Proposed Collection; Comment Request; A Process Evaluation of the NIH Director's Pioneer Award (NDPA) Program, 61888-61889 [E7-21474]

Download as PDF mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES 61888 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 211 / Thursday, November 1, 2007 / Notices during the fiscal year, identifying findings and developing recommendations to enhance Title VII Interdisciplinary, Community-Based Training Grant Programs. The Annual Report is submitted to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and ranking members of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions of the Senate, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives. The Department of Health and Human Services is requesting a total of seven (7) nominations for voting members of the ACICBL from schools that have administered or are currently administering awards from the following programs: Area Health Education Centers (AHECs)—1 nominee, Allied Health—1 nominee, Geriatric Education and Training Programs—1 nominee, Health Education and Training Centers (HETCs)—1 nominee, and Quentin N. Burdick Program for Rural Interdisciplinary Training—1 nominee. Nominations are also requested for two student, resident, and/or fellow representatives. Interested individuals may nominate multiple qualified professionals for membership to the ACICBL to allow the Secretary to choose from a highly qualified list of potential candidates. Nominees willing to serve as members of the ACICBL should have no appearance of a conflict of interest that would preclude their participation. Potential candidates will be asked to provide detailed information concerning consultancies, research grants, or contracts to permit an evaluation of possible sources of conflicts of interest. In addition, a curriculum vitae and a statement of interest will be required of the nominee to support experience working with Title VII Interdisciplinary, Community-Based Training Grant Programs, expertise in the field, and personal desire in participating on a National Advisory Committee. Qualified candidates will be invited to serve a one-, two-, or three-year term. All nominations must be received no later than December 31, 2007. The legislation governing this Committee requires a fair balance of health professionals who represent the general population with regard to a broad geographic distribution and an evenness of urban and rural areas, along with professionals who are women and minorities. As such, the pool of appropriately qualified nominations should reflect these requirements to the degree possible. VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:40 Oct 31, 2007 Jkt 214001 Dated: October 25, 2007. Alexandra Huttinger, Acting Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination. [FR Doc. E7–21521 Filed 10–31–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165–15–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Health Resources and Services Administration Revisions to the Program Guidance for the Training in Primary Care Medicine and Dentistry Program Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HHS. ACTION: General notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: HRSA announces a revision to the program guidance for the Training in Primary Care Medicine and Dentistry Program posted on August 23, 2007 on Grants.gov, https://www.grants.gov. The guidance includes information for the following competitive funding opportunities: HRSA–08–032 Academic Administrative Units; HRSA–08–035 Physician Faculty Development; HRSA– 08–037 Predoctoral Training; HRSA– 08–039 Physician Assistant Training; HRSA–08–042 Residency Training; and HRSA–08–044 Residency Training in General and Pediatric Dentistry. This revision only affects the Physician Faculty Development program, HRSA– 08–035. A revised guidance has been posted on Grants.gov. Specifically, the additional language included in the guidance is presented below: Primary Care Clinician Research Fellowship—This track provides fellowships that focus on development of primary care research investigators. Duration—Fellowships will last 2 to 3 years. Features—Applications should include a rigorous research/training track which is offered at an academic health science center. Advanced degrees (e.g., M.P.H., M.P.A.) are a desirable option. Desirable candidates include multidisciplinary physician faculty and fellows. Research areas should be consistent with the scope and content of primary care practice and education, and may include such areas as the linkage between Healthy People 2010 and health disparities, community and practice-based research, patient safety, quality improvement, professionalism, health literacy, and cultural competency. Stipend Level—Enhanced stipend level is equivalent to National Research Service Award (NRSA) stipends, which PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 range from $36,996 for individuals entering immediately following receipt of their doctoral degree to $51,036 for individuals with 7 years or more of relevant experience and/or training. A table of stipend levels is provided in this guidance. Supplementation of the stipends is allowable and encouraged; however, the combination of stipend and supplementation may not exceed the full-time salary of comparable multidisciplinary physician faculty at the applicant’s institution. Time Requirement—Pro-rated stipends are not available. For applicants requesting full stipends, 60 percent of a Fellow’s time for 24- to 36 months of fellowship must be devoted to formal research training. The remaining 40 percent of time for a 24 to 36-month fellowship must be spent in activities consistent with the roles of academic faculty (clinical practice, teaching, and/or administration). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda L. Williamson, MA, CTHE, Chief, Primary Care Medical Education Branch, Division of Medicine and Dentistry, Bureau of Health Professions, HRSA, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, (301) 443–1467. Dated: October 25, 2007. Elizabeth M. Duke, Administrator. [FR Doc. E7–21520 Filed 10–31–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165–15–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Proposed Collection; Comment Request; A Process Evaluation of the NIH Director’s Pioneer Award (NDPA) Program Summary: In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, for opportunity for public comment on proposed data collection projects, the Office of the Director, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects to be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. Proposed Collection: Title: A Process Evaluation of the NIH Director’s Pioneer Award (NDPA) Program. Type of Information Collection Request: Extension of a currently approved collection. Need and Use of Information Collection: This study will assess the NDPA Program operations and the outputs of the identification, evaluation and selection process. The primary E:\FR\FM\01NON1.SGM 01NON1 61889 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 211 / Thursday, November 1, 2007 / Notices objectives of the study are to: (1) Assess the NDPA award selection process; (2) determine if the program was implemented as planned; and (3) determine if the process was conducted in accordance with the overall mission of the NDPA program. The findings will provide valuable information concerning: (1) The characteristics of applicants and reviewers; (2) the criteria used to evaluate and select awardees; Responses per Respondent: 1. Average Burden Hours Per Response: .25 (15 minutes), and Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours Requested: 177.50 and the annualized cost to respondents is estimated at $9,662.50. There are no Capital Costs to report. There are no Operating or Maintenance Costs to report. Table l and Table 2, respectively, present data concerning the burden hours and cost burdens for this data collection. and (3) aspects of the process that could be revised or improved. Frequency of Response: Once. Affected Public: none. Type of Respondents: Applicants, Reviewers and Panelists, Liaisons. There are no Capital Costs to report. There are no Operating or Maintenance Costs to report. Frequency of Response: Once. Affected Public: none. Type of Respondents: Applicants, Reviewers and Panelists. Estimated Number of Respondents: 710; Estimated Number of TABLE 1.—ANNUALIZED ESTIMATE OF HOUR BURDEN Number of respondents Type of respondents Frequency of response Average time for response (hr) Total hour burden * Applicants ...................................................................................................... Extramural evaluators .................................................................................... 600 110 1 1 .25 .25 150 2 Total ........................................................................................................ 710 1 .25 177.50 * Total Burden = N Respondents*Response Frequency*minutes to complete/60. TABLE 2.—ANNUALIZED COST TO RESPONDENTS Number of respondents Type of respondents Applicants ...................................................................................................... Extramural evaluators .................................................................................... Total ........................................................................................................ Response frequency 1200 220 710 Approx. hourly wage rate 1 1 1 $55.00 55.00 55.00 Total respondent cost ** $8,250 1,512.50 9,662.50 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES ** Total Respondent Cost = N Respondents*Response Frequency*minutes to complete/60* hourly rate. Request for Comments: Written comments and/or suggestions from the public and affected agencies are invited on one or more of the following points: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. For Further Information Contact: To request more information on the proposed project or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and instruments, contact G. Stephane Philogene, PhD, Assistant Director for Policy and Planning, Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Drive, Building 31, Room B2– VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:40 Oct 31, 2007 Jkt 214001 B37, Bethesda, MD 20892, or call nontoll-free number 301–402–3902, or Email your request, including your address to: philoges@od.nih.gov. Comments Due Date: Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of having their full effect if received within 60 days of the date of this publication. Dated: October 24, 2007. G. Stephane Philogene, Assistant Director for Policy and Planning, Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health. [FR Doc. E7–21474 Filed 10–31–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Submission of OMB Review; Comment Request; Drug Accountability Record (NCI) Summary: In compliance with the requirement of Section 3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, for opportunity for public comment on proposed data collection projects, the PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 National Cancer Institute, the National Cancer Institute (NIH) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for review and approval of the information collected below. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register on August 13, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 55, Page 45251 and allowed 60 days for public comment. No public comments were received. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment. The National Institutes of Health may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection that has been extended, revised, or implemented on or after December 1, 2007, unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Proposed Collection: Title: Drug Accountability Record (NCI) (Form NIH 2564). Type of Information Collection Request: Extension, with no changes OMB No. 0925–0240. Expiration Date: 11/30/07. Need and Use of Information Collection: Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations require investigators to establish a record of the receipt, use and disposition of all investigational agents. The National Cancer Institute, (NCI), as E:\FR\FM\01NON1.SGM 01NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 211 (Thursday, November 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61888-61889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Proposed Collection; Comment Request; A Process Evaluation of the 
NIH Director's Pioneer Award (NDPA) Program

