Operating Limitations at New York LaGuardia Airport; Notice of Order, 63224-63228 [07-5583]
Download as PDF
63224
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 216 / Thursday, November 8, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Agency Information Collection Activity
Seeking OMB Approval
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA invites public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) revision of a current information
collection. The Federal Register Notice
with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the following collection of
information was published on August
15, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 157, page 45863.
This report is necessary to establish
qualifications of eligibility to receive
voluntary psychological training with
the U.S. Air Force and will be used as
proper evidence of training.
DATES: Please submit comments by
December 10, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carla Mauney at Carla.Mauney@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Title: Physiological Training.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
OMB Control Number: 2120–0101.
Forms(s): There are no FAA forms
associated with this collection.
Affected Public: An estimated 5,500
Respondents.
Frequency: This information is
collected on occasion.
Estimated Average Burden Per
Response: Approximately 8 minutes per
response.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An
estimated 733 hours annually.
Abstract: This report is necessary to
establish qualifications of eligibility to
receive voluntary psychological training
with the U.S. Air Force and will be used
as proper evidence of training. The
information is collected from pilots and
crewmembers for application to receive
voluntary training.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed
to Nathan Lesser, Desk Officer,
Department of Transportation/FAA, and
sent via electronic mail to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or faxed
to (202) 395–6974.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:54 Nov 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimates of the
burden of the proposed information
collection; ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 2,
2007.
Carla Mauney,
FAA Information Collection Clearance
Officer, IT Enterprises Business Services
Division, AES–200.
[FR Doc. 07–5573 Filed 11–07–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAION
Federal Aviation Administration
Agency Information Collection Activity
Seeking OMB Approval
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA invites public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) revision of a current information
collection. The Federal Register Notice
with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the following collection of
information was published on August
15, 2007, vol. 72, no. 157, pages 45861–
45862. The FAA collects information
from airport sponsors and planning
agencies in order to administer the
Airports Grants Program.
DATES: Please submit comments by
December 10, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carla Mauney at Carla.Mauney@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Title: Airports Grants Program.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
OMB Control Number: 2120–0569.
Form(s): Forms 5100–100, 5100–101,
5100–108, 5100–126, 5100–127, 5370–1.
Affected Public: An estimated 1,950
Respondents.
Frequency: This information is
collected on occasion.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: Approximately 8.6 hours per
response.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An
estimated 78,017 hours annually.
Abstract: The FAA collects
information from airport sponsors and
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
planning agencies in order to administer
the Airports Grants Program. Data is
used to determine eligibility, ensure
proper use of Federal Funds, and ensure
project accomplishments.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed
to Nathan Lesser, Desk Officer,
Department of Transportation/FAA, and
sent via electronic mail to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or faxed
to (202) 395–6974.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimates of the
burden of the proposed information
collection; ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 2,
2007.
Carla Mauney,
FAA Information Collection Clearance
Officer, IT Enterprises Business Services
Division, AES–200.
[FR Doc. 07–5574 Filed 11–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25755]
Operating Limitations at New York
LaGuardia Airport; Notice of Order
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of order.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On August 7, 2007, the FAA
proposed amendments to the December
12, 2006, order (the Order) that
temporarily limits flight operations at
New York’s LaGuardia Airport
(LaGuardia). Under the Order, the FAA
limited scheduled and unscheduled
operations at the airport to prevent
congestion-related delays associated
with LaGuardia’s limited runway
capacity. The FAA is issuing
amendments to the Order as proposed
with little modification.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Komal K. Jain, Office of the Chief
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 216 / Thursday, November 8, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Counsel, Regulations Division, AGC–
240, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
267–3073.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The FAA’s authority to limit the
number of flight operations at
LaGuardia is an essential component of
the FAA’s statutory responsibilities. The
FAA holds broad authority under 49
U.S.C. 40103(b) to regulate the use of
the navigable airspace of the United
States. This provision authorizes the
FAA to develop plans and policy for the
use of navigable airspace and, by order
or rule, to regulate the use of the
airspace as necessary to ensure its
efficient use.
On August 7, 2007, the FAA proposed
to modify its December 12, 2006, Order
that temporarily limits the flight
operations at LaGuardia pending the
promulgation of a long-term regulation
to manage congestion at the airport. 72
FR 44214. The Agency proposed to (1)
provide an approval process for
Operating Authorization (OA) transfers
for ‘‘day-of’’ carrier substitutions; (2)
amend provisions affecting the 80
percent minimum use requirement by
adding a waiver for holiday periods and
providing the Administrator greater
discretion to suspend the requirement
under certain conditions; and (3)
provide a mechanism for withdrawal of
OAs for FAA operational reasons.
issued the Order and adopted temporary
limits that will remain in place until the
rulemaking is completed. Without such
operational limitations, the FAA
expected severe congestion-related
delays would occur, both at LaGuardia
and at other airports throughout the
National Airspace System (NAS) as a
result of capacity constraints at
LaGuardia.
Under the Order, the FAA (1)
maintains the current hourly limits on
scheduled (75) and unscheduled (six)
operations at LaGuardia during peak
period; (2) imposes an 80 percent
minimum usage requirement for OAs;
(3) provides for a lottery to reallocate
withdrawn, surrendered or unallocated
OAs; and (4) allows for trades and leases
of OAs for consideration for the
duration of the Order.
On August 7, 2007, the FAA proposed
to modify the Order to (1) provide an
approval for OA transfers for ‘‘day-of’’
carrier substitutions; (2) amend
provisions affecting the 80 percent
minimum use requirement by adding a
waiver for holiday periods and
providing the Administrator greater
discretion to suspend the requirement
under certain conditions; and (3)
provide a mechanism for withdrawal of
OAs for FAA operational reasons
(August 2007 notice). The FAA
requested written comments to its
proposed changes. The comment period
closed on September 6, 2007.
