Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments, 60845-60846 [E7-21089]
Download as PDF
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 207 / Friday, October 26, 2007 / Notices
biostatistics, statistical modeling,
epidemiology, meta-analysis, Bayesian
analysis and toxicology of inhaled
particles.
The SAB is a chartered Federal
Advisory Committee, established by 42
U.S.C. 4365, to provide independent
scientific and technical advice,
consultation, and recommendations to
the EPA Administrator on the technical
bases for EPA policies and actions. The
SAB expert panel will provide technical
advice to EPA through the chartered
SAB. The SAB Asbestos Panel will
comply with the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) and all appropriate SAB
procedural policies.
Request for Nominations: The SAB
Staff Office is requesting nominations
for nationally and internationally
recognized non-EPA scientists with
demonstrated expertise in biostatistics,
statistical modeling, epidemiology,
meta-analysis, Bayesian analysis and
toxicology of inhaled particles. The
previously submitted nominations of
individuals for this Asbestos Expert
Panel need not be re-submitted, as they
will still be considered.
Process and Deadline for Submitting
Nominations: Any interested person or
organization may nominate individuals
qualified in the areas of expertise
described above to serve on the SAB
Asbestos Expert Panel. Nominations
may be submitted in electronic format
through the Form for Nominating
Individuals to Panels of the EPA Science
Advisory Board which can be accessed
through a link on the blue navigational
bar on the SAB Web site at: https://
www.epa.gov/sab. Please follow the
instructions for submitting nominations
carefully, and include all of the
information requested on that form. The
nominating form requests contact
information of the person making the
nomination; contact information for the
nominee; the disciplinary and specific
areas of expertise of the nominee; the
nominee’s curriculum vita; and a
biographical sketch of the nominee
indicating current position, educational
background, research activities, and
recent service on other national
advisory committees or national
professional organizations. Anyone
unable to submit nominations using the
electronic form, or who may have
questions concerning the nomination
process or any other aspect of this
notice may contact Ms. Vivian Turner,
DFO, at the contact information.
Nominations should be submitted in
time to arrive no later than November
16, 2007.
The process for forming an SAB panel
is described in the Overview of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Oct 25, 2007
Jkt 214001
Panel Formation Process at the
Environmental Protection Agency,
Science Advisory Board (EPA–SAB–EC–
COM–02–010), on the SAB Web site at:
https://www.epa.gov/sab/pdf/
ec02010.pdf. The SAB Staff Office will
acknowledge receipt of nominations and
inform nominees of the panel for which
they have been nominated. From the
nominees identified by respondents to
this Federal Register notice (termed the
‘‘Widecast’’), the SAB Staff Office will
develop a smaller subset (known as the
‘‘Short List’’) for more detailed
consideration. The Short List will be
posted on the SAB Web site at: https://
www.epa.gov/sab and will include the
nominee’s name and biographical
sketch. Public comments on the Short
List will be accepted for 21 calendar
days. During this comment period, the
public will be requested to provide
information, analysis or other
documentation on nominees that the
SAB Staff Office should consider in
evaluating candidates for the panel.
For the SAB, a balanced panel is
characterized by inclusion of nominees
who possess the necessary domains of
knowledge, the relevant scientific
perspectives (which, among other
factors, can be influenced by work
history and affiliation), and the
collective breadth of experience to
adequately address the charge. Public
responses to the Short List will be
considered in the selection of the panel
members, along with information
provided by nominees and information
independently gathered by SAB Staff
(e.g., financial disclosure information
and computer searches to evaluate a
nominee’s prior involvement with the
topic under review). Specific criteria to
be used in evaluating Short List
nominees include: (a) Scientific and/or
technical expertise, knowledge, and
experience (primary factors); (b) absence
of financial conflicts of interest; (c)
scientific credibility and impartiality;
(d) availability and willingness to serve;
and (e) ability to work constructively
and effectively on committees.
Dated: October 19, 2007.
Anthony F. Maciorowski,
Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Board
Staff Office.
[FR Doc. E7–21092 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60845
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL6692–4]
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7167.
