Changes in Flood Elevation Determinations, 62121-62123 [E7-21597]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 212 / Friday, November 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
rescissions of state law that are
unnecessary to meet Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule rescinds requirements under state
law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty, it does not contain
any unfunded mandate or significantly
or uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves rescissions of state law that are
unnecessary to implement a Federal
standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:25 Nov 01, 2007
Jkt 214001
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by January 2, 2008.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: October 16, 2007.
Wayne Nastri,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart DD—Nevada
2. Section 52.1470 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(14)(xi) and
(c)(25)(ii) to read as follows:
I
§ 52.1470
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00017
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
62121
(14) * * *
(xi) Previously approved on July 10,
1980 in paragraph (14)(ii) and now
deleted without replacement: Nevada
Revised Statutes (NRS) sections:
445.401, 445.466, and 445.497.
*
*
*
*
*
(25) * * *
(ii) Previously approved on March 27,
1984, in paragraph (25)(i)(A) and now
deleted without replacement: Nevada
Administrative Code (NAC) sections:
445.447, 445.554, 445.596, 445.662,
445.695, 445.698, 445.700, and 445.844.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–21447 Filed 11–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 65
[Docket No. FEMA–B–7745]
Changes in Flood Elevation
Determinations
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Interim rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This interim rule lists
communities where modification of the
Base (1% annual-chance) Flood
Elevations (BFEs) is appropriate because
of new scientific or technical data. New
flood insurance premium rates will be
calculated from the modified BFEs for
new buildings and their contents.
DATES: These modified BFEs are
currently in effect on the dates listed in
the table below and revise the Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) in effect
prior to this determination for the listed
communities.
From the date of the second
publication of these changes in a
newspaper of local circulation, any
person has ninety (90) days in which to
request through the community that the
Mitigation Assistant Administrator of
FEMA reconsider the changes. The
modified BFEs may be changed during
the 90-day period.
ADDRESSES: The modified BFEs for each
community are available for inspection
at the office of the Chief Executive
Officer of each community. The
respective addresses are listed in the
table below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William R. Blanton, Jr., Engineering
Management Branch, Mitigation
Directorate, Federal Emergency
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
62122
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 212 / Friday, November 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
modified BFEs are not listed for each
community in this interim rule.
However, the address of the Chief
Executive Officer of the community
where the modified BFE determinations
are available for inspection is provided.
Any request for reconsideration must
be based on knowledge of changed
conditions or new scientific or technical
data.
The modifications are made pursuant
to section 201 of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105,
and are in accordance with the National
Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C.
4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65.
For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown
and must be used for all new policies
and renewals.
The modified BFEs are the basis for
the floodplain management measures
that the community is required to either
adopt or to show evidence of being
already in effect in order to qualify or
to remain qualified for participation in
the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
September 30, 1993, Regulatory
Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
This interim rule involves no policies
that have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This interim rule meets the
applicable standards of Executive Order
12988.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 65
Flood insurance, Floodplains,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 65 is
amended to read as follows:
I
PART 65—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 65
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.;
Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,
3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376.
§ 65.4
[Amended]
2. The tables published under the
authority of § 65.4 are amended as
follows:
I
Date and name of newspaper
where notice was published
Chief executive officer of community
Effective date of modification
City of Burlington
(06–04–BY00P).
May 15, 2007, May 22, 2007,
The Times-News.
August 20, 2007 .............
370002
Dare ..................
Town of Nags Head
(07–04–4138P).
June 21, 2007, June 28, 2007,
The Coastland Times.
June 13, 2007 ................
375356
Dare ..................
Unincorporated
Areas of Dare
County (07–04–
4138P).
City of Durham (07–
04–2980P).
June 21, 2007, June 28, 2007,
The Coastland Times.
The Honorable Stephen M. Ross, Mayor
of the City of Burlington, P.O. Box
1358, 425 South Lexington Avenue,
Burlington, North Carolina 27215.
Mr. Charles L. Cameron, Manager, Town
of Nags Head, P.O. Box 99, 5401
South Croatan Highway, Nags Head,
North Carolina 27959.
Mr. Terry Wheeler, Manager, Dare County, P.O. Drawer 1000, 211 Budleigh
Street, Manteo, North Carolina 27954.
June 13, 2007 ................
375348
The Honorable William V. Bell, Mayor of
the City of Durham, Office of the
Mayor, 101 City Hall Plaza, Durham,
North Carolina 27701.