I. Background
LaGuardia’s runway capacity cannot
accommodate the number of arrivals
and departures that carriers would like
to operate without the development of
significant congestion. Until January 1,
2007, the FAA limited the number of
operations at the airport through
implementation of the High Density
Rule and the Buy-Sell Rule (or slot
rules), 14 CFR part 93, subparts K and
S. In 2000, out of concern over the
collateral effects of the slot rules at
LaGuardia on airport access and
competition, Congress included a
provision in the Wendell H. Ford
Aviation Investment and Reform Act for
the 21st Century (AIR–21) that
terminated the LaGuardia slot rules as of
January 1, 2007.1 In anticipation of the
HDR’s expiration, the FAA proposed a
long-term rule that would limit the
number of scheduled and unscheduled
operations at LaGuardia.2 Because the
FAA could not complete that
rulemaking by January 1, the FAA
II. Discussion of Written Submissions
and the Final Order
In response to a request for written
comments, 12 respondents expressed
views on the FAA’s proposed
amendments to the Order. The
respondents included eight air carriers
(American Airlines (American), US
Airways, Delta Air Lines, Northwest
Airlines, United Airlines, jetBlue
Airways Corp. (jetBlue), Air Canada,
and Pinnacle Airlines Group
(Pinnacle)), three air carrier
organizations (Regional Airline
Association (RAA), Air Carrier
Association of America (ACAA) and Air
Transport Association of America
(ATA)), and the Port Authority of New
York and New Jersey (Port Authority).
Overall, the commenters supported
the FAA’s effort to address concerns
that were overlooked or not identified at
the time the Order was issued. Several
commenters also raised issues that were
beyond the scope of the proposed
amendments, including elimination of
the Perimeter Rule, creation of a buy/
sell secondary market, and the
withdrawals of OAs for immediate
redistribution to limited incumbents.
The FAA therefore is not responding to
1 49 U.S.C. 41715(a)(2), enacted by Pub. L. No.
106–181, § 231, 114 Stat. 61, 106–10 (2000).
2 71 FR 51360 (August 29, 2006); Docket FAA–
2006–25709.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:54 Nov 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63225
those issues. The FAA, however, has
chartered an Aviation Rulemaking
Committee (ARC) to address the
congestion at the New York City area
airports, and these issues are expected
to be part of the ARC deliberations. The
FAA’s discussion of remaining
comments follows.
Secondary Market: Approval Process for
‘‘Day-of’’ Transfers
As discussed in the August 2007
notice, some air carriers have expressed
concerns about the administrative
burden associated with obtaining prior
approval from the FAA for OA transfers
when making ‘‘day-of’’ carrier
substitutions between affiliated or
regional carriers under the marketing
control of a single air carrier. Due to the
around-the-clock nature of an airline’s
operations, and the real-time nature of
operational logistics, it is not unusual
for an air carrier to make ‘‘day-of’’ flight
service substitutions from one affiliated
carrier to another to meet operational
needs or to address schedule
disruptions. The FAA recognizes that
advance approval of an OA transfer for
these last-minute carrier substitutions is
not always possible, in part because of
the coordination required between air
carrier operation centers and scheduling
or marketing departments and because
the FAA Slot Administration Office is
not open 24 hours a day. Therefore, it
proposed to amend the Order to permit
a transfer request to be submitted for
FAA approval up to 72 hours after the
actual operation.
While the FAA received general
support for its efforts to streamline the
reporting burden associated with
obtaining approvals for transfers
between marketing carriers and the
operating carriers under their marketing
control, several air carriers, ATA and
RAA argued that it did not go far
enough. ATA and RAA, among others,
would have the FAA treat these
transactions as ‘‘substitutions’’ rather
than ‘‘transfers’’ among commonly
owned and affiliated carriers and,
therefore, take them out of the
secondary market purview. US Airways
further argued that ‘‘once [OAs] are
obtained by a carrier, the FAA’s only
real concern ought to be ensuring
compliance with the minimum usage
requirements * * * [T]racking of which
individual carrier is operating under the
‘‘US’’ marketing code seems an
unnecessary resource drain on both
airlines and the FAA.’’
The FAA recognizes there is a
significant paperwork responsibility
associated with the transfer approval
process, and is trying to lessen this
burden on carriers while also
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
63226
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 216 / Thursday, November 8, 2007 / Notices
maintaining an accurate record of which
air carrier is flying under each OA at
any particular time. This is not simply
a matter of monitoring operations for
minimum use requirements, as US
Airways suggests. Under this Order, the
FAA limits the number of operations
that can occur at LaGuardia and,
therefore, has a significant interest and
responsibility in ensuring that only
carriers with OAs conduct flights at the
airport during the allocated time
periods. Air carriers may have
marketing agreements with many other
carriers to operate flights on their
behalf, with varying degrees of
scheduling or operational control. One
carrier may even operate for multiple
marketing carriers at the same airport.
The FAA monitors operations through
several mechanisms including usage
reports, published flight schedules, and
flight plans filed with FAA Air Traffic
Control (ATC). Communication with
ATC facilities, including flight plans,
require authorized FAA identifiers and
call signs that are unique to the
operating carrier and do not signify
information as to the marketing or
selling carrier of the flight. In order for
the FAA to have accurate record
detailing which carriers are authorized
to operate at the airport, approval
requests for the transfer of OAs are
generally required in advance if they are
to be operated by a carrier other than the
holder listed on FAA records. This
amendment is adopting a very limited
exception to provide flexibility for ‘‘dayof’’ operational needs.
However, as requested by US Airways
under its comment submission, the FAA
is willing to provide more time for
carriers to inform the FAA of its
transfers. Under the Order, the FAA
provides carriers five business days,
instead of the proposed 72 hours, to
submit requests for OA transfer
approvals for ‘‘day-of’’ transfers among
commonly owned and affiliated carriers.
This additional time also allows carriers
to submit more transfer approval
requests under one cover, thereby
reducing the number of transactions
with the FAA.
As proposed, to support any request,
carriers must provide flight information,
including flight number, origin,
destination and scheduled time of
operation. While United commented
that this is more information than is
required by the FAA under the ‘‘use or
lose’’ reports, the FAA distinguishes the
two reporting requirements. Under this
provision, in order to approve an afterthe-fact transfer request, the FAA must
verify that the substitution from one
carrier to another resulted from the
express need to conduct a specific
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:54 Nov 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
flight. Without the above mentioned
information, the FAA could not validate
the request.
Minimum Usage Requirements and
Waivers
Holiday Waiver
In response to the January 9, 2007,
petition submitted by ATA,3 the FAA
proposed to treat as used any OA held
by a carrier at LaGuardia on
Thanksgiving Day, the Friday following
Thanksgiving Day, and the period from
December 24 through the first Saturday
in January. Most respondents supported
the amendment, but Pinnacle and US
Airways, asked that this provision be
expanded to apply on the 4th of July,
Memorial Day and Labor Day. JetBlue
and ACAA, on the other hand, did not
believe that waivers should be provided
for any holiday periods. They argued
that the FAA should ‘‘encourage the
efficient use of scarce air traffic system
capacity’’, and if holders of OAs do not
fully maximize use of their OAs during
holidays, they should be returned to the
FAA for temporary redistribution.
