Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes, 61288-61291 [E7-21178]
Download as PDF
61288
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(b) July 25 in Arizona.
(c) August 15 in North Carolina;
Oklahoma; and Haskell and Knox
Counties, Texas.
(d) August 31 in Virginia.
(e) In Alabama; California; Florida;
and Georgia; the dates established by
the Special Provisions for each planting
period; and
(f) October 15 in Bailey, Castro,
Dallam, Deaf Smith, Floyd, Gaines,
Hale, Hartley, Lamb, Parmer, Swisher,
and Yoakum Counties, Texas; Delaware;
Maryland; New Jersey; and all counties
in New Mexico except San Juan.
10. Cause of Loss
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Damage that occurs or becomes
evident after the end of the insurance
period, including, but not limited to,
damage that occurs or becomes evident
in storage; or
*
*
*
*
*
12. Settlement of Claim
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(7) Multiplying the result of section
12(b)(6) by your share.
For example: You have a 100 percent
share in 100 harvested acres of potatoes
in the unit, with a guarantee of 150
hundredweight per acre and a price
election of $4.00 per hundredweight.
You are only able to harvest 10,000
hundredweight. Your indemnity would
be calculated as follows:
(1) 100 acres × 150 hundredweight =
15,000 hundredweight guarantee;
(2) 15,000 hundredweight × $4.00
price election = $60,000.00 value of
guarantee;
(4) 10,000 hundredweight × $4.00
price election = $40,000.00 value of
production to count;
(5) $60,000.00 ¥ $40,000.00 =
$20,000.00 loss; and
(6) $20,000.00 × 100 percent =
$20,000.00 indemnity payment.
You also have a 100 percent share in
100 unharvested acres of potatoes in the
same unit, with a guarantee of 150
hundredweight per acre and a price
election of $3.60 per hundredweight.
(The price election for unharvested
acreage is 90.0 percent of your elected
price election ($4.00 × 0.90 = $3.60.))
This unharvested acreage was appraised
at 35 hundredweight per acre for a total
of 3500 hundredweight as production to
count. Your total indemnity for the
harvested and unharvested acreage
would be calculated as follows:
(1) 100 acres × 150 hundredweight =
15,000 hundredweight guarantee for the
harvested acreage, and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:42 Oct 29, 2007
Jkt 214001
100 acres × 150 hundredweight =
15,000 hundredweight guarantee for the
unharvested acreage;
(2) 15,000 hundredweight guarantee ×
$4.00 price election = $60,000.00 value
of guarantee for the harvested acreage,
and
15,000 hundredweight guarantee ×
$3.60 price election = $54,000.00 value
of guarantee for the unharvested
acreage;
(3) $60,000.00 + $54,000.00 =
$114,000.00 total value of guarantee;
(4) 10,000 hundredweight × $4.00
price election = $40,000.00 value of
production to count for the harvested
acreage, and 3500 hundredweight ×
$3.60 = $12,600.00 value of production
to count for the unharvested acreage;
(5) $40,000.00 + $12,600.00 =
$52,600.00 total value of production to
count;
(6) $114,000.00 ¥ $52,600.00 =
$61,400.00 loss; and
(7) $61,400.00 loss × 100 percent =
$61,400.00 indemnity payment.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Unharvested production,
including unharvested production on
insured acreage you intend to put to
another use or abandon, or acreage
damaged by insurable causes and for
which you cease to provide further care,
if you and we agree on the appraised
amount of production. Upon such
agreement, the insurance period for that
acreage will end when you put the
acreage to another use or cease
providing care for the crop. This
unharvested production may be
adjusted in accordance with sections
12(e), and the value of all unharvested
production will be calculated using the
reduced price election determined in
section 3(b). If agreement on the
appraised amount of production is not
reached:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Only marketable lots of mature
potatoes will be production to count for
loss adjustment purposes, except for
production specified in 12(e)(1):
(1) Production not meeting the
standards for grading U.S. No. 2 due to
external defects will be determined on
an individual basis for all harvested and
unharvested potatoes if we determine it
is or would be practical to separate the
damaged production;
(2) All determinations must be based
upon a grade inspection; and
(3) Prior to any grade inspection, you
must notify us of the intended use of the
potatoes so the appropriate United
States Standard will be applied (We
may request previous sales records to
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
verify your claimed intended use or
base the intended use on the type of
potato grown if such potatoes are not
usually grown for the intended use you
reported).
