Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Gowanus Canal, Brooklyn, NY, 61057-61058 [E7-21237]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 208 / Monday, October 29, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: October 18, 2007.
David M. Frank,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–21216 Filed 10–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01–07–130]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Gowanus Canal, Brooklyn, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has
temporarily changed the drawbridge
operating regulations governing the
operation of the Hamilton Avenue
Bridge, mile 1.2, across the Gowanus
Canal at Brooklyn, New York. This final
rule allows the bridge owner to require
a four-hour notice for bridge openings
from November 5, 2007 to January 15,
2009. This rule is necessary to facilitate
rehabilitation construction at the bridge.
DATES: This temporary rule suspending
§ 117.787 and adding § 117.788 is
effective from November 5, 2007 to
January 15, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket (CGD01–07–130) and are
available for inspection or copying at
the First Coast Guard District, Bridge
Branch Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue,
Boston, Massachusetts 02110, between 7
a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First
Coast Guard District, (212) 668–7195.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Regulatory Information
On September 18, 2007, we published
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ‘‘Drawbridge Operation
Regulations’’; Gowanus Canal, New
York, in the Federal Register (72 FR
53202). We received no comments in
response to the notice of proposed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Oct 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
rulemaking. No public hearing was
requested and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register.
The bridge repairs scheduled to begin
on November 5, 2007, are necessary
repairs that must be performed with all
due speed to assure the continued safe
and reliable operation of the bridge. Any
delay in making this rule effective
would not be in the best interest of
public safety and the marine interests
that use the Gowanus Canal. We
received no comments on the published
NPRM, which included the effective
period for comment, indicating a need
to delay the effective date of this
temporary final rule.
Background and Purpose
The Hamilton Avenue Bridge has a
vertical clearance of 19 feet at mean
high water, and 23 feet at mean low
water in the closed position. The
existing drawbridge operating
regulations listed at 33 CFR 117.5,
require the bridge to open on signal at
all times.
The bridge owner, New York City
Department of Transportation
(NYCDOT), has requested a temporary
rule to facilitate structural, electrical
and mechanical rehabilitation at the
Hamilton Avenue Bridge.
Under this temporary rule the
Hamilton Avenue Bridge would open on
signal after at least a four-hour advance
notice is given by calling (201) 400–
5243.
Major rehabilitation bridge repairs
have been ongoing at the Hamilton
Avenue Bridge since March 2007. The
bridge owner NYCDOT, requested a
temporary deviation from the
drawbridge operation regulations to
help facilitate bridge rehabilitation
repairs at the Hamilton Avenue Bridge.
As a result of that request the Coast
Guard authorized a temporary deviation
[CGD01–07–026] on March 15, 2007,
which required mariners to provide a
four-hour advance notice for bridge
openings from April 6, 2007 through
September 29, 2007.
On August 7, 2007, the Coast Guard
received a second request from the
bridge owner NYCDOT, to extend the
four-hour advance notice requirement at
the Hamilton Avenue Bridge through
January 15, 2009, in order to facilitate
the remaining rehabilitation bridge
repairs.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no
comments in response to the notice of
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61057
proposed rulemaking and as a result, no
changes have been made to this
temporary final rule.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3), of
that Order. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
that Order.
This conclusion is based on the fact
that all vessel traffic will still be able to
transit through the bridge at all times
after providing the four-hour advance
notice for bridge openings.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This conclusion is based on the fact
that all vessel traffic will still be able to
transit through the bridge at all times
after providing the four-hour advance
notice for bridge openings.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process.
No small entities requested Coast
Guard assistance and none was given.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
E:\FR\FM\29OCR1.SGM
29OCR1
61058
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 208 / Monday, October 29, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Indian Tribal Governments
This final rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Oct 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation considering that it
relates to the promulgation of operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. Under figure 2–1,
paragraph (32)(e), of the instruction, an
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are not required for this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
I For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g);
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. From November 5, 2007 to January
15, 2009, suspend § 117.787 and add
§ 117.788 to read as follows:
I
§ 117.788
Gowanus Canal.
(a) The draws of the Ninth Street
Bridge, mile 1.4, the Third Street Bridge,
mile 1.8, the Carroll Street Bridge, mile
2.0, and the Union Street Bridge, mile
2.1, at Brooklyn, shall open on signal if
at least a two-hour advance notice is
given to the New York City Department
of Transportation (NYCDOT), Radio
Hotline, or the NYCDOT Bridge
Operations Office.