ACAA would further have the
temporary OAs be made available to
limited incumbents first.
The FAA first rejects the notion that
the holiday waiver to the minimum use
requirements be extended to additional
days. In establishing the 80% minimum
use requirement, the FAA specifically
accounted for days in the year where
there are drops in service, for planned
and unplanned events, including
holidays. The FAA, however, has
traditionally provided the waiver for the
days of Thanksgiving Day, the Friday
following Thanksgiving Day, and the
period from December 24 through the
first Saturday in January because of
reduced passenger demand at all
airports and because they fall within the
same 2-month reporting cycle for usage.
Therefore, a majority of carriers would
not meet the minimum requirement of
80 percent without potentially operating
uneconomic flights.
To the extent that there are carriers
that hold OAs during holidays and do
not anticipate full usage and there are
other carriers who desire OAs during
those same days, the FAA suggests
carriers avail themselves of the
secondary leasing market. The FAA is
not compelled to increase our
management of OA usage and
allocations under the Order during
holiday periods. The Agency fully
believes that a viable and practical
solution already exists, and it urges
3 See
PO 00000
Docket FAA–2006–25755.
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
carriers to take advantage of the leasing
market.
Start-up Waiver
The FAA did not receive any adverse
comments to the proposed amendment
to waive the minimum use requirement
for 120 days following the allocation of
an OA by lottery. The provision is
included in this amendment.
Administrator’s Waiver Authority
Under the Order, the FAA
Administrator can ‘‘waive the 80
percent usage requirement in the event
of a highly unusual and unpredictable
condition which is beyond the control
of the carrier and which exists for a
period of 5 consecutive days or more.’’
The FAA proposed the Administrator be
given greater discretion to issue a
waiver if the impact of a particular
event is five consecutive days versus the
duration of the event existing for more
than five days. This provision
recognizes that carrier operations may
require several days to return to normal
after significant disruptions to service.
Commenters supported this proposal,
and the provision is included in this
amendment.
Reversion and Withdrawal of Operating
Authorizations
The Order currently does not provide
a process for the FAA to reduce flight
operations at the airport to meet
operational needs or to recognize
reductions in available airport capacity.
The FAA, therefore, proposed to include
such a mechanism and use a weighted
lottery system. The Agency received a
number of comments in response.
To the extent that certain respondents
would have the FAA further refine this
provision and have it affect operations
at other airports in the New York area
or commit to reducing the number of
reservations made available to nonscheduled operators before scheduled
operators, the FAA notes that these
comments are outside the scope of this
proposal and, therefore, will not be
addressed.
Some carriers opposed the weighted
lottery system. Delta argued that the
proposal is ‘‘unfair to carriers that
operate substantial levels of service, and
have made significant investments in
operations.’’ The FAA believes,
however, that through the following
explanation, Delta and others will have
a better understanding of why the FAA
continues to support the proposal and
has decided to include it in the Order
subject to one modification related to
the baseline protection of 20 OAs.
Under the weighted lottery system, a
lottery would be implemented each time
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 216 / Thursday, November 8, 2007 / Notices
we needed to withdraw on OA. All air
carriers holding OAs at the airport
would be included, regardless of what
period of the day needed to be
depeaked. In this way, any air carrier
operating at LaGuardia assumes the risk,
based on its share of operations at the
airport, of having OAs withdrawn.
Weights will be established based on the
proportionate share of OAs the carrier
holds at the airport. For example, if an
air carrier has a weight equal to 30, the
carrier’s name will be placed in a
random draw 30 times. The random
draw by an FAA representative would
establish the order in which carriers
need to relinquish OAs. While there is
more of a likelihood that a carrier with
greater operations at LaGuardia will be
randomly chosen first, any air carrier
holding OAs, including carriers with
limited presence at the airport, as
explained below, could be chosen.
Carriers would relinquish two OAs in
each sequence until the FAA’s reduced
level of operations by half-hour or hour,
as appropriate, has been achieved.
The FAA proposed that a withdrawal
would not be made from any carrier if
the result would reduce its holdings to
less than 20 OAs on any weekday.
However, upon reconsideration, the
FAA believes that every carrier serving
LaGuardia should carry the potential
burden, proportional to its share of OAs,
of a withdrawal. As such, American is
correct in its assertion that the FAA
should not provide a 20 OA baseline
protection from potential withdrawal.
The following illustrates how weights
would be assigned to each air carrier in
the lottery. On a weekly basis, there are
a total of 6,750 available OAs at
LaGuardia. Assume Carrier A has 4,000
OAs, Carrier B has 2,000 OAs; and
Carrier C has 750 OAs.
Carrier A’s share is 4,000/6,750 =
.593.
Carrier B’s share is 2,000/6,750 = .296.
Carrier C’s share is 750/6,750 = .11.
Thus, the weight for each carrier
rounded to the higher whole number is:
Carrier A = .593(100) = 60.
Carrier B = .296(100) = 30.
Carrier C = .11(100) = 11.
For these purposes, the FAA will
consider commonly owned and
affiliated carriers to be single air
carriers.
Air Canada argued that their possible
inclusion in a lottery violates the Air
Transport Agreement between the
Government of Canada and the
Government of the United States and
the 2005 US-Canada Open Skies
Agreement in which the U.S.
government agreed to provide Canadian
carriers with a base level of 42 slots
(OAs) at LaGuardia in the summer and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:54 Nov 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
winter seasons. The FAA has reviewed
these agreements and believes that, as
long as the Canadian carriers are subject
to the same, non-discriminatory
regulations as U.S. operator, no
violation of the agreements would
occur. This withdrawal system is only
to be used in the event of reduced
capacity at the airport. The FAA would
not be able to engage this mechanism
and draw down OA holdings for
purposes such as providing U.S. or
foreign airlines with OAs for
international services or providing OAs
for ‘‘new entrants.’’ Any OA that is
withdrawn or temporarily suspended, if
reallocated, will be reallocated to the
carrier form which it was taken,
provided that the carrier continues to
operate scheduled service at LaGuardia.
III. Conclusion: The Amended Order
On August 7, 2007, the FAA proposed
amendment to the Order, and solicited
written views on the FAA’s tentative
determination to provide an approval
process for OA transfers for ‘‘day-of’’
carrier substitutions; to amend
provisions affecting the 80 percent
minimum use requirement; and to
provide a mechanism for withdrawal of
OAs for FAA operational reasons. After
considering the responses, the FAA has
determined to amend the Order and
adopt the proposal with two minor
modifications. The Order, as amended,
is recited below in its entirety.