(4) Marketable lots of potatoes will
include any lot of potatoes that is:
(i) Stored;
(ii) Sold as seed;
(iii) Sold for human consumption; or
(iv) Harvested and not sold or that is
appraised if such lots meet the
standards for grading U.S. No. 2 grade
or better on a sample basis.
(5) Marketable lots will also include
any potatoes that we determine:
(i) Could have been sold for seed or
human consumption in the general
marketing area;
(ii) Were not sold as a result of
uninsured causes including, but not
limited to, failure to meet chipper or
processor standards for fry color or
specific gravity; or
(iii) Were disposed of without our
prior written consent and such
disposition prevented our determination
of marketability.
(6) Unless included in section 12(e)(4)
or (5), a potato lot will not be
considered marketable if, due to
insurable causes of damage, it:
(i) Is partially damaged, and is
salvageable only for starch, alcohol, or
livestock feed;
(ii) Does not meet the standards for
grading U.S. No. 2 grade or better due
to internal defects; or
(iii) Does not meet the standards for
grading U.S. No. 2 grade or better due
to external defects, and it is not
practical to separate the damaged
production.
*
*
*
*
*
Signed in Washington, DC on October 23,
2007.
Eldon Gould,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E7–21238 Filed 10–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–29235; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–232–AD; Amendment
39–15245; AD 2007–22–09]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier
Model DHC–8–400 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Final rule; request for
comments.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier Model DHC–8–400 series
airplanes. This AD requires an
inspection to detect discrepancies of the
main landing gear (MLG) system, an
inspection of the jam nut of the retract
actuator of the MLGs to ensure the wire
lock is in place and the nut is secured,
an inspection of the retract actuator for
any signs of corrosion or wear, and
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary. This AD
also requires submitting an inspection
report to Bombardier. This AD results
from two reports of collapse of MLGs
within a few days of each other. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct
potential failure of major components of
the MLG assembly and attachments,
which could result in the possible
collapse of a MLG and consequent
damage to the airplane and injury to
people or damage to property on the
ground.
This AD becomes effective
November 14, 2007.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of November 14, 2007.
We must receive comments on this
AD by November 29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc.,
Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division,
123 Garratt Boulevard, Downsview,
Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada.
DATES:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:42 Oct 29, 2007
Jkt 214001
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon
Hjelm, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
and Propulsion Branch, ANE–171, FAA,
New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590;
telephone (516) 228–7323; fax (516)
794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the airworthiness
authority for Canada, notified us that an
unsafe condition may exist on certain
Bombardier Model DHC–8–400 series
airplanes. TCCA advises that, on
September 9, 2007, a main landing gear
(MLG) collapsed on a Bombardier
Model DHC–8–400 series airplane
during landing, and that two days later
on September 11, 2007, another MLG
collapsed on a Bombardier Model DHC–
8–400 series airplane during landing. It
has been determined that the root cause
of both MLG failures was a failure of the
retract actuator during gear extension.
This failure allowed the gear to fall
unrestricted with sufficient force to
break the over-center drag strut. The
reason for the component failure was
determined to be caused by internal
corrosion of the threads at the rod end
of the retract actuator. Potential failure
of the major components of the MLG
assembly and attachments, if not
corrected, could result in the possible
collapse of the MLG and consequent
damage to the airplane and injury to
people or damage to property on the
ground.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued DHC–8 Series
400 Maintenance Requirements Manual
(PSM 1–84–7), Part 1 (Maintenance
Review Board Report), tasks Z700–03E
(left hand) and Z700–04E (right hand).
These tasks describe procedures for
doing a general visual inspection to
detect discrepancies of the left- and
right-hand MLG systems.
