Notice of Availability of the Canyons of the Ancients Draft Resource Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Colorado, 60877-60879 [E7-21011]
Download as PDF
60877
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 207 / Friday, October 26, 2007 / Notices
(1) Act of August 28, 1937 (43 U.S.C.
1181a & b); and
(2) The Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C.
1762).
The BLM uses this information to
approve use of BLM roads for access to
timber on the O. and C. lands, and to
determine the amount of charges for
such use.
Burden Estimate Per Form: We
estimate the completion time for the
form information that is submitted
quarterly by the private sector as
follows:
Number of actions per year
Burden hours
per action
(a) Report of Road Use (2812–6) and related non-form information in 43 CFR part 2810 .......
272
8
Totals ....................................................................................................................................
272
Burden hours information collected
Annual Responses: 272.
Application Fee Per Response: 0.
Annual Burden Hours: 2,176.
Dated: October 22, 2007.
Ted R. Hudson,
Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. E7–21079 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[CO–800–1610–DP 016C]
Notice of Availability of the Canyons of
the Ancients Draft Resource
Management Plan and Draft
Environmental Impact Statement,
Colorado
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act (FLPMA) of 1976
(FLPMA, 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has
prepared a Draft Resource Management
Plan/Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DRMP/DEIS) for the Canyons
of the Ancients National Monument and
by this notice is announcing the
opening of the comment period. This
notice also meets BLM requirements in
43 CFR 1610.7–2(b) concerning
potential Areas of Critical
Environmental Concern (ACECs).
DATES: A 90-day public comment period
will begin the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes their
Notice of Availability in the Federal
Register. The Canyon of the Ancients
National Monument will announce
future meetings or hearings and any
other public involvement activities at
least 15 days in advance through public
notices, local media news releases, and/
or mailings, and posting on the project
Web site at https://www.blm.gov/rmp/
canm. Public meetings will be held in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Oct 25, 2007
Jkt 214001
Cortez, Denver, and Durango, Colorado
and in other locations, if warranted.
ADDRESSES: The DRMP/DEIS will be
posted on the Internet at: https://
www.blm.gov/rmp/canm/. You may
submit comments by any of the
following methods:
Web site: https://www.blm.gov/rmp/
canm/.
Fax: (970) 882–7035.
Mail: Monument Manager, Canyons of
the Ancients National Monument,
27501 Highway 184, Dolores, CO 81323.
Comments, including names and
addresses of respondents, will be
available for public review at the
Anasazi Heritage Center, 27501 Hwy
184, Dolores, CO 81323. Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, be advised that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold from public review your
personal identifying information, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. Copies of the DRMP/DEIS are also
available during regular business hours
at the following locations:
Anasazi Heritage Center, 27501
Highway 184, Dolores, CO 81323.
Dolores Public Lands Center, 29211
Highway 184, Dolores, CO 81323.
San Juan Public Lands Center, 15
Burnett Court, Durango, CO 81301.
Dolores Public Library, 420 Railroad
Ave., Dolores, CO 81323.
Cortez Public Library, 202 N. Park,
Cortez, CO 81321.
Mancos Public Library, 111 N. Main,
Macos, CO 81328.
Durango Public Library, 1188 E. 2nd
Ave, Durango, CO 81301.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Musclow, Monument Planner,
Canyons of the Ancients National
Monument, 27501 Highway 184,
Dolores, CO 81323; Phone: (970) 882–
5632.
To have your name added to the
Canyons of the Ancients Resource
Management Plan mailing list or to view
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total annual
burden hours
2,176
2,176
and download the DRMP/DEIS in
portable document format (PDF) go to
the project Web site: https://
www.blm.gov/rmp/canm/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
planning area is located in Southwest
Colorado in Dolores and Montezuma
counties. The plan will provide a
framework to guide subsequent
management decisions on
approximately 164,000 acres managed
by the BLM. Within the Monument
boundary, there are approximately 400
acres of National Park Service lands
(Hovenweep National Monument) and
18,000 acres of private inholdings. The
Canyons of the Ancients National
Monument is currently being managing
under the BLM 1985 San Juan/San
Miguel RMP and the Interim Guidance
provided after the Monument was
established.