An explanation of the ratings assigned
to draft environmental impact
statements (EISs) was published in FR
dated April 6, 2007 (72 FR 17156).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20070285, ERP No. D–COE–
K35044–CA, Berth 136–147 [TraPac]
Container Terminal Project, Upgrade
Existing Wharf Facilities, Install a
Buffer Area between the Terminal and
Community, US Army COE Section
10 and 404 Permit, West Basin
Portion of the Port of Los Angeles,
CA.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns because the
preferred alternative may not represent
the least environmentally damaging
practicable alternative, as required
under the Clean Water Act Section
404(b)(1) Guidelines. EPA also
expressed environmental concerns
about impacts to air quality and
minority and low-income communities,
and requested that the Final EIS discuss
mitigation in more detail. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20070296, ERP No. D–AFS–
K65332–CA, Eldorado National Forest
Public Wheeled Motorized Travel
Management Project, Proposes to
Regulate Unmanaged Public Wheeled
Motor Vehicle, Implementation,
Alpine, Amador, El Dorado and Placer
Counties, CA.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about impacts
to water quality, meadows, riparian
areas, critical habitat, and watersheds,
and requested additional information on
the above issues, monitoring and
enforcement commitments. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20070297, ERP No. D–AFS–
J65486–UT, Big Creek Vegetation
Treatment Project, To Treat 4,800
Acres of Aspen Conifer and Sagebrush
Communities, Ogden Ranger District,
Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Rich
County, UT.
Summary: While EPA does not object
to the proposed action, it requested
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
60846
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 207 / Friday, October 26, 2007 / Notices
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
clarification of impacts to migratory
birds, regeneration of big sagebrush, and
mitigation of impacts from illegal ORV
use. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20070315, ERP No. D–NOA–
L91029–AK, Alaska Eskimo Whaling
Commission for a Subsistence Hunt
on Bowhead Whale for the Years 2008
through 2012 for Issuing Annual
Quotas, Proposes to Authorize
Subsistence Harvests of the Western
Arctic Stock of Bowhead Whales,
Bering, Chukchi and Beaufort Seas,
AK.
Summary: While EPA does not object
to the proposed action, it requested
clarification on the exchange of nonfood portions of the whales between
native villages as a commodity. Rating
LO
EIS No. 20070365, ERP No. D–USA–
A15000–00, PROGRAMMATIC—
Army Growth and Force Structure
Realignment, Implementation,
Nationwide.
Summary: EPA does not object to the
proposed action. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20070393, ERP No. DS–AFS–
J65424–MT, Fishtrap Project, Updated
Information on Past Maintenance/
Restorative Treatments within Old
Growth Stands, 200 Timber Harvest,
Prescribed Burning, Road
Construction and Other Restoration
Activities, Lolo National Forest,
Plains/Thompson Falls Ranger
District, Sanders County, MT.
Summary: EPA does not object to the
proposed action. Rating LO.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20070260, ERP No. F–COE–
K36142–CA, PROGRAMMATIC—San
Luis Obispo Creek Watershed,
Waterway Management Plan, Stream
Maintenance and Management Plan,
City of San Luis Obispo and County
of San Luis Obispo, Community of
Avila Beach, San Luis Obispo County,
CA.
Summary: EPA’s previous issues have
been resolved; therefore, EPA does not
object to the proposed action.
EIS No. 20070292, ERP No. F–COE–
K36055–CA, San Luis Rey Flood
Control Project, Operation and
Maintenance of the Vegetation and
Sediment Management, from College
Blvd to the Pacific Ocean, San Diego
County, CA.
Summary: EPA continues to have
environmental concerns because the
preferred alternative may not represent
the least environmentally damaging
practicable alternative, as required
under the Clean Water Act section
404(b)(1) Guidelines.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Oct 25, 2007
Jkt 214001
EIS No. 20070318, ERP No. F–FHW–
K40257–CA, Los Banos Bypass
Project, Construct from CA–152 in
Merced County beginning near Volta
Road west to Los Banos, bypassing
Los Banos, ending near the Santa Fe
Grade Road, U.S. Army COE Section
404 Permit, Merced County, CA.
Summary: EPA continues to have
environmental concerns about the
proposed project related to induced
growth. Also, EPA recommends that the
project sponsor develop a strategy to
facilitate protection of valuable habitat
areas.
EIS No. 20070379, ERP No. F–AFS–
L65525–AK, Baht Timber Sale Project,
Proposes to Harvest Timber and
Temporary Road Construction on
Zarembo Island, Wrangell Ranger
District, Tongass National Forest, AK.
Summary: EPA continues to have
concerns about potential impacts to
water quality and impacts to old growth
habitat, and recommends water quality
monitoring, preservation of riparian
buffers and reduced new road
construction.