Bombardier also has issued Repair
Drawing (RD) 8/4–32–059, Issue 4,
dated September 14, 2007. Bombardier
RD 8/4–32–059 refers to Goodrich
Service Concession Request SCR 086–
07, Revision C, dated September 14,
2007, as an additional source of service
information for accomplishing the
procedures in the RD. These documents
describe procedures for doing an
inspection of the retract actuator for any
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61289
signs of corrosion or wear, and doing
applicable corrective actions if
necessary, which include adjusting the
retracted length of the rod end, torquing
the jam nut, installing a wire lock, and
lubricating the piston if necessary.
These documents also describe
procedures for doing a detailed
inspection of affected parts for any signs
of corrosion or wear, and doing
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary. The
related investigative actions involve
visually inspecting the threads of the
piston pin and the thread relief area for
evidence of corrosion. The corrective
actions include, but are not limited to,
removing the wire lock, backing off the
jam nut and rod end out of the piston,
replacing any discrepant retract actuator
or actuator assembly, coating certain
parts with a corrosion inhibitor
compound, and reworking any corroded
threaded area of the piston.
TCCA mandated the RD and
Bombardier DHC–8 Series 400
Maintenance Requirements Manual
(PSM 1–84–7), Part 1 (Maintenance
Review Board Report), tasks Z700–03E
(left hand) and Z700–04E (right hand),
and issued Canadian airworthiness
directive CF–2007–20, dated September
12, 2007, to ensure the continued
airworthiness of these airplanes in
Canada.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of this AD
These airplanes are manufactured in
Canada and are type certificated for
operation in the United States under the
provisions of section 21.29 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.29) and the applicable bilateral
airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to
this bilateral airworthiness agreement,
TCCA has kept the FAA informed of the
situation described above. We have
examined TCCA’s findings, evaluated
all pertinent information, and
determined that we need to issue an AD
for products of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United
States.
Therefore, we are issuing this AD to
detect and correct potential failure of
major components of the MLG assembly
and attachments, which could result in
the possible collapse of a MLG and
consequent damage to the airplane and
injury to people or damage to property
on the ground. This AD requires doing
a general visual inspection to detect
discrepancies of the left- and right-hand
MLG systems, doing a general visual
inspection of the jam nut of the retract
actuator of the left- and right-hand
MLGs to ensure the wire lock is in place
and the nut is secured, doing a detailed
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
61290
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
inspection of the retract actuator for any
signs of corrosion or wear, and doing
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary. This AD
also requires reporting the inspection
results to Bombardier.
Interim Action
We consider this AD interim action.
The inspection reports that are required
by this AD will enable the manufacturer
to obtain better insight into the nature,
cause, and extent of the problem, and
eventually to develop final action to
address the unsafe condition. Once final
action has been identified, we might
consider further rulemaking.
FAA’s Determination of the Effective
Date
An unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD; therefore, providing notice and
opportunity for public comment before
the AD is issued is impracticable, and
good cause exists to make this AD
effective in less than 30 days.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not provide you with notice and
an opportunity to provide your
comments before it becomes effective.
However, we invite you to send any
written data, views, or arguments about
this AD. Send your comments to an
address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2007–29235; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–232–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:42 Oct 29, 2007
Jkt 214001
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective November
14, 2007.
Regulatory Findings
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from two reports of
collapse of the main landing gear (MLG)
within a few days of each other. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct
potential failure of major components of the
MLG assembly and attachments, which could
result in the possible collapse of the MLG
and consequent damage to the airplane and
injury to people or damage to property on the
ground.
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
I
2007–22–09 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de
Havilland, Inc.): Amendment 39–15245.
Docket No. FAA–2007–29235;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–232–AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model
DHC–8–400 series airplanes, certificated in
any category; serial number 003 and
subsequent.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
General Visual Inspection of MLG System
and Corrective Actions
(f) Before further flight, do a general visual
inspection to detect discrepancies of the leftand right-hand MLG system and do all
applicable corrective actions, in accordance
with a method approved by the Manager,
New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA; or the Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA) (or its delegated agent). Bombardier
DHC–8 Series 400 Maintenance
Requirements Manual (PSM 1–84–7), Part 1
(Maintenance Review Board Report), tasks
Z700–03E (left hand) and Z700–04E (right
hand), is one approved method for
accomplishing the general visual inspection.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
general visual inspection is: ‘‘A visual
examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious
damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of
inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror
may be necessary to ensure visual access to
all surfaces in the inspection area. This level
of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as
daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
droplight and may require removal or
opening of access panels or doors. Stands,
ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.’’