• San Juan/San Miguel Resource
Management Plan.
The current RMP was approved in
1985 and has been amended five times.
The Wilderness Study Areas (WSA)
within the Monument are being
managed under interim guidance
provided by the Interim Management
Policy and Guidance for Lands under
Wilderness Review until such time that
Congress makes a final wilderness
decision. The DRMP/DEIS discusses
how those lands would be managed if
Congress released them from wilderness
study.
The Canyons of the Ancients National
Monument has worked extensively with
the community, interested and affected
publics, Native American tribes, and
cooperating agencies in the
development of the DRMP/DEIS. The
Monument has conducted a broad
community-based public input process.
Cooperating agencies include The
Colorado State Historical Society and
the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service. Five alternatives are analyzed
in the DRMP/DEIS.
• Alternative I: This is the No Action
Alternative. This alternative is
comprised of current management
actions and goals and assumes existing
or approved land uses would continue.
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
60878
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 207 / Friday, October 26, 2007 / Notices
Current management actions are
assembled from three sources: Colorado
Interim Management for Canyons of the
Ancients National Monument (BLM
2001f), Anasazi ACEC Plan Management
Guideline (BLM 1986a), and San Juan/
San Miguel RMP (BLM 1985). Under
this alternative, cultural resource sites
would continue to be developed for
visiting and interpretation.
• Alternative II: This alternative
maximizes cultural resource protection
by avoiding impacts to cultural resource
communities, sites and isolated finds.
This management strategy maintains
large blocks of undisturbed land that
provide information on not only
individual sites and artifacts but also
their interconnectedness (i.e., how they
relate to each other). Alternative II
would develop the ‘‘outdoor museum’’
concept for self-discovery of cultural
and natural resources. The outdoor
museum concept provides a
backcountry experience to visiting
publics. In addition, 13 cultural sites
would be developed for public access,
facilitating visitation through developed
routes and interpretive signs. The
development of these cultural resource
sites would enhance front country
visitor experiences.
• Alternative III: This alternative
emphasizes the protection of cultural
resource communities and sites, while
providing for resource use and
development. This management strategy
also maintains large blocks of
undisturbed land, although not as large
as Alternative II, and provides for the
retrieval of information on not only
individual sites but also their
interconnectedness (i.e., how they relate
to each other). Alternative III would
develop the ‘‘outdoor museum’’ concept
for self-discovery of cultural and natural
resources in addition to developing 13–
25 sites for public access.
• Alternative IV: This alternative
emphasizes the protection of cultural
resource communities and sites while
encouraging resource use and
development. This management strategy
maintains large blocks of undisturbed
land, although not as large as
Alternative II, and provides for the
retrieval of information on not only
individual sites but also their
interconnectedness (i.e., how they relate
to each other). Alternative IV would
develop the ‘‘outdoor museum’’ concept
for self-discovery of cultural and natural
resources in addition to developing 13–
25 sites for public access.
• Alternative V: This is the Preferred
Alternative. Alternative V represents the
best fit between protection of objects of
the Monument and the multiple use of
all resources. Alternative V emphasizes
the protection of cultural resource
communities and sites, while providing
for resource use and development. This
management strategy maintains large
blocks of undisturbed land, although
not as large as Alternative II, and
provides for the retrieval of information
on not only individual sites and artifacts
but also their interconnectedness (i.e.,
how they relate to each other).
Alternative V would promote selfdiscovery through the ‘‘outdoor
museum’’ concept, in addition to 13–25
cultural sites developed for public
access.
Section 202(c)(3) of FLPMA requires
the DRMP/DEIS to examine the
designation of Areas of Critical
Environmental Concern (ACEC) on BLM
lands. The Monument was an Anasazi
ACEC prior to being designated a
Monument. The ACEC designation has
continued but is considered of little
value since the Monument designation
provides protection of the same
outstanding characteristics. Therefore,
the Anasazi ACEC designation is
proposed to be dropped in this plan.