Mr. Michael M. Ruffin, Manager, Durham
County, 200 East Main Street, 2nd
Floor, Old Courthouse, Durham, North
Carolina 27701.
Mr. Moses Carey, Jr., Chairman of the
Orange County, Board of Commissioners, 200 South Cameron Street,
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278.
The Honorable Sandy Moore, Mayor of
the Town of Indian Trail, P.O. Box
2430, Indian Trail, North Carolina
28079.
Mr. Mike Shalati, Manager, Union County,
500 North Main Street, Room 925,
Monroe, North Carolina 28112.
August 7, 2007 ...............
370086
August 7, 2007 ...............
370085
November 5, 2007 ..........
370342
August 21, 2007 .............
370235
August 21, 2007 .............
370234
November 7, 2007 ..........
370244
State and county
North Carolina:
Alamance .........
Durham .............
Durham .............
Orange .............
Union ................
Union ................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Wake ................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Location and case
No.
These modified BFEs, together with
the floodplain management criteria
required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the
minimum that are required. They
should not be construed to mean that
the community must change any
existing ordinances that are more
stringent in their floodplain
management requirements. The
community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own, or
pursuant to policies established by the
other Federal, State, or regional entities.
The changes BFEs are in accordance
with 44 CFR 65.4.
National Environmental Policy Act.
This interim rule is categorically
excluded from the requirements of 44
CFR part 10, Environmental
Consideration. An environmental
impact assessment has not been
prepared.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood
elevation determinations are not within
the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required.
Regulatory Classification. This
interim rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 of
Unincorporated
Areas of Durham
County (07–04–
2980P).
Unincorporated
Areas of Orange
County (06–04–
C141P).
Town of Indian Trail
(06–04–BX22P).
Unincorporated
Areas of Union
County (06–04–
BX22P).
Town of Wake Forest (07–04–
0615P).
16:25 Nov 01, 2007
August 14, 2007, August 21,
2007, The Herald-Sun.
August 14, 2007, August 21,
2007, The Herald-Sun.
July 31, 2007, August 7, 2007,
Chapel Hill Herald.
May 15, 2007, May 22, 2007,
The Enquirer Journal.
May 15, 2007, May 22, 2007,
The Enquirer Journal.
August 2, 2007, August 9,
2007, The Wake Weekly.
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
The Honorable Vivian A. Jones, Mayor of
the Town of Wake Forest, 401 Elm Avenue, Wake Forest, North Carolina
27587.
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
Community
No.
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 212 / Friday, November 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.
97.022, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’)
Dated: October 29, 2007.
David I. Maurstad,
Federal Insurance Administrator of the
National Flood Insurance Program,
Department of Homeland Security, Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E7–21597 Filed 11–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 11
[EB Docket No. 04–296; FCC 07–109]
Review of the Emergency Alert System
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission) amends its rules in order
to ensure the efficient, rapid, and secure
transmission of Emergency Alert System
(EAS) alerts in a variety of formats
(including text, audio, and video) and
via different means (broadcast, cable,
satellite, and other networks), increasing
the reliability, security, and efficacy of
the nation’s EAS network.
DATES: The effective date is December 3,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Beers, Policy Division, Public
Safety and Homeland Security Bureau,
(202) 418–1170, or TTY (202) 418–7233.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Second
Report and Order (Order) in EB Docket
No. 04–296, FCC 07–109, adopted May
31, 2007, and released July 12, 2007.
The complete text of this document is
available for inspection and copying
during normal business hours in the
FCC Reference Information Center,
Room CY–A257, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. This document
may also be obtained from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., in person
at 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, via telephone at
(202) 488–5300, via facsimile at (202)
488–5563, or via e-mail at
FCC@BCPIWEB.COM. Alternative
formats (computer diskette, large print,
audio cassette, and Braille) are available
to persons with disabilities by sending
an e-mail to FCC504@fcc.gov or calling
the Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530, TTY (202)
418–0432. This document is also
available on the Commission’s Web site
at https://www.fcc.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:25 Nov 01, 2007
Jkt 214001
Synopsis of the Order
Next Generation EAS
1. In the Order, we reaffirm the
obligations of today’s EAS Participants
to maintain existing EAS and establish
the framework for the nation’s Next
Generation EAS. This Next Generation
EAS will include new and innovative
technologies and distribution systems
that will provide increased redundancy
and resiliency for the delivery of
emergency alerts. We also take steps to
ensure that the upgraded EAS will meet
the needs of all Americans, including
persons with hearing and vision
disabilities and those who do not speak
English. Finally, we will continue to
harness the benefits of existing EAS
while the Next Generation EAS is
developed and deployed. The
combination of the existing and Next
Generation EAS systems will ensure the
continuity of EAS while the Next
Generation EAS is being implemented,
and ensure that EAS alerts reach the
largest number of affected people by
multiple communications paths as
quickly as possible.