EIS No. 20070402, ERP No. F–FRC–
K03030–00, Phoenix Expansion
Project, Construction and Operation
of Existing Natural Gas Transmission
Pipeline, Right-of-Way Grant and
Temporary Use Permit, San Juan and
McKinley Counties, NM and Pinal
and Maricopa Counties, AZ.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20070058, ERP No. FA–FHW–
E40325–NC, Western Section of the
Winston-Salem Northern Beltway,
Updated Information, U.S. 158 north
to U.S. 52, TIP Project No. R–2247,
Forsyth County, NC. (THIS EIS
#20070058 AND EIS #20070057 ARE
COMBINED IN A SINGLE
DOCUMENT.)
Summary: EPA continues to have
environmental concerns about the large
bypass regarding 7–8 linear miles of
stream impacts, sedimentation and
erosion control, terrestrial forest habitat
losses and impacts to migratory birds.
EPA requests that the Record of
Decision disclose plans to mitigate these
adverse impacts.
EIS No. 20070384, ERP No. FS–FHW–
E40714–GA, U.S. 411 Connector,
From U.S. 411/GA–20 Interchange
with U.S. 41 to U.S. 411 Interchange
with I–75, Updated Information,
Funding and U.S. Army COE Section
404 Permit, Bartow County, GA.
Summary: EPA continues to have
environmental concerns about the
preferred alternative regarding impacts
to jurisdictional wetlands, regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
floodplains, and the loss of upland
forest habitat. However, EPA supports
the mitigation measures and monitoring
programs as described in the Final
Supplemental EIS.
Dated: October 23, 2007.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E7–21089 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6692–3]
Environmental Impacts Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements
Filed 10/15/2007 through 10/19/2007.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20070435, Draft EIS, BLM, UT,
Richfield Field Office Resource
Management Plan, Implementation,
Future Management of the Public
Lands and Resource, Glen Canyon
National Recreation Area, Capitol
Reef and Canyonlands National Parks,
Sanpete, Sevier, Piute, Wayne and
Garfield Counties, UT. Comment
Period Ends: 01/24/2008. Contact:
Wayne Wetzel, 435–896–1500.
EIS No. 20070436, Draft EIS, FHW, ME,
Wiscasset Route 1 Corridor Study
Project, To Relieve Traffic Congestion
and Improve Safety, U.S. Army COE
section 404 Permit, Wiscasset and
Edgecomb Counties, ME. Comment
Period Ends: 12/21/2007. Contact:
Mark Asselmann, 207622–8350.
EIS No. 20070437, Draft EIS, NPS, HI,
PROGRAMMATIC EIS—Ala Kahakai
National Historic Trail
Comprehensive Management Plan, To
Provide Long-Term Direction for
Natural and Cultural Resource, Island
of Hawii, HI. Comment Period Ends:
12/26/2007. Contact: Aric Arakaki
808–326–6012.
EIS No. 20070438, Final Supplement,
NOA, NC, Atlantic Sea Scallop
Fishery Management Plan (FMP),
Amendment 11, Implementation to
Control Capacity and Mortality in the
General Category Scallop Fishery,
Gulf of Maine, Georges Bank, NC.
Wait Period Ends: 11/26/2007.
Contact: Patricia A. Kurkal, 978–281–
9250.
EIS No. 20070439, Draft EIS, BOP, AL,
Aliceville, Alabama Area, Proposed
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 207 (Friday, October 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60845-60846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21089]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL6692-4]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at 202-564-7167.
An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 6, 2007 (72 FR
17156).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20070285, ERP No. D-COE-K35044-CA, Berth 136-147 [TraPac]
Container Terminal Project, Upgrade Existing Wharf Facilities, Install
a Buffer Area between the Terminal and Community, US Army COE Section
10 and 404 Permit, West Basin Portion of the Port of Los Angeles, CA.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns because the preferred
alternative may not represent the least environmentally damaging
practicable alternative, as required under the Clean Water Act Section
404(b)(1) Guidelines. EPA also expressed environmental concerns about
impacts to air quality and minority and low-income communities, and
requested that the Final EIS discuss mitigation in more detail. Rating
EC2.
EIS No. 20070296, ERP No. D-AFS-K65332-CA, Eldorado National Forest
Public Wheeled Motorized Travel Management Project, Proposes to
Regulate Unmanaged Public Wheeled Motor Vehicle, Implementation,
Alpine, Amador, El Dorado and Placer Counties, CA.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about impacts to
water quality, meadows, riparian areas, critical habitat, and
watersheds, and requested additional information on the above issues,
monitoring and enforcement commitments. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20070297, ERP No. D-AFS-J65486-UT, Big Creek Vegetation
Treatment Project, To Treat 4,800 Acres of Aspen Conifer and Sagebrush
Communities, Ogden Ranger District, Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Rich
County, UT.