A. Scheduled Operations
With respect to scheduled operations
at LaGuardia:
1. The final Order governs scheduled
arrivals and departures at LaGuardia
from 6 a.m. through 9:59 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday and from
12 noon through 9:59 p.m., Eastern
Time, Sunday.
2. The final Order takes effect on
January 1, 2007, and will expire at the
first change of scheduling season, as
defined in 14 CFR, part 93, subpart B,
occurring no less than 90 days after the
issuance of a final rule regulating
congestion at LaGuardia.
3. The FAA will assign operating
authority to conduct an arrival or a
departure at LaGuardia during the
affected hours to the air carrier that
holds equivalent slot or slot exemption
authority under the High Density Rule
of FAA slot exemption rules as of
January 1, 2007; to the primary
marketing air carrier in the case of AIR–
21 small hub/nonhub airport slot
exemptions; or to the air carrier
operating the flights as of January 1,
2007, in the case of a slot held by a non
carrier. The FAA will not assign
operating authority under the final
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63227
Order to any person or entity other than
a certificated U.S. or foreign air carrier
with appropriate economic authority
under 14 CFR part 121, 129 or 135. The
Chief Counsel of the FAA will be the
final decision maker regarding the
initial assignment of Operating
Authorizations.
4. For administrative tracking
purposes only, the FAA will assign an
identification number to each Operating
Authorization.
5. An air carrier can lease or trade an
Operating Authorization to another
carrier for any consideration, not to
exceed the duration of the Order. Notice
of a trade or lease under this paragraph
must be submitted in writing to the FAA
Slot Administration Office, facsimile
(202) 267–7277 or e-mail 7-AWASlotadmin@faa.gov, and must come
from a designated representative of each
carrier. The FAA must confirm and
approve these transactions in writing
prior to the effective date of the
transaction. However, the FAA will
approve transfers between carriers
under the same marketing control up to
5 business days after the actual
operation. This post-transfer approval is
limited to accommodate operational
disruptions that occur on the same day
of the scheduled operation.
6. Each air carrier holding an
Operating Authorization must forward
in writing to the FAA Slot
Administration Office a list of all
Operating Authorizations held by the
carrier along with a listing of the
Operating Authorizations actually
operated for each day of the two-month
reporting period within 14 days after the
last day of the two-month reporting
period beginning January 1 and every
two months thereafter. Any Operating
Authorization not used at least 80
percent of the time over a two-month
period will be withdrawn by the FAA
except:
A. The FAA will treat as used any
Operating Authorization held by an air
carrier on Thanksgiving Day, the Friday
following Thanksgiving Day, and the
period from December 24 through the
first Saturday in January.
B. The FAA will treat as used any
Operating Authorization obtained by an
air carrier through a lottery under
paragraph 7 for the first 120 days after
allocation in the lottery.
C. The Administrator of the FAA may
waive the 80 percent usage requirement
in the event of a highly unusual and
unpredictable condition which is beyond
the control of the air carrier and which
affects carrier operations for a period of
five consecutive days or more.
7. In the event that Operating
Authorizations are withdrawn for nonuse, surrendered to the FAA or are
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
63228
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 216 / Thursday, November 8, 2007 / Notices
unassigned, the FAA will determine
whether any of the available Operating
Authorizations should be reallocated. If
so, the FAA will conduct a lottery using
the provisions specified under 14 CFR
93.225. The FAA may retime an
Operating Authorization prior to
reallocation in order to address
operational needs. When the final Order
expires, any Operating Authorizations
reassigned under this paragraph, except
those assigned to new entrants or
limited incumbents, will revert to the
FAA for reallocation according to the
reallocation mechanism prescribed in
the final rule that succeeds the final
Order.
8. If the FAA determines that a
reduction in the number of allocated
Operating Authorizations is required to
meet operational needs, such as reduced
airport capacity, the FAA will conduct
a weighted lottery to withdraw
Operating Authorizations to meet a
reduced hourly or half-hourly limit for
scheduled operations. The FAA will
provide at least 45 days’ notice unless
otherwise required by operational
needs. Any Operating Authorization
that is withdrawn or temporarily
suspended will, if reallocated, be
reallocated to the air carrier from which
it was taken, provided that the air
carrier continues to operate scheduled
service at LaGuardia.
9. The FAA will enforce the final
Order through an enforcement action
seeking a civil penalty under 49 U.S.C.
46301(a). An air carrier that is not a
small business as defined in the Small
Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632, would be
liable for a civil penalty of up to $25,000
for every day that it violates the limits
set forth in the final Order. An air
carrier that is a small business as
defined in the Small Business Act
would be liable for a civil penalty of up
to $10,000 for every day that it violates
the limits set forth in the final Order.
The FAA also could file a civil action
in U.S. District Court, under 49 U.S.C.
46106, 46107, seeking to enjoin any air
carrier from violating the terms of the
final Order.
B. Unscheduled Operations: 4
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
With respect to unscheduled flight
operations at LaGuardia:
4 Unscheduled operations are operations other
than those regularly conducted by an air carrier
between LaGaurdia and another service point.
Unscheduled operations include general aviation,
public aircraft, military, charter, ferry, and
positioning flights. Helicopter operations are
excluded from the reservation requirement.
Reservations for unscheduled flights operating
under visual flight rules (VFR) are granted when the
aircraft receives clearance from air traffic control to
land or depart LaGuardia. Reservations for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:54 Nov 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
1. The final Order applies to all
operators of unscheduled flights, except
helicopter operations, at LaGuardia from
6 a.m. through 9:59 p.m., Eastern Time,
Monday through Friday and from 12
noon through 9:59 p.m., Eastern Time,
Sunday.
2. The final Order takes effect on
January 1, 2007, and will expire at the
first change of scheduling season
occurring no less than 90 days after the
issuance of a final rule regulating
congestion at LaGuardia.
3. No person can operate an aircraft
other than a helicopter to or from
LaGuardia unless the operator has
received, for that unscheduled
operations, a reservation that is assigned
by the David J. Hurley Air Traffic
Control System Command Center’s
Airport Reservation Office (ARO).
Additional information on procedures
for obtaining a reservation will be
available via the Internet at https://
www.fly.faa.gov/ecvrs.
