Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS); Pelagic Longline Research, 62441-62444 [07-5474]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 213 / Monday, November 5, 2007 / Notices
EE442 (Daily Math Practice Journal
Grades 1 - 3); EE443 and EE444 (Daily
Math Practice Journal Grades 4 - 6);
EE651 and EE652 (Daily Language
Practice, Grades 1-3); EE653 and EE654
(Daily Language Practice Journal, Grades
4 - 6), are included within the scope of
the antidumping duty order; requested
December 7, 2006; initiated May 7,
2007.
Multiple Countries
A-423-808 and C-423-809: Stainless
Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium; A475-822: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils
from Italy; A-580-831: Stainless Steel
Plate in Coils from South Korea; A-583830: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from
Taiwan; A-791-805 and C-791-806:
Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South
Africa
Requestor: Ugine & ALZ Belgium N.V.;
whether stainless steel products with an
actual thickness of less than 4.75 mm,
regardless of nominal thickness, are
within the scope of the antidumping
and countervailing duty orders;
requested June 8, 2007; initiated July 23,
2007.
A-533-809: Certain Forged Stainless
Steel Flanges from India; A-583-821:
Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges
from Taiwan
Anticircumvention Rulings Pending as
of September 30, 2007:
People’s Republic of China
A-570-001: Potassium Permanganate
from the People’s Republic of China
Requestor: Specialty Products
International, Inc.; whether sodium
permanganate is later-developed
merchandise that is circumventing the
antidumping duty order; requested
October 10, 2006.
ycherry on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
A-570-868: Folding Metal Tables and
Chairs from the People’s Republic of
China
Requestor: Meco Corporation; whether
the common leg table (a folding metal
table affixed with cross bars that enable
the legs to fold in pairs) produced in the
PRC is a minor alteration that
circumvents the antidumping duty
order; requested October 31, 2005;
initiated June 1, 2006.
15:04 Nov 02, 2007
Jkt 214001
Requestor: Seaman Paper Company;
whether imports of tissue paper from
Vietnam made out of jumbo rolls of
tissue paper from the PRC are
circumventing the antidumping duty
order; requested July 19, 2006; initiated
September 5, 2006.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on the completeness of this
list of pending scope and
anticircumvention inquiries. Any
comments should be submitted to the
Deputy Assistant Secretary for D/CVD
Operations, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
14th Street and Constitution Avenue,
N.W., Room 1870, Washington, DC
20230.
This notice is published in
accordance with 19 C.F.R. 351.225(o).
Dated: October 25, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–21707 Filed 11–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Requestor: Lokring Technology
Corporation; whether certain assemblies
comprising stainless steel flanges from
India or Taiwan welded to stainless
steel ‘‘half-bodies’’ with swage rings,
and completed in Canada, are within
the scope of the order; requested
September 18, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
A-570-894: Certain Tissue Paper
Products from the People’s Republic of
China
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD57
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species
(HMS); Pelagic Longline Research
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the
availability of an Environmental
Assessment (EA) analyzing the impacts
of conducting research with pelagic
longline (PLL) vessels in portions of the
East Florida Coast (EFC) and Charleston
Bump closed areas. Given the nearly
rebuilt status of north Atlantic
swordfish and recent bycatch reduction
measures implemented throughout the
U.S. PLL fishery, NMFS is proposing to
collect baseline PLL fishery data in the
closed areas to evaluate the
effectiveness of existing bycatch
reduction measures. The EA analyzes
monthly and annual PLL logbook and
pelagic observer program (POP) data on
catch and bycatch rates of all species in
the proposed research area from 1995–
2000 to determine potential impacts of
the research fishery on target and non-
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62441
target species. NMFS invites comments
from interested parties on the EA.
DATES: Written comments on the EA
must be received by 5 p.m. on
November 20, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email: PLL.ResearchEA@noaa.gov.
Include in the subject line the following
identifier: I.D. PLL Research EA.
• Mail: Margo Schulze-Haugen, Highly
Migratory Species Management Division
(F/SF1), NMFS, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Please mark the outside of the envelope
‘‘Comments on PLL Research EA.’’