General Visual Inspection of the Jam Nut of
the Retract Actuator of the MLG and
Corrective Actions
(g) Before further flight, do a general visual
inspection of the jam nut of the retract
actuator of the left- and right-hand MLG to
ensure the wire lock is in place and the nut
is secured. If the wire lock is not in place or
if the jam nut is not secured, before further
flight, adjust the retracted length of the rod
end, torque the jam nut, install a wire lock,
and lubricate the piston, as applicable, in
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
accordance with Bombardier Repair Drawing
(RD) 8/4–32–059, Issue 4, dated September
14, 2007.
Note 2: Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4–
32–059 refers to Goodrich Service
Concession Request SCR 086–07, Revision C,
dated September 14, 2007 (specifically item
14), as an additional source of service
information for adjusting the retracted length
of the rod end, torquing the jam nut,
installing a wire lock, and lubricating the
piston if necessary, as required by paragraph
(g) of this AD.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Detailed Inspection of the Retract Actuator
of the MLG
(h) For airplanes on which the retract
actuator of the MLG, part number 46550–7 or
46550–9, has accumulated 8,000 or more
total landings or has been in-service 4 or
more years since new as of the effective date
of this AD: Before further flight, do a detailed
inspection of affected parts for any signs of
corrosion or wear, and applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, in
accordance with Bombardier Repair Drawing
8/4–32–059, Issue 4, dated September 14,
2007.
Note 3: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive
examination of a specific item, installation,
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
cleaning and elaborate procedures may be
required.’’
(i) For airplanes other than those identified
in paragraph (h) of this AD with a retract
actuator of the MLG, part number 46550–7 or
46550–9: Do a detailed inspection of affected
parts for any signs of corrosion or wear, and
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance with
Bombardier RD 8/4–32–059, Issue 4, dated
September 14, 2007; at the later of the times
specified in paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this
AD.
(1) Before the accumulation of 4,000 total
landings or 2 years since new, whichever
occurs first.
(2) Within 500 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD.
Note 4: Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4–
32–059 refers to Goodrich Service
Concession Request SCR 086–07, Revision C,
dated September 14, 2007, as an additional
source of service information for
accomplishing the applicable related
investigative and corrective actions required
by paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD.
Actions Done in Accordance with Previous
Issues of Service Information
(j) Actions done before the effective date of
this AD in accordance with Bombardier
Repair Drawing 8/4–32–059, Issue 1, dated
September 12, 2007; Issue 2, dated
September 13, 2007; or Issue 3, dated
September 13, 2007; are acceptable for
compliance with the corresponding actions
specified in paragraphs (g) through (i) of this
AD.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:42 Oct 29, 2007
Jkt 214001
Reporting Requirement
(k) Submit a report of any discrepancy
found during any inspection required by this
AD to the Bombardier Technical Help Desk,
at the applicable time specified in paragraph
(k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD; telephone (416)
375–4000; fax (416) 375–4539; e-mail:
thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com. Under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements contained in this AD and has
assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056.
(1) If the inspection was done after the
effective date of this AD: Submit the report
within 7 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the
effective date of this AD: Submit the report
within 7 days after the effective date of this
AD.
Special Flight Permit
(l) Special flight permits may be issued in
accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to
a location where the airplane can be
inspected (if the operator elects to do so),
provided that the procedures and limitations
in paragraphs (l)(1) and (l)(2) of this AD are
adhered to.
(1) Flight Crew Limitations and Procedures:
(i) Ferry flight with gear extended and
pinned.
(ii) Landing to be conducted at a minimum
descent rate.
(iii) Minimize braking on landing.