The Values and Limitations to protect
the natural and cultural resources of the
Monument are consistent with the
previous ACEC. The McElmo Research
Natural Area (RNA) would continue its
ACEC designation with four units
proposed located immediately north of,
and adjacent to, McElmo Canyon:
• McElmo Unit (existing RNA, 427
acres),
• McElmo Expansion Unit (2,738
acres),
• Cannonball Mesa Unit (2,797 acres),
and
• Sand Canyon Unit (1,864 acres).
All of the RNA units have the same
values and use limitations.
Potential ACEC acres vary by
alternative as shown in the table below.
ACRES OF BLM-MANAGED SURFACE ESTATE PROPOSED TO BE MANAGED AS ACECS UNDER THE ALTERNATIVES IN THE
DRAFT LMP/EIS
Alternative I
(no action)
Values and use limitations
McElmo RNA (ACEC) ..........................................................
Values: natural systems (sensitive plants)
Limitations: apply a no surface occupancy (NSO/NGD)
stipulation for areas not previously leased for oil and
gas leasing and other surface disturbing activities.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
• Cultural Issues: Concerns included
the protection/preservation of cultural
resources for purposes of current and
future scientific research, education,
and Native American cultural heritage;
development opportunities; access to
cultural resource sites; and looting.
• General Recreation: Concerns
included permitted and restricted types
of recreation and their allocated ‘‘zones’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Oct 25, 2007
Jkt 214001
Alternative V
(preferred)
427
7,297
7,826
427
7,826
427
427
7,826
• Transportation Network: Concerns
included road closures and access, and
road maintenance and improvements.
• Rangeland Management/Grazing:
Concerns included management for
Land Health Standards, administration
of grazing allotments, and evaluation of
grazing impacts in terms of current
standards and guidelines.
Frm 00083
Alternative IV
7,826
or locations, and related roads and
transportation issues, such as motorized
and mechanized access and limitations.
PO 00000
Alternative III
427
Manage as VRM I.
Total Acres ....................................................................
Major issues considered in the DRMP/
DEIS include:
Alternative II
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Mineral Resources: Concerns
included limitations on oil and gas
exploration and development,
mitigation of impacts from existing and
new mineral exploration and
development.
• Visitor Use: Concerns included
visitor education opportunities, facility
development and improvements, and
commercial and not-for-profit tours.
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
60879
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 207 / Friday, October 26, 2007 / Notices
• Soil, Water, and Air: Concerns
included the protection/preservation of
soil, water, and air quality.
Sally Wisely,
Colorado State Director.
[FR Doc. E7–21011 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[UT050–1610–012J]
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Resource Management Plan (DRMP)
and Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) for the Richfield Field
Office in Garfield, Piute, Sanpete,
Sevier, and Wayne Counties, UT
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA, 43
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) hereby gives notice
that the Richfield Draft Resource
Management Plan and Draft
Environmental Impact Statement
(DRMP/DEIS) is available for a 90-day
public review and comment period.
This notice also meets requirements in
part 1610, 7–2(b) concerning potential
Areas of Critical Environmental Concern
(ACECs).
DATES: To ensure that they will be
considered, BLM must receive written
comments on the DRMP/DEIS within 90
days following the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes its notice of availability in the
Federal Register. The BLM will
announce public meetings and other
public-involvement activities at least 15
days in advance through public notices,
news releases, direct mailings, and on
the project Web site at: https://
www.blm.gov/rmp/ut/richfield/. Public
meetings will be held in Junction, Loa,
Manti, Richfield, and Salt Lake City,
and in other locations if warranted.
ADDRESSES: Address written comments
to: RMP Comments, Richfield Field
Office, Bureau of Land Management
(BLM), 150 East 900 North, Richfield,
Utah 84701. Comments may also be
faxed to the Field Office at 435–896–
1550, or submitted electronically by
e-mail:
UT_Richfield_Comments@blm.gov.
Comments and information submitted
on the Supplement to the Vernal Field
Office DRMP/DEIS, including names, email addresses, and street addresses of
respondents, will be available for public
review and disclosure at the Vernal
Field Office address listed below. The
BLM will not accept anonymous
comments. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, or to have your
name added to the Richfield RMP
mailing list, visit the RMP Web site:
https://www.blm.gov/rmp/ut/richfield/.