    Summary: In compliance with the requirement of Section 
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, for opportunity 
for public comment on proposed data collection projects, the Office of 
the Director, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), will publish 
periodic summaries of proposed projects to be submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval.
    Proposed Collection: Title: A Process Evaluation of the NIH 
Director's Pioneer Award (NDPA) Program. Type of Information Collection 
Request: Extension of a currently approved collection. Need and Use of 
Information Collection: This study will assess the NDPA Program 
operations and the outputs of the identification, evaluation and 
selection process. The primary

[[Page 61889]]

objectives of the study are to: (1) Assess the NDPA award selection 
process; (2) determine if the program was implemented as planned; and 
(3) determine if the process was conducted in accordance with the 
overall mission of the NDPA program. The findings will provide valuable 
information concerning: (1) The characteristics of applicants and 
reviewers; (2) the criteria used to evaluate and select awardees; and 
(3) aspects of the process that could be revised or improved.
    Frequency of Response: Once. Affected Public: none. Type of 
Respondents: Applicants, Reviewers and Panelists, Liaisons. There are 
no Capital Costs to report. There are no Operating or Maintenance Costs 
to report. Frequency of Response: Once. Affected Public: none. Type of 
Respondents: Applicants, Reviewers and Panelists. Estimated Number of 
Respondents: 710; Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1. 
Average Burden Hours Per Response: .25 (15 minutes), and Estimated 
Total Annual Burden Hours Requested: 177.50 and the annualized cost to 
respondents is estimated at $9,662.50. There are no Capital Costs to 
report. There are no Operating or Maintenance Costs to report. Table l 
and Table 2, respectively, present data concerning the burden hours and 
cost burdens for this data collection.

                                  Table 1.--Annualized Estimate of Hour Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                   Average time
               Type of respondents                   Number of     Frequency of    for response     Total hour
                                                    respondents      response          (hr)          burden *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants......................................             600               1             .25          150
Extramural evaluators...........................             110               1             .25            2
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................................             710               1             .25          177.50 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Total Burden = N Respondents*Response Frequency*minutes to complete/60.


                                    Table 2.--Annualized Cost to Respondents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                       Total
               Type of respondents                   Number of       Response     Approx. hourly    respondent
                                                    respondents      frequency       wage rate        cost **
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants......................................            1200               1          $55.00       $8,250
Extramural evaluators...........................             220               1           55.00        1,512.50
    Total.......................................             710               1           55.00        9,662.50 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
** Total Respondent Cost = N Respondents*Response Frequency*minutes to complete/60* hourly rate.

    Request for Comments: Written comments and/or suggestions from the 
public and affected agencies are invited on one or more of the 
following points: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the 
accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed 
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology 
and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 
clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize 
the burden of the collection of information on those who are to 
respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, 
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms 
of information technology.
    For Further Information Contact: To request more information on the 
proposed project or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and 
instruments, contact G. Stephane Philogene, PhD, Assistant Director for 
Policy and Planning, Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, 
National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Drive, Building 31, Room B2-
B37, Bethesda, MD 20892, or call non-toll-free number 301-402-3902, or 
E-mail your request, including your address to: philoges@od.nih.gov.
    Comments Due Date: Comments regarding this information collection 
are best assured of having their full effect if received within 60 days 
of the date of this publication.

    Dated: October 24, 2007.
G. Stephane Philogene,
Assistant Director for Policy and Planning, Office of Behavioral and 
Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. E7-21474 Filed 10-31-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.