(iv) Flight to be conducted in accordance
with Section 4.8 of the Aircraft Operating
Manual (AOM).
(v) Essential crew only on board.
(vi) Flight in known or forecast icing
condition is prohibited.
(2) Maintenance Procedures:
(i) Do the general visual inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(ii) Do the general visual inspections of the
stabilizer stay and the hinge points of the
MLG for general condition and security, in
accordance with Bombardier Q400 All
Operator Message 236A, dated September 11,
2007.
(iii) If no discrepancy is detected during
the inspections required by paragraph (l)(2)(i)
and (l)(2)(ii) of this AD, before further flight,
insert the ground lock pins and a wire lock
of the MLG in place.
(iv) Ensure the ground lock of the nose
landing gear is engaged.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(m)(1) The Manager, New York ACO, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested in accordance with the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61291
Related Information
(n) Canadian airworthiness directive CF–
2007–20, dated September 12, 2007, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(o) You must use Bombardier Repair
Drawing 8/4–32–059, Issue 4, dated
September 14, 2007, to perform the actions
that are required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation
by reference of this document in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Contact Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier
Regional Aircraft Division, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5,
Canada, for a copy of this service
information. You may review copies at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
19, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–21178 Filed 10–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0023; Airspace
Docket No. 07–AEA–08]
Establishment of Class E Airspace;
Muncy, PA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Direct final rule, request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action establishes Class
E Airspace at Muncy, PA, to provide
adequate airspace for a new Area
Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning
System (GPS) Special Instrument
Approach Procedure (IAP) that has been
developed to serve the Muncy Valley
Hospital (7PS5), Muncy, PA.
DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, December
20, 2007. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under title 1, Code of
Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to
the annual revision of FAA Order
7400.9 and publication of conforming
amendments. Comments for inclusion
in the Rules Docket must be received on
or before November 28, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 30, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61288-61291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21178]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-29235; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-232-AD;
Amendment 39-15245; AD 2007-22-09]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
[[Page 61289]]
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. This AD requires
an inspection to detect discrepancies of the main landing gear (MLG)
system, an inspection of the jam nut of the retract actuator of the
MLGs to ensure the wire lock is in place and the nut is secured, an
inspection of the retract actuator for any signs of corrosion or wear,
and applicable related investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. This AD also requires submitting an inspection report to
Bombardier. This AD results from two reports of collapse of MLGs within
a few days of each other. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
potential failure of major components of the MLG assembly and
attachments, which could result in the possible collapse of a MLG and
consequent damage to the airplane and injury to people or damage to
property on the ground.
DATES: This AD becomes effective November 14, 2007.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of November 14,
2007.
We must receive comments on this AD by November 29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Bombardier,
Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division, 123 Garratt Boulevard,
Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon Hjelm, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York ACO, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516)
228-7323; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the airworthiness
authority for Canada, notified us that an unsafe condition may exist on
certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. TCCA advises that,
on September 9, 2007, a main landing gear (MLG) collapsed on a
Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 series airplane during landing, and that two
days later on September 11, 2007, another MLG collapsed on a Bombardier
Model DHC-8-400 series airplane during landing. It has been determined
that the root cause of both MLG failures was a failure of the retract
actuator during gear extension. This failure allowed the gear to fall
unrestricted with sufficient force to break the over-center drag strut.
The reason for the component failure was determined to be caused by
internal corrosion of the threads at the rod end of the retract
actuator. Potential failure of the major components of the MLG assembly
and attachments, if not corrected, could result in the possible
collapse of the MLG and consequent damage to the airplane and injury to
people or damage to property on the ground.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued DHC-8 Series 400 Maintenance Requirements
Manual (PSM 1-84-7), Part 1 (Maintenance Review Board Report), tasks
Z700-03E (left hand) and Z700-04E (right hand). These tasks describe
procedures for doing a general visual inspection to detect
discrepancies of the left- and right-hand MLG systems.