Or, you may contact Cornell
Christensen, RMP Project Manager,
Richfield BLM Field Office, 150 East
900 North, Richfield, Utah 84701, phone
435–896–1532. The DRMP/DEIS can be
viewed and downloaded in portable
document format (PDF) at the project
Web site: https://www.blm.gov/rmp/ut/
richfield/. Copies of the DRMP/DEIS are
also available at the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) Richfield Field
Office.
The
DRMP/DEIS addresses public lands and
resources managed by the Richfield
Field Office in Garfield, Piute, Sanpete,
Sevier, and Wayne Counties, Utah.
These lands and resources are currently
managed under six old land use plans:
Cedar-Beaver-Garfield-Antimony RMP
(1986), Forest Management Framework
Plan (MFP) (1982), Henry Mountains
MFP (1982), Mountain Valley MFP
(1981), Parker Mountain MFP (1983),
and San Rafael RMP (1991). The
planning area includes approximately
2.1 million acres of BLM-administered
surface lands and additional Federallyowned minerals under Federal, state,
and private lands in the area. Decisions
in the Richfield RMP will only apply to
BLM-administered public lands and
Federally-owned minerals. The DRMP/
DEIS proposes and analyzes five
alternatives for future management of
the public lands and resources in the
planning area. Alternative B is BLM’s
proposed action and the preferred
alternative. Major issues considered in
the DRMP/DEIS include oil and gas
leasing, mining, range and livestock
management, access and transportation,
recreation and off-highway vehicle
management, special status species,
special designations (including Areas of
Critical Environmental Concern
[ACECs] and wild and scenic rivers),
and lands with wilderness
characteristics, among others. When
completed, the new RMP will replace
management decisions in the existing
land use plans. As required by law, the
DRMP/DEIS considers the designation
and protection of ACECs. ACEC values
and resource use limitations vary by
ACEC, and the ACECs themselves vary
by alternative. See table below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ACRES OF PUBLIC LAND TO BE MANAGED AS ACECS UNDER THE ALTERNATIVES IN THE RICHFIELD DRMP/DEIS
Alt. N
(no action)
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Values and use limitations
Badlands ACEC Values: Outstanding scenery, special status
species, natural processes (wind erosion), riparian areas,
relict vegetation. Limitations: Designate scenic areas outside Wilderness study Areas (WSAs) as Visual Resource
Management (VRM) II, limit or close to Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) use, close to oil and gas leasing, propose withdrawal from mineral entry.
Beaver Wash ACEC Values: Desert riparian community.
Limitations: Close to OHV use, close to oil and gas leasing, close to livestock grazing, propose withdrawal from
mineral entry.
Bull Creek ACEC Value: Cultural resources. Limitations:
Limit off-highway vehicles to designated routes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Oct 25, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Alt. B
(preferred)
Alt. A
Alts. C and D
0
0
88,900.
3,400
0
0
(Included in Dirty Devil/North
Wash ACEC).
0
Fmt 4703
0
0
0
4,800.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 207 (Friday, October 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60877-60879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21011]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[CO-800-1610-DP 016C]
Notice of Availability of the Canyons of the Ancients Draft
Resource Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement,
Colorado
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act (FLPMA) of 1976 (FLPMA, 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a Draft Resource
Management Plan/Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DRMP/DEIS) for
the Canyons of the Ancients National Monument and by this notice is
announcing the opening of the comment period. This notice also meets
BLM requirements in 43 CFR 1610.7-2(b) concerning potential Areas of
Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs).
DATES: A 90-day public comment period will begin the date the
Environmental Protection Agency publishes their Notice of Availability
in the Federal Register. The Canyon of the Ancients National Monument
will announce future meetings or hearings and any other public
involvement activities at least 15 days in advance through public
notices, local media news releases, and/or mailings, and posting on the
project Web site at https://www.blm.gov/rmp/canm. Public meetings will
be held in Cortez, Denver, and Durango, Colorado and in other
locations, if warranted.