• Fax: (301)713–1917
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Russell Dunn, 727–824–5399; fax: 727–
824–5398, or Chris Rilling 301–713–
2347; fax: 301–713–1917.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
proposes to conduct research with a
limited number of vessels (two are
proposed, but backup vessels may be
used if breakdowns occur) in portions of
the EFC and Charleston Bump closed
areas (Figure 1). The latitude and
longitude coordinates of the proposed
research area are provided in Table 1. In
the EFC closed area, the proposed
research area would be north of Fort
Pierce, FL, beginning at 28 degrees
north latitude and proceeding north,
seaward of the axis of the Gulf Stream,
to the northern boundary of the EFC
closed area at 31 degrees north latitude.
In the Charleston Bump, the proposed
research area would be north of 31
degrees north latitude and following the
200 meter isobath ( ∼100 fathom
contour) to the northern and eastern
boundaries of the Charleston Bump
closed area. The two areas are hereafter
referred to collectively as the proposed
research area. NMFS closed the EFC and
Charleston Bump closed areas to PLL
gear in early 2001 to reduce bycatch of
juvenile swordfish, billfish, and other
HMS (65 FR 47214, August 1, 2000).
The Charleston Bump closed area is a
seasonal closure from February through
April every year, whereas the EFC
closed area is closed year-round to PLL
gear. Since that time, the swordfish
stock has been nearly rebuilt
(B=0.99BMSY) and new bycatch
reduction measures have been
implemented throughout the PLL
fishery (e.g., circle hook requirements,
bait requirements, bycatch release gear,
and careful handling and release
workshops). No PLL fishing has been
authorized in the closed areas since
2001, and NMFS has not collected
information on the effectiveness of
current bycatch reduction measures in
closed areas where bycatch rates may be
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
62442
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 213 / Monday, November 5, 2007 / Notices
ycherry on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
higher than in other areas. NMFS thus
proposes to collect information under
scientifically rigorous protocols to
determine the effectiveness of bycatch
reduction measures in these closed
areas. This information will assist
NMFS in making appropriate
management decisions regarding the
effectiveness of existing closed areas
and bycatch reduction technologies, as
well as any potential modifications to
the closed areas.
NMFS proposes to make a total of 289
sets distributed inside and outside the
proposed research area over a 12 month
period beginning in late 2007 or early
2008. Each set would consist of 500 18/
0 circle hooks with an offset not to
exceed 10 degrees with whole dead
finfish bait and/or squid bait. Vessels
would be subject to 100 percent
observer coverage, and observers or
research staff would collect data that
includes, but is not limited to, catch per
unit effort (CPUE) for target and bycatch
species; discard rates; interaction rates
with protected species; size of target
species; hooking location; mortality at
haul back; bycatch mortality; and if
possible, an evaluation of the condition
of fish at haul back to allow post-release
mortality estimates.
All targeted catch (tunas, swordfish,
and sharks) that can be legally landed
could be harvested and sold by the
vessel owners. No other compensation
would be provided to the vessels. All
bycatch would be released using NMFSapproved dehooking equipment and
appropriate safe handling and release
protocols. Incidental catch of bluefin
tuna would be landed consistent with
existing regulations. Any mortalities of
Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA)
regulated species (i.e., tunas and
swordfish) and sharks would be counted
against the appropriate quotas. Nontarget species and protected resources
would be tagged and released alive,
consistent with requirements of the
Terms and Conditions of the 2004
Biological Opinion issued for the
fishery, and research objectives.
The EA analyzed the status quo and
two alternatives on different proposed
research areas within the EFC and
Charleston Bump areas. A fourth
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:04 Nov 02, 2007
Jkt 214001
alternative to conduct research
throughout the entire EFC and
Charleston Bump closed areas was
considered but not further analyzed.