4. Six (6) reservations are available
per hour for unscheduled operations at
LaGuardia. The ARO will assign
reservations on a 30-minute basis.
5. The ARO receives and processes all
reservation requests. Reservations are
assigned on a ‘‘first-come, first-served’’
basis, determined as of the time that the
ARO receives the request. A
cancellation of any reservation that will
not be used as assigned is required.
6. Filing a request for a reservation
does not constitute the filing of an
instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan,
as separately required by regulation.
After the reservation is obtained, an IFR
flight plan can be filed. The IFR flight
plan must include the reservation
number in the ‘‘remarks’’ section.
7. Air Traffic Control will
accommodate declared emergencies
without regard to reservations. Nonemergency flights in direct support of
national security, law enforcement,
military aircraft operations, or publicuse aircraft operations will be
accommodated above the reservation
limits with the prior approval of the
Vice President, System Operations
Services, Air Traffic Organization.
Procedures for obtaining the appropriate
reservation for such flights are available
via the Internet at https://
www.fly.faa.gov/ECVRS.
8. Notwithstanding the limits in
paragraph 4, if the Air Traffic
Organization determines that air traffic
control, weather, and capacity
conditions are favorable and significant
delay is not likely, the FAA can
accommodate additional reservations
unscheduled VFR flights are not included in the
limits for unscheduled operators.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
over a specific period. Unused
Operating Authorizations can also be
temporarily made available for
unscheduled operations. Reservations
for additional operations would be
obtained through the ARO.
9. Reservations cannot be bought,
sold, or leased.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 2,
2007.
Kerry B. Long
Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation
Administration.
[FR Doc. 07–5583 Filed 11–2–07; 4:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions
on Proposed Highways in Texas
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims
for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA
and Other Federal Agencies.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions
taken by the FHWA and other Federal
agencies that are final within the
meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The
actions relate to various proposed
highway projects in the State of Texas.
Those actions grant licenses, permits,
and approvals for the projects.
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is
advising the public of final agency
actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A
claim seeking judicial review of the
Federal agency actions on any of the
listed highway projects will be barred
unless the claim is filed on or before
May 6, 2008. If the Federal law that
authorizes judicial review of a claim
provides a time period of less than 180
days for filing such claim, then that
shorter time period still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Salvador Deocampo, District Engineer,
Texas Division, Federal Highway
Administration, 826 Federal Building,
Room 826, 300 E. 8th Street, Austin,
Texas 78701, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday
through Friday, 512–536–5950,
salvador.deocampo@fhwa.dot.gov. Ms.
Dianna Noble, P.E., Director
Environmental Affairs Division, Texas
Department of Transportation, 118 E.
Riverside, Austin, Texas 78704; 512–
416–2734; e-mail:
dnoble@dot.state.tx.us. Texas
Department of Transportation normal
business hours are 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
(central time) Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that the FHWA and other
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 216 (Thursday, November 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63224-63228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5583]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA-2006-25755]
Operating Limitations at New York LaGuardia Airport; Notice of
Order
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On August 7, 2007, the FAA proposed amendments to the December
12, 2006, order (the Order) that temporarily limits flight operations
at New York's LaGuardia Airport (LaGuardia). Under the Order, the FAA
limited scheduled and unscheduled operations at the airport to prevent
congestion-related delays associated with LaGuardia's limited runway
capacity. The FAA is issuing amendments to the Order as proposed with
little modification.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Komal K. Jain, Office of the Chief
[[Page 63225]]
Counsel, Regulations Division, AGC-240, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 267-3073.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The FAA's authority to limit the number of flight operations at
LaGuardia is an essential component of the FAA's statutory
responsibilities. The FAA holds broad authority under 49 U.S.C.
40103(b) to regulate the use of the navigable airspace of the United
States. This provision authorizes the FAA to develop plans and policy
for the use of navigable airspace and, by order or rule, to regulate
the use of the airspace as necessary to ensure its efficient use.
On August 7, 2007, the FAA proposed to modify its December 12,
2006, Order that temporarily limits the flight operations at LaGuardia
pending the promulgation of a long-term regulation to manage congestion
at the airport. 72 FR 44214. The Agency proposed to (1) provide an
approval process for Operating Authorization (OA) transfers for ``day-
of'' carrier substitutions; (2) amend provisions affecting the 80
percent minimum use requirement by adding a waiver for holiday periods
and providing the Administrator greater discretion to suspend the
requirement under certain conditions; and (3) provide a mechanism for
withdrawal of OAs for FAA operational reasons.
I. Background
LaGuardia's runway capacity cannot accommodate the number of
arrivals and departures that carriers would like to operate without the
development of significant congestion. Until January 1, 2007, the FAA
limited the number of operations at the airport through implementation
of the High Density Rule and the Buy-Sell Rule (or slot rules), 14 CFR
part 93, subparts K and S. In 2000, out of concern over the collateral
effects of the slot rules at LaGuardia on airport access and
competition, Congress included a provision in the Wendell H. Ford
Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) that
terminated the LaGuardia slot rules as of January 1, 2007.\1\ In
anticipation of the HDR's expiration, the FAA proposed a long-term rule
that would limit the number of scheduled and unscheduled operations at
LaGuardia.\2\ Because the FAA could not complete that rulemaking by
January 1, the FAA issued the Order and adopted temporary limits that
will remain in place until the rulemaking is completed. Without such
operational limitations, the FAA expected severe congestion-related
delays would occur, both at LaGuardia and at other airports throughout
the National Airspace System (NAS) as a result of capacity constraints
at LaGuardia.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 49 U.S.C. 41715(a)(2), enacted by Pub. L. No. 106-181, Sec.
231, 114 Stat. 61, 106-10 (2000).
\2\ 71 FR 51360 (August 29, 2006); Docket FAA-2006-25709.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the Order, the FAA (1) maintains the current hourly limits on
scheduled (75) and unscheduled (six) operations at LaGuardia during
peak period; (2) imposes an 80 percent minimum usage requirement for
OAs; (3) provides for a lottery to reallocate withdrawn, surrendered or
unallocated OAs; and (4) allows for trades and leases of OAs for
consideration for the duration of the Order.
On August 7, 2007, the FAA proposed to modify the Order to (1)
provide an approval for OA transfers for ``day-of'' carrier
substitutions; (2) amend provisions affecting the 80 percent minimum
use requirement by adding a waiver for holiday periods and providing
the Administrator greater discretion to suspend the requirement under
certain conditions; and (3) provide a mechanism for withdrawal of OAs
for FAA operational reasons (August 2007 notice). The FAA requested
written comments to its proposed changes. The comment period closed on
September 6, 2007.