ADDRESSES: The DRMP/DEIS will be posted on the Internet at: https://
www.blm.gov/rmp/canm/. You may submit comments by any of the following
methods:
Web site: https://www.blm.gov/rmp/canm/.
Fax: (970) 882-7035.
Mail: Monument Manager, Canyons of the Ancients National Monument,
27501 Highway 184, Dolores, CO 81323.
Comments, including names and addresses of respondents, will be
available for public review at the Anasazi Heritage Center, 27501 Hwy
184, Dolores, CO 81323. Before including your address, phone number, e-
mail address, or other personal identifying information in your
comment, be advised that your entire comment--including your personal
identifying information--may be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment to withhold from public review
your personal identifying information, we cannot guarantee that we will
be able to do so. Copies of the DRMP/DEIS are also available during
regular business hours at the following locations:
Anasazi Heritage Center, 27501 Highway 184, Dolores, CO 81323.
Dolores Public Lands Center, 29211 Highway 184, Dolores, CO 81323.
San Juan Public Lands Center, 15 Burnett Court, Durango, CO 81301.
Dolores Public Library, 420 Railroad Ave., Dolores, CO 81323.
Cortez Public Library, 202 N. Park, Cortez, CO 81321.
Mancos Public Library, 111 N. Main, Macos, CO 81328.
Durango Public Library, 1188 E. 2nd Ave, Durango, CO 81301.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Musclow, Monument Planner,
Canyons of the Ancients National Monument, 27501 Highway 184, Dolores,
CO 81323; Phone: (970) 882-5632.
To have your name added to the Canyons of the Ancients Resource
Management Plan mailing list or to view and download the DRMP/DEIS in
portable document format (PDF) go to the project Web site: https://
www.blm.gov/rmp/canm/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The planning area is located in Southwest
Colorado in Dolores and Montezuma counties. The plan will provide a
framework to guide subsequent management decisions on approximately
164,000 acres managed by the BLM. Within the Monument boundary, there
are approximately 400 acres of National Park Service lands (Hovenweep
National Monument) and 18,000 acres of private inholdings. The Canyons
of the Ancients National Monument is currently being managing under the
BLM 1985 San Juan/San Miguel RMP and the Interim Guidance provided
after the Monument was established.
San Juan/San Miguel Resource Management Plan.
The current RMP was approved in 1985 and has been amended five
times. The Wilderness Study Areas (WSA) within the Monument are being
managed under interim guidance provided by the Interim Management
Policy and Guidance for Lands under Wilderness Review until such time
that Congress makes a final wilderness decision. The DRMP/DEIS
discusses how those lands would be managed if Congress released them
from wilderness study.
The Canyons of the Ancients National Monument has worked
extensively with the community, interested and affected publics, Native
American tribes, and cooperating agencies in the development of the
DRMP/DEIS. The Monument has conducted a broad community-based public
input process. Cooperating agencies include The Colorado State
Historical Society and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
Five alternatives are analyzed in the DRMP/DEIS.
Alternative I: This is the No Action Alternative. This
alternative is comprised of current management actions and goals and
assumes existing or approved land uses would continue.
[[Page 60878]]
Current management actions are assembled from three sources: Colorado
Interim Management for Canyons of the Ancients National Monument (BLM
2001f), Anasazi ACEC Plan Management Guideline (BLM 1986a), and San
Juan/San Miguel RMP (BLM 1985). Under this alternative, cultural
resource sites would continue to be developed for visiting and
interpretation.
Alternative II: This alternative maximizes cultural
resource protection by avoiding impacts to cultural resource
communities, sites and isolated finds. This management strategy
maintains large blocks of undisturbed land that provide information on
not only individual sites and artifacts but also their
interconnectedness (i.e., how they relate to each other). Alternative
II would develop the ``outdoor museum'' concept for self-discovery of
cultural and natural resources. The outdoor museum concept provides a
backcountry experience to visiting publics. In addition, 13 cultural
sites would be developed for public access, facilitating visitation
through developed routes and interpretive signs. The development of
these cultural resource sites would enhance front country visitor
experiences.
