Superior National Forest, Kawishiwi Ranger District, MN, Glacier Project Environmental Impact Statement, 62205-62206 [07-5457]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 212 / Friday, November 2, 2007 / Notices
domestic citrus industry, including the
individual farmers who comprise the
base of that industry, APHIS must act
quickly to expand the Federal order.
APHIS has completed an assessment
of the environmental impacts
anticipated from the implementation of
a new Federal order for the domestic
quarantine of citrus greening disease
and Asian citrus psyllid. There is now
scientific evidence showing that orange
jasmine (Murraya paniculata) and
related species are hosts of citrus
greening as well as the Asian citrus
psyllid. Previously, orange jasmine was
regulated only as a host of the Asian
citrus psyllid. The new Federal order
will add Murraya spp. to the citrus
greening host list. The main difference
in the new Federal order is the
expansion of the citrus greening
quarantined area in Florida and the
distinction made between citrus
greening and Asian citrus psyllid
quarantine areas.
APHIS’ review and analysis of the
potential environmental impacts
associated with the implementation of
the new Federal order are documented
in detail in an environmental
assessment titled ‘‘Movement of
Regulated Articles from a Citrus
Greening Quarantine Zone’’ (October
2007). We are making this
environmental assessment available to
the public for review and comment. We
will consider all comments that we
receive on or before the date listed
under the heading DATES at the
beginning of this notice.
Due to the serious and destructive
nature of citrus greening disease, it is
necessary to expand the number of
counties in Florida from which the
movement of plants that are hosts of
citrus greening is present in order to
prevent the further spread and
infestation. It is also necessary to
expand the areas quarantined due to the
presence of Asian citrus psyllid so that
host plants can be treated and inspected
before being moved interstate. Since
citrus greening is a highly injurious
citrus disease, and the Asian citrus
psyllid is harmful both as the insect
vector of the disease and as a significant
citrus pest in its own right, APHIS has
determined that it may be necessary to
immediately address both the disease
and the associated insect pest. This will
be accomplished by the restriction of
hosts of citrus greening from areas
where the disease is present, and the
regulation and treatment of plants that
are hosts of the psyllid from those areas
where the insect is present and may be
spread through the movement of
infested nursery stock. Therefore,
APHIS may have to begin the expanded
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:58 Nov 01, 2007
Jkt 214001
citrus greening regulatory program in
Florida immediately and issue a finding
of no significant impact for the
environmental assessment before the
comment period on the environmental
assessment concludes. Nevertheless, all
comments received on the
environmental assessment will be
evaluated and responded to after the
comment period has ended.
The environmental assessment may
be viewed on the Regulations.gov Web
site or in our reading room (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov and
information on the location and hours of
the reading room). You may request
paper copies of the environmental
assessment by calling or writing to the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. Please refer to the
title of the environmental assessment
when requesting copies.
The environmental assessment has
been prepared in accordance with: (1)
The National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the
Council on Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3)
USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part
372).
Done in Washington, DC this 30th day of
October 2007.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E7–21679 Filed 11–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Superior National Forest, Kawishiwi
Ranger District, MN, Glacier Project
Environmental Impact Statement
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, will prepare
an environmental impact statement
(EIS) for the Glacier Project. The
proposed activities would manage forest
vegetation composition, structure, and
spatial patterns (including habitat defragmentation), and the transportation
system associated with these activities.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
November 30, 2007. The draft
environmental impact statement is
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62205
expected in January 2008 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected in May 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Mark E. Van Every, Kawishiwi District
Ranger, Glacier Project EIS, 1393 Hwy
169, Ely, MN 55731. Send electronic
comments to comments-easternsuperior-kawishiwi@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Duffy, Glacier Project Leader,
1393 Hwy 169, Ely, MN 55731,
Telephone (218) 365–2097.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the Glacier Project is
to move the area towards the vegetation
and landscape ecosystem desired
conditions described in the 2004
Superior National Land and Resource
Management Plan.