II. Discussion of Written Submissions and the Final Order
In response to a request for written comments, 12 respondents
expressed views on the FAA's proposed amendments to the Order. The
respondents included eight air carriers (American Airlines (American),
US Airways, Delta Air Lines, Northwest Airlines, United Airlines,
jetBlue Airways Corp. (jetBlue), Air Canada, and Pinnacle Airlines
Group (Pinnacle)), three air carrier organizations (Regional Airline
Association (RAA), Air Carrier Association of America (ACAA) and Air
Transport Association of America (ATA)), and the Port Authority of New
York and New Jersey (Port Authority).
Overall, the commenters supported the FAA's effort to address
concerns that were overlooked or not identified at the time the Order
was issued. Several commenters also raised issues that were beyond the
scope of the proposed amendments, including elimination of the
Perimeter Rule, creation of a buy/sell secondary market, and the
withdrawals of OAs for immediate redistribution to limited incumbents.
The FAA therefore is not responding to those issues. The FAA, however,
has chartered an Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) to address the
congestion at the New York City area airports, and these issues are
expected to be part of the ARC deliberations. The FAA's discussion of
remaining comments follows.
Secondary Market: Approval Process for ``Day-of'' Transfers
As discussed in the August 2007 notice, some air carriers have
expressed concerns about the administrative burden associated with
obtaining prior approval from the FAA for OA transfers when making
``day-of'' carrier substitutions between affiliated or regional
carriers under the marketing control of a single air carrier. Due to
the around-the-clock nature of an airline's operations, and the real-
time nature of operational logistics, it is not unusual for an air
carrier to make ``day-of'' flight service substitutions from one
affiliated carrier to another to meet operational needs or to address
schedule disruptions. The FAA recognizes that advance approval of an OA
transfer for these last-minute carrier substitutions is not always
possible, in part because of the coordination required between air
carrier operation centers and scheduling or marketing departments and
because the FAA Slot Administration Office is not open 24 hours a day.
Therefore, it proposed to amend the Order to permit a transfer request
to be submitted for FAA approval up to 72 hours after the actual
operation.
While the FAA received general support for its efforts to
streamline the reporting burden associated with obtaining approvals for
transfers between marketing carriers and the operating carriers under
their marketing control, several air carriers, ATA and RAA argued that
it did not go far enough. ATA and RAA, among others, would have the FAA
treat these transactions as ``substitutions'' rather than ``transfers''
among commonly owned and affiliated carriers and, therefore, take them
out of the secondary market purview. US Airways further argued that
``once [OAs] are obtained by a carrier, the FAA's only real concern
ought to be ensuring compliance with the minimum usage requirements * *
* [T]racking of which individual carrier is operating under the ``US''
marketing code seems an unnecessary resource drain on both airlines and
the FAA.''
The FAA recognizes there is a significant paperwork responsibility
associated with the transfer approval process, and is trying to lessen
this burden on carriers while also
[[Page 63226]]
maintaining an accurate record of which air carrier is flying under
each OA at any particular time. This is not simply a matter of
monitoring operations for minimum use requirements, as US Airways
suggests. Under this Order, the FAA limits the number of operations
that can occur at LaGuardia and, therefore, has a significant interest
and responsibility in ensuring that only carriers with OAs conduct
flights at the airport during the allocated time periods. Air carriers
may have marketing agreements with many other carriers to operate
flights on their behalf, with varying degrees of scheduling or
operational control. One carrier may even operate for multiple
marketing carriers at the same airport. The FAA monitors operations
through several mechanisms including usage reports, published flight
schedules, and flight plans filed with FAA Air Traffic Control (ATC).
Communication with ATC facilities, including flight plans, require
authorized FAA identifiers and call signs that are unique to the
operating carrier and do not signify information as to the marketing or
selling carrier of the flight. In order for the FAA to have accurate
record detailing which carriers are authorized to operate at the
airport, approval requests for the transfer of OAs are generally
required in advance if they are to be operated by a carrier other than
the holder listed on FAA records. This amendment is adopting a very
limited exception to provide flexibility for ``day-of'' operational
needs.
However, as requested by US Airways under its comment submission,
the FAA is willing to provide more time for carriers to inform the FAA
of its transfers. Under the Order, the FAA provides carriers five
business days, instead of the proposed 72 hours, to submit requests for
OA transfer approvals for ``day-of'' transfers among commonly owned and
affiliated carriers. This additional time also allows carriers to
submit more transfer approval requests under one cover, thereby
reducing the number of transactions with the FAA.
As proposed, to support any request, carriers must provide flight
information, including flight number, origin, destination and scheduled
time of operation. While United commented that this is more information
than is required by the FAA under the ``use or lose'' reports, the FAA
distinguishes the two reporting requirements. Under this provision, in
order to approve an after-the-fact transfer request, the FAA must
verify that the substitution from one carrier to another resulted from
the express need to conduct a specific flight. Without the above
mentioned information, the FAA could not validate the request.
Minimum Usage Requirements and Waivers
Holiday Waiver
In response to the January 9, 2007, petition submitted by ATA,\3\
the FAA proposed to treat as used any OA held by a carrier at LaGuardia
on Thanksgiving Day, the Friday following Thanksgiving Day, and the
period from December 24 through the first Saturday in January. Most
respondents supported the amendment, but Pinnacle and US Airways, asked
that this provision be expanded to apply on the 4th of July, Memorial
Day and Labor Day. JetBlue and ACAA, on the other hand, did not believe
that waivers should be provided for any holiday periods. They argued
that the FAA should ``encourage the efficient use of scarce air traffic
system capacity'', and if holders of OAs do not fully maximize use of
their OAs during holidays, they should be returned to the FAA for
temporary redistribution. ACAA would further have the temporary OAs be
made available to limited incumbents first.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Docket FAA-2006-25755.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA first rejects the notion that the holiday waiver to the
minimum use requirements be extended to additional days. In
establishing the 80% minimum use requirement, the FAA specifically
accounted for days in the year where there are drops in service, for
planned and unplanned events, including holidays. The FAA, however, has
traditionally provided the waiver for the days of Thanksgiving Day, the
Friday following Thanksgiving Day, and the period from December 24
through the first Saturday in January because of reduced passenger
demand at all airports and because they fall within the same 2-month
reporting cycle for usage. Therefore, a majority of carriers would not
meet the minimum requirement of 80 percent without potentially
operating uneconomic flights.