Alternative III: This alternative emphasizes the
protection of cultural resource communities and sites, while providing
for resource use and development. This management strategy also
maintains large blocks of undisturbed land, although not as large as
Alternative II, and provides for the retrieval of information on not
only individual sites but also their interconnectedness (i.e., how they
relate to each other). Alternative III would develop the ``outdoor
museum'' concept for self-discovery of cultural and natural resources
in addition to developing 13-25 sites for public access.
Alternative IV: This alternative emphasizes the protection
of cultural resource communities and sites while encouraging resource
use and development. This management strategy maintains large blocks of
undisturbed land, although not as large as Alternative II, and provides
for the retrieval of information on not only individual sites but also
their interconnectedness (i.e., how they relate to each other).
Alternative IV would develop the ``outdoor museum'' concept for self-
discovery of cultural and natural resources in addition to developing
13-25 sites for public access.
Alternative V: This is the Preferred Alternative.
Alternative V represents the best fit between protection of objects of
the Monument and the multiple use of all resources. Alternative V
emphasizes the protection of cultural resource communities and sites,
while providing for resource use and development. This management
strategy maintains large blocks of undisturbed land, although not as
large as Alternative II, and provides for the retrieval of information
on not only individual sites and artifacts but also their
interconnectedness (i.e., how they relate to each other). Alternative V
would promote self-discovery through the ``outdoor museum'' concept, in
addition to 13-25 cultural sites developed for public access.
Section 202(c)(3) of FLPMA requires the DRMP/DEIS to examine the
designation of Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) on BLM
lands. The Monument was an Anasazi ACEC prior to being designated a
Monument. The ACEC designation has continued but is considered of
little value since the Monument designation provides protection of the
same outstanding characteristics. Therefore, the Anasazi ACEC
designation is proposed to be dropped in this plan. The Values and
Limitations to protect the natural and cultural resources of the
Monument are consistent with the previous ACEC. The McElmo Research
Natural Area (RNA) would continue its ACEC designation with four units
proposed located immediately north of, and adjacent to, McElmo Canyon:
McElmo Unit (existing RNA, 427 acres),
McElmo Expansion Unit (2,738 acres),
Cannonball Mesa Unit (2,797 acres), and
Sand Canyon Unit (1,864 acres).
All of the RNA units have the same values and use limitations.
Potential ACEC acres vary by alternative as shown in the table
below.
Acres of BLM-Managed Surface Estate Proposed To Be Managed as ACECs Under the Alternatives in the Draft LMP/EIS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternative I Alternative Alternative V
Values and use limitations (no action) Alternative II III Alternative IV (preferred)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
McElmo RNA (ACEC)............... 427 7,826 427 7,297 7,826
Values: natural systems
(sensitive plants)
Limitations: apply a no surface
occupancy (NSO/NGD) stipulation
for areas not previously leased
for oil and gas leasing and
other surface disturbing
activities.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manage as VRM I.
Total Acres................. 427 7,826 427 427 7,826
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major issues considered in the DRMP/DEIS include:
Cultural Issues: Concerns included the protection/
preservation of cultural resources for purposes of current and future
scientific research, education, and Native American cultural heritage;
development opportunities; access to cultural resource sites; and
looting.
General Recreation: Concerns included permitted and
restricted types of recreation and their allocated ``zones'' or
locations, and related roads and transportation issues, such as
motorized and mechanized access and limitations.
Transportation Network: Concerns included road closures
and access, and road maintenance and improvements.
Rangeland Management/Grazing: Concerns included management
for Land Health Standards, administration of grazing allotments, and
evaluation of grazing impacts in terms of current standards and
guidelines.
Mineral Resources: Concerns included limitations on oil
and gas exploration and development, mitigation of impacts from
existing and new mineral exploration and development.
Visitor Use: Concerns included visitor education
opportunities, facility development and improvements, and commercial
and not-for-profit tours.
[[Page 60879]]
Soil, Water, and Air: Concerns included the protection/
preservation of soil, water, and air quality.
Sally Wisely,
Colorado State Director.
[FR Doc. E7-21011 Filed 10-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P