Proposed Action
The Proposed Action would manage
forest vegetation composition, structure,
and spatial patterns and the
transportation system associated with
these activities. Proposed activities
include: creating young forest on
approximately 5,500 acres, improving
stand structure and within-stand
diversity on approximately 2,500 acres,
and restoring stand conditions through
a variety of non-harvest activities such
as planting, biomass removal, and
conducting prescribed burns to reduce
risk of wildfire on approximately 5,200
acres. The project has been specifically
designed to:
• Maintain existing patches of mature
forest greater than 300 acres that would
not lose interior forest qualities during
the next ten years.
• Create one 300-plus-acre patch of
young forest by harvesting a mature
patch that will not meet interior forest
characteristics in ten years.
• Reduce fragmentation by proposing
regeneration harvests adjacent to
existing young stands, including those
proposed to be harvested on other
ownership.
• Maintain and improve habitat
needed for threatened, endangered, and
sensitive species.
Possible Alternatives
Alternative 1 is the no-action
alternative. Alternative 2, the Modified
Proposed Action, was developed based
on the proposed action that was
included in the Scoping Report and
incorporates comments from the public
and additional field information.
Alternative 3 was developed to address
the significant issues raised by the
public during the Scoping comment
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
62206
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 212 / Friday, November 2, 2007 / Notices
period. The Responsible Official
directed the interdisciplinary team to
develop an alternative that would not
harvest or build roads directly adjacent
to the BWCAW and would not harvest
in an area perceived to be at higher risk
from non-native invasive species.
Responsible Official
Mark E. Van Every, Kawishiwi
District Ranger, 1393 Hwy 169, Ely MN,
55731.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
An environmental analysis for the
Glacier Project will evaluate sitespecific issues, consider management
alternatives, and analyze the potential
effects of the proposed action and
alternatives. The scope of the project is
limited to decisions concerning
activities within the Glacier Project Area
that meet the Purpose and Need, as well
as desired conditions. An
environmental impact statement will
provide the Responsible Official, Mark
E. Van Every, with the information
needed to decide which actions, if any,
to approve.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Scoping Process
The District Ranger mailed the Glacier
Project Scoping Report to area
landowners and other interested
individuals and groups in May 2007.
Based on comments received during the
scoping period and additional
information gathered by resource
specialists, the District Ranger has
directed the Glacier Project
Interdisciplinary Team to develop an
Environmental Impact Statement. The
public will be notified that an EIS is
being developed and will have an
additional opportunity to submit
comments before the Draft EIS will be
completed. The public will be notified
of the significant issues and possible
alternatives that will be used to disclose
the effects of the project. A public
meeting is planned during the comment
period on the Draft EIS.
Preliminary Issues
For significant issues were identified
based on comments the public
submitted on the May 2007 Scoping
Report. These issues involve vegetation
and associated road management
adjacent to the Boundary Waters Canoe
Area Wilderness, project activities that
have the potential to affect lynx and
lynx habitat, concern about non-native
invasive species, and impacts to Forest
Plan Inventoried Roadless Areas.
Permits or Licenses Required
Easement or permission to cross nonfederal property may be needed to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:58 Nov 01, 2007
Jkt 214001
access some treatment units to
implement Forest Service activities.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. Written comments
will be solicited through a notice that
will be sent to the Glacier Project
mailing list.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the court. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: October 26, 2007.
Mark E. Van Every,
Kawishiwi District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 07–5457 Filed 11–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
Procurement List; Proposed Additions
Committee for Purchase from
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled.
ACTION: Proposed Additions to the
Procurement List.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing
to add to the Procurement List products
and services to be furnished by
nonprofit agencies employing persons
who are blind or have other severe
disabilities.
Comments Must Be Received on or
Before: December 2, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase
From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800,
1421 Jefferson Davis Highway,
Arlington, Virginia, 22202–3259.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT
COMMENTS CONTACT: Kimberly M. Zeich,
Telephone: (703) 603–7740, Fax: (703)
603–0655, or e-mail
CMTEFedReg@jwod.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C
47(a) (2) and 41 CFR 51–2.3. Its purpose
is to provide interested persons an
opportunity to submit comments on the
proposed actions.