Bombardier also has issued Repair Drawing (RD) 8/4-32-059, Issue 4,
dated September 14, 2007. Bombardier RD 8/4-32-059 refers to Goodrich
Service Concession Request SCR 086-07, Revision C, dated September 14,
2007, as an additional source of service information for accomplishing
the procedures in the RD. These documents describe procedures for doing
an inspection of the retract actuator for any signs of corrosion or
wear, and doing applicable corrective actions if necessary, which
include adjusting the retracted length of the rod end, torquing the jam
nut, installing a wire lock, and lubricating the piston if necessary.
These documents also describe procedures for doing a detailed
inspection of affected parts for any signs of corrosion or wear, and
doing applicable related investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. The related investigative actions involve visually
inspecting the threads of the piston pin and the thread relief area for
evidence of corrosion. The corrective actions include, but are not
limited to, removing the wire lock, backing off the jam nut and rod end
out of the piston, replacing any discrepant retract actuator or
actuator assembly, coating certain parts with a corrosion inhibitor
compound, and reworking any corroded threaded area of the piston.
TCCA mandated the RD and Bombardier DHC-8 Series 400 Maintenance
Requirements Manual (PSM 1-84-7), Part 1 (Maintenance Review Board
Report), tasks Z700-03E (left hand) and Z700-04E (right hand), and
issued Canadian airworthiness directive CF-2007-20, dated September 12,
2007, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in
Canada.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of this AD
These airplanes are manufactured in Canada and are type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, TCCA has kept the FAA informed of
the situation described above. We have examined TCCA's findings,
evaluated all pertinent information, and determined that we need to
issue an AD for products of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are issuing this AD to detect and correct potential
failure of major components of the MLG assembly and attachments, which
could result in the possible collapse of a MLG and consequent damage to
the airplane and injury to people or damage to property on the ground.
This AD requires doing a general visual inspection to detect
discrepancies of the left- and right-hand MLG systems, doing a general
visual inspection of the jam nut of the retract actuator of the left-
and right-hand MLGs to ensure the wire lock is in place and the nut is
secured, doing a detailed
[[Page 61290]]
inspection of the retract actuator for any signs of corrosion or wear,
and doing applicable related investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. This AD also requires reporting the inspection results to
Bombardier.
Interim Action
We consider this AD interim action. The inspection reports that are
required by this AD will enable the manufacturer to obtain better
insight into the nature, cause, and extent of the problem, and
eventually to develop final action to address the unsafe condition.
Once final action has been identified, we might consider further
rulemaking.
FAA's Determination of the Effective Date
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD; therefore, providing notice and opportunity for public comment
before the AD is issued is impracticable, and good cause exists to make
this AD effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to
provide your comments before it becomes effective. However, we invite
you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this AD. Send
your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include
``Docket No. FAA-2007-29235; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-232-AD'' at
the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this
AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may
amend this AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2007-22-09 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de Havilland, Inc.): Amendment
39-15245. Docket No. FAA-2007-29235; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
232-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective November 14, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 series
airplanes, certificated in any category; serial number 003 and
subsequent.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from two reports of collapse of the main
landing gear (MLG) within a few days of each other. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct potential failure of major components
of the MLG assembly and attachments, which could result in the
possible collapse of the MLG and consequent damage to the airplane
and injury to people or damage to property on the ground.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
General Visual Inspection of MLG System and Corrective Actions
(f) Before further flight, do a general visual inspection to
detect discrepancies of the left- and right-hand MLG system and do
all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with a method
approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA; or the Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) (or its
delegated agent). Bombardier DHC-8 Series 400 Maintenance
Requirements Manual (PSM 1-84-7), Part 1 (Maintenance Review Board
Report), tasks Z700-03E (left hand) and Z700-04E (right hand), is
one approved method for accomplishing the general visual inspection.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or
irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to
ensure visual access to all surfaces in the inspection area. This
level of inspection is made under normally available lighting
conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
droplight and may require removal or opening of access panels or
doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.''