Based on analysis in the EA of PLL and
POP data from 1995–2000 and prior to
the closures and circle hook
requirements going into effect, a limited
number of interactions with leatherback
sea turtles (four based on PLL data and
six based on POP data over six years)
and loggerhead sea turtles (five based on
PLL data and 12 based on POP data over
six years) occurred in the proposed
research area. Under a worst case
scenario using estimates from the POP
data, and applying anticipated fishing
effort in the research fishery to preclosure J-hook catch rates, two
leatherback and six loggerhead sea turtle
interactions may occur as a result of the
research fishery. Given the significantly
lower interaction and mortality rates of
Atlantic sea turtles with circle hooks,
this action is not expected to
significantly increase fishery
interactions with, or mortalities of, sea
turtles. The predicted interactions
would not cause the Incidental Take
Statement in the 2004 Biological
Opinion for the PLL fishery to be
exceeded, and would not be expected to
jeopardize the continued existence of
sea turtles. Incidental takes of, or
interactions with, protected species that
are listed as threatened or endangered
under the Endangered Species Act
taking place under the research fishery
would be counted against the
authorized incidental take levels
specified in the 2004 Biological Opinion
for the PLL fishery.
The EA includes similar analyses of
PLL and POP data from 1995–2000 on
catch rates, live and dead discard rates,
and retained numbers of swordfish,
bluefin, yellowfin, and bigeye tunas,
large coastal sharks, and pelagic sharks.
Based on the worst case scenario from
the POP data, and applying anticipated
fishing effort in the research fishery to
pre-closure J-hook catch rates, an
estimated 1,083 swordfish are predicted
to be retained, 973 discarded alive, and
360 discarded dead; zero (0) bluefin
tuna are predicted to be caught or
discarded; nine white marlin are
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
predicted to be discarded alive and 13
dead; 10 blue marlin are predicted to be
discarded alive and 14 dead; 113 large
coastal sharks are predicted to be kept;
124 discarded alive, and 50 discarded
dead (depending upon available quota);
and 21 pelagic sharks are predicted to
be kept, 81 discarded alive, and 11
discarded dead (depending upon
available quota). Given the known and
anticipated mortality reduction benefits
of circle hooks for Atlantic HMS relative
to J-hooks, the estimates above are likely
over-estimates. As a result, this action is
not expected to significantly increase
the retention or bycatch of HMS.
All fishing activities would be
monitored by Federal fisheries observers
or trained research staff to provide data
on longline gear configuration; target
and incidental catch; bycatch of billfish,
juvenile swordfish, and bluefin tuna;
and sea turtle interactions. NMFS
currently collects this information on
selected PLL vessels through the POP.
Even though fishing effort will
increase in the proposed research area,
fishing effort across the entire fishery is
not anticipated to increase because
vessels participating in the research
fishery would have otherwise been
fishing commercially for HMS in open
areas.
The regulations that prohibit the
proposed activities absent issuance of
an EFP, include requirements for vessel
reporting (50 CFR 635.4) and fishing in
a closed area (50 CFR 635.21(c)(2)). All
other relevant regulations concerning
HMS at 50 CFR Part 635 would apply.
NMFS is requesting public comment
on the EA because the fishing activities
are proposed to occur in closed areas,
specifically the EFC and Charleston
Bump. If NMFS proceeds with the
proposed research as described in the
EA, then NMFS would issue the
necessary exempted fishing permits to
authorize the research activity.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq. and 16
U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: October 30, 2007.
Emily H. Menashes
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:04 Nov 02, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
62443
EN05NO07.001
ycherry on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 213 / Monday, November 5, 2007 / Notices
62444
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 213 / Monday, November 5, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 1. COORDINATES OF THE PROPOSED RESEARCH AREA (PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE 3) SHOWN IN FIGURE 1 BEGINNING
WITH LOCATION NUMBER 1 AND PROCEEDING CLOCKWISE THROUGH LOCATION NUMBER 12.
Latitude
Longitude
Point
Degrees
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
34
31
31
28
28
28
31
31
31
32
33
34
Minutes
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
...................................