2. Below, we describe the four
cornerstones of the Next Generation
EAS: (1) Maintaining the existing EAS
network; (2) utilizing a common
messaging protocol, CAP, to be
implemented by all EAS Participants
following its adoption by FEMA; (3)
incorporating new authentication and
security requirements; and (4) fostering
the deployment of new, redundant EAS
delivery systems, including satellite,
Internet, and wireline networks.
Maintaining Existing EAS
3. Although a Presidential alert has
never been sent over the EAS, the
current EAS network has been used for
state, local, and weather-related
emergencies. We recognize that in
certain emergency situations, batterypowered AM or FM receivers may be
the primary source of emergency
information for the general public.
Broadcast and cable personnel are
familiar with current EAS equipment
and are trained in its use. In addition,
it would be inadvisable to require
immediate use of a new system until
that system is fully in place and its
reliability tested. We therefore do not
agree with those commenters who argue
that the existing EAS should be wholly
abandoned or replaced at this time.
4. Instead, we conclude that
broadcast, cable and other current EAS
Participants should maintain the
existing EAS, particularly since
alternative delivery mechanisms,
although potentially more robust, have
yet to be deployed. We recognize,
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
62123
however, that EAS currently uses a
station-relay message dissemination
process that lacks the flexibility and
redundancy of certain evolving digital
communications systems. Consequently,
we also require these current EAS
Participants to upgrade their networks
to the Next Generation EAS, as
discussed below, while maintaining
existing EAS.
5. NOAA Weather Radio. In addition,
we disagree with those commenters who
suggest that NWR should replace the
existing EAS. We believe, however, that
the NWR system should continue to be
closely integrated with EAS. NWR is
one of the principal sources of alert
information, and is likely to continue to
be the primary originator of weatherbased alerts. We also recognize that
voluntary efforts, including CEA’s
Public AlertTM Certification and Logo
Program launched in April 2004, further
enhance the value and potential of this
proven emergency-alert delivery system.
The record demonstrates that redundant
alert-delivery systems will enhance the
overall reach, efficacy, and reliability of
the EAS as a whole. NWR provides an
alternative source of emergency alerts,
and we expect that it will continue to
be an important component of EAS and
the overall national public alert and
warning system. We nevertheless
caution EAS Participants that retransmit
NWR alerts to ensure that such
retransmission is consistent with our
EAS rules and associated protocols.
Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) for
EAS
6. In the Further NPRM, the
Commission sought comment on the
widespread assertion in the record that
a common messaging protocol should be
adopted to permit a digitally-based alert
or warning to be distributed
simultaneously over multiple platforms.
The Commission noted that the
Partnership for Public Warning had
endorsed the OASIS Common Alerting
Protocol (CAP) for this purpose and that
many public and private organizations
responsible for alerts believed that CAP
offered the most practical means of
quickly creating an effective interface
between emergency managers and
multiple emergency alert distribution
platforms. Accordingly, the Commission
asked whether CAP should be adopted
as the common messaging protocol for
any future digital alert system, and
particularly for EAS alerts. The
Commission also asked whether CAP
would allow simultaneous distribution
to radio, television, and wireless media
such as mobile telephones and personal
digital assistants (PDAs), and how it
would ensure uniformity of alerts across
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 212 (Friday, November 2, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62121-62123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21597]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management Agency
44 CFR Part 65
[Docket No. FEMA-B-7745]
Changes in Flood Elevation Determinations
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Interim rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This interim rule lists communities where modification of the
Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) is appropriate because
of new scientific or technical data. New flood insurance premium rates
will be calculated from the modified BFEs for new buildings and their
contents.
DATES: These modified BFEs are currently in effect on the dates listed
in the table below and revise the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
From the date of the second publication of these changes in a
newspaper of local circulation, any person has ninety (90) days in
which to request through the community that the Mitigation Assistant
Administrator of FEMA reconsider the changes. The modified BFEs may be
changed during the 90-day period.