General Visual Inspection of the Jam Nut of the Retract Actuator of the
MLG and Corrective Actions
(g) Before further flight, do a general visual inspection of the
jam nut of the retract actuator of the left- and right-hand MLG to
ensure the wire lock is in place and the nut is secured. If the wire
lock is not in place or if the jam nut is not secured, before
further flight, adjust the retracted length of the rod end, torque
the jam nut, install a wire lock, and lubricate the piston, as
applicable, in
[[Page 61291]]
accordance with Bombardier Repair Drawing (RD) 8/4-32-059, Issue 4,
dated September 14, 2007.
Note 2: Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-059 refers to Goodrich
Service Concession Request SCR 086-07, Revision C, dated September
14, 2007 (specifically item 14), as an additional source of service
information for adjusting the retracted length of the rod end,
torquing the jam nut, installing a wire lock, and lubricating the
piston if necessary, as required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
Detailed Inspection of the Retract Actuator of the MLG
(h) For airplanes on which the retract actuator of the MLG, part
number 46550-7 or 46550-9, has accumulated 8,000 or more total
landings or has been in-service 4 or more years since new as of the
effective date of this AD: Before further flight, do a detailed
inspection of affected parts for any signs of corrosion or wear, and
applicable related investigative and corrective actions, in
accordance with Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-059, Issue 4, dated
September 14, 2007.
Note 3: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
(i) For airplanes other than those identified in paragraph (h)
of this AD with a retract actuator of the MLG, part number 46550-7
or 46550-9: Do a detailed inspection of affected parts for any signs
of corrosion or wear, and applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance with Bombardier RD 8/4-32-059,
Issue 4, dated September 14, 2007; at the later of the times
specified in paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD.
(1) Before the accumulation of 4,000 total landings or 2 years
since new, whichever occurs first.
(2) Within 500 flight hours after the effective date of this AD.
Note 4: Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-059 refers to Goodrich
Service Concession Request SCR 086-07, Revision C, dated September
14, 2007, as an additional source of service information for
accomplishing the applicable related investigative and corrective
actions required by paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD.
Actions Done in Accordance with Previous Issues of Service Information
(j) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-059, Issue 1, dated
September 12, 2007; Issue 2, dated September 13, 2007; or Issue 3,
dated September 13, 2007; are acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding actions specified in paragraphs (g) through (i) of
this AD.
Reporting Requirement
(k) Submit a report of any discrepancy found during any
inspection required by this AD to the Bombardier Technical Help
Desk, at the applicable time specified in paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2)
of this AD; telephone (416) 375-4000; fax (416) 375-4539; e-mail:
thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com. Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection
requirements contained in this AD and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120-0056.
(1) If the inspection was done after the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 7 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 7 days after the effective date of this
AD.
Special Flight Permit
(l) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the airplane can be inspected (if the operator elects to do so),
provided that the procedures and limitations in paragraphs (l)(1)
and (l)(2) of this AD are adhered to.
(1) Flight Crew Limitations and Procedures:
(i) Ferry flight with gear extended and pinned.
(ii) Landing to be conducted at a minimum descent rate.
(iii) Minimize braking on landing.
(iv) Flight to be conducted in accordance with Section 4.8 of
the Aircraft Operating Manual (AOM).
(v) Essential crew only on board.
(vi) Flight in known or forecast icing condition is prohibited.
(2) Maintenance Procedures:
(i) Do the general visual inspection required by paragraph (g)
of this AD.
(ii) Do the general visual inspections of the stabilizer stay
and the hinge points of the MLG for general condition and security,
in accordance with Bombardier Q400 All Operator Message 236A, dated
September 11, 2007.
(iii) If no discrepancy is detected during the inspections
required by paragraph (l)(2)(i) and (l)(2)(ii) of this AD, before
further flight, insert the ground lock pins and a wire lock of the
MLG in place.
(iv) Ensure the ground lock of the nose landing gear is engaged.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(m)(1) The Manager, New York ACO, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Related Information
(n) Canadian airworthiness directive CF-2007-20, dated September
12, 2007, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(o) You must use Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-059, Issue 4,
dated September 14, 2007, to perform the actions that are required
by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this
document in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Contact Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division, 123
Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada, for a copy of
this service information. You may review copies at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-
register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 19, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-21178 Filed 10-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P