(b) The draw of the Hamilton Avenue
Bridge, mile 1.2, shall open on signal
after at least a four-hour advance notice
is given by calling (201) 400–5243. This
paragraph is effective from November 7,
2007 to January 15, 2009.
Dated: October 19, 2007.
Timothy S. Sullivan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–21237 Filed 10–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. CGD11–07–014]
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Sacramento River, Rio Vista, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, Eleventh
Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the Rio Vista
Drawbridge across the Sacramento
River, mile 12.8, at Rio Vista, CA. The
deviation is necessary to allow the
E:\FR\FM\29OCR1.SGM
29OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 208 (Monday, October 29, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61057-61058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21237]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01-07-130]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Gowanus Canal, Brooklyn, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has temporarily changed the drawbridge
operating regulations governing the operation of the Hamilton Avenue
Bridge, mile 1.2, across the Gowanus Canal at Brooklyn, New York. This
final rule allows the bridge owner to require a four-hour notice for
bridge openings from November 5, 2007 to January 15, 2009. This rule is
necessary to facilitate rehabilitation construction at the bridge.
DATES: This temporary rule suspending Sec. 117.787 and adding Sec.
117.788 is effective from November 5, 2007 to January 15, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket (CGD01-07-130) and are available for inspection or
copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch Office, 408
Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, between 7 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer,
First Coast Guard District, (212) 668-7195.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On September 18, 2007, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations''; Gowanus Canal,
New York, in the Federal Register (72 FR 53202). We received no
comments in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. No public
hearing was requested and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
The bridge repairs scheduled to begin on November 5, 2007, are
necessary repairs that must be performed with all due speed to assure
the continued safe and reliable operation of the bridge. Any delay in
making this rule effective would not be in the best interest of public
safety and the marine interests that use the Gowanus Canal. We received
no comments on the published NPRM, which included the effective period
for comment, indicating a need to delay the effective date of this
temporary final rule.
Background and Purpose
The Hamilton Avenue Bridge has a vertical clearance of 19 feet at
mean high water, and 23 feet at mean low water in the closed position.
The existing drawbridge operating regulations listed at 33 CFR 117.5,
require the bridge to open on signal at all times.
The bridge owner, New York City Department of Transportation
(NYCDOT), has requested a temporary rule to facilitate structural,
electrical and mechanical rehabilitation at the Hamilton Avenue Bridge.
Under this temporary rule the Hamilton Avenue Bridge would open on
signal after at least a four-hour advance notice is given by calling
(201) 400-5243.
Major rehabilitation bridge repairs have been ongoing at the
Hamilton Avenue Bridge since March 2007. The bridge owner NYCDOT,
requested a temporary deviation from the drawbridge operation
regulations to help facilitate bridge rehabilitation repairs at the
Hamilton Avenue Bridge.
As a result of that request the Coast Guard authorized a temporary
deviation [CGD01-07-026] on March 15, 2007, which required mariners to
provide a four-hour advance notice for bridge openings from April 6,
2007 through September 29, 2007.
On August 7, 2007, the Coast Guard received a second request from
the bridge owner NYCDOT, to extend the four-hour advance notice
requirement at the Hamilton Avenue Bridge through January 15, 2009, in
order to facilitate the remaining rehabilitation bridge repairs.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking and as a result, no changes have been made to this
temporary final rule.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3), of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
This conclusion is based on the fact that all vessel traffic will
still be able to transit through the bridge at all times after
providing the four-hour advance notice for bridge openings.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This conclusion is based on the fact that all vessel traffic will
still be able to transit through the bridge at all times after
providing the four-hour advance notice for bridge openings.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
No small entities requested Coast Guard assistance and none was
given.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
[[Page 61058]]
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This final rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have substantial direct effect on one
or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation considering that it relates to the
promulgation of operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR
part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. From November 5, 2007 to January 15, 2009, suspend Sec. 117.787 and
add Sec. 117.788 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.788 Gowanus Canal.
(a) The draws of the Ninth Street Bridge, mile 1.4, the Third
Street Bridge, mile 1.8, the Carroll Street Bridge, mile 2.0, and the
Union Street Bridge, mile 2.1, at Brooklyn, shall open on signal if at
least a two-hour advance notice is given to the New York City
Department of Transportation (NYCDOT), Radio Hotline, or the NYCDOT
Bridge Operations Office.
(b) The draw of the Hamilton Avenue Bridge, mile 1.2, shall open on
signal after at least a four-hour advance notice is given by calling
(201) 400-5243. This paragraph is effective from November 7, 2007 to
January 15, 2009.
Dated: October 19, 2007.
Timothy S. Sullivan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7-21237 Filed 10-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P