted
by industry, universities or in
government laboratories. The agenda for
this meeting will include programs on
molecular electronics, microelectronics,
electro-optics, and electronic materials.
In accordance with section 10(d) of
Pub. L. 92–463, as amended, (5 U.S.C.
App. 2), it has been determined that this
Advisory Group meeting concerns
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and
that accordingly, this meeting will be
closed to the public.
Dated: October 31, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07–5588 Filed 11–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
Dated: November 5, 2007.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management invites
comments on the submission for OMB
review as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:54 Nov 07, 2007
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before
December 10, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Education Desk Officer,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW., Room 10222,
Washington, DC 20503. Commenters are
encouraged to submit responses
electronically by e-mail to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or via fax
to (202) 395–6974. Commenters should
include the following subject line in
their response ‘‘Comment: [insert OMB
number], [insert abbreviated collection
name, e.g., ‘‘Upward Bound
Evaluation’’]. Persons submitting
comments electronically should not
submit paper copies.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The IC Clearance
Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of
Management, publishes that notice
containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection,
grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested,
e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of
the collection; (4) Description of the
need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and
frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping
burden. OMB invites public comment.
DATES:
Jkt 214001
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services
Type of Review: Revision.
Title: Projects with Industry Annual
Reporting Form.
Frequency: Annually.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit; Not-for-profit institutions;
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
State, Local, or Tribal Gov’t, SEAs or
LEAs.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 72.
Burden Hours: 6,480.
Abstract: This collection will be used
to measure the effectiveness of the
Projects With Industry (PWI) Program in
meeting its purpose, statutory
requirements and address concerns
raised as a result of the PART. The
proposed revisions to the existing data
collection package were recommended
in order to; (1) Respond to OMB PART
recommendations to collect job
retention and earnings information that
is consistent with the common measures
for federal job training programs; (2)
include demographic and other
descriptive data on the individuals
served by the program; and (3)
consolidate the two existing reporting
requirements thereby reducing the
number of reports submitted by PWI
grantees from two to one annually. The
information collected will be aggregated
in order to provide information to
Congress, Office of Management and
Budget, policy makers and the public.
Requests for copies of the information
collection submission for OMB review
may be accessed from https://
edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the
‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and
by clicking on link number 3454. When
you access the information collection,
click on ‘‘Download Attachments’’ to
view. Written requests for information
should be addressed to U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue,
SW., Potomac Center, 9th Floor,
Washington, DC 20202–4700. Requests
may also be electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202–
245–6623. Please specify the complete
title of the information collection when
making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
[FR Doc. E7–21939 Filed 11–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Closed Meeting of the National
Advisory Council on Indian Education
U.S. Department of Education,
National Advisory Council on Indian
Education (NACIE).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 216 (Thursday, November 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63167-63168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5588]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary of Defense
Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices
AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.
[[Page 63168]]
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a
closed session meeting.
DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Tuesday November 13, 2007.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the IT Services Group-QNA, 4100
N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22203.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Aimee Steussy, IT Services Group-
QNA, 4100 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22203, 703-284-
8357.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology and Logistics, to the Director of Defense Research and
Engineering (DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Military Departments in
planning and managing an effective and economical research and
development program in the area of electron devices.
The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and
development efforts in electronics and photonics with a focus on
benefits to national defense. The reviews may form the basis for
research and development programs initiated by the Military Departments
and Defense Agencies to be conducted by industry, universities or in
government laboratories. The agenda for this meeting will include
programs on molecular electronics, microelectronics, electro-optics,
and electronic materials.
In accordance with section 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, (5
U.S.C. App. 2), it has been determined that this Advisory Group meeting
concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly,
this meeting will be closed to the public.
Dated: October 31, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-5588 Filed 11-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M