If the Committee approves the
proposed additions, the entities of the
Federal Government identified in the
notice for each product or service will
be required to procure the products and
services listed below from nonprofit
agencies employing persons who are
blind or have other severe disabilities.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
I certify that the following action will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The major factors considered for this
certification were:
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 212 (Friday, November 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62205-62206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5457]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Superior National Forest, Kawishiwi Ranger District, MN, Glacier
Project Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Glacier Project. The
proposed activities would manage forest vegetation composition,
structure, and spatial patterns (including habitat de-fragmentation),
and the transportation system associated with these activities.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by November 30, 2007. The draft environmental impact statement is
expected in January 2008 and the final environmental impact statement
is expected in May 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Mark E. Van Every, Kawishiwi
District Ranger, Glacier Project EIS, 1393 Hwy 169, Ely, MN 55731. Send
electronic comments to comments-eastern-superior-kawishiwi@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Duffy, Glacier Project Leader,
1393 Hwy 169, Ely, MN 55731, Telephone (218) 365-2097.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the Glacier Project is to move the area towards the
vegetation and landscape ecosystem desired conditions described in the
2004 Superior National Land and Resource Management Plan.
Proposed Action
The Proposed Action would manage forest vegetation composition,
structure, and spatial patterns and the transportation system
associated with these activities. Proposed activities include: creating
young forest on approximately 5,500 acres, improving stand structure
and within-stand diversity on approximately 2,500 acres, and restoring
stand conditions through a variety of non-harvest activities such as
planting, biomass removal, and conducting prescribed burns to reduce
risk of wildfire on approximately 5,200 acres. The project has been
specifically designed to:
Maintain existing patches of mature forest greater than
300 acres that would not lose interior forest qualities during the next
ten years.
Create one 300-plus-acre patch of young forest by
harvesting a mature patch that will not meet interior forest
characteristics in ten years.
Reduce fragmentation by proposing regeneration harvests
adjacent to existing young stands, including those proposed to be
harvested on other ownership.
Maintain and improve habitat needed for threatened,
endangered, and sensitive species.
Possible Alternatives
Alternative 1 is the no-action alternative. Alternative 2, the
Modified Proposed Action, was developed based on the proposed action
that was included in the Scoping Report and incorporates comments from
the public and additional field information. Alternative 3 was
developed to address the significant issues raised by the public during
the Scoping comment
[[Page 62206]]
period. The Responsible Official directed the interdisciplinary team to
develop an alternative that would not harvest or build roads directly
adjacent to the BWCAW and would not harvest in an area perceived to be
at higher risk from non-native invasive species.
Responsible Official
Mark E. Van Every, Kawishiwi District Ranger, 1393 Hwy 169, Ely MN,
55731.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
An environmental analysis for the Glacier Project will evaluate
site-specific issues, consider management alternatives, and analyze the
potential effects of the proposed action and alternatives. The scope of
the project is limited to decisions concerning activities within the
Glacier Project Area that meet the Purpose and Need, as well as desired
conditions. An environmental impact statement will provide the
Responsible Official, Mark E. Van Every, with the information needed to
decide which actions, if any, to approve.
Scoping Process
The District Ranger mailed the Glacier Project Scoping Report to
area landowners and other interested individuals and groups in May
2007. Based on comments received during the scoping period and
additional information gathered by resource specialists, the District
Ranger has directed the Glacier Project Interdisciplinary Team to
develop an Environmental Impact Statement. The public will be notified
that an EIS is being developed and will have an additional opportunity
to submit comments before the Draft EIS will be completed. The public
will be notified of the significant issues and possible alternatives
that will be used to disclose the effects of the project. A public
meeting is planned during the comment period on the Draft EIS.
Preliminary Issues
For significant issues were identified based on comments the public
submitted on the May 2007 Scoping Report. These issues involve
vegetation and associated road management adjacent to the Boundary
Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, project activities that have the
potential to affect lynx and lynx habitat, concern about non-native
invasive species, and impacts to Forest Plan Inventoried Roadless
Areas.
Permits or Licenses Required
Easement or permission to cross non-federal property may be needed
to access some treatment units to implement Forest Service activities.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. Written comments
will be solicited through a notice that will be sent to the Glacier
Project mailing list.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal
Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the court. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: October 26, 2007.
Mark E. Van Every,
Kawishiwi District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 07-5457 Filed 11-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