[FR Doc. 07–5474 Filed 11–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–C
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control
Program: Proposed Findings
Document, Environmental
Assessment, and Finding of No
Significant Impact
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of
Proposed Findings Document,
Environmental Assessment, and Finding
of No Significant Impact on Approval of
the Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control
Program for Indiana.
ycherry on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
availability of the Proposed Findings
Document, Environmental Assessment,
and Finding of No Significant Impact for
Indiana’s Coastal Nonpoint Pollution
Control Program. Coastal states and
territories are required to submit their
coastal nonpoint programs to the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
for approval. The Findings Document
was prepared by NOAA and EPA to
provide the rationale for the agencies’
decision to approve the state coastal
nonpoint pollution control program.
Section 6217 of the Coastal Zone Act
Reauthorization Amendments (CZARA),
16 U.S.C. 1455b, requires states and
territories with coastal zone
management programs that have
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:04 Nov 02, 2007
Jkt 214001
Seconds
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
47
29
5
0
Degrees
0
0
0
6.8
0
0
0
0
7.2
12.1
35.8
0
received approval under section 306 of
the Coastal Zone Management Act to
develop and implement coastal
nonpoint programs. The Environmental
Assessment was prepared by NOAA,
pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. sections
4321 et seq., to assess the environmental
impacts associated with the approval of
the coastal nonpoint pollution control
program submitted to NOAA and EPA
by Indiana.
NOAA and EPA have proposed to
approve, with conditions, the coastal
nonpoint program submitted by Indiana.
The requirements of 40 CFR Parts 1500–
1508 (Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) regulations to implement
the National Environmental Policy Act)
apply to the preparation of these
Environmental Assessments.
Specifically, 40 CFR section 1506.6
requires agencies to provide public
notice of the availability of
environmental documents. This notice
is part of NOAA’s action to comply with
this requirement.
Copies of the proposed Findings
Document, Environmental Assessment,
and Finding of No Significant Impact
may be found on the NOAA Web site at
https://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/
assessments/welcome.html or may be
obtained upon request from: Allison
Castellan, Coastal Programs Division (N/
ORM3), Office of Ocean and Coastal
Resource Management, NOS, NOAA,
1305 East-West Highway, Silver Spring,
Maryland 20910, phone (301) 713–3155,
extension 125, e-mail
allison.castellan@noaa.gov.
Individuals or organizations
wishing to submit comments on the
proposed Findings or Environmental
Assessment should do so by December
5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be made
to: John King, Chief, Coastal Programs
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Minutes
76
76
78
79
79
79
79
79
78
78
77
76
Seconds
0
0
0
11
23
40
40
54
21
40
27
15
0
0
0
54.5
47.9
0
0
38.9
50.5
21.0
15.7
26.5
Division (N/ORM3), Office of Ocean and
Coastal Resource Management, NOS,
NOAA, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, Maryland 20910, phone (301)
713–3155 extension 188, e-mail
john.king@noaa.gov.
(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog 11.419
Coastal Zone Management Program
Administration).
John H. Dunnigan,
Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services
and Coastal Zone Management, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Benjamin H. Grumbles,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Water,
Environmental Protection Agency.
[FR Doc. 07–5473 Filed 11–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–08–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0037]
Federal Acquisition
Regulation;Information Collection;
Presolicitation Notice and Response
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments regarding an extension to an
existing OMB clearance.
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Secretariat will be submitting to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 213 (Monday, November 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62441-62444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5474]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XD57
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS); Pelagic Longline
Research
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the availability of an Environmental Assessment
(EA) analyzing the impacts of conducting research with pelagic longline
(PLL) vessels in portions of the East Florida Coast (EFC) and
Charleston Bump closed areas. Given the nearly rebuilt status of north
Atlantic swordfish and recent bycatch reduction measures implemented
throughout the U.S. PLL fishery, NMFS is proposing to collect baseline
PLL fishery data in the closed areas to evaluate the effectiveness of
existing bycatch reduction measures. The EA analyzes monthly and annual
PLL logbook and pelagic observer program (POP) data on catch and
bycatch rates of all species in the proposed research area from 1995-
2000 to determine potential impacts of the research fishery on target
and non-target species. NMFS invites comments from interested parties
on the EA.