To the extent that there are carriers that hold OAs during holidays
and do not anticipate full usage and there are other carriers who
desire OAs during those same days, the FAA suggests carriers avail
themselves of the secondary leasing market. The FAA is not compelled to
increase our management of OA usage and allocations under the Order
during holiday periods. The Agency fully believes that a viable and
practical solution already exists, and it urges carriers to take
advantage of the leasing market.
Start-up Waiver
The FAA did not receive any adverse comments to the proposed
amendment to waive the minimum use requirement for 120 days following
the allocation of an OA by lottery. The provision is included in this
amendment.
Administrator's Waiver Authority
Under the Order, the FAA Administrator can ``waive the 80 percent
usage requirement in the event of a highly unusual and unpredictable
condition which is beyond the control of the carrier and which exists
for a period of 5 consecutive days or more.'' The FAA proposed the
Administrator be given greater discretion to issue a waiver if the
impact of a particular event is five consecutive days versus the
duration of the event existing for more than five days. This provision
recognizes that carrier operations may require several days to return
to normal after significant disruptions to service.
Commenters supported this proposal, and the provision is included
in this amendment.
Reversion and Withdrawal of Operating Authorizations
The Order currently does not provide a process for the FAA to
reduce flight operations at the airport to meet operational needs or to
recognize reductions in available airport capacity. The FAA, therefore,
proposed to include such a mechanism and use a weighted lottery system.
The Agency received a number of comments in response.
To the extent that certain respondents would have the FAA further
refine this provision and have it affect operations at other airports
in the New York area or commit to reducing the number of reservations
made available to non-scheduled operators before scheduled operators,
the FAA notes that these comments are outside the scope of this
proposal and, therefore, will not be addressed.
Some carriers opposed the weighted lottery system. Delta argued
that the proposal is ``unfair to carriers that operate substantial
levels of service, and have made significant investments in
operations.'' The FAA believes, however, that through the following
explanation, Delta and others will have a better understanding of why
the FAA continues to support the proposal and has decided to include it
in the Order subject to one modification related to the baseline
protection of 20 OAs.
Under the weighted lottery system, a lottery would be implemented
each time
[[Page 63227]]
we needed to withdraw on OA. All air carriers holding OAs at the
airport would be included, regardless of what period of the day needed
to be depeaked. In this way, any air carrier operating at LaGuardia
assumes the risk, based on its share of operations at the airport, of
having OAs withdrawn. Weights will be established based on the
proportionate share of OAs the carrier holds at the airport. For
example, if an air carrier has a weight equal to 30, the carrier's name
will be placed in a random draw 30 times. The random draw by an FAA
representative would establish the order in which carriers need to
relinquish OAs. While there is more of a likelihood that a carrier with
greater operations at LaGuardia will be randomly chosen first, any air
carrier holding OAs, including carriers with limited presence at the
airport, as explained below, could be chosen. Carriers would relinquish
two OAs in each sequence until the FAA's reduced level of operations by
half-hour or hour, as appropriate, has been achieved.
The FAA proposed that a withdrawal would not be made from any
carrier if the result would reduce its holdings to less than 20 OAs on
any weekday. However, upon reconsideration, the FAA believes that every
carrier serving LaGuardia should carry the potential burden,
proportional to its share of OAs, of a withdrawal. As such, American is
correct in its assertion that the FAA should not provide a 20 OA
baseline protection from potential withdrawal.
The following illustrates how weights would be assigned to each air
carrier in the lottery. On a weekly basis, there are a total of 6,750
available OAs at LaGuardia. Assume Carrier A has 4,000 OAs, Carrier B
has 2,000 OAs; and Carrier C has 750 OAs.
Carrier A's share is 4,000/6,750 = .593.
Carrier B's share is 2,000/6,750 = .296.
Carrier C's share is 750/6,750 = .11.
Thus, the weight for each carrier rounded to the higher whole
number is:
Carrier A = .593(100) = 60.
Carrier B = .296(100) = 30.
Carrier C = .11(100) = 11.
For these purposes, the FAA will consider commonly owned and
affiliated carriers to be single air carriers.
Air Canada argued that their possible inclusion in a lottery
violates the Air Transport Agreement between the Government of Canada
and the Government of the United States and the 2005 US-Canada Open
Skies Agreement in which the U.S. government agreed to provide Canadian
carriers with a base level of 42 slots (OAs) at LaGuardia in the summer
and winter seasons. The FAA has reviewed these agreements and believes
that, as long as the Canadian carriers are subject to the same, non-
discriminatory regulations as U.S. operator, no violation of the
agreements would occur. This withdrawal system is only to be used in
the event of reduced capacity at the airport. The FAA would not be able
to engage this mechanism and draw down OA holdings for purposes such as
providing U.S. or foreign airlines with OAs for international services
or providing OAs for ``new entrants.'' Any OA that is withdrawn or
temporarily suspended, if reallocated, will be reallocated to the
carrier form which it was taken, provided that the carrier continues to
operate scheduled service at LaGuardia.
III. Conclusion: The Amended Order
On August 7, 2007, the FAA proposed amendment to the Order, and
solicited written views on the FAA's tentative determination to provide
an approval process for OA transfers for ``day-of'' carrier
substitutions; to amend provisions affecting the 80 percent minimum use
requirement; and to provide a mechanism for withdrawal of OAs for FAA
operational reasons. After considering the responses, the FAA has
determined to amend the Order and adopt the proposal with two minor
modifications. The Order, as amended, is recited below in its entirety.
A. Scheduled Operations
With respect to scheduled operations at LaGuardia:
1. The final Order governs scheduled arrivals and departures at
LaGuardia from 6 a.m. through 9:59 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday and from 12 noon through 9:59 p.m., Eastern Time, Sunday.
2. The final Order takes effect on January 1, 2007, and will expire
at the first change of scheduling season, as defined in 14 CFR, part
93, subpart B, occurring no less than 90 days after the issuance of a
final rule regulating congestion at LaGuardia.
3. The FAA will assign operating authority to conduct an arrival or
a departure at LaGuardia during the affected hours to the air carrier
that holds equivalent slot or slot exemption authority under the High
Density Rule of FAA slot exemption rules as of January 1, 2007; to the
primary marketing air carrier in the case of AIR-21 small hub/nonhub
airport slot exemptions; or to the air carrier operating the flights as
of January 1, 2007, in the case of a slot held by a non carrier. The
FAA will not assign operating authority under the final Order to any
person or entity other than a certificated U.S. or foreign air carrier
with appropriate economic authority under 14 CFR part 121, 129 or 135.