Summary: While EPA does not object to the proposed action, it
requested
[[Page 60846]]
clarification of impacts to migratory birds, regeneration of big
sagebrush, and mitigation of impacts from illegal ORV use. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20070315, ERP No. D-NOA-L91029-AK, Alaska Eskimo Whaling
Commission for a Subsistence Hunt on Bowhead Whale for the Years 2008
through 2012 for Issuing Annual Quotas, Proposes to Authorize
Subsistence Harvests of the Western Arctic Stock of Bowhead Whales,
Bering, Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, AK.
Summary: While EPA does not object to the proposed action, it
requested clarification on the exchange of non-food portions of the
whales between native villages as a commodity. Rating LO
.EIS No. 20070365, ERP No. D-USA-A15000-00, PROGRAMMATIC--Army Growth
and Force Structure Realignment, Implementation, Nationwide.
Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20070393, ERP No. DS-AFS-J65424-MT, Fishtrap Project, Updated
Information on Past Maintenance/Restorative Treatments within Old
Growth Stands, 200 Timber Harvest, Prescribed Burning, Road
Construction and Other Restoration Activities, Lolo National Forest,
Plains/Thompson Falls Ranger District, Sanders County, MT.
Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20070260, ERP No. F-COE-K36142-CA, PROGRAMMATIC--San Luis
Obispo Creek Watershed, Waterway Management Plan, Stream Maintenance
and Management Plan, City of San Luis Obispo and County of San Luis
Obispo, Community of Avila Beach, San Luis Obispo County, CA.
Summary: EPA's previous issues have been resolved; therefore, EPA
does not object to the proposed action.
EIS No. 20070292, ERP No. F-COE-K36055-CA, San Luis Rey Flood Control
Project, Operation and Maintenance of the Vegetation and Sediment
Management, from College Blvd to the Pacific Ocean, San Diego County,
CA.
Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns because the
preferred alternative may not represent the least environmentally
damaging practicable alternative, as required under the Clean Water Act
section 404(b)(1) Guidelines.
EIS No. 20070318, ERP No. F-FHW-K40257-CA, Los Banos Bypass Project,
Construct from CA-152 in Merced County beginning near Volta Road west
to Los Banos, bypassing Los Banos, ending near the Santa Fe Grade Road,
U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit, Merced County, CA.
Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns about the
proposed project related to induced growth. Also, EPA recommends that
the project sponsor develop a strategy to facilitate protection of
valuable habitat areas.
EIS No. 20070379, ERP No. F-AFS-L65525-AK, Baht Timber Sale Project,
Proposes to Harvest Timber and Temporary Road Construction on Zarembo
Island, Wrangell Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, AK.
Summary: EPA continues to have concerns about potential impacts to
water quality and impacts to old growth habitat, and recommends water
quality monitoring, preservation of riparian buffers and reduced new
road construction.
EIS No. 20070402, ERP No. F-FRC-K03030-00, Phoenix Expansion Project,
Construction and Operation of Existing Natural Gas Transmission
Pipeline, Right-of-Way Grant and Temporary Use Permit, San Juan and
McKinley Counties, NM and Pinal and Maricopa Counties, AZ.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20070058, ERP No. FA-FHW-E40325-NC, Western Section of the
Winston-Salem Northern Beltway, Updated Information, U.S. 158 north to
U.S. 52, TIP Project No. R-2247, Forsyth County, NC. (THIS EIS
20070058 AND EIS 20070057 ARE COMBINED IN A SINGLE
DOCUMENT.)
Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns about the
large bypass regarding 7-8 linear miles of stream impacts,
sedimentation and erosion control, terrestrial forest habitat losses
and impacts to migratory birds. EPA requests that the Record of
Decision disclose plans to mitigate these adverse impacts.
EIS No. 20070384, ERP No. FS-FHW-E40714-GA, U.S. 411 Connector, From
U.S. 411/GA-20 Interchange with U.S. 41 to U.S. 411 Interchange with I-
75, Updated Information, Funding and U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit,
Bartow County, GA.
Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns about the
preferred alternative regarding impacts to jurisdictional wetlands,
regulatory floodplains, and the loss of upland forest habitat. However,
EPA supports the mitigation measures and monitoring programs as
described in the Final Supplemental EIS.
Dated: October 23, 2007.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E7-21089 Filed 10-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P