DATES: Written comments on the EA must be received by 5 p.m. on
November 20, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Email: PLL.ResearchEA@noaa.gov. Include in the subject
line the following identifier: I.D. PLL Research EA.
Mail: Margo Schulze-Haugen, Highly Migratory Species
Management Division (F/SF1), NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, MD 20910. Please mark the outside of the envelope ``Comments on
PLL Research EA.''
Fax: (301)713-1917
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russell Dunn, 727-824-5399; fax: 727-
824-5398, or Chris Rilling 301-713-2347; fax: 301-713-1917.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS proposes to conduct research with a
limited number of vessels (two are proposed, but backup vessels may be
used if breakdowns occur) in portions of the EFC and Charleston Bump
closed areas (Figure 1). The latitude and longitude coordinates of the
proposed research area are provided in Table 1. In the EFC closed area,
the proposed research area would be north of Fort Pierce, FL, beginning
at 28 degrees north latitude and proceeding north, seaward of the axis
of the Gulf Stream, to the northern boundary of the EFC closed area at
31 degrees north latitude. In the Charleston Bump, the proposed
research area would be north of 31 degrees north latitude and following
the 200 meter isobath ( ~100 fathom contour) to the northern and
eastern boundaries of the Charleston Bump closed area. The two areas
are hereafter referred to collectively as the proposed research area.
NMFS closed the EFC and Charleston Bump closed areas to PLL gear in
early 2001 to reduce bycatch of juvenile swordfish, billfish, and other
HMS (65 FR 47214, August 1, 2000). The Charleston Bump closed area is a
seasonal closure from February through April every year, whereas the
EFC closed area is closed year-round to PLL gear. Since that time, the
swordfish stock has been nearly rebuilt (B=0.99BMSY) and new
bycatch reduction measures have been implemented throughout the PLL
fishery (e.g., circle hook requirements, bait requirements, bycatch
release gear, and careful handling and release workshops). No PLL
fishing has been authorized in the closed areas since 2001, and NMFS
has not collected information on the effectiveness of current bycatch
reduction measures in closed areas where bycatch rates may be
[[Page 62442]]
higher than in other areas. NMFS thus proposes to collect information
under scientifically rigorous protocols to determine the effectiveness
of bycatch reduction measures in these closed areas. This information
will assist NMFS in making appropriate management decisions regarding
the effectiveness of existing closed areas and bycatch reduction
technologies, as well as any potential modifications to the closed
areas.
NMFS proposes to make a total of 289 sets distributed inside and
outside the proposed research area over a 12 month period beginning in
late 2007 or early 2008. Each set would consist of 500 18/0 circle
hooks with an offset not to exceed 10 degrees with whole dead finfish
bait and/or squid bait. Vessels would be subject to 100 percent
observer coverage, and observers or research staff would collect data
that includes, but is not limited to, catch per unit effort (CPUE) for
target and bycatch species; discard rates; interaction rates with
protected species; size of target species; hooking location; mortality
at haul back; bycatch mortality; and if possible, an evaluation of the
condition of fish at haul back to allow post-release mortality
estimates.
All targeted catch (tunas, swordfish, and sharks) that can be
legally landed could be harvested and sold by the vessel owners. No
other compensation would be provided to the vessels. All bycatch would
be released using NMFS-approved dehooking equipment and appropriate
safe handling and release protocols. Incidental catch of bluefin tuna
would be landed consistent with existing regulations. Any mortalities
of Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA) regulated species (i.e., tunas
and swordfish) and sharks would be counted against the appropriate
quotas. Non-target species and protected resources would be tagged and
released alive, consistent with requirements of the Terms and
Conditions of the 2004 Biological Opinion issued for the fishery, and
research objectives.
The EA analyzed the status quo and two alternatives on different
proposed research areas within the EFC and Charleston Bump areas. A
fourth alternative to conduct research throughout the entire EFC and
Charleston Bump closed areas was considered but not further analyzed.