The Chief Counsel of the FAA will be the final decision maker regarding
the initial assignment of Operating Authorizations.
4. For administrative tracking purposes only, the FAA will assign
an identification number to each Operating Authorization.
5. An air carrier can lease or trade an Operating Authorization to
another carrier for any consideration, not to exceed the duration of
the Order. Notice of a trade or lease under this paragraph must be
submitted in writing to the FAA Slot Administration Office, facsimile
(202) 267-7277 or e-mail 7-AWA-Slotadmin@faa.gov, and must come from a
designated representative of each carrier. The FAA must confirm and
approve these transactions in writing prior to the effective date of
the transaction. However, the FAA will approve transfers between
carriers under the same marketing control up to 5 business days after
the actual operation. This post-transfer approval is limited to
accommodate operational disruptions that occur on the same day of the
scheduled operation.
6. Each air carrier holding an Operating Authorization must forward
in writing to the FAA Slot Administration Office a list of all
Operating Authorizations held by the carrier along with a listing of
the Operating Authorizations actually operated for each day of the two-
month reporting period within 14 days after the last day of the two-
month reporting period beginning January 1 and every two months
thereafter. Any Operating Authorization not used at least 80 percent of
the time over a two-month period will be withdrawn by the FAA except:
A. The FAA will treat as used any Operating Authorization held
by an air carrier on Thanksgiving Day, the Friday following
Thanksgiving Day, and the period from December 24 through the first
Saturday in January.
B. The FAA will treat as used any Operating Authorization
obtained by an air carrier through a lottery under paragraph 7 for
the first 120 days after allocation in the lottery.
C. The Administrator of the FAA may waive the 80 percent usage
requirement in the event of a highly unusual and unpredictable
condition which is beyond the control of the air carrier and which
affects carrier operations for a period of five consecutive days or
more.
7. In the event that Operating Authorizations are withdrawn for
non-use, surrendered to the FAA or are
[[Page 63228]]
unassigned, the FAA will determine whether any of the available
Operating Authorizations should be reallocated. If so, the FAA will
conduct a lottery using the provisions specified under 14 CFR 93.225.
The FAA may retime an Operating Authorization prior to reallocation in
order to address operational needs. When the final Order expires, any
Operating Authorizations reassigned under this paragraph, except those
assigned to new entrants or limited incumbents, will revert to the FAA
for reallocation according to the reallocation mechanism prescribed in
the final rule that succeeds the final Order.
8. If the FAA determines that a reduction in the number of
allocated Operating Authorizations is required to meet operational
needs, such as reduced airport capacity, the FAA will conduct a
weighted lottery to withdraw Operating Authorizations to meet a reduced
hourly or half-hourly limit for scheduled operations. The FAA will
provide at least 45 days' notice unless otherwise required by
operational needs. Any Operating Authorization that is withdrawn or
temporarily suspended will, if reallocated, be reallocated to the air
carrier from which it was taken, provided that the air carrier
continues to operate scheduled service at LaGuardia.
9. The FAA will enforce the final Order through an enforcement
action seeking a civil penalty under 49 U.S.C. 46301(a). An air carrier
that is not a small business as defined in the Small Business Act, 15
U.S.C. 632, would be liable for a civil penalty of up to $25,000 for
every day that it violates the limits set forth in the final Order. An
air carrier that is a small business as defined in the Small Business
Act would be liable for a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for every day
that it violates the limits set forth in the final Order. The FAA also
could file a civil action in U.S. District Court, under 49 U.S.C.
46106, 46107, seeking to enjoin any air carrier from violating the
terms of the final Order.
B. Unscheduled Operations: \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Unscheduled operations are operations other than those
regularly conducted by an air carrier between LaGaurdia and another
service point. Unscheduled operations include general aviation,
public aircraft, military, charter, ferry, and positioning flights.
Helicopter operations are excluded from the reservation requirement.
Reservations for unscheduled flights operating under visual flight
rules (VFR) are granted when the aircraft receives clearance from
air traffic control to land or depart LaGuardia. Reservations for
unscheduled VFR flights are not included in the limits for
unscheduled operators.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to unscheduled flight operations at LaGuardia:
1. The final Order applies to all operators of unscheduled flights,
except helicopter operations, at LaGuardia from 6 a.m. through 9:59
p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday and from 12 noon through 9:59
p.m., Eastern Time, Sunday.
2. The final Order takes effect on January 1, 2007, and will expire
at the first change of scheduling season occurring no less than 90 days
after the issuance of a final rule regulating congestion at LaGuardia.
3. No person can operate an aircraft other than a helicopter to or
from LaGuardia unless the operator has received, for that unscheduled
operations, a reservation that is assigned by the David J. Hurley Air
Traffic Control System Command Center's Airport Reservation Office
(ARO). Additional information on procedures for obtaining a reservation
will be available via the Internet at https://www.fly.faa.gov/ecvrs.
4. Six (6) reservations are available per hour for unscheduled
operations at LaGuardia. The ARO will assign reservations on a 30-
minute basis.
5. The ARO receives and processes all reservation requests.
Reservations are assigned on a ``first-come, first-served'' basis,
determined as of the time that the ARO receives the request. A
cancellation of any reservation that will not be used as assigned is
required.
6. Filing a request for a reservation does not constitute the
filing of an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan, as separately
required by regulation. After the reservation is obtained, an IFR
flight plan can be filed. The IFR flight plan must include the
reservation number in the ``remarks'' section.
7. Air Traffic Control will accommodate declared emergencies
without regard to reservations. Non-emergency flights in direct support
of national security, law enforcement, military aircraft operations, or
public-use aircraft operations will be accommodated above the
reservation limits with the prior approval of the Vice President,
System Operations Services, Air Traffic Organization. Procedures for
obtaining the appropriate reservation for such flights are available
via the Internet at https://www.fly.faa.gov/ECVRS.
8. Notwithstanding the limits in paragraph 4, if the Air Traffic
Organization determines that air traffic control, weather, and capacity
conditions are favorable and significant delay is not likely, the FAA
can accommodate additional reservations over a specific period. Unused
Operating Authorizations can also be temporarily made available for
unscheduled operations. Reservations for additional operations would be
obtained through the ARO.
9. Reservations cannot be bought, sold, or leased.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 2, 2007.
Kerry B. Long
Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 07-5583 Filed 11-2-07; 4:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M