ADDRESSES: The modified BFEs for each community are available for
inspection at the office of the Chief Executive Officer of each
community. The respective addresses are listed in the table below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William R. Blanton, Jr., Engineering
Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal Emergency
[[Page 62122]]
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-
3151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The modified BFEs are not listed for each
community in this interim rule. However, the address of the Chief
Executive Officer of the community where the modified BFE
determinations are available for inspection is provided.
Any request for reconsideration must be based on knowledge of
changed conditions or new scientific or technical data.
The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
For rating purposes, the currently effective community number is
shown and must be used for all new policies and renewals.
The modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management
measures that the community is required to either adopt or to show
evidence of being already in effect in order to qualify or to remain
qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
These modified BFEs, together with the floodplain management
criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are required.
They should not be construed to mean that the community must change any
existing ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain
management requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter
requirements of its own, or pursuant to policies established by the
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The changes BFEs are in
accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
National Environmental Policy Act. This interim rule is
categorically excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR part 10,
Environmental Consideration. An environmental impact assessment has not
been prepared.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood elevation determinations are
not within the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
Regulatory Classification. This interim rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This interim rule involves no
policies that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This interim rule
meets the applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 65
Flood insurance, Floodplains, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 65 is amended to read as follows:
PART 65--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 65 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp., p. 376.
Sec. 65.4 [Amended]
0
2. The tables published under the authority of Sec. 65.4 are amended
as follows:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date and name of
State and county Location and case No. newspaper where Chief executive officer Effective date of modification Community
notice was published of community No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
North Carolina:
Alamance...................... City of Burlington May 15, 2007, May The Honorable Stephen M. August 20, 2007................ 370002
(06-04-BY00P). 22, 2007, The Times- Ross, Mayor of the City
News. of Burlington, P.O. Box
1358, 425 South
Lexington Avenue,
Burlington, North
Carolina 27215.
Dare.......................... Town of Nags Head (07- June 21, 2007, June Mr. Charles L. Cameron, June 13, 2007.................. 375356
04-4138P). 28, 2007, The Manager, Town of Nags
Coastland Times. Head, P.O. Box 99, 5401
South Croatan Highway,
Nags Head, North
Carolina 27959.
Dare.......................... Unincorporated Areas June 21, 2007, June Mr. Terry Wheeler, June 13, 2007.................. 375348
of Dare County (07- 28, 2007, The Manager, Dare County,
04-4138P). Coastland Times. P.O. Drawer 1000, 211
Budleigh Street, Manteo,
North Carolina 27954.
Durham........................ City of Durham (07-04- August 14, 2007, The Honorable William V. August 7, 2007................. 370086
2980P). August 21, 2007, Bell, Mayor of the City
The Herald-Sun. of Durham, Office of the
Mayor, 101 City Hall
Plaza, Durham, North
Carolina 27701.
Durham........................ Unincorporated Areas August 14, 2007, Mr. Michael M. Ruffin, August 7, 2007................. 370085
of Durham County (07- August 21, 2007, Manager, Durham County,
04-2980P). The Herald-Sun. 200 East Main Street,
2nd Floor, Old
Courthouse, Durham,
North Carolina 27701.
Orange........................ Unincorporated Areas July 31, 2007, Mr. Moses Carey, Jr., November 5, 2007............... 370342
of Orange County (06- August 7, 2007, Chairman of the Orange
04-C141P). Chapel Hill Herald. County, Board of
Commissioners, 200 South
Cameron Street,
Hillsborough, North
Carolina 27278.
Union......................... Town of Indian Trail May 15, 2007, May The Honorable Sandy August 21, 2007................ 370235
(06-04-BX22P). 22, 2007, The Moore, Mayor of the Town
Enquirer Journal. of Indian Trail, P.O.
Box 2430, Indian Trail,
North Carolina 28079.
Union......................... Unincorporated Areas May 15, 2007, May Mr. Mike Shalati, August 21, 2007................ 370234
of Union County (06- 22, 2007, The Manager, Union County,
04-BX22P). Enquirer Journal. 500 North Main Street,
Room 925, Monroe, North
Carolina 28112.
Wake.......................... Town of Wake Forest August 2, 2007, The Honorable Vivian A. November 7, 2007............... 370244
(07-04-0615P). August 9, 2007, The Jones, Mayor of the Town
Wake Weekly. of Wake Forest, 401 Elm
Avenue, Wake Forest,
North Carolina 27587.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 62123]]
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')
Dated: October 29, 2007.
David I. Maurstad,
Federal Insurance Administrator of the National Flood Insurance
Program, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management
Agency.
[FR Doc. E7-21597 Filed 11-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P