Based on analysis in the EA of PLL and POP data from 1995-2000 and
prior to the closures and circle hook requirements going into effect, a
limited number of interactions with leatherback sea turtles (four based
on PLL data and six based on POP data over six years) and loggerhead
sea turtles (five based on PLL data and 12 based on POP data over six
years) occurred in the proposed research area. Under a worst case
scenario using estimates from the POP data, and applying anticipated
fishing effort in the research fishery to pre-closure J-hook catch
rates, two leatherback and six loggerhead sea turtle interactions may
occur as a result of the research fishery. Given the significantly
lower interaction and mortality rates of Atlantic sea turtles with
circle hooks, this action is not expected to significantly increase
fishery interactions with, or mortalities of, sea turtles. The
predicted interactions would not cause the Incidental Take Statement in
the 2004 Biological Opinion for the PLL fishery to be exceeded, and
would not be expected to jeopardize the continued existence of sea
turtles. Incidental takes of, or interactions with, protected species
that are listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered
Species Act taking place under the research fishery would be counted
against the authorized incidental take levels specified in the 2004
Biological Opinion for the PLL fishery.
The EA includes similar analyses of PLL and POP data from 1995-2000
on catch rates, live and dead discard rates, and retained numbers of
swordfish, bluefin, yellowfin, and bigeye tunas, large coastal sharks,
and pelagic sharks. Based on the worst case scenario from the POP data,
and applying anticipated fishing effort in the research fishery to pre-
closure J-hook catch rates, an estimated 1,083 swordfish are predicted
to be retained, 973 discarded alive, and 360 discarded dead; zero (0)
bluefin tuna are predicted to be caught or discarded; nine white marlin
are predicted to be discarded alive and 13 dead; 10 blue marlin are
predicted to be discarded alive and 14 dead; 113 large coastal sharks
are predicted to be kept; 124 discarded alive, and 50 discarded dead
(depending upon available quota); and 21 pelagic sharks are predicted
to be kept, 81 discarded alive, and 11 discarded dead (depending upon
available quota). Given the known and anticipated mortality reduction
benefits of circle hooks for Atlantic HMS relative to J-hooks, the
estimates above are likely over-estimates. As a result, this action is
not expected to significantly increase the retention or bycatch of HMS.
All fishing activities would be monitored by Federal fisheries
observers or trained research staff to provide data on longline gear
configuration; target and incidental catch; bycatch of billfish,
juvenile swordfish, and bluefin tuna; and sea turtle interactions. NMFS
currently collects this information on selected PLL vessels through the
POP.
Even though fishing effort will increase in the proposed research
area, fishing effort across the entire fishery is not anticipated to
increase because vessels participating in the research fishery would
have otherwise been fishing commercially for HMS in open areas.
The regulations that prohibit the proposed activities absent
issuance of an EFP, include requirements for vessel reporting (50 CFR
635.4) and fishing in a closed area (50 CFR 635.21(c)(2)). All other
relevant regulations concerning HMS at 50 CFR Part 635 would apply.
NMFS is requesting public comment on the EA because the fishing
activities are proposed to occur in closed areas, specifically the EFC
and Charleston Bump. If NMFS proceeds with the proposed research as
described in the EA, then NMFS would issue the necessary exempted
fishing permits to authorize the research activity.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq. and 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: October 30, 2007.
Emily H. Menashes
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
[[Page 62443]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05NO07.001
[[Page 62444]]
Table 1. Coordinates of the proposed research area (preferred alternative 3) shown in Figure 1 beginning with
location number 1 and proceeding clockwise through location number 12.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
Point --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Degrees Minutes Seconds Degrees Minutes Seconds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 34 0 0 76 0 0
2 31 0 0 76 0 0
3 31 0 0 78 0 0
4 28 17 6.8 79 11 54.5
5 28 0 0 79 23 47.9
6 28 0 0 79 40 0
7 31 0 0 79 40 0
8 31 0 0 79 54 38.9
9 31 47 7.2 78 21 50.5
10 32 29 12.1 78 40 21.0
11 33 5 35.8 77 27 15.7
12 34 0 0 76 15 26.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 07-5474 Filed